http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-161.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 7.2 7.3 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 11.1
debate We will accept the challenge proposed by Wolff and try to imagine what would happen if there were no policy. Imagine humans living stateless, lawless, with nothing in common, without conscience or responsibility of belonging to a community, a city. Is that possible? We would have more or less freedom? What would life be without politics? Do not forget to record in writing the ideas that emerged in the debate. The rules for the discussion was the introduction to this book. Let us return to the propositions Wolff. The first is undesirable, after all, who likes to live under duress? The second possibility is that the idea of living alone, moves between the romantic and pathetic and is anachronistic. The third, which suggests life without politics, is a utopia without material support. So what's left? We know that we live together in society, not in isolation. We know we have differences and confrontations and conflicts are part of life in society. We know that there are profound social contradictions. Therefore, it is through the ideal of self-government or a body outside the company and therefore coercive (the State), the policy is a necessary and constitutive dimension of human existence, so there is a society where there will be political. The question is then: What kind of politics we? What kind of politics do we want? What policy can build? The Political Ideal The optimal policy is characterized by the existence of a community and the construction and maintenance of a unit of this community, without this she needs to undergo an external power (like "they" are the power, they make laws we must obey). There is, however, a case for anarchy. It is important to note that it is not possible to live together without any very clear rules and sanctions. So a ideal polity should establish their purposes, their rules, their priorities, and finally, should govern themselves (we are the power, we make the laws that regulate life in the community and this is our freedom). However, the history witness how difficult it is to achieve this ideal politician. If there were a community, rather than remain through a power distinct from itself (an instance organized for this purpose, a boss almighty, a group leader, a ruling class, a State), is retained in its unit only on its own power, a society in which political power could only be found in the political community as a whole, we might say that society she realized idea of politics.
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 7.2 7.3 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 11.1
debata Mi ćemo prihvatiti izazov koji je predložio Wolff i pokušati zamisliti što bi se dogodilo da nije bilo pravilo. Zamislite ljudi živi bez državljanstva, bezakonje, s ništa zajedničko, bez savjesti ili odgovornosti pripadnosti zajednici, gradu. Je li to moguće? Mi bi imati više ili manje slobode? Što bi život bio bez politike? Ne zaboravite zabilježiti u pisanom obliku ideje koje su se pojavile u raspravi. Pravila za raspravu bio je uvod u ovu knjigu. Vratimo se propozicijama Wolff. Prvi je nepoželjno, nakon svega, tko voli živjeti pod prisilom? Druga mogućnost je da je ideja živi sama, kreće između romantične i jadno i anakrono. Treći, što upućuje na život bez politike, je utopija bez materijalne potpore. Dakle, što je ostalo? Mi znamo da živimo zajedno u društvu, a ne u izolaciji. Znamo da imamo razlike i konfrontacije i sukobe su dio života u društvu. Znamo da postoje duboke društvene proturječnosti. Dakle, to je kroz ideal samouprave ili tijela izvan poduzeća i time prisile (državni), politika je potrebno i konstitutivni dimenzija ljudskog postojanja, tako da je društvo u kojem neće biti politički. Pitanje je, dakle: Kakvu politiku mi? Kakav politika ne želimo? Ono što politika može graditi? Politička Idealno Optimalna politika karakterizira postojanje zajednice i izgradnja i održavanje jedinice ove zajednice, a da to ona treba da se podvrgnu vanjsko napajanje (kao što su "oni" su snage, oni donose zakone moramo slijediti). Tu je, međutim, slučaj za anarhije. Važno je imati na umu da to nije moguće živjeti zajedno bez ikakvih vrlo jasna pravila i sankcije. Dakle, idealno ciju treba utvrditi njihove potrebe, svoja pravila, svoje prioritete, a na kraju, treba se reguliraju (mi smo snage, možemo napraviti zakone koji reguliraju život u zajednici, a to je naša sloboda). Međutim, povijest svjedok kako je teško postići taj ideal političara. Ako je bilo zajednica, umjesto da ostane kroz vlast razlikuje od sebe (instanca organizirala za ovu namjenu, šef Svemogući, vođa grupe, vladajuće klase, država), zadržan je u svojem Uređaj se na vlastitom snagom, društvo u kojem se politička vlast se jedino može naći u političkoj zajednici u cjelini, mogli bismo reći da je društvo shvatila ideju o politici.