<p>EdS universe represents a matter-dominated universe. Since the universe evolving towards lambda dominated and recently it was matter dominated, its a good approximation to use the EdS model to calculate the age of the universe.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-13T14:08:54.770Z
The universe has been lambda dominated for several billion years now.
Sir Cumference
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-13T14:23:26.743Z
@SirCumference well yes but its not like $a(t) \propto e^{Ht}$. I mean that
seVenVo1d
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-12T14:12:45.307Z
2020-03-14T08:58:38.453Z
2020-03-14T08:58:38.453Z
seVenVo1d
<p>The scale factor of the universe depends on the matter and energy density in a way that depends on which component is dominant.  This is discussed in the question <a href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/136056/how-does-the-hubble-parameter-change-with-the-age-of-the-universe">How does the Hubble parameter change with the age of the universe?</a> on the Physics Stack Exchange, and from that I have taken this graph showing how the scale factor changes with time for our universe:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/lWUhz.gif" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/lWUhz.gif" alt="Scale factor time"></a></p>

<p>For a (cold) matter dominated universe we get a dependence:</p>

<p><span class="math-container">$$ a(t) \propto t^{2/3} $$</span></p>

<p>and for a dark energy dominated universe we get an exponential dependence of <span class="math-container">$a(t)$</span> on <span class="math-container">$t$</span>. Just by looking at the graph you can see that the <span class="math-container">$t^{2/3}$</span> dependence was good up to about half the current age of the universe and after that the exponential growth becomes increasingly dominant.</p>

<p>So you are quite correct that the Einstein de Sitter model is not a good description of our universe right now, but it is a good description of the first half of the lifetime of the universe. Furthermore, because when we view distance regions of the universe we are viewing them as they were in the past it turns out that all the parts of the universe we can see beyond a redshift of about <span class="math-container">$Z = 2$</span> are still well described by an Einstein de Sitter model.</p>

<p>I would take issue with your statement that the Einstein de Sitter model is still taught and used to calculate the age of the universe. The most precise calculations of the age of the universe come from the <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209" rel="noreferrer">Planck observations of the cosmic microwave background</a>, and these most certainly do not use the Einstein de Sitter model. As for being taught, if you do a general relativity course you will be taught the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann%E2%80%93Lema%C3%AEtre%E2%80%93Robertson%E2%80%93Walker_metric" rel="noreferrer">FLRW metric</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann_equations" rel="noreferrer">Friedmann equations</a>. The Einstein de Sitter model is just a special case of the more general result.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-13T08:48:47.110Z
2020-03-13T10:53:44.967Z
2020-03-13T10:53:44.967Z
John Rennie
<p>Why is the EdS model still taught and used to predict the age of the universe if ours is not an EdS Universe. Does this model have any pros? </p>

<cosmology><modeling>
What good is the Einstein de-Sitter model?
Arnab Chowdhury
# What good is the Einstein de-Sitter model?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-03-12)

Why is the EdS model still taught and used to predict the age of the universe if ours is not an EdS Universe. Does this model have any pros?

**Tags:** cosmology, modeling


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-03-13. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

The scale factor of the universe depends on the matter and energy density in a way that depends on which component is dominant. This is discussed in the question [How does the Hubble parameter change with the age of the universe?](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/136056/how-does-the-hubble-parameter-change-with-the-age-of-the-universe) on the Physics Stack Exchange, and from that I have taken this graph showing how the scale factor changes with time for our universe:

[![Scale factor time](https://i.sstatic.net/lWUhz.gif)](https://i.sstatic.net/lWUhz.gif)

For a (cold) matter dominated universe we get a dependence:

$$ a(t) \propto t^{2/3} $$

and for a dark energy dominated universe we get an exponential dependence of $a(t)$ on $t$. Just by looking at the graph you can see that the $t^{2/3}$ dependence was good up to about half the current age of the universe and after that the exponential growth becomes increasingly dominant.

So you are quite correct that the Einstein de Sitter model is not a good description of our universe right now, but it is a good description of the first half of the lifetime of the universe. Furthermore, because when we view distance regions of the universe we are viewing them as they were in the past it turns out that all the parts of the universe we can see beyond a redshift of about $Z = 2$ are still well described by an Einstein de Sitter model.

I would take issue with your statement that the Einstein de Sitter model is still taught and used to calculate the age of the universe. The most precise calculations of the age of the universe come from the [Planck observations of the cosmic microwave background](https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209), and these most certainly do not use the Einstein de Sitter model. As for being taught, if you do a general relativity course you will be taught the [FLRW metric](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann%E2%80%93Lema%C3%AEtre%E2%80%93Robertson%E2%80%93Walker_metric) and [Friedmann equations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann_equations). The Einstein de Sitter model is just a special case of the more general result.


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-03-12. Score: 3

EdS universe represents a matter-dominated universe. Since the universe evolving towards lambda dominated and recently it was matter dominated, its a good approximation to use the EdS model to calculate the age of the universe.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: The universe has been lambda dominated for several billion years now.  
> **username_1**: @username_2 well yes but its not like $a(t) \propto e^{Ht}$. I mean that  

---

