<p>These are images taken from Nasa's <a href="https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Eyes on Asteroids</a> site.  It lets you see the orbit and get information about the asteroid in a nice interactive way.  For asteroids with a known shape and surface texture, it will use that information. (Try searching for Bennu)  But most asteroids have no known surface information, and the system uses a standard texture for these asteroids.  The texture is &quot;artistic&quot; rather than being based on any particular data.</p>
<p>In the case of 2023 DW, there is no shape nor surface data, so the Eyes on asteroids site provides a standard &quot;potato&quot; with &quot;eyes&quot;.  If you look at other random asteroids, such as <a href="https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/2023_aa" rel="nofollow noreferrer">2023 AA</a> you'll see they are exactly the same. Trying it out a few times suggests that there are a few different &quot;shapes&quot; and &quot;textures&quot; and they are chosen randomly.</p>
<p>Nasa could be blamed for not making it clear which asteroids have &quot;real&quot; and which have &quot;imagined&quot; details. It's not surprising that these picture find their way to the media, where they are likewise presented as &quot;a picture from NASA of the asteroid&quot;.</p>
<p>The upshot of this is that there is no data. Even the shape of this asteroid is unknown, and the surface details were drawn in by analogy with other asteroids.</p>


CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-12T15:53:45.540Z
Indeed :-( [Although (it) would have been an excellent target for astronomers using the Goldstone Radar at California, unfortunately the DSS-14 radar antenna was not able to study the space rock due to maintenance.](https://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-1994-pc1-closest-jan-18-2022/#:~:text=Although%20asteroid%20(7482)%201994%20PC1%20would%20have%20been%20an%20excellent%20target%C2%A0for%20astronomers%20using%20the%20Goldstone%20Radar%20at%20California%2C%20unfortunately%C2%A0the%20DSS%2D14%20radar%20antenna%20was%20not%20able%20to%20study%20the%20space%20rock%20due%20to%C2%A0maintenance.)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-12T23:28:45.187Z
I'm curious; you state without any support that "In the case of 2023 DW, there is no shape nor surface data" What makes you say this? How do you know? I think the hallmark of a good Stack Exchange answer is that facts and assertions are *supported* with links and references, and this assertion is absolutely key to your answer. You must have looked that up somewhere, why withhold the source?
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T03:10:43.210Z
I thought this same thing... when I saw the article I went searching for other images, and they all looked suspiciously like not actual photographs
Michael
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T19:12:33.963Z
NASA absolutely *should* be blamed for blurring the line between imagined but photorealistic images and actual astronomy images. The constant confusion caused by this practice (see e.g. all the beautiful "images" of exoplanets) is going to hurt the scientific community (and NASA). I am begging them to stop this practice and be more responsible.
user2705196
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-14T10:40:15.647Z
@user71659 Still a lot better than getting another generation of flat earthers or space deniers, whose default approach to anything is "NASA lies". Being realistic about the limitations also lets people appreciate better whenever these limitations are being expanded.
zovits
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-14T10:40:28.830Z
If this is the case then NASA definitely deserves to be kicked and kicked hard. However I'd also mention https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11nzrb0/samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are_fake_and_here/ (via Hackaday) which demonstrates that a particular brand of mobile 'phone routinely applies "AI" to skin images with details which quite simply cannot be observed.
Mark Morgan Lloyd
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-14T15:59:15.207Z
@user71659 Tell kids to spend years in college so they can make an LED flash...
Michael
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-14T19:07:38.850Z
"Eyes On Asteroids" - I guess someone at NASA took that name literally.
rgettman
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-12T09:05:43.513Z
2023-03-17T05:39:15.970Z
2023-03-17T05:39:15.970Z
James K
<p>The face situation is getting curiouser and curiouser!</p>
<p>At first, when I went to the <em>actual page</em> in NASA Eyes for the asteroid <a href="https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1</a> I could not find the face that <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/53136/7982">@JamesK's answer</a> says is there.</p>
<p>I looked everywhere and couldn't find the three nearly equal size craters touching each other with a little triangular &quot;nose&quot; in the center, and two much smaller craters in the center for pupils:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/vHRS4.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/vHRS4.jpg" alt="screenshot towards the Sun NOT showing the face, at about 08:20 (UTC+8 local time) on March 13, 2023 from https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1" /></a></p>
<p>But when I opened the page again in a new tab, I found a completely different asteroid! In this tab, looking in the same direction at the same time (live, about 08:20 (UTC+8 local time) on March 13, 2023, <em>there it is!</em></p>
<p>The face seems to come and go.</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/ZgpEVzCUr3s" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Oh noooooooo!....</a></p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/AKH9R.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/AKH9R.jpg" alt="screenshot towards the Sun showing the face, at about 08:20 (UTC+8 local time) on March 13, 2023 from https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1" /></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T00:42:16.097Z
