<p><a href="https://aty.sdsu.edu/vision/Galileo.html" rel="noreferrer">This webpage</a> gives a lot of background information. Key points:</p>
<ol>
<li>It does seem to be the overall dimness of near-total eclipses that allows the pupil to widen enough to allow damaging levels of UV in.</li>
<li>There are cases of eye damage from staring at the full sun, and also cases of staring at the noonday sun without apparent damage (not recommended). Perhaps levels of pupil dilation were different for different people.</li>
</ol>
<p>The linked article points to UV light as the main culprit in eclipse-related eye injuries. Please don't use this as an excuse to try viewing a partial eclipse through just UV filters. Improvised, &quot;this-ought-to-work&quot; filters have led to multiple cases of eye damage. I don't think you could get volunteers for a study mapping out in detail which intensities at which frequencies cause human blindness. Best to assume they all do when you are planning to look hard right at it.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T08:54:33.190Z
Thanks for providing the missing sources for [PM 2Ring's answer](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/36630/19639)!
I'm with Monica
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T21:19:14.663Z
Hmm, this page seems to imply that using a pair of photographic UV filters as glasses would drastically reduce the danger while preserving the colors seen on the sky and the ground (which are completely removed by a solar filter).
Ruslan
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T03:45:08.410Z
2020-06-23T01:50:36.847Z
2020-06-23T01:50:36.847Z
Mark Foskey
<p><em><strong>Disclaimer</strong></em></p>
<p>I have no medical knowledge and do NOT recommend following what I describe below.</p>
<p><strong>Any children that read this should not copy it. I was stupid and it was pointless. Especially do NOT look at the sun with a <em>telescope</em>. It will burn the back of your eyes and cause blindness.</strong></p>
<hr />
<p>When I was about 11, I was told not to look at the sun but not told why. Being a rebellious child I saw this as a challenge. In fact I used to deliberately look at the sun to 'prove' how clever I was. It was painful and for a while afterwards I got a sort of ache that appeared to come from the back of my eyes. Of course I also got afterimages for up to a minute.</p>
<p>I am now in my 70's and suffering no ill effects. It seems that it did no lasting damage.</p>
<p><em><strong>Repeat: I do not recommend this. It serves no purpose and I'm lucky that I did not not blind myself. I did it from youthful ignorance.</strong></em></p>
<p>Do not do it. <strong>If you accidentally glance at the sun for a moment, don't worry.</strong></p>
<p>If you look at the sun through a telescope you will almost certainly burn your retina and blind yourself.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-25T14:03:03.913Z
*If you accidentally glance at the sun for a moment, don't worry.* Does it mean it won't harm then? Because I don't see any harm so far after years.
Vikas
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-27T14:08:36.303Z
I'm no expert either. From what I remember bright visible light can bleach the photoreceptor molecules, but they are replenished eventually. All light can make heat and if there is thermal damage it can not be repaired. UV can also do nasty things, including cause cancer. More at [Can no amount bright light blind you?](https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1k35pw/can_no_amount_bright_light_blind_you/) which refers to Feynman's confidence that looking at a nuclear test (through glass I believe, to absorb the UV) would not *permanently* blind him. He probably estimated the heating also.
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-23T13:22:41.323Z
2020-06-23T13:27:53.950Z
2020-06-23T13:27:53.950Z
chasly - supports Monica
<p>Glancing at a <em>partial</em> solar eclipse is about as dangerous as glancing at the Sun on any other day. If you look at the Sun a few minutes after sunrise or a few minutes before sunset, when the Sun's altitude is low, the light is filtered through a lot of air, and most of the ultraviolet is scattered, so it's a lot less dangerous than looking at the Sun in the middle of the day. However, during an eclipse, people tend to look at the Sun for more than just a few minutes, and that's not healthy for the eyes.</p>
