฀ 3 A G S � GT EffS ฀ B O P� L ฀ FU N GE R ER฀ UD฀ OVER฀ SOM฀ ALMINDELIG฀ K OM P E T E N C E REGEL฀ � ฀ SIDE฀ OM฀ SIDE฀ MED฀ ANDRE฀ REGLER฀ MEN฀ KUN฀ N � R ฀ DETTE฀ ER฀ F A SffT S AT฀ I฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ � ฀ DESUDEN฀ SOM฀ K R I T E R I U M ฀ FOR฀ A FG R � NffS NING฀ AF฀ AN VE N D E L S EffS OM R � DET฀ FOR฀DE฀ KOMPETENCEREGLER฀ DER฀ ER฀DIREKTE฀ FASTLAGT฀ I฀ SELVE฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ ) F � L GE ฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ A FG �RES฀ K OM P E TENCEN฀ NEMLIG฀ HVIS฀ S A G S � GT E ฀ IKKE฀HAR฀ B O P� L ฀ P� ฀ EN฀ MEDLEMSSTATS฀ OM R � DE฀ KUN฀ IN DIREKTE฀ AF฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ VED฀ EN฀ H E N V I S NING฀ TIL฀ DEN฀ ENKELTE฀ MEDLEMSSTATS฀ LOVGIVNING฀ DOG฀ IKKE฀ FOR฀ S � ฀ VIDT฀ AN G � R ฀ REGLERNE฀ OM฀ ENEKOMPETENCE฀ OG฀ AFTALE฀ OM฀ V � R N E T IN G ฀ I฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ OG฀ ฀ DER฀ O G S � ฀ I฀ DETTE฀ T I L F � L DE฀ lNDER฀ ANVENDELSE฀ / VE R ฀ FOR฀ P E R SffO N ER฀DER฀ HAR฀ B O P� L ฀ I฀ T R E D J E LA N DE฀ KAN฀MAN฀ IMIDLERTID฀ O G S � ฀ P� BE R � BE ฀ SIG฀ DE฀ NATIONALE฀ KOMPETENCEREGLER฀ SOM฀ AN F � R T ฀ I฀ BILAG฀ ) ฀ TIL฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ SELV฀ N � R ฀ D E T ฀DREJER฀SIG฀OM฀ E K SffO R B I T AN T E ฀ V � R N E T IN G ฀ 2 E TffS A FG � R E L S ER฀DER฀ SffT� T T EffS ฀ P� ฀ S � D AN N E ฀ NATIONALE฀ REGLER฀ HAR฀ IMIDLERTID฀ P� ฀ GRUNDLAG฀ AF฀ FORORDNINGEN฀ F R I฀ B EV � GE L IG HED฀ I฀DE฀ANDRE฀ MEDLEMSSTATER฀ P� ฀ DE฀ SAMME฀ BETINGELSER฀ SOM฀ RETS A FG � R E L S ER฀DER฀ SffT� T T EffS ฀ P� ฀ FORORDNINGENS฀ KOMPETENCEREGLER฀ $ENNE฀ BE SffT E M M E L S E ฀ DER฀ ALLEREDE฀ FORE L � ฀ I฀ "RUXELLES฀) KONVENTIONEN฀ ER฀BLEVET฀ BE S KYL D T ฀ FOR฀ AT฀ S K A BE ฀ FOR S K E L S BEHANDLING฀ AF฀ P E R SffO N ER฀ MED฀ B O P� L ฀ I฀ T R E D J E LA N DE฀ ฀ HVILKET฀ R E G LEN฀ I฀ ARTIKEL฀ ฀ DER฀ U N D T A GE R ฀ E K S I SffT E RENDE฀ B I LA T E R A L E ฀ AFTALER฀ MED฀ T R E D J E LA N DE฀ DER฀ H IN D R ER฀ DENNE฀ F R I E ฀ B EV � GE L IG HED฀ SKULLE฀ AF H J� L P E ฀ OM฀ END฀ KUN฀ TIL฀ DELS฀
R T I C L E S ฀ ฀ AND฀ ฀ WHICH฀ APPLY฀ REGARDLESS฀ OF฀ D O M I C I L E ฀ !GAINST฀DEFENDANTS฀DOMICILED฀IN฀THIRD฀COUNTRIES฀IT฀IS฀THEN฀POSSIBLE฀TO฀RELY฀ ON฀ THE฀ NATIONAL฀ RULES฀ OF฀ JURISDICTION฀ L I S T E D ฀ IN฀!NNEX฀)฀ TO฀ THE฀REGULATION ฀ EVEN฀ WHEN฀ THESE฀ A S S E R T ฀EX O R B I TANT฀ JURISDICTION฀ *U DG MENTS฀ GIVEN฀ IN฀AC T I O N S ฀ BASED฀ ON฀ SUCH฀NATIONAL฀ RULES฀ ARE฀ � ฀ AS฀ WILL฀ BE฀ SEEN฀ LATER฀ � ฀ RECOGNISED฀ IN฀ THE฀ OTHER฀-EMBER฀3TATES฀ON฀THE฀SAME฀CONDITIONS฀AS฀JUDGMENTS฀IN฀ACCORDANCE฀ WITH฀ THE฀ REGULATIONS฀ OWN฀ RULES฀ON฀ JURISDICTION฀ 4HIS฀ PROVISION฀ ALREADY฀ F O U N D ฀ IN฀ THE฀"RUSSELS฀ ) ฀ #ONVENTION฀ HAS฀ BEEN฀ A T T A C K E D ฀ AS฀ DIS C R I M IN A TING฀ AGAINST฀ PER S O N S ฀ D O M I C I L E D ฀ IN฀ THIRD฀ COUNTRIES฀ � ฀ TO฀ R EM E D Y ฀ THIS฀ AL BE IT฀ P A R TIALLY฀ !RTICLE฀ ฀ L E A V E S ฀ U N AF F E C T E D ฀ AN Y ฀EX I S TING฀ B I L A T E R AL ฀ AGREEMENTS฀ WITH฀ THIRD฀ COUNTRIES฀ THAT฀ PROVIDE฀ FOR฀ NON RECOGNITION฀OF฀ JUDGMENTS฀