http___fractalenlightenment.com_7895_sustainability_sustainability-for-a-futurist-archaeology.xml
http___fractalenlightenment.com_hr_7895_sustainability_sustainability-for-a-futurist-archaeology_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 18.1 18.2 19.1 19.2 19.3 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.2 23.1 23.2 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 26.2 27.1 28.1 30.1 30.2 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 34.1 34.2 34.3 36.1 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 38.5 40.1 40.2 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 42.5 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 44.5 44.6 44.7 44.8 44.9
Sustainability for a Futurist : Archaeology Here’s another dose of enlightenment from our comrade Aliston, he takes us through the origins of man, laughs at evolution and puts forth some interesting theories. This is a follow up on his previous post on Health. There have been many unexplainable artifacts that have been found at sites all around the world but are dumped in basements and not acknowledged because they don’t fit in with every leading, and obviously concerned, scientists current way of thinking. This authoritarian system of “peer review” be it in archeology, paleontology, biology or any other department is an effective way of keeping independent thinkers out of the public information loop. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that Darwin’s “Swiss cheese” evolution theory is going to become very stupid to the public understanding even though they still brainwash us with his survival agenda. Author Lloyd Pye in his book Human Origins demonstrates the huge difference between primates and humans. Genes: A popular statistic to back up evolution is that human DNA shares 99% of its code with chimpanzees and 98% with gorillas. Human DNA has 3 billion base pairs, 1% of which is 30 million base pairs. One base pair is enough to cause a significant difference in the species, 30 million means its highly unlikely that we ever evolved in a few ‘million gene swap’ leaps naturally from primates. Humans suffer from 4000 genetic disorders compared to a few that affect primates, many of which are fatal, so did we evolve to a ‘higher & improved’ species. We also lost two chromosomes to become 46 from the 48 chromosomes of primates. Nature cannot make so much DNA just disappear. Primates are 5-10 times stronger than humans, even the smallest monkeys. How did we become so puny and weak in our evolutionary improvement process. The list goes on: - Bones: Lighter and more porous than any primate - Skin: Not adapted to the solar intensity on this planet unless melanin(the dark pigment) is increased which has only been achieved by the Negro and Aboriginal races. - Body Hair: Primates have a complete pelt of body hair with a thicker coat on the back so they have no problems with skin exposure to solar radiation. Humans have completely switched our body hair pattern to almost that of pigs and the thickest area has moved from the back to the front. - Fat: Humans have 10 times more fat cells on the underside of their skin compared to primates. This makes healing of injuries much slower. - Head Hair & FingernToe Nails: All primates have head hair that grows to a certain length and stops. Humans have continuously growing hair throughout their lifespan. The same goes for finger and toe nails. - Skull: The human skull is hardly comparable to any primate skull. Even attempts are foolish & useless. - Brains: The human brain is more radical but not necessarily better than primates. Primate brains work extremely well for what they have to do. - Locomotion: Humans are bipedal, primates are quadrupeds. Enough said. - Throats: Human throats are completely redesigned compared to primates. The larynx has dropped much lower so that humans can break typical primate sounds by modulation which makes speech and language possible. - Sex: Primate females have oestrus cycles and are receptive to sex only at certain times of the year. Bonobos and human females are continuously receptive to sex. Apart from this, the entire time-line we have been given for evolution may be in fact wrong. A book called Evolution Cruncher by PBS TV networks is the latest, most in-depth examination of evolution for those interested in going deeper. Additionally, Earth’s Forbidden Secrets by Maxwell Igan catalogs archaeological and historical evidence not explainable & accepted by academia. The most hard hitting evidence comes from DNA research. First, the chance that long chains of amino acids assembled the full protein with a few lightning strikes in a pre-biotic soup left to stew for billions of years is very unlikely no matter how nutritious the pre-biotic soup was. The probability is calculated by geneticists to be one followed by 240 zeros. To give some form of benchmark all the atoms in the universe are calculated to be 1 followed by 80 zeros. How much less likely is it that the cells, tissues, membranes, organs or all the other complex biological life with their functional mechanisms formed fully from nowhere through continuous lightning, strikes in some primordial soup after some millions of chance collisions of molecules. Sounds as lame as anything I’ve ever heard, but they still teach us this like its a fact. Francis Crick, the co discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA said that “the odds against such instant life are astronomical – more unlikely than assembling a Boeing 707 from a hurricane junkyard.” Moreover, when DNA replicates it uses the same 20 amino acids to produce proteins in all organisms, from the simplest to the most complex. The choice of this language of 20 amino acids is so universal that it may go back to the beginning of all living things. The scientific establishment states that 1-3% of DNA’s function is for protein synthesis and the rest 97% is junk. It has also been demonstrated that this junk DNA follows the same pattern that we have in language. Zipf’s law states that the rank and frequency of the words of all languages follow a pattern that can be plotted on a graph with a slope of -I. This means that there is a whole language of life yet to be deciphered by us within our own DNA. DNA then, is an electromagnetic receiver and transmitter of information. Hypnotists, medicine men and shamans have been claiming for thousands of years of their ability to be taught information by what they call ‘spirit helpers’ when in a trance. Information that they never imagined of before but were able to easily access when in a trance state. Whatever be the case, with our technology today we still cannot build any of the gigantic structures that dot important leylines around the world like Baal-beck, Easter island etc. So its reasonable to assume they used some other far more advanced technology that is most likely within, rather than external to, us. Show Us Some Love & Spread the Light: 8 Comments Why is it people that never took an Evolution class somehow know Evolution enough to prove it false? The owner of this site first off knows nothing about the DNA evidence nor the Evolutionary timeline which he depicted as wrong. This article is dishonest. “Lying for Jesus” does not prove your case. You act as if your readers are too stupid to go and cross reference your claims…. sadly, that is probably the case. Your image of “Darwin’s theory of evolution” does not correctly depict the theory at all, and you know this. This is why people look like idiots when they claim evolution says we evolved from monkeys. It’s because of dishonest people like this author. Crap Peer-review is a very reasonable process by which colleagues judge whether the claims a researcher is proposing are sound and free of errors. It is not used as ” an effective way of keeping independent thinkers out of the public information loop.” It is the best way to fight false information that could be damaging to the progression of a field of study. The only reason to be scared of peer-review is when you are talking out of your butt with no actual research or knowledge to support your ideas, for example the writer of this article. Making wild claims in disagreement with something you don’t fully understand in the first place would be a good example of information that is damaging to the progression of science. This is a terrible piece of work: poorly written, unresearched, misleading, out of context bits of information thrown together to prove some point which, in itself, is not clearly stated. Brush up on your science please. Hi All, I’m not a scientist and have progressed a lot from those views if you bothered looking at the date it was written and yes I was young and naive then. I’m still for the scientific method but do not give much value to credentials. I’d appreciate if you could provide links that contradict the article so people reading your comments can be more informed than being forced to throat your word bashing. In the mean time check out Gobekkli Tepe and the Nubian Pyramids and help us come to terms with that. Fing one way street legacy thinking wkers….;} Act like ya know, why don’t ya’ll. Could there be infinite stories telling tales of one same, great truth of the matter? Is there only one way to see or say it? Does the one who knows something, know that they know nothing at all? On and On. Go on, tell me what it really is, gimme another bite of the apple and let’s Know it your way too. Maybe eventually we will have pieced the Whole picture, and find out we were all right, yet not one of us quite had the truth of the matter totally pegged in its entirety… blah blah the lovely sound of my own blah-blabbing. Thanks for the post, and thanks for not acting like you know, Aliston. I love watching our lovely mind bend over various possibilities.
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 18.1 18.2 19.1 19.2 19.3 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.2 23.1 23.2 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 26.2 27.1
