<p>Human color vision is based on three types of "cones" in the eye that respond differently to different wavelengths of light. Thus, not counting overall brightness, the human color space has two degrees of freedom. In contrast, the spectra of stars are very close to a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law" rel="noreferrer">black body</a>, which depends only on effective temperature. As one varies the temperature, the color of a star should make a one-dimensional curve in this color space. Thus, unless some <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-filling_curve" rel="noreferrer">perverse shenanigans</a> are going on, it is intuitive that we necessarily miss most of colors, i.e. there will be no stars of those colors.</p>

<p>Our Sun actually has a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law" rel="noreferrer">peak</a> at about $500\,\mathrm{nm}$, which is a green. However, that's just the peak: since the Sun also radiates lots of light with shorter wavelength (bluer) and also longer wavelengths (redder), the resulting mixture doesn't look green to human eyes.</p>

<p>An image from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_temperature" rel="noreferrer">wikipedia</a> on the color of a blackbody of a given temperature:</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Sps3c.png" alt="Color temperature"></p>

<p>Note that the colors at near edges of this color space aren't accurate, because the sRGB standard used in computers only covers a fairly small triangle portion of it. Still, that's a complication that's not very important here.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-01T07:15:50.747Z
It would be interesting to add the curve of pure frequencies to this diagram.
Steve Linton
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-19T12:59:58.673Z
Does this mean that a green star is literally impossible?
HyperLuminal
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-19T14:12:10.883Z
@HyperLuminal It means that a green blackbody is literally impossible, and since the spectra of stars is that of a blackbody plus some relatively spectral line corrections, green stars should be impossible too. I'm not entirely sure how to quantify a deviation from greenness, though. In any case, you can see from the color space that there's nothing special about green in this way, as you stars actually miss almost all the colors.
Stan Liou
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-19T14:43:31.627Z
Your argument of a curve in a two dimensional space is beautifully clear. I subscribed for the very purpose of voting this up!
Michaël Le Barbier
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-19T00:47:49.123Z
2015-04-19T00:47:49.123Z
Stan Liou
<p>There are red stars, and orange stars, and yellow stars, and blue stars, and they are all understandable save the fact that there is a 'gap': <strong>There are no green stars.</strong> </p>

<p>Is this because of hydrogen's chemical properties (e.g. the emission spectrum) or some other reason? Or are there just green stars that I have no idea of? If so, I need some pictures; they must look awesome.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-01T18:51:02.567Z
Maybe with super-fast relativistic effects one could view a green star.
BMF
<star><stellar-astrophysics><hydrogen>
Why are there no green stars?
HyperLuminal
# Why are there no green stars?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-18)

There are red stars, and orange stars, and yellow stars, and blue stars, and they are all understandable save the fact that there is a 'gap': **There are no green stars.**

Is this because of hydrogen's chemical properties (e.g. the emission spectrum) or some other reason? Or are there just green stars that I have no idea of? If so, I need some pictures; they must look awesome.

**Tags:** star, stellar-astrophysics, hydrogen

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Maybe with super-fast relativistic effects one could view a green star.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-04-19. Score: 34 | Accepted answer

Human color vision is based on three types of "cones" in the eye that respond differently to different wavelengths of light. Thus, not counting overall brightness, the human color space has two degrees of freedom. In contrast, the spectra of stars are very close to a [black body](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law), which depends only on effective temperature. As one varies the temperature, the color of a star should make a one-dimensional curve in this color space. Thus, unless some [perverse shenanigans](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-filling_curve) are going on, it is intuitive that we necessarily miss most of colors, i.e. there will be no stars of those colors.

Our Sun actually has a [peak](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wien%27s_displacement_law) at about $500\,\mathrm{nm}$, which is a green. However, that's just the peak: since the Sun also radiates lots of light with shorter wavelength (bluer) and also longer wavelengths (redder), the resulting mixture doesn't look green to human eyes.

An image from [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_temperature) on the color of a blackbody of a given temperature:

![Color temperature](https://i.sstatic.net/Sps3c.png)

Note that the colors at near edges of this color space aren't accurate, because the sRGB standard used in computers only covers a fairly small triangle portion of it. Still, that's a complication that's not very important here.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Does this mean that a green star is literally impossible?  
> **username_2**: @username_0 It means that a green blackbody is literally impossible, and since the spectra of stars is that of a blackbody plus some relatively spectral line corrections, green stars should be impossible too. I'm not entirely sure how to quantify a deviation from greenness, though. In any case, you can see from the color space that there's nothing special about green in this way, as you stars actually miss almost all the colors.  
> **username_4**: Your argument of a curve in a two dimensional space is beautifully clear. I subscribed for the very purpose of voting this up!  
> **username_3**: It would be interesting to add the curve of pure frequencies to this diagram.  

---

