»Må det antages, at en værnetingsaftale 'kun er indgået til fordel for én af parter ne', jfr. domskonventionens artikel 17, stk. 3, når forholdet alene er det, at parterne i henhold til domskonventionens artikel 17, stk. 1, gyldigt har aftalt, at den internationale kompetence tilkommer en ret eller retterne i en kontraherende stat, på hvis område denne part har sin bopæl?«
'Is an agreement conferring jurisdiction to be regarded as "concluded for the benefit of only one of the parties" within the meaning of the third paragraph of Ar ticle 17 of the Convention where all that is established is that the parties have effectively agreed, in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 17, that a court or the courts of the Contracting State in which that party is domiciled are to have in ternational jurisdiction?'