http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-35.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1
Reason Philosophical and Scientific Reason It has been commonly thought that the philosopher is one who wanders into abstract questions, disconnected from everyday life with a speech that does not concern the interests of the majority. The scientist, by contrast, is attributed to the image of a researcher confined in his laboratory concerned with practical problems, imbued in developing a useful knowledge. However, we can ask: to what extent philosophical knowledge is not operating, or not useful, and how scientific knowledge is close to expectations practices? What are objectively the differences between philosophy and science? With Greek philosophy holds all knowledge: mathematics, astronomy, geometry are examples of knowledge that came along with the philosophical questioning. In the Middle Ages, philosophy becomes an instrument of theology, that is, once the knowledge was restricted to monasteries, science is inspired knowledge, or divine origin. In modernity, philosophy and science follow different paths determined by its own methodology. The method determines the difference in approach to the problems in each area and logic is the common instrument between science and philosophy. The philosophy is characterized by rational discourse, that is, theoretical re-inflexive, his method is intended to explain the relationship between particular and universal in order to conceptualize and broaden the understanding of man in the world. Science and Common Sense According to Vasquez (1968), is a common sense knowledge, utility without or almost without any theory, integral call popular culture. The knowledge from the sense appears as a resistance force of the lower layers, or do not have access to the means of technology. In this sense we may ask ourselves, making an analysis of how scientific knowledge achieves its goals, reaching those who are most interested
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1
Razlog filozofsko-znanstveni razlog To je obično bio mislio da je jedan filozof koji zaluta u apstraktnih pitanja, isključen iz svakodnevnog života s govora koji se ne odnosi na interese većine. Znanstvenik, s druge strane, pripisuje se likom istraživač skučen u svom laboratoriju se bave praktičnim problemima, prožeti u razvoju korisno znanje. Međutim, možemo pitati: u kojoj mjeri filozofsko znanje ne radi, ili nije korisno, i kako znanstveno znanje je blizu očekivanja praksi? Koje su razlike između objektivno filozofije i znanosti? Uz grčka filozofija posjeduje sve znanje: matematike, astronomije, su primjeri znanja koji su došli zajedno s filozofskog propitivanja. U srednjem vijeku, filozofija postaje instrument teologije, koji je, kada znanje je ograničeno na samostana, znanost je inspiriran znanje ili božansko podrijetlo. U modernosti, filozofija i znanost imaju različite putanje utvrđene vlastitom metodologijom. Metoda utvrđuje razliku u pristupu problemima u svakom području, a logika je uobičajeno sredstvo između znanosti i filozofije. Filozofija se odlikuje racionalnog diskursa, koji je, teoretski re-inflexive, njegova metoda je namjera objasniti odnos između pojedinačnog i univerzalna kako bi se konceptualiziraju i proširiti razumijevanje čovjeka u svijetu. Znanost i Common Sense Prema Vasquez (1968), je zdrav razum znanje, alat bez ili gotovo bez teorije, sastavni je poziv popularne kulture. Znanje iz smislu pojavljuje kao otpor snagu donjim slojevima, ili nemaju pristup sredstvima tehnologije. U tom smislu možemo se zapitati, što je analizu o tome kako znanstveno znanje postiže svoje ciljeve, do onih koji su najviše zainteresirani