http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-183.html_1.xml
1.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1
Machiavelli was not, in his time, something purely bookish ', a monopoly of isolated thinkers, a secret book that started circulating among applicable Writing things, Machiavelli intends to teach, educate, but who do not already know, or would be a "ruling elite" necessarily. For Gramsci does not seem that the intent of Machiavelli. What he proposes goes beyond, has greater purpose. Consider the words of Antonio Gramsci: One can therefore assume that Machiavelli has in mind "who do not know," he intends to politically educate "those who do not know." Political education non-negative, those who hate tyrants, as Foscolo could understand, but positive, who should recognize as necessary means certain, even if the tyrants themselves, because you want certain purposes. Who was born in the tradition of the men of government, absorbing the whole complexion of education in the family environment, which dominate the dynastic interests or property, almost automatically acquires the characteristics of realistic politician. Who, therefore, "do not know"? the revolutionary class of the time, the "people" and "nation" Italian urban democracy that is expressed through Savonarola and Pier Soderini and not of Castruccio and Valentino. Can deduce that Machiavelli seeks to persuade these forces need to have a "boss" who knows what he wants and how to get it, and accept it with enthusiasm, even if their actions may be or appear to contradict the ideology spread at the time: religion. In Machiavelli, there is construction policy autonomously, based on reality, but also the need to change this reality to achieve the greatest challenge: the unification of Italy and the founding of the Italian state. Arriving at night, I go back to my house and get in my workroom. Shooting my clothes covered in dirt and dust and seen my garments worthy of pontifical and royal courts. Thus, suitably attired, visit the princely courts of the ancient Greeks and Romans. I affectionately received by them and I cherish me the only food to me appropriate and for which I was born. I do not acanho to talk to them and ask the reasons for their actions, and they with all their humanity, answer me. So for 4 hours do not feel suffering, forget all the troubles, I can not remember poverty and even death frightens me / ... /. It's the story that drives the ruler Machiavelli to seek lessons, learning from the actions and intentions of great men. Machiavelli is right in the middle of a "whirlwind" of new ideas that are emerging in transition between old and new, in reassessing the political projects and at the same time in an attempt to maintain. Are emerging states and the monarchy is losing its legitimacy by tradition or blood lineage to found-
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1
Machiavelli nije bio, u svoje vrijeme, nešto čisto knjiško ", monopol izoliranih mislilaca, tajna knjiga koja je počela kruži među" (Gramsci, 1991, str. 10). Primjenjuju Pisanje stvari, Machiavelli namjerava učiti, educirati, ali koji ne znate, ili će biti "vladajuća elita" nužno Za Gramsci se ne čini da je namjera Machiavellija što predlaže ide dalje, ima veću svrhu Razmislite riječi Antonio Gramsci...: Stoga se može pretpostaviti da je Machiavelli je na umu ", koji ne znaju," namjerava politički educirati "oni koji ne znaju." Političko obrazovanje ne-negativni, oni koji mrze mučiteljima, kao Foscolova mogao razumjeti, ali pozitivan, koji bi trebao prepoznati kao neophodno sredstvo sigurno, čak i ako su tirani i sami, jer želite da određene svrhe. Tko je rođen u tradiciji ljudi od vlasti, upija cijeli ten obrazovanja u obiteljskom okruženju, koje dominiraju dinastičke interese ili imovinu, gotovo automatski stječe obilježja realan političar. Tko je, dakle, "ne znam"? revolucionarna klasa na vrijeme, "narod" i "nacija" talijanski urbana demokracija koja se izražava kroz Savonarola i Pier Soderiniju a ne Castruccio i Valentino. Mogu zaključiti da Machiavelli nastoji uvjeriti ove snage trebaju imati "šef" koji zna što želi i kako to dobiti, i to prihvatiti s oduševljenjem, čak i ako je njihovo djelovanje može biti ili izgledati kao da proturječe ideologiju proširio na vrijeme: religija. U Machiavellija, postoji politika građenja samostalno, na temelju stvarnosti, ali i potreba da se to promijeni stvarnost kako bi se postigla najveći izazov: ujedinjenje Italije i osnivanje talijanske države. Dolazite noću, idem natrag u moju kuću i dobili u mom radna soba. Pucanje svoju odjeću prekrivena prljavštine i prašine, a vidi moje haljine dostojan papinsku kraljevskim sudovima. Dakle, prikladno odjeven, posjetite kneževske sudove starih Grka i Rimljana. Ja nježno primio njima i ja njegujemo mi samo hranu mi se prikladnim i za koji sam se rodio. Ne acanho razgovarati s njima i pitati razloge za svoje postupke, a oni sa svim svojim čovječnosti, odgovori mi. Tako je za 4 sata ne osjeća patnju, zaboraviti sve probleme, ne mogu se sjetiti siromaštva pa čak i smrt plaši me / ... /. To je priča koja vozi vladara Machiavelli tražiti pouke, učiti iz akcijama i namjerama velikih ljudi. Machiavelli je točno u sredini "vrtloga" novih ideja koje se pojavljuju u tranziciji između starog i novog, u preispitivanja političkih projekata, au isto vrijeme u pokušaju da se održi. Jeste nastajanju država i monarhija gubi svoj legitimitet prema tradiciji ili krvi loze osnovati-