http___www.politicalarticles.net_blog_ga_2011_01_27_a-precis-and-a-preview-about-the-nuclear-fool-cycle__1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 8.2 9.1 9.2 10.1 10.2 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 18.1 19.1 19.2 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 22.1 22.2 22.3 23.1 23.2 23.3 24.1 24.2 24.3 25.1 25.2 26.1 26.2 27.1
Anyone Convinced that Depleted Uranium Is Safe Should Read This What follows summarizes one article, already produced, and synopsizes another narrative, forthcoming in a few days. The rationale for giving folks a summary and a preview is twofold. In the first place, these are extremely complicated issues, a full understanding of which inevitably involves digging pretty deeply into background, technical data, and divergent perspectives about the evidence and how to analyze it. Under such circumstance, many people prefer to know ‘the skinny’ or ‘executive summary’ and leave the heavy-lifting for nerds and policy wonks. In the second place, even if someone shoulders the responsibility to plow through the intricacies of such problems, she might not have time right now. He might markedly prefer to receive a briefing, with appropriate coordinates to find the more complete account, so as to be able to have a sense of context going in, choosing the moment to try to take in the bigger picture, as it were. In any case, here readers see a short queue. The first place tells of a piece posted a couple of weeks ago. The second stop proffers the essence of an upcoming installment. A RECAP In the initial article of this partnered pair, the narrative introduced the fiery clash that has occurred over the impacts of Depleted Uranium munitions. Given such deep-seated differences of opinion, a widespread, grassroots dialog and policy consideration might serve purposes both scientific and political. An increase in knowledge almost always attends such processes; popular decision-making is impossible without the necessary understanding and nexus of participation. A contextualization of DU followed, in which the general historical omnipresence of class oppression and imperial-industrial growth arguably went hand-in-hand. What Jeremiah Wright called a ‘theology of liberation’ has acted as a counterpoise to this central tendency of domination by propertied elites. Taking DU as a plausible expression of both ruling-class self-interest and imperial hegemony, last week’s text focused on a particular effort of the Manhattan Project’s S-I Uranium Committee. A subcommittee of that body, so vital to the success of the race for atomic weapons, examined with some care the question of creating lethal instruments from fission, creating ‘dirty bombs’ out of waste and by-products of the inherent work of trying to construct an atomic explosive. The likely formulation of such deadly machines would have been as poison gas bombs of some sort. From this demonstrable fact, various opponents of contemporary DU weaponry have concluded that this ‘Groves-Memorandum’ acted as the inception of the United States’ pathway toward the present deployment of DU as a devastating component of bullets and cannon shells and bombs of various sizes. Stentorian and frequent and derisive critique of these arguments has emanated from the ranks of Health Physics experts and from former members of the military who dismiss any contention of significant dangers flowing from DU weapons. Such disputants hammer on the otherwise accurate summation that nowhere in either the summary memo or the original report’s easily available text do the authors–Conant, Compton, and Urey–make any mention of Uranium. Instead of engaging in a dialog about this interpretation, however, these voluble naysayers condemned the anti-DU proponents of this position as