http___logoblink.com_hr_explaining-web20-logos__2.xml
2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 40.2 40.3 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 45.2 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 47.5 48.1 49.1 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 53.1 53.2 53.3 55.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 61.1 62.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 72.1 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 77.1 78.1 79.1
The question: Fashion, decease, necessity or evolution ? Although this ridiculous Apple logo from 1976 looks like 1876 emblem… this picture represents very good the evolution. Apple is a technology company and can afford to redesign its symbol like in the current moment, but companies like UPS will not do this soon because the UPS logo is used on too many print materials and the cost of full-color-print is still times more expansive than the one-color print or the representation of the logo with a cut folio. Also we should add the difficulty of printing perfect or even correct gradients. This is the same reason why Firefox logo is also so colorful and full with gradients. The media where the logo is used defines it’s look. Now let’s talk about the similarities of the web 2.0 logos. Primary characteristics: 1 – usage of gradients 2 – usage of bright colors 3 – usage of non-serif fonts 4 – usage of shadows 5 – reflection ( under or over the body ) 6 – looks like web glossy buttons 7 – often made by a “logo generators” 8 – stands for a website, web service or interface, created after 2004 Non-primary characteristics : 9 – speech bubble shapes 10 – spheres and other easy to fabricate “3d” shapes 11 – usage of strokes 12 – usage of “badges” 13 – small “beta” notice 14 – rounded corners 15 – rectangular background 16 – consist of a small icon + word mark 17 – the word mark writes a strange or non-existing word Here are some logos, defined by the internet users as “web 2.0 logos”, which will illustrate this characteristics: Why people are creating such logos ? Some web 2.0 logos are interesting (e-buddy) , some are even original (flickr). The truth is that most of them are bad designs or just coppies. May be we can blame developers, who are trying to come with a brilliant design idea for a few photoshop minutes or designers who serve the “I want one like this, with the pink R at the end” clients. Anyway – let’s explain the characteristics: 1,2 – privileges of the new media 3 – symbol of new age (serifs are associated with old times) 4,5 – result of a Photoshop usage for a logo tool (the same tool, websites are designed with) 6 – usually one can click on the logo + people like shiny stuff 7 – the tool of everybody who needs a logo, but is not willing to pay a designer. 8 – the name of the website should be clearly declared 9 – community sites are the most popular and therefore need a decent identification like a logo. 10 – people like shiny AND 3D 11 – common feature in Photoshop 12 – nice place to put “BETA” in 13 – “beta” is fashion now 14 – also symbols of the new age + looks more “teen” 15 – rectangular backgrounds are the safety belt for bad designed word mark. 16 – what does your desktop have ? icons. You’ll easy understand and get used to another one. 17 – one can not buy google.com domain name, but boogle.com could be free… “While they are pretty cool, they are all kinda the same.” This is written by the creator a web 2.0 generator . And it says the basic disadvantage of this type of logos. Another approach to understand the psychology of this type of logos is to understand what is web 2.0. Here’s what Wikipedia says about it : Web 2.0 is a trend in World Wide Web technology, and web design, a second generation of web-based communities and hosted services such as social-networking sites, wikis, blogs, and folksonomies, which aim to facilitate creativity, information sharing, collaboration, and sharing among users. It is almost defined as the new era of the World Wide Web. The term became notable after the first O’Reilly Media Web 2.0 conference in 2004. Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not refer to an update to any technical specifications, but to changes in the ways software developers and end-users use webs. According to Tim O’Reilly: “Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. Some technology experts, notably Tim Berners-Lee, have questioned whether one can use the term in a meaningful way, since many of the technology components of “Web 2.0″ have existed since the early days of the Web. May be these sites really need a web 2.0 logos. I don’t know. For all the rest that need a decent logo, but their budget is limited – check www.desbar.eu . This is a DesignBarter forum, where you can ask for your own logo and give credits in return. The moto of this place is “Every good idea deserves a design and every good designer deserves field for action”. The quality of the web 2.0 logos could be easily defined. I don’t see any web 2.0 logos in “www.eulda.com/2007 “, do you ? What does this tell to you :) ? You can make a visualisation of a good ideas without gradients and reflections. If you can not – better visit Logoblink.com more often or never visit it again :) Though, I should admit I have a favorite one – the green Sony Ericsson symbol. It stands just perfect on the phones and in every advertisement. I guess it’s a web 2.0 logo / icon. My answer: web2.0 logos are 4 of them. And, yes, web 2.0 logos are international: US sites Chineese sites French sites Israel sites places from where you can get an extra idea what web 2.0 logos are: www.web2logo.com www.fontshop.com/fontfeed/archives/the-logos-of-web-20 www.logotwo.com/category/blog www.flickr.com/photos/tags/yay2dot0logoparody/interesting Incoming search terms: - internet logos - apple evolution - original apple logo - web 2 0 logos - apple symbol - apple logo evolution - apple emblem - web logo - word logos - Web 2 0 Logo
2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 25.2 25.3 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 40.2 40.3 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 45.2 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 47.5 48.1 49.1 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 52.1 52.2 52.3 52.4 53.1 53.2 53.3 55.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 61.1 62.1 64.1 65.1 66.1 67.1 68.1 69.1 70.1 71.1 72.1 73.1 74.1 75.1 76.1 77.1 78.1 79.1
Pitanje: Moda, preminuti, nužnost ili evolucija? Iako je to smiješno Apple logo od 1976 izgleda 1876 amblem ... ova slika predstavlja vrlo dobru evoluciju. Apple je tvrtka tehnologija i mogu si priuštiti da redizajn svoj simbol kao u sadašnjem trenutku, ali tvrtke poput UPS neće to učiniti uskoro, jer UPS logotip se koristi na previše tiskanih materijala i trošak puni kolor tisak je još puta skuplji nego jedna tiska u boji ili zastupanje logo s cut portfelju. Također bismo trebali dodati poteškoća ispisa spektar ili čak točne nizbrdici. To je isti razlog zašto Firefox logo je isto tako šarene i pune s gradijentima. Mediji gdje logotip koriste definira da je izgled. Sada ćemo govoriti o sličnosti web 2,0 logotipa. Primarni karakteristike: 1 - korištenje gradijentima 2 - korištenje svijetlih boja 3 - korištenje non-serif fontovi 4 - korištenje sjene 5 - refleksije (ispod ili iznad tijela) 6 - izgleda kao web sjajnih gumba 7 - često napravio je "logo generatora" 8 - kratica za web stranice, web servis ili sučelje, nastalo nakon 2004 Non-osnovna obilježja: 9 - govor mjehurić oblici 10 - sfere i drugih lako izmišljati "3D" oblike 11 - korištenje udaraca 12 - uporaba "značke" 13 - mali "beta" obavijest 14 - zaobljenim kutovima 15 - pravokutni pozadina 16 - sastoje se od malih ikona + oznaka riječi 17 - oznaka riječi piše čudne ili nepostojeće riječ Ovdje su neke logotipa, definirane korisnicima interneta kao "web 2.0 logos", koje će ilustrirati ove karakteristike: Zašto ljudi stvaraju takve logotipe? Neke web 2,0 logotipi