<p>I finally found it - It was group polarization.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-05T11:25:39.940Z
Polarization isn't exactly what you describe in the question. When a group becomes polarized, the beliefs they **had to begin with** become more extreme from exposure to like-minded individuals - i.e. if you leave a group of moderately racist people in a room together, they will come out more bigoted than when they came in due to polarization.
Eoin
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-25T14:33:35.920Z
2014-04-25T14:33:35.920Z
Ashtopher
<p>I believe the name you are searching for is <strong>conformity</strong>.  </p>

<p>One of the most well-known examples: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments" rel="nofollow">Asch Conformity Experiments</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-22T16:20:33.003Z
2014-04-22T16:20:33.003Z
Kevin Binz
<p>I think the title and the example given described 2 slightly different situations, </p>

<p>Answering strictly from the title:</p>

<p>I also believe that <a href="http://psychology.about.com/od/socialinfluence/f/conformity.htm" rel="nofollow">conformity</a> is what you are looking for, or more specifically <a href="http://www.simplypsychology.org/conformity.html" rel="nofollow">normative conformity</a>, in relation to the "odd one out" feeling that you mentioned.</p>

<p>Closely related to conformity, Groupthink may also explains the phenomenon, which stated that an individual might suppresses a dissenting/opposing opinion to keep the peace &amp; harmony of a group, though it's more commonly explained in group decision-making situations.</p>

<p>On the other hand, Group Polarization mainly refers to group phenomenon where a group tend to take a more extreme decisions than the initial inclinations of its members. Meaning that such decisions are less likely to be taken in individual situations.</p>

<p>Now, answering from the given example is a little bit harder because it depends on what made them not wanting to voice their opinion (that they hated the food).</p>

<p>If it's purely because none of them wanted to go against the others opinions, then it's conformity/groupthink as stated above. But how can one go against others opinion when their opinion is one and the same? I would argue that they don't necessarily know that all of them have the same opinion, instead it's very plausible that a few misreading of body-language, or some misunderstood comments would make someone thinks that everyone enjoyed the food, and thus acted accordingly, which in turn would reinforce the others to act the same way.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-09-05T11:02:22.013Z
2014-09-05T11:02:22.013Z
Nono
<p>I forgot the name, but I remember reading about it in lifehacker or i09 some time ago.</p>

<p>When the group feels a certain way, but say that they feel the other way to avoid being the only one to agree. Despite all of them feeling the same way.</p>

<p>For example, a group goes to a restaurant. All of them hate the food. But no one wants to be the one to say it, so they all unwittingly say it's great and that they are enjoying.</p>

<social-psychology>
Phenomena where group truly feels a certain way, but each member says that they feel the other way to avoid being the odd one out
Ashtopher
# Phenomena where group truly feels a certain way, but each member says that they feel the other way to avoid being the odd one out

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-04-22)

I forgot the name, but I remember reading about it in lifehacker or i09 some time ago.

When the group feels a certain way, but say that they feel the other way to avoid being the only one to agree. Despite all of them feeling the same way.

For example, a group goes to a restaurant. All of them hate the food. But no one wants to be the one to say it, so they all unwittingly say it's great and that they are enjoying.

**Tags:** social-psychology


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_0 on 2014-04-25. Score: 0 | Accepted answer

I finally found it - It was group polarization.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Polarization isn't exactly what you describe in the question. When a group becomes polarized, the beliefs they **had to begin with** become more extreme from exposure to like-minded individuals - i.e. if you leave a group of moderately racist people in a room together, they will come out more bigoted than when they came in due to polarization.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2014-04-22. Score: 3

I believe the name you are searching for is **conformity**.

One of the most well-known examples: [Asch Conformity Experiments](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments).


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2014-09-05. Score: 0

I think the title and the example given described 2 slightly different situations,

Answering strictly from the title:

I also believe that [conformity](http://psychology.about.com/od/socialinfluence/f/conformity.htm) is what you are looking for, or more specifically [normative conformity](http://www.simplypsychology.org/conformity.html), in relation to the "odd one out" feeling that you mentioned.

Closely related to conformity, Groupthink may also explains the phenomenon, which stated that an individual might suppresses a dissenting/opposing opinion to keep the peace & harmony of a group, though it's more commonly explained in group decision-making situations.

On the other hand, Group Polarization mainly refers to group phenomenon where a group tend to take a more extreme decisions than the initial inclinations of its members. Meaning that such decisions are less likely to be taken in individual situations.

Now, answering from the given example is a little bit harder because it depends on what made them not wanting to voice their opinion (that they hated the food).

If it's purely because none of them wanted to go against the others opinions, then it's conformity/groupthink as stated above. But how can one go against others opinion when their opinion is one and the same? I would argue that they don't necessarily know that all of them have the same opinion, instead it's very plausible that a few misreading of body-language, or some misunderstood comments would make someone thinks that everyone enjoyed the food, and thus acted accordingly, which in turn would reinforce the others to act the same way.


---

