For det første fastslog Retten i den allerede nævnte dom i sagen Camós Grau mod Kommissionen, at reglen om upartiskhed, som binder institutionerne ved varetagelsen af undersøgelsesopgaver af den karakter, der er overladt OLAF, tager sigte på – ud over den almindelige interesse – at beskytte de pågældende personer og således tildeler dem en individuel ret til, at de tilsvarende garantier overholdes 67.
First, in its judgment in Camós Grau v Commission, the Court of First Instance held that the requirement of impartiality, to which the institutions are subject in carrying out investigative tasks of the kind which are entrusted to OLAF, is intended, as well as ensuring that the public interest is respected, to protect the persons concerned and confers on them a right as individuals to see that the corresponding guarantees are complied with 67.