<p>Short answer is that no one knows, there's too much margin for error.</p>
<p>There is too much margin for error, just in the Earth's rotation.  The Earth does not rotate at a constant rate, partly due to the Moon's affects on Earth.  These variations are quite unpredictable and even the Five Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses has a link to <a href="https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/deltaT.html" rel="noreferrer">challenges with delta T</a>.</p>
<p>Just in the past 50 years, there have been 27 <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second" rel="noreferrer">Leap Seconds</a> added, and at unpredictable intervals.  Since the Earth's orientation can't be predicted accurately, instead, the IERS publishes <a href="https://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/Bulletins/bulletins.html" rel="noreferrer">daily bulletins</a> of the Earth Orientation Parameters based on actual observations, and predicts leap seconds just 6 months in advance.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/moon-mars/a27824/when-is-last-total-solar-eclipse/" rel="noreferrer">This article</a> cites Jean Meeus' (one of the FMCSE authors) book where he states the last solar eclipse will be in about 1.2 billion years.  But, reading the book, he uses a lot of averages and even he states it's <em>doubtful</em> the recession rate he used for the Moon would stay constant.  So the error margin, just in when the last solar eclipse will happen, is likely hundreds of millions of years off.</p>
<p>The length of a day is 86,400 seconds.  We currently can't predict the Earth's rotation to better than 1 second even a few years in advance, but if we were to assume we could do it out to infinity with an error margin of just on in every 10 years, the error margin would be one full rotation of the Earth in just 864,000 years.</p>
<p>So, not knowing when the last Solar Eclipse will be to within just 1M years would make it a total crap shoot.  And the reality is we don't know even within 100M years, nor can we predict changes in Earth's rotation even a few years in advance.</p>
<p>Meeus also has a book on Solar Eclipses (currently unavailable, but should be available within the next month at <a href="https://shopatsky.com/" rel="noreferrer">shopatsky</a>).  If you look at the <a href="https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsearch/SEdata.php?Ecl=20240408" rel="noreferrer">data page</a> of an eclipse in the FMCSE, you'll see he provides a <span class="math-container">$ \Delta T$</span> estimate that was used to produce the catalog.  In the book he shows how to apply an updated <span class="math-container">$\Delta T$</span> to produce more accurate results as it gets closer to eclipse time.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T04:02:13.267Z
https://sunearthday.nasa.gov/2006/faq.php says the last total solar eclipse is in ~600 million years, but doesn't give any calculation or reference.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T04:14:30.850Z
FWIW, for the year -4000, Espenak https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/uncertainty2004.html gives an uncertainty of longitude of 67.9°
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T07:31:05.460Z
This does not address the question asked at all. I think you misunderstood what was asked.
TimRias
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T11:59:18.190Z
Respectfully, this really does not answer my question. Check @jpa's answer to better understand the point of my question. I'm aware predicting future eclipses and guessing ones in the past is bound to have some inaccuracies, but just using the data provided, even if inaccurate, should still provide interesting results.
user177107
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T13:00:55.637Z
@user177107, if you are expecting assumptions to be made, you should specify that in your question.
Greg Miller
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T03:31:02.177Z
2022-11-08T03:31:02.177Z
Greg Miller
<p>Here is a combination of the maps available from <a href="https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEatlas/SEatlas.html" rel="noreferrer">NASA SEAtlas</a>. They cover time span from year 2001 to 3000. Made with a custom <a href="https://gist.github.com/PetteriAimonen/b83ed3cc1b5e087c4aac23af61ca7f11" rel="noreferrer">Python script</a> and some editing in GIMP.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/dtOpw.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/dtOpw.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>The yellow to blue colors mark the time of the next total solar eclipse by location. A red or light blue color marks the areas that do not experience a total eclipse by year 3000.</p>
<p>There are many such areas without eclipse, so based on this data it is not possible to say which will be the last one. There is no clear pattern so it is likely that computational accuracy and the definition of total vs. annular vs. 99% eclipse would affect the answer also.</p>
<p>Here is a map on the number of total eclipses per area in the whole 5000 year dataset:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/fpJCO.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/fpJCO.png" alt="Number of total solar eclipses by geographical location" /></a></p>
<p>There are three tiny areas with no eclipses. One is near the border of Brazil and Bolivia, one in north Zimbabwe and one in south Kongo.  I have hilighted them in red.</p>
<p>For some reason the southern hemisphere seems to have less total eclipses on average. An explanation may be in <a href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/595934/58997">this answer</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T11:57:55.273Z
This is great and definitely a partial answer to what I had in mind. I wonder if all places on Earth will have experienced a total solar eclispe if the starting date is taken as -1999.
user177107
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T12:31:18.430Z
@user177107 I added a map on the count of eclipses.
jpa
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-27T00:26:57.250Z
Could you provide the script for counting the eclipses in each place?
WordP
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-27T13:28:54.023Z
