http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-234.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1
Common Sense and Science Science is an extension intellectualized rupture or common sense, the answer seems obvious, but you need to think the problem. The obvious here is saying that it is breaking, critical common sense, because it is clear that science is a cumulative know much more solid than the citizen know that normally lives his life, has its source of information on TV and cares little for scientific literature. But what is the sense of this difference? Did scientists do science for the sake of knowing for knowledge? Will consider themselves above the ordinary mortals? The inevitable first question is this: Science is a way of knowing that is not built at random, but is obtained through a scientific method. The scientific method requires a considerable amount of penetration, analysis, experimentation and organization. You can even say that these features are also present in the common sense, but it is not the same thing. Common sense is characterized by an attachment to images, sensations and a disinterest in seeking explanations and justifications. This scheme of thought is not exclusive of everyday life. Common sense is also a way of thinking that refuses to accept the challenge judicious criticism with arguments and demonstrations. When Pope Urban VIII, in the seventeenth century, with polemical Galileo and prevented him from conveying their views on the physics of the universe, which provided the food attack Urban Galileo was just a vision of common sense and millennia old. According to this view there is no contradiction between what the bible says, what he taught Aristotle and the dogmas of the Church. The theses of Galileo challenged this thought, showed serious cracks in the geocentric theory of the universe and indicated errors of Aristotle. Scientists, meanwhile, also used the scheme images, especially when they need to illustrate a complicated chemical or physical system, whose structure is too complex to be expos-
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1
Zdrav razum i znanost Znanost je proširenje Intellectualized puknuti ili zdrav razum, odgovor je očigledno, ali treba misliti problem. Očito je ovdje rekao da se rješava, kritički zdrav razum, jer je jasno da je znanost kumulativna znam puno čvršće od građanina znati da normalno živi svoj život, ima svoj izvor informacija o TV-u i brine malo za znanstvene literature. No, ono što je smisao ove razlike? Je li znanstvenici znanost poradi znajući za znanjem? Hoće li se smatraju iznad običnih smrtnika? Prvi neizbježno pitanje je ovo: Znanost je način znajući da nije izgrađena na slučajan, nego se dobiva kroz znanstvene metode. Znanstvena metoda zahtijeva znatnu količinu penetracija, analize, pokusa i organizaciju. Možete čak reći da te značajke su također prisutne u zdravom razumu, ali to nije ista stvar. Zdrav razum karakterizira privitak slike, doživljaja i nezainteresiranosti u traženju objašnjenja i opravdanja. Ova shema misli nije isključiva svakodnevnog života. Zdrav razum je također način razmišljanja koji odbija prihvatiti izazov razumnu kritiku sa argumentima i demonstracija. Kada je papa Urban VIII, u sedamnaestom stoljeću, s polemičkom Galilea i spriječila ga prenoseći svoja stajališta o fizici svemira, koja je dala hranu napad Urban Galileo je bio samo vizija zdravog razuma i tisućljeća stari. Prema tom gledištu ne postoji proturječnost između onoga što Biblija kaže, ono što je podučavao Aristotel i dogme Crkve. Teze Galilea izazvao ovu misao, pokazali su ozbiljne napukline u teoriji geocentričnog svemira i naznačeno pogreške Aristotela. Znanstvenici u međuvremenu također koristiti shemi slike, pogotovo kada im je potrebno kako bi ilustrirao kompliciranu kemijski ili fizički sustav, čija struktura je previše složen da se Sajmovi-