http___fitnessweightlosscenter.com_editorial_the-nutrition-debate-a-look-from-both-sides_.xml
http___fitnessweightlosscenter.com_hr_editorial_the-nutrition-debate-a-look-from-both-sides__1.xml
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 9.1 10.1 10.2 11.1 11.2 12.1 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 16.1 17.1 18.1
Based on the recurring dialog in the media and web surrounding Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move initiative along with her campaign to promote healthier food choices it seems that the debate over nutrition is just heating up. And as I type this out it is perplexing to me as to why this is the case. Is there really a question as to what is considered healthy food? Doesn’t everyone agree that fruits, vegetables and whole grains are healthier than processed foods? I guess not. Let’s take a look at a definition of nutrition from thefreedictionary.com: The process of nourishing or being nourished, especially the process by which a living organism assimilates food and uses it for growth and for replacement of tissues. The science or study that deals with food and nourishment, especially in humans. A source of nourishment; food. That seems fairly straight forward but it doesn’t mention what foods are healthier than others. But if we look at evidenced based research and websites like the Harvard School of Public Health, Cornell University’s Evidence Based Living, and Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity we find the same results. Fruit, vegetables and whole grains are far better for you than processed foods. But still some people take the position to advocate against evidenced based nutrition recommendations. I don’t get it. Both sides in the debate recently published articles and we are going to look at excerpts from both articles. First lets take a look at an article published yesterday on the Huffington Post by Dr. David L. Katz titled Nutrition in a Second-Rate Hen House: The mission here is to question why we denigrate nutrition. Whey when it comes to nutrition, common sense goes into suspended animation. Why we tolerate a mishandling of nutrition guidance we would tolerate in no other industry. Why what would be “marketing” in any other industry is called “guidance” in the food industry. And why we tolerate all this when nutrition is, without question, one of the most profoundly important and universally relevant determinants of health outcomes there is — for us and our children. Why? Honestly, I haven’t a clue. We generally don’t let foxes guard hen houses. Not hen houses we care about — like cars and vacuums and washing machines. Nutrition, it seems, isn’t in such a quality hen house. So, when you walk by the farm we all seem willing to sell, you’ll recognize it: It’s in the second-rate hen house, with the fox out front. Next Let’s look at an article published in the American Thinker by Betsy M. Galliher titled The Rube Goldberg Diet: Perhaps the perfect illustration of Mrs. Obama’s absurd mission in parenting the nation is the nearly unpalatable promotional video, featuring Mrs. Obama and spandex-clad comedian and Obama sycophant, Jimmy Fallon, frolicking through the people’s house. I can’t say with any certainty the pair even filmed together as awkwardly as some segments are pieced together, which is a bit like a stirring testament on Detroit, filmed in New Orleans. I only recommend the video for those with very strong stomachs. Watching a First Lady and a comedian play dodge ball under a portrait of George Washington, is an image so disgraceful, I could do without it etched permanently to memory. After another week of executive power grabs, the First Lady’s efforts at government-mandated vegetable embrace should garner little more than a collective harrumph, or make for a nice distraction. But, these are yet more baby steps into tyranny, planted in young acorns, and embraced by the thousands of adults who will share Mrs. Obama’s stage this week, from which big, fat, expensive, government-loving oaks grow. The one thing that jumps out at me is David L. Katz talks about nutrition guidance obviously referring to the evidenced based research that shows what foods are healthier than others and Betsy M. Galliher does not talk about nutrition at all but makes statements against big government and rails against a promotional video which was probably designed to garner attention to the healthy eating initiative. Is this just because of politics? I don’t know. But presented with the nutrition evidence I can’t see how any reasonable person can argue that a healthier diet is not good for both kids and adults. Related articles - First Lady Brings Healthy Eating Message To DISD (dfw.cbslocal.com) - Congress Isn’t Actually Claiming Pizza Is A Vegetable, But Our Kids Deserve Better (blisstree.com)
