<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Swan_Leavitt" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Henrietta Swan Levitt</a> was the first person to develop the &quot;standard candle&quot; technique for measuring the distance to stars, while studying Cepheid variables around 1912-1913.</p>
<p>Of course, the standard candle technique just extends the parallax technique to farther distances; in order to figure out how bright Cepheid variables are, Levitt had to know the parallax distances to enough of them to fit their brightness and period on a logarithmic curve. (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period-luminosity_relation" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Levitt's Law</a>) To this day there are still no ways to measure the distances to stars that do not ultimately rely on parallax measurements.</p>
<p>However, we <em>can</em> make completely independent measurements of the distance to gravitational wave events. Their &quot;absolute brightness&quot; depends solely on their mass, and their mass can be calculated from their waveform. A few things like orientation, redshift, gravitational lensing etc make this more complicated, but theorists have been able to correct for most of the confounding factors. More info: <a href="https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4090" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4090</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-13T07:39:44.797Z
We know the distance to the Sun and it's luminosity, independently of parallax. The distance to any star could be estimated by assuming it was similar to the Sun.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-13T11:57:59.833Z
We learned the distance to the sun by observing a transit of Venus from two different points on earth - so it all comes back to parallax. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1769_transit_of_Venus_observed_from_Tahiti
dieki
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-13T12:00:49.527Z
Also, stars vary by a factor of over 100,000,000 in brightness, so this doesn't help you tell a distant bright star from a close dim star. And until we knew how far away the stars were, we had no reason to assume they were the same brightness as the sun.
dieki
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-13T13:00:33.780Z
I take issue with your comment that all distances are ultimately based on parallax. The astronomical unit is now based on radar distance measurements, not the parallax of Venus. Indeed many stars are very different to the Sun, which is why earlier estimates of the distances to stars were often erroneous. That does not mean that they were not estimated and Steve Linton provides an example.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-13T03:28:02.397Z
2020-11-13T03:28:02.397Z
dieki
<p>From <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius#Distance" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>In his 1698 book, Cosmotheoros, Christiaan Huygens estimated the distance to Sirius at 27664 times the distance from the Earth to the Sun (about 0.437 light years, translating to a parallax of roughly 7.5 arcseconds).</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan_Huygens" rel="nofollow noreferrer">and</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>It was also in this book that Huygens published his method for estimating stellar distances. He made a series of smaller holes in a screen facing the Sun, until he estimated the light was of the same intensity as that of the star Sirius. He then calculated that the angle of this hole was <span class="math-container">$\frac{1}{27,664}$</span>th the diameter of the Sun, and thus it was about 30,000 times as far away, on the (incorrect) assumption that Sirius is as luminous as the Sun. The subject of photometry remained in its infancy until the time of Pierre Bouguer and Johann Heinrich Lambert.[124]</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-13T08:25:52.023Z
2022-07-11T00:17:05.157Z
2022-07-11T00:17:05.157Z
Steve Linton
<p>This is somewhat of a follow-up to <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/39408/7982">When was the parallax of a star first measured?</a> Once the distance to the nearest stars was determined, it was possible to discover physical properties of stars (such as the relation between intrinsic luminosity and color, or the relation between luminosity and period for Cepheid variables), then use the knowledge of those physical properties to find the distance of stars with no visible parallax.</p>
<p>When was the distance to a star (other than the Sun) determined for the first time with a method other than parallax?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-10T00:01:06.223Z
I made a small edit that takes advantage of a Stack Exchange feature. Please feel free to roll back or edit further if it conflicts with your intention.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-10T00:05:05.933Z
Will you allow for answers that provide distance determinations and/or distance estimates, or should they qualify as actual measurements? I don't actually know how to define the distinction exactly, but I suppose it depends on how much modeling is required. Parallax is an angular measurement, and distance is inferred through a model of Earth's orbit around the Sun as well as an assumption that there are no other period 1 year motions of the Sun. Those are pretty solid assumptions.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-10T00:05:19.833Z
Models of stellar luminosity or variability are much more involved; would you allow distance determinations based on those to be called "measurements" as well?
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-10T07:56:15.257Z
@uhoh I guess "determinations" would be a better term for what I intend.
usernumber
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-10T08:03:54.527Z
People assumed that stars were like the Sun and estimated distance well before parallaxes were measured.
ProfRob
<star><distances><history>
When was the distance to a star measured for the first time without using parallax?
usernumber
# When was the distance to a star measured for the first time without using parallax?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-11-09)

