<p>Like I mentioned in my comment to your question, Asuras are shown to be stronger than normal human beings although they lack intelligence (Like Naruto). Devas on the other hand lack physical strength but are believed to be witty and skillful (Like Sasuke). Your argument that Asuras <em>always</em> try to steal the place of Devas is not entirely true. Example is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prahlada" rel="nofollow">Prahlada</a>. He is an Asura but still is described as a saintly boy in the Puranas. His name's literal meaning is: filled with joy. (Just like Naruto).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-21T07:24:44.497Z
Prahlada is the only exception but even his family had same intention. You can even count King Bali but it was complete different scenario and he got changed later on due to his promise of donation.
Ankit Sharma
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-12T15:33:47.677Z
2016-03-12T15:33:47.677Z
Aditya Dev
<p>Well, I don't know if Sensei Masashi has given any explanation. But my guess is that, Naruto wasn't intended to be a history series, they probably intentionally made it different or reversed the version from the real one.</p>

<p>Why? Maybe for creative purposes. Maybe they didn't want it to be like a real version of the otherwise religiously influenced story, to avoid any claims or to avoid any offensive feelings that may occur because of it.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-11-30T06:18:03.847Z
2016-11-30T07:02:57.707Z
2016-11-30T07:02:57.707Z
Izzat
<p>In Hindu mythology, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura">Asura</a> are the bad beings. Asuras always try to steal the place of Devas because they didn't get it. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra">Indra</a> is a king of Devas/Suras.</p>

<p>So in short Indra (Deva) is depicted as good being in Hindu mythology and Asura as bad beings and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Naruto_episodes">Naruto</a> is inspired from Hinduism/Buddhism, so why is the adaptation of Indra and Asura made opposite to their real self? Have the makers explained it ever?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-03-09T18:22:00.723Z
Asuras in Hindu mythology are sometimes pictured as giants and posses more physical strength. Devas in Hindu mythology lack physical strength but are intelligent and skillful.
Aditya Dev
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-11T22:19:04.967Z
Keep in mind that Buddhism also has devas/asuras, which are similar to but not the same as Hindu devas/asuras. Indra also appears in some Buddhist traditions as Sakka (in Japan, Taishakuten), but has very different stories from the Hindu Indra. I suspect that the Buddhist versions of these beings had more of an influence on the Naruto characters, since Buddhism is _far_ more prevalent in Japan than Hinduism is. (There are basically no Hindus in Japan besides recent immigrants from India/Nepal.)
senshin
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-15T21:04:54.000Z
@senshin And where did Buddhism come from? It derived much of its philosophy from Hinduism. At the same time, it rejected some teachings. Naturally, the stories changed. They changed further while being transported. To say Buddhist asuras/devas are different is silly and fallacious. Even Hindu puranas diverge depending on region.
Ekoji
<naruto>
Why are Asura and Indra of Hindu mythology represented opposite in Naruto?
# Why are Asura and Indra of Hindu mythology represented opposite in Naruto?
Posted by: username_0 on 2016-03-09
In Hindu mythology, [Asura](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura) are the bad beings. Asuras always try to steal the place of Devas because they didn't get it. [Indra](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra) is a king of Devas/Suras.

So in short Indra (Deva) is depicted as good being in Hindu mythology and Asura as bad beings and [Naruto](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Naruto_episodes) is inspired from Hinduism/Buddhism, so why is the adaptation of Indra and Asura made opposite to their real self? Have the makers explained it ever?
**Tags:** naruto
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Asuras in Hindu mythology are sometimes pictured as giants and posses more physical strength. Devas in Hindu mythology lack physical strength but are intelligent and skillful.  
> **username_2**: Keep in mind that Buddhism also has devas/asuras, which are similar to but not the same as Hindu devas/asuras. Indra also appears in some Buddhist traditions as Sakka (in Japan, Taishakuten), but has very different stories from the Hindu Indra. I suspect that the Buddhist versions of these beings had more of an influence on the Naruto characters, since Buddhism is _far_ more prevalent in Japan than Hinduism is. (There are basically no Hindus in Japan besides recent immigrants from India/Nepal.)  
> **username_3**: @senshin And where did Buddhism come from? It derived much of its philosophy from Hinduism. At the same time, it rejected some teachings. Naturally, the stories changed. They changed further while being transported. To say Buddhist asuras/devas are different is silly and fallacious. Even Hindu puranas diverge depending on region.  
---
## 2 answers
### Answer by username_1 on 2016-03-12. Score: 4
Like I mentioned in my comment to your question, Asuras are shown to be stronger than normal human beings although they lack intelligence (Like Naruto). Devas on the other hand lack physical strength but are believed to be witty and skillful (Like Sasuke). Your argument that Asuras *always* try to steal the place of Devas is not entirely true. Example is [Prahlada](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prahlada). He is an Asura but still is described as a saintly boy in the Puranas. His name's literal meaning is: filled with joy. (Just like Naruto).
> **Comments:**
> **username_0** (2016-03-21): Prahlada is the only exception but even his family had same intention. You can even count King Bali but it was complete different scenario and he got changed later on due to his promise of donation.  
---
### Answer by username_4 on 2016-11-30. Score: 0
Well, I don't know if Sensei Masashi has given any explanation. But my guess is that, Naruto wasn't intended to be a history series, they probably intentionally made it different or reversed the version from the real one.

Why? Maybe for creative purposes. Maybe they didn't want it to be like a real version of the otherwise religiously influenced story, to avoid any claims or to avoid any offensive feelings that may occur because of it.
---
