<p>While light pollution certainly makes things more challenging, there are a number of objects that tend to compete with light pollution well-enough to be enjoyed.</p>
<p>I have done astronomy outreach events from urban parks (located in downtown metropolitan areas) where light pollution is extreme.  Faint deep-sky objects typically can't be viewed without special equipment -- but there are objects that can still be viewed.</p>
<p><strong>Planets</strong></p>
<p>Specific planets such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Venus</li>
<li>Mars</li>
<li>Jupiter</li>
<li>Saturn</li>
</ul>
<p>These bright planets are usually easy to spot if they are in the sky.  Venus is <em>so</em> bright that it can be viewed in the middle of the day (the trick is knowing <em>precisely</em> where to look).  I have been able to show Venus to school students in the middle of the day.  More impressive yet, is that once the students see it, I'm able to have them put their face near the side of the telescope -- to use the telescope as a guide.  The students can see Venus as a point of light in the sky without using any optical aid at all (no binoculars or telescope).  But if they turn away and look again, they usually have difficulty finding it again without something to point the way.</p>
<p>Jupiter is another object that can be seen in mid-day ... although not as bright as Venus and this one <em>requires</em> a telescope (you can't see it with just your eyes -- as is the case with Venus).  It appears fairly washed-out with very weak contrast (as if looking at it through a fog) when observing it in mid-day.</p>
<p>If these planets are visible even during mid-day, they are certainly also visible at night in light polluted conditions.</p>
<p>I did not mention</p>
<ul>
<li>Mercury</li>
<li>Uranus</li>
<li>Neptune</li>
</ul>
<p>Mercury is <em>sometimes</em> visible ... that object is tricky at times, but at other times it is easy to spot (it is not nearly as bright as Venus).</p>
<p>Uranus and Neptune are far enough away that don't appear brighter than most other stars in the sky (they don't stand out like the closer planets).</p>
<p><strong>Deep Sky Objects</strong></p>
<p>Experienced observers have an easier time finding these objects in light polluted skies mostly because they know what they are looking for ... by which I mean for each object, they have a pretty good idea of how it will appear in the eyepiece of the their telescope.  Many deep-sky objects will appear as a faint smudge that an inexperienced observer might ignore -- not having realized that this was the object.  Experienced observers also know where to look to find each object -- so they aren't searching randomly.</p>
<p>There are many &quot;planetarium&quot; applications made for smart-phones that tie into the phone's GPS, compass, and level/motion sensors so they know where you are and where you are pointing the phone in the sky.  These make it MUCH easier to find objects.</p>
<p><strong>Open Clusters</strong></p>
<p>Bright stars do tend to be visible through a telescope -- even in light polluted skies.  This makes certain open star-clusters good targets.</p>
<p>The Pleiades cluster (located in Taurus and tends to be visible during months such as December, January, &amp; February) is one of the brighter open clusters and is usually very easy to spot -- even in heavily light polluted skies.  Many open-clusters are visible from light polluted skies.  These objects also tend to cover a patch of sky large enough that they are often best observed at relatively low-magnification.</p>
<p><strong>Nebulae</strong></p>
<p>The Orion Nebula (Messier 42) is a particularly bright nebula.  It is so bright, that it appears star-like even without using a telescope -- even from urban locations.  Through a telescope it appears as a large gas cloud.  The core of this nebula is particularly bright.  In dark-skies, the object is so large that it can fill the eyepiece.  Heavily light polluted skies tend to wash out the fainter and more extended areas of the nebula, but the bright core is still visible -- just smaller (and less impressive).</p>
<p>The Ring Nebula (Messier 67) is another nebula that tends to be visible even from light polluted skies.  Through a telescope it appears as a tiny donut-shaped cloud (like a smoke-ring) -- but is bright enough that it often can be viewed.  This is a fainter object ... but I usually am able to find this from urban skies.</p>
<p>Depending on where you live, there may be several southern-hemisphere objects (I am a northern-hemisphere observer).</p>
<p><strong>Galaxies</strong></p>
