http___hr.cassiopaea.org_2014_08_01_20140719__1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 9.1 9.2 9.3 10.1 11.1 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 22.2 23.1 23.2 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 25.1 25.2 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 30.5 30.6 30.7 30.8 30.9 30.10 31.1 32.1 33.1 33.2 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 38.2 39.1 40.1 41.1 41.2 41.3 42.1 42.2 42.3 43.1 43.2 44.1 45.1 46.1 46.2 47.1 48.1 49.1 49.2 49.3 49.4 49.5 49.6 49.7 50.1 51.1 52.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 55.2 56.1 56.2 57.1 58.1 59.1 59.2 60.1 61.1 62.1 63.1 63.2 64.1 65.1 65.2 65.3 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 69.2 69.3 69.4 69.5 69.6 70.1 71.1 71.2 71.3 72.1 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 76.2 76.3 77.1 78.1 78.2 79.1 80.1 80.2 81.1 82.1 82.2 83.1 84.1 84.2 85.1 86.1 87.1 88.1 89.1 90.1 91.1 92.1 93.1 94.1 95.1 96.1 96.2 97.1 98.1 99.1 100.1 101.1 102.1 103.1 104.1 104.2 105.1 105.2 106.1 107.1 108.1 108.2 108.3 108.4 109.1 109.2 109.3 110.1 111.1 112.1 113.1 114.1 115.1 116.1 117.1 118.1 118.2 119.1 119.2 120.1 120.2 120.3 120.4 120.5 120.6 121.1 121.2 122.1 122.2 123.1 124.1 124.2 124.3 124.4 124.5 125.1 125.2 126.1 126.2 127.1 128.1 128.2 128.3 129.1 129.2 129.3 129.4 129.5 130.1 130.2 130.3 130.4 130.5 130.6 130.7 130.8 131.1 131.2 131.3 132.1 133.1 133.2 133.3 133.4 133.5 134.1 134.2 134.3 134.4 135.1 135.2 136.1 137.1 138.1 139.1 140.1 141.1 142.1 142.2 142.3 143.1 143.2 144.1 144.2 145.1 146.1 146.2 147.1 148.1 149.1 149.2 149.3 149.4 149.5 149.6 150.1 151.1 151.2 152.1 152.2 152.3 152.4 152.5 153.1 153.2 154.1 155.1 156.1 156.2 157.1 158.1 159.1 160.1 161.1 162.1 163.1 164.1 165.1 166.1 167.1 168.1 168.2 169.1 170.1 170.2 171.1 172.1 173.1 174.1 175.1 176.1 177.1 177.2 177.3 177.4 177.5 177.6 177.7 177.8 177.9 177.10 177.11 177.12 177.13 178.1 178.2 178.3 179.1 179.2 179.3 180.1 181.1 182.1 183.1 183.2 184.1 184.2 184.3 185.1 186.1 187.1 188.1 189.1 189.2 190.1 191.1 192.1 193.1 194.1 195.1 195.2 195.3 195.4 196.1 197.1 197.2 198.1 198.2 199.1 200.1 200.2 200.3 201.1 201.2 201.3 201.4 201.5 202.1 203.1 203.2 204.1 204.2 204.3 204.4 204.5 204.6 204.7 204.8 204.9 204.10 204.11 204.12 205.1 205.2 205.3 206.1 206.2 207.1 208.1 208.2 208.3 209.1 209.2 210.1 211.1 211.2 212.1 212.2 212.3 212.4 212.5 212.6 212.7 212.8 213.1 213.2 214.1 214.2 214.3 214.4 214.5 215.1 216.1 217.1 217.2 218.1 218.2 219.1 220.1 220.2 221.1 221.2 222.1 223.1 224.1 224.2 224.3 225.1 225.2 225.3 225.4 225.5 225.6 226.1 227.1 227.2 227.3 227.4 227.5 227.6 228.1 228.2 228.3 229.1 230.1 231.1 232.1 233.1
Session Date: July 19th 2014 Laura, Ark, and Andromeda at the board Pierre, Perceval, PoB, Chu, Kniall, Bubbles, Oxajil, Terran, Alana, Timotheos, Parallel, Athena, Data A: Hello Q: (L) That's what they said. They pointed at "Hello". And who do we have with us this evening? A: Jeriponea of Cassiopaea Q: (L) Okay, let me ask a few preliminary questions before we launch onto the topics of the evening. First question: What was going on last session when we were communicating with Julius Caesar, allegedly, when Ark was having a feeling of the hair moving on the side of his and then his glasses went all wonky? What was going on there? A: Ark is closest in frequency to Caesar; thus the EM bursts upon connection. Q: (L) Okay, that kind of leads to my other question. I think you once told us something along the line that it's not so easy... maybe it wasn't that it's not so easy, but that you couldn't really connect with people in 5D unless there was some kind of a strong tie or a binding element that connected you to them - in other words, to be able to get them on the phone, so to speak. So, what was it that made it possible for us to allegedly contact Julius Caesar? A: Frequency of entire group was conducive to contact. Q: (L) And why was that? A: Strong psychic connection and long focus period in advance of attempt. Plus, as previously indicated, Caesar volunteered to be accessible. It is a sacrifice at that level. By the way, it WAS Caesar. Q: (Bubbles) He was insulted by your "allegedly"! (L) Is it advisable to continue to try to communicate directly with Caesar? A: Occasionally is okay. Q: (L) Why only occasionally? A: Note what we just said. Q: (Perceval) It's a sacrifice at that level. (L) Oh, so does that mean that spirits or souls at that level are really getting into contemplation? A: Yes. Q: (L) And what was it that induced Caesar to volunteer for that service? A: The many cries of grief and need for succor at the time of his death. It could be said that this immense need and sense of loss was the foundation of the beginnings of what became Christianity. Q: (L) "The foundation of the beginnings of what became Christianity..." So was the calling for their lost leader that actually... (Perceval) In one sense, you can see there might have been a sense of responsibility to this hope, and the idea for a different type of world and a different type of living that he created in people. And then when he died, I mean, people were just cut off, left adrift, got lost... It was premature. It didn't last. It only lasted part of his life. (L) Is that kind of close, that he created this great hope in the hearts of so many people that when he was gone, they just couldn't accept it, believe it, or deal with it? Is that part of it? A: Yes. Q: (Perceval) There was nobody to replace him. (L) Yeah. (Bubbles) Kind of like JFK. (L) Worse. I was reading some things about different opinions about Caesar from the period when he lived, and immediately after - I think a couple of generations. It's pretty clear that in spite of the defamation and propaganda by the oligarchy that killed him, he was absolutely famed for his gentle nature, for his compassion, his mercy, his forgiveness, and his courtesy. I mean, he was literally famous for them. It's only defamers who have tried to blot that out, but it survives in some written texts that we still have. Okay, anybody else? I mean, we don't want to talk to Caesar right now because we have other questions. I guess we don't want to bother him unless we have really important questions. And I'm assuming we can ask questions about Caesar through this source, through the Cassiopaeans, without having to necessarily disturb Caesar on too many occasions. Is that correct? A: Yes. Q: (L) So, while we're on the topic, let me get in a couple of questions... [laughter] First of all, we didn't ask about Caesarion, did we? (Pierre) Caesarion? Oh, no. (L) Did Caesar and Cleopatra have a child together? A: No. Q: (L) Who was the father of her child that she named Caesarion? A: Anthony. Q: (L) Alright then. Was Caesar in love with Cleopatra? A: No. Q: (Pierre) But he had interactions with her. (L) Did he have... What do you mean interactions, Pierre? [laughter] (Pierre) English is not my native language! The monkey dance, I dunno. [laughter] (L) What do you mean English is not your native language?! [laughter] Inquiring minds want to know... (Athena) Oh lord... (Pierre) It's an essential point of history! (L) Inquiring minds want to know if he was having the hanky-panky with her? [laughter] A: Once or twice... Q: (Pierre) Or three times, or four times... (L) Well, you know it's an interesting thing, because when you read his Continuators, those who followed the Gallic Wars and the civil wars... There was the African