https___missionlocal.org_2019_10_with-election-day-in-sight-da-debates-clash-at-oft-testy-debate_.xml
http___galerija.sczg.hr_index.php_2019_02_11_otvorenje-izlozbe-monoliti-autora-domagoja-rogine__1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 6.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 12.3 13.1 14.1 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 17.3 18.1 19.1 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.2 23.1 23.2 24.1 25.1 26.1
[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”3.0.47″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”3.0.48″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.0.47″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on”][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” _builder_version=”3.0.74″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”] At a contentious Monday night debate hosted by Mission Local and the San Francisco Public Press, candidates for the District Attorney crossed swords in a dramatic night filled with attempts at one-upsmanship. The debate — one of the very last after more than two dozen — was preceded by an informational breakdown in which the Public Press’ Laura Wenus and Mission Local’s Julian Mark gave attendees a summation of measures on the upcoming November ballots. But around 7:40 p.m., Joe Eskenazi, the managing editor for Mission Local, took the stage and introduced the four candidates running for the city’s district attorney: Alameda County Deputy DA Nancy Tung, Interim DA Suzy Loftus, Assistant Attorney General Leif Dautch and Deputy Public Defender Chesa Boudin. Audio of the debate can be heard on KSFP 102.5 FM tonight at 6 p.m. and on Wednesday at 8 a.m. It will also be available at https://sfpublicpress.org. Loftus was asked about her appointment to interim District Attorney by Mayor London Breed and whether or not she was able to retain independence from the mayor. “Is Manohar Raju, our public defender, independent of the mayor?” Loftus asked. “He was appointed by the mayor.” She brought up Mark Leno’s appointment to the board of supervisors by former mayor Willie Brown. Like it or not, she said, the city charter allows mayors to fill positions in the city by picking people they feel are the most qualified. And she was not going to start apologizing for being the person Breed feels is most qualified. The room erupted into cheering and clapping. But it gave Boudin an opportunity for rebuttal. The comparison to Raju, his boss, was one he felt was apt — for his own reasons. He compared the extended period it took the mayor to settle upon a replacement for Jeff Adachi, the former public defender who died in February, to the rapid anointment of Loftus upon the announced departure of George Gascón. “It took the mayor six weeks to decide who to replace [Adachi]. It was a thorough process. Suzy was announced as the next person in less than 12 hours,” Boudin said. He let that statement linger in the air as bells signaled the end of his 30-second rebuttal period. From this point on, the debate turned snippy between Boudin and Loftus, who spent the debate digging into each other. It left the two remaining candidates, Tung and Dautch, out in the ether to fight their way into the spotlight. Eskenazi asked Boudin what he meant in a prior debate when he told the surviving family of Jesus Delgado Duarte that “your family gets justice the day I take office.” Considering that Duarte fired a pistol at police officers prior to being shot dead, Boudin was asked, “what does ‘justice’ look like in this case? What would your office do?” Boudin reiterated that he would revisit the case and thoroughly examine the circumstances of Duarte’s death — and that justice “doesn’t automatically mean criminal charges.” Loftus pushed back in her rebuttal. “That’s not what you actually told that family,” said Loftus, who accused Boudin of walking back his statement to Duarte’s survivors, and overpromising what he could deliver. “I will not overpromise something that doesn’t work.” The debate, however, was not as raucous as some prior DA debates in the city. There were no protesters, no interjections from the public, and no people waving signs. In her closing statement, Tung emphasized her 18 years of experience as a prosecutor in the state and county levels, and Dautch talked about his real-world experience. Loftus described herself as “not the typical person who runs for DA” and asked voters to make her “the people’s lawyer.” Boudin talked about growing up with his parents in jail and having his life affected by a broken criminal justice system. After the debate, the candidates lingered, to varying degrees, to speak to the attendees. Brenda White and Paul Selmants were two audience members who, even after the debate ended, could yet determine who they would vote for. “I think they all had really good points. I couldn’t come to a decision for me. There were some that were more popular than others but that doesn’t sell me yet,” White said. “Every time I might find someone to lean towards someone else would make a good point,” Selmants said. “Every one of them meets the bar for what we want.” Another attendee, Laura Witzig, had been hoping there wouldn’t be as much jabbing between the candidates and easily spotted some of the animosity between Boudin and Loftus. She was leaning towards either Boudin or Dautch, but she was still undecided and wanted to listen to other debates. “You gotta strike a good balance on calling each other out, like getting along and showing you can work with other people. I found a little more argumentation that I hoped for,” Witzig said. But they all have qualities the city needs, she said. Election Day is Nov. 5. [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.10 9.11 10.1