<p>The only galaxy I have managed to view from light polluted skies with ordinary equipment is the Andromeda Galaxy (Messier 31).  The core of the galaxy competes rather well with light pollution ... but not the galaxy disk.  This means it wont appear as a galaxy... it will appear as a fuzzy pin-point of light.</p>
<p>I have technically been able to observe other galaxies from urban locations -- but only with highly specialized equipment.</p>
<p>Here's an example...</p>
<p>This first image is a heavily processed image of the Andromeda Galaxy (Messier 42).  You will never see an image that looks like this through any telescope.  These are my own images.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/1iUX0.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/1iUX0.jpg" alt="M42 Processed Image" /></a></p>
<p>Here is a mostly unprocessed image out of the camera to show roughly what you might see from a dark sky site.  Notice you can see the disk ... although it does become quite faint even in a dark sky site.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/rBWqL.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/rBWqL.jpg" alt="M42 Natural Image as seen from a dark sky location" /></a></p>
<p>Here is the same image again, but I've processed it in an effort to simulate light pollution.  I think I probably did not add enough haze to this image for the simulation.  When I observe from light polluted skies, I <em>ONLY</em> see a tiny pin-point of light surrounded by a haze and don't see even a hint of the disk structure (this image does show a hint of it).  So imagine only seeing the pin-point in the center and that's what you'd be trying to find.</p>
<p>I usually do not see the tiny companion galaxies at all.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/TyUOJ.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/TyUOJ.jpg" alt="M42 Light Polluted Simulation" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The Sun</strong></p>
<p>Nearly any telescope can also be used to view the Sun <strong>WITH A SAFE SOLAR FILTER</strong> attached.  The solar filter looks a bit like a cap that fits over the front of the telescope.  It blocks 99.996% or more (usually 99.999%) of the Sun's energy.  These safe solar filters are usually not particularly expensive.</p>
<p>If you do this, be safe:</p>
<ul>
<li>Inspect the filter each time before placing on the telescope.  Make sure the filter is not damaged and discontinue use with a filter if it is damaged.</li>
<li>Remove or cover the finder-scope.</li>
<li>Do NOT look through the telescope to point the scope at the Sun.  Instead, observe the shadow cast on the ground and orient the optical tube so that the shadow of the telescope's optical tube is round.  (There is such a thing as as solar finder...and some people make their own.)</li>
<li>Be safe.  Staring at the Sun without proper protection damages the retina of your eye ... but this works a bit like getting a sun-burn ... where you do not initially notice the damage until several hours later.  Often the damage from directly observing the Sun without a safe filter may not show up until one or two days after the damage is done.  This can result in the false-perception that you are ok ... only to find out you are having difficulty with eyesight a day or two later.</li>
</ul>
<p>Do not use filters that attach elsewhere to the scope (such as the eyepiece) as these allow too much energy into the instrument and can cause damage.</p>
<p>If you do equip the telescope with a safe solar filter and practice safe viewing techniques, then you can easily observe sunspots.</p>
<p>This image was captured through a solar filter in October 2014 when one of the large Sun-spot complexes of the last solar cycle was active.  The Sun appears orange in this image because the filter being used reduces blue wavelength light more aggressively than red wavelength light (if all wavelengths are reduced equally then the Sun will appear white).</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/ZdbHx.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ZdbHx.jpg" alt="Sun as viewed through a safe solar filter" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Techniques</strong></p>
<p><strong>Dark Adapted Eyes</strong></p>
<p>Even in urban light-polluted skies, protect your eyes from light.  If you can find a location where you are not able to directly see things such as street lights, etc. then your pupils will dilate and allow you to see fainter objects.  Part of the problem is the light pollution -- to be sure.  But the <em>other</em> part of the problem is not having dark-adapted eyes.  Human eyes will quickly constrict when you view a bright light source... but take much longer to dilate open again.  It requires something like 40+ minutes to become &quot;fully&quot; dark-adapted ... but you are more than 90% of the way there after just 20 minutes.  Just a few seconds of glimpsing a bright light source can ruin that (and resets the clock back to another long wait to get dark-adapted again).</p>