war, and the Spanish war, and so forth... but you see they make no mention of any affair with Cleopatra. And some others I think made no mention of her, and they would have been likely to have known. The assumption of scholars is that they "passed over" this in silence because Caesar never mentioned it. They were honoring his silence. But my thought is that they passed over it in silence because there was nothing to report. If anything happened of a hanky panky nature, it was so fleeting and unimportant... and only the defamers blew it up and made a big deal out of it... (Pierre) Was Cleopatra in love with Caesar? A: No. Q: (Chu) Did he know that Caesarion wasn't his? (L) Caesarion wasn't born until after he was dead. (Athena) That's a no. (L) Okay, so any other Caesar questions at the moment? Well, we can always ask more Caesar questions later. (Alana) I've got a question. I'm wondering if like where he is in the contemplation plane, does he see what we're doing as a group, and is he interested? (Perceval) Too busy contemplating. A: When thoughts about him are intense and focused, he "hears". Q: (Pierre) And that might be one key for the prayers. To reach him, the prayer of the person must be intense and focused to go through. A: It helps also to eliminate lies, illusions and so forth. Q: (L) So, it helps to know that it IS Caesar, to know something about Caesar, to know the reality of his life and what he really did, and what he really meant... (Perceval) So he gets VERY little e-mail, then... (L) Yeah, obviously, he gets very few e-mails. At this point in time, few people know. (Pierre) Less and less. (L) So, if more people became aware of the truth of Caesar, and thought about him more intently and would focus on the truth, would that have any effect on receiving information or strength or... What would you say? Almost like answers to prayers, or communication, or being in tune or connected, or something like that? A: Something like that, yes. Q: (PoB) Would it also help him in his contemplation state? A: No. Q: (L) Okay. We're going to change topics here. As you know, we just had this plane fall out of the sky over the Ukraine. Immediately the US blamed Russia, and then it started blaming the Russian-aided freedom fighters in East Ukraine. Meanwhile, the Russians say it was clearly the Ukrainians in conjunction with US/NATO/UK/Whoever. So, I guess the first thing we ought to ask is: What brought the plane down? A: [Spiraling] Bomb on the plane placed there prior to departure. Q: (Pierre) Schiphol airport, again! The famous Underwear Bomber place! So, MOSSAD? (L) Who was involved? A: Note change in altitude for "signature". Q: (Perceval) From 35 to 33... Is 33 the clue? A: Yes. Consortium. And who is at the top of this STS pyramid?? Q: (Perceval) Figures. (L) Who is at the top of this pyramid? And who is at the top? (Perceval) MOSSAD. (L) MOSSAD? The Israelis? A: Yes Q: (Perceval) It seems the goal was to further demonize Putin and Russia. But was it also to distract from what's happening in Palestine? A: Absolutely! Q: (Pierre) Is it only coincidence... before MH 17, there was MH 370, this plane that disappeared from the same company. Is it just coincidence that the two incidents involve the same airline company? A: Another "signature". Q: (Data) Why did the plane deviate from its usual course? A: Instructed by ATC. Q: (Perceval) Air traffic control at Schiphol? A: Kiev. Q: (Perceval) So, some agent... (L) There was some control by MOSSAD in Kiev, and that whole Nazi business going on there... (Kniall) They've been there for DECADES! A: Yes! Q: (L) I think that was answering Kniall there. (Data) Why was it necessary to change the course with a bomb on board? (L) So it would fall where it did. They had to change the course to put it in the middle of the war zone. (Ark) The Russians were saying that the timing was a little bit miscalculated because it was supposed to come down closer to the Russian territory so that it would be easier to blame Russia. A: Yes. Q: (Pierre) It exploded too early. (L) Yeah, they're so lazy, they never get anything perfect. (Chu) Or too impatient. A: But most people are so gullible it doesn't matter. Q: (Perceval) You can say that again. (Kniall) Another signature. That suggests some planning at a level behind the first Malaysian plane... (L) No it doesn't. It's just like answering back to what happened to that first one. (Pierre) It's like, "They removed the 370, so we'll bring down the 17!" A: Yes Q: (Pierre) Which is really screwed up when you think about it. The signal is strong, ya know? Okay, we make MH 370 disappear. And the only answer they have instead of behaving better is, "Okay, we bring down MH 17, and we increase even more the lies and suffering!" (Perceval) So these signatures are used for what? Just for fun? For whose benefit? A: Pride, hubris, warnings to those who know. Q: (Chu) On the session when we talked about the interpreters and stuff, the plane {that disappeared, Flight 370}, if I understood correctly, was a message... (L) It was a warning... (Chu) To not go too far. (L) And they've basically answered by saying, "Up yours!" A: Yes. Q: (Chu) So would that mean that there really is a "law" that can prevent them from really going full-blown and starting a war? (L) There's no law that can prevent them, no. (Chu) They can go to war if they want to. It's just not in their interest to go too far. (L) I don't think they think about what's in their interest. I think they're too far gone. (Perceval) Well, hang on... The original idea was that it was some kind of bleedthrough. So, it was a natural thing. It wasn't necessarily a warning from anybody. They just interpreted it that way. They didn't see it as something was telling them, "Don't you dare!" (L) Yeah, they don't see it that way. But it SHOULD have been a warning IF they had been paying attention. (Perceval) As in a cause and effect kind of way. If you keep going like this, you're gonna... (Chu) But the effect would have been that they would have seen it as, "You can't go too far here..." (L) IF they had understood it. If they had understood that the conditions that were causing bleedthroughs and so on and so forth were a result of their actions and their behaviors globally speaking... If they had understood that, they would have said, "Hmm, weird things are happening. Let's rethink what's going on and what we're doing!" But instead, they interpreted it... (Pierre) And they did the opposite, and they're raising the ante. They're worsening the situation. (Perceval) What I was thinking earlier on was that, if the original idea was that they couldn't go too far, as in spark a major war with Russia by sending NATO into the Ukraine or whatever, they backed off from that because of their interpretation of the {disappearance of Flight 370}... As in, a plane went missing, it's a bit dodgy, we don't know what's going on, let's just cool it a bit... (L) Somebody backed off... (Perceval) Somebody backed off. So if that's true in that sense, shooting down a plane was like a Plan B or a second option that wasn't the full-scale kind of war {they may have been planning; it was on the level of mass emotional manipulation; an information war as opposed to an actual war. Because it's an all-out information war going on now because of this. (L) Well, let me ask this: 20 years ago, on 3rd December 1994, you gave a series of short little