<p>I have the Hamilton Beach 40792.  It will be hard to find a decent one without the steamer.  Mine cost around $100</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-25T22:52:26.843Z
2018-01-25T22:52:26.843Z
lbf
<p>"There are hundreds of espresso machines that do not have a (milk) steaming wand" - that's not true at all.</p>

<p>If we are talking about bean-to-cup espress machines there are really few. I remember only Melitta Caffeo Solo, cheapest modifications of Philips/Saeco Xsmall (HD8648) and Jura Ena Micro 1.</p>

<p>There are a bit more models without a pannarello, only with the tube for hot water/steam. It's harder to froth the milk on the simple tube, however it's still a steamer. Philips Saeco HD8743/11 in the UK is a great example.</p>

<p>However, if you want to spend less on the machine w/o the steamer since you don't need it, than it's useless. All these rare modifications usually costs the same or even more than normal versions of the same machine with the steam wand.</p>

<p>So this is not the sitaution when you ar eiverpaying for the steam wand. Also the wand is useful not only for milk frothing, bit for delievering hot water as well (for tea, for americano).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-05-21T10:29:47.310Z
2018-05-21T10:29:47.310Z
Artem Sou
<p>I want to make high quality espressos at home with a machine like this, but I don't like milk. Therefore, if there is a machine like this without the milk steamer, it would be preferred. </p>

<p>Do you know of any machines like this? Would it be cheaper to just get a machine with the steamer? </p>

<p>The primary reason I would go without the steamer is to minimize price anyway.</p>

<espresso><espresso-machine><steamed-milk><bean-to-cup>
Bean-to-cup coffee machines without milk steamer
Max_Planck
# Bean-to-cup coffee machines without milk steamer

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-01-25)

I want to make high quality espressos at home with a machine like this, but I don't like milk. Therefore, if there is a machine like this without the milk steamer, it would be preferred.

Do you know of any machines like this? Would it be cheaper to just get a machine with the steamer?

The primary reason I would go without the steamer is to minimize price anyway.

**Tags:** espresso, espresso-machine, steamed-milk, bean-to-cup


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-01-25. Score: 1

I have the Hamilton Beach 40792. It will be hard to find a decent one without the steamer. Mine cost around $100


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-05-21. Score: 1

"There are hundreds of espresso machines that do not have a (milk) steaming wand" - that's not true at all.

If we are talking about bean-to-cup espress machines there are really few. I remember only Melitta Caffeo Solo, cheapest modifications of Philips/Saeco Xsmall (HD8648) and Jura Ena Micro 1.

There are a bit more models without a pannarello, only with the tube for hot water/steam. It's harder to froth the milk on the simple tube, however it's still a steamer. Philips Saeco HD8743/11 in the UK is a great example.

However, if you want to spend less on the machine w/o the steamer since you don't need it, than it's useless. All these rare modifications usually costs the same or even more than normal versions of the same machine with the steam wand.

So this is not the sitaution when you ar eiverpaying for the steam wand. Also the wand is useful not only for milk frothing, bit for delievering hot water as well (for tea, for americano).


---

