<p>Your confusion comes from the words "singularity" and perhaps "atom" and "particle"</p>

<p>An equation like y=1/x is singular when x=0. For a physical object modelled by the equation y=1/x the model can't be applied to understand the object at x=0, and it may or may not make sense to use the model for negative values of x.</p>

<p>The singularity is not an object. It would be better if people said "the equations that model the universe become singular at a point in time. The models that we have for the universe don't work at time  t = 0, and it is not clear if negative values of "t" are physically meaningful. </p>

<p>The singularity <em>was not a tiny particle that expanded</em>. Since the singularity is not an object, it doesn't make much sense to ask "how did it form"</p>

<p>Atoms are another thing altogether.  We know with great detail how protons and electrons formed. How most of the protons that formed were annihilated by antiprotons, but a few remained, and as the universe cooled, electrons bound with the protons to form atoms.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T05:59:45.597Z
understood that but can you explain a bit how space(The black fabric) came into existence neither singularity equation nor any other theories clarify that ?
Amey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T07:39:12.640Z
It has always existed. If you mean "spacetime", (which is not black, and not really a fabric) then at no time has it not existed, so it never came into existence.  After all since space time includes "time" you would need say what you mean by "before time"
James K
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T08:29:19.287Z
but the explanation that it always existed cant really add up . everything  always have a origin so how space-time originated ?as we know solar system is made by cloud dust , singularity makes the universe like that whats th reason behind space-time ?
Amey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-29T22:41:48.833Z
2018-07-29T22:41:48.833Z
James K
<p>I guess here there is an assumption that there was a singularity, where as Sir Circumference points out, both relativity and quantum mechanics break down. </p>

<p>Einstein even considered that the universe goes through eternal oscillations of expansion, crunch and bounce before Tolman showed that entropy can only increase, thereby resulting in progressively slower expansion. Which means through extrapolation there must have been some sort of beginning.  Entropy is the problem in any cyclical model of the universe that involves matter.</p>

<p>Recent theorists such as Paul Steinhardt (Princeton) and Neil Turok (Cambridge) have proposed another theory of cyclical epochs where there is a limit on the net expansion phase brought about by colliding branes (membranes) and dark energy limiting entropy.</p>

<p>An alternative theory is the Baum-Frampton Cyclic Model which also proposes cyclical phases in regard to expansion, turnaround, contraction and bounce.  Expansion results in the fragmentation of all matter into patches, or separate universes.  Just before the end of time, at the turnaround, the patches individually contract and then bounce to infinitely repeat the cycle.  Entropy becomes a non-player as the theory contends that contraction of each universe results in an empty state, that is, only dark energy and no matter.</p>

<p>Steinhardt–Turok model
<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111030" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111030</a></p>

<p>Baum-Frampton model
<a href="http://Baum-Frampton%20Cyclic%20Model" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0703162</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T09:05:19.550Z
but this dosen't explain how the darkness which contain all celestial object is formed ? i want to know the origin of that !
Amey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T09:29:35.537Z
Aah, I see, you mean space itself. Space is just the distance between things.
IlludiumPu36
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T09:39:33.970Z
but space-time is like a fabric as explained by einstien its not just a mere distance all celestial objects are patched in space-time
Amey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T15:11:25.910Z
@Amey Space *is* just mere distance. No one ever said it was a "fabric".
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-31T01:50:40.117Z
@Amey space-time is a mathematical model which describes the four dimensional continuum, time or interval being the fourth dimension.  It can conceptually be viewed as a fabric to model the affect mass has on space and time.  But as Einstein said "Space-time does not claim existence in its own right, but only as a structural quality of the [gravitational] field" and "Space and time are modes in which we think, not conditions in which we exist".
IlludiumPu36
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T08:31:13.160Z
2018-07-31T08:49:03.127Z
2018-07-31T08:49:03.127Z
IlludiumPu36
<p>I'd like to add onto what James K said, but I'll try and simplify things too.</p>

