http___www.hiiraanweyn.net_2017_12_us-top-court-allows-trumps-latest-travel-ban-to-go-into-full-effect_.xml
https___setopati.com_global_america_111081_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 17.2
TRT World Tuesday December 5, 2017 The Supreme Court action means that Trumps ban will now go fully into effect for people seeking to enter the United States from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad, in addition to people from North Korea and certain officials from Venezuela. The US Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his latest travel ban targeting people from six Muslim-majority countries to go into full effect even as legal challenges continue in lower courts. The court, with two of the nine justices dissenting, granted his administration’s request to lift two injunctions imposed by lower courts that had partially blocked the ban, which is the third version of a contentious policy that Trump first sought to implement a week after taking office in January. The apex court’s action means that the ban will now go fully into effect for people seeking to enter the United States from Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad. Lower courts had previously limited the scope of the ban to people without certain family or other connections to the United States. Trump’s ban also covers people from North Korea and certain government officials from Venezuela, but lower courts had already allowed those provisions to go into effect. TRT World’s Giles Gibson reports from Washington. ‘Discrimination against Muslims’ The nine-member high court said in two similar one-page orders on Monday that lower court rulings that partly blocked the latest ban should be put on hold while appeals courts in San Francisco and Richmond, Virginia weigh the cases. Both courts are due to hear arguments in those cases this week. Two of court’s liberal justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, said they would have denied the administration’s request. The ban was challenged in separate lawsuits by the state of Hawaii and the American Civil Liberties Union. Both sets of challengers said the latest ban, like the earlier ones, discriminates against Muslims in violation of the US Constitution and is not permissible under immigration laws. Trump issued his first travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries in January, then issued a revised one in March after the first was blocked by federal courts. The second one expired in September after a long court fight and was replaced with the present version
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1
मुस्लिम बाहुल्य ६ देशका नागरिकमाथि अमेरिकी सर्वोच्च अदालतले यात्रा प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने राष्ट्रपति डोनाल्ड ट्रम्पको निर्णयको समर्थन गरेको छ । राष्ट्रपति ट्रम्पको निर्णयको समर्थन गर्दै अदालतले तत्कालै पूर्ण रूपले कार्यान्वयन गर्न निर्देशन पनि दिएको छ । यस मुद्दामा सर्वोच्च अदालतले राष्ट्रपतिको पक्षमा फैसला गर्दै कार्यान्वयनका लागि निर्देशन दिएको हो । ट्रम्पले राष्ट्रपतिको जिम्मेवारी सम्हालेलगत्तै मुस्लिम बाहुल्य देशबाट अमेरिकाको सुरक्षामा खतरा रहेको भन्दै चाड, इरान, लिबिया, सोमालिया, सिरिया र यमनमाथि यात्रा प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने निर्णय गरेका थिए । तर राष्ट्रपतिको निर्णयविरुद्धमा विभिन्न संघीय अदालतले फैसला गरेपछि कार्यान्वयनमा आउन सकेको थिएन। सर्वोच्च अदालतका ९ मध्ये सात न्यायाधीशले ट्रम्प प्रशासनले तल्लो अदालतले यात्रा प्रतिबन्ध लागू गर्न लगाएको प्रतिबन्ध हटाउन गरेको मागको पक्षमा मत दिएका छन् । सर्वोच्चले कार्यान्वयनको बाटो खुला गरे पनि अझै कानुनी चुनौती बाँकी नै रहेको बताइएको छ। तल्लो अदालतका न्यायाधीशले ट्रम्पको निर्णय धार्मिक रुपमा मुस्लिममाथिको प्रतिबन्ध रहेको भन्दै कार्यान्वयनमा रोक लगाएका थिए । अब सर्वोच्च अदालतको आदेशपछि मुस्लिम बाहुल्य ६ देशका नागरिक अमेरिका प्रवेश गर्न नपाउने भएका छन् ।