http___yvesmarineau.com_blog_ga__1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 13.1 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 19.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.2 22.3 23.1 23.2 23.3 24.1 24.2 24.3 25.1 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 27.1 28.1 29.1 29.2 30.1 30.2 30.3 31.1 31.2 31.3 32.1 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 34.1 34.2 35.1 35.2 35.3 36.1 37.1 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 38.5 39.1 40.1 40.2 40.3 41.1 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 42.5 42.6 42.7 42.8 42.9 43.1 44.1 45.1 45.2 46.1 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 48.1 49.1 49.2 49.3 50.1 51.1 51.2 52.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.1 58.2 59.1 59.2 60.1 61.1 62.1 63.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 71.2 71.3 71.4 72.1 73.1 74.1 74.2 74.3 74.4 74.5 74.6 75.1 76.1 77.1 77.2 77.3 77.4 78.1 79.1 79.2 79.3 80.1 80.2 80.3 80.4 80.5 80.6 81.1 81.2 81.3 81.4 81.5 82.1 83.1 84.1 85.1 85.2 85.3 85.4 85.5 86.1 86.2 87.1 87.2 87.3 87.4 88.1 89.1 90.1 90.2 91.1 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 92.5 92.6 93.1 94.1 94.2 94.3 94.4 95.1 96.1 96.2 96.3 97.1 98.1 98.2 98.3 98.4 98.5 99.1 99.2 99.3 99.4 99.5 99.6 100.1 100.2 100.3 101.1 102.1 102.2 103.1 104.1 104.2 104.3 105.1 106.1 107.1 107.2 107.3 108.1 109.1 110.1 111.1 111.2 111.3 111.4 111.5 111.6 112.1 112.2 113.1 114.1 115.1 116.1 117.1 118.1 119.1 120.1 121.1 122.1 122.2 122.3 122.4 123.1 124.1 125.1 126.1 127.1 127.2 128.1 129.1 129.2 129.3 130.1 130.2 130.3 131.1 132.1 133.1 133.2 134.1 135.1 136.1 137.1 138.1 138.2 139.1 139.2 140.1 141.1 142.1 143.1 144.1 145.1 146.1 147.1 148.1 149.1 150.1 150.2 150.3 150.4 151.1 152.1 152.2 152.3 152.4 152.5 152.6 153.1 154.1 155.1 156.1 157.1 158.1 159.1 160.1 161.1 162.1 163.1 164.1 165.1 166.1 167.1 168.1
In all likelihood, the galaxies, and our universe, would result from the collision of black masses(1). PART 1 – origin of galaxies Unless you believe in anything(2), and believe that the material can appear or explode by itself, there must be a logical explanation for the creation of galaxies; as the universe. Hence the need for epistemological assumptions on which modern cosmology rests. For a galaxy created must: 1- At least two huge masses. 2- A huge collision force. Question: In which case can we find these elements in the universe? Hypothesis: In a collision between two black masses. We have all seen in the science fiction film simulation collisions between stars as here: Now try to imagine the result of the collision of two dark masses. Argument: The dark masses of different sizes; of the order of a star billions of stars. In this last case, super masses therefore such force d & rsquo; attraction, if two d & rsquo; they find themselves between a close even remote; it can s & rsquo; draw with d & rsquo strength, phenomenal acceleration for a more dramatic impact. Argument : At the center of galaxies is a black hole. Evidence of the existence of dark mass before impact. Depending on the force of the impact this residual mass will be greater or less. Over the force of the impact will be strong. More residues are removed. The black mass will be smaller, see no or almost. The greater the impact will be low, over the black mass will be great, resulting from the fusion of two black masses. And in the case of impact between a small and a large black mass; the smaller will be absorbed and “splash” will be absorbed more or less quickly depending on the size of the masses; according to its attraction; in this case there will be no galaxy creation; and if it's the case, it will be quickly reabsorbed by the great mass. VIDEO OF COLLISION J & rsquo; had already sought collisions videos in slow motion in past years to support my thesis. J & rsquo; have finally found two videos that should support my thesis. Even if a real video of two masses colliding would be more convincing that & rsquo; simulation. I think it & rsquo; is simulations should be quite similar to what may be reality. Left to do his real cases to confirm my hypothesis videos. The collision video d & rsquo; neutron stars that will follow should be enough to validate my hypothesis. Argument: L & rsquo; impact created a saucer. See this video simulation. Argument: But the galaxies rotate on itself. And as observed, the black masses also turn on itself. And during the period of & rsquo; mutual attraction before collision. And as she can s & rsquo; between-attracting far, because of their immense strength & rsquo; attraction, it may turn, l & rsquo; one around & rsquo; another before & rsquo; impact. From our earthly perspective l & rsquo; impact between two tiny dots in the sky may seem trivial. I leave to care astrophysicists s & rsquo; fun to calculate(7) l & rsquo; acceleration and force d & rsquo; impact (the dispersion & rsquo; energy) that can generate the shock between two dark masses, depending on their size. Since over their mass is large, the greater will be the & rsquo; acceleration preceding & rsquo; impact; causing a d & rsquo impact; such force, the two black masses will disintegrate under the & rsquo; impact. See the following simulation video with rotation. SPEED OF PROJECTED AMAS Argument : When & rsquo; impact the speed of dark masses will determine the speed of projected clusters. Unlike Kepler determined the speed of clusters depending on the distance from the galaxy center; So the dark mass which would accelerate the speed of nearby clusters, not those remote, according to his theory predicted. While c & rsquo; is the speed of dark mass in the & rsquo; impact that determines the speed at all distances. “So, the speed of the stars at the edge of & rsquo; a galaxy is constant, and does not depend on the distance r”(6). This confirms that the rotational speed of galaxies is observed. We allow d & rsquo; estimate the speed of the dark masses on impact. Legend: galactic rotation curve : predicted (A) and observed (B). FORM OF GALAXIES Argument: Hubble believed that galaxy was the result of”evolution” to crush a round mass (or spiral). Theory rejected for valid but if you press the & rsquo; & rsquo hypothesis, a collision between two masses. Argument: A central impact will create a round galaxy. An off-center impact will create an elliptical galaxy. Such that & rsquo; observed by Hubble: Legend: Diagram of the Hubble classification, in its usual form of diapason. It is also called "range Hubble". (Source: Wikipedia) Argument: Given their great strength & rsquo; attraction, the majority of collisions between dark mass must be in the center. Such that & rsquo; observed, 77 % galaxies have a spiral shape (or circle)(3). So contrary to what Hubble thought, it s & rsquo; d & rsquo not act; an evolutionary form between spiral and elliptical would explain the difference, but the & rsquo; & rsquo angle; impact, if not, passing near d & rsquo; another galaxy and possibly d & rsquo; a black mass. EXPLANATION OF SHAPE ELLIPSE Argument: More dark masses colliding are large, plus & rsquo; acceleration during the & rsquo; mutual attraction will be great, the strength of & rsquo; impact will be great, creating an ellipse if the masses hit before & rsquo; have time to focus before & rsquo; impact. The result should give larger elliptical galaxies than rounder. Sure enough, the larger galaxies are elliptical. While smaller galaxies are round because the two masses have time to direct the & rsquo; towards one & rsquo; another before & rsquo; impact, since the force & rsquo; attraction, So d & rsquo; acceleration is less. COALESCENCE This phenomenon also observed between two bubbles & rsquo; air drop or two of liquid s & rsquo; also applies to planets, soleil, black masses, Quasars less, etc.. EXPLANATION OF ARMS IN SPIRAL GALAXIES. 