on august seeking a partial reconsideration of that part of the ca decision, which ordered a remand to the office of the regional director of the dole-national capital region of the matter of the regularization of individuals performing installation, repair and maintenance, or irM, services. in its motion, Pldt argued that the fact-finding process contemplated by the court’s remand order is actually not part of the visitorial power of the dole (i.e., the evidence that will need to be assessed cannot be gleaned by in the ‘normal course’ of a labor inspection) and is therefore, outside the jurisdiction of the secretary of labor.