<p>NICER observations of PSR J0030+0451 in x-rays show hot spots clustered near one pole. The hot spots are presumed to be the termination of the active magnetic field lines, so there is really no magnetic "axis". The field is more complicated.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2019/nasa-s-nicer-delivers-best-ever-pulsar-measurements-1st-surface-map" rel="noreferrer">First surface map of a pulsar</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-07T00:38:40.210Z
`+1` This was a cool result! I've linked to this answer [here](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/43931/12102) and [here](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/43930/12102)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-06T22:53:32.700Z
2020-05-06T22:53:32.700Z
John Doty
<p>It is believed that old pulsars may have their rotational axes closely aligned with their magnetic field. This would happen over a timescale of <span class="math-container">$\tau\sim10^7$</span> years (<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.234..477L/abstract" rel="noreferrer">Lyne &amp; Manchester (1988)</a>). There are three sets of phenomena driving the dynamics of the alignment (<a href="https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..374C/abstract" rel="noreferrer">Casini &amp; Montemayor (1998)</a>):</p>

<ul>
<li>Short-term (<span class="math-container">$\sim50$</span> days) variations caused by glitches</li>
<li>Intermediate increases of the alignment angle <span class="math-container">$\theta$</span>, moving the magnetic dipole moment towards the equator</li>
<li>A set of long-term (<span class="math-container">$\sim10^7$</span> years) dynamics leading to a decrease in <span class="math-container">$\theta$</span></li>
</ul>

<p>Only in older pulsars does this last set of dynamics dominate. What this means is that the pulses from the neutron star would appear wider than pulses from neutron stars with significant misalignment. We also would not see interpulses, signals from the opposite magnetic pole, which we see in a number of young (or simply short-period) pulsars; we would just observe one pulse per rotation period.</p>

<p>I will add that Lyne &amp; Manchester identified some young pulsars (including PSR 1800-21 and PSR 1823-13) that exhibited near alignment, a possible indication that the initial offset between the two axes may have a uniform distribution. Therefore, there should be examples of young pulsars with magnetic and rotation axes almost aligned. I would assume the intermediate-timescale mechanisms would then lead to misalignment before the long-term dynamics began to dominate.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-05-06T14:46:22.180Z
2020-05-06T20:07:29.190Z
2020-05-06T20:07:29.190Z
HDE 226868
<p>I know that there's probably a higher chance of having a neutron star that has its magnetic axis inclined to the rotational axis rather than having it perfectly aligned. 
If they are not aligned, the neutron star will create beams of radiation that sweep through space like the beams of light from a lighthouse. But what will happen if they were to be aligned?</p>

<star><observational-astronomy><neutron-star><magnetic-field><pulsar>
Are there neutron stars whose magnetic axis and rotating axis are the same, and if so what will happen?
space nerd
# Are there neutron stars whose magnetic axis and rotating axis are the same, and if so what will happen?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-05-06)

I know that there's probably a higher chance of having a neutron star that has its magnetic axis inclined to the rotational axis rather than having it perfectly aligned.
If they are not aligned, the neutron star will create beams of radiation that sweep through username_0 like the beams of light from a lighthouse. But what will happen if they were to be aligned?

**Tags:** star, observational-astronomy, neutron-star, magnetic-field, pulsar


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-05-06. Score: 13 | Accepted answer

It is believed that old pulsars may have their rotational axes closely aligned with their magnetic field. This would happen over a timescale of $\tau\sim10^7$ years ([Lyne & Manchester (1988)](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.234..477L/abstract)). There are three sets of phenomena driving the dynamics of the alignment ([Casini & Montemayor (1998)](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..374C/abstract)):

* Short-term ($\sim50$ days) variations caused by glitches
* Intermediate increases of the alignment angle $\theta$, moving the magnetic dipole moment towards the equator
* A set of long-term ($\sim10^7$ years) dynamics leading to a decrease in $\theta$

Only in older pulsars does this last set of dynamics dominate. What this means is that the pulses from the neutron star would appear wider than pulses from neutron stars with significant misalignment. We also would not see interpulses, signals from the opposite magnetic pole, which we see in a number of young (or simply short-period) pulsars; we would just observe one pulse per rotation period.

I will add that Lyne & Manchester identified some young pulsars (including PSR 1800-21 and PSR 1823-13) that exhibited near alignment, a possible indication that the initial offset between the two axes may have a uniform distribution. Therefore, there should be examples of young pulsars with magnetic and rotation axes almost aligned. I would assume the intermediate-timescale mechanisms would then lead to misalignment before the long-term dynamics began to dominate.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-05-06. Score: 5

NICER observations of PSR J0030+0451 in x-rays show hot spots clustered near one pole. The hot spots are presumed to be the termination of the active magnetic field lines, so there is really no magnetic "axis". The field is more complicated.

[First surface map of a pulsar](https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2019/nasa-s-nicer-delivers-best-ever-pulsar-measurements-1st-surface-map)

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: `+1` This was a cool result! I've linked to this answer [here](https://username_0.stackexchange.com/q/43931/12102) and [here](https://username_0.stackexchange.com/q/43930/12102)  

---

