http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-167.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 7.2 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1
debate Compare the fundamentals and practices adopted in the direct democracy of the Athenians (equality, isegoria, dokimasia, ekklesia), with those existing in contemporary political life (representative democracy). Do not forget to record in writing the ideas that emerged in the debate. The rules for the discussion was the introduction to this book. - The Importance of Rhetoric for the Athenians One of the great merits of Athenian democracy was the fact that she did not value only the final result of political action, ie, the decisions taken and implemented valued, above all, the process of formation and strengthening of democracy through assemblies, public debates and the defense argued the positions of citizens. Now, if the public authority was and collective, not private, if the resolutions were collectively gave then think, talk and discuss as well, in order to persuade the opponent, conditions were absolutely needed to participate in politics. Therefore, the rhetoric occupied a central role in the political life of Athens and was the basis of his education. Wolff states that "it is remarkable that this link between the politician and the language is entered in the same institution isegoria: all men, and all men equally, just as they speak, they are able to live in the community and, precisely because they speak and can say the just and the unjust, to participate in the power of that community. Aristotle argues that "the speech serves to clarify the useful and harmful and, therefore, fair and unfair.'s That towards other living beings, man has its peculiarities: it just feels good and evil, the righteous and unjust is the community that produces these feelings family and the city. (Aristotle, Politics, p. 55, 1253rd -10) The political rhetoric was the instrument by which the Greeks interpreted the past, but without attachment to it, and built their awareness of this with the ultimate goal of designing the future of political community. Pericles speaking to the Athenians on the hill of the Pnyx
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 7.2 8.1 9.1 9.2 10.1 11.1 12.1
debata Usporedite osnove i prakse usvojene u izravnoj demokraciji Atenjanima (ravnopravnost, isegoria, dokimasia, ekklesia), s onima koji postoje u suvremenom političkom životu (predstavnička demokracija). Ne zaboravite zabilježiti u pisanom obliku ideje koje su se pojavile u raspravi. Pravila za raspravu bio je uvod u ovu knjigu. - Važnost retorike za Atenjane Jedan od velikih zasluga atenske demokracije je činjenica da ona nije vrijednost samo konačni rezultat političkog djelovanja, tj. odluke poduzete i provedene cijenjeni, prije svega, proces oblikovanja i jačanja demokracije skupštinama, javnih debata Obrana je tvrdila i stavove građana. Sada, ako je tijelo javne vlasti je i kolektivni, a ne privatno, ako rezolucije zajedno su dali onda razmišljati, razgovarati i raspravljati, kao i, kako bi se uvjeriti protivnika, apsolutno su uvjeti potrebni da sudjeluju u politici. Dakle, retorika zauzeli središnju ulogu u političkom životu Atene, a bila je temelj njegova obrazovanja. Wolff navodi da "je nevjerojatno da je ta veza između političara i jezik je ušao u istoj instituciji isegoria: svi ljudi, i svi ljudi jednako, baš kao što oni govore, oni su u stanju živjeti u zajednici i, upravo zbog toga što oni govore i mogu reći samo i nepravedno, da sudjeluju u vlasti te zajednice. Aristotel tvrdi da je "govor služi pojasniti korisno i štetno i, dakle, fer i nepravedno je da prema drugim živim bićima, čovjek ima svoje osobitosti:. Samo se osjeća dobro i zlo, pravedni i nepravedno je zajednica koja proizvodi ove osjećaje obitelj i grad. (Aristotel, Politika, str. 55, 1253. Politička retorika je instrument kojim su Grci tumačiti prošlost, ali bez vezanosti za njega, i izgradili svoju svijest o tome s krajnjim ciljem projektiranja buduće političke zajednice. Periklo govorio Atenjanima na brdu Pnyx