<p>If you are a student at an academic institution, the first step should be to speak to faculty members there. If you are not, you might find helpful advice in <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58020/163512">How to find an academic mentor as a professional</a>. More generally, see also <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/68127/163512">How to find collaborators for a research project</a> and <a href="https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/68155/163512">How to find a co-author</a>.</p>
<p>Regarding the specific proposal, energy (potential or kinetic) is frame dependent, so you have to pick a reference frame to even define it. What reference frame will you use? This is important because the question of whether the universe is &quot;zero energy&quot; (which you mention wanting to address) is a theoretical matter that concerns how we even define energy; see for example</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://mathoverflow.net/q/38659">Total energy of the universe</a></li>
<li><a href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/2838/180843">Is the total energy of the universe zero?</a></li>
</ul>
<p>More broadly, you should try to <em>quantitatively</em> predict what the result of your investigation will be, based on known physics. The process of making that prediction should help you to clarify what your experiment is actually measuring and to resolve any ambiguity in your plan.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-05-26T10:21:01.443Z
2023-05-26T10:21:01.443Z
Sten
<p>I'm a student with a deep interest in cosmology and astrophysics. I've embarked on a project and am seeking some guidance, insights, or even ways that I could look for possible collaboration on this project.</p>
<p>The central idea of my project is to examine the potential energy variation in the universe due to cosmic expansion. The hypothesis is that as the universe expands, the average potential energy per unit volume decreases, as celestial bodies are moving farther apart from each other. This would be the expected result according to current laws of physics. However, if we observe otherwise, it could potentially point towards a zero-energy universe.</p>
<p>To investigate this, I'm planning to compare galaxies at different points in time using images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). By examining galaxies at different distances (and hence at different points in the past due to light travel time), I hope to track changes in potential energy per unit over time.</p>
<p>Here's the general methodology I'm considering:</p>
<ol>
<li>Using the SDSS dataset, I will select galaxies at various distances from us, effectively creating a timeline from the past to the present.</li>
<li>For each galaxy, I will estimate its mass based on its luminosity, and use redshift data to estimate its distance.</li>
<li>Using these mass and distance estimates, I'll calculate the gravitational potential energy of each galaxy, treating it as a point mass in a universe filled with a homogeneous distribution of matter.</li>
<li>Finally, I will plot the potential energy per unit volume against time, expecting to see a trend of decreasing energy as the universe expands.</li>
</ol>
<p>I realize this is a simplified approach and there are significant challenges to overcome, including the inherent uncertainties in estimating mass and distance, the role of dark matter, the influence of dark energy, and the potential for inhomogeneities in the universe's energy distribution.</p>
<p>However, I view this project as a unique learning opportunity, and I'm excited about the possibility of gaining a deeper understanding of our universe and developing my skills in astronomical data analysis. But the complexity is a bit overwhelming because I truly am a beginner in this field and don't really know how to calculate anything from the data set.</p>
<p>But if there is an expert that would see this as a fun side project on the weekends with a highly interested student, that would be awesome. I would love to collaborate with someone who has some expertise in the estimation of the potential energy and certain factors that would need to be looked out for or how to improve the estimates.</p>
<p>But generally, if anyone here could provide insights, suggestions, resources, I would be truly grateful. I'm eager to learn and look forward to finding resources and suggestions for how to engage with others about this topic.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-05-18T22:23:19.200Z
*Welcome to Astronomy Stack Exchange!* Fascinating proposal! I've made some small edits to make your post a better fit. Stack Exchange works a little differently than other sites you may have used, it's a pretty rigid question and answer format. So while we don't propose collaborations here, it's fine to ask for advice how one can look for them.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-05-25T18:29:36.377Z
Generally when it comes to my answers, I know nothing about the topic or very little, so I research a ton, but this topic seems super interesting so I'll start right away :). @uhoh is right to say this site doesn't do collabs, we can only give you answers, but I do hope any answers posted are helpful!
DialFrost
<astrophysics><expansion><space><mass><resource-request>
Seeking Guidance & Tips for Collaboration on a Cosmological Project Involving Potential Energy Variation Due to Cosmic Expansion
Aaron Schramm
# Seeking Guidance & Tips for Collaboration on a Cosmological Project Involving Potential Energy Variation Due to Cosmic Expansion

(Asked by: username_0 on 2023-05-18)

I'm a student with a deep interest in cosmology and astrophysics. I've embarked on a project and am seeking some guidance, insights, or even ways that I could look for possible collaboration on this project.

