<p>The baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) have a present-day scale $\sim 100 h^{-1}$ Mpc.  This has little or nothing to do with the appearance of voids, which appear predominantly on scales of $\sim 20h^{-1}$ Mpc. and below.  The BAO scale is only detected in the galaxy distribution by correlation analysis and does not manifest itself by mere visual inspection, unlike the voids, filaments and clusters that dominate the appearance of the cosmic web.  If anything, the voids scales are determined by the velocity field power spectrum, which is to be expected in light of the way the Zel'dovich approximation works (as explained in the movie I referred to).</p>

<p>I would have added this as a comment to the post except that I have insufficient reputation and so this is the only way I can make the point.  Apologies are offered if they are in order.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-14T21:04:00.303Z
2015-04-14T21:04:00.303Z
JonesTheAstronomer
<p>You might like to watch this short movie from one of the authorities on this subject:
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI12X2zczqI" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI12X2zczqI</a></p>

<p>The movie starts by answering the question "what is the cosmic web and what does it look like?".  Simulations can reproduce such structures, but they do not explain "why" they look the way they do.  The clue lies in the geometric appearance of the structures: The voids resemble the elements of a Voronoi tessellation in which the walls of the Voronoi polyhedra intersect in lines that are identified with the filaments.  We need to understand the dynamics that generated this pattern.</p>

<p>At around 2:30 the movie addresses the issue of why it looks the way it does using a simple ballistic model for the motion of a set of discrete particles that represent a random density field (the Zel'dovich model).  The filaments are there but too fuzzy.  So at ~3:00 it generalizes this so as to achieve greater realism by making the particles sticky.  This is the "adhesion model", which is governed by the Burgers-Hopf equation, which is easily solved by geometric means.  There is no gravity in this - it's ballistics acting on density field generated by a Gaussian Random process with a known covariance function (or power spectrum).</p>

<p>The adhesion model is a remarkable representation of the structure.  It shows how nothing "special" is required to generate the pattern of the cosmic web.  That's the "how".  </p>

<p>The "why does the structure look like it does?" is a little more complex: this is the question of emergent geometry which is understood in terms of the technical language of the Lagrangian description of the flow. But the graphics is pretty and quite didactic, so worth a look.  This happens after around 5:30.</p>

<p>The movie compares appearance of the flow simultaneously in both Lagrangian and Eulerian space.  In the Lagrangian picture the particles have fixed coordinates, </p>

<p>A short descriptive article goes with the movie:
<a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.1669v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.1669v1.pdf</a>
and a short explanatin of the Lagrangiuan view is at
<a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.5385v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.5385v1.pdf</a>
This is part of the thesis work of Johan Hidding from the Kapteyn Instutue in Groningen (supevisor Rien van de Weygaert - the father of the cosmic web according to Richard Bond).  A full presentation of the nature of the singularities in terms of Morse Theory is at 
<a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.7134v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.7134v1.pdf</a> 
and there are several other papers pending.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-08T03:09:44.470Z
Hello Jones, welcome to Astronomy! It may be helpful to include a bit more context explaining what is found in the video.
Mitch Goshorn
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-19T13:20:30.710Z
Done - This is nowadays a well understood problem.  Most of the work on structural environments for galaxy formation is numerical simulation.
JonesTheAstronomer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-07T22:07:37.043Z
2015-04-09T22:33:21.587Z
2015-04-09T22:33:21.587Z
JonesTheAstronomer
<p>Void formation is due to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_acoustic_oscillations" rel="nofollow">baryon acoustic oscillations</a>. These can be thought of as fluctuations in the dense matter in the early stages of the universe; they became <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropy" rel="nofollow">anisotropies</a>, which can be seen in the cosmic microwave background. The fluctuations grew, until they hit the <a href="http://www.sdss3.org/surveys/boss.php" rel="nofollow">150 Mpc scale</a>, which correlates nicely to the sizes of voids in the universe today.</p>

<p>There's an interesting section (4.2) in <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9508159v2.pdf" rel="nofollow">this paper</a> by Robert Brandenberger, which gives a mathematical treatment of how fluctuations of <em>all</em> kinds grew in the early universe. There is a better version of the explanation in <a href="http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1972MNRAS.160P...1Z&amp;data_type=PDF_HIGH&amp;whole_paper=YES&amp;type=PRINTER&amp;filetype=.pdf" rel="nofollow">Zeldovich (1972)</a>, which in fact puts forth the theory. The number density (if you'll pardon the pun) is lesser in that latter, but the former has a good overview, as it is meant to be a broad summary.</p>

<p>The simple explanation is that tiny fluctuations grew over time to become enormous structures.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-06T17:21:49.800Z
I would disagree with the beginning of this answer: you have voids in simulations which do not model BAO.
chris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-06T17:25:18.947Z
I think the correct Zeldovich citation is [this one](http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1970A%26A.....5...84Z)
chris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-14T15:40:02.173Z
would it be possible to replicate a cosmic web in a laboratory experiment? I don't mean a computer simulation, I mean an experiment with real particles.
set5
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-14T15:40:48.777Z
@mick I kind of doubt it, based on the extreme conditions early on, but I'm not 100% sure.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-14T15:40:59.657Z
@chris I'll see what I can update.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-04T19:06:42.040Z
2015-04-04T19:06:42.040Z
HDE 226868
<p>Why aren't galaxies distributed evenly in space, but instead form those sponge-like structures, with huge voids between filaments?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-06T17:20:15.860Z
Voids is what is left when you form the rest (the sponge like structure). You form this so-called cosmic web because typically a given over-density is a-symmetric (it would be very unlikely that all over densities be spherically symmetric) hence it will tend to collapse faster along its denser direction. In the process it forms the so-called Zeldovitch pancakes. When the second direction collapses it forms filaments, and finally peaks of the primordial density field. What is left in between are voids. In an expanding universe, underdense regions repel as well so the symmetric process occurs.
chris
<cosmology><galaxy-cluster>
what is the current explanation for the formation of cosmic voids?
set5
# what is the current explanation for the formation of cosmic voids?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-04)

Why aren't galaxies distributed evenly in space, but instead form those sponge-like structures, with huge voids between filaments?