frauds and charlatans. In fact, quite the opposite is, reasonably, a much more legitimate conclusion. The horrific toxicity of Uranium is well-established. The USG inclination to develop weapons of indiscriminate effect, putting poison by-products to ‘productive’ use, is incontrovertible. Mass murder repeatedly happened at the behest of the U.S. Government, through the technology of fission weapons and their aftermath. Moreover, the USG approached these matters as opportunities for human experiment. As well, Leuren Moret, whose analysis led the way in linking DU with the Manhattan Project, offers testimony from Manhattan-Engineering District participants that scientists and bureaucrats involved with the S-1 subcommittee did in fact intend to include Uranium in the lethal stew that this small group was contemplating. In no obvious way do the supposed scholars so busily casting aspersions refute Moret’s directly pertinent rebuttal. Thus, any wholesale rejection of the notion that 1940′s experts imagined the possibility of weaponizing Uranium is at best one plausible assertion. In fact, such a view goes against both analytical and evidentiary elements of this case. However, rather than merely proposing that the DU decriers have clearly won this battle of wits, this humble correspondent proceeded to call for a Peoples Congress on this particular issue, and on the wider questions associated with the employment of DU ordnance and the insistence that a ‘renaissance’ of the Nuclear Fool Cycle is in the best interest, here or elsewhere, of citizens and soldiers and civilians. Without going into devilish details, THC does insist that such a community-led conversation may be the only way to achieve anything akin to justice or consensus on DU. The present pages provide further background useful to the creation of such a forum. The nature of this explication is the articulation, development, and defense of a thesis that might account for the attendant facts of DU and the dogfights which it has engendered. A BRIEF PREFACE In the first portion of this duo, readers may easily have gained adequate background to begin to speak, ask questions about, and generally learn more regarding the origins of ‘atomic energy,’ which, of course, started out exclusively as a modality for creating ‘gadgets’ that killed tens of thousands in one fell swoop. The data and background that these articles and the many other resources about DU provide permit at least a general discussion of the nuclear genie to move forward. The present narrative installment seeks to accomplish one basic task, which is to proffer a hypothesis as to why such a toxic metal, in the context of ongoing doubts and fears about its safety, would end up the default choice of the USG and its military branches. This premise is fairly easy to state. Something like the following would fit the bill necessary to develop the argument here. ‘The development of nuclear weaponry, and all the attendant events and processes related to them–such as the so-called Nuclear Fuel Cycle of the both weapons and power based on fission or fusion; such as the problem of atomic wastes and such opportunistic ‘solutions’ to that problem as the manufacture and use of DU ordnance; such as the policy choices to pursue a ‘Nuclear Renaissance;’ and so forth–not only emanate from and serve both the dominance of capitalism, but they also represent the primary, and some would say the only, focus or methodology that financial Plutocrats, who have come to predominate the entire system, will accept to resolve capitalism’s inherent and ever-recurring crises.