http___hr.cassiopaea.org_2015_01_10_20141206__1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 17.1 17.2 19.1 20.1 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 22.5 22.6 22.7 23.1 24.1 25.1 25.2 26.1 27.1 27.2 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 28.5 29.1 30.1 30.2 30.3 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 32.1 33.1 34.1 34.2 34.3 36.1 37.1 37.2 37.3 37.4 37.5 37.6 37.7 38.1 38.2 40.1 40.2 40.3 40.4 40.5 41.1 41.2 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 42.5 43.1 43.2 43.3 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 44.5 44.6 44.7 44.8 44.9 44.10 44.11 45.1 45.2 46.1 47.1 48.1 49.1 50.1 50.2 51.1 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 61.1 62.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 72.1 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 78.1 79.1 80.1 81.1 82.1 84.1 85.1 86.1 87.1 88.1 89.1 90.1 91.1 91.2 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 92.5 92.6 92.7 93.1 93.2 93.3 93.4 93.5 93.6 93.7 94.1 94.2 94.3 94.4 95.1 95.2 95.3 95.4 95.5 95.6 95.7 96.1 97.1 97.2 97.3 98.1 98.2 98.3 98.4 99.1 100.1 101.1 102.1 103.1 104.1 105.1 105.2 106.1 106.2 107.1 108.1 108.2 108.3 109.1 110.1 111.1 111.2 111.3 111.4 112.1 112.2 113.1 114.1 114.2 115.1 116.1 116.2 116.3 117.1 118.1 119.1 120.1 121.1 122.1 122.2 122.3 122.4 122.5 122.6 123.1 124.1 124.2 124.3 125.1 126.1 127.1 127.2 128.1 129.1 130.1 131.1 132.1 132.2 132.3 132.4 132.5 132.6 133.1 133.2 133.3 134.1 134.2 134.3 135.1 135.2 136.1 136.2 136.3 137.1 138.1 138.2 138.3 138.4 138.5 138.6 138.7 138.8 138.9 138.10 138.11 138.12 139.1 139.2 139.3 139.4 139.5 139.6 139.7 139.8 139.9 140.1 141.1 141.2 141.3 141.4 141.5 141.6 142.1 142.2 142.3 143.1 143.2 144.1 144.2 145.1 146.1 147.1 148.1 148.2 149.1 150.1 151.1 152.1 152.2 153.1 153.2 153.3 154.1 155.1 156.1 157.1 157.2 158.1 159.1 160.1 161.1 162.1 163.1 163.2 164.1 164.2 165.1 166.1 167.1 168.1 169.1 170.1 171.1 172.1 173.1 173.2 173.3 173.4 173.5 173.6 173.7 174.1 175.1 176.1 176.2 176.3 177.1 178.1 179.1 179.2 180.1 181.1 182.1 183.1 184.1 185.1 186.1 187.1 188.1 188.2 189.1 189.2 189.3 190.1 191.1 192.1 193.1 194.1 195.1 195.2 196.1 197.1 198.1 198.2 198.3 199.1 199.2 199.3 200.1 201.1 202.1 203.1 204.1 204.2 205.1 206.1 207.1 208.1 209.1 210.1 211.1 212.1 213.1 214.1 215.1 216.1 216.2 217.1 217.2 218.1 218.2 219.1
Session Date: December 6th 2014 Laura and Andromeda at the board Pierre, Perceval, Ark, Chu, parallel, Breton, Windmill Knight, Prodigal Son, Data, Mr. Scott, Kniall, Galatea, and Noko the Wonderdog (who once again slept for the whole session and woke up just before the "Goodbye") Q: (L) This is 6 December 2014. A: Fine fire this evening! Ginollia of Cassiopaea here for the present energy arrangement/transduction. Q: (L) That was a thorough introduction. We've got a real OCD type. [laughter] Sorry, I was just being a little bit funny. You covered all the bases for me. A: Just trying to help conserve your energy! Q: (L) I'm assuming that means that I need help conserving my energy... A: Yes. Q: (L) Okay, well we won't go into that. Now, I wanted to ask a question based on something that was said - well, actually there were several things said - in the last session. Oh, that's funny. I just turned to this page and it says: Session 11 October 2014: A: Time for you to sit in the psychomantium or something similar with pencil and paper ready. Q: (L) Why do I need a paper and pencil ready? A: Because we have complex things to convey and that will conserve energy. (L) So we've got energy conservation going on. And then in the same session I said: Q: (L) Do these have to be questions of general interest, or is it possible that say, for example, other people could send in questions to be answered in this way? A: Limit personal questions please. (L) And this is the topic I would like to address: personal questions. I have noticed that on many occasions, starting off with a somewhat personal question has led to something of universal interest for everyone. So, I want to know: is there some kind of... I mean, I'm assuming that a personal question is not... Well, that there's different classifications. Some personal questions might be personal, but they're universally interesting, and other personal questions are just specific to that individual themselves. In that case, is it okay to ask questions that are, or may be, universally interesting or that may lead to discussions that are of universal interest? A: Notice this: Most often the questions that drain and lead to STS energies are asked by individuals who are not in frequency with you and your general tendency to utilize all in service to others. Q: (L) So it depends on the intention and the frequency match? A: More or less. There is also a tendency in such types to ask merely with the intention to "use" this source in a selfish way. Q: (L) Well, yeah, but there are also some people who are fairly desperate in physical situations, like situations of illness and so forth, where it can be kind of understandable that they're feeling just a little bit selfish. A: Yes, but also notice that such individuals often are "fair weather" friends. They come only because they want/need something, but give back very little. Q: (L) Anybody have any elucidating questions on that? {Multiple head shakes.} So, in other words, "limit personal questions" is not a hard and fast dictum, it's flexible. In some cases, personal questions can actually be helpful to other people who may have similar situations. Well, for health issues most often, I think that research is probably the way to go. (Perceval) You can imagine someone for example with health questions, if they had done a lot of work themselves in terms of trying to solve their problem and they came with more information that was shared with everyone via the session, then by the nature of it that would be of more universal interest. (L) I noticed the last time that Rabelais was wanting to ask about cancer, and he was asking about if the theory of Dr. So-and-so is useful. Well, that doesn't help anybody. Explaining the theory and reading it into the record... but on the other hand, that's something you can make your own judgment on and can share via the forum. (Perceval) Exactly. You do all that you can, and then the question you come up with about it, that question would then be more universally useful. Or like, "What's wrong with my big toe? Why is my big toe sore?" (Andromeda) Yeah, and then you would be giving something back to other people first, and utilizing your own energy to find answers. (Chu) And that would be the key, because then you're giving back to the network. (L) If you're not networking, then what are you doing? That kind of leads me to the next question. In the last session, we were talking about DNA changes: Session 11 October 2014: (L) So, liquid DNA... What we have here is a little bit of a confirmation of what the C's were saying way back when, that DNA can turn from a solid to a liquid to infect a cell. But we also know that DNA can also produce beneficial changes. The likelihood is that we have DNA that infected us at some point in time. It truncated the flow of some other DNA that's in our cells already there, but it isn't doing anything because it's been blocked by an infection. The possibility exists, I am surmising, that at some point in time, this could be changed or reversed possibly - probably - virally. Now, am I on to something here? A: Oh indeed! The times ahead will be most interesting especially if the network both expands to the full tribal unit strength, and many others take the initiative to move up to the next stair step. (L) Now, something really interesting occurred this past summer. Well, actually it started happening beginning in the fall of last year when we had these meetings here. We were talking about making changes and decisions and changing realities. {We made videos on the topics showing how making a choice can move you into a different reality.