<p>It doesn't look like an Einstein ring.  An Einstein ring shows highly distorted shapes: stretched and multiple images of the distant galaxy, and a massive foreground object (with different redshift) which would have to be a galaxy itself as nothing else is big enough.</p>
<p>Hoag's object shows none of these distortions, and the central bulge is at exactly the same redshift (so the same distance by Hubble's law).  The areas of star formation in the ring look rather like those in more normal galaxies. It is just an unusual shape.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-31T02:37:25.060Z
@D.Halsey Why? Suspicion of what? There's always stuff in-front-of and behind other stuff in astronomy because things are in 3D, not carefully painted on the inside of a sphere. For a particularly crazy photo of one galaxy in front of another unrelated galaxy see [Was the “green star” event in NGC 3314 ever figured out or named?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/35549) Nothing suspicious there at all folks.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-30T22:21:45.703Z
2021-01-30T22:21:45.703Z
James K
<p>What are the main arguments against Hoag's object in particular and Hoag-like objects in general to be explained as Einstein rings formed by a farther edge-on galaxy?</p>

<gravitational-lensing>
Hoag's object as an Einstein ring
lurscher
# Hoag's object as an Einstein ring

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-01-30)

What are the main arguments against Hoag's object in particular and Hoag-like objects in general to be explained as Einstein rings formed by a farther edge-on galaxy?

**Tags:** gravitational-lensing


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-01-30. Score: 3

It doesn't look like an Einstein ring. An Einstein ring shows highly distorted shapes: stretched and multiple images of the distant galaxy, and a massive foreground object (with different redshift) which would have to be a galaxy itself as nothing else is big enough.

Hoag's object shows none of these distortions, and the central bulge is at exactly the same redshift (so the same distance by Hubble's law). The areas of star formation in the ring look rather like those in more normal galaxies. It is just an unusual shape.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: @D.Halsey Why? Suspicion of what? There's always stuff in-front-of and behind other stuff in astronomy because things are in 3D, not carefully painted on the inside of a sphere. For a particularly crazy photo of one galaxy in front of another unrelated galaxy see [Was the “green star” event in NGC 3314 ever figured out or named?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/35549) Nothing suspicious there at all folks.  

---

