http___www.wcablog.com_ga_2012_05_leading-from-both-kingdoms__1.xml
1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6.1 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 11.1 11.2
Josh Riebock wrote today’s post. He’s an author and speaker from Austin, TX. Read more about Josh and follow him on Twitter. A little boy was in the backyard, when he heard his dad calling. The boy ran into the house, looking for his dad, and eventually found him in the bedroom, sitting in a chair, reading the newspaper. The little boy ran to his dad, and said, “Dad! I was outside and I thought I heard you calling me. So I ran to you.” Setting the newspaper aside, the dad lifted his son onto his lap. Then he looked into his son’s eyes, and slapped the little boy across the face. “Son, you’re wrong. I wasn’t calling you. Next time you think you hear my voice, you better make sure that it’s me before you come running.” In a nearby backyard, another little boy was playing, when he heard his dad calling. Immediately, the boy ran into the house, looking for his dad, and eventually found him in the bedroom, sitting in a chair, reading the newspaper. The little boy ran to his dad, and said, “Dad! I was outside and I thought I heard you calling me. So I ran to you.” Setting the newspaper aside, the dad lifted his son onto his lap, and smiled. “Son, I wasn’t calling you in here. But the fact that you came running when you thought you heard my voice brings me so much joy.” I find the idea of hearing and responding to God’s voice to be incredibly fuzzy. Sure, I believe God wants me to be able to recognize His voice, to respond to it. But how am I supposed to respond to a voice when I’m not sure if it’s God, or just some voice in my head? And how am I supposed to lead others through this fog? The above story is about this very thing, and more specifically, about reconfiguring my understanding of who God is, what He values more, and what I, in turn, ought to value. Like the second father, perhaps God takes greater joy in my desire to respond when I think I hear him calling, rather than my ability to hear him perfectly. Perhaps God wants me to go where I believe He’s leading—even if I’m uncertain that it’s Him, even if I’m wrong altogether—and to lead others to do the same. But for that to happen, I have to see God as the second father rather than the first. After all, it’s my fear of what will happen if I’m wrong that often keeps me from pursuing the voice of God. But if I am to believe in a loving father who takes great joy in my eagerness to run when I think I hear him calling, then perhaps I’d come running more often, and spend less time worrying about whether or not I’ve got flawless hearing. Take some time to reflect on your idea of the Father’s voice. We’d love to hear your thoughts.
1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 11.1 11.2 12.1
Bob Hamp Is sagart ag Eaglais Gheata i Southlake, TX, tá sé chomh maith le cainteoir agus údar roinnt teideal, lena n-áirítear Smaoinigh Murab ionann is Live Murab ionann is . Tabhair cuairt ar a suíomh , agus é a leanúint ar Twitter . Ceann de na dúshláin is mó atá os comhair gach believers é a thuiscint agus atá ag feidhmiú sa Ríocht Dé agus cónaí orm ag an am céanna ár ann earthly. Tá an dúshlán a iolrú nuair a muid ag cur tús dul i ngleic leis na saincheisteanna ar a eagrú agus a rá as an áit na saoránachta dé. Is é an Chríostaíocht córas creideamh atá bunaithe ar léargas domhanda nach bhfuil an chuid is mó westerners glacadh go nádúrtha. Tá an scéal ar fad Bhíobla leathnaíonn go soiléir i gcoinne an chúlra ar domhan, le feiceáil nádúrtha agus dofheicthe, domhan osnádúrtha. Feicimid an idirghníomhaíocht i scéal Elisha agus a chuid seirbhíseach i 2 Kings 6:15-18. Tuairiscíonn seirbhíseach Elisha chuig an POF go bhfuil siad timpeallaithe go hiomlán ag arm namhaid. Le swipe lámh Jedi, an seirbhíseach a súile a osclaíodh don níos mó, réaltacht dofheicthe, agus tuigeann sé go surrounds arm níos mó angelic an arm an duine a fheiceann sé. D'fhéadfadh cinneadh eagraíochtúla nó ceannaireacht, bunaithe ar an dearcadh gcéad de na catha, a bheith go hiomlán contrártha le cinneadh bunaithe ar an dearcadh an dara. Mar thoradh air sin, chun bheith ina cheannaire éifeachtach spioradálta ní mór dúinn a fhoghlaim a threorú sa dá realms ag an am céanna. Is féidir le samhlacha ceannaireacht tuata a bheith cabhrach chomh fada agus is eol dúinn nuair a dhéanann siad agus nach a iarraidh ar an gcomhthéacs na ceannaireachta Ríocht. A ceannaire a fhorbairt a gcuid saineolais i réimse nádúrtha nach mbeidh ach a bheith in ann a aithint, i bhfad níos lú a oibriú i, an réimse spioradálta. Seo a leanas roinnt de na dinimic atá ríthábhachtach chun ceannaireacht éifeachtach spioradálta: - An láthair Dia: I rith stair na Iosrael, ba léir go má bhí Dia leo nach bhféadfadh siad a bheith defeated-beag beann ar loighic nó odds. D'fhéadfadh aon chathair nó arm withstand arm an duine a lean I Láthair Dé. Mar cheannaire, d'fhoghlaim Moses an simplí, paidir fós ríthábhachtach: ". Más rud é nach mbeidh tú ag dul a dhéanamh liom, ní bheidh mé ag dul" an gcaoi chéanna, níor chóir aon cheannaire spioradálta an lae inniu a mheas riamh tionscnamh, is cuma cé chomh loighiciúil nó staitistiúil fuaime, go dtí go fhios agat go bhfuil Dia leo. - Urnaí: Urnaí é an uirlis ag a fhanann muid ag baint leis an láthair Dé, agus is é an straitéis phríomhúil ar aon cheannaire spioradálta. Daoine mar thoradh ar a n-knees. Bí ar an chéad éisteacht le haghaidh an Guth Dé. Gan comhrá brí le Dia, tá sé dodhéanta a threorú ar fud an domhain spioradálta. Bheadh sé cosúil le daoine ag iarraidh a threorú tríd an jungle ag caitheamh le blindfold. - Troscadh: Níor chóir dúinn dearmad troscadh, an col ceathrar cumhachtach chun urnaí. Tá an séanadh ár flesh, cé riamh taitneamhach, a ceapadh chun a dhéanamh linn níos íogaire don Spiorad. Mar sin féin, ní ina cheannaire atá i gceannas ach amháin i réimse fisiciúil aithníonn an eagna agus cumhacht i troscadh. I John 03:10, béim ar an tábhacht a bhaineann Íosa ceannairí spioradálta a fhios agam an difríocht idir an Spiorad agus flesh. - Cogaío Spioradálta: Ní féidir go léir a freasúra a bhíonn ag ceannairí agus eagraíochtaí a láimhseáil trí fhadhb, simplí réasúnach a réiteach. Go deimhin, Paul ligeann dúinn go bhfuil riamh flesh agus fola an fhreasúra fíor romhainn. Gan a bheith spooky, ní mór dúinn a aithint go má oibrímid sa dá realms, beidh muid aghaidh a thabhairt freisin bhfreasúra sa dá realms. Tá mé cinnte gur féidir cinntí a dhéanamh go bhfuil éifeachtach in aon réimse, fós millteach i eile. Chun a bheith fíor-éifeachtach ceannairí spioradálta ní mór dúinn a fhoghlaim a threorú le cos sa dá ríochtaí. An féidir leat smaoineamh ar an am nuair nach raibh do thuiscint fearr treo Dé ciall ar dtús, torthaí a bhfuiltear fós tháirgtear iontas?