<p>As I understand it caffeine itself is a mild diuretic. Some say this effect quickly goes away (within a week). Even if it does not for coffee the mildness of the diuretic is mostly compensated by the water intake.</p>

<p>I suppose in the case of espresso there may be a net loss of water, but it would still be very minimal.</p>

<p>I am not a doctor, so I have not fully researched this. I have not provided links because there is such varied opinion on the topic. Someone from the medical community might be able to provide a definitive reference.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T18:14:19.093Z
There are plenty of articles and research out there studying the effects of caffeine as a diuretic on both tolerant and naive individuals.
Suspended User
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T15:47:33.580Z
2015-01-28T15:47:33.580Z
Justin C
<p>Even though <em>caffeine</em> may be a mild diuretic, most <em>coffee</em> is over 99% water, contributing to <em>hydration</em>. </p>

<p>I read about <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11022872" rel="nofollow">an interesting study</a> that measured no difference in effective hydration between several classes of beverages (carbonated, caffeinated, sweetened, or not). </p>

<p>They're all mostly water.</p>

<p>See also <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416202" rel="nofollow">No evidence of dehydration with moderate daily coffee intake: a counterbalanced cross-over study in a free-living population.</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T23:10:50.567Z
2015-01-28T23:10:50.567Z
Nathan
<p>Though caffeine's action as a diuretic is hotly debated, recently it seems the scientific consensus is that caffeine in normal doses is a weak diuretic in <em>caffeine-naive</em> individuals only (those without a tolerance), and only in doses exceeding 250-300 mg, or 2-3 cups of coffee. To go even further,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>A profound tolerance to the diuretic and other effects of caffeine
  develops, however, and the actions are much diminished in individuals
  who regularly consume tea or coffee.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>And from the same <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19774754">review of the literature</a>: </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Doses of caffeine equivalent to the amount normally found in standard
  servings of tea, coffee and carbonated soft drinks appear to have no
  diuretic action.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The New York Times exposed this myth in this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/health/nutrition/04real.html?_r=0">article</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Researchers found no significant differences in levels of excreted
  electrolytes or urine volume [between those given caffeine and a placebo].</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.beverageinstitute.org/expert/laying-the-caffeine-dehydration-myth-to-rest/">Here</a> is another good resource for answering these questions in a clear, FAQ-style and features a good list of references on the topic.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T19:40:33.570Z
That seems to be the consensus of the several studies/articles I have read, as well as what the cardiologist I work with tells his patients.
Suspended User
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T21:17:15.253Z
Leave it to scientists to worry about getting the facts right and still miss the point... While coffee isn't a diuretic, the fact that you are sipping coffee *instead of drinking cups of water* leads to many (not all) coffee drinkers to get partially dehydrated. (Yes, there are studies on this, but I don't remember where I saw it...) Of the few times that the Social sciences got it more right than hard science ;-)
AviD
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T21:32:36.660Z
@AviD I think the consensus is precisely the opposite of what you say. In a discussion strictly about hydration, black coffee and water are interchangeable. Humans are very susceptible to letting our experiences dictate our beliefs when data are really the only way to see the (more accurate) bigger picture.
speedfranklin
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T21:34:39.247Z
Even if that's so, one would normally sip coffee slowly, as opposed to overall drinking more water. Then again, this alone is also dependent on location - water drinking is not just more popular here than e.g. U.S., it is ingrained in the culture here.
AviD
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T17:55:15.807Z
2015-01-28T17:55:15.807Z
speedfranklin
<p>Actual scientific information on the effects of food and drink is notoriously hard to sift from all the dieting pseudoscience. I know that caffeine is a diuretic, which means it will cause me to lose more water, but given that I'm dosing up on it with water, will I lose more water than I gain? Even if it doesn't for longer drinks, will drinking espresso result in a net loss of water?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T18:15:38.697Z
Caffeine is, in fact, not a diuretic in caffeine tolerant individuals.
Suspended User
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-28T18:23:42.627Z
Personal experience if you only drink coffee you will become very dehydrated
Joshua Aslan Smith
<health>
Does coffee cause dehydration?
fredley
# Does coffee cause dehydration?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-01-28)

Actual scientific information on the effects of food and drink is notoriously hard to sift from all the dieting pseudoscience. I know that caffeine is a diuretic, which means it will cause me to lose more water, but given that I'm dosing up on it with water, will I lose more water than I gain? Even if it doesn't for longer drinks, will drinking espresso result in a net loss of water?

**Tags:** health

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Caffeine is, in fact, not a diuretic in caffeine tolerant individuals.  
> **username_2**: Personal experience if you only drink coffee you will become very dehydrated  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2015-01-28. Score: 12 | Accepted answer

Though caffeine's action as a diuretic is hotly debated, recently it seems the scientific consensus is that caffeine in normal doses is a weak diuretic in *caffeine-naive* individuals only (those without a tolerance), and only in doses exceeding 250-300 mg, or 2-3 cups of coffee. To go even further,

> A profound tolerance to the diuretic and other effects of caffeine
> develops, however, and the actions are much diminished in individuals
> who regularly consume tea or coffee.

And from the same [review of the literature](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19774754):

> Doses of caffeine equivalent to the amount normally found in standard
> servings of tea, coffee and carbonated soft drinks appear to have no
> diuretic action.

The New York Times exposed this myth in this [article](http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/health/nutrition/04real.html?_r=0):

> Researchers found no significant differences in levels of excreted
> electrolytes or urine volume [between those given caffeine and a placebo].

[Here](http://www.beverageinstitute.org/expert/laying-the-caffeine-dehydration-myth-to-rest/) is another good resource for answering these questions in a clear, FAQ-style and features a good list of references on the topic.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: That seems to be the consensus of the several studies/articles I have read, as well as what the cardiologist I work with tells his patients.  
> **username_6**: Leave it to scientists to worry about getting the facts right and still miss the point... While coffee isn't a diuretic, the fact that you are sipping coffee *instead of drinking cups of water* leads to many (not all) coffee drinkers to get partially dehydrated. (Yes, there are studies on this, but I don't remember where I saw it...) Of the few times that the Social sciences got it more right than hard science ;-)  
> **username_5**: @username_6 I think the consensus is precisely the opposite of what you say. In a discussion strictly about hydration, black coffee and water are interchangeable. Humans are very susceptible to letting our experiences dictate our beliefs when data are really the only way to see the (more accurate) bigger picture.  
> **username_6**: Even if that's so, one would normally sip coffee slowly, as opposed to overall drinking more water. Then again, this alone is also dependent on location - water drinking is not just more popular here than e.g. U.S., it is ingrained in the culture here.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2015-01-28. Score: 4

As I understand it caffeine itself is a mild diuretic. Some say this effect quickly goes away (within a week). Even if it does not for coffee the mildness of the diuretic is mostly compensated by the water intake.

I suppose in the case of espresso there may be a net loss of water, but it would still be very minimal.

I am not a doctor, so I have not fully researched this. I have not provided links because there is such varied opinion on the topic. Someone from the medical community might be able to provide a definitive reference.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: There are plenty of articles and research out there studying the effects of caffeine as a diuretic on both tolerant and naive individuals.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-01-28. Score: 3

Even though *caffeine* may be a mild diuretic, most *coffee* is over 99% water, contributing to *hydration*.

I read about [an interesting study](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11022872) that measured no difference in effective hydration between several classes of beverages (carbonated, caffeinated, sweetened, or not).

They're all mostly water.

See also [No evidence of dehydration with moderate daily coffee intake: a counterbalanced cross-over study in a free-living population.](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24416202)


---