‘ Readers should note that this leaves aside all judgments about the viability of these glowing, radioactive choices. It completely ignores the opinions, more or less informed, that the Fuel-Cycle is in fact a ‘Fool-Cycle’ that guarantees human mayhem, dissolution, and decline as the best possible outcome. Of course, such beliefs are typical of this humble correspondent and many wiser than he. However, the point of the forthcoming investigation and analysis, which these paragraphs merely summarized, is to explore the rationality of the thesis. Does capital necessitate a nuclear highway? That would be the preliminary conclusion of THC, and the pages-to-come are the initial presentation of a proof about that. This first pass, though, will not attempt a complete telling of the tale of the hypothesis-in-action, but instead will circumscribe the assessment by tending to revolve an examination of DU in the process. In part, this is the result of the alleged, and quite plausible, social damage that has accompanied the political and economic underpinnings of DU’s deployment. In part, the emphasis on DU follows from the way that this unfolding catastrophe–or, if one prefers, highly charged controversy–sheds so much light on how capital created this situation and how its manifestation illustrates the chief proposition itself. The choice here, to make a radical excision in order to present an overview of multifaceted difficulties, may or may not end up making the other materials more digestible. But the idea seemed a worthy experiment, in the same sense that long reports and other texts often begin with such brief statements of the case. Besides, my wife be me that this would be a good idea. I couldn’t resist the wager. Popularity: 1% [?]
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 8.2 9.1 9.2 10.1 10.2 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 18.1 19.1 19.2 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 22.1 22.2 22.3 23.1 23.2 23.3 24.1 24.2 24.3 25.1 25.2 26.1 26.2 27.1 28.1 29.1
Más duine ar bith Ós deimhin go bhfuil ídithe Úráiniam Sábháilte Léigh seo Cad a leanas achoimre ar alt amháin, cheana féin a tháirgtear, agus synopsizes eile scéal, atá le teacht i gceann cúpla lá. Tá an réasúnaíocht a thabhairt folks achoimre agus réamhamharc ar dhá ghné. Sa chéad áit, is iad na ceisteanna seo thar a bheith casta, tuiscint iomlán a bhaineann dosheachanta digging deas go domhain isteach sa chúlra, sonraí teicniúla, agus peirspictíochtaí éagsúla mar gheall ar an fhianaise agus conas anailís a dhéanamh air. Faoi imthosca den sórt sin, is fearr a lán daoine go mbeadh a fhios 'an skinny' nó 'achoimre feidhmiúcháin' agus an trom-ardaithe saoire do nerds agus Wonks polasaí. Sa dara áit, fiú má tá duine éigin an fhreagracht shoulders a plow tríd an intricacies fadhbanna den sórt sin, ní fhéadfadh sí a bheith am ceart anois. D'fhéadfadh sé go suntasach fearr a fháil faisnéise, leis na comhordanáidí cuí a aimsiú ar an cuntas níos iomláine, ionas go mbeidh siad in ann a bhfuil tuiscint ar chomhthéacs ag dul i, a roghnú faoi láthair chun iarracht a ghlacadh i an pictiúr níos mó, mar a bhí sé. In aon chás, féach anseo léitheoirí scuaine gearr. Insíonn an chéad áit de phíosa phost cúpla seachtain ó shin. Proffers an dara stad an croílár an tráthchuid le teacht. A recap I airteagal tosaigh an péire i gcomhpháirtíocht, thug an scéal an Clash fiery a tharla thar na tionchair muinisean Úráiniam Laghdaithe. Mar gheall ar sin doimhin-suí difríochtaí den tuairim, d'fhéadfadh go forleathan, Grassroots dialóg agus breithniú polasaí freastal ar an dá críocha eolaíocha agus polaitiúla. Méadú ar eolas ag freastal ar beagnach i gcónaí próisis den sórt sin; is coitianta cinnteoireachta dodhéanta gan an tuiscint is gá agus nasc na rannpháirtíochta. A contextualization de DU dhiaidh sin, a chuaigh an uileláithreacht ginearálta stairiúil ranga fás cos ar bolg agus impiriúil-tionsclaíoch fhéadfaí a rá lámh ar láimh. Cad a dtugtar Jeremiah