<p>Objects are not place <strong>at</strong> the Sun-Earth L1 or L2 Lagrange points. They are instead placed in pseudo orbits about these points. These pseudo orbits intentionally avoid being directly in line with the Earth and the Sun for two key reasons. One reason is that these points are directly in the line between the Sun and the Earth. An object at the Sun-Earth L1 would be hard to see, while an object at the Sun-Earth L2 point would be in the Earth's umbral shadow.</p>
<p>A much more important reason is the incredible amount of propellant that would be needed to maintain their position <strong>at</strong> those unstable Lagrange points. The pseudo orbits, while also unstable, are much less unstable and require considerably less propellant for stationkeeping.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-06T07:19:15.073Z
So the objects orbit around the Lagrangian points kind of?
Greenhorn
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-06T07:54:27.323Z
@Greenhorn. Yes.
Steve Linton
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-05T22:43:06.717Z
2021-01-05T22:43:06.717Z
David Hammen
<p>Does anything placed at the Lagrangian point L1 between the Earth and Sun obscure the Sun like a transit of the innermore planets? The James Webb telescope is to be placed at L2, but if it was placed at L1, would it be in front of the Sun when looked upon from Earth? When you looked from the equator into the Sun, the telescope would be in the very center of the solar disc, right?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-05T20:30:54.187Z
"The James Webb telescope is to be placed at L2..." Is that true? ***at*** L2? You can consider asking about DSCOVR which is associated with L1 in a similar way to how JWST is associated with L2 if it helps, but double check the "at" part.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-01-06T07:21:00.353Z
@uhoh It's placed (in a pseudo-orbit, as evident from the answer) of L2.
Greenhorn
<lagrange-point><james-webb-space-telescope>
Would an object placed at L1 be seen in front of the Sun from Earth?
Greenhorn
# Would an object placed at L1 be seen in front of the Sun from Earth?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-01-05)

Does anything placed at the Lagrangian point L1 between the Earth and Sun obscure the Sun like a transit of the innermore planets? The James Webb telescope is to be placed at L2, but if it was placed at L1, would it be in front of the Sun when looked upon from Earth? When you looked from the equator into the Sun, the telescope would be in the very center of the solar disc, right?

**Tags:** lagrange-point, james-webb-space-telescope

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: "The James Webb telescope is to be placed at L2..." Is that true? ***at*** L2? You can consider asking about DSCOVR which is associated with L1 in a similar way to how JWST is associated with L2 if it helps, but double check the "at" part.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 It's placed (in a pseudo-orbit, as evident from the answer) of L2.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2021-01-05. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

Objects are not place **at** the Sun-Earth L1 or L2 Lagrange points. They are instead placed in pseudo orbits about these points. These pseudo orbits intentionally avoid being directly in line with the Earth and the Sun for two key reasons. One reason is that these points are directly in the line between the Sun and the Earth. An object at the Sun-Earth L1 would be hard to see, while an object at the Sun-Earth L2 point would be in the Earth's umbral shadow.

A much more important reason is the incredible amount of propellant that would be needed to maintain their position **at** those unstable Lagrange points. The pseudo orbits, while also unstable, are much less unstable and require considerably less propellant for stationkeeping.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: So the objects orbit around the Lagrangian points kind of?  
> **username_3**: @username_0. Yes.  

---

