<p><strong>Nature Neuroscience</strong> offers such a possibility.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/nature-journals-offer-double-blind-review-1.16931" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.nature.com/news/nature-journals-offer-double-blind-review-1.16931</a></p>

<p>See also</p>

<p><a href="https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/9689/does-anyone-know-of-any-clinical-psychology-journals-that-use-a-double-blind-rev">Does anyone know of any clinical psychology journals that use a double-blind review process?</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-31T19:44:11.630Z
2015-05-31T19:44:11.630Z
2017-04-13T12:56:16.167Z
marsei
<p>In terms of impact factor (for a lack of a better proxy), what are the highest ranked neuroscience journals that use double-blind review process?</p>

<p>I would be submitting a paper that combines neuroscience, psychology and machine learning.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-31T19:13:25.910Z
Why the fixation on double-blind review?
StrongBad
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-01T02:31:19.053Z
I don't know the particulars of your case, but it is usually a big red flag when someone thinks that their work deserves a top journal but do not know the top journals of the field in which the work is in. That usually signals a certain amount of disengagement with the literature, my personal advice on how to proceed [would be here](http://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104/66). However, I think your question is a fine fit for this site and I hope you get some useful answers.
Artem Kaznatcheev
<neuroscience><neuroimaging><publication-process><publication>
What are the highest ranked neuroscience journals that use double-blind review process?
referee
# What are the highest ranked neuroscience journals that use double-blind review process?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-05-31)

In terms of impact factor (for a lack of a better proxy), what are the highest ranked neuroscience journals that use double-blind review process?

I would be submitting a paper that combines neuroscience, psychology and machine learning.

**Tags:** neuroscience, neuroimaging, publication-process, publication

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Why the fixation on double-blind review?  
> **username_2**: I don't know the particulars of your case, but it is usually a big red flag when someone thinks that their work deserves a top journal but do not know the top journals of the field in which the work is in. That usually signals a certain amount of disengagement with the literature, my personal advice on how to proceed [would be here](http://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104/66). However, I think your question is a fine fit for this site and I hope you get some useful answers.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2015-05-31. Score: 5

**Nature Neuroscience** offers such a possibility.

<http://www.nature.com/news/nature-journals-offer-double-blind-review-1.16931>

See also

[Does anyone know of any clinical psychology journals that use a double-blind review process?](https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/9689/does-anyone-know-of-any-clinical-psychology-journals-that-use-a-double-blind-rev)


---

