<p>The role of H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> is to allow primordial gas to cool down sufficiently to allow the collapse to start and then to hold the gas at a relatively low temperature as it gets much more dense. The formation of H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> is <strong>essential</strong> because atomic hydrogen simply has no way of cooling itself below temperatures that are capable of exciting the <span class="math-container">$n=2$</span> level and then emitting Lyman alpha photons. This means that without H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> the gas can't cool effectively once it gets below about <span class="math-container">$10^4$</span> K and it will never reach the densities required to form stars.</p>
<p>Without molecular H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> you get stuck with large (<span class="math-container">$\sim 10^4 -10^6M_{\odot}$</span>) pressure-supported &quot;protogalaxies&quot; that won't collapse any further. These are formed at redshifts of around 20-40 from growing primordial density perturbations and have initial temperatures of a few thousand K. The ongoing formation of H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> in primordial <em>gas phase</em> reactions (no dust required) allows a collapsing cloud to cool down to around <span class="math-container">$\sim 200$</span> K.</p>
<p>The importance of H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> cooling is outlined in reviews by <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0409737.pdf" rel="noreferrer">Glover 2005</a> and reiterated more recently by <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.06248.pdf" rel="noreferrer">Klessen 2018</a>. A telling quote is from the review by <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.5178.pdf" rel="noreferrer">Bromm 2013</a>, who says</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If the gas were unable to cool, there would be no further collapse, and consequently no
gas fragmentation and star formation. The gas would simply persist in hydrostatic
equilibrium, roughly tracing the density profile of the Dark Matter. Early on, it was realized
that cooling in the low-temperature primordial gas had to rely on molecular hydrogen
(H2) instead (Saslaw and Zipoy 1967).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Conversely, in gas that is enriched with heavier elements, H<span class="math-container">$_2$</span> cooling is totally unimportant because there are more efficient routes for a collapsing cloud to radiate away energy (e.g. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3073" rel="noreferrer">Glover &amp; Clark 2012</a>).</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-24T19:25:56.273Z
Very interesting! So we can conclude that the fact that Hydrogen can bond is key for the existence of all the elements in the Universe as stars would have never formed otherwise (except from small traces from Big Bang nucleosynthesis I guess).
Swike
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-08-07T09:44:50.510Z
What about primordial helium and lithium atoms? The n=2 energy for helium is much larger than for hydrogen, but for lithium it is only 1.8 eV, which is five times lower than for hydrogen. That should allow cooling to around 2000 K (very rough guestimate). Cooling would be much slower, but would this in the end be sufficient for a gravitational collapse?
JanKanis
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-08-07T12:33:26.830Z
@JanKanis All the atomic Li is ionised above about 7000 K so the gas would still be "stuck" at $>10^4$ K.. Also the Li abundance is only 1 part in 10 billion.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 4.0
2024-03-29T16:22:42.657Z
@ProfRob Wouldn't stars eventually form just after a really long time because of the gravitational wave radiation of the hydrogen atoms and gravitational waves can't get reabsorbed very easily so it would just take much longer for stars to form, probably like 10^15 years or something big but stars can still form eventually right?
MiltonTheMeme
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-24T18:37:34.837Z
2022-12-11T12:45:40.103Z
2022-12-11T12:45:40.103Z
ProfRob
<p>I just saw <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL4f94pBokY" rel="noreferrer">this YouTube video</a> made by PBS Studios. There they explain that <span class="math-container">$H_2$</span> can reduce the traslational kinetic energy of regular <span class="math-container">$H$</span> atoms when it is formed since the energy can also be stored in vibrational and rotational modes after each collision. They state that the gas was so hot that regular atomic <span class="math-container">$H$</span> generated enought pressure to impede gravitational collapse and that, only because of <span class="math-container">$H_2$</span>, it was possible to lower that pressure and stars could form.</p>
<p>My question is, if <span class="math-container">$H_2$</span> were impossible to form (for some reason) wouldn't gravitational collapse eventually happen as the universe expanded and the gas cooled down? Or the expansion itself would be enought to prevent this by lowering the density of the gas before any star could be formed?</p>
<p>Would a universe without <span class="math-container">$H_2$</span> had formed any stars in its entire evolution?</p>

