An Adversarial Interpretation of Information-Theoretic Bounded
  Rationality
  Recently, there has been a growing interest in modeling planning with
information constraints. Accordingly, an agent maximizes a regularized expected
utility known as the free energy, where the regularizer is given by the
information divergence from a prior to a posterior policy. While this approach
can be justified in various ways, including from statistical mechanics and
information theory, it is still unclear how it relates to decision-making
against adversarial environments. This connection has previously been suggested
in work relating the free energy to risk-sensitive control and to extensive
form games. Here, we show that a single-agent free energy optimization is
equivalent to a game between the agent and an imaginary adversary. The
adversary can, by paying an exponential penalty, generate costs that diminish
the decision maker's payoffs. It turns out that the optimal strategy of the
adversary consists in choosing costs so as to render the decision maker
indifferent among its choices, which is a definining property of a Nash
equilibrium, thus tightening the connection between free energy optimization
and game theory.
