<p><a href="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.2676&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf" rel="nofollow">Fuzzy Belief Revision</a> and <a href="http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=3677" rel="nofollow">Probabilistic Belief Revision</a> are two flavours of Belief Revision that do not fall within the <em>formal logic propositions</em> characterisation of the field.</p>

CC BY-SA 2.5
2011-03-28T16:17:16.503Z
2011-03-28T16:24:36.580Z
2011-03-28T16:24:36.580Z
Dave Clarke
<p>Are there Belief Revision techniques that aren't based solely in formal logic propositions?</p>

<p>For example, if one agent believes the temperature for an area is 85 degrees and another believes the temperature is 79 degrees, is there a technique in the literature that has been proposed to to harmonize their beliefs?</p>

<lo.logic><ai.artificial-intel><knowledge-representation>
Are there Belief Revision techniques for quantified data?
Chris Redford
# Are there Belief Revision techniques for quantified data?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-03-28)

Are there Belief Revision techniques that aren't based solely in formal logic propositions?

For example, if one agent believes the temperature for an area is 85 degrees and another believes the temperature is 79 degrees, is there a technique in the literature that has been proposed to to harmonize their beliefs?

**Tags:** lo.logic, ai.artificial-intel, knowledge-representation

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2011-03-28. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

[Fuzzy Belief Revision](http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.2676&rep=rep1&type=pdf) and [Probabilistic Belief Revision](http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=3677) are two flavours of Belief Revision that do not fall within the *formal logic propositions* characterisation of the field.


---

