http___hr.adaptogens.com_c-1489.aspx_1.xml
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10
In brief: Once it was called blind, deaf, it was replaced by the blind, the deaf, and then the visually impaired. On the initiative of the sick themselves, today, we are switching to factual descriptions of the state of health. Simple words like blind, deaf are acceptable again, even more suitable than evasive euphemisms. And it's not just that fashion goes in circles - the main reason is surprisingly the effort to preserve the greatest dignity of the sick. The change comes as usual in English. Anglo-French have weakness for euphemisms. In the chain of euphemisms, they have gone so far as to begin to call the people with disabilities "people with reduced ability". But when the excitement of replacing short-word words of the "blind", "deaf" descriptions unsuitable for infamy, people realized that the euphemistic description actually carries out judgments about abilities, which is even worse than a simple statement of the disease. Beethoven was deaf, Maresjev was legless, but he did not have reduced capacities (not at least compared to ordinary people). In an effort to address this, "disability" was further replaced by the cover word "challenge" as in the untranslatable "mentally challenged". Next, the term "differently able" appeared, perhaps translated as "otherwise adapted", perhaps because of the fact that fashion psychiatric diagnoses (autism, pseudomonas "child hyperactivity with attention deficit disorder, Asperger syndrome ...) But the Beethoven insisted they were only deaf, and if they were "otherwise adapted", not because of their deafness. They have adapted their disability according to their possibilities, they know best what they are and are unable and feel embarrassed when others pretend to be true what is not true. The story of the English euphemisms for the handicapped I watched only marginally to be "in" in grammar, so I think a little bit, but that's how it was. These topics, in particular, have certainly been written in the United States, all of which, they are, for various strange "social group studies", so there should be no need for refinement of the literature for those interested. Most recently, in the professional labeling of diseases, it was no longer possible to see if the words were used as pejorativa, and the factual importance of them began to be taken into account. Perhaps "crippled" is back in. (Do not mess with the creten, which is the most staggering euphemism I know.) In English there are whole guidelines on how to use the words "impairment" ⊃ "disability" ⊃ "handicap". In Czech, the situation is less pronounced. Cover concepts of "physically / mentally handicapped" are still descriptive and do not impose any trials, although for their greatest glory, a deeper factual description of the disability is considered as inaccurate. In fact, the only word that can furiously be thrown is the disease / sick, which, after the English model, is replaced by the preferred forms of disease / ill. I write this text a little bit too much to show that I know about it, even if I do not want to avoid the ill-used words sick, ill, hospital. Otherwise, I welcome the development towards etymological accuracy. I hope that it will lead to the emancipation of other short, etymologically correct nosyms and ethnoms, which have been mistakenly censored as merely defamation.
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9
Ukratko: To je nekad samo slijepi, gluhi, a zatim zamijenio slijep, gluh, a zatim i vizualno oslabljen sluh. Na inicijativu i sami bolesni danas opet proći činjenične opise zdravstvenog statusa. Jednostavne riječi poput sljepoće, gluhoće opet dopušteno, čak i bolje nego naglim eufemizama. I to ne samo da je moda ide u krug - glavni razlog je iznenađujuće nastojanje da se sačuva što više dostojanstva bolestan. Promjena dolazi u tow, kao obično, na engleskom jeziku. Anglofóni jer imaju eufemizama za slabosti. Lanac eufemizama otišao tako daleko da kažu preko odbora počela bolestan „osobe s invaliditetom”, da „ljudi s oštećenjima.” No, kada je uzbuđenje nestao iz zamjene kratke riječi kao što su „slijepi”, „gluhe” opisima neprimjerenog psovki, ljudi su shvatili da je eufemistički opis zapravo donosi sposobnosti sudova, što je još gore od obične izjave o bolesti. Beethoven je bio gluh, bez udova Maresjev, ali je smanjena mogućnost (barem ne u usporedbi s običnim ljudima). U nastojanju da se riješi ovo „invaliditet” i poklopac zamijenio riječ „izazov” (Challenge, figurativno problema), prevesti kao „mentalno”. On je također pojavio pojam „Za razliku sposobnu”, možda prevesti kao „drugačije modificirani”, možda zato tako moderan psihijatrijska dijagnoza (autizam, pseudodisease „dječje hiperaktivnosti i deficita pažnje poremećaj” ... Aspergerov sindrom) ne može ukazati na bolest. No, Beethoven je inzistirao da je samo gluha, a ako su „drugačije omogućeno”, a ne zbog gluhoće. Njegov invaliditet prilagoditi prema svojim sposobnostima i sami najbolje znaju što su i sposobni i osjećaju neugodno kada drugi pretvarati se da je istina ono što nije istina. Priča o engleskom eufemizmi za osobe s invaliditetom, gledao sam samo marginalno, biti „in” u gramatiku, tako da izmisle nešto, ali to nekako je i bilo. Ove teme, štoviše, osobito u SAD-u svakako je napisao cijelu BYCHL na njemu su oni, do raznih „studija društvenih skupina” čudno, tako da je pravopis za one koji su zainteresirani u literaturi ne bi trebao biti slučaj. Tako je nedavno u profesionalnim bolestima označavanju prestala tako da vidi da li netko koristi riječi poput pejorativ i počeo promatrati uglavnom njihovo stvarno značenje. Možda „osakaćen” je opet u. (Ne smije se miješati s šupak, što je sramotno eufemizam što ja znam.) Na anličtině postoje diljem direktive o tome kako koristiti riječ „umanjenja” ⊃ „invaliditeta” ⊃ „hendikep”. U engleskom jeziku, situacija je manje akutna. Cover pojmovi „fizički / psihički hendikepirane” i dalje su opisni i ne daje nikakve sudove, čak i za njihova najveća slava je dodatno činjenični opis invalidnosti smatra netaktičan. Zapravo, jedina riječ koja može biti mahnito bacati, je bolest / bolestan, što je, nakon što je engleski model zamjenjuje željene oblike bolesti / bolestan. Ovaj tekst pišem tako malo i tako sam jasno da ja znam o tome, iako je konvencionalna riječima bolesti, bolestan, hospital'm neće izbjeći. Inače, međutim, razvoj prema etimološkom preciznost dobrodošlice. Nadam se da će dovesti do emancipacije i druge kratke, etimološki ispravan nosonym i etnonym, ali pogrešno cenzurirani kao puki uvrede.