https___2020rolhr.undp.org_impact_results-framework_.xml
https___sagarmatha.tv_2018_07_26_1777_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 20.2 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 27.2 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 38.2 39.1 40.1 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 46.1 47.1 48.1 49.1 50.1 51.1 51.2 52.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.1 59.1 59.2 59.3 60.1 61.1 62.1 63.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 72.1 72.2 73.1 74.1 75.1 75.2 76.1 77.1 78.1 79.1 80.1 81.1 82.1 83.1 84.1 85.1 85.2 86.1 87.1 88.1 89.1 90.1 91.1 91.2 92.1 93.1 93.2 94.1 95.1 96.1 97.1 98.1 98.2 99.1 100.1 101.1 101.2 101.3 102.1 103.1 103.2 104.1 104.2 105.1 106.1 107.1 108.1
Impact Results Framework The Global Programme’s Results Framework tracks aggregated results across its 32 priority contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, and Kosovo1. In the tables below, we provide our results achieved per each of our global indicators since 2015. In 2020, we achieved over 80% of our global targets. Political Engagement 1 References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) 2 This framework tracks results across the 32 priority countries (including Lebanon and Jordan as affected by the Syrian crisis) for UNDP’s Global Programme on Strengthening the Rule of Law and Human Rights for Sustaining Peace and Fostering Development (Phase III) to illustrate progress year-on-year. 3 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Iraq, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Tunisia. 4 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Colombia, Iraq, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tunisia. 5 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia. 6 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1]. 7 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Libya, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1]. 8 Information verified through “IRRF Indicators” is data gathered through UNDP’s corporate reporting system, the Integrated Results and Resources Framework, which is aligned with UNDP’s Strategic Plan. 9 IRRF Indicator 2.2.3.3 measures “Number of additional contexts with strengthened capacities for governance and oversight of rule of law institutions20” 10 Information verified through the ‘RoLSHR Reporting’ (written in italics) is data gathered from various Rule of Law, Security, and Human Rights for Sustaining Peace and Development team processes, i.e. annual reporting, mission reports, direct communication with Country Offices, fact sheets, meeting outcomes, briefing notes, etc. 11 Baseline Contexts: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of The Congo, Mali, Somalia, Sudan. 12 2016 contexts: Central African Republic (2 projects), Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Mali (2 projects), Liberia, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan 13 2017 contexts: Central African Republic (2 projects), Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Mali (2 projects), Myanmar, Lebanon, Libya, Liberia, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan, 14 2018 contexts: Central African Republic (3), Colombia (6), Democratic Republic of Congo (2), Guinea-Bissau (1), Haiti (1), Kyrgyz Republic (1), Lebanon (1), Liberia (1), Libya (1), Mali (1), Myanmar (1), State of Palestine (1), Sierra Leone (1), Somalia (6), Sri Lanka (1), Sudan (1), Yemen (2), Kosovo [1] (1). 15 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina (1), Central African Republic (4), Colombia (6), Democratic Republic of Congo (2), Guatemala (1), Guinea-Bissau (1), Haiti (1), Kyrgyz Republic (1), Lebanon (1), Liberia (1), Libya (1), Mali (1), Myanmar (2), Sierra Leone (1), Somalia (6), Sri Lanka (1), State of Palestine (1), Sudan (1), Ukraine (1), Yemen (2), Kosovo [1] (1). 16 IRRF Indicator 3.2.2.1. D measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: utilizing joint UN approaches to rebuilding rule of law and justice sector institutions and services”. Institution Building 17 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 18 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 19 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 20 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 21 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 22 Baselines for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator. 23 2016 contexts: Colombia, Guatemala, Iraq, Jordan, Liberia, Somalia. 24 2017 contexts: Central African Republic, Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Somalia, Kosovo [1]. 25 2018 contexts: Central African Republic, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Somalia, Kosovo [1]. 26 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. Community Security 27 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 28 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 29 2017 contexts Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 30 2018 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 31 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 32 IRRF Indicator 3.2.2.1. C measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: community-oriented security services and oversight mechanisms”. 33 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Jordan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 34 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Jordan, , Liberia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 35 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine,Kosovo [1]. 36 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1]. 37 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo [1]. Human Rights Systems 38 Baseline Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, , Kyrgyz Republic, Sierra Leone, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo[1] 39 2016 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, , Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 40 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sri-Lanka, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 41 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 42 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 43 IRRF indicator 2.2.3.1 measures “Number of additional contexts with strengthened institutions and systems supporting fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations: rule of law and justice, and human rights”. 44 Indicator 4.2 was changed from “number of contexts with NHRIs receiving an “A status” rating from the GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation” in 2017 to better reflect the contributions of the global programme. Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2017 are the same for this indicator. 45 2017 contexts: Haiti, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Somalia, Ukraine. 46 2018 contexts: Central African Republic, Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Ukraine. 47 2019 contexts: Central African Republic, Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. Access to Justice 48 GPRF Indicator 5.2 “Cases receiving judgment in the first instance of the formal justice system” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021). 49 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 50 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, State of Palestine, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1]. 51 IRRF indicator 2.2.3.2. A measures “Total number of additional population who have access to justice.” The previous IRRF indicator 3.4.1 (UNDP Strategic Plan 2013-2017) linked to GPRF indicator 5.1 measured “Total number of people who have access to legal aid services.” 52 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Iraq, Jordan, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 53 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Kosovo [1]. 