prophecies. Being so long ago, they kind of hit to the side, but one of the first was, "Ukraine explosion; chemical or nuclear". The second one was: "Hawaii crash; aviation, possibly involving military." And those two were juxtaposed next to each other, and there was a semicolon and period, and then the next sequence began. The next sequence was a series of earthquakes in California, destruction of California, Mount Lassen, several other volcanoes along the west coast of the US erupting, the sea floor subsiding, and so forth. {3 Dec 1004: Ukraine explosion; chemical or nuclear. Hawaii crash; aviation, possibly involving military. More California seismic activity after 1st of year: San Diego, San Bernardino, North Bakersfield, Barstow: all are fracture points. Hollister, Palo Alto, Imperial, Ukiah, Eureka, Point Mendocino, Monterrey, Offshore San Luis Obispo, Capistrano, Carmel: these are all stress points of fracture in sequence. “Time” is indefinite. Expect gradual destruction of California economy as people begin mass exodus. Also, Shasta erupts; Lassen activity. Ocean floor begins to subside. Getting to my question: Was that “Hawaii crash” a reference to what has happened here recently, like for example with MH 370 and MH 17? Even though the original was Hawaii, I would say Malaysia is in the Pacific more or less, so it's kind of sideways... Was that a reference to these events, even that far in advance? A: Yes. Q: (Perceval) So that was seen that far in advance as a marker, as a major event. There's been a lot of stuff that has happened since then that they didn't mention. So, why did that one stand out 20 years ago? Why did this event stand out so strongly? Are we all screwed? A: Interpretation is key. The elements here are metaphoric. That far in advance it can only be approximate. However, note the confluence of major elements in terms of similarity. Q: (L) So, Ukraine obviously has been known in advance as a flashpoint, and there is some awareness of... Could it be said that these sorts of things were already in the minds of some planners that far in advance? A: Yes. Q: (L) So, they change or shift their plans... (Perceval) When you say planners... (L) Do you mean human planners? A: And 4D STS. Q: (Perceval) The ones who jump around in time and stuff. (L) So they change things to confuse things. Well, they once said something about how they can change things. They specifically said something about that: moving back and forth in time. {7 Jan 1996: The forces at work here are far too clever to be accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of prophetic and philosophical patternings and usually shift course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed futures.} (Perceval) Can I ask how long in advance this bombing of MH 17 was planned? Like in a practical sense? (L) Practical sense like right now? (Perceval) As in today? How long ago did they decide on it? A: 3 weeks. Q: (PoB) It was well organized with Kiev moving the ground to air missile launchers closer... (L) Yeah, they made a plan, and they moved those launchers in place to confuse the issue. They turned them on so that the radar would be read by the Russian detectors, they planted the bomb... That was probably the easiest part: getting the bomb on the plane. The Israelis run that airport. It could have been a timed bomb, or it could have been a triggered bomb. It could have been triggered by the accompanying jets that were seen flying alongside it, assuming they were there. (Perceval) I wouldn't think that would even be necessary. (L) It could be just a timer. Hell, it could be set off by dialing a telephone or something. (Pierre) You know, it's roughly three weeks before... It's roughly the beginning of the Gaza invasion. They're starting to bomb Gaza, and they already know, "Okay, we are going to bomb and kill all those civilians, and there'll be this international uproar. So in two or three weeks, we need to create a diversion. Let’s bring down a plane!" (Perceval) Or they see how it goes. It's part of the plan... (Pierre) Yeah, and if necessary, we bring it down. (Perceval) Were the Israelis or someone working for the Israelis responsible for the murder of those three Israeli teenagers? A: Yes. How else to get a conflict going? Q: (Perceval) That's what they've always done. (Timotheos) Is there any significance to the fact that there were a hundred or so AIDS researchers on board that plane? (Perceval) Were there that many? A: Not as many as that. Q: (Perceval) Yeah, apparently there weren't that many. A: And, no. Q: (L) They just were there. (Perceval) It was just a random plane in the sense that it fit the bill. (L) And they made sure they didn't have anybody they didn't want to kill on there. (Perceval) In terms of the propaganda war and the kind of lower-level conflict, I suppose you would say that it is between the US and Russia... (Kniall) Is there some understanding between the US and Russia that Israel is the wildcard? (Perceval) No, that's not what I'm thinking of. In terms of these people at the top of the pyramid, do they feel threatened in any way by what Putin and Russia is doing, or is that merely at the lower level of geopolitical chessboard nonsense? A: They are incapable of seeing outcomes other than what they wish. Q: (Perceval) I think way back just after 9/11, there was a reference made to the "Russians" having some evidence about 9/11? Is that true, or am I...? (L) No, that wasn't in the sessions. (Perceval) Do the Russians have any data on the truth of the 9/11 attacks? A: Yes. Q: (Perceval) Would it ever be in the realm of possibility, or within Putin's power to release that kind of information just to mix things up in the information war? A: Strong possibility if the tide of public perception can be adjusted. Q: (Pierre) And does that evidence involve the US and/or Israel? (L) Well, since we have a pretty good idea of who did it, we know the answer to that. Okay, so that leads me to a question that's been on my mind for the last day or so. I noticed that the "Black Hats", the bad guys, the whole pathological community seem to be quite well-organized and unified to some extent in their public activities. For example, Israel is able to get all these students, the Hasbara program; the Pentagon has hired all of these people to engage in cyber warfare; there are trolls that go all over the internet swaying public opinion and writing commentary. Edward Snowden has come out and explained exactly how it's done. I mean, they have a HUGE, elaborate cyber warfare program and train people to get out there and work for the control of people's minds. It's just absolutely staggering. So, one thing about it that really gets me is that first of all, even with this revelation of Snowden that has hit all the major media, people don't stop and think that EVERYTHING that's going on could be part of that disinformation program! The second thing is, why is it that people with peaceful, world-benevolent opinions and approaches - people of conscience - can't get together in the same way that evil does? Evil seems to coalesce, and people of conscience seem to... it's almost like their conscience forces them to fight with each other! I mean, assuming they even have a conscience. What's the deal here? I want to know. A: First of all notice that the STS side uses two hooks: money and promises of power. It is not so much "unity of purpose." Secondly, just as