<p>The short answer is that, as George notes in his answer, there is no naming system for supermassive black holes. I wouldn't say they're really "named" after their host galaxies; more that when one wants to refer one, you usually do it by using the name of the galaxy (e.g., "the SMBH in M31" or "M87's SMBH").</p>

<p>"Sgr A*" is actually the name of a <em>radio source</em>, a subcomponent of the radio source <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A" rel="noreferrer">Sgr A</a> which happens to be associated with the Galaxy's SMBH.</p>

<p>The very early system for naming radio sources -- before better radio telescopes found so many that the system became unworkable -- was basically "name of constellation" + "decreasing brightness rank". So Sgr A was simply the brightest radio source in the constellation of Sagittarius. (In fact, the system was abandoned before most constellations even got to B.) Most such sources are not black holes; for example, Casiopeia A is a supernova remnant, as is Taurus A (the Crab Nebula).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-30T17:27:21.373Z
2017-11-30T17:27:21.373Z
Peter Erwin
<p>Check this <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*#History" rel="noreferrer">wiki link</a> out. "The name Sgr A* was coined by Brown in a 1982 paper because the radio source was "exciting", and excited states of atoms are denoted with asterisks."</p>

<p>There is no unified naming system for black holes. They are usually named after their host galaxy. Others are identified by the name of the survey in which they were observed. A few black holes are catalogued by their constellation and the order in which they were discovered</p>

<p>EDIT: The 1982 paper by Brown and Lo can be found <a href="http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1982ApJ...253..108B" rel="noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-27T14:38:04.693Z
It would be better to quote Brown's paper than the wiki note on the matter.
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-27T18:13:44.063Z
@called2voyage Ok, I edited it in. But other than that I don't see what else can be added. Maybe OP can specify if they are looking for something more.
George
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-28T02:36:30.660Z
Thanks for your answer. Ok, now I get it that why is it "A*" and why not "A". But if it's "A", are there any more Black holes such as "Sagittarius B/ Sagittarius B*"? (May be this is total nonsense, just asking out of curiosity)
Jaideep Khare
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-28T07:02:31.777Z
The radio source which contains Sgr A*, consists of three radio sources total, and is called Sgr A. Sgr A* is the most excited and is therefore considered to be the central BH of the Galaxy. As far as other letters go, there's a GMC called Sgr B2.
George
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-25T18:26:57.977Z
2017-11-27T18:11:18.110Z
2017-11-27T18:11:18.110Z
George
<p>At the center of the Milky Way, we have a supermassive black hole. It's name is "Sagittarius A*". I was wondering that why is it called so? I mean, why "A*" why not just "A". Is there a naming system for super massive black holes?</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-27T21:14:49.930Z
Somewhat related: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/22503/2153
HDE 226868
<supermassive-black-hole><naming>
Why is Sagittarius A* called so?
Jaideep Khare
# Why is Sagittarius A* called so?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-11-25)

At the center of the Milky Way, we have a supermassive black hole. It's name is "Sagittarius A\*". I was wondering that why is it called so? I mean, why "A\*" why not just "A". Is there a naming system for super massive black holes?

Thanks!

**Tags:** supermassive-black-hole, naming

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Somewhat related: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/22503/2153  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-11-25. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

Check this [wiki link](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*#History) out. "The name Sgr A\* was coined by Brown in a 1982 paper because the radio source was "exciting", and excited states of atoms are denoted with asterisks."

There is no unified naming system for black holes. They are usually named after their host galaxy. Others are identified by the name of the survey in which they were observed. A few black holes are catalogued by their constellation and the order in which they were discovered

EDIT: The 1982 paper by Brown and Lo can be found [here](http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1982ApJ...253..108B).

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: It would be better to quote Brown's paper than the wiki note on the matter.  
> **username_3**: @username_4 Ok, I edited it in. But other than that I don't see what else can be added. Maybe OP can specify if they are looking for something more.  
> **username_0**: Thanks for your answer. Ok, now I get it that why is it "A*" and why not "A". But if it's "A", are there any more Black holes such as "Sagittarius B/ Sagittarius B*"? (May be this is total nonsense, just asking out of curiosity)  
> **username_3**: The radio source which contains Sgr A*, consists of three radio sources total, and is called Sgr A. Sgr A* is the most excited and is therefore considered to be the central BH of the Galaxy. As far as other letters go, there's a GMC called Sgr B2.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-11-30. Score: 5

The short answer is that, as username_3 notes in his answer, there is no naming system for supermassive black holes. I wouldn't say they're really "named" after their host galaxies; more that when one wants to refer one, you usually do it by using the name of the galaxy (e.g., "the SMBH in M31" or "M87's SMBH").

"Sgr A\*" is actually the name of a *radio source*, a subcomponent of the radio source [Sgr A](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A) which happens to be associated with the Galaxy's SMBH.

The very early system for naming radio sources -- before better radio telescopes found so many that the system became unworkable -- was basically "name of constellation" + "decreasing brightness rank". So Sgr A was simply the brightest radio source in the constellation of Sagittarius. (In fact, the system was abandoned before most constellations even got to B.) Most such sources are not black holes; for example, Casiopeia A is a supernova remnant, as is Taurus A (the Crab Nebula).


---

