http___fractalenlightenment.com_24617_life_the-path-of-the-razor-shedding-the-superfluous.xml
http___fractalenlightenment.com_bs_24617_life_the-path-of-the-razor-shedding-the-superfluous_2.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 6.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 11.1 11.2 11.3 12.1 12.2 12.3 13.1 13.2 13.3 14.1 14.2 14.3 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.8 20.9 20.10 20.11 20.12 20.13
The Path of the Razor: Shedding the Superfluous “In an atonal world one must oppose it in such a way that one compels it to tonalize itself.” –Slavoj Zizec “Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily. When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one tends to be the better one.” Most of us are familiar with this principle attributed to the 14th century logician William of Occam, known as Occam’s Razor, or The Law of Parsimony. It is a principal typically used in scientific circles to distinguish elegant theories from inelegant ones. But what happens if we apply the same principle to our lives? What if we are caught between two competing lifestyles, does it follow that the simpler one tends to be the better one? How might we be multiplying things unnecessarily? And what if we used the razor as a means toward the end of aggressive progressive change? This article uses the principle of Occam’s Razor as a meta-symbol for acquiring elegance in the face of excess. We can call it Bob’s Razor or Sam’s Razor, or even Martha Stuart’s Razor. It doesn’t matter. As long as we’re using it to “shave away” what is unnecessary from our lives, then it will be most efficacious. The razor represents our need for striving toward simplicity and consistency despite complexity and inconsistency. So far as it applies to our culture, the razor represents the need to shave away unhealthiness; to thrive in a healthy way despite stagnation and decadence. It takes courage to wield the Razor, but most things worth doing do. In order to maintain equilibrium in an excessively senseless culture, we need to be able to shave the heaviness from our heart. We must be able to seek out that which is excessive in our lives and then shed it. This is easier said than done and requires a particular flavor of courage. Shedding the superfluous is a very difficult process. It first needs to be done on an individual level, so that it can eventually be done on a cultural level. Shedding the superfluous from our lives helps us focus on making sense out of human senselessness. Eventually simplicity can lead to elegance. Once excess has been shaved away then we are free to live more elegantly. Just as brevity is the soul of wit, elegance is the soul of acumen. Faced with the tragedy of a dying world, the simplest lifestyle tends to be the best one. And considering the condition of our natural resources, the more people living simply the better. Gandhi said it best, “Live simply so that others may simply live.” But in order to live simply we must be able to change our center of gravity from that of inert consumption to that of active adaptation. We need to become local world-movers as opposed to mere global world-watchers. The hardest part will be using the razor to unburden ourselves of material, political, and spiritual excess. Using the razor causes our cultural ideas, hypotheses and theories to become more elegant in regard to healthy, ecological order. Finesse and precision of thought are the goal here. Like Lewis Carroll said in his 1884 lecture, “Avoid having a FAT MIND.” We avoid having a fat mind by using the razor. By relinquishing ourselves to the razor we allow ourselves to be refined and polished. We allow ourselves to become vulnerable so that we might become numinous. We become numinous after trimming the fat of hyper-reality from actual reality, after shaving the opacity from the luminous. The more we “trim the fat” the sharper we become, refining our innocence into focused courage, which leads to mindfulness and holistic thinking. But we must apply our new-found sharpness with responsibility. By showing respect and compassion to others, as well as to our environment, we indirectly become teachers who help others to shave the heaviness from their hearts. Once we’ve shaved enough excess from our lives, we eventually reach a kind of existential liberation where we go beyond shedding superfluity and move to outright decollation. What I call McGee’s Guillotine. My Occam’s Razor answer to cognitive dissonance, which, paraphrasing Occam, states: Worldviews should not be aggrandized unnecessarily. When you have two competing worldviews that disagree with each other, the healthier one tends to be the better one and the unhealthier one should be discarded. McGee’s Guillotine strips away the ignorance of human opinion and replaces it with natural dictation. It goes beyond shedding superfluity and cuts the human head out of the equation so that a “new head” can grow: open-minded, non-dogmatic and fluid in its self-actualization of the original equation: reality as it is, divorced from the hyper-reality and abstraction of the unhealthy worldview. In the end, the razor and the guillotine are tools that teach us healthy circumspection. With them we are ready to flip the switch on all unhealthy worldviews and unsustainable cultures. We are prepared to oppose the atonal world in such a way that it is compelled to tonalize itself. Image Source: Snail on a Razor Devolution La Guillotine by Oscar Dominguez Comments This is great, but I really do hope your view of the world is the correct one. You are basically saying to not critically think about what our world actually is. To “throw out” the one side that serves no purpose to you. That is wonderful advice, but we must make sure we are throwing out the wrong side. Would be interested to hear your viewpoint on what you believe is truly going on in our world. I see you’re ex-Navy Seal, so you either are all for the American way of government, or your are “ex” for a reason; the reason being that the U.S. and its military are merely pawns for foreign policy, and used as the rich, ruling global elites as their OWN world military branch. In essence, this is what is happening, as these global zionist elites control our world through 3 main branches…military, finance, and religion. And, of course, it is no surprise all 3 operate out of city states, answering to nobody, and above law… Washington, DC, City of London inside of London, and The Vatican. I hope you’re NOT throwing out this viewpoint of our world because to accept what we are fed on tell-lie-vision (networks owned by the elite) is morally wrong and unjust. So, in closing, maybe people can throw out one side once they ACTUALLY know the truth of what is going on, and none sooner. Clearly, the military is filled with people who have been brainwashed to believe your country is seriously under attack, or has the possibility of it, lol, which would be absurd to say the least. But, they need people to continue to enlist so they can continue to work on behalf of the world elite, murdering innocent people all over the world.
