<p>Scientists make lists of stars in a catalogue. In the past this would be in a book nowadays it is more likely to be a computer database.</p>

<p>The stars don't move (much) so it is possible to make a list of them by position Modern catalogues are online (see <a href="http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SINBAD</a> older ones were on paper (see the <a href="https://archive.org/stream/henrydrapercata00obsegoog#page/n28/mode/2up" rel="nofollow noreferrer">1918 Henry Draper catalogue</a>)</p>

<p>The Henry Draper catalogue is typical and easier to follow. It is just a table, the first column is the catalogue number (used instead of a "name")  the second column is a cross reference to another database. Then there is information on the location of the star in the sky using the RA and Dec system. Next comes information on the brightness of the star (estimated in two ways). Some letters come next to describe the spectrum (or "colour") of the star and finally some short "remarks", and a "plate number (the number of the photograph that contains an image of the star"</p>

<p>Scientists need to be systematic and careful to avoid missing anything.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T08:08:08.607Z
2018-07-02T08:08:08.607Z
James K
<p>In billions of stars, how space scientist keeps the track of the stars ? </p>

<p>There is a star called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIC_8462852" rel="nofollow noreferrer">KIC 8462852</a>, I saw that picture, star is so small from the earth. It has higher chance to miss that star in the universe.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T06:05:32.857Z
Welcome to AstronomySE. Have you taken the [site tour](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/tour)? Keshav, you need to show that you've made some effort to find your answer before asking it here. The first item that comes up with the google question "How do scientists keep track of stars?" seems to provide a [good answer](https://www.quora.com/How-do-astronomers-know-which-stars-are-which) for beginners.
Chappo Hasn't Forgotten
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T07:19:46.733Z
@Chappo That's certainly good advice, but "The first item that comes up with the google question..." isn't really a meaningful concept. Searches in different locations will return very different sets of results, as will searches in different languages. See "After getting beaten up here for not pre-Googling, I can testify that I have indeed searched for 'Gemini BECO' and all I get is a [baby carrier](https://i.sstatic.net/V7skU.jpg)." and other comments associated with [this question](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/27339/12102).
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T07:25:25.610Z
@Chappo here's [another example](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/352131/102305) of a "google first hit." (see first four comments) looking nothing like my google search, due to regional differences.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-02T07:32:22.013Z
@uhoh good point. I also recognise that language barriers and inexperience in the subject matter can make searches difficult. In any case, my comment provided a link to the answer I found.
Chappo Hasn't Forgotten
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-03T13:16:58.050Z
When someone asks a question, how can you tell if the person did not put any effort into finding the answer before asking the question?
Kornpob Bhirombhakdi
<star>
How space scientist keeps the track of the stars?
Keshav Arvind
# How space scientist keeps the track of the stars?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-07-02)

In billions of stars, how space scientist keeps the track of the stars ?

There is a star called [KIC 8462852](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIC_8462852), I saw that picture, star is so small from the earth. It has higher chance to miss that star in the universe.

**Tags:** star

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Welcome to AstronomySE. Have you taken the [site tour](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/tour)? username_0, you need to show that you've made some effort to find your answer before asking it here. The first item that comes up with the google question "How do scientists keep track of stars?" seems to provide a [good answer](https://www.quora.com/How-do-astronomers-know-which-stars-are-which) for beginners.  
> **username_2**: @username_1 That's certainly good advice, but "The first item that comes up with the google question..." isn't really a meaningful concept. Searches in different locations will return very different sets of results, as will searches in different languages. See "After getting beaten up here for not pre-Googling, I can testify that I have indeed searched for 'Gemini BECO' and all I get is a [baby carrier](https://i.sstatic.net/V7skU.jpg)." and other comments associated with [this question](https://space.stackexchange.com/q/27339/12102).  
> **username_2**: @username_1 here's [another example](https://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/352131/102305) of a "google first hit." (see first four comments) looking nothing like my google search, due to regional differences.  
> **username_1**: @username_2 good point. I also recognise that language barriers and inexperience in the subject matter can make searches difficult. In any case, my comment provided a link to the answer I found.  
> **username_3**: When someone asks a question, how can you tell if the person did not put any effort into finding the answer before asking the question?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-07-02. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

Scientists make lists of stars in a catalogue. In the past this would be in a book nowadays it is more likely to be a computer database.

The stars don't move (much) so it is possible to make a list of them by position Modern catalogues are online (see [SINBAD](http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/) older ones were on paper (see the [1918 Henry Draper catalogue](https://archive.org/stream/henrydrapercata00obsegoog#page/n28/mode/2up))

The Henry Draper catalogue is typical and easier to follow. It is just a table, the first column is the catalogue number (used instead of a "name") the second column is a cross reference to another database. Then there is information on the location of the star in the sky using the RA and Dec system. Next comes information on the brightness of the star (estimated in two ways). Some letters come next to describe the spectrum (or "colour") of the star and finally some short "remarks", and a "plate number (the number of the photograph that contains an image of the star"

Scientists need to be systematic and careful to avoid missing anything.


---

