http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-207.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1
(CONSTANT, De la chez release you read modernes. If Greeks and Romans, by different paths invented public sphere and could make it to a greater or lesser extent a well-participável within the privacy despotism remained the form of power factor in both cultures. Preserved the differences, it is possible to say that both the Greeks and the Romans for the freedom corresponded to participation in public life and life in the private domain, or were related to domestic economic activities, was necessarily subordinated to political life. In contrast, the hallmark of modern liberty is configured according to Constant, while exercising prerogatives private. We will present the two classical conceptions of freedom in the words of Benjamin Constant: Liberty of the ancients: Consisted in exercising collectively, but directly, several parts of the entire sovereignty, in deliberating on the public square on war and peace, to conclude with foreign treaties of alliance, in voting laws, in pronouncing judgment, to examine the accounts, the acts the management of magistrates; force them to appear before a whole people, to accuse them of crimes, to condemn them or absolve them, but at the same time that it consisted of what the ancients called liberty, they admitted as compatible with it, the complete submission of the individual to the authority of the whole. You will not find among them almost none of the privileges we see part of freedom among the moderns. All private actions are subject to strict oversight. Freedom of the modern: It is for each of the right not to be subject only to such laws, it can not be arrested or detained, or convicted, or mistreated in any way, the effect of the arbitrary will of one or more individuals. It is for each one the right to say your opinion, to choose their work and exercêlo, to dispose of his property, even abuse it, come and go, without needing permission and without having to account for their motives or his footsteps. It is for each of the right to meet with other individuals, either to discuss their interests, or to profess the cult that he and his associates prefer, or simply to fill your days and hours so more suited to their inclinations, with their fantasies. Anyway, it's the right, for each, to influence the administration of government, is the appointment of all or certain employees, whether by representations, petitions, demands to which the authority is more or less obliged to take into consideration. The Political Representation Constant although concerned about the threat posed to modern individualism, intended to prove that the Athenian political experience was unattainable and even undesirable, due to the abolition of slavery model and the development of capitalism that de-
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1
(Konstanta, De la chez objaviti ste pročitali Modernes. Ako Grci i Rimljani, po različitim stazama izumio javnu sferu, a mogao bi ga u većoj ili manjoj mjeri dobro participável u privatnost despotizma ostao oblik faktor snage u obje kulture. Očuvani razlike, moguće je reći da su i Grci i Rimljani za slobodu odgovarao na sudjelovanje u javnom životu i život u privatnoj domeni, ili su povezane s domaćim gospodarskim djelatnostima, nužno je podređena političkom životu. Nasuprot tome, obilježje moderne slobode konfiguriran prema Constant, dok vježbanje ovlasti jednom privatnom. Mi ćemo predstaviti dva klasična shvaćanja slobode u riječima Benjamina Constanta: Liberty of pradjedova: Sastojala u ostvarivanju zajednički, već izravno, nekoliko dijelova cijelog suvereniteta, u povodu javnog trga o ratu i miru, zaključiti sa stranim sporazuma o savezu, u glasačkim pravima, pri izricanju presude, da ispita račune, djela upravljanje sudaca, prisiliti ih da se pojavi pred cijelog naroda, da ih optužuju za zločine, da ih osuđujemo ili ih oslobodili, ali u isto vrijeme da se sastojao od onoga što su stari nazivali slobodu, priznali kao kompatibilne s njim, potpuna predaja pojedinca prema autoritetu u cjelini. Nećete naći među njima gotovo nitko od privilegija vidimo dio slobode među modernih ljudi. Sve privatne aktivnosti podliježu strogom nadzoru. Sloboda moderni: To je za svaku od desne ne biti podvrgnut samo zakonima, to ne može biti uhićen ili pritvoren, ili osuđen, ili zlostavljani na bilo koji način, učinak proizvoljne volje jednog ili više pojedinaca. To je za svakog od njih pravo reći svoje mišljenje, da odaberete svoje radove i exercêlo, raspolagati svoje imovine, pa čak i to zlostavljanje, doći i otići, bez potrebe odobrenja i bez računa za njihove motive ili njegovi koraci. To je za svakog od prava na susret s drugim pojedincima, bilo bi razgovarali o svojim interesima, ili na ispovijedanje kult da su on i njegovi suradnici vole, ili jednostavno ispuniti svoje dane i sate tako da više prilagođen njihovim sklonostima, sa svojim fantazijama. U svakom slučaju, to je pravo, za svaku, utjecati na upravu vlade, je imenovanje svih ili nekih zaposlenika, bilo reprezentacije, peticije, zahtjeva na koje tijelo je više ili manje dužan uzeti u obzir. Politička zastupljenost Stalno iako je zabrinut zbog prijetnje modernoj individualizma, koji za cilj dokazati da je atenski političko iskustvo bila nedostižna, pa čak i nepoželjnim, zbog ukidanja ropstva modela i razvoj kapitalizma koji de-