http___luckyladyscharm.info_hr_den-sakalte-solomonic-by-gate-pa-megiddo__1.xml
1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 8.2 9.1 9.2 10.1 10.2 10.3 11.1 11.2 12.1 12.2 12.3 13.1 13.2 14.1 15.1 15.2 16.1 16.2 16.3 17.1 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5
Need to relax in online casino? Subscribe to the most fortunate casinos 2018. SPLASH YOUR PASSION NOW! Redaktorens note: Den “Solomonic & rdquo; ports on Hazor, Gezer and Megiddo has long been controversial for their apparent confirmation of biblical accounts. Under, argumenterer David Ussishkin, excavator to Lachish and Megiddo, the sekskammerede gate structure on Megiddo not dating to the tenth century and Solomon's government. What is the right relationship between archeology and the Bible, and that takes precedence over historical reconstruction? Den caked "Solomonic & rdquo; By-gate pa Megiddo. After the discovery of 1958 the sekskammerede port pa Hazor, published Yigael Yadin his famous concept similar Hazor, Megiddo and Gezers sekskammerede port 1 Kings 9:15 which says that Solomon built three cities. This equation confirmed presence disturbances of Megiddo gates of Salomon's government. The author star n r the six-conditioned chamber port under renewed utgravninger. Megiddo Stratum VA-IVB, the administrative city, which was characterized by palaces, was awarded by Yadin to Salomon's government, mens Stratum IVA, the overlying town of stall, was assigned by him to Omride kings. While no city wall of Stratum VA-IVB was discovered in Chicago excavations, a massive stone walled & ndash; City-Wall 325 & ndash; Surrounded by the later Stratum IVA-town. Based on the above equation and faith in the gate to be v re Solomonic date, suggested Yadin that the sekskammerede port had been built in Stratum VA-IVB, Solomons city. He assumed that a case feed city-wall that had not been separated by University of Chicago researchers, must have surrounded Stratum VA-IVB town, and that the port had v rt connected to the. Based on Chicago excavation report showed Yohanan Aharoni in 1972 the sekskammerede port was connected to the later Stratum IVA City Wall 325. Accepting the concept that 1 Kong 9:15 dated gates of Solomon's government, granted he Stratum IVA to the same period, and the former Stratum VA-IVB to David's government. Yadin suggested na that the port must have had two phases (characterized by two gulvnivaer) in its history: The former Solomonic phase, wherein the port was connected to the assumed case feed city walls of Stratum VA IVB; and a second level, marked by Yadin Stratum IVAI, where the port was connected to the City Wall 325 Stratum IVA. Yadin biblical and stratigraphic concepts are accepted today by many l RDE. Reconstruction of the port complex. Den caked "Solomonic & rdquo; Internal door with six chambers is top (by Megiddo II: Fig. 107). I 1980 I published a detailed article on the so-called "Solomonic & rdquo; street and date. After thirty-three years, including twenty years with renewed excavation pa Megiddo, I keep still my views. I believe that the methodological approximation adopted by Yadin and his trailer is incorrect. The starting point for the discussion on the port and its date live v re stratigraphic evidence from Megiddo, instead of comparable porte from elsewhere and biblical texts. Important as they are, the others will in any evaluation. Analysis of excavation data, uncovered and published by Chicago researchers, leads to a clear, unequivocal picture. The sekskammerede port formed inner port housing of a larger complex containing an outer port, an internal port and a farm space therebetween. The excavated articles of the sekskammerede port forms the solid basic structure of the building. The gate had a single floor in its history; The lower floor which Yadin realized, belonged in fact a former port structure. Bymur 325 tilhort until the porttarn, and it is clear that both wall and towers at the same time were built. The father of the sekskammerede port during excavation. The man standing on the right tarn; The tilstotende City Wall 325 can be seen to the right (by Megiddo II: figure 109). A previous case feed wall was not distinguished here. Summary, den caked "Solomonic & rdquo; by-street belonged to the stable town Stratum IVA, dated much later than Salomon, likely to Iron IIb period, to it 8. arhundre BCE. And what about the biblical historiography? In my opinion has the date of the Megiddo gate almost no impact on the serious problems related to the understanding of Salomon rich and the interpretation of the biblical text. These grooves templates must be evaluated separately by biblical l RDE, rather than by archaeologists. David Ussishkin er professor emeritus of archeology pa tel Aviv universitetet. If you enjoyed this article, please sign up on for a receive The Ancient Near East today via e-mail! It is vart FREE Monthly newsletter. The articles will be delivered direct to your inbox, along with links to news, findings and resources about Old Near East. Just gave here a register. All content provided on this blog, is for information purposes. The American schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) makes no express accuracy or completeness of the information on this blog or found by a follow any links on this blog. ASOR will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information. ASOR is not responsible for loss, injury or damage on the display or use of this information. The opinions expressed by bloggers and those providing comments, are theirs alone, and do not reflect the Azores opinions or any employee thereof.
