<blockquote>
  <p>At what annual rate are new exoplanets being recognized? How does it compare to new asteroids?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Assuming exoplanets have been discovered at a constant rate since 1995 (not very true) then the rate is very approximately 117 exoplanets a year. Comparing to the <a href="https://minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/ArchiveStatistics.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Minor Planet Center (MPC) archive stats</a> which are plotted below: </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/omCRY.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/omCRY.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>which shows that approx. 761,000 asteroids of all types have been discovered since 1995 April or roughly 22,000 a year. (The lower black line is for the smaller number of asteroids that have been seen enough times and the orbit is secure enough that they can be numbered).</p>

<p>Exoplanets suffer from magnitude and volume-limit problems in that to get a large enough number on the sky to discover large numbers of them, requires going faint. Since confirming an exoplanet and ruling out other explanations such as blended background stars and M dwarf or brown dwarf binaries (which give similar transit depths but different radial velocity amplitudes) requires a large additional effort and high precision spectroscopy to confirm them, this becomes the bottleneck requiring tens or more of hours of large (4m) telescope time to confirm each of the fainter exoplanet candidates. Additionally the most numerous exoplanets in the 2-15 times of the Earth range are very tough to confirm as the RV amplitude is very small (few m/s or smaller depending on the orbital period).</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I'm also wondering if there is any chance there will be a crossover in the rates in the next few years. </p>
</blockquote>

<p>Because of the limitations discussed above, the chances of there being a cross-over in rates any time soon is slim to none.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-01T22:49:21.853Z
Sorry, yes, I failed to address that second part of your question. Once LSST gets going in the ~2022, then the rate of asteroid discovery will rocket up again
astrosnapper
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-05T01:27:49.770Z
Thinking about the cross-over rate; at some point won't *all the asteroids* have been found, and what's left unfound would be better classified as dust? Also, just asked [Are there actual asteroids in the Oort cloud?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/41232/7982) to try to put some limits on this.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-05T16:29:07.103Z
No not even close. If you look at Fig 8 in [Jones, Juric & Ivezic 2015 ](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.03199.pdf) which shows the completeness of the different Solar System populations after LSST. 50% completion for Main Belt asteroids is at a few hundred meters, for TNOs many km's in diameter. Inverse square law in both directions means things get faint fast with distance...
astrosnapper
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-06T02:08:48.817Z
you darn astronomers and the intuitive way you apply scaling laws to everything! :-)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-04-01T21:39:21.033Z
2019-04-01T22:35:30.337Z
2019-04-01T22:35:30.337Z
astrosnapper
<p>I just read the BBC News article <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47681239" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Exoplanet tally set to pass 4,000 mark
</a>. It makes me wonder about the annual rate  that new exoplanets being recognized, and how it compares to the rate of new asteroids.</p>

<p>I'm also wondering if there is any chance there will be a crossover in the rates in the next few years. <a href="https://space.stackexchange.com/a/26577/12102">TESS</a> has found it's first exoplanet, and <a href="https://space.stackexchange.com/q/34762/12102">hopefully WFIRST will be on schedule</a> as well.</p>

<exoplanet><asteroids><tess>
At what annual rate are new exoplanets being recognized? How does it compare to new asteroids?
uhoh
# At what annual rate are new exoplanets being recognized? How does it compare to new asteroids?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-04-01)

I just read the BBC News article [Exoplanet tally set to pass 4,000 mark](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-47681239). It makes me wonder about the annual rate that new exoplanets being recognized, and how it compares to the rate of new asteroids.

I'm also wondering if there is any chance there will be a crossover in the rates in the next few years. [TESS](https://space.stackexchange.com/a/26577/12102) has found it's first exoplanet, and [hopefully WFIRST will be on schedule](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/34762/12102) as well.

**Tags:** exoplanet, asteroids, tess


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-04-01. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

> At what annual rate are new exoplanets being recognized? How does it compare to new asteroids?

Assuming exoplanets have been discovered at a constant rate since 1995 (not very true) then the rate is very approximately 117 exoplanets a year. Comparing to the [Minor Planet Center (MPC) archive stats](https://minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/ArchiveStatistics.html) which are plotted below:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/omCRY.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/omCRY.png)

which shows that approx. 761,000 asteroids of all types have been discovered since 1995 April or roughly 22,000 a year. (The lower black line is for the smaller number of asteroids that have been seen enough times and the orbit is secure enough that they can be numbered).

Exoplanets suffer from magnitude and volume-limit problems in that to get a large enough number on the sky to discover large numbers of them, requires going faint. Since confirming an exoplanet and ruling out other explanations such as blended background stars and M dwarf or brown dwarf binaries (which give similar transit depths but different radial velocity amplitudes) requires a large additional effort and high precision spectroscopy to confirm them, this becomes the bottleneck requiring tens or more of hours of large (4m) telescope time to confirm each of the fainter exoplanet candidates. Additionally the most numerous exoplanets in the 2-15 times of the Earth range are very tough to confirm as the RV amplitude is very small (few m/s or smaller depending on the orbital period).

> I'm also wondering if there is any chance there will be a crossover in the rates in the next few years.

Because of the limitations discussed above, the chances of there being a cross-over in rates any time soon is slim to none.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Sorry, yes, I failed to address that second part of your question. Once LSST gets going in the ~2022, then the rate of asteroid discovery will rocket up again  
> **username_0**: Thinking about the cross-over rate; at some point won't *all the asteroids* have been found, and what's left unfound would be better classified as dust? Also, just asked [Are there actual asteroids in the Oort cloud?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/41232/7982) to try to put some limits on this.  
> **username_1**: No not even close. If you look at Fig 8 in [Jones, Juric & Ivezic 2015 ](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.03199.pdf) which shows the completeness of the different Solar System populations after LSST. 50% completion for Main Belt asteroids is at a few hundred meters, for TNOs many km's in diameter. Inverse square law in both directions means things get faint fast with distance...  
> **username_0**: you darn astronomers and the intuitive way you apply scaling laws to everything! :-)  

---

