<blockquote>
<p>From whence is the Event Horizon Telescope black hole data available for amateur reconstruction?</p>
<p>So I'm wondering what kind of data is available that would allow someone to reconstruct their own EHT image?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In the CalTech video <a href="https://youtu.be/glfON286APE?t=1545" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Imaging the Unseen: Taking the First Picture of a Black Hole - Katie Bouman - 6/7/2019</a>  which I just found <a href="https://space.stackexchange.com/q/37663/12102">in this question</a>, after about <code>25:45</code> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Bouman" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Dr. Katie Bouman</a> says (edited from closed captions):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>So we collected five petabytes of data during that time... and a little less than a petabyte was for M87... but actually what we use for imaging; we don’t work with the petabytes of data.</p>
<p>This is reduced down through a process of correlation and a calibration stage that initially it’s at petabytes, then it goes to terabytes, <strong>then eventually what we use for imaging is in the megabytes range, where you can just email the file. And you can actually download it online now. We have all of the data online that we use for imaging and you can try to make your own image...</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>It seems that the MB sized raw data is available <a href="http://datacommons.cyverse.org/browse/iplant/home/shared/commons_repo/curated/EHTC_FirstM87Results_Apr2019" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>, found on the EHT website <a href="https://eventhorizontelescope.org/for-astronomers/data" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> per <a href="https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/32561/from-whence-is-the-event-horizon-telescope-black-hole-data-available-for-amateur#comment60017_32561">@PeterErwin's comment</a>.</p>
<p>More information is available at <a href="https://github.com/eventhorizontelescope/2019-D01-02" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/eventhorizontelescope/2019-D01-02</a></p>
<p>One can only speculate on how the tweeted image was generated, but luckily that wasn't the question.</p>
<p>A sample of a random selection of the text files begins with:</p>
<pre><code># SRC:M87 DATE(MJD):57849 FREQ:227.0707GHz
# time(UTC)      T1     T2   U(lambda)        V(lambda)         Iamp(Jy)    Iphase(d)   Isigma(Jy)
00.86805555      AA     PV  -4396973056.0000  -4510950912.0000  0.13778746    178.1494  0.00382148
00.87083334      AA     PV  -4397497344.0000  -4511639040.0000  0.13610664   -179.6852  0.00413867
00.87361112      AA     PV  -4398009344.0000  -4512314368.0000  0.13498885    179.0204  0.00400464
00.87638891      AA     PV  -4398538752.0000  -4513015296.0000  0.13268795    179.9253  0.00369624
[...]
</code></pre>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-25T07:55:19.600Z
2019-07-25T08:39:59.570Z
2020-06-17T09:47:40.653Z
uhoh
<p>Ralf Vandebergh's <a href="https://twitter.com/ralfvandebergh/status/1116090016873238529" rel="nofollow noreferrer">tweet</a> shows his own reconstruction of an image of the accretion disk around a black hole, generated presumably from Event Horizon Telescope data.</p>

<p>I'm assuming that the data came from a publicly available source, but I don't know for sure. That would make sense, they used two completely independent groups to reconstruct the images to cross-check each other before they were published, because with so few of the telescopes in the array recording data at any one time, the reconstruction took a bit of artistic license or "filling in". </p>

<p>Since the <em>raw data</em> is huge, boxes and boxes of hard drives with high speed digital recording of GHz rate ADC conversions, I don't think there's an ftp site for the actual raw data. And since calibrations and baselining is pretty complicated, it would be hard to reconstruct.</p>

<p>So I'm wondering what kind of data is available that would allow someone to reconstruct their own EHT image?</p>

<p>FYI Ralf Vandebergh's astrophotography can be found in links within <a href="https://photo.stackexchange.com/q/109370/50110">Why exactly do “CMOS astrophotographers” prefer CMOS sensors?</a></p>

<hr>

<p>From <a href="https://twitter.com/ralfvandebergh/status/1116090016873238529" rel="nofollow noreferrer">tweet</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This is one of my processings of the #blackhole #EHTBlackHole first ever image. @RHdijkgraaf @govertschilling @NASAblueshift @ehtelescope @jordydavelaar @UofA @perimeter @smithsonian @TheNRAO @PhysicsWorld</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/gkJFE.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/gkJFEm.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a> click for larger</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-07T09:21:41.927Z
My reading of the tweet is that he did image processing. He didn't do reconstruction.
James K
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-07T14:09:42.150Z
@JamesK I think it may be something like that. Do you think he just took the image released to the public and processed it further? In that case it's not particularly interesting at all. Everyone's computer has a "sharpen" feature somewhere.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-07T17:51:54.417Z
If you look at the (tiny) annotations at the bottom, the left one says, "Original", and the right one says, "Processing Ralf Vandebergh". So I agree with James K -- he just applied some tweaks to the publicly released color image.
Peter Erwin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-07T17:54:35.413Z
For what it's worth, you can find links to at least some of the pipeline-processed VLBI data here:
https://eventhorizontelescope.org/for-astronomers/data
Peter Erwin
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-07T21:04:36.097Z
@PeterErwin oh that looks interesting! I wonder if I start clicking on those links if I'll be able to get anything else done this week, or if my productivity will fall into an event horizon as well?
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-25T07:56:43.403Z
@PeterErwin I had a brush with the photon sphere [but somehow emerged](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/32786/7982), thanks for your help!
uhoh
<radio-astronomy><data-analysis><event-horizon-telescope>
From whence is the Event Horizon Telescope black hole data available for amateur reconstruction?
uhoh
# From whence is the Event Horizon Telescope black hole data available for amateur reconstruction?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-07-07)

Ralf Vandebergh's [tweet](https://twitter.com/ralfvandebergh/status/1116090016873238529) shows his own reconstruction of an image of the accretion disk around a black hole, generated presumably from Event Horizon Telescope data.

