<p>No idea is stupid <em>per se</em>.  But in order to place an answer to your question, please consider Venus as a comet. It once had, in that image, a coma (a tail) pointing outwards from the sun, made of evaporated water pushed away by solar wind. How frequently is the Earth exactly inside that coma?</p>

<p>As a comparison, when the Earth strikes a real comet coma we see meteor showers that last no more than one day. So if we consider that Earth may go through Venus imaginary coma once a year, we have an upper limit of 1/365 of Venus' water captured by Earth. This, without taking into effect that Venus had not have a real coma, that evaporation and expelletion of water from Venus was not a so directional process, and surely other factors I can not think about just now.</p>

<p>Besides, do not consider comets the main source of water on Earth. You need to count also with the water vapour generated on volcanoes and that generated on acid-base reactions among Earth's rocks.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-10T21:21:31.483Z
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30414519
db9dreamer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-11T06:24:58.220Z
Considering that the particles of Venus's "tail" would be in orbit around the Sun confined more or less to the ecliptic plane, it actually is feasible that they were collected by the Earth after a few rotations.
dotancohen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-11T10:23:01.883Z
If they were in orbits, we would almost never collect them, unless their orbits crossed ours. Those particles with orbits minor or major than Earth's would never be captured!
Envite
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-02T22:34:13.613Z
Not sure why you think passing through the coma of every comet occurs in 24 hours or less.  A cursory examination of the active periods of the major meteorite showers associated with comets produces active periods of several days to (much less often) several weeks.  Venus is considerably larger than any comet I've heard of - so I would predict a large coma.  Venus always orbits inside Earth's orbit, in the same plane and direction as Earth - so wouldn't Earth line up in the ideal position for extended periods?
db9dreamer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-03T06:06:37.530Z
I was just stressing the point that water on Earth does not come in its entirety from Venus by presenting a set of very simplified considerations. It is true that Earth lines up with Venus from more than one day, but it is also true that it does not do that once a year but once each 584 days.
Envite
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-03T10:19:57.393Z
I appreciate that, and you taking the time to answer.
db9dreamer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-02T06:16:08.120Z
2013-12-02T06:16:08.120Z
Envite
<p>First, one should observe that water is very abundant in the Solar system and most of it comes from before the planetary formation stage. Even Mercury has got its deal of water, albeit a small one.</p>

<p>I think, it will be safer to assume that earth had had it water from the very beginning of its formation.</p>

<p>Additional thing to consider are the temperatures, routinely reachable on various planetary bodies. Mars and everything beyond are way too cool for liquid water to exist, but solid water is present there in considerable quantities. Similarly, Venus and Mercury  ended up with temperatures above point of water vaporization or even chemical breakdown in the presence of other compounds. Only the Earth happens to occupy a nice orbital zone where water can exist in all 3 phases (solid, liquid and vapor). But it's not something Venus has any effect on.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-10T21:20:20.157Z
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30414519
db9dreamer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-12-03T02:56:45.337Z
2013-12-03T02:56:45.337Z
oakad
<p>I've watched documentaries about the solar system, where it is suggested that Venus once had oceans of liquid water similar to those that cover most of Earth today.  Venus is now in a period of runaway greenhouse effect and has lost its oceans.  </p>

<p>I've always wondered whether the apparent overabundance of water on Earth could be partially explained by our planet sweeping up the water, pushed into Earth's path by the solar wind, after it had been liberated from Venus.  I know one theory on where our water came from is a bombardment of comets - but I've always wondered whether some could also have arrived after Venus heated up.</p>

<p>How stupid is this as an idea?</p>

<hr>

<p>edits:-</p>

<p>10/12/2014 - article from the bbc - <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30414519" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rosetta results: Comets 'did not bring water to Earth'</a></p>

<p>20/09/2017 - article from www.spacetelescope.org - <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1715/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Hubble discovers a unique type of object in the Solar System</a> which includes an interesting note - "[2] Current research indicates that water came to Earth not via comets, as long thought, but via icy asteroids."</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-21T15:53:13.257Z
If Venus had water and doesn't need explanation for having it, why does Earth need to get it's water from Venus?
A. C. A. C.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-21T19:36:53.413Z
@A.C.A.C. I should have included "apparent over abundance" (from the second paragraph) in the title/question.
db9dreamer
<earth><water><venus>
Could Venus be a source of Earth's apparent overabundance of water?
db9dreamer
# Could Venus be a source of Earth's apparent overabundance of water?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-12-01)

I've watched documentaries about the solar system, where it is suggested that Venus once had oceans of liquid water similar to those that cover most of Earth today. Venus is now in a period of runaway greenhouse effect and has lost its oceans.

