<p>As an update, I noticed that DBLP has added ICLR to tracking as of today. Now it has ICLR papers and their bibtex available at <a href="https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iclr/" rel="noreferrer">https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iclr/</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-03T06:25:29.283Z
2019-05-03T06:25:29.283Z
gungunba
<ul>
<li>For NeurIPS (previously NIPS), the <a href="https://papers.neurips.cc/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">NeurIPS website</a> itself is a good source: look for a paper, go to its page, and click on the "BibTex" link. Here is a random sample (!):</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/JyZnx.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/JyZnx.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<ul>
<li>ICML, COLT, and JMLR appear to have similar BibTex-ready websites: see <a href="http://proceedings.mlr.press/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://proceedings.mlr.press/</a>. For instance, going to the abstract of a randomly chosen paper from ICML'15:</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/ZpB1n.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ZpB1n.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<ul>
<li>ICLR does not seem to have this in place; for instance, even checking on <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9430221802571417838&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=0,5" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Google Scholar</a>, the paper you point out is cited <em>a lot</em> (~4k times), but <em>always</em> as the arXiv version. For conferences or workshops using <a href="https://openreview.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">OpenReview</a>, such as ICLR'18 <em>(I believe it was the first time for this conference)</em>, you can get <em>some</em> BibTex entry by <a href="https://openreview.net/group?id=ICLR.cc/2018/Conference" rel="nofollow noreferrer">clicking on a specific paper</a>, and selecting "Show BibTex":
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/j4Zu2.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/j4Zu2.png" alt="enter image description here"></a>
However, it is unclear to me the resulting citation is better that the ArXiv one.</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-21T09:13:08.100Z
thanks for the tip. it made me go back and check on dblp and actually the paper you mentioned is listed there https://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/nips/AtkesonS07 along with all other papers i tried. it seems only some workshop papers are not listed which was the paper i was trying to reference when i wrote the question. i updated the question to reflect that.
user2160809
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-21T17:06:52.623Z
@user2160809 As far as I can tell, ICLR *does* have proceedings, but no way to generate BibTex mentioning that (including [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/), which itself is a good default place to look at for citations if everything else fails). As for workshops, in general it'll depend. If there are no official proceedings, for instance, it's unlikely you'll find anything...
Clement C.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-21T20:17:25.067Z
@user2160809 See my edit.
Clement C.
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-20T18:04:47.360Z
2019-05-19T22:42:12.507Z
2019-05-19T22:42:12.507Z
Clement C.
<p>dblp seems the best i found so far (as also mentioned in the comments and in <a href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/6607/what-is-the-best-place-to-get-bibtex-entries-for-computer-science-articles">What is the best place to get BibTeX entries for computer science articles ?</a>) but even there some papers from NIPS workshops and ICLR in general are not listed as such and are listed simply as CoRR papers.</p>

<p>For example "Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate" <br/>
<a href="https://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/journals/corr/BahdanauCB14" rel="noreferrer">https://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/journals/corr/BahdanauCB14</a> <br/>
although after writing the question i'm finding that most papers are referencing the NMT paper also as CoRR/arXiv. I also didn't find proceedings of ICLR so maybe it's a general issue only with ICLR papers and some conference workshops.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-20T16:36:11.107Z
I like DBLP: https://dblp.uni-trier.de/. It has BibTex entries for conference articles across CS.
Huck Bennett
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-21T09:06:15.983Z
i tried with dblp as i mentioned in the question but i'm having issues with iclr papers and some nips papers as well. i added an example in the question
user2160809
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-23T08:41:02.630Z
There's also The Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies maintained here: https://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/index.html
Neeldhara
<machine-learning><research-practice><paper-review><bibliography>
What is the best place to get BibTeX entries for ICLR and other machine learning papers?
user2160809
# What is the best place to get BibTeX entries for ICLR and other machine learning papers?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-07-20)

dblp seems the best i found so far (as also mentioned in the comments and in [What is the best place to get BibTeX entries for computer science articles ?](https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/6607/what-is-the-best-place-to-get-bibtex-entries-for-computer-science-articles)) but even there some papers from NIPS workshops and ICLR in general are not listed as such and are listed simply as CoRR papers.

For example "Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate"   
<https://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/journals/corr/BahdanauCB14>   
although after writing the question i'm finding that most papers are referencing the NMT paper also as CoRR/arXiv. I also didn't find proceedings of ICLR so maybe it's a general issue only with ICLR papers and some conference workshops.

**Tags:** machine-learning, research-practice, paper-review, bibliography
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I like DBLP: https://dblp.uni-trier.de/. It has BibTex entries for conference articles across CS.  
> **username_0**: i tried with dblp as i mentioned in the question but i'm having issues with iclr papers and some nips papers as well. i added an example in the question  
> **username_2**: There's also The Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies maintained here: https://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/index.html  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2019-05-03. Score: 7 | Accepted answer

As an update, I noticed that DBLP has added ICLR to tracking as of today. Now it has ICLR papers and their bibtex available at <https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iclr/>


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-07-20. Score: 9

* For NeurIPS (previously NIPS), the [NeurIPS website](https://papers.neurips.cc/) itself is a good source: look for a paper, go to its page, and click on the "BibTex" link. Here is a random sample (!):

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/JyZnx.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/JyZnx.png)

* ICML, COLT, and JMLR appear to have similar BibTex-ready websites: see <http://proceedings.mlr.press/>. For instance, going to the abstract of a randomly chosen paper from ICML'15:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/ZpB1n.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/ZpB1n.png)

* ICLR does not seem to have this in place; for instance, even checking on [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9430221802571417838&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5), the paper you point out is cited *a lot* (~4k times), but *always* as the arXiv version. For conferences or workshops using [OpenReview](https://openreview.net/), such as ICLR'18 *(I believe it was the first time for this conference)*, you can get *some* BibTex entry by [clicking on a specific paper](https://openreview.net/group?id=ICLR.cc/2018/Conference), and selecting "Show BibTex":
  [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/j4Zu2.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/j4Zu2.png)
  However, it is unclear to me the resulting citation is better that the ArXiv one.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: thanks for the tip. it made me go back and check on dblp and actually the paper you mentioned is listed there https://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/nips/AtkesonS07 along with all other papers i tried. it seems only some workshop papers are not listed which was the paper i was trying to reference when i wrote the question. i updated the question to reflect that.  
> **username_4**: @user2160809 As far as I can tell, ICLR *does* have proceedings, but no way to generate BibTex mentioning that (including [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/), which itself is a good default place to look at for citations if everything else fails). As for workshops, in general it'll depend. If there are no official proceedings, for instance, it's unlikely you'll find anything...  
> **username_4**: @user2160809 See my edit.  

---