4 HYPOTHESES. Hypothesis 1 : The material attracting matter. The scattered clumps of material s & rsquo; attracting, in billions of & rsquo; years following the & rsquo; impact, have seen to draw shapes validating this attraction. Sure enough, arms emerge with time. legends: spiral arms observed (solid lines) and extrapolated (dotted lines). Segments depart the Sun. (in the upper center) towards constellations whose name is abbreviated to three letters. Source: Wikipedia Hypothesis 2 : When & rsquo; approach of the two dark masses. They attract each other the contents of the & rsquo; one and the & rsquo; other; creating a dragged spiral-shaped material in the galaxy. Low density in the distance and density in & rsquo; approach the point & rsquo; impact. L & rsquo; angle of the start of the branch being an index of & rsquo; d & rsquo angle, approaching the dark mass. Hypothesis 3 : When & rsquo; d & rsquo approach; a black mass, it will absorb all the clusters on its way creating, not arms, but between arms, blank material. This explains the & rsquo; existence of partially lost arm, where would have gone a black mass. Legend : Structure Milky Way. In both diagrams the Soleil is represented by a yellow dot. Source: Wikipedia Hypothesis 4 : A combination of the above assumptions is most likely because obviously the & rsquo; hypothesis 3 is inevitable in the case of passage & rsquo; a black mass in a galaxy. AGE OF SPIRAL Argument: O & rsquo; there are several impacts between different galaxies, or dark masses (this is the same) there will be different arms by & rsquo; age and size of stars; depending on the & rsquo; s age & rsquo; impact and the size of the black masses that came into collision. And coincidentally, in our own galaxy are different branches. The arms of Perseus and the & rsquo; ECU Cross include about 30 % more red giant. The other arms include a surplus of gas, but no old stars. These two spiral arms were therefore built by old stars and four arms, by gas and young stars. REVERSE MATCHING THE SIZE OF CLUSTER AND BLACK MASSES Argument: Over the & rsquo; impact is strong, between large black masses, more clusters will be small. At & rsquo; reverse, plus & rsquo; impact is low, between small black masses, more clusters are great. As is observed a difference in size are inversely proportional to the size of stars & rsquo; origin of the dark masses in the collision. CONSISTENCY OF GALAXIES Argument: The dark mass at the center of young galaxies are less numerous than the black masses without galaxy; but more likely than older galaxies. Their impacts will give less irregular galaxies. L & rsquo; assumption being that & rsquo; there are more black masses without galaxy, detected and called “Quasars less” (the stars have been, be absorbed, otherwise ejected; at least n & rsquo; have never collisionnées), there will be more regular galaxies (elliptical or spiral; youth) as d & rsquo; Irregular (old). What we see in practice. The clash between two black masses surrounded by their galaxy will give an irregular shape. As the clash between two black masses without galaxy, of “Quasars less” give regular galaxy. Contrary to what some think they are failing studies believer and a galaxy “quasar nu” to create new stars(4). It takes any combination of galaxies or “naked quasar” to create new stars. In fact these are the two dark masses, galaxies or naked quasar, which produce the required material to create stars following their collision. A UN QUASAR C & rsquo; IS A BLACK MASS NUE A quasar c & rsquo; is a black mass that n & rsquo; not collided with another black mass (or not for ages) and n & rsquo; therefore no galaxy. Argument: The black mass within the quasar OJ 287 made light eruptions all 12 years when a black mass between us and the quasar. Typical diagrams of two masses coalesced to create d & rsquo; a galaxy such views collisions at the beginning of the text. DIRECTION OF ROTATION OF DEBRIS Argument: A galaxy rotate in one direction depending on the direction of rotation of dark masses colliding. If more & rsquo; impact is between a dark mass and d & rsquo; other dark masses rotating in opposite directions, arms or just debris could rotate in opposite directions. Sure enough, 40% the material of the Milky Way turns to & rsquo; unlike the majority of the material in our galaxy. So there were more & rsquo; collision; And this, in opposite directions in an amount 2:3. STARS TO NEUTRON The neutron stars are intermediate density masses between the Suns and the black masses. The coalescence of neutron stars lead to the creation of the black masses(12). A collision video d & rsquo; neutron stars was conducted 2017 to see the similarity with the creation of & rsquo; suite galaxy to the collision of two black masses. Source: Youtube You can see in 1:25 that & rsquo; shockwave strangely resembles the arms forming a galaxy. Explanation of Georgia Tech available here: Youtube This video confirms my theory of galaxy formation from the collision of black masses. PROPORTION OF CONTENTS BLACK Once off, a galaxy would have a higher black mass in proportion to its mass; compared to a young galaxy lit. theory: Once the material was either expelled part of the & rsquo; orbit of the galaxy; or partially reabsorbed by the black mass; the portion of the black mass is greater than d & rsquo; a young galaxy, where the black mass is still surrounded by all its stars following the collision of two black masses. Fact: ” the dark matter would rate ten times that of the luminous matter, but in clusters, it would be much more important : up to thirty times the "visible" mass of these clusters.” THEORY OF CREATION OF THE ATOMS One theory want the larger atoms have been created by the & rsquo; exploding supernovas. Explosion giving the & rsquo; energy for the creation of larger atoms. This mass of & rsquo; energy is also found, and above way, in the collision of black masses. It is therefore likely that these black masses collisions have also contributed to the creation of large molecules. It will also watch to see if the & rsquo; n & supernova explosion rsquo; is in fact due to a collision between the stars. CONTENTS BLACK HOT AND COLD The presence, in the same environment, cold dark matter (from old universe) and hot black materials (from d & rsquo; a young universe like ours) would confirm that the material universe come from other than from the “Big bang” our universe. ENCOUNTER OF TWO BLACK MASSES WITHOUT COLLISION The meeting of two black masses without collision exerts d & rsquo force, attraction as the two masses will be slow d & rsquo; inversely proportional to their mass. See the video simulation of the & rsquo; Ball clusters here: Source: Forbes A galaxy consists of 10 thousand billion billion & rsquo; stars. And hundreds of billions of galaxies are observable. PART 2 – Origin of our universe BIG BANG The myth, creationist, the creation of the universe in a “Big Bang” relies more on inherited beliefs mythical societies than reality. It probably strong product collisions black masses every day in & rsquo; universe, as it s & rsquo; is still produced and it s & rsquo; always produce. And this, since, and the & rsquo; eternity. A concept, l & rsquo; infinite space, as infinite time, are difficult to design for a finite. MULTIPLE WORLD O & rsquo; there was a big bang, or collision between great black hyper-mass during the creation of our universe, there was, there, and there are also still out of our universe. Argument: the CMB the center was observed blackbody. Which would confirm that the universe is from great black hyper-masses. Whose black body (dark or dark energy) would the black mass of universe. And the received signal, in large scale, is homogeneous and perfect in the sky(16). On a small scale the signal has gaps. So there is an infinite number & rsquo; universe in the sky. “If the universe continues to expand, the CMB will continue to be shifted towards the red to the point of no longer be detectable.”(17) This is even more the case for the detection of the universe would be older than ours. SUPER HYPER MASS DARK Belief in an original Big Bang holds the same type of myth was that the sun is the center of our galaxy, or that the earth is the center of the & rsquo; universe. Coming from & rsquo; an ethnocentric vision that sees, even today the Big Bang as a single event creator, and to which we would be the center(5). So that & rsquo; there has been, that & rsquo; there and that & rsquo; there will still, a Big Bang infinity in & rsquo; universe. Probably from the & rsquo; impact of two great dark hyper-masses that are sprayed, in a hyper-force & rsquo; energy, in a dust infinity d & rsquo; atoms, d & rsquo; atoms, clusters and perhaps format up to the primordial black masses expanding that range reformed atoms by recombination (d & rsquo; otherwise atoms of electrons components, neutrons and protons) up & rsquo; dark masses attraction, then galaxies and current stars. WHY THE SKY IS DARK L & rsquo; universe is probably peopled & rsquo; innumerable galaxies that would inform us perhaps all 24 hours 24 if n & rsquo; was dark materials that absorb all their light radiation and clusters that mask the light rays during their long trek up & rsquo; us. If the sky is dark at night c & rsquo; is that & rsquo; there 700 times more dark masses, in galactic mass, as d & rsquo; stars. And this, not counting the black masses without stars. Argument: Proof, were observed in the formed galaxies 200 million & rsquo; years after our galaxy. It n & rsquo; is therefore not original A Big Bang of creation of the & rsquo; universe at galaxies. The galaxies and the Big Bang are independent to a certain extent. And … especially not created by a god in one day, or even in a week! Proof, the nearest galaxy to our own, Andromède, East 1 Billion & rsquo; more year eve that the Milky Way. While d & rsquo; other galaxies, visible earth, are younger or more watches. At most our “universe”, or rather the portion, we see the earth could be preceded by & rsquo; a super hyper-collision between two great black hyper-masses(15) which will then be from the material that will form the current galaxies. But nothing suggests that nothing & rsquo; existed before elsewhere in the & rsquo; universe. On the contrary, in