<p>The big danger of looking at a solar eclipse without proper protection occurs when it's a total (or nearly total) eclipse. When the eclipse is near totality, the sky is dark, so your pupils dilate, letting in more light. But the light rays coming from that small sliver of Sun are just as bright as normal, and have the same proportion of UV (ultraviolet) as full sunlight. Those UV rays can cause a lot of damage to the retina <em>very</em> quickly, and that damage can be permanent.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T23:47:32.173Z
slightly related (but about cameras): [Are there industry standards or specs for image sensor resistance to damage from intense light?](https://photo.stackexchange.com/q/77429/50110)
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-23T16:46:04.300Z
Is there reason to believe it's any more damaging than stepping out of a dimly-lit indoor room with no windows into the outdoors and immediately glancing at the sun?
R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-23T17:53:07.620Z
@R..GitHubSTOPHELPINGICE It's probably pretty similar. Or looking directly at the Sun through a crack in the curtains of a dark room. But I Am Not An Eye Doctor.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-25T14:01:22.193Z
I'm afraid I feel I was more curious about knowing if we look at the sun the way I explained in question, will it damage eyes?
Vikas
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-25T14:12:55.100Z
@Vikas There's nothing happening on a solar eclipse day that makes the Sun more dangerous than normal, apart from the thing I mentioned about having dilated pupils because of the darkness when the eclipse is very close to totality.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-27T14:09:44.233Z
@PM2Ring ha, [coffee](https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/45583/will-surface-samples-from-mars-orbit-it-in-a-spherical-capsule-until-captured#comment148098_45583)!
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T20:09:44.307Z
2020-06-21T20:09:44.307Z
PM 2Ring
<p>This question arose when I thought that on <strong>Normal Days</strong>, at least I have observed bright sun while going outside, going to office, in park etc. for less than a second. It happens almost daily. Not deliberately but that's how things work I guess. Similar example is playing cricket. Many times sun comes in the way of ball in the air and again I have a glimpse of sun. To me, it is very common as I've seen in international cricket matches on TV.</p>
<p>On the other hand, in case of the days of <strong>Solar Eclipse</strong>, on one or two occasions, when the sun wasn't very bright due to clouds, I've deliberately observed the partial eclipse just for a glimpse, just to confirm it's actually <em>cut</em>. And I confirmed it. <em>(How fast it was? It was not like I stood still and observed the sun for less than a second and then closed eyes. It was like this: I started moving my head and sight from earth surface and in a faster way moved my head towards sun and without any break, stopped at safe location on earth again where there was no sun)</em>. And it did literally no harm to me.</p>
<p><strong>So my doubt is:</strong></p>
<p>Why there's so much theories that you must not stare sun even for less than a second or even a glimpse by mistake? If you see news on eclipse day, you'll see full news about this. But on any other normal day, no such news. Is there something special, something more bright on solar eclipse day? Will it damage eyes?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T19:18:56.183Z
Closely related: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/22233/16685 Note [this comment](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/22233/why-is-it-okay-to-watch-a-sunset-but-not-an-eclipse?rq=1#comment38006_22237): "The sunset also doesn't trick your pupils into dilating".
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T19:21:45.327Z
On normal days, people are significantly less likely to attempt to spend minutes staring into the sun, and the damage the sun does to your retina is painless.
notovny
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T19:34:12.147Z
@notovny painless? You mean it damages but it's painless?
Vikas
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T19:37:33.247Z
