<p><em>My take</em> on this is because there are no other options. We have no previous emotional involvement, attachment or knowledge of them on a personal level.</p>

<p>We trust strangers on a daily basis. We get on a bus, which is driven by  a stranger. We go out to eat food and that food is cooked by strangers. We also work for strangers (until we get to know them, better). Celebrities are paid, celebrities are smart. They build up reputation and we trust statistics more than just one example from our personal lives. Thousands of people know Leo. Millions. There are probably no public statistics on our friends or co-workers, people we work with or spend time with. We just go by <em>our</em> opinion.</p>

<hr>

<p>When you meet someone and work with them, what does that relationship entail? <strong><em>Emotional involvement.</em></strong> You get to know them and form opinions. Things you <em>like</em> about them and things you don't <em>like</em>. You're listening to more than just a few conversations about a given topic. </p>

<p>If you're listening to a speech from a celebrity you know of and their opinion is to your liking, that's all you're hearing. You don't really know anything else about them to have any other options but to trust them.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>This is also very similar to why some people trust their therapist
  over their friend, even if what both of them say are similar. Sometimes, they aren't similar. We tend to trust what we're more objective towards. Who you're surrounded by makes a huge difference. They can be abusive, vulgar, rude. You're seeing more than just one side to them. You're only seeing one side of your therapist. The helpful, knowledgeable side.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>If we spend enough time to form an emotional bond with a therapist or let's say someone we've never met, we could very well go back to square one. Not trusting them as much as another celebrity you're objective towards.</p>

<p>When we're listening to the opinion of someone we know, other emotional factors are involved. Our dislikes (and other opinions of them) influence our trust in them and their opinions or knowledge of a given topic.</p>

<p>It's about things being objective. What we don't know can't  hurt us. In your case, you don't know much about Leo's personal life. You only know the opinions he shares. There's nothing else to go by and usually documentaries give you the best parts specified information. Nothing that sounds inaccurate, immoral, wrong or questionable.</p>

<hr>

<p><strong>Helpful Sources</strong></p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-earle-mcleod/why-we-trust-strangers-more-than-our-friends_b_5148323.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Why We Trust Strangers More Than Our Friends</a></li>
<li><p><a href="http://time.com/103396/we-trust-strangers-even-when-it-doesnt-make-sense-to-do-so/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">We Trust Strangers, Even When It Doesn’t Make Sense to Do So</a></p></li>
<li><p><a href="https://www.quora.com/Why-do-some-people-prefer-to-trust-what-strangers-say-rather-than-those-they-know" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Why do some people prefer to trust what strangers say rather than those they know?</a></p></li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-23T06:40:39.100Z
Hi Mike, interesting answer. I see that the websites you refer to are indirect references. Here at CogSci, however, we aim to have references to scientific literature, I.e. books and research papers. Do you have any, or are you able to find a few?
Robin Kramer-ten Have
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-24T10:54:37.360Z
This actually makes a lot of sense, because I always took what my friend said with a grain of salt - not always he was right -, other people around him didn't really have any achievements (which I personally take into an account when communicating with them).
skmasq
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-25T16:33:11.083Z
@RobinKramer, thank you! I am not able to find resources at the current moment, but will try sometime this week and will keep this in mind for future reference.
Mike Kuplevatsky
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-25T16:34:08.193Z
@skmasq, I hear that, that makes sense. I think I see the connection there! And thank you for the comment!
Mike Kuplevatsky
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-22T23:48:31.087Z
2017-01-22T23:57:15.820Z
2017-01-22T23:57:15.820Z
Mike Kuplevatsky
<p>I have been working on project with a person who is climate change activist, and after all those months I had a feeling he is on to something, but I was not convinced.</p>

<p>Now comes Leonardo DiCaprio with his National Geographic documentary and I am completely sold and have started to slowly participate in the climate change movement.</p>

<p>Why do I value celebrities opinion, a person I have never met, more than a person I have spent months together in meetings, pubs and even birthdays?</p>

<social-psychology><decision-making>
Why I value celebrities opinion more than a person I have actually met?
skmasq
# Why I value celebrities opinion more than a person I have actually met?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-01-21)

I have been working on project with a person who is climate change activist, and after all those months I had a feeling he is on to something, but I was not convinced.

Now comes Leonardo DiCaprio with his National Geographic documentary and I am completely sold and have started to slowly participate in the climate change movement.

Why do I value celebrities opinion, a person I have never met, more than a person I have spent months together in meetings, pubs and even birthdays?

**Tags:** social-psychology, decision-making


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-01-22. Score: 1

*My take* on this is because there are no other options. We have no previous emotional involvement, attachment or knowledge of them on a personal level.

We trust strangers on a daily basis. We get on a bus, which is driven by a stranger. We go out to eat food and that food is cooked by strangers. We also work for strangers (until we get to know them, better). Celebrities are paid, celebrities are smart. They build up reputation and we trust statistics more than just one example from our personal lives. Thousands of people know Leo. Millions. There are probably no public statistics on our friends or co-workers, people we work with or spend time with. We just go by *our* opinion.

---

When you meet someone and work with them, what does that relationship entail? ***Emotional involvement.*** You get to know them and form opinions. Things you *like* about them and things you don't *like*. You're listening to more than just a few conversations about a given topic.

If you're listening to a speech from a celebrity you know of and their opinion is to your liking, that's all you're hearing. You don't really know anything else about them to have any other options but to trust them.

> This is also very similar to why some people trust their therapist
> over their friend, even if what both of them say are similar. Sometimes, they aren't similar. We tend to trust what we're more objective towards. Who you're surrounded by makes a huge difference. They can be abusive, vulgar, rude. You're seeing more than just one side to them. You're only seeing one side of your therapist. The helpful, knowledgeable side.

If we spend enough time to form an emotional bond with a therapist or let's say someone we've never met, we could very well go back to square one. Not trusting them as much as another celebrity you're objective towards.

When we're listening to the opinion of someone we know, other emotional factors are involved. Our dislikes (and other opinions of them) influence our trust in them and their opinions or knowledge of a given topic.

It's about things being objective. What we don't know can't hurt us. In your case, you don't know much about Leo's personal life. You only know the opinions he shares. There's nothing else to go by and usually documentaries give you the best parts specified information. Nothing that sounds inaccurate, immoral, wrong or questionable.

---

**Helpful Sources**

* [Why We Trust Strangers More Than Our Friends](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-earle-mcleod/why-we-trust-strangers-more-than-our-friends_b_5148323.html)
* [We Trust Strangers, Even When It Doesn’t Make Sense to Do So](http://time.com/103396/we-trust-strangers-even-when-it-doesnt-make-sense-to-do-so/)
* [Why do some people prefer to trust what strangers say rather than those they know?](https://www.quora.com/Why-do-some-people-prefer-to-trust-what-strangers-say-rather-than-those-they-know)

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Hi Mike, interesting answer. I see that the websites you refer to are indirect references. Here at CogSci, however, we aim to have references to scientific literature, I.e. books and research papers. Do you have any, or are you able to find a few?  
> **username_0**: This actually makes a lot of sense, because I always took what my friend said with a grain of salt - not always he was right -, other people around him didn't really have any achievements (which I personally take into an account when communicating with them).  
> **username_1**: @RobinKramer, thank you! I am not able to find resources at the current moment, but will try sometime this week and will keep this in mind for future reference.  
> **username_1**: @username_0, I hear that, that makes sense. I think I see the connection there! And thank you for the comment!  

---

