For det første mener jeg i lyset af Præsidiets fortolkning af disse aktiviteter, at det er klart, at mødeformanden på det pågældende tidspunkt fortolkede forretningsordenen forkert, da det, der skulle være sket i forbindelse med en så grov forstyrrelse af mødet, var, at medlemmet burde have været bortvist fra mødet med det samme.
Firstly, it seems to me, in the light of the Bureau's interpretation of these actions, that it is clear that the President in the Chair at the time acted incorrectly in interpreting the Rules, because what should have happened for a gross breach of conduct was that the Member should have been excluded from the House at that moment.