http___matrixworldhr.wordpress.com_2011_08_27_vrata-pilotske-kabine-leta-77-nisu-se-nikad-otvorila-za-vrijeme-_e2_80_9eotmice_e2_80_9c-11-9-2001-godine__1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 9.1 9.2 10.1 10.2 10.3 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 14.1 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 17.2 17.3 18.1 18.2 18.3 19.1 19.2 20.1 20.2 21.1 21.2 22.1 22.2 23.1 24.1 24.2 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 26.2 27.1 27.2 27.3 28.1 29.1
Sheila Casey / RCFP A Profile of 9/11 Researcher Aidan Monaghan In an attempt to get to the bottom of what really happened on 9/11, citizen investigator Aidan Monaghan has filed dozens of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with federal agencies such as the FBI, SEC, Department of the Navy, and the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey. Agency after agency has refused to comply with his requests, instead claiming that the information cannot be found, does not exist, was never properly filed, or even, from the FAA, that it was simply “not in a position to release said records at this time.” The Freedom of Information Act was signed into law by President Johnson in 1966. It mandates that information held by federal agencies must be made available to any citizen requesting it, unless that information is exempt. The Act specifies nine reasons why any given piece of information could be exempt, such as invasion of personal privacy, trade secrets, anything related to the supervision or regulation of financial institutions, and anything that could compromise either law enforcement or national security. In addition, the FBI has put an exemption on all of their 9/11 information and will release information only if compelled to do so by a lawsuit, of which Monaghan has filed two. ―Despite the persistent stonewalling, Monaghan has turned up some interesting discrepancies. While it was widely reported in the media that the flight data recorder (FDR) also known as the “black box,” for American Airlines Flight 77 (the plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon on 9/11) was found at 4 am on September 14, 2001, the file containing the FDR data was dated over four hours earlier. In other words, the data from the FDR was downloaded prior to the FDR being found. When Monaghan filed a Request for Correction with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and pointed out this disparity, his request was denied and an explanation offered that the file was created as a routine procedure prior to finding the FDR. However the FDR file indicates three parameters: date created, date modified, and date accessed. The “date created” and “date modified” fields are both listed as 11:45:38 pm on September 13, 2001, indicating that no data was added later, after the FDR was found. The “date accessed” field is blank. This is, Monaghan says, “sufficient reason to wonder if the information is faked.” Monaghan has also established that the NTSB does not have either serial or part numbers for the FDRs from American Airlines Flight # 77 or United Airlines Flight # 93 (which allegedly crashed in Shanksville, PA). This is highly unusual, in fact, according to Monaghan, there is only one other occasion in the past 20 years when the NTSB report for a airplane crash did not contain the part and serial numbers for the FDR. That was, oddly enough, exactly ten years earlier, on September 11, 1991, when a Continental Express flight broke up in mid-air, killing 14 people, when the horizontal stabilizer failed. The accident was blamed on the negligence of Continental’s maintenance and inspection crew. The NTSB’s own handbook indicates that the part number and serial number of the FDR are required for data readout of the FDR. The NTSB did not have this information, giving us another reason to question how the FDR data was created. Other researchers have raised serious doubts about Flight #77. The fact that the file for American Airlines Flight 77 FDR was created before the AA 77 FDR was found, was first reported on the forum for Pilots for 9/11 Truth in August of 2007, but with a timestamp of six hours earlier than reported by Monaghan. Pilots for 9/11 Truth have also concluded that the FDR data released by the NTSB has the plane flying too high to hit the Pentagon. Monaghan also uncovered a discrepancy suggesting that either the FAA or Popular Mechanics writers are lying. Monaghan filed a FOIA with the FAA requesting data about the number of times the FAA had asked