http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_geografia_hr_geography-240.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 9.1
Table 3 The design of the Power Plant Maua, in Tibagi / PR is being challenged by many (biologists, anthropologists, and others) who claim that the plant's reservoir would cause a major impact on local fauna and flora, as this region has a mega diversity Besides achieving indigenous land. To what extent must produce energy to meet demand and satisfy the diverse needs and interests of human beings? So, how is the environmental issue? What is the attitude that the state government should have? Text systematized by the author. Since the oil crisis of 1973 began in Brazil a run for other energy sources, in an attempt to reduce our dependence on imported oil, which was very large. During this period, began the construction of large plants, most often with impacts as large as the size of the plants built, which consumed exorbitant figures from public coffers. All Brazilian rivers were studied to verify their potential use, by installing small, medium or large plants. The State of Paraná is responsible for generating more than 20% of hydropower consumed in Brazil, because it has large plants such as Itaipu, Foz do Areia, Salto Osório, Salto Santiago and others, with great power, meeting the needs of its population and distributing energy to other states. This potential is explored by Copel - Companhia Paranaense de Energia Electrical - except Itaipu hydroelectric and located along the Paranapanema. There are also projects to build new plants, among these are the projects for the river Tibagy, which will overflow lands of Indian reservations. Well remember that indigenous peoples have suffered over the centuries and, to some extent, have failed their area effectively, because they need once again to "give" your area for the "good" of society. Has society in general think of the welfare of the natives? How do you think this? The following plants Copel, listed in order of decreasing power.
1.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 8.1 8.2 9.1
Tablica 3 Dizajn Maua Power Plant, u Tibagi / PR je izazvan od strane mnogih (biolozi, antropolozi i drugi) koji tvrde da je biljka u jezero bi izazvati veliki utjecaj na lokalne flore i faune, kao i ovoj regiji ima mega raznolikost Osim postizanja autohtoni zemlju. U kojoj mjeri mora proizvoditi energiju kako bi se zadovoljile potražnju i zadovoljiti različite potrebe i interese ljudskih bića? Dakle, kako je ekološki problem? Koji je stav da državnu upravu treba imati? Tekst sistematizirani od strane autora. Budući naftne krize iz 1973 započela je u Brazilu vođen za druge izvore energije, u pokušaju da smanji ovisnost o uvozu nafte, koja je bila vrlo velika. Tijekom tog razdoblja, počela je gradnja velikih biljaka, najčešće s utjecajima kao velika kao o veličini postrojenja izgrađen, koji konzumira zelenaški likove iz javnih blagajni. Svi Brazilski rijeke su proučavali kako bi provjerili njihovu potencijalnu uporabu, ugradnjom male, srednje ili velike biljke. Država Paraná je odgovoran za stvaranje više od 20% od hidroelektrana konzumira u Brazilu, jer ima velike biljke kao što su Itaipu, Foz Areia, Salto Osorio, Salto Santiago i drugi, s velikom moći, zadovoljiti potrebe svojih stanovnika i distribucijom energiju u druge države. Ovaj potencijal je istražiti Copel - Companhia Paranaense de Energia Električna - osim Itaipu hidroelektrana, a nalazi se uz Paranapanema. Tu su i projekti za izgradnju novih postrojenja, među njima su projekti za rijeku Tibagy, koji će prelijevanje zemljama indijanskim rezervatima. Pa sjetite se da su autohtoni narodi pretrpjeli tijekom stoljeća i, u određenoj mjeri, nije uspio svoj prostor učinkovito, jer im je potrebno još jednom "dati" svoj prostor za "dobro" društva. Je li društvo u cjelini misliti na dobrobit domorocima? Što mislite, kako to? Sljedeće biljke Copel, navedena u cilju smanjenja snage.