http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-193.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1
LECAM fair and unfair, and put in place the conditions to resolve the controversy caused by the violation of property leads men to join. The establishment of the state from the social contract is made on the basis of consent, so that the body politic established exert the function of guaranteeing life, liberty, and especially the natural right to property. The foundations of liberal theory are well placed. THE SOCIAL CONTRACT Jean-Jacques Rousseau notes the contradiction that characterizes life in society to wonder about the legitimacy of political authority. Man is born free, and everywhere is in chains. What is believed Lord of the others, it remains more of a slave than they. As this change stemmed? Ignore it. What can legitimize it? I think I can solve this issue. If only consider the force and effect that results from it, say: "When a nation is obliged to obey and do, act rightly, so that yoke can flip and do, act better, because recovering liberty by the same right that snatched him, or he has the right to retomála or had not subtract from it. The social order, however, is a sacred right which underlies all others. This right, however, does not originate from nature: based, therefore, on conventions. It is, therefore, to know that these conventions are. Suppose men coming to that point where barriers detrimental to their conservation in the state of nature surpass, by its resistance, the forces that each individual has to remain in that state. Then, this primitive state can no longer exist, and mankind, if not change his way of life, perish. Now, as men can not engender new forces, but only unite and direct existing ones, they have no other way to save themselves but forming, by aggregation, a set of forces that can overcome the resistance, pushing them to one mobile, leading them to operate a concert. This sum of forces can only arise from the competition of many, being, however, the strength and freedom of each individual primary instruments of preservation, how could he commit them without prejudice and without neglecting the care yourself to? This difficulty led back to my subject, may be stated as follows: Find a form of association which defends and protects the person and goods of each associate with all the common force, and in which each, uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself, thus remaining as free as before. That's the fundamental problem whose solution provides the social contract.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1
LECAM fer i pošteno, i staviti na mjesto su uvjeti za rješavanje kontroverze uzrokovane povredom imovine dovodi ljude da se pridruže. Uspostava države iz društvenog ugovora donosi se na temelju odobrenja, tako da političko tijelo osnovano izvršiti funkciju jamči život, slobodu, a posebno u prirodnim pravo na imovinu. Temelji liberalne teorije su dobro postavljeni. Društveni ugovor Jean-Jacques Rousseau primjećuje kontradikciju koja obilježava život u društvu da se pitaju o legitimnosti političke vlasti. Čovjek je rođen slobodan, a svugdje je u okovima. Što se vjeruje Gospodar drugima, ona ostaje više rob nego oni. Kao što je ova promjena proizlazi? Ignorirajte ga. Što može legitimirati? Mislim da se može riješiti ovaj problem. Ako samo uzeti u obzir snagu i utjecaj koji proizlazi iz nje, kaže: "Kad narod je dužan poštivati i činiti, djelovati pravom, tako da se može okrenuti jaram i da, djeluje bolje, jer se oporavlja slobodu od strane istog tog prava ga zgrabi, ili je on ima pravo na retomála ili nisu oduzeti od nje. Društveni poredak, međutim, je sveto pravo na kojem počivaju sve ostale. To pravo, međutim, ne potječu iz prirode: temelji, dakle, na konvencijama. To je, dakle, da znaju da ove konvencije su. Pretpostavimo da muškarci dolaze do te točke gdje prepreke štetno za njihovo očuvanje u prirodnom stanju nadmašiti, po svojoj otpornosti, snage koje svaki pojedinac mora ostati u tom stanju. Zatim, ovaj primitivni država više ne može postojati, i čovječanstvo, ako ne i promijeniti svoj način života, propada. Sada, kao što muškarci ne mogu izazvati nove snage, ali samo ujedine i usmjerava postojeće, oni nemaju drugog načina da se spasi, ali formiranja, prema agregacije, set snaga koja može prevladati otpor, da ih gura jedan mobitel, što je dovelo ih da rade koncert. Ova suma sila može nastati samo iz natjecanja mnogih, što, međutim, snaga i sloboda svakog pojedinca primarnih instrumenata u očuvanju, kako bi ih počine bez predrasuda i bez zanemarivanja brigu za sebe? Ova poteškoća je vodio natrag u mojoj temi, može se konstatirati kako slijedi: Pronađite oblik udruge koja brani i štiti osobu i dobra svakog suradnika sa svim zajedničkim snagu, iu kojoj je svaki koji je objedinjavao sve, ipak pokorava samo sebe, dakle preostalo slobodni kao prije. To je osnovni problem čije rješenje daje društvenog ugovora.