all logical. To that & rsquo; a big bang happen it was necessary that the material for the set pre-exists him. Therefore… it was that great black hyper-masses exist before “creation” our universe! CYCLE DES BIG BANGS The dark masses therefore always end by themselves into hyper-super dark masses that will eventually collide with each other in a super hyper-acceleration of such force that the central dark masses will be fully, otherwise almost entirely, pulverized in a cycle infinity, recreating atoms which will meet in visible and dark masses of up & rsquo; a super hyper dark mass through the dark masses that form galaxies and stars and clusters. EXPLANATION OF THE EXPANSION OF & rsquo; UNIVERSE It remains to be, if at d & rsquo; a super hyper-collision – where two great dark hyper-mass would be almost completely disintegrated – causing a decrease in & rsquo; s attraction as clusters s & rsquo; away from each other. Thus the speed s & rsquo; accelerate into space instead of & rsquo; be constant. This would explain the & rsquo; acceleration of the & rsquo; expansion of & rsquo; universe. If the d & rsquo centripetal force, a mass is greater than the force & rsquo; attraction of the dark mass they s & rsquo; d & rsquo escape when, impact, it is natural that & rsquo; s in & rsquo; away from the dark mass speed s & rsquo; accelerates since the force d & rsquo; attraction decreases in proportion to the square of the distance. The speed & rsquo; an object corresponding to its speed under the force & rsquo; attraction, to the black mass of & rsquo; where the collision originait, square gives the observed actual speed; so, accelerating. If the reduced speed and the material is then attracted by the dark mass. In the case of our universe, if the dark mass, as discussed below, is completely disintegrated, it n & rsquo; there are more & rsquo; attraction, so there is expansion of the & rsquo; universe. Fact: Milgrom says of speed clusters d & rsquo; a galaxy, on the edge of & rsquo; a galactic disk: “This is roughly the acceleration it would take to go from rest to the speed of light during the life of the universe. C & rsquo; is the & rsquo; order of magnitude of & rsquo; s recently discovered acceleration & rsquo; expansion of & rsquo; universe7,8.” Which would confirm that the Big Bang would, to & rsquo; originally from d & rsquo; a collision between two super dark hyper-masses. The expansion of the & rsquo; universe matching the expansion d & rsquo; a way galaxy collision of two dark masses in the same order of magnitude. CYCLE DES BIG BANGS The big bang recreating the & rsquo; d & rsquo universe originally formed dust which quietly alternately attract atom, masses, stars, hyper-mass dark, galaxies, super dark hyper-mass that will absorb all matter in the distance light-years and then return galaxies or dust in an endless cycle of collisions between black masses or super dark hyper-masses and d & rsquo; evaporation of the black masses. EXPLICATION DES BIG BANGS. 3 HYPOTHESES Hypothesis 1: Under internal pressure d & rsquo; a dark hyper-mass must be huge molecules but a huge molecule infinitely often more unstable than radioactive molecules such as plutonium or & rsquo; uranium. A collision between two super hyper-mass dark should trigger a nuclear overreaction spraying all atoms instead of creating a galaxy, as in the case of dark hyper-masses. What is called cosmic inflation. Explaining the temperature reached record by & rsquo; d & rsquo universe when, a big bang and the disappearance of the surrounding galaxies would move toward the center of the big bang; also sprayed on a huge distance. We thus find in an original universe made of dust d & rsquo; atoms that seems expanding, since all matter in all are, seems to s & rsquo; away from & rsquo; epicenter of the big bang. In this case our universe would have the shape of & rsquo; an expanding sphere. Hypothesis 2: Of course, as we are in the period and part of the big bang expansion; we don & rsquo; to see that the party and a tiny part of the Big Bang. We can not see if only a portion or all of the Big Bang was sprayed in a nuclear reaction or if a party has been expelled (as in the case of & rsquo; an expelled galaxy black masses collide). In this case our visible universe does not necessarily show us all parts of the heap and do not show us s & rsquo; there remains a residual black super hyper-mass point & rsquo; impact; since this may be out of reach of our telescopes. In this case our universe would have the shape of & rsquo; a galaxy. hypothesis 3: It may have been partial nuclear reaction and expulsion of materials in forms of & rsquo; clusters that would have allowed the formation of black masses faster that & rsquo; from d & rsquo dust, atoms. This explanation is more plausible than the first. Since the d & rsquo dust, atoms in an expanding universe could hardly s & rsquo; together to form atoms and even harder clusters or black masses. Here too our universe would have the shape of & rsquo; a galaxy. Fact: ” Astronomers have come to a baryonic matter rate of about 4 % the critical density. Or, to explain the flat geometry of the & rsquo; universe, the total matter in the Universe must represent 30 % the critical density (the 70 % remaining being of’dark energy). Therefore missing 26 % the critical density as non-baryonic matter ; c & rsquo; is to say consisting of & rsquo; other particles that baryons. ” (19) There had accordingly been expelled material in the form of clusters. Which would confirm my theory about the creation of our universe following an impact between two black hyper-masses. We can not see that part of the & rsquo; universe where s & rsquo matter; assembles with d & rsquo material, another big bang. Since we don & rsquo; observe that the luminous part of the & rsquo; universe. And we can not distinguish the dust of other big bang super dark hyper-mass crossing our part of & rsquo; s universe and & rsquo; assemble into clusters with path, dark stars and hyper-mass. And we can not see far enough to see the other galaxies created by d & rsquo; other big bang to the & rsquo; outside our universe. Since we do not even see the limits of our own universe from d & rsquo; a big bang. We actually would see that & rsquo; about 1:10²³ of our universe. Proof, l & rsquo; & rsquo observation; object appear older than our universe by Hubble, as was the case for galaxies Abell 1835 IR1916 or galaxy formed only a billion & rsquo; year after the big bang, HUDF-JD2, what seems impossible in such a short time; in addition it would be too massive to s & rsquo; be formed so soon after the big bang. So there would be galaxies not from the big bang matter of our universe. C & rsquo; is two cases remain to be confirmed. HYPERION The discovery of the great mass of galaxy & rsquo; Hyperion, the 17 October 2018 latest, could lead the way to a series of discoveries confirming the presence of & rsquo; clusters increasingly numerous and massive in the center of our universe. This could lead us to the discovery of & rsquo; a black hyper-mass in the center of our universe. BIG CRUNCH It n & rsquo; there is nothing that allow to believe in a big crunch if a potential re-assembling materials; but not necessarily from the big bang d & rsquo; origin. But scattered materials from all world. Then d & rsquo; a new collision between great black hyper-mass. O & rsquo; there is a Big Crunch in the same place d & rsquo; whence came the Big Bang this assumes that & rsquo; it would remain a super hyper ground in the same place that would attract our universe at the end of its expansion. Argument : L & rsquo; Friedman equation confirms whether & rsquo; expansion of & rsquo; universe is accelerating, deceleration or constant. O & rsquo; there is deceleration of & rsquo; expansion so you have that & rsquo; there is a great black hyper-mass that attracts our universe to stop its expansion following the & rsquo; explosion of & rsquo; universe. Eventually reverse the movement of clusters near the great black hyper-mass and draw them into a Big Crunch. If c & rsquo; is the case we would be in the portion of the pile near the great black hyper-mass; rather than the farthest part will s & rsquo; escape from its attraction. O & rsquo; there is acceleration of the & rsquo; expansion, it means that we are in the portion of our universe that s & rsquo; hard to & rsquo; attraction of the great black hyper-mass. And if the & rsquo; expansion is constant, this means that the super-hyper black mass was completely pulverized in a hyper-nuclear explosion. DARK ENERGY “In 1998, Both teams & rsquo; astronomers, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z supernovae search team respectively directed by Saul Perlmutter and Brian P. Schmidt, reached the unexpected result that the expansion of the universe appeared to be accelerating.”