Wright bhfuil 'diagacht na saoirse' ghníomhaigh mar counterpoise leis an claonadh atá lárnach de forlámhas ag Scothaicme propertied. Ag tabhairt DU mar léiriú inchreidte an dá rialú-aicme féin-ús agus hegemony impiriúil, an tseachtain seo caite téacs dírithe ar iarracht ar leith de Choiste an Tionscadail Manhattan ar Úráiniam IR. A fochoiste de chuid an chomhlachta, agus mar sin ríthábhachtach do rath an rás d'airm adamhach, scrúdú le roinnt cúram ar an gceist a chruthú uirlisí marfach ó eamhnú, ag cruthú 'buamaí salach' as dramhaíl agus fotháirgí an obair bhunúsach ag iarraidh a thógáil ar pléascach adamhach. Ba mhaith leis an dóigh a cheapadh de mheaisíní deadly den sórt sin a bheith mar buamaí gás nimhe de chineál éigin. Ón deimhin inléirithe, tá opponents éagsúla armra DU comhaimseartha i gcrích go bhfuil an ghníomhaigh 'Groves-Mheabhrán' mar cuireadh tús leis na Stát Aontaithe 'conair i dtreo an t-imscaradh faoi láthair de DU mar chomhpháirt devastating de urchair agus sliogáin gunna agus buamaí de mhéideanna éagsúla . Stentorian agus léirmheas minic agus derisive de na hargóintí tá eascair ó na céimnigh na saineolaithe Fisic Sláinte agus ó iar-bhaill den míleata a bhriseadh as aon spairne i gcás aon chontúirtí suntasach ag sileadh ó airm DU. Den sórt sin disputants casúr ar an tsuimithe a mhalairt go cruinn go bhfuil áit ar bith i meamram ceachtar an achoimre nó an tuarascáil bhunaidh téacs ar fáil go héasca a dhéanamh ar an údair-Conant, Compton, agus Urey-a dhéanamh ar aon lua Úráiniam. In áit dul i mbun a dialóg faoi seo léirmhíniú, áfach, dhaoradh na lucht tuathail voluble an proponents frith-DU an staid mar calaois agus charlatans. Go deimhin, tá go leor a mhalairt, le réasún, a thabhairt i gcrích i bhfad níos mó dlisteanach. Is é an tocsaineacht horrific de Úráiniam-bunaithe go maith. Tá an claonadh usg a fhorbairt airm i bhfeidhm gan idirdhealú, a chur ar nimh fotháirgí a 'táirgiúil' a úsáid, is é incontrovertible. Dúnmharú Aifreann a tharla arís agus arís eile ar ordú de chuid an Rialtais Stáit Aontaithe, tríd an teicneolaíocht na n-arm agus a n-eamhnú ndiaidh. Thairis sin, chuaigh an usg na nithe seo mar dheiseanna le haghaidh turgnamh daonna. Chomh maith, cuireann Leuren Moret, a bhfuil anailís ar thús cadhnaíochta i nascadh DU leis an Tionscadal Manhattan, fianaise ó Manhattan-Innealtóireachta rannpháirtithe Dúiche go raibh eolaithe agus Maorlathaigh i gceist leis an fochoiste S-1 i ndáiríre i gceist a chur san áireamh Úráiniam sa stew marfach go an grúpa beag a bhí ag smaoineamh. Ar aon bhealach soiléir dhéanann na scoláirí ceaptha mar sin réitigh busily aspersions bhréagnú fhrisnéis díreach ábhartha Moret ar. Dá bhrí sin, aon diúltú mórdhíola ar an nóisean go shamhlú saineolaithe 1940 ar an bhféidearthacht Úráiniam weaponizing ag fearr amháin dearbhú sochreidte. Go deimhin, téann den sórt sin d'fhonn i gcoinne an dá ghné anailíse agus fianaise an cháis seo. Mar sin féin, seachas ach ag moladh go bhfuil an decriers DU bhuaigh go soiléir an cath ar wits, imeachtaí a thionscnamh seo comhfhreagraí humble chun glaoch le haghaidh Comhdháil Peoples ar an gceist seo, go háirithe, agus ar na ceisteanna níos leithne a bhaineann le fostaíocht DU ordanáis agus an insistence go 'athbheochan' na Sraithe amadán Núicléach Is é an leas is fearr, anseo nó in áit eile, na saoránach agus na saighdiúirí agus sibhialtaigh. Gan dul isteach sonraí devilish, ní MHC seasann gur féidir a leithéid de comhrá pobal-threoraithe a bheith ar an t-aon bhealach a bhaint amach aon rud cosúil le ceartas nó comhaontú a fháil ar DU. Soláthraíonn na leathanaigh seo faoi láthair cúlra eile is fóinteach a chruthú fóram den sórt sin. Is é an cineál seo explication an chur in iúl, a fhorbairt, agus cosaint ar thráchtas a d'fhéadfadh cuntas a thabhairt ar na fíorais