http___hr.cassiopaea.org_2014_07_02_20140322__shared_email_msg_fail_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 14.1 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 16.1 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 19.1 19.2 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 21.5 22.1 23.1 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 25.6 26.1 27.1 27.2 27.3 28.1 29.1 30.1 30.2 31.1 32.1 32.2 33.1 34.1 34.2 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 39.5 39.6 39.7 39.8 39.9 39.10 39.11 40.1 41.1 41.2 42.1 43.1 43.2 43.3 43.4 44.1 45.1 46.1 47.1 48.1 49.1 49.2 49.3 50.1 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 51.6 51.7 51.8 51.9 51.10 51.11 51.12 51.13 52.1 52.2 53.1 53.2 54.1 55.1 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.5 55.6 55.7 55.8 56.1 57.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 60.2 61.1 61.2 62.1 62.2 62.3 63.1 64.1 64.2 65.1 65.2 65.3 65.4 65.5 65.6 65.7 66.1 67.1 67.2 68.1 69.1 69.2 69.3 69.4 69.5 70.1 71.1 72.1 72.2 72.3 73.1
September 28, 2002 Ark, Laura, Andromeda, BT Q: Hello. A: Hello! Q: And who do we have with us this evening? A: Ropponiea. Q: And where do you transmit through? A: Cassiopaea. Q: [Laura asks for door to be opened as she feels great heat.] A: Life is religion. Q: (L) What does that mean? A: Life experiences reflect how one interacts with God. Those who are asleep are those of little faith in terms of their interaction with the creation. Some people think that the world exists for them to overcome or ignore or shut out. For those individuals, the worlds will cease. They will become exactly what they give to life. They will become merely a dream in the "past." People who pay strict attention to objective reality right and left, become the reality of the "Future." Q: (L) In this recent incident with Jeanine, I have a few questions. Apparently, she was "hearing" things differently than I was, and I was reading things that she wrote with a certain perspective that does not seem to have accurately represented what she meant. She had said "you don't pay attention to the confusion, you just do what you came here to do." I understood this in a completely different context. From her perspective, "paying no attention to the confusion all around and doing what you came here to do" essentially amounted to discovering the ways and means to "ascend" by overcoming and ignoring and shutting out the world. To me, "pay no attention to the confusion" means to pay close attention to what is going on, but not to be confused by it, to see the reality in the midst of the confusion. (Andromeda) Any new knowledge a person comes in contact with can cause confusion until you come to terms with the reality of it. (L) The important thing seems to be to not dwell on the "confusion" aspect, but to concentrate on learning the knowledge that is buried in the confusion. Trying to understand what it is you need to learn. Jeanine's idea was that if it causes confusion, you are supposed to shut it ALL out, pay no attention to any of it, and just concentrate on feeling peaceful. That's the same thing Whitley Strieber was saying: "The only freedom you will have is inside yourself." I guess, because those are the things I have been mulling over, this may be what is the stimulus for the C's opening remarks. Is that in response to the concerns in my mind? A: More or less. Q: (L) The other thing I was thinking about is the teaching that you are supposed to withdraw into some kind of monastic life in order to grow spiritually. What I have observed is that the world is exactly what is