Jeg vil ganske enkelt nævne hovedpunkterne: at en kreditor kan hæfte for erstatningskrav over for debitor, at kreditor skal være forpligtet til at indlede hovedproceduren inden for en bestemt frist, at kreditor kan blive bedt om at stille sikkerhed, at debitor skal have appelret, at man ikke skal vælge en procedure, der tager en evighed, men som mere eller mindre er i overensstemmelse med den forudgående procedure, at der skal indføres foranstaltninger, der forhindrer, at for store pengebeløb fastfryses til fordel for kreditor, og at debitor skal garanteres økonomiske muligheder, som vedkommende kan leve af.
I would simply like to mention the main points: that a creditor may be liable for damages arising for the debtor, that the creditor should be obliged to institute the main proceedings within a fixed time limit, that the creditor may be required to provide security, that the debtor should be entitled to appeal, that a procedure should not be selected which takes an eternity but which is broadly in line with the previous proceedings, that there should be provisions preventing too much money being frozen for the benefit of the creditor, and that the debtor must be guaranteed the wherewithal to live on.