http___logoblink.com_hr_explaining-web20-logos__1.xml
2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 40.2 40.3 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 45.2 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 47.5 48.1 49.1 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 53.1 53.2 53.3 55.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 61.1 62.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 72.1 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 77.1 78.1 79.1
The question: Fashion, decease, necessity or evolution ? Although this ridiculous Apple logo from 1976 looks like 1876 emblem… this picture represents very good the evolution. Apple is a technology company and can afford to redesign its symbol like in the current moment, but companies like UPS will not do this soon because the UPS logo is used on too many print materials and the cost of full-color-print is still times more expansive than the one-color print or the representation of the logo with a cut folio. Also we should add the difficulty of printing perfect or even correct gradients. This is the same reason why Firefox logo is also so colorful and full with gradients. The media where the logo is used defines it’s look. Now let’s talk about the similarities of the web 2.0 logos. Primary characteristics: 1 – usage of gradients 2 – usage of bright colors 3 – usage of non-serif fonts 4 – usage of shadows 5 – reflection ( under or over the body ) 6 – looks like web glossy buttons 7 – often made by a “logo generators” 8 – stands for a website, web service or interface, created after 2004 Non-primary characteristics : 9 – speech bubble shapes 10 – spheres and other easy to fabricate “3d” shapes 11 – usage of strokes 12 – usage of “badges” 13 – small “beta” notice 14 – rounded corners 15 – rectangular background 16 – consist of a small icon + word mark 17 – the word mark writes a strange or non-existing word Here are some logos, defined by the internet users as “web 2.0 logos”, which will illustrate this characteristics: Why people are creating such logos ? Some web 2.0 logos are interesting (e-buddy) , some are even original (flickr). The truth is that most of them are bad designs or just coppies. May be we can blame developers, who are trying to come with a brilliant design idea for a few photoshop minutes or designers who serve the “I want one like this, with the pink R at the end” clients. Anyway – let’s explain the characteristics: 1,2 – privileges of the new media 3 – symbol of new age (serifs are associated with old times) 4,5 – result of a Photoshop usage for a logo tool (the same tool, websites are designed with) 6 – usually one can click on the logo + people like shiny stuff 7 – the tool of everybody who needs a logo, but is not willing to pay a designer. 8 – the name of the website should be clearly declared 9 – community sites are the most popular and therefore need a decent identification like a logo. 10 – people like shiny AND 3D 11 – common feature in Photoshop 12 – nice place to put “BETA” in 13 – “beta” is fashion now 14 – also symbols of the new age + looks more “teen” 15 – rectangular backgrounds are the safety belt for bad designed word mark. 16 – what does your desktop have ? icons. You’ll easy understand and get used to another one. 17 – one can not buy google.com domain name, but boogle.com could be free… “While they are pretty cool, they are all kinda the same.” This is written by the creator a web 2.0 generator . And it says the basic disadvantage of this type of logos. Another approach to understand the psychology of this type of logos is to understand what is web 2.0. Here’s what Wikipedia says about it : Web 2.0 is a trend in World Wide Web technology, and web design, a second generation of web-based communities and hosted services such as social-networking sites, wikis, blogs, and folksonomies, which aim to facilitate creativity, information sharing, collaboration, and sharing among users. It is almost defined as the new era of the World Wide Web. The term became notable after the first O’Reilly Media Web 2.0 conference in 2004. