<p>For me it is the inference that the more notifications I have the more value I will have in bothering to click it.</p>

<p>That 1 notification on a social networking site might be a request to play some terrible game.. however 24 notifications are likely to yield at least something beneficial for me to justify having bothered clicking it.</p>

<p>The higher the number the increased urgency I feel to check them (maybe the same person is repeatedly trying to make contact and I am unintentionally ignoring them!).</p>

<p>As for there being a notification with no number, that is easier for me to ignore. In the case of the Windows' PC issues (Action Center) in the task-bar, there is always a notification in it for me, so I have learnt to dismiss it.. I have become de-sensitised to seeing that alert. If however the icon increased in number and I detected this change, then I would deem that to be an increase in urgency and would be more likely to click it again.</p>

<p>I think if I kept clicking Action Center and felt it yielded little value to me then I would be able to filter out if the numbers were to keep increasing, but I would find it more difficult to ignore and feel tricked by it just in-case this new state meant something important this time round..</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-07-06T23:03:57.663Z
2014-07-06T23:10:02.420Z
2014-07-06T23:10:02.420Z
Matthew1471
<p>What is the difference in cognitive effects on the user between simply showing that there are 'some' unattended notifications, or showing how many notifications there are?</p>

<p>Take Facebook's notification count for example, 
<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/oBoTX.png" alt="Facebook&#39;s notification count"></p>

<p>as opposed to Windows' PC issues notification <img src="https://i.sstatic.net/JpqCV.png" alt="Solve PC issues tray icon"> in the system tray.</p>

<p>Of course depending on what the notification is notifying you of, people will respond differently, which is not something I'm interested in. However, I suspect there could be a difference based on where it is being displayed, e.g. whether it  is always visible or not. Would one be preferred over the other in different situations?</p>

<p>I'm mainly interested in a comparative study between the two, but any research which might give additional insights in the two separate representations would help me out as well.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-12T14:54:49.223Z
I found [a related question on UX](http://ux.stackexchange.com/q/15556/3612), but let's see whether we can do better here!
Steven Jeuris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-12T19:51:55.340Z
@what You mean you remember the number then and see whether it increases?
Steven Jeuris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-12T21:04:46.537Z
@what Never thought of it that way. Already useful input, thanks! The question remains though. Suppose it would always show the amount of items you haven't 'inspected' yet, or just an indication that there are some you haven't inspected yet.
Steven Jeuris
<cognitive-psychology><hci>
What is the impact of showing the amount of unattended notifications to the user?
Steven Jeuris
# What is the impact of showing the amount of unattended notifications to the user?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-09-12)

What is the difference in cognitive effects on the user between simply showing that there are 'some' unattended notifications, or showing how many notifications there are?

Take Facebook's notification count for example,
![Facebook's notification count](https://i.sstatic.net/oBoTX.png)

as opposed to Windows' PC issues notification ![Solve PC issues tray icon](https://i.sstatic.net/JpqCV.png) in the system tray.

Of course depending on what the notification is notifying you of, people will respond differently, which is not something I'm interested in. However, I suspect there could be a difference based on where it is being displayed, e.g. whether it is always visible or not. Would one be preferred over the other in different situations?

I'm mainly interested in a comparative study between the two, but any research which might give additional insights in the two separate representations would help me out as well.

**Tags:** cognitive-psychology, hci

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I found [a related question on UX](http://ux.stackexchange.com/q/15556/3612), but let's see whether we can do better here!  
> **username_0**: @what You mean you remember the number then and see whether it increases?  
> **username_0**: @what Never thought of it that way. Already useful input, thanks! The question remains though. Suppose it would always show the amount of items you haven't 'inspected' yet, or just an indication that there are some you haven't inspected yet.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2014-07-06. Score: 1

For me it is the inference that the more notifications I have the more value I will have in bothering to click it.

That 1 notification on a social networking site might be a request to play some terrible game.. however 24 notifications are likely to yield at least something beneficial for me to justify having bothered clicking it.

The higher the number the increased urgency I feel to check them (maybe the same person is repeatedly trying to make contact and I am unintentionally ignoring them!).

As for there being a notification with no number, that is easier for me to ignore. In the case of the Windows' PC issues (Action Center) in the task-bar, there is always a notification in it for me, so I have learnt to dismiss it.. I have become de-sensitised to seeing that alert. If however the icon increased in number and I detected this change, then I would deem that to be an increase in urgency and would be more likely to click it again.

I think if I kept clicking Action Center and felt it yielded little value to me then I would be able to filter out if the numbers were to keep increasing, but I would find it more difficult to ignore and feel tricked by it just in-case this new state meant something important this time round..


---

