http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-246.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 6.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1
School http://upload.wikimedia.org Court of the Inquisition. One result embarrassing for many philosophers of science is that these episodes in the history of science - commonly seen as more characteristic of important advances, both innovations of Galileo, Newton and Darwin, both the Einstein - not held by anything similar to the methods typically described by philosophers. www.univie.ac.at Philosophy of Science Ram also faced by rational speculation, observations of natural phenomena and formulations of rational theories. This movement scientific, cultural and intellectual renaissance was called, inspired by the Greco-Roman culture. Modern science does not seek only to know the reality and the genesis of things, but above all, influence and dominion over it. New values have been developed along with the new science. The bourgeoisie breaking with the clergy, because of conflicting interests, such as economic speculation (sin of usury) and the struggle for power, began to finance artistic and scientific experiments. In order to structure the new model of society. In modern times, science is highly regarded. Apparently there is a widely held belief that there is something special about science and its methods. The assignment of the term "scientific" to a statement or line of reasoning part of research is done in a way meant to imply any type of substance or a particular type of reliability. But what's so special about science? What is this that "scientific method" that leads to reliable results especially meritorious? (CHALMERS, 1993. According to Chalmers, part of the estimated conquered by science in modern times is the fact that science has become a modern religion, from the promises of a better quality of life and happiness contained in scientific work. The idea of progress include this expectation in the common sense. Currently, we note that in advertisements of products there is a strong appeal to the authority of science, to ensure its effectiveness and evidence, usually relying on the image of the scientist wearing a white coat in his laboratory. When we say that something is scientifically proven, we are appealing to the authority granted to science for more than a popular belief by an effective method. On the other hand, out of the everyday life in the school plan and academic self-esteem of science is linked to the defense of the methods scientists, whose reliability is linked to accurate results sciences. However, the empirical method is through observation, data collection and experiments that generate scientific procedures commonly restricted to laboratories, scanning the world through numbers and formulas, what about the effectiveness of these methods in the field of humanities and social? The contemporary philosophers of science, especially Popper, Bachelard, Kuhn, Lakatos and Feyerabend commune as the impossibility of proving that some science deserves the status of true, or certain misconceptions. Just a brief glimpse into the history of philosophy of science to notice any kind of contradiction.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1
Škola http://upload.wikimedia.org Sud inkvizicije. Jedan rezultat neugodno za mnoge filozofe znanosti je da ta epizoda u povijesti znanosti - uobičajeno vidjeti kao obilježje značajnim pomacima, obje inovacije Galileo, Newton i Darwin, i Einstein - ne drži ništa slično načinu obično opisuje filozofa. (Chalmers, 1993, str. 19) www.univie.ac.at Karla Poppera (1902 - 1994). Filozofija znanosti Ram je također suočen racionalnim nagađanja, promatranja prirodnih pojava i formulacije racionalnih teorija. Ovaj pokret znanstvene, kulturne i intelektualne renesansa zvao, inspiriran grčko-rimske kulture. Suvremena znanost ne traže samo znaju stvarnost i genezu stvari, ali prije svega, utjecaj i vlast nad njim. Nove vrijednosti su razvijeni uz nove znanosti. Buržoazija nego što se s klerom, zbog suprotstavljenih interesa, kao što su ekonomski nagađanja (grijeh lihvarenja) i borbe za vlast, počeo financirati umjetničke i znanstvene eksperimente. Kako bi se ustrojiti novi model društva. U moderno doba, znanost je vrlo cijenjen. Navodno postoji široko rasprostranjeno uvjerenje da postoji nešto posebno o znanosti i njezinim metodama. Raspored termina "znanstveno" se u priopćenju ili pravac promišljanja dijelu istraživanja je učinjeno na način značilo da podrazumijeva bilo koju vrstu tvari ili određenu vrstu pouzdanosti. No, ono što je tako posebno u znanosti? Što je to što "znanstvena metoda" koja vodi do pouzdane rezultate posebno zaslužnim? (Chalmers, 1993. 17 P) Prema Chalmers, dio procjenjuje se pokorili znanosti u modernim vremenima je činjenica da je znanost postala moderna religija, od obećanja bolju kvalitetu života i sreće sadržanih u znanstvenom radu. Ideja o tijeku su ova očekivanja u zdravom razumu. Trenutno smo na umu da u reklamama proizvoda postoji jaka privlačnost prema autoritetu znanosti, kako bi se osigurala njegova učinkovitost i dokaze, najčešće oslanjajući se na slici znanstvenika nosi bijeli kaput u svom laboratoriju. Kada kažemo da je nešto znanstveno dokazano, apelujemo na vlasti dodijeljene znanosti za više od popularnog vjerovanja po učinkovita metoda. S druge strane, iz svakodnevnog života u školskom planu i akademskog samopoštovanja znanosti vezana za obranu od metoda znanstvenika, čija pouzdanost je povezan s točnim rezultatima znanosti. Međutim, empirijska metoda je kroz promatranje, prikupljanje podataka i eksperimenata koji generiraju znanstvene postupke obično ograničeni na laboratorijima, skeniranje svijet kroz brojeve i formule, ono o učinkovitosti ovih metoda u području humanističkih znanosti i socijalnog? Suvremeni filozofi znanosti, pogotovo Popper, Bachelarda, Kuhn, Lakatos i Feyerabend komunom nemogućnosti dokazivanja da su neke znanstvene zaslužuje status prave, ili neke zablude. Samo kratak pogled u povijest filozofije znanosti da primijetite bilo kakve kontradikcije.