needed to learn the lessons of existence. Anybody who thinks that, in order to be spiritual, they have to go off to a monastery, or meditate, or follow this or that so-called "spiritual practice," are turning away the greatest interaction with God and creation imaginable. They are throwing away a great gift. By living in the world, and striving to see the spirit in things, one can accomplish so much more than if they go off to a monastery where there are no distractions, no real tests of balance or seeing. It's more religious, I think, to be in the world and be able to see and experience "spirit" than most people realize. The real world is where we fit. It is where we are born. And if we try to escape this lesson, we just come back over and over again. (Andromeda) Maybe that IS their world? Maybe escaping to a monastery or ignoring or shutting out the world IS what is right for them. (Ark) But, the question is, whether we learn to understand the world around us. Some people don't care about understanding the world. They are effectively saying: "it's holier to not care about the world, it's your business - we just want to ignore it." (L) And they become the memory of the past - primal matter - they recycle. The very fact that we ARE in this realm means that this is where we fit. And it seems that the only way to move to the next level is to grow. And that means to take full cognizance of the medium of growth, to learn about the realm, learn how to be spiritual in the realm where you are. Grow where you are planted, but always toward the light. A: Home is where the heart is. Q: (Andromeda) Is it vital to my physical existence to move to another country in the near future? A: It is not "vital" to be in the body at all. But for those with missions in this realm, it is quite useful to preserve the physical vehicle. Thus, if one accepts the mantle of responsibility to humanity, it is not a selfish thing to seek preservation until the mission is accomplished. In the present situation, that will be enhanced outside of the USA. Q: (Ark) I am reading one of the books by the Polish engineer Pajak, written in 1990, where he describes a UFO propulsion system. He claims that he has discovered a "periodic principle" where inventions come like the periodic table, and he says it is now time to discover this UFO propulsion system. So much that he says seems to "fit." He gives many good ideas, but generally for the wrong reasons. Are his main ideas sound? Is it true that UFOs are using the machinery that he describes? A: His primary block is his lack of knowledge of hyperdimensional physics. Q: (Ark) That is true. But to build such a thing, we need to use 3D technology because that is what we have. We cannot use 4D technology because we don't have access to 4D tools, so what can we do? A: You will. Q: (Ark) Question is whether Pajak's 3D technology that he describes corresponds to what it really is? A: Generally speaking, more or less. But so much is lacking that, as designed, the prototypes will do nothing. Q: (Ark) Has his idea been taken from him and successfully implemented by others - say, military? A: No need. Only objective there is to prevent his further discoveries. Q: (Ark) His ideas are quite original, so I wonder where he is getting them? A: Not so original, just logical. Only reason others don't "get" such ideas is because they cannot think logically due to hypnosis. Q: (Ark) Well, I also have problems with logical thinking due to hypnosis! A: Less than before. Q: (Ark) Well, that means that I am still under hypnosis and clearly I am under more hypnosis than this