<p>Taken from a purely practical viewpoint, there is a finite number of neurons in the brain, with a finite (though large) number of connections between them. As such, a brain can only contain a finite amount of information. The more that one attempts to learn, the more that the connections between neurons will get obscured as a single memory  or idea becomes mapped to a multitude of different related pieces of information or memories.</p>

<p>Evolutionarily, the brain attempts to condense related information to allow for the processing of new and possibly more important data. If you tried to learn everything about every single chair in existence, your memories of different chairs would blur together as your brain tries to force similar things to be considered one memory, especially concerning things that are neither life-threatening or of obvious physical gain. This conclusion is drawn from various theories in Evolutionary Psychology, principally "The cognitive system operates at all times to optimize the adaptation of the behavior of the organism" (John R. Anderson 1990 p. 28). A short summary of these theories can be found <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=esDW3xTKoLIC&amp;lpg=PA5&amp;ots=N5Kt-onnlR&amp;dq=evolutionary%20psychology%20memory&amp;lr&amp;pg=PA784#v=onepage&amp;q=memory&amp;f=false">here</a> starting on page 783</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-06-25T08:05:57.100Z
@SCGhost would you mind editing the citations into your answer?
Artem Kaznatcheev
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-19T19:03:33.137Z
I guess the real question is: how does the brain "save" information?
nico
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-19T22:06:44.930Z
@nico the real question is very very broad then. nice answer!
zergylord
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-20T04:06:18.200Z
You've made some strong claims about the way the brain works. Could you cite any support for your answer?
Mark Lapierre
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-26T01:37:27.333Z
@Solus My evolutionary points are based off of various Evolutionary Psychology theories that propose "the cognitive system operates at all times to optimize the adaptation of the behavior of the organism" (John R. Anderson 1990 p. 28). A short summary of these theories can be found [here](http://books.google.com/books?id=esDW3xTKoLIC&lpg=PA5&ots=N5Kt-onnlR&dq=evolutionary%20psychology%20memory&lr&pg=PA784#v=onepage&q=memory&f=false) starting on page 783
SC Ghost
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-19T17:15:05.183Z
2012-07-05T16:55:35.917Z
2012-07-05T16:55:35.917Z
SC Ghost
<p>There's definitely progressive interference and retroactive interference, which are basically two ways that old memories and new memories can interfere with each other. </p>

<p>But on the other hand, do these types of interference <em>always</em> have to happen?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-19T17:38:09.610Z
There are studies of individuals who "never forget" certain types of irrelevant details, I'll try to find something tomorrow
Zelda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-20T03:56:16.097Z
What's your definition of "amount of knowledge learnt"? Do you have domain specific applications in mind, or are you thinking across all domains?
Jeromy Anglim
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-20T04:20:29.747Z
Knowledge across all domains.

I'm particularly interested in if interference is greater for domain specific knowledge than for knowledge across all domains.
InquilineKea
<learning><memory>
Is there a practical limit to the amount of knowledge a human can learn?
InquilineKea
# Is there a practical limit to the amount of knowledge a human can learn?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-01-19)

There's definitely progressive interference and retroactive interference, which are basically two ways that old memories and new memories can interfere with each other.

But on the other hand, do these types of interference *always* have to happen?

**Tags:** learning, memory

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: There are studies of individuals who "never forget" certain types of irrelevant details, I'll try to find something tomorrow  
> **username_2**: What's your definition of "amount of knowledge learnt"? Do you have domain specific applications in mind, or are you thinking across all domains?  
> **username_0**: Knowledge across all domains.  I'm particularly interested in if interference is greater for domain specific knowledge than for knowledge across all domains.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2012-01-19. Score: 14

Taken from a purely practical viewpoint, there is a finite number of neurons in the brain, with a finite (though large) number of connections between them. As such, a brain can only contain a finite amount of information. The more that one attempts to learn, the more that the connections between neurons will get obscured as a single memory or idea becomes mapped to a multitude of different related pieces of information or memories.

Evolutionarily, the brain attempts to condense related information to allow for the processing of new and possibly more important data. If you tried to learn everything about every single chair in existence, your memories of different chairs would blur together as your brain tries to force similar things to be considered one memory, especially concerning things that are neither life-threatening or of obvious physical gain. This conclusion is drawn from various theories in Evolutionary Psychology, principally "The cognitive system operates at all times to optimize the adaptation of the behavior of the organism" (John R. Anderson 1990 p. 28). A short summary of these theories can be found [here](http://books.google.com/books?id=esDW3xTKoLIC&lpg=PA5&ots=N5Kt-onnlR&dq=evolutionary%20psychology%20memory&lr&pg=PA784#v=onepage&q=memory&f=false) starting on page 783

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: I guess the real question is: how does the brain "save" information?  
> **username_6**: @username_5 the real question is very very broad then. nice answer!  
> **username_7**: You've made some strong claims about the way the brain works. Could you cite any support for your answer?  
> **username_3**: @Solus My evolutionary points are based off of various Evolutionary Psychology theories that propose "the cognitive system operates at all times to optimize the adaptation of the behavior of the organism" (John R. Anderson 1990 p. 28). A short summary of these theories can be found [here](http://books.google.com/books?id=esDW3xTKoLIC&lpg=PA5&ots=N5Kt-onnlR&dq=evolutionary%20psychology%20memory&lr&pg=PA784#v=onepage&q=memory&f=false) starting on page 783  
> **username_4**: @SCGhost would you mind editing the citations into your answer?  

---