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but to changes in the ways software developers and end-users use webs. According to Tim O’Reilly: “Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. Some technology experts, notably Tim Berners-Lee, have questioned whether one can use the term in a meaningful way, since many of the technology components of “Web 2.0″ have existed since the early days of the Web. May be these sites really need a web 2.0 logos. I don’t know. For all the rest that need a decent logo, but their budget is limited – check www.desbar.eu . This is a DesignBarter forum, where you can ask for your own logo and give credits in return. The moto of this place is “Every good idea deserves a design and every good designer deserves field for action”. The quality of the web 2.0 logos could be easily defined. I don’t see any web 2.0 logos in “www.eulda.com/2007 “, do you ? What does this tell to you :) ? You can make a visualisation of a good ideas without gradients and reflections. If you can not – better visit Logoblink.com more often or never visit it again :) Though, I should admit I have a favorite one – the green Sony Ericsson symbol. It stands just perfect on the phones and in every advertisement. I guess it’s a web 2.0 logo / icon. My answer: web2.0 logos are 4 of them. And, yes, web 2.0 logos are international: US sites Chineese sites French sites Israel sites places from where you can get an extra idea what web 2.0 logos are: www.web2logo.com www.fontshop.com/fontfeed/archives/the-logos-of-web-20 www.logotwo.com/category/blog www.flickr.com/photos/tags/yay2dot0logoparody/interesting Incoming search terms: - internet logos - apple evolution - original apple logo - web 2 0 logos - apple symbol - apple logo evolution - apple emblem - web logo - word logos - Web 2 0 Logo
2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 40.2 40.3 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 45.2 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 47.5 48.1 49.1 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 53.1 53.2 53.3 55.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 61.1 62.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 72.1 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 77.1 78.1 79.1
Pitanje: Moda, umrijeti, nužnost ili evolucija? Iako je ovo smiješno Apple logo od 1976 izgleda 1876 amblema ... ta slika predstavlja vrlo dobru evoluciju. Apple je tehnološka tvrtka i može si priuštiti da redizajnira svoj simbol kao što je u ovom trenutku, no tvrtke poput UPS-a neće to učiniti uskoro, jer UPS logo se koristi previše tiskanih materijala i troškova u boji tiskaju još puta šire od jedne boje tiska ili zastupanje znaka sa cut Folio. Također treba dodati poteškoća ispisa spektar ili čak točno stupnjevima. To je isto razlog zašto Firefox logo je isto tako šareni i puni s gradijentima. Mediji u kojem se koristi logotip definira svoju izgled. Sada ćemo govoriti o sličnosti web 2.0 logotipa. Osnovne značajke: 1 - korištenje gradijentima 2 - korištenje svijetlih boja 3 - korištenje non-serif fontova 4 - korištenje sjene 5 - refleksije (ispod ili iznad tijela) 6 - izgleda kao web gumbi sjajan 7 - često donose "logo generatora" 8 - stoji za web stranice, web-uslugu ili sučelje, stvoren nakon 2004 Non-osnovne karakteristike: 9 - govor mjehurić oblici 10 - sfere i drugih lako izraditi "3D" oblike 11 - korištenje udaraca 12 - korištenje "znaka" 13 - mala "beta" obavijest 14 - zaobljeni kutovi 15 - pravokutna pozadina 16 - sastoje se od malih ikona + oznaka riječi 17 - oznaka riječi piše čudno ili ne postoji riječ Ovdje su neke logotipe, definirane od strane korisnika Interneta kao "web 2.0 logo", koje će ilustrirati ove karakteristike: Zašto ljudi stvaraju takve logotipa? Neke web 2.0 logotipi su