<p>Micrometeorites are just tinier versions of regular meteorites. As such, they can have the same composition as any other meteor class. There's nothing that we know of that says they have a chemistry more like one kind of dust source, although this is controlled entirely by observational bias. Certain types of particles are more likely to make it to our planetary neighborhood. </p>

<p>We know that interstellar dust grains are found in meteorites, as are all kinds of other grains. Most (or many) meteorites we have contain grains from all over our cosmic neighborhood, including those formed long before our Earth, and they're conglomerated together in the meteorite matrix. Micrometeorites are smaller and will have less types of grains and likely more weathering due to their higher surface area to volume ratio. </p>

<p><strong>To answer your question: are micrometeorites cosmic dust?</strong></p>

<p>Some probably <em>contain</em> microscopic bits of cosmic dust, but some won't, and those that do aren't necessarily entirely made of cosmic dust. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-08T07:53:52.300Z
*"We know that interstellar dust grains are found in meteorites"* Really? I've never heard of that before. I'm now quite interested in anything interstellar coming to us, be it micrometeorites or Sedna. Of course dust grains form meteorites, I just never heard of them being determined to be  of interstellar origin. [3 interstellar grains](http://www.space.com/26833-nasa-stardust-spacecraft-captured-interstellar-dust.html) I've heard of, and I think they gave them each funny names form the Muppet Show or something.
LocalFluff
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-09T16:50:16.337Z
@LocalFluff: Have you ever heard of "presolar grains"? These are dust grains that formed *before* the Sun, and many of these merged with grains from our solar system as it was being formed. We can learn a lot about the early solar system and before it from these grains, including elemental and isotopic composition, temperature, density/pressure, "processing" mechanisms (the general term for many different types of space weathering), and more.
jvriesem
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-08T07:15:15.890Z
2015-09-08T07:15:15.890Z
jvriesem
<p>It might seem like the way to figure this out would be to test the composition of micrometeorites and see what objects this matches up with. This, however, is not a viable technique, as <a href="http://lmcm.mnhn.fr/cos/doc/2008%20Genge%20et%20al.%20MAPS.pdf" rel="nofollow">Genge et al. (2008)</a> explains:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>In interplanetary space dust particles are inherently transported sunwards by P-R light drag (Dohnanyi 1967) and once captured by the Earth their deceleration occurs at high altitudes allowing fragile micrometeoroids to survive atmospheric entry (Love and Brownlee 1991). The parent bodies of MMs, therefore, are likely to differ from those of meteorites.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It is, however, possible to analyze micrometeorites and group them in various categories, and determine the parent bodies. The two main types of parent bodies are thought to be comets and asteroids. Distinguishing between the micrometeorites of these two groups, however, can be difficult. Many large micrometeorites are from main-belt asteroids (see <a href="http://oro.open.ac.uk/8727/1/the_distribution_of_asteroids_-_evidence_from_Antarctic_micrometeorites.pdf" rel="nofollow">Genge &amp; Grady (2002)</a>). However, <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..816N" rel="nofollow">Nesvorny et al. (2010)</a> suggests that many micrometeorites (and large amounts of cosmic dust in general) are from comets.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-07T00:21:38.530Z
Is there any evidence for MM impacts on spacecrafts being more frequent during meteor showers (from comet tails)? [This](https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasablueshift/12088151104/) is an image of an instrument (WFPC2?) brought home from the Hubble ST after an upgrade. The micrometeorites have been drilled out so the impact craters were not at all that large. But wow! It's been under fire, and that is in relatively protected LEO.
LocalFluff
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-07T13:48:41.997Z
@LocalFluff I don't know; I haven't read about impacts with spacecraft.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-06T23:26:47.727Z
2015-09-06T23:26:47.727Z
HDE 226868
<p>Are micrometeorites just dust grains at high relative speed, or is there some difference between them and cosmic or interstellar or solar nebula dust? Dust as in the clouds which obscure parts of the Milky Way in our night sky.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-06T23:14:41.150Z
[Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micrometeorite) states "They differ from meteorites in being smaller, more plentiful and different in composition and are a subset of cosmic dust, which also includes the smaller interplanetary dust particles (IDPs)." Where that dust comes from is a trickier question, though, so that doesn't answer your question.
HDE 226868
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-07T08:25:21.640Z
They certainly seem to be plentiful, having pulverized all the boulders on the Moon, I read, except yet around the youngest craters.
LocalFluff
<dust><meteorite>
Are micrometeorites cosmic dust?
LocalFluff
# Are micrometeorites cosmic dust?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-09-06)

Are micrometeorites just dust grains at high relative speed, or is there some difference between them and cosmic or interstellar or solar nebula dust? Dust as in the clouds which obscure parts of the Milky Way in our night sky.

