<p>Yes, that is the case.  The Earth would have to be between the sun and the distant star for them to detect it via the transit method.  Interestingly and something I don't hear a lot about is that only a fraction of stars that would see the Earth transit would see any other of our planets transit.  See <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/14832/likelihood-of-extra-planets-in-systems-identified-by-kepler">my question</a> on the topic.  Since the orbits of the planets are inclined to each other, if another civilization can see Earth transit, they will not be able to see all the inner planets transit.  If they were in just the right place they could see Earth, Mars, and Mercury transit, but not Venus.  In other places they could see Earth and Venus transit, but not Mars or Mercury.  Through most of the ecliptic where they would see an Earth transit that is the only one they would see.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/fvkuh.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/fvkuh.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-19T16:51:41.860Z
Shouldn't at least the Mercury transit zone sweep along the ecliptic?
Hagen von Eitzen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-19T17:16:22.450Z
Mercury's orbit is inclined 7 degrees to the ecliptic (Earth's orbit which is in blue).  The chart shows 4 degrees above and below the ecliptic. Venus is inclined at 3.39 degrees and Mars at 1.85 degrees.
Jason Goemaat
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-18T15:14:51.937Z
2020-11-18T20:36:54.270Z
2020-11-18T20:36:54.270Z
Jason Goemaat
<p>Yes.  And this fact explains some of the distribution of known planets.  Many orbit very close to their star, so they have a greater chance of transiting.  Detecting the Earth by the transiting method would be a challenge with our level of technology, even if we were on one of those stars that lie very close to the ecliptic.</p>
<p>However stars are so plentiful and that even sampling only a small area in Cygnus, the Kepler satellite found many stars with transiting planets.</p>
<p>There are other methods of detecting planets, such as the radial velocity method, but many work better with either planets that are very close to their host stars, or very far.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-17T20:50:46.777Z
2020-11-17T20:50:46.777Z
James K
<p>If you want to know what places would see a transit, simply draw a ray from the Sun to the Earth. Since the ecliptic is a plane that contains the Sun and Earth, the ray is also contained in the ecliptic.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-18T06:22:41.157Z
2020-11-18T06:22:41.157Z
Acccumulation
<p>Yes. <a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AsBio..16..259H/abstract" rel="noreferrer">Heller and Pudritz 2016</a> define an Earth transit zone (ETZ) within 0.26° of the ecliptic and a restricted ETZ (rETZ) half as wide.
They also list 82 Sun-like stars in the rETZ and within 1 kiloparsec of the Sun.
<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160...29S/abstract" rel="noreferrer">Sheikh et al. 2020</a> report on a search for artificial radio signals from 20 of those.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-17T22:53:47.547Z
2020-11-17T22:53:47.547Z
Mike G
<p>The majority of exoplanets we have discovered have been found by the transit method, in which a planet passes in front of its parent star and by analyzing the light curve we can deduct its characteristics.</p>
<p>Say there was intelligent life around a nearby star, could they only see the Earth transit in front of the Sun if they were located around the ecliptic?</p>

<exoplanet>
Are stars near the ecliptic the only stars from which Earth would appear to transit the Sun?
user177107
# Are stars near the ecliptic the only stars from which Earth would appear to transit the Sun?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-11-17)

The majority of exoplanets we have discovered have been found by the transit method, in which a planet passes in front of its parent star and by analyzing the light curve we can deduct its characteristics.

Say there was intelligent life around a nearby star, could they only see the Earth transit in front of the Sun if they were located around the ecliptic?

**Tags:** exoplanet


---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2020-11-17. Score: 19 | Accepted answer

Yes. [Heller and Pudritz 2016](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AsBio..16..259H/abstract) define an Earth transit zone (ETZ) within 0.26° of the ecliptic and a restricted ETZ (rETZ) half as wide.
They also list 82 Sun-like stars in the rETZ and within 1 kiloparsec of the Sun.
[Sheikh et al. 2020](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160...29S/abstract) report on a search for artificial radio signals from 20 of those.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-11-17. Score: 8

Yes. And this fact explains some of the distribution of known planets. Many orbit very close to their star, so they have a greater chance of transiting. Detecting the Earth by the transiting method would be a challenge with our level of technology, even if we were on one of those stars that lie very close to the ecliptic.

However stars are so plentiful and that even sampling only a small area in Cygnus, the Kepler satellite found many stars with transiting planets.

There are other methods of detecting planets, such as the radial velocity method, but many work better with either planets that are very close to their host stars, or very far.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-11-18. Score: 6

Yes, that is the case. The Earth would have to be between the sun and the distant star for them to detect it via the transit method. Interestingly and something I don't hear a lot about is that only a fraction of stars that would see the Earth transit would see any other of our planets transit. See [my question](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/14832/likelihood-of-extra-planets-in-systems-identified-by-kepler) on the topic. Since the orbits of the planets are inclined to each other, if another civilization can see Earth transit, they will not be able to see all the inner planets transit. If they were in just the right place they could see Earth, Mars, and Mercury transit, but not Venus. In other places they could see Earth and Venus transit, but not Mars or Mercury. Through most of the ecliptic where they would see an Earth transit that is the only one they would see.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/fvkuh.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/fvkuh.png)

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Shouldn't at least the Mercury transit zone sweep along the ecliptic?  
> **username_1**: Mercury's orbit is inclined 7 degrees to the ecliptic (Earth's orbit which is in blue).  The chart shows 4 degrees above and below the ecliptic. Venus is inclined at 3.39 degrees and Mars at 1.85 degrees.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-11-18. Score: 1

If you want to know what places would see a transit, simply draw a ray from the Sun to the Earth. Since the ecliptic is a plane that contains the Sun and Earth, the ray is also contained in the ecliptic.


---

