https___www.bbc.co.uk_news_world-us-canada-38950433.xml
https___www.bbc.com_nepali_news-40256299_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 10.2 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1
Trump travel ban: Policy adviser attacks US federal appeals court A top White House adviser has attacked the US federal appeals court for upholding a ruling suspending Mr Trump's travel ban order. Stephen Miller told US media the court ruling was a "judicial usurpation of power" and that "the president's powers here are beyond question". The court rejected Mr Trump's attempt to reinstate the ban on Thursday. His executive order barred citizens from seven mainly Muslim countries from entering the US. The ban caused chaos at US airports and sparked protests across the country. Several lawsuits have been filed against the ban, and a federal judge has issued a temporary nationwide block on the travel ban. Mr Trump has said he may fight the case in the courts, but could also consider issuing a new executive order. Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Mr Miller accused the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the block on Mr Trump's order, of "overreaching". He also told ABC's This Week: "We have equal branches of government in this country. The judiciary is not supreme." Under the US system of checks and balances, courts can declare laws, or acts by the president, unconstitutional. - Trump border policy: Who's affected? - Is Trump's immigration order legal? - The Canadian town taking refugees from US - Is US heading for constitutional crisis? The US government has argued that the president is best placed to make decisions about national security, and that the ban does not discriminate against Muslims. But upholding the suspension last week, the three appeals court three judges said that the government had provided "no evidence that any foreigner from the countries named in the order" had carried out a terrorist attack on US soil. Lawsuits against the ban have been launched in 14 states. The states of Washington and Minnesota have argued that the travel ban is unconstitutional and harmful to their residents, businesses and universities. Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson told ABC on Sunday the current order was "unlawful" and had an "improper motive" because it was intended to discriminate against Muslims. If necessary, he could ask government officials to testify, and examine "documents and emails to get behind what truly motivated that executive order", he added. What did the executive order say? - nationals from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen - even those with visas - banned from entering the US; - a temporary ban on all refugee admissions; - the reprioritisation of minority religion (interpreted to mean Christian) refugee claims; - a ban on all Syrian refugees; - a cap on total annual refugee admissions to the US of 50,000.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1
राष्ट्रपति ट्रम्पलाई अदालतको अर्को झट्का संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिकाको एक पुनरावेदन अदालतले ६ वटा मुस्लिम बहुल मुलुकका मानिसमाथि अमेरिका यात्रामा प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने राष्ट्रपति डोनल्ड ट्रम्पको संशोधित प्रस्ताव रोक्ने आदेशलाई सदर गरेको छ। हवाई राज्यले दायरा गरेको मुद्दामाथि सुनुवाई गर्दै पुनरावेदन न्यायाधीशहरुले राष्ट्रपतिको कार्यकारी आदेशबाट विद्यमान आप्रवासनसम्बन्धी कानूनको उल्लंघन भएको ठहर गरेका हुन्। अदालतको पछिल्लो निर्णय मुस्लिमहरुको प्रवेशमा प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने राष्ट्रपति ट्रम्पको प्रयासमाथि थप कानूनी झट्का भएको बताइएको छ। महान्यायाधिवक्ता जेफ सेसन्सले अदालतको निर्णयप्रति आफू असहमत रहेको बताएका छन्। खतरा उनले भने, "मुलुकलाई सुरक्षित राख्न आफ्नो कानूनी दायराभित्र रही राष्ट्रपति ट्रम्पले जारी गरेको आदेश सही छ। पछिल्ला आक्रमणहरुबाट हाम्रो मुलुकका लागि पनि खतरा निकट र वास्तविक रहेको पुष्टि भएको छ।" सर्वोच्च अदालतको निर्णयपछि अब यात्रासम्बन्धी विवाद अन्त्य हुन सक्छ। न्यायाधीशहरुले आफ्नो आदेशमा राष्ट्रपति ट्रम्पले जुन ५ तारिखमा गरेको ट्वीटलाई पनि उद्धृत गरेका छन्। यसअघि राष्ट्रपति पद सम्हाले लगत्तै ट्रम्पले यात्रा प्रतिबन्धसम्बन्धी जारी गरेको आदेशबाट विमानस्थलहरुमा दोधार सिर्जना भएको थियो र प्रदर्शनहरु भएका थिए। सन्दर्भ त्यसपछि संशोधित कार्यकारी आदेशमा इरान, लिबिया, सिरिया, सोमालिया, सुडान र यमनबाट अमेरिका जान चाहने मानिसमाथि ९० दिने प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने भनिएको थियो। जोसुकै शरणार्थीमाथि १२० दिने प्रतिबन्ध लगाउने पनि संशोधित कार्यकारी आदेशमा भनिएको थियो तर धार्मिक अल्पसंख्यकको सन्दर्भ त्यसबाट हटाइएको थियो। आफ्नो चुनावी अभियानका क्रममा ट्रम्पले "मुस्लिमहरुलाई पूर्ण रुपमा अमेरिका प्रवेशमा रोक लगाउने" बताएका थिए। अदालतको पछिल्लो आदेशप्रपछि ह्वाइट हाउसका एकजना प्रवक्ताले राष्ट्रपतिको कार्यकारी आदेशको बचाउ गर्दै भने, "अमेरिका प्रवेश गर्न र रक्तपात एवं हिंसा मचाउनका लागि प्रवेश गर्नबाट रोक्न हामीसँग उपलब्ध बाटो हामीले अवलम्बन गर्नुपर्ने हुन्छ।"