<p>You are correct that topocentric coordinates are for the position of "close" objects, corrected for observing from the Earth's surface instead of the theoretical center.</p>

<p>The topocentric and geocentric coordinates would use the same system (J2000, true, etc.) There is no convention to use one in favor of another (but there may be preferences in some cases).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-14T23:40:41.420Z
2020-04-14T23:40:41.420Z
JohnHoltz
<p>I'm looking up how to convert an azimuth/elevation measurement from a specific location on Earth's surface to right ascension/declination.  I'm coming across the terms "topocentric declination" and "topocentric right ascension", which I haven't come across before.</p>

<p>What does the "topocentric" mean here? Is this different from "regular" RA and dec?</p>

<p>My guess from the terminology is that, for objects that can't be treated as being infinitely far away from Earth, "topocentric" is used to differentiate a sky position of an object as seen from a specific place on Earth instead of from Earth's center.  (For very distant objects, like stars, the sky position seen from Earth's surface and Earth's center are for virtually all purposes going to be the same.)</p>

<p>If my guess is correct, is there a convention specifying which equator and equinox the topocentric RA and declination use?  Is it supposed to always be true equator and true equinox, or something more along the lines of a J2000 epoch?</p>

<coordinate><positional-astronomy><declination><right-ascension>
What is meant by *topocentric* right ascension and declination?
NeutronStar
# What is meant by *topocentric* right ascension and declination?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-04-14)

I'm looking up how to convert an azimuth/elevation measurement from a specific location on Earth's surface to right ascension/declination. I'm coming across the terms "topocentric declination" and "topocentric right ascension", which I haven't come across before.

What does the "topocentric" mean here? Is this different from "regular" RA and dec?

My guess from the terminology is that, for objects that can't be treated as being infinitely far away from Earth, "topocentric" is used to differentiate a sky position of an object as seen from a specific place on Earth instead of from Earth's center. (For very distant objects, like stars, the sky position seen from Earth's surface and Earth's center are for virtually all purposes going to be the same.)

If my guess is correct, is there a convention specifying which equator and equinox the topocentric RA and declination use? Is it supposed to always be true equator and true equinox, or something more along the lines of a J2000 epoch?

**Tags:** coordinate, positional-astronomy, declination, right-ascension


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-04-14. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

You are correct that topocentric coordinates are for the position of "close" objects, corrected for observing from the Earth's surface instead of the theoretical center.

The topocentric and geocentric coordinates would use the same system (J2000, true, etc.) There is no convention to use one in favor of another (but there may be preferences in some cases).


---

