<p>I'll address the second question first, <em>Venus uniquely has retrograde rotation; how would this have come about based on current theories?</em> The answer is that there are a number of hypotheses related to Venus's rotation. See the related question <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26">What is the current accepted theory as to why Venus has a slow retrograde rotation?</a>. None of them involve capture of a rogue planet. Note that this also applies to Uranus; it too has an odd orientation.</p>

<p>So why not? Note that I am now addressing your first question, <em>is it possible that the planets could have been captured by the Sun's gravitational force after drifting through space while retaining their axis of spin and speed?</em></p>

<p>The answer is simple. Capture is extremely unlikely (and that's putting it mildly), and it is not needed to explain the odd orientations of Venus and Uranus.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-14T17:01:39.190Z
I wouldn't say capture is "very unlikely".  Capture of Oort cloud objects is thought to be fairly common.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort_cloud#Origin but for a planet to be captured it would need to go from one very distant orbit to another (and it would need to meet the definition of a planet).   We don't know enough about very distant orbiting objects to say how often planets get captured.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-16T19:24:12.737Z
Thank you.I have no argument but how would the change be effected.respectfully.Colin
Colin Shorey
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-17T03:47:20.633Z
What change? There is no reason to invoke an extremely unlikely event to explain a very likely event.
David Hammen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-17T04:26:31.737Z
You feel capture most unlikely? Maybe so but Pluto was considered this way for many years because its orbit comes within that of Uranus.Current thinking is that it is no longer a planet.Cheers,Colin
Colin Shorey
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-17T04:44:13.550Z
@ColinShorey - That,sir, is a non sequitur.
David Hammen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-16T18:27:48.807Z
2015-01-17T03:45:38.053Z
2017-04-13T12:59:06.910Z
David Hammen
<p>Ignoring any current beliefs, is it possible that the planets could have been captured by the Sun's gravitational force after drifting through space while retaining their axis of spin and speed?</p>

<p>Notably, Venus uniquely has retrograde rotation; how would this have come about based on current theories?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-15T21:47:25.317Z
possible duplicate of [What is the current accepted theory as to why Venus has a slow retrograde rotation?](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26/what-is-the-current-accepted-theory-as-to-why-venus-has-a-slow-retrograde-rotati)
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-16T17:55:10.917Z
Related, but not a duplicate. The related question asks why Venus has a retrograde rotation, which is indeed the second part of this question. This first part of this question asks whether the Sun could have captured a rogue planet (and by implication, was Venus a rogue planet).
David Hammen
<solar-system><rotation>
Could the planets in the Solar System have been captured?
Colin Shorey
# Could the planets in the Solar System have been captured?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-01-15)

Ignoring any current beliefs, is it possible that the planets could have been captured by the Sun's gravitational force after drifting through space while retaining their axis of spin and speed?

Notably, Venus uniquely has retrograde rotation; how would this have come about based on current theories?

**Tags:** solar-system, rotation

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: possible duplicate of [What is the current accepted theory as to why Venus has a slow retrograde rotation?](http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26/what-is-the-current-accepted-theory-as-to-why-venus-has-a-slow-retrograde-rotati)  
> **username_2**: Related, but not a duplicate. The related question asks why Venus has a retrograde rotation, which is indeed the second part of this question. This first part of this question asks whether the Sun could have captured a rogue planet (and by implication, was Venus a rogue planet).  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-01-16. Score: 2

I'll address the second question first, *Venus uniquely has retrograde rotation; how would this have come about based on current theories?* The answer is that there are a number of hypotheses related to Venus's rotation. See the related question [What is the current accepted theory as to why Venus has a slow retrograde rotation?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/26). None of them involve capture of a rogue planet. Note that this also applies to Uranus; it too has an odd orientation.

So why not? Note that I am now addressing your first question, *is it possible that the planets could have been captured by the Sun's gravitational force after drifting through space while retaining their axis of spin and speed?*

The answer is simple. Capture is extremely unlikely (and that's putting it mildly), and it is not needed to explain the odd orientations of Venus and Uranus.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you.I have no argument but how would the change be effected.respectfully.username_0  
> **username_2**: What change? There is no reason to invoke an extremely unlikely event to explain a very likely event.  
> **username_0**: You feel capture most unlikely? Maybe so but Pluto was considered this way for many years because its orbit comes within that of Uranus.Current thinking is that it is no longer a planet.Cheers,username_0  
> **username_2**: @username_0 - That,sir, is a non sequitur.  
> **username_3**: I wouldn't say capture is "very unlikely".  Capture of Oort cloud objects is thought to be fairly common.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oort_cloud#Origin but for a planet to be captured it would need to go from one very distant orbit to another (and it would need to meet the definition of a planet).   We don't know enough about very distant orbiting objects to say how often planets get captured.  

---

