Den tilføjede imidlertid, at de omhandlede regler har så vægtige formål, at det kan berettige sådanne negative følger, og at indefrysningen af midler ikke forhindrer de berørte personer i under de givne omstændigheder at have et tilfredsstillende privatliv, familieliv og socialt liv.
However, it went on to state that the importance of the aims pursued by the legislation in question is such as to justify those negative consequences and that the freezing of the funds did not prevent the individuals concerned from leading satisfactory personal, family and social lives, given the circumstances.