http___fractalenlightenment.com_th_29438_life_splinter-in-the-mind-part-3-the-consciousness-enigma.xml
http___fractalenlightenment.com_hr_29438_life_splinter-in-the-mind-part-3-the-consciousness-enigma_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 12.1 12.2 12.3 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 14.1 15.1 16.1 18.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 22.1 23.1 23.2
แตกคอในใจ, ส่วนหนึ่ง 3: สติปริศนา "ควอนตัมกลศาสตร์แปลก, และเพื่อให้เป็นจิตสำนึก. และความแปลกประหลาดของแต่ละคนที่อยู่ในวิธีการบางอย่างที่คล้ายกัน: ทั้งสอง, เช่น, ดูเหมือนจะต่อต้านพื้นที่และเวลา, and both exist in a different dimension from material systems ordered by classical physical laws. This is enough, สำหรับบางคน, to convince them that consciousness will eventually be explained in terms of quantum theory.” – R. Carter Consciousness remains an enigma. Quantum mechanics also remains an enigma. The way we perceive these two enigmas is caught in the middle. There’s the way consciousness actually is, and then there is the way consciousness seems to be. There is the way we can explain consciousness using psychological terminology and then there is the way consciousness ‘feels’ to us. เหมือนกับ, there is the way reality actually is, and there is the way reality seems to be, the way we perceive it. Quantum mechanics is the theoretical tool we have devised to help us in understanding the way reality actually is. แต่, as we have seen, consciousness seems to be inherent in physics, และในทางกลับกัน. The question we must ask ourselves is: What creates the difference between perceptual and actual reality? And is there even a difference? “Consciousness is a proactive agency in the establishment of reality,” said Princeton physicist Robert Jahn and parapsychologist Brenda Dunne, who drew on their empirical data to conclude: “Consciousness has the capacity not only to absorb and process objective information, but to create it in rigorously measurable quantities.” Taking this statement into consideration, along with the concepts derived from Schrodinger’s equation, one can see how this thesis could be viable. Jahn and Dunne write further, “Consciousness enjoys a ‘wave/particle duality’ which allows it to circumvent and penetrate barriers and to resonate with other consciousness and with appropriate aspects of its environment.” เหมือนกับ, Henry Stapp, ในหนังสือของเขา A Quantum Theory of Consciousness, uses Heisenberg’s principle as well as Shrodinger’s equation in his model to describe the brain itself as a type of Heisenberg measuring device where quantum processes are involved to ‘actualize’ and ‘eradicate’ potential observable states. Stapp wrote, “Heisenberg’s picture allows quantum theory to be viewed as a coherent description of the evolution of the entire physical reality itself, rather than a set of stark statistical rules about connections between human observations. What is the data showing us? If we take every single conscious organism off the planet, from single-celled amoeba to fully erect Homo sapiens, what do we have? Is that which is left over what should be considered ‘real’? Is matter the same if a conscious organism is not there to perceive it? Are mountains the same? Are clouds the same? Is light and gravity the same? These questions can easily spill over into philosophy, but the point is that ‘reality’ may not be the way our perceptions tell us it is when we are not there to perceive it. In fact experiments in modern physics are showing us that ‘reality’ isn’t there (in the objective sense) until a conscious observer perceives it as being there. “Why should we not see the occurrence of this necessity for a conscious observer in quantum theory as something that tells us about the nature of reality?” writes Walker in The Physics of Consciousness. “So far, nowhere else in all of science have we seen anything that gives us any hint about what consciousness really is. Maybe this Gordian knot is simply something we have created in our own minds because we cannot see the simple solution.” What could be the simple solution? Could it be that it is our perception of reality, not reality itself, that’s the paradox? Could it be that reality and we are the same thing, and we’re simply not aware of it because our perceptions are bias to finite conceptualization? นี่คือสิ่งที่: if reality is actually infinite, but perceptually finite, wouldn’t that create a paradox? Of course it would. And it does. The paradox isn’t out there somewhere. It’s in