<p>Some observers will put a sheet, towel, blanket, etc. over their head while observing at the eyepiece to protect their eyes from stray light sources such as nearby street lights, house-lights, etc.</p>
<p><strong>Know where to Look</strong></p>
<p>Use a planetarium app on your phone to help you located objects -- so you aren't searching randomly.  On a mobile phone, Sky Safari is very popular (and cheap).  On a computer, Stellarium is popular (and free ... but only on the computer.  There is a mobile version but it is not free.)</p>
<p><strong>Star Hopping</strong></p>
<p>While there are sophisticated &quot;go to&quot; telescopes that can quickly located objects once they are &quot;aligned&quot; to the celestial sphere (they need to know your location, date, time, and then you orient them by helping them center on a couple of bright stars) ... the electronics and motors increases the price of the scope.  So depending on your budget ... they might not qualify as &quot;low cost&quot;.</p>
<p>BUT ... there are ways to find objects by first locating something bright enough that you <em>can</em> find it ... and then determine how far and in which direction to move the scope.  This would work with any telescope.</p>
<p>Telescopes are typically paired with a small &quot;finder&quot;.  Sometimes the finder is a tiny scope (very low power so it sees a wider piece of sky) and sometimes it's a red-dot finder (no magnification).  But one interesting type of finder is the Telrad ... this finder has 3 concentring rings.  The inner-most ring is a 1/2° circle on the sky.  The next ring is 2°.  The outer-most ring is 4°.   The find is actually popular enough that most software and most star-charts support it.  I have paper charts that come with a clear over-lay that has the Telrad pattern.  Also a number of applications (such as Stellarium or Sky Safari) also support the Telrad overlay.  The idea is that you use this with your chart/app to determine how many Telrad diameters to move the scope from an easy-to-find object to locate your hard-to-find target ... and then make the very same moves with the telescope using the physical Telrad finder.</p>
<p>There are numerous techniques and it takes a bit of practice, but in time you get fairly good at locating objects.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-08T23:02:33.133Z
This is *excellent!* Thank you for taking the time to write such a thorough, comprehensive answer with so much practical advice!
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-08T23:06:28.140Z
There has been some mention of the possibility of using a filter at night to address light pollution ([1](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/36698/my-local-night-sky-is-so-bright-that-i-can-only-see-the-moon-so-would-a-low-cos#comment73024_36698), [2](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/36698/my-local-night-sky-is-so-bright-that-i-can-only-see-the-moon-so-would-a-low-cos#comment76788_36701)). Have you had any experience with these? Historically I think they were most helpful for low-pressure gas (Hg, Na) lights with narrow lines, but these days it's high pressure and LEDs.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-11T23:04:57.520Z
I have had good luck with OIII filters on *some* emission nebulae (only works on nebulae that glow in OIII band).  I have used "Deep Sky" and "Ultra High Contrast" (UHC) filters.  I personally find them to be a bit too aggressive -- things mostly just look very dark.  I have also used the "Moon & Sky Glow" filter... basically a broadband filter with similar bandpass to the Deep Sky light pollution filter except it's much less aggressive (think of it as a moderate blocking filter) -- a gentle improvement but not so aggressive as to make it difficult to see anything.
Tim Campbell
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-11T23:06:01.463Z
You are correct that most of these light-pollution filters are tuned to block the wavelengths associated with Mercury and Sodium street lights ... and are not as effective with modern LED street lights.
Tim Campbell
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-12T02:42:31.643Z
Okay I see, thanks!
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-08T21:04:46.377Z
2020-09-08T21:04:46.377Z
Tim Campbell
<h2>There is hope!</h2>
<p>You may be able to see some stars through a telescope even though you can't see them with your eye.</p>
<p>For extended objects like sky brightness, nebulae, and the Moon and resolved planets, magnification reduces sky brightness, while aperture increases it.</p>
