<p>In FMA 2003, homunculi are paralysed if they come into close proximity of a part of their original bodies. Wrath (Fuhrer King Bradley in 2003) was defeated by Mustang after his son brought him his skull, which he usually kept locked in a safe.</p>

<p>Why did he keep his skull? Why did he not simply destroy it or dispose of it in a place that he could not be traced to?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-29T13:50:01.900Z
It could have been a way to make sure he always knew and (theoretically) could control where it was.
kuwaly
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-01T11:58:40.290Z
@kuwaly Then why not destroy it instead?
otah007
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-11T14:04:52.330Z
We don't know. It can't be answered, since not enought information is given. Maybe he wanted to keep it near. Maybe he couldn't destroy it. Maybe it was just a plot device to defeat him.
Sigfried666
<fullmetal-alchemist-series><fullmetal-alchemist-2003>
Why did FMA 2003 Wrath (King Bradley) keep his skull?
# Why did FMA 2003 Wrath (King Bradley) keep his skull?
Posted by: username_0 on 2017-06-28
In FMA 2003, homunculi are paralysed if they come into close proximity of a part of their original bodies. Wrath (Fuhrer King Bradley in 2003) was defeated by Mustang after his son brought him his skull, which he usually kept locked in a safe.

Why did he keep his skull? Why did he not simply destroy it or dispose of it in a place that he could not be traced to?
**Tags:** fullmetal-alchemist-series fullmetal-alchemist-2003
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: It could have been a way to make sure he always knew and (theoretically) could control where it was.  
> **username_0**: @kuwaly Then why not destroy it instead?  
> **username_2**: We don't know. It can't be answered, since not enought information is given. Maybe he wanted to keep it near. Maybe he couldn't destroy it. Maybe it was just a plot device to defeat him.  
---
## 0 answers