Održivost za futuristički : Arheologija Evo još jedna doza prosvjetljenja iz naše drugarice Aliston, On nas vodi kroz podrijetlu čovjeka, smije na evoluciju i stavlja naprijed neke zanimljive teorije. To je pratiti na svom prethodnom postu na Zdravlje. Bilo je mnogo neobjašnjive artefakti koje su pronađene na mjestima diljem svijeta, ali su bačena u podrumima i nisu potvrđene, jer se ne uklapaju se u svaki vodeći, i očito zabrinuti, Znanstvenici trenutni način razmišljanja. Ovaj autoritarnog sustava "peer review" bilo u arheologiji, paleontologija, biologije ili bilo koji drugi odjel je učinkovit način vođenja nezavisne mislioce iz javnog informacijskog petlje. Međutim, to postaje sve jasnije da je Darwinova "Švicarski sir" teorija evolucije će postati vrlo glupo na javnom razumijevanja iako su nam još uvijek prali mozak sa svojim dnevnim redom opstanak. Autor Lloyd Pye u svojoj knjizi Human Origins pokazuje ogroman razlika između ljudi i primata. Geni: Popularni statistika za sigurnosno evoluciju je da se ljudska DNK dionice 99% njegovog koda s čimpanzama i 98% s gorilama. Ljudski DNA ima 3 milijarde baznih parova, 1% od čega je 30 milijuna baznih parova. Jedan par baza je dovoljno da uzrokuje značajnu razliku u vrstama, 30 milijuna znači njegov vrlo malo vjerojatno da ćemo ikada razvio u nekoliko 'milijuna gena swapa’ skokovi, naravno, od primata. Ljudi koji pate od 4000 genetske bolesti u odnosu na neke koji utječu primata, mnogi od kojih su fatalne, tako smo se razvije u 'viša & poboljšan’ vrsta. Također smo izgubili dva kromosoma postati 46 iz 48 kromosomi primata. Priroda se ne može napraviti toliko DNA samo nestati. Primati su 5-10 puta jači od ljudi, čak i najmanji majmuni. Kako smo postali toliko jadni i slabi naše evolucijske poboljšanje procesa. Popis ide dalje: - Kosti: Lakši i porozna od bilo primata - Koža: Ne prilagođen solarnom intenzitetom na ovoj planeti, osim melanin(tamni pigment) se povećao što samo je postignut od strane crnca i aboridžinske utrke. - Sušilo za tijelo: Primati imaju kompletan krzno dlačica s debljim dlake na leđima, tako da nema problema s izlaganjem kože sunčevom zračenju. Ljudi su u potpunosti uključen naše tijelo kose uzorak za gotovo da je svinja, a najdeblji područje je preselio s leđa na prednjoj. - Mast: Ljudi imaju 10 puta više masnih stanica na donjoj njihove kože u odnosu na primatima. To čini ozdravljenje ozljeda puno sporiji. - Voditelj kose & FingernToe Nokti: Svi su primati imali glavu kosu koja raste do određene dužine i zaustavljanja. Ljudi su kontinuirano raste kosa tijekom njihovog životnog vijeka. Isto vrijedi i za prst i nožni prst noktiju. - Lobanja: Ljudska lubanja je teško usporediti s bilo primata lubanje. Čak i pokušaji su glupo & beskoristan. - Mozak: Ljudski mozak je radikalniji, ali nije nužno bolje od primata. Primasa mozgovi rade iznimno dobro za ono što oni moraju učiniti. - Kretanje: Ljudi su dvopedalni, primati su četveronožaca. Dosta je rekao. - Grla: Ljudska grla potpuno redizajnirana u odnosu na primatima. Grkljana je pao mnogo niže, tako da bi ljudi mogli slomiti tipične primata zvukove modulacijom što čini govora i jezika moguće. - Seks: Primasa ženke imaju Oestrus cikluse i sluha za seks samo u određeno doba godine. Bonobo majmuna i ljudske ženke su kontinuirano osjetljiv na seks. Osim toga, Cijelo to vrijeme retka smo dobili za evoluciju može biti u stvari u krivu. Knjiga pod nazivom Evolution Cruncher strane PBS TV mreža je najnovija, najviše u dubini pregled evolucije za one koji su zainteresirani za odlazak dublje. Dodatno, Zemljini Forbidden Secrets Maxwell Igan katalozi arheološki i povijesni dokazi nisu objašnjive & prihvaćen od strane akademske zajednice. Većina teško udarajući dokaz dolazi iz DNA istraživanja. Prvi, vjerojatnost da dugih lanaca aminokiselina okupili puni proteina s nekoliko udara groma u pre-biološke juhe napustio pirjati milijardama godina je vrlo malo vjerojatno, bez obzira koliko je hranjiv pre-biotski juha je. Vjerojatnost se izračunava tako da se jedan genetike slijedi 240 nula. Da bi neki oblik mjerilo svih atoma u svemiru izračunavaju se 1 nakon čega slijedi 80 nula. Koliko je manje vjerojatno da stanice, tkiva, membrane, organa ili sve druge složen biološki život sa svojim funkcionalnim mehanizmima formirana u potpunosti iz ničega kroz kontinuiranu munje, štrajkovi u nekim primordijalne juhe nakon nekih milijunima slučajnih sudara molekula. Zvuči kao hromi kao ništa sam ikada čuo, ali su nam još uvijek uče to kao i njegov činjenicu. Francis Crick, ko otkrivač dvostruke spirale strukture DNA , rekao je da su "izgledi protiv takvog trenutak života su astronomske - više vjerojatno nego sastavljanje Boeing 707 iz uragan smetlištu.” Povrh toga, kada je DNK replicira se koristi ista 20 amino kiseline za proizvodnju proteina u svim organizmima, od najjednostavnijih do najsloženijih. Odabir tog jezika 20 aminokiseline toliko univerzalna da se vratite na početak svih živih bića. Znanstveni establišment navodi da 1-3% DNK je funkcija je za sintezu proteina i ostatak 97% je junk. Također se pokazalo da je to junk DNA slijedi isti uzorak koji imamo u jeziku. Zipf zakon navodi da je čin i učestalost riječi svih jezika slijede obrazac koji se može nacrtane na grafikonu s nagibom od-I. To znači da postoji čitav jedan jezik života tek treba odgonetnuti kod nas u našem vlastitom DNK. DNA potom, je elektromagnetsko prijemnik i odašiljač informacija. Hypnotists, medicina muškarci i šamani su tvrdeći tisućama godina njihove sposobnosti da se uči informacija onim što oni nazivaju 'duhovnim pomagačima’ kada je u transu. Informacije da oni nikad nisu slutili od prije, ali su bili u mogućnosti da lako pristupiti kada je u stanje transa. Što god se slučaj, s naše tehnologije danas još uvijek ne možemo graditi bilo koju od gigantskih struktura koja točka važna leylines diljem svijeta like Baal-beck, Otok Uskrs itd.. Tako je razumno pretpostaviti da koriste neki drugi daleko naprednije tehnologije koja je najvjerojatnije u roku, a ne izvan, nas. Hvala ti puno: