http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-62.html_1.xml
2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 14.2 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 41.1 42.1
Plato and Protagoras: Rationalism and Relativism What really sets these levels of knowledge we are talking about, ie, what specific sensation, belief and knowledge? Let's see what Plato and Protagoras wrote about. Plato is a philosopher born in Athens in the classical period. His work comes to politics, morality, science and art. Plato described his ideas in written texts in the form of thematic dialogues, ie, each dialogue was a specific theme such as Justice, Knowledge, Courage, etc.. Already Protagoras is a "sophist" born a few years before Plato. A sophist is a subject considered knowledgeable learning techniques of public speaking, mathematics, geometry, etc. .. It is someone who has a "special skill or knowledge to communicate. Their sophia (wisdom) is practice, whether in the fields of management and policy, both in technical arts" The relationship between the positions of Plato and Protagoras about knowledge is, to say the least, tense. Protágoras is considered from the point of view of knowledge, a relativist. He argued, for example, that for every item had an argument in favor and one against. Said he could make the "weaker argument the stronger." In Plato's Theaetetus it appears defending his thesis most famously, the idea that "(...) the man is the measure of all things, of which are and which are not. (Theaetetus 152c). In the Theaetetus Plato makes a careful examination of this doctrine, noting that it is not just a catch phrase created by sophistical crowd-pleasing, typical strategy in the activities of Protagoras. Protagoras actually defended the thesis that in matters such as politics, morality, religion, health, the individual is the measure, that is, there is nothing beyond what each perceives in his field of vision, hearing, etc.. This philosophy creates relativism, a perspective that takes into account only that sensitivity of a person picks. But why? Sensitivity that has to do with the idea that the individual man is the measure of all things? Firstly, one must consider that Protagoras taught, according to Plato, two different qualities of education. A popular and affordable education was given to the crowd that occasionally paid and attended his courses. Another type of lesson, and more detailed, was given to the so called "initiates" regulars disciples who received detailed explanations of the theories of Protagoras. Secondly, always according to Plato in the Theaetetus, the Sophist used in their lessons to initiates the core philosophy of the pre-Socratic Heraclitus to give a foundation to the theory of man-measure. Heraclitus Protagoras lent the idea that "everything
2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 14.2 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 41.1 42.1
Platon i Protagora: racionalizam i Relativizam Što se uistinu postavlja ove razine znanja o kojem govorimo, odnosno, ono specifično senzacija, vjerovanja i znanja? Idemo vidjeti što Platon Protagora pisao o. Platon je filozof rođen u Ateni u klasičnom razdoblju. Njegov rad u pitanju politika, moral, znanost i umjetnost. Platon je opisao svoje ideje u pisanim tekstovima u obliku tematskih dijalozima, odnosno, svaki dijalog je posebna tema, kao što su pravosuđe, znanje, hrabrost, itd.. Već je Protagora "sofist" rođen nekoliko godina prije Platona. Sofist je predmet smatra obrazovan tehnike učenja o javnom govorništvu, matematika, geometrija, itd. To je netko tko ima "posebnu vještinu ili znanje da komuniciraju. Njihov sophia (mudrost) je praksa, hoće li se u području upravljanja i politike, kako u tehničkim vještinama" Odnos između pozicije Platona i Protagora o znanju je, u najmanju ruku, napeta. Protagora smatra sa stajališta znanja, relativistički. Tvrdio je, primjerice, da je za svaki predmet imao argument u korist i protiv jednog. Rekao je mogao napraviti "slabiji argument jači." U Platonovim Theaetetus čini se brani svoju tezu većina slavno, ideju da "(...) Čovjek je mjera svih stvari, od kojih su, a koji nisu. (Theaetetus 152c). Theaetetus Platon čini oprezni pregled ove doktrine, ističući da je to ne samo uhvatiti izraz stvorio sophistical gužve-ugodan, tipičan strategije u aktivnostima Protagora. Protagora je zapravo branio tezu da u pitanjima kao što su politika, moral, religija, zdravlje, pojedinac mjera, koje je, ne postoji ništa izvan onoga što percipira svaki u svom vidnom polju, sluha, itd.. Ova filozofija stvara relativizam, perspektiva koja uzima u obzir samo tu osjetljivost osoba pijucima. Ali zašto? Osjetljivost koja ima veze s idejom da pojedinac čovjek je mjerilo svih stvari? Prvo, mora se uzeti u obzir da je Protagora učio, prema Platonu, dvije različite kvalitete obrazovanja. Popularan i dostupnog obrazovanja dobio je mnoštvo koje povremeno uplatili i pohađao njegov predmet. Druga vrsta lekcije, i detaljnije, dobio je takozvanih "inicira" regulars učenicima koji su primili detaljna objašnjenja teorije Protagora. Drugo, uvijek prema Platonu u Theaetetus, sofist koristi u svojim lekcijama na inicira osnovnu filozofiju predsezoni sokratsku Heraklita dati temelje na teoriji čovjek po mjeri. Heraklit Protagora posudio ideju da "sve