http___www.hngn.com_articles_225623_20170605_president-donald-trump-s-proposed-travel-ban-hands-supreme-court.htm.xml
https___www.bbc.com_nepali_news-42232872_1.xml
1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2
President Donald Trump's administration is trying all means to convince the Supreme Court to approve the proposed travel ban. However, it remains to be seen whether, the administration gets the required votes to approve the proposal and that too before the court goes on a summer recess by the end of June. The United States' Supreme Court will be considering the travel ban proposal put forth by President Donald Trump. The travel ban proposal includes six countries, which has a predominant Muslim population. And, President Trump's administration is pushing hard to convince the Supreme Court to grant the emergency request and allow putting into force the travel ban, Reuters reported. Notably the legal team of President Trump asked nine justices to approve the orders, on Thursday, so that the travel ban is imposed with immediate effect. The travel ban was announced by President Trump on March 6 and since then, it has been a controversial issue. Moreover, the lower courts have also blocked the proposal and stayed the imposition of the travel ban. The lower courts termed the travel ban to be "animus," a legal term meaning illegitimate prejudice, Bloomberg has learned. Remarkably, the term has been the basis of several cases that Justice Anthony Kennedy handled. And, since he is also a part of the Supreme Court's bench of judges, who will be deciding on the travel ban proposal, his vote might play a pivotal role. According to the reports, if it so happens that the Supreme Court decides to approve the proposed travel ban, another issue that will need to be resolved is the 90-days period that Trump's ban has sought. Whether the 90 days period will start from the day that the Supreme Court issues an approval or whether it will include the time throughout the litigation, remains to be seen. Moreover, if the second option is decided on, the travel ban is set to expire sometime in mid-June. It must be mentioned that President Donald Trump has stated that his proposed travel ban aims to prevent terror attacks in the US and thus protect the Americans. However, it has been largely criticized due to its discriminatory nature and flawed reasoning.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1
'प्रतिबन्ध पूर्ण कार्यान्वयन गर्न मिल्छ' अमेरिकाको सर्वोच्च अदालतले ६ वटा मुसलमान बहुल देशमाथि यात्रा प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने राष्ट्रपति डोनल्ड ट्रम्पको निर्णय पूर्ण रुपमा कार्यन्वयन गर्न मिल्ने आदेश दिएको छ। तर चाड, इरान, लिबिया, सोमालिया, सिरिया र यमनका नागरिकविरुद्धको यात्रा प्रतिबन्धले अझै कानुनी चुनौतीहरुको सामना गरिरहेका छन्। सर्वोच्च अदालतको यो आदेशले राष्ट्रपति डोनल्ड ट्रम्पले सत्ता सम्हालेयता घोषणा गरेको तेस्रो यात्रा प्रतिबन्धलाई समेट्छ। सोमबार सर्वोच्च अदालतका ९ मध्ये ७ न्यायाधीशहरुले ट्रम्प प्रशासनले लगाएको यात्रा प्रतिबन्धमाथि रोक लगाउने तल्लो अदालतका निर्णयहरु हटाएका हुन्। सुनुवाइ दुई न्यायाधीशहरुले मात्रै राष्ट्रपतिको आदेशलाई रोकिरहन अनुमति दिए। क्यालिफोर्नियाको सान फ्रान्सिस्को र भर्जिनियाको रिचमण्ड संघीय पुनरावेदन अदालतहरुले यो साता यात्रा प्रतिबन्धसम्बन्धी नीति ठिक भएको भन्ने आदेश कानुनसम्मत भए नभएको दाबीमाथि सुनुवाइ गर्नेछन्। अध्यागमनसम्बन्धी राष्ट्रिय कानुन केन्द्रकी कानुनी निर्देशक क्यारेन टम्लिनले सोमवारको आदेशलाई विध्वंसकारी समाचार भएको भन्दै ट्वीट गरेकी छन्। उनले सर्वोच्च अदालतले मुसलमान देशहरुमाथि लगाउने पछिल्लो यात्रा प्रतिबन्धको पुर्याउने कानुनी लाभ र त्यसले पार्ने मानवीय असरलाई सम्बोधन नगरेको बताएकी छन्। उनले लडाइँ जारी रहने पनि बताइन्। उल्लंघन ट्रम्पले शासन सम्हालेयता विभिन्न समयमा लगाएका तीनवटै यात्रा प्रतिबन्धहरुलाई अदालतमा चुनौती दिइएको थियो। ज्यानुअरी, मार्च र सेप्टेम्बरको अन्त्यमा गरी उनले तीन फरक फरक समयमा विभिन्न देशमाथि यात्रा प्रतिबन्धको आदेश जारी गरेका थिए। तर तल्लो तहका अदालतहरुले उनको यात्रा प्रतिबन्ध खासगरी मुसलमानहरुमाथि लक्षित भएको भन्दै त्यसले अमेरिकी संविधानको पहिलो संशोधनले समेटेको धर्मसम्बन्धी स्वतन्त्रताको उल्लंघन गरेको जनाएका थिए।