<p>The galaxy is kept together by the combined mass of the matter in the galaxy, of which the supermassive black hole is a negligible part. There are galaxies that don't have a central black hole (such as the Triangulum galaxy), and they are also held together by their combined mass.</p>
<p>In particular, the dark matter of the galaxy is what provides most of the mass that holds the visible matter together. Galaxies usually have far more dark matter than visible matter. This mass is distributed in a roughly spherical shape, with the greatest density towards the centre of the galaxy, and dropping off further from the centre. This &quot;dark matter halo&quot; is substantially larger than the visible disc.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-02T17:13:48.630Z
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/120343/discussion-on-answer-by-james-k-what-keeps-galaxies-together).
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-03T20:13:52.557Z
I found "There are galaxies that don't have a central black hole [...] **but** they are held together by their combined mass" confusing. Surely you mean "**and they are also** held together by their combined mass", in exactly the same way as galaxies which _do_ have black holes.
Nigel Touch
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-04T01:01:01.870Z
Relevant, and probably summarizes contrary views : [Testing the Strong Equivalence Principle: Detection of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abbb96)
J...
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-28T20:07:21.620Z
2021-03-03T20:30:12.280Z
2021-03-03T20:30:12.280Z
James K
<p>This was studied many years ago.</p>
<p>Not only do galaxies have to hold together, but there also has to be enough matter to hold it tightly enough to spin at the speed it turns. <em>(Imagine swinging an object on a string around your head, the faster it spins, the more force you have to apply.)</em></p>
<p><em>(Note that galaxies don't actually rotate like a single solid object would. Instead different stars orbit at different angular speeds depending on their positions. However that's not an issue for this question, because we can still calculate the galaxy's total mass and mass distribution, that's needed to produce the rotation we observe.)</em></p>
<p>It turns out that not only the central black hole isn't nearly big enough, but even the black hole plus the mass of all the stars, planets, gas clouds that we can see, <strong>still</strong> isn't nearly enough.</p>
<p>So we know that unless there is some aspect of the laws of nature we don't know about, there <strong>must</strong> be a lot more mass in most galaxies than we can see. Both of those possibilities have to be considered.</p>
<p>We don't think that new features in the laws of nature are the real answer. There is other evidence that suggests laws like gravity operate on galactic (and even apparently cosmic) scales much like we think they do. Too many experiments over the decades would have given different results, if gravity worked much differently at galactic and larger scales. So we don't think that's the answer.</p>
<p>So the answer is that galaxies include a lot more matter that somehow, we aren't able to directly detect, but we are very sure must be there. We can't even detect any extra matter on the scale needed, in our own home galaxy, the Milky Way. We call this unseen matter &quot;Dark Matter&quot; because it's unseen (dark) to our detectors, and we have some ideas what it could be, but we are still trying to prove what it is and directly detect it.</p>
<p>The evidence for this also famously includes <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/11/09/the-bullet-cluster-proves-dark-matter-exists-but-not-for-the-reason-most-physicists-think" rel="nofollow noreferrer">studies of colliding and non colliding galaxies</a>.  We can study the images to determine where mass seems to be, and where gravity seems to be acting. For example, gravity distorts distant light (&quot;gravitational lensing&quot;) and we can study where the centre of that distortion occurs. In non-colliding galaxies the results suggest that gravity effects occur where the mass is - they are centred in the same location. But in colliding or recently collided galaxies, gravity effects are found to be displaced to a different location than the visible mass distribution would suggest. If gravity itself acted differently than we believe, or there was a flaw in our workings, we would expect to see an effect in all galaxies not just colliding ones.  But in fact we only see such effects in galaxies whose mass is being disturbed,or was recently disturbed, and this supports the belief that there is a much more massive and larger distribution of unseen matter, whose distribution/shape is usually symmetrically around the galaxy but during a collision is distorted, causing the galaxy's <strong>overall</strong>  mass distribution to change, much more than the movement of its visible stars would suggest.</p>
<p>So the central black hole in galaxies isn't what holds them together. It might have the mass of millions of stars, but the Milky Way contains <strong>hundreds of billions</strong> of stars - about fifty thousand times more - and a huge amount of dark matter too, which we know is there in a form that our instruments can't yet &quot;see&quot;.  Some estimates suggest that the mass of this dark matter could be huge - <a href="https://www.sciencealert.com/the-most-accurate-measurement-yet-of-the-milky-way-s-mass-puts-us-ahead-of-andromeda" rel="nofollow noreferrer">almost 10 times the mass of the visible stars and matter (90% of the galaxy's total mass)</a> and extending out more than 10 times as far as the visible stars of the galaxy - taking the galaxy's total mass to maybe as much as 1.5 <strong>trillion</strong> suns.</p>
<p>The central black hole is impressive, and a feature of the galaxy, but it's completely insignificant in terms of holding the galaxy together. If it suddenly vanished, some stars near the middle would change their orbits, but the galaxy as a whole would be almost totally unaffected. You'd almost not notice it.</p>
<p>What holds galaxies together is the immensely greater mass of their dark matter halo (as it's called), together with their visible stars and objects generally, for almost every galaxy we have studied.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T10:22:40.717Z
It's astounding how often the sentence "Space is big." matches on any description of this kind.
AnoE
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T14:38:46.023Z
"You'd almost not notice it." it would be extremely loud to any gravitational wave telescope.  ;)  (of course, "disappear" isn't a solution to the equations of relativity)
Yakk - Adam Nevraumont
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T15:49:00.853Z
Aam - yes, but the question is about galaxy cohesion/orbits/shape/"patterns", not the rather smaller transients of vanishing ;-)
Stilez
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T08:45:39.930Z
2021-03-05T13:19:21.200Z
2021-03-05T13:19:21.200Z
Stilez
<p>Galaxies are actually moving, space between galaxies increment proportionally to the distance beteween them, the universe is in expansion and it may be by effect of dark matter. Some phisics say that.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-04T00:33:15.043Z
2021-03-04T06:32:21.850Z
2021-03-04T06:32:21.850Z
Ramón Castillo
<p>The super massive black hole at the centre of Milky Way has a mass of about 4 million times that of our sun. Is this enough to keep the entire galaxy together, is it this black hole which keeps the galaxy together? I did read that there are also galaxies that don't have a super massive blackhole, what keeps those galaxies together?</p>
<p>I did ask this <a href="https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/50436/what-keeps-galaxies-together">question</a> at space stackexchange but it got closed because it was posted at wrong place.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-28T22:56:00.667Z
The Milky Way is about $10^{12} M_{\odot}$, and the black hole is $5 \cdot 10^6 M_{\odot}$, for reference
WarpPrime
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T00:29:23.113Z
Welcome aboard! This is the right place to ask such a question. (Asking at physics.SE would also have been appropriate.) Ignore the downvoters; this is a good question for this site.
David Hammen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-01T02:14:45.283Z
I wrote [Luckily however it's 100% on-topic in Astronomy SE and possibly Physics SE, so I hope it will be migrated soon and find a new home](https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/50436/what-keeps-galaxies-together#comment164251_50436) because it was a good candidate for migration here. However you've now duplicated your question on a second site which is strongly discouraged. Instead, it is much better to have a little patience and wait for or flag and ask for migration.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-02T17:54:55.797Z
A related question you could research is, *How did the stars and planets form?*, since many of them formed with no black-hole in the vicinity, and without one at the core of the star or planet. (Also, more prosaically, *How does loose dirt stay on the ground?* and *Why does the atmosphere stick to the Earth?*)
jpaugh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-02T20:15:53.080Z
I'm unsure what that has to do with what keeps the galaxy together.
O S
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-03T13:09:36.560Z
Is "gravity" an acceptable answer? ;)
I'm with Monica
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-06T03:11:58.707Z
Could it be that they are not being kept together, but are actually in the process of drifting apart?
Constantthin
<galaxy><supermassive-black-hole>
What keeps galaxies together?
O S
# What keeps galaxies together?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-02-28)