@PM2Ring that comment is too hard for me to understand. Also, unfortunately the question doesn't answer my question at all.
Vikas
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T19:55:31.207Z
When the eclipse is near totality, the sky is dark, so your pupils dilate, letting in more light. But the light rays coming from that small sliver of Sun are just as bright as normal, and have the same proportion of ultraviolet as full sunlight. I'll put this into a proper answer.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T20:02:29.093Z
@Vikas Yes. The retina has no pain nerves, so the typical reflex response "That hurts, I should  probably stop doing it" is not generally in effect for retinal damage caused by looking at the Sun.
notovny
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T20:02:29.170Z
@PM2Ring are you sure sky is dark when there's 99.5% solar eclipse, sky is dark? I have pictures of yesterday's total solar eclipse. I could still see sharp shadows of trees and objects. The light was less but it wasn't dark.
Vikas
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-21T20:13:44.677Z
If the sky isn't dark, then your pupils won't dilate, and so it's just the same as glancing at the Sun at the same altitude (that is, the same angle above the horizon) on a non-eclipse day.
PM 2Ring
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T03:19:17.620Z
Variants of this question have been asked multiple times on Physics Stack Exchange. Here is a starting place: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/353019/is-looking-at-an-eclipse-worse-than-looking-at-the-sun
Mark Foskey
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T07:08:14.370Z
Humans are very good at adapting to changing light conditions. By the time things start _looking_ dark during an eclipse, the light reaching you is already about 1/100th of normal daylight - two orders of magnitude less light. I hope you see why this could be a problem for your eyesight :) And of course you can see shadows just like normal; the light in shadows still comes from the Sun. The ratio between the part in direct sunlight and the part in ambient sunlight (i.e. refracted by the atmosphere, basically) is different, but not by a lot.
Luaan
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T07:09:57.403Z
You're probably confused by associating "dark" with cloudy skies. When it's overcast, there's essentially no direct sunlight reaching you. Much of the incident light is reflected back into space (it gets dark), but almost all of the light that makes it through comes from the atmosphere, not directly from the Sun. Thus, there are no shadows - all of the environment is illuminated from the same source, with the same brightness. The same isn't true at all when dealing with an eclipse.
Luaan
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T14:59:52.343Z
Humans have been *accidentally* glancing at the sun since they first evolved, and they have an "automatic blink reflex" that prevents that from causing eye damage. If you *deliberately* look at the sun in any conditions, you are overriding that automatic protection.
alephzero
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-22T15:03:42.737Z
The other issue is that the speed at which the brightness increases after the mininum of an eclipse is very fast, compared with sunrise or sunset, if the sun is high in the sky. I have seen one total eclipse "live", and after 2 minutes of totality, I found the rapid increase in brightness in the few minutes after totality was actually painful, even when *not* looking directly at the sun. The brightness change from switching on a light bulb in a dark room is several orders of magnitude smaller.
alephzero
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-23T08:15:49.963Z
Isaac Newton states at the sun for several minutes for some reason. He had to spend several days in a dark room with severe pain in his eyes.
Just another Java programmer
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-10-25T16:08:23.770Z
You have two experiments you can do with your eyes. Left and right.
ProfRob
<the-sun><solar-eclipse><naked-eye>
Will just a glimpse (less than a second) of sun during partial solar eclipse damage eyes?
Vikas
# Will just a glimpse (less than a second) of sun during partial solar eclipse damage eyes?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-06-21)

