<p>One star passes in front of another from our perspective. Instead of just blocking the light from the distant star, the light from the distant star that was previously directed to one side, the other side, above, below, - in fact all around the other star - is now bent by the influence of gravity from the nearby star on the photons. As a result, more photons end up heading our way than there were before.</p>

<p>What objects would cause this effect? A massive object passing in front of a star.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-25T00:37:20.033Z
2013-09-25T00:37:20.033Z
Jeremy
<p>Gravitational lensing is the bending of light by massive objects in between the observer (us), and a background source of light. It is a direct prediction of Einstein's theory of General Relativity, and was tested and confirmed by Sir Aurther Eddington during the famous <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_May_29,_1919" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Solar exlipse of May 29, 1919</a>, where the apparent position of a star very close to the sun was observed at a <em>different</em> location - the exact position was successfully predicted by GR.</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/I8GDI.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>There are many situations which can give rise to gravitational lensing. These regimes are:</p>

<p><strong>Strong Lensing</strong></p>

<p>Strong lensing is the most visually stunning form of gravitational lensing, and as its name suggests, requires an extremely massive object, and a good deal of alignment between the lens and the source. Galaxy clusters are the most common cause of strong gravitational lensing. Partial arcs, full arcs (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_ring" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Einstein rings</a>), and multiple images are all strong gravitational lensing features one can observe. Some of the most commonly studied objects producing strong gravitational lensing features are the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Abell_clusters" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Abell clusters</a>, the most famous of which is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abell_1689" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Abell 1689</a> (image below).</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/lbIvw.jpg" alt="Abell 1689"></p>

<p>Strong lensing features like arcs and rings are typically due to extended objects (like background galaxies which are not part of the cluster itself), and multiple-image (mostly quad-image systems) are typically objects like background quasars. </p>

<p><strong>Weak Lensing</strong></p>

<p>Weak gravitational lensing occurs much more frequently than strong lensing. Lenses can be clusters (in their outer regions), individual galaxies, or even large scale structure in the universe. Weak lensing is not a noticeable effect by eye, rather, it has to be done statistically. Ellipticities of a <em>field</em> of background galaxies are observed on a grid, and are statistically averaged together to create the weak lensing signal. Shape distortions of these background galaxies due to lensing are on the percent scale. One important assumption is made, however, and that is that galaxies' isophotes (lines of constant light) are elliptical, and their orientations are completely random. With that, any <em>net</em> tangential shearing produced is due to gravitational lensing. In the image below (from upper left to bottom right), the upper left frame shows an unlensed field of circular galaxies, and to its immediate right shows the effect of lensing. The image in the bottom right has added shape noise (a 'realistic' field of background galaxies), and to its right is how the field would lens.  </p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/jXnUj.png" alt="WL Field."></p>

<p>Lastly, higher order shape distortion effects, most notably <a href="http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~goldberg/flexion/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Flexion</a>, can produce the extended galaxy sources to not only shear, but to flex. This is currently a tough thing to measure.</p>

<p><strong>Microlensing</strong></p>

<p>Microlensing is a regime of lensing which is most common on the scale of the Milky Way galaxy. This can occur when background stars pass behind foreground stars. Microlensing is actually strong enough to produce multiple images of the background star, but since the image separations are so small (micro-arcsecond scale - hence the name), what we observe (since an angular resolution of a micro-arcsecond is tough to achieve)  is a change in the flux as the object moves into and out of alignment with the intermediate massive object. Interestingly, microlensing has actually proven useful in detecting planets around stellar lensing systems.</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/B75do.jpg" alt="Microlensing Planet"></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-26T14:18:49.667Z
2013-09-26T14:18:49.667Z
astromax
<p>What is the effect known as gravitational lensing? How does it work? What objects would be able to cause this effect?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-20T15:15:02.190Z
Related: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/92050/do-gravitational-lenses-have-a-focus-point
Chris Mueller
<light><gravity>
What is Gravitational Lensing?
damned truths
# What is Gravitational Lensing?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-09-25)

What is the effect known as gravitational lensing? How does it work? What objects would be able to cause this effect?

**Tags:** light, gravity

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Related: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/92050/do-gravitational-lenses-have-a-focus-point  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2013-09-26. Score: 12 | Accepted answer

Gravitational lensing is the bending of light by massive objects in between the observer (us), and a background source of light. It is a direct prediction of Einstein's theory of General Relativity, and was tested and confirmed by Sir Aurther Eddington during the famous [Solar exlipse of May 29, 1919](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_May_29,_1919), where the apparent position of a star very close to the sun was observed at a *different* location - the exact position was successfully predicted by GR.

![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/I8GDI.jpg)

There are many situations which can give rise to gravitational lensing. These regimes are:

**Strong Lensing**

Strong lensing is the most visually stunning form of gravitational lensing, and as its name suggests, requires an extremely massive object, and a good deal of alignment between the lens and the source. Galaxy clusters are the most common cause of strong gravitational lensing. Partial arcs, full arcs ([Einstein rings](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_ring)), and multiple images are all strong gravitational lensing features one can observe. Some of the most commonly studied objects producing strong gravitational lensing features are the [Abell clusters](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Abell_clusters), the most famous of which is [Abell 1689](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abell_1689) (image below).

![Abell 1689](https://i.sstatic.net/lbIvw.jpg)

Strong lensing features like arcs and rings are typically due to extended objects (like background galaxies which are not part of the cluster itself), and multiple-image (mostly quad-image systems) are typically objects like background quasars.

**Weak Lensing**

Weak gravitational lensing occurs much more frequently than strong lensing. Lenses can be clusters (in their outer regions), individual galaxies, or even large scale structure in the universe. Weak lensing is not a noticeable effect by eye, rather, it has to be done statistically. Ellipticities of a *field* of background galaxies are observed on a grid, and are statistically averaged together to create the weak lensing signal. Shape distortions of these background galaxies due to lensing are on the percent scale. One important assumption is made, however, and that is that galaxies' isophotes (lines of constant light) are elliptical, and their orientations are completely random. With that, any *net* tangential shearing produced is due to gravitational lensing. In the image below (from upper left to bottom right), the upper left frame shows an unlensed field of circular galaxies, and to its immediate right shows the effect of lensing. The image in the bottom right has added shape noise (a 'realistic' field of background galaxies), and to its right is how the field would lens.

![WL Field.](https://i.sstatic.net/jXnUj.png)

Lastly, higher order shape distortion effects, most notably [Flexion](http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~goldberg/flexion/), can produce the extended galaxy sources to not only shear, but to flex. This is currently a tough thing to measure.

**Microlensing**

Microlensing is a regime of lensing which is most common on the scale of the Milky Way galaxy. This can occur when background stars pass behind foreground stars. Microlensing is actually strong enough to produce multiple images of the background star, but since the image separations are so small (micro-arcsecond scale - hence the name), what we observe (since an angular resolution of a micro-arcsecond is tough to achieve) is a change in the flux as the object moves into and out of alignment with the intermediate massive object. Interestingly, microlensing has actually proven useful in detecting planets around stellar lensing systems.

![Microlensing Planet](https://i.sstatic.net/B75do.jpg)


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-09-25. Score: 5

One star passes in front of another from our perspective. Instead of just blocking the light from the distant star, the light from the distant star that was previously directed to one side, the other side, above, below, - in fact all around the other star - is now bent by the influence of gravity from the nearby star on the photons. As a result, more photons end up heading our way than there were before.

What objects would cause this effect? A massive object passing in front of a star.


---