54 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 55 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 56 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. Transitional Justice 57 GPRF indicator 6.1 “Total number of victims whose grievances cases are addressed within transitional justice processes” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021). 58 Baseline Contexts: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Libya, South Sudan, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo [1]. 59 2016 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Liberia, Libya, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 60 2017 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Libya, South Sudan, Sudan, Sri Lanka, Tunisia 61 2018 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia 62 2019 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo [1]. 63 IRRF indicator 3.2.2.1. B measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: victim redress mechanisms including transitional justice” Gender Justice 64 GPRF indicator 7.4 “Existence of new and strengthened legal aid and justice services to prevent and address sexual and gender-based violence” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021). 65 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator. 66 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Timor-Leste 67 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Timor-Leste 68 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Guinea-Bissau, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Tunisia 69 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Kosovo [1]. 70 Baseline Contexts: Sierra Leone, Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 71 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Mali, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 72 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, South Sudan, Sudan, Kosovo [1]. 73 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Nepal, Somalia, Sudan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 74 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 75 IRRF indicator 1.6.2.2. A measures “Number of additional contexts with frameworks in place to prevent and respond to SGBV: Multi-sectoral policy and legislation.” 76 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan. 77 2016 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine. 78 2017 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Ukraine. 79 2018 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine. 80 2019 contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 81 IRRF indicator 1.6.2.2. B measures “Number of additional contexts with frameworks in place to prevent and respond to SGBV: multi-sectoral services including justice and security.” Programme 82 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator. 83 2016 contexts: Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau. 84 2017 contexts: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Jordan. 85 2018 contexts: Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Jordan. 86 2019 contexts: Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Jordan, State of Palestine. 87 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator. 88 2016 contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan (2 projects), Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal (2 projects), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 89 2017 contexts: SES: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan (2 projects), Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal (2 projects), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo [1]. 90 UNDP only requires Quality Assurance assessments during the implementation phase of a project every other year. 2018 is an off year for the assessments; thus, the number of projects reported are lower. 2018 Contexts: Burundi, Bosnia and Herzegovina (2 projects), Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali (2 projects), Myanmar, Lebanon, Liberia (2 projects), Somalia (3 projects), South Sudan, State of Palestine (2 projects), Sudan, Syria, Ukraine (2 projects), Yemen, Kosovo [1]. 91 2019 contexts: Afghanistan (3), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic (5), Colombia (2), Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic (2), Liberia (2), Libya, Mali (2), Myanmar, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Somalia (3), South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine (2), Kosovo [1] (2). 92 Information verified through the “UNDP Quality Assurance Assessments” is data gathered from corporate mechanisms to assure adherence to quality standards. Projects included in this indicator are ranked “satisfactory” or above when it comes to utilizing the SES standards, which includes HRBA as an overarching principle. 93 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator. 94 2016 Partnerships: The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP – OHCHR – GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions, The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; Clingendael, the Folke Bernadotte Academy, International Security Sector Advisory Team. 95 2017 Active Partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies ; Clingendael; The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/ International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Open Society Justice Initiative Measuring Justice Initiative; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; UNDP – OHCHR – GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance. 96 2018 Partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; Clingendael; The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/ International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Open Society Justice Initiative Measuring Justice Initiative; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; University of Pennsylvania Law School/Chubb Rule of Law Fellowship, UNDP – OHCHR – GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP- UN Women – UNFPA Partnership on Gender Justice. 97 2019 partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; The Global Focal Point for Rule of Law; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International IDEA; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe; UNODC, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Open Society Justice Initiative and the World Justice Project on measuring access to civil justice; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; The UNDP – UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights – Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions Tri-Partite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP – UN Women – UNFPA Gender Justice Initiative; UN Women – UNDP Gender Justice Partnership and UNDP – UNODA partnership SALIENT – Saving Lives Entity.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1
काठमाडौं – नेपाली सेनाले राष्ट्रसंघीय शान्ति मिसनमा थप अर्को अवसर प्राप्त गरेको छ । नेपाली सेनाले सेन्ट्रल अफ्रिकन रिपब्लिकमा नयाँ बटालियनका लागि थप अवसर प्राप्त गरेको हो । नेपाली सेनाले कारमा थप अवसर प्राप्त गरेसँगै अब हरेक वर्ष करिब सय जना सैनिकका लागि कोटा बढ्नेछ । कारमा यसअघि १३३ सैनिक अधिकृतहरु ‘सैनिक प्रहरी’का रूपमा कार्यरत रहेकामा राष्ट्रसंघले नेपाली सेनाको कामको उच्च प्रशंसा गर्दै बटालियनको अवसर दिएको हो । सैनिक प्रवक्ता सहायक रथी गोकुल भण्डारीका अनुसार, कारमा नयाँ मिसन थपिएसँगै शान्ति मिसनमा हरेक वर्ष करिब सय सैनिकले अवसर पाउनेछन् । आजको राजधनी दैनिकमा समाचार छापिएको छ । प्रवक्ता भण्डारीले ६ सय सैनिकहरु बटालियनका रूपमा त्यहाँ जान लागेको बताए । उनले आवश्यक बन्दोबस्तीका सामानसहित केही सैनिक त्यहाँ पुगिसकेको र थप सैनिक माग भएलगत्तै पठाउने गरी तयारी अवस्थामा राखिएको बताए । नेपाली सेना संयुक्त राष्ट्रसंघअन्तर्गत हाल सेन्ट्रल अफ्रिकन रिपब्लिक, लेबनान, इराक, लिबिया, इजरायल, माली, कंगो, सुडान, सिरिया, मोरक्को र दक्षिण सुडानमा खटिँदै आएको छ।