This question arose when I thought that on **Normal Days**, at least I have observed bright sun while going outside, going to office, in park etc. for less than a second. It happens almost daily. Not deliberately but that's how things work I guess. Similar example is playing cricket. Many times sun comes in the way of ball in the air and again I have a glimpse of sun. To me, it is very common as I've seen in international cricket matches on TV.

On the other hand, in case of the days of **Solar Eclipse**, on one or two occasions, when the sun wasn't very bright due to clouds, I've deliberately observed the partial eclipse username_6 for a glimpse, username_6 to confirm it's actually *cut*. And I confirmed it. *(How fast it was? It was not like I stood still and observed the sun for less than a second and then closed eyes. It was like this: I started moving my head and sight from earth surface and in a faster way moved my head towards sun and without any break, stopped at safe location on earth again where there was no sun)*. And it did literally no harm to me.

**So my doubt is:**

Why there's so much theories that you must not stare sun even for less than a second or even a glimpse by mistake? If you see news on eclipse day, you'll see full news about this. But on any other normal day, no such news. Is there something special, something more bright on solar eclipse day? Will it damage eyes?

**Tags:** the-sun, solar-eclipse, naked-eye

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Closely related: https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/q/22233/16685 Note [this comment](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/22233/why-is-it-okay-to-watch-a-sunset-but-not-an-eclipse?rq=1#comment38006_22237): "The sunset also doesn't trick your pupils into dilating".  
> **username_2**: On normal days, people are significantly less likely to attempt to spend minutes staring into the sun, and the damage the sun does to your retina is painless.  
> **username_0**: @username_2 painless? You mean it damages but it's painless?  
> **username_0**: @username_1 that comment is too hard for me to understand. Also, unfortunately the question doesn't answer my question at all.  
> **username_1**: When the eclipse is near totality, the sky is dark, so your pupils dilate, letting in more light. But the light rays coming from that small sliver of Sun are username_6 as bright as normal, and have the same proportion of ultraviolet as full sunlight. I'll put this into a proper answer.  
> **username_2**: @username_0 Yes. The retina has no pain nerves, so the typical reflex response "That hurts, I should  probably stop doing it" is not generally in effect for retinal damage caused by looking at the Sun.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 are you sure sky is dark when there's 99.5% solar eclipse, sky is dark? I have pictures of yesterday's total solar eclipse. I could still see sharp shadows of trees and objects. The light was less but it wasn't dark.  
> **username_1**: If the sky isn't dark, then your pupils won't dilate, and so it's username_6 the same as glancing at the Sun at the same altitude (that is, the same angle above the horizon) on a non-eclipse day.  
> **username_3**: Variants of this question have been asked multiple times on Physics Stack Exchange. Here is a starting place: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/353019/is-looking-at-an-eclipse-worse-than-looking-at-the-sun  
> **username_4**: Humans are very good at adapting to changing light conditions. By the time things start _looking_ dark during an eclipse, the light reaching you is already about 1/100th of normal daylight - two orders of magnitude less light. I hope you see why this could be a problem for your eyesight :) And of course you can see shadows username_6 like normal; the light in shadows still comes from the Sun. The ratio between the part in direct sunlight and the part in ambient sunlight (i.e. refracted by the atmosphere, basically) is different, but not by a lot.  
> **username_4**: You're probably confused by associating "dark" with cloudy skies. When it's overcast, there's essentially no direct sunlight reaching you. Much of the incident light is reflected back into space (it gets dark), but almost all of the light that makes it through comes from the atmosphere, not directly from the Sun. Thus, there are no shadows - all of the environment is illuminated from the same source, with the same brightness. The same isn't true at all when dealing with an eclipse.  
> **username_5**: Humans have been *accidentally* glancing at the sun since they first evolved, and they have an "automatic blink reflex" that prevents that from causing eye damage. If you *deliberately* look at the sun in any conditions, you are overriding that automatic protection.  
> **username_5**: The other issue is that the speed at which the brightness increases after the mininum of an eclipse is very fast, compared with sunrise or sunset, if the sun is high in the sky. I have seen one total eclipse "live", and after 2 minutes of totality, I found the rapid increase in brightness in the few minutes after totality was actually painful, even when *not* looking directly at the sun. The brightness change from switching on a light bulb in a dark room is several orders of magnitude smaller.  
> **username_6**: Isaac Newton states at the sun for several minutes for some reason. He had to spend several days in a dark room with severe pain in his eyes.  
> **username_7**: You have two experiments you can do with your eyes. Left and right.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-06-21. Score: 35 | Accepted answer

Glancing at a *partial* solar eclipse is about as dangerous as glancing at the Sun on any other day. If you look at the Sun a few minutes after sunrise or a few minutes before sunset, when the Sun's altitude is low, the light is filtered through a lot of air, and most of the ultraviolet is scattered, so it's a lot less dangerous than looking at the Sun in the middle of the day. However, during an eclipse, people tend to look at the Sun for more than username_6 a few minutes, and that's not healthy for the eyes.

The big danger of looking at a solar eclipse without proper protection occurs when it's a total (or nearly total) eclipse. When the eclipse is near totality, the sky is dark, so your pupils dilate, letting in more light. But the light rays coming from that small sliver of Sun are username_6 as bright as normal, and have the same proportion of UV (ultraviolet) as full sunlight. Those UV rays can cause a lot of damage to the retina *very* quickly, and that damage can be permanent.

