<p>Good question! I will need to go into some cosmology to answer it, my main source being <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Davis &amp; Lineweaver (2003)</a>.</p>

<p>Nothing <em>traveling through space</em> should be able to leave the observable universe. However, information can and will inevitably leave our observable universe. How is this possible?</p>

<p><strong>The Universe is expanding.</strong></p>

<p>If we lived in a static universe, no objects would leave our observable universe. However, in our accelerating universe, space is being created between objects, with farther objects drifting away faster than closer ones.</p>

<p>Einstein said nothing can travel through space faster than light. However, space is literally being created between objects, so they can be pushed away from each other faster than light. So while the observable universe is expanding at the speed of light, distant objects are moving away from us even faster.</p>

<p>And the result? Take a look at this image:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/txwtv.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/txwtv.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>This describes how the observable universe will evolve. The <em>Hubble sphere</em> defines the area in which objects are receding from us at or below the speed of light. Beyond this, objects are far enough to recede from us faster than light.</p>

<p>The light cone is the region of the Universe capable of influencing us today. Essentially, it is the observable universe, and its boundary is clearly marked. It is, as you mentioned, growing at the speed of light.</p>

<p>The light cone does not contain the entire Hubble sphere, since photons from many objects receding faster than light cannot reach us yet. Conversely, the Hubble sphere doesn't contain the entire light cone. This is because photons emitted by objects outside of the Hubble sphere can crawl into regions of space that are receding from us a bit slower than the one from which they were emitted. They can then crawl into regions that expand slower than the last one, and so on. Eventually, the photons will reach regions of space that aren't expanding faster than light, and they can reach us.</p>

<p>Now, there is a distance beyond which space expands faster than the light can traverse it. This distance is called the cosmic event horizon. Light from beyond the event horizon will never reach us. Our observable universe grows because more photons come into our view. However, the observable universe will infinitely approach the event horizon, since light from beyond there can never reach us.</p>

<p>Thus, after an incomprehensibly long time, the observable universe would stop growing. At this point, it may finally be possible to travel through space beyond the observable universe.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-12T11:46:13.683Z
Nice answer, but: "photons from objects receding faster than light cannot reach us yet". I think you didn't mean this, since you write correctly further down that "light from beyond the Hubble sphere can reach us". Everything outside the Hubble sphere recedes faster than light, and yet we easily see it. Also, I think you forgot to cite Davis & Lineweaver (2004) ;-)
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-12T12:03:54.723Z
@pela Yeah, I realize now how contradictory I was.
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-12T14:38:07.873Z
I like the explanation with photons "crawling into regions that expand slower". I'm not gonna upvote you until you until you cite that paper, though.
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-12T14:39:46.100Z
Also, you might want to mention that the figure is in _comoving_ coordinates. That's why it looks like a static Universe.
pela
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-12T14:44:58.783Z
@pelagic That's true, but I would have to explain comoving coordinates and that might confuse the OP even more. Keeping it simple and just saying that proper distances increase might be best.
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-12T14:48:33.627Z
@pela Also, I'll quote the paper ;)
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-11T20:26:53.813Z
2017-06-19T17:41:22.900Z
2017-06-19T17:41:22.900Z
Sir Cumference
<p>From what I gather, the observable universe is expanding at the speed of light. In addition, information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. It seems as though these two facts would imply that information cannot leave the observable universe. However, if that is true, it would either mean that the universe started spread apart, or that the observable universe is the entire universe. So, which of these explanations is correct?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T03:22:24.320Z
The outer part of the observable universe is moving away from us at faster than the speed of light, not at the speed of light.   It's also extremely unlikely that the observable universe is the entire universe, like, hugely, enormously unlikely.     I think your information question is kind of interesting though.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T03:30:07.727Z
That is interesting that the outer part is moving away faster than the speed of light, and i thank you for that. But it seems that makes it even more impossible for information to leave.
enoua5
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T11:57:12.750Z
The Universe is defined as everything that exists. A set that is the superset of everything. How can anything get even out of everything.
Suhrid Mulay
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T12:52:41.343Z
@SuhridMulay  He's asking about the observable universe, not the entire universe.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T13:24:07.170Z
OK, having given this some thought, you are correct, information cannot leave the observable universe and the observable universe isn't static, it keeps expanding.    Also, yes, the universe probably started out spread apart, perhaps infinite, not as a singularity, though nobody knows for certain, but what's mostly certain is that the oldest light we see is from about 379,000 years after the big bang, at which point the universe was significantly expanded, though much less expanded than it is today.   If nobody answers this, I can flesh this out into an answer, but I'll leave it open for now.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T13:25:08.420Z
You might enjoy this video.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBr4GkRnY04
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T13:28:03.703Z
@userLTK In theory, couldn't information leave the observable universe through a wormhole?
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T13:45:19.450Z
@called2voyage  I'm of the opinion that wormholes are theoretically impossible.   Also, if information can leave by wormhole, couldn't it return by wormhole too?   It's also worth pointing out that information might leave the observable universe if it falls into a black hole, but I'd rather not take up the black hole-information debate.   I'll leave that to the experts.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T13:46:45.253Z
Fair enough, I just thought I'd bring it up. Yeah, I was wondering about the black hole thing myself, but I think that's really kind of a different scope than what's being addressed here. Though, to be fair, wormholes probably fall in that category too.
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-08-02T14:34:19.240Z
Alright, I think I understand now! Thanks guys!
enoua5
<universe><light><observable-universe>
Can information leave the observable Universe?
enoua5
# Can information leave the observable Universe?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-08-02)

From what I gather, the observable universe is expanding at the speed of light. In addition, information cannot travel faster than the speed of light. It seems as though these two facts would imply that information cannot leave the observable universe. However, if that is true, it would either mean that the universe started spread apart, or that the observable universe is the entire universe. So, which of these explanations is correct?

