<p>Momentary events in general (comets, supernovae, solar flares, etc.) can be lumped under the general heading of "transient phenomena". 'Transient asterisms' may be a candidate term for the concept you are describing.</p>

<p>Then again, we now know that on a large enough time scale <em>all</em> asterisms are eventually transient in nature. So one might justifiably take the point of view that the adjective "transient" is redundant. So perhaps calling the patterns you describe simply as "asterisms" is not as bad of a candidate term as you might suspect.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-06-01T15:49:24.900Z
There's transient and then there's transient. Some of stars we see may be moving 100s of km/s with regard to our solar system. But they are so distant the angular velocity is small. In contrast the sun moves about a degree per day against the celestial sphere and the moon about 12 degrees.
HopDavid
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-06-01T08:46:17.540Z
2014-06-01T08:46:17.540Z
David H
<p>Few days back, the Pleiades, the Sun and the Moon were forming an almost perfect equilateral triangle.</p>

<p>Is there a term that describes such momentary geometrical patterns? <code>Asterism</code> and <code>conjunction</code> are close, but not exactly applicable here.</p>

<terminology>
Term for a momentary geometric pattern formed by astronomical objects
HRJ
# Term for a momentary geometric pattern formed by astronomical objects

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-06-01)

Few days back, the Pleiades, the Sun and the Moon were forming an almost perfect equilateral triangle.

Is there a term that describes such momentary geometrical patterns? `Asterism` and `conjunction` are close, but not exactly applicable here.

**Tags:** terminology


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2014-06-01. Score: 4

Momentary events in general (comets, supernovae, solar flares, etc.) can be lumped under the general heading of "transient phenomena". 'Transient asterisms' may be a candidate term for the concept you are describing.

Then again, we now know that on a large enough time scale *all* asterisms are eventually transient in nature. So one might justifiably take the point of view that the adjective "transient" is redundant. So perhaps calling the patterns you describe simply as "asterisms" is not as bad of a candidate term as you might suspect.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: There's transient and then there's transient. Some of stars we see may be moving 100s of km/s with regard to our solar system. But they are so distant the angular velocity is small. In contrast the sun moves about a degree per day against the celestial sphere and the moon about 12 degrees.  

---

