<p>Your question touches on a number of different active research areas in cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience.</p>

<p>The motoric component to not "following and running after every thought" is commonly understood to reflect a capacity for response inhibition - that is, the ability to override or cancel ongoing or prepotent motor commands.  This process is thought by some to be similar to that involved in reducing perceptual or cognitive interference, for example in attending to a particular type of information despite salient or prepotent sources of distraction (e.g., as studied in the Stroop and Flanker tasks), or in reducing interference from recently abandoned information/goals (e.g., variously studied in terms of negative priming and lag-2 repetition cost respectively).</p>

<p>However, there are other perspectives.  One is that the ability to maintain an overall task set - perhaps a more stable one, that has a hierarchical influence over other more transient thoughts/perceptions - might be responsible for keeping these kinds of more extraneous exogenous and endogenous distractions at bay, through a process known as competitive lateral inhibition.  Keywords for this kind of work include biased competition, goal maintenance, context maintenance, and active maintenance. </p>

<p>Finally, there is a third line of work relevant to your question, in which cognitive processes are selectively granted control over behavior.  This has so far been studied primarily in the domain of visual search, although computational models suggest that it may have rather domain-general applications.  In the visual search literature relevant keywords are "accessory items in working memory". In the modeling literature, this is known as an "output gate."</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-26T21:14:27.760Z
2012-06-26T21:14:27.760Z
CHCH
<p>Usually when a thought arises, it seems that we quickly scurry after it, unconsciously getting caught up with whatever everyday thoughts come up. These can be invoked internally or externally. 
(No reference to that phenomenon but for example, you may have just read that and add more thoughts or complicated it. )</p>

<p><strong>What is the scientific term or concept that explains being able to NOT follow and run after every thought that arises out of the brain or not be swayed by them in anyway?</strong></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-26T20:56:02.820Z
I removed your last question; it's a big question for an aside; it should be asked as a separate question once you know more about the issue if you can make it a constructive question.
Zelda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-26T21:01:40.390Z
@BenBrocka: What should I add to this question to make it constructive? Please advise. (or what what makes it not constructive?)
Greg McNulty
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-26T21:06:52.573Z
The side question needed a lot more fleshing out. Focusing on *this* question, I find it hard to follow exactly what you mean. Are you simply talking about inhibition? Focus? I can't quite tell what you mean by getting caught up by other thoughts.
Zelda
<terminology><philosophy-of-mind>
What is the scientific term or concept for inner thought control?
Greg McNulty
# What is the scientific term or concept for inner thought control?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-06-26)

Usually when a thought arises, it seems that we quickly scurry after it, unconsciously getting caught up with whatever everyday thoughts come up. These can be invoked internally or externally.
(No reference to that phenomenon but for example, you may have just read that and add more thoughts or complicated it. )

**What is the scientific term or concept that explains being able to NOT follow and run after every thought that arises out of the brain or not be swayed by them in anyway?**

**Tags:** terminology, philosophy-of-mind

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I removed your last question; it's a big question for an aside; it should be asked as a separate question once you know more about the issue if you can make it a constructive question.  
> **username_0**: @BenBrocka: What should I add to this question to make it constructive? Please advise. (or what what makes it not constructive?)  
> **username_1**: The side question needed a lot more fleshing out. Focusing on *this* question, I find it hard to follow exactly what you mean. Are you simply talking about inhibition? Focus? I can't quite tell what you mean by getting caught up by other thoughts.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2012-06-26. Score: 9 | Accepted answer

Your question touches on a number of different active research areas in cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience.

The motoric component to not "following and running after every thought" is commonly understood to reflect a capacity for response inhibition - that is, the ability to override or cancel ongoing or prepotent motor commands. This process is thought by some to be similar to that involved in reducing perceptual or cognitive interference, for example in attending to a particular type of information despite salient or prepotent sources of distraction (e.g., as studied in the Stroop and Flanker tasks), or in reducing interference from recently abandoned information/goals (e.g., variously studied in terms of negative priming and lag-2 repetition cost respectively).

However, there are other perspectives. One is that the ability to maintain an overall task set - perhaps a more stable one, that has a hierarchical influence over other more transient thoughts/perceptions - might be responsible for keeping these kinds of more extraneous exogenous and endogenous distractions at bay, through a process known as competitive lateral inhibition. Keywords for this kind of work include biased competition, goal maintenance, context maintenance, and active maintenance.

Finally, there is a third line of work relevant to your question, in which cognitive processes are selectively granted control over behavior. This has so far been studied primarily in the domain of visual search, although computational models suggest that it may have rather domain-general applications. In the visual search literature relevant keywords are "accessory items in working memory". In the modeling literature, this is known as an "output gate."


---

