<p>To add to Rob's answer, I wanted to expand on where this naming convention comes from.</p>

<p>The International Astronomical Union (IAU) is the organization which generally sets conventions and definitions. They're the ones who demoted Pluto to being a dwarf planet in 2006. Anyway, before any exoplanets were found, there existed a convention for naming multiple-star systems. The rule was that you gave the system a name, for example Alpha Centauri, and then the brightest star in that system is designated by "A". Any other objects are then given the letters "B", "C", etc. The Alpha Centauri system has three stars in it and so they're named Alpha Centauri A (The brightest of the three), Alpha Centauri B, and Alpha Centauri C (a.k.a. Proxima Centauri).</p>

<p>This convention then continued on to naming exoplanets. The star, according to this convention is "A", whereas all the exoplanets are given the letters "b" and onwards. Note that generally the exoplanet letters are lowercase, whereas they'd be uppercase for stars. Also note that if you have a star (say TRAPPIST-1) around which planets are found, the star's name doesn't then become TRAPPIST-1 A. The "A" is implicit.</p>

<p>Just to point out another point of interest with this naming convention, the letters of the planets don't always signify their distance from the star. That is, the "b" planet isn't necessarily the closest, followed by "c", etc. The planets are labeled at their time of discovery. Someone could find a planet, label it as "b" and then later find a second, closer planet and label it "c". It just so happens that the lettering of TRAPPIST 1 is in order because the first three were found at the same time and labeled according to distance, then the last 4 were found at the same time and labelled according to distance.</p>

<p>You can read more about the full set of rules concerning this on Wikipedia's <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet_naming_convention" rel="noreferrer">exoplanet naming convention</a> page. There are a lot of caveats such as what to do when your planet is orbiting a binary system.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T15:08:03.650Z
But then the first planet if a secondary star's names is just weird - e.g. Alpha Centaury B b.
Guss
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T15:21:29.990Z
@Guss Sure its weird. In fact one valid name of the planet recently found around Proxima Centauri is [Alpha Centauri Cb](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri_b). But who ever said astronomy naming conventions weren't weird? They're always weird, convoluted, and difficult to understand. That's what happens when you have a science with thousands of years of naming conventions.
zephyr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-24T03:29:20.883Z
This is more correct than the currently accepted answer.
NeutronStar
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-24T09:06:23.437Z
*That's what happens when you have a science with thousands of years of naming conventions.* ... it's also what happens when you have a universe that seems to make a point of making things difficult to categorise neatly, vs humans who have an inbuilt need to do exactly that.
Simba
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-24T21:33:18.790Z
This *IS* Ceti Alpha V!
https://youtu.be/Uhu5V8VRxFU?t=16s
Eight-Bit Guru
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-21T20:06:51.950Z
What happens when planets are found at multi-star system: do they start with "b" or with the first letter not used by the stars in the system? For example if you have 2 stars and 2 planets in the system, are they called starname-A, starname-B, starname-c, starname-d, or starname-A, starname-B, starname-b, starname-c?
Michael
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-20T18:49:26.663Z
If they find a planed closer to b, will they call it a?
Anixx
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-20T18:55:45.120Z
@Anixx No, for two reasons. As I stated in my answer: *The star, according to this convention is "A", whereas all the exoplanets are given the letters "b" and onwards.* No exoplanet uses the "a" letter since the star is the primary object and hence "A" (even though the star is uppercase and the planet lowercase). Secondly, planets are lettered in the order they're found. The first planet found gets the first available letter, which is "b", the second gets "c", and onwards. If the first available letter was "a" it would have already been taken, but as I said, "a" is not available.
zephyr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T14:24:16.077Z
2017-02-23T14:24:16.077Z
zephyr
<p>The reason is because exoplanets orbiting a star are named in the order they were discovered, starting with the letter b. Sometimes, in a system with two stars, say Alpha Centauri, there are two stars, Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B, no planes have been found in the system so far. If there were planets orbiting either one of those two stars, say for example a planet orbited Alpha Centauri A, the first planet discovered would be named Alpha Centauri Ab, and so on for Alpha Centauri B. Upper case letters are usually only used in the stars' names.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-14T13:46:53.333Z
2017-03-14T13:46:53.333Z
StellarExile
<p>The convention for planetary naming is that the closest planet to the star (if multiple planets are found at the same time) is named "star"b, then "star"c and so on. As correctly pointed out by Zephyr, if the discoveries are more haphazard, the order of discovery takes precedence over distance from the star).</p>

<p>So, there is no Trappist-1a. Or you can think of it being the star itself if you like, although that becomes confusing if the star is itself part of a multiple star system, where it might be known as "star"A or "star"B etc. (note, capital letters), depending on where it is in the hierarchy.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T14:07:26.013Z
Interesting. Any idea where that convention started? I'd guess somebody somewhere called the star "star"a, and it became a convention, but I know nothing.
JiK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-27T09:44:09.290Z
Wikipedia has an [article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet_naming_convention) about the naming convention of exo planets including references and a few exemptions made so far.
Adwaenyth
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T10:38:30.617Z
2017-02-24T08:55:40.173Z
2017-02-24T08:55:40.173Z
ProfRob
<p>According to the <a href="https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/trappist1/" rel="noreferrer">NASA announcement</a> and the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRAPPIST-1" rel="noreferrer">Wikipedia article on TRAPPIST-1</a>, the planets around the TRAPPIST-1 star are named TRAPPIST-1 b through h. What happened to "TRAPPIST-1 a"?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-27T10:12:19.320Z
As pointed out by @Adwaenyth this really is comprehensively covered in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet_naming_convention
ProfRob
<exoplanet><naming><trappist-1>
Where did TRAPPIST-1a go?
Guss
# Where did TRAPPIST-1a go?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-02-23)

According to the [NASA announcement](https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/trappist1/) and the [Wikipedia article on TRAPPIST-1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRAPPIST-1), the planets around the TRAPPIST-1 star are named TRAPPIST-1 b through h. What happened to "TRAPPIST-1 a"?

