<p><strong>Short answer</strong><br>
Subcortical structures can definitely show neuroplasticity in adults. Most likely, all brain structures can show plastic changes to some degree.</p>

<p><strong>Background</strong><br>
The question is rather broad, as there are many <a href="http://www.intropsych.com/ch02_human_nervous_system/subcortical_structures.html" rel="nofollow">subcortical structures</a> and <a href="http://www.whatisneuroplasticity.com/" rel="nofollow">neuroplasticity</a> is age-dependent. I will therefore restrict my answer to three examples I dug up from the literature. </p>

<p>For example, in primates it has been shown that <strong><a href="https://www.dartmouth.edu/~rswenson/NeuroSci/chapter_10.html" rel="nofollow">thalamic</a></strong> and <a href="http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=2517" rel="nofollow"><strong>brainstem</a></strong> areas projecting to the somatosensory cortex are plastic and change their projections to the cortex to aid in the rearrangement of the somatotopical map <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10845057" rel="nofollow">(Jones, 2000)</a>.     </p>

<p>Changes in the connectivity between hemispheres has been associated with plastic changes in the <strong>callosal pathway</strong> (<strong><em><a href="http://radiopaedia.org/articles/corpus-callosum" rel="nofollow">corpus callosum</a></em></strong>) after somatosensory lesions in the cortex <a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0168010209002090/1-s2.0-S0168010209002090-main.pdf?_tid=8226563c-1cca-11e6-b257-00000aab0f01&amp;acdnat=1463556857_3d28d7d1d3b34fbc5b35623272c718fb" rel="nofollow">(Duffau, 2009)</a>. </p>

<p>As a last example, subcortical plasticity has been shown after lesioning the spinal cord in monkeys and rats. By interrupting the ascending projections of mechanoreceptor afferents of the forelimb and the rest of the lower body the corresponding part of the somatotopic representation of primary somatosensory cortex becomes completely deafferented and unresponsive to tactile stimuli. If some of the afferents from the hand remain intact after such dorsal column lesions, the remaining afferents will extensively reactivate portions of somatosensory cortex formerly representing the hand over the course of a month. This functional reorganization has been linked to the sprouting of preserved afferents within the <strong><a href="http://www.neuroanatomy.wisc.edu/coursebook/webstem4-10.pdf" rel="nofollow">cuneate nucleus</a></strong> of the <strong>dorsal column–trigeminal complex</strong> in the <strong><a href="http://www.healthline.com/human-body-maps/medulla-oblongata" rel="nofollow">medulla</a></strong>, also subcortical brain structure <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488607002452" rel="nofollow">(Kaas <em>et al</em>., 2009)</a>. </p>

<p>In terms of structures that are resilient to plasticity, <a href="http://www.doctorclaudia.com/" rel="nofollow">Aguire</a> from USC argues that <a href="https://www.headspace.com/blog/2015/01/30/which-parts-of-the-brain-are-most-resilient-to-change/" rel="nofollow">every brain structure has the potential for neural plasticity to occur</a>. Basically, because the term plasticity is pretty much all-encompassing, and I quote:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>[N]europlasticity is the ability of elements in the brain to show structural and functional changes in response to internal and external events. Neuroplasticity occurs at different levels: structural[ly], functional[ly] and [through] all the molecular and cellular mechanisms that accompany these changes. [...] At all times, these players are constantly changing [...].</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Admittedly it is a popular-scientific and broad answer to this question, but I do agree with it.  </p>

<p><sub><strong>References</strong><br>
<strong>-</strong> <a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0168010209002090/1-s2.0-S0168010209002090-main.pdf?_tid=8226563c-1cca-11e6-b257-00000aab0f01&amp;acdnat=1463556857_3d28d7d1d3b34fbc5b35623272c718fb" rel="nofollow">Duffau, <em>Neurosci Res</em>(2009); <strong>65</strong>: 131–5</a><br>
<strong>-</strong> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10845057" rel="nofollow">Jones, <em>Annu Rev Neurosci</em> (2000); <strong>23</strong>:1-37</a><br>
<strong>-</strong> <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488607002452" rel="nofollow">Kaas <em>et al</em>., <em>Exp Neurol</em> (2000); <strong>209</strong>(2): 407–16</a></sub></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-18T07:48:00.923Z
2016-05-18T12:28:48.537Z
2016-05-18T12:28:48.537Z
AliceD
<p>In this question, I am defining neuroplasticity as being the creation of new connections between neurons. I'm aware that there is a high degree of neuroplasticity in the cortex and that new connections are created frequently in that brain area. However, in what areas of the brain are the connections constant or change rarely? I'm assuming that any brain area that controls muscles (such as the superior colliculus in the midbrain) are statically connected. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-02-12T07:32:48.027Z
The term "critical period" implies that regional plasticity ends thereafter. For instance, the critical period for ocular dominance to develop in primary visual cortex makes me wonder if plasticity in all or part of primary visual cortex ends after that critical period.
John Pick
<neuroanatomy><plasticity>
Is neuroplasticity limited to the cerebral cortex in the brain?
Seanny123
# Is neuroplasticity limited to the cerebral cortex in the brain?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-11-14)

