http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_sociologia_hr_sociology-208.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 14.2 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3
All this leads us to think about our society and our government types. Why do we, in Brazil and the USA, the Czech presidential? Why in England and Spain for the parliamentary monarchy? Why France and Italy for the Parliamentary system? Why the experience of some countries, for example France and the U.S., is seen as a model for others? To answer these questions it is necessary to research the historical process of each country in order to understand the reasons or reasons they have given some kind of government. Let's look at the history of France, more precisely the process of the French Revolution, as an exercise in analysis and understanding. This revolution occurred in 1789 and since then is sung in verse and prose as a model of revolution bourgeois-democratic. But why? It is considered a model because it can and should serve as an example; democratic because when launching the slogan - liberty, equality and fraternity - sought to ensure respect for the rights of each, and bourgeois because, as history has shown, helped and helps deter proposals for effective changes. But we must ask ourselves about the organization of society on the eve of the French Revolution of 1789: What kind of society was? Who ruled it? As the ruling? Who inspired the revolutionary ideals? The revolutionaries managed to achieve the proposed objectives? To begin with, one can say that, despite historians put the final period of feudalism as the sixteenth century, was still in France, some characters feudal stubbornly insisted on keep alive longer. This is far from mean, however, that the feudal system remained dominant until the eighteenth century, therefore capitalism "agrarian" had been introduced long before that, the point in the eighteenth century, the traditional payments to you are quite modest compared to the lease- ments capitalists. Politically, French society was ruled by kings who held the power centralized in his hands point of Luis XV tell Parliament of Paris: "In my person resides sovereign power. Only me belongs legislative power, without dependence and without sharing. The public order emanates from me entirely, and the rights and interests of the nation are united necessarily mine, and just rest in my hands.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2 8.3 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 14.2 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3
Sve to dovodi nas na razmišljanje o našem društvu i naše državne vrste. Zašto mi, u Brazilu i SAD-a, Češke predsjedničkih? Zašto u Engleskoj i Španjolskoj za parlamentarne monarhije? Zašto Francuska i Italija za parlamentarni sustav? Zašto iskustvo nekih zemalja, primjerice Francuske i SAD-u, vidi se kao model za druge? Da biste odgovorili na ova pitanja potrebno je istražiti povijesni proces svake zemlje kako bi se razumjeli razlozi ili razlozi koje su dali neku vrstu vlasti. Pogledajmo povijesti Francuske, točnije proces Francuske revolucije, kao vježba u analizi i razumijevanju. Ova revolucija dogodila u 1789, a od tada je pjevao u stihu i prozi kao model revolucije građansko-demokratski. Ali zašto? To se smatra uzorom jer to može i treba poslužiti kao primjer; demokratska jer prilikom pokretanja slogan - sloboda, jednakost i bratstvo - nastojao osigurati poštivanje prava svake od njih, i građanske jer, kako je povijest pokazala, pomogla i pomaže spriječiti Prijedlozi za učinkovite promjene. No, moramo se zapitati o organizaciji društva uoči Francuske revolucije 1789: Kakvo je društvo? Tko je donio odluku? Kao rješenja? Tko je inspirirala revolucionarne ideale? Revolucionari uspjeli ostvariti ciljeve predložene? Za početak, može se reći da, unatoč povjesničara staviti konačnu razdoblje feudalizma kao šesnaestog stoljeća, bio je još uvijek u Francuskoj, neki likovi feudalni uporno inzistirao na držati na životu dulje. To je daleko od prosjeka, međutim, da je feudalizam i dalje dominantna do osamnaestog stoljeća, dakle kapitalizam "agrarna" uveden je dugo prije toga, točka u osamnaestom stoljeću, tradicionalna plaćanja vama su vrlo skromni u odnosu na zakup ma i kapitalisti. Politički, francusko društvo vladali kraljevi koji su držali vlast u svojim rukama centralizirano točka Luis XV da parlament o Parizu: "U moje osobno prebivalište suverenu vlast. Samo ja pripadnik zakonodavnu vlast, bez ovisnosti i bez dijeljenja. Javnost bi zrači iz mene u potpunosti, te prava i interesi nacije su ujedinjeni nužno mina, i samo odmoriti u mojim rukama.