<p>It sounds a lot like Turkish Coffee <a href="http://www.illy.com/wps/wcm/connect/en/coffee/how-prepare-turkish-coffee" rel="nofollow">http://www.illy.com/wps/wcm/connect/en/coffee/how-prepare-turkish-coffee</a>
or Bosnian Coffee
<a href="http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20140707-the-complicated-culture-of-bosnian-coffee" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20140707-the-complicated-culture-of-bosnian-coffee</a></p>

<p>In both cases, it is customary to grind to a fine powder and sweeten heavily.  The coffee will be very strong, rich and smoky and will contain quite a bit of sediment but that mostly stays at the bottom so you don't drink the last little bit.</p>

<p>You might also check out Cowboy Coffee (just google it, I'm not allowed more than 2 links)</p>

<p>It's surprisingly good and, when you're in the woods with no espresso machine or pour over supplies, it'll hit the spot</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-02T14:29:56.653Z
2015-09-02T14:29:56.653Z
levous
<p>The biggest drawback is that you might add the grounds to too hot water. Especially avoid adding the coffee to water that is still boiling. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_preparation#Boiling" rel="noreferrer">Wikipedia</a> has some references about the temperature and it states that boiling water will extract bitterness instead of aromatic oils. So just make sure to wait a moment after taking the water off boil.</p>

<p>Second drawback is that since the grounds remain in the pot in contact with the water, you have to empty the pot entirely once the coffee is "done". Leaving the grounds in contact with the water for longer times will only add betterness to the coffee. Of course this is no problem if you only make one cup, but prepare to have a (pre-heated) container ready if making more cups.</p>

<p>Related to the second drawback is that the extraction will continue in your cup because of the sediment, but in my opinion most people will not even notice it affecting the cup.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6242467/ns/health-heart_health/t/coffee-cholesterol/#.VbiFUPnsT3w" rel="noreferrer">Coffee oils make it to the news</a> from time to time. Since this coffee is not paper filtered it contains more oils. Some like the taste, some do not. Some link coffee oils to cholesterol levels (I do not..), which might be a personal drawback to some.</p>

<p>Offtopic: the method you describe is actually how my granny makes coffee, with a little twist (that I dislike). After adding the grounds, she heats the water to boil <em>again</em> and quickly removes it from the stove after first signs of boiling.</p>

<p><strong>Edit:</strong> Just wanted to mention that none of the drawbacks I listed is unique to this method.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-29T07:51:04.053Z
2015-07-29T08:21:54.890Z
2015-07-29T08:21:54.890Z
milez
<p>The question here is about the following primitive method for making coffee. Having used this method for many years now I think it gives consistently good coffee, comparable to that from a good espresso machine but without the need for machinery or paper filters.</p>

<p><strong>Recipe:</strong> Bring one cup's worth of water to a boil in a small pot. Add about a scoop and a half of ground decent-quality beans to the pot. Swirl gently until chalky bubbles appear. Filter through a tea strainer into a cup. Let stand briefly. </p>

<p>No need to grind the beans to a powder. The tea-strainer gets most of the grounds and the amount of sediment in the cup is about the same as in cafe espresso. The only electric component is a coffee grinder. Using pre-ground beans requires more coffee per cup, as some flavor will be missing.</p>

<p>In general this method produces coffee that is slightly weaker than espresso. While I might add a bit of sugar to espresso to counter bitterness if the beans are old or mediocre, the strainer method above gives coffee that is very drinkable without sugar. </p>

<p>It sometimes surprises me that this simple method isn't more widely used. <strong>Has anyone else tried it?</strong> Are there any drawbacks to this method? It isn't worth much commercially because it only makes decent coffee one cup at a time.  </p>

<p>This method is adapted from one I saw used by fisherman in Brazil, except he used a sock instead of a tea strainer. Comments welcome.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-20T01:25:09.297Z
Sounds similar to a [French press](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_press) (or cafetière) method, or perhaps a hybrid of that and [Turkish coffee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_coffee). Are you familiar with these methods and equipment? +1 for methods hacking!
hoc_age
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-20T03:49:18.910Z
@hoc_age: You're right, it's a lot like French press method. I wasn't really familiar with that. Thanks.
daniel
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-20T12:56:59.857Z
I like the idea of doing this with a sock.
fredley
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-21T05:04:36.190Z
I'd agree that this is similar to a french press, more so its just a rigid way of doing an immersion brew. Its probably less common, especially in the west because we value convenience, and its easier to put folgers in a hopper, fill it with water and press a button and watch the news while the machine does the rest. Then on the other side of the spectrum there are people who weigh their beans, grind them with a burr grinder, and brew using a manual method(french press, pourover, etc). There is little grey zone I feel.
tsturzl
<brewing-process>
Does anyone have experience with this brewing method?
daniel
# Does anyone have experience with this brewing method?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-07-19)

The question here is about the following primitive method for making coffee. Having used this method for many years now I think it gives consistently good coffee, comparable to that from a good espresso machine but without the need for machinery or paper filters.

