http___www.udarno.com_povlacenje-istrazivanja-koje-ukazuje-na-stetnost-gmo-a_1.xml
1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 4.2 5.1 6.1 7.1 8.1 9.1 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 11.1 12.1 13.1 13.2 13.3 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 19.2 19.3
After a 2012 study linking cancer with Monsanto’s genetically modified corn, the scientific journal that published the study is now retracting it, after hiring a former Monsanto employee to fill a new editorial position reviewing biotechnology papers. In September 2012, the scientific journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology(FCT), published the study of Gilles-Eric Séralini, et al. which reviewed the toxicological effects of Monsanto’s NK603, and its requisite Round-Up pesticide. They found “severe toxic effects (including liver congestions, necrosis and kidney nephropathies), increased tumor rates and higher mortality in rats fed Monsanto’s genetically modified NK603 maize and/or the associated herbicide Roundup.” In February of 2013, the FCT hired Monsanto’s former employee, Richard E. Goodman, for a new position reviewing biotechnology papers. On November 19, the FCT reported its decision to retract the published paper stating the study’s results were inconclusive because there weren’t enough rats used in the study, and the strain of rat used was not acceptable. Writing for CRIIGEN, the independent lab with which Seralini is affiliated, Frédérique Baudouin noted that a short Monsanto study, which was published in the same journal to prove the safety of its product, “was conducted with the same strain and number of rats.” Read the whole article at: www.activistpost.com / link to original article Views: 86 "...there weren’t enough rats used in the study, and the strain of rat used was not acceptable." love sharing this stuff on food forum sites... thanks Rose Funny that the only studies that are favorable to Monsanto's GMO grains come from Monsanto itself. All the others I have read speak of them causing organ failure, tumors, abortion/stillbirth, infertility, and premature death. And if these GMO's are so good, why does Monsanto spend $$millions to prevent labeling of the GMO's?? Wouldn't you think they would be so proud of what they have created they would WANT all GMO's labeled as such????? Sorry, it doesn't pass my smell test!! hey, thx, Rose ~ was gonna get to it... ;-) Its reposted on three NING forums ♥ FYI Rady - the blog area is still glitching. You need to make sure the date stamp (under the blog) is set to POST NOW. It is defaulting the wrong way and NING are too busy to care. great, the more number of hits at Activist Post, the more I earn (I get just pennies a page view, but it can add up : ) okay, will check it out now Great stuff, Rady. shared Dearest Rose, I don't think my spirit could take it if I tried to read the entire article. I cannot abide by such deceipt and traumatic intervention of the truth. Just this summary is enough to make me want to vomit ♦ jibs
1.1 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7
POVLAČENJE ISTRAŽIVANJA KOJE UKAZUJE NA ŠTETNOST GMO-A Gilles-Eric Séralini, autor studije, koja pokazuje da genetski modificirani kukuruz može dovesti do velike učestalosti raka, razmišlja o tužbi časopisa koji je objavio studiju, ako se izvrši navedeni plan o povlačenju njegove studije piše Forbes. Nakon studije 2012. godine koja povezuje karcinom s Monsantovim genetski modificiranim kukuruzom, znanstveni časopis koji je objavio istraživanje sada ga povlači, nakon zapošljavanja bivšeg Monsantovog zaposlenika na novu uredničku poziciju. U rujnu 2012. godine, znanstveni časopis Food and Chemical Toxicology(FCT), objavio je studiju Gilles-Erica Séralinija, koji je ispitao toksikološke učinke Monsantovog NK603, i njegova neophodna Round-up pesticida. Otkrili su “teške toksične učinke (uključujući zastoje jetre, nekroze i nefropatiju bubrega), povećane stope tumora i smrtnosti u štakora koji su se hranili Monsantovim genetski modificiranim NK603 kukuruzom i/ili pripadajućim herbicidom Roundup.” U veljači 2013, FCT angažirao je Monsantovog bivšeg zaposlenika, Richarda E. Goodmana, za novo radno mjesto pregleda biotehnoloških radova. Dana 19. studenoga, FCT je objavio svoju odluku o povlačenju objavljenog rada navodeći da su rezultati ove studije su neuvjerljivi, jer nije bilo dovoljno štakora korišteno u istraživanju, a soj štakora nije bio prihvatljiv. Pišući za CRIIGEN, nezavisni laboratorij s kojim je povezan Seralini, Frédérique Baudouin je istaknuo da je kratka Monsantova studija koja je objavljena u istom časopisu, radi dokazivanja sigurnosti proizvoda, “provedena sa istim sojem i brojem štakora”, prenosi Activist Séralini je obećao da će ih tužiti. Europska mreža znanstvenika (ENSSER) je isto tako objavila oštru osudu ponašanja FCT-a, upozoravajući da je ta razina korupcije “flagrantna zloupotreba znanosti” koja će “smanjiti povjerenje javnosti u znanost.” Osim svega toga, Seralini nije bio ni u potrazi za rakom, koji bi zahtijevao veći broj životinja, već je samo pripremio studiju kronične toksičnosti pod jednakim uvjetima koje Monsanto koristi za procjenu sigurnosti GM kukuruza. ENSSER objašnjava da je kratkoročno istraživanje pokazalo ne samo “izrazite toksične učinke”, ali i “povećane stope tumora.” Nadalje, soj štakora Sprague-Dawley je “uobičajeno korišten standard za ovu vrstu istraživanja” i bio je isti onaj koji je koristio. Ono što je najvažnije, “Neugodne rezultate treba provjeriti, a ne ignorirati“. Biotehnološka industrija ima dugu povijest potiskivanja svake znanosti koja prikazuje da su njezini proizvodi štetni. U filmu, Svijet prema Monsantu, Marie-Monique Robin otkrila je kako je dr. Arpad Pusztai izgubio svoju karijeru otišavši na britansku televiziju sa svojim nalazima koji su pokazivali da je GM krumpir izazivao oštećenja organa i organiskih sustava kod štakora.