<p>This sounds like a mix of biases "due to the effectiveness of a search set", "the illusion of validity" and "biases of imaginability". See <a href="http://www.math.mcgill.ca/vetta/CS764.dir/judgement.pdf" rel="nofollow" title="judgement under uncertainty">judgement under uncertainty [Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4157. (Sep. 27, 1974), pp. 1124-1131.]</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-25T12:08:57.713Z
Welcome to cogsci.SE!  Including a citation or DOI would be helpful, since all the extra info would drop out of the answer if the link went dead.
Krysta
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-25T06:23:42.223Z
2016-07-26T07:29:19.477Z
2016-07-26T07:29:19.477Z
dddvvv
<p>I was recently trying to argue that the Democratic National Committee's efforts to undermine the Bernie Sanders campaign were probably ineffective, and that those who attempted to do so probably suffered from a specific cognitive bias. Namely, due to their presence in the "political operative" nexus, they tended to overestimate, in general, the impact that political operations have on elections, swaying public opinion, etc. </p>

<p>I wonder whether social scientists have observed that, in general, experts overestimate their ability to make an impact, because they put the system they belong to on a pedestal. Has such a cognitive bias ever been discussed in the literature? Is there a name for it?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-25T04:35:20.330Z
Hard to say in "literature" but certainly any discussion of "intellect" as a subject worthy of Historical Study is usually frowned upon as seldom do academics "make History." Never hurts to be smart but "intellectualism" is not usually equated with anything substantive or "proveable." In short the smart person is "always correct" fallacy.
Doctor Zhivago
<cognitive-psychology><bias>
Is there a cognitive bias which describes expert communities' overestimation of their potential impact?
Josh M.
# Is there a cognitive bias which describes expert communities' overestimation of their potential impact?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-07-25)

I was recently trying to argue that the Democratic National Committee's efforts to undermine the Bernie Sanders campaign were probably ineffective, and that those who attempted to do so probably suffered from a specific cognitive bias. Namely, due to their presence in the "political operative" nexus, they tended to overestimate, in general, the impact that political operations have on elections, swaying public opinion, etc.

I wonder whether social scientists have observed that, in general, experts overestimate their ability to make an impact, because they put the system they belong to on a pedestal. Has such a cognitive bias ever been discussed in the literature? Is there a name for it?

**Tags:** cognitive-psychology, bias

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Hard to say in "literature" but certainly any discussion of "intellect" as a subject worthy of Historical Study is usually frowned upon as seldom do academics "make History." Never hurts to be smart but "intellectualism" is not usually equated with anything substantive or "proveable." In short the smart person is "always correct" fallacy.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-07-25. Score: 2

This sounds like a mix of biases "due to the effectiveness of a search set", "the illusion of validity" and "biases of imaginability". See [judgement under uncertainty [Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4157. (Sep. 27, 1974), pp. 1124-1131.]](http://www.math.mcgill.ca/vetta/CS764.dir/judgement.pdf "judgement under uncertainty").

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Welcome to cogsci.SE!  Including a citation or DOI would be helpful, since all the extra info would drop out of the answer if the link went dead.  

---