NORAD to intercept an aircraft in three specific years, but received a reply stating that the FAA does not track or record that information and that they “have no records responsive to your request.” But on page 22 of the 2006 Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths, the writers quote an unnamed source at the FAA as saying that scrambles were routine, but interceptions were not - especially over the continental United States. If the FAA does not track that information, how did the FAA source know this? Another discrepancy arose when Monaghan asked the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) for the last pre-9/11 flights of the aircraft that were allegedly destroyed on 9/11. BTS responded with a spreadsheet that showed that prior to 9/11, three of the four aircraft had not flown since December 2000. (No information was given for the plane that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon.) However a searchable online database on the BTS website shows that three of the four flights (again, no information for the Pentagon plane) flew continuously until September 11, 2001. The list of FOIAs that Monaghan has filed which have yielded no information is long. He asked the Secret Service for documents that reveal what time former Vice President Dick Cheney entered the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC), as well as documents pertaining to the names of persons admitted to PEOC on the morning of 9/11. Reply: no records or documents pertaining to your request. He asked the SEC for a bibliography of the investigation records that were located in the SEC’s offices on floors 11-13 in World Trade Center 7, even attaching a copy of a September 17, 2001 article in the National Law Journal which stated that SEC and EEOC investigations had been delayed due to the loss of “substantial files” for 3,000 to 4,000 cases. The reply: “did not locate or identify any information responsive to your request.” In an attempt to shed light on what may have led to the destruction of the World Trade Center towers, Monaghan asked the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey for a complete list of outsourced contract projects performed upon World Trade Center buildings 1 and 2 from January 1, 2001 to September 11, 2001. Reply: “no documents in Port Authority files responsive to your request.” (Monaghan notes that since the Port Authority was located in WTC 1, it is possible that all files were lost that day.) Monaghan sued the FBI to obtain “documentation revealing the process by which wreckage recovered by defendant, from the aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified by defendant…as belonging to the said aircraft…” Reply: “…there are no responsive records. The identities of the airplanes hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never in question, and, therefore, there were no records generated…” As reported in the April, 2008 Rock Creek Free Press, the aircraft were very much in question, as transponders were turned off and one plane, Flight 77, was even lost to radar over Ohio for a time. NTSB officials are on record stating that they were involved in aircraft parts identification, and bins were set up at all three crash sites labeled “aircraft parts.” The Rock Creek Free Press reported in May 2009 that explosive, unreacted thermitic material containing nano particles of aluminum and iron oxide had recently been discovered in the dust from the World Trade Center buildings that collapsed on September 11, 2001. The Indian Head Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center was described in 1999 as “the only reliable source for aluminum nano-powders in the United States,” and in 2008 as “probably the most prominent US center for nano-thermite technology.” Monaghan asked the Naval Surface Warfare Center for records about the research and development of nano-sized aluminum powders or nano-sized iron oxide powders. Reply: “have not found any records responsive to your request.” Monaghan is currently trying to get more information from the FBI with Aidan Monaghan v. US Dept of Justice, et al., 09-CV-0060. When you sue the FBI, Monaghan explained, you go up against the Department of Justice, since the FBI is a division of the DoJ. This lawsuit asks for information about the wreckage recovered from American Airlines Flight 77 and United Airlines Flight #93, the flight management computers and multi-mode receivers used on all four aircraft, the serial numbers for the flight data recorders and