I've always wondered whether the apparent overabundance of water on Earth could be partially explained by our planet sweeping up the water, pushed into Earth's path by the solar wind, after it had been liberated from Venus. I know one theory on where our water came from is a bombardment of comets - but I've always wondered whether some could also have arrived after Venus heated up.

How stupid is this as an idea?

---

edits:-

10/12/2014 - article from the bbc - [Rosetta results: Comets 'did not bring water to Earth'](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30414519)

20/09/2017 - article from www.spacetelescope.org - [Hubble discovers a unique type of object in the Solar System](http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/heic1715/) which includes an interesting note - "[2] Current research indicates that water came to Earth not via comets, as long thought, but via icy asteroids."

**Tags:** earth, water, venus

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: If Venus had water and doesn't need explanation for having it, why does Earth need to get it's water from Venus?  
> **username_0**: @A.C.A.C. I should have included "apparent over abundance" (from the second paragraph) in the title/question.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-12-02. Score: 5

No idea is stupid *per se*. But in order to place an answer to your question, please consider Venus as a comet. It once had, in that image, a coma (a tail) pointing outwards from the sun, made of evaporated water pushed away by solar wind. How frequently is the Earth exactly inside that coma?

As a comparison, when the Earth strikes a real comet coma we see meteor showers that last no more than one day. So if we consider that Earth may go through Venus imaginary coma once a year, we have an upper limit of 1/365 of Venus' water captured by Earth. This, without taking into effect that Venus had not have a real coma, that evaporation and expelletion of water from Venus was not a so directional process, and surely other factors I can not think about just now.

Besides, do not consider comets the main source of water on Earth. You need to count also with the water vapour generated on volcanoes and that generated on acid-base reactions among Earth's rocks.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Not sure why you think passing through the coma of every comet occurs in 24 hours or less.  A cursory examination of the active periods of the major meteorite showers associated with comets produces active periods of several days to (much less often) several weeks.  Venus is considerably larger than any comet I've heard of - so I would predict a large coma.  Venus always orbits inside Earth's orbit, in the same plane and direction as Earth - so wouldn't Earth line up in the ideal position for extended periods?  
> **username_2**: I was just stressing the point that water on Earth does not come in its entirety from Venus by presenting a set of very simplified considerations. It is true that Earth lines up with Venus from more than one day, but it is also true that it does not do that once a year but once each 584 days.  
> **username_0**: I appreciate that, and you taking the time to answer.  
> **username_0**: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30414519  
> **username_3**: Considering that the particles of Venus's "tail" would be in orbit around the Sun confined more or less to the ecliptic plane, it actually is feasible that they were collected by the Earth after a few rotations.  
> **username_2**: If they were in orbits, we would almost never collect them, unless their orbits crossed ours. Those particles with orbits minor or major than Earth's would never be captured!  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2013-12-03. Score: 5

First, one should observe that water is very abundant in the Solar system and most of it comes from before the planetary formation stage. Even Mercury has got its deal of water, albeit a small one.

I think, it will be safer to assume that earth had had it water from the very beginning of its formation.

Additional thing to consider are the temperatures, routinely reachable on various planetary bodies. Mars and everything beyond are way too cool for liquid water to exist, but solid water is present there in considerable quantities. Similarly, Venus and Mercury ended up with temperatures above point of water vaporization or even chemical breakdown in the presence of other compounds. Only the Earth happens to occupy a nice orbital zone where water can exist in all 3 phases (solid, liquid and vapor). But it's not something Venus has any effect on.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30414519  

---

