<p>The distinction between experiment and quasi-experiment is often made in undergraduate psychology courses. </p>

<p>In general, the term quasi-experiment is used to identify studies that fall short of a controlled experiment in some respect:
e.g., pre-existing groups;  allocation of participants to groups in a non-random way. In some cases, repeated measures experiments are labelled as quasi-experimental especially if they confound order with condition, especially simple pre-post designs.</p>

<p>The purpose of the term "quasi-experimental" is to highlight that there are potential confounds to causal inference that would not be present in a controlled experiment (e.g., time effects, pre-existing group differences, etc.).</p>

<p>However, more generally, an experiment typically refers to doing something in the world and observing the effect. In this sense, experiments are also sometimes distinguished from purely observational studies.</p>

<p>So in general, researchers should generally not use term "experiment" to describe an observational study. However, "quasi-experiments" can be labelled experiments.</p>

<p>So to come back to your question: how do you know whether a study is an experiment or a quasi-experiment? You have to read about the design and see whether the conditions for a controlled experiment are satisfied.</p>

<p>In general, as you progress in your psychology education, you may find that you use more nuanced descriptions of studies than simply "quasi-experimental". For example, you might describe a study as a simple pre-post repeated measures design. Or you might say that it compared a treatment and control group using pre-existing groups. The point is that these descriptions are more informative than simply saying "quasi-experimental".</p>

<p>In terms of reporting procedures for quasi-experiments in APA style, I think as above, this question does not entirely make sense. There are a variety of different types of quasi-experiments. For each type, there would be common things to report. For example, in simply describing your design, you will say what are between and within subjects factors and how participants were allocated or not allocated to groups.</p>

<p>You might find these APA reporting standards useful: "Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology" <a href="https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf</a></p>

<p>This APA Task Force article also describes many of these issues quite clearly around how to report methods:
Wilkinson (1999) <a href="https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-54-8-594.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-54-8-594.pdf</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-26T09:38:05.357Z
2018-06-27T05:32:18.890Z
2018-06-27T05:32:18.890Z
Jeromy Anglim
<p>As one reads the psychology literature (e.g. social psychology), it seems to me, and I hope I'm not wrong, that such a discipline is highly dependent on quasi experiments (correct me if I'm wrong please).</p>

<p>Yet, one is most likely to read "we carried out the experiment/study with N participants... etc.", and never "we carried out the quasi-experiment with N participants... etc.".</p>

<p>The idea is, there seems to be systematic avoidance of declaring the name of the design. One has to use a kind of induction from experience to discover the design procedure.</p>

<p>My questions:</p>

<p>1 - Why?... I'm a naive undergraduate and I need to know what is the design in a clear and declarative manner that doesn't confuse me.</p>

<p>2 - What is the official reporting procedure for reporting quasi experiments in APA (if such a procedure exists)?... Do I need to report the details of the design? and if so, how much details?</p>

<methodology><experiment-design><publication><apa-style>
How to report a quasi-experiment in APA?
Am95
# How to report a quasi-experiment in APA?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-06-26)

As one reads the psychology literature (e.g. social psychology), it seems to me, and I hope I'm not wrong, that such a discipline is highly dependent on quasi experiments (correct me if I'm wrong please).

Yet, one is most likely to read "we carried out the experiment/study with N participants... etc.", and never "we carried out the quasi-experiment with N participants... etc.".

The idea is, there seems to be systematic avoidance of declaring the name of the design. One has to use a kind of induction from experience to discover the design procedure.

My questions:

1 - Why?... I'm a naive undergraduate and I need to know what is the design in a clear and declarative manner that doesn't confuse me.

2 - What is the official reporting procedure for reporting quasi experiments in APA (if such a procedure exists)?... Do I need to report the details of the design? and if so, how much details?

**Tags:** methodology, experiment-design, publication, apa-style


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-06-26. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

The distinction between experiment and quasi-experiment is often made in undergraduate psychology courses.

In general, the term quasi-experiment is used to identify studies that fall short of a controlled experiment in some respect:
e.g., pre-existing groups; allocation of participants to groups in a non-random way. In some cases, repeated measures experiments are labelled as quasi-experimental especially if they confound order with condition, especially simple pre-post designs.

The purpose of the term "quasi-experimental" is to highlight that there are potential confounds to causal inference that would not be present in a controlled experiment (e.g., time effects, pre-existing group differences, etc.).

However, more generally, an experiment typically refers to doing something in the world and observing the effect. In this sense, experiments are also sometimes distinguished from purely observational studies.

So in general, researchers should generally not use term "experiment" to describe an observational study. However, "quasi-experiments" can be labelled experiments.

So to come back to your question: how do you know whether a study is an experiment or a quasi-experiment? You have to read about the design and see whether the conditions for a controlled experiment are satisfied.

In general, as you progress in your psychology education, you may find that you use more nuanced descriptions of studies than simply "quasi-experimental". For example, you might describe a study as a simple pre-post repeated measures design. Or you might say that it compared a treatment and control group using pre-existing groups. The point is that these descriptions are more informative than simply saying "quasi-experimental".

In terms of reporting procedures for quasi-experiments in APA style, I think as above, this question does not entirely make sense. There are a variety of different types of quasi-experiments. For each type, there would be common things to report. For example, in simply describing your design, you will say what are between and within subjects factors and how participants were allocated or not allocated to groups.

You might find these APA reporting standards useful: "Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology" <https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf>

This APA Task Force article also describes many of these issues quite clearly around how to report methods:
Wilkinson (1999) <https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-54-8-594.pdf>


---

