Da »kontoret« i Heidelberg imidlertid førte samme navn som sagsøgtes datterselskab i Hamburg, skulle det anses for en filial af dette selskab, men ikke for en filial af det italienske moderselskab.
But since the office in Heidelberg bore the descrip­tion of the defendant's subsidiary company in Hamburg, it must be regarded as a branch of that company and not of the Italian parent company.