http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-76.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 15.1 17.1 19.1 20.1 22.1 24.1 26.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1
cha is what we know toward what things actually are. Try not to make confusion on this point. This is why the best students in the school are those who develop the habit of accompanying the main points of the content. The golden rule is: understand the main concepts, more general, only then is dedicated to the study of particular points. Often these students are taken "smart", but that's not it. Acquiring knowledge is a question of how learning proceeds. Many who take the first places in the vestibular not devote more than four hours of study per day in the period of preparation, which offend others in the same period come to study 10 hours a day and do not achieve the same results. debate Philosophy www.gallery.spacebar Reread what was previously stated about the process of knowledge and develop the following questions: Make a survey with his colleagues on some contents of physics, mathematics, history, etc.., you've studied. Write in the notebook to remember and put to the test the theory of Aristotle. Check especially if what you learned follows the outline of the general to the particular. Ask for help from your teacher to organize content that reminds you according to this methodology. After that, record the methods used by teachers: what were those who started their contents caught by general and later added the details. Explain the main points of Plato's Theory of Forms. Justify the criticism that Aristotle is to Plato. Provide the answers to the class for discussion. The rules for the discussion was the introduction to this book. The Aristotelian Logic The limits of this paper do not allow a detailed expose many important points of the Aristotelian view of knowledge. But we could not say a word about Aristotelian logic. Before there was no philosopher Aristotle who cared about the formalization of rules that could guarantee the validity of reasoning and argument. This is properly the subject of logic. As highlighted Zingano (2002), for Aristotle was more challenging to find a way to organize the mass of data of knowledge than actually reunite them. In this sense, Aristotle realized that was needed a classification of knowledge: he divided the ci- ences in theoretical (mathematics, physics and metaphysics), practices (ethics and Philosophy and Method
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 15.1 17.1 19.1 20.1 22.1 24.1 26.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1
cha je ono što znamo prema onome na što zapravo jesu. Pokušajte ne napraviti zbrku na ovom mjestu. To je razlog zašto su najbolji učenici u školi su oni koji razviju naviku prati glavne točke sadržaja. Zlatno pravilo je: razumjeti glavne pojmove, općenitije, tek tada je posvećen proučavanju pojedinih točaka. Često ti studenti uzimaju "pametni", ali nije to to. Stjecanje znanja je pitanje kako učiti sredstva. Mnogi koji zauzimaju prva mjesta u vestibularni ne posvećuju više od četiri sata rada dnevno u razdoblju pripreme, koji vrijeđa druge u istom razdoblju dolaze studirati 10 sati dnevno, a ne postići iste rezultate. debata Filozofija www.gallery.spacebar pročitao ono što je prethodno bilo navedeno o procesu znanja i razvijati na sljedeća pitanja: napraviti anketu sa svojim kolegama na nekim sadržaja fizike, matematike, povijesti, itd.., što sam studirao. Napišite u bilježnicu se sjetiti i staviti na kušnju teoriju Aristotela. Provjerite pogotovo ako se ono što ste naučili slijedi obris general posebno. tražiti pomoć od svog učitelja za organiziranje sadržaja koji će vas podsjetiti prema ovoj metodologiji. Nakon toga, snimanje metode koje se koriste od strane nastavnika: ono što su oni koji su započeli svoje sadržaje uhvaćen od strane generala i kasnije dodao pojedinosti. Objasnite glavne točke Platonova teorija o Oblicima. Opravdati kritike da je Aristotel je do Platona. Osigurati odgovore na klasi za raspravu. Pravila za raspravu bio je uvod u ovu knjigu. aristotelovska logika Granice tog papira ne dopuštaju detaljnije izlagati mnoge važne točke gledišta aristotelijanskom znanja. No, ne bismo mogli reći ni riječ o Aristotelove logike. Prije nije bilo filozofa Aristotela koji je brinuo o formalizacije pravila koja bi mogla jamčiti valjanost razmišljanja i argumenta. To je ispravno predmet logike. Kako je istaknuto Zingano (2002), za Aristotela je veći izazov pronaći način da organizira masu podataka o znanju nego zapravo ih ujediniti. U tom smislu, Aristotel je shvatio da je potrebno klasifikaciju znanja: on je podijelio CI- ma u teorijska (matematika, fizika i metafizika), vježbe (etika i Filozofija i Metoda