http___mediaresearch.cro.net_hr_sadrzaj_clanak_percepcija-kriterija-selekcije-vijesti-kod-novinara-u-hrvatskim-dnevnim-novinama_843.html_Autor__KeyWord__Sadrzaj__1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7
Heading The selection of news is at the center of the study of various authors, especially because of the variability of news values indicators which affect the journalist’s decision about which event is going to be published. However, most previous authors examined that process from the theoretical aspect (Galtung and Ruge, 1965, Schulz, 1975, Gans, 1980), while a few of them did empirical tests (Kanižaj, 2010; Perišin, 2010; Prpić, Popović, Hadžić, 2011). A special challenge thereby is monitoring specifi c areas such as the EU topics, which often remain in the shadow of the national topics. The paper presents the results of the research of perception of news selection indicators divided into internal and external criteria, whose suitability and applicability was appraised by journalists in six widely read daily newspapers ‒ Jutarnji list, Večernji list, 24 sata, Novi list, Slobodna Dalmacija and Glas Slavonije. The research, that was conducted at the end of October and in early November 2014, by online survey on a sample of N=62 journalists divided into two groups ‒ journalists who cover EU topics and journalists who cover other topics, found that the journalist’s imaginary theoretical concept evaluate in the broader context of professional standards. At the same time, the results have shown that there were no signifi cant differences between the journalists from the six observed newsrooms, but according to the average scores, there were some differences in news selection by following criteria: bias vs. impartiality, personalization and human interest, editorial policy, the impact of elite people and elite nations and the infl uence of interest groups. Also, the research showed that there are differences between the journalists who cover the EU and journalists who cover other topics in four analyzed indicators: human interest and personalization, integrated newsroom and global vs. regional events.
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7
Sažetak Selekcija vijesti u središtu je proučavanja brojnih autora, posebice zbog promjenjivosti faktora vrijednosti vijesti koji utječu na novinarsku odluku o tome koji će događaj biti objavljen. No, većina dosadašnjih autora taj proces raz matra s teorijskog aspekta (Galtung i Ruge, 1965; Schulz, 1975; Gans, 1980), dok je vrlo malo empirijskih provjera (Kanižaj, 2010; Perišin, 2010; Prpić, Popović, Hadžić, 2011). Poseban izazov pritom predstavlja praćenje specifi čnih područja, kao EU tematike, koja nerijetko ostaje u sjeni nacionalne tematike. Rad donosi rezultate istraživanja indikatora selekcije vijesti podijeljenih na unutarnje i vanjske kriterije, čiju su prikladnost i primjenjivost u sklopu predloženoga modela (pr) ocjenjivali novinari redakcija šest najčitanijih dnevnih novina – Jutarnjeg lista, Večernjeg lista, 24 sata, Novog lista i Slobodne Dalmacije krajem listopada i početkom studenoga 2014. godine. Istraživanje provedeno metodom online ankete na uzorku od N=62 novinara podijeljenih u dvije skupine – novinari koji prate EU tematiku i novinari koji prate ostale teme, pokazalo je da novinari zamišljeni teorijski koncept procjenjuju u širem kontekstu profesionalnih standarda. Istodobno, rezultati su pokazali kako nema značajnijih razlika između novinara šest promatranih redakcija, no prema prosječnim rezultatima utvrđene su razlike u odabiru sljedećih kriterija: pristranost vs. nepristranost, personalizacija i ljudski interes, urednička politika, utjecaj elitnih osoba i elitnih nacija te utjecaj interesnih skupina. Također, utvrđene su i raz like između novinara koji prate EU i novinara koji prate ostale teme u četiri ispitana indikatora: ljudski interes i personalizacija, integrirana redakcija te globalni vs. regionalni događaji.