http___fractalenlightenment.com_el_760_enlightening-video_the-holographic-universe-perceiving-reality.xml
http___fractalenlightenment.com_hr_760_enlightening-video_the-holographic-universe-perceiving-reality_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 9.3 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 13.2 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 15.3 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.1 17.2 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.7 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 19.10 19.11
To OλoYpaφιkό Eύuπav, AvtιλauBavόuevoι ΠpaYuatιkόtnta! To oλoYpaφιkό σύuπav eίvaι έva BιBλίo aπό tov Michael Talbot, (1953-1992), ήtav eπίσnς o σuYYpaφέaς πoλλώv BιBλίwv tovίZovtaς ouoιόtnteς uetaEύ twv apxaίwv uuσtιkισuό kaι tnv kBavtιkή unxavιkή, kaι evσtepvίZovtaι έva θewpntιkό uovtέλo tnς πpaYuatιkόtntaς πou δeίxveι to φuσιkό σύuπav uπopeί va πapouoιaσteί ue έva YιYavtιaίo oλόYpauua. Oι kύpιoι apxιtέktoveς autής tnς ekπλnktιkής ιδέaς ήtav δύo eπιφaveίς σtoxaσtές, o πpώtoς ήtav o David Bohm, a protege of Einstein, physicist in the University of London and one of the world’s most respected quantum physicists. The second was Karl Pribram, a neurophysiologist at Stanford University and author of the classic neuropsychological textbook Languages of the Brain. The most interesting part is both Bohm and Pribram worked in two different fields and arrived at the same conclusion from two very different directions. Bohm became convinced of the universe’s holographic nature only after years of dissatisfaction with standard theories’ inability to explain all of the phenomena encountered in quantum physics. Pribram became convinced because of the failure of standard theories of the brain to explain various neurophysiological puzzles. Oπwσδήπote, enough of that talk its kind of difficult to understand these principles when you have not experienced shifts in the space time continuum in your head. These two videos will explain the part of the holographic universe and how our brain perceives, its a very well made video to enable understanding of these principles. Earlier I had written on a Conscious and Participatory universe, where we had quoted Gregg Braden, and included a couple of his interviews, this video bridges the gap in understanding our place in the holographic universe. The experiment that kick started the entire concept of the holographic universe was Alain Aspects’ σe 1982 at the University of Paris related to the EPR Experiment, a consciousness experiment which had been devised by Albert Einstein, and his colleagues, Poldlsky and Rosen, in order to disprove Quantum Mechanics on the basis of the Pauli Exclusion Principle contradicting Special Relativity. Aspect and his team discovered that under certain circumstances subatomic particles such as electrons are able to instantaneously communicate with each other regardless of the distance separating them. It doesn’t matter whether they are 10 feet or 10 billion miles apart. Somehow each particle always seems to know what the other is doing. The problem with this feat is that it violates Einstein’s long-held tenet that no communication can travel faster than the speed of light. Since traveling faster than the speed of light is tantamount to breaking the time barrier, this daunting prospect has caused some physicists to try to come up with elaborate ways to explain Aspect’s findings. But it has inspired others to offer even more radical explanations. Πόpoι: “To OλoYpaφιkό Eύuπav” By Michael Talbot Exόλιa While the finer points are beyond me I do understand the concept of holography being interference waves which become the picture when a second focused light shines on the interference wave patterns. Maybe this is memory. The important point being that the reflection mirrors store unimaginable amounts of data and then alter the angle (maybe just 1 degree, fraction of a degree, I don’t know) and you can store all this and more again, move the angle, same thing. Think of maybe sets of mirrors, any of whose angle can be altered. That means there has to be a key or gate address, take you pick, that sets the specific memory-location. We have no idea of how this works. My guess is we never will. Think diamonds: in order for the diamond to have the sparkle, the cut at the bottom has to be exact. Too wide and the light is not caught, too narrow and too much. The exact angle is 45.75 degrees. This catches the light. We will never know our address or angle. We do not have that ability. We are playing at science and we cant even do fission. Lasers are locked at the same level. We get to the fine print and things become too difficult. No faster than SOL. But then again I never thought the 2nd law was anything but immutable. Consider the Hoag stellar object. There it is, what appears to be a brand new globular cluster. If indeed it is a new cluster, then all the laws of physics are overthrown. That is the problem with the neutrinos that enter the Earth. There aren’t leaving. Are they adding mass? Πάλι, physics is on shaky ground. Conjecture: since we have immutable globular cluster and super clusters, existing since time, and all in darn good shape, what can we say about our poor spiral galaxies? Are they destined to consume energy and expand anistrophically from the magnetic trap (aka black hole) into a beautiful globular cluster? That is in violation of the 2nd Law. Are they collapsed clusters whose jets blew energy out? But then why us and not the oldest clusters? They seem to hang on to their energy permanently; they are immortal. This describes what astrophysicists call broken symmetry. This quantum locality is the problem that led Bohn to the deeper layer which in turn sounds a lot like how the ancient pre history Egyptians explained the beginning: the watery Abyss but it was nothing, had no quality. The Creative Principal Atum parted the Abyss and pushed out the sun. Atum (shown as a dung beetle) made Ma at and then Shu. Seems a lot more simplier but the same.
