<p>Yes, this <em>could be</em> a cognitive bias. Quite clearly, a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consultant" rel="nofollow noreferrer">consultant</a> is <em>expected</em> to be more knowledgeable about the specific topic they were hired to consult on.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>A consultant (from Latin: consultare "to deliberate") is a
  professional who provides expert advice.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Consultants are <em>supposed</em> to be experts in their field, and as a result they carry some authority. Therefore, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authority_bias" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><strong>authority bias</strong></a> comes to mind:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Authority bias is the tendency to attribute greater accuracy to the
  opinion of an authority figure <strong>(unrelated to its content)</strong> and be more
  influenced by that opinion.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The bolded addendum in between parentheses is important. As long as based on the content the consultant brings to the table you respect their opinion, there is no cognitive bias (no irrationality); they are simply doing a good job.</p>

<p>But, not all 'consultants' are experts per se. In software development specifically, I have the impression 'consultancy' has almost become synonymous with 'temporary hire'. Newly grads often get hired straight out of school in consultancy firms. In such cases, there might be a cognitive bias at play, when it is not the contributed content which is evaluated (as you outline in your answer), but merely the title the consultant carries.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T09:33:45.377Z
While I agree with your reasoning, the specific question "I've also seen teams who believe everything a consultant says, especially at the beginning of the relationship yet scrutinize the people they work with. Why?" doesn't give the people enough information to do a "rational" decision/belief of the consultant's competency. Thus I conclude in my answer that it is in fact a cognitive bias which leads them to believe that the consultant is an expert.
Jeyy
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T09:36:59.877Z
That's what I wrote in the final paragraph, no? _"In such cases, there might be a cognitive bias at play, ... (as you outline in your answer), ..."_ I merely provided more context to clarify exactly when it is/isn't considered a cognitive bias.
Steven Jeuris
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T08:52:47.130Z
2018-06-13T08:52:47.130Z
Steven Jeuris
<p>I've noticed that many people assume that consultants know more than they themselves do and/or more than their team does.  That is, when a team is stuck on a problem, some people believe that a consultant can figure it out even without knowing that consultant. True, more heads might help, but I've also seen teams who believe everything a consultant says, especially at the beginning of the relationship yet scrutinize the people they work with.  Why?</p>

<p>I've read about the <strong>halo effect</strong> <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect" rel="nofollow noreferrer">in Wikipedia</a>, which contains the statement, "The halo effect is a type of immediate judgement discrepancy, or cognitive bias, where a person making an initial assessment of another person, place, or thing will assume ambiguous information based upon concrete information."</p>

<p>This would suggest to me that any concrete information can bias someone when filling in the ambiguous information.  However, reading more about the halo effect, it seems mainly focused on how people <em>look</em>.</p>

<p>So my questions are, what goes on in people's minds to create the belief that a consultant knows best when they don't have evidence to believe so?  Is it a bias?  If so, which one?  Or just human behaviour?  Something else?  Does it depend on the situation?  </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T06:07:11.003Z
Who are the "many people"? Managers, team members, outside persons, or ??? All will have a different viewpoint. But if the team were more knowledgeable, then the consultant wouldn't be necessary, right? Anyway this seems to be more situational than psychological.
user3169
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T09:15:53.003Z
@user3169 - different situations can can have psychological effects so a phenomenon which is situational can also be psychological.
Chris Rogers
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-13T16:01:08.210Z
@user3169: I'm not referring to a specific personal experience but, rather, a trend I've noticed over 18+ years working in software.
Marnie A.
<cognitive-psychology><bias><halo-effect>
Is the belief that a consultant knows more than the team a form of cognitive bias?
Marnie A.
# Is the belief that a consultant knows more than the team a form of cognitive bias?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-06-12)

I've noticed that many people assume that consultants know more than they themselves do and/or more than their team does. That is, when a team is stuck on a problem, some people believe that a consultant can figure it out even without knowing that consultant. True, more heads might help, but I've also seen teams who believe everything a consultant says, especially at the beginning of the relationship yet scrutinize the people they work with. Why?

I've read about the **halo effect** [in Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect), which contains the statement, "The halo effect is a type of immediate judgement discrepancy, or cognitive bias, where a person making an initial assessment of another person, place, or thing will assume ambiguous information based upon concrete information."

This would suggest to me that any concrete information can bias someone when filling in the ambiguous information. However, reading more about the halo effect, it seems mainly focused on how people *look*.

So my questions are, what goes on in people's minds to create the belief that a consultant knows best when they don't have evidence to believe so? Is it a bias? If so, which one? Or just human behaviour? Something else? Does it depend on the situation?

**Tags:** cognitive-psychology, bias, halo-effect

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Who are the "many people"? Managers, team members, outside persons, or ??? All will have a different viewpoint. But if the team were more knowledgeable, then the consultant wouldn't be necessary, right? Anyway this seems to be more situational than psychological.  
> **username_2**: @username_1 - different situations can can have psychological effects so a phenomenon which is situational can also be psychological.  
> **username_0**: @username_1: I'm not referring to a specific personal experience but, rather, a trend I've noticed over 18+ years working in software.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-06-13. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Yes, this *could be* a cognitive bias. Quite clearly, a [consultant](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consultant) is *expected* to be more knowledgeable about the specific topic they were hired to consult on.

> A consultant (from Latin: consultare "to deliberate") is a
> professional who provides expert advice.

Consultants are *supposed* to be experts in their field, and as a result they carry some authority. Therefore, [**authority bias**](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authority_bias) comes to mind:

> Authority bias is the tendency to attribute greater accuracy to the
> opinion of an authority figure **(unrelated to its content)** and be more
> influenced by that opinion.

The bolded addendum in between parentheses is important. As long as based on the content the consultant brings to the table you respect their opinion, there is no cognitive bias (no irrationality); they are simply doing a good job.

But, not all 'consultants' are experts per se. In software development specifically, I have the impression 'consultancy' has almost become synonymous with 'temporary hire'. Newly grads often get hired straight out of school in consultancy firms. In such cases, there might be a cognitive bias at play, when it is not the contributed content which is evaluated (as you outline in your answer), but merely the title the consultant carries.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: While I agree with your reasoning, the specific question "I've also seen teams who believe everything a consultant says, especially at the beginning of the relationship yet scrutinize the people they work with. Why?" doesn't give the people enough information to do a "rational" decision/belief of the consultant's competency. Thus I conclude in my answer that it is in fact a cognitive bias which leads them to believe that the consultant is an expert.  
> **username_3**: That's what I wrote in the final paragraph, no? _"In such cases, there might be a cognitive bias at play, ... (as you outline in your answer), ..."_ I merely provided more context to clarify exactly when it is/isn't considered a cognitive bias.  

---