@WordP the link to the script is in first paragraph.
jpa
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-27T18:33:17.400Z
@jpa that link doesn't count the number of eclipses in each place like your second image, it only combines the eclipse images to form something similar to your first image.
WordP
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-10-28T07:44:11.857Z
@WordP Ah, sorry, missed that - I added the second script to the same link now. It should make the basic image, I have done some post-editing in GIMP manually.
jpa
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T10:22:04.320Z
2022-11-08T12:36:30.220Z
2022-11-08T12:36:30.220Z
jpa
<p>All coordinates on Earth are equally likely to experience a solar eclipse, so it's just a matter of luck where the Moon's shadow happens to fall. But <em><strong>some</strong></em> place has to draw the short straw and be the last in line to experience a total solar eclipse. My question is: where is that place exactly?</p>
<p>The <a href="https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEpubs/5MCSE.html" rel="noreferrer">Five Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses</a> lists all solar eclipses (of any kind) occuring from the years -1999 to +3000. Yes, there's bound to be some inaccuracies, but this is NASA data and you're not particularly gonna get better than that.</p>
<p>Using that data, I'm sure someone smarter than me could gradually highlight all the total eclipses' umbral shadow paths until all but one spot on Earth's surface is covered. Maybe there's a better way to reach the result, but I think I got my point across.</p>
<p>P.S: There is the possibility that even after all the total eclipses from 2000 to 3000, multiple random places would still be uncovered. In which case I think starting from an earlier point would be wise.</p>
<p>Edit: I feel the need to clarify my question a bit. I am <em>not</em> asking about the last solar eclipse that will happen due to the Moon receding from the Earth.</p>
<p>Imagine you had a world map in front of you, and you accurately highlighted the path of totality of every total solar eclipse one by one starting from a certain date. Gradually, almost all the map would be filled as more and more eclipses cover more ground until only a few spots remain. My question is, where are these few unlucky spots that don't get to experience a total solar eclipse?</p>
<p>The starting point doesn't necessarily have to be the beginning of the 21st century. The data I linked covers all eclipses from the years -1999 to +3000. That is 5 millennia worth of eclipses.</p>
<p>After all these millennia have passed, which spots, if any, will remain uncovered on the world map and never experience a total solar eclipse during that time frame?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T07:59:22.130Z
I can see two ways to interpret this question, but it doesn't seem clear which one is intended - it would be great to clarify which it is. (1) For the last total solar eclipse that will _ever_ occur on Earth, what location will be the last to experience it? (2) For each location on Earth, if we calculate the time between now and when that location next gets to experience a total solar eclipse, what location will have the longest time?
David Z
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T11:55:29.467Z
@DavidZ Neither. My question really is just which place on earth is going to be last in line to experience a total solar eclispe. Not the last one *ever*, just the last chronologically.
user177107
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T11:59:59.843Z
I think there's an unacknowledged assumption in the question: just because all co-ordinates are *equally likely* to experience an eclipse, that doesn't mean that all co-ordinates will, within any finite time, experience one. Depending on how you define "total", the number of locations which experience each eclipse may be quite a small proportion of the Earth's surface, so it's like buying the same lottery numbers every week: you might have to wait for millions of draws before they come up, even if others come up more than once. I suspect 1000 years is nowhere near enough lottery tickets.
IMSoP
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T12:01:47.800Z
@IMSoP yes, that is true. Even if the paths of all total solar eclispes occurring from the years -1999 to 3000 are merged on a world map, there might still be multiple spots remaining that have never experienced one. I'm just curious as to where they are.
user177107
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-08T12:16:33.120Z
@user177107 What I'm saying is that "multiple spots" might be a massive understatement; it might be that *the majority of the Earth's surface* won't experience a *total* eclipse within a period as short as a few thousand years.
IMSoP
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-09T04:20:46.550Z
@user177107 (4 comments up) Unfortunately that doesn't help me understand what you're asking at all. What exactly do you mean by "last in line to experience a total solar eclipse"? Like, how is this line defined? What does "last one chronologically" mean to you, if not the last one ever? (are you by chance from a different universe with multiple time dimensions? :-P just kidding, of course, but I am confused)
David Z
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-09T07:08:39.163Z
@DavidZ Probably the last place to experience its first solar eclipse. When all places finally experienced an eclipse, where was the last place that was missing one. But the formulation is not very clear.
Vladimir F Героям слава
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-11-09T10:44:52.197Z
By my reading, the asker does in fact mean "if we calculate the time between now and when that location next gets to experience a total solar eclipse, what location will have the longest time," and they were mistaken in answering your question with "neither."
Sophie Swett
<solar-eclipse>
Counting from the 21st century forward, what place on Earth will be last to experience a total solar eclipse?
user177107
# Counting from the 21st century forward, what place on Earth will be last to experience a total solar eclipse?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-11-07)