you have learned from your studies of psychology and from the work of Gurdjieff, people with the genetics for "soul" or conscience are very wounded by the programming of family and society. Q: (L) So, it's their wounds, their programming, their buffers as Gurdjieff says, that keeps them all pointing in dozens of different directions with different opinions, ideas, wounds, fears, and so on. And that prevents unity. Is there anything that can change that? A: Sure! Q: [laughter] (L) What? A: Work or a huge shock! Q: (Perceval) A huge shock like a giant fireball? Giant meteorite or an earthquake? A: Some cosmic activity might do it provided the seeds of knowledge have been planted as you have been doing for years now. As we once said, from the fire comes light. There are several levels of meaning there. Q: (L) Cosmic fire, maybe? A: Yes! Q: (Pierre) Cosmic activity can help this seed to grow? (Chu) No, I don't think that's what they're saying. (L) I think they're saying that that's the shock. And if there is a seed there, and if there is any potential in the individual, if the shock doesn't kill them, then... (Pierre) So the shock due to cosmic activity is what will make the seed grow? (Ark) No! (Chu) The seed of knowledge has to be there for people to interpret it, right? (L) I think they already have to have it inside them, then they get a shock, and then afterwards... (Pierre) Yeah, the shock makes the seed of knowledge grow... (Ark) No! The knowledge cannot grow by shock. The knowledge can grow only if you get more truth. Shock may only cause the seed to do some job. (L) Like what? (Ark) I mean, because you may know things, know things, know things... and do nothing! And then, there comes shock, and then you realize that your knowledge - you were not using your knowledge! (Perceval) It seems to me that this might apply to a lot of forum members who have been just quietly absorbing the information, but unable to do anything with it because of all this programming and stuff. The seed of knowledge has been planted in those people, but they haven't actually done anything with it. (L) But when it becomes real... (Perceval) When they realize that, "Holy shit, this isn't just theoretical! A fireball just blew the crap out of Washington, DC!"... God willing... [laughter] Suddenly it's true for them, and it may activate the knowledge that they've been growing slowly inside. (L) In other words, it will kind of like blow the fear away because what's really holding people back is fear: these programs, these buffers. That's what Caesar said last week. He said to be true to your inner nature, and fear nothing. You have to get to the point where you fear nothing. You have to get to the point where you can say “It’s a good day to die” like Black Elk said before going into battle. (Chu) But there's also the other side of the coin in people who think that things don't apply to them, or they can learn that tomorrow, or... (L) Or it's happening over there, and not here... That’s why working on SOTT is so important; it provides LOTS of shocks! (Chu) I was telling people this morning in the kitchen that I watched a video. It's really shocking. It's a meteorite that fell in Argentina. People saw the light, the crater. The authorities covered it up really quick. And you see a hundred people at least, protesting that the authorities are lying, and that it wasn't a gas stove burning the house down. But NONE of them was able to say it was a meteorite because none of them had the frame of reference. And it was SO frustrating hearing these people saying, "People are lying to us! We want the truth!" They were shouting. But none of them, it never occurred to them... They thought it was like a missile, or an attack... (L) Well, it's like the chemtrails issue. They KNOW that the government is lying to them, and so they create this elaborate conspiracy theory that the government is spraying masses of chemicals in the upper atmosphere. Every single plane that makes a contrail is automatically a chemtrail producer. (Chu) And it's usually the cosmic connection that is not in people's minds. It has to be the government, it has to be some kind of force or whatever, so it seems to me they're saying it has to be... (L) Aristotle still holds sway. (Pierre) The question I wanted to answer is, those shocks due to cosmic activity... Is it because on the psychological level, there is this fear and people are thinking, "Oh, it's real!" And/or because cosmic activity might modify the electromagnetic environment and stimulate shifts in some people? A: A little of both. And for now Goodbye. (Perceval) They just took off? (Ark) That was a shock! [laughter] (Alana) 9/11 was a shock, right? And so many people like myself included, started... I remember being in Europe and thinking, "I haven't ever been watching the news. Why did this come? Why did this happen?" How many people started asking questions and trying to understand what happened? That's how many people found the forum. It took a shock. (L) Yeah, so that's one kind of big shock. So, if there gets to be another big, humongous shock, there's going to be a whole different attitude about things; but only if people have the knowledge to parse it. (Perceval) I think it has to be a shock that isn't selective. It has to be something that can't be dismissed as just happening to "those people over there”. It has to be something that threatens everybody. A visceral kind of "Oh my god! My ass is toast!" (Chu) Problem with those is that it's usually too late, if it's threatening the entire world. (L) Well, obviously there's going to be… well... a really big shock would necessarily include death on a massive scale. (Perceval) But I'm talking here about only the people who, as they said, contained the seed of knowledge that has been planted. The vast majority of people don't even have that. (Bubbles) Don't the C's have loads of free time? Where did they go? (L) I think they perceived my tiredness. (Perceval) They have to go to Intermarche. [laughter] They're out of eggs for their fatbombs. (Ark) Speaking of these shocks... Okay, people after an earthquake: an earthquake is certainly a shock, but do they wake up in any way after an earthquake? (L) Not if they don't know something. (Chu) A lot of people didn't wake up after 9/11 either. (L) Yeah. So, it's going to be only the people who've had the seeds of knowledge implanted already, and they have been taking root and growing slowly inside them. But they're not yet... (Perceval) Look at the effects of this recent shock of the plane crashing. The vast majority of people felt it as a shock in some way or another, and it made them MORE authoritarian, more authoritarian followers. It threw them into the arms of the government. Ya know, "Get Putin! He's out to get us!" They basically bought the lie, and went further to the Dark Side just like so many people did on 9/11, buying the government conspiracy theory about 19 Arabs who couldn’t fly. (Andromeda) They have different seeds. (Perceval) Exactly. A few people, like on our forum and who read Sott and our work would have felt it as a shock as well. But, because they had the seeds of knowledge about how these things happen and who does them, and that it's all lies, that pushed them further in the direction of waking up and realizing that things are getting serious! It was confirmation that this kind of shit is real, there IS really a cabal, there IS really an STS pyramid, ya know... It's more confirmation for what they already know. And it's a shock. (Ark) But, but... There is also another thing, because Pierre mentioned electromagnetic whatever. Now, such a shock, what it can do is, it can destroy the programming frequencies of the STS. (L) Oh yeah. (Perceval) The frequency fence? (Ark) And then, because we are all the time blocked from knowing more at higher levels, those who have knowledge and those who don't, being beamed in many ways, by some kind of organized thing… (L) A cosmic event could definitely destroy the frequency fence. END OF SESSION