> **Comments:**
> **username_11**: slightly related (but about cameras): [Are there industry standards or specs for image sensor resistance to damage from intense light?](https://photo.stackexchange.com/q/77429/50110)  
> **username_12**: Is there reason to believe it's any more damaging than stepping out of a dimly-lit indoor room with no windows into the outdoors and immediately glancing at the sun?  
> **username_1**: @username_12 It's probably pretty similar. Or looking directly at the Sun through a crack in the curtains of a dark room. But I Am Not An Eye Doctor.  
> **username_0**: I'm afraid I feel I was more curious about knowing if we look at the sun the way I explained in question, will it damage eyes?  
> **username_1**: @username_0 There's nothing happening on a solar eclipse day that makes the Sun more dangerous than normal, apart from the thing I mentioned about having dilated pupils because of the darkness when the eclipse is very close to totality.  
> **username_11**: @username_1 ha, [coffee](https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/45583/will-surface-samples-from-mars-orbit-it-in-a-spherical-capsule-until-captured#comment148098_45583)!  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-06-22. Score: 14

[This webpage](https://aty.sdsu.edu/vision/Galileo.html) gives a lot of background information. Key points:

1. It does seem to be the overall dimness of near-total eclipses that allows the pupil to widen enough to allow damaging levels of UV in.
2. There are cases of eye damage from staring at the full sun, and also cases of staring at the noonday sun without apparent damage (not recommended). Perhaps levels of pupil dilation were different for different people.

The linked article points to UV light as the main culprit in eclipse-related eye injuries. Please don't use this as an excuse to try viewing a partial eclipse through username_6 UV filters. Improvised, "this-ought-to-work" filters have led to multiple cases of eye damage. I don't think you could get volunteers for a study mapping out in detail which intensities at which frequencies cause human blindness. Best to assume they all do when you are planning to look hard right at it.

> **Comments:**
> **username_8**: Thanks for providing the missing sources for [PM username_1's answer](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/a/36630/19639)!  
> **username_9**: Hmm, this page seems to imply that using a pair of photographic UV filters as glasses would drastically reduce the danger while preserving the colors seen on the sky and the ground (which are completely removed by a solar filter).  

---

### Answer by username_10 on 2020-06-23. Score: 2

***Disclaimer***

I have no medical knowledge and do NOT recommend following what I describe below.

**Any children that read this should not copy it. I was stupid and it was pointless. Especially do NOT look at the sun with a *telescope*. It will burn the back of your eyes and cause blindness.**

---

When I was about 11, I was told not to look at the sun but not told why. Being a rebellious child I saw this as a challenge. In fact I used to deliberately look at the sun to 'prove' how clever I was. It was painful and for a while afterwards I got a sort of ache that appeared to come from the back of my eyes. Of course I also got afterimages for up to a minute.

I am now in my 70's and suffering no ill effects. It seems that it did no lasting damage.

***Repeat: I do not recommend this. It serves no purpose and I'm lucky that I did not not blind myself. I did it from youthful ignorance.***

Do not do it. **If you accidentally glance at the sun for a moment, don't worry.**

If you look at the sun through a telescope you will almost certainly burn your retina and blind yourself.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: *If you accidentally glance at the sun for a moment, don't worry.* Does it mean it won't harm then? Because I don't see any harm so far after years.  
> **username_11**: I'm no expert either. From what I remember bright visible light can bleach the photoreceptor molecules, but they are replenished eventually. All light can make heat and if there is thermal damage it can not be repaired. UV can also do nasty things, including cause cancer. More at [Can no amount bright light blind you?](https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1k35pw/can_no_amount_bright_light_blind_you/) which refers to Feynman's confidence that looking at a nuclear test (through glass I believe, to absorb the UV) would not *permanently* blind him. He probably estimated the heating also.  

---

