anbringende må afvises, så meget mere som enhver beslutning om udsættelse af sagen i det foreliggende tilfælde ville være ensbetydende med at anse Fællesskabet for blottet for ethvert indhold ved i ratifikationsakten at se en kun delvis accept af traktaten eller hjemmel til at tillægge den forskellige retsvirkninger alt efter medlemsstaterne, eller mulighed for visse borgere for at unddrage sig dens regler« 33).
It went on 'such a claim is all the more inadmissible in that, in this case, any decision to suspend judgment would be tantamount to reducing the Community to a cipher by regarding the instrument of ratification either as only partially accepting the Treaty, or as the means of according to it different legal consequences, varying with the Member State concerned, or as the means whereby some nationals might evade its rules'.33