3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 11.1 12.1 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 23.2 24.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 26.1 26.2 27.1 28.1 30.1 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.5 31.6 31.7 31.8 31.9 31.10 32.1 33.1 34.1 34.2 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 39.2 40.1 41.1 42.1 42.2 43.1 43.2 43.3 44.1 44.2 45.1 46.1 47.1 47.2 48.1 49.1 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 50.5 50.6 51.1 52.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 56.2 57.1 57.2 58.1 59.1 60.1 60.2 61.1 62.1 63.1 64.1 64.2 65.1 66.1 66.2 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 70.2 70.3 70.4 70.5 70.6 71.1 72.1 72.2 72.3 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 77.1 77.2 77.3 78.1 79.1 79.2 80.1 81.1 81.2 82.1 83.1 83.2 84.1 85.1 85.2 86.1 87.1 88.1 89.1 90.1 91.1 92.1 93.1 94.1 95.1 96.1 97.1 97.2 98.1 99.1 100.1 101.1 102.1 103.1 104.1 105.1 105.2 106.1 106.2 107.1 108.1 109.1 109.2 109.3 109.4 110.1 110.2 110.3 111.1 112.1 113.1 114.1 115.1 116.1 117.1 118.1 119.1 119.2 120.1 120.2 121.1 121.2 121.3 121.4 121.5 122.1 122.2 123.1 123.2 124.1 125.1 125.2 125.3 126.1 126.2 127.1 128.1 129.1 129.2 129.3 130.1 130.2 130.3 130.4 130.5 131.1 132.1 132.2 132.3 132.4 132.5 132.6 132.7 132.8 133.1 133.2 134.1 135.1 135.2 135.3 135.4 135.5 136.1 136.2 136.3 136.4 137.1 138.1 139.1 140.1 141.1 142.1 143.1 144.1 144.2 144.3 145.1 146.1 146.2 147.1 147.2 148.1 149.1 149.2 150.1 151.1 152.1 152.2 152.3 152.4 152.5 153.1 154.1 154.2 155.1 155.2 155.3 155.4 156.1 156.2 157.1 158.1 159.1 159.2 160.1 161.1 162.1 163.1 164.1 165.1 166.1 167.1 168.1 169.1 170.1 171.1 171.2 172.1 173.1 173.2 174.1 175.1 176.1 177.1 178.1 179.1 180.1 180.2 180.3 180.4 180.5 180.6 180.7 180.8 180.9 180.10 180.11 180.12 180.13 181.1 181.2 181.3 182.1 182.2 182.3 183.1 184.1 185.1 186.1 186.2 187.1 187.2 187.3 188.1 189.1 190.1 191.1 192.1 192.2 193.1 194.1 195.1 196.1 197.1 198.1 198.2 198.3 198.4 199.1 200.1 200.2 201.1 201.2 202.1 203.1 203.2 204.1 204.2 204.3 204.4 204.5 205.1 206.1 207.1 207.2 207.3 207.4 207.5 207.6 207.7 207.8 207.9 207.10 208.1 208.2 208.3 209.1 209.2 210.1 211.1 212.1 212.2 213.1 214.1 214.2 215.1 215.2 215.3 215.4 215.5 215.6 216.1 216.2 217.1 217.2 217.3 217.4 217.5 218.1 219.1 220.1 220.2 221.1 221.2 222.1 223.1 223.2 224.1 225.1 226.1 227.1 227.2 228.1 228.2 228.3 228.4 228.5 229.1 230.1 230.2 230.3 230.4 230.5 231.1 231.2 232.1 233.1 234.1 235.1 236.1 237.1 238.1 239.1
Laura (L), Ark, i Andromeda za pločom Prisutni: Pierre, Perceval, PoB, Chu, Kniall, Bubbles, Oxajil, Terran, Alana, Timotheos, Parallel, Athena, Data Odgovor (O): Pozdrav. Pitanje (P): (L) To je ono što su rekli. Pokazali su na “Pozdrav”. I koga imamo s nama večeras? O: Jeriponea od Kasiopeje. P: (L) OK, dajte da postavim nekoliko početnih pitanja prije nego što pređemo na teme ove večeri. Prvo pitanje: što se događalo tijekom posljednje sesije kada smo komunicirali s Julijem Cezarom, navodno, kada je Ark osjećao kako mu se kosa miče na jednoj strani, a naočale su mu se iskrivile? O čemu se to radilo? O: Ark je po frekvenciji najbliži Cezaru; stoga EM izboji tijekom veze. P: (L) OK, to me uvodi u sljedeće pitanje. Mislim da ste nam jednom rekli nešto otprilike kako nije tako lako… ne možda da nije tako lako, nego da se ne možete spojiti s ljudima u petom denzitetu osim ako ne postoji snažna veza ili povezni element koji vas veže s njima – drugim riječima, da ih se može dobiti na telefon, da se tako izrazim. Pa, što nam je omogućilo da navodno kontaktiramo Cezara? O: Frekvencija cijele grupe je bila pogodna za kontakt. P: (L) I zašto je to tako? O: Snažna psihička veza i dugo razdoblje usredotočenja prije pokušaja. Dodatno, kako je prethodno objašnjeno, Cezar je volontirao da bude dostupan. Na toj razini radi se o žrtvovanju. Usput, to JESTE bio Cezar. P: (Bubbles) Uvrijedilo ga je tvoje “navodno”! (L) Je li uputno nastaviti pokušavati izravnu komunikaciju s Cezarom? O: Povremeno je u redu. P: (L) Zašto samo povremeno? O: Sjeti se što smo upravo rekli. P: (Perceval) Na toj razini radi se o žrtvovanju. (L) Oh, znači li to da se duhovi ili duše na toj razini zbilja upuštaju u kontemplaciju? O: Da. P: (L) I što je ponukalo Cezara da volontira za to služenje? O: Brojni vapaji tuge i traženje pomoći u vrijeme njegove smrti. Može se reći kako su ova neizmjerna potreba i osjećaj gubitka bili temelji začetka onoga što je kasnije postalo kršćanstvo. P: (L) “Temelji začetka onoga što je kasnije postalo kršćanstvo…” Jesu li pozivi izgubljenom vođi zapravo.. (Perceval) U određenom smislu, može se vidjeti kako je tu možda bio prisutan osjećaj odgovornosti prema toj nadi, i ideji o drugačijem svijetu i drugačijem načinu življenja, koju je on probudio kod ljudi. I onda kada je on umro, hoću reći, ljudi su bili jednostavno odsječeni, prepušteni slučaju, bili su izgubljeni… To je bilo preuranjeno. To nije potrajalo. Trajalo je samo dio njegovog života. (L) Je li to blizu istine, da je on stvorio tu veliku nadu u srcima velikog broja ljudi, pa kad je umro, oni jednostavno nisu to mogli prihvatiti, povjerovati u to, ili nositi se s time? Je li to dio toga? O: Da. P: (Perceval) Nitko ga nije mogao zamijeniti. (Bubbles) Pomalo kao JFK. (L) Još gore. Čitala sam o različitim mišljenjima o Cezaru iz razdoblja kada je živio, i odmah nakon – mislim kroz nekoliko generacija. Prilično je jasno kako ga se, unatoč blaćenju i propagandi od strane oligarhije koja ga je ubila, slavilo zbog njegove blage naravi, njegovog suosjećanja, njegovog milosrđa, njegove sklonosti opraštanju, i njegove ljubaznosti. Hoću reći, doslovno je bio poznat po tome. Samo oni koji su ga blatili su to pokušali okaljati, ali to je preživjelo u određenim pisanim tekstovima koje i danas imamo. OK, netko drugi? Hoću reći, ne želimo sada pričati s Cezarom jer imamo druga pitanja. Pretpostavljam da ga ne želimo gnjaviti osim ako ne budemo imali zbilja važna pitanja. I pretpostavljam kako pitanja o Cezaru možemo postavljati kroz ovaj izvor, kroz Kasiopejce, bez da nepotrebno uznemiravamo Cezara u previše navrata. Je li to točno? O: Da. P: (L) Dakle, dok smo na toj temi, dajte da postavim nekoliko pitanja… (smijeh) Prije svega, nismo pitali o Cezarionu, jesmo li? (Pierre) Cezarionu? Oh, ne. (L) Jesu li Cezar i Kleopatra imali dijete zajedno? O: Ne. P: (L) Tko je bio otac njenog djeteta kojemu je dala ime Cezarion? O: Antonije. P: (L) U redu onda. Je li Cezar bio zaljubljen u Kleopatru? O: Ne. P: (Pierre) Ali imao je s njom interakcije. (L) Je li imao… Kako to misliš interakcije, Pierre? [smijeh] (Pierre) Engleski nije moj materinji jezik! Majmunski ples, što ja znam. [smijeh] (L) Kako to misliš engleski nije tvoj materinji jezik?! [smijeh] Znatiželjni umovi bi htjeli znati… (Athena) Oh Bože… (Pierre) To je