<p>Although I will only tackle one part of the question, I find the following part of a <a href="https://www.space.com/supergiant-star-antares-map-atmosphere.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">picture from NRAO/AUI/NSF, S. Dagnello, cited from space.com</a> worth sharing:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/phNiM.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/phNiM.png" alt="NRAO/AUI/NSF, S. Dagnello" /></a></p>
<p>You see the radial structure of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antares" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Antares</a>, a red supergiant of spectral type M1.5Iab-Ib, and more specifically</p>
<ol>
<li>The average temperatures of photosphere, chromosphere, and above are given.</li>
<li>One can see how far the different zones would stretch out if Antares would be the center of our solar system.</li>
<li>We learn which parts can be studied with the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_Large_Millimeter_Array" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA)</a> or the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Array" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Very Large Array (VLA)</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>How is that related with you question? Well, when we speak about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency" rel="nofollow noreferrer">transparency or translucency</a>, we should also specify the wavelength(s) we are considering, here a quote from the above mentioned space.com article:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>While Antares' diameter is about 700 times larger than the sun in visible light, this map revealed that, as seen in radio light, the star's atmosphere stretches even farther and is even more enormous.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So, for the case of Antares and radio-frequencies, I would suspsect, that it could be possible to actually see other radio-objects within the radio-glow (e.g. the &quot;Wind Acceleration Zone&quot;) of Antares, but I have not found any publication on that yet, maybe somebody could suggest search terms in the comments.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<ul>
<li>The original publication: <a href="https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2020/06/aa37756-20/aa37756-20.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ALMA and VLA reveal the lukewarm chromospheres of the nearby red supergiants Antares and Betelgeuse</a></li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-13T23:04:16.217Z
Just a small addition from wikipedia: "Like most cool supergiants, Antares's size has much uncertainty due to the tenuous and translucent nature of the extended outer regions of the star." which suggests this is true for most other 'cool' supergiants. +1 btw
Aryan Bansal
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-14T00:07:21.483Z
`+1`, and potentially related: [Do stars have “radio photospheres”? Are they different from their optical photospheres?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/36366/7982)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-18T02:16:42.033Z
So if the radius of this or any similar star were established via radio astrometric techniques for some reason (which is not typically how the size of a star is defined), the star *has the potential* to be optically translucent or even transparent in its outer layers? Is that a tl;dr of your answer?
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-18T19:21:20.093Z
Your TL;DR more or less what I meant, I feel it is a matter of wavelengths. I do not see any conceptual arguments why some chromosphere (definition) would *not* allow translucency in of some kind.
B--rian
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-13T21:12:28.540Z
2021-06-13T21:31:09.380Z
2021-06-13T21:31:09.380Z
B--rian
<p>No mass blob of stellar mass is transparent at any wavelength of interest. Opacities <span class="math-container">$\kappa_{\nu}$</span>(inverse transparency) as function of wavelength becomes really high and broad band at pressures above &gt; 0.1 bars, for all wavelengths.<br />
This leads to the optical depths <span class="math-container">$\tau_{\nu}$</span> being enormous and as transmission is <span class="math-container">$T=1-\exp(-\tau)$</span>, you won't be able to see through any star, ever.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T14:25:07.357Z
I feel like this question could be elaborated.  What would the pressure be at the photosphere of a supergiant; what kind of transition would you expect there?
antlersoft
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T14:27:55.690Z
@antlersoft: Not sure where you want me to elaborate, but generally, the fact that a photosphere exists, which it does for all stars, is 1.) due to pressure broadening and 2.) means that no star can be translucent.
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T15:59:04.583Z
`-1` While this answer *sounds authoritative* there's no way to see if it is right or wrong. There's nothing here but "No, because I said so." The relation $T=1-\exp(-\tau)$ alone doesn't tell us anything without a $\tau$ and you haven't cited one.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T17:41:07.473Z
This is Stack Exchange; answers should and do support their assertions.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-01T12:17:59.610Z
I modestly agree with the answer. It just seems to me that my comment under the question is of relevance. One cannot see through a star passing through its center, but being inside the star at a sufficient peripheral point could allow translucency. I am not sure about the density of the outer parts of a supergiant but it should be low.
Alchimista
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-10T19:05:11.927Z
Nothing with a photosphere is transparent.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-02-28T22:52:28.710Z
@ProfRob I guess that can be posted as a complete answer! Even a blob of molten glass should become dark and opaque when hot enough to glow brightly. I haven't found a source for that but I think it has to be true. I'm going to take a glass blowing class some day and bring along some laser pointers (or modulated LEDs) of different colors and, a photodiode and a meter for personal satisfaction :-)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T10:38:14.213Z
2021-04-30T10:38:14.213Z
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
<p>Are any supergiants translucent? Some have volumes thousands of times more than the Sun's while having maybe twenty times the mass of the Sun which makes them sound rather diffuse. If there was a very bright distant star behind the supergiant would we be able to see it?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T02:22:18.310Z
You might find this question helpful: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26622/when-a-star-reaches-the-red-giant-phase-why-does-it-become-more-opaque
WarpPrime
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T03:30:47.007Z
*Great question!* Roughly speaking we can say that the part outside of it's photosphere is and the part below isn't, roughly speaking. Certainly when simulating eclipsing binaries one might want to include light from one passing through the supra-photosphere part of the other, but I don't know how often or carefully that's done. Slightly related: [What is the spectral reflectance of starlight in a close binary?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/25781/7982)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T09:26:02.210Z
A red giant may have a huge non-luminous atmosphere, but that atmosphere can contain dust that's been dredged up from the interior. And they spew out a lot of dust too. Some red giants are almost completely obscured by their dust in optical wavelengths, but they're quite bright in infrared photos.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-30T10:12:31.217Z
I think there is possibly a misunderstanding on how opacity sets up. It seems to me like asking if one can see the fog, in the sense that it should depend on the sight direction and what portion of the disk one look at. But I am not sure, myself. It is just to say that being *within* the periphery of the suorrgiant one should be able to see the outside and turning to the back, a huge star.
Alchimista
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-18T19:27:01.473Z
Another related question:  [Photosphere is relatively transparent. Is that right?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/18970/37191)
B--rian
<star><density><red-supergiant><photosphere><opacity>
Are any supergiants translucent?
Some Student
# Are any supergiants translucent?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-04-30)

