http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_historia_hr_history-47.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 28.1
School The servant could not join religious orders, free men could not report on justice, not freely dispose of their property, no part of the army (defense), and could not move freely. There were, however, differences in the conditions of a servant? Text 6 For heavier that these obligations would seem, in a sense, were the antithesis of slavery, they supposed the existence of a real asset in the hands of the debtor. In his capacity as foreiro the servant had the same rights as any other, its possession was no longer precarious and their work, once they meet the taxes and services, only he belonged. (Adapted from BLOCH, 1987 p. 273-279). Text 7 There were the 'servants of the domains', who lived permanently attached to the house of the Lord and worked in their fields all the time, not just for two or three days a week. There was very poor peasants, called 'frontier' that kept small leases an acre, more or less, to the edge of the village, and the 'villagers', which even had a short lease, but only a hut, and should work to Mr. arms as contractors, in exchange for food. There were the 'bad guys' who, it seems, were servants with greater personal and economic privileges. Distanced themselves very servants of the road that leads to freedom, enjoyed greater privileges and lower duties to you. An important difference, too, is the fact that you actually took the duties were more precious than those of servants. This constituted great advantage, because then the bad guys know what your exact situation. Some villains were exempted from the 'day gift' and performed just normal tasks of cultivation. Others simply did not perform any task, but paid to you a portion of their production. Still others did not work, but they made their payment in cash. Some villains were almost as wealthy as free men, and could rent part of the property of the Lord, and their own leases. So there were some people who were independent owners and never forced the tasks of cultivation, but simply paid a fee to your landlord. (Adapted from Huberman, 1986, P. 7) And the slave, feudal disappeared from the scene? Slavery reduced, in Western Europe, with increasing servitude. In twelfth-century England, slaves performed housework, France, north of the Loire, had almost no numerical significance. Then, the slaves did not disappear in the feudal era, Greeks and Muslims captured by merchants, along the Black Sea coast, West Asia, North Africa, were sold and used in field work, either as domestic eunuchs, concubines or prostitutes. Slavery has acquired some importance in Italy, because of the proximity to the Muslim countries, which allowed the slave trade in the region of the Mediterranean and continental Africa. However, prevailed in feudal society defined three orders: clergy, nobility and serfs. These social groups should live together in harmony, each played certain roles. Labor Relations
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 11.2 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 28.1
Škola Službenik ne bi mogao pridružiti redovničkih zajednica, slobodni ljudi nisu mogli prijaviti na pravdi, ne mogu slobodno raspolagati svojom imovinom, niti jedan dio vojske (obrana), a ne mogu slobodno kretati. Bilo je, međutim, razlike u uvjetima sluge? Tekst 6 Za teže da te obveze čini se, u nekom smislu, bili su suprotnost ropstvu, oni trebali postojanje stvarne imovine u rukama dužnika. U svojstvu foreiro sluga imali ista prava kao i bilo koji drugi, koji posjeduje više nije bila neizvjesna i njihov rad, kada ispune poreze i usluge, samo je on pripadao. (Preuzeto iz Bloch, 1987 str. 273-279). Tekst 7 Tu su bili "sluge Domene ', koji se trajno nastanio u prilogu kuće Gospodnje i radili u svojim poljima cijelo vrijeme, ne samo za dva ili tri dana u tjednu. Bilo je vrlo siromašni seljaci, pod nazivom 'Granica' koji čuva mala zakupnina ral, više ili manje, na rubu sela, a 'seljaci', koji je čak imao kratku zakup, ali samo koliba, i treba raditi na Mr. ruke kao izvođača radova, u zamjenu za hranu. Tu su se 'loši momci' koji je, čini se, bili sluge s većim osobnim i ekonomskim povlasticama. Udaljio sami vrlo sluge ceste koja vodi do slobode, uživao veće privilegije i niže carine za vas. Bitna razlika je, također, činjenica da ste zapravo pojeli su dužnosti bili su dragocjeniji od onih službenika. Ovo konstituiran velika prednost, jer onda negativci znate što vaš točan položaj. Neki zločinci su bili izuzeti iz 'dar' dan i izvedena samo normalne poslove uzgoja. Drugi jednostavno ne obavljaju bilo koji zadatak, ali posvetiti vama dio svoje proizvodnje. Ipak drugi ne rade, ali oni su svoj plaćanje u gotovini. Neki zločinci su gotovo jednako bogati kao slobodni ljudi, a mogao unajmiti dio imovine od Gospodina, i vlastitim zakupnina. Tako je bilo nekih ljudi koji su bili neovisni vlasnici i nikada prisiljeni poslove uzgoja, već jednostavno platili naknadu za svoj iznajmljivača. (Preuzeto iz Huberman, 1986, P. I rob, feudalno nestao sa scene? Ropstvo smanjio, u zapadnoj Europi, s povećanjem ropstva. U dvanaestom stoljeću u Engleskoj, robovi obavlja kućanske poslove, Francuska, sjeverno od Loire, imala gotovo nikakav značaj numerički. Zatim, robovi nisu nestale u feudalnom razdoblju, Grci i muslimani zarobili trgovci, uz obalu Crnog mora, Zapadna Azija, Sjeverna Afrika, prodano i koriste u radu na terenu, bilo kao domaći eunuha, priležnica ili prostitutke. Ropstvo je stekla neki značaj u Italiji, zbog blizine muslimanskih zemalja, što je omogućilo trgovinu robljem u regiji Mediterana i kontinentalne Afrike. Međutim, prevladalo u feudalnom društvu definirane tri reda: kler, plemstvo i kmetovi. Ove društvene skupine trebaju živjeti zajedno u skladu, svaka igrao određenu ulogu. radnih odnosa