(13) Which therefore means that & rsquo; he has a great black hyper-mass which our portion d & rsquo; s world & rsquo; s hard to its attraction; what is wrongly called “Dark Energy”, or “dark energy” would represent 68,3% our universe, against 26,8% for dark matter and 4,9% to matter(14). It n & rsquo; is therefore not a static universe as Einstein believed, or deceleration as Friedman believed. But what is called dark energy may contain the total mass of all that n & rsquo; is not considered black mass and matter. Including not only the super hyper ground but, the quasar, etc.. This would explain the low density of the & rsquo; dark energy if it is multi-position. So that & rsquo; a super hyper-mass dark is with a much higher density than d & rsquo; a black mass and an unknown distance. In fact the & rsquo; dark energy would be the & rsquo; hyper-mass located at the center of our universe. As the black masses are at the center of galaxies. The report 68,3, 26,8 and 4,9% black materials and materials as well as the & rsquo; age of our universe should allow us to calculate the mass of the great black hyper-mass in the original collision of our universe and the speed and strength of & rsquo; impact. EMPLACEMENT YOU BIG BANG For the location of our original super hyper-mass, should happen to calculate d & rsquo; origin where our universe and then detect waves (similar to the black masses) that could be issued this place to confirm the & rsquo; existence. From the trajectory of the & rsquo; expansion it should be easy to find the point & rsquo; origin of the Big Bang, and so, super original black hyper-mass. But depending on its distance this could be tiny and lost in the & rsquo; all waves from other universes. MYTH OF & rsquo; ORIGIN OF THE BIG BANG Needless to say, if the big bang origin & rsquo; a collision between two super hyper black masses, the myth of the & rsquo; origin of the Big Bang from d & rsquo; a smaller one that & rsquo mass; an atom is more outlandish hypotheses verified and verifiable assumptions. Since the portion of the & rsquo; visible universe is infinitesimal, it would be inappropriate to draw any hasty conclusion on the size of the big bang d & rsquo; origin. PHANTOM POWER As clusters s & rsquo; away from the center of the great black hyper-mass, suite au big bang. L & rsquo; attracting clusters of black core s & rsquo; shrinking. The black core is therefore withdrawal itself. This explains the & rsquo; increase as its core density that our universe is ejected away from its center. Argument: There is a cooling of the & rsquo; universe as our universe takes the & rsquo; expansion. BIG RIP The core of the densification of the great black hyper-mass and the fact that & rsquo; s taking & rsquo; expanding galaxies maintain their size, come invalidate the big rip theory. On the contrary, l & rsquo; clusters of remoteness should, on the contrary, densify galaxies, love, Contents, molecules, etc.. But as galaxies are explosions following a collision, it is difficult to measure the two opposite forces. The forces of & rsquo; d & rsquo expulsion; attraction that s & rsquo; partly cancel but can explain the & rsquo; explosion in slow motion of the galaxies that we observe. COSMIC RAYS L & rsquo; d & rsquo existence; other big bang in the external universe to ours could explain the presence of cosmic rays. “loaded mainly protons (88%), nuclei’helium (9%), the remainder consisting of’electrons, different nucleons (nuclei & rsquo; atoms) as well as trace amounts of’antimatter light (antiprotons and positrons). The neutral portion is itself made up of gamma as well as neutrinos.”(8) It would be interesting to compare this charge that would be a super nuclear reaction between two great black hyper-mass. Argument: the composition of cosmic rays strangely similar to that of cores (87% proton)(9) rather that & rsquo; to that of the stars, like the sun, which mainly emit photons and neutrinos. (10) And “the most energetic particles from interstellar and intergalactic space. In 2017 the first confirmations of & rsquo; geographical origin of high-energy radiation are given by the publication of the result of 12 years old measurements made since 2004 to & rsquo; Pierre Auger Observatory in Malargüe in Argentina3 : this radiation is clearly extragalactic, from galaxies located in a portion of the space located beyond the confines of the Milky Way.” EXPANSION EXPONENTIAL 1- L & rsquo; exponential expansion of & rsquo; universe, itself remains to be confirmed, can be derived from the red ray capture due to aging of the observed stars or the & rsquo; expanding galaxy itself. 2- Is the radius of the length between us and another galaxy, from the point of & rsquo; origin of the Big Bang which increases? Or else, Is the distance between us and a galaxy following the same path relative to the big bang increasing? HYPER-GALAXY likewise, our place of & rsquo; observation does not allow us to see that our universe may be itself a part of & rsquo; a …hyper-galaxy from d & rsquo; a big bang between two hyper black mass! As the & rsquo; visible universe is only 2% our universe, it will d & rsquo; other observations to determine its form and confirm its origin. Flatness L & rsquo; UNIVERSE The collision of two black hyper-masses explain the platform of our visible universe; similar to the flat shape of the galaxies after the collision of two black masses. This would explain the lack of curvature of our universe. The only curvature would be one of the branches. But to observe it would see the & rsquo; d & rsquo together; a great distance and looking in the right direction. PROPORTION OF BLACK MASS Our universe is more “young” that other universe has a lower proportion of black mass; suite a un Big bang; that & rsquo; an old universe would consist mainly of black masses or & rsquo; hyper-black masses. Only comments out of our universe, not for now, we would confirm. DUST BLACK MASSES As the majority of the & rsquo; universe would consist of many more black masses colliding as d & rsquo total mass; stars, it would be fair to say that we are made of black masses of dust; more than dust… d & rsquo; stars. Yves Marineau, Sociologist written from 2 mars 2018 the 20 October 2018 from & rsquo; ideas germinated in previous years. Any reproduction permitted providing the source : http://yvesmarineau.com/blog/2018/10/20/origine-des-galaxies-et-de-lunivers/ Footnote : (1) I prefer to use the term rather than black mass black hole. Although & rsquo; a black mass appears to be a hole or s & rsquo; engulfs the light; it s & rsquo; is indeed actually d & rsquo; a mass that attracts all matter and light that passes nearby. also avoiding eccentric speculation that such wanting that & rsquo; black hole is a time space for time travel. Aside from traveling to certain death, it n & rsquo; there is no other time travel permit! (2) As the myth of the goddess Hera, including her breast milk jet would have created the Milky Way! (3) Source: Wikipedia. It is highly unlikely that & rsquo; impact to be exactly in the center of two dark masses. Our angle, seen from Earth or even d & rsquo; a satellite never allows us to see a d & rsquo galaxy; an exactly perpendicular angle to d & rsquo; see the exact form. It is likely that all galaxies have an elliptical shape but with an ellipse ranging from & rsquo; ellipse to the circle but pure, with an average closer to the pure circle of & rsquo; ellipse. (Note that the perfectly pure forms – circle, square, triangle, ellipse, etc.. – does not exist in nature and are purely imaginary creation of the human). (4) See the study with an erroneous assumption appeared in “Astronomy and Astrophysics” (5) There are many d & rsquo; other myths astrophysics similar to disassemble; like time travel, parallel universes, problem of flatness or curvature of the & rsquo; universe, deformation of the & rsquo; space and time by a mass, etc.. (6) Source: Wikipedia. (7) Either way mathematics is a tautological science for that & rsquo; to confirm their own assertions. (8) Source: Wikipedia. (9) Source: “Introductory Nuclear, Atomic and Molecular Physics”, PHYS -H-405, Teachers: M. Godefroid and N. Pauly. (10) A GUIDE TO THE NUCLEAR SCIENCE WALL CHART, Chapter 10 (11) Source: Wikipedia (12) Source: NASA video Youtube (13) Source: Wikipedia (14) Source : Wikipedia (15) Also called: black hole (16) This information is valid provided that the measured particle is not deflected by the stars that are on their way. (17) Source : Wikipedia (18) Source: Wikipedia (19) Source: Wikipedia
