<p>This is a pretty broad question so I'll limit myself to describing one instance of how the radius of the Earth is measured. Specifically, I'll talk about how it's measured today, with current technology.</p>

<p>As technology has progressed, our ability to precisely measure facets of the Earth has drastically improved. At this point, we can measure the exact shape and size of the Earth to such precision that asking about the "radius of the Earth" is no longer meaningful. Primarily because we know the shape of the Earth to such precision that we know it is not a perfect sphere with a fixed radius.</p>

<p>The current standard used to describe the exact shape of the Earth is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Geodetic_System" rel="nofollow noreferrer">World Geodetic System</a>, the latest edition of which is referred to as WGS84. In effect, this is a coordinate system centered on the Earth that precisely describes the shape of the Earth. This is done by using sensitive satellite measurements to fit the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_harmonics" rel="nofollow noreferrer">spherical harmonics</a> to the Earth's geoid. The current, most updated version of WGS84 has more than 4.6 million harmonic terms with an accuracy in "radius" at any given point of 10 km. That is, you could pick any precise location on the Earth and use WGS84 to calculate the radius of the Earth at that exact point to an accuracy of 10 km. This radius would of course vary as you moved about the Earth.</p>

<p>If you really want to break this down into a simple number, the WGS model, at the crudest level, considers the Earth to be an oblate spheroid with an equitorial radius of $R_{eq} = 6\:378\:137\:\mathrm{m}$ and a polar radius of $R_{p} = 6\:356\:752.3\:\mathrm{m}$.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-06T14:13:16.040Z
Isn't there a slight bulge at the north pole region?
0tyranny0poverty
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-06T14:15:34.017Z
@0tyranny0poverty [I suppose you could say that.](http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/egm08_wgs84.html)
zephyr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-06T13:41:32.510Z
2017-07-06T13:41:32.510Z
zephyr
<p>I'd imagine ancient methods are fun exercises in geometry. how has the measurement has evolved over time?</p>

<p>The first method is credited to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Eratosthenes</a>. He knew that during the summer solstice in Syenne the angle of the Sun overhead at noon was $0^\circ$. Following this he made the same measurement in Alexandria and measured the angle of the Sun overhead using shadows and calculated it to be $\approx 7^\circ$ which is approximately $1/50$ of a circle. Hence, both the circumference and the radius are easily calculated and quite accurate for such crude methods.</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/sU4q4.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/sU4q4.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-06T13:37:49.883Z
Not an answer, but maybe a start for you to look up the cornerstones of the development you're asking for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy
AtmosphericPrisonEscape
<solar-system><earth><distances>
How have we measured the radius of the Earth (old and new)?
Rumplestillskin
# How have we measured the radius of the Earth (old and new)?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-07-06)

I'd imagine ancient methods are fun exercises in geometry. how has the measurement has evolved over time?

The first method is credited to [Eratosthenes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes). He knew that during the summer solstice in Syenne the angle of the Sun overhead at noon was $0^\circ$. Following this he made the same measurement in Alexandria and measured the angle of the Sun overhead using shadows and calculated it to be $\approx 7^\circ$ which is approximately $1/50$ of a circle. Hence, both the circumference and the radius are easily calculated and quite accurate for such crude methods.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/sU4q4.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/sU4q4.png)

**Tags:** solar-system, earth, distances

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Not an answer, but maybe a start for you to look up the cornerstones of the development you're asking for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_geodesy  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-07-06. Score: 2

This is a pretty broad question so I'll limit myself to describing one instance of how the radius of the Earth is measured. Specifically, I'll talk about how it's measured today, with current technology.

As technology has progressed, our ability to precisely measure facets of the Earth has drastically improved. At this point, we can measure the exact shape and size of the Earth to such precision that asking about the "radius of the Earth" is no longer meaningful. Primarily because we know the shape of the Earth to such precision that we know it is not a perfect sphere with a fixed radius.

The current standard used to describe the exact shape of the Earth is the [World Geodetic System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Geodetic_System), the latest edition of which is referred to as WGS84. In effect, this is a coordinate system centered on the Earth that precisely describes the shape of the Earth. This is done by using sensitive satellite measurements to fit the [spherical harmonics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_harmonics) to the Earth's geoid. The current, most updated version of WGS84 has more than 4.6 million harmonic terms with an accuracy in "radius" at any given point of 10 km. That is, you could pick any precise location on the Earth and use WGS84 to calculate the radius of the Earth at that exact point to an accuracy of 10 km. This radius would of course vary as you moved about the Earth.

If you really want to break this down into a simple number, the WGS model, at the crudest level, considers the Earth to be an oblate spheroid with an equitorial radius of $R\_{eq} = 6\:378\:137\:\mathrm{m}$ and a polar radius of $R\_{p} = 6\:356\:752.3\:\mathrm{m}$.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Isn't there a slight bulge at the north pole region?  
> **username_2**: @username_3 [I suppose you could say that.](http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/egm08_wgs84.html)  

---

