<p>Here's what I'm curious about. So this hydrogen gas collects and at some point, it eventually becomes a star. What does that process look like? If you were there as a witness to the formation of a star (greatly speeded up, of course), what would you see. What stages would the gas go through? Would it first form a gas giant planet at some point? With perhaps a solid core of something covered with metallic hydrogen and then hydrogen gas over that? Or does it form differently?</p>
<p>I assume at some point a critical pressure/temperature point is reached and fission begins. What does that look like? Does the whole thing just burst into flames or does it take time?</p>
<p>And somewhat relatedly, I'm curious how large stars form. Why wouldn't it first form as a small star? I have always assumed that once the star ignites, it's going to radiate away any of the collecting gas. But maybe that assumption is invalid. Will the gas continue to collect due to the gravity and the nature of the star simply evolves as the gas collects?</p>
<p>I've never really seen a sort of &quot;diary of a star's birth&quot; kind of description.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-26T23:28:43.100Z
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2019.00051/full
Daddy Kropotkin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-26T23:33:14.367Z
I saw [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xIQGbYur9Q) video by Professor Dave explaining stellar evolution. He talks about stellar birth & evolution, and probably answers some aspects of your question.
AdiBak
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-29T15:54:26.667Z
It's rare for a question to have so many up vote and also be closed and unanswered after a few months. I think if you remove the "And somewhat relatedly..." and sharpen up the main question in the beginning this can be reopened. *Thanks!*
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-30T20:30:40.093Z
@KeithMcClary This is interesting, but I'm more interested in a single star's birth instead of a bunch of stars. The video is cool, but it sheds little light on what a single star's birth is like.
Pete
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-30T21:53:03.930Z
If someone feels inspire to reframe this such that someone's willing to answer it, that would be great. I asked the question I wanted to ask. Seems like people are interested in the answer.
Pete
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-30T21:58:58.290Z
@Pete I understand how you feel, but this is the way Stack Exchange works. With four close votes already if I hadn't added the fifth, someone else would have. The only thing that closing guarantees is that answer posts are now impossible. Beginning with "And somewhat relatedly, I'm curious how large stars form..." is an interesting but separate question, and can be answered separately from the first. You've asked *two questions* that you'd like to ask, but to make it easier for answer authors to focus on one or the other, just split them up into separate question posts.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-30T22:00:55.190Z
You can post as many questions as you'd like and link them to each other, but it makes it much easier for answer authors if we break "the big question" into multiple parts.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-24T04:55:02.687Z
[Videos of computer simulations](https://www.google.com/search?q=star+formation+simulation&client=ubuntu&hs=BrQ&channel=fs&biw=1519&bih=888&tbm=vid)
Keith McClary
<star-formation><gas-giants>
What is the birth of a star like?
Pete
# What is the birth of a star like?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-03-03)

Here's what I'm curious about. So this hydrogen gas collects and at some point, it eventually becomes a star. What does that process look like? If you were there as a witness to the formation of a star (greatly speeded up, of course), what would you see. What stages would the gas go through? Would it first form a gas giant planet at some point? With perhaps a solid core of something covered with metallic hydrogen and then hydrogen gas over that? Or does it form differently?

I assume at some point a critical pressure/temperature point is reached and fission begins. What does that look like? Does the whole thing just burst into flames or does it take time?

And somewhat relatedly, I'm curious how large stars form. Why wouldn't it first form as a small star? I have always assumed that once the star ignites, it's going to radiate away any of the collecting gas. But maybe that assumption is invalid. Will the gas continue to collect due to the gravity and the nature of the star simply evolves as the gas collects?

I've never really seen a sort of "diary of a star's birth" kind of description.

**Tags:** star-formation, gas-giants

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: [Videos of computer simulations](https://www.google.com/search?q=star+formation+simulation&client=ubuntu&hs=BrQ&channel=fs&biw=1519&bih=888&tbm=vid)  
> **username_1**: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2019.00051/full  
> **username_2**: I saw [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xIQGbYur9Q) video by Professor Dave explaining stellar evolution. He talks about stellar birth & evolution, and probably answers some aspects of your question.  
> **username_3**: It's rare for a question to have so many up vote and also be closed and unanswered after a few months. I think if you remove the "And somewhat relatedly..." and sharpen up the main question in the beginning this can be reopened. *Thanks!*  
> **username_0**: @username_4 This is interesting, but I'm more interested in a single star's birth instead of a bunch of stars. The video is cool, but it sheds little light on what a single star's birth is like.  
> **username_0**: If someone feels inspire to reframe this such that someone's willing to answer it, that would be great. I asked the question I wanted to ask. Seems like people are interested in the answer.  
> **username_3**: @username_0 I understand how you feel, but this is the way Stack Exchange works. With four close votes already if I hadn't added the fifth, someone else would have. The only thing that closing guarantees is that answer posts are now impossible. Beginning with "And somewhat relatedly, I'm curious how large stars form..." is an interesting but separate question, and can be answered separately from the first. You've asked *two questions* that you'd like to ask, but to make it easier for answer authors to focus on one or the other, just split them up into separate question posts.  
> **username_3**: You can post as many questions as you'd like and link them to each other, but it makes it much easier for answer authors if we break "the big question" into multiple parts.  

---

## 0 answers

