<p>Astronomers call the type of object you are describing-- one that condensed from an isolated nebula but was too small to undergo hydrogen fusion-- a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-brown_dwarf" rel="noreferrer">sub-brown dwarf</a>.  They are quite difficult to detect as you might imagine, since they "shine" only with the heat of their formation, very dimly in the infrared (the Wikipedia page refers to some that orbit other stars and so could be classified as planets).</p>

<p>It is theorized that there is a lower-limit on their mass of about 1 Jupiter mass, because smaller masses could not condense from an interstellar cloud in isolation.  A few candidate sub-brown dwarfs have been detected and listed on the linked Wikipedia page; the uncertainty in their mass is high (has to be inferred from their temperature and suspected age).  <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WISE_0855%E2%88%920714" rel="noreferrer">WISE-0855</a> is the smallest, coldest, and closest sub-brown dwarf in isolation observed so far, estimated 3-10x mass of Jupiter.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-24T17:26:09.180Z
2018-04-24T17:26:09.180Z
antlersoft
<p>The minimum mass of a "planet" forming from a gas cloud (definitions of what a planet is are rather slippery, and some would say this is not a planet at all) is <em>not</em> determined by the time available. The collapse process is rapid - less than a million years. There is a minimum mass though, and what you are referring to is something known as the <strong>fragmentation limit</strong>.</p>

<p>A cloud becomes unstable and collapses if its mass exceeds the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeans_instability" rel="noreferrer">Jeans mass</a>. The Jeans mass depends on temperature to the power of 3/2 and inversely on the square root of the cloud density.
$$ M_J \propto \frac{T^{3/2}}{\rho^{1/2}}$$
When a cloud of gas collapses, its density increases. If it is able to radiate away heat efficiently, then its temperature can remain more-or-less constant and so the Jeans mass <em>decreases</em>. This allows the cloud to fragment into smaller pieces.</p>

<p>The minimum mass that can collapse in isolation will therefore be set by the smallest value that the Jeans mass can attain as the collapse proceeds. This fragmentation limit is in turn set by the cloud becoming opaque to its own radiation, which occurs when the density becomes large enough. At this point, the cloud can no longer efficiently get rid of all the heat that is generated in its interior by the work done by gravity in squashing it. The temperature rises and the Jeans mass stops decreasing. Now, the cloud may still collapse, but it won't break into smaller chunks.</p>

<p>The fragmentation limit is difficult to calculate with any accuracy, because it depends on the 3D turbulent dynamics of a collapsing cloud and also on whether the cloud is spinning. It is generally thought to be in the range one-to-a-few times the mass of Jupiter (e.g. <a href="https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2006/42/aa5806-06.pdf" rel="noreferrer">Whitworth &amp; Stamatellos 2006</a>). This is <em>far</em> below the minimum mass for hydrogen fusion of about 75 Jupiter masses or deuterium fusion of about 13 Jupiter masses.</p>

<p>Evidence that such objects may exist can be found in answers to the related questions <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/1715/how-are-rogue-planets-discovered?rq=1">How are rogue planets discovered?</a> and <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/12536/is-there-any-hard-evidence-that-rogue-planets-exist?rq=1">Is there any hard evidence that rogue planets exist?</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-24T20:15:41.270Z
2018-04-24T22:13:22.140Z
2018-04-24T22:13:22.140Z
ProfRob
<p>I'm using the term "rogue planet" here loosely to mean anything of planet-level mass that is not orbiting around a star. Popular discussions of these objects always describe them as forming around a star and then being ejected by gravitational interaction with other planets. But I would have thought that, in principle, they could form in interstellar space just by the collapse of a sufficiently small cloud of dust and gas.</p>

<p>I realize that a small cloud will have less self-gravity, and would therefore take more time to collapse [see the answers for a correction to this assumption] and have a greater chance of being disrupted by other forces. But has a theoretical analysis been done of the minimum mass object that could be expected to form in isolation over the time frame of the current lifetime of the universe? It would be a surprising coincidence of that minimum threshold were the same mass as the mass required for hydrogen fusion.</p>