All coordinates on Earth are equally likely to experience a solar eclipse, so it's just a matter of luck where the Moon's shadow happens to fall. But ***some*** place has to draw the short straw and be the last in line to experience a total solar eclipse. My question is: where is that place exactly?

The [Five Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses](https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEpubs/5MCSE.html) lists all solar eclipses (of any kind) occuring from the years -1999 to +3000. Yes, there's bound to be some inaccuracies, but this is NASA data and you're not particularly gonna get better than that.

Using that data, I'm sure someone smarter than me could gradually highlight all the total eclipses' umbral shadow paths until all but one spot on Earth's surface is covered. Maybe there's a better way to reach the result, but I think I got my point across.

P.S: There is the possibility that even after all the total eclipses from 2000 to 3000, multiple random places would still be uncovered. In which case I think starting from an earlier point would be wise.

Edit: I feel the need to clarify my question a bit. I am *not* asking about the last solar eclipse that will happen due to the Moon receding from the Earth.

Imagine you had a world map in front of you, and you accurately highlighted the path of totality of every total solar eclipse one by one starting from a certain date. Gradually, almost all the map would be filled as more and more eclipses cover more ground until only a few spots remain. My question is, where are these few unlucky spots that don't get to experience a total solar eclipse?

The starting point doesn't necessarily have to be the beginning of the 21st century. The data I linked covers all eclipses from the years -1999 to +3000. That is 5 millennia worth of eclipses.

After all these millennia have passed, which spots, if any, will remain uncovered on the world map and never experience a total solar eclipse during that time frame?

**Tags:** solar-eclipse

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I can see two ways to interpret this question, but it doesn't seem clear which one is intended - it would be great to clarify which it is. (1) For the last total solar eclipse that will _ever_ occur on Earth, what location will be the last to experience it? (2) For each location on Earth, if we calculate the time between now and when that location next gets to experience a total solar eclipse, what location will have the longest time?  
> **username_0**: @username_1 Neither. My question really is just which place on earth is going to be last in line to experience a total solar eclispe. Not the last one *ever*, just the last chronologically.  
> **username_2**: I think there's an unacknowledged assumption in the question: just because all co-ordinates are *equally likely* to experience an eclipse, that doesn't mean that all co-ordinates will, within any finite time, experience one. Depending on how you define "total", the number of locations which experience each eclipse may be quite a small proportion of the Earth's surface, so it's like buying the same lottery numbers every week: you might have to wait for millions of draws before they come up, even if others come up more than once. I suspect 1000 years is nowhere near enough lottery tickets.  
> **username_0**: @username_2 yes, that is true. Even if the paths of all total solar eclispes occurring from the years -1999 to 3000 are merged on a world map, there might still be multiple spots remaining that have never experienced one. I'm just curious as to where they are.  
> **username_2**: @username_0 What I'm saying is that "multiple spots" might be a massive understatement; it might be that *the majority of the Earth's surface* won't experience a *total* eclipse within a period as short as a few thousand years.  
> **username_1**: @username_0 (4 comments up) Unfortunately that doesn't help me understand what you're asking at all. What exactly do you mean by "last in line to experience a total solar eclipse"? Like, how is this line defined? What does "last one chronologically" mean to you, if not the last one ever? (are you by chance from a different universe with multiple time dimensions? :-P just kidding, of course, but I am confused)  
> **username_3**: @username_1 Probably the last place to experience its first solar eclipse. When all places finally experienced an eclipse, where was the last place that was missing one. But the formulation is not very clear.  
> **username_4**: By my reading, the asker does in fact mean "if we calculate the time between now and when that location next gets to experience a total solar eclipse, what location will have the longest time," and they were mistaken in answering your question with "neither."  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_8 on 2022-11-08. Score: 47 | Accepted answer

Here is a combination of the maps available from [NASA SEAtlas](https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEatlas/SEatlas.html). They cover time span from year 2001 to 3000. Made with a custom [Python script](https://gist.github.com/PetteriAimonen/b83ed3cc1b5e087c4aac23af61ca7f11) and some editing in GIMP.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/dtOpw.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/dtOpw.png)

The yellow to blue colors mark the time of the next total solar eclipse by location. A red or light blue color marks the areas that do not experience a total eclipse by year 3000.

