Det fremgår af den appellerede doms præmis 62, at hvad angår appellanterne er Retten af den opfattelse, at deres fartøjer er »fiktive«, fordi de omhandlede fartøjer ikke var blevet bygget på datoen for den anfægtede beslutning.
It follows from paragraph 62 of the judgment under appeal that, with regard to the appellants, the Court of First Instance inferred that their vessels were ‘fictitious’ from the fact that those vessels had not been built at the date of the contested decision.