} And right in the middle of these workshops, damned if we didn't discover that there was a farm for sale right down the road from us! It took us a number of months to decide to enter negotiations, and then it took several more months to sort out the negotiations. Meanwhile, we were dealing with the group over in the US, too, and there was a desperate need for a permanent facility there. The bottom line is that in the month of July, I believe we closed on the house in the US in the first or second week of July, and then we closed on the farm on the 22nd of July. So in the month of July, we took definite reality-changing steps to essentially expand our tribal unit strength, so to say. And then, the most curious thing happened which I didn't know about until November: our old pal Vinnie Bridges died on the 25th of July just three days after we acquired the facility here, and about ten days after we acquired the US facility. It hadn't really occurred to me that there could be any relationship between these events until just recently when I was thinking about it and then it struck me as darned curious. I remembered in – I think it was the last session - talking about this tribal unit strength thing, and also about this force field or energy barrier that we generate within this house and how people who have come up against this energy barrier who are the wrong frequency, at the wrong time, and in the wrong way, seem to have difficulties (to put it mildly). And then it occurred to me that it IS a curious thing that two of our major attackers/defamers are dead now. One of them was Andy Rowland who died December of last year (Christmas night, as I heard), and then, Vincent Bridges died almost exactly 7 months later, again on the 25th of the month. That made me think of “year 0” which was discussed a few years back, speaking of 2014. I know I'm speculating like crazy here, but Andy Rowland lived in the UK and Vincent died just a few years after he transferred himself to Europe. The reason this struck me so forcibly is because I looked at pictures of Vincent posted in the guestbook of the funeral home which handled his arrangements, I saw that there were pictures of him from way back right up to just before he died. In 2009, he looked pretty normal and healthy. After 2010, the year he came to Europe and probably helped to instigate and participated in the police investigation that we underwent that year, he just went downhill like crazy. I don’t want to read too much into it, but it's almost as though he had come into contact with something that really destroyed him. So that made me think of the energy field around us that has been described previously, that those with dark or negative frequencies that encounter it, hit it like a brick wall, so to say. I mean, I know it's a long way to Prague, but still, we're on this side of the pond. So I got to wondering if it could possibly be because of being on this side of the Atlantic where we are? And I'm just wondering - speculatively - if there is any relationship between his death on the 25th of July and our changing our reality by purchasing these two properties to enable our tribal unit strength to expand in a definite way? That's my question. Does that sound like a crazy question? (Perceval) It's only crazy if it's not true. [laughter] (Pierre) It's the beginning of superpowers! (L) Is there any relationship? A: In the words of the philosopher: You betcha! Q: (Perceval) What philosopher said that? (Galatea) That could also explain why people become so sick when they travel: because they're entering into someone else's home where their defenses are lowered. The frequency change makes you weak. (Perceval) So, some kind of "death ray" was fired from this house at Vinnie Bridges in Prague and it knocked him stone dead? A: Silly! There was in fact a burst of energy at the accomplishment of the aim and this resonated within the planetary field. It was unfortunate that Bridges was configured in the wrong frequency pattern. Check the news around the same time for other clues of both positive and negative nature! Q: (Pierre) Was Bridges the only casualty of this energy burst? A: No. Q: (Perceval) They said to check the news for other clues... Pierre did a search with the following results: John Blundell, English economist (b. 1952) Johann Breyer, German SS officer (b. 1925) Louis Lentin, Irish director and producer (b. 1933) Robert Newhouse, American football player (b. 1950) Nitzan Shirazi, Israeli footballer and manager (b. 1971) Dora Bryan, English actress and singer (b. 1923) Norman Leyden, American composer and conductor (b. 1917) 2014 – Ariano Suassuna, Brazilian author and playwright (b. 1927) 2014 – Jordan Tabor, English footballer (b. 1990) 2014 – Bill Thompson, American television host (b. 1931) 2014 – Saado Ali Warsame, Somalian singer and politician (b. 1950) 2014 – Joseph Wood, American murderer (b. 1958) 2014 – Ik-Hwan Bae, South Korean-American violinist (b. 1956) 2014 – Yoo Chae-yeong, South Korean-American singer-songwriter and actress (b. 1973) 2014 – Christian Falk, Swedish singer-songwriter and bass player (Imperiet) (b. 1962) 2014 – Dale Schlueter, American basketball player (b. 1945) 2014 – Hans-Hermann Sprado, German journalist and author (b. 1956) 2014 – Carlo Bergonzi, Italian tenor and actor (b. 1924) 2014 – Alan C. Greenberg, American businessman (b. 1927) 2014 – Çolpan Ilhan, Turkish actress (b. 1936) 2014 – Bel Kaufman, German-American author and academic (b. 1911) 2014 – Richard Larter, Australian painter and illustrator (b. 1929) 2014 – Oleh Babayev, Ukrainian politician (b. 1965) 2014 – Charles R. Larson, American admiral (b. 1936) 2014 – Richard MacCormac, English architect, founded MJP Architects (b. 1938) 2014 – Sergei O. Prokofieff, Russian anthroposophist and author (b. 1954) 2014 – Roland Verhavert, Belgian director, producer, and screenwriter (b. 1927) (L) Well, if this is the nature of the kind of things that we could possibly accomplish... [laughter] (Galatea) Think of the possibilities! (Perceval) Quick, buy another farm! [laughter] (L) Some years back, we had an issue with the prefecture in Gers. And we got a notification from the Prefect at the time that we had 30 days to leave France because of the BS started by Vinnie Bridges and Marten Jukema. And our friend, I***, interceded for us directly with one of the ministers of France, {name redacted}, and he interceded on our behalf with the prefect. At the time, I was delivered a personal verbal message from the minister by I***, and he said, "You have enemies in very high places." Well, I didn't take that very seriously at that time. Sheesh, who am I? A housewife with an unusual career choice? But with these recent issues over the past few years, police investigation in 2010 fer cryin’ out loud, and then the FISC investigation in 2011-2012, it just makes me wonder. Just recently we had a sort of confirmation when our bank sent us a letter telling us after 11 years of a very good relationship, they were closing our accounts. After months of trying to open an account in a dozen other banks, and repeatedly being refused after initial acceptance, it became obvious that something was up, that my name triggered some kind of red flag in the banking system. After months of excuses, BS, and disinfo, Chu finally encountered a sympathetic banker who did some checking and told her that this problem with our banking has been because somebody in a very high position has targeted me specifically – it isn’t even FATCA. And also, there appears to be indications from still another source who has access to the inside information, i.e. the computer database, that the social security system was gearing up to target us for an investigation. Now, all that being said, and realizing that there is certainly a lot of circumstantial evidence that something very strange is going on, considering these events with Andy and Vinnie, I’d like to know when are our efforts going to result in countering the attacks of those guys at the top? [laughter] A: Keep in mind that some of these types of individuals have protection via STS sources at the global scale. It will be awhile yet before your group or tribal unit achieves that level of projective power. However, it must be said that the critical mass is a lot less than you might expect to need due to the amplification of networked energies. So, keep your awareness sharp and carry on, as there