http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-47.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 25.2 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 26.5
Scepticism "The skepticism was developed initially by Pyrrhus (367-275 BC) (...) According to Pirro, the man is not able to reach any truth in science or philosophy. The only" truths "are subjective in nature and not can be considered properly truths as are merely impressions, we do not guarantee certainty. do not have access to the essence of things, know only their appearances. Given this, the wisest man of attitudes is abstention or suspension of judgments (Epoke.) The best-known version of skepticism is probabilism. encourages this version is permanent distrust regarding the truth without, however, completely close the hypothesis that likelihood. So, what you observe is skeptical, suspicious, and expects it unfold for only then rule (in Greek, means skepsis the look of those analyzes, considers). "(Hryniewicz, The pursuit of philosophy as questioning of the various instances of real questions the established order and, as analyzes and ponders, interferes with the action. In its comments on Socrates Merleau-Ponty adds: The irony of Socrates is a distant relation, but true, with others expressing this really important that each being ineluctably itself, however it is recognized in the other, and looking off each other's freedom (...) (Merleau-Ponty, s / d p 51). The irony is a way of philosophizing that returns at other times in history, with other meanings: for example, Montaigne, stating that "neither he nor anyone know anything right" applies the irony in the context of what is called skepticism. Montaigne was a sixteenth century philosopher who lived in a time of many conflicts, social transformations and questioning the prevailing thought in the middle ages. The thought of Montaigne reflected these contradictions so that the oscillations, the allusions, the lack of systematic, make it a unique thinker. Like other intellectuals of his time, sought inspiration in antiquity, more precisely in the Greek and Roman skepticism. The skeptical thinking can be found in Protagoras, whose propositions relativize all knowledge, that is, man is the measure of all things, there is no certainty about the nature of knowledge and things. Interestingly, stating that there is no possibility of a certain knowledge about things, skeptics approach the Socratic proposition "I only know that I know nothing." Socrates, however, relies on reason and strives to seek the truth. Our hatreds and affections "The fear, desire, hope, always play them for the future, evading us the feeling and examination of what is to distract us with what will be, though, so now we are no longer. Worried Every spirit the future is miserable. "Make it so that you are done and know-thyself ', here is a great precept often quoted in Plato. And every member of this proposition already point us our duty, and brings with it another. Whoever applied in do that which is made to realize that it is necessary first of all to acquire knowledge of himself and of what is fit. And who knows not wrong about his ability, because he enjoys himself and seeks to improve, refusing the occupations superfluous thoughts and useless projects. Likewise the loucu-
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 23.2 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4
Scepticism "Skepsa je razvijen u početku Pyrrhus (367-275 BC) (...) Prema Pirro, čovjek nije u mogućnosti doći do istine u znanosti i filozofiji. Jedini" istine "su subjektivne prirode i ne može se smatrati ispravno istine kao samo su dojmovi, ne možemo jamčiti sigurnost. nemaju pristup suštine stvari, znam samo da svoje nastupe. S obzirom na to, najmudriji čovjek stavova je apstinencija ili suspenzija sudovi (Epoke.) najpoznatiji verzija skepticizma je probabilism. potiče ova verzija je trajno nepovjerenje u vezi Istina, bez, međutim, sasvim blizu Hipoteza da je vjerojatnost. Dakle, ono što promatramo je skeptičan, sumnjičav, a očekuje se ona odvijala za tek onda vladati (na grčkom, znači skepsis izgled tih analiza, smatra). "(Hryniewicz, Težnja filozofije i propitivanje različitih primjeraka stvarnih pitanja uspostavljen red i, kao analizira i razmišlja, ometa djelovanje. U svojim komentarima na Sokrata Merleau-Ponty dodaje: (...) Ironija Sokrat je udaljena odnos, ali istinito, s drugima izražava ovo je stvarno važno da svatko se neumoljivo sebi, no to se priznaje u drugi, a upravo off jedni druge slobodu (...) (Merleau-Ponty, a / d p 51). Ironija je način filozofiranja koji se vraća po drugi puta u povijesti, s drugim značenjima: primjerice, Montaigne, navodeći da "ni on ni bilo tko znati ništa pravo" odnosi ironiju u kontekstu onoga što se naziva skepsa. Montaigne je šesnaestog stoljeća filozof koji je živio u vremenu od brojnih sukoba, društvenim transformacijama i propitivanje prevladavajući misao u srednjem vijeku. Misao Montaigne ogleda ove kontradikcije, tako da su oscilacije, aluzije, nedostatak sustavne, čine ga jedinstvenim mislilac. Poput drugih intelektualaca svoga vremena, tražio inspiraciju u antici, točnije u grčke i rimske skepticizma. Skeptično razmišljanje može se naći u Protagora, čije propozicije relativizirati sva znanja, da je, čovjek je mjerilo svih stvari, ne postoji sigurnost o prirodi znanja i stvari. Zanimljivo, navodeći da ne postoji mogućnost određenog znanja o stvarima, skeptici pristup sokratsku prijedlog "Ja samo znam da ništa ne znam." Sokrat je, međutim, oslanja na razum i nastoji da traže istinu. Naši mržnje i naklonosti "Strah, želja, nada, uvijek ih igrati za budućnost, izbjegavajući nam osjećaj i pregled onoga što je do nas odvratiti s tim što će se, ipak, tako da sada više nismo. Zabrinut svaki duh Budućnost je jadno. "Učinite to tako da ste učinili i know-samoga sebe ', ovdje je super zapovijed se često citira u Platona., A svaki član tog prijedloga već ukazuju nam svoju dužnost, a sa sobom donosi još jedan. Tko primijeniti u to što je napravio kako bi shvatili da je neophodno prije svega kako bi stekli znanje o sebi i onoga što je u formi. A tko zna nije krivo o njegovoj sposobnosti, jer on uživa i nastoji poboljšati, odbijajući zanimanja suvišnih misli i beskorisnih projekata. Isto tako loucu-