http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-243.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1
Scientific Revolutions The classical Euclidean geometry worked analyzing the flat space geometry currently operates three dimensional space. We note that there are stages of a same geometry but are two different geometries. The change did not occur through an evolution or progress because they are based on different concepts and systems. Just as Aristotle's physics is not analogous to the physics of Galileo. The concept of nature adopted by Galileo Galilei is different from Aristotle, as well as the methods used are different. Galileo considered one of the founders of modern physics, believed that the great book of nature was written in the universal language of mathematics. And above all, the expected results and the object of study that is expected to know are not equal. For Bachelard scientific knowledge turns through a discontinuity, which he called "epistemological break". This rupture happens when a set of methods, concepts, theories, instruments and procedures do not achieve the expected results, or not aware of the proposed problems. It is necessary to develop a new paradigm, which proves that scientific knowledge thrives by leaps and ruptures. Furthermore, the scientific advances through constant adjustments of theories. According to Bachelard is necessary to have the courage to make mistakes. It is from the correction of certain errors that a new paradigm is established. The error is part of scientific experiment. For the scientist, the knowledge out of ignorance as light out of darkness. The scientist does not see that ignorance is a tissue of errors positive, tenacious solidarity. Can not you see the spiritual darkness have a structure and, accordingly, all experience objectively correct must always imply the correction of an error subjective (...) the scientific spirit can only be built by destroying the spirit unscientific. In the work's philosophy does not, Bachelard points out that philosophy does not, in any way, is restricted merely the refusal and denial, rather it is more an attitude of conciliation, which will summarize both the sensitive knowledge and scientific knowledge. The process of denial does not imply abandonment of previous theories, but the attempt to make them coexist simultaneously. It is overrun, one to go beyond, and acceptance of diversity. Understanding the notion of Bachelard break in scientific knowledge is understanding a whole new way the history of scientific thought.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1
Znanstvenih revolucija Klasična Euklidska geometrija radio analizu stan prostor geometriju trenutno posluje trodimenzionalni prostor. Napominjemo da postoje faze u istoj geometriji, ali su dvije različite geometrije. Promjena nije došlo kroz evoluciju ili napredak jer se temelje na različitim konceptima i sustava. Baš kao što je Aristotelova fizika nije analogan fizike Galileo. Pojam prirode usvojila Galileo Galilei se razlikuje od Aristotela, kao i metode korištene su različite. Galileo smatra jednim od osnivača moderne fizike, vjeruje se da je velika knjiga prirode napisana u univerzalnim jezikom matematike. A iznad svega, očekivane rezultate i predmet proučavanja kako se očekuje da znaju nisu jednaki. Za Bachelarda znanstvene spoznaje okreće kroz diskontinuiteta, koju je nazvao "epistemoloska break". To se događa kada rupture skup metoda, koncepata, teorija, instrumenata i postupaka ne postižu očekivane rezultate, ili nisu svjesni predloženih problema. Potrebno je razviti novu paradigmu, što dokazuje da je znanstveno znanje napreduje po skokovi i lomove. Nadalje, znanstveni napredak kroz stalne prilagodbe teorija. Prema Bachelarda potrebno je imati hrabrosti da griješe. To je iz korekcije određenih pogrešaka koje je osnovana nova paradigma. Pogreška je dio znanstvenog eksperimenta. Za znanstvenika, znanje iz neznanja kao svjetlo iz tame. Znanstvenik ne vidi da je neznanje tkivo pogreške pozitivan, uporan solidarnosti. Zar ne vidiš duhovna tama imaju strukturu i, sukladno tome, svi iskustvo objektivno točne uvijek mora podrazumijevati korekciju greške subjektivne (...) znanstveni duh može biti izgrađen samo uništavanjem duha neznanstvena. radu filozofije ne, Bachelarda ističe da filozofija ne, na bilo koji način, je ograničena samo na odbijanje i poricanje, a to je više stav mirenja, koji će sažeti i osjetljivu znanja i znanstvenih spoznaja. Proces poricanje ne znači odustajanje od prethodnih teorija, ali je pokušaj da ih istovremeno postojati. To je pregažen, jedan ići dalje, i prihvaćanje različitosti. Razumijevanje pojma Bachelarda pauze u znanstvene spoznaje je razumijevanje sasvim nov način povijesti znanstvene misli.