<p>For unresolved (point-like) objects like stars and unresolved planets, as long as focus is good magnification <em>does not</em> reduce its brightness but aperture still increases it.</p>
<h2>However</h2>
<p>If you can't see stars or planets by eye, it is going to be hard to point your low-end telescope at them, and searching randomly has a low probability of success.</p>
<h2>In this case</h2>
<p>I recommend first getting your hands on a pair of binoculars with low magnification (see if you can borrow some somehow, don't buy them <em>yet!</em>), something you can hold in your hands comfortably. Then get a star chart or use a website like <a href="https://in-the-sky.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">in-the-sky.org</a> and going to the <em>planetarium</em> page to view a simulated night sky, and find a bright star or planet and note where it is relative to the horizon. You might use a map or compass to find out where your North, South, East and West are so you can compare the sky map to your local surroundings.</p>
<p>Once you are able to find stars or planets this way, you can ask yourself if it's worth it to get a telescope and go through the same exercise.</p>
<p>You can also ask yourself if a pair of binoculars might be a better investment.</p>
<p>Also, please read answers to <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/443/7982">I live in an area with a lot of light pollution, how can I view the stars without building an observatory?</a> for some more advanced options.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-05T01:03:53.650Z
Binoculars are cheap- I got one with 8 times power is that powerful enough. Can't see anything in the sky.
user2617804
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-05T01:15:41.857Z
Hi @user2617804 I'm sorry to hear that! I'm going to add a bounty to your question which may attract further answers. Please feel free to update your question and mention the specifications of those binoculars if available. For example, if they say 8x42 it means the magnification is 8 and the diameter of the front lens is 42 mm. As one comment under your question mentions, if much of the light is from certain types of lights a special filter *might* help a bit. But these days with LED lighting filters are less effective.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-05T01:24:51.020Z
@user2617804 I don't know if it is possible to get to another location or not, but answers to the following might be of some interested: [How high does light pollution reach into the sky?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/14486/7982) and [Why (actually) is the night sky so bright in the city? How far up is that happening?](https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/q/8795/6031) and suggest roughly how far one would have to go away from the sources of light to see a significant improvement.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-05T01:31:03.120Z
@user2617804 When higher electrical efficiency LED street lighting was introduced, people thought it would lead to lower power usage. Instead, in many cities, it lead to *much more light* and the power usage stayed roughly the same!
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-27T02:34:05.457Z
2020-06-27T10:21:50.777Z
2020-06-27T10:21:50.777Z
uhoh
<p>Light pollution is so bad near our home that we can't see anything other the Moon in the night sky. For instance there is a street light on all night right in our lane and there are many other housing lights in the area.</p>
<p>Am I right to think that with a low-end telescope I won't be able to see anything else besides the Moon?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-27T12:03:37.913Z
If you're one of the lucky few who still have sodium lamps and not the unhealthy and power-hungry LEDs in their city, you can buy a filter which takes care of a lot of the light pollution.
JohnEye
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-05T01:02:55.597Z
I went Kawagawa City in Chiba Prefecture on holidays and despite the spotlights  and hotel lights, I could see quite a lot of stars. Unfortunately too busy to really assess them. Maybe it is local pollution and high clouds.  At that time they had a heavy fog warning and you could the low cloud rolling in but it never made it in.
user2617804
<telescope><amateur-observing><night-sky><light-pollution>
My local night sky is so bright that I can only see the Moon, so would a low-cost telescope be any use?
user2617804
# My local night sky is so bright that I can only see the Moon, so would a low-cost telescope be any use?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-06-27)