**Tags:** cosmology, galaxy-cluster

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Voids is what is left when you form the rest (the sponge like structure). You form this so-called cosmic web because typically a given over-density is a-symmetric (it would be very unlikely that all over densities be spherically symmetric) hence it will tend to collapse faster along its denser direction. In the process it forms the so-called Zeldovitch pancakes. When the second direction collapses it forms filaments, and finally peaks of the primordial density field. What is left in between are voids. In an expanding universe, underdense regions repel as well so the symmetric process occurs.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-04-14. Score: 1

The baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) have a present-day scale $\sim 100 h^{-1}$ Mpc. This has little or nothing to do with the appearance of voids, which appear predominantly on scales of $\sim 20h^{-1}$ Mpc. and below. The BAO scale is only detected in the galaxy distribution by correlation analysis and does not manifest itself by mere visual inspection, unlike the voids, filaments and clusters that dominate the appearance of the cosmic web. If anything, the voids scales are determined by the velocity field power spectrum, which is to be expected in light of the way the Zel'dovich approximation works (as explained in the movie I referred to).

I would have added this as a comment to the post except that I have insufficient reputation and so this is the only way I can make the point. Apologies are offered if they are in order.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-04-07. Score: 1

You might like to watch this short movie from one of the authorities on this subject:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI12X2zczqI>

The movie starts by answering the question "what is the cosmic web and what does it look like?". Simulations can reproduce such structures, but they do not explain "why" they look the way they do. The clue lies in the geometric appearance of the structures: The voids resemble the elements of a Voronoi tessellation in which the walls of the Voronoi polyhedra intersect in lines that are identified with the filaments. We need to understand the dynamics that generated this pattern.

At around 2:30 the movie addresses the issue of why it looks the way it does using a simple ballistic model for the motion of a set of discrete particles that represent a random density field (the Zel'dovich model). The filaments are there but too fuzzy. So at ~3:00 it generalizes this so as to achieve greater realism by making the particles sticky. This is the "adhesion model", which is governed by the Burgers-Hopf equation, which is easily solved by geometric means. There is no gravity in this - it's ballistics acting on density field generated by a Gaussian Random process with a known covariance function (or power spectrum).

The adhesion model is a remarkable representation of the structure. It shows how nothing "special" is required to generate the pattern of the cosmic web. That's the "how".

The "why does the structure look like it does?" is a little more complex: this is the question of emergent geometry which is understood in terms of the technical language of the Lagrangian description of the flow. But the graphics is pretty and quite didactic, so worth a look. This happens after around 5:30.

The movie compares appearance of the flow simultaneously in both Lagrangian and Eulerian space. In the Lagrangian picture the particles have fixed coordinates,

A short descriptive article goes with the movie:
<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.1669v1.pdf>
and a short explanatin of the Lagrangiuan view is at
<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.5385v1.pdf>
This is part of the thesis work of Johan Hidding from the Kapteyn Instutue in Groningen (supevisor Rien van de Weygaert - the father of the cosmic web according to Richard Bond). A full presentation of the nature of the singularities in terms of Morse Theory is at
<http://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.7134v1.pdf>
and there are several other papers pending.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Hello Jones, welcome to Astronomy! It may be helpful to include a bit more context explaining what is found in the video.  
> **username_2**: Done - This is nowadays a well understood problem.  Most of the work on structural environments for galaxy formation is numerical simulation.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-04-04. Score: 1

Void formation is due to [baryon acoustic oscillations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_acoustic_oscillations). These can be thought of as fluctuations in the dense matter in the early stages of the universe; they became [anisotropies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropy), which can be seen in the cosmic microwave background. The fluctuations grew, until they hit the [150 Mpc scale](http://www.sdss3.org/surveys/boss.php), which correlates nicely to the sizes of voids in the universe today.

There's an interesting section (4.2) in [this paper](http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9508159v2.pdf) by Robert Brandenberger, which gives a mathematical treatment of how fluctuations of *all* kinds grew in the early universe. There is a better version of the explanation in [Zeldovich (1972)](http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1972MNRAS.160P...1Z&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf), which in fact puts forth the theory. The number density (if you'll pardon the pun) is lesser in that latter, but the former has a good overview, as it is meant to be a broad summary.

The simple explanation is that tiny fluctuations grew over time to become enormous structures.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I would disagree with the beginning of this answer: you have voids in simulations which do not model BAO.  
> **username_1**: I think the correct Zeldovich citation is [this one](http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1970A%26A.....5...84Z)  
> **username_0**: would it be possible to replicate a cosmic web in a laboratory experiment? I don't mean a computer simulation, I mean an experiment with real particles.  
> **username_4**: @mick I kind of doubt it, based on the extreme conditions early on, but I'm not 100% sure.  
> **username_4**: @username_1 I'll see what I can update.  

---