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 13.1 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 19.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.2 22.3 23.1 23.2 24.1 24.2 24.3 25.1 26.1 26.2 26.3 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 30.2 31.1 31.2 32.1 33.1 33.2 34.1 34.2 35.1 35.2 35.3 36.1 37.1 38.1 38.2 38.3 39.1 40.1 40.2 40.3 41.1 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 42.5 42.6 42.7 42.8 42.9 43.1 44.1 45.1 46.1 47.1 47.2 47.3 48.1 49.1 49.2 49.3 50.1 51.1 51.2 52.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.1 58.2 59.1 59.2 60.1 61.1 62.1 63.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 71.2 71.3 72.1 73.1 74.1 74.2 74.3 74.4 74.5 74.6 75.1 76.1 77.1 77.2 77.3 77.4 78.1 79.1 79.2 79.3 80.1 80.2 80.3 80.4 80.5 81.1 81.2 81.3 81.4 81.5 82.1 83.1 84.1 85.1 85.2 85.3 85.4 86.1 86.2 87.1 87.2 87.3 88.1 89.1 90.1 91.1 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 92.5 92.6 93.1 94.1 94.2 94.3 94.4 95.1 96.1 96.2 96.3 97.1 98.1 98.2 98.3 99.1 99.2 99.3 99.4 99.5 99.6 100.1 100.2 100.3 101.1 102.1 102.2 103.1 104.1 104.2 104.3 105.1 106.1 107.1 107.2 107.3 108.1 109.1 110.1 111.1 111.2 111.3 111.4 111.5 111.6 111.7 112.1 112.2 113.1 114.1 115.1 116.1 117.1 118.1 119.1 120.1 121.1 122.1 122.2 122.3 122.4 123.1 124.1 125.1 126.1 127.1 127.2 128.1 129.1 129.2 130.1 131.1 132.1 133.1 133.2 134.1 135.1 136.1 137.1 138.1 138.2 139.1 139.2 140.1 141.1 142.1 143.1 144.1 145.1 146.1 147.1 148.1 149.1 150.1 150.2 150.3 151.1 152.1 152.2 152.3 153.1 154.1 155.1 156.1 157.1 158.1 158.2 158.3 159.1 160.1 161.1 162.1 163.1 164.1 165.1 166.1 167.1 168.1
I ngach dóchúlacht, réaltraí les, agus ár n-Cruinne, Bheadh mar thoradh ar an imbhualadh na maiseanna dubh(1). CUID 1 – tionscnaimh na réaltraí Mura gcreideann tú i n & rsquo; rud ar bith(2), agus creidim gur féidir leis an t-ábhar láithriú nó pléascadh d & rsquo; é féin, ní mór go mbeadh míniú loighciúil do chruthú réaltraí; mar an & rsquo; Cruinne. D & rsquo; mar sin, an gá atá & rsquo; ar eipistéimeolaíocht na boinn tuisceana go atá & rsquo; Tacaíonn an domhan-eolaíocht atá ann faoi láthair. Chun na críche sin & rsquo; réaltra cruthaíodh mór: 1- Ar a laghad dhá maiseanna ollmhór. 2- Bhí foireann oibre imbhualadh ollmhór. Ceist: Agus sa chás sin is féidir linn teacht ar an dá ghné sa & rsquo; Cruinne? hipitéis: Nuair a bheidh d & rsquo; imbhualadh idir dhá mhais dubh. Chonaiceamar go léir sa ficsean eolaíochta imbhuailtí insamhalta scannán idir réaltaí chomh anseo: Anois bain triail as & rsquo; mar thoradh ar an imbhualadh dhá maiseanna dorcha shamhlú. argóint: Na maiseanna dorcha de mhéideanna éagsúla; a billiúin réalt de & rsquo; = d & rsquo ordú; s & rsquo réaltaí. Sa chás deireanach, MAISEANNA Super mar sin cibé forneart d & rsquo; mhealladh, más rud é dhá d & rsquo; fhaigheann siad iad féin idir deiridh fiú iargúlta; is féidir é S & rsquo; tharraingt le d & rsquo neart, luasghéarú phenomenal do tionchar níos drámatúla. argóint : Ag an lár réaltraí is poll dubh. Cruthúnas & rsquo; mais dubh ann roimhe & rsquo; tionchar. Ag brath ar an neart an & rsquo; tionchar a bheidh an mais iarmharach a bheith níos mó nó níos lú. Neart an & rsquo; beidh tionchar a bheith láidir. Níos iarmhair a bhaint. Beidh an mais dubh a bheith níos lú, féach ar bith nó beagnach. Thar an & rsquo; Beidh tionchar a bheith íseal, níos mó ná go mbeidh an mais dubh go hiontach, mar thoradh ar an comhleá de dhá mhais dubh. Agus i gcás & rsquo; tionchar idir beag agus mais dubh mór; la petite sera absorbée et les “éclaboussures” seront plus ou moins absorbées rapidement dépendamment de la grandeur de la grande masse; ag brath ar a neart & rsquo; mhealladh; sa chás seo air n & rsquo; ní bheidh aon cruthú réaltra; agus más rud é c & rsquo; is amhlaidh i gcás, beidh sé a reabsorbed go tapa ag an mais mór. VIDEO AN IMBHUALADH J & rsquo; iarr cheana imbhuailtí físeáin ag gluaiseacht go mall sna blianta atá caite chun tacú le mo thráchtas. J & rsquo; a fuair ar deireadh dhá físeáin chóir a thacaíonn le mo thráchtas. Fiú má tá físeán fíor de dhá maiseanna colliding bheadh níos diongbháilte go & rsquo; insamhalta. Sílim go bhfuil sé & rsquo; tá Ba chóir go mbeadh insamhaltaí a bheith cosúil go leor le d'fhéadfadh a bheith réaltacht. D'fhág a dhéanamh ar a gcásanna fíor a dheimhniú mo físeáin hipitéis. Tá an físeán imbhualadh d & rsquo; ba cheart neodrónréaltaí a leanúint go leor a bhailíochtú mo hipitéis. argóint: L & rsquo; tionchar a cruthaíodh saucer. Féach ar an insamhalta físeán. argóint: Ach na réaltraí rothlú ar féin. Agus mar a breathnaíodh, na maiseanna dubh seal freisin ar féin. Agus le linn na tréimhse & rsquo; mhealladh go frithpháirteach roimh imbhualadh. Agus is féidir léi s & rsquo; idir-mhealladh go dtí seo, mar gheall ar a neart ollmhór & rsquo; mhealladh, d'fhéadfadh sé dul, l & rsquo; amháin timpeall & rsquo; roimh & rsquo eile; tionchar. Ó ár thaobh l earthly & rsquo; fhéadfadh tionchar idir dhá poncanna bídeach sa spéir cosúil fánach. Fágaim astrophysicists s & rsquo cúram; spraoi a ríomh(7) l & rsquo; luasghéarú agus bhfeidhm d & rsquo; tionchar (fuinneamh; an scaipeadh & rsquo) is féidir a ghiniúint an turraing idir dhá mhais dorcha, brath ar a mhéid. Ós rud é níos mó ná é a mais mór, beidh an níos mó a bheith ar an & rsquo; tuairte; luasghéarú roimhe & rsquo; is cúis le d & rsquo tionchair; fórsa den sórt sin, Beidh an dá mhais dubh disintegrate faoin & rsquo; tionchar. Féach ar an físeán insamhalta a leanas le huainíocht. SPEED OF AMAS RÉAMH-MHEASTA argóint : Nuair & rsquo; tionchar ar an luas na maiseanna dorcha a chinneadh an luas braislí réamh-mheasta. Murab ionann agus Kepler chinneadh an luas na mbraislí ag brath ar an fad ó lár réaltra; Mar sin, bheadh an mais dorcha a dlús a chur leis an luas na braislí in aice láimhe, ní iad siúd iargúlta, de réir a theoiric tuartha. Cé c & rsquo; is é an luas na maise dorcha sa & rsquo; tionchar a gcinnfidh an luas ar chor ar bith faid. “Mar sin,, an luas na réaltaí ar imeall na & rsquo; is réaltra tairiseach, agus ní ag brath ar an t-achar r”(6). Deimhníonn sé seo go bhfuil an luas rothlach de réaltraí faoi deara. ligfidh muid d & rsquo; meastachán ar an luas an MAISEANNA dorcha ar thionchar. finscéal: cuar uainíochta réaltrach : tuartha (A) agus inar breathnaíodh (B). FOIRM Réaltraí argóint: Hubble croyait qu’une galaxie était la résultante de l'”évolution” vers l’écrasement d’une masse ronde (nó bíseach). Teoiric diúltaíodh do bailí ach má tú ar an cnaipe an & rsquo; & hipitéis rsquo, imbhualadh idir dhá mhais. argóint: Beidh tionchar lárnach a chruthú réaltra bhabhta. Beidh tionchar as-ionad chruthú réaltra éilipseacha. Den sórt sin go bhfuil & rsquo; comhlíonadh ag Hubble: finscéal: Léaráid an aicmithe Hubble, ina fhoirm is gnách ar diapason. Il est aussi nommé « fourchette de Hubble ». (Foinse: Vicipéid) argóint: Mar gheall ar a neart mór & rsquo; mhealladh, Ní mór an chuid is mó na n-imbhuailtí idir mais dorcha a bheith i lár. Den sórt sin go bhfuil & rsquo; breathnaithe, 77 % tá réaltraí cruth bíseach (nó ciorcal)(3). Mar sin, contrártha leis an méid machnaimh Hubble, tá sé & rsquo; d & rsquo ní gníomhú; bheadh foirm éabhlóideach idir bíseach agus éilipseacha míniú a thabhairt ar an difríocht, ach an & rsquo; & uillinn rsquo; tionchar, ar shlí eile, dul in aice le rsquo d &; réaltra eile agus b'fhéidir d & rsquo; mais dubh. MÍNIÚ AR éilips SHAPE argóint: Tá MAISEANNA níos dorcha colliding mór, móide & rsquo; luasghéarú i rith na & rsquo; Beidh mhealladh go frithpháirteach go hiontach, an neart & rsquo; Beidh tionchar go hiontach, ag cruthú éilips má na maiseanna bhuail roimh & rsquo; ag am chun díriú sula & rsquo; tionchar. Ba chóir an toradh a thabhairt réaltraí éilipseacha níos mó ná rounder. cinnte go leor, Is iad na réaltraí móra éilipseacha. Cé go bhfuil réaltraí níos lú bhabhta toisc go bhfuil an dá maiseanna am a ordú don & rsquo; i dtreo amháin & rsquo; eile roimh & rsquo; tionchar, ós rud é an fórsa & rsquo; mhealladh, Mar sin, d & rsquo; tá luasghéarú níos lú. coalescence baineann sé seo le pláinéid; an feiniméan a tugadh idir dhá boilgeoga & rsquo; titim aeir nó dhá cheann de s leachtacha & rsquo, soleil, mAISEANNA dubh, quasars lú, srl. Míniú ARM A IN bíseach Réaltraí. 4 Boinn Tuisceana. hipitéis 1 : An ní ábhartha a mhealladh. Na clumps scaipthe na s ábhartha & rsquo; mhealladh, i billiúin & rsquo; bliana tar éis an & rsquo; tionchar, Feicthe chun cruthanna a bhailíochtú seo a mhealladh a tharraingt. cinnte go leor, airm chun cinn leis an am. finscéalta: airm bíseach faoi deara (línte soladach) agus eachtarshuite (línte poncaithe). Deighleoga imeacht na Gréine (i lár uachtarach) i dtreo réaltbhuíon a bhfuil a ainm giorraithe go trí litir. Foinse: Vicipéid hipitéis 2 : Nuair & rsquo; cur chuige an dá mhais dorcha. mhealladh siad a chéile an t-ábhar ar an & rsquo; amháin agus an & rsquo; eile; chruthú ábhar bíseach-chruthach dragged sa réaltra. ísealdlúis i gcéin agus dlús i & rsquo; cur chuige an bpointe & rsquo; tionchar. L & rsquo; uillinn thús an bhrainse a bheith ar liosta na & rsquo; d & rsquo uillinn, druidim an mais dorcha. hipitéis 3 : Nuair & rsquo; d & chuige rsquo; mais dubh, beidh sé ionsú go léir na braislí ar a bhealach a chruthú, ní airm, ach idir arm, ábhar bán. Míníonn sé seo an & rsquo; ann lámh páirteach caillte, i gcás ina mbeadh go bhfuil siad imithe ar mó a mais dubh. finscéal : struchtúr Bó Finne ar bhealach. Sa dá léaráidí na Soleil Tá ionadaíocht ag ponc buí. Foinse: Vicipéid hipitéis 4 : Tá meascán de na toimhdí thuas is dóichí mar gheall ar ndóigh an & rsquo; hipitéis 3 Is dosheachanta i gcás sliocht & rsquo; mais dubh i réaltra. AOIS bíseach argóint: O & rsquo; tá roinnt tionchair idir réaltraí éagsúla, nó mais dorcha (is é seo mar an gcéanna) beidh arm