The super massive black hole at the centre of Milky Way has a mass of about 4 million times that of our sun. Is this enough to keep the entire galaxy together, is it this black hole which keeps the galaxy together? I did read that there are also galaxies that don't have a super massive blackhole, what keeps those galaxies together?

I did ask this [question](https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/50436/what-keeps-galaxies-together) at space stackexchange but it got closed because it was posted at wrong place.

**Tags:** galaxy, supermassive-black-hole

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The Milky Way is about $10^{12} M_{\odot}$, and the black hole is $5 \cdot 10^6 M_{\odot}$, for reference  
> **username_2**: Welcome aboard! This is the right place to ask such a question. (Asking at physics.SE would also have been appropriate.) Ignore the downvoters; this is a good question for this site.  
> **username_3**: I wrote [Luckily however it's 100% on-topic in Astronomy SE and possibly Physics SE, so I hope it will be migrated soon and find a new home](https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/50436/what-keeps-galaxies-together#comment164251_50436) because it was a good candidate for migration here. However you've now duplicated your question on a second site which is strongly discouraged. Instead, it is much better to have a little patience and wait for or flag and ask for migration.  
> **username_4**: A related question you could research is, *How did the stars and planets form?*, since many of them formed with no black-hole in the vicinity, and without one at the core of the star or planet. (Also, more prosaically, *How does loose dirt stay on the ground?* and *Why does the atmosphere stick to the Earth?*)  
> **username_0**: I'm unsure what that has to do with what keeps the galaxy together.  
> **username_5**: Is "gravity" an acceptable answer? ;)  
> **username_6**: Could it be that they are not being kept together, but are actually in the process of drifting apart?  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_7 on 2021-02-28. Score: 46

The galaxy is kept together by the combined mass of the matter in the galaxy, of which the supermassive black hole is a negligible part. There are galaxies that don't have a central black hole (such as the Triangulum galaxy), and they are also held together by their combined mass.