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 9.1 10.1 10.2 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 16.1 17.1 18.1
Na temelju ponavljajućeg dijaloga u medijima i web oko Michelle Obame Idemo Move inicijativu , zajedno sa svojom kampanjom za promicanje zdraviji izbor hrane čini se da je rasprava oko prehrane je samo zagrijavanje. I kao što sam ovaj tip se je zbunjujuće za mene da zašto je to tako. Postoji li doista pitanje što se smatra zdrava hrana? Ne svi se slažu da voće, povrće i cjelovite žitarice su zdraviji od procesirana hrana? Mislim da ne. Uzmimo pogledati definiciju prehrane iz thefreedictionary.com : Proces hranjivu ili se hrani, osobito u procesu u kojem živi organizam upija hranu i koristi ga za rast i za zamjenu tkiva. Znanost ili istraživanje koje se bavi hrane i ishrane, osobito kod ljudi. Izvor hrane, hrane. To se čini prilično ravno naprijed, ali to se ne spominje što hrana su zdravije od drugih. Ali ako gledamo svjedoče temelji na istraživanju i web stranice kao što su Harvard School of Public Health , Cornell University-a temeljena na dokazima Dnevni i Yale Rudd Centar za hranu politiku i pretilosti nalazimo iste rezultate. Voće, povrće i cjelovite žitarice su daleko bolje za vas od procesirana hrana. No, još uvijek neki ljudi zauzeti položaj na zagovaranje protiv svjedoče temelji prehrambenih preporuka. Ja ne shvaćam. Obje strane u raspravi nedavno objavljenih radova, a mi smo ide pogledati izvatke iz obaju članaka. Prvi omogućuje pogledati članku objavljenom jučer na Huffington Post by Dr. David L. Katz pod nazivom Prehrana u drugorazredni kokoš kući : Misija ovdje je na pitanje zašto smo oklevetati prehranu. Sirutke kada je u pitanju prehrana, zdrav razum ide u suspendirane animacije. Zašto mi tolerirati loše vođenje prehrambenog vodstvom ćemo tolerirati ni u druge industrije. Zašto ono što će biti "marketing" u bilo kojoj drugoj industriji se zove "vodstvo" u prehrambenoj industriji. A zašto mi sve to tolerirati kada prehrana je, bez sumnje, jedan od važnih duboko i univerzalno relevantne odrednice zdravstvenih ishoda postoji - za nas i naše djece. Zašto? Iskreno, ja haven'ta pojma. Mi obično ne neka lisice kuće kokošjih straže. Ne kokošji kuće mi je stalo - poput automobila i vacuums i strojeva za pranje rublja. Prehrana, čini se, nije u takvom objektu kvalitete kokoš. Dakle, kada hoda po farmi svi mi izgledaju spremni prodati, vi ćete ga prepoznati: To je u drugi-rate kokoš kući, s lisica out front. Sljedeća Pogledajmo članku objavljenom u američkom mislilac po Betsy M. Galliher pod nazivom The Rube Goldberg Dijeta : Možda je savršena ilustracija gospođe Obame apsurdnog misije u roditeljstvu nacije je gotovo neukusan promotivni video, featuring Michelle Obama i spandex-odjeven komičar i Obama ulizica, Jimmy Fallon i frolicking kroz ljude u kuću. Ne mogu reći sa sigurnošću par čak snimio zajedno kao nespretno kao što su neki segmenti pieced zajedno, što je malo kao uzbudljiv zavjet na Detroit, sniman u New Orleansu. Ja samo preporučiti video za one s vrlo jakim želucima. Gledanje prva dama i komičar play izmicanje loptu pod portret George Washington, je slika tako sramotno, ja mogu učiniti bez da trajno urezan u memoriju. Nakon drugog tjedna izvršne vlasti zgrabi, prva dama napori vlade na zacrtane povrća zagrljaju treba prikupiti nešto više od kolektivnog harrumph, ili napraviti za lijep distrakcija. No, to su još bebe više koraka u tiraniju, zasađeni u mladih žira, a prihvatila na tisuće odraslih koji će dijele Michelle Obama pozornici ovaj tjedan, od kojih veliki, masti, skupo, vlada vole hrastovi rasti. Jedna stvar koja skače se na mene je David L. Katz govori o prehrani vodstvom očito odnose na temelju istraživanja je vidljivo da pokazuje što hrana su zdravije od drugih i Betsy M. Galliher ne govori o prehrani na sve, ali čini izjave protiv prevelike vlade i tračnice protiv promotivnog spota koji je vjerojatno bio dizajniran da garner pozornost na zdravom prehranom inicijativu. Je li to samo zbog politike? Ne znam. Ali predstavio s prehrane dokaza ne vidim kako je bilo razumna osoba može tvrditi da je zdravije prehrane nije dobro za djecu i odrasle. Povezani članci - Prva dama donosi zdravom prehranom poruku DISD (dfw.cbslocal.com) - Kongres nije zapravo Tvrdeći Pizza je povrće, ali naša djeca zaslužuju bolje (blisstree.com)