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 6.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 11.1 11.2 11.3 12.1 12.2 12.3 13.1 13.2 13.3 14.1 14.2 14.3 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.8 20.9 20.10 20.11 20.12
Put od Razor: Skidajući suvišne "U atonalan svijetu mora se protive na takav način da je jedan primorava da tonalize sebi." -Slavoj Zizec "Entiteti ne treba pomnožiti nepotrebno. Kada imate dva konkurentska teorije koje čine isti predviđanja, je jednostavnije ima tendenciju da bude bolje. "Većina od nas su upoznati s ovim principom pripisati stoljeća logičara 14. William of Occam, poznat kao Okamova Razor, ili Zakon o škrtost. To je glavna obično koriste u znanstvenim krugovima razlikovati elegantnim teorijama iz elegantan onih. Ali, ono što se događa ako se primjenjuju isti princip na naše živote? Što ako se u procjepu između dva konkurentska način života, to slijedi da je jednostavnije teži da bude bolji? Kako bi smo se umnožavaju stvari nepotrebno? A šta ako smo koristili brijač kao sredstvo pred kraj agresivnih progresivne promjene? Ovaj članak koristi princip Okamova Razor kao meta-simbol za sticanje eleganciju u lice viška. Možemo to nazvati Bob Razor ili Sam Razor, ili čak Martha Stuart Razor. Nije bitno. Dokle god smo ga koristite na "brije dalje", što je nepotrebno iz naših života, onda će biti najefikasnije. Bodljikava predstavlja našu potrebu za težnja ka jednostavnosti i konzistentnost unatoč složenosti i nekonzistentnost. Do sada kao što se odnosi na naše kulture, brijač predstavlja potrebu da se brije dalje nezdravo; da napreduju na zdrav način bez obzira stagnacije i dekadencije. Potrebno je hrabrosti da raspolažu sa Razor, ali većina stvari vrijedi radi do. U cilju održavanja ravnoteže u pretjerano besmislenom kulture, moramo biti u stanju da se brije na težinu od našeg srca. Moramo biti u stanju da traže ono što je pretjerana u našim životima, a zatim baciti ga. To je lakše reći nego učiniti i zahtijeva poseban okus hrabrosti. Skidajući je suvišno je vrlo težak proces. Prvo treba da se uradi na individualnom nivou, tako da se može na kraju biti učinjeno na kulturnom nivou. Skidajući je suvišno iz naših života pomaže nam da se fokusira na izradu smisao ljudskog besmisla. Na kraju jednostavnost može dovesti do elegancije. Kada višak je obrijao dalje onda smo slobodni da žive više elegantno. Baš kao što kratkoća je duša duhovitosti, elegancija je duša pronicljivosti. Suočeni s tragedijom svijetu umire, najjednostavnijih načina života teži da bude najbolji. A s obzirom na stanje naših prirodnih resursa, Što više ljudi koji žive jednostavno bolji. Gandhi je najbolje, rekao je, "Live jednostavno, tako da drugi mogu jednostavno živjeti." Ali, kako da žive, jednostavno moramo biti u stanju promijeniti naš centar gravitacije iz tog inertnog potrošnje u tom aktivne adaptacije. Moramo postati lokalni svjetski pokretače za razliku od pukog globalnom svijetu čuvari. Najteži dio će biti koristeći brijač da rastereti sebe materijala, politički, i duhovni višak. Koristeći brijača uzrokuje naše kulturne ideje, hipoteze i teorije kako bi postali više elegantan u odnosu na zdravu, ekološke bi. Finesse i preciznost misli su cilj ovdje. Kao Lewis Carroll je u svom 1884 čitanje, "Izbjegavajte imaju FAT uma." Mi izbjeći masnoće uma pomoću brijača. Napuštanjem sebe da brijač dozvolimo sebi