What I don't understand is, the foreman was one of the "not guilty" votes, and then, after lunch, not only does he change his vote, but he pressures another juror to overturn his vote?
Što ne razumijem, predsjednik je bio taj za "nije kriva" glasove, a onda, poslije ručka, ne samo da je promijenio svoj glas, nego je prisilio drugoga porotnika da promijeni svoj glas?