ključni povijesni događaj! (L) Znatiželjni umovi žele znati je li s njom prakticirao hopa-cupa? [smijeh] O: Jednom ili dvaput… P: (Pierre) Ili tri puta, ili četiri puta… (L) Dobro, znate da se tu radi o nečemu interesantnom, jer kada čitate njegove Nastavke, one koji su pratili Galske ratove i građanske ratove… Bio je tu afrički rat, i španjolski rat, i tako dalje… ali nigdje se ne spominje njegova ljubavna veza s Kleopatrom. A neki drugi je nisu ni spomenuli, a oni bi vjerojatno znali. Učenjaci nagađaju kako je to u tišini “prešućeno” jer Cezar to nije nikada spominjao. Poštovali su njegovu šutnju. Ali ja mislim kako su to u tišini prešutili jer se nije imalo o čemu pričati. Ako je bilo nečega poput hopa-cupa, bilo je to prolazno i nebitno… i samo oni koji su ga blatili su to napuhali i pridali tome važnost… (Pierre) Je li Kleopatra bila zaljubljena u Cezara? O: Ne. P: (Chu) Je li on znao da Cezarion nije bio njegov? (L) Cazarion se rodio tek nakon njegove smrti. (Athena) Dakle, nije. (L) OK, ima li još pitanja o Cezaru u ovom trenutku? Dobro, uvijek možemo kasnije postaviti dodatna pitanja. (Alana) Ja imam pitanje. Zanima me, ako je on na kontemplacijskoj razini, vidi li što mi kao grupa radimo, i zanima li ga to? (Perceval) Previše je zauzet kontemplacijom. O: Kada su misli o njemu intenzivne i usredotočene, onda on “čuje”. P: (Pierre) I to može biti ključno za molitve. Da bi ga se kontaktiralo, molitve te osobe moraju biti dovoljno intenzivne i usredotočene kako bi se uspjele probiti. O: Pomaže također ako se eliminiraju laži, iluzije i tako dalje. P: (L) Dakle, pomaže znati da to JESTE Cezar, i znati nešto o Cezaru, znati što je stvarno bio u životu i što je stvarno radio, i što je zbilja želio… (Perceval) Znači da mu onda stiže JAKO malo e-mailova… (L) Da, očito, stiže mu jako malo e-mailova. U ovom trenutku, malo ljudi je svjesno. (Pierre) Sve manje i manje. (L) Dakle, ako bi ljudi postali svjesni istine o Cezaru, i mislili o njemu intenzivnije i bili usredotočeni na istinu, bi li to imalo utjecaja na primanje informacija ili snagu ili… Što bi vi rekli? Nešto poput odgovora na molitve, ili komunikacije, ili namještanja na odgovarajuću frekvenciju ili povezanost, ili nešto slično? O: Nešto slično, da. P: (PoB) Bi li mu to također bilo od pomoći u stanju kontemplacije? O: Ne. P: (L) OK. Mijenjamo temu. Kao što znate, avion je oboren na nebu iznad Ukrajine. Odmah nakon toga SAD su za to okrivile Rusiju, i onda su počeli kriviti borce za slobodu kojima Rusi pomažu u istočnoj Ukrajini. U međuvremenu, Rusi tvrde kako je jasno da su za to krivi Ukrajinci u dosluhu sa SAD-om/NATO-om/Velikom Britanijom/kim god. Dakle, pretpostavljam da bi prvo trebali pitati: što je oborilo avion? O: [spiralna vrtnja na ploči] Bomba postavljena na avion prije polaska. P: (Pierre) Aerodrom u Schipholu, ponovo! Mjesto odakle je krenuo slavni Bombaš u gaćama! Dakle, MOSSAD? (L) Tko je bio umiješan? O: Primijetite promjenu visine aviona kao “potpis”. P: (Perceval) S 35 na 33… Je li 33 indicija? O: Da. Konzorcij. I tko je na vrhu te OPS piramide?? P: (Perceval) Da, jasno. (L) Tko je na vrhu te piramide? I tko je na vrhu? (Perceval) MOSSAD. (L) MOSSAD? Izraelci? O: Da. P: (Perceval) Čini se kako je cilj bio dodatno demonizirati Putina i Rusiju. Ali i kako bi se skrenula pažnja s onoga što se događa u Palestini? O: Apsolutno! P: (Pierre) Radi li se isključivo o slučajnosti… prije MH 17, bio je MH 370, taj avion te iste kompanije koji je nestao. Je li samo slučajnost što su ta dva incidenta povezana s istom avionskom kompanijom? O: Još jedan “potpis”. P: (Data) Zašto se avion odmaknuo od uobičajene rute? O: Zbog uputa KZP. P: (Perceval) Kontrole zračnog prometa u Schipholu? O: Kijev. P: (Perceval) Dakle, neki je agent… (L) MOSSAD ima nešto utjecaja u Kijevu, i svi ti skupa nacisti tamo… (Kniall) Tamo su već DESETLJEĆIMA! O: Da! P: (L) Mislim da su to odgovorili Kniallu. (Data) Zašto je bilo potrebno odmaknuti avion s bombom od uobičajene rute? (L) Kako bi pao tamo gdje je pao. Morali su mu promijeniti smjer kako bi dospio usred ratne zone. (Ark) Rusi su rekli kako je tajming bio donekle pogrešan jer je trebao pasti bliže ruskom teritoriju kako bi bilo lakše okriviti Ruse. O: Da. P: (Pierre) Prerano je eksplodirao. (L) Da, tako su lijeni, nikad im ne bude sve savršeno. (Chu) Ili su suviše nestrpljivi. O: Ali većina ljudi je toliko lakovjerna da nije ni bitno. P: (Perceval) Možete to opet reći. (Kniall) Još jedan potpis. To sugerira neku vrstu planiranja na razini u pozadini prvog malezijskog aviona… (L) Ne sugerira. Radi se samo o odgovoru na to što se dogodilo prvom avionu. (Pierre) To je poput: “Oni su maknuli 370, pa ćemo mi oboriti 17!” O: Da. P: (Pierre) Što je zbilja poremećeno kad čovjek razmisli o tome. Signal je jak, znate? OK, mi učinimo da MH 370 nestane. I jedini odgovor koji oni imaju, umjesto boljeg ponašanja, jest “OK, mi ćemo oboriti MH 17, i pojačati laži i patnju!” (Perceval) Dakle, ovi potpisi se koriste za što? Za zabavu? Tko ima koristi od toga? O: Ponos, oholost, upozorenje onima koji znaju. P: (Chu) Tijekom sesije na kojoj smo pričali o interpretatorima i tim stvarima, avion (koji je nestao, let 370), ako sam dobro razumjela, je bio poruka… (L) Radilo se o upozorenju… (Chu) Da ne pretjeraju. (L) A oni su manje-više odgovorili sa “Nosite se!” O: Da. P: (Chu) Dakle, znači li to da zbilja postoji “zakon” koji bi ih spriječio da se u potpunosti razmašu i započnu rat? (L) Ne postoji zakon koji bi ih spriječio, ne. (Chu) Mogu započeti rat ako žele. Samo što nije u njihovom interesu pretjerati. (L) Mislim da oni ne razmišljaju o tome što je u njihovom interesu. Mislim da su predaleko odmakli. (Perceval) Pa, samo malo… Izvorna ideja je bila da se radilo o rascjepu između denziteta. Dakle, radilo se o prirodnoj stvari. Nije to nužno bilo nečije upozorenje. Samo su to tako interpretirali. Oni to nisu vidjeli kao da im nešto govori: “Da vam ne padne na pamet!” (L) Da, oni ne razmišljaju na taj način. Ali to je TREBALO biti upozorenje DA su obraćali pažnju. (Perceval) Na način uzroka i posljedice. Ako nastavite ovako, vi ćete… (Chu) Ali posljedica bi bila da su to trebali vidjeti kao “ne smjete pretjerati…” (L) DA su to shvatili. Da su shvatili da uvjeti koji stvaraju rascjepe između denziteta i tako dalje, su rezultat njihovih akcija i njihovog ponašanja gledajući u globalu… Da su to razumjeli, rekli bi: “Hmm, čudne stvari se događaju. Idemo ponovo razmisliti o tome što se događa i što radimo!” Ali umjesto toga, to su interpretirali… (Pierre) A postupili su suprotno, te još i podižu ulog. Oni pogoršavaju situaciju. (Perceval) Ono o čemu sam razmišljao ranije je da, ako je izvorna ideja bila da ne smiju pretjerati, poput izazivanja velikog rata s Rusijom tako što bi se NATO poslao u Ukrajinu ili štogod, oni su se povukli jer je njihova interpretacija (nestanka leta 370)… Bila poput, avion je nestao, to je pomalo sumnjivo, mi ne znamo što se događa, idmo se malo smiriti… (L) Netko se povukao… (Perceval) Netko se povukao. Tako da ako je to istina u tom smislu, obaranje aviona je bio plan B ili druga opcija u odnosu na totalni rat koji su možda planirali; bilo je to na razini masovne emocionalne manipulacije; informacijski rat u odnosu na stvarni rat. Jer trenutno bjesni potpuni informacijski rat zbog toga. (L) Pa, dajte mi da pitam: prije 20 godina, 03. prosinca 1994. godine, dali ste seriju malih proročanstava. Obzirom da je to bilo davno, pomalo su