http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_sociologia_hr_sociology-55.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1
And the phase "C" of the deployment of Sociology in Brazil: Already from 1940s new sociologists begin to appear in the Brazilian scenario. This third generation is formed by sociologists who came from different universities, founded in 1930 and inaugurated styles more or less independent of doing sociology. Thus, progressively sociological intellectuals in Brazil begins to take shape. Also begin to emerge styles or trends, which has spurred different "schools" of Sociology in Sao Paulo, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Belo Horizonte and elsewhere. Authors who are part of the third generation, we mention Oliveira Viana, Florestan Fernandes, Guerreiro Ramos, among many others. But let's stop the work of sociologist Florestan Fernandes Paulo an important name of critical sociology in Brazil. What is the purpose of sociology that he presents? Florestan Fernandes was a sociologist who made a continuous questioning of the social reality and theories attempting to explain this reality. The aim of this author was in an intense search investigative and critical reflections go beyond the existing. Florestan Fernandes had as a methodology "talk" so much criticism, with production sociological classic, with the authors cited in the Leaves 02. But see, the dialogue did not occur only with those authors, because the list of classics, mostly modern, is very extensive. Florestan also maintained ongoing dialogue with Brazilian critical. Authors such as Euclides da Cunha and Caio Prado Junior, which we saw earlier, are part of your list of contacts. The dialogue with these authors was critical to its analytical work of movements and struggles in society, especially those waged by the popular sectors. Another critical aspect of their way of doing sociology was his affinity with Marxist thought, especially on how to analyze society, which constituted a kind of "north" critical guiding your thinking. Social changes that have occurred since 1930 in Brazil were also a kind of "engine" for the work of Florestan. But not just for him, because as already mentioned, these changes served as the impetus for sociological work in Brazil as a whole. And it was mainly after 1940, because these changes are very intensified because of increased industrialization and urbanization.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1
I faza "C" od raspoređivanja za sociologiju u Brazilu: Već od 1940 novih sociolozi se početi prikazivati u brazilskom scenariju. Ova treća generacija je formirana od strane sociologa koji su došli iz raznih sveučilišta, osnovana je 1930, a svečano stilove više ili manje neovisno radi sociologiju. Dakle, progresivno sociološki intelektualci u Brazilu počinje dobivati oblik. Također početi rađati stilove ili trendovi, što je potaknulo različite "škole" sociologije u Sao Paulo, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Belo Horizonte i drugdje. Autori koji su dio treće generacije, možemo spomenuti Oliveira Viana, Florestan Fernandes Guerreiro, Ramos, među mnogim drugima. Ali neka je zaustaviti rad sociolog Florestan Fernandes Paulu važno ime kritičke sociologije u Brazilu. Koja je svrha sociologije da on predstavlja? Florestan Fernandes je sociolog koji je napravio kontinuirano propitivanje društvenoj stvarnosti i teorije koje pokušavaju objasniti tu stvarnost. Cilj ovog autora je u intenzivnom traženju istražnih i kritična razmišljanja nadilaze postojeće. Florestan Fernandes je kao metodologija "razgovor" toliko kritika, s proizvodnjom socioloških klasika, s autorima citiranih u lišću 02. Ali vidite, dijalog nije došlo samo od onih autora, jer je popis klasika, uglavnom modernim, vrlo je opsežna. Florestan također održava trajan dijalog s Brazilski kritično. Autori poput Euclides da Cunha i Caio Junior Prado, koji smo vidjeli ranije, su dio vašeg popisa kontakata. Dijalog s tim autorima je presudno za njegovu analitičkom radu pokreta i borbe u društvu, posebno onih koje vodi popularnih sektora. Drugi kritičan aspekt njihovog načina izvođenja sociologiju bio je njegov afinitet s marksističke misli, osobito o tome kako analizirati društvo, što je predstavljalo neku vrstu "sjevera" kritičnom vodilja svoje razmišljanje. Društvene promjene koje su se dogodile od 1930 u Brazilu također neka vrsta "motor" za rad Florestan. No, ne samo za njega, jer kao što je već spomenuto, ove promjene služio kao poticaj za rad u sociološkom Brazilu u cjelini. I to je uglavnom nakon 1940, jer je te promjene vrlo su pojačane zbog povećane industrijalizacije i urbanizacije.