cockpit voice recorders for AA77 and UA93, communications between the four hijacked aircraft, information regarding the presence of bombs in the World Trade Center towers, three days of logs of the recovery of human remains from the crash sites of AA77 and UA93, an audio copy of the cockpit voice recorder from UA93, and information about phone calls placed from AA11, UA175, AA77 and UA93, including the existence of seatback or Airfone telephones for passenger use on all four aircraft. Monaghan admits that he is now “running out of ideas for FOIAs for file.” As recently as September 2007, the FBI denied Monaghan’s FOIAs under the law enforcement exemption, claiming that this is an “ongoing investigation” and that information related to identifying the aircraft used on 9/11 “could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.” “I’m beginning to wonder if the FOIA is just a lot of theatre for public consumption to provide a perception that yes, government is accessible, it’s transparent,” said Monaghan. “For two years now I’ve tried to pull as much 9/11 info from the federal government as I can, and the most noteworthy thing I’ve found is the absence of information. Material that should be there just isn’t.” Monaghan is married, lives in Las Vegas and works in risk management and public safety for a large commercial property that gets a lot of public traffic. He was educated as an electrical engineer. Sheila Casey is a DC-based journalist. Her work has appeared in The Denver Post, Reuters, Chicago Sun-Times, Dissident Voice and Common Dreams. She blogs at http://www.sheilacasey.com ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ Source: http://rockcreekfreepress.tumblr.com/post/174802552/the-deep-state-does-not-respond-to-foia-requests
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 8.1 8.2 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 10.1 10.2 10.3 11.1 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 14.1 14.2 14.3 15.1 15.2 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 20.2 20.3 21.1 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 23.1 23.2
Sheila Casey Rock Creek Free Press Organizacija „Piloti za Istinu o 11/9“ izvijestili su da zapis podataka iz crne kutije (FDR, eng.) za let 77 American Airlinesa, koji je navodno udario Pentagon 11/9-tog, pokazuje da se vrata nisu nikad otvorila za vrijeme cijelog 90 minutnog leta. Podaci su dani od strane Odbora za sigurnost nacionalnog prometa (NTSB, eng.), koji je to odbio komentirati. FDR je jedna od dvije „crne kutije“ koje se nalaze u svakom komercijalnom avionu. Jedna crna kutije bilježi podatke leta, a druga snima glasovne podatke (sve što je rečeno u pilotskoj kabini za vrijeme leta). Sa tim podatcima, istraživači NTSB-a mogu povezati događaje koji su doveli do pada. Status vrata pilotske kabine se provjerava svake četiri sekunde tijekom leta i smjenuje se kao jednostavno 0 ili 1, gdje je 0=zatvoreno a 1=otvoreno, sa otprilike 1.300 provedenih provjera statusa vrata za vrijeme 90 minutnog leta AA77. Sve od tih provjera stanja vrata prikazane su sa 0, ukazujući na to da se vrata pilotske kabine nisu otvorila tijekom cijelog leta. Istražitelji nesreća pregledavaju vrata pilotske kabine s crnom kutijom jer ona može pokazati podatke o greškama pilota u nesreći. Crna kutija počinje sa snimanjem kada se piloti smjeste u svoja sjedala i pripremaju se za uzlijetanje, avion ne može uzletite samo ako crna kutija radi. Službena priča o letu 77 je da su pet muslimanskih terorista prijeteći noževima iz kutije s rezačima napravili put do pilotske kabine te odveli dva pilota, četiri poslužitelja leta i sve putnike na kraj aviona. Ova priča je priča nastala putem izjava Ted-a Olson-a, zamjenika ministra pravosuđa SAD-a, koji je rekao CNN-u – da je primio dva telefonska poziva od svoje žene Barbare Olson, putnice na osuđenom letu. Priča Ted-a Olson-a se promijenila nekoliko puta. Ponekad je tvrdio da su pozivi od njegove žene napravljeni sa telefona na stražnjim sjedalima, druge pute da je koristila njezin mobilni telefon. Prema službi za korisnike American Airlines-a, priručniku American Airlines-a za održavanje zrakoplova, i kapetanu American Airlines-a Ralph-u Kolstad-u, telefoni na zadnjim sjedalima u zrakoplovima tipa 757 su bili isključeni još od prije 11/9/01.