zanimljiv (e-buddy), neki su čak i izvorni (flickr). Istina je da većina od njih su loše izvedbe ili samo coppies. Možda možemo kriviti programerima, koji pokušavaju da se s briljantne ideje dizajna za nekoliko minuta ili Photoshop dizajnera koji služe "Želim jedan ovako, s ružičastim R na kraja" klijenata. U svakom slučaju - neka objasniti karakteristike: 1,2 - povlastice na novim medijima 3 - simbol novog doba (serifs su povezane s prošlim vremenima) 4,5 - rezultat uporabe Photoshop za logo alat (isti alat, web stranice su dizajnirani s) 6 - obično se može kliknuti na logo tipke + ljudi poput sjajne stvari 7 - alat za svakoga tko treba logotip, ali nije voljan platiti dizajnera. 8 - naziv web stranici bi trebao biti jasno proglasio 9 - društvene stranice su najpopularniji i stoga trebaju pristojan identifikaciju poput logotipa. 10 - ljudi vole sjajna i 3D 11 - zajedničko obilježje u Photoshopu 12 - lijepo mjesto za staviti "Beta" u 13 - "beta" je modna sada 14 - i simboli novog dobi + izgleda više "teen" 15 - pravokutna pozadina su sigurnosni pojas za loše dizajniran riječi marku. 16 - Što vaš desktop imati? ikona. Možete lako ćete shvatiti i naviknuti se na drugu. 17 - ne može se kupiti google.com korisničkog imena domene, ali boogle.com mogao biti slobodan ... "Dok su cool, oni su sve nekako isto." To je napisao kreator generatora web 2.0 . A ona kaže osnovni nedostatak ove vrste logotipa. Drugi pristup razumjeti psihologiju ove vrste logotipa je razumjeti što je web 2.0. Evo što Wikipedia kaže o tome: Web 2.0 je trend u World Wide Web tehnologije i web dizajn, druga generacija web-based zajednice i domaćin usluga kao što su socijalno umrežavanje sučelja, wikija, blogova i folksonomies, koji imaju za cilj omogućiti kreativnost, razmjenu informacija, suradnju , i dijeljenje među korisnicima. To je gotovo definira kao nove ere na World Wide Webu. Termin je postao značajan nakon prve O'Reilly Media Web 2.0 konferencije u 2004. Iako je termin sugerira novu verziju World Wide Weba, ne odnosi na nadogradnje na bilo tehničkim specifikacijama, ali do promjena u načinima razvojnim inženjerima i krajnji korisnici koriste mreže. Prema Tim O'Reilly: "Web 2.0 je poslovna revolucija u računalnoj industriji uzrokovana prelaskom na Internet kao platformu i pokušaj razumjeti pravila za uspjeh na toj novoj platformi. Neki stručnjaci tehnologije, osobito Tim Berners-Lee, su ispitali da li se mogu koristiti pojam na smislen način, budući da su mnogi od tehnoloških komponenti "Web 2.0" postoji od ranih dana webu. Može se ta mjesta zaista treba web 2.0 logo. Ne znam. Za sve ostalo što je potrebno za pristojan logotip, ali njihov proračun je ograničen - provjerite www.desbar.eu . To je DesignBarter forum gdje možete pitati za svoj logotip i dati kredite u povratku. Moto ovog mjesta je "Svaka dobra ideja zaslužuje dizajn i svaki dobar dizajner zaslužuje polje za akciju". Kvaliteta web 2.0 logo mogao lako definirati. Ne vidim nikakve web 2.0 logo u " www.eulda.com/2007~~pobj ", zar ne? Što to reći za vas :)? Možete napraviti vizualizaciju dobrih ideja bez gradijentima i razmišljanja. Ako ne može - bolje posjetiti Logoblink.com češće ili nikad ga ponovo posjetiti :) Iako, moram priznati da imam onaj najdraži - zelena Sony Ericsson simbol. To stoji upravo savršen na telefone i na svakom oglasu. Mislim da je logo web 2.0 / ikona. Moj odgovor: web2.0 logotipi su četiri od njih. I, da, web 2.0 logotipi su međunarodni: Američki stranice Chineese stranice Francuski stranice Izrael stranice iz mjesta gdje možete dobiti dodatnu ideju što web 2.0 logotipa su: www.web2logo.com www.fontshop.com/fontfeed/archives/the-logos-of-web-20 www.logotwo.com / kategorija / blog www.flickr.com/photos/tags/yay2dot0logoparody/interesting~~V Dolazni uvjete za pretraživanje: - internet logotipa - apple evolution - original apple logo - web 2 0 logotipa - jabuka simbol - apple logo evolucija - jabuka simbol - riječ logos - web logo - Web 2 0 Logo