http___www.jurankosm.hr_about.php_lang_hr_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1 38.1 39.1 40.1 41.1 42.1 43.1 44.1 45.1 46.1 47.1 48.1 49.1 50.1 51.1 52.1 53.1 54.1 55.1 56.1 57.1 58.1 59.1 60.1 60.2 60.3 60.4 61.1 62.1 62.2 63.1
One problem is that positions put forward by member states are not made public in time, and that the presentation of these documents is not at all citizen-friendly. Take for example the Council Regulation establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 18 September 2007. If you wanted to see the opinions of your country on the proposal by the Commission from 6 October 2005, you had to wait until this weekend to find the respective documents published. I have tried to assemble all those more than 70 documents made public now, so that you do not need to search on your own, just to show what you have "missed" so far. Member states' comments in November 2005: - Commented draft regulation with positions of member states - Austria - Belgium - Denmark - Estonia - Finland - Germany 1, Germany 2 - Greece - Latvia - Lithuania - The Netherlands - Poland - Portugal - Slovenia - Sweden - United Kingdom - Finland - France - Latvia - Poland I; Poland II - Slovakia - Sweden - United Kingdom - Summary of Working Party discussions - Revised Presidency working document - Denmark - Lithuania - The Netherlands - Poland I, Poland II - Sweden I, Sweden II - United Kingdom - Summary of negotiations - Draft Proposal with comments from Working Party meeting - Estonia - Finland - France - Lithuania - The Netherlands - State of the play (Presidency) - Presidency Working document - Denmark - Summary of COREPER discussions - France - Hungary - The Netherlands - Poland - Portugal - Lithuania - Presidency compromise proposal - Consolidated compromise proposal by the Presidency - Latvia - Poland The time it took to put together this blog post is already way to much. How can you expect any citizens to do this, look for hours for two or three documents that concern the position of its country during a European law-making process, or even to put together the full set of positions of all member states?! And so far, I haven't analysed a single document. I have just put them together. The next step would be to analyse the individual positions and to see how these figure in the different intermediary documents and in the final regulation. But this would implicate much more research, going well beyond these Council documents. What I want to say is that we get relevant documents late, we get them in a bad presentation, and we need to enter into an almost scientific research process to understand who got what, which position came through, what was ignored, etc. And since the regulation is already 1 1/2 years old: Who will involve in such an effort? - No journalist will take the time to do so, and my resources as an individual blogger are way to limited to do this on a regular basis. In the end, most decision-making within the Council, even if well-documented and finally publicised, will never become truly public and transparent - just because this transparency demands retrospective efforts that the institutional side doesn't want to bear and that the democratic society cannot take on its shoulders alone.
1.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 4.1 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 22.1 23.1 24.1 25.1 26.1 27.1 28.1 29.1 30.1 31.1 32.1 33.1 34.1 35.1 36.1 37.1
Tvrtka JURANKO S.M. razvilo se iz obrta, koji datira iz 80-ih g., a za izradu dijelova te reznog alata za papirnu industriju. Širenjem obima poslova, te nizom upita za izradu ostalog reznog alata za druge oblike industrija, 1989 godine osnovana je tvrtka pod današnjim nazivom, s zaposlenicima koji imaju u prosjeku 20-godišnje iskustvo u radu na poslovima izrade reznog alata. Upravo zbog velike raznolikosti u načinu rezanja, te raznovrsnosti proizvodnih procesa vrlo veliku pažnju posvećujemo odabiru materijala za izradu strojnih industrijskih noževa. U nastojanju da naši alati imaju što bolja rezna svojstva, za izradu industrijskih noževa koristimo najkvalitetnije alatne čelike, brzorezne čelike i praškaste čelike dok najveću pažnju posvećujemo završnoj obradi, a to je oštrenje i brušenje. Usvajanjem novih tehnologija te ulaganjem u strojni park, kao i usmjerenost prema kvaliteti proizvoda te poštivanju dogovorenih rokova izrade, tvrtku JURANKO S.M. dovodi u poziciju da od ukupne proizvodnje industrijskih noževa na izvoz otpada gotovo 70%. Trenutno izvozimo u 30 zemlja svijeta - Austria - Italija - Njemačka - Belgija - Nizozemska - Francuska - Danska - Engleska - Finska - Češka Republika - Slovenija - Švicarska - Bjelorusija - Litva - Bosna i Hercegovina - Srbija - Izrael - Meksiko - Rusija - Estonija - Australija - Portugal - Čile - Mađarska - Makedonija - Crna Gora - Luksemburg - Egipat - Rumunjska - Poljska Dakle, ovi podaci daju nam za pravo, da Vam tvrtku JURANKO S.M. predložimo kao pouzdanog proizvođača industrijskih strojnih noževa. Obratite nam se s povjerenjem!