http___livro-ensino-medio.f1cf.com.br_filosofia_hr_philosophy-75.html_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1
study of men before concrete and so on. Aristotle asks: why posit essential properties of each object separately when we know that there are concepts, terms, words, phrases are the product of thought itself, and only exist as thought? For Aristotle man is more real than humanity, and it is through the first we got to the second concept. the particular to the general: first movement of understanding In a work called "Physics" Aristotle explains step of knowledge: "the route will naturally knowable from more and more clear to us towards clearer and more knowable by nature ..." It is not difficult to understand what Aristotle is saying. If you are an expert in the theory of relativity and was called for a lecture to an audience that does not understand anything physical, it's best to start your speech by some trivial examples of everyday life to captivate the audience and only then risking more technical concepts or formulas . In other words, you will make a way that the "particular" (which is part of the experience of the public) to the "general" (the overall view, more technical and elaborate on which you will speak.) The march of our understanding goes from simple to complex. This means that we better understand a subject when we make the transition from what we know to what we do not know. Notice how the great speakers begin their speeches by analogies or cases that the audience immediately identifies. In the text of "Physics" Aristotle gives the example of the child to illustrate his thesis: first she calls any man or woman of father and mother. Only later learn to identify who is father and mother, and eventually form a concept of fatherhood and motherhood. There is here a course that will understanding the particular to the universal causing to expand the knowledge. Aristotle, who was considered a brilliant teacher, has dominated in his time notions of psychology and pedagogy to know that any human being acquires knowledge if you can not from what we already know. the universal to the particular: 2nd movement of understanding Warning: the previous rule is absolute when it comes to learning, but it does not say anything. The text of physics also indicates that the "clear" to us is often a given very general and simplistic. Knowledge is only effective when you can go down to the minutiae. This is what Aristotle meant by "(...) clearer and more knowable to us towards clearer and more knowable by nature." The mar-
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1
Studija muškaraca prije betona i tako dalje. Aristotel je pita: Zašto postavljam bitna svojstva svakog objekta posebno kada znamo da postoje pojmovi, pojmovi, riječi, fraze su proizvod pomislio sam, i postoje samo kao misao? Za Aristotela Čovjek je stvarnija od čovječanstva, a to je kroz prvi smo na drugom konceptu. Konkretno u cjelini: prvi stavak razumijevanja U radu pod nazivom "Fizika" Aristotel objašnjava korak znanja: "Ruta će, naravno, biti spoznato na sve više i više jasno da nas prema jasnije i raspoznati po prirodi ..." To nije teško razumjeti što je Aristotel je rekao. Ako ste stručnjak u teoriji relativnosti, a nazvan je za predavanje publici koja ne razumije ništa fizički, to je najbolje započeti svoj govor od strane nekih trivijalnih primjera iz svakodnevnog života očarati publiku i tek onda riskirati više tehničke pojmove ili formule . Drugim riječima, što će napraviti način da se "posebno" (što je dio iskustva od javnosti) na "General" (ukupni pogled, više tehničkih i elaborat o kojima će govoriti.) Ožujku naše razumijevanje ide od jednostavnih do složenih. To znači da bismo bolje razumjeli temu kad smo napraviti prijelaz iz onoga što znamo da ono što mi ne znamo. Obavijest o tome kako su veliki zvučnici počinju svoje govore strane analogije ili predmeta koje je publika odmah identificira. U tekstu "fiziku" Aristotel daje primjer djeteta za ilustraciju svoje teze: prva je ona nazove bilo koji čovjek ili žena od oca i majke. Tek kasnije nauče prepoznati tko je otac i majka, i na kraju se formira koncept očinstvu i majčinstvu. Bilo je ovdje, naravno da će razumijevanje posebno sveopće uzrokuje proširiti znanje. Aristotel, koji je smatrao sjajan učitelj, dominirao je u njegovo vrijeme pojmovima psihologije i pedagogije znati da svaki čovjek stječe znanje ako ne mogu iz onoga što već znamo. univerzalna se osobito: 2. kretanje razumijevanja Upozorenje: prethodnom pravilu je apsolutna kada je riječ o učenju, ali to ne govori ništa. Tekst fizike također ukazuje na to da "jasno" da nam je često dati vrlo općenito i pojednostavljeno. Znanje je učinkovit samo kad možete otići na sitnice. To je ono što Aristotel misli pod "(...) jasnije i doznati da nas prema jasnije i raspoznati po prirodi." Mar-