<p>The physical difference between high- and low-mass X-ray binaries is that the latter has a donor star that fills its <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roche_lobe" rel="nofollow">Roche lobe</a>. Usually, the compact object is <em>more</em> massive than the donor star. Mass transfer occurs via Roche lobe overflow.</p>

<p>In high-mass X-ray binaries usually the donor star is more massive than the compact object and mass transfer is via a stellar wind.</p>

<p>The reason that a disc may form (in either case actually, but almost always for a LMXB) is that there is too much specific angular momentum (angular momentum per unit mass) in the accreted material to allow it to fall directly onto the compact object (angular momentum must be conserved). Broadly speaking, a condition for the formation of an accretion disc would be that the specific angular momentum of the accreted material exceeds the specific angular momentum of material in a Keplerian orbit at the surface of the compact object. The formation of an accretion disc would be favoured by short orbital periods or slower wind speeds. Material can then only be transferred onto the compact object as angular momentum is transferred outward by (possibly) viscous torques.</p>

<p>This simple picture is immensely complicated by the presence of any strong magnetic fields.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-09T09:53:45.730Z
if a black hole is much more massive than its companion O star, a disc may form?  There may be a mixture zone(no pure disc, no pure wind) between wind and disc accretion? In some kind of circumstance, there should be no clear cut?
questionhang
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-09T08:45:53.210Z
2015-09-09T08:45:53.210Z
ProfRob
<p>High mass x-ray binaries necessarily accrete via wind, no disc accretion?</p>

<p>What makes the difference between a hmxb and a lmxb?</p>

<p>In what kind of circumstances does an accretion disc form?</p>

<p>How does it form?</p>

<p>When do we think there is a disc?</p>

<p>There is a clear cut between disc and wind accretion?</p>

<accretion><x-ray>
accretion discs in h/lmxbs
questionhang
# accretion discs in h/lmxbs

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-09-09)

High mass x-ray binaries necessarily accrete via wind, no disc accretion?

What makes the difference between a hmxb and a lmxb?

In what kind of circumstances does an accretion disc form?

How does it form?

When do we think there is a disc?

There is a clear cut between disc and wind accretion?

**Tags:** accretion, x-ray


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-09-09. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

The physical difference between high- and low-mass X-ray binaries is that the latter has a donor star that fills its [Roche lobe](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roche_lobe). Usually, the compact object is *more* massive than the donor star. Mass transfer occurs via Roche lobe overflow.

In high-mass X-ray binaries usually the donor star is more massive than the compact object and mass transfer is via a stellar wind.

The reason that a disc may form (in either case actually, but almost always for a LMXB) is that there is too much specific angular momentum (angular momentum per unit mass) in the accreted material to allow it to fall directly onto the compact object (angular momentum must be conserved). Broadly speaking, a condition for the formation of an accretion disc would be that the specific angular momentum of the accreted material exceeds the specific angular momentum of material in a Keplerian orbit at the surface of the compact object. The formation of an accretion disc would be favoured by short orbital periods or slower wind speeds. Material can then only be transferred onto the compact object as angular momentum is transferred outward by (possibly) viscous torques.

This simple picture is immensely complicated by the presence of any strong magnetic fields.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: if a black hole is much more massive than its companion O star, a disc may form?  There may be a mixture zone(no pure disc, no pure wind) between wind and disc accretion? In some kind of circumstance, there should be no clear cut?  

---