su zanimljivi (e-buddy), neki su čak i originalni (Flickr). Istina je da je većina od njih su loše izvedbe ili samo coppies. Može biti možemo kriviti programerima, koji pokušavaju doći s briljantnim dizajn ideje za nekoliko minuta photoshop ili dizajnera koji služe "Želim jedan ovako, s ružičastim R na kraju" klijenata. U svakom slučaju - ajmo objasniti karakteristike: 1,2 - privilegije novim medijima 3 - simbol novog doba (serifa su povezani sa starim vremenima) 4,5 - rezultat Photoshop korištenja za logo alat (isti alat, web stranice su dizajnirane s) 6 - obično jedan kliknuti na logo + ljudi poput sjajnih stvari 7 - alat za svakoga tko treba logotip, ali je nisu spremni platiti dizajner. 8 - naziv web stranice treba biti jasno proglasio 9 - community stranice su najpopularniji i stoga je potrebno pristojan identifikaciju poput logotipa. 10 - ljudi vole sjajna i 3D 11 - zajednička značajka u Photoshopu 12 - lijepo mjesto za staviti "Beta" u 13 - "beta" je modni sada 14 - također simboli new age + izgleda više "teen" 15 - pravokutni pozadine su sigurnosni pojas za loše dizajniran riječi marku. 16 - što ne vaš desktop imati? ikone. Možete lako ćete shvatiti i naviknuti na drugu. 17 - nitko ne može kupiti google.com naziv domene, ali boogle.com mogao biti slobodan ... "Dok su prilično cool, oni su svi nekako isti." Ovo je napisao kreator generatora web 2.0 . A ona kaže osnovni nedostatak ove vrste logotipa. Drugi pristup razumjeti psihologiju ove vrste logotipa je razumjeti što je web 2.0. Evo što Wikipedia kaže o tome: Web 2.0 je trend u World Wide Web tehnologiji i web dizajn, druga generacija web-based zajednice i domaćin usluga, kao što su socijalno-umrežavanje sučelja, wikija, blogova i folksonomies, koje imaju za cilj olakšati kreativnost, razmjenu informacija, suradnju , i dijeljenje među korisnicima. To je gotovo je definirana kao novog doba World Wide Weba. Pojam je postao poznat nakon prve O'Reilly Media Web 2.0 konferenciji u 2004. Iako je pojam sugerira nova verzija World Wide Web, to se ne odnosi na ažuriranju svih tehničkih specifikacija, ali do promjena u načinima programerima i krajnjim korisnicima korištenje traka. Prema Timu O'Reilly: "Web 2.0 je poslovna revolucija u računalnoj industriji uzrokovana pokretu na Internet kao platformu i pokušaj da se shvate pravila za uspjeh na toj novoj platformi. Neke tehnologije stručnjaci, osobito Tim Berners-Lee, su pitanje da li se može koristiti termin na smislen način, budući da su mnogi od tehnoloških komponenti "Web 2.0" postoji od ranih dana webu. Može se ove stranice stvarno trebate web 2,0 logotipa. Ne znam. Za sve ostalo koje je potrebno za pristojan logo, ali je njihov proračun je ograničen - provjerite www.desbar.eu . Ovo je DesignBarter forum, gdje možete pitati za svoj logo i dati kredite u povratku. Moto ovog mjesta je "Svaki dobra ideja zaslužuje dizajn i svaki dobar dizajner zaslužuje polje za akciju". Kvaliteta web 2,0 logotipa mogao lako definirati. Ne vidim nikakve web 2,0 logotipe u " www.eulda.com/2007 ", zar ne? Što to reći da vas :)? Možete napraviti vizualizaciju dobrim idejama bez gradijentima i razmišljanja. Ako ne možete - bolje posjetiti Logoblink.com češće ili nikada ga posjetiti opet :) Iako, moram priznati da imam onaj najdraži - zelena Sony Ericsson simbol. To stoji upravo savršen na telefonima iu svakom oglasu. Pretpostavljam da je to logotip web 2.0 / ikona. Moj odgovor: web2.0 logotipi su četiri od njih. I, da, web 2,0 logotipi su međunarodni: Američki stranice Chineese stranice Francuski stranice Izrael stranice mjesta odakle možete dobiti dodatni pojma što web 2,0 logotipi su: www.web2logo.com www.fontshop.com/fontfeed/archives/the-logos-of-web-20 www.logotwo.com / kategorija / blog www.flickr.com/photos/tags/yay2dot0logoparody/interesting Dolazni uvjete za pretraživanje: - internet logotipa - međunarodni logotipa - american logotipa - logotipi SAD - nas logotipa - usa logotipa - jabuka evolucija - Izvorni jabuka logotip - Riječ logotipa - web 2 0 logotipa