are STO forces in your corner. Q: (L) Okay. Since we're on this topic, and since it seems that the tribal unit is kind of an important thing, I suppose we should ask some questions about it at the local level. We've got this house, and we've got the house down the road. However, there seems to be a certain issue that I would like to ask for some help on, and I know it's a little personal, but help us out here. I'd like to know what the issues are with Breton in particular in his struggle to come to terms with what we're doing and what we're trying to accomplish. Is that a good way to put it, Breton? You are having a struggle coming to terms with it? (Breton) Um, not consciously, but... (L) Oh, okay. He says it's not conscious. Well, okay, so... A: Warning here! Breton has precipitately disconnected psychic and etheric cords that bound him to a specific plan and milieu. The consequence is that he has torn his triple cycle veil and is leaking energy. The result is what you all observe: a rapid decline in functional intellectual power. Q: (Perceval) What are the cords that bound him to a specific plan and milieu? (L) Did you get that, Breton? (Breton) Yeah, mostly. (L) Do you have a follow up question? (Breton) I'm astounded. (Perceval) Want me to read it out to you? (Breton) One more time. [answer is read out again] (L) I don't understand. Can you... (Chu) What's the triple cycle veil? (L) The triple cycle veil is in the sessions... The body, the emotions, and the soul are the triple cycle thingamajig. So he has like a life plan that he has abandoned? (Chu) They said "milieu", so I'm guessing it's something about his family. (Perceval) Yeah, they said, "a specific plan and milieu". (L) I think you need to be a little more specific because we don't know... Breton says he's in shock, so he can't ask a question, and we have no clue either. So, can we be more specific? I know that's a vague question, but can you help us out here on this? A: Put it this way: It is similar to what has been discussed regarding FRV. Breton has effectively "left his true self behind" near his children and only the body centers are here. Q: (Galatea) Is this like his pre-destiny, like he planned to do something before he came here, but he's not doing it now? A: Exactly, though he has intellectualized that he is making preparations for his children. Breton, what happens if you get things ready in material terms but the children are not prepared in spiritual and emotional terms? Q: (L) Can you answer that, Breton? (Breton) No, I can't answer it. I guess I thought that as you prepare and make steps in the right direction towards the aim, these things become more clear. It's not totally clear how the children and I would get back together again and in what way, but I had to take the first steps. A: You should rather find the way to do both; you must continue the karmic development with those souls and at the same time support the network and safety net that you hope will receive you. Q: (Galatea) What is leaking again? (L) Energy. (Pierre) Energy, because one part of him is here, and one part of him is over there, so he's split. So, in other words... in other words, I dunno. (Pierre) It's a solvable problem. If he's split, the way to fix this problem is to bring these centers back together: to be where his soul is, to help them, and meet them as much as a possible and give them love and psychological and emotional support. Get them prepared on these levels as well. Meanwhile, doing what you're done for years: keep on supporting the network. Where you are doesn't matter. It will all happen at the right time, so have this faith that it will all be resolved. A: You suffer from a lack of faith in the process and have allowed fear to make choices for you. Q: (Chu) For what it's worth, what I'm understanding is that because of this lack of faith in the process, you chose to intellectualize it as the right decision to prepare for them materially here, because that's something tangible that you can see. But the spiritual and emotional preparation is a lot more vague and requires a lot more faith. Being there might prepare them more for later when they have to take a harder or necessary step... A: If you are not there guiding developments and simultaneously watching for the signs, how will you be able to do what is needed for them when it is needed? Q: (L) Well, all right then. (Breton) I don't know how I would be guiding my children given that they live with that... lady. I felt it was out of my hands. A: You give that way more power than it has, and have not developed the necessary force and skills to circumvent obstacles. Q: (L) Maybe it's time to compromise: move close to where she is. (Breton) Yeah, maybe that's the skill I'm supposed to be developing: to be able to raise the children under those kinds of circumstances because I have a contract with those souls. (Chu) And if you're closer, you have more influence and contact. (Pierre) And the motivation, as well. Apparently it's on the soul level that you made this choice. So, it's a very deep commitment, and it should give you a very strong motivation. There's no regret to have. And you know what you have to do, and it's great. It's rare in our lives that we know that this is my path, this is my destiny. (Breton) And maybe I made a mistake. I thought I was following my aim the best by coming here. But maybe I can still follow the aim of the group under a different set of circumstances. (Perceval) Well, of course. Everybody else is doing that. Everyone else who isn't here is following the aim even though they're not here. (Breton) I just thought that I heard the call, and I thought it was mine. But maybe it wasn't the time to come. (Chu) Maybe it's not a matter of being wrong or right. You made a statement to her when you decided not to move closer to her. But now, maybe it's time to choose that path for other reasons? (Breton) The way I was going to serve the aim should have been different, perhaps. (L) Okay, that leads me to another question. I’ve been reading all this stuff about biblical criticism. What was discussed in the chapter I just finished was the fact that there was a conflict between certain sayings that were attributed to Jesus in the text of the gospels and also in the Book of Acts. Whatever is in there reflects something that was going on at the time of writing, and not authentic reporting about anyone called Jesus. In short, what the gospels say represent much later concerns of the authors of those texts. Without going into a whole lot of detail, there are two things, two ways of living, that are kind of in opposition within those texts. First, there are the many sayings where they talk about how you have to give up all your money, your goods, and become basically like a cynic philosopher and wander up and down the roads and convert people... Like Jesus talking to the rich man and saying, "Go and sell all you own, and follow me." And then there are injunctions in other places where it says that an individual who does not take care of his family and who does not take care of the real world - kind of like the obyvatel concept of Gurdjieff - is committing a worse sin than not believing in Jesus. It's dishonoring your parents, your family, and so forth. So there are these two completely diametrically opposed points of view in the texts, and they pop up at odd times. It’s like the cynic version is the gentile point of view, and the strict obedience to the law (honor your father and mother, etc), is the Judaizing point of view. The way that this particular analyst – Robert Price - resolved it was to point out that in Buddhism, which started about 600 BC, went along for several hundred years as a very tough ascetic way of achieving Nirvana, whatever. The whole thing is all about Nirvana, being a monk, withdrawing from the world, meditating, and whatever in order to achieve this Nirvana to get free of the whole earthly cycle; to become nothing, to merge into cosmic mind, or whatever. Then about 100 BC, there was a “new revelation” in Buddhism. Another kind of Buddhism came into being and began to be promulgated. It was The Way of the Bodhisattva, which is that a person could deliberately choose to remain in the world - in other words, stop thinking about getting out of the world every minute of the day, and think about remaining in the world with a commitment to be as perfect as you possibly can, knowing that by not withdrawing into a monkish-type situation, that, yes, you may live many more lifetimes, but you will do them as service to others. I think that the idea was that this was a more benevolent way to be a Buddhist, at least one that ordinary people could follow though the purists of the original form declared it to be cheating or a rationalization at the time. It’s now pretty well accepted. So, both kinds of Buddhism are now being practiced, but the idea of serving others by not withdrawing into the monastery seems to be dominant. So then it just basically comes back to there's a high road, and a low road. (Pierre) Yeah, and it's called the Great Vehicle and the Small Vehicle, I think. (L) So anyhow, this Robert Price says that this is that what he thinks he's seeing: that there was a similar thing in early Christianity; there was the high road where you could become something like a cynic philosopher and wander up and down the road, save people, and sleep on the road side, the good lord provides everything, etc. That's opposed to the ones that were taking care of business, their families, and also the monks and philosophers. So, in any event, the reason I'm giving this background is that, from some of these things that have been said in various sessions about tribal unit and networks and things, it seems that those people who support the network in certain ways, or in whatever ways they can, as long as they are a part of it and as long as they are networking, they don't have to give up their life, give up their jobs, give up whatever, and move into a community, still benefit from the advances of the network; that is to say, they literally receive when they give and help and support. Obviously, a community is one particular way. It's an intense way. But still, our communities are very different from monkly communities, because we're very much "in the world" in a certain sense. Am I kind of on to something with this comparison between the high road and the low road of Buddhism and the high road and low road of Christianity? And what we're talking about in terms of communities and other members in our communities, is that pretty much what we're talking about here? That just being a part of the network in whatever way you can is as valuable as giving up everything to go live in a community? A: More or less. But be aware that there is still the need in these particular times to prepare to actually receive and aid others in the outer edges of the network. Q: (L) Okay. If people are fully engaged in the network, will they receive information in time? A: Yes, the operative term being "fully engaged" in any and every way possible. Q: (Chu) So if they're sitting on the fence, they won't? (Galatea) They have to commit to it. (L) Yeah, but you can commit to something and stay right in your regular life. You don't have to commit to something and just throw all caution to the wind. (Pierre) Fully engaged in every way possible... (L) I think it means what is possible for that person. A: Yes. Q: (Perceval) The previous answer was that there is still a need in these times to prepare to actually receive and aid others in the outer edges of the network. That's us doing the preparation, for example, so that we are effectively acting as proxies for all those others? (Ark) I think that the main thing is to achieve as much RESULTS as possible, you see? So if you are somewhere and you see that you are not at your optimal strength because something is leaking, you cannot achieve most results. Some other place, you can see the results of what you are doing. (L) So if you're not seeing results in your life, you need to rethink what's going on. (Ark) Yeah. (L) Anybody else got any questions on it? (Chu) Just a comment. I would say that if it applied like Perceval was saying to us, or the US community for example, to be preparing for aiding and receiving other people, in order to do that even more, we need those that are in the outer edges to be doing what is possible... (L) ...so that we can receive them! A: Yes yes yes!! Q: (Chu) It's not that they should just sit and wait... A: Tribal unit strength should be a goal! Q: (Perceval) So that last answer then was that there's a need in these particular times, that means people that are out there in the network need to be networking and expanding the network and helping each other. (L) In the center of the network which is where we and the people in the US house are, they need to be prepared and ready. In other words, people on the outer edges of the network can stay where they are for now and be part of the network and know that if the circumstances or conditions transpire, they DO have a place to go. A: Where you put your energy, including funding, is where your heart is and where you will be drawn and received when the time comes. [table leg starts squeaking during this answer.] Q: (Chu) I was thinking it's the clearest explanation that it's not where you are, but who you are and what you see that counts. (L) Because where you are, IF you see the signs, you can change your position if it's required. (Chu) Yeah, and people have been worried about preparing, but they're worried about the "where" before worrying about where the heart is. (Pierre) It's not only who you are, it's what you give as well. (Perceval) Where you put your energy. (L) Anything else anybody has on that? (Ark) Yeah. (L) What? (Ark) I forgot. [laughter] No, I mean, I have two short sentences. First is: Duties first. Second: Results is what counts. If you have unfulfilled duties, then you cannot get best results. So, first thing is to do your duty. The better you are doing your duties, the more energy you can give to the network, and then the more energy can flow to you. (L) In other words, “how can you have your pudding if you don't eat your meat?” (Pierre) How can you have your fat bomb if you didn't have your bacon? (Galatea) I have one tiny question. How can we strengthen our pineal gland? What are some other methods we can use? (L) Why do you want to strengthen your pineal gland? (Galatea) So it makes us more psychic. (L) No it isn't. It's the pituitary. (Galatea) Oh, pituitary, sorry. A: Diet and detox. (Galatea) That's it? A: Channeling also helps if one is suited to it. Q: (L) In other words, if you're not suited, don't do it. A: Yes. Q: (Perceval) Here be dragons. (Chu) Well, the question everybody's going to ask on the forum is: How do they know if they're suited? (Perceval) Use your intuition! [laughter] A: The individuals who are truly suited and capable of useful STO communication are RARE. It is as much genetics as soul potential and mission destiny profile as preparation. It takes ALL in the right mix. Q: (L) So, the fact that you mention this to Galatea, does this indicate that she might possibly have the right mix? A: Very possibly! Q: (Galatea) As in, it's going to happen, or it might happen? A: Up 2 U Q: (L) So, you've been texting, eh? (Andromeda) That was Galatea in the future! [laughter] TY, TY! (L) What does "TY" mean? (Galatea) Thank you. (L) Okay, I think I want to shut down for the night if nobody has anything pressing. Is there anything we need know? We didn't ask any world questions. (Pierre) I have a question about those drones. Many drones have been observed over French nuclear plants. Are these really drones? A: Yes. Q: (Pierre) Who is operating them? A: Wouldn't you and the army like to know? Q: (Andromeda) So it's not the army... (Perceval) It's probably just... Okay, so it's not just some locals. (Pierre) It's over the whole country - for weeks. A: Who is spying on everyone everywhere? Q: (Perceval) NSA. (Pierre) Mossad. A: Close enough! Q: (Pierre) Why? A: Keeping the pressure on France. Q: (Pierre) Like a threat. (Perceval) The NSA is trying to scare the French political establishment by flying drones over nuclear power plants. (Pierre) To not switch to Russia, or... (Perceval) ...an "accident" is gonna happen. A: Now it is time to say goodnight and "see you in the psychomantium soon!" Goodbye. (Pierre) They didn't forget, eh? [laughter] (Perceval) So when you go to the psychomantium they’ll be there with a watch saying, "We've been waiting for WEEKS!" [laughter] END OF SESSION