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 9.3 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 13.2 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 15.3 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 17.1 17.2 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.7 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 19.10 19.11 19.12
Holografski svemir, Uviđajući stvarnost! Holografski svemir je knjiga Michael Talbot, (1953-1992), bio je i autor brojnih knjiga naglašavajući paralelu između antičkog misticizma i kvantne mehanike, i zalaže teoretski model realnosti koji sugerira fizički svemir je srodan divovski hologram. Glavni arhitekti ove zapanjujuće zamisli bile dvije ugledni mislioci, Prvi je bio David Bohm, štićenik Einstein, fizičar na Sveučilištu u Londonu, i jedan od najuglednijih svjetskih kvantnih fizičara. Drugi je bio Karl Pribram, neurofiziolog na Sveučilištu Stanford, i autor klasičnog neuropsihološkog udžbenika Languages of the Brain. Najzanimljiviji dio je kako Bohm i Pribram je radio u dva različita polja i stigao do istog zaključka iz dva vrlo različita smjera. Bohm uvjerio svemira holografsku prirodu tek nakon godina nezadovoljstva standardnih teorija’ nesposobnost da objasni sve pojave susreće u kvantnoj fizici. Pribram je postao uvjeren zbog kvara standardnih teorija mozga objasniti različite neurofiziološke zagonetke. U svakom slučaju, dosta toga govoriti svoje vrste teško shvatiti ta načela kada niste doživjeli promjene u vremenskom kontinuumu prostor u glavi. Ove dvije video će objasniti dio holografski svemir i kako naš mozak percipira, njegova vrlo dobro napravljena videa omogućiti razumijevanje ovih načela. Ranije sam napisao na Svjesno i sudjelovanja svemir, gdje smo je citirao Gregg Braden, , a uključivala je par njegovih intervjua, ovaj video premošćuje jaz u razumijevanju naše mjesto u svemiru holografski. Eksperiment koji kick započeo cijeli koncept holografskog svemira je Alain aspektima’ u 1982 na Sveučilištu u Parizu u vezi s EPR eksperimenta, Eksperiment je svijest koja je bila osmišljena Albert Einstein, i njegovi kolege, Poldlsky i Rosen, kako bi pobiti kvantne mehanike na temelju Pauli načelo isključenja kontradiktorne specijalne relativnosti. Aspect i njegov tim otkrili su da su pod određenim okolnostima subatomske čestice poput elektrona su u mogućnosti da odmah komuniciraju jedni s drugima bez obzira na udaljenost ih razdvaja. Nije važno radi li se o 10 noge ili 10 milijardi milja apart. Nekako svaka čestica uvijek izgleda kao da zna što drugi radi. Problem s ovom pothvatu je da se krši Einsteinovu dugo održati načelo da nema komunikacije može putovati brže od brzine svjetlosti. Budući da putuju brže od brzine svjetlosti se svodi na razbijanje vremensku barijeru, to zastrašujuće izglede je izazvalo neke fizičare da pokušaju doći do razraditi načine da objasni nalaz aspekt je. No, to je inspirirala drugima ponuditi čak i radikalniji objašnjenja. Sredstva: “Holografski svemir” Michael Talbot Komentari Dok se sitnije točke su izvan mene ja razumijem koncept holografije biće interferencije valova koji postaju slike kada drugi fokusiran svjetlo na val uzoraka smetnjama. Možda je ovo memorije. Bitna stvar je da su odraz ogledala pohraniti nezamislive količine podataka, a zatim mijenja kut (možda samo 1 stepen, dio stupnja, Ne znam) i možete spremiti sve to i još jednom, premjestiti kut, ista stvar. Razmislite o možda seta ogledala, bilo čijeg kuta može se mijenjati. To znači da mora biti ključ ili vrata adresa, odvesti pokupiti, koja postavlja specifične memorije-mjesto. Nemamo pojma kako se to radi. Moje mišljenje je da nikada neće. Razmislite dijamanata: kako za dijamant bi imali živost, rez na dnu mora biti točan. Preširoka i svijetlo nije uhvaćen, preuska i previše. Točan kut 45.75 stupnjeva. Ovaj hvata svjetlo. Mi nikada nećemo znati našu adresu ili kut. Mi nemamo tu mogućnost. Mi igramo na znanost, a mi još ne mogu učiniti fisijom. Laseri su zaključani na istoj razini. Mi smo dobili na fine print i stvari postaju previše teško. Ne brže od SOL. Ali onda opet nikada nisam razmišljao drugi zakon bio sve samo ne nepromjenjivi. Razmislite Hoag zvjezdani objekt. Tamo je, ono što se čini potpuno novi kuglasti skup. Ako doista je nova ploča, onda svi zakoni fizike su zbačeni. To je problem s neutrina koji ulaze u Zemlju. Postoje ne ostavljajući. Jesu li oni dodavši masu? Opet, fizika je na staklenim nogama. Pretpostavka: jer imamo nepromjenjivi globulamu klastera i super klastere, postojeće od vremena, a sve u prokleto dobroj formi, Što možemo reći o našim lošim spiralnih galaksija? Jesu li im je suđeno da troše energiju i proširiti anistrophically od magnetskog zamku (aka crna rupa) u lijepoj kuglastom klastera? To je u suprotnosti 2. Zakona. Jesu li propali klastera čiji zrakoplovi puhao energiju iz? Ali zašto onda nas i ne najstariji klasteri? Oni Čini se da objesiti na njihovom energijom trajno; oni su besmrtni. To opisuje što astrofizičari nazvati slomljena simetrija. To je kvantna lokalitet je problem koji je vodio Bohn na dubljem sloju koji je pak silno podsjeća kako su drevni Egipćani prapovijesti objasnio početak: vodenasta Abyss, ali to nije bilo ništa, nije imao kvalitetu. Creative Principal Atum rastali ponor i gurnuo sunce. Tuna (pokazalo kao balegar) Ma napravili na te Shu. Čini se puno više jednostavnije, ali isto.