<p>Charge is a conserved quantity. If you add a net charge to an object, then it becomes charged.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-18T21:21:03.340Z
2017-10-18T21:21:03.340Z
ProfRob
<p>The pressures are so great in a neutron star that most of the electrons combine with protons and become neutrons.  A statistical equilibrium is set up in which neutrons, because they are unstable, decay into electrons and protons while some electron proton pairs form neutrons.  For typical neutron star temperature/pressures, at any one time about 1/7 of the nucleons are protons (with an equal number of electrons) and 6/7 are neutrons.   If there were more electrons than protons, then the excess of electrons would persist since they would not have enough partners to combine with.   Of course, this net charge would attract protons and other positive ions from nearby space and this would reduce the neutron star's charge.  So, if you added electrons, you would change the charge of the neutron star, but the net charge would decay over time as positive particles are pulled in from space.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-28T14:41:49.923Z
I think your answer can be improved, especially the last phrase. So what are you proposing, net charge yes/no?
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-25T18:49:41.113Z
2018-04-11T20:08:17.243Z
2018-04-11T20:08:17.243Z
eshaya
<p>If you keep adding electrons or protons to a Neutron star, what would happen? Are there decay processes that convert them to neutrons in the absence of the oppositely charged particle? </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-18T21:05:53.087Z
The net charge of almost all astronomical objects is zero. Your question is equivalent to asking "what happens if we keep adding electrons or protons to any astronomical body"? As you'd expect, the electric charge would change.
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-18T21:09:17.427Z
@SirCumference But aren't electrons and protons unstable on a neutron star? Also since black holes can become charged, I was just wonder if the same thing happened to neutron stars.
A. C. A. C.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-11T20:27:22.140Z
@A.C.A.C. The process where electrons and protons become neutrons inside a neutron star doesn't change it's charge.  The outer rim is still protons, neutrons and electrons and it's charge is a sum of the charge of it's particles.   A black hole is different.
userLTK
<neutron-star>
Can a Neutron Star become charged?
A. C. A. C.
# Can a Neutron Star become charged?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-10-18)

If you keep adding electrons or protons to a Neutron star, what would happen? Are there decay processes that convert them to neutrons in the absence of the oppositely charged particle?

**Tags:** neutron-star

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The net charge of almost all astronomical objects is zero. Your question is equivalent to asking "what happens if we keep adding electrons or protons to any astronomical body"? As you'd expect, the electric charge would change.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 But aren't electrons and protons unstable on a neutron star? Also since black holes can become charged, I was just wonder if the same thing happened to neutron stars.  
> **username_2**: @A.C.A.C. The process where electrons and protons become neutrons inside a neutron star doesn't change it's charge.  The outer rim is still protons, neutrons and electrons and it's charge is a sum of the charge of it's particles.   A black hole is different.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-10-18. Score: 7

Charge is a conserved quantity. If you add a net charge to an object, then it becomes charged.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2017-10-25. Score: 2

The pressures are so great in a neutron star that most of the electrons combine with protons and become neutrons. A statistical equilibrium is set up in which neutrons, because they are unstable, decay into electrons and protons while some electron proton pairs form neutrons. For typical neutron star temperature/pressures, at any one time about 1/7 of the nucleons are protons (with an equal number of electrons) and 6/7 are neutrons. If there were more electrons than protons, then the excess of electrons would persist since they would not have enough partners to combine with. Of course, this net charge would attract protons and other positive ions from nearby space and this would reduce the neutron star's charge. So, if you added electrons, you would change the charge of the neutron star, but the net charge would decay over time as positive particles are pulled in from space.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: I think your answer can be improved, especially the last phrase. So what are you proposing, net charge yes/no?  

---