In this question, I am defining neuroplasticity as being the creation of new connections between neurons. I'm aware that there is a high degree of neuroplasticity in the cortex and that new connections are created frequently in that brain area. However, in what areas of the brain are the connections constant or change rarely? I'm assuming that any brain area that controls muscles (such as the superior colliculus in the midbrain) are statically connected.

**Tags:** neuroanatomy, plasticity

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The term "critical period" implies that regional plasticity ends thereafter. For instance, the critical period for ocular dominance to develop in primary visual cortex makes me wonder if plasticity in all or part of primary visual cortex ends after that critical period.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-05-18. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

**Short answer**  
Subcortical structures can definitely show neuroplasticity in adults. Most likely, all brain structures can show plastic changes to some degree.

**Background**  
The question is rather broad, as there are many [subcortical structures](http://www.intropsych.com/ch02_human_nervous_system/subcortical_structures.html) and [neuroplasticity](http://www.whatisneuroplasticity.com/) is age-dependent. I will therefore restrict my answer to three examples I dug up from the literature.

For example, in primates it has been shown that **[thalamic](https://www.dartmouth.edu/~rswenson/NeuroSci/chapter_10.html)** and [**brainstem**](http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=2517) areas projecting to the somatosensory cortex are plastic and change their projections to the cortex to aid in the rearrangement of the somatotopical map [(Jones, 2000)](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10845057).

Changes in the connectivity between hemispheres has been associated with plastic changes in the **callosal pathway** (***[corpus callosum](http://radiopaedia.org/articles/corpus-callosum)***) after somatosensory lesions in the cortex [(Duffau, 2009)](http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0168010209002090/1-s2.0-S0168010209002090-main.pdf?_tid=8226563c-1cca-11e6-b257-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1463556857_3d28d7d1d3b34fbc5b35623272c718fb).

As a last example, subcortical plasticity has been shown after lesioning the spinal cord in monkeys and rats. By interrupting the ascending projections of mechanoreceptor afferents of the forelimb and the rest of the lower body the corresponding part of the somatotopic representation of primary somatosensory cortex becomes completely deafferented and unresponsive to tactile stimuli. If some of the afferents from the hand remain intact after such dorsal column lesions, the remaining afferents will extensively reactivate portions of somatosensory cortex formerly representing the hand over the course of a month. This functional reorganization has been linked to the sprouting of preserved afferents within the **[cuneate nucleus](http://www.neuroanatomy.wisc.edu/coursebook/webstem4-10.pdf)** of the **dorsal column–trigeminal complex** in the **[medulla](http://www.healthline.com/human-body-maps/medulla-oblongata)**, also subcortical brain structure [(Kaas *et al*., 2009)](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488607002452).

In terms of structures that are resilient to plasticity, [Aguire](http://www.doctorclaudia.com/) from USC argues that [every brain structure has the potential for neural plasticity to occur](https://www.headspace.com/blog/2015/01/30/which-parts-of-the-brain-are-most-resilient-to-change/). Basically, because the term plasticity is pretty much all-encompassing, and I quote:

> [N]europlasticity is the ability of elements in the brain to show structural and functional changes in response to internal and external events. Neuroplasticity occurs at different levels: structural[ly], functional[ly] and [through] all the molecular and cellular mechanisms that accompany these changes. [...] At all times, these players are constantly changing [...].

Admittedly it is a popular-scientific and broad answer to this question, but I do agree with it.

**References**  
**-** [Duffau, *Neurosci Res*(2009); **65**: 131–5](http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0168010209002090/1-s2.0-S0168010209002090-main.pdf?_tid=8226563c-1cca-11e6-b257-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1463556857_3d28d7d1d3b34fbc5b35623272c718fb)  
**-** [Jones, *Annu Rev Neurosci* (2000); **23**:1-37](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10845057)  
**-** [Kaas *et al*., *Exp Neurol* (2000); **209**(2): 407–16](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488607002452)


---