**Tags:** universe, light, observable-universe

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The outer part of the observable universe is moving away from us at faster than the speed of light, not at the speed of light.   It's also extremely unlikely that the observable universe is the entire universe, like, hugely, enormously unlikely.     I think your information question is kind of interesting though.  
> **username_0**: That is interesting that the outer part is moving away faster than the speed of light, and i thank you for that. But it seems that makes it even more impossible for information to leave.  
> **username_2**: The Universe is defined as everything that exists. A set that is the superset of everything. How can anything get even out of everything.  
> **username_1**: @username_2  He's asking about the observable universe, not the entire universe.  
> **username_1**: OK, having given this some thought, you are correct, information cannot leave the observable universe and the observable universe isn't static, it keeps expanding.    Also, yes, the universe probably started out spread apart, perhaps infinite, not as a singularity, though nobody knows for certain, but what's mostly certain is that the oldest light we see is from about 379,000 years after the big bang, at which point the universe was significantly expanded, though much less expanded than it is today.   If nobody answers this, I can flesh this out into an answer, but I'll leave it open for now.  
> **username_1**: You might enjoy this video.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBr4GkRnY04  
> **username_3**: @username_1 In theory, couldn't information leave the observable universe through a wormhole?  
> **username_1**: @username_3  I'm of the opinion that wormholes are theoretically impossible.   Also, if information can leave by wormhole, couldn't it return by wormhole too?   It's also worth pointing out that information might leave the observable universe if it falls into a black hole, but I'd rather not take up the black hole-information debate.   I'll leave that to the experts.  
> **username_3**: Fair enough, I just thought I'd bring it up. Yeah, I was wondering about the black hole thing myself, but I think that's really kind of a different scope than what's being addressed here. Though, to be fair, wormholes probably fall in that category too.  
> **username_0**: Alright, I think I understand now! Thanks guys!  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2016-08-11. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

Good question! I will need to go into some cosmology to answer it, my main source being [Davis & Lineweaver (2003)](https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310808).

Nothing *traveling through space* should be able to leave the observable universe. However, information can and will inevitably leave our observable universe. How is this possible?

**The Universe is expanding.**

If we lived in a static universe, no objects would leave our observable universe. However, in our accelerating universe, space is being created between objects, with farther objects drifting away faster than closer ones.

Einstein said nothing can travel through space faster than light. However, space is literally being created between objects, so they can be pushed away from each other faster than light. So while the observable universe is expanding at the speed of light, distant objects are moving away from us even faster.

And the result? Take a look at this image:

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/txwtv.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/txwtv.png)

This describes how the observable universe will evolve. The *Hubble sphere* defines the area in which objects are receding from us at or below the speed of light. Beyond this, objects are far enough to recede from us faster than light.

The light cone is the region of the Universe capable of influencing us today. Essentially, it is the observable universe, and its boundary is clearly marked. It is, as you mentioned, growing at the speed of light.

The light cone does not contain the entire Hubble sphere, since photons from many objects receding faster than light cannot reach us yet. Conversely, the Hubble sphere doesn't contain the entire light cone. This is because photons emitted by objects outside of the Hubble sphere can crawl into regions of space that are receding from us a bit slower than the one from which they were emitted. They can then crawl into regions that expand slower than the last one, and so on. Eventually, the photons will reach regions of space that aren't expanding faster than light, and they can reach us.

Now, there is a distance beyond which space expands faster than the light can traverse it. This distance is called the cosmic event horizon. Light from beyond the event horizon will never reach us. Our observable universe grows because more photons come into our view. However, the observable universe will infinitely approach the event horizon, since light from beyond there can never reach us.

Thus, after an incomprehensibly long time, the observable universe would stop growing. At this point, it may finally be possible to travel through space beyond the observable universe.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: Nice answer, but: "photons from objects receding faster than light cannot reach us yet". I think you didn't mean this, since you write correctly further down that "light from beyond the Hubble sphere can reach us". Everything outside the Hubble sphere recedes faster than light, and yet we easily see it. Also, I think you forgot to cite Davis & Lineweaver (2004) ;-)  
> **username_4**: @username_5 Yeah, I realize now how contradictory I was.  
> **username_5**: I like the explanation with photons "crawling into regions that expand slower". I'm not gonna upvote you until you until you cite that paper, though.  
> **username_5**: Also, you might want to mention that the figure is in _comoving_ coordinates. That's why it looks like a static Universe.  
> **username_4**: @pelagic That's true, but I would have to explain comoving coordinates and that might confuse the OP even more. Keeping it simple and just saying that proper distances increase might be best.  
> **username_4**: @username_5 Also, I'll quote the paper ;)  

---

