<p>The probably most advanced system for determination of parallaxes is <a href="http://www.astro.lu.se/~david/posters/UweLammers.pdf" rel="noreferrer">AGIS</a> as used for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_%28spacecraft%29" rel="noreferrer">Gaia</a>. It's able to go far beyond the angular resolution of the telescopes. Angular resolution is just one parameter.</p>

<p>Actually it's just necessary to determine the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity" rel="noreferrer">luminosity</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centroid" rel="noreferrer">centroids</a> of the stars, almost independent of the resolution of the telescopes. That's mainly a statistical challenge, and it is especially dependent of the image noise, the brightness of the star and the number of observations.</p>

<p>The calibration of the telescope and the determination of the luminosity centroids can be done in one solution algorithm.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-07T19:59:04.547Z
2014-01-07T19:59:04.547Z
Gerald
<p>Parallax measurement in practice is not as is explained above using the popular diagram you have used. The parallax causes the star to prescribe an ellipse in the sky, the semi-major axis of whose is equal to the parallactic angle. </p>

<p>The <strong>telescopes generally measure the shift in co-ordinates of star(RA and Dec)</strong> and then translate the information to that of the <a href="http://star-www.st-and.ac.uk/~fv/webnotes/chapt14.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ellipse</a> prescribed and determine the parallactic angle. Now, the <strong>ability of telescopes to note this change in RA and Dec is based on their least count, obviously which is dependent on their angular resolution.</strong></p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/2LA3K.png" alt="parallactic ellipse"></p>

<p>Hence, distance measurements using parallax method have their range based on the angular resolution of the telescope being used.</p>

<p><em>Image source:</em> <a href="http://documents.stsci.edu/hst/fgs/documents/handbooks/ihb_cycle16/c01_intro4.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://documents.stsci.edu/hst/fgs/documents/handbooks/ihb_cycle16/c01_intro4.html</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-01T16:45:37.503Z
I don't understand this answer. It doesn't explain why angular resolution is important or limiting.
ProfRob
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-07T15:49:16.140Z
Where TGM in that diagram means what?
Donald.McLean
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-07T23:15:40.917Z
@Donald.McLean It's Hubble Space Telescope's Two-Gyro Mode.
Image taken from this page : http://documents.stsci.edu/hst/fgs/documents/handbooks/ihb_cycle16/c01_intro4.html

They were demonstrating the porperties of the instrument, but gave a useful diagram for illustration.
Cheeku
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-08T14:30:45.650Z
Ahh. I'm familiar with Two Gyro Mode, but without any context for the diagram, I just didn't recognize it. Perhaps you could edit your answer to add some explanation?
Donald.McLean
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-08T14:49:38.813Z
StackExchange websites tend to be informative and descriptive, but they often drift. With all humility, I am against this, since the only thing I wanted to show in my diagram is the parallactic ellipse. The description of TGM, in my opinion, is not relevant. I am sorry and I hope you understand.
Cheeku
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-08T15:26:48.520Z
That's fine, but your answer should, at the very least, include proper attribution of the source of the picture.
Donald.McLean
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-01-09T01:28:42.787Z
@Donald.McLean Edited!
Cheeku
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-28T02:03:24.347Z
2014-01-09T01:29:57.183Z
2014-01-09T01:29:57.183Z
Cheeku
<p>We can often read in the scientific and also more casual reader literature and articles about the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution" rel="noreferrer">angular resolution</a> of various telescopes and other optical equipment, be it ground based or onboard space probes. They would often list their angular resolution, or in other words, their ability to resolve or distinguish small, distant objects with today's digital era mostly on a per sensor pixel basis.</p>

<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/hPakC.jpg" alt="parallax"></p>

<p><sup>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Finding a star's distance from its parallax. Trigonometric Parallax method determines distance to star by measuring<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;its slight shift in apparent position as seen from opposite ends of Earth's orbit. (Source: <a href="http://wwwhip.obspm.fr/heritage/hipparcos/SandT/hip-SandT.html" rel="noreferrer">Measuring the Universe</a>)</sup></p>