otišla u krivom smjeru, ali jedno od prvih je bilo: “Eksplozija u Ukrajini; kemijska ili nuklearna”. Drugo je bilo: “Nesreća na Havajima; avionska, moguća umiješanost vojske.” I ta dva su bila jedno do drugog, i bila je točka-zarez i točka, i onda je sljedeći niz počinjao. Sljedeći niz je obuhvaćao seriju potresa u Kaliforniji, uništenje Kalifornije, Mt. Lassena, erupcije nekoliko vulkana uz zapadnu obalu SAD-a, slijeganje morskog dna, i tako dalje. Citat iz sesije 03.12.1994.: “Eksplozija u Ukrajini; kemijska ili nuklearna. Nesreća na Havajima; avionska, moguća umiješanost vojske. Dodatna seizmička aktivnost u Kaliforniji nakon prvog u godini: San Diego, San Bernardino, North Bakersfield, Barstow: sve su to točke pucanja. Hollister, Palo Alto, Imperial, Ukiah, Eureka, Point Mendocino, Monterrey, u blizini obale San Luis Obispoa, Capistrano, Carmel: sve su to stresne točke pucanja u nizu. “Vrijeme” je neodređeno. Očekujte postepeno uništenje gospodarstva Kalifornije kako ljudi počinju s masovnim iseljavanjem. Također, erupcija Shaste; aktivnost Lassena. Počinje slijeganje morskog dna.” (L) Dolazim na moje pitanje: Odnosi li se “nesreća na Havajima” na to što se dogodilo nedavno, na primjer s MH 370 i MH 17? Iako u originalu stoje Havaji, rekla bi kako je Malezija manje-više u Tihom oceanu, tako da je to pomalo u krivu… Odnosi li se to na te događaje, čak toliko unaprijed? O: Da. P: (Perceval) Dakle, to se toliko unaprijed moglo vidjeti kao oznaka, kao ključni događaj. Od tada se štošta dogodilo, a što oni nisu spominjali. Dakle, zašto je baš taj događaj istaknut prije 20 godina? Zašto se upravo taj događaj isticao tako jako? Jesmo li osuđeni na propast? O: Interpretacija je ključna. Ovi elementi su simbolični. Predviđanje toliko unaprijed može biti samo približno. No, primijetite slijevanje (konvergenciju, op. prev.) glavnih elemenata u smislu sličnosti. P: (L) Dakle, unaprijed se znalo da će Ukrajina biti zapaljiva točka, i postoji određena svijest o… Može li se reći kako su te stvari toliko unaprijed već bile na pameti određenim planerima? O: Da. P: (L) Dakle, oni mijenjaju ili pomiču svoje planove… (Perceval) Kada kažete planeri… (L) Mislite li na ljudske planere? O: I 4D OPS. P: (Perceval) Oni koji skaču kroz vrijeme i slično. (L) Oni mijenjaju stvari kako bi zbunili. Pa, jednom su rekli nešto o tome kako oni mogu mijenjati stvari. Izričito su rekli nešto o tome: kretanje naprijed i nazad kroz vrijeme. Citat iz sesije 07.01.1996.: “Sile koje su ovdje na djelu su suviše pametne da bi se unaprijed moglo točno predvidjeti njihovo ponašanje. Nikada ne možete znati kakvi će preokreti i obrati uslijediti, i oni su svjesni proročanskih i filozofskih šablona, te obično mijenjaju smjer kako bi obmanuli i obeshrabrili one koji vjeruju u unaprijed utvrđenu budućnost.” (Perceval) Smijem li pitati koliko unaprijed je postavljanje bombe na MH 17 planirano? U praktičnom smislu? (L) U praktičnom smislu kao upravo sada? (Perceval) U odnosu na danas? Prije koliko vremena su se odlučili na to? O: 3 tjedna. P: (PoB) To je dobro organizirano s Kijevom koji je približio lansirne rampe raketa zemlja-zrak… (L) Da, napravili su plan, i pomaknuli su lansirne rampe tamo kako bi zbunili. Upalili su ih kako bi Rusi mogli detektirati, postavili su bombu… To je bio vjerojatno najlakši dio: postaviti bombu na avion. Izraelci upravljaju tim aerodromom. Mogla je biti bomba s tajmerom, ili je mogla biti bomba s detonatorom. Mogli su je detonirati prateći avioni koji su letjeli uz njega, pod pretpostavkom da su bili tamo. (Perceval) Mislim da to uopće nije bilo potrebno. (L) Dovoljan je bio tajmer. Do vraga, mogao ju je detonirati telefonski poziv ili nešto slično. (Pierre) Znate, radi se o otprilike tri tjedna prije… To je otprilike početak invazije na Gazu. Oni počinju bombardirati Gazu, i unaprijed znaju, “OK, bombardirati ćemo i ubiti sve te civile, i međunarodna zajednica će se uzbuniti. Pa ćemo kroz dva ili tri tjedna morati izvesti diverziju. Idemo srušiti avion!“ (Perceval) Ili će vidjeti kako će se situacija razvijati. To je dio plana… (Pierre) Da, i ako bude potrebno, srušit ćemo ga. (Perceval) Jesu li Izraelci ili netko tko radi za Izraelce odgovorni za ubojstvo ona tri izraelska tinejdžera? O: Da. Kako inače pokrenuti konflikt? P: (Perceval) To su oduvijek tako radili. (Timotheos) Je li značajna činjenica da je na avionu bilo otprilike 100 istraživača AIDS-a? (Perceval) Bilo ih je toliko puno? O: Nije ih bilo toliko. P: (Perceval) Da, čini se da ih nije bilo toliko. O: I, ne. P: (L) Jednostavno su bili tamo. (Perceval) Bio je to nasumce odabran avion koji se uklapao u njihove planove. (L) I pobrinuli su se da nema nikoga koga ne žele ubiti. (Perceval) Što se tiče propagandnog rata i sukoba niskog intenziteta, pretpostavljam da ćete reći kako je to između SAD-a i Rusije… (Kniall) Postoji li razumijevanje između SAD i Rusije kako je Izrael nepredvidiv? (Perceval) Ne, ne mislim tako. Što se tiče ljudi na vrhu piramide, osjećaju li se oni na bilo koji način ugroženi zbog toga što Putin i Rusija rade, ili je to isključivo na nižim razinama te budalaštine od geopolitičke šahovske ploče? O: Nisu u stanju percipirati ishode osim onoga što oni žele. P: (Perceval) Mislim da je tamo odmah nakon 11. rujna 2001. godine, spomenuto kako “Rusi” imaju neke dokaze o tom događaju? Je li to istina, ili sam ja…? (L) Ne, to nije bilo u sesijama. (Perceval) Imaju li Rusi nekakve podatke vezane za istinu o napadima 11. rujna 2001. godine? O: Da. P: (Perceval) Je li realno, ili u sklopu Putinovih ovlasti, objavljivanje takvih informacija kako bi se uzburkale vode u informacijskom ratu? O: Jaka mogućnost ukoliko se plima javnog mnijenja može podesiti. P: (Pierre) I impliciraju li ti dokazi SAD i/ili Izrael? (L) Pa, s obzirom da imamo prilično jasnu predodžbu o tome tko je to napravio, znamo odgovor na to. OK, to nas dovodi do pitanja koje mi se mota po glavi posljednjih dana. Primijetila sam kako su “Crni šeširi”, negativci, cijela ta patološka zajednica, dosta dobro organizirani i ujedinjeni do određene mjere kad se radi o javnim aktivnostima. Na primjer, Izrael je u stanju okupiti sve te studente, Hasbara program; Pentagon je unajmio sve te ljude koji su uključeni u cyber ratovanje; postoje “trolovi” koji kruže internetom i utječu na mišljenje javnosti i pišu komentare. Edward Snowden je izašao u javnost i točno objasnio kako se to sve skupa radi. Hoću reći, oni imaju OGROMNI, razrađeni program cyber ratovanja i obučavaju ljude kako bi se prihvatili kontrole ljudskih umova. To je apsolutno nevjerojatno. Tako da, jedna od stvari u vezi toga koja me pogađa, prije svega, čak i s tim Snowdenovim otkrićima koja su bila u svim vodećim medijima, je zašto ljudi ne stanu i počnu razmišljati o mogućnosti da je SVE skupa što se događa dio dezinformacijskog programa! Druga stvar je, zašto se ljudi s miroljubivim, dobronamjernim mišljenjima i pristupima – ljudi koji imaju savjest – ne mogu ujediniti kao što je to slučaj sa zlom? Čini se kako se zlo međusobno povezuje, a ljudi koji imaju savjest… kao da ih njihova savjest tjera na borbu među sobom! Hoću reći, uz pretpostavku da oni imaju savjest. O čemu se tu radi? Želim znati. O: Prije svega, primijeti kako OPS koristi dvije navlakuše: novac i obećavanje moći. Ne radi se toliko o “ujedinjenosti oko cilja”. Drugo, kao što si naučila iz tvojih proučavanja psihologije i djela Gurdjieffa, ljudi koji imaju genetiku koja podržava “dušu” ili