a ghabhann DU agus an dogfights a engendered sé. A RÉAMHRÁ GHEARR Sa chuid seo den chéad duo, féadfaidh léitheoirí a bhfuil clú agus go héasca cúlra leordhóthanach chun tús a labhairt, ceisteanna a chur faoi, agus go ginearálta níos mó a fhoghlaim maidir le bunús 'fuinneamh adamhach,' a bhí, ar ndóigh, a thosaigh amach go heisiach mar mhodh a chruthú 'gadgets' gur maraíodh na mílte i gceann thit swoop. Na sonraí agus cúlra go bhfuil na hearraí agus na hacmhainní go leor eile mar gheall ar DU a chur ar fáil a cheadú ar a laghad plé ginearálta ar an genie núicléach chun dul ar aghaidh. Féachann an tráthchuid scéal faoi láthair a chur i gcrích tasc amháin bunúsach, is é sin proffer le hipitéis maidir le cén fáth den sórt sin le miotail tocsaineach, i gcomhthéacs an amhras agus imní leanúnach maidir lena sábháilteacht, a bheadh suas go deireadh an rogha réamhshocraithe an usg agus a chuid brainsí míleata . Is é seo an mbonn go cothrom éasca a rá. Mbeadh rud éigin cosúil leis an méid seo a leanas d'oirfeadh an bille is gá a fhorbairt ar an argóint anseo. 'Tá forbairt armra núicléach, agus na himeachtaí agus na próisis a bhaineann le freastalaí iad-nós tSraith mar a thugtar air Breosla núicléach na n-arm agus cumhacht dá bunaithe ar eamhnú nó comhleá; mar shampla an fhadhb na dramhaíola adamhach agus faille sin' réitigh 'leis an fhadhb mar a mhonarú agus a úsáid DU ordanáis; ar nós na roghanna beartais a shaothrú ar' Renaissance Núicléach; 'agus mar sin de, ní hamháin-eascróidh as an dá an ceannas agus de capitalism freastal, ach léiríonn siad freisin na bunscoile, agus go mbeadh roinnt rá an t-aon, fócas nó go mbeidh modheolaíocht Plutocrats airgeadais, a tháinig chun tosaigh leis an gcóras ar fad, glacadh a réiteach capitalism le géarchéimeanna inghreamaithe agus ar riamh-athfhillteacha. ' Ba chóir do léitheoirí faoi deara go bhfágann seo ar leataobh ar fad breithiúnais faoi inmharthanacht na, roghanna glowing radaighníomhach. Neamhaird sé go hiomlán na tuairimí, níos mó nó níos lú an eolas, go bhfuil an t-Breosla Rothaíochta i ndáiríre 'amadán-tSraith' go ráthaíonn phortaigh agus daonna, díscaoileadh, agus meath mar an toradh is fearr is féidir. Ar ndóigh, tá tuairimí den sórt sin is gnách ar an comhfhreagraí humble agus wiser go leor ná sé. Mar sin féin, is é an pointe an imscrúdaithe atá le teacht agus a anailísiú, ina bhfuil na míreanna achoimre ach, chun féachaint ar an réasúntacht an tráchtais. An bhfuil gá le caipiteal mhórbhealaigh núicléach? Bheadh sin i gcrích réamh MHC, agus an leathanaigh le teacht go bhfuil an cur i láthair tosaigh de chruthúnas faoi sin. Seo an chéad pas, cé nach mbeidh, iarracht a insint iomlán ar an scéal an hipitéis-i-ngníomh, ach beidh circumscribe an measúnú trí ionad a raghadh chun revolve scrúdú DU sa phróiseas. Go páirteach, is é seo an toradh ar an damáiste, líomhnaithe, agus go leor sochreidte sóisialta go bhfuil ag gabháil leis an underpinnings polaitiúil agus eacnamaíoch an imscartha ar DU. Sa chuid seo a leanas, an bhéim ar DU as an mbealach seo go unfolding tubaiste-nó, más fearr amháin, an-mhuirear chonspóid sheds-éadrom an oiread sin ar an gcaoi a cruthaíodh caipitil ar an staid seo agus an chaoi a léiríonn a léiriú ar an tairiscint príomhfheidhmeannach féin. An rogha anseo, a dhéanamh excision radacach d'fhonn a chur i láthair forbhreathnú ar na deacrachtaí a multifaceted, b'fhéidir nach féidir nó suas go deireadh a dhéanamh ar na hábhair eile níos mó digestible. Ach bhí cuma an smaoineamh ar thurgnamh fiú, an bhrí chéanna a bhfuil tús tuairiscí fada agus téacsanna eile go minic le ráitis gearr den sórt sin an cháis. Thairis sin, go mbeadh mo bhean liom go mbeadh sé seo a bheith ag smaoineamh maith. Ní raibh mé in ann seasamh in aghaidh an wager. Éileamh: 1% [ ? ] Poist Similar - None Aimsíodh