<p>What I'm interested in is, is the precision in measurements of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax" rel="noreferrer">parallax</a> and with it our ability to determine distance of observed objects directly analogous to mentioned radial resolution and how could it be calculated using data on angular resolution of a telescope alone, if we assume both ground based and in space observatories have more or less the same <a href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perihelion" rel="noreferrer">perihelion</a> to <a href="https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphelion" rel="noreferrer">aphelion</a> distance (i.e. the space observatory is in Earth's orbit).</p>

<observational-astronomy><distances><parallax><angular-resolution><astrometry>
How does angular resolution of a telescope translate to its parallax precision?
TildalWave
# How does angular resolution of a telescope translate to its parallax precision?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-09-27)

We can often read in the scientific and also more casual reader literature and articles about the [angular resolution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution) of various telescopes and other optical equipment, be it ground based or onboard space probes. They would often list their angular resolution, or in other words, their ability to resolve or distinguish small, distant objects with today's digital era mostly on a per sensor pixel basis.

![parallax](https://i.sstatic.net/hPakC.jpg)

Finding a star's distance from its parallax. Trigonometric Parallax method determines distance to star by measuring  
                its slight shift in apparent position as seen from opposite ends of Earth's orbit. (Source: [Measuring the Universe](http://wwwhip.obspm.fr/heritage/hipparcos/SandT/hip-SandT.html))

What I'm interested in is, is the precision in measurements of [parallax](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax) and with it our ability to determine distance of observed objects directly analogous to mentioned radial resolution and how could it be calculated using data on angular resolution of a telescope alone, if we assume both ground based and in space observatories have more or less the same [perihelion](https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perihelion) to [aphelion](https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphelion) distance (i.e. the space observatory is in Earth's orbit).

**Tags:** observational-astronomy, distances, parallax, angular-resolution, astrometry


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-09-28. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

Parallax measurement in practice is not as is explained above using the popular diagram you have used. The parallax causes the star to prescribe an ellipse in the sky, the semi-major axis of whose is equal to the parallactic angle.

The **telescopes generally measure the shift in co-ordinates of star(RA and Dec)** and then translate the information to that of the [ellipse](http://star-www.st-and.ac.uk/~fv/webnotes/chapt14.htm) prescribed and determine the parallactic angle. Now, the **ability of telescopes to note this change in RA and Dec is based on their least count, obviously which is dependent on their angular resolution.**

![parallactic ellipse](https://i.sstatic.net/2LA3K.png)

Hence, distance measurements using parallax method have their range based on the angular resolution of the telescope being used.

*Image source:* <http://documents.stsci.edu/hst/fgs/documents/handbooks/ihb_cycle16/c01_intro4.html>

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: Where TGM in that diagram means what?  
> **username_2**: @username_4 It's Hubble Space Telescope's Two-Gyro Mode. Image taken from this page : http://documents.stsci.edu/hst/fgs/documents/handbooks/ihb_cycle16/c01_intro4.html  They were demonstrating the porperties of the instrument, but gave a useful diagram for illustration.  
> **username_4**: Ahh. I'm familiar with Two Gyro Mode, but without any context for the diagram, I just didn't recognize it. Perhaps you could edit your answer to add some explanation?  
> **username_2**: StackExchange websites tend to be informative and descriptive, but they often drift. With all humility, I am against this, since the only thing I wanted to show in my diagram is the parallactic ellipse. The description of TGM, in my opinion, is not relevant. I am sorry and I hope you understand.  
> **username_4**: That's fine, but your answer should, at the very least, include proper attribution of the source of the picture.  
> **username_2**: @username_4 Edited!  
> **username_3**: I don't understand this answer. It doesn't explain why angular resolution is important or limiting.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2014-01-07. Score: 5

The probably most advanced system for determination of parallaxes is [AGIS](http://www.astro.lu.se/~david/posters/UweLammers.pdf) as used for [Gaia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_%28spacecraft%29). It's able to go far beyond the angular resolution of the telescopes. Angular resolution is just one parameter.

Actually it's just necessary to determine the [luminosity](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminosity) [centroids](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centroid) of the stars, almost independent of the resolution of the telescopes. That's mainly a statistical challenge, and it is especially dependent of the image noise, the brightness of the star and the number of observations.

The calibration of the telescope and the determination of the luminosity centroids can be done in one solution algorithm.


---