here, right behind our eyes. It’s our beautiful brain’s bias to finite perception attempting, and failing, to perceive an infinite reality. The paradox inherent within the quantum enigma is exactly consciousness itself. But what a beautiful paradox it is. ผมหมายถึง, it gives us meaning in an otherwise meaningless universe. It gives us beauty in an otherwise ubiquitously banal cosmos. It gives us such concepts as Truth, Justice, and Love in an otherwise unbiased, unloving, flat reality. Conscious observation is the fly in the ointment of understanding both consciousness and quantum theory. But what a beautiful, meaningful, loving fly it is, lapping up the ointment like it was mother’s milk. ในตอนท้ายของวันที่, our brains are the Gordian Knot of reality. Whether our brains evolved by chance, or as a compulsory process in the fundamental makeup of reality so that reality could eventually bring meaning to itself, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that there เป็น ความหมาย. There เป็น beauty. There เป็น love. And we are the ones who perceive it. Without our finite-bias perspectives none of these concepts would exist. We are the befuddled sentinels of the cosmos, confused and perplexed by a plethora of paradoxes; unaware that the paradox is us. But what a ride! And around and around we go, which brings us all the way back around to the colossal importance of practicing the discipline of การทำสมาธิมีสติ. จริง, mindful meditation is the disentangling of the “impossible” knot, the cutting of the Gordian Knot. We can calculate the mathematical probabilities all we want. We can wrestle with paradox after paradox all we want. We can discover correlations between consciousness and physics all we want. But at the end of the day, the only way we can ever make sense of it is to get to a place of peaceful, mindful awareness of ourselves, and our paradoxical place within an otherwise non-paradoxical reality. แหล่งที่มาของภาพ: แสดงเราบางความรักและกระจายแสง: 2 ความเห็น Amen……ความสงบสุข, แสง,and Love I do not see any reason why two wierd things must be related simply because they are wierd. Brain signalling happens way above the quantum level, synapses fire when hundreds of vesicles free neurotransmitters… this is not a matter of elementary particles but of big molecules. There is no need to invoke any quantum effects. In my view conciousness arises as some brain circuits get dedicated to watching other parts of the brain, rather than, พูด, signals coming from the eyes. This is actually why meditation works. By concentrating new circuits can be made and new control gained.
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 12.1 12.2 12.3 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 14.1 15.1 16.1 18.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 22.1 23.1 23.2
Splinter u Mind, Dio 3: Svijest Enigma "Quantum Mechanics je čudno, i tako je svijest. I nastranost svake je na neki način sličan: oboje, na primjer, Čini se da se ne daju prostora i vremena, te da postoje u različitim dimenzijama od materijalnih sustava naredio klasičnim fizikalnim zakonima. Ovo je dovoljno, za neke, kako bi ih uvjerili da je svijest na kraju će biti objašnjeno u smislu kvantne teorije. Prijevoznik Svijest ostaje enigma. Kvantna mehanika je također ostaje enigma. Način na koji percipiramo ove dvije enigme je uhvaćen u sredini. Postoji način na svijest zapravo je, i onda je način svijest čini se da je. Postoji način na koji možemo objasniti svijest pomoću psihološku terminologiju i tada postoji način svijest 'osjeća' za nas. Slično, ne postoji način na stvarnost je zapravo, a tu je i način na stvarnost, čini se da, način na koji smo ga vidim. Kvantna mehanika je teorijski alat smo izmislili kako bi nam pomogli u razumijevanju način u stvarnosti je. Ali, kao što smo vidjeli, svijest čini se da je svojstvena u fizici, i obratno. Pitanje moramo se zapitati je: Ono što stvara razliku između perceptivnih i aktualne stvarnosti? A postoji i razlika? "Svijest je proaktivna agencija u uspostavljanju realnosti,", Rekao je Princeton fizičar Robert Jahn i Brenda Dunne parapsiholog, koji je nacrtao na svojim empirijskih podataka zaključiti: "Svijest ima sposobnost ne samo da apsorbira i obradu objektivnu informaciju, ali da ga stvoriti u rigorozno mjerljivim količinama. "Uzimajući u obzir ovu izjavu, zajedno s pojmovima izvedenim iz Schrödinger jednadžbe, može se vidjeti kako bi ova teza mogla biti održiva. Jahn i Dunne pisati dalje, "Svijest uživa 'val / čestica dualnost' koji