http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_educacao-fisica_hr_physical-education-81.html_1.xml
2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 8.1 9.1 9.2 10.1 11.1 12.1 12.2
School In Imperial Brazil (1822-1889), were considered citizens who possessed considerable number of land and slaves, and later those who held properties. There is an important point that you should note: the history of the concept of citizenship, in principle, the term was used as a way to distinguish between citizens and non-citizens. There, as in bourgeois thought, a clear separation between owners and non-owners. owners only who is entitled to full freedom and full citizenship. To non-owners fit a citizenship of second order, while passive citizens, are entitled to protection of his person, his liberty and his belief, but are not eligible to be active members of the sovereign. Currently the official discourse speaks of equality of opportunity and freedom as important values in the pursuit of full citizenship. The question is who has real freedom to enjoy the opportunities, as both the number of slums as the number of people miserable increase every day in cities and the countryside. Being a citizen today, according to the official discourse, seems to be within reach of anyone, because, under the law, all are equal. However, this equality should be pursued through individual effort. Advertisements on individual responsibility in pursuit of citizenship are announced daily with goals quite confusing at first. Second Station - Citizenship: Inclusion exclusionary? The official story was that always written by the winners. Thus, the discourse on the "discovery" of Brazil (1500) or the victories of the great commanders such as Alexander (356-323 BC) and Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), have highlighted before the release of the defeated and humiliated. In Brazil, with the abolition of slavery in 1888, held both by pressures of the slaves themselves, as the English capitalism, estab- leceram up, slowly, typically capitalist relations, including wage labor. For land ownership did not go out of the hands of the elite, were created legal mechanisms that hindered the new citizen access to private property. One example was the Land Law of 1850, which made the illegal possession, requiring those occupying
2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 8.1 9.1 9.2 10.1 11.1 12.1 12.2
Škola U Imperial Brazila (1822-1889), smatrani su građani koji posjeduju znatan broj zemljišta i robovi, a kasnije i oni koji su imali svojstva. Tu je važna točka koju treba imati na umu: povijest koncepta građanstva, u principu, termin je korišten kao način da se napravi razlika između građana i nedržavljane. Tamo, kao iu građanskom misli, jasno razdvajanje između vlasnika i nevlasnika. Vlasnici samo tko ima pravo na punu slobodu i pravo građanstva. Do nevlasnika stati državljanstvo drugog reda, dok su pasivni građani, imaju pravo na zaštitu svoje osobe, svoje slobode i njegova uvjerenja, ali ne mogu biti aktivni članovi suverena. Trenutno službeni diskurs govori o jednakosti mogućnosti i slobode kao važne vrijednosti u traganju za punom državljanstva. Pitanje je tko ima pravu slobodu za uživanje u mogućnosti, kao i na broj slamova kao broj ljudi jadni porast svaki dan u gradovima i sela. Biti građanin danas, prema službenom diskursu, čini se da je unutar dosega bilo tko, jer se, prema zakonu, svi su jednaki. Međutim, ova ravnopravnost treba provoditi kroz individualni napor. Oglasi o individualnoj odgovornosti u potrazi za građanstvo su najavili svakodnevno golova prilično zbunjujuće na prvi. Drugi kolodvor - Državljanstvo: Uključivanje isključujuće? Službena priča je da su uvijek pisali pobjednici. Dakle, diskurs o "otkrića" od Brazila (1500) ili u pobjedama velikih zapovjednika poput Alexandera (356-323 BC) i Napoleona Bonapartea (1769-1821), su istaknute prije objavljivanja poražen i ponižen. U Brazilu, uz ukidanja ropstva u 1888, imala je i pritisci od robova samih, kao engleski kapitalizma, osno- leceram se, polako, obično kapitalističkih odnosa, uključujući i plaćeni rad. Za vlasništvo nad zemljom nije otišao iz ruke u eliti, stvoreni su pravne mehanizme koji su remetile novi građanin pristup privatnom posjedu. Jedan od primjera je Land of Law 1850, koji je i nelegalno posjedovanje, zahtijevaju oni okupatorska