**Tags:** exoplanet, naming, trappist-1

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: As pointed out by @username_10 this really is comprehensively covered in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet_naming_convention  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-02-23. Score: 42 | Accepted answer

The convention for planetary naming is that the closest planet to the star (if multiple planets are found at the same time) is named "star"b, then "star"c and so on. As correctly pointed out by username_2, if the discoveries are more haphazard, the order of discovery takes precedence over distance from the star).

So, there is no Trappist-1a. Or you can think of it being the star itself if you like, although that becomes confusing if the star is itself part of a multiple star system, where it might be known as "star"A or "star"B etc. (note, capital letters), depending on where it is in the hierarchy.

> **Comments:**
> **username_9**: Interesting. Any idea where that convention started? I'd guess somebody somewhere called the star "star"a, and it became a convention, but I know nothing.  
> **username_10**: Wikipedia has an [article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet_naming_convention) about the naming convention of exo planets including references and a few exemptions made so far.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-02-23. Score: 55

To add to Rob's answer, I wanted to expand on where this naming convention comes from.

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) is the organization which generally sets conventions and definitions. They're the ones who demoted Pluto to being a dwarf planet in 2006. Anyway, before any exoplanets were found, there existed a convention for naming multiple-star systems. The rule was that you gave the system a name, for example Alpha Centauri, and then the brightest star in that system is designated by "A". Any other objects are then given the letters "B", "C", etc. The Alpha Centauri system has three stars in it and so they're named Alpha Centauri A (The brightest of the three), Alpha Centauri B, and Alpha Centauri C (a.k.a. Proxima Centauri).

This convention then continued on to naming exoplanets. The star, according to this convention is "A", whereas all the exoplanets are given the letters "b" and onwards. Note that generally the exoplanet letters are lowercase, whereas they'd be uppercase for stars. Also note that if you have a star (say TRAPPIST-1) around which planets are found, the star's name doesn't then become TRAPPIST-1 A. The "A" is implicit.

Just to point out another point of interest with this naming convention, the letters of the planets don't always signify their distance from the star. That is, the "b" planet isn't necessarily the closest, followed by "c", etc. The planets are labeled at their time of discovery. Someone could find a planet, label it as "b" and then later find a second, closer planet and label it "c". It just so happens that the lettering of TRAPPIST 1 is in order because the first three were found at the same time and labeled according to distance, then the last 4 were found at the same time and labelled according to distance.

You can read more about the full set of rules concerning this on Wikipedia's [exoplanet naming convention](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exoplanet_naming_convention) page. There are a lot of caveats such as what to do when your planet is orbiting a binary system.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: But then the first planet if a secondary star's names is just weird - e.g. Alpha Centaury B b.  
> **username_2**: @username_0 Sure its weird. In fact one valid name of the planet recently found around Proxima Centauri is [Alpha Centauri Cb](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri_b). But who ever said astronomy naming conventions weren't weird? They're always weird, convoluted, and difficult to understand. That's what happens when you have a science with thousands of years of naming conventions.  
> **username_3**: This is more correct than the currently accepted answer.  
> **username_4**: *That's what happens when you have a science with thousands of years of naming conventions.* ... it's also what happens when you have a universe that seems to make a point of making things difficult to categorise neatly, vs humans who have an inbuilt need to do exactly that.  
> **username_5**: This *IS* Ceti Alpha V! https://youtu.be/Uhu5V8VRxFU?t=16s  
> **username_6**: What happens when planets are found at multi-star system: do they start with "b" or with the first letter not used by the stars in the system? For example if you have 2 stars and 2 planets in the system, are they called starname-A, starname-B, starname-c, starname-d, or starname-A, starname-B, starname-b, starname-c?  
> **username_7**: If they find a planed closer to b, will they call it a?  
> **username_2**: @username_7 No, for two reasons. As I stated in my answer: *The star, according to this convention is "A", whereas all the exoplanets are given the letters "b" and onwards.* No exoplanet uses the "a" letter since the star is the primary object and hence "A" (even though the star is uppercase and the planet lowercase). Secondly, planets are lettered in the order they're found. The first planet found gets the first available letter, which is "b", the second gets "c", and onwards. If the first available letter was "a" it would have already been taken, but as I said, "a" is not available.  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2017-03-14. Score: 6

The reason is because exoplanets orbiting a star are named in the order they were discovered, starting with the letter b. Sometimes, in a system with two stars, say Alpha Centauri, there are two stars, Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B, no planes have been found in the system so far. If there were planets orbiting either one of those two stars, say for example a planet orbited Alpha Centauri A, the first planet discovered would be named Alpha Centauri Ab, and so on for Alpha Centauri B. Upper case letters are usually only used in the stars' names.


---

