<p>It could be useful to look at the list of participants of recent Dagstuhl seminars on scheduling</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=13111">http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=13111</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=11091">http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=11091</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=10071">http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=10071</a></p>

<p>and then to look at the publications of each participant on DBLP. This would give you a good overview of who is doing what in the area. (The approach should work also for other topics.) </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T07:48:13.777Z
2015-12-06T07:48:13.777Z
Daniel Marx
<p>Kirk Pruhs, Cliff Stein, Kamesh Munagala, Nikhil Bansal, Sungjin Im, Ben Moseley.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-05T06:07:35.417Z
2015-12-05T06:07:35.417Z
Chandra Chekuri
<p>I have an interest in a postdoc on scheduling problems but I cannot find many researchers who are actively involved in this. Any help?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T20:14:52.240Z
I guess this is not a research level technical question which explains the down voting. Perhaps a different forum exists for this question?
Chandra Chekuri
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-07T06:00:18.460Z
I don't think this is on-topic here.  This site is for *technical* questions about computer science theory.  (The question has many other issues: it calls for a big list, which often doesn't work so well on this site format; answers will go out of date; the question shows no evidence of research or effort before asking; and if the site permitted this kind of question, it might be inundated with variants of this for every subfield of CS theory.)
D.W.
<scheduling>
Who are active researchers in the scheduling theory?
user1009285
# Who are active researchers in the scheduling theory?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-12-05)

I have an interest in a postdoc on scheduling problems but I cannot find many researchers who are actively involved in this. Any help?

**Tags:** scheduling
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I guess this is not a research level technical question which explains the down voting. Perhaps a different forum exists for this question?  
> **username_2**: I don't think this is on-topic here.  This site is for *technical* questions about computer science theory.  (The question has many other issues: it calls for a big list, which often doesn't work so well on this site format; answers will go out of date; the question shows no evidence of research or effort before asking; and if the site permitted this kind of question, it might be inundated with variants of this for every subfield of CS theory.)  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2015-12-06. Score: 6

It could be useful to look at the list of participants of recent Dagstuhl seminars on scheduling

<http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=13111>

<http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=11091>

<http://www.dagstuhl.de/program/calendar/partlist/?semnr=10071>

and then to look at the publications of each participant on DBLP. This would give you a good overview of who is doing what in the area. (The approach should work also for other topics.)


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-12-05. Score: 5

Kirk Pruhs, Cliff Stein, Kamesh Munagala, Nikhil Bansal, Sungjin Im, Ben Moseley.


---