3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 16.2 17.1 18.1 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 20.1 21.1 22.1 22.2 23.1 24.1 24.2 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 26.1 27.1 27.2 27.3 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 29.1 30.1 31.1 31.2 31.3 32.1 33.1 33.2 33.3 33.4 33.5 33.6 34.1 34.2 35.1 35.2 35.3 35.4 36.1 36.2 37.1 37.2 37.3 37.4 37.5 38.1 38.2 38.3 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 39.5 39.6 39.7 39.8 39.9 39.10 39.11 40.1 40.2 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 45.2 46.1 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 48.1 49.1 50.1 51.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 61.1 62.1 63.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 72.1 73.1 74.1 74.2 75.1 76.1 77.1 78.1 79.1 80.1 80.2 81.1 82.1 82.2 83.1 84.1 85.1 86.1 86.2 87.1 87.2 87.3 87.4 87.5 87.6 88.1 88.2 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.6 88.7 89.1 89.2 89.3 89.4 90.1 90.2 90.3 90.4 90.5 90.6 90.7 91.1 92.1 92.2 92.3 93.1 93.2 93.3 93.4 94.1 95.1 96.1 97.1 98.1 99.1 100.1 100.2 101.1 101.2 102.1 103.1 103.2 104.1 105.1 106.1 106.2 106.3 107.1 107.2 108.1 109.1 109.2 110.1 111.1 111.2 111.3 112.1 113.1 114.1 115.1 116.1 117.1 117.2 117.3 117.4 117.5 117.6 118.1 119.1 119.2 119.3 120.1 121.1 122.1 122.2 123.1 124.1 125.1 126.1 127.1 127.2 127.3 127.4 127.5 127.6 128.1 128.2 128.3 129.1 129.2 129.3 130.1 130.2 131.1 131.2 131.3 132.1 133.1 133.2 133.3 133.4 133.5 133.6 133.7 133.8 133.9 133.10 134.1 134.2 134.3 134.4 134.5 134.6 134.7 134.8 134.9 134.10 134.11 135.1 136.1 136.2 136.3 136.4 136.5 136.6 137.1 137.2 137.3 138.1 138.2 139.1 139.2 140.1 141.1 142.1 143.1 143.2 144.1 145.1 146.1 147.1 147.2 148.1 148.2 148.3 149.1 150.1 151.1 152.1 152.2 153.1 154.1 155.1 156.1 157.1 158.1 158.2 159.1 159.2 160.1 161.1 162.1 163.1 164.1 165.1 166.1 167.1 168.1 168.2 168.3 168.4 168.5 168.6 168.7 169.1 170.1 171.1 171.2 171.3 172.1 173.1 174.1 174.2 175.1 176.1 177.1 178.1 179.1 180.1 181.1 182.1 183.1 183.2 184.1 184.2 184.3 185.1 186.1 187.1 188.1 188.2 189.1 190.1 190.2 191.1 192.1 193.1 193.2 193.3 194.1 194.2 194.3 195.1 196.1 197.1 198.1 199.1 200.1 201.1 202.1 203.1 204.1 205.1 206.1 207.1 208.1 209.1 210.1 211.1 212.1 212.2 213.1 214.1 215.1 216.1 217.1
Laura (L) i Andromeda za pločom Prisutni: Pierre, Perceval, Ark, Chu, parallel, Breton, Windmill Knight, Prodigal Son, Data, Mr. Scott, Kniall, Galatea i Noko the Wonderdog (pas, op. prev.) (koji je opet spavao kroz cijelu sesiju i probudio se taman prije završnih pozdrava) Pitanje (P): (L) Danas je 6. prosinac 2014. Odgovor (O): Fina vatra večeras! Ginollia od Kasiopeje je prisutna za sadašnji raspored/pretvaranje energije. P: (L) To je bio temeljiti uvod. S nama je OKP tip (opsesivno-kompulzivni poremećaj, op. prev.). [smijeh] Ispričavam se, malo sam se šalila. Sve ste obuhvatili. O: Samo pokušavamo pomoći sačuvati tvoju energiju! P: (L) Pretpostavljam kako to znači da mi je potrebna pomoć u očuvanju moje energije… O: Da. P: (L) OK, dobro, nećemo sad ulaziti u to. E sada, željela sam postaviti pitanje temeljeno na nečemu o čemu smo već govorili – pa, zapravo se pričalo o nekoliko stvari – u posljednjoj sesiji. Oh, ma zamisli to. Okrenula sam ovu stranicu i tu piše: Sesija 11. listopad 2014. O: Vrijeme je da sjedneš u psihomantijum ili nešto slično s unaprijed pripremljenim olovkom i papirom. P: (L) Zašto su mi potrebni unaprijed pripremljeni papir i olovka? O: Zato što imamo kompleksne stvari za prenijeti i to će uštedjeti energiju. (L) Dakle pričamo o očuvanju energije. I onda sam tijekom iste sesije rekla: P: (L) Moraju li to biti pitanja od općeg interesa, ili je moguće da, recimo, na primjer, drugi ljudi mogu poslati pitanja kako bi se na njih moglo odgovoriti na ovaj način? O: Molili bismo da ograničite osobna pitanja. (L) I to je tema kojom bi se htjela pozabaviti: osobna pitanja. Primjetila sam puno puta, kada bi započeli s donekle osobnim pitanjem da bi to dovelo do nečega što je od općeg interesa. Dakle, zanima me: postoji li neka… Hoću reći, pretpostavljam da osobno pitanje nije… Pa, da postoje različite klasifikacije. Neka osobna pitanja bi mogla biti osobna, ali su općenito interesantna, a druga osobna pitanja se odnose isključivo na određenog pojedinca. U tom slučaju, je li u redu postavljati pitanja koja su, ili bi mogla biti, od općeg interesa ili koja mogu dovesti do rasprava koje su od općeg interesa? O: Obrati pažnju na ovo: pitanja koja crpe i koja uzrokuju OPS energije najčešće postavljaju pojedinci koji nemaju frekvencije usklađene s tobom i tvojim općim težnjama da koristiš sve kako bi služila drugima. P: (L) Dakle, to ovisi o namjeri i usklađenosti frekvencija? O: Manje-više. Kod takvih osoba je prisutna sklonost postavljanja pitanja isključivo s namjerom da se ovaj izvor “iskoristi” u sebične svrhe. P: (L) Pa, da, ali ima ljudi koji su poprilično očajni u fizičkim okolnostima, poput okolnosti vezanih za bolest i tako dalje, gdje je donekle razumljivo da se ponašaju mrvicu sebično. O: Da, ali obrati pažnju na to da su takvi pojedinci često prijatelji s tobom dok god imaju nekakve koristi od toga. Dolaze isključivo jer žele/trebaju nešto, ali zauzvrat jako malo daju. P: (L) Ima li još netko kakvo pitanje čime bi to razjasnili? {Više njih vrti glavom} Dakle, drugim riječima, “ograničavanje osobnih pitanja” nije kruta zapovijed, nego je fleksibilna. U nekim slučajevima, osobna pitanja mogu biti od pomoći drugim ljudima koji se mogu nalaziti u sličnim okolnostima. Dobro, što se tiče stvari vezanih za zdravlje, mislim kako je istraživanje najčešće najpametniji izbor. (Perceval) Zamislite si nekoga, na primjer, sa zdravstvenim poteškoćama, ako je taj puno radio na sebi u smislu pokušaja da riješi svoj problem i prikupio više informacija koje je podijelio sa svima putem sesije, onda to u svojoj suštini spada više u pitanja od općeg interesa. (L) Primjetila sam zadnji put kad je Rabelais želio pitati vezano za rak, i pitao je vezano za teoriju tog i tog doktora je li ona korisna. Pa, to nikome ne pomaže. Objasniti teoriju i pročitati je naglas… no s druge strane, to je nešto o čemu sam možeš donijeti sud i podijeliti putem foruma. (Perceval) Upravo tako. Odradiš što je u tvojoj moći, i onda će pitanje koje ćeš osmisliti, to pitanje će onda biti više od općeg interesa. Ili kad pitaju: “Što se događa s mojim nožnim palcem? Zašto me boli nožni palac?” (Andromeda) Da, na taj način bi prije svega vraćao nešto drugim ljudima, i koristio vlastitu energiju kako bi našao odgovore. (Chu) I to bi bilo ključno, jer onda bi vraćali nešto nazad mreži. (L) Ako se ne umrežavaš, što onda radiš? To me pomalo dovodi do sljedećeg pitanja. U zadnjoj sesiji pričali smo o DNK promjenama: Sesija 11. listopad 2014. (L) Dakle, tekuća DNK… Ovdje pomalo imamo potvrdu toga što su Kasiopejci davnih dana pričali, da DNK može mijenjati oblik iz krutog u tekući – vezano za napomenu o prekinutom toku tekućine u kontekstu genetskog inžinjeringa – kako bi inficirala stanicu. Ali također znamo kako DNK također može proizvesti pozitivne promjene. Vjerojatnost je kako imamo DNK koja nas je inficirala u određenom trenutku u prošlosti. Ona je prekinula tok neke druge DNK koja već postoji u našim stanicama, ali ništa ne radi jer je blokirana infekcijom koja je ubacila INTRONE blokada. Postoji mogućnost, nagađam, da se to u određenom trenutku, može promijeniti ili poništiti možda – vjerojatno – putem virusa. E sada, jesam li na dobrom tragu? O: Oh doista! Vremena koja slijede će biti naročito interesantna ako se mreža proširi do pune snage plemenske jedinice, i mnogi drugi preuzmu inicijativu kako bi se popeli za jednu stepenicu. (L) E sad, nešto zbilja interesantno se dogodilo ovog ljeta. Pa, zapravo se počelo događati tokom jeseni prošle godine kada smo imali te sastanke ovdje. Pričali smo o uvođenju promjena i odlukama i stvarnostima koje se mijenjaju. {Napravili smo video snimke vezane za te teme pokazujući kako nas pravljenje izbora može