<p>As a fellow layman, I'll give this my best shot.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The further away a galaxy is from us, the faster it is moving away
  from us. But the galaxies we see exist in the distant past because it
  takes a long time for their light to reach us. The closer galaxies
  are, the more recent their light is, and the slower they move away
  from us.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>All true.   Think of a single point explosion, at any given time, the object twice as far should be moving twice as fast, cause they both started in the same place at the same time, so twice as fast moves twice s far.   There are, complications - with the explosion there's air resistance, with the universe well, I'll get to that.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Doesn’t this seem to indicate that the expansion of the universe is
  slowing down, because the more recent light from galaxies, appears to
  be moving away slower? Does this make sense?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>OK, it sounds like you have an incorrect assumption there.   Expansion means the far away is moving away faster and the closer is moving away slower, that's true with accelerating or decelerating expansion.   </p>

<p>What they look for when studying expansion is measuring the precise speed and comparing that to distance.   In steady expansion, you expect to see the galaxy 8 billion light years away to be apparently moving away twice as fast as the galaxy 4 billion light years away.  (I say apparently cause we can only observe the relative velocity from 8 billion years in the past).</p>

<p>So, whether the galaxy 8 billion light years is traveling slightly more or slightly less than twice as fast away from us as the galaxy 4 billion light years away - that's what tells us about acceleration vs deceleration.</p>

<p>Imagine a car driving 60 MPH, and the driver puts the ever so slightest pressure on one of the pedals, but you don't know which one, and similarly the car driving 30 MPH does the same, but we can only see how fast the 60 MPH car was driving 6 minutes ago and we see how fast the car driving 30 was driving 3 minutes ago - that gives the 30 MPH car more time to apply the acceleration or deceleration.    It's that time differential that gives us the information.</p>

<p>So, like the cars above, the galaxy 4 billion light years away has been in the accelerating expansion of space longer than the one 8 billion years ago and that's what tells us that the acceleration of expansion is happening, the nearer galaxies are moving a bit faster away from us than they would in a steady expansion or a gravitationally slowed expansion.  (edited to make a bit more clear)</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The newer light is moving slower. The older light moving faster. So
  from this it seems that the universe was expanding faster in the past?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>light doesn't move slower or faster.  it red-shifts when objects are moving away from each other.  The faster they move away the greater the red-shift.  That's one way relative velocity can be measured. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-05T01:23:18.417Z
Thank you,  that makes sense. The bit about the newer light moving faster was a typo.
Shardvexz
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-05T01:10:35.780Z
2015-04-05T04:15:50.680Z
2015-04-05T04:15:50.680Z
userLTK
<p>Brilliant question and great guess. The farther we see in space, the farther we see back in time; and the farther we see back in time, the faster <strong>was</strong> acceleration. And vice versa.
In fact, our local universe--Laniakea--is contracting. Laniakea is 500 million light years across. It suggests that the expansion stopped 500 million years ago and contraction began.
Galaxies farther than 500 light years away we still see redshifted because more than 500 million years ago they still were running away. Today they are blueshifted but humans will see this blueshift only in very distant future.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-18T19:38:54.120Z
You know this how?
Conrad Turner
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-18T17:02:22.727Z
2015-07-18T17:02:22.727Z
max
<p>Please forgive my ignorance, I am not an astronomer, just an interested layman.</p>

<p>The further away a galaxy is from us, the faster it is moving away from us.  But the galaxies we see exist in the distant past because it takes a long time for their light to reach us. The closer galaxies are, the more recent their light is, and the slower they move away from us. Doesn’t this seem to indicate that the expansion of the universe is slowing down, because the more recent light from galaxies, appears to be moving away slower? Does this make sense?</p>

<p>Quote from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Overview" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Hubble observed that the distances to faraway galaxies were strongly correlated with their redshifts. This was interpreted to mean that all distant galaxies and clusters are receding away from our vantage point with an apparent velocity proportional to their distance: that is, the farther they are, the faster they move away from us, regardless of direction.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-05T08:24:05.587Z
possible duplicate of [Dark Energy Expansion](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/4719/dark-energy-expansion)
ProfRob
<big-bang-theory><expansion>
How do we know the universe's expansion is speeding up?
Shardvexz
# How do we know the universe's expansion is speeding up?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-04)

Please forgive my ignorance, I am not an astronomer, just an interested layman.