Light pollution is so bad near our home that we can't see anything other the Moon in the night sky. For instance there is a street light on all night right in our lane and there are many other housing lights in the area.

Am I right to think that with a low-end telescope I won't be able to see anything else besides the Moon?

**Tags:** telescope, amateur-observing, night-sky, light-pollution

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: If you're one of the lucky few who still have sodium lamps and not the unhealthy and power-hungry LEDs in their city, you can buy a filter which takes care of a lot of the light pollution.  
> **username_0**: I went Kawagawa City in Chiba Prefecture on holidays and despite the spotlights  and hotel lights, I could see quite a lot of stars. Unfortunately too busy to really assess them. Maybe it is local pollution and high clouds.  At that time they had a heavy fog warning and you could the low cloud rolling in but it never made it in.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-09-08. Score: 5

While light pollution certainly makes things more challenging, there are a number of objects that tend to compete with light pollution well-enough to be enjoyed.

I have done astronomy outreach events from urban parks (located in downtown metropolitan areas) where light pollution is extreme. Faint deep-sky objects typically can't be viewed without special equipment -- but there are objects that can still be viewed.

**Planets**

Specific planets such as:

* Venus
* Mars
* Jupiter
* Saturn

These bright planets are usually easy to spot if they are in the sky. Venus is *so* bright that it can be viewed in the middle of the day (the trick is knowing *precisely* where to look). I have been able to show Venus to school students in the middle of the day. More impressive yet, is that once the students see it, I'm able to have them put their face near the side of the telescope -- to use the telescope as a guide. The students can see Venus as a point of light in the sky without using any optical aid at all (no binoculars or telescope). But if they turn away and look again, they usually have difficulty finding it again without something to point the way.

Jupiter is another object that can be seen in mid-day ... although not as bright as Venus and this one *requires* a telescope (you can't see it with just your eyes -- as is the case with Venus). It appears fairly washed-out with very weak contrast (as if looking at it through a fog) when observing it in mid-day.

If these planets are visible even during mid-day, they are certainly also visible at night in light polluted conditions.

I did not mention

* Mercury
* Uranus
* Neptune

Mercury is *sometimes* visible ... that object is tricky at times, but at other times it is easy to spot (it is not nearly as bright as Venus).

Uranus and Neptune are far enough away that don't appear brighter than most other stars in the sky (they don't stand out like the closer planets).

**Deep Sky Objects**

Experienced observers have an easier time finding these objects in light polluted skies mostly because they know what they are looking for ... by which I mean for each object, they have a pretty good idea of how it will appear in the eyepiece of the their telescope. Many deep-sky objects will appear as a faint smudge that an inexperienced observer might ignore -- not having realized that this was the object. Experienced observers also know where to look to find each object -- so they aren't searching randomly.

There are many "planetarium" applications made for smart-phones that tie into the phone's GPS, compass, and level/motion sensors so they know where you are and where you are pointing the phone in the sky. These make it MUCH easier to find objects.

**Open Clusters**

Bright stars do tend to be visible through a telescope -- even in light polluted skies. This makes certain open star-clusters good targets.

The Pleiades cluster (located in Taurus and tends to be visible during months such as December, January, & February) is one of the brighter open clusters and is usually very easy to spot -- even in heavily light polluted skies. Many open-clusters are visible from light polluted skies. These objects also tend to cover a patch of sky large enough that they are often best observed at relatively low-magnification.

**Nebulae**

The Orion Nebula (Messier 42) is a particularly bright nebula. It is so bright, that it appears star-like even without using a telescope -- even from urban locations. Through a telescope it appears as a large gas cloud. The core of this nebula is particularly bright. In dark-skies, the object is so large that it can fill the eyepiece. Heavily light polluted skies tend to wash out the fainter and more extended areas of the nebula, but the bright core is still visible -- just smaller (and less impressive).

The Ring Nebula (Messier 67) is another nebula that tends to be visible even from light polluted skies. Through a telescope it appears as a tiny donut-shaped cloud (like a smoke-ring) -- but is bright enough that it often can be viewed. This is a fainter object ... but I usually am able to find this from urban skies.

Depending on where you live, there may be several southern-hemisphere objects (I am a northern-hemisphere observer).

**Galaxies**

The only galaxy I have managed to view from light polluted skies with ordinary equipment is the Andromeda Galaxy (Messier 31). The core of the galaxy competes rather well with light pollution ... but not the galaxy disk. This means it wont appear as a galaxy... it will appear as a fuzzy pin-point of light.

I have technically been able to observe other galaxies from urban locations -- but only with highly specialized equipment.

Here's an example...

This first image is a heavily processed image of the Andromeda Galaxy (Messier 42). You will never see an image that looks like this through any telescope. These are my own images.

[![M42 Processed Image](https://i.sstatic.net/1iUX0.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/1iUX0.jpg)

Here is a mostly unprocessed image out of the camera to show roughly what you might see from a dark sky site. Notice you can see the disk ... although it does become quite faint even in a dark sky site.