Mr. Pajak is because I have not been able to get as far as he has... A: You aren't an engineer. Q: (L) That reminds me! I wonder why it is we have such a preponderance of engineer types and computer types in QFS? (Ark) Computer types, it's clear: they are the only guys who have the time! [Laughter] (L) I think that the C's really appeal to engineering types for some reason. (Ark) I want to ask about these Polish crop circles that have appeared in the same place several years in a row. Last time, the people were already waiting there, equipped with cameras and all sorts of things, and were able to film a formation, to film strange lights in the night, the compass needle moving, and so on. The guy wrote to me and said that they have seen a real UFO making crop circles. (L) Did they film any solid objects? (Ark) Just lights. Of course, it was over three years so there is no guarantee that they were made by the same method for three years. The question is: who made these circles? A: Just because their conscious minds rationalize a "psychic" impulse of awareness at another level does not mean they are right. Q: (L) Are you saying that there is a psychic impulse, or awareness at another level, of something going on, and this cues them into the fact that something is going to appear, and they have come up with a rational explanation for it that may or may not be correct. In other words, because they had awareness, because they showed up and saw lights in the sky, does not mean that these lights are necessarily UFOs as they are commonly understood, is that it? A: Yes. Q: (Ark) I don't understand. There are these circles. Something is making them. What is it? A: Thoughts. Q: (BT) The observers, or others? A: 6th Density. Q: (Ark) Are UFOs also made by thoughts? A: Everything is. Q: (Ark) But some thoughts we call material, like this cup, which is material. And then there is technology to build this cup. Question is, is there technology behind producing these crop circles? A: Not in the sense you are thinking. Q: (L) I think that the problem is the assumption that seeing lights while the circles were being made meant that they were being made by UFOs, that these lights were, themselves, UFOs. That is the rationalization. (Ark) Seeing a flying boomerang - is it not the same thing as seeing a light in the sky? A boomerang is a solid object even if it is a hyperdimensional one. It still has solidity. There are many instances of seeing lights that do unusual things that are not the result of solid objects as we understand them. Or so I think. (Ark) Okay. Last week I was looking again at the deal of Joel Scherk, a French scientist. In September of 1979, he wrote a paper on anti-gravity and he had written other papers about time before that. Then, in 1980, he died. Nobody was there to give him insulin when he had a diabetic condition. Question is: was his death somehow 'sponsored?' A: Indeed, as are many such. Keep in mind that the chemistry of the body can be manipulated by waves at a distance! Q: (Ark) He was an expert on supersymmetry. Is supersymmetry a valid idea? A: It is a partially correct approach to certain "states." Q: (Ark) Change of subject. I want to build an ozone generator. That is, I had an idea that it may be a good idea. Who knows, it may be a very bad idea because we may die due to ozone. It kills germs, it might kill us. [laughter] We ordered a transformer and it will be our first experiment with high voltage. So, question about ozone: Can we play with ozone? Is it a good idea? A: Allow it to run while out of the room, limit long term direct exposure. Q: (L) Will an ozone generator prevent UFOs from hanging around? A: If it did, it would also prevent you from "being around" Q: (L) What about some of these UFO detectors this guy Pajak has talked about? A: Most of that is nonsense. UFOs can easily overcome any such devices. Q: (L) In reading the Pajak story, there is a part of it written by a former Miss Italy who claims that she had information from some sort of "contact" - maybe extraterrestrials or something - about how to build a "telepathic communication pyramid." Is it something that would do what was claimed about it? A: To some extent, thought not in the way desired. It provides a medium of reception of "earth bound" discarnates. It other words, it is about as useful as trying to "remote view" 4th density from a 3rd density state of being. Q: (L) I would like to know if there is going to be any further manipulations of the population in terms of terrorist attacks and such things might further the negative agenda that is presently underway? A: No doubt! You are looking at men who are so desperate that they have nothing to lose at this point. Q: (L) Yes, sad but true. Any bunch of people who are so desperate to do something that they would crash two jet airliners into the tallest buildings in the world to and fake a crash on the Pentagon, and murder all those people - because it is nothing else but murder - are pretty desperate. They've got to be crazy. It's like Vincent Bridges. He couldn't even see his craziness. It just escalated until he shot himself in the foot. I guess, from that perspective, it's a good thing. A: In a sense, since it will fail. Q: (L) Yeah, but in the meantime a whole lot of awful stuff is likely to come down. (BT) Is France still vulnerable to an attack? A: Less likely since you have exposed it. Q: (L) Yes. That was my intention. After all, they can't be doing things that we predict... it would be "too synchronistic." (Ark) What about TS? Should we try to intervene and help? A: Let him ask. Q: (L) Okay, I guess that's it for tonight... A: Open eyes of souls. It will come soon! Goodnight. End of Session
3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 10.2 11.1 12.1 13.1 13.2 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 15.1 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 24.2 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 29.2 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 30.5 31.1 32.1 32.2 32.3 32.4 32.5 33.1 34.1 34.2 34.3 34.4 34.5 34.6 35.1 35.2 36.1 37.1 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 38.5 39.1 40.1 40.2 41.1 42.1 42.2 42.3 42.4 42.5 42.6 43.1 44.1 44.2 45.1 46.1 46.2 47.1 48.1 48.2 48.3 48.4 48.5 48.6 48.7 48.8 48.9 48.10 48.11 49.1 50.1 50.2 51.1 52.1 53.1 54.1 54.2 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 60.2 61.1 62.1 62.2 63.1 63.2 64.1 65.1 66.1 66.2 66.3 66.4 66.5 67.1 67.2 68.1 68.2 69.1 70.1 70.2 71.1 72.1 72.2 72.3 72.4 72.5 72.6 73.1 73.2 74.1 75.1 75.2 75.3 76.1 76.2 76.3 77.1 77.2 78.1 78.2 78.3 78.4 78.5 79.1 80.1 80.2 80.3 80.4 80.5 80.6 81.1 82.1 83.1 84.1 84.2 85.1 86.1 86.2 87.1 87.2 87.3 87.4 88.1 88.2 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.6 88.7 88.8 88.9 88.10 89.1 90.1 91.1 92.1 92.2 93.1 94.1 94.2 94.3 94.4 95.1 96.1 97.1 98.1 98.2 99.1 99.2 100.1 100.2 100.3 100.4 101.1 102.1 102.2 102.3 102.4 102.5 102.6 102.7 102.8 103.1 104.1 104.2 105.1 106.1 106.2 106.3 106.4 107.1 107.2 108.1 109.1 109.2 109.3 110.1 110.2 110.3 110.4 110.5 111.1 112.1 112.2 113.1 114.1 114.2 114.3 115.1 115.2 115.3 115.4 116.1 117.1 118.1 119.1
