<ol>
<li><p>Because the geometry will be subdivided into quads. Anyway the primary reason for this is if you have a function with 2 directions it is easer for humans to think it out andcanticipate results if its a quad.</p>

<p>Software renderers dont have to rely on triangles. And did not for a long time. But then if you microdice your surface who cares its not like you can see the micropolygon anyway.</p>

<p>For more on this read <a href="https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/questions/5465/why-are-quads-used-in-filmmaking-and-triangle-in-gaming">this post</a></p></li>
<li><p>You might want to control the triangulation yourself. Interpolation does not happen the same way regardless of how the triangles are laid out. So being able to triangulate and then flip offending triangles is useful.</p></li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-01T10:43:12.487Z
2020-05-01T10:50:59.113Z
2020-05-01T10:50:59.113Z
joojaa
<p>In addition to what other people have said, for cpu / raytracing it is more memory effecient to store quads even though they may be intersected as two triangles.</p>

<p>When you have millions of polygons, this memory saving is useful and there are no real performance side effects.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-06T14:12:10.820Z
2020-05-06T14:12:10.820Z
Peter
<p>I know that 3D artists make a 3D model with quads. And they advise to remesh with quads only (if it's possible).</p>

<p>So I have some questions:</p>

<ol>
<li>Why do we use quads in CG (for games, cartoons, film, etc) if the graphic card (or render, I'm not sure) convert quads to tris all the same?</li>
<li>Why many 3D apps (Max, Blender, Maya, etc) have a triangulate function? Eventually, the graphic card (or render) does that.</li>
</ol>

<p>I want to clarify this question for myself since I know it incompletely.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-01T10:38:37.910Z
Does this answer your question? [Why are quads used in filmmaking and triangle in gaming?](https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/questions/5465/why-are-quads-used-in-filmmaking-and-triangle-in-gaming)
wychmaster
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-01T10:42:46.657Z
Further information can be found [here](https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/questions/8966/triangle-why-is-it-the-basic-building-block-for-complex-shapes/8969#8969), [here](https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/66312/quads-vs-triangles), and [here](https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/9511/why-do-game-engines-convert-models-to-triangles-instead-of-using-quads)
wychmaster
<3d><mesh><triangulation>
What tris and quads need for?
Jo K
# What tris and quads need for?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-05-01)

I know that 3D artists make a 3D model with quads. And they advise to remesh with quads only (if it's possible).

So I have some questions:

1. Why do we use quads in CG (for games, cartoons, film, etc) if the graphic card (or render, I'm not sure) convert quads to tris all the same?
2. Why many 3D apps (Max, Blender, Maya, etc) have a triangulate function? Eventually, the graphic card (or render) does that.

I want to clarify this question for myself since I know it incompletely.

**Tags:** 3d, mesh, triangulation

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Does this answer your question? [Why are quads used in filmmaking and triangle in gaming?](https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/questions/5465/why-are-quads-used-in-filmmaking-and-triangle-in-gaming)  
> **username_1**: Further information can be found [here](https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/questions/8966/triangle-why-is-it-the-basic-building-block-for-complex-shapes/8969#8969), [here](https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/66312/quads-vs-triangles), and [here](https://gamedev.stackexchange.com/questions/9511/why-do-game-engines-convert-models-to-triangles-instead-of-using-quads)  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-05-01. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

1. Because the geometry will be subdivided into quads. Anyway the primary reason for this is if you have a function with 2 directions it is easer for humans to think it out andcanticipate results if its a quad.

   Software renderers dont have to rely on triangles. And did not for a long time. But then if you microdice your surface who cares its not like you can see the micropolygon anyway.

   For more on this read [this post](https://computergraphics.stackexchange.com/questions/5465/why-are-quads-used-in-filmmaking-and-triangle-in-gaming)
2. You might want to control the triangulation yourself. Interpolation does not happen the same way regardless of how the triangles are laid out. So being able to triangulate and then flip offending triangles is useful.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-05-06. Score: -1

In addition to what other people have said, for cpu / raytracing it is more memory effecient to store quads even though they may be intersected as two triangles.

When you have millions of polygons, this memory saving is useful and there are no real performance side effects.


---

