Fru Roth-Behrendt insisterer i sin forklaring på, at der ikke er omvendt bevisbyrde, men de formuleringer, der har til formål at gøre forsvaret lettere for forbrugerne og de skadelidte, forekommer os juridisk set alt for vage.
Mrs Roth-Behrendt does stress in her explanation that it does not involve a reversal of the burden of proof, but we feel that the phrases which aim to facilitate the protection of consumers and injured people are too vague in legal terms.