savjest su jako ranjeni programiranjem od strane obitelji i društva. P: (L) Dakle, njihove rane, njihovo programiranje, njihovi odbojnici (tamponi, op. prev.), kako ih Gurdjieff naziva, sve to skupa ih usmjerava u različite smjerove s različitim mišljenjima, idejama, ranama, strahovima, i tako dalje. I to sprečava jedinstvo. Može li išta to promijeniti? O: Naravno! P: [smijeh] (L) Što? O: Rad ili ogromni šok! P: (Perceval) Ogromni šok poput velike vatrene kugle? Velikog meteorita ili potresa? O: Nešto kozmičke aktivnosti bi moglo biti dovoljno, pod uvjetom da je sjeme znanja posijano, kao što vi radite već godinama. Kao što smo jednom rekli, iz vatre dolazi svjetlost. Ovdje ima nekoliko razina značenja. P: (L) Kozmička vatra, možda? O: Da! P: (Pierre) Kozmička aktivnost može pomoći ovom sjemenu da raste? (Chu) Ne, ne mislim da su to rekli. (L) Mislim da su rekli da je to šok. I ako postoji sjeme, i ako u pojedinca postoji potencijal, ako ih šok ne ubije, onda… (Pierre) Znači, šok uzrokovan kozmičkom aktivnošću će potaknuti sjeme na rast? (Ark) Ne! (Chu) Sjeme znanja mora postojati kako bi ljudi mogli to protumačiti, je li tako? (L) Mislim da to moraju već imati u sebi, onda dožive šok, i nakon toga… (Pierre) Da, šok čini da sjeme znanja raste… (Ark) Ne! Znanje ne može rasti zbog šoka. Znanje može rasti samo ako dobiješ još istine. Šok može jedino uzrokovati da sjeme obavi nešto posla. (L) Poput čega? (Ark) Hoću reći, ako možda nešto znaš, nešto znaš, nešto znaš… i ne radiš ništa! I onda, dođe šok, i onda shvatiš da tvoje znanje – nisi koristio svoje znanje! (Perceval) Čini mi se da je to primjenjivo na dosta članova foruma koji samo tiho upijaju informacije, ali nisu u stanju nešto napraviti s njima zbog programiranja i tih stvari. Sjeme znanja je u njih zasijano, ali nisu ništa napravili s time. (L) Ali kada zagusti… (Perceval) Kada shvate da: “Sranje, ovo nije samo u teoriji! Vatrena kugla je upravo rasturila Washington, DC, SAD!”… Ako Bog da… [smijeh] Odjednom sve to postaje istina za njih, i to može aktivirati znanje koje je polagano raslo u njima. (L) Drugim riječima, to će raspršiti strah jer to je ono što koči ljude: ti programi, ti obrambeni mehanizmi. To je Cezar rekao prošli tjedan. Rekao je da treba biti iskren prema samom sebi, i ničega se ne bojati. Mora se doći do točke kada se više ničega ne bojite. Mora se doći do točke kada možete reći “Danas je dobar dan za umiranje”, kao što je Crni los govorio prije odlaska u bitku. (Chu) Ali postoji i druga strana novčića kod ljudi koji misle da se stvari ne odnose na njih, ili da to mogu naučiti sutra, ili… (L) Ili da se nešto događa tamo negdje, a ne ovdje… Zato je rad na SOTT-u toliko bitan; on omogućava PUNO šokova! (Chu) Baš sam ujutro govorila ljudima u kuhinji kako sam pogledala video. Stvarno je šokantan. To je meteorit koji je pao u Argentini. Ljudi su vidjeli svjetlost, krater. Vlasti su to brzo zataškale. I možete vidjeti najmanje sto ljudi, kako prosvjeduju tvrdeći da vlasti lažu, i da se nije radilo o štednjaku na plin koji je spalio kuću. Ali NITKO od njih nije bio u stanju reći da se radi o meteoritu jer se nisu imali po čemu orijentirati. I to je bilo TAKO frustrirajuće čuti ljude koji su govorili, “Ljudi nam lažu! Hoćemo istinu!” Vikali su. Ali nitko od njih, nije im palo na pamet… Mislili su kako se radi o raketi, ili napadu… (L) Pa, to je kao s chemtrails-ima. Oni ZNAJU da im vlasti lažu, i onda stvore tu razrađenu teoriju zavjere kako vlasti ispuštaju kemikalije u gornji dio atmosfere. Svaki avion koji napravi contrail automatski postaje proizvođač chemtrailsa. (Chu) I obično im kozmička veza ne pada na pamet. Mora da se radi o vlastima, mora da se radi o nekakvoj sili ili čemu god, i meni se čini da oni govore kako to mora biti… (L) Aristotel i dalje ima utjecaj. (Pierre) Pitanje na koje sam htio odgovor, ti šokovi vezani za kozmičku aktivnost… Je li to zato što na psihološkoj razini, postoji strah i ljudi razmišljaju: “Oh, pa to je stvarno!” I/ili zato što kozmička aktivnost može modificirati elektromagnetski okoliš i potaknuti promjene u ljudima? O: Pomalo od oboje. A za sada doviđenja. (Perceval) Jednostavno odoše? (Ark) To je bio šok! [smijeh] (Alana) 11. rujna je bio šok, zar ne? I velik broj ljudi, uključujući i mene, je počeo… Sjećam se kako sam bila u Europi i razmišljala: “Nikad nisam gledala vijesti. Odakle sad ovo? Zašto se to dogodilo?” Koliko ljudi je počelo postavljati pitanja i pokušavalo shvatiti što se dogodilo? Tako je velik broj ljudi našao forum. Bio je potreban šok. (L) Da, tako da je to jedna vrsta velikog šoka. Dakle, ako se dogodi još jedan veliki, golemi šok, pojavit će se jedan potpuno nov pristup stvarima; ali samo ako ljudi imaju znanje potrebno za analizu. (Perceval) Mislim kako taj šok mora biti neselektivan. Mora biti nešto što se ne može jednostavno odbaciti jer se događa “ljudima tamo negdje”. To mora biti nešto što ugrožava svakoga. Shvaćanje nabijeno jakim emocijama poput: “Oh, moj Bože! Gotov sam!” (Chu) Problem s tim je što je onda obično prekasno, ako prijeti cijelom svijetu. (L) Pa, očito da će biti… pa… zbilja veliki šok nužno uključuje smrt u velikim razmjerima. (Perceval) Ali ja ovdje pričam o ljudima koji, kako su oni rekli, u sebi imaju sjeme znanja koje je posijano. Velika većina ljudi nema ni to. (Bubbles) Nemaju li Kasiopejci hrpu slobodnog vremena? Gdje su otišli? (L) Mislim da su primijetili da sam umorna. (Perceval) Moraju ići u Intermarché. [smijeh] Nemaju više jaja za svoje masne bombe. (Ark) Kada pričamo o šokovima… OK, ljudi nakon potresa: potres je definitivno šok, ali hoće li se na bilo koji način probuditi nakon potresa? (L) Ne, ako ništa ne znaju. (Chu) Masa ljudi se također nije probudila nakon 11. rujna. Tako da će se jedino raditi o ljudima koji već imaju posijano sjeme znanja, i razvilo se korijenje i polagano raste u njima. Ali nisu još… (Perceval) Pogledajte samo učinke ovog zadnjeg šoka s padom aviona. Velika većina je osjetila taj šok na ovaj ili onaj način, i zbog toga su postali JOŠ više autoritarni, još više autoritarni sljedbenici. To ih je bacilo u naručje vlasti. Znate, “Sredite Putina! Pokušava nam doći glave!” Sve u svemu, progutali su tu laž, i još više prešli na Mračnu stranu, kao i veliki broj ljudi nakon 11. rujna, koji su progutali vladinu teoriju zavjere o 19 Arapa koji nisu znali letjeti. (Andromeda) Oni imaju drugačije sjeme. (Perceval) Točno. Nekolicina ljudi, kao što su ovi na našem forumu i koji čitaju SOTT.net i naše radove, je osjetila također to kao šok. Ali, zato što su imali sjeme znanja o tome kako se to inače odvija i tko je iza toga, i da se tu radi isključivo o lažima, to ih je dalje poguralo u smjeru buđenja i shvaćanja kako stvari postaju ozbiljne! Radilo se o potvrdi da su takva sranja stvarna, da zbilja POSTOJI zavjera, zbilja postoji OPS piramida, znate… To je više potvrda onoga što već znaju. I to je šok. (Ark) Ali, ali… Ima još nešto, jer Pierre je spomenuo elektromagnetsko štogod. Sad, takav šok, ono što on može napraviti, jest uništiti frekvencije programiranja OPS-a. (L) Oh da. (Perceval) Frekvencijsku ogradu? (Ark) I onda, jer se nas sve sprečava u dobivanju znanja s viših razina, one koji imaju znanje i one koji nemaju, različitim zrakama, na nekakav organizirani način… (L) Kozmički događaj bi definitivno mogao uništiti frekvencijsku ogradu. KRAJ SESIJE Original sesije na engleskom jeziku možete naći ovdje. Related Articles: Posted in Kasiopejske sesije