This is somewhat of a follow-up to [When was the parallax of a star first measured?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/39408/7982) Once the distance to the nearest stars was determined, it was possible to discover physical properties of stars (such as the relation between intrinsic luminosity and color, or the relation between luminosity and period for Cepheid variables), then use the knowledge of those physical properties to find the distance of stars with no visible parallax.

When was the distance to a star (other than the Sun) determined for the first time with a method other than parallax?

**Tags:** star, distances, history

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I made a small edit that takes advantage of a Stack Exchange feature. Please feel free to roll back or edit further if it conflicts with your intention.  
> **username_1**: Will you allow for answers that provide distance determinations and/or distance estimates, or should they qualify as actual measurements? I don't actually know how to define the distinction exactly, but I suppose it depends on how much modeling is required. Parallax is an angular measurement, and distance is inferred through a model of Earth's orbit around the Sun as well as an assumption that there are no other period 1 year motions of the Sun. Those are pretty solid assumptions.  
> **username_1**: Models of stellar luminosity or variability are much more involved; would you allow distance determinations based on those to be called "measurements" as well?  
> **username_0**: @username_1 I guess "determinations" would be a better term for what I intend.  
> **username_2**: People assumed that stars were like the Sun and estimated distance well before parallaxes were measured.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-11-13. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

[Henrietta Swan Levitt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Swan_Leavitt) was the first person to develop the "standard candle" technique for measuring the distance to stars, while studying Cepheid variables around 1912-1913.

Of course, the standard candle technique just extends the parallax technique to farther distances; in order to figure out how bright Cepheid variables are, Levitt had to know the parallax distances to enough of them to fit their brightness and period on a logarithmic curve. ([Levitt's Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period-luminosity_relation)) To this day there are still no ways to measure the distances to stars that do not ultimately rely on parallax measurements.

However, we *can* make completely independent measurements of the distance to gravitational wave events. Their "absolute brightness" depends solely on their mass, and their mass can be calculated from their waveform. A few things like orientation, redshift, gravitational lensing etc make this more complicated, but theorists have been able to correct for most of the confounding factors. More info: <https://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/PT.3.4090>

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: We know the distance to the Sun and it's luminosity, independently of parallax. The distance to any star could be estimated by assuming it was similar to the Sun.  
> **username_3**: We learned the distance to the sun by observing a transit of Venus from two different points on earth - so it all comes back to parallax. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1769_transit_of_Venus_observed_from_Tahiti  
> **username_3**: Also, stars vary by a factor of over 100,000,000 in brightness, so this doesn't help you tell a distant bright star from a close dim star. And until we knew how far away the stars were, we had no reason to assume they were the same brightness as the sun.  
> **username_2**: I take issue with your comment that all distances are ultimately based on parallax. The astronomical unit is now based on radar distance measurements, not the parallax of Venus. Indeed many stars are very different to the Sun, which is why earlier estimates of the distances to stars were often erroneous. That does not mean that they were not estimated and username_4 username_4 provides an example.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-11-13. Score: 6

From [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius#Distance)

> In his 1698 book, Cosmotheoros, Christiaan Huygens estimated the distance to Sirius at 27664 times the distance from the Earth to the Sun (about 0.437 light years, translating to a parallax of roughly 7.5 arcseconds).

[and](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan_Huygens)

> It was also in this book that Huygens published his method for estimating stellar distances. He made a series of smaller holes in a screen facing the Sun, until he estimated the light was of the same intensity as that of the star Sirius. He then calculated that the angle of this hole was $\frac{1}{27,664}$th the diameter of the Sun, and thus it was about 30,000 times as far away, on the (incorrect) assumption that Sirius is as luminous as the Sun. The subject of photometry remained in its infancy until the time of Pierre Bouguer and Johann Heinrich Lambert.[124]


---

