http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-131.html_1.xml
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2
William of Ockham, like other medieval philosophers, makes use of the Christian revelation, therefore the Bible as revealed truth. That's why we constantly uses biblical quotes to support his thesis. In the above quote, William of Ockham is discussing with Moses that there was a law that was oppressive and that Jesus came precisely to free man from such bondage and servitude. Therefore, the papal power can not present themselves in any way as a weight to men, since William of Ockham says that the oppression of the papal power is detrimental not only to Christians but to the entire society. The law of Christ would be a right of every hideous, and much larger than the old law, if the pope, by precept and ordinance of Christ, had such fullness of power to be allowed by right in both the temporal and the spiritual, without exception, everything that is not opposed to the divine law and the natural law. If so, all Christians, both emperors and kings and their subjects, would be slaves of the pope, in the strictest sense of the term, because there has never been nor will there be someone who, in law, have power over any man greater than he what about all that he can not repugnant to natural law and the divine. William of Ockham has a clear concern to limit papal power to the natural and divine law. This is because in the fourteenth century the Church's power was immense and there was the assertion that the papal power was above the temporal power, because it is one of divine origin; seeks to dismantle the thesis of the superiority of the spiritual over the temporal power, situating them as distinct powers and legitimate, and that both can not go beyond its limits, as this contravenes the right to freedom of men, something also assumed by God and nature. By law not only evangelical Christians do not become servants of the pope, as well as the pope can not, the plenitude of power, encumber any Christian, against their will, without guilt and without cause, with the cultic ceremonies much weight as were the old law. And if you try, this fact has no legal value, and by divine right, is null. William of Ockham puts in place the papal power, ie, the law of the Gospel are free and as such must be respected and any attempt to impose yokes against the same law are void, worthless and weigh the responsibility of those who do , even the pope. Hannah Arendt (1906 - 1975) in the work between the past and the future , when discussing the chapter, What is freedom? says:
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 8.2
Vilim Ockhama, kao i drugih srednjovjekovnih filozofa, čini korištenje kršćanske objave, dakle Bibliju kao što je otkrio istinu. To je razlog zašto smo stalno koristi biblijske citate koje podržavaju njegovu tezu. U gornjem citatu, Vilim Ockhama je razgovarao s Mojsijem da je zakon koji je opresivni i da je Isus došao upravo na slobodan čovjek od takvog ropstva i potčinjenosti. Stoga, papinska vlast ne može se predstaviti na bilo koji način kao težine na muškarce, budući Vilim Ockhama kaže da je ugnjetavanje papinske moći štetno ne samo za kršćane, nego cijelog društva. Zakon o Kristu će biti pravo svakog grozni, i još mnogo veće od starog zakona, ako je papa, po propisu, te pravilnik o Kristu, imao takvu puninu moći biti dopušteno prava u oba vremenska i duhovna, bez iznimke, sve ono što se ne protivi božanskom zakonu i naravnog zakona. Ako je tako, svi kršćani, oba carevi i kraljevi i njihovi predmeti, biti robovi pape, u najužem smislu riječi, jer tamo nikada nije bila, niti će tamo biti netko tko, u zakonu, imaju moć nad svakom čovjeku veći od njega što je sve da on ne može mrsko prirodnom pravu i božanskom. Vilim Ockhama ima jasnu zabrinutost da ograniči papinsku moć prirodnog i božanskog zakona. To je zato što je u četrnaestom stoljeću crkvena vlast bila ogromna, a tu je tvrdnju da je papinska vlast bila iznad temporalne moći, jer je jedan od božanskog podrijetla; nastoji srušiti tezu o nadmoćnosti duhovnog nad svjetovnu moć, stavimo ih kao posebne ovlasti i legitimne, te da i ne može ići dalje od svojih granica, što je u suprotnosti s pravom na slobodu ljudima, nešto što je također preuzela od Boga i prirode. (...) Po zakonu ne samo evanđeoski kršćani ne postali sluge Pape, kao i papa ne može, puninu vlasti, zalaganje bilo kršćanski, protiv svoje volje, bez grižnje savjesti i bez razloga, s kultnih obreda više na težini kao što su bili stari zakon. A ako pokušate, ta činjenica nema pravnu vrijednost, i prema božanskom pravu, null. Vilim Ockhama stavlja u mjestu papinske moći, odnosno, zakon Evanđelja su besplatni, a kao takva mora se poštovati i svaki pokušaj da se nametne jaram protiv istog zakona su ništavi, bezvrijedno i vagati odgovornost onih koji su to , čak i papa. Hannah Arendt (1906 - 1975) u radu između prošlosti i budućnosti , kada se raspravlja o poglavlje, Što je sloboda? , kaže: