http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-177.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1
Ethics and Politics In presenting his arguments, Machiavelli seeks to demonstrate how it would be possible to establish this Italian state, from a strong ruler and an effective government. Secretary to the Second Chancery of Florence, a post he received in 1498, Machiavelli was sworn in a republican government that was overthrown in 1512 by the Medici monarchy. Considered a traitor in 1513, was removed from his public functions and exiled in San Casciano, near Florence region. In this period he wrote The Prince, probably his most popular and probably the most complex. When he wrote The Prince, Machiavelli temporarily halted another work entitled the Comments on the First Decade of Livy, his work republican. What seems clear from the writings of Machiavelli is that he seeks a political solution to your Italy. Therefore, addressing Prince the magnificent Lorenzo, son of Piero de Medici, ruler of Florence. Machiavelli suggests the monarch that he can be the prince who would unify Italy. In the book, Machiavelli provides virtually safe guidelines for this to happen. It is within this that discusses and establishes a new relationship between ethics and politics. How Weffort clarifies, "the policy has an ethics and logic of its own. Machiavelli reveals a horizon for thinking and doing politics that does not fit the traditional pious moralism." By performing the analysis of reality, Machiavelli distinguishes individual moral of political morality. The attitude of the individual is not necessarily the attitude of the head of state. If for an individual moral action is particular decision, to the monarch, for example, it is necessary to weigh that this will mean for the state. There is an exclusion between ethics and politics, but the first must be understood from the second. One implication of this is that "moral values only have meaning from social life, presenting as moments of a fight that is at the root of power and gives it meaning" (SCHLESENER, 1989, With that Machiavelli is saying that we have virtues that can ruin a state and vices that can save him what in traditional moral analysis would be reprehensible, but "political ethics" would be fully acceptable. Logically these questions depend on the circumstances and the fighting forces (SCHLESENER, 1989, p. 10). So what may seem unacceptable to Machiavelli is policy: Where one should note that, while taking a State, the conqueror must practice all the necessary cruelties while avoiding having to repeat them every day, so placate the people, without making innovations, after seducing him with benefits. Who act differently, timidity or evil advice, is always compelled to be gun-toting, and can never rely on their subjects that due to continuous injuries, will not have confidence in the ruler.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 21.2 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1
Etika i politika U predstavljanju svoje argumente, Machiavelli nastoji pokazati kako bi to bilo moguće utvrditi tu talijansku državu, od jakog vladara i učinkovitu vladu. Tajnik Drugog ordinarijata u Firenci, poslije je dobio u 1498, Machiavelli je prisegnuo u republikanske vlade koji je svrgnut 1512 by Medici monarhije. Smatra izdajica u 1513, bio je uklonjen iz njegovih javnih funkcija i prognan u San Casciana, blizu Firence regija. U tom razdoblju napisao je princ, vjerojatno njegov najpopularniji i vjerojatno najsloženiji. Kad je pisao je knez, Machiavelli je privremeno obustavila još jedan rad pod naslovom Komentari na prvom desetljeću Livije, njegov rad republičke. Ono što se čini jasna iz spisa Machiavelli je da on traži političko rješenje za svoj Italiji. Stoga, obraćajući Prince veličanstveni Lorenza, sin Piero de Medici, vladar Firence. Machiavelli predlaže monarha da on može biti princ koji će ujediniti Italiju. U knjizi, Machiavelli daje gotovo sigurne smjernice za to dogoditi. To je u roku od toga da raspravlja i uspostavlja novi odnos između etike i politike. Kako Weffort pojašnjava, "politika ima etiku i logiku vlastite. Machiavelli otkriva horizont za razmišljanje i radi politiku koja se ne uklapa u tradicionalnu pobožnog Moralizam." Izvodeći analizu stvarnosti, Machiavelli razlikuje pojedinca moralnu političkog morala. Stav pojedinca nije nužno stav šefa države. Ako za individualni moralni akcija je posebno odluka, kako bi monarh, primjerice, potrebno je da se vagati kako će to značiti za državu. Tu je isključenje između etike i politike, ali se mora razumjeti na drugi. Pretpostavka za to je da je "moralne vrijednosti samo da su što znači iz društvenog života, predstavljajući se kao trenucima borbe koja je u korijenu vlasti i daje mu značenje" (SCHLESENER, 1989, Uz to Machiavelli govori da imamo vrline koje mogu upropastiti državu i poroci koji ga može spasiti ono što se u tradicionalnoj moralne analize će biti osudu, ali "političke etike" će biti u potpunosti prihvatljiva. Logično ta pitanja ovise o okolnostima i borbenih snaga (SCHLESENER, 1989, str. 10). Dakle, ono što se čini neprihvatljivo Machiavellija je politika: Gdje treba napomenuti da je, dok je uzimanje državu, osvajač moraju vježbati sve potrebne okrutnosti dok izbjegavanje potrebe da ih ponavljaju svaki dan, pa umiriti narod, bez inovacija, nakon što ga zavodi s povlasticama. Tko djelovati drugačije, bojažljivost ili zlo savjet, uvijek je primorana da se pištolj-toting, i nikada ne može osloniti na svoje podanike da je zbog kontinuiranih ozljeda, neće imati povjerenje u vladara.