<blockquote>
  <p>What is the largest recorded solar flare?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Since @Moriarty already dealt with historical records, I will focus on the modern observations.</p>

<p><strong>X-Ray Classification</strong><br>
On April 2, 2001 the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_Operational_Environmental_Satellite" rel="nofollow">GOES</a> spacecraft recorded an X20 flare (see the following for flare classification: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare#Classification" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare#Classification</a>).  Most flares fall below C-class (i.e., at least 100 times weaker) and X-class flares are the strongest.</p>

<p>On November 4, 2003 there was an X20+ class flare.  Initially it was estimated to be an <a href="http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2013/11/04/largest-ever-recorded-solar-flare-in-history-the-x-whatever-mega-flare/" rel="nofollow">X40</a>, but was later re-classified as an <a href="http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Extreme_space/The_biggest_solar_X-ray_flare_ever_is_classified_as_X28" rel="nofollow">X28</a>.</p>

<p><strong>CME Speeds</strong><br>
In events that also release <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_mass_ejection" rel="nofollow">coronal mass ejections</a> (CMEs), we can classify the strength of the solar storm by the CME speed.</p>

<p>The 1859 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859" rel="nofollow">Carrington event</a> reached Earth in just ~17.67 hr, which is an average speed of ~2400 km/s (or ~5.3 million mph).</p>

<p>There was a CME on <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/swe.20097/abstract" rel="nofollow">July 12, 2012</a> observed by the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEREO" rel="nofollow">STEREO</a> spacecraft that had an observed speed of ~2500 $\pm$ 500 km/s.</p>

<p>The record CME speed was set in August 1972, where the CME speed was estimated at ~2850 km/s (or ~6.4 million mph).</p>

<p><strong>Probability of Occurrence</strong><br>
There was a recent <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011SW000734/abstract" rel="nofollow">study</a> that found the probability of another Carrington-like event is as high as ~12% in the next decade.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-03T10:56:04.273Z
"There was a recent study that found the probability of another Carrington-like event is as high as ~12%". In what time frame?
MichaelK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-03T12:22:08.083Z
Good question and nice catch...
honeste_vivere
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T19:00:16.183Z
2016-08-03T12:22:49.617Z
2016-08-03T12:22:49.617Z
honeste_vivere
<p>A spike in Carbon-14 content was recorded from tree rings in Japan, <em>possibly</em> due to a solar flare 20 times more energetic than the 1859 Carrington Event (the largest <em>definitively recorded</em> solar storm). This event has been dated to 774 AD. I think this could be the most energetic (tentatively) recorded solar flare.</p>

<p>Such a solar storm would be <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/03/110302-solar-flares-sun-storms-earth-danger-carrington-event-science/">far more devastating today</a> than it was back then, in the sense that we rely so much on technology that the EM interference would cost trillions of dollars in damage to power grids and communications.</p>

<p>A flare would need to be disastrously large, I think, to give us on Earth radiation poisoning. Certainly, animals that use Earth's magnetic field for navigation and would get rather confused. But our atmosphere and magnetic field are adequate protection when we're on Earth.</p>

<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/12/mysterious-radiation-event-of-774-might-be-a-little-less-mysterious/">Here is a good write-up</a> of the situation, with a couple of Nature papers if you have access.</p>

<p><sub>If you're going to delve into considering the effects of solar storms on human health (i.e. the effects of magnetic field perturbations), put your tinfoil hat on first. There's a lot of pseudoscience and little substantive research.</sub></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-10-19T01:30:36.780Z
2013-10-21T00:17:40.510Z
2013-10-21T00:17:40.510Z
Moriarty
<p>For the purposes of this question I would interpret the word "recorded" as loosely as possible meaning that historic records such as ice cores or tree rings would count. Also what effect did such a large flare have on life on Earth at the time?</p>

<the-sun><solar-flare>
What is the largest recorded solar flare?
ehsteve
# What is the largest recorded solar flare?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-10-11)

For the purposes of this question I would interpret the word "recorded" as loosely as possible meaning that historic records such as ice cores or tree rings would count. Also what effect did such a large flare have on life on Earth at the time?

**Tags:** the-sun, solar-flare


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2013-10-19. Score: 14 | Accepted answer

A spike in Carbon-14 content was recorded from tree rings in Japan, *possibly* due to a solar flare 20 times more energetic than the 1859 Carrington Event (the largest *definitively recorded* solar storm). This event has been dated to 774 AD. I think this could be the most energetic (tentatively) recorded solar flare.

Such a solar storm would be [far more devastating today](http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/03/110302-solar-flares-sun-storms-earth-danger-carrington-event-science/) than it was back then, in the sense that we rely so much on technology that the EM interference would cost trillions of dollars in damage to power grids and communications.

A flare would need to be disastrously large, I think, to give us on Earth radiation poisoning. Certainly, animals that use Earth's magnetic field for navigation and would get rather confused. But our atmosphere and magnetic field are adequate protection when we're on Earth.

[Here is a good write-up](http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/12/mysterious-radiation-event-of-774-might-be-a-little-less-mysterious/) of the situation, with a couple of Nature papers if you have access.

If you're going to delve into considering the effects of solar storms on human health (i.e. the effects of magnetic field perturbations), put your tinfoil hat on first. There's a lot of pseudoscience and little substantive research.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-08-02. Score: 3

> What is the largest recorded solar flare?

Since @username_3 already dealt with historical records, I will focus on the modern observations.

**X-Ray Classification**  
On April 2, 2001 the [GOES](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_Operational_Environmental_Satellite) spacecraft recorded an X20 flare (see the following for flare classification: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare#Classification>). Most flares fall below C-class (i.e., at least 100 times weaker) and X-class flares are the strongest.

On November 4, 2003 there was an X20+ class flare. Initially it was estimated to be an [X40](http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2013/11/04/largest-ever-recorded-solar-flare-in-history-the-x-whatever-mega-flare/), but was later re-classified as an [X28](http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Extreme_space/The_biggest_solar_X-ray_flare_ever_is_classified_as_X28).

**CME Speeds**  
In events that also release [coronal mass ejections](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_mass_ejection) (CMEs), we can classify the strength of the solar storm by the CME speed.

The 1859 [Carrington event](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859) reached Earth in just ~17.67 hr, which is an average speed of ~2400 km/s (or ~5.3 million mph).

There was a CME on [July 12, 2012](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/swe.20097/abstract) observed by the [STEREO](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEREO) spacecraft that had an observed speed of ~2500 $\pm$ 500 km/s.

The record CME speed was set in August 1972, where the CME speed was estimated at ~2850 km/s (or ~6.4 million mph).

**Probability of Occurrence**  
There was a recent [study](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011SW000734/abstract) that found the probability of another Carrington-like event is as high as ~12% in the next decade.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: "There was a recent study that found the probability of another Carrington-like event is as high as ~12%". In what time frame?  
> **username_1**: Good question and nice catch...  

---

