http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_educacao-fisica_hr_physical-education-83.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 8.2 10.1
School It seems to him a scene normal, natural, with no further implications, correct? Still may wonder what this story has to do with the principle mentioned above about the exclusion, citizenship concept developed at the beginning of capitalism in our country. Well, let's rewind the tape a little and remember the characters in this story. You had a beautiful practitioner of the sport, but there was that / his / her colleague who had enough contact with the sport, remember? Well, now pay attention to the version of him / her Physical Education class: Well, he / she arrived at the place where the physical education occur, was beside her, watched you choose / the best / the players / and, knowing that it would not be chosen / a, went to a place to sit and watch him / her play. He / she was sitting across the classroom / a, with no opportunity to play, deleted / to all the practice developed in 40 minutes you played. But as you have an argument for everything, the answer: "Yes, but he / she did not play because I did not, and what's more, he / she is really bad." Or "women can not play, only serves to watch, cheer for us." Contrary to their arguments, we believe this / his / her colleague not mastered the basic moves of the game by not having the opportunity. People are built, ie they are what they are, depending on the opportunities they had and have. Exclusion of citizens, excluding the student does life imitate art? Are these mere coincidences? Or are facts that are placed in society and in gym class and we could not see them with criticality? The discourse on social exclusion / inclusion is today a force of illusion that conceals the difficulties that mankind has found to survive. Most of the policies implemented in Games
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 7.3 8.1 8.2 10.1
Škola Čini se da mu scene normalno, prirodno, bez daljnje implikacije, točno? Ipak svibanj čudo što ova priča ima veze s prije spomenutog principa isključenja, koncepta građanstva razvijenog na početku kapitalizma u našoj zemlji. Pa, neka je premotati vrpcu unatrag i sjetite se malo likova u ovoj priči. Ti si imao lijepu prakse u sportu, ali bio je onaj / njegov / njezin kolega koji je dovoljno kontaktirati sa sportom, sjećaš se? Pa, sada obratite pozornost na verziju njega / nju tjelesnog odgoja klase: Pa, on / ona je stigla na mjesto gdje se tjelesni odgoj dogoditi, bio pokraj nje, gledao izabrati / najbolji / igrači / i, znajući da neće biti izabran /, otišao do mjesta za sjedenje i gledati mu / joj igrati. On / ona je sjedila preko učionici / usluge, bez prilike za igru, izbrisati / na sve prakse razvijene u 40. minuti li igrali. Ali, kao što imaju argument za sve, odgovor: "Da, ali on / ona nije igrati, jer nisam, i što je više, on / ona je stvarno loše." Ili "žena ne može igrati, služi samo za gledanje, navijati za nas." Za razliku od svojih argumenata, vjerujemo da je ovo / njegova / njezina kolegica ne savladali osnovne poteze u igri koje nemaju priliku. Ljudi su izgrađena, tj. oni su ono što jesu, ovisno o mogućnostima koje su imali i imaju. Isključenje građana, isključujući student ne život imitira umjetnost? Jesu li ti puke slučajnosti? Ili su činjenice koje su smještene u društvu, a na satu tjelesnog, a nismo ih mogli vidjeti s kritičnosti? Diskurs o socijalnoj isključenosti / uključivanje je danas snaga iluzije da skriva poteškoće koje je čovječanstvo naći preživjeti. Većina politika provodi u Igre