<cosmology><stellar-astrophysics><hydrogen>
Would stars have formed in the Universe if atomic hydrogen couldn't make molecular hydrogen?
Swike
# Would stars have formed in the Universe if atomic hydrogen couldn't make molecular hydrogen?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-09-24)

I just saw [this YouTube video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mL4f94pBokY) made by PBS Studios. There they explain that $H\_2$ can reduce the traslational kinetic energy of regular $H$ atoms when it is formed since the energy can also be stored in vibrational and rotational modes after each collision. They state that the gas was so hot that regular atomic $H$ generated enought pressure to impede gravitational collapse and that, only because of $H\_2$, it was possible to lower that pressure and stars could form.

My question is, if $H\_2$ were impossible to form (for some reason) wouldn't gravitational collapse eventually happen as the universe expanded and the gas cooled down? Or the expansion itself would be enought to prevent this by lowering the density of the gas before any star could be formed?

Would a universe without $H\_2$ had formed any stars in its entire evolution?

**Tags:** cosmology, stellar-astrophysics, hydrogen


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-09-24. Score: 13 | Accepted answer

The role of H$\_2$ is to allow primordial gas to cool down sufficiently to allow the collapse to start and then to hold the gas at a relatively low temperature as it gets much more dense. The formation of H$\_2$ is **essential** because atomic hydrogen simply has no way of cooling itself below temperatures that are capable of exciting the $n=2$ level and then emitting Lyman alpha photons. This means that without H$\_2$ the gas can't cool effectively once it gets below about $10^4$ K and it will never reach the densities required to form stars.

Without molecular H$\_2$ you get stuck with large ($\sim 10^4 -10^6M\_{\odot}$) pressure-supported "protogalaxies" that won't collapse any further. These are formed at redshifts of around 20-40 from growing primordial density perturbations and have initial temperatures of a few thousand K. The ongoing formation of H$\_2$ in primordial *gas phase* reactions (no dust required) allows a collapsing cloud to cool down to around $\sim 200$ K.

The importance of H$\_2$ cooling is outlined in reviews by [Glover 2005](https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0409737.pdf) and reiterated more recently by [Klessen 2018](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.06248.pdf). A telling quote is from the review by [Bromm 2013](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.5178.pdf), who says

> If the gas were unable to cool, there would be no further collapse, and consequently no
> gas fragmentation and star formation. The gas would simply persist in hydrostatic
> equilibrium, roughly tracing the density profile of the Dark Matter. Early on, it was realized
> that cooling in the low-temperature primordial gas had to rely on molecular hydrogen
> (H2) instead (Saslaw and Zipoy 1967).

Conversely, in gas that is enriched with heavier elements, H$\_2$ cooling is totally unimportant because there are more efficient routes for a collapsing cloud to radiate away energy (e.g. [Glover & Clark 2012](https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3073)).

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Very interesting! So we can conclude that the fact that Hydrogen can bond is key for the existence of all the elements in the Universe as stars would have never formed otherwise (except from small traces from Big Bang nucleosynthesis I guess).  
> **username_2**: What about primordial helium and lithium atoms? The n=2 energy for helium is much larger than for hydrogen, but for lithium it is only 1.8 eV, which is five times lower than for hydrogen. That should allow cooling to around 2000 K (very rough guestimate). Cooling would be much slower, but would this in the end be sufficient for a gravitational collapse?  
> **username_1**: @username_2 All the atomic Li is ionised above about 7000 K so the gas would still be "stuck" at $>10^4$ K.. Also the Li abundance is only 1 part in 10 billion.  
> **username_3**: @username_1 Wouldn't stars eventually form just after a really long time because of the gravitational wave radiation of the hydrogen atoms and gravitational waves can't get reabsorbed very easily so it would just take much longer for stars to form, probably like 10^15 years or something big but stars can still form eventually right?  

---

