http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-229.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1
tions by means of examples taken from Ptolemy and Galileo. You will find some issues that present themselves to the philosophy of science, as well as some possibilities of discussion that can be expanded classroom discussion. The leaves, Saber thinking science: it starts with the problem of induction, so a discussion of the inductive method, its validity, its reach, its problems. Then, what we find is a differentiation / conceptualization of science, common sense, scientific production and its social, historical, political and economic. Thomas Kuhn and Gaston Bachelard are basically philosophers of science who assist us in the discussion. Kuhn, takes up the concepts of paradigm, normal science, the scientific revolution and incommensurability. Bachelard, we work the concepts of epistemological rupture, discontinuity, epistemological obstacle and not philosophy. In Sheets titled Bioethics, philosophy of science appears as a possibility for a critical look at the scientific. The idea is to conduct an inquiry on the risks, consequences, interests that permeate our time, whose development techno-alarma, firstly, by presenting solutions to health problems, technical problems and use of natural resources and on the other, to be subjected to market interest without parameters ethical, social justifications and concerns with long-term consequences of the conditions of life of the animals, biodiversity and the man himself on planet Earth. Within this perspective, bioethics, as a problem of philosophy of science is the question of responsibility and authority of the physician in the right and duty of the patient as well as the interventions and acceptable limits of certain experiences, such as abortion, artificial insemination and sterilization; choice and pre-determination of sex; euthanasia; breaks patents; research projects on genetics (stem cells, transgenic animals and human cloning); biopiracy, use of animals and humans as guinea pigs, etc.., which are discussed or cited throughout the paper and can be further developed in the classroom.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1
ma pomoću primjera iz Ptolomeja i Galileja. Naći ćete neke probleme koje se predstaviti na filozofiju znanosti, kao i neke mogućnosti rasprave koja može biti proširen razrednu raspravu. Lišće, Saber razmišljanje znanosti: ona počinje s problemom indukcije, tako da rasprava o induktivne metode, njegova važenja, njegov domet, njegovi problemi. Zatim, ono što smo pronašli je diferencijacija / konceptualizacija znanosti, zdrav razum, znanstvene produkcije i njezine društvene, povijesne, političke i ekonomske. Thomas Kuhn i Gaston Bachelarda su u osnovi filozofi znanosti koji su nam pomogli u raspravu. Kuhn, zauzima koncepte paradigme, normalne znanosti, znanstvena revolucija i neizmjernost. Bachelarda, radimo koncepte epistemološkom rupture, diskontinuiteta, epistemološke prepreke, a ne filozofije. U listova pod nazivom bioetika, filozofija znanosti pojavljuje kao mogućnost za kritički pogled na znanstvenom. Ideja je da provede istragu o rizicima, posljedicama, interesima koji prožimaju naše vrijeme, čiji je razvoj tehno-alarma, kao prvo, uz predočenje rješenja zdravstvenih problema, tehničkih problema i korištenju prirodnih resursa, as druge strane, da se podvrgnuti tržišne kamate bez parametara etičkih, društvenih opravdanjima i brigama s dugoročnim posljedicama uvjeta života za životinje, bioraznolikost i sam čovjek na planeti Zemlji. U toj perspektivi, bioetika, kao problem filozofije znanosti je pitanje odgovornosti i ovlasti liječnika u pravo i dužnost pacijenta, kao i intervencija i prihvatljivih granica određenih iskustava, kao što su pobačaj, umjetna oplodnja, a sterilizacije; izbor i unaprijed određivanje spola; eutanaziju; pauze patenti, istraživačkih projekata o genetici (matične stanice, transgenička životinje i ljudskog kloniranja);. biopiratstvom, korištenje životinja i ljudi kao zamorcima, itd., koji se su raspravljali ili citirani tijekom rada i može se dalje razvijati u učionici.