odvesti u drugačiju stvarnost} I baš usred održavanja tih radionica, otkrili smo, k vragu, kako je na prodaju poljoprivredno imanje koje se nalazilo niz cestu nedaleko od nas! Nekoliko mjeseci nam je trebalo kako bi se odlučili hoćemo li se upustiti u pregovaranje, i onda je još nekoliko mjeseci bilo potrebno da se pregovori privedu kraju. Za to vrijeme, imali smo također posla s grupom koja je preko u SAD-u, i postojala je tamo prijeka potreba za stalnim prostorom. Kad se sve zbroji i oduzme, u srpnju smo, ako se ne varam, došli do kuće u SAD-u, tijekom prvog ili drugog tjedna srpnja, i onda smo do poljoprivrednog imanja došli 22. srpnja. Dakle, u srpnju smo poduzeli konačne korake koji mijenjaju stvarnost kako bi u suštini proširili snagu naše plemenske cjeline, da se tako izrazim. I onda, jedna užasno zanimljiva stvar se dogodila za koju nisam saznala do studenog: naš stari prijatelj Vinnie Bridges je preminuo 25. srpnja, samo tri dana nakon što smo ovdje kupili imanje, i otprilike deset dana nakon što smo kupili prostor u SAD-u. Nije mi uopće palo na pamet da bi mogla postojati veza između ovih događaja sve dok nedavno nisam razmišljala o tome i onda mi se to učinilo zanimljivim. Sjećam se – mislim da se radilo o posljednjoj sesiji – kako smo pričali o toj snazi plemenske cjeline, i također o ovom polju sila ili energetskoj barijeri koju generiramo unutar ove kuće i kako ljudi koji su se suočili s tom energetskom barijerom, a da svojom frekvencijom nisu usklađeni, te se nalaze na pogrešnom mjestu u pogrešno vrijeme, imaju raznih poteškoća (najblaže rečeno). I onda mi je palo na pamet da JEST zanimljivo to što su dva od naših najistaknutijih napadača/klevetnika sada mrtvi. Jedan od njih je bio Andy Rowland koji je preminuo u prosincu prošle godine (u noći na Božić, koliko sam čula), i onda, Vincent Bridges je umro gotovo točno 7 mjeseci kasnije, ponovno na 25. dan mjeseca. Pa sam počela razmišljati o “nultoj godini” o kojoj smo raspravljali prije nekoliko godina, govoreći o 2014. godini. Znam da ovdje debelo nagađam, ali Andy Rowland je živio u Velikoj Britaniji, a Vincent je umro samo nekoliko godina nakon što se preselio u Europu. To me se tako snažno dojmilo jer sam gledala Vincentove fotografije, u knjizi za goste pogrebnog poduzeća koje se brinulo o njegovoj sahrani, i vidjela sam da su tu bile fotografije iz njegove davne prošlosti pa sve do vremena prije nego što je umro. U 2009., on je izgledao normalno i zdravo. Nakon 2010. godine, kada je došao u Europu i vjerojatno pomogao pokrenuti policijsku istragu protiv nas i sudjelovati u njoj, sve mu je pošlo strašno nizbrdo. Ne želim to tumačiti na svoj način, ali kao da je došao u kontakt s nečime što ga je zbilja uništilo. Pa me je to natjeralo na razmišljanje o prethodno opisanom energetskom polju oko nas, u koje oni s mračnim ili negativnim frekvencijama udare kao u zid kad ga sretnu, da se tako izrazim. Hoću reći, daleko smo mi od Praga, ali svejedno, s ove strane bare smo. Pa sam se počela pitati je li to možda jer je bio s ove strane Atlantskog oceana, gdje se mi nalazimo? I samo me zanima – špekuliram – postoji li veza između njegove smrti 25. srpnja i našeg mijenjanja naše stvarnosti kupovinom ta dva imanja koja će nam omogućiti proširenje snage naše plemenske cjeline na konkretan način? To je moje pitanje. Zvuči li to kao ludo pitanje? (Perceval) Ludo je isključivo ako nije istinito. [smijeh] (Pierre) To je začetak supermoći! (L) Postoji li neka veza? O: Riječima filozofa: dakako! P: (Perceval) Koji je to filozof rekao? (Galatea) To bi također moglo objasniti zašto se ljudi razbole kada putuju: jer ulaze u tuđi dom gdje je njihova obrana slabija. Promjena frekvencije te oslabi. (Perceval) Dakle, neka vrsta “smrtonosne zrake” je ispaljena iz ove kuće na Vinnieja Bridgesa u Pragu i to ga je usmrtilo? O: Smijurija! Dogodio se, zapravo, izboj energije pri postignuću cilja i to je rezoniralo unutar planetarnog polja. Nesreća je što je Bridges bio podešen na krivi frekvencijski uzorak. Pretražite tadašnje vijesti kako bi našli znakove i pozitivne i negativne prirode! P: (Pierre) Je li Bridges bio jedina žrtva ovog izboja energije? O: Ne. P: (Perceval) Rekli su da pretražimo vijesti kako bi našli još neke znakove… Pierre je obavio pretragu sa sljedećim rezultatima: John Blundell, engleski ekonomist (r. 1952) Johann Breyer, časnik njemačkog SS-a (r. 1925) Louis Lentin, irski režiser i producent (r. 1933) Robert Newhouse, igrač američkog nogometa (r. 1950) Nitzan Shirazi, izraelski nogometaš i menadžer (r. 1971) 23. srpanj Dora Bryan, engleska glumica i pjevačica (r. 1923) Norman Leyden, američki skladatelj i dirigent (r. 1917) 2014 – Ariano Suassuna, brazilski pisac i dramatičar (r. 1927) 2014 – Jordan Tabor, engleski nogometaš (r. 1990) 2014 – Bill Thompson, američki televizijski voditelj (r. 1931) 2014 – Saado Ali Warsame, somalijski pjevač i političar (r. 1950) 2014 – Joseph Wood, američki ubojica (r. 1958) 24. srpanj 2014 – Ik-Hwan Bae, južnokorejsko-američki violinist (r. 1956) 2014 – Yoo Chae-yeong, južnokorejsko-američka pjevačica, tekstopisac i glumica (r. 1973) 2014 – Christian Falk, švedski pjevač, tekstopisac i svirač bas-gitare (Imperiet) (r. 1962) 2014 – Dale Schlueter, američki košarkaš (r. 1945) 2014 – Hans-Hermann Sprado, njemački novinar i pisac (r. 1956) 25. srpanj 2014 – Carlo Bergonzi, talijanski tenor i glumac (r. 1924) 2014 – Alan C. Greenberg, američki biznismen (r. 1927) 2014 – Çolpan Ilhan, turska glumica (r. 1936) 2014 – Bel Kaufman, njemačko-američki pisac i akademik (r. 1911) 2014 – Richard Larter, australski slikar i ilustrator (r. 1929) 26. srpanj 2014 – Oleh Babayev, ukrajinski političar (r. 1965) 2014 – Charles R. Larson, američki admiral (r. 1936) 2014 – Richard MacCormac, engleski arhitekt, osnivač MJP arhitekata (r. 1938) 2014 – Sergei O. Prokofieff, ruski antropozof i pisac (r. 1954) 2014 – Roland Verhavert, belgijski režiser, producent i scenarist (r. 1927) (L) Pa, ako je ovo narav događaja koje bi mi možda mogli postići… [smijeh] (Galatea) Zamislite što bi sve mogli! (Perceval) Brzo, kupimo još jedno imanje! [smijeh] (L) Prije nekoliko godina imali smo problem s prefekturom u Gersu. I dobili smo tada obavijest od prefekta da u roku od 30 dana moramo otići iz Francuske zbog gluposti koje su pokrenuli Vinnie Bridges i Marten Jukema. I naš prijatelj, I***, zauzeo se izravno kod jednog od francuskih ministara, {ime cenzurirano}, a ovaj se zauzeo za nas kod prefekta. U to vrijeme, I*** mi je prenijeo osobnu usmenu poruku francuskog ministra, i rekao je, “Imaš neprijatelje na jako visokim položajima.” Dobro, nisam to tada shvatila pretjerano ozbiljno. Bože, tko sam ja? Kućanica s neuobičajenim odabirom karijere? Ali s ovim nedavnim problemima tijekom zadnjih nekoliko godina, policijskom istragom 2010. godine, za ime Božje, i onda FISC istragom 2011.-2012., to me tjera na razmišljanje. Baš nedavno doživjeli smo potvrdu, recimo, kad nam je naša banka poslala pismo u kojem stoji da nam zatvaraju račun nakon 11 godina poslovanja uz obostrano zadovoljstvo. Nakon što smo mjesecima pokušavali otvoriti račun u desetak drugih banaka, i nakon što su nas stalno odbijali nakon početnog primanja, postalo je jasno da se nešto događa, da moje ime pokreće neku vrstu upozorenja u bankovnom sustavu. Nakon više mjeseci isprika, gluposti, i dezinformacija, Chu je napokon naletila na suosjećajnog bankara koji je išao provjeravati i rekao joj da ovaj problem s našim bankarenjem postoji jer netko na jako visokom položaju ima upravo mene na piku – čak se ni ne radi o FATCA-i. Također, postoje naznake od jednog drugog izvora, koji ima pristup insajderskim informacijama, tj. kompjuterskoj bazi podataka, da se Ministarstvo rada i socijalne skrbi (“social security system” u izvorniku, op. prev.) sprema pokrenuti istragu protiv nas. E sad, kad se sve to skupa uzme u obzir, i shvati da postoji dosta posrednih dokaza da se nešto zbilja čudno događa, uzevši u obzir ove događaje s Andyjem i Vinniejem, zanima me kada će naši napori uroditi uzvraćanjem napada tim likovima na vrhu? [smijeh] O: Imajte na umu da neki od tih vrsta pojedinaca imaju zaštitu putem OPS izvora koji djeluju na globalnoj razini. Proći će dosta vremena prije no što vaša grupa ili