Prisutni: Laura (L), Ark, Pierre, Perceval, Andromeda, PoB, Kniall, Chu, Data, Alana, Timotheos, Mr. Scott Pitanje (P): (L) Oh, sad bi trebao biti ekvinocij, zar ne? (Andromeda) Nije li bio jučer? Dakle, danas je subota, 22.03.2014. Bilo je oblačno, vjetrovito i kišno vrijeme, a mi smo ovdje zapalili vatru u kaminu. Dobro… Pozdrav. Odgovor (O): Svi izgledaju tako zdravo! Oh, bože moj! Napadi ne djeluju na vas! Kako to oni očekuju da naškode onima koji se ne pokoravaju njihovim pravilima? P: (L) Koga imamo večeras s nama? O: Komessias. P: (L) I od kuda ili kroz kuda prenosite? O: Kasiopeja. P: (L) Dakle, što je smisao ovog malog uvoda u vezi zdravlja, osim onoga što je upravo rečeno… Jesu li rekli “naškoditi”? Znači sada se odvijaju direktni napadi na nas pomoću nekih vrsta elektromagnetskih ili elektroničkih uređaja ili nečeg sličnog što bi trebalo naškoditi našem zdravlju? O: Da. P: (L) Da li to igra neku malu ulogu u vezi oteklini na mojoj nozi? O: Da. Ali ti si to “hladno” zaustavila. P: (L) Ha ha ha! [smijeh jer se Lauru savjetovalo da krene na program saune nakon kojeg slijedi kupka za kuk u ledenoj vodi] Dobro onda. Dakle pretpostavljam da možemo prilično dobro odgovoriti unaprijed na pitanje u vezi mnogih drugih malih problema koje ljudi imaju – to je sve dio jedne te iste stvari. To se samo manifestira drugačije kod svake osobe, tj. prema njihovoj specifičnoj ranjivosti? O: Da. P: (L) U redu, mislim da je dosta u vezi toga. Mislim da je svima na umu pitanje u vezi aviona [malezijski avion koji je nestao, Let 370]. Avion, avion! {Fantasy Island serija na TV-u} (Pierre) Gdje je? O: U pukotini zaključanog vremena/prostora. P: (L) Pa, Kinezi su sigurni u to da su našli neke ostatke od aviona. O: Bilo kakvi “ostaci” pronađeni u datim okolnostima moraju biti viđeni kao vrlo upitni. P: (Pierre) Da li je to bilo namjerno ili je to bila nesreća? O: Događa se kad curenje (između denziteta, op. prev.) uzrokuje konfuziju. P: (L) Konfuziju čega? O: Realiteta i svega unutar njih. P: (Perceval) Izgleda da je konfuzija bila očita u promjeni smjera kretanja aviona, a onda je nestao u pukotini vremena i prostora. (Data) Jesu li putnici u avionu u redu? O: Ovisi o tome kako definirate “u redu”. P: (Perceval) Da li je to slična situacija kao i sa Letom 19? O: Da. P: (Perceval) Dakle, imamo to objašnjenje u transkriptima sesija, što se događa putnicima… Da li neka od vlada u svijetu zna za to? O: Naravno! Što mislite zašto je došlo do onakvog “spuštanja na zemlju” u vezi Krima i Rusije? P: (L) Hoćete reći da su oni imali planove da budu agresivniji i da se “unesu u lice”, i oni… (Perceval) Zašto bi ih nestanak aviona uplašio ili naterao na povlačenje? “Spuštanje na zemlju”, da li je to ono što je rečeno? Poput povlačenja. Dakle, u osnovi sile moći su se povukle od Krima i Rusije jer je avion nestao i oni su bili zabrinuti o…? (Pierre) Znači, ako vi previše lažete, ako kreirate previše kaosa, poput neopravdanog rata, vi možete povećati takvo curenje između denziteta? O: Oni imaju “savjetnike” i “tumače” takvih stvari. P: (Pierre) Dakle, savjetnici su rekli da ako nastave s napadom, i s lažima i manipulacijom… (L) Mislim da oni ne bi to rekli. (Perceval) Oni ne bi tako sročili. (L) Mislim da se oni njima ne bi tako izrazili. (Pierre) Što bi oni rekli? (L) Nešto poput… ne znam… Možda imaju neke savjetnike i tumače koji kažu “Mi smo to učinili, i ako se vi ne povučete, mi ćemo to učiniti opet!” Znate, više kao prijetnja nego kao objašnjenje kako biti dobri momci. O: Više – manje. P: (L) Hoću reći, svi bi mi željeli misliti da u svijetu postoji neka jaka i moćna sila koja bi rekla psihopatima “Oh, ako vi nastavite kreirati