Update README.md

README.md

@@ -12,6 +12,24 @@ tags:
 This model was converted to GGUF format from [`SicariusSicariiStuff/X-Ray_Alpha`](https://huggingface.co/SicariusSicariiStuff/X-Ray_Alpha) using llama.cpp via the ggml.ai's [GGUF-my-repo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/ggml-org/gguf-my-repo) space.
 Refer to the [original model card](https://huggingface.co/SicariusSicariiStuff/X-Ray_Alpha) for more details on the model.
 
+---
+This is a pre-alpha proof-of-concept of a real fully uncensored vision model.
+
+Why do I say "real"? The few vision models we got (qwen, llama 3.2) were "censored," and their fine-tunes were made only to the text portion of the model, as training a vision model is a serious pain.
+
+The only actually trained and uncensored vision model I am aware of is ToriiGate; the rest of the vision models are just the stock vision + a fine-tuned LLM.
+
+Having a fully compliant vision model is a critical step toward democratizing vision capabilities for various tasks, especially image tagging. This is a critical step in both making LORAs for image diffusion models, and for mass tagging images to pretrain a diffusion model.
+
+In other words, having a fully compliant and accurate vision model will allow the open source community to easily train both loras and even pretrain image diffusion models.
+
+Another important task can be content moderation and classification, in various use cases there might not be black and white, where some content that might be considered NSFW by corporations, is allowed, while other content is not, there's nuance. Today's vision models do not let the users decide, as they will straight up refuse to inference any content that Google \ Some other corporations decided is not to their liking, and therefore these stock models are useless in a lot of cases.
+
+What if someone wants to classify art that includes nudity? Having a naked statue over 1,000 years old displayed in the middle of a city, in a museum, or at the city square is perfectly acceptable, however, a stock vision model will straight up refuse to inference something like that.
+
+It's like in many "sensitive" topics that LLMs will straight up refuse to answer, while the content is publicly available on Wikipedia. This is an attitude of cynical patronism, I say cynical because corporations take private data to train their models, and it is "perfectly fine", yet- they serve as the arbitrators of morality and indirectly preach to us from a position of a suggested moral superiority. This gatekeeping hurts innovation badly, with vision models especially so, as the task of tagging cannot be done by a single person at scale, but a corporation can.
+
+---
 ## Use with llama.cpp
 Install llama.cpp through brew (works on Mac and Linux)