<p>A singularity may sound like everything was at a "single point", but that's not what the word means in physics/math. A singularity, loosely speaking, is just a point where a function reaches infinity. It's not a physical object, but an input to a function. As James mentioned, 1/x has a singularity at x=0. At the moment of the Big Bang, several functions have singularities, as I discuss below.</p>

<p>So with that set aside, let's explain the Big Bang. Our modern theory of gravity, general relativity, indicates that the universe is currently expanding (i.e. space is being created between all matter). By that logic, we expect the matter in the universe to be closer together as we look further back in time. Our physical theories indicate that at earlier periods, temperatures were so high that even atoms couldn't form.</p>

<p>Our theories can handle these conditions pretty well, but eventually they start to fall apart. At a point around 13.8 billion years in the past, our calculations predict that the amount of space in the Universe should be zero. As a result, density, gravity and temperature would skyrocket to infinity — in other words, they have singularities at that moment. This moment is known as the Big Bang.</p>

<p>These infinities are a problem, since our theories break down at such extreme conditions. The Big Bang is an unsolved problem that modern physics has yet to explain. It's not the beginning of the universe per se, but rather we do not know what happened around, or before, that moment.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T06:00:21.387Z
Please can you explain  how space(The black fabric) came into existence neither singularity equation nor any other theories clarify that ?
Amey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T06:44:00.187Z
It would be good if an explanation is provided that attempts to answer the OP...
IlludiumPu36
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T06:44:34.080Z
@Amey You're going to need to be clearer on what you mean by "black fabric".
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T06:45:06.090Z
@IlludiumPu36 The premise is based on misconceptions. What kind of answer do you expect?
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T07:03:50.950Z
@SirCumference The Darkness where all the planets are placed (The blackness) In general theory terms the dark cloth in which this planets are placed (Space)
Amey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-03T16:00:08.380Z
@Amey if your question is "why did space even *start* exapanding" I am afraid that we do not have an answer for that.
paul23
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T03:43:55.410Z
2018-07-30T03:43:55.410Z
Sir Cumference
<p>How did this 'black fabric' that we call space start? How was it made? How was the initial singularity formed? How did the first atom come into existence?</p>

<p>If it all started from a tiny particle that expanded and is now still expanding, how did that tiny particle come into existence ?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-30T10:16:36.677Z
Small point, but space isn't black, it's clear.   That's why we can see things so far away.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-31T15:00:54.723Z
The false vacuum became unstable?
Wayfaring Stranger
<space><big-bang-theory>
How did space start?
Amey
# How did space start?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-07-29)

How did this 'black fabric' that we call space start? How was it made? How was the initial singularity formed? How did the first atom come into existence?

If it all started from a tiny particle that expanded and is now still expanding, how did that tiny particle come into existence ?

**Tags:** space, big-bang-theory

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Small point, but space isn't black, it's clear.   That's why we can see things so far away.  
> **username_2**: The false vacuum became unstable?  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-07-30. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

I'd like to add onto what username_3 said, but I'll try and simplify things too.

A singularity may sound like everything was at a "single point", but that's not what the word means in physics/math. A singularity, loosely speaking, is just a point where a function reaches infinity. It's not a physical object, but an input to a function. As username_3 mentioned, 1/x has a singularity at x=0. At the moment of the Big Bang, several functions have singularities, as I discuss below.

So with that set aside, let's explain the Big Bang. Our modern theory of gravity, general relativity, indicates that the universe is currently expanding (i.e. space is being created between all matter). By that logic, we expect the matter in the universe to be closer together as we look further back in time. Our physical theories indicate that at earlier periods, temperatures were so high that even atoms couldn't form.

Our theories can handle these conditions pretty well, but eventually they start to fall apart. At a point around 13.8 billion years in the past, our calculations predict that the amount of space in the Universe should be zero. As a result, density, gravity and temperature would skyrocket to infinity — in other words, they have singularities at that moment. This moment is known as the Big Bang.

