<p>The size of a black hole is not defined by the expanse of its matter content but (usually) its event horizon.  The radius of the event horizon  (of a non-rotating and uncharged black hole) depends on the mass:</p>

<p>$$r_S = \frac{2 G M}{c^2}\\ \small M : \text{black hole mass} \\ \small G: \text{gravitational constant} \\ \small c : \text{speed of light} \\ \small r_S : \text{Schwarzschild radius}$$</p>

<p>Yes, the size of black holes as final stage of stellar evolution stems from the original star's mass, though some mass is ejected/radiated away during the supernova.</p>

<p>Black holes do grow (increasing $M$ and $r_S$) when they accrete matter from disks or companion stars.</p>

<p>Not all black holes we (kind of) observe are from stars: for example supermassive black holes in galactic centers, which can have <a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_87" rel="nofollow noreferrer">billions of solar masses</a>.  However, it is not yet fully understood, how they form. </p>

<p><strong>Note:</strong> The most common black hole descriptions actually don't include any matter.  They are defined in an empty spacetime except for one singular point that is usually interpreted to hold all the matter.  The mass of the black hole is then assigned by identifying the gravitational pull in the Newtonian approximation at some distant point. </p>

<p>How the interior of real, non-vacuum black holes looks like, is still up to discussion.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T20:10:41.467Z
2018-04-06T20:10:41.467Z
Hannes
<p>Black hole have different size eg intermediate mass black hole, supermassive black hole etc. Higher the mass of black hole, larger is the radius of event horizon. All black hole have infinite curvature of space-time at their centre (called singularity), but their ability to warps spacetime away from their respective centre large enough to not allow light to escape depends on their mass. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T18:37:13.357Z
2018-04-06T18:37:13.357Z
Gauti
<p>When the size of a black hole is mentioned, people are talking about the size of the event horizon surrounding the object, not anything about the singularity that might be within.</p>

<p>And since the size of a Schwarzschild black hole depends only on the mass, it's just a different way to describe the object based on the mass estimate.</p>

<p>The size (mass) of black holes is basically identical to the mass of the  infalling material.  In the case of stellar black holes, that would mostly be the stellar remnants that formed the hole initially.  For supermassive black holes, the process isn't clear, but it will have "consumed" significant amounts of mass after its creation.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T20:08:36.850Z
2018-04-06T20:08:36.850Z
BowlOfRed
<p>If the point in space that belongs to the collapsed star (that formed the black hole) is infinitely dense, why are black holes different sizes? Is it due to them feeding on stars and everything else that they swallow?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-07T08:13:57.653Z
See http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/19813/mass-of-black-holes-compared-to-parent-star If this is what your question is about, then it's a duplicate.
ProfRob
<black-hole>
Are black holes different sizes thanks to the different sized stars that created them?
Pete Duke
# Are black holes different sizes thanks to the different sized stars that created them?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-04-06)

If the point in space that belongs to the collapsed star (that formed the black hole) is infinitely dense, why are black holes different sizes? Is it due to them feeding on stars and everything else that they swallow?

**Tags:** black-hole

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: See http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/19813/mass-of-black-holes-compared-to-parent-star If this is what your question is about, then it's a duplicate.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-04-06. Score: 1

The size of a black hole is not defined by the expanse of its matter content but (usually) its event horizon. The radius of the event horizon (of a non-rotating and uncharged black hole) depends on the mass:

$$r\_S = \frac{2 G M}{c^2}\\ \small M : \text{black hole mass} \\ \small G: \text{gravitational constant} \\ \small c : \text{speed of light} \\ \small r\_S : \text{Schwarzschild radius}$$

Yes, the size of black holes as final stage of stellar evolution stems from the original star's mass, though some mass is ejected/radiated away during the supernova.

Black holes do grow (increasing $M$ and $r\_S$) when they accrete matter from disks or companion stars.

Not all black holes we (kind of) observe are from stars: for example supermassive black holes in galactic centers, which can have [billions of solar masses](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_87). However, it is not yet fully understood, how they form.

**Note:** The most common black hole descriptions actually don't include any matter. They are defined in an empty spacetime except for one singular point that is usually interpreted to hold all the matter. The mass of the black hole is then assigned by identifying the gravitational pull in the Newtonian approximation at some distant point.

How the interior of real, non-vacuum black holes looks like, is still up to discussion.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-04-06. Score: 0

Black hole have different size eg intermediate mass black hole, supermassive black hole etc. Higher the mass of black hole, larger is the radius of event horizon. All black hole have infinite curvature of space-time at their centre (called singularity), but their ability to warps spacetime away from their respective centre large enough to not allow light to escape depends on their mass.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-04-06. Score: 0

When the size of a black hole is mentioned, people are talking about the size of the event horizon surrounding the object, not anything about the singularity that might be within.

And since the size of a Schwarzschild black hole depends only on the mass, it's just a different way to describe the object based on the mass estimate.

The size (mass) of black holes is basically identical to the mass of the infalling material. In the case of stellar black holes, that would mostly be the stellar remnants that formed the hole initially. For supermassive black holes, the process isn't clear, but it will have "consumed" significant amounts of mass after its creation.


---