(Kasnije su u potpunosti maknuti, budući da nikad nisu dobro radili.) Ni Barbara Olson nije mogla koristiti svoj mobilni telefon: mnogi su istraživači 11/9-tog, poglavito David Ray Griffin, istakli su da mobilni telefoni nisu radili 11/9-tog na zrakoplovima. Brzina i visina komercijalnih zrakoplova predstavljaju ogromne zapreke i mogućnosti mobilnih telefona da se spoje na neki toranj mobilne mreže, te da se onda povežu na neki slijedeći toranj koji se nalazi na drugoj lokaciji. FBI je otkrio dokaz koji odlučno odbacuje priču Ted-a Olson-a. Na suđenju Zacarias-u Moussaoui-u 2006, FBI je predstavio izvještaj o pozivima mobilnih telefona sa sva četiri leta 11/9-tog. Njihov izvještaj o AA77 pokazuje da je bio samo jedan poziv od Barbare Olson, ali da je to bio nepovezani poziv koji je trajao nula sekundi. Stoga je Ted Olson lagao da je primio poziv od svoje žene ili je bio prevaren da vjeruje da ga je primio od nje. Prema UK Telegraphu, Barbara Olson je odugovlačila svoj let 11/9-tog kako bi mogla imati doručak sa svojim mužem na njegov rođendan. To odugovlačenje ju je stavilo na let u propast. Ted Olson se je ponovno oženio 2006 za poreznu odvjetnicu Lady Booth, koju je navodno upoznao godinu dana nakon što je Barbara umrla. Postoje mnoge neobičnosti i proturječnosti o crnim kutijama AA77. Vlada tvrdi da je snimač glasa oštećen za vrijeme pada i da nisu pronađeni nikakvi korisni podaci na njemu. Ako je to istinito, to bi bilo prvi puta u povijesti avijacije da je čvrsto tijelo crne kutije bilo uništeno za vrijeme nesreće. Dok je široko izviješteno u medijima da je crna kutija AA77 nađena u 4 ujutro 21 rujna, 2001, datoteka koja sadrži podatke crne kutije je datirana četiri sata ranije. Drugim riječima, traži se od nas da vjerujemo da su podaci iz crne kutije skinuti prije nego što je ona pronađena. Istraživač Aidan Monagahan je ustanovio da NTSB nema ni serijske ni djelomične brojeve za crne kutije sa leta AA77. Sam priručnik NTSB-a ukazuje da su djelomični i serijski brojevi crne kutije potrebni za čitanje podataka na crnoj kutiji. NTSB nije imao ove podatke, dajući nam još jedan razlog da pitamo kako su podaci crne kutije stvoreni. Strukturni inženjer Allyn Kilsheimer je tvrdio da je osobno 11/9-tog našao crnu kutiju AA77. Ali u Popularnoj Mehaničkoj knjizi Raskrinkavanje mita o 11/9, Kilsheimer je citiran pri izjavi; „Stajao sam na gomili ostataka za koje smo kasnije otkrili da sadrže crnu kutiju…“ Kilsheimer-ova priča se ponovno mijenja u kolovozu 2007 u djelu napravljenom od History Channel-a „Urota 11/9“, gdje tvrdi: „Spotaknuo sam se na nešto; to je bila crna kutija.“ U ranijem radu, Piloti za Istinu o11/9 (P4T) su odredili da isti skup podataka dan od NTSB-a pokazuje da je avion bio previsoko da udari u Pentagon, i to na temelju visinomjera koji koristi zračni tlak da odredi visinu. Kao što je izvješteno u travnju 2009, od strane Slobodnog Tiska iz Rock Creek-a, istraživački tim građana, građanski novinari iz južne Kalifornije su sakupili dokaze od 14 svjedoka koji pokazuju da avion koji je viđen toga jutra blizu Pentagona nije udario zgradu, nego je preletio iznad nje u trenutku kada je detoniran eksploziv u Pentagonu, vodeći promatrače do zaključka da je avion udario u Pentagon. Pitanja oko toga što se dogodilo u Pentagonu su godinama intrigirala istraživače 11/9-tog, počevši sa slikama iz navodnog poprišta pada koje ne pokazuju ostatke aviona. Ovaj novi dokaz, koji pokazuje da se vrata pilotske kabine nisu nikad otvorila za vrijeme leta, je još jedan čavao u lijesu službene priče o letu 77. Očito, ako se vrata kabinske kabine nisu nikad otvorila, tada otimači nisu napali pilotsku kabinu i ispratili pilote na kraj aviona. Podaci, koji proizlaze od vlade, ne podupiru vladinu priču. Zašto bi vlada pustila podatke koji proturječe njezinoj verziji događaja? Da li je moguće da su bili nemarni, ili nisu nikad očekivali da će netko analizirati podatke tako pažljivo kao što su Piloti za Istinu o 11/9. Možda su se osjećali sigurnima da bez obzira kakva prokleta otkrivienja bila sadržana u podacima crne kutije, neće zainteresirati nijedan mainstream medij da potroši tintu ili vrijeme, držeći službenu priču netaknutom za veliku većinu Amerikanaca koji primaju njihove vijesti iz mainstream medija. Rob Balsamo, osnivač Piloti za Istinu o 11/9 je izjavio: „Nismo našli nijedan nezavisno potvrđeni podatak koji potvrđuje vladinu priču. FBI i NTSB odbijaju komentirati.“ Osnovani u kolovozu 2006, Piloti za Istinu o 11/9 su organizacija avijacijskih profesionalaca iz cijelog svijeta koji istražuju vladine tvrdnje o napadima 11/9-tog. Sheila Casey je novinar koja djeluje u DC-u (District of Columbia). Njezin rad je izdan u Denver Post-u, Reuters-u, Chicago Sun Times-u,Dissident Voice-u i Common Dreams-u.