One supposes the  ateroid rorates. Also your first image is flipped with respect to OP's second image -- compare the orientations between the overlapped small and large crater in both images. Once you understand this, you'll realize the "face" would be on the other side of the asteroid in your first image.
Spencer
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T01:05:32.653Z
@Spencer NO, the images are only 1 minute apart (in sim. time), and I've shown the face opposite the Sun in both cases; the Sun is at the center of both images, one can see Mercury's purple orbit behind the asteroid in both images. And in both cases I have rotated the view exhaustively to see the asteroid from all angles. After spending some time, I'm pretty confident that the NASA site is putting up at least two alternate renderings. *I invite anyone else to carefully redo the experiment*. Open the page in several different tabs, or several different times, and try to see the face each time
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T06:16:03.473Z
I mentioned this in my answer.  There are a few different shapes and they are chosen randomly.
James K
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T06:26:26.797Z
@JamesK considering that it took some time and effort to verify your unsupported assertion, I felt that I could be nice and save several future readers the time of doing the same thing. Yes some people just believe answers as soon as they see circa 100k rep, but some don't. Answers drawing from and supported by authoritative sources and citing or linking to those sources for independent verification are the norm for most SE sites and it's what makes SE different than most other sites. *It's not who said it first, it's who can support it best.*
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T16:04:55.790Z
At some point "a guy that's been doing this for a long time and sharing his experience" is a pretty good source in and of itself. Often better than the "support" we've been taught to crave so unconditionally.
Mad Physicist
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T21:40:55.927Z
@MadPhysicist future readers and those here via search results (rather than being frequent user) have no way to judge such things, and the internet is full of folks who project the aura of "doing this for a long time and sharing his experience" whether they do or not. Stack Exchange is an oasis in the cacophonic internet, supporting sources for facts and assertions, along with excellent moderation, is what distinguishes it from that. It ain't broke, doesn't need fixing. Quora's a good place for answers from folks who project the aura of "doing this for a long time and sharing their experience"
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T21:42:45.717Z
@MadPhysicist As my profile says, "let Stack Exchange be Stack Exchange".
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-03-13T00:29:15.247Z
2023-03-13T00:29:15.247Z
uhoh
<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/oRF1H.png" alt="NPR's March 10, 2023 &quot;Newly found asteroid has a 'very small chance' of hitting Earth, NASA says&quot; https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162659328/asteroid-2023-dw-nasa-earth-impact" /> <img src="https://i.sstatic.net/8RlA7.png" alt="File - SNL MrBill Doll.jpg from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SNL_MrBill_Doll.jpg" /></p>
<p>(Image sources linked below)</p>
<p>NPR's March 10, 2023 <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162659328/asteroid-2023-dw-nasa-earth-impact" rel="noreferrer">Newly found asteroid has a 'very small chance' of hitting Earth, NASA says</a> includes an image of what looks like a computer reconstructed 3D surface of an asteroid, perhaps from delay-doppler radar imaging or optical images (photographs) taken at many solar phase angles.</p>
<p>Similar but smaller rendering at a different angle can be seen in ABC News' January 19, 2023 <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/International/huge-asteroid-safely-pass-close-earth/story?id=82326953" rel="noreferrer">Huge asteroid safely passes close to Earth</a></p>
<p>Due to the miracle of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia" rel="noreferrer">Pareidolia</a> I'm seeing two big eyes with pupils (could also be seen as a big pair of round glasses), a triangular nose, and a big round circular mouth reminiscent of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Bill" rel="noreferrer">Mr. Bill's &quot;Oh no!&quot;</a></p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> How did asteroid (7482) 1994 PC1 get its &quot;face&quot;? How was the surface topography (assuming this is really from data) reconstructed and rendered? What data was used, and primarily from what instrument(s)?</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/hz72N.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/hz72N.jpg" alt="NPR's March 10, 2023 &quot;Newly found asteroid has a 'very small chance' of hitting Earth, NASA says&quot; https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162659328/asteroid-2023-dw-nasa-earth-impact" /></a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Asteroid 2023 DW will make a close approach to Earth on Feb. 14, 2046. NASA and other agencies are closely monitoring the asteroid to learn more about its projected path.
NASA</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<p>Image sources:</p>
<ul>
<li>cropped from NPR's March 10, 2023 <a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162659328/asteroid-2023-dw-nasa-earth-impact" rel="noreferrer">Newly found asteroid has a 'very small chance' of hitting Earth, NASA says</a> credit: NASA</li>
<li>File: SNL MrBill Doll.jpg <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SNL_MrBill_Doll.jpg" rel="noreferrer">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SNL_MrBill_Doll.jpg</a></li>
</ul>

