The findings indicated that taxonomy criteria for climate change mitigation only, while only 1% – for which it was not possible to conduct a timely assessment due to the lack of robust data – was ruled out on a conservative basis; > in order to maintain this conservative approach, the business activity relating to the generation of electricity from geothermal sources was considered almost entirely ineligible pending certification by an independent third party of compliance with the threshold for geothermal plants of 100 gCO2eq/kWh for the entirety of Group’s geothermal assets; > activities relating to the infrastructure and networks business in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Argentina were consi dered ineligible, again adopting a conservative approach.