http___fractalenlightenment.com_eo_25948_sustainability_eco-moral-tribalism-for-progressive-sustainability.xml
http___fractalenlightenment.com_bs_25948_sustainability_eco-moral-tribalism-for-progressive-sustainability_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 12.1 12.2 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3
Eco-morala Tribalism por Progresa #Da?rigebleco Progressive sustainability, as opposed to progressive unsustainability, is a challenging prospect. Perhaps the only thing more challenging is figuring out how to live in a compassionate empathic way with our fellow man. I mean there are people caught up in the progressive unsustainability paradigm who are downright lazy, ignorant, stubborn, and mean to contend with. But can we all agree that we don’t want people to starve? Can we all agree that we don’t want people to go without fresh water? Can we all agree that we don’t want people to go without shelter, unnecessarily? If the majority of us can agree on this then the solution is simple, albeit deceivingly simple: provide basic food/water/shelter FOR ALL that meets with basic needs to keep people healthy enough to make more of themselves if they so choose. If they choose to remain lazy, or unskilled, that’s on them. At least they won’t starve, die of thirst, or die of exposure. And maybe with the right kind of help they actually can make something better out of themselves. There’s no cure for laziness. Only the lazy person can cure themselves. Tamen, there is a cure for poverty. But it takes those of us with enough, to actually help out. This is the tricky part. This is the proverbial fly in the ointment. This is where people puff up their chests and espouse culturally-prescribed platitudes such as: “I earned this. Why should I be expected to help people who are too dumb and lazy to help themselves?” The answer is: Kompato, empathy, and love for your fellow man. The answer is: because otherwise people will die. But I realize that all this “Jesus-hippie-talk” doesn’t jive with most people, so here’s a little analogy for you… Let’s shrink our entire society down to a single tribe of ten tents with a single family in each tent. Each tent has a hunter. One tent has a hunter of great prowess, skilled with all weapons. The ten hunters go on a Great Hunt to provide food for the people. The skilled hunter kills 5 buffalo! The next best hunter kills 2 buffalo. And only two other hunters get a single kill each, while the other six hunters get exactly zero. Maybe these other six hunters were lazy. Maybe they were unskilled. Maybe their weapons weren’t adequate enough. Maybe it was a combination of all of these. It matters little the reason. What really matters is that they, and their innocent families, will most certainly starve. Unless? Unless the skilled hunter(S) share their meat (wealth) with the tribe so as to maintain a healthy tribe (eco-moral tribalism). The skilled hunter would get more of the meat, and the choicest cuts, Nature, but at least the other people in the tribe wouldn’t starve. Easy right? Ne, not really. This is a ridiculously simple concept to learn and to rationalize, and yet it is an excruciatingly complex concept to really understand and apply to everyday reality. The main cause of this is that most people are egotistical about what they’ve “earned.” It’s a cultural problem. We’ve been raised to believe in the false ideal of greed. Our culture has become ego-centric, as opposed to eco-centric. It whines, “Me! Me!” instead of declaring: “We!? Enoughness: Restoring Balance to the Economy The problem is we imagine that our sense of worth is wrapped up in how skilled we are at something, because we were raised and conditioned in a culture that values competition over cooperation. This creates ego-centric specialists concerned only with narrow-minded one-upmanship. But we are social creatures first and foremost. Ni devas #?iu alia. Competition has always been secondary to cooperation; otherwise we wouldn’t have survived as species (Darwin). Sekve kiam ?i venas malsupren al ?i, our worth is actually wrapped up in how much we care for other people. The problem is that we’ve had the cart (competition) in front of the horse (Kompato) for roughly 2,000+ Jaroj. It’s time we got the horse back in front of the cart. This will be an arduously Herculean task, considering our cultural conditioning. But it is very important, for the survival of our species, that we get it right. The interesting thing is that when the skilled hunters distribute their wealth they become New-heroes with honor, power and prestige, as opposed to just typical heroes who only have power. We must go beyond being just a typical hero (hoarding hunter) and become a New-hero (wealth distributor). ‘I Am’ is a non-fiction film that poses two practical and provocative questions: what’s wrong with our world, and what can we do to make it better? Bilda Fonto: Ubuntu: I am because we are Dankoni vin tiel: Rimarkoj Slowly, every so slowly, people are waking up. People are teaching their children. Soon a tipping point!
