http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_fisica_hr_physics-133.html_1.xml
2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 7.1 8.1 8.2 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 12.1 12.2 13.1 14.1 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 18.1 18.2
Figure 1: Thales, the first philosopher to observe physical phenomena associated with electricity. The pursuit of a single principle ... Looks about natural phenomena associated with electricity today, appear from antiquity. The first observations (initially random) that are known to have been made by the Greek philosopher Thales of Miletus (VI and V century BC). Thales is considered the first philosopher of history, although it has not received that title, since the term was created later. He lived in Miletus, in the periodpre-Socratic. This philosopher observed that amber (Greek elektron ), certain types of plant resin, used for making jewelry and decorative objects when rubbed with fur animals acquired the property of attracting small material objects. Given these facts, Thales would have asked about the composition of matter. Was there a beginning to all things? Thales, Anaximander and Anaximenes are three of the first philosophersPre-Socratic. All of them were born in the same city (Miletus) and lived in the same period (sixth century before the Christian era). They had one thing in common: they taught that all things originate from a single primordial matter, which would be the "beginning" (in Greek, arche). The basic idea can be clarified through a comparison. Suppose there were only clay in the world and, from it, were continuously modeled different types of object, which would then be dismantled to give rise to other objects. This clay was the arche - the beginning and end of everything. Read carefully? And then, you know the saying that matter is composed? Otherpre-Socratic, Anaximander(610-547 BC) thought that there was a principle that compose the whole, the indefinite (Greek apeiron ), which derive all things and all things return to the beginning to be destroyed. But what would be the apeiron? This primordial substance, the apeiron, would be indestructible, or "immortal": it does not cease to exist when, from her form different substances and things in the universe, but still exists within them, having just acquired a new appearance. This idea eliminates therefore the possibility of an absolute beginning of everything: the apeiron has no beginning, it has always existed. Rather, the universe comes from apeiron and can not be forever.(...) The apeiron would be infinite, filling all space. There would be no place empty or with another type of substance. The apeiron exist within everything we know. You must be wondering what this has to do with the composition of matter? Or perhaps: what the attraction between some materials have to do with all this?
2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 12.2 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 16.2 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1
Slika 1: Thales, prvi filozof promatrati fizičke fenomene povezane s električnom energijom. Potrazi za jednom principu ... Izgleda o prirodnim fenomenima povezanih s električnom energijom danas, pojavljuju se iz antike. Prva mjerenja (inicijalno slučajni) koje se zna da su napravljene od strane grčkog filozofa iz Mileta (VI i V stoljeća prije Krista). Thales smatra prvi filozof povijesti, ali još nije dobila taj naslov, budući da je pojam nastao kasnije. On je živio u Miletu, upre-sokratsku. Ovaj filozof primijetio da je narančasta(ELEKTRON na grčkom), određene vrste bilja smole, a koristi se za izradu nakita i dekorativne predmete kada je gumiran s krznaša stekla svojstvo privlačenja mali materijalni predmeti. S obzirom na ove činjenice, Thales bi pitali o sastavu materije. Je li početak za sve stvari? Tales, Anaksimandar i Anaximenes su tri od prvihpre-sokratsku filozofa. Svi su rođeni u istom gradu (Mileta), a živio je u istom razdoblju (šesto stoljeće prije nove ere). Imali su jednu zajedničku stvar: oni učili da sve stvari potječu iz jednog primordijalne tvari, koji bi na "početak" (na grčkom, Arche). Osnovna ideja može pojasniti kroz usporedbu. Pretpostavimo da je bilo samo glina u svijetu, a od nje, stalno su po uzoru različite vrste objekta, koji bi se onda demontirane bi dovesti do drugih objekata. To je Clay Arche -. Početak i kraj svega(Martins, 1997, str.37) Pročitajte pažljivo? I onda, znate izreku da je materija sastavljena? Ostalipre-Sokratova, Anaksimandar(610-547 BC) mislili da je princip da sastavite cjelinu, neodređeni (grčkiApeiron), koji je izdvojen sve stvari i sve stvari vratiti na početak biti uništen. No, ono što će biti Apeiron? To iskonsko supstanca, Apeiron, biti neuništiva, ili "besmrtni": on ne prestaje postojati kada, od nje stvoriti različite tvari i stvari u svemiru, ali još uvijek postoji unutar njih, nakon što je upravo kupio novi izgled. Ova ideja eliminira time mogućnost apsolutnom početku sve: Apeiron nema početka, to je oduvijek postojala. Umjesto toga, svemir dolazi od Apeiron i ne može biti zauvijek. (...) Apeiron će biti beskonačan, ispunjavanje svih prostora. Tu bi bilo mjesta prazna ili s drugim vrstama tvari. Apeiron postoje u svemu što znamo.(Martins, 1997, str. 37) Morate se pitate što to ima veze sa sastavom pitanju? Ili možda: što je privlačnost između nekih materijala morati učiniti sa svim tim?