The central idea of my project is to examine the potential energy variation in the universe due to cosmic expansion. The hypothesis is that as the universe expands, the average potential energy per unit volume decreases, as celestial bodies are moving farther apart from each other. This would be the expected result according to current laws of physics. However, if we observe otherwise, it could potentially point towards a zero-energy universe.

To investigate this, I'm planning to compare galaxies at different points in time using images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). By examining galaxies at different distances (and hence at different points in the past due to light travel time), I hope to track changes in potential energy per unit over time.

Here's the general methodology I'm considering:

1. Using the SDSS dataset, I will select galaxies at various distances from us, effectively creating a timeline from the past to the present.
2. For each galaxy, I will estimate its mass based on its luminosity, and use redshift data to estimate its distance.
3. Using these mass and distance estimates, I'll calculate the gravitational potential energy of each galaxy, treating it as a point mass in a universe filled with a homogeneous distribution of matter.
4. Finally, I will plot the potential energy per unit volume against time, expecting to see a trend of decreasing energy as the universe expands.

I realize this is a simplified approach and there are significant challenges to overcome, including the inherent uncertainties in estimating mass and distance, the role of dark matter, the influence of dark energy, and the potential for inhomogeneities in the universe's energy distribution.

However, I view this project as a unique learning opportunity, and I'm excited about the possibility of gaining a deeper understanding of our universe and developing my skills in astronomical data analysis. But the complexity is a bit overwhelming because I truly am a beginner in this field and don't really know how to calculate anything from the data set.

But if there is an expert that would see this as a fun side project on the weekends with a highly interested student, that would be awesome. I would love to collaborate with someone who has some expertise in the estimation of the potential energy and certain factors that would need to be looked out for or how to improve the estimates.

But generally, if anyone here could provide insights, suggestions, resources, I would be truly grateful. I'm eager to learn and look forward to finding resources and suggestions for how to engage with others about this topic.

**Tags:** astrophysics, expansion, space, mass, resource-request

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: *Welcome to Astronomy Stack Exchange!* Fascinating proposal! I've made some small edits to make your post a better fit. Stack Exchange works a little differently than other sites you may have used, it's a pretty rigid question and answer format. So while we don't propose collaborations here, it's fine to ask for advice how one can look for them.  
> **username_2**: Generally when it comes to my answers, I know nothing about the topic or very little, so I research a ton, but this topic seems super interesting so I'll start right away :). @username_1 is right to say this site doesn't do collabs, we can only give you answers, but I do hope any answers posted are helpful!  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2023-05-26. Score: 2

If you are a student at an academic institution, the first step should be to speak to faculty members there. If you are not, you might find helpful advice in [How to find an academic mentor as a professional](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58020/163512). More generally, see also [How to find collaborators for a research project](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/68127/163512) and [How to find a co-author](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/68155/163512).

Regarding the specific proposal, energy (potential or kinetic) is frame dependent, so you have to pick a reference frame to even define it. What reference frame will you use? This is important because the question of whether the universe is "zero energy" (which you mention wanting to address) is a theoretical matter that concerns how we even define energy; see for example

* [Total energy of the universe](https://mathoverflow.net/q/38659)
* [Is the total energy of the universe zero?](https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/2838/180843)

More broadly, you should try to *quantitatively* predict what the result of your investigation will be, based on known physics. The process of making that prediction should help you to clarify what your experiment is actually measuring and to resolve any ambiguity in your plan.


---

