<p>Lists of astronomical sources are called &quot;catalogues&quot; and other answers have already mentioned the NGC catalogue of galaxies and nebulae. However, you asked about quasars and black hole x-ray binaries.</p>
<p>I say &quot;sources&quot; because the catalogues normally list what can be observed, rather than what can be inferred. For black holes, this is significant, as we can rarely observe black holes directly, but we can infer their existence from the effects that they have on other matter.</p>
<p>For quasars, there are several catalogues. None claim to be complete, as new discoveries happen all the time. The <a href="https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/w3browse/all/milliquas.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MILLIQUAS</a> catalogue is a compendium of 460,222 type-I QSOs and AGN. It also contains about a million &quot;Quasar candidates&quot;. (sources that may be quasars, 80% confidence)</p>
<p>For Black hole binaries, the difficulty is proving that the object is indeed a black hole. This usually requires calculating the mass of the accreting object, which is <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9802177" rel="nofollow noreferrer">not always easy</a>. The <a href="https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/w3browse/all/xray.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">X-ray catalogues</a> are classified by the mass of the normal stellar component. <a href="https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/hmxbcat.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The High Mass x-ray binary catalogue</a> notes objects that are &quot;black hole candidates&quot;. It is in no way a definitive list, since no such list exists.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2017-07-23T13:45:42.570Z
2021-11-26T00:05:41.357Z
2021-11-26T00:05:41.357Z
James K
<p>There are actually numerous lists, categorised in all sorts of ways. </p>

<p>Depending on what level you are approaching this, I'd suggest <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_astronomical_objects" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia's list</a> may be your best entry point.</p>

<p>If you want raw data, the <a href="https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/ngc2000.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">NGC 2000 list</a> is the way to go.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-23T10:44:16.687Z
2017-07-23T17:38:36.403Z
2017-07-23T17:38:36.403Z
Rory Alsop
<p>I would like to know how many known quasars there are in the Universe as well as x-ray binary black holes (not Neutron stars) but I don't seem to be able to.</p>

<p>I also want to know how many black holes have been found via gravitational wave detections but I think the answer to this question is 3.</p>

<p>Do you guys know any credible sources that list the objects in the sky via category and gives detailed info of how we found them (x-ray binary or gravitational waves or quasars).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-24T11:09:45.370Z
Another not so helpful comment, but I thought you might like to see [this chart](http://ligo.org/detections/images/BHmassChartGW17.jpg) which was produced by LIGO after the 3rd confirmed detection of gravitational waves. Technically they found 6 but those have now merged to become 3 :) 
Note: LVT151012 was detected with <5 sigma confidence so is not considered a confirmed detection.
Dean
<black-hole><gravitational-waves><quasars>
Is there an official list of objects in the sky?
Bill
# Is there an official list of objects in the sky?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-07-23)

I would like to know how many known quasars there are in the Universe as well as x-ray binary black holes (not Neutron stars) but I don't seem to be able to.

I also want to know how many black holes have been found via gravitational wave detections but I think the answer to this question is 3.

Do you guys know any credible sources that list the objects in the sky via category and gives detailed info of how we found them (x-ray binary or gravitational waves or quasars).

**Tags:** black-hole, gravitational-waves, quasars

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Another not so helpful comment, but I thought you might like to see [this chart](http://ligo.org/detections/images/BHmassChartGW17.jpg) which was produced by LIGO after the 3rd confirmed detection of gravitational waves. Technically they found 6 but those have now merged to become 3 :)  Note: LVT151012 was detected with <5 sigma confidence so is not considered a confirmed detection.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-07-23. Score: 2

Lists of astronomical sources are called "catalogues" and other answers have already mentioned the NGC catalogue of galaxies and nebulae. However, you asked about quasars and black hole x-ray binaries.

I say "sources" because the catalogues normally list what can be observed, rather than what can be inferred. For black holes, this is significant, as we can rarely observe black holes directly, but we can infer their existence from the effects that they have on other matter.

For quasars, there are several catalogues. None claim to be complete, as new discoveries happen all the time. The [MILLIQUAS](https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/w3browse/all/milliquas.html) catalogue is a compendium of 460,222 type-I QSOs and AGN. It also contains about a million "Quasar candidates". (sources that may be quasars, 80% confidence)

For Black hole binaries, the difficulty is proving that the object is indeed a black hole. This usually requires calculating the mass of the accreting object, which is [not always easy](https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9802177). The [X-ray catalogues](https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/w3browse/all/xray.html) are classified by the mass of the normal stellar component. [The High Mass x-ray binary catalogue](https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/hmxbcat.html) notes objects that are "black hole candidates". It is in no way a definitive list, since no such list exists.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-07-23. Score: 0

There are actually numerous lists, categorised in all sorts of ways.

Depending on what level you are approaching this, I'd suggest [Wikipedia's list](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_astronomical_objects) may be your best entry point.

If you want raw data, the [NGC 2000 list](https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/ngc2000.html) is the way to go.


---