<planetary-formation><rogue-planet>
Are rogue planets ever born in isolation?
Mark Foskey
# Are rogue planets ever born in isolation?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-04-24)

I'm using the term "rogue planet" here loosely to mean anything of planet-level mass that is not orbiting around a star. Popular discussions of these objects always describe them as forming around a star and then being ejected by gravitational interaction with other planets. But I would have thought that, in principle, they could form in interstellar space just by the collapse of a sufficiently small cloud of dust and gas.

I realize that a small cloud will have less self-gravity, and would therefore take more time to collapse [see the answers for a correction to this assumption] and have a greater chance of being disrupted by other forces. But has a theoretical analysis been done of the minimum mass object that could be expected to form in isolation over the time frame of the current lifetime of the universe? It would be a surprising coincidence of that minimum threshold were the same mass as the mass required for hydrogen fusion.

**Tags:** planetary-formation, rogue-planet


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-04-24. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

The minimum mass of a "planet" forming from a gas cloud (definitions of what a planet is are rather slippery, and some would say this is not a planet at all) is *not* determined by the time available. The collapse process is rapid - less than a million years. There is a minimum mass though, and what you are referring to is something known as the **fragmentation limit**.

A cloud becomes unstable and collapses if its mass exceeds the [Jeans mass](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeans_instability). The Jeans mass depends on temperature to the power of 3/2 and inversely on the square root of the cloud density.
$$ M\_J \propto \frac{T^{3/2}}{\rho^{1/2}}$$
When a cloud of gas collapses, its density increases. If it is able to radiate away heat efficiently, then its temperature can remain more-or-less constant and so the Jeans mass *decreases*. This allows the cloud to fragment into smaller pieces.

The minimum mass that can collapse in isolation will therefore be set by the smallest value that the Jeans mass can attain as the collapse proceeds. This fragmentation limit is in turn set by the cloud becoming opaque to its own radiation, which occurs when the density becomes large enough. At this point, the cloud can no longer efficiently get rid of all the heat that is generated in its interior by the work done by gravity in squashing it. The temperature rises and the Jeans mass stops decreasing. Now, the cloud may still collapse, but it won't break into smaller chunks.

The fragmentation limit is difficult to calculate with any accuracy, because it depends on the 3D turbulent dynamics of a collapsing cloud and also on whether the cloud is spinning. It is generally thought to be in the range one-to-a-few times the mass of Jupiter (e.g. [Whitworth & Stamatellos 2006](https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2006/42/aa5806-06.pdf)). This is *far* below the minimum mass for hydrogen fusion of about 75 Jupiter masses or deuterium fusion of about 13 Jupiter masses.

Evidence that such objects may exist can be found in answers to the related questions [How are rogue planets discovered?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/1715/how-are-rogue-planets-discovered?rq=1) and [Is there any hard evidence that rogue planets exist?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/12536/is-there-any-hard-evidence-that-rogue-planets-exist?rq=1)


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-04-24. Score: 7

Astronomers call the type of object you are describing-- one that condensed from an isolated nebula but was too small to undergo hydrogen fusion-- a [sub-brown dwarf](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-brown_dwarf). They are quite difficult to detect as you might imagine, since they "shine" only with the heat of their formation, very dimly in the infrared (the Wikipedia page refers to some that orbit other stars and so could be classified as planets).

It is theorized that there is a lower-limit on their mass of about 1 Jupiter mass, because smaller masses could not condense from an interstellar cloud in isolation. A few candidate sub-brown dwarfs have been detected and listed on the linked Wikipedia page; the uncertainty in their mass is high (has to be inferred from their temperature and suspected age). [WISE-0855](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WISE_0855%E2%88%920714) is the smallest, coldest, and closest sub-brown dwarf in isolation observed so far, estimated 3-10x mass of Jupiter.


---