Are any supergiants translucent? username_0 have volumes thousands of times more than the Sun's while having maybe twenty times the mass of the Sun which makes them sound rather diffuse. If there was a very bright distant star behind the supergiant would we be able to see it?

**Tags:** star, density, red-supergiant, photosphere, opacity

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: You might find this question helpful: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26622/when-a-star-reaches-the-red-giant-phase-why-does-it-become-more-opaque  
> **username_2**: *Great question!* Roughly speaking we can say that the part outside of it's photosphere is and the part below isn't, roughly speaking. Certainly when simulating eclipsing binaries one might want to include light from one passing through the supra-photosphere part of the other, but I don't know how often or carefully that's done. Slightly related: [What is the spectral reflectance of starlight in a close binary?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/25781/7982)  
> **username_3**: A red giant may have a huge non-luminous atmosphere, but that atmosphere can contain dust that's been dredged up from the interior. And they spew out a lot of dust too. username_0 red giants are almost completely obscured by their dust in optical wavelengths, but they're quite bright in infrared photos.  
> **username_4**: I think there is possibly a misunderstanding on how opacity sets up. It seems to me like asking if one can see the fog, in the sense that it should depend on the sight direction and what portion of the disk one look at. But I am not sure, myself. It is just to say that being *within* the periphery of the suorrgiant one should be able to see the outside and turning to the back, a huge star.  
> **username_5**: Another related question:  [Photosphere is relatively transparent. Is that right?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/18970/37191)  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2021-06-13. Score: 4

Although I will only tackle one part of the question, I find the following part of a [picture from NRAO/AUI/NSF, S. Dagnello, cited from space.com](https://www.space.com/supergiant-star-antares-map-atmosphere.html) worth sharing:

[![NRAO/AUI/NSF, S. Dagnello](https://i.sstatic.net/phNiM.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/phNiM.png)

You see the radial structure of [Antares](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antares), a red supergiant of spectral type M1.5Iab-Ib, and more specifically

1. The average temperatures of photosphere, chromosphere, and above are given.
2. One can see how far the different zones would stretch out if Antares would be the center of our solar system.
3. We learn which parts can be studied with the [Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_Large_Millimeter_Array) or the [Very Large Array (VLA)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Array).