omogućuje da zaobići i prodrijeti barijere i rezonirati s druge svijesti i sa odgovarajućim aspektima svog okruženja." Slično, Henry Stapp, in his book Kvantna teorija svijesti, koristi Heisenberg je princip kao i Shrodinger jednadžbe u svom modela za opisivanje samog mozga kao tip Heisenberg mjerni uređaj na kojem kvantni procesi su uključeni u 'ostvare' i 'iskorijeniti' potencijalnih promatranih država. Stapp pisao, "Heisenberg slikama dopušta kvantna teorija da se gleda kao cjelovit opis evolucije cjelokupnog fizičkog samoj stvarnosti, umjesto skupa šturim statističkim pravilima o vezama između ljudskih zapažanja. Što je podatke koji pokazuju nas? Ako uzmemo svaku svjesnu organizam off planeta, od jednostaničnog amebe do potpuno uspravno Homo sapiens, što mi imamo? Je li ono što je ostalo više od onoga što bi trebalo uzeti u obzir 'pravi'? Je li važno isto ako svjesno organizam nije tu da ga vidim? Su planine ista? Jesu li oblaci isto? Je svjetlost i gravitacija ista? Ova pitanja mogu se lako preliti u filozofiji, ali stvar je u tome što 'reality' ne može biti način naša percepcija nam je kad nismo tu da ga vidim. Zapravo eksperimenti u modernoj fizici su nam pokazuje da je 'stvarnost' ne postoji (u objektivnom smislu) dok svjesni promatrač ga percipira kao tamo. "Zašto mi ne vidimo pojavu ove neophodnosti na svjesnoj promatrača u kvantnoj teoriji kao nešto što nam govori o prirodi stvarnosti?", Piše Walker u Fizika svijesti. "Do sada, nigdje drugdje u svim znanosti smo vidjeli nešto što nam daje naslutiti ono što je svijest stvarno. Možda je ovo Gordijski čvor je jednostavno nešto što smo stvorili u našim glavama, jer ne možemo vidjeti jednostavno rješenje. "Što bi moglo biti jednostavno rješenje? Je li moguće da je to naša percepcija stvarnosti, Sama nije stvarnost, to je paradoks? Je li moguće da je stvarnost, a mi smo ista stvar, i mi smo se jednostavno nisu svjesni toga, jer naša percepcija su predrasude na konačnih konceptualizacije? Evo stvar: ako je stvarnost zapravo beskonačna, ali perceptivno konačnih, Ne bi to stvoriti paradoks? Naravno, to bi. I to ne. Paradoks je ne negdje vani. To je ovdje, odmah iza naših očiju. To je u našem prekrasnom mozga pristranost na konačnih percepcija pokušaja, i ne, uočiti beskonačnu stvarnost. Paradoks u kvantnoj enigma je upravo sama svijest. No, ono lijepo paradoks je. Mislim, to nam daje smisao u inače besmislenom svemiru. To nam daje ljepotu u inače prisutno banalnih svemira. To nam daje pojmove kao istine, Pravda, i Ljubav u protivnom nepristran, unloving, stan stvarnost. Svjesno promatranje je prstom u oko razumijevanja oba svijest i kvantna teorija. No, ono lijepo, smislen, voli letjeti je, preklapanje mast kao da je majčino mlijeko. Na kraju dan, naši mozgovi Gordijski čvor stvarnosti. Bilo koji naš mozak evoluirao slučajno, ili kao obveznog procesa u temeljnom šminke stvarnosti, tako da je stvarnost na kraju mogao donijeti značenje za sebe, nije važno. Ono što je važno je da postoji je značenje. Tamo je ljepota. Tamo je ljubav. I mi smo ti koji ga doživljavaju. Bez naših konačnih bias perspektiva nijedan od tih pojmova bi postojati. Mi smo zbunjeni stražari iz svemira, zbunjen i zbunjeni mnoštvom paradoksa; nesvjestan da paradoks je us. No, ono što vožnja! A i okolo idemo, koja donosi nam sve na putu natrag oko kolosalne važnosti prakticiranja disciplinu spominješ meditaciju. Doista, spominješ meditacija je odvajanje od "nemogućeg" čvor, rezanje od Gordijski čvor. Možemo izračunati matematičke vjerojatnosti svi želimo. Možemo se boriti s paradoksom nakon paradoks svega želimo. Možemo otkriti korelacije između svijesti i fizike svi želimo. Ali na kraju dan, Jedini način na koji smo ikada može smisla to je da se na mjestu mirno, spominješ svijest o nama samima, i naš paradoksalno mjesto unutar inače ne-paradoksalne stvarnosti. Izvor slike: Pokažite nam malo ljubavi i širiti svjetlo: 2 Komentari Amen……Mir, Svjetlo,and Love I do not see any reason why two wierd things must be related simply because they are wierd. Brain signalling happens way above the quantum level, synapses fire when hundreds of vesicles free neurotransmitters… this is not a matter of elementary particles but of big molecules. There is no need to invoke any quantum effects. In my view conciousness arises as some brain circuits get dedicated to watching other parts of the brain, rather than, reći, signals coming from the eyes. This is actually why meditation works. By concentrating new circuits can be made and new control gained.