De belgiske myndigheder hævder imidlertid i deres bemærkninger, at Kommissionen ikke havde sondret tilstrækkeligt mellem AGVO's, PAKHUIZENs og EVO's aktiviteter og opgaver, og at de fordele, som AGVO fik, på grund af opgavefordelingen mellem AGVO og EVO kun var relevante for den foreliggende undersøgelse, i det omfang de var blevet »overført« til EVO.
However, in their comments, the Belgian authorities claimed that the Commission had not sufficiently distinguished between the activities and tasks performed by AGVO, PAKHUIZEN and EVO and that, due to the division of tasks between AGVO and EVO, the advantages granted to AGVO were relevant for the current investigation only to the extent that they had been ‘transferred’ to EVO.