**Recipe:** Bring one cup's worth of water to a boil in a small pot. Add about a scoop and a half of ground decent-quality beans to the pot. Swirl gently until chalky bubbles appear. Filter through a tea strainer into a cup. Let stand briefly.

No need to grind the beans to a powder. The tea-strainer gets most of the grounds and the amount of sediment in the cup is about the same as in cafe espresso. The only electric component is a coffee grinder. Using pre-ground beans requires more coffee per cup, as some flavor will be missing.

In general this method produces coffee that is slightly weaker than espresso. While I might add a bit of sugar to espresso to counter bitterness if the beans are old or mediocre, the strainer method above gives coffee that is very drinkable without sugar.

It sometimes surprises me that this simple method isn't more widely used. **Has anyone else tried it?** Are there any drawbacks to this method? It isn't worth much commercially because it only makes decent coffee one cup at a time.

This method is adapted from one I saw used by fisherman in Brazil, except he used a sock instead of a tea strainer. Comments welcome.

**Tags:** brewing-process

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Sounds similar to a [French press](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_press) (or cafetière) method, or perhaps a hybrid of that and [Turkish coffee](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_coffee). Are you familiar with these methods and equipment? +1 for methods hacking!  
> **username_0**: @username_1: You're right, it's a lot like French press method. I wasn't really familiar with that. Thanks.  
> **username_2**: I like the idea of doing this with a sock.  
> **username_3**: I'd agree that this is similar to a french press, more so its just a rigid way of doing an immersion brew. Its probably less common, especially in the west because we value convenience, and its easier to put folgers in a hopper, fill it with water and press a button and watch the news while the machine does the rest. Then on the other side of the spectrum there are people who weigh their beans, grind them with a burr grinder, and brew using a manual method(french press, pourover, etc). There is little grey zone I feel.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2015-07-29. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

The biggest drawback is that you might add the grounds to too hot water. Especially avoid adding the coffee to water that is still boiling. [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_preparation#Boiling) has some references about the temperature and it states that boiling water will extract bitterness instead of aromatic oils. So just make sure to wait a moment after taking the water off boil.

Second drawback is that since the grounds remain in the pot in contact with the water, you have to empty the pot entirely once the coffee is "done". Leaving the grounds in contact with the water for longer times will only add betterness to the coffee. Of course this is no problem if you only make one cup, but prepare to have a (pre-heated) container ready if making more cups.

Related to the second drawback is that the extraction will continue in your cup because of the sediment, but in my opinion most people will not even notice it affecting the cup.

[Coffee oils make it to the news](http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6242467/ns/health-heart_health/t/coffee-cholesterol/#.VbiFUPnsT3w) from time to time. Since this coffee is not paper filtered it contains more oils. Some like the taste, some do not. Some link coffee oils to cholesterol levels (I do not..), which might be a personal drawback to some.

Offtopic: the method you describe is actually how my granny makes coffee, with a little twist (that I dislike). After adding the grounds, she heats the water to boil *again* and quickly removes it from the stove after first signs of boiling.

**Edit:** Just wanted to mention that none of the drawbacks I listed is unique to this method.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-09-02. Score: 2

It sounds a lot like Turkish Coffee <http://www.illy.com/wps/wcm/connect/en/coffee/how-prepare-turkish-coffee>
or Bosnian Coffee
<http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20140707-the-complicated-culture-of-bosnian-coffee>

In both cases, it is customary to grind to a fine powder and sweeten heavily. The coffee will be very strong, rich and smoky and will contain quite a bit of sediment but that mostly stays at the bottom so you don't drink the last little bit.

You might also check out Cowboy Coffee (just google it, I'm not allowed more than 2 links)

It's surprisingly good and, when you're in the woods with no espresso machine or pour over supplies, it'll hit the spot


---