In particular, the dark matter of the galaxy is what provides most of the mass that holds the visible matter together. Galaxies usually have far more dark matter than visible matter. This mass is distributed in a roughly spherical shape, with the greatest density towards the centre of the galaxy, and dropping off further from the centre. This "dark matter halo" is substantially larger than the visible disc.

> **Comments:**
> **username_8**: Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/120343/discussion-on-answer-by-james-k-what-keeps-galaxies-together).  
> **username_9**: I found "There are galaxies that don't have a central black hole [...] **but** they are held together by their combined mass" confusing. Surely you mean "**and they are also** held together by their combined mass", in exactly the same way as galaxies which _do_ have black holes.  
> **username_10**: Relevant, and probably summarizes contrary views : [Testing the Strong Equivalence Principle: Detection of the External Field Effect in Rotationally Supported Galaxies](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abbb96)  

---

### Answer by username_11 on 2021-03-01. Score: 32

This was studied many years ago.

Not only do galaxies have to hold together, but there also has to be enough matter to hold it tightly enough to spin at the speed it turns. *(Imagine swinging an object on a string around your head, the faster it spins, the more force you have to apply.)*

*(Note that galaxies don't actually rotate like a single solid object would. Instead different stars orbit at different angular speeds depending on their positions. However that's not an issue for this question, because we can still calculate the galaxy's total mass and mass distribution, that's needed to produce the rotation we observe.)*

It turns out that not only the central black hole isn't nearly big enough, but even the black hole plus the mass of all the stars, planets, gas clouds that we can see, **still** isn't nearly enough.

So we know that unless there is some aspect of the laws of nature we don't know about, there **must** be a lot more mass in most galaxies than we can see. Both of those possibilities have to be considered.

We don't think that new features in the laws of nature are the real answer. There is other evidence that suggests laws like gravity operate on galactic (and even apparently cosmic) scales much like we think they do. Too many experiments over the decades would have given different results, if gravity worked much differently at galactic and larger scales. So we don't think that's the answer.

So the answer is that galaxies include a lot more matter that somehow, we aren't able to directly detect, but we are very sure must be there. We can't even detect any extra matter on the scale needed, in our own home galaxy, the Milky Way. We call this unseen matter "Dark Matter" because it's unseen (dark) to our detectors, and we have some ideas what it could be, but we are still trying to prove what it is and directly detect it.

The evidence for this also famously includes [studies of colliding and non colliding galaxies](https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/11/09/the-bullet-cluster-proves-dark-matter-exists-but-not-for-the-reason-most-physicists-think). We can study the images to determine where mass seems to be, and where gravity seems to be acting. For example, gravity distorts distant light ("gravitational lensing") and we can study where the centre of that distortion occurs. In non-colliding galaxies the results suggest that gravity effects occur where the mass is - they are centred in the same location. But in colliding or recently collided galaxies, gravity effects are found to be displaced to a different location than the visible mass distribution would suggest. If gravity itself acted differently than we believe, or there was a flaw in our workings, we would expect to see an effect in all galaxies not just colliding ones. But in fact we only see such effects in galaxies whose mass is being disturbed,or was recently disturbed, and this supports the belief that there is a much more massive and larger distribution of unseen matter, whose distribution/shape is usually symmetrically around the galaxy but during a collision is distorted, causing the galaxy's **overall** mass distribution to change, much more than the movement of its visible stars would suggest.

So the central black hole in galaxies isn't what holds them together. It might have the mass of millions of stars, but the Milky Way contains **hundreds of billions** of stars - about fifty thousand times more - and a huge amount of dark matter too, which we know is there in a form that our instruments can't yet "see". Some estimates suggest that the mass of this dark matter could be huge - [almost 10 times the mass of the visible stars and matter (90% of the galaxy's total mass)](https://www.sciencealert.com/the-most-accurate-measurement-yet-of-the-milky-way-s-mass-puts-us-ahead-of-andromeda) and extending out more than 10 times as far as the visible stars of the galaxy - taking the galaxy's total mass to maybe as much as 1.5 **trillion** suns.

The central black hole is impressive, and a feature of the galaxy, but it's completely insignificant in terms of holding the galaxy together. If it suddenly vanished, some stars near the middle would change their orbits, but the galaxy as a whole would be almost totally unaffected. You'd almost not notice it.

What holds galaxies together is the immensely greater mass of their dark matter halo (as it's called), together with their visible stars and objects generally, for almost every galaxy we have studied.

> **Comments:**
> **username_12**: It's astounding how often the sentence "Space is big." matches on any description of this kind.  
> **username_13**: "You'd almost not notice it." it would be extremely loud to any gravitational wave telescope.  ;)  (of course, "disappear" isn't a solution to the equations of relativity)  
> **username_11**: Aam - yes, but the question is about galaxy cohesion/orbits/shape/"patterns", not the rather smaller transients of vanishing ;-)  

---

### Answer by username_14 on 2021-03-04. Score: -4

Galaxies are actually moving, space between galaxies increment proportionally to the distance beteween them, the universe is in expansion and it may be by effect of dark matter. Some phisics say that.


---

