<p>So, I agree with the other answers, that as we look further away from our Galaxy, we see galaxies as they were in the past. Therefore, by and large, these galaxies are <em>younger</em> than ours. That is, we see them as they were when they had an age that could be <em>at most</em> 13.7 billion (the age of the universe) minus their distance in light years.</p>

<p>Therefore to find the oldest objects in the universe, we must look locally. Probably the most ancient galaxies that we can study, are those that are thought to be the building blocks of larger galaxies. These are the "dwarf spheroidal galaxies", several of which have been identified as companions to the Milky Way and M31, and are probably remnants of a larger population of such objects. Their stellar populations appear to consist of mostly intermediate age stars through to extremely ancient stars.</p>

<p>Other ancients objects include the extremely metal-poor stars of the halo population of our Galaxy and a number of very metal poor globular clusters.</p>

<p>Estimates for the ages of such objects are uncertain, but are likely in the range 12-13 billion years old and so only a short time after the big bang.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-29T16:45:59.293Z
@adrianmcmenamin Photons are not galaxies. The question asks for the oldest galaxies, not the oldest objects.
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-02T17:29:49.433Z
@called2voyage The first question is "how do we determine which part of the universe is the oldest?" The answer above also refers to the "oldest objects" - aren't hydgrogen atoms formed in the recombination epoch objects?
Also the only thing we "see" are photons so your basic point is not even physical.
adrianmcmenamin
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-09T10:37:29.883Z
I think you are wrong when you say "Therefore, by and large, these galaxies are younger than ours.". This is not what looking at distant galaxies means. It means the galaxy you are looking at is AT LEAST as old as the time it took for it's light to reach you. Did I miss your point or are you indeed wrong ? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Nico
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-09T12:08:53.447Z
@Nico Our galaxy is 12 billion years old (roughly). If I look at a galaxy that is 5 billion light years away, the maximum age of that galaxy is 13.7-5 = 8.7 billion years old. i.e. Younger than our galaxy.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-09T12:49:16.180Z
Oh, I get it now. Thanks for clarifiying.
Nico
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-12T18:29:33.170Z
Yes and no. What we actually see are the photons and in the case of the CMB these photons are the oldest things we can 'see'. But yours is an interesting argument, for sure.
adrianmcmenamin
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-08T23:50:49.103Z
2015-12-09T12:12:05.697Z
2015-12-09T12:12:05.697Z
ProfRob
<p>The key point is that the Big Bang happened everywhere at the same time, hence there is no centre (or alternatively, the centre is any point). This was not an explosion into space, it created space. (Think of a balloon, when you blow it up points on the surface all move further apart without there being a centre of the expansion on the surface itself.)</p>

<p>A related idea is the "cosmological principle" (CP) which, simply put, states that, at a large scale, the universe looks the same everywhere. That means the "oldest" parts (as measured by how long it look radiation to get here) of the universe can be seen in any direction - and the CMB is just that and it does come from all directions. You can think of it as the burst of light that was emitted when the universe, through expansion, cooled just enough to let atomic nuclei recapture electrons. The electrons emitted photons and those have now been redshifted by the universe's expansion to match the spectrum of a body 'glowing' at about 3 degrees Kelvin.</p>

<p>(In fact there is some evidence to suggest that the CP is not valid or at least that there is a question about what scale constitutes "large scale": there is more here <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huge-LQG#Cosmological_principle" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huge-LQG#Cosmological_principle</a>)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-07T18:08:31.347Z
2015-12-07T18:08:31.347Z
adrianmcmenamin
<p>If all that exists originated in the big bang, as per the begining of your question, why then would you be searching for the oldest part of something that was globally formed at the same instant? I wouldn't ;-) Thankfully, the finite light speed allows us to view objects as they were during younger times at increasing distances.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-07T14:08:19.377Z
This doesn't quite answer the question. See the comments on the question itself. Welcome to Astronomy Stack Exchange!
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-07T11:56:28.013Z
2016-07-07T11:56:28.013Z
yaron
<p>When the big bang happened and all that exist today came into existence from singularity, how do you determine which part of the universe is the oldest?  Its natural to think that looking back at the center of the universe, we would find the oldest galaxies(not sure if this is true); but isn't there a certain logic that the farthest from the center should have the oldest galaxies?  Is there a proven theory behind where we would find the oldest galaxies? or is this one of those space-time enigmas?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-08T16:08:41.607Z
Not a duplicate - and if it is reopened I will provide an answer as to where to look to see the oldest galaxies.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-08T22:58:55.393Z
@RobJeffries I'm sorry that was my bad--I understood the question as asking if there was a region of space that was oldest. I see now that even though that was the OPs reasoning, the heart of the question is how we find the oldest galaxies--which is answerable.
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-04T00:56:10.453Z
The universe is homogeneous, so there shouldn't be a preferred direction. Additionally, the universe has no unique center, as the Big Bang did not happen at a point.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-04T06:59:37.783Z
The further away we look into the universe the older things are that we're looking at, but that's true in any direction.    The most distant galaxies are the "oldest" or "youngest" is the term usually used, but we mean the same thing.   Since the universe probably has no center there's no center to look at, as I said, look far enough in any direction and you can see the early universe, though it's hard to look through the Milky way, so much of our looking is through more clear openings in the Milky way.    Very far away tends to be very red shifted as well.
userLTK
<galaxy>
Oldest in the universe
Dr. No
# Oldest in the universe

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-12-04)

When the big bang happened and all that exist today came into existence from singularity, how do you determine which part of the universe is the oldest? Its natural to think that looking back at the center of the universe, we would find the oldest galaxies(not sure if this is true); but isn't there a certain logic that the farthest from the center should have the oldest galaxies? Is there a proven theory behind where we would find the oldest galaxies? or is this one of those space-time enigmas?

