<p>If we don't wait for too long, where we don't know for sure, whether <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay">protons or atomic nuclei stay stable forever</a>, there won't be just one single element.</p>

<p>The most abundant element in the universe will probably stay hydrogen, since it will stay in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warm%E2%80%93hot_intergalactic_medium">intergalactic medium</a>, and thin out by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_universe">accelerating cosmic expansion</a>.</p>

<p>The second-most abundant element will probably stay helium, mostly for the same reason.</p>

<p>The most frequent stars are probably <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_dwarf">red dwarfs</a>.
They'll burn hydrogen and helium to oxygen and carbon, and end up as white dwarfs.</p>

<p>Only a small fraction of stars is large enough to burn oxygen and carbon to silicon and iron.</p>

<p>Very heavy elements, like uranium and beyond, as formed in supernovae, will decay to lead, helium (alpha particles), some hydrogen (via neutrons decaying to hydrogen), and a couple of less abundant elements formed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_fission">spontaneous fission</a>. Other stable (isotopes of) elements heavier than iron are also formed in, or a consequence of, supernova explosions.</p>

<p>Part of the dead stars will collide, and merge to heavier stars, which will end as intergalactic dust (mixture of elements, e.g. iron and silicon), including planets, after supernova explosions, and as Black Holes. Others will be scattered out of reach of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermassive_black_hole">supermassive black hole</a> in the center of the galaxy (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy#Future_trends">gravitational relaxation</a>).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-05T13:00:29.147Z
There's an extended explanation [here](https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/53b1412bf49a). "over the first 9.3 billion years of the Universe, the fraction of hydrogen has gone down from 92% to 91.1%." It also argues that ultimately, we may still have more than 50% hydrogen.
Hobbes
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-02T22:37:09.440Z
2014-05-02T22:37:09.440Z
Gerald
<p>We know that, in stars, hydrogen is used by the stars and due to the fusion in two hydrogen elements we get helium -> Carbon -> Oxygen ->Other elements -> Iron -> then Super/Hypernova.</p>

<p>If everywhere hydrogen is getting converted to other element then will we(universe) have hydrogen to create/retain stars ? </p>

<p>Or in the end what is the ultimate matter in the universe ?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-02T11:10:20.253Z
Looks like it will mostly be iron...lighter elements combine, and heavier elements are split.
Rory Alsop
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-03T03:03:40.043Z
I don't see any reason for it to hace an ultimate element. I could agree on a variety of elements as the final faith of the Universe. Could you please clarify/reformulate your question? Or provide evidence.
harogaston
<star><universe><planetary-atmosphere><formation><hydrogen>
In the end what is the ultimate matter/element in the universe, due to fusion process in stars?
AmitG
# In the end what is the ultimate matter/element in the universe, due to fusion process in stars?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-05-02)

We know that, in stars, hydrogen is used by the stars and due to the fusion in two hydrogen elements we get helium -> Carbon -> Oxygen ->Other elements -> Iron -> then Super/Hypernova.

If everywhere hydrogen is getting converted to other element then will we(universe) have hydrogen to create/retain stars ?

Or in the end what is the ultimate matter in the universe ?

**Tags:** star, universe, planetary-atmosphere, formation, hydrogen

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Looks like it will mostly be iron...lighter elements combine, and heavier elements are split.  
> **username_2**: I don't see any reason for it to hace an ultimate element. I could agree on a variety of elements as the final faith of the Universe. Could you please clarify/reformulate your question? Or provide evidence.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2014-05-02. Score: 8 | Accepted answer

If we don't wait for too long, where we don't know for sure, whether [protons or atomic nuclei stay stable forever](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay), there won't be just one single element.

The most abundant element in the universe will probably stay hydrogen, since it will stay in the [intergalactic medium](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warm%E2%80%93hot_intergalactic_medium), and thin out by [accelerating cosmic expansion](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_universe).

The second-most abundant element will probably stay helium, mostly for the same reason.

The most frequent stars are probably [red dwarfs](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_dwarf).
They'll burn hydrogen and helium to oxygen and carbon, and end up as white dwarfs.

Only a small fraction of stars is large enough to burn oxygen and carbon to silicon and iron.

Very heavy elements, like uranium and beyond, as formed in supernovae, will decay to lead, helium (alpha particles), some hydrogen (via neutrons decaying to hydrogen), and a couple of less abundant elements formed by [spontaneous fission](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_fission). Other stable (isotopes of) elements heavier than iron are also formed in, or a consequence of, supernova explosions.

Part of the dead stars will collide, and merge to heavier stars, which will end as intergalactic dust (mixture of elements, e.g. iron and silicon), including planets, after supernova explosions, and as Black Holes. Others will be scattered out of reach of the [supermassive black hole](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermassive_black_hole) in the center of the galaxy ([gravitational relaxation](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy#Future_trends)).

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: There's an extended explanation [here](https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/53b1412bf49a). "over the first 9.3 billion years of the Universe, the fraction of hydrogen has gone down from 92% to 91.1%." It also argues that ultimately, we may still have more than 50% hydrogen.  

---