[![M42 Natural Image as seen from a dark sky location](https://i.sstatic.net/rBWqL.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/rBWqL.jpg)

Here is the same image again, but I've processed it in an effort to simulate light pollution. I think I probably did not add enough haze to this image for the simulation. When I observe from light polluted skies, I *ONLY* see a tiny pin-point of light surrounded by a haze and don't see even a hint of the disk structure (this image does show a hint of it). So imagine only seeing the pin-point in the center and that's what you'd be trying to find.

I usually do not see the tiny companion galaxies at all.

[![M42 Light Polluted Simulation](https://i.sstatic.net/TyUOJ.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/TyUOJ.jpg)

**The Sun**

Nearly any telescope can also be used to view the Sun **WITH A SAFE SOLAR FILTER** attached. The solar filter looks a bit like a cap that fits over the front of the telescope. It blocks 99.996% or more (usually 99.999%) of the Sun's energy. These safe solar filters are usually not particularly expensive.

If you do this, be safe:

* Inspect the filter each time before placing on the telescope. Make sure the filter is not damaged and discontinue use with a filter if it is damaged.
* Remove or cover the finder-scope.
* Do NOT look through the telescope to point the scope at the Sun. Instead, observe the shadow cast on the ground and orient the optical tube so that the shadow of the telescope's optical tube is round. (There is such a thing as as solar finder...and some people make their own.)
* Be safe. Staring at the Sun without proper protection damages the retina of your eye ... but this works a bit like getting a sun-burn ... where you do not initially notice the damage until several hours later. Often the damage from directly observing the Sun without a safe filter may not show up until one or two days after the damage is done. This can result in the false-perception that you are ok ... only to find out you are having difficulty with eyesight a day or two later.

Do not use filters that attach elsewhere to the scope (such as the eyepiece) as these allow too much energy into the instrument and can cause damage.

If you do equip the telescope with a safe solar filter and practice safe viewing techniques, then you can easily observe sunspots.

This image was captured through a solar filter in October 2014 when one of the large Sun-spot complexes of the last solar cycle was active. The Sun appears orange in this image because the filter being used reduces blue wavelength light more aggressively than red wavelength light (if all wavelengths are reduced equally then the Sun will appear white).

[![Sun as viewed through a safe solar filter](https://i.sstatic.net/ZdbHx.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/ZdbHx.jpg)

**Techniques**

**Dark Adapted Eyes**

Even in urban light-polluted skies, protect your eyes from light. If you can find a location where you are not able to directly see things such as street lights, etc. then your pupils will dilate and allow you to see fainter objects. Part of the problem is the light pollution -- to be sure. But the *other* part of the problem is not having dark-adapted eyes. Human eyes will quickly constrict when you view a bright light source... but take much longer to dilate open again. It requires something like 40+ minutes to become "fully" dark-adapted ... but you are more than 90% of the way there after just 20 minutes. Just a few seconds of glimpsing a bright light source can ruin that (and resets the clock back to another long wait to get dark-adapted again).

Some observers will put a sheet, towel, blanket, etc. over their head while observing at the eyepiece to protect their eyes from stray light sources such as nearby street lights, house-lights, etc.

**Know where to Look**

Use a planetarium app on your phone to help you located objects -- so you aren't searching randomly. On a mobile phone, Sky Safari is very popular (and cheap). On a computer, Stellarium is popular (and free ... but only on the computer. There is a mobile version but it is not free.)

**Star Hopping**

While there are sophisticated "go to" telescopes that can quickly located objects once they are "aligned" to the celestial sphere (they need to know your location, date, time, and then you orient them by helping them center on a couple of bright stars) ... the electronics and motors increases the price of the scope. So depending on your budget ... they might not qualify as "low cost".

BUT ... there are ways to find objects by first locating something bright enough that you *can* find it ... and then determine how far and in which direction to move the scope. This would work with any telescope.

Telescopes are typically paired with a small "finder". Sometimes the finder is a tiny scope (very low power so it sees a wider piece of sky) and sometimes it's a red-dot finder (no magnification). But one interesting type of finder is the Telrad ... this finder has 3 concentring rings. The inner-most ring is a 1/2° circle on the sky. The next ring is 2°. The outer-most ring is 4°. The find is actually popular enough that most software and most star-charts support it. I have paper charts that come with a clear over-lay that has the Telrad pattern. Also a number of applications (such as Stellarium or Sky Safari) also support the Telrad overlay. The idea is that you use this with your chart/app to determine how many Telrad diameters to move the scope from an easy-to-find object to locate your hard-to-find target ... and then make the very same moves with the telescope using the physical Telrad finder.

