http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-219.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1
School Photo: J. Who is in the opposite direction? Louvre Museum, Paris. Eugène Delacroix, Liberty leading the people, July 28, 1830, Oil on Canvas. Political Philosophy In games of domination, seeks to confuse the development of political thought and action of a citizen, which should be made up of mediation and ethical questioning by simply empty rhetoric, or the mere assimilation and reproduction of competence discursive, supposedly democratic, but whose goal is tãosomente domination and, therefore, suppression of freedoms. For some authors, the problem of Marx is the disregard of the role of the state as a means of recording and promoting freedom. But did Marx definitely disregards the role of the state, or is he moving the axis of politics beyond the formal boundaries of the state - thinking about the politicization of civil society, exercising state sovereignty, then to be a truly democratic State? Marx and Freedom Marx was an advocate of civil liberties and individual, but obviously it was not by means of classical liberalism and its concept of freedom - which has always been critical blunt - but the idea of human emancipation, of freedom as non- domi-nation and does not limit the purposes of political instrumentality legal protection (formal) of individual freedom. Human freedom, just as Marx suggests, incorporates the thinking, action and production. It is the freedom that the individual being as being-Community efetivase the polity by fighting the mechanisms of domination and alienation of human freedom, adherent to the condition of the individual as a social being. The restriction that Marx makes the rule of bourgeois right, while abstraction of the basic condition of human sociability linked to the immediacy of living-together of men, is that this state just by virtue of its structure bureaucratizing and reducing the political to the legal aspects, representing the interests of a part of society and, as such, is powerless to secure the ends of the major and universal community. Rather, it is a factor of alienation and domination by the "cunning" of ideological representation of political interests. For Marx, there is no freedom under the rule of the selfish forces of civil society, or the state that symbolically embody individuals, but actually excludes them from political life subtracting
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1
Škola Foto: J.Marçal (1998) Koji je u suprotnom smjeru? Muzej Louvre, Pariz. Eugène Delacroix, Liberty voditi ljude, 28. srpnja 1830, ulje na platnu. politička filozofija U igrama dominacije, traži da se zbuniti razvoj političkog mišljenja i djelovanja jednog građanina, koji bi trebao biti sastavljen od posredovanja i etičkih promišljanja, jednostavno praznom retorikom, ili puke asimilacije i reprodukciju nadležnosti diskurzivnih, navodno demokratskoj, ali čiji je cilj tãosomente dominacije i, dakle, potiskivanje slobode. Za neke autore, problem Marxa je podcjenjivanje uloge države, kao sredstvo za snimanje i promicanje slobode. No, je li Marx definitivno zanemaruje uloga države, ili se on kreće os politike izvan formalnih granica države - razmišljanje o politizaciji civilnog društva, vježbanje državna suverenost, onda se doista demokratska država? Marx i Sloboda Marx je bio zagovornik građanskih sloboda i pojedinca, ali očito to nije bilo uz pomoć klasičnog liberalizma i svoj koncept slobode - koja je uvijek bila kritična tupim - ali ideja ljudske emancipacije, slobode kao ne- Domi-nacije, a ne ograničava svrhe političke sredstvo pravne zaštite (formalno) individualne slobode. Ljudska sloboda, baš kao što je Marx sugerira, uključuje razmišljanje, akciju i proizvodnje. To je sloboda da se kao pojedinac Zajednice efetivase političke zajednice borbama mehanizmi dominacije i otuđenja ljudske slobode, prijanja na stanje pojedinca kao društveno biće. Ograničenje koje Marks pravi vladavinu buržoaske prava, dok je apstrakcija temeljni uvjet ljudske društvenosti povezane s neposrednošću dnevni zajedno ljudi, je da je ovo stanje samo zahvaljujući svojoj strukturi bureaucratizing i smanjenje političke zakonskim aspektima, zastupa interese dio društva i, kao takav, je nemoćan da osigura krajeve od glavnih i univerzalne zajednice. Umjesto toga, to je faktor otuđenja i dominacije "lukavi" ideološke zastupljenosti političkih interesa. Za Marxa, nema slobode pod vlašću sebičnih snaga civilnog društva, odnosno države koja simbolično utjelovljuju pojedince, ali zapravo ih iz političkog života oduzimanjem