<p>Discrimination can be understood as “making judgment based on general, rather than case-specific, information”. For instance, racial discrimination is making judgments based on one’s race (general information) rather than one’s own merits (case-specific information).</p>
<p>However, people often find certain types of discrimination morally acceptable. For instance, it is usually okay for an employer to outright reject job applicants without college degrees even if it is possible that some without a degree are more qualified. People are often also okay with employers giving more consideration to those who went to better schools, even though some students from lower ranked schools can be better.</p>
<p>There are many such examples. Human beings cannot spend infinite time to acquire information in each task, so they use shortcuts which, usually, involve some kind of discrimination.</p>
<p>The question is: why do people find certain types of discrimination unacceptable but others acceptable?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-12-18T05:00:03.307Z
This is more a question of social psychology and social norms. One such norm says not to discriminate on *factors beyond one's control*. Another such norm says *financial status is in one's control*. These and other norms combine to give the observed result. Basically many if not most people are following the prevailing norms without much reflection. Usually in society the safest path is doing what others are doing.
Michael
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-12-18T20:14:18.693Z
@Michael I agree this is more of a social psychology question. I’m just wondering if there are foundations from neuroscience and personal psychology that may be able to speak to this.
J Li
<moral-psychology>
Why do people find certain, but not all, forms of discrimination wrong?
J Li
# Why do people find certain, but not all, forms of discrimination wrong?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-01-03)

Discrimination can be understood as “making judgment based on general, rather than case-specific, information”. For instance, racial discrimination is making judgments based on one’s race (general information) rather than one’s own merits (case-specific information).

However, people often find certain types of discrimination morally acceptable. For instance, it is usually okay for an employer to outright reject job applicants without college degrees even if it is possible that some without a degree are more qualified. People are often also okay with employers giving more consideration to those who went to better schools, even though some students from lower ranked schools can be better.

There are many such examples. Human beings cannot spend infinite time to acquire information in each task, so they use shortcuts which, usually, involve some kind of discrimination.

The question is: why do people find certain types of discrimination unacceptable but others acceptable?

**Tags:** moral-psychology

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: This is more a question of social psychology and social norms. One such norm says not to discriminate on *factors beyond one's control*. Another such norm says *financial status is in one's control*. These and other norms combine to give the observed result. Basically many if not most people are following the prevailing norms without much reflection. Usually in society the safest path is doing what others are doing.  
> **username_0**: @username_1 I agree this is more of a social psychology question. I’m just wondering if there are foundations from neuroscience and personal psychology that may be able to speak to this.  

---

## 0 answers