difriúil ag & rsquo; aois agus méid na réaltaí; ag brath ar an & rsquo; s aois & rsquo; tionchar agus an méid de na maiseanna dubh a tháinig i imbhualadh. agus coincidentally, inár réaltra féin iad brainsí éagsúla. Armas Peirséas agus an & rsquo; ECU Cross I measc thart 30 % fathach níos dearg. Ar na arm eile barrachas de ghás, ach gan aon réaltaí aois. dá bhrí sin, an dá arm bíseach tógtha ag réaltaí d'aois agus ceithre arm, gás agus óg réaltaí. Droim ar ais MHEAITSEÁIL AN MÉID AN CLUSTER AGUS DUBH MAISEANNA argóint: Thar an & rsquo; tá tionchar láidir, idir MAISEANNA mór dubh, Beidh níos mó braislí a bheith beag. Ag & rsquo; mhalairt, móide & rsquo; tá tionchar íseal, idir MAISEANNA dubh beag, Tá níos mó braislí mór. Toisc go bhfuil faoi deara difríocht i méid atá contrártha comhréireach leis an méid na n réaltaí & rsquo; tionscnamh na maiseanna dorcha sa imbhualadh. COMHLEANÚNACHAS na réaltraí argóint: Is iad na mais dorcha ag lár réaltraí óga chomh iomadúla ná na maiseanna dubh gan réaltra; ach níos mó seans ann ná réaltraí níos sine. Beidh a gcuid tionchair a thabhairt réaltraí chomh neamhrialta. L & rsquo; toimhde a bheith go & rsquo; tá maiseanna níos dubh gan réaltra, détectées et appelées des “quasars lú” (na réaltaí a bheith, bheith clúdaithe,, scaoileadh ar shlí eile; ar a laghad, n & rsquo; riamh collisionnées), beidh réaltraí níos rialta (éilipseacha nó bíseach; óige) mar d & rsquo; Neamhrialta (aois). Cad a fheiceann muid i gcleachtas. Beidh an Clash idir dhá mhais dubh timpeallaithe ag a n-réaltra thabhairt cruth neamhrialta. Mar an Clash idir dhá mhais dubh gan réaltra, de “quasars lú” donnera une galaxie régulière. Contrairement à ce que pensent certaines études croyant qu’ils faillent une galaxie et un “quasar nu” pour créé de nouvelles étoiles(4). Il faut n’importe quelle combinaison de galaxies ou de “quasar nus” pour créer de nouvelles étoiles. Go deimhin tá na an dá mais dorcha, réaltraí nó quasar naked, a tháirgeann an ábhar is gá chun réaltaí a chruthú tar éis a imbhualadh. A UN QUASAR C & rsquo; IS DUBH MASS Nue Is mó a mais dubh a n & rsquo;; A quasar c & rsquo nach imbhuail mais dubh eile (nó nach bhfuil do aois) agus n & rsquo; dá bhrí sin, níl aon réaltra. argóint: Ní rachaidh mais dubh taobh istigh den IO quasar 287 rinneadh brúchtaí solas go léir 12 blianta nuair a mais dubh idir muid féin agus an quasar. léaráidí tipiciúla de dhá mhais coalesced a chruthú d & rsquo; réaltra sórt tuairimí imbhuailtí ag tús an téacs. Treo rothlaithe bhruscar argóint: A réaltra rothlú i dtreo amháin ag brath ar an treo rothlaithe maiseanna dorcha colliding. Má tá níos mó & rsquo; tá tionchar idir mais dorcha agus d & rsquo; MAISEANNA dorcha eile rothlach i dtreonna os coinne, D'fhéadfadh airm nó díreach bhruscar rothlú i dtreonna os coinne. cinnte go leor, 40% an t-ábhar ar an Bealach na Bó Finne casadh rsquo go &; murab ionann agus an chuid is mó de an t-ábhar in ár réaltra. Mar sin, bhí níos mó & rsquo; imbhualadh; agus, ar mhalairt treo i méid 2:3. STARS TO neodrón Is iad na réaltaí neodrón maiseanna dlús idirmheánach idir na Suns agus an mais dubh. An Comhtháthú neodrónréaltaí mar thoradh ar an cruthú na maiseanna dubh(12). Físeán imbhualadh d & rsquo; Rinneadh neodrónréaltaí 2017 a fheiceáil ar an cosúlacht leis an cruthú & rsquo; réaltra suite ar an imbhualadh dhá maiseanna dubh. Foinse: Youtube Is féidir leat a fheiceáil i 1:25 sin & rsquo; Shockwave resembles strangely an t-armas a bheidh ina réaltra. Míniú ar Georgia Tech ar fáil anseo: Youtube Deimhníonn an físeán mo theoiric le múnlú na réaltra ó imbhualadh na maiseanna dubh. Cion na CLÁR DUBH aon uaire, Bheadh réaltra bhfuil mais dubh níos airde i gcomhréir lena mhais; i gcomparáid le réaltra óg lit. teoiric: Chomh luath agus a bhí an t-ábhar dhíbirt ceachtar mar chuid den & rsquo; bhfithis an réaltra; nó go páirteach reabsorbed ag an mais dubh; Is an chuid den mhais dubh níos mó ná d & rsquo; réaltra óg, ina bhfuil an mais dubh i gcónaí timpeallaithe ag a chuid réaltaí uile tar éis an imbhualadh dhá maiseanna dubh. Go deimhin: ” le taux de matière noire serait jusqu’à dix fois celui de la matière lumineuse, ach i mbraislí, Bheadh sé i bhfad níos tábhachtaí : jusqu’à trente fois la masse « visible » de ces amas.” (18) TEOIRIC NA CRUTHÚ de na hadaimh ceann teoiric gur mian leis an adamh mó Chruthaigh an & rsquo; supernovas pléascadh. Pléascadh ag tabhairt an & rsquo; fuinneamh do chruthú na n-adamh mó. Seo mais & rsquo; fuinneamh le fáil chomh maith, agus ar bhealach thuas, i imbhualadh na maiseanna dubh. Is cosúil mar sin, go bhfuil na MAISEANNA imbhuailtí dubh freisin le cruthú móilíní móra. Beidh sé ag breathnú freisin chun a fháil amach an & rsquo; n & rsquo ollnóva pléascadh; Tá go deimhin mar gheall ar imbhualadh idir na réaltaí. CLÁR DUBH te agus fuar an láthair, sa timpeallacht chéanna, ábhar dorcha fuar (ó Cruinne d'aois) agus ábhair dubh te (ó d & rsquo; Cruinne óg cosúil linne) viendrait confirmer que de la matière proviendrait de d’autres univers que celle provenant du “Big bang” ár n-cruinne. Encounter DHÁ MAISEANNA DUBH GAN IMBHUALADH Feidhmíonn an cruinniú de dhá maiseanna dubh gan imbhualadh d & rsquo bhfeidhm, a mhealladh mar an dá mhais a bheith mall d & rsquo; contrártha comhréireach leis a mais. Féach ar an insamhalta físeán an & rsquo; braislí Ball anseo: Foinse: Forbes Is éard atá réaltra de 10 míle billiún billiún & rsquo; réaltaí. Agus tá na céadta billiúin réaltraí inbhraite. CUID 2 – Tionscnamh ár Cruinne BANG MÓR an miotas, creationist, de la création de l’univers entier lors d’un “Big Bang” repose bien plus sur des croyances héritées des sociétés mythiques que de la réalité. Tá sé imbhuailtí táirge dócha láidir MAISEANNA dubh gach lá i & rsquo; Cruinne, mar atá sé & rsquo; tháirgtear go fóill agus tá sé & rsquo; i gcónaí ar aird. Agus seo, ó, agus an & rsquo; eternity. coincheap, l & rsquo; spás gan teorainn, mar am gan teorainn, atá deacair a dearadh a dhéanamh do críochta. WORLD MULTIPLE O & rsquo; bhí Bang mór, nó imbhualadh idir mór dubh Hyper-mhais le linn a chruthú ár n-Cruinne, bhí, ann, agus tá freisin fós as ár Cruinne. argóint: an CMB tugadh faoi deara an t-ionad blackbody. Cé acu a dheimhniú go bhfuil na cruinne ó mór dubh Hyper-MAISEANNA. Cé leis comhlacht dubh (fuinneamh dorcha nó dorcha) bheadh an mais dubh na cruinne. Agus an comhartha a fhaightear, ar scála mór, Is aonchineálach agus foirfe sa spéir(16). Ar scála beag Tá an comhartha bearnaí. Mar sin, tá líon gan teorainn & rsquo; Cruinne sa spéir. “Si l’Univers poursuit son expansion, le fond diffus cosmologique va continuer à décaler vers le rouge jusqu’au point de ne plus être détectable.”(17) Tá sé seo níos amhlaidh i gcás a bhrath na cruinne a bheith níos sine ná linne. Super Hyper AIFREANN DARK Tá creideamh i bunaidh Big Bang an cineál céanna Myth ná go bhfuil an ghrian lár ár réaltra, nó go bhfuil an domhan lár an & rsquo; Cruinne. Ag teacht as & rsquo; fís eitnealárnacha go bhfeiceann, fiú sa lá atá inniu an Big Bang mar cruthaitheoir imeacht amháin, agus a ba mhaith linn a bheith an t-ionad(5). Mar sin, go & rsquo; tá, sin & rsquo; ann agus go bhfuil & rsquo; a bheidh ann go fóill, a Infinity Big Bang i & rsquo; Cruinne. Is dócha as an & rsquo; tionchar dhá dorcha Hyper-maiseanna mór go spréitear, i Hyper-fórsa & rsquo; fhuinnimh, i Infinity deannaigh d & rsquo; adaimh, d & rsquo; adaimh, d’amas et peut-être de format allant jusqu’aux masses noires primordiales en expansion qui vont reformés les atomes par recombinaisons (d & rsquo; ar shlí eile adaimh leictreoin comhpháirteanna, neodróin agus prótóin) suas & rsquo; MAISEANNA dorcha mhealladh, ansin réaltraí agus réaltaí atá ann faoi láthair. CÉN FÁTH AN SKY Dark L & rsquo; Tá Cruinne peopled dócha & rsquo; réaltraí innumerable a chuirfeadh in iúl dúinn b'fhéidir go léir 24 uaireanta 24 más rud é n & rsquo; ba ábhair dorcha a ionsú go léir a n-radaíocht éadrom agus braislí a masc na gathanna solais le linn a aistear fada suas & rsquo; us. Má tá an spéir dorcha san oíche c & rsquo; is é sin & rsquo; ann 700 amanna maiseanna níos dorcha, i bhfianaise na maise réaltrach, mar d & rsquo; réaltaí. Agus seo, ní comhaireamh na maiseanna dubh gan réaltaí. argóint: do chruthúnas, iad faoi deara sa réaltraí déanta 200 milliún & rsquo; bliana tar éis ár réaltra. Tá sé n & rsquo; dá bhrí sin nach bhfuil bunaidh A Big Bang bunaithe an & rsquo; Cruinne ag réaltraí. Is iad na réaltraí agus an Big Bang neamhspleách go pointe áirithe. Agus … go háirithe nach bhfuil cruthaithe ag dia in aon lá amháin, nó fiú in aghaidh na seachtaine! do chruthúnas, an réaltra is gaire go dtí ár féin, Andromède, Is 1 Billiún & rsquo; níos oíche roimh bliana go bhfuil an Bealach na Bó Finne. Cé d & rsquo; eile réaltraí, cré le feiceáil, Tá uaireadóirí níos óige nó níos mó. Tout au plus notre “univers”, nó in áit an chuid, a fheicimid fhéadfaí an domhain roimh & rsquo; a Super Hyper-imbhualadh idir dhá dubh Hyper-MAISEANNA mór(15) a bheidh ansin as an ábhar a bheidh mar réaltraí atá ann faoi láthair. Ach le fios rud ar bith go bhfuil aon rud & rsquo; bhí ann roimh aon