<observational-astronomy><asteroids><photography><data-analysis><radar>
How did asteroid (7482) 1994 PC1 get its "face"? Is it reconstructed from optical or radar imaging, or something else?
uhoh
# How did asteroid (7482) 1994 PC1 get its "face"? Is it reconstructed from optical or radar imaging, or something else?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2023-03-12)

![NPR's March 10, 2023 ](https://i.sstatic.net/oRF1H.png) ![File - SNL MrBill Doll.jpg from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SNL_MrBill_Doll.jpg](https://i.sstatic.net/8RlA7.png)

(Image sources linked below)

NPR's March 10, 2023 [Newly found asteroid has a 'very small chance' of hitting Earth, NASA says](https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162659328/asteroid-2023-dw-nasa-earth-impact) includes an image of what looks like a computer reconstructed 3D surface of an asteroid, perhaps from delay-doppler radar imaging or optical images (photographs) taken at many solar phase angles.

Similar but smaller rendering at a different angle can be seen in ABC News' January 19, 2023 [Huge asteroid safely passes close to Earth](https://abcnews.go.com/International/huge-asteroid-safely-pass-close-earth/story?id=82326953)

Due to the miracle of [Pareidolia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia) I'm seeing two big eyes with pupils (could also be seen as a big pair of round glasses), a triangular nose, and a big round circular mouth reminiscent of [Mr. Bill's "Oh no!"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Bill)

**Question:** How did asteroid (7482) 1994 PC1 get its "face"? How was the surface topography (assuming this is really from data) reconstructed and rendered? What data was used, and primarily from what instrument(s)?

[![NPR's March 10, 2023 ](https://i.sstatic.net/hz72N.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/hz72N.jpg)

> Asteroid 2023 DW will make a close approach to Earth on Feb. 14, 2046. NASA and other agencies are closely monitoring the asteroid to learn more about its projected path.
> NASA

---

Image sources:

* cropped from NPR's March 10, 2023 [Newly found asteroid has a 'very small chance' of hitting Earth, NASA says](https://www.npr.org/2023/03/10/1162659328/asteroid-2023-dw-nasa-earth-impact) credit: NASA
* File: SNL MrBill Doll.jpg <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SNL_MrBill_Doll.jpg>

**Tags:** observational-astronomy, asteroids, photography, data-analysis, radar


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2023-03-12. Score: 26

These are images taken from Nasa's [Eyes on Asteroids](https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids) site. It lets you see the orbit and get information about the asteroid in a nice interactive way. For asteroids with a known shape and surface texture, it will use that information. (Try searching for Bennu) But most asteroids have no known surface information, and the system uses a standard texture for these asteroids. The texture is "artistic" rather than being based on any particular data.

In the case of 2023 DW, there is no shape nor surface data, so the Eyes on asteroids site provides a standard "potato" with "eyes". If you look at other random asteroids, such as [2023 AA](https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/2023_aa) you'll see they are exactly the same. Trying it out a few times suggests that there are a few different "shapes" and "textures" and they are chosen randomly.

Nasa could be blamed for not making it clear which asteroids have "real" and which have "imagined" details. It's not surprising that these picture find their way to the media, where they are likewise presented as "a picture from NASA of the asteroid".

