<p>You may be interested in the number of habitable zone planets. These are planetary-mass objects in a sort of "Goldilocks" region from their respective stars: This region is just right, given adequate atmospheric conditions, to possibly permit the existence of liquid water on the surface. That's not a surefire sign that the planet is capable of supporting humans, but it's certainly a good start.</p>

<p>Scientists Kane and Gellino have <a href="http://www.hzgallery.org/">tabulated such information at the HZ Gallery</a>. As of Sep 2015, the site assesses nearly 1600 exoplanets of which 62 spend their time entirely within the habitable zone.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T21:56:43.470Z
1600 is the total number of planets, but besides this detail, good first answer
Gerald
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T22:00:19.930Z
@Gerald Thanks! I edited the post. I was unaware that ~2000 exoplanets have even been detected... that would have made 1600 a rather large figure.
zahbaz
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T20:39:17.003Z
2015-12-06T21:58:37.533Z
2015-12-06T21:58:37.533Z
zahbaz
<p>There is currently only one planet known to be capable of supporting human life, and you're on it.</p>

<p>Several planets have been found in the region in which we expect water to be liquid on much of the planet. Of these, only one fits the criteria of being Earth-sized and well placed in the habitable zone: <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/ames/kepler/nasas-kepler-discovers-first-earth-size-planet-in-the-habitable-zone-of-another-star/">Kepler 186-f</a></p>

<p>However we know nothing about it's atmosphere (or lack of one). The star is a red dwarf, so it could be subject to dramatic solar flares. The planet is rather colder than earth, so could be in a perpetual "snowball world" state, depending on the composition of the atmosphere and the strength of the greenhouse effect. The atmosphere would be very unlikely to be even close to breathable, and it is nearly 500 light-years from Earth, so could not be reached in a reasonable amount of time, even with much more advanced propulsion.</p>

<p>At the moment we can't usually detect most Earth-like planets in the habitable zone of brighter stars like the sun, though the probably do exist and may be common.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T16:01:17.487Z
Even counting Earth as one, is maybe a biased overestimation. Only during the last fifth of its history could a human survive here (just considering oxygenation, other organisms would probably kill us even much later or we would not be fit to eat what was growing during a global ice age and whatnot else). We are not easily replanted. If humans ever go anywhere they'll need to bring a piece of Earth with them, the neighbor will not be a paradise for us.
LocalFluff
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-07T09:48:55.210Z
*its* atmosphere (sorry)
Federico
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T11:37:13.207Z
2015-12-06T11:37:13.207Z
James K
<p>I have heard a lot of buzz about distant planets that could potentially be second homes for human existence, but what is that approximate number?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T21:17:37.977Z
For how long? It seems that all we know of would work only for a rather short timespan, cosmologically...
PlasmaHH
<earth><life><earth-like-planet>
How many planets have we discovered that can support human life?
rib3ye
# How many planets have we discovered that can support human life?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-12-06)

I have heard a lot of buzz about distant planets that could potentially be second homes for human existence, but what is that approximate number?

**Tags:** earth, life, earth-like-planet

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: For how long? It seems that all we know of would work only for a rather short timespan, cosmologically...  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-12-06. Score: 27 | Accepted answer

There is currently only one planet known to be capable of supporting human life, and you're on it.

Several planets have been found in the region in which we expect water to be liquid on much of the planet. Of these, only one fits the criteria of being Earth-sized and well placed in the habitable zone: [Kepler 186-f](http://www.nasa.gov/ames/kepler/nasas-kepler-discovers-first-earth-size-planet-in-the-habitable-zone-of-another-star/)

However we know nothing about it's atmosphere (or lack of one). The star is a red dwarf, so it could be subject to dramatic solar flares. The planet is rather colder than earth, so could be in a perpetual "snowball world" state, depending on the composition of the atmosphere and the strength of the greenhouse effect. The atmosphere would be very unlikely to be even close to breathable, and it is nearly 500 light-years from Earth, so could not be reached in a reasonable amount of time, even with much more advanced propulsion.

At the moment we can't usually detect most Earth-like planets in the habitable zone of brighter stars like the sun, though the probably do exist and may be common.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: Even counting Earth as one, is maybe a biased overestimation. Only during the last fifth of its history could a human survive here (just considering oxygenation, other organisms would probably kill us even much later or we would not be fit to eat what was growing during a global ice age and whatnot else). We are not easily replanted. If humans ever go anywhere they'll need to bring a piece of Earth with them, the neighbor will not be a paradise for us.  
> **username_6**: *its* atmosphere (sorry)  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-12-06. Score: 12

You may be interested in the number of habitable zone planets. These are planetary-mass objects in a sort of "Goldilocks" region from their respective stars: This region is just right, given adequate atmospheric conditions, to possibly permit the existence of liquid water on the surface. That's not a surefire sign that the planet is capable of supporting humans, but it's certainly a good start.

Scientists Kane and Gellino have [tabulated such information at the HZ Gallery](http://www.hzgallery.org/). As of Sep 2015, the site assesses nearly 1600 exoplanets of which 62 spend their time entirely within the habitable zone.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: 1600 is the total number of planets, but besides this detail, good first answer  
> **username_2**: @username_3 Thanks! I edited the post. I was unaware that ~2000 exoplanets have even been detected... that would have made 1600 a rather large figure.  

---

