http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_sociologia_hr_sociology-37.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1
And the modern world to Durkheim? Mankind, for this author, is constantly evolving, which would be characterized by increased social roles or functions. For example, for Durkheim, there are companies that are organized in the form of a kind of solidarity called mechanical and other societies are organized in the form of organic solidarity. Societies organized in the form of mechanical solidarity would be those in which there would be few social roles. According to Durkheim, these societies, members would live in a similar way and usually bound together by common beliefs and feelings, which he calls the collective consciousness. In this kind of society would exist little room for individuality, because any attempt attitude "individualist" would be perceived and corrected by other members. The organization of some Indian villages could serve as an example of how it gives mechanical solidarity: groups of people living and working similarly bound by their beliefs and values. In these groups, if someone started to act on their own, it would be easy to see who would be "cluttering" the local way of life. Another example that can characterize the mechanical solidarity are the task forces for harvest in agricultural regions or to rebuild homes devastated by storm and also examples are also campaigns to collect food. Unlike the societies organized in mechanical solidarity, organic solidarity in societies - typical of the modern world - there are many social roles. Think of the amount of tasks that can be in urban areas, in the cities: there are many functions and activities. Durkheim believed that even with a large variety of activities and division, they should all cooperate. So he called organic (like an organism). But, in these societies, given the existence of numerous social roles, decreases the degree of social control over each person. The individuality under less control, becomes a door for the person intends to increase even more, its radius of action or position within society. One of the greatest expressions of anomie in the modern world, according to Durkheim, it would be this: the selfishness of individuals. And because of this attitude was the fragility of standards and controls on individuality, standards and controls that societies of mechanical solidarity work more effectively What, then, the solution to the modern world, according to Durkheim?
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1
I suvremeni svijet Durkheima? Čovječanstvo, za ovog autora, stalno razvija, koji će biti obilježen povećane društvene uloge i funkcije. Na primjer, za Durkheima, postoje tvrtke koje su organizirane u obliku neke vrste solidarnosti pod nazivom mehanički i ostali društva organizirana u obliku organske solidarnosti. Društva organizirani u obliku mehaničke solidarnosti bi se one u kojoj ne bi bilo nekoliko društvene uloge. Prema Durkheima, ta društva, članovi će živjeti na sličan način i obično povezani zajedničkim vjerovanjima i osjećajima, koje on naziva kolektivna svijest. U ovakvom društvu će postojati malo prostora za individualnost, jer svaki pokušaj stav "individualac" bi se doživljava i ispravljene od strane drugih članova. Organizacija nekim indijskim selima mogu poslužiti kao primjer kako to daje mehaničku solidarnost: skupine ljudi koji žive i rade na sličan način vezan njihovim uvjerenjima i vrijednostima. U tim skupinama, ako je netko počeo djelovati samostalno, bilo bi lako vidjeti tko će biti "nered" lokalni način života. Još jedan primjer kako se može okarakterizirati mehanički solidarnost su radne skupine za žetvu u poljoprivrednim regijama ili obnoviti domove razorili su oluje i primjere Također su i kampanje za prikupljanje hrane. Za razliku od društava organiziranih u mehaničke solidarnosti, organska solidarnost u društvu - tipično modernom svijetu - postoje mnoge društvene uloge. Razmislite o iznosu od zadataka koji mogu biti u urbanim sredinama, u gradovima: postoje mnoge funkcije i aktivnosti. Durkheim je vjerovao da je čak i uz veliki izbor aktivnosti i podjela, svi oni trebaju surađivati. Tako je nazvao organski (kao organizam). No, u tim društvima, s obzirom postojanje brojnih društvenih uloga, smanjuje stupanj društvene kontrole nad svakom osobom. Individualnost pod kontrolom manje, postaje vrata za osobu namjerava povećati još više, svoj opseg djelovanja ili položaj u društvu. Jedan od najvećih izraza bezakonja u suvremenom svijetu, prema Durkheima, da će biti ovako: sebičnost pojedinaca. I zbog takvog stava bio krhkost standardima i kontrolama na individualnost, standardima i kontrolama koje društvima mehaničke solidarnosti rade učinkovitije Što je, dakle, rješenje u modernom svijetu, prema Durkheima?