http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_historia_hr_history-239.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 18.1
School ACTIVITY Arrange in a frame the main ideas advocated by: Locke, Montesquieu and Rousseau. Compare the differences and similarities. Read the text and discuss: Why the formation of the Spanish nation-state was late in relation to France and England? DEBATE As a group, discuss these ideas with your colleagues, then resume reading the texts and write a historical narrative explaining why these thinkers defend a democratic state. Independence of Brazil and the formation of National State You may have read about the independence of Brazil. That relationship can be established between this fact and the formation of the Brazilian National State? The Independence of Brazil in 1822, was articulated by dominant social groups, composed of large landowners and large traders. Therefore, there was no decisive role in this process of the lower classes, which were made by slave labor and free, because for these layers independence should also involve social changes, which did not correspond to the interests of dominant social groups. Thus, the formation of the Brazilian National State was limited by the political separation of the colonial rule of the Portuguese metropolis. The system of monarchy and slavery were kept, while all other Latin American countries (with the exception of a brief period monarchy in Mexico in 1822 and 1823), and Paraguay in 1813 and Argentina in 1816, after conquer its independence, adopted a republican form of government, which is reflected in some way, the ideas of the French Revolution of 1789 (liberty, equality and fraternity). In this context, the Brazilian elites were divided: a current liberal, linked to Rousseau's thought, advocated popular sovereignty, democratic expression (right to vote) and a Constitution, the other connected to conservatives, defended the absolutist monarchy (Emperor ) as legitimacy of the Brazilian state. Power Relations
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 18.1
Škola AKTIVNOST Rasporedi u okviru glavne ideje za koje se zalaže: Locke, Montesquieu i Rousseau. Usporedite razlike i sličnosti. Pročitajte tekst i raspravljati: Zašto formiranje španjolske nacionalne države kasnio u odnosu na Francusku i Englesku? DEBATA Kao skupina, raspravljati o ovim idejama sa svojim kolegama, a zatim nastaviti čitati tekstove i napisati povijesnu priču s objašnjenjem zašto su ti mislioci braniti demokratske države. Neovisnost Brazila i formiranje Nacionalna država Možda ste čitali o neovisnosti Brazila. Taj odnos može biti uspostavljena između ove činjenice i formiranje brazilske nacionalne države? Neovisnost Brazilu u 1822, je artikulirao dominantnih društvenih skupina, sastavljena od velikih zemljoposjednika i velikih trgovaca. Dakle, nema presudnu ulogu u ovom procesu niže klase, koje su izradile prisilni rad i slobodan, jer je za tih slojeva neovisnosti treba uključiti i društvene promjene, koje nisu u skladu s interesima dominantnih društvenih skupina. Dakle, formiranje brazilske nacionalne države bio je ograničen na političkom odvajanju kolonijalne vladavine portugalske metropole. Sustav monarhije i robovanja držani, dok su sve ostale zemlje Latinske Amerike (s izuzetkom kratkog razdoblja monarhije u Meksiku u 1822 i 1823), te Paragvaj u 1813 i Argentine u 1816, nakon što je osvojiti svoju neovisnost, donio republikanski oblik vladavine, što se odražava na neki način, su ideje Francuske revolucije 1789 (sloboda, jednakost i bratstvo). U tom kontekstu, brazilski elite su podijeljeni: liberalna struja, povezana s Rousseauove misli, zalagao narodnog suvereniteta, demokratskog očitovanja (pravo glasa) i Ustava, drugi povezan s konzervativcima, branio apsolutističku monarhiju (Car ) kao legitimnosti brazilske države. odnosima moći