http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-22.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1
tasmagoria, ie what society imagines herself from an appearance he believes to be reality. For example: is the mythical idea of progress, because it is an idea that moves us and nourishes our action, but in fact is not realized. Modern society does not progress in the sense that whatever is new is absorbed into the maintenance and expansion of the structures of the capitalist system. The progress is presented as a myth because it feeds our imagination. Bonaventure (2003), argues that all scientific knowledge is socially constructed, that the rigor of science has limits insurmountable and that its alleged objectivity does not imply neutrality, it follows that believe that science leads to progress and that progress and history are some linear form, can be regarded as modern scientific myth. When we seek to analyze the present situation in the sciences as a whole, we look at the past, the first image is perhaps that scientific advances of the last 30 years are of an order that the spectacular centuries before us do not approach in complexity . So along with Rousseau (1712 - 1778) asked: the progress of the sciences and the arts contribute to purify or to corrupt our morals? There is a relationship between science and virtue? There is a compelling reason to replace common knowledge as scientific knowledge? Ever since the Enlightenment, in the broader sense of a thought that makes progress, pursued the goal of freeing men from fear and make them gentlemen. But completely illuminated, the earth shines under the sign of misfortune triumphant. The program of the Enlightenment was to rid the world of the spell. Their intention, to dissolve the myths and void the imagination through knowledge. Bacon, "the father of experimental philosophy" (Voltaire cofr.), had already collected their ideas guidelines. Although unrelated to mathematics, Bacon, captured well the spirit of science that followed him. The happy marriage between human understanding and the nature of things, which he has in view, is patriarchal understanding, who won superstition, must have voice command over nature desenfeitiçada. In the enslavement of the creature or the ability of the opposition to voluntary masters of the world, knowledge is power that knows no bounds. This knowledge serves to enterprises of any one, without distinction of origin, as well as in the factory and on the battlefield, is at the service of all the ends of the bourgeois economy. Kings do not provide a technique more directly than traders: knowledge is as democratic as the economic system with which it develops. The technique is the essence of this knowledge. Their goal is not the concepts or images or happiness of contemplation, but method, exploitation of the work of others, the capital. Philosophy www.xtec.es Steam Train of George Stephenson, the myth of progress. www.culturabrasil.pro.br Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1
tasmagoria, tj. ono što društvo sebe zamišlja od pojave koju smatra da je stvarnost. Na primjer: je mitska ideja napretka, jer je ideja koja nas pokreće i njeguje našu akciju, ali u stvari nije shvatio. Suvremeno društvo ne napredak u smislu da ono što je novo je apsorbiran u održavanje i širenje struktura kapitalističkog sustava. Napredak je predstavljen kao mit, jer to hrani našu maštu. Bonaventura (2003), tvrdi da su sve znanstvene spoznaje izgrađuje u društvu, kako je strogost znanosti ima granice nepremostive i da je njezina navodna objektivnost ne podrazumijeva neutralnost, proizlazi da vjeruju da znanost vodi za napredak i da je napredak i povijest Neki linearni oblik, može se smatrati suvremenim znanstvenim mita. Kad tražimo da analizira sadašnje stanje u znanosti u cjelini, mi gledamo na prošlost, prva slika je možda da se znanstveni napredak u zadnjih 30 godina su od reda koji su spektakularne stoljećima prije nas ne obrate u složenosti . Dakle, uz Rousseau (1712 - 1778) upitao: napredak u znanosti i umjetnosti doprinijeti očisti ili pokvariti naše moral? Postoji odnos između znanosti i vrline? Tu je uvjerljiv razlog za zamjenu općeg znanja kao znanstvene spoznaje? Otkako prosvjetiteljstva, u širem smislu misli da čini napredak, u potjeru za cilj oslobađajući ljudi od straha i učiniti ih gospodo. No, potpuno osvijetljen, zemlja blista pod znakom nesreće pobjednički. Program prosvjetiteljstva bio je osloboditi svijet čarolija. Namjera im je, da se raspusti mitove i poništiti maštu kroz znanje. Bacon, "otac eksperimentalne filozofije" (Voltaire cofr.), Već prikupljaju svoje ideje smjernice. (...) Iako je nevezano za matematiku, Bacon, zarobljen i duh znanosti koja ga slijedi. Sretan spoj ljudskog razumijevanja i prirode stvari koje on ima u vidu, je patrijarhalna razumijevanja, koji je osvojio praznovjerje, mora imati glasovne naredbe nad prirodom desenfeitiçada. U porobljavanju stvorenje ili na sposobnost suprotstavljanja dobrovoljnih majstora svijeta, znanje je moć koja ne poznaje granice. To znanje služi za poduzeća bilo jednog, bez obzira na podrijetlo, kao u tvornici, a na bojnom polju, u službi svih krajeva buržoaske ekonomije. Kings ne pružaju tehniku izravnije nego trgovaca: znanje je kao demokratske kao ekonomski sustav s kojim se razvija. Tehnika je bit ovog znanja. Njihov cilj nije pojmovi ili slike ili sreća kontemplacije, ali metoda, iskorištavanje rada drugih, kapital. Filozofija www.xtec.es Parni vlak George Stephenson, mit o napretku. www.culturabrasil.pro.br Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712