How is that related with you question? Well, when we speak about [transparency or translucency](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_and_translucency), we should also specify the wavelength(s) we are considering, here a quote from the above mentioned space.com article:

> While Antares' diameter is about 700 times larger than the sun in visible light, this map revealed that, as seen in radio light, the star's atmosphere stretches even farther and is even more enormous.

So, for the case of Antares and radio-frequencies, I would suspsect, that it could be possible to actually see other radio-objects within the radio-glow (e.g. the "Wind Acceleration Zone") of Antares, but I have not found any publication on that yet, maybe somebody could suggest search terms in the comments.

### References

* The original publication: [ALMA and VLA reveal the lukewarm chromospheres of the nearby red supergiants Antares and Betelgeuse](https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2020/06/aa37756-20/aa37756-20.html)

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: Just a small addition from wikipedia: "Like most cool supergiants, Antares's size has much uncertainty due to the tenuous and translucent nature of the extended outer regions of the star." which suggests this is true for most other 'cool' supergiants. +1 btw  
> **username_2**: `+1`, and potentially related: [Do stars have “radio photospheres”? Are they different from their optical photospheres?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/36366/7982)  
> **username_2**: So if the radius of this or any similar star were established via radio astrometric techniques for username_0 reason (which is not typically how the size of a star is defined), the star *has the potential* to be optically translucent or even transparent in its outer layers? Is that a tl;dr of your answer?  
> **username_5**: Your TL;DR more or less what I meant, I feel it is a matter of wavelengths. I do not see any conceptual arguments why username_0 chromosphere (definition) would *not* allow translucency in of username_0 kind.  

---

### Answer by username_7 on 2021-04-30. Score: 1

No mass blob of stellar mass is transparent at any wavelength of interest. Opacities $\kappa\_{\nu}$(inverse transparency) as function of wavelength becomes really high and broad band at pressures above > 0.1 bars, for all wavelengths.  
This leads to the optical depths $\tau\_{\nu}$ being enormous and as transmission is $T=1-\exp(-\tau)$, you won't be able to see through any star, ever.

> **Comments:**
> **username_8**: I feel like this question could be elaborated.  What would the pressure be at the photosphere of a supergiant; what kind of transition would you expect there?  
> **username_7**: @username_8: Not sure where you want me to elaborate, but generally, the fact that a photosphere exists, which it does for all stars, is 1.) due to pressure broadening and 2.) means that no star can be translucent.  
> **username_2**: `-1` While this answer *sounds authoritative* there's no way to see if it is right or wrong. There's nothing here but "No, because I said so." The relation $T=1-\exp(-\tau)$ alone doesn't tell us anything without a $\tau$ and you haven't cited one.  
> **username_2**: This is Stack Exchange; answers should and do support their assertions.  
> **username_4**: I modestly agree with the answer. It just seems to me that my comment under the question is of relevance. One cannot see through a star passing through its center, but being inside the star at a sufficient peripheral point could allow translucency. I am not sure about the density of the outer parts of a supergiant but it should be low.  
> **username_9**: Nothing with a photosphere is transparent.  
> **username_2**: @username_9 I guess that can be posted as a complete answer! Even a blob of molten glass should become dark and opaque when hot enough to glow brightly. I haven't found a source for that but I think it has to be true. I'm going to take a glass blowing class username_0 day and bring along username_0 laser pointers (or modulated LEDs) of different colors and, a photodiode and a meter for personal satisfaction :-)  

---

