I den danske sag indeholdt systemet ganske vist et sådant gebyr (fra modtagerbanken til korrespondentbanken), men Kommissionen konkluderede, at det ikke indebar nogen mærkbar konkurrencebegrænsning som omhandlet i artikel 85, stk. 1.
Finally, in the Danish case, the system did contain a multilateral fee (paid by the beneficiary's bank to the correspondent bank) but the view was taken that it did not restrict competition to an appreciable extent within the meaning of Article 85(1).