I'm assuming that the data came from a publicly available source, but I don't know for sure. That would make sense, they used two completely independent groups to reconstruct the images to cross-check each other before they were published, because with so few of the telescopes in the array recording data at any one time, the reconstruction took a bit of artistic license or "filling in".

Since the *raw data* is huge, boxes and boxes of hard drives with high speed digital recording of GHz rate ADC conversions, I don't think there's an ftp site for the actual raw data. And since calibrations and baselining is pretty complicated, it would be hard to reconstruct.

So I'm wondering what kind of data is available that would allow someone to reconstruct their own EHT image?

FYI Ralf Vandebergh's astrophotography can be found in links within [Why exactly do “CMOS astrophotographers” prefer CMOS sensors?](https://photo.stackexchange.com/q/109370/50110)

---

From [tweet](https://twitter.com/ralfvandebergh/status/1116090016873238529):

> This is one of my processings of the #blackhole #EHTBlackHole first ever image. @RHdijkgraaf @govertschilling @NASAblueshift @ehtelescope @jordydavelaar @UofA @perimeter @smithsonian @TheNRAO @PhysicsWorld

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/gkJFEm.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/gkJFE.jpg) click for larger

**Tags:** radio-astronomy, data-analysis, event-horizon-telescope

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: My reading of the tweet is that he did image processing. He didn't do reconstruction.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 I think it may be something like that. Do you think he just took the image released to the public and processed it further? In that case it's not particularly interesting at all. Everyone's computer has a "sharpen" feature somewhere.  
> **username_2**: If you look at the (tiny) annotations at the bottom, the left one says, "Original", and the right one says, "Processing Ralf Vandebergh". So I agree with username_1 -- he just applied some tweaks to the publicly released color image.  
> **username_2**: For what it's worth, you can find links to at least some of the pipeline-processed VLBI data here: https://eventhorizontelescope.org/for-astronomers/data  
> **username_0**: @username_2 oh that looks interesting! I wonder if I start clicking on those links if I'll be able to get anything else done this week, or if my productivity will fall into an event horizon as well?  
> **username_0**: @username_2 I had a brush with the photon sphere [but somehow emerged](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/32786/7982), thanks for your help!  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_0 on 2019-07-25. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

> From whence is the Event Horizon Telescope black hole data available for amateur reconstruction?
>
> So I'm wondering what kind of data is available that would allow someone to reconstruct their own EHT image?

In the CalTech video [Imaging the Unseen: Taking the First Picture of a Black Hole - Katie Bouman - 6/7/2019](https://youtu.be/glfON286APE?t=1545) which I just found [in this question](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/37663/12102), after about `25:45` [Dr. Katie Bouman](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Bouman) says (edited from closed captions):

> So we collected five petabytes of data during that time... and a little less than a petabyte was for M87... but actually what we use for imaging; we don’t work with the petabytes of data.
>
> This is reduced down through a process of correlation and a calibration stage that initially it’s at petabytes, then it goes to terabytes, **then eventually what we use for imaging is in the megabytes range, where you can just email the file. And you can actually download it online now. We have all of the data online that we use for imaging and you can try to make your own image...**

It seems that the MB sized raw data is available [here](http://datacommons.cyverse.org/browse/iplant/home/shared/commons_repo/curated/EHTC_FirstM87Results_Apr2019), found on the EHT website [here](https://eventhorizontelescope.org/for-astronomers/data) per [@username_2's comment](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/32561/from-whence-is-the-event-horizon-telescope-black-hole-data-available-for-amateur#comment60017_32561).

More information is available at <https://github.com/eventhorizontelescope/2019-D01-02>

One can only speculate on how the tweeted image was generated, but luckily that wasn't the question.

A sample of a random selection of the text files begins with:

```
# SRC:M87 DATE(MJD):57849 FREQ:227.0707GHz
# time(UTC)      T1     T2   U(lambda)        V(lambda)         Iamp(Jy)    Iphase(d)   Isigma(Jy)
00.86805555      AA     PV  -4396973056.0000  -4510950912.0000  0.13778746    178.1494  0.00382148
00.87083334      AA     PV  -4397497344.0000  -4511639040.0000  0.13610664   -179.6852  0.00413867
00.87361112      AA     PV  -4398009344.0000  -4512314368.0000  0.13498885    179.0204  0.00400464
00.87638891      AA     PV  -4398538752.0000  -4513015296.0000  0.13268795    179.9253  0.00369624
[...]

```


---

