https___lists.debian.org_debian-amd64_2003_08_msg00100.html.xml
http___forum.pcekspert.com_showthread.php_s_86f7f3cd5de3b654bd2a8e6b8eaa267d_t_279286_page_2_1.xml
1.1 2.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 6.1 7.1 8.1 10.1 10.2 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 17.1 18.1 20.1
Re: amd64 and dpkg and so Martin Jungowski writes: > Home users with 64-bit CPUs are going to look for an 64-bit OS, and > that's where I can see Linux still has the upper hand. I wouldn't expect > a 64-bit Windows for another year, which gives us a one year time frame > to push 64-bit Linux - however in order to achieve that, the user has to > be capable of running 32-bit applications as well. good point, very good point. And if this was a democratic decision I would certainly vote for the mixed 64/32bit path, in which case we would make use of one of the main features of the amd64 architecture, isn't it? my 2¢ Peter Peter Kruse  , Chief Software Architect Q-Leap Networks GmbH Reply to:
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 8.1
Citiraj: Nisam ja misao point, nego ti miješaš lončiće. Znači, imaš OS 64-bit, a većina aplikacija je 32-bit. 99.9% 32-bitnih aplikacija uredno radi u 64-bit OSu. 64-bit OS se najviše koristi zbog već navedenog razloga. Aplikacije koje su ti 64 bit, u TMu ti neće pisati da su 64-bit, nego ti jednostavno neće pisati da su 32, ako si shvatio poantu. (Sad sam na 32-bit OSu pa ne mogu 100% provjeriti tvrdnju, ali mislim da je tako) Ništa čudno, sve ti je u redu i nema razloga za brigu. Zašto je to tako, objasnio sam ti u samom startu, plus za 95% aplikacija nema previše smisla da se ponovo pišu za 64-bit OS, ponajviše iz razloga što nemaju nikakve dobiti samim time. Koristiš 8GB rama i jedini način da ih iskoristiš je da imaš 64-bit OS.