plemenska jedinica postigne tu razinu projekcijske moći. Međutim, mora se reći kako je kritična masa puno manja nego što bi vi očekivali da je potrebna, zbog pojačanja umreženih energija. Dakle, neka vam svijest bude izoštrena i samo nastavite, obzirom da su OPD snage na vašoj strani. P: (L) OK. Obzirom da smo na ovoj temi, i obzirom da se čini kako je plemenska jedinica nekako važna stvar, pretpostavljam da bi trebali postaviti neka pitanja o tome vezano za lokalnu razinu. Imamo ovu kuću, i imamo kuću koja se nalazi niz cestu. Međutim, postoji određeni problem oko kojeg bi htjela da nam pomognete, i znam da je pomalo osobno, ali pomozite nam. Zanima me kakve konkretno probleme ima Breton vezano za njegovu borbu da se pomiri s time što mi ovdje radimo i što pokušavamo postići. Jesam li se izrazila na pravi način, Breton? Imaš poteškoća pomiriti se s time? (Breton) Hm, ne svjesno, ali… (L) Oh, OK. Kaže da nije svjesno. Dobro, OK, znači da… O: Upozorenje, u ovom slučaju! Breton je naglo raskinuo psihičke i eterične veze koje su ga vezivale za određeni plan i milje. Posljedica toga jest da je rastrgao veo trostrukog ciklusa i gubi energiju. Rezultat je ono što ste svi vi primjetili: nagli gubitak funkcionalne intelektualne moći. P: (Perceval) Koje su to veze što ga vežu za određeni plan i milje? (L) Jesi li to shvatio, Breton? (Breton) Da, uglavnom. (L) Da li imaš popratno pitanje? (Breton) Zaprepašten sam. (Perceval) Želiš li da ti to još jednom pročitam? (Breton) Još jednom. [odgovor se još jednom čita] (L) Ne razumijem. Možeš li… (Chu) Što je veo trostrukog ciklusa? (L) Veo trostrukog ciklusa se nalazi u sesijama… Tijelo, emocije i duša su stvarčice trostrukog ciklusa. Dakle, on ima životni plan koji je napustio? (Chu) Rekli su “milje”, pa nagađam da je to vezano za njegovu obitelj. (Perceval) Da, rekli su, “određeni plan i milje”. (L) Mislim da trebate biti određeniji jer ne znamo… Breton kaže da je u šoku, pa ne može postaviti pitanje, a i mi nemamo pojma. Dakle, možemo li biti određeniji? Znam da je pitanje nejasno, ali možete li nam ovdje pomoći oko ovoga? O: Recimo to ovako: to je slično onome o čemu se pričalo vezano za frekvencijsku rezonantnu vibraciju (FRV). Breton je u stvarnosti “ostavio svoje istinsko ja za sobom” kod svoje djece i samo su tjelesni centri prisutni ovdje. P: (Galatea) Je li to kao njegova unaprijed planirana sudbina, kao da je planirao nešto uraditi prije nego što je došao ovdje, ali sada on to ne radi? O: Upravo tako, iako je on to intelektualizirao kao da pravi pripreme za svoju djecu. Breton, što se događa kada sve pripremiš u materijalnom smislu, ali djeca nisu spremna u duhovnom i emocionalnom smislu? P: (L) Možeš li na to odgovoriti, Breton? (Breton) Ne, ne mogu na to odgovoriti. Pretpostavljam da sam mislio kako priprema i kretanje u pravom smjeru prema cilju dovode do razjašnjenja. Nije u potpunosti jasno kako bi se ja i djeca ponovo našli skupa i na koji način, ali morao sam poduzeti prve korake. O: Prije bi trebao naći načina da učiniš oboje; moraš nastaviti karmički razvoj s tim dušama i istovremeno podržavati mrežni rad i sigurnosnu mrežu za koju se nadaš da će te primiti. P: (Galatea) Što se ono gubi? (L) Energija. (Pierre) Energija, jer dio njega je ovdje, a dio njega je tamo, pa je rastrgan. (L) Dobro… Dakle, drugim riječima… drugim riječima, pojma nemam. (Pierre) Problem se da riješiti. Ako je rastrgan, problem se može riješiti tako da se ti centre ponovo spoje: neka ide tamo gdje mu je duša, neka im pomogne, neka se nalazi s njima što je više moguće, i pruži im ljubav, i psihološku i emocionalnu podršku. Neka ih pripremi i na taj način. U međuvremenu, neka radi što je godinama radio: nastavi podržavati mrežu. Gdje se nalaziš nije bitno. Sve će se dogoditi u pravom trenutku, pa imaj vjere da će se sve to razriješiti. O: Patiš od pomanjkanja vjere u proces i dozvolio si da strah donosi odluke umjesto tebe. P: (Chu) Ako ti išta znači, koliko ja shvaćam, zbog tog pomanjkanja vjere u proces si odabrao to intelektualizirati kao ispravnu odluku da za njih napraviš materijalne pripreme ovdje, jer to je nešto opipljivo što možeš vidjeti. Ali duhovna ili emocionalna priprema je kudikamo nejasnija i zahtjeva puno više vjere. Ako budeš uz njih, to bi ih moglo bolje pripremiti za kasnije kada moraju poduzeti teže ili neophodne korake… O: Ako nisi tamo usmjeravajući razvoj situacije i istovremeno prateći znakove, kako ćeš biti u stanju učiniti što je potrebno za njih kada bude potrebno? P: (L) Dobro, u redu onda. (Breton) Ne znam kako ću usmjeravati svoju djecu obzirom da žive s tom… damom. Imao sam osjećaj da situacija nije pod mojom kontrolom. O: Na taj način pridaješ tome više moći nego što zapravo ima, i nisi razvio nužnu silu i vještine kako bi premostio zapreke. P: (L) Možda je došlo vrijeme za kompromis: preseli se tamo u blizinu gdje ona živi. (Breton) Da, možda je to vještina koju bi trebao razvijati: biti u stanju odgajati djecu u tim uvjetima jer imam ugovor s tim dušama. (Chu) I ako si im bliže, imaš više utjecaja i kontakta s njima. (Pierre) I motivacije, također. Čini se da si to na razini duše odabrao. Dakle, to je jako duboka obaveza, i trebala bi ti dati jako snažnu motivaciju. Nije vrijeme za žaljenje. I znaš što moraš napraviti, i to je sjajno. Rijetkost je u našim životima da znamo da je nešto naš put, naša sudbina. (Breton) I možda sam pogriješio. Mislio sam da dolazeći ovamo na najbolji način slijedim svoj cilj. Ali možda još uvijek mogu slijediti cilj grupe u drugačijim uvjetima. (Perceval) Pa, naravno. Svi ostali to čine. Svi ostali koji nisu ovdje slijede cilj iako nisu ovdje. (Breton) Samo sam pomislio kako sam čuo poziv, i mislio sam kako se odnosi na mene. Ali možda nije bilo pravo vrijeme za doći ovamo. (Chu) Možda nije stvar u tome tko je u pravu, a tko u krivu. Izrazio si joj svoj stav kada si odlučio da se nećeš preseliti u njenu blizinu. Ali sada, možda je vrijeme da se taj put izabere iz drugih razloga? (Breton) Način na koji sam mislio služiti cilju je trebao biti drugačiji, možda. (L) OK, to me dovodi do jednog drugog pitanja. Čitala sam sav taj materijal o biblijskoj kritici. U poglavlju koje sam upravo završila se raspravljalo o činjenici da je postojao konflikt između određenih izreka koje su pripisane Isusu u tekstovima evanđelja i također u Djelima apostolskim. Što god da je u njima, odražava nešto što se odvijalo u vrijeme njihovog pisanja, a ne autentično izvještavanje o nekome tko se zvao Isus. Ukratko, ono što stoji u evanđeljima odražava kasnije brige autora tih tekstova. Da ne ulazim pretjerano u detalje, postoje dvije stvari, dva načina življenja, koja su si međusobno suprotstavljena unutar tih tekstova. Prvi, postoje brojne izreke gdje pričaju o tome kako moraš predati sav svoj novac, svoja dobra, i manje-više postati kao cinični filozof i lutati gore-dolje cestama i preobraćati ljude… Kao kad je Isus pričao s bogatašem i rekao: “Odi i prodaj sve što imaš, i slijedi me.” Ali postoje i naredbe na drugim mjestima gdje se govori o tome da pojedinac koji ne vodi brigu o svojoj obitelji i ne vodi brigu o vanjskom svijetu – slično Gurdjieffovom konceptu “obivatela” – čini gori grijeh od nevjerovanja u Isusa. Radi se o sramoćenju svojih roditelja, svoje obitelji, i tako dalje. Dakle postoje te dvije dijametralno suprotne perspektive u tekstovima, i one iskaču na čudnim mjestima. Kao da je cinična verzija iz nežidovske perspektive, a strogo poštivanje zakona (poštuj oca i majku, itd.) iz židovske perspektive. Upravo taj analitičar – Robert Price – je to razriješio tako da je istaknuo kako je budizam, koji je začet otprilike 600. g. pr. Kr., postojao nekoliko stotina godina kao vrlo strog, asketski način dostizanja nirvane, čega god. Tu je sve posvećeno nirvani, treba biti redovnik, povući se iz svijeta, meditirati, i raditi štogod kako bi se postigla ta nirvana da bi se oslobodili cijelog zemaljskog ciklusa; postati ništa, stopiti se s kozmičkim umom, ili što već. I onda otprilike 100. g. pr. Kr. dogodilo se “novo otkrivenje” u budizmu. Pojavila se i širila nova vrsta budizma. Radilo se o Putu Bodhisattve, gdje je osoba mogla odabrati ostati u svijetu – drugim riječima, prestati razmišljati svake minute svakog dana o bijegu s ovog svijeta, i