http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-36.html_1.xml
2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 20.1 22.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 28.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1
ordinary people, citizens. Does Science and byproducts reach everyone? Was there anything in common sense, in their way of perceiving the world that is correlated to scientific knowledge? For Antonio Gramsci: "(...) there is no single common sense, because it is a product and historical development." Common sense and also religion "(...) can not be an intellectual order because they can not be reduced to unity and coherence even in the individual consciousness." Common sense, even implicitly, "employs the principle of causality," "in a series of judgments, identifies the exact cause, simple and immediate, not leaving sidetracked by phantasmagoria and obscure metaphysical pseudo-deep, etc. pseudoscientific." Herein lies the value of what is called common sense. With the birth of philosophy, the Greeks were gradually breaking the myth and religion. Likewise scientific thinking wants to break with common sense. So while the first break is essential to constitute the science, the second to turn the common sense knowledge that reaches all layers, debugged their prejudices and pre-judgments. With this double transformation, what is expected is a clear common sense and science consistent with the social realities, a practical knowledge that gives meaning and direction to life and clings to the wisdom to find the common good. After breaking up with common sense, science must become a new and improved common sense, thus combining the practicality of the method with common sense and rigor typical of science and philosophy. debate Philosophy www.socialistworker.co.uk Antonio Gramsci 1891-1937. Answer the questions below. Notice the charge on the next page comparing the frames and analyze their possible sen taken. Which are the possible interpretations of the Allegory of the Cave? Establish relationships between the Matrix and the social and political reality of the Brazil Current. Establish relationships between the charge and the social and political reality of the Brazil Current. Establish relationships between the Allegory of the Cave and the social and political reality of the Brazil Current. Provide the answers to the class for discussion. The rules for the discussion was the introduction to this book. The Desert of the Real
2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 20.1 22.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 28.1 30.1 31.1 32.1
obični ljudi, građani. Da li znanost i nusprodukti doći svima? Je li išta u zdravom razumu, na svoj način doživljavanja svijeta koji je u korelaciji s znanstvenim spoznajama? Za Antonio Gramsci: "(...) ne postoji niti jedan zdrav razum, jer je proizvod i povijesni razvoj." Zdrav razum i vjera "(...) ne može biti intelektualac kako, jer oni se ne mogu svesti na jedinstvo i koherentnost ni u pojedinačnoj svijesti." Zdrav razum, ni implicitno, "zapošljava načelo uzročnosti", "u nizu presuda, navodi točan uzrok, jednostavan i neposredan, ne ostavljajući skrenuti s puta prema fantazmagoriju i opskuran metafizička pseudo-duboko, itd. pseudoznanstvene." U tome leži vrijednost onoga što se zove zdrav razum. Uz rođenje filozofije, Grci su se postupno razbijanje mita i religije. Isto tako znanstveno razmišljanje želi razbiti sa zdravim razumom. Dakle, dok je prvi break je bitno da predstavljaju znanost, drugi okrenuti zdrav razum znanja koja doseže sve slojeve, debagirao svoje predrasude i pre-presude. S ovom dvostrukom transformacije, što se očekuje je jasna zdrav razum i znanost u skladu s društvenim stvarnostima, praktična znanja koja daje smisao i smjer u životu i oslanja se na mudrosti kako bi pronašli zajedničko dobro. Nakon prekida veze s zdravim razumom, znanost mora postati novi i poboljšani zdrav razum, tako kombinirajući praktičnost te metode u zdravom razumu i strogosti tipičnom znanosti i filozofije. debata Filozofija www.socialistworker.co.uk Antonio Gramsci 1891-1937. Odgovorite na pitanja u nastavku. Obavijest naboj na sljedećoj stranici, uspoređivala okvire i analizirati njihov mogući sen poduzeti. Koja su moguća tumačenja alegorija o pećini? Uspostaviti odnose između Matrixa i na društvenom i političkom stvarnošću Brazil Trenutni. Uspostaviti odnose između optužbe i društvenom i političkom stvarnošću Brazil Trenutni. Uspostaviti odnose između alegorija o pećini i na društvenom i političkom stvarnošću Brazil Trenutni. Osigurati odgovore na klasi za raspravu. Pravila za raspravu bio je uvod u ovu knjigu.