Rekvisitus kærede denne afgørelse til Oberlandesgericht under anbringende af, at rekvirentens begæring ikke burde have været imødekommet, jfr. konventionens arti kel 27, nr. 2.
The debtor appealed against this judgment to the Oberlandesgericht, claiming that under Article 27(2) of the Convention the creditor's application should not have been allowed.