The upshot of this is that there is no data. Even the shape of this asteroid is unknown, and the surface details were drawn in by analogy with other asteroids.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Indeed :-( [Although (it) would have been an excellent target for astronomers using the Goldstone Radar at California, unfortunately the DSS-14 radar antenna was not able to study the space rock due to maintenance.](https://earthsky.org/space/asteroid-1994-pc1-closest-jan-18-2022/#:~:text=Although%20asteroid%20(7482)%201994%20PC1%20would%20have%20been%20an%20excellent%20target%C2%A0for%20astronomers%20using%20the%20Goldstone%20Radar%20at%20California%2C%20unfortunately%C2%A0the%20DSS%2D14%20radar%20antenna%20was%20not%20able%20to%20study%20the%20space%20rock%20due%20to%C2%A0maintenance.)  
> **username_0**: I'm curious; you state without any support that "In the case of 2023 DW, there is no shape nor surface data" What makes you say this? How do you know? I think the hallmark of a good Stack Exchange answer is that facts and assertions are *supported* with links and references, and this assertion is absolutely key to your answer. You must have looked that up somewhere, why withhold the source?  
> **username_2**: I thought this same thing... when I saw the article I went searching for other images, and they all looked suspiciously like not actual photographs  
> **username_3**: NASA absolutely *should* be blamed for blurring the line between imagined but photorealistic images and actual astronomy images. The constant confusion caused by this practice (see e.g. all the beautiful "images" of exoplanets) is going to hurt the scientific community (and NASA). I am begging them to stop this practice and be more responsible.  
> **username_4**: @user71659 Still a lot better than getting another generation of flat earthers or space deniers, whose default approach to anything is "NASA lies". Being realistic about the limitations also lets people appreciate better whenever these limitations are being expanded.  
> **username_5**: If this is the case then NASA definitely deserves to be kicked and kicked hard. However I'd also mention https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11nzrb0/samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are_fake_and_here/ (via Hackaday) which demonstrates that a particular brand of mobile 'phone routinely applies "AI" to skin images with details which quite simply cannot be observed.  
> **username_2**: @user71659 Tell kids to spend years in college so they can make an LED flash...  
> **username_6**: "Eyes On Asteroids" - I guess someone at NASA took that name literally.  

---

### Answer by username_0 on 2023-03-13. Score: 2

The face situation is getting curiouser and curiouser!

At first, when I went to the *actual page* in NASA Eyes for the asteroid <https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1> I could not find the face that [@JamesK's answer](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/53136/7982) says is there.

I looked everywhere and couldn't find the three nearly equal size craters touching each other with a little triangular "nose" in the center, and two much smaller craters in the center for pupils:

[![screenshot towards the Sun NOT showing the face, at about 08:20 (UTC+8 local time) on March 13, 2023 from https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1](https://i.sstatic.net/vHRS4.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/vHRS4.jpg)

But when I opened the page again in a new tab, I found a completely different asteroid! In this tab, looking in the same direction at the same time (live, about 08:20 (UTC+8 local time) on March 13, 2023, *there it is!*

The face seems to come and go.

[Oh noooooooo!....](https://youtu.be/ZgpEVzCUr3s)

[![screenshot towards the Sun showing the face, at about 08:20 (UTC+8 local time) on March 13, 2023 from https://eyes.nasa.gov/apps/asteroids/#/asteroids/7482_1994_pc1](https://i.sstatic.net/AKH9R.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/AKH9R.jpg)

> **Comments:**
> **username_7**: One supposes the  ateroid rorates. Also your first image is flipped with respect to OP's second image -- compare the orientations between the overlapped small and large crater in both images. Once you understand this, you'll realize the "face" would be on the other side of the asteroid in your first image.  
> **username_0**: @username_7 NO, the images are only 1 minute apart (in sim. time), and I've shown the face opposite the Sun in both cases; the Sun is at the center of both images, one can see Mercury's purple orbit behind the asteroid in both images. And in both cases I have rotated the view exhaustively to see the asteroid from all angles. After spending some time, I'm pretty confident that the NASA site is putting up at least two alternate renderings. *I invite anyone else to carefully redo the experiment*. Open the page in several different tabs, or several different times, and try to see the face each time  
> **username_1**: I mentioned this in my answer.  There are a few different shapes and they are chosen randomly.  
> **username_0**: @JamesK considering that it took some time and effort to verify your unsupported assertion, I felt that I could be nice and save several future readers the time of doing the same thing. Yes some people just believe answers as soon as they see circa 100k rep, but some don't. Answers drawing from and supported by authoritative sources and citing or linking to those sources for independent verification are the norm for most SE sites and it's what makes SE different than most other sites. *It's not who said it first, it's who can support it best.*  
> **username_8**: At some point "a guy that's been doing this for a long time and sharing his experience" is a pretty good source in and of itself. Often better than the "support" we've been taught to crave so unconditionally.  
> **username_0**: @MadPhysicist future readers and those here via search results (rather than being frequent user) have no way to judge such things, and the internet is full of folks who project the aura of "doing this for a long time and sharing his experience" whether they do or not. Stack Exchange is an oasis in the cacophonic internet, supporting sources for facts and assertions, along with excellent moderation, is what distinguishes it from that. It ain't broke, doesn't need fixing. Quora's a good place for answers from folks who project the aura of "doing this for a long time and sharing their experience"  
> **username_0**: @MadPhysicist As my profile says, "let Stack Exchange be Stack Exchange".  

---