áit eile sa & rsquo; Cruinne. A mhalairt ar fad, i ngach loighciúil. Chun na críche sin & rsquo; Bang mór a tharlóidh go raibh sé riachtanach go bhfuil an t-ábhar le haghaidh an tsraith réamh-ann dó. Dá bhrí sin,… il fallait que des super hyper-masses noires existent avant la “création” ár n-cruinne! CYCLE DES BIG BANGS Les masses sombres finissent donc toujours par se regrouper en super hyper-masses sombres qui finiront par entrer en collision entre elles lors d’une super hyper-accélération d’une force telle que les masses sombres centrales seront entièrement, ar shlí eile go hiomlán beagnach, pulvérisées dans un infini cycle, adaimh a thiocfaidh le chéile i maiseanna infheicthe agus dorcha de suas & rsquo athchruthú; mais Super dorcha Hyper tríd an mais dorcha go foirm réaltraí agus na réaltaí agus braislí. MÍNIÚ AR FAIRSINGIÚ AN & rsquo; UNIVERSE Tá sé fós a bheith, más rud é ar d & rsquo; a Super Hyper-imbhualadh – i gcás ina mbeadh beirt mór dorcha Hyper-mhais a disintegrated beagnach go hiomlán – is cúis le laghdú ar & rsquo; s mhealladh mar braislí s & rsquo; amach óna chéile. Dá bhrí sin an luas s & rsquo; dlús isteach i spás in ionad & rsquo; a tairiseach. Bheadh sé seo míniú a thabhairt ar an & rsquo; luasghéarú an & rsquo; leathnú & rsquo; Cruinne. Má tá an d & rsquo fórsa láraimsitheach, tá súil le mais níos mó ná an fórsa & rsquo; mhealladh an mais dorcha s siad & rsquo; d & rsquo éalú nuair, tionchar, tá sé nádúrtha go & rsquo; s in & rsquo; ar shiúl ó na luas mais dorcha s & rsquo; accelerates ó lucht d & rsquo; laghduithe mhealladh i gcomhréir leis an cearnach de an t-achar. mhealladh = An luas & rsquo; rud ar comhréir lena luas faoi bhfeidhm & rsquo, leis an mais dubh & rsquo; i gcás an originait imbhualadh, cearnóg Tugann an luas iarbhír a breathnaíodh; dá bhrí sin,, luasghéaraithe. Má tá an luas laghdaithe agus an t-ábhar mheall ansin ag an mais dorcha. I gcás ár Cruinne, má tá an mais dorcha, mar a phléitear thíos, Tá disintegrated go hiomlán, sé n & rsquo; tá níos mó & rsquo; mhealladh, agus mar sin tá leathnú ar an & rsquo; Cruinne. Go deimhin: Milgrom deir braislí luais d & rsquo; réaltra, ar imeall na & rsquo; diosca Réaltrach: “C’est grossièrement l’accélération qu’il faudrait pour passer du repos à la vitesse de la lumière pendant la vie de l’univers. Is an & rsquo; = C & rsquo ord méadaíochta de & rsquo; s luasghéarú & rsquo déanaí aimsigh = leathnú & rsquo; Cruinne7,8.” Ce qui confirmerait que le big bang serait, rsquo go &; dtús ó rsquo d &; imbhualadh idir dhá Super dorcha Hyper-MAISEANNA. An leathnú ar an & rsquo; Cruinne a thagann leis an leathnú d & rsquo; imbhualadh bhealach Réaltra 2 maiseanna dorcha sa ord céanna méadaíochta. CYCLE DES BIG BANGS An Bang mór athchruthú an & rsquo; d & rsquo Cruinne bhíodh mar deannaigh a ciúin mhealladh re adamh, mAISEANNA, réaltaí, Hyper-mhais dorcha, réaltraí, Super dorcha Hyper-mhais a ionsú gach ábhar i gcéin solasbhliain agus ansin réaltraí nó deannaigh filleadh i timthriall endless na n-imbhuailtí idir MAISEANNA dubh nó dorcha Super Hyper-maiseanna agus d & rsquo; galú de na maiseanna dubh. Explication DES BIG BANGS. 3 Boinn Tuisceana hipitéis 1: Faoi bhrú d & rsquo inmheánach; ní mór dorcha Hyper-mhais a móilíní ollmhór ach móilín ollmhór infinitely minic níos éagobhsaí ná móilíní radaighníomhacha, mar shampla plútóiniam no & rsquo; úráiniam. Ba chóir go mbeadh imbhualadh idir dhá Super dorcha Hyper-mhais spreagadh iomarcach núicléach spraeáil gach adamh in ionad a chruthú réaltra, mar atá i gcás na dorcha Hyper-MAISEANNA. Rud ar a dtugtar boilsciú Cosmaí. Ag míniú an teocht bainte amach taifead ag & rsquo; d & rsquo Cruinne nuair, bheadh Bang mór agus an cealú na réaltraí máguaird bogadh i dtreo an t-ionad an Bang mór; sprayed freisin ar achar ollmhór. Táimid ag teacht dá bhrí sin i Cruinne bunaidh déanta as deannaigh d & rsquo; adaimh cosúil leathnú, ós rud é go léir is cuma i ngach iad, is cosúil go s & rsquo; shiúl ó & rsquo; croílár na Bang mór. Sa chás seo, bheadh ár n-Cruinne bheith ar an cruth & rsquo; sféar ag leathnú. hipitéis 2: Ar ndóigh,, mar go bhfuil muid sa tréimhse agus cuid den leathnú Bang mór; táimid ag Don & rsquo; a fheiceáil go bhfuil an páirtí agus cuid bheag bhídeach den Bang Big. Ní féidir linn a fheiceáil más rud é go raibh sprayed ach cuid nó gach ceann de an Big Bang in imoibriúchán núicléach nó má tá páirtí díbríodh (mar atá i gcás & rsquo; réaltra dhíbirt MAISEANNA dubh collide). Sa chás seo nach bhfuil ar ár Cruinne infheicthe gá go a thaispeáint dúinn gach cuid den gcarn agus nach léiríonn dúinn s & rsquo; fanann pointe Super dubh iarmharach Hyper-mhais & rsquo; tionchar; ós rud é d'fhéadfadh sé seo a bheith as aimsiú ar ár teileascóip. Sa chás seo, bheadh ár n-Cruinne bheith ar an cruth & rsquo; réaltra. hipitéis 3: D'fhéadfadh sé a bheith páirteach imoibriú núicléach agus díbirt na n-ábhar i bhfoirmeacha de & rsquo; braislí a bheadh cead ag an foirmiú na maiseanna dubh tapúla sin & rsquo; ón d & rsquo deannaigh, adaimh. Tá an míniú níos inchreidte ná an chéad. Ós rud é an d & rsquo deannaigh, d'fhéadfadh adaimh i cruinne ag leathnú s éigean & rsquo; le chéile chun adaimh agus braislí níos deacra nó maiseanna dubh. Anseo fosta go mbeadh ár n-Cruinne bheith ar an cruth & rsquo; réaltra. Go deimhin: ” Les astronomes en sont arrivés à un taux de matière baryonique d’environ 4 % de la densité critique. nó, míniú a thabhairt ar an geoiméadracht cothrom na & rsquo; Cruinne, la matière totale de l’Univers doit représenter 30 % de la densité critique (an 70 % restants étant de l’fuinneamh dorcha). Il manque donc 26 % de la densité critique sous forme de matière non baryonique ; c & rsquo; is é sin le rá arb éard & rsquo; cáithníní eile a baróin. ” (19) Il y aurait donc eu expulsion de matière sous forme d’amas. Ce qui confirmerait ma théorie sur la création de notre univers suite à un impact entre deux hyper-masses noires. Ní féidir linn a fheiceáil go bhfuil cuid de na & rsquo; Cruinne i gcás s & rsquo ábhar; chóimeálann le d & rsquo ábhar, mór Bang eile. Ós rud é muid ag Don & rsquo; deara go bhfuil an chuid lonrúil an & rsquo; Cruinne. Agus ní féidir linn idirdhealú a dhéanamh ar an deannaigh an Bang mór eile Super dorcha Hyper-mhais trasnú ár gcuid den & rsquo; s cruinne agus & rsquo; assemble i mbraislí le cosán, réaltaí dorcha agus Hyper-mhais. Agus ní féidir linn a fheiceáil i bhfad go leor chun na réaltraí eile arna gcruthú leis d & rsquo; ollphléasc eile leis an & rsquo; lasmuigh dár Cruinne. Ós rud é nach féidir linn a fheiceáil fiú na teorainneacha ar ár Cruinne féin ó d & rsquo; Bang mór. Ba mhaith linn a fheiceáil i ndáiríre go & rsquo; thart 1:10²³ ar ár Cruinne. do chruthúnas, l & rsquo; & breathnóireacht rsquo; réad le feiceáil níos sine ná ár Cruinne ag Hubble, mar a bhí an cás le haghaidh réaltraí Abell 1835 IR1916 nó réaltra déanta ach billiún & rsquo; bliain i ndiaidh an Bang mór, HUDF-JD2, cad is cosúil sé dodhéanta i cibé tréimhse ama gearr; ina theannta sin go mbeadh sé ró-ollmhór le s & rsquo; a bhunú chomh luath, ndiaidh an Bang mór. Mar sin, bheadh a bheith ann réaltraí nach as an t-ábhar Bang mór ar ár Cruinne. C & rsquo; tá dhá chás fós le deimhniú. Hyperion An fionnachtain an mhais mór de réaltra & rsquo; Hyperion, an 17 Deireadh Fómhair 2018 seo caite, mar thoradh ar an mbealach chun sraith fionnachtana ag deimhniú an láthair & rsquo; braislí níos iomadúla agus ollmhór i lár ár n-Cruinne. D'fhéadfadh sé seo mar thoradh ar an teacht ar & rsquo; dubh Hyper-mhais i lár ár n-Cruinne. Crunch BIG Tá sé n & rsquo; níl rud ar bith a chuireann ar chumas chun a chreidiúint i géarchor mór más rud é go d'fhéadfadh ábhair ath-chéile; ach ní gá as an Bang d mór & rsquo; tionscnaimh. Ach ábhair ó gach domhan scaipthe. Ansin d & rsquo; imbhualadh nua idir mór dubh Hyper-mhais. O & rsquo; tá géarchor Mór san áit chéanna d & rsquo; gach áit a tháinig an Big Bang Glacann sé seo go & rsquo; bheadh sé fós fhoras Super Hyper san áit chéanna a mheallfadh ár Cruinne ag deireadh a leathnú. argóint : Deimhníonn Friedman cothromóid an bhfuil & rsquo; = L & rsquo leathnú & rsquo; Tá Cruinne ag luasghéarú, luasmhoillithe nó tairiseach. O & rsquo; tá luasmhoillithe ar & rsquo; leathnú ionas go mbeidh tú go & rsquo; tá dubh Hyper-mhais mór a mheallann ár Cruinne chun stop a leathnú tar éis an & rsquo; pléascadh de & rsquo; Cruinne. Faoi dheireadh athrú ar an ghluaiseacht na braislí in aice leis an mór dubh Hyper-mais agus iad a tharraingt isteach i géarchor Mór. Más rud é c & rsquo; Is é an cás mhaith linn a bheith sa chuid den carn in aice leis an mór dubh Hyper-mhais; in ionad an chuid is faide a bheidh s & rsquo; éalú as a mhealladh. O & rsquo; tá luasghéarú an & rsquo; leathnú, ciallaíonn sé go bhfuil muid in an chuid ar ár Cruinne go atá & rsquo; chrua rsquo go &; mhealladh an mór dubh Hyper-mhais. Agus má tá an & rsquo; Tá leathnú leanúnach, ciallaíonn sé seo go raibh an mais dubh Super-Hyper smidiríní go hiomlán i pléascadh Hyper-núicléach. DARK ENERGY “I 1998, Dá fhoireann & rsquo; réalteolaithe, an Tionscadal Cosmology Ollnóva agus Ard-Z fhoireann cuardaigh supernovae faoi seach faoi stiúir Saul Perlmutter agus Brian P. Schmidt, sont parvenues au résultat inattendu que l’expansion de l’Univers semblait s’accélérer.”