The further away a galaxy is from us, the faster it is moving away from us. But the galaxies we see exist in the distant past because it takes a long time for their light to reach us. The closer galaxies are, the more recent their light is, and the slower they move away from us. Doesn’t this seem to indicate that the expansion of the universe is slowing down, because the more recent light from galaxies, appears to be moving away slower? Does this make sense?

Quote from [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Overview):

> Hubble observed that the distances to faraway galaxies were strongly correlated with their redshifts. This was interpreted to mean that all distant galaxies and clusters are receding away from our vantage point with an apparent velocity proportional to their distance: that is, the farther they are, the faster they move away from us, regardless of direction.

**Tags:** big-bang-theory, expansion

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: possible duplicate of [Dark Energy Expansion](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/4719/dark-energy-expansion)  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-04-05. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

As a fellow layman, I'll give this my best shot.

> The further away a galaxy is from us, the faster it is moving away
> from us. But the galaxies we see exist in the distant past because it
> takes a long time for their light to reach us. The closer galaxies
> are, the more recent their light is, and the slower they move away
> from us.

All true. Think of a single point explosion, at any given time, the object twice as far should be moving twice as fast, cause they both started in the same place at the same time, so twice as fast moves twice s far. There are, complications - with the explosion there's air resistance, with the universe well, I'll get to that.

> Doesn’t this seem to indicate that the expansion of the universe is
> slowing down, because the more recent light from galaxies, appears to
> be moving away slower? Does this make sense?

OK, it sounds like you have an incorrect assumption there. Expansion means the far away is moving away faster and the closer is moving away slower, that's true with accelerating or decelerating expansion.

What they look for when studying expansion is measuring the precise speed and comparing that to distance. In steady expansion, you expect to see the galaxy 8 billion light years away to be apparently moving away twice as fast as the galaxy 4 billion light years away. (I say apparently cause we can only observe the relative velocity from 8 billion years in the past).

So, whether the galaxy 8 billion light years is traveling slightly more or slightly less than twice as fast away from us as the galaxy 4 billion light years away - that's what tells us about acceleration vs deceleration.

Imagine a car driving 60 MPH, and the driver puts the ever so slightest pressure on one of the pedals, but you don't know which one, and similarly the car driving 30 MPH does the same, but we can only see how fast the 60 MPH car was driving 6 minutes ago and we see how fast the car driving 30 was driving 3 minutes ago - that gives the 30 MPH car more time to apply the acceleration or deceleration. It's that time differential that gives us the information.

So, like the cars above, the galaxy 4 billion light years away has been in the accelerating expansion of space longer than the one 8 billion years ago and that's what tells us that the acceleration of expansion is happening, the nearer galaxies are moving a bit faster away from us than they would in a steady expansion or a gravitationally slowed expansion. (edited to make a bit more clear)

> The newer light is moving slower. The older light moving faster. So
> from this it seems that the universe was expanding faster in the past?

light doesn't move slower or faster. it red-shifts when objects are moving away from each other. The faster they move away the greater the red-shift. That's one way relative velocity can be measured.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you,  that makes sense. The bit about the newer light moving faster was a typo.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2015-07-18. Score: -2

Brilliant question and great guess. The farther we see in space, the farther we see back in time; and the farther we see back in time, the faster **was** acceleration. And vice versa.
In fact, our local universe--Laniakea--is contracting. Laniakea is 500 million light years across. It suggests that the expansion stopped 500 million years ago and contraction began.
Galaxies farther than 500 light years away we still see redshifted because more than 500 million years ago they still were running away. Today they are blueshifted but humans will see this blueshift only in very distant future.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: You know this how?  

---

