Sagsøgerne har navnlig til støtte for det fjerde og femte anbringende anført, at Kommissionen, som led i bedømmelsen af en eventuel påvirkning af samhandelen inden for Fællesskabet samt Fællesskabets interesse i henhold til artikel 86, stk. 2, EF, var forpligtet til at undersøge foreneligheden af RES med artikel 82 EF, den frie bevægelighed for tjenesteydelser, etableringsretten og det tredje skadesforsikringsdirektiv.
In particular, in support of their fourth and fifth pleas, they maintain that, in its assessment of a possible effect on intra-Community trade and the interest of the Community, under Article 86(2) EC, the Commission was required to examine the compatibility of the RES with Article 82 EC, with freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment and also with the third non-life insurance directive.