http___yvesmarineau.com_blog_ga_2015_10_04_un-ou-des-arbres-de-levolution__1.xml
1.1 1.2 2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11.1 12.1 13.1
The current theory is that & rsquo; evolution describes in one family tree for all living beings. So that & rsquo; in fact it is highly likely that more & rsquo; there is a number of trees & rsquo; evolution appeared at different times and that & rsquo; they continue to unfold in simultaneous. If theories, such as Jeremy England hold true, unicellular and even multicellular beings can create at any time. It is d & rsquo; moreover unlikely that all the & rsquo; evolution of all species, goes back to a single DACU (last universal ancestor ), or LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor ) in English. It is much more likely that & rsquo; there is more DACU. There may even be new DACU who would create every day. And there is certainly a multitude of DACU who appeared and disappeared even after millions of & rsquo; & rsquo years; developments. It is very likely that & rsquo; & rsquo idea; a single common origin that dates back to a single unicellular being is linked to creation myths of & rsquo; universe by a single cause or a single person. L & rsquo; archeology will never regain more standby living cell. And even if we found all species that have existed. It would be impossible to link, beyond doubt, especially in the case of unicellular multicellular species and even without a genetic analysis of & rsquo; DNA. But, as the life of the genetic code n & rsquo; is a few million years, it is highly unlikely that & rsquo; we may one day find the & rsquo; DNA, nondegraded, which can have up & rsquo; several billion & rsquo; years! Then it is probably unrealistic to believe that & rsquo; one day we can prove that all life originally d & rsquo; a single first living cell. In fact it is more likely that & rsquo; in fact there were several sources of creation of life that would allow different trees of & rsquo; evolution & rsquo; appear at different times of the & rsquo; s life story. So, instead of expressing an evolutionary tree containing all living species by linking to a single unicellular being original as does classical figuration : It is more likely that evolution caused several evolutionary trees appeared at different times : And several developments shafts which are disappeared : This new hypothesis remains to be verified and could simplify the search d & rsquo; ancestors common to different species. When in fact it may be that there is simply "evolution" or linear genetic changes in various species. And not necessarily always Species Division from & rsquo; one source. This would eliminate many branch lines, n & rsquo; having never existed, can not be found. Yves Marineau Any reproduction permitted providing the source: http://yvesmarineau.com/blog/?p=466
1.1 1.2 2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11.1 12.1 13.1
Is í an teoiric atá ann faoi láthair go & rsquo; cur síos ar éabhlóid i crann teaghlaigh amháin do gach dhaoine ina gcónaí. Mar sin, go & rsquo; go deimhin tá sé an-dóchúil go bhfuil níos mó & rsquo; tá roinnt crann & rsquo; éabhlóid feiceáil ag amanna éagsúla agus go & rsquo; leanann siad unfold i comhuaineach. Si des théories, comme celle de Jeremy Sasana shealbhú fíor, Is féidir le neacha unicellular agus fiú ilcheallach chruthú ag am ar bith. Tá sé d & rsquo; ina theannta sin dócha go bhfuil an & rsquo uile; éabhlóid de gach speiceas, Téann ar ais go dtí amháin DACU (sinsear uilíoch caite ), nó LUCA (Uilíoch Last Common Ancestor ) Béarla. Tá sé i bhfad níos mó seans ann go & rsquo; tá níos mó DACU. D'fhéadfadh go mbeadh fiú DACU nua a bheadh a chruthú gach lá. Agus tá cinnte an iliomad DACU a feiceáil agus imithe fiú tar éis na milliúin de & rsquo; & blianta rsquo; fhorbairtí. Tá sé an-dóchúil go & rsquo; & smaoineamh rsquo; is bunús amháin coitianta go dátaí ar ais go dtí unicellular bheith amháin a bhaineann le miotais a chruthú & rsquo; Cruinne ag cúis amháin nó duine aonair. L & rsquo; ní bheidh seandálaíocht agus faigh ar ais cille beo níos fuireachas. Agus fiú má fuair muid gach speiceas atá ann. Bheadh sé dodhéanta a nascadh, inchurtha in amhras, go háirithe i gcás na speiceas ilcheallach unicellular agus fiú gan anailís ghéiniteach de & rsquo; DNA. More, mar an saol an cód géiniteach n & rsquo; is le cúpla milliún bliain, tá sé an-dócha go & rsquo; is féidir linn aon lá amháin teacht ar an & rsquo; DNA, nondegraded, Is féidir a bheith suas & rsquo; roinnt billiún & rsquo; bliana! Ansin, tá sé neamhréadúil dócha chun a chreidiúint go & rsquo; lá amháin is féidir linn a chruthú go bhfuil gach saol ar dtús d & rsquo; ceall beo amháin ar dtús. Go deimhin, tá sé níos dóichí go & rsquo; bhí i ndáiríre roinnt foinsí a chruthú saol a chuirfeadh ar chumas crainn éagsúla de & rsquo; éabhlóid & rsquo; feiceáil ag amanna éagsúla den & rsquo; s scéal saoil. Mar sin,, au lieu d’exprimer un arbre de l’évolution contenant toutes les espèces vivantes en les liants à un seul être unicellulaire d’origine comme le fait la figuration classique : Il serait plus probable que l’évolution origine de plusieurs arbres d’évolution apparût à différentes époques : Ainsi que plusieurs arbres d’évolutions qui sont disparût : Fanann an hipitéis nua a fhíorú agus a d'fhéadfadh a shimpliú an cuardach d & rsquo; sinsear coiteann do speicis éagsúla. Alors qu’en réalité il se peut qu’il y ait simplement « évolution » ou modifications génétiques linéaires de différentes espèces. Agus ní gá go i gcónaí Rannán Speiceas ó & rsquo; foinse amháin. Bheadh sé seo deireadh a chur línte brainse go leor, n & rsquo; tar riamh ann, Ní féidir a fháil. Yves Marineau Ar an gcoinníoll aon atáirgeadh go bhfuil an fhoinse: http://yvesmarineau.com / blog /?p = 466