These infinities are a problem, since our theories break down at such extreme conditions. The Big Bang is an unsolved problem that modern physics has yet to explain. It's not the beginning of the universe per se, but rather we do not know what happened around, or before, that moment.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Please can you explain  how space(The black fabric) came into existence neither singularity equation nor any other theories clarify that ?  
> **username_4**: It would be good if an explanation is provided that attempts to answer the OP...  
> **username_5**: @username_0 You're going to need to be clearer on what you mean by "black fabric".  
> **username_5**: @username_4 The premise is based on misconceptions. What kind of answer do you expect?  
> **username_0**: @username_5 The Darkness where all the planets are placed (The blackness) In general theory terms the dark cloth in which this planets are placed (Space)  
> **username_6**: @username_0 if your question is "why did space even *start* exapanding" I am afraid that we do not have an answer for that.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-07-29. Score: 2

Your confusion comes from the words "singularity" and perhaps "atom" and "particle"

An equation like y=1/x is singular when x=0. For a physical object modelled by the equation y=1/x the model can't be applied to understand the object at x=0, and it may or may not make sense to use the model for negative values of x.

The singularity is not an object. It would be better if people said "the equations that model the universe become singular at a point in time. The models that we have for the universe don't work at time t = 0, and it is not clear if negative values of "t" are physically meaningful.

The singularity *was not a tiny particle that expanded*. Since the singularity is not an object, it doesn't make much sense to ask "how did it form"

Atoms are another thing altogether. We know with great detail how protons and electrons formed. How most of the protons that formed were annihilated by antiprotons, but a few remained, and as the universe cooled, electrons bound with the protons to form atoms.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: understood that but can you explain a bit how space(The black fabric) came into existence neither singularity equation nor any other theories clarify that ?  
> **username_3**: It has always existed. If you mean "spacetime", (which is not black, and not really a fabric) then at no time has it not existed, so it never came into existence.  After all since space time includes "time" you would need say what you mean by "before time"  
> **username_0**: but the explanation that it always existed cant really add up . everything  always have a origin so how space-time originated ?as we know solar system is made by cloud dust , singularity makes the universe like that whats th reason behind space-time ?  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-07-30. Score: 0

I guess here there is an assumption that there was a singularity, where as Sir Circumference points out, both relativity and quantum mechanics break down.

Einstein even considered that the universe goes through eternal oscillations of expansion, crunch and bounce before Tolman showed that entropy can only increase, thereby resulting in progressively slower expansion. Which means through extrapolation there must have been some sort of beginning. Entropy is the problem in any cyclical model of the universe that involves matter.

Recent theorists such as Paul Steinhardt (Princeton) and Neil Turok (Cambridge) have proposed another theory of cyclical epochs where there is a limit on the net expansion phase brought about by colliding branes (membranes) and dark energy limiting entropy.

An alternative theory is the Baum-Frampton Cyclic Model which also proposes cyclical phases in regard to expansion, turnaround, contraction and bounce. Expansion results in the fragmentation of all matter into patches, or separate universes. Just before the end of time, at the turnaround, the patches individually contract and then bounce to infinitely repeat the cycle. Entropy becomes a non-player as the theory contends that contraction of each universe results in an empty state, that is, only dark energy and no matter.

Steinhardt–Turok model
<https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111030>

Baum-Frampton model
[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0703162](http://Baum-Frampton%20Cyclic%20Model)

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: but this dosen't explain how the darkness which contain all celestial object is formed ? i want to know the origin of that !  
> **username_4**: Aah, I see, you mean space itself. Space is just the distance between things.  
> **username_0**: but space-time is like a fabric as explained by einstien its not just a mere distance all celestial objects are patched in space-time  
> **username_5**: @username_0 Space *is* just mere distance. No one ever said it was a "fabric".  
> **username_4**: @username_0 space-time is a mathematical model which describes the four dimensional continuum, time or interval being the fourth dimension.  It can conceptually be viewed as a fabric to model the affect mass has on space and time.  But as Einstein said "Space-time does not claim existence in its own right, but only as a structural quality of the [gravitational] field" and "Space and time are modes in which we think, not conditions in which we exist".  

---