razmišljati o ostanku na ovom svijetu uz obavezu da se što je moguće više teži savršenosti, znajući kako ćeš zbog nepovlačenja u redovničku situaciju možda živjeti još brojne živote, ali proživjeti ćeš ih u služenju drugima. Mislim kako se tu radilo o ideji da je to dobronamerniji način kako biti budist, barem onakav kakvog obični ljudi mogu slijediti bez obzira na puriste izvornog oblika koji su to tada proglasili varanjem ili racionalizacijom. Danas je to dosta dobro prihvaćeno. Dakle, obje vrste budizma se danas prakticiraju, ali čini se da prevladava ideja služenja drugima bez povlačenja u samostan. Dakle to se sve skupa svodi na to što je lakše, i što je teže. (Pierre) Da, i zovu se Veliko vozilo i Malo vozilo, mislim. (L) Kako god dakle, ovaj Robert Price tvrdi kako je to ono što on misli da primjećuje: da je postojala slična stvar u ranom kršćanstvu; postojao je taj teži put gdje si mogao postati nešto poput ciničnog filozofa i tumarati cestom gore i dolje, spašavati ljude, spavati uz cestu, dragi Gospod brine o svemu, itd. Što je u suprotnosti onima koji su brinuli o poslu, svojim obiteljima, i također o redovnicima i filozofima. Dakle, u bilo kojem slučaju, ovu pozadinu objašnjavam jer, obzirom na te neke stvari koje su rečene o plemenskoj jedinici, i mrežama i stvarima, čini se kako ti ljudi koji na određene načine podržavaju mrežu, ili na koji god način mogu, dok god su dio toga i dok god se umrežavaju, ne moraju odustati od svog života, od svojih poslova, od bilo čega, i preseliti se u zajednicu, jer i dalje imaju koristi od prednosti umrežavanja; odnosno, oni doslovno primaju kad daju i pomažu, te daju podršku. Očito, zajednica je jedan specifičan oblik. Radi se o intenzivnom obliku. Ali ipak, naše zajednice se razlikuju od redovničkih zajednica, jer smo poprilično “unutar svijeta” u određenom smislu. Jesam li na dobrom tragu s tom usporedbom između težeg i lakšeg puta budizma, i težeg i lakšeg puta kršćanstva? I ovo o čemu pričamo u smislu zajednica i drugih članova u našim zajednicama, je li to manje-više ono o čemu pričamo ovdje? Da je biti dio mreže na koji god način možeš jednako vrijedno kao i odustajanje od svega i odlazak u zajednicu? O: Manje-više. Ali budite svjesni da je i dalje potrebno u konkretno ovom vremenu pripremiti se kako bi zaista primili i pomogli ostalima koji su na vanjskim rubovima mreže. P: (L) OK. Ako su ljudi u potpunosti angažirani u mreži, hoće li na vrijeme dobiti informacije? O: Da, ključni izraz ovdje je “u potpunosti angažirani” na bilo koji i svaki mogući način. P: (Chu) Dakle ako sjede na ogradi, neće? (Galatea) Moraju se tome posvetiti. (L) Da, ali možeš se nečemu posvetiti i ostati na istom mjestu u svakodnevnom životu. Ne moraš se nečemu posvetiti i jednostavno prestati biti oprezan. (Pierre) U potpunosti angažirati na svaki mogući način… (L) Mislim da to znači ono što je moguće za tu osobu. O: Da. P: (Perceval) Prethodni odgovor je bio da je i dalje potrebno pripremiti se kako bi zapravo primili i pomogli ostalima koji su na vanjskim rubovima mreže. To se odnosi na nas i pripremu kako bi, na primjer, učinkovito djelovali kao posrednici za sve ostale? (Ark) Mislim kako je najvažnije postići što je više moguće REZULTATA, znate? Pa ako ste negdje i vidite da niste pri optimalnoj snazi jer nešto gubite, ne možete ostvariti najviše rezultate. Na nekom drugom mjestu, možete vidjeti rezultate onoga što radite. (L) Pa ako ne vidite rezultate u svom životu, morate iznova promisliti o onome što se događa. (Ark) Da. (L) Ima li još netko kakvo pitanje vezano za to? (Chu) Samo komentar. Rekla bih da ako se to primjeni onako kako je Perceval to nama govorio, ili zajednici iz SAD-a na primjer, priprema za pomaganje i primanje ostalih ljudi, kako bi to mogli još i više, potrebno je da oni koji su na vanjskim rubovima rade što je moguće… (L) …kako bi ih mi mogli primiti! O: Da da da!! P: (Chu) Nije kao da bi samo trebali sjediti i čekati… O: Snaga plemenske jedinice bi trebala biti cilj! P: (Perceval) Onda znači taj posljednji odgovor da postoji potreba u konkretno ovim vremenima, to znači da se ljudi koji su tamo negdje u mreži moraju umrežavati i proširivati mrežu, te pomagati jedni drugima. (L) U središtu mreže, to je ovdje gdje smo mi i ljudi u kući u SAD-u, moraju biti pripremljeni i spremni. Drugim riječima, ljudi na vanjskim rubovima mreže mogu zasad ostati tamo gdje su sada i biti dio mreže, te znati da ako se dogode određene okolnosti i uvjeti, IMAJU gdje otići. O: Gdje ulažeš svoju energiju, uključujući financije, tamo je tvoje srce i tamo ćeš biti privučen i primljen kada vrijeme za to dođe. [noga stola je počela škripiti tijekom ovog odgovora] P: (Chu) Razmišljala sam kako je najjasnije objašnjenje kako nije bitno gdje se nalaziš, nego je bitno tko si i što vidiš. (L) Jer mjesto gdje se nalaziš, AKO vidiš znakove, možeš promijeniti ako je to potrebno. (Chu) Da, i ljudi su zabrinuti oko priprema, ali brinu o “gdje” prije nego što brinu o tome gdje im je srce. (Pierre) Nije samo bitno tko si, nego i ono što daješ. (Perceval) Gdje ulažeš svoju energiju. (L) Ima li još netko nešto za reći? (Ark) Da. (L) Što? (Ark) Zaboravio sam. [smijeh] Ne, hoću reći, imam dvije kratke rečenice. Prva je: dužnosti na prvom mjestu. Druga je: rezultati su bitni. Ako imaš neispunjene dužnosti, onda ne možeš polučiti najbolje rezultate. Dakle, prva stvar je izvršavati svoje dužnosti. Što bolje izvršavaš svoje dužnosti, više energije možeš dati mreži, i onda više energije može doći tebi. (L) Drugim riječima, “kako možeš jesti puding ako nisi pojeo svoje meso?” (Pierre) Kako možeš jesti svoju masnu bombu kad nisi pojeo svoju slaninu? (Galatea) Imam jedno sićušno pitanje? Kako možemo ojačati našu epifizu? Koje još metode postoje da ih možemo koristiti? (L) Zašto bi htjela ojačati svoju epifizu? (Galatea) Da razvijemo vidovnjačke sposobnosti. (L) Ne, nije ona. To je hipofiza. (Galatea) Oh, hipofiza, ispričavam se. O: Prehrana i detoksikacija. (Galatea) To je sve? O: Kanaliziranje također pomaže ako je netko prikladan kandidat. P: (L) Drugim riječima, ako nisi prikladan kandidat, nemoj to raditi. O: Da. P: (Perceval) Tu vrebaju zmajevi. (Chu) Dobro, pitanje koje će svi postaviti na forumu jest: kako netko zna je li prikladan kandidat? (Perceval) Neka koristi svoju intuiciju! [smijeh] O: Pojedinci koji su zbilja prikladni kandidati i sposobni za održavanje korisne OPD komunikacije su RIJETKI. To podjednako ovisi o genetici, potencijalu duše i profilu sudbinske misije, te pripremi. SVE to je potrebno u pravoj kombinaciji. P: (L) Dakle, činjenica da ste to spomenuli Galatei, znači li to da je moguće da ona ima pravu kombinaciju? O: Jako moguće! P: (Galatea) Kao, dogodit će se, ili će se možda dogoditi? O: Ovisi o tebi. (“Up 2 U” u izvorniku, op. prev.) (L) Dakle, slala si poruke, ha? (Andromeda) To je bila Galatea iz budućnosti! [smijeh] HV, HV! (L) Što znači “HV”? (Galatea) Hvala vam. (L) OK, mislim da želim završiti za večeras ako nitko nema ništa hitno. Postoji li nešto što moramo znati? Nismo postavljali pitanja vezana za stanje u svijetu. (Pierre) Imam pitanje vezano za bespilotne letjelice. Brojne bespilotne letjelice su primjećene iznad francuskih nuklearnih elektrana. Jesu li to zbilja bespilotne letjelice? O: Da. P: (Pierre) Tko njima upravlja? O: Ne biste li ti i vojska željeli to znati? P: (Andromeda) Dakle ne radi se o vojsci… (Perceval) Vjerojatno su samo… OK, dakle ne radi se samo o nekim mještanima. (Pierre) Iznad cijele zemlje – već tjednima. O: Tko špijunira svakoga posvuda? P: (Perceval) NSA. (Pierre) Mossad. O: Dovoljno blizu! P: (Pierre) Zašto? O: Kako bi nastavili s pritiskom na Francusku. P: (Pierre) Poput prijetnje. (Perceval) NSA pokušava zaplašiti francusku političku garnituru pomoću bespilotnih letjelica koje voze iznad nuklearnih elektrana. (Pierre) Kako ne bi prešli na rusku stranu, ili… (Perceval) …će se dogoditi “nesreća”. O: Sada je vrijeme za reći laku noć i “vidimo se uskoro u psihomantijumu!” Pozdrav. (Pierre) Nisu to zaboravili, ha? [smijeh] (Perceval) Pa kad odeš do psihomantijuma, oni će već biti tamo sa satom govoreći, “Već TJEDNIMA čekamo!” [smijeh] KRAJ SESIJE Original sesije na engleskom možete naći ovdje. Related Articles: Posted in Kasiopejske sesije