<p>In <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6155/218.full" rel="noreferrer">Farihi et al. (2013)</a> (it's a <em>Science</em> paper, unfortunately I'm not sure its content is freely accessible), they actually measured metal excess in the white dwarf GD 61 (for an astronomer, everything that is nor hydrogen neither helium is a metal). Due to high surface gravity in white dwarfs, any heavy element should sink rapidely in its atmosphere; therefore, they infer that, if you find traces of metals, it means that it comes from accreted material, "polluting" its atmosphere.</p>

<p>So if you find oxygen in a white dwarf spectrum, you know that it has to come from somewhere else, and if the white dwarf has a circumstellar disk, it has to come from planetesimals that are accreted from the disk.</p>

<p>Now, what they did was to measure abundances (or upper limit for their abundance) for a bunch of chemical elements (O, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Fe) and carbon. Then, they could infer different things to determine the total oxygen budget:</p>

<ol>
<li>There is a carbon deficiency, that means that carbon abundance has no impact on the total oxygen budget;</li>
<li>Elements Mg, Al, Si, Ca, are assumed to be carried as MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, and CaO at their maximum abundance, so once they had these abundances, they could substract it to the total oxygen budget;</li>
<li>The remaining oxygen excess, found in FeO and debris, is interpreted as water-rich (if you want to form FeO, you need water somehow).</li>
</ol>

<p>That's how they were able to determine this water abundance in debris around the white dwarf GD 61.</p>

<p>I'm not sure the oxygen abundance would be very meaningful here, but since you asked for it, it is of -5.95+/-0.13 dex.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-10-14T13:05:35.360Z
Spectacular answer. Thanks for providing the oxygen abundance. The number may not be very meaningful out of context, but it provides us with a reference for making our own back-of-the-envelope calcuations.
called2voyage
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-10-14T09:43:40.637Z
2013-10-14T09:43:40.637Z
MBR
<p>There are several articles out saying that a Warwick/Cambridge study of ultraviolet spectroscopy data from the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope found a large amount of oxygen in rocky debris around the white dwarf GD 61. They say that this amount of oxygen is indicative of a larger mass (asteroid), that was once composed of the rocky debris, which was 26% water.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/4yYg7.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/4yYg7.jpg" alt="Asteroid around GD 61" /></a><br />
<sub>(source: <a href="https://images.sciencedaily.com/2013/10/131010142739-large.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">sciencedaily.com</a>)</sub></p>
<p><sub>Image credit: copyright Mark A. Garlick, space-art.co.uk, University of Warwick and University of Cambridge</sub></p>
<p>What I cannot seem to find is how much oxygen the spectroscopic examination found. Also, what methods did they use to determine how much water there would have been based on the level of oxygen?</p>

<water><spectrometry>
How much oxygen did the Warwick/Cambridge study find in the rocky debris around white dwarf GD 61?
called2voyage
# How much oxygen did the Warwick/Cambridge study find in the rocky debris around white dwarf GD 61?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-10-11)

There are several articles out saying that a Warwick/Cambridge study of ultraviolet spectroscopy data from the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope found a large amount of oxygen in rocky debris around the white dwarf GD 61. They say that this amount of oxygen is indicative of a larger mass (asteroid), that was once composed of the rocky debris, which was 26% water.

[![Asteroid around GD 61](https://i.sstatic.net/4yYg7.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/4yYg7.jpg)  
(source: [sciencedaily.com](https://images.sciencedaily.com/2013/10/131010142739-large.jpg))

Image credit: copyright Mark A. Garlick, space-art.co.uk, University of Warwick and University of Cambridge

What I cannot seem to find is how much oxygen the spectroscopic examination found. Also, what methods did they use to determine how much water there would have been based on the level of oxygen?

**Tags:** water, spectrometry


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2013-10-14. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

In [Farihi et al. (2013)](http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6155/218.full) (it's a *Science* paper, unfortunately I'm not sure its content is freely accessible), they actually measured metal excess in the white dwarf GD 61 (for an astronomer, everything that is nor hydrogen neither helium is a metal). Due to high surface gravity in white dwarfs, any heavy element should sink rapidely in its atmosphere; therefore, they infer that, if you find traces of metals, it means that it comes from accreted material, "polluting" its atmosphere.

So if you find oxygen in a white dwarf spectrum, you know that it has to come from somewhere else, and if the white dwarf has a circumstellar disk, it has to come from planetesimals that are accreted from the disk.

Now, what they did was to measure abundances (or upper limit for their abundance) for a bunch of chemical elements (O, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Fe) and carbon. Then, they could infer different things to determine the total oxygen budget:

1. There is a carbon deficiency, that means that carbon abundance has no impact on the total oxygen budget;
2. Elements Mg, Al, Si, Ca, are assumed to be carried as MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, and CaO at their maximum abundance, so once they had these abundances, they could substract it to the total oxygen budget;
3. The remaining oxygen excess, found in FeO and debris, is interpreted as water-rich (if you want to form FeO, you need water somehow).

That's how they were able to determine this water abundance in debris around the white dwarf GD 61.

I'm not sure the oxygen abundance would be very meaningful here, but since you asked for it, it is of -5.95+/-0.13 dex.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Spectacular answer. Thanks for providing the oxygen abundance. The number may not be very meaningful out of context, but it provides us with a reference for making our own back-of-the-envelope calcuations.  

---

