<blockquote>
  <p>The materials inside a neutron star are densely packed (extremely close to each other) and as time goes by say about an eon later, most of the neutrons would eventually tunnel into each other</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Based on what ?</p>

<p>The material's collapse was <em>halted</em> from an astonishingly high speed collapse by the neutron degeneracy pressure that exists precisely because the universe doesn't want to let two neutrons fuse.  The enormous forces involved in the collapse and the enormous forces keeping the mass compact are not high enough to overcome this.  That's why it exists in the first place.</p>

<p>Over time "tunnelling" works in many, many ways. If two neutrons were to fuse in this manner the list of possible by products is enormous, and a black hole is most unlikely, IMO.  We've a lot of experience of whacking particles into other particles in extreme conditions ( think CERN ) and we haven't seen any sign of a black hole yet ( and believe me, they're looking for them ).  So I think the odds of a fuse into a black hole are extremely low.  Over time it's more likely the neutron star would "evaporate" into other particles.  But over those time scales you're looking at the cold death of the universe and protons decaying and so on.</p>

<p>And if, for argument sake, a mini black hole formed from two neutron's "fusing" it's life expectancy would be minuscule as tunnelling effects ( predicted by Hawking ) suggest it would "evaporate" in the blink of an eye.  So isolated fusing events, even f they happened, would be unlikely to produce a black hole that grew, but instead one that just blew up as fast as it was created.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>and voila! the neutron star becomes black hole? sound suspicious to me but can it happen?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No evidence I am aware of suggests neutrons will fuse in the manner you're describing.</p>

<p>"Neutron Star" is probably something of a misnomer.  Apart from neutrons, current models ( "educated guesses" ) suggest that the core of such a body might be a lump of something called quark-gluon plasma, which is essentially mush made from neutrons.  This is what you get when you fuse neutrons together -  a form of mush made up of the stuff that neutrons and protons are made from - quarks.</p>

<p>So theory and evidence suggests that you don't get a black hole from just waiting for a neutron star to change into one.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-20T08:07:45.567Z
Neutron stars are not supported by neutron degeneracy pressure (though it makes a small contribution). The max. mass of a NS supported by NDP is 0.7 solar masses, and all known NS are more massive than this. What supports NS is the repulsive core of the strong nuclear force at small separations. Otherwise, all agreed.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-20T04:53:35.020Z
2015-12-20T04:53:35.020Z
StephenG - Help Ukraine
<blockquote>
  <p>Would all neutron stars inevitably collapse into black holes due to quantum tunnelling?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Not to my knowledge. Where did you hear that? I don't think it's true, because if it was you could make the same claim about any massive body. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The materials inside a neutron star are densely packed (extremely close to each other) and as time goes by say about an eon later, most of the neutrons would eventually tunnel into each other and voila! the neutron star becomes black hole? sound suspicious to me but can it happen?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I can't say <em>no it can't happen</em> with confidence. But nor can I say with confidence that you won't receive a visit tomorrow from a fairy riding on the back of a unicorn. The thing to focus on here is the "quantum tunnelling". Do you know of any actual experiments where two particles do some "quantum tunnelling" and morph into something else. Because I don't.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-19T18:36:29.467Z
2015-12-19T18:36:29.467Z
John Duffield
<p>The materials inside a neutron star are densely packed (extremely close to each other) and as time goes by say about an <strong><em>eon</em></strong> later, most of the neutrons would eventually tunnel into each other and voila! the neutron star becomes black hole? sound suspicious to me but can it happen?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-19T12:19:57.043Z
What do you mean by tunnel into each other?
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-19T13:16:45.410Z
@RobJeffries: maybe neutron-neutron fusion... I might be wrong but worth a shot!
user6760
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-19T16:46:24.690Z
how-does-neutron-star-collapse- into-black-hole this is a similar question also answered about neutron stars collapsing and there lifetime in the space . Hopefully it helps--
varunk
<black-hole><neutron-star>
Would all neutron stars inevitably collapse into black holes due to quantum tunneling?
user6760
# Would all neutron stars inevitably collapse into black holes due to quantum tunneling?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-12-19)

The materials inside a neutron star are densely packed (extremely close to each other) and as time goes by say about an ***eon*** later, most of the neutrons would eventually tunnel into each other and voila! the neutron star becomes black hole? sound suspicious to me but can it happen?

**Tags:** black-hole, neutron-star

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What do you mean by tunnel into each other?  
> **username_0**: @RobJeffries: maybe neutron-neutron fusion... I might be wrong but worth a shot!  
> **username_2**: how-does-neutron-star-collapse- into-black-hole this is a similar question also answered about neutron stars collapsing and there lifetime in the space . Hopefully it helps--  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2015-12-20. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

> The materials inside a neutron star are densely packed (extremely close to each other) and as time goes by say about an eon later, most of the neutrons would eventually tunnel into each other

Based on what ?

The material's collapse was *halted* from an astonishingly high speed collapse by the neutron degeneracy pressure that exists precisely because the universe doesn't want to let two neutrons fuse. The enormous forces involved in the collapse and the enormous forces keeping the mass compact are not high enough to overcome this. That's why it exists in the first place.

Over time "tunnelling" works in many, many ways. If two neutrons were to fuse in this manner the list of possible by products is enormous, and a black hole is most unlikely, IMO. We've a lot of experience of whacking particles into other particles in extreme conditions ( think CERN ) and we haven't seen any sign of a black hole yet ( and believe me, they're looking for them ). So I think the odds of a fuse into a black hole are extremely low. Over time it's more likely the neutron star would "evaporate" into other particles. But over those time scales you're looking at the cold death of the universe and protons decaying and so on.

And if, for argument sake, a mini black hole formed from two neutron's "fusing" it's life expectancy would be minuscule as tunnelling effects ( predicted by Hawking ) suggest it would "evaporate" in the blink of an eye. So isolated fusing events, even f they happened, would be unlikely to produce a black hole that grew, but instead one that just blew up as fast as it was created.

> and voila! the neutron star becomes black hole? sound suspicious to me but can it happen?

No evidence I am aware of suggests neutrons will fuse in the manner you're describing.

"Neutron Star" is probably something of a misnomer. Apart from neutrons, current models ( "educated guesses" ) suggest that the core of such a body might be a lump of something called quark-gluon plasma, which is essentially mush made from neutrons. This is what you get when you fuse neutrons together - a form of mush made up of the stuff that neutrons and protons are made from - quarks.

So theory and evidence suggests that you don't get a black hole from just waiting for a neutron star to change into one.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Neutron stars are not supported by neutron degeneracy pressure (though it makes a small contribution). The max. mass of a NS supported by NDP is 0.7 solar masses, and all known NS are more massive than this. What supports NS is the repulsive core of the strong nuclear force at small separations. Otherwise, all agreed.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-12-19. Score: -2

> Would all neutron stars inevitably collapse into black holes due to quantum tunnelling?

Not to my knowledge. Where did you hear that? I don't think it's true, because if it was you could make the same claim about any massive body.

> The materials inside a neutron star are densely packed (extremely close to each other) and as time goes by say about an eon later, most of the neutrons would eventually tunnel into each other and voila! the neutron star becomes black hole? sound suspicious to me but can it happen?

I can't say *no it can't happen* with confidence. But nor can I say with confidence that you won't receive a visit tomorrow from a fairy riding on the back of a unicorn. The thing to focus on here is the "quantum tunnelling". Do you know of any actual experiments where two particles do some "quantum tunnelling" and morph into something else. Because I don't.


---