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 12.1 12.2 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3
Eko-moralne Tribalism za napredne održivosti Progressive održivosti, za razliku od progresivne neodrživosti, je izazovan izgledi. Možda je jedino što veći izazov je smisliti kako da žive u saosećajnog empatijskog način s našim bližnjima. Mislim da postoje ljudi uhvaćeni u progresivnom neodrživost paradigme, koji su veoma lijeni, neupućen, tvrdoglav, i znači da se bori sa. Ali možemo svi složiti da ne želite da ljudi gladuju? Možemo li se svi slažemo da ne želite da ljudi idu bez svježe vode? Možemo li se svi slažemo da ne želite da ljudi idu bez skloništa, nepotrebno? Ako većina nas može složiti na ovom onda rješenje je jednostavno, doduše lažno jednostavno: pružaju osnovne hrane / vode / sklonište za sve što se sastaje s osnovnim potrebama zadržati ljude dovoljno zdravi da bi više o sebi, ako tako odluče. Ako oni odluče da ostanu lijeni, ili nekvalificirane, to je na njima. Barem oni neće gladovati, umiru od žeđi, ili umrijeti od izloženosti. A možda s pravom vrstu pomoći oni zapravo mogu napraviti nešto bolje od sebe. Ne postoji lijek za lijenost. Samo lijeni osoba može sebe izliječiti. Međutim, postoji lijek za siromaštvo. Ali to traje one od nas dovoljno, da zaista pomogne. To je lukav dio. Ovo je poslovično prstom u oko. Ovo je mjesto gdje ljudi dah svoje grudi i zastupaju kulturno-propisana floskule kao što su: "Zaradio sam ovo. Zašto treba očekivati sam da pomognem ljudima koji su previše glupi i lijeni da se pomogne?"Odgovor je: samilost, empatija, i ljubav za svoje kolege čovjeka. Odgovor je: jer u suprotnom ljudi će umrijeti. Ali sam shvatio da je sve to "Isus-hipi-talk" ne uklapa s većinom ljudi, evo malo analogija za tebe ... Idemo skupiti cijelog našeg društva do jedan pleme deset šatora s jedne porodice u svakom šatoru. Svaki šator ima lovac. Jedan šator ima lovac velike junaštvo, vješti sa svim oružjem. Deset lovci idu na Velikoj Hunt osigurati hranu za ljude. U vješti lovac ubija 5 bizon! Pored najbolje Hunter ubija 2 bizon. I još samo dva lovca dobije jednu poubijaju, dok je ostalih šest lovaca dobiti jednak nuli. Možda ovih ostalih šest lovci su lijeni. Možda su nestručne. Možda oružje nije bilo dovoljno adekvatne. Možda je to bila kombinacija svih ovih. Bitno je malo razlog. Ono što je zaista važno je da oni, i njihove nevine obitelji, će svakako gladovati. Osim ako? Ukoliko se stručnih lovac(s) podijele svoje meso (bogatstvo) sa plemena kako bi se održala zdrava plemena (eko-moralne tribalizma). U vješti lovac dobiti više od mesa, i najbiranije rezove, naravno, ali barem se drugi ljudi u plemenu ne bi gladovati. Jednostavno pravo? Ne, ne baš. Ovo je smiješno jednostavan koncept da uče i racionalizacije, a ipak to je neverovatno složen koncept da zaista razumiju i primjenjuju na svakodnevne stvarnosti. Glavni uzrok tome je što većina ljudi su egoistične o tome šta su oni "zaradili." To je kulturni problem. Mi smo podignuta da vjeruju u lažne ideal pohlepe. Naša kultura je postala ego-centric, za razliku od eko-centric. To whines, "Me! Mene! Mene!"Umjesto da se proglasi: "Mi smo!" Enoughness: Vraćanje Stanje na ekonomiju Problem je da zamislimo da je naš osjećaj vrijedi je zamotan u koliko vješti smo u nečemu, jer smo duple i uslovljeni u kulturi koja vrednuje konkurencija suradnji. To stvara ego-centric stručnjaka brine samo zatucan jednom upmanship. Ali mi smo društvena bića prije svega. We need each other. Konkurencija je uvijek bio u drugom planu suradnje; inače ne bismo preživio kao vrsta (Darwin). Dakle, kada se sve svodi na to, naša vrijedi zapravo zamotan u koliko nam je stalo do drugih ljudi. Problem je u tome što smo imali kolica (konkurencija) ispred konja (samilost) za otprilike 2,000+ godina. To je vrijeme imamo konja ispred košaricu. To će biti arduously herkulovski zadatak, s obzirom na naše kulturne uređaj. Ali, vrlo je važno, za opstanak naše vrste, da ne bude kako treba. Zanimljivo je da, kada je vješti lovci distribuira svoje bogatstvo postaju Novi-heroji časno, moći i prestiža, za razliku od samo tipične heroja koji imaju moć samo. Moramo ići dalje biti samo tipičan heroj (gomilamo lovac) i postati novi-heroj (bogatstva distributer). 'I Am’ je non-fiction film koji predstavlja dva praktična i provokativna pitanja: šta nije u redu s našim svijetu, i što možemo učiniti da bude bolje? Image Source: Ubuntu: I am because we are Hvala ti puno: Komentari Slowly, every so slowly, people are waking up. People are teaching their children. Soon a tipping point!