kaos, zeznut ćete stvari! Vi ste zločesti dečki!” Ali se to vjerojatno neće dogoditi jer bi to bilo… znate… (Perceval) Došla si ovdje do pojma različitih nivoa moći. Ti ljudi rade tu otvorenu operaciju oko Krima. I oni imaju savjetnike i možda pretpostavljaju da postoji viša sila poput one koja je raznijela Columbia space-shuttle Bushu i njegovima. Oni pripisuju taj incident s avionom “njima”, i to tumače nešto poput “Povucimo se”. Kao što su aludirali na tu ideju da postoji viša sila koja ima takvu ogromnu tehnologiju i može utjecati na američku vladu i njenu politiku, na primjer da pošalje upozorenje… Dakle, možda su oni koji prate takve stvari pogledali na taj avion i rekli “Možda je to neka vrsta poruke upućena nama”. O: Vjerojatno je da tu ima malo interdimenzionalnog ucjenjivanja. Što mislite, koliko je vjerojatno da američke sile moći koje “kreiraju realnost” odstupe od svog prirodnog stanja da budu najveći svjetski nasilnici? P: (Pierre) Zašto ti viši entiteti žele da sile moći odstupe od Krima i Rusije? O: Oni razumiju kakve su posljedice toga. P: (Perceval) Dakle, čitava ta njihova stvar je u vezi kontrole… nuklearni ili sveopći rat, i to bi bio kraj. Oni su oduvijek željeli kontrolirati stvari i gnječiti ljude sve jače i jače. (L) Pa, jedina stvar koja ikada prestraši ili zaustavi psihopata je još veći psihopat. Hm, imam osjećaj da je nekako MOSSAD umiješan u sve to, možda čak i u nestanak aviona. To je jednostavno previše, hm… O: Možda oni žive svoj moto? P: (L) “Pomoću obmane vi ćete voditi rat.” Dakle to bi značilo da je, na nekom nivou, MOSSAD umiješan pomoću tih savjetnika ili tumača, ili nekako… (Perceval) Rekli su u prethodnim sesijama da je MOSSAD blizu vrha u hijerarhiji. (L) Dakle na vrhu MOSSAD-a postoji povezanost s hiperdimenzionalnim OPS bićima, više-manje? O: Da. P: (L) Dakle… (Perceval) Izraelci su odabrani narod! Tko bi drugi bio izabran za takav zadatak? (L) Vidim. U redu, to je bilo u vezi aviona. Oh, želim pitati u vezi mobitela. Kako to da su mobiteli putnika još uvijek zvonili tri dana nakon što je avion nestao? O: Ako se nalaziš u “prostoru” jednog drugog vremena/prostora to ne znači da si izvan dometa elektroničkih signala, a dodatno tu je i vremenska anomalija. P: (L) Dakle, ET vanzemaljac zbilja može telefonirati kući? [smijeh] O: Da. P: (Perceval) Ali bi onda mogao primiti poziv prije ili kasnije nego što je on obavljen! (L) Da, on će ga primiti jučer. O: Nešto poput toga. P: (Chu) Hm, sada to mogu izbaciti iz vijesti, ali će morati s nečim kasnije izaći. (L) Ignorirat će to jednostavno. Jednostavna taktika ignoriranja koja briše cijelu hrpu stvari iz ljudskih glava. (Perceval) Apsolutno. Jednostavno će se prebaciti na nešto drugo. Bilo je oko 50 aviona koji su nestali na taj način i nikad nisu pronađeni. (Chu) Da, ali oni su rekli da su obitelji počeli štrajkati glađu i takve vrste stvari. (Perceval) Ako to ne objave u vijestima, onda to nikad nitko neće znati. (L) Da, bez izvještavanja u vijestima o tome, što će oni imati? Facebook i Twitter. (Andromeda) Hoćemo li početi viđati sve više i više takvih stvari? O: Oh, da!!! Scott) Fenomenalno! (Perceval) Ima li kakve šanse da Pentagon jednostavno nestane? O: On ima drugačiju sudbinu! P: (Chu) Komet?! O: Čekajte i vidite! P: (L) Mislite, mi ćemo to vidjeti? Hoće li nam se SVIDJETI? O: Vjerojatno. P: (L) Dobro, mislim da mnogo ljudi ima na umu sljedeće pitanje: Što je s tim Vladimirom Putinom, ha? O: On nije savršen, ali je trenutno najbolji čovjek na planeti koji je na takvoj poziciji. P: (L) Dakle, on nije psihopat? O: Ne. P: (Perceval) Postoji li, u biti, netko tko mu