Han anmodede derfor Kommissionen om (1) at angive,hvorvidt den mente,at artikel 14 i rammereglerne,entenalene eller sammen med artikel 25,27 og 28 i de særlige ansættelsesvilkår,forpligtede dentil at tilbyde supplerende forsikringspolicer til sine lokale medarbejdere i Østrig,(2) atoplyse Ombudsmanden,om hvilke tiltag Kommissionen havde planlagt med henblik på atgennemføre den beslutning,der blev truffet i marts 1999,om at oprette en supplerendeforsikringspolice for uarbejdsdygtighed i overensstemmelse med artikel 25 i de særlige
He therefore asked the Commission (1) to specifywhether or not it considered that Article 14 of the Framework Rules,either on its own orin conjunction with Articles 25,27 and 28 of the Specific Conditions,obliged it to providesupplementary insurance policies for its local staff in Austria,(2) to inform the Ombudsman as to what steps it had taken to implement the decision taken in March 1999to conclude a supplementary insurance policy for incapacity to work as provided for in Article 25 of the Specific Conditions,(3) to provide information as to how the discussionsrelating to the supplementary benefits relating to retirement pensions,invalidity and deathhad developed since the Commission’s letter of 1 June 1999 and (4) to provide a cleartimetable for further action in the matter.