(13) Rud a chiallaíonn dá bhrí sin & rsquo; tá sé go maith dubh Hyper-mhais a bhí ag ár chuid d & rsquo; s domhan & rsquo; s go crua chun a mhealladh; ce que l’on a appelé à tort “l’énergie sombre”, nó “énergie noire” qui représenterait 68,3% ár n-cruinne, in aghaidh 26,8% le haghaidh ábhar dorcha agus 4,9% a ábhar(14). Tá sé n & rsquo; dá bhrí sin ní Cruinne statach mar gur chreid Einstein, nó luasmhoillithe mar gur chreid Friedman. Ach d'fhéadfadh rud ar a dtugtar fuinneamh dorcha go bhfuil an mhais iomlán an fad n & rsquo; Ní mheastar mais dubh agus ábhar. Lena n-áirítear ní amháin ar an talamh Super Hyper ach, an quasar, srl. Bheadh sé seo míniú a thabhairt ar an dlús íseal an & rsquo; fhuinnimh dorcha má tá sé il-phost. Mar sin, go & rsquo; Is Hyper-mhais dorcha Super le dlús bhfad níos airde ná d & rsquo; mais dubh agus achar anaithnid. Go deimhin leis an & rsquo; bheadh fuinneamh dorcha an & rsquo; Hyper-mhais suite i gcroílár ár Cruinne. Toisc go bhfuil an mais dubh i lár na réaltraí. an tuarascáil 68,3, 26,8 agus 4,9% ábhair agus ábhair dubha chomh maith leis an & rsquo; tionchair; Ba chóir go aois ar ár Cruinne ar ár gcumas chun mais na mór dubh Hyper-mhais i imbhualadh bunaidh ar ár Cruinne agus an luas agus neart & rsquo. Emplacement TÚ BIG Bang I gcás an suíomh ár bunaidh Super Hyper-mhais, Ba chóir go dtarlódh d & rsquo a ríomh; tionscnaimh ina bhfuil ár Cruinne agus ansin a bhrath dtonnta (cosúil le maiseanna dubh) d'fhéadfaí a eisiúint an áit a dhaingniú ar an & rsquo; ann. Ón an trajectory na & rsquo; leathnú ba chóir go mbeadh éasca a fháil ar an bpointe & rsquo; bunús an Big Bang, agus dá bhrí sin, Super bunaidh dubh Hyper-mhais. Ach ag brath ar a fhad d'fhéadfadh sé seo a bheith beag bídeach agus a cailleadh sa & rsquo; tonnta ar fad ó universes eile. Miotas OF & rsquo; ORIGIN AN BIG Bang Gá é a rá, más rud é an tionscnaimh Bang mór & rsquo; imbhualadh idir dhá mhais dubh Super Hyper, an miotas an & rsquo; bunús an Big Bang ó d & rsquo; ceann níos lú a & mais rsquo; is adamh hipitéisí níos outlandish fíoraithe agus boinn tuisceana infhíoraithe. Ós rud é an chuid den & rsquo; tá Cruinne infheicthe infinitesimal, nár chuí a tharraingt ar aon chonclúid hasty ar an méid de na Bang d mór & rsquo; tionscnaimh. PHANTOM POWER Mar braislí s & rsquo; ar shiúl ó lár na mór dubh Hyper-mhais, suite au Bang mór. L & rsquo; braislí de chroí-s dubh & rsquo a mhealladh; crapadh. Is é an croí dubh, dá bhrí sin a tharraingt siar é féin. Míníonn sé seo an & rsquo; méadú mar a dlús chroí go bhfuil ár Cruinne ejected amach as a ionad. argóint: Tá fuaraithe ar an & rsquo; Cruinne mar a thógann ár n-Cruinne an & rsquo; leathnú. RIP BIG Croílár an comhdhlúthú an mór dubh Hyper-mais agus ar an bhfíric go bhfuil & rsquo; s ag cur & rsquo; a choimeád ar bun ag leathnú réaltraí a mhéid, teacht ar an teoiric sracadh mór neamhbhailí. A mhalairt ar fad, l & rsquo; braislí iargúltacht Ba chóir, a mhalairt ar fad, réaltraí densify, Is breá, Clár ábhair, móilíní, srl. Ach toisc go bhfuil réaltraí pléascanna tar éis imbhualadh, tá sé deacair chun an dá fhórsa os coinne a thomhas. Na fórsaí na & rsquo; d & rsquo díbirt; mhealladh go s & rsquo; ceal i bpáirt, ach is féidir a mhíniú ar an & rsquo; pléascadh ag gluaiseacht go mall ar na réaltraí go bhreathnú againn. RAYS Cosmaí L & rsquo; d & rsquo ann; d'fhéadfadh ollphléasc eile sa Cruinne taobh amuigh linne míniú a thabhairt ar an láthair ghathanna Cosmaí. “luchtaithe den chuid is mó prótóin (88%), núicléas’héiliam (9%), an chuid eile comhdhéanta de’leictreoin, difriúil nucleons (núicléis & rsquo; adaimh) chomh maith le méideanna rian de’antimatter solas (antiprotons agus positrons). Tá an chuid neodrach déanta é féin suas ar gáma chomh maith le neutrinos.”(8) Bheadh sé suimiúil a ghabhann leis an muirear a bheadh ann imoibriú Super núicléach idir dhá mhór dubh Hyper-mhais a chur i gcomparáid. argóint: comhdhéanamh ghathanna Cosmaí strangely cosúil leis sin de cores (87% prótón)(9) seachas é a & rsquo; leis sin de na réaltaí, cosúil leis an ghrian, a scaoileann den chuid is mó fótón agus neutrinos. (10) Agus “les particules les plus énergétiques proviennent de l’espace interstellaire et intergalactique. (…) I 2017 an chéad deimhnithe de & rsquo; thionscnamh geografach ar radaíocht ardfhuinnimh tugtha ag foilsiú an toradh 12 bliana tomhais a rinneadh ó 2004 go & rsquo; Pierre Auger Réadlann i Malargüe san Airgintín3 : tá an radaíocht extragalactic soiléir, venant de galaxies situées dans une partie de l’espace située au-delà des confins de la Voie Lactée.” (11) easpónantúil FAIRSINGITHE 1- L & rsquo; leathnú as cuimse ar & rsquo; Cruinne, é féin fós le deimhniú, Is féidir a bhaint as an ghabháil gha dearg mar gheall ar dul in aois na réaltaí a breathnaíodh nó an & rsquo; réaltra leathnú féin. 2- An bhfuil an ga an fad idir muid féin agus réaltra eile, ó thaobh & rsquo; bunús an Big Bang a ardaíonn? Ou Bien, An bhfuil an t-achar idir muid féin agus réaltra tar éis an cosán céanna i gcoibhneas leis an Bang mór ag méadú? Hyper-GALAXY mar an gcéanna, ár n-áit & rsquo; Ní breathnóireacht ar ár gcumas a fheiceáil gur féidir ár Cruinne bheith ann féin mar chuid de & rsquo; a …Hyper-réaltra ó d & rsquo; Bang mór idir dhá mhais dubh Hyper! Mar an & rsquo; tá Cruinne sofheicthe ach 2% ár n-cruinne, Beidh sé d & rsquo; tuairimí eile chun a fhoirm agus a bhunadh dhaingniú. Maoile L & rsquo; UNIVERSE An imbhualadh dhá dubh Hyper-MAISEANNA míniú a thabhairt ar an ardán ar ár Cruinne infheicthe; cosúil leis an cruth árasán na réaltraí tar éis an imbhualadh dhá maiseanna dubh. Bheadh sé seo míniú a thabhairt ar an easpa cuaire ar ár Cruinne. Ba mhaith leis an cuaire amháin a bheith ar cheann de na brainsí. Ach a thabhairt faoi deara go mbeadh sé a fheiceáil ar an & rsquo; d & rsquo chéile; achar mór agus ag féachaint sa treo ceart. Céatadán den MASS DUBH Notre univers étant plus “jeune” que d’autres univers a une proportion de masse noire moindre; sraith a un Mór Bang; sin & rsquo; bheadh Cruinne d'aois den chuid is mó maiseanna dubh nó & rsquo; maiseanna Hyper-black. Níl ach Tuairimí as ár Cruinne, ní le haghaidh anois, ba mhaith linn a dheimhniú. MAISEANNA DUST DUBH Mar chuid is mó de na & rsquo; bheadh Cruinne comhdhéanta de go leor maiseanna níos dubh colliding mar d & rsquo mhais iomlán; réaltaí, go mbeadh sé cóir a rá go bhfuil muid ag déanta de maiseanna dubh deannaigh; níos mó ná deannaigh… d & rsquo; réaltaí. Yves Marineau, Sociologist scríofa ó 2 mars 2018 an 20 Deireadh Fómhair 2018 ó & rsquo; Smaointe germinated sna blianta roimhe. Ar an gcoinníoll aon atáirgeadh go bhfuil an fhoinse : http://yvesmarineau.com/blog/2018/10/20/origine-des-galaxies-et-de-lunivers/ leathanach fonóta : (1) Is fearr liom a bhaint as an téarma in áit poll dubh dubh mais. Cé & rsquo; Is cosúil mais dubh a bheith ina poll nó s & rsquo; engulfs an solas; tá sé & rsquo; go deimhin i ndáiríre d & rsquo; mais a mheallann gach ábhar agus solas a théann in aice láimhe. chomh maith a sheachaint tuairimíocht eccentric go den sórt sin ar mian leo sin & rsquo; tá poll dubh spás am le haghaidh taistil am. Chomh maith as taisteal chun báis áirithe, sé n & rsquo; níl aon chead taistil am eile! (2) Mar an miotas an bandia Hera, lena n-áirítear go mbeadh a scaird bainne cíche a chruthaigh an Bealach na Bó Finne! (3) Foinse: Vicipéid. Is beag an baol go & rsquo; tionchar a bheith go díreach i lár an dá maiseanna dorcha. ár uillinn, fheictear ón Domhan nó fiú d & rsquo; cheadaíonn shatailít riamh dúinn a fheiceáil d & rsquo réaltra; uillinn díreach ingearach le d & rsquo; féach an fhoirm cruinn. Is dócha go bhfuil gach réaltraí cruth éilipseacha ach le éilips idir & rsquo; éilips leis an gciorcal ach íon, le meán níos gaire don ciorcal íon de & rsquo; éilips. (Tabhair faoi deara go bhfuil na foirmeacha breá íon – ciorcal, cearnach, triantán, éilips, srl. – n’existent pas dans la nature et sont une création purement imaginaire de l’humain). (4) Voir l’étude avec une hypothèse erronée paru dans “Réalteolaíocht agus Réaltfhisic” (5) Tá go leor d & rsquo; eile miotais Réaltfhisic den chineál céanna a disassemble; cosúil le taisteal am, universes comhthreomhar, fadhb ar Maoile nó cuaire an & rsquo; Cruinne, dífhoirmiúchán an & rsquo; spás agus am faoi mhais, srl. (6) Foinse: Vicipéid. (7) Slí amháin nó slí matamaitice ar eolaíocht tautological sin & rsquo; a n-dearbhuithe féin a dhaingniú. (8) Foinse: Vicipéid. (9) Foinse: “Introductory Nuclear, Atomic and Molecular Physics”, PHYS -H-405, Múinteoirí: M. Godefroid agus N. Pauly. (10) TREOIR DON CAIRT NÚICLÉACH SCIENCE WALL, caibidil 10 (11) Foinse: Vicipéid (12) Foinse: NASA video Youtube (13) Foinse: Vicipéid (14) Foinse : Vicipéid (15) ar a dtugtar freisin: dúpholl (16) Tá an t-eolas bailí ar an gcoinníoll nach bhfuil an cáithnín thomhas shraonadh ag na réaltaí atá ar a mbealach. (17) Foinse : Vicipéid (18) Foinse: Vicipéid (19) Foinse: Vicipéid