naređuje? Da li je ono što on radi kontrolirano na takav način? O: Ne na način na koji vi mislite, ali da u smislu savjesti. P: (Ark) Mislim da je ono što je bitno je to da on ima dobar tim savjetnika. Kad imate svoje savjetnike koji su pametni i imaju znanje, i oni su stručnjaci u određenim područjima, oni će reći: “Ako učiniš to, onda će rezultat biti ovakav, pa savjetujemo sljedeće…” O: Svakako, postoje mnogi u Rusiji koji su učili u školi teške stvarnosti koja je zapadnjacima jako teška za zamisliti. Povrh toga, Rusi su bolje obrazovani, generalno gledajući. P: (PoB) Postoji li realna prijetnja da ubiju Putina? O: Uvijek postoji, ali on nije bio u KGB-u nizašta. P: [smijeh] (L) Nismo imali sesiju od kada se desila “LG afera”, zar ne? Imali smo jednu prije LG-inog ispada? Scott) Zadnja je bila 7. rujna 2013. godine. (L) Da, mislim da je bolje da pitamo u vezi LG. Da li je istina, kao što sumnjamo, da smo kod LG bili suočeni s istinskim i potpunim primjerom pravog ženskog psihopata? O: Ako mislite na oštećenog organskog portala, da. Ali nije baš “rođeni psihopat”. P: (Chu) To bi moglo objasniti zašto čini toliko stvari koje su na kraju samouništavajuće. Dobro, što je s B_? O: Kao što smo rekli prije, dobro srce, ali oštećena također. P: (Perceval) Mislim da nismo pitali ovo pitanje kroz cijeli ovaj dugi period komunikacije. Što uzrokuje ove velike požare na raznim mjestima, pa čak i po zimi kad je… O: Izlučivanja plina kombinirano s aktivnom plazmom. P: (L) Dakle ne moraju biti uzrokovani eksplozijama iz atmosfere. (Perceval) Pa, mi smo mislili da to mora biti plin. (Andromeda) I električna aktivnost. (Pierre) To je oboje. Aktivna plazma zbog aktivnosti kometa, i Zemlja koja se otvara. (L) Da, što je s nedavnom eksplozijom plina u New Yorku? O: Primarni primjer: upozorili smo vas u vezi takvih stvari koje će se sve više i više događati. Planet na kojem boravite se otvara!!! P: (Perceval) Što je s “još pet godina do početka”? O: Kako to misliš? Vi ste tu! Zar vi to ne VIDITE? P: (Perceval) Pa, naravno, da. (Pierre) Što je sa Nultom Godinom? (Perceval) Dakle, za nju ste govorili da je ona početak kraja. O: Kao što potresi mogu početi s jednim koji onda pokrene proces “otvaranja otvarača”, tako je i s promjenama realiteta. Zapravo, ovo dvoje imaju mnogo zajedničkog. P: (Andromeda) Da, svi ti potresi u Kaliforniji, južnoj Americi, pacifičkom vatrenom prstenu… (Pierre) Da, mnogi su bili uzduž pacifičkog vatrenog prstena koji okružuje pacifičku ploču. Otvaranje otvarača, da li to znači da je cijela ploča bila privezana i da se na neki način miče… (Chu) Pa otvaranje otvarača je poput početka otkrivanja… otvaranja. Izbacivanje plina i svega toga, razna otvaranja… (L) Da. (Andromeda) Dakle, hoće li biti zbilja velikog događaja uskoro? (Chu) Čekaj i vidi! O: Čekajte i vidite! P: [smijeh] (Pierre) Potresi i promjena realiteta imaju mnogo zajedničkog. Što to znači? (Andromeda) Yellowstone, također. (Perceval) Pa jedan potres može početi lančanu reakciju koja otvori Zemlju i jedna promjena… (L) Rekla bih da promjena realiteta mijenja frekvencije, što može promjeniti frekvencije Zemlje, što može inicirati potrese. A potresi mogu emitirati elektromagnetske signale koji mogu kreirati otvore u realitetima. Dakle, imamo svakakve vrste elektromagnetskih stvari u oba smjera. O: Da. P: (Ark) Što je ključ kvantne slučajnosti? O: Dugačak odgovor. P: [smijeh] (Perceval) Nemamo simbole i takve stvari na Ouija ploči. (Pierre) Trebamo specijalnu ploču za to! O: Ne postoji takva stvar kao što je “čista” slučajnost. P: (Ark) Oni čitaju moju knjigu. [smijeh] O: Kako bi to moglo biti kad je