[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.19.5″] Otvorenje izložbe Monoliti autora Domagoja Rogine održat će se 1. veljače u 20 sati. Izložba će biti otvorena do 16. veljače, a radno vrijeme galerije je radnim danom od 12 do 20 sati te subotom od 10 do 13 sati. Osnova vedantske filozofije može se pronaći u pojmu advaita, koji znači nedvojnost, a odnosi se, ukratko, na jedinstvenost pojedinca i bitka (osnove postojanja). Svaka pojedinačna svijest je prema tom učenju nerazdvojiva od svega ostaloga što postoji – od drugih svijesti, ali i od cijelog svemira. Na tu nedjeljivost podsjetile su me slikarske težnje Domagoja Rogine iskazane u ciklusu koji je naslovio Monoliti. Već samim tim imenom koje označava strukturu načinjenu od jednog kamenog bloka, pa i lapidarnim potezom, te gustim i slojevitim nanosima boje kojima oblikuje senzacije na platnu, on nas podsjeća na stoljetnu težnju slikarstva ka postizanju jedinstva promatrača, autora, prizora, forme kojom se taj prizor prezentira, materije koja ga tka i asocijacija koje on budi. Sve izrečeno na ovim slikama izrečeno je u intenzivnom jeziku boje – predmeti poput čajnika ili buketa cvijeća, tijelo morske nemani, doživljaj jutarnje atmosfere ili autoportret kojemu se sjena naviruje preko ramena. Čini se da autor svemu odbija dati narativni razlog izvan same slikarske fascinacije. To su prizori njegove osobne svijesti, njegovi osjećaji i demoni koji dobivaju vlastite oblike i usisavaju nas. Mi smo, tako, zajedno s njim u tom vječnom trenutku jutra u atelijeru, kada je zrak svjež i gust, a dan obećava brojne prilike, a također s njim plovimo kroz prazan prostor njegovih snoviđenja u utrobi životinje slične morskome psu, sjajne kože i golemih usta, koja sugeriraju neobuzdano gutanje. To proždiranje ide u dva smjera: ono je i slikareva pohlepna konzumacija svijeta, kojega probavljenog izbacuje na platno, ali i gutanje gledatelja koje čini slika, njezina asimilacija naše pažnje i budnosti, te pretakanje cijele naše ličnosti u mentalni proces čuđenja i divljenja. Zato kažem da s Roginom putujemo u samoj utrobi zvjeri, to jest u utrobi slike. On nam ne želi dopustiti da se od njegovih slika odvojimo i da ih gledamo kao nešto izvan nas. U tome je njihov silni intenzitet, koji je imenom ciklusa povezan s osjećajem divljenja pred megalitskim konstrukcijama, prapovijesnim uspravnim kamenjem posijanim po svijetu s magijskim i obrednim svrhama poistovjećenja čovjeka s kozmosom i prirodom. Pored ovih slika svjedoci smo ekspresije tvari i stvari, transformacije površine slikarskog platna u prostor osobne nedokučivosti i čistog estetskog djelovanja (što svoje povijesne korijene ima u enformelu ili apstraktnom ekspresionizmu). S tim u vezi nameće se i spoznaja o arbitrarnosti doživljaja i o proizvoljnosti značenja koja pridajemo formama: svako tumačenje koje upisujemo u neko umjetničko djelo plod je sinergije našeg iskustva sa iskustvom stvaraoca. Domagoj Rogina je svoj osjećaj raznovrsnih predmeta i prostora izrazio u istovremeno nijemoj i rječitoj umjetnosti slikarstva, a ti izrazi za senzibilnog promatrača postaju poput sjene na njegovu autoportretu – tamni obrisi našeg lika, koji se nekim čudom otimaju pokretima koje bi trebali slijediti i žive svoj vlastiti, neobičan život. Stihovi Eliotove Puste zemlje obećavaju: „Pokazat ću ti nešto drugačije od / Tvoje sjene u jutro dok korača za tobom / Tvoje sjene predvečer dok ti hrli u susret / Pokazat ću ti tvoj strah u šaci prašine“. Slikarstvo je, također, svakako nešto drugačije od sjene ili oponašanja svijeta. To je odlamanje komada stvarnosti i njihovo klesanje u nove monolite ljudskih strahova, želja i fascinacija. (iz predgovora, Feđa Gavrilović) Domagoj Rogina rođen je 1989. u Varaždinu. Diplomirao je slikarstvo u klasi prof. Damira Sokića na Nastavničkom odsjeku na Akademiji likovnih umjetnosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu 2017. godine. Izlagao je na nekoliko samostalnih (2017. U ogledalu, Galerija Greta; Plivač, Galerija V. Filakovac i 2014. Fragmentologija 2/2, Galerija 3,14) i tridesetak skupnih izložbi (2017. Bijenale slikarstva, HDLU; 13. Erste fragmenti, Galerija Kranjčar; 2014. Salon mladih, HDLU i dr.) Boravio je na rezidenciji u Belgiji 2015. godine. Od 2018. godine radi kao profesor likovne i tehničke kulture u Centru za odgoj i obrazovanje Slava Raškaj u Zagrebu. [/et_pb_text][et_pb_gallery _builder_version=”3.19.5″ gallery_ids=”636,637,638″ show_title_and_caption=”off” hover_overlay_color=”rgba(255,255,255,0.9)” /][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]