**Tags:** dust, meteorite

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micrometeorite) states "They differ from meteorites in being smaller, more plentiful and different in composition and are a subset of cosmic dust, which also includes the smaller interplanetary dust particles (IDPs)." Where that dust comes from is a trickier question, though, so that doesn't answer your question.  
> **username_0**: They certainly seem to be plentiful, having pulverized all the boulders on the Moon, I read, except yet around the youngest craters.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-09-08. Score: 2

Micrometeorites are just tinier versions of regular meteorites. As such, they can have the same composition as any other meteor class. There's nothing that we know of that says they have a chemistry more like one kind of dust source, although this is controlled entirely by observational bias. Certain types of particles are more likely to make it to our planetary neighborhood.

We know that interstellar dust grains are found in meteorites, as are all kinds of other grains. Most (or many) meteorites we have contain grains from all over our cosmic neighborhood, including those formed long before our Earth, and they're conglomerated together in the meteorite matrix. Micrometeorites are smaller and will have less types of grains and likely more weathering due to their higher surface area to volume ratio.

**To answer your question: are micrometeorites cosmic dust?**

Some probably *contain* microscopic bits of cosmic dust, but some won't, and those that do aren't necessarily entirely made of cosmic dust.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: *"We know that interstellar dust grains are found in meteorites"* Really? I've never heard of that before. I'm now quite interested in anything interstellar coming to us, be it micrometeorites or Sedna. Of course dust grains form meteorites, I just never heard of them being determined to be  of interstellar origin. [3 interstellar grains](http://www.space.com/26833-nasa-stardust-spacecraft-captured-interstellar-dust.html) I've heard of, and I think they gave them each funny names form the Muppet Show or something.  
> **username_2**: @username_0: Have you ever heard of "presolar grains"? These are dust grains that formed *before* the Sun, and many of these merged with grains from our solar system as it was being formed. We can learn a lot about the early solar system and before it from these grains, including elemental and isotopic composition, temperature, density/pressure, "processing" mechanisms (the general term for many different types of space weathering), and more.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-09-06. Score: 2

It might seem like the way to figure this out would be to test the composition of micrometeorites and see what objects this matches up with. This, however, is not a viable technique, as [Genge et al. (2008)](http://lmcm.mnhn.fr/cos/doc/2008%20Genge%20et%20al.%20MAPS.pdf) explains:

> In interplanetary space dust particles are inherently transported sunwards by P-R light drag (Dohnanyi 1967) and once captured by the Earth their deceleration occurs at high altitudes allowing fragile micrometeoroids to survive atmospheric entry (Love and Brownlee 1991). The parent bodies of MMs, therefore, are likely to differ from those of meteorites.

It is, however, possible to analyze micrometeorites and group them in various categories, and determine the parent bodies. The two main types of parent bodies are thought to be comets and asteroids. Distinguishing between the micrometeorites of these two groups, however, can be difficult. Many large micrometeorites are from main-belt asteroids (see [Genge & Grady (2002)](http://oro.open.ac.uk/8727/1/the_distribution_of_asteroids_-_evidence_from_Antarctic_micrometeorites.pdf)). However, [Nesvorny et al. (2010)](http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..816N) suggests that many micrometeorites (and large amounts of cosmic dust in general) are from comets.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Is there any evidence for MM impacts on spacecrafts being more frequent during meteor showers (from comet tails)? [This](https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasablueshift/12088151104/) is an image of an instrument (WFPC2?) brought home from the Hubble ST after an upgrade. The micrometeorites have been drilled out so the impact craters were not at all that large. But wow! It's been under fire, and that is in relatively protected LEO.  
> **username_1**: @username_0 I don't know; I haven't read about impacts with spacecraft.  

---

