<p>Yes, it matters, and you should probably go with scale <code>B</code> if you have to use numbers. See <a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/96880/32036">my answer here on Cross Validated</a> in response to, "<a href="https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/32389/32036">Is 0 a valid value in a Likert scale?</a>" The zero in the middle of <code>A</code> is confusing (this isn't to say I don't understand it, but do you really trust that every respondent you ever come across will?), but even if you were to replace it with 4 and add 1 to the options currently labeled 4–6, you might get different answers than if you go with (-3)–(+3). Either way, there's some connotation of "less" applied to the options on the left, which may bias responses. Option <code>C</code> even confuses me, so I'd say you should throw that out completely...</p>

<p>IMO, the safest bet would be to label your rating options with words, not numbers. To make responding easy, let people check boxes or provide abbreviated codes for their preferences such as "Strongly prefer left option" = <code>SL</code> or "Right option is a mildly better fit" = <code>Rm</code>. Here's how I presented these suggestions in my other answer, and the supporting reference <sup>(Schwarz, Knäuper, Hippler, Noelle-Neumann, &amp; Clark, 1991)</sup>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <ol>
  <li><p>Allow respondents to check cells in a table corresponding to their answer preference: each row can be a different item, and each column can be labeled with your rating anchor, or vice versa – no numbers involved. Here's how that might look (if one were to answer wisely):</p>
  
  <p>$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline&amp;\tiny\text{Strongly Disagree}&amp;\tiny\text{Disagree}&amp;\tiny\text{Mildly Disagree}&amp;\tiny\text{Mildly Agree}&amp;\tiny\text{Agree}&amp;\tiny\text{Strongly Agree}\\\hline\tiny\text{Tumblers: better than pumpers!}^*&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;\checkmark\\\hline\tiny\text{I look fat in this dress.}&amp;\checkmark\\\hline\end{array}$<sup><a href="http://video.adultswim.com/tim-and-eric-awesome-show-great-job/tumblers.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">*</a></sup></p>
  
  <p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likert_scale" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia</a> gives another style using marked options (by <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Mr.Olas" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Nicholas Smith</a>):</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Example_Likert_Scale.svg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/Example_Likert_Scale.svg/200px-Example_Likert_Scale.svg.png" alt=""></a></p></li>
  <li><p>Letter codes can also be substituted for numeric options if blanks are to be filled for a list of very many items; e.g., {<code>SD</code>,<code>D</code>,<code>MD</code>,<code>MA</code>,<code>A</code>,<code>SA</code>}. Just don't forget to include the legend!</p></li>
  </ol>
  
  <hr>
  
  <p><sup><strong>Reference</strong><br>
  Schwarz, N., Knäuper, B., Hippler, H. J., Noelle-Neumann, E., &amp; Clark, L. (1991). Rating scales numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels. <em>Public Opinion Quarterly, 55</em>(4), 570–582.</sup></p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-29T20:11:41.427Z
The only confusion I see while attributing values is that if I go for B: -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3; on the right hand side, it increases from 0 to 3 whereas on the left hand side, it decreases from 0 to -3 (left direction). Do we normally average the values of the Likert Scale to analyze the data?      2) If I choose to avoid negative integers, in the following manner, does that make more sense: [ technical 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | human ] How should I analyze the data reponses in this example?  Legend: (1: extremely; 2: moderately; 3:fairly – 4:fairly; 5: moderately; 6:extremely)
user39531
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-29T20:16:37.550Z
As I've said in my answer, either option connotes the left option is somehow "less" than the right option. The reference I've listed describes a study that demonstrated undesirable differences between the two options. It's not clear that either is preferable, and there's reason to suspect either will bias responses. This is why I suggested avoiding a numeric response system. As for analysis, that's a separate question, and the answer will depend on how much data you're prepared to collect and how sophisticated you're willing to get with statistics – it can get quite complex with Likert ratings
Nick Stauner
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-29T20:24:04.897Z
Does the following alternative sound better: If I choose to avoid negative integers, in the following manner, does that make more sense: [ technical 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | human ] How should I analyze the data reponses in this example? Legend: (1: extremely; 2: moderately; 3:fairly – 4:fairly; 5: moderately; 6:extremely)
user39531
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-29T20:26:45.293Z
You seem to be missing my point. You're still suggesting respondents give their ratings in terms of numbers; this is the core problem. It is not clear that any set of numbers is preferable to any other. Again, **analysis is a separate question.**
Nick Stauner
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-05-29T04:24:28.820Z
2014-05-29T04:24:28.820Z
2017-04-13T12:44:18.443Z
Nick Stauner
<p>Does it matter which one of the three scales we use: A, B, or C in the attached questionnaire? Each one will have a different interpretation of the data. Please advise how should we analyze the bi-polar items of this questionnaire. Thank you.<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/XoTPw.png" alt="Questionnaire"></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-06-09T06:49:08.593Z
Are you asking about whether and how to display numbers to respondents or how you code the resulting responses?
Jeromy Anglim
<cognitive-psychology><perception><emotion><measurement>
How to assign numbers to response options on a bipolar scale?
user39531
# How to assign numbers to response options on a bipolar scale?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-05-29)

