http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_sociologia_hr_sociology-194.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1
Following the conclusions of the proposed work above reread what you wrote Marilena Chauí on the strength of ideology on people, in view of the pressure it exerts on the daily: "The systematic and coherent ideological born of a very precise determination: the ideological discourse is one that aims to match things, annul the difference between thinking, saying and being and, Thus, engendering a logic of identity that unifies thought, language to reality and, through this logic, get the ID of all social subjects with a particular image universalized, ie the image of the ruling class. Universalizing the particular by erasing the differences and contradictions, ideology gains coherence and strength because it is a discourse that lacuna can not be filled. In other words, the ideology consistency is not obtained despite the gaps, but, on the contrary, thanks to them. Why can ever say anything until the end, ideology is that speech in which the terms absent ensure supposed veracity of what is explicitly stated. These ideas are dubious universalizing and pass the design, for example, that everyone is on an equal footing to compete, which is guaranteed by the Constitution of 1988, but at the same time demonstrates that among these are the most "able" that will have access to employment, university place, to be champion in the school gymkhana. This thought, to give primacy to the winner, creates a bias, because it ignores those who were second, third, fourth, in the latter as if these people do not deserve respect. Did not realize this when dubiousness encourage and watched the competitions between people, understanding that the result is that they have the absolute truth. And this truth becomes a universal idea that the former are the most capable, which encourages competitive behavior between people. By doing so, ideology creates an action biased and individualistic, as many think it is right to be so, because "I was the best." Nothing more illusory, since there is material inequalities (class) and also other types, such as gender and ethnicity, which are outside of the "choices" of individuals, and end up becoming too unequal, social opportunities of people. Individualism is an ideology that comes with the liberal thought of the seventeenth century, John Locke which has as its main representative. This view, then, the human guindava a sphere of action that was denied him in Feudal Society (fifth century XV), the domination of the nobility. With the rise of the bourgeoisie (the eighteenth century) and its control of the state and the dissemination and standard-
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1
Slijedom zaključaka predloženog rada iznad pročitao ono što je napisao Marilena Chauí na snazi ideologija na ljude, s obzirom na tlak ona vrši na dan: "Sustavno i koherentna ideološka rođen od vrlo precizno određivanje: ideologijski diskurs je onaj koji ima za cilj uskladiti stvari, anulirati razlika između razmišljanja, rekavši i da, na temelju čega je engendering logiku identiteta koji objedinjuje misli, jezik u stvarnost i, kroz ovu logiku, dobili ID svih društvenih subjekata koji imaju određenu sliku univerzaliziran, odnosno sliku vladajuće klase. Univerzalizirajućega posebice brisanje razlike i kontradikcije, ideologija dobitke povezanosti i snage jer je diskurs koji Lacuna ne može biti ispunjen. Drugim riječima, ideologija dosljednost nije postignut unatoč praznine, ali, naprotiv, zahvaljujući njima. Zašto se nikad ne može ništa reći sve do kraja, ideologija je da je govor u kojem je odsutna osigurali uvjeti trebao istinitost onoga što je izrijekom navedeno. Ove ideje su dvojbena univerzalizirajućega i proći dizajn, primjerice, da su svi ravnopravno konkurirati, koje je zajamčeno Ustavom iz 1988, ali u isto vrijeme pokazuje da je među njima su najčešće "mogućnosti" koji će imati pristupa zapošljavanju, sveučilišni mjestu, biti prvak u školskoj Gymkhana. Ova misao, dati primat na pobjednika, stvara pristranost, jer zanemaruje one koji su bili drugi, treći, četvrti, u potonjem, kao da ti ljudi ne zaslužuju poštovanje. Nije li to shvatili kad problematičnošću poticati i gledao natjecanja među ljudima, razumijevanje da rezultat je da oni imaju apsolutnu istinu. A ta istina postaje univerzalna ideja da se bivši najsposobniji, koji potiče natjecateljski ponašanje među ljudima. Na taj način, ideologija stvara akcijski pristran i individualistički, kao što mnogi misle da je pravo da bude tako, jer je "bio sam najbolji." Ništa više iluzorno, budući da postoji materijalni nejednakosti (klase) ali i druge vrste, poput spola i nacionalnosti, koji su izvan "izbora" pojedinaca, a završiti postaje previše nejednaki, socijalne prilike ljudi. Individualizam je ideologija koja dolazi s liberalne misli od sedamnaestog stoljeća, Johna Lockea koje kao glavni predstavnik. Taj pogled, a zatim, čovjeka guindava područje djelovanja koja mu je u feudalnom društvu (petog stoljeća XV), dominaciju plemstva. S razvojem buržoazije (osamnaestog stoljeća) i njegove kontrole države i diseminaciju i standardno-