sve informacija? Ako uopće nešto postoji u vašem realitetu, to je derivat iz “višeg” realiteta informacija. Kako bi onda to moglo biti “slučajno”? Skupovi. P: (Ark) Skupovi? (Perceval) Matematički skupovi. To je odgovor. (Pierre) Skupovi čega? (Ark) Seth! (L) S-E-T-S (skupovi). (Ark) Seth. Ne sjećaš se vjerojatnosti i Seth-a? (L) Ne, oni su rekli “skupovi” (“sets”, op. prev.). (Ark) Znam… [smijeh] (Andromeda) Seth govori! O: Vaš realitet, koji je 3D, i vrijeme, čine “skup”. P: (Ark) Skup. O: Skup je definiran. P: (Ark) Što? (Perceval) “Skup je definiran.” O: Ograničen. Scott) Dakle ako želite ići na 4D, trebate veći list papira tako da možete nacrtati veći skup. Jednostavno. (L) U redu, jesmo li gotovi? (Pierre) Da li su katastrofe koje su se dogodile oko 2300 godina p.n.e. uzrokovale pomak kuta nagiba ekliptike našeg planeta? O: Da. P: (Pierre) Za koliko se stupnjeva nagnuo? Nije to bilo “trenutno”, ali poprilično brzo uzimajući u obzir omjere. P: (Pierre) Koliko je potomaka Cezara u ovoj sobi? (L) Oh, to je trik pitanje! O: Svi vi! Cezar je “švrljao okolo”! P: [smijeh] (Pierre) Sigurno je bio vrlo aktivan! (Ark) Imam pitanje. Ti {Laura} si išla na te hladne kupke, ali ja se dižem ujutro s tim glavoboljama. Da li bih ja također trebao staviti glavu u hladnu kupku da bih zaustavio te jutarnje glavobolje? O: Da, i tvoji planovi preuređenja bi također mnogo pomogli. P: (Chu) Preuređenje tvoje spavaće sobe. (L) On dobija te glavobolje u krevetu. Budi se s njima. Smrtonosni su ti zakrivljeni zidovi. Mrtvačke krivulje! (Pierre) Moramo to učiniti. (L) Ali me to zgraža. To će biti ogroman nered. O: Ali ćete to zavoljeti kad bude gotovo, i realnost će se dramatično promijeniti zajedno s olakšanjem psihičkih i fizioloških ograničenja i smetnji. P: (Chu) Dakle, to morate učiniti odmah! (L) Da li sam bila u pravu u vezi vrata u Pierrovoj spavaćoj sobi i Feng Shui-ja? O: Apsolutno! P: (Pierre) To je bio nizak udarac! [smijeh] (PoB) Bila je jedna osoba na forumu koja je htjela pitati pitanje, i vi ste rekli nešto o… (L) Oh, pitat ćemo o toj J_, osobi koja vjeruje da je ona OPD Nordijac ili tako nešto. Mislim da je bolje da pitamo u vezi te J_ s foruma koja mi je poslala privatnu poruku. Da li je J_ 4D OPD biće? O: Glupost! Na široko smo to već objasnili! P: (L) Ona misli da je OPD s 4. denziteta jer je pod konstantnim jakim napadom koji ju sprečava da radi svoj istinski posao. O: Dvostruka glupost!! Da je ona ovdje radi “misije”, kao što tvrdi, načini i sredstva da se nosi s takvim stvarima bili bi “dio paketa”. Činjenica da ta osoba nema “djela” od bilo kakve važnosti već samo opravdanja u vezi “napada” vam dosta govori. P: (L) Dakle vi kažete da bi ona onda znala kako postupati. Ona bi naučila kako se nositi s tim stvarima kao što smo i mi naučili kroz rad i pomoću unutrašnje snage da podnesemo te lekcije. To je dio paketa. Vi imate u sebi nagon da naučite stvari koje morate naučiti da bi radili stvari koje trebate raditi, i izdržljivost da sve to preživite. I to dolazi iz vas samih. O: Da. P: (L) U redu. Pa što je s tom individuom, odnosno želite li uopće govoriti o tome? O: Nemamo komentar na njen rezultat, ili nedostatak istog. P: (L) Dakle, drugim riječima, tu nema rezultata. Još nešto što bi trebali pitati, a nismo pitali, a što bi bilo dobro pitati da smo mogli razmišljati o tome? [smijeh] Baš sam lukava, ha? O: Umorna si, ali lukava. Stvari se odvijaju onako kako bi trebale. Svi dobro radite i ubrzo će se ostali pridružiti vašem realitetu. Doviđenja. KRAJ SESIJE Original sesije na engleskom jeziku možete naći ovdje. Related Articles: Posted in Kasiopejske sesije