da budemo rafinirano i polirani. Mi dozvoliti sebi da postanu ranjive, tako da smo mogli postati numinozno. Mi smo postali numinozno nakon podrezivanje masti hiper-realnosti od stvarnosti, nakon brijanja providnost iz Luminous. Što više "trim masti" oštrija postajemo, rafiniranje naše nevinosti u fokusiran hrabrosti, što dovodi do sabranosti i holističkog razmišljanja. Ali moramo primijeniti naš novi-pronašao oštrinu sa odgovornošću. Po pokazuje poštovanje i suosjećanje prema drugima, kao i našeg okruženja, indirektno postanu nastavnici koji pomažu drugima da obrijem težinu od njihova srca. Kada smo obrijao dovoljno viška iz naših života, smo na kraju doći do neke vrste egzistencijalne oslobođenja kuda idemo dalje je pao suvišnosti i presele se u otvoreno odljepljivanje. Ono što ja nazivam McGee je Giljotina. Moj Okamova Razor odgovor na kognitivne disonance, koja, parafraziranje Occam, država: Poglede na svijet ne treba nepotrebno aggrandized. Kada imate dva konkurentska poglede na svijet koji se ne slažu jedni s drugima, zdraviji jedan teži da bude bolji i unhealthier treba biti odbačena. McGee je Giljotina skida neznanje ljudskog mišljenja i zamjenjuje ga sa prirodnim diktata. To ide dalje od prolivanja suvišnosti i smanjuje ljudsku glavu iz jednadžbe, tako da je "nova glava" može rasti: otvorenog uma, non-dogmatskog i tečnosti u svom samoaktuelizacije originalne jednadžbe: stvarnosti kao što je to, razvela od hiper-realnosti i apstrakcija nezdravih svjetonazor. In the end, brijača i giljotina su alati koji nas uče zdrave oprezom. S njima smo spremni da flip prekidača na svim nezdravo poglede na svijet i neodržive kulture. Mi smo spremni da se suprotstave atonalan svijet na takav način da je primoran da tonalize sebi. Image Source: Snail na Razor Decentralizacija La Giljotina Oscar Dominguez Komentari Ovo je super, ali stvarno se nadam vašeg pogleda na svijet je ispravan. U osnovi, vi kažete da nije kritički misli o tome što je zapravo naš svijet. To “izbaciti” S jedne strane to nema nikakvu svrhu da vam. To je divno savjete, ali moramo biti sigurni da su bacanje pogrešnu stranu. Bi bili zainteresovani da čuju svoje gledište o tome što ti veruješ se istinski događa u našem svijetu. Vidim da si ex-Navy Seal, tako da ni svi za američki način vlasti, ili su “ex” s razlogom; iz razloga što je U.S. i svoje vojne su samo pijuni za vanjsku politiku, i koristi se kao bogati, vladajuće globalne elite kao svoju svetu vojnu grane. U suštini, to je ono što se događa, kao ove globalne cionističke elite kontrolirati naš svijet kroz 3 glavne grane…vojne, Finance, i religija. I, naravno, to je sve što nije iznenađenje 3 rade od grada država, odgovarajući na niko, i iznad zakona…Washington, DC, City of London unutar London, i Vatikan. Nadam se da nisi bacaju ovaj stanovišta našeg svijeta, jer da prihvate ono što mi se hranili, reci-laž-vision (mreže u vlasništvu elite) je moralno pogrešno i nepravedno. Tako, u završnoj, Možda ljudi ne mogu izbaciti jednu stranu kada su zaista znaju istinu o tome šta se dešava, i nijedna pre. Jasno, vojni je puna ljudi koji su isprali mozak da vjeruju svojoj zemlji ozbiljno je pod napadom, ili ima mogućnost njegovog, lol, što bi bilo apsurdno da se u najmanju ruku. Ali, što im je potrebno da ljudi i dalje se prijave tako da mogu i dalje raditi na ime svijeta elite, ubijanje nevinih ljudi u cijelom svijetu.