There are numerous techniques and it takes a bit of practice, but in time you get fairly good at locating objects.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: This is *excellent!* Thank you for taking the time to write such a thorough, comprehensive answer with so much practical advice!  
> **username_3**: There has been some mention of the possibility of using a filter at night to address light pollution ([1](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/36698/my-local-night-sky-is-so-bright-that-i-can-only-see-the-moon-so-would-a-low-cos#comment73024_36698), [2](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/36698/my-local-night-sky-is-so-bright-that-i-can-only-see-the-moon-so-would-a-low-cos#comment76788_36701)). Have you had any experience with these? Historically I think they were most helpful for low-pressure gas (Hg, Na) lights with narrow lines, but these days it's high pressure and LEDs.  
> **username_2**: I have had good luck with OIII filters on *some* emission nebulae (only works on nebulae that glow in OIII band).  I have used "Deep Sky" and "Ultra High Contrast" (UHC) filters.  I personally find them to be a bit too aggressive -- things mostly just look very dark.  I have also used the "Moon & Sky Glow" filter... basically a broadband filter with similar bandpass to the Deep Sky light pollution filter except it's much less aggressive (think of it as a moderate blocking filter) -- a gentle improvement but not so aggressive as to make it difficult to see anything.  
> **username_2**: You are correct that most of these light-pollution filters are tuned to block the wavelengths associated with Mercury and Sodium street lights ... and are not as effective with modern LED street lights.  
> **username_3**: Okay I see, thanks!  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-06-27. Score: 5

## There is hope!

You may be able to see some stars through a telescope even though you can't see them with your eye.

For extended objects like sky brightness, nebulae, and the Moon and resolved planets, magnification reduces sky brightness, while aperture increases it.

For unresolved (point-like) objects like stars and unresolved planets, as long as focus is good magnification *does not* reduce its brightness but aperture still increases it.

## However

If you can't see stars or planets by eye, it is going to be hard to point your low-end telescope at them, and searching randomly has a low probability of success.

## In this case

I recommend first getting your hands on a pair of binoculars with low magnification (see if you can borrow some somehow, don't buy them *yet!*), something you can hold in your hands comfortably. Then get a star chart or use a website like [in-the-sky.org](https://in-the-sky.org/) and going to the *planetarium* page to view a simulated night sky, and find a bright star or planet and note where it is relative to the horizon. You might use a map or compass to find out where your North, South, East and West are so you can compare the sky map to your local surroundings.

Once you are able to find stars or planets this way, you can ask yourself if it's worth it to get a telescope and go through the same exercise.

You can also ask yourself if a pair of binoculars might be a better investment.

Also, please read answers to [I live in an area with a lot of light pollution, how can I view the stars without building an observatory?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/443/7982) for some more advanced options.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Binoculars are cheap- I got one with 8 times power is that powerful enough. Can't see anything in the sky.  
> **username_3**: Hi @username_0 I'm sorry to hear that! I'm going to add a bounty to your question which may attract further answers. Please feel free to update your question and mention the specifications of those binoculars if available. For example, if they say 8x42 it means the magnification is 8 and the diameter of the front lens is 42 mm. As one comment under your question mentions, if much of the light is from certain types of lights a special filter *might* help a bit. But these days with LED lighting filters are less effective.  
> **username_3**: @username_0 I don't know if it is possible to get to another location or not, but answers to the following might be of some interested: [How high does light pollution reach into the sky?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/14486/7982) and [Why (actually) is the night sky so bright in the city? How far up is that happening?](https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/q/8795/6031) and suggest roughly how far one would have to go away from the sources of light to see a significant improvement.  
> **username_3**: @username_0 When higher electrical efficiency LED street lighting was introduced, people thought it would lead to lower power usage. Instead, in many cities, it lead to *much more light* and the power usage stayed roughly the same!  

---

