http___free-gate.org_do_Qa_k_gYLhRiyQbRL08P_zaXD_v2aAxDN3_s-rV_V_s4_356.html.xml
http___free-gate.org_do_za_k_z8LhRYyzbAL08y_xvaNy02AN3_20-zasto-progon_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.1 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 9.1 10.1 10.2 11.1 12.1 13.1 13.2 14.1 15.1 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 18.1 18.2 19.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 21.3 22.1 23.1 23.2 24.1 24.2 25.1 25.2 26.1 26.2
Inspiring Kindness: Looking Back at April 25, 1999 (Minghui.org) During the 2011 Christmas holidays, several Hong Kong newspapers reported an inspiring story: At gunpoint and under threat of a bomb, a 41-year-old cashier at a convenience store persuaded the thief to abandon his intent to rob the store, and flee the scene. People wondered where this cashier's strength and courage came from. The cashier was a Falun Gong practitioner. His take was, “As a practitioner, I cannot go along with such criminal acts. I have to be responsible to society. My master teaches me to be a good person, living according to Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance. I didn't want the thief to harm himself by committing a robbery.” This incident was not an exception. The peaceful demonstration by Falun Gong practitioners on April 25, 1999, was driven by a similar rationale. On that day, over 10,000 practitioners quietly demonstrated in Beijing. They had three requests, that the practitioners arrested in Tianjin be released, that their legal right to practice be recognized, and that the ban on publishing Falun Gong materials be lifted. The 10,000 left peacefully later that day, after then-Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji met with Falun Gong representatives. Zhu agreed to release the Tianjin practitioners and gave assurances that the government did not oppose Falun Gong. Reason for Gathering: 45 Practitioners Detained in Tianjin The immediate reason that practitioners went to Beijing was the arrest and detention of 45 practitioners in Tianjin. Other practitioners learned from the government of Tianjin, a directly-controlled municipality, that the Minister of Public Security was involved, and that the issue could only be resolved with an authorization from Beijing. On April 11, 1999, an article entitled, “I Do Not Agree with Youth Practicing Qigong” was published in the Tianjin College of Education’s Youth Reader magazine. Examples which slandered Falun Gong were listed, and were the same as those presented on a Beijing TV station program in 1998. Those examples had already been fully corrected in Beijing shortly after the TV program was aired the year before. When the Tianjin article appeared, some practitioners in Tianjin felt that they simply needed to explain the facts to the Tianjin officials. They also hoped to lessen the negative impact of the article through contact with the magazine editors. On April 18-24, 1999, practitioners visited the Tianjin College of Education and related governmental agencies to reach a solution. On April 23-24, 1999, the Public Security Bureau of Tianjin dispatched riot police to beat the practitioners who had come to speak with Tianjin officials, resulting in injuries to the practitioners and the arrests of 45. From attacks in the media in previous years, to physical violence against practitioners in Tianjin, the escalation of the persecution was alarming. Word of the “Tianjin incident” spread rapidly all across the country. Gathering Momentum: Pattern of Harassment The pattern of harassment started as early as 1996. Guangming Daily , the mouthpiece of the State Council, published an article by a columnist denouncing Falun Gong on June 17, 1996. On July 24, 1996, the Chinese News Publication Office issued a nationwide circular banning the distribution of all Falun Gong publications. In early 1997, the Public Security Bureau began a nationwide investigation to gather evidence in hopes of casting Falun Gong as an “evil cult.” However, police stations all around the country finally reported after much investigation, “No evidence found so far,” and the investigations came to an end. In late May 1998, He Zuoxiu denounced Falun Gong in an interview on Beijing Television, saying that it was harmful. Next, when showing an interview at a Falun Gong practice site, the program said that Falun Gong was “feudalistic superstition.” After the program was aired, practitioners who actually knew the people whom He Zuoxiu used as examples in the program, immediately pointed out to him and the TV station that the program was not factual because the people weren’t even Falun Gong practitioners. Soon after, the TV station made the correction by airing a positive program on Falun Gong. The First Division of the Public Security Bureau issued on July 21, 1998, a 1998-No. 555 circular “Notification Regarding Starting an Investigation on Falun Gong.” The “Notification” claimed that some practitioners were engaged in illegal activities in the name of Falun Gong. As a result of this “notification,” the local Public Security Departments in a number of areas around the country raided Falun Gong practice sites, forcibly dispersed practitioners, searched their homes, broke into and entered their residences, confiscated private property, and so on. Cause and Effect Many think that the April 25 demonstration precipitated the persecution of Falun Gong, which officially began on July 20, 1999. In reality, given the three-year pattern of escalating harassment prior to April 25, 1999, the CCP was already looking for some way to justify the persecution. The demonstration was an effort by practitioners to thwart a crackdown in the making. It was an attempt to benefit all members of society, including the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). When innocent people are being harmed, everyone is responsible for bringing it to an end. The events of April 25, 1999, showcased the dignity of a group of Chinese people and their commitment to upholding their beliefs and justice. Over the past 15 years, practitioners have continued to show the same spirit by clarifying the facts about Falun Gong and the persecution, winning increasing grassroots support in China. These citizens who live by Truthfulness-Compassion-Forbearance have become the cornerstone of Chinese society.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11
Zašto progon? Zašto se Falun Dafa progoni u Kini? Kompleksni razlozi iza progona se mogu podijeliti u 4 elementa: strah paranoičnog diktatora od brzog rasta i sve veće popularnosti Falun Gonga; ljubomora istog diktatora naspram popularnosti prakse, inherentni konflikt između divlje političke ideologije režima i njene potpune suprotnosti --- principa Istinitosti, Dobrodušnosti i Tolerancije; sama priroda komunizma koji, da bi se održao, traži periodično imenovanje malog dijela populacije kao „neprijatelja“ protiv kojeg se treba „boriti“. Kako je započeo progon? Tri godine prije službenog pokretanja progona u srpnju 1999., praktikanti su bili pod sve intenzivnijom vladinom opresijom. Falun Gong knjige su bile pod zabranom tiskanja već od 1996., a u državnim novinama se pojavio i prvi članak koji kritizira Falun Gong. Već 1998. i 1999. su prekidali grupno vježbanje u parkovima. Pojačani su propagandni napadi protiv Falun Gonga u državnim medijima. Nakon serije događaja u travnju 1999. u kojima je policija nepravedno uhitila i tukla praktikante u gradu Tianjin, skoro 10 tisuća Falun Gong praktikanata se 25. travnja okupilo u Pekingu u mirnom apelu Državnom žalbenom uredu. Tražili su otpuštanje uhićenih praktikanata, ponovno razmatranje pitanja o zabrani tiskanja Falun Gong knjiga kao i prekid vladinog uznemiravanja praktikanata. Iako je okupljanje bilo iznimno miroljubivo, a tadašnji premijer Zhu Rongji koji se sastao s praktikantima prihvatio ispuniti njihove zahtjeve, službena opresija se ubrzala nakon tog događaja. Predsjednik Jiang Zemin je 10. lipnja 1999. utemeljio Ured 6-10, državnu policijsku agenciju s posebnim autoritetom nad svim lokalnim upravnim tijelima, vladama i sudovima, koja je bila vodič progona Falun Gonga. Policija je 20. srpnja 1999. provela masovna uhićenja koordinatora mjesta za vježbanje Falun Gonga. Sveobuhvatan medijski napad protiv Falun Gonga je lansiran 22. srpnja i praksa je službeno postala zabranjena. Od tada progon nije ništa slabiji, bez obzira na činjenicu da ne postoji nikakav zakon na kojem je zabrana utemeljena niti koji dopušta progon.