http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-194.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1
Relationship Between Violence and Power In this context, violence is defined as an action that destroys or modifies designs with the use of force, that is, violence is characterized by the application of overt or hidden procedures designed to ensure, moderate or restrain the action of the individual or social group. In relations of power, strength explicitly denies the possibility of expression of individual or collective will through words and dialogue, and suffocate the underlying conflicts that underlie the politi- tica. Violence isolates individuals, groups dissolve, generating mecha- Mos control contributes to concentrate power. Here, we could make use of the well-known expression "divide and rule." The establishment of the modern state was accompanied by profound insights into the internal structure of power. Machiavelli was one of the first to reflect on the power structured in conflict from opposing interests that are organized in society: There are two governments in all sources of opposition: the people's interests and those of the aristocratic class. All laws to protect the freedom born of their disunity ... One can not in any way accusing disorder a republic that gave many examples of virtue, as good examples born of good education, good education, good laws and these disorder that almost all condemn rashly. From Machiavelli distinguishes violence from the conflict, which is at the root of power relations: violence is understood as the use of brute force, while the conflict or dissent generated by class antagonism, are salutary in politics and need to be recognized for its beneficial effects since, confrontation and disunity are born good laws. The good ruler is one that recognizes the reality of conflict and seeks the balance of forces in the struggle, organizing the social and political order.
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1
Odnos između nasilja i struje U tom kontekstu, u obitelji definira kao akcija koja uništava ili mijenja dizajna uz uporabu sile, koja je, nasilje se odlikuje primjeni otvorenog ili skrivenog postupaka osmišljenih kako bi se osiguralo, umjerena ili ograničila djelovanje pojedinca ili društvene skupine. U odnosima moći, snage izričito niječe mogućnost izražavanja individualne i kolektivne volje kroz riječi i dijalog, i davi temeljne sukobe koji su temelj poli- Tica. Nasilje izolira pojedinci, skupine raspusti, stvaranje me- Mos kontrola pridonosi da se koncentriraju snage. Evo, mogli bismo iskoristiti poznatom izraz "podijeli pa vladaj". Uspostavljanje moderne države bio popraćen dubokim uvidima u unutarnje strukture vlasti. Machiavelli je bio jedan od prvih koji odražavaju na vlasti ustrojene su u sukobu sa suprotne interese koji su organizirani u društvu: Postoje dvije vlade u svim izvorima oporbe: Narodne interesa i interesa aristokratske klase. Svi zakoni koji štite slobodu rođeno u njihovoj razjedinjenosti ... (...) Ne može se ni na koji način optužujući poremećaja republika koji je dao brojne primjere vrline, kao dobre primjere rođene dobrog obrazovanja, dobro obrazovanje, dobrim zakonima i ovim neredima koji su gotovo svi osuđuju nepromišljeno. Od Machiavelli razlikuje nasilje od sukoba, koji je u korijenu odnosa snaga: Nasilje je shvaćena kao uporabi silu, dok sukoba ili neslaganja generira klasnog antagonizma, su spasonosni u politici i treba da bude prepoznat po svojim blagotvornim učincima jer, sukobi i razjedinjenost su rođeni dobre zakone. Dobar vladar je onaj koji prepoznaje stvarnost sukoba i traži ravnotežu snaga u borbi, organiziranje društveni i politički poredak.