http___metro-portal.hr_tags_view_znacenje-sna_2.xml
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 10.1 10.2 11.1 12.1 12.2 13.1 13.2 13.3 14.1 14.2 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 17.1 18.1 18.2 19.1 19.2 20.1 21.1 22.1 22.2 23.1 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 24.5 24.6 25.1 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 27.1 28.1 28.2 28.3 28.4 28.5
Actually, lilhobbit, the problem I have with the words "ban" and "prejudice," is that they are implicitly hostile. A less incendiary way to gather information on this topic would be to ask: "Why do people put up ads seeking stories with specific gender writers?" By employing the words "ban," "prejudice" and "bigot" one is essentially stating: "I think people who seek stories with a specific gender writers are bad people. Now, explain to me why you are not bad." Here's the thing. It isn't all about one person--particularly not one person who happens to read an ad they do not like. Let's play it out. Scenario 1: A wants to play a game with gender G writers only. A puts up an ad seeking a game (group or individual), and the ad states: "gender G writers only." B reads the post. B is interested in the story, but is not gender G. Odds are, B will not then apply to join the game. B may feel excluded or "banned," but regardless, A and B move on. Scenario 2: A wants to play a game with gender G writers only. A puts up an ad seeking a game (group or individual), and the ad does not state any preference for gender. B reads the post. B is interested in the story. B is not gender G. B applies to join the game. A then rejects B's application. B may feel excluded or "banned," but regardless, A and B move on. See how the result does not change if we mandate that people must remove gender preferences from the headings of their game ads? It still won't force A to write with B. Scenario 3: A wants to play a game with gender G writers only. A puts up an ad seeking a game (group or individual), and the ad does not state any preference for gender. B, C, D, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z read the post. B through Z are interested in the story. B through Z are not gender G. B through Z apply to join the game. A then rejects B through Z's application. B may feel excluded or "banned," but regardless, everyone moves on. B, C, D, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z were all put through the extra step of applying for a game that was not created for them. A was put to the extra step of denying the applications of B, C, D, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z. See how in this sense, stating a gender preference in an ad can actually be a polite thing to do? It saves the poster time and wasted effort, and it saves all other E members time and wasted effort. Scenario 4: A wants to play a game with gender G writers only. A puts up an ad seeking a game (group or individual), and the ad states: "gender G writers only." B, C, D, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z read the post. They are interested in the story. B, C, D, F, H I, J, K, L, M, N, O, and P are not gender G. Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z are gender G. C, X, Y, and Z apply to join the game. B does not apply, feeling excluded or "banned." A then rejects C and Z's application, and opts to play with X and Y. Everyone moves on. Compare Scenarios 3 and 4 and you can see how focusing on just B makes us myopic. If we mandated that people cannot state gender preferences in their ads, we get Scenario 3. If we do not impose such a rule, then we have Scenario 4. E allows people to select their RPs based on the other writer's gender. Putting up an ad that clearly specifies one's gender preferences (if any) saves everyone time and wasted effort: D through P didn't have to write an application; A only needed to respond to four applications. This likely leads to more satisfying RP experiences for everyone as a whole. Now, some people may respond saying: "yes, but A shouldn't want to write only with gender G writers, and that A is a bigot/prejudiced because A feels that way." Maybe. But you can't force people to RP in the way you want. If they don't feel comfortable RPing with someone of a specific gender because of their past (e.g., having been abused or worse), we need to respect that. If it is because they get their "rocks off knowing that she's enjoying it too," then that should be allowed too. The point I have been trying to make repeatedly is this: your feelings are not the only ones that matter. You may not like the fact that someone else has a preference for certain kinds of RPs, whether it is gender or tentacles. But you don't get to tell them what to do. Respect their choices, even when you disagree with them. And don't try to shame them into doing what you want by labeling them bigots or prejudiced. You don't know anywhere near enough about their past to pass judgment.
2.1 3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.2 7.1 8.1 8.2 9.1 10.1 11.1
Teorije evolucije i 'Velikog praska' su točne, a Bog nije 'mađioničar s čarobnim štapićemneobično otvoreni papa papa Franjo Snovi i njihovo tumačenje predmet su zanimanja raznih profila ljudi, a pridružili su se i znanstvenici koji su pokušali saznati koju su najčešći muški snovi. Nakon… više » Naime, razvijen je sustav koji omogućuje snimanje viših nivoa moždane aktivnosti. Prije toga, jedini način na koji se moglo pristupiti snovima jest preko psihologa koji bi osobu… više » Snovi oduvijek fasciniraju čovječanstvo. Jedini ih pokušavaju što prije zaboraviti, dok drugi traže skrivenu simboliku i vjeruju da snovi govore mnogo o našoj… više » Sanjarica, tumačenje snova s najopširnijim i najdetaljnijim objašnjenjima snova na hrvatskom po abecednim pojmovima - slovo A, B, C, Č, Ć, D, Đ, DŽ, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L,… više »