http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_historia_hr_history-238.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1
Political liberty in a citizen is that tranquility of mind which comes from the opinion each person has of his safety, and in order to have this freedom, it must be that the government is such that one citizen can not fear another citizen. When the same person or the same body of magistrates the legislature is meeting the executive, there is no freedom, because one can fear that the same monarch or senate even just establish tyrannical laws to execute them tyrannically. Nor will there be liberty if the power of judging is not separated from the legislative and the executive. If you were connected to the legislative power, the power over life and liberty of the citizens would be arbitrary, for the judge would be the legislature. If you were on the executive, the judge could have the force of an oppressor. All would be lost if the same man or the same body of principal or of the nobles or of the people, exercised these three powers: that of making laws, that of executing the public resolutions, and of judging the crimes or differences of individuals. Document 7 From Democracy It seems that one could not have a better constitution than that in which executive power was by the legislature. This makes the government inadequate in some respects, because the things that must be distinguished are not, the prince and sovereign being but the same person, form a government without government. Not good that he who makes the laws to execute, even if the body of the people divert your attention from general counsels to lend it to particular goals. Nothing more dangerous than the influence of private interests in public affairs; abuse of the law by the government is a lesser evil than the corruption of the legislator, infallible consequence of particular designs. So the state changed in substance, it is impossible any reform. A people who have never abused the government also would not abuse of independence, a people who always govern well would not need to be governed. In fact, there has never been and will never be a true democracy. It is against the natural order governing the large number and the lowest number being governed. One can not imagine the people who remain continuously in assembly to take up public affairs. How many hard things together, assumes that government? Firstly, a very small state is easy to gather the people, where every citizen spends know everyone else, and second, a simplicity of manners to avoid the accumulation of thorny questions and discussions, with equality between classes and fortunes, little or anything luxury. The virtue of principle of the republic, as all of these conditions could not exist without it. There is no form of government so subject to civil wars, the upheavals bowel as the democratic or popular, because there is another tent that so strong and continually change shape, or requiring more vigilance and courage to be maintained in their original form. It is particularly in this constitution that the citizen should arm yourself with strength and constancy, and take in the heart, everyday life, the one that said palatal virtuoso in the diet of Poland: I prefer dangerous freedom to peaceful slavery.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1
Politička sloboda u građanina je da mir uma koji dolazi iz mišljenju svaka osoba ima svoje sigurnosti, te kako bi se tu slobodu, to mora biti da je Vlada, kao da je jedan građanin ne može bojati drugog građanina. Kad je ista osoba ili isto tijelo sudaca zakonodavac je sastanak izvršne, nema slobode, jer se ne mora bojati da ista monarh ili Senat je čak i samo utvrditi tiranske zakone, da ih tirani. Niti će biti slobodu ako je moć sudeći nije odvojena od zakonodavne i izvršne vlasti. Ako ste spojeni na zakonodavne vlasti, moć nad životom i slobode građana će biti proizvoljna, jer je sudac bi zakonodavac. Ako ste bili na komisiji, sudac je mogao imati snagu tlačitelj. Sve će biti izgubljena ako isti čovjek ili isto tijelo glavnice ili od plemića ili naroda, vršio ove tri moći: da je od donošenja zakona, kako za pogubljenje javne odluke, i sudeći zločine ili razlika pojedinaca. Dokument 7 od demokracije Čini se da nitko ne bi mogao imati bolji ustav od onoga u kojem izvršnu vlast je od strane zakonodavca. To čini Vlada neadekvatna u nekim aspektima, jer stvari koje se moraju razlikovati nisu, princ i suverena biće, ali ista osoba, formirati vladu bez vlade. Nije dobro da onaj tko donosi zakone njegove provedbe, ili da je tijelo građana odvratiti pažnju s općenito savjetuje ga posuditi pojedinih ciljeva. Ništa opasnije od utjecaja privatnih interesa u javnim poslovima; zloupotreba zakona vlada je manje zlo od korupcije zakonodavca, nepogrešivog posljedica pojedinih dizajna. Dakle države promijenila u svojoj biti, nemoguće je svaka reforma. A ljudi koji nikada nisu zlostavljani vlada neće zloupotrijebiti neovisnosti, narod koji je uvijek vladaju i ne bi trebala biti regulirana. Zapravo, nikad nije i nikad neće biti istinske demokracije. To je protiv prirodnog poretka uređuje velik broj, a najmanji broj za koje je mjerodavno. One se ne mogu zamisliti da ljudi koji ostaju trajno u skupštini da se javnim poslovima. Koliko je teško stvari zajedno, pretpostavlja da je Vlada? Prvo, jako mala država je lako okupiti ljude, gdje svaki građanin potroši znamo svi drugi, i drugo, jednostavnost načine kako bi se izbjeglo nakupljanje trnovitim pitanja i rasprave, jednakosti između klasa i bogatstvo, malo ili bilo luksuz. Vrlina principu republike, kao i sve od ovih uvjeta ne može postojati bez njega. Nema oblik vlasti, tako podliježe građanskim ratovima, ustancima u crijevima, kao demokratska i popularna, jer postoji još jedan šator da je toliko jaka i stalno mijenjaju oblik, ili zahtijevaju više budnost i hrabrost da se održava u izvornom obliku. To je osobito u ovom ustavu koji građanin trebao oboružajte snage i postojanost, i uzeti u srca, svakodnevnom životu, jednom je rekao da je usna virtuoz u prehrani Poljske: Radije opasnu slobodu mirnog ropstva.