<p>There are two substantial (~650 entries) glitch databases I'm aware of, <a href="https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/%7Epulsar/glitches.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">one maintained by Jodrell Bank</a> and <a href="https://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/pulsar/psrcat/glitchTbl.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">one maintained as part of the ATNF's pulsar catalog</a>. Both list similar information for each glitch, including the glitch MJD (with ATNF's values sometimes being more precise) and the fractional changes in spin frequency and frequency derivative. References are listed for each entry if you need more information. The databases unsurprisingly overlap (~473 entries, by a count with a quick script), but neither is totally complete.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-04-03T20:26:28.193Z
fyi I've just asked [What are the main ways that pulsar "glitches" are noticed and documented? Do they have to be caught in the act of glitching to be catalogued?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/48994/7982)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-04-03T16:08:56.870Z
2022-04-03T20:43:30.740Z
2022-04-03T20:43:30.740Z
HDE 226868
<p>Besides listing which pulsars have ever actually glitched, it would hopefully also include some historical data on their periods before and after they glitched.</p>

<pulsar>
Is there any well-populated list or database of pulsar "glitches"?
bigjosh
# Is there any well-populated list or database of pulsar "glitches"?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-04-03)

Besides listing which pulsars have ever actually glitched, it would hopefully also include some historical data on their periods before and after they glitched.

**Tags:** pulsar


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-04-03. Score: 7 | Accepted answer

There are two substantial (~650 entries) glitch databases I'm aware of, [one maintained by Jodrell Bank](https://www.jb.man.ac.uk/%7Epulsar/glitches.html) and [one maintained as part of the ATNF's pulsar catalog](https://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/pulsar/psrcat/glitchTbl.html). Both list similar information for each glitch, including the glitch MJD (with ATNF's values sometimes being more precise) and the fractional changes in spin frequency and frequency derivative. References are listed for each entry if you need more information. The databases unsurprisingly overlap (~473 entries, by a count with a quick script), but neither is totally complete.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: fyi I've just asked [What are the main ways that pulsar "glitches" are noticed and documented? Do they have to be caught in the act of glitching to be catalogued?](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/48994/7982)  

---