1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 9.1 9.2 9.3 10.1 10.2 11.1 11.2 11.3 12.1 12.2 13.1 14.1 15.1 15.2 15.3 16.1 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5
Redaktorens bilješka: Den „salomonskog & rdquo; porta na hasorski, Gezer i Megido je dugo bio kontroverzni za svoje prividne potvrda biblijske račune. Pod, ispod, argumenterer David Ussishkin, bager u Lakiš i Megido, sekskammerede vrata struktura na Megida ne datira iz desetog stoljeća i Solomonovog vlade. Koji je pravi odnos između arheologije i Biblije, i da ima prednost nad povijesnom rekonstrukcijom? Den caked „salomonskog & rdquo; Do-vrata godišnje Megida. Nakon otkrića 1958 sekskammerede luka godišnje Hasor, objavljeno Yigael Yadin njegov poznati koncept sličan Hasor, Megida i Gezers sekskammerede luka 1 kraljevi 9:15 koji kaže da je Salomon sagradio tri grada. Ova jednadžba je potvrdio prisutnost poremećaja Megida vrata Salomon vlade. Autor zvijezda n r šest klimatizacijom komore luku pod obnovljenim utgravninger. Megido sloju VA-IVB, administrativno grad, koji karakterizira palače, je nagrađen od strane Yadin se Salomon vladi, Muške sloju Iva, ležećeg grad staje, je dodjeljuje mu se Omride kraljevima. Iako nema gradski zid od Stratum VA-IV B otkriven je u Chicagu iskopavanja, golemi kamen uzidan & ndash; Grad-zid 325 & ndash; Okružen kasnije Stratum IVA-grad. Temeljem gornje jednadžbe i vjere u vrata da se v re salomonskog dan, predložio Yadin da sekskammerede luka je sagrađena Stratum VA-IVB, solomons grad. On pretpostavlja da je slučaj hraniti grad-zid koji nije odvojen Sveučilišta istraživača Chicago, mora da je okružen sloju VA-IVb grad, i da je luka imala v rt spojen na. Na temelju Chicago iskopa izvješća pokazala Yohanan Aharoni u 1972 sekskammerede luka je povezan s kasnijim sloju IVA gradskim zidinama 325. Prihvaćajući koncept koji 1 Kong 9:15 datiran vrata Salomonova vlade, odobren je sloj Iva na isto razdoblje, i bivši sloju VA-IVB Davidovom vlade. Yadin sugerirao na koji port morao imati dvije faze (naznačen dva gulvnivaer) u svojoj povijesti: Bivši salomonskog faza, naznačen time što je priključak spojen na pretpostavljene slučaju hrane zidina Stratum VA IVB; i drugi stupanj, obilježen Yadin Stratum IVAI, gdje je luka bila povezana s gradskim zidinama 325 stratum Iva. Yadin biblijski i stratigrafski koncepti su prihvaćeni i danas mnogi l RDE. Obnova luke kompleksa. Den caked „salomonskog & rdquo; Unutarnja vrata sa šest komora vrh (po megidonskoj II: smokva. 107). ja 1980 objavio sam detaljan članak o tzv „salomonskog & rdquo; ulica i datum. Nakon trideset i tri godine, uključujući dvadeset godina obnovljena iskopa godišnje Megida, Držim dalje moje stavove. Vjerujem da je metodološki aproksimacija usvojila Yadin i njegova prikolica je netočna. Polazna točka za raspravu o luci i datum uživo v re stratigrafski dokaz iz Megida, umjesto usporedivog porte od drugdje i biblijskih tekstova. Važno kao što su oni, a drugi će u svakom ocjenjivanju. Analiza iskopa podataka, otkrio i objavio istraživači Chicago, dovodi do jasno, jasna slika. Sekskammerede otvor oblikovan unutarnji port kućište većeg kompleksa koji sadrži vanjski priključak, interni port i farma prostor izmedu njih. Iskopanog članci sekskammerede luke formira čvrstu osnovnu strukturu zgrade. Vrata imao jedan kat u svojoj povijesti; Donja etaža koja Yadin shvatio, pripadao u stvari bivši struktura luka. Bymur 325 tilhort do porttarn, i jasno je da su oba zida i kule u isto vrijeme grade. Otac sekskammerede luke tijekom iskopa. Čovjek koji je stajao na desnoj Tarn; Tilstotende Grad Zid 325 može se vidjeti na desno (po megidonskoj II: brojka 109). Prethodna zid slučaj feed nije ovdje razlikovati. rezime, den caked „salomonskog & rdquo; po ulici pripadao je stabilan grada Stratum IVA, datira mnogo kasnije nego Salomon, vjerojatno Iron IIb razdoblju, do 8. arhundre pne. A što je s biblijskim historiografiji? Po mom mišljenju ima datum Megida vrata gotovo nikakav utjecaj na ozbiljne probleme u vezi s razumijevanjem Salomon bogate i tumačenje biblijskog teksta. Ovi utori predlošci moraju biti ocijenjeni odvojeno biblijskim l RDE, nego arheolozi. David Ussishkin profesor er emeritus arheologija godišnje Tel Aviv universitetet. Ako ste uživali u ovaj članak, prijavite se na za primanje Bliskom istoku danas putem e-maila! To je VART SLOBODAN mjesečni newsletter. Članci će biti isporučena izravno u vaš poštanski sandučić, zajedno s linkovima na vijesti, nalaz i resurse o starom Bliskom istoku. Samo je dao tu evidenciju. Sav sadržaj pod uvjetom da na ovom blogu, je u svrhu informiranja. Američki škola Oriental Research (ASOR) ne čini izričitu točnost ili potpunost informacija na ovom blogu ili pronašao nastavak veza na ovom blogu. ASOR neće biti odgovoran za bilo kakve pogreške ili propuste u ovom informacija. ASOR nije odgovoran za gubitak, ozljede ili oštećenja na zaslonu ili korištenja ovih informacija. Mišljenja iznesena od strane blogera i onih koji pružaju komentari, su njihovi sami, i ne odražavaju mišljenja Azori ili bilo koje njegove zaposlenik.