There are many such areas without eclipse, so based on this data it is not possible to say which will be the last one. There is no clear pattern so it is likely that computational accuracy and the definition of total vs. annular vs. 99% eclipse would affect the answer also.

Here is a map on the number of total eclipses per area in the whole 5000 year dataset:

[![Number of total solar eclipses by geographical location](https://i.sstatic.net/fpJCO.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/fpJCO.png)

There are three tiny areas with no eclipses. One is near the border of Brazil and Bolivia, one in north Zimbabwe and one in south Kongo. I have hilighted them in red.

For some reason the southern hemisphere seems to have less total eclipses on average. An explanation may be in [this answer](https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/595934/58997).

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: This is great and definitely a partial answer to what I had in mind. I wonder if all places on Earth will have experienced a total solar eclispe if the starting date is taken as -1999.  
> **username_8**: @username_0 I added a map on the count of eclipses.  
> **username_9**: Could you provide the script for counting the eclipses in each place?  
> **username_8**: @username_9 the link to the script is in first paragraph.  
> **username_9**: @username_8 that link doesn't count the number of eclipses in each place like your second image, it only combines the eclipse images to form something similar to your first image.  
> **username_8**: @username_9 Ah, sorry, missed that - I added the second script to the same link now. It should make the basic image, I have done some post-editing in GIMP manually.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2022-11-08. Score: 17

Short answer is that no one knows, there's too much margin for error.

There is too much margin for error, just in the Earth's rotation. The Earth does not rotate at a constant rate, partly due to the Moon's affects on Earth. These variations are quite unpredictable and even the Five Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses has a link to [challenges with delta T](https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/deltaT.html).

Just in the past 50 years, there have been 27 [Leap Seconds](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second) added, and at unpredictable intervals. Since the Earth's orientation can't be predicted accurately, instead, the IERS publishes [daily bulletins](https://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/Bulletins/bulletins.html) of the Earth Orientation Parameters based on actual observations, and predicts leap seconds just 6 months in advance.

[This article](https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/moon-mars/a27824/when-is-last-total-solar-eclipse/) cites Jean Meeus' (one of the FMCSE authors) book where he states the last solar eclipse will be in about 1.2 billion years. But, reading the book, he uses a lot of averages and even he states it's *doubtful* the recession rate he used for the Moon would stay constant. So the error margin, just in when the last solar eclipse will happen, is likely hundreds of millions of years off.

The length of a day is 86,400 seconds. We currently can't predict the Earth's rotation to better than 1 second even a few years in advance, but if we were to assume we could do it out to infinity with an error margin of just on in every 10 years, the error margin would be one full rotation of the Earth in just 864,000 years.

So, not knowing when the last Solar Eclipse will be to within just 1M years would make it a total crap shoot. And the reality is we don't know even within 100M years, nor can we predict changes in Earth's rotation even a few years in advance.

Meeus also has a book on Solar Eclipses (currently unavailable, but should be available within the next month at [shopatsky](https://shopatsky.com/)). If you look at the [data page](https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsearch/SEdata.php?Ecl=20240408) of an eclipse in the FMCSE, you'll see he provides a $ \Delta T$ estimate that was used to produce the catalog. In the book he shows how to apply an updated $\Delta T$ to produce more accurate results as it gets closer to eclipse time.

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: https://sunearthday.nasa.gov/2006/faq.php says the last total solar eclipse is in ~600 million years, but doesn't give any calculation or reference.  
> **username_6**: FWIW, for the year -4000, Espenak https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/uncertainty2004.html gives an uncertainty of longitude of 67.9°  
> **username_7**: This does not address the question asked at all. I think you misunderstood what was asked.  
> **username_0**: Respectfully, this really does not answer my question. Check @username_8's answer to better understand the point of my question. I'm aware predicting future eclipses and guessing ones in the past is bound to have some inaccuracies, but just using the data provided, even if inaccurate, should still provide interesting results.  
> **username_5**: @username_0, if you are expecting assumptions to be made, you should specify that in your question.  

---