**Tags:** galaxy

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: The universe is homogeneous, so there shouldn't be a preferred direction. Additionally, the universe has no unique center, as the Big Bang did not happen at a point.  
> **username_4**: The further away we look into the universe the older things are that we're looking at, but that's true in any direction.    The most distant galaxies are the "oldest" or "youngest" is the term usually used, but we mean the same thing.   Since the universe probably has no center there's no center to look at, as I said, look far enough in any direction and you can see the early universe, though it's hard to look through the Milky way, so much of our looking is through more clear openings in the Milky way.    Very far away tends to be very red shifted as well.  
> **username_1**: Not a duplicate - and if it is reopened I will provide an answer as to where to look to see the oldest galaxies.  
> **username_2**: @RobJeffries I'm sorry that was my bad--I understood the question as asking if there was a region of space that was oldest. I see now that even though that was the OPs reasoning, the heart of the question is how we find the oldest galaxies--which is answerable.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-12-08. Score: 3

So, I agree with the other answers, that as we look further away from our Galaxy, we see galaxies as they were in the past. Therefore, by and large, these galaxies are *younger* than ours. That is, we see them as they were when they had an age that could be *at most* 13.7 billion (the age of the universe) minus their distance in light years.

Therefore to find the oldest objects in the universe, we must look locally. Probably the most ancient galaxies that we can study, are those that are thought to be the building blocks of larger galaxies. These are the "dwarf spheroidal galaxies", several of which have been identified as companions to the Milky Way and M31, and are probably remnants of a larger population of such objects. Their stellar populations appear to consist of mostly intermediate age stars through to extremely ancient stars.

Other ancients objects include the extremely metal-poor stars of the halo population of our Galaxy and a number of very metal poor globular clusters.

Estimates for the ages of such objects are uncertain, but are likely in the range 12-13 billion years old and so only a short time after the big bang.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: I think you are wrong when you say "Therefore, by and large, these galaxies are younger than ours.". This is not what looking at distant galaxies means. It means the galaxy you are looking at is AT LEAST as old as the time it took for it's light to reach you. Did I miss your point or are you indeed wrong ? Please correct me if I'm wrong.  
> **username_1**: @username_6 Our galaxy is 12 billion years old (roughly). If I look at a galaxy that is 5 billion light years away, the maximum age of that galaxy is 13.7-5 = 8.7 billion years old. i.e. Younger than our galaxy.  
> **username_6**: Oh, I get it now. Thanks for clarifiying.  
> **username_5**: Yes and no. What we actually see are the photons and in the case of the CMB these photons are the oldest things we can 'see'. But yours is an interesting argument, for sure.  
> **username_2**: @username_5 Photons are not galaxies. The question asks for the oldest galaxies, not the oldest objects.  
> **username_5**: @username_2 The first question is "how do we determine which part of the universe is the oldest?" The answer above also refers to the "oldest objects" - aren't hydgrogen atoms formed in the recombination epoch objects? Also the only thing we "see" are photons so your basic point is not even physical.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2015-12-07. Score: 1

The key point is that the Big Bang happened everywhere at the same time, hence there is no centre (or alternatively, the centre is any point). This was not an explosion into space, it created space. (Think of a balloon, when you blow it up points on the surface all move further apart without there being a centre of the expansion on the surface itself.)

A related idea is the "cosmological principle" (CP) which, simply put, states that, at a large scale, the universe looks the same everywhere. That means the "oldest" parts (as measured by how long it look radiation to get here) of the universe can be seen in any direction - and the CMB is just that and it does come from all directions. You can think of it as the burst of light that was emitted when the universe, through expansion, cooled just enough to let atomic nuclei recapture electrons. The electrons emitted photons and those have now been redshifted by the universe's expansion to match the spectrum of a body 'glowing' at about 3 degrees Kelvin.

(In fact there is some evidence to suggest that the CP is not valid or at least that there is a question about what scale constitutes "large scale": there is more here <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huge-LQG#Cosmological_principle>)


---

### Answer by username_7 on 2016-07-07. Score: 1

If all that exists originated in the big bang, as per the begining of your question, why then would you be searching for the oldest part of something that was globally formed at the same instant? I wouldn't ;-) Thankfully, the finite light speed allows us to view objects as they were during younger times at increasing distances.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: This doesn't quite answer the question. See the comments on the question itself. Welcome to Astronomy Stack Exchange!  

---

