https___englishbackend.vishwanews.com_court-to-take-more-time-to-give-its-verdict-on-parliamnent-dissolution_.xml
https___radioprabhav.com.np__E0_A4_B8_E0_A4_82_E0_A4_B8_E0_A4_A6-_E0_A4_B5_E0_A4_BF_E0_A4_98_E0_A4_9F_E0_A4_A8-_E0_A4_86_E0_A4_9C_E0_A4_AC_E0_A4_BE_E0_A4_9F-_E0_A4_8F_E0_A4_AE_E0_A4_BF_E0_A4_95_E0_A4_B8-_E0_A4_95_E0_A5_8D__1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1 8.1 8.2
Kathmandu: Following the news that the Supreme Court has heard the writ petitions filed against the dissolution of Parliament by the Oli government in a single sitting of the Chief Justice, many people on Wednesday questioned whether the verdict is coming today or not. In this, the experts of the court procedure say that it may take a few more weeks for the Supreme Court to decide right or wrong about the government’s move to dissolve the parliament. According to experts, the Constitutional Court cannot rule on the writs of dissolution of Parliament on Friday. The court might take at least one and a half week to give its verdict. On Wednesday, Chief Justice Cholendra Samsher JBR ordered to file 12 writ petitions in this regard in the Constitutional Court from a single sitting. The hearing on the writ petition will begin in the Constitutional Court on Friday. Article 137 of the constitution provides for a constitutional session. There are five members in the Constitutional Court, including the Chief Justice. On the recommendation of the Judicial Council, a five-member constitutional bench is constituted, including four judges appointed by the Chief Justice. The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that the constitution should be interpreted in a writ petition dissolving the parliament. The order issued by the single bench of Chief Justice Cholendra Samsher Jabra said, “Since the subject matter raised in this petition is related to the interpretation of Article 76 (1), (7) and Article 85 of the Constitution of Nepal, the petition should be submitted to the Constitutional Court as per Article 137 (3).” Since the President was dissolving the Parliament on the basis of the recommendation made by Prime Minister Oli, Articles 76 (1), (7) and Article 85 of the Constitution have been mentioned and now the Supreme Court has to interpret these articles. Article 133 of the constitution has given privileges to the Supreme Court for the implementation of the fundamental rights provided by the constitution. Giving even more power, Article 137 (3) of the Constitution has given the Supreme Court the right to interpret the Constitution.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1
४ माघ, काठमाडौं । संसद विघटनका विषयमा राय लिन सर्वोच्च अदालतले गठन गरेको एमिकस क्युरीले आजबाट राय दिने छ । संसद विघटनविरुद्ध परेका रिटहरुमा पक्ष-विपक्षका वकिलहरुको बहस सकिएपछि आजबाट एमिकस क्युरीको बहस सुरु हुन लागेको हो । एमिकस क्युरी सर्वोच्च अदालतको सहयोगी हो । कुनै मुद्दाका विषयमा राय लिनुपरेमा सर्वोच्चले एमिकस क्युरी गठन गर्ने गर्दछ । संसद विघटनका विषयमा राय लिन गठित एमिकस क्युरीमा बद्रीबहादुर कार्की, विजयकान्त मैनाली, सतीशकृष्ण खरेल, पूर्णमान शाक्य र गीता पाठक छन् । उनीहरुले आजबाट आफ्नो राय दिनेछन् । एमिकस क्युरीको रायपछि सर्वोच्चले आफ्नो फैसला सुनाउने छ । सरकारले गत पुस ५ गते प्रतिनिधिसभा विघटन गरेपछि त्यसविरुद्ध सर्वोच्च अदालतमा १३ वटा रिट परेका छन् । रिटहरुमाथि प्रधानन्यायाधीश चोलेन्द्र समशेर जबरा नेतृत्वको संवैधानिक इजलासमा सुनुवाइ तथा बहस हुँदै आएको छ ।