Does it matter which one of the three scales we use: A, B, or C in the attached questionnaire? Each one will have a different interpretation of the data. Please advise how should we analyze the bi-polar items of this questionnaire. Thank you.![Questionnaire](https://i.sstatic.net/XoTPw.png)

**Tags:** cognitive-psychology, perception, emotion, measurement

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Are you asking about whether and how to display numbers to respondents or how you code the resulting responses?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2014-05-29. Score: 2

Yes, it matters, and you should probably go with scale `B` if you have to use numbers. See [my answer here on Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/96880/32036) in response to, "[Is 0 a valid value in a Likert scale?](https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/32389/32036)" The zero in the middle of `A` is confusing (this isn't to say I don't understand it, but do you really trust that every respondent you ever come across will?), but even if you were to replace it with 4 and add 1 to the options currently labeled 4–6, you might get different answers than if you go with (-3)–(+3). Either way, there's some connotation of "less" applied to the options on the left, which may bias responses. Option `C` even confuses me, so I'd say you should throw that out completely...

IMO, the safest bet would be to label your rating options with words, not numbers. To make responding easy, let people check boxes or provide abbreviated codes for their preferences such as "Strongly prefer left option" = `SL` or "Right option is a mildly better fit" = `Rm`. Here's how I presented these suggestions in my other answer, and the supporting reference (Schwarz, Knäuper, Hippler, Noelle-Neumann, & Clark, 1991):

> 1. Allow respondents to check cells in a table corresponding to their answer preference: each row can be a different item, and each column can be labeled with your rating anchor, or vice versa – no numbers involved. Here's how that might look (if one were to answer wisely):
>
>    $\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline&\tiny\text{Strongly Disagree}&\tiny\text{Disagree}&\tiny\text{Mildly Disagree}&\tiny\text{Mildly Agree}&\tiny\text{Agree}&\tiny\text{Strongly Agree}\\\hline\tiny\text{Tumblers: better than pumpers!}^\*&&&&&&\checkmark\\\hline\tiny\text{I look fat in this dress.}&\checkmark\\\hline\end{array}$[\*](http://video.adultswim.com/tim-and-eric-awesome-show-great-job/tumblers.html)
>
>    [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likert_scale) gives another style using marked options (by [Nicholas Smith](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Mr.Olas)):
>
>    [![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/Example_Likert_Scale.svg/200px-Example_Likert_Scale.svg.png)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Example_Likert_Scale.svg)
> 2. Letter codes can also be substituted for numeric options if blanks are to be filled for a list of very many items; e.g., {`SD`,`D`,`MD`,`MA`,`A`,`SA`}. Just don't forget to include the legend!
>
> ---
>
> **Reference**  
> Schwarz, N., Knäuper, B., Hippler, H. J., Noelle-Neumann, E., & Clark, L. (1991). Rating scales numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels. *Public Opinion Quarterly, 55*(4), 570–582.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: The only confusion I see while attributing values is that if I go for B: -3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3; on the right hand side, it increases from 0 to 3 whereas on the left hand side, it decreases from 0 to -3 (left direction). Do we normally average the values of the Likert Scale to analyze the data?      2) If I choose to avoid negative integers, in the following manner, does that make more sense: [ technical 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | human ] How should I analyze the data reponses in this example?  Legend: (1: extremely; 2: moderately; 3:fairly – 4:fairly; 5: moderately; 6:extremely)  
> **username_2**: As I've said in my answer, either option connotes the left option is somehow "less" than the right option. The reference I've listed describes a study that demonstrated undesirable differences between the two options. It's not clear that either is preferable, and there's reason to suspect either will bias responses. This is why I suggested avoiding a numeric response system. As for analysis, that's a separate question, and the answer will depend on how much data you're prepared to collect and how sophisticated you're willing to get with statistics – it can get quite complex with Likert ratings  
> **username_0**: Does the following alternative sound better: If I choose to avoid negative integers, in the following manner, does that make more sense: [ technical 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | human ] How should I analyze the data reponses in this example? Legend: (1: extremely; 2: moderately; 3:fairly – 4:fairly; 5: moderately; 6:extremely)  
> **username_2**: You seem to be missing my point. You're still suggesting respondents give their ratings in terms of numbers; this is the core problem. It is not clear that any set of numbers is preferable to any other. Again, **analysis is a separate question.**  

---

