<p>According to <a href="https://move.rpi.edu/sites/default/files/publication-documents/2016-4.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this paper</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>pitch and roll control authority is up to about 30% greater for the
cross-conﬁguration since all four (as opposed to only two) rotors are
used.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>However this is a bit academic as you often combine pitch and roll in normal flying, or fly at an angle, so it only matters if you want to do the fastest possible flips or rolls.</p>
<p>For most FPV people, the main advantage is that the camera can look out between the front two rotors. A lot of the time you're flying at an angle anyway (because you're looking where you're going while cornering), so the theoretical differences are minor.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-29T10:49:54.140Z
while that 30% figure is correct, the "plus" pattern has those 30% advantage when you combine roll and pitch. On a "cross" drone however, only two rotors are used. This completely eliminates the first argument. I agree however, that this is less of a point compared to the camera.
Bastian Springer
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-29T15:06:15.233Z
@BastianSpringer - good point, I've added that to my answer.
Robin Bennett
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-11T15:13:39.383Z
2020-09-29T15:05:56.657Z
2020-09-29T15:05:56.657Z
Robin Bennett
<p>Practically speaking, &quot;plus&quot; blocks the camera and has a different flight characteristic, especially when landing as you can drag a single arm if not &quot;flat&quot; and the chance of using the arms to level out is more difficult.</p>
<p>A big disadvantage is how a plus crashes.  A plus design generally will be arm first and will not crumble like an &quot;X&quot; might. I don't fly plus because my crashes would be so much worse (50+mph cartwheels, fences,  buildings, you name it)</p>
<p>I agree with @Robin Bennet, but that point is also moot in many scenario, especially FPV as the power to weight ratio is intense.  I have 5 inch drones that legitimately rotate in excess of 1000 degrees per second on pitch and roll.</p>
<p>The flight controller will need to know of the configuration of course.</p>
<p>Another advantage of &quot;X&quot; over plus is the rotational nature of the propellers.  I use a reversed spin.  (see image, credit <a href="https://blog.seidel-philipp.de/" rel="noreferrer">https://blog.seidel-philipp.de/</a>)</p>
<p>By using reversed direction I am able to fly through grass and trees better because the props push debris away (not pull them in). Two props in the front pushing out has saved me from certain crash very often.  I switched about 3 years ago and I can say that recovery from bumps is vastly improved. I also note easier take off as well from a lawn, less instance of things getting tangled, plus my camera lenses are not chipped as much from sand reflections and ingestion because the props work more actively to not throw junk into the drone, prop-wash notwithstanding.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/D4Ci2.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/D4Ci2.png" alt="propeller rotation reference" /></a></p>
<p>In the end it is a preference, there are mild advantages to both but most to lean towards X for performance and logistical reasons.  I see plus format very infrequently, usually someone experimenting.  I hope that helps.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-16T16:43:20.727Z
2020-09-16T16:43:20.727Z
FunHog.me
<p>I'm not really an expert when it comes to quadcopters, I heard about the &quot;plus&quot; and &quot;cross&quot; configurations and that the &quot;cross&quot; configuration provides more stability.
I would appreciate any sort of help on the advantages and disadvantages of those configurations and the physics/maths behind why one is better than the other.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-11T14:02:33.450Z
I don't have the time to write a proper answer right now, but the paper [A Comparison Between Quadrotor Flight Configurations](https://move.rpi.edu/sites/default/files/publication-documents/2016-4.pdf) may help you, and might also help anyone who wants to add an answer.
sempaiscuba
<quadcopters>
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a "plus" and "cross" quadcopter configuration? Is one preferred over another?
Ahmed Abdulla
# What are the advantages and disadvantages of a "plus" and "cross" quadcopter configuration? Is one preferred over another?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-09-11)

I'm not really an expert when it comes to quadcopters, I heard about the "plus" and "cross" configurations and that the "cross" configuration provides more stability.
I would appreciate any sort of help on the advantages and disadvantages of those configurations and the physics/maths behind why one is better than the other.

**Tags:** quadcopters

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I don't have the time to write a proper answer right now, but the paper [A Comparison Between Quadrotor Flight Configurations](https://move.rpi.edu/sites/default/files/publication-documents/2016-4.pdf) may help you, and might also help anyone who wants to add an answer.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-09-11. Score: 8

According to [this paper](https://move.rpi.edu/sites/default/files/publication-documents/2016-4.pdf):

> pitch and roll control authority is up to about 30% greater for the
> cross-conﬁguration since all four (as opposed to only two) rotors are
> used.

However this is a bit academic as you often combine pitch and roll in normal flying, or fly at an angle, so it only matters if you want to do the fastest possible flips or rolls.

For most FPV people, the main advantage is that the camera can look out between the front two rotors. A lot of the time you're flying at an angle anyway (because you're looking where you're going while cornering), so the theoretical differences are minor.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: while that 30% figure is correct, the "plus" pattern has those 30% advantage when you combine roll and pitch. On a "cross" drone however, only two rotors are used. This completely eliminates the first argument. I agree however, that this is less of a point compared to the camera.  
> **username_2**: @BastianSpringer - good point, I've added that to my answer.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-09-16. Score: 6

Practically speaking, "plus" blocks the camera and has a different flight characteristic, especially when landing as you can drag a single arm if not "flat" and the chance of using the arms to level out is more difficult.

A big disadvantage is how a plus crashes. A plus design generally will be arm first and will not crumble like an "X" might. I don't fly plus because my crashes would be so much worse (50+mph cartwheels, fences, buildings, you name it)

I agree with @Robin Bennet, but that point is also moot in many scenario, especially FPV as the power to weight ratio is intense. I have 5 inch drones that legitimately rotate in excess of 1000 degrees per second on pitch and roll.

The flight controller will need to know of the configuration of course.

Another advantage of "X" over plus is the rotational nature of the propellers. I use a reversed spin. (see image, credit <https://blog.seidel-philipp.de/>)

By using reversed direction I am able to fly through grass and trees better because the props push debris away (not pull them in). Two props in the front pushing out has saved me from certain crash very often. I switched about 3 years ago and I can say that recovery from bumps is vastly improved. I also note easier take off as well from a lawn, less instance of things getting tangled, plus my camera lenses are not chipped as much from sand reflections and ingestion because the props work more actively to not throw junk into the drone, prop-wash notwithstanding.

[![propeller rotation reference](https://i.sstatic.net/D4Ci2.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/D4Ci2.png)

In the end it is a preference, there are mild advantages to both but most to lean towards X for performance and logistical reasons. I see plus format very infrequently, usually someone experimenting. I hope that helps.


---

