<p><strong>Short answer</strong><br>
In psychophysics, positive hit-rates on zero-intensity stimuli are called <em>false positives</em>.</p>

<p><strong>Background</strong><br>
In <strong><a href="http://psychology.jrank.org/pages/514/Psychophysics.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">psychophysics</a></strong>, it is a common phenomenon where subjects say they perceived something, while no stimulus was in fact being presented. Such responses are called <strong>false positives</strong> <a href="https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3612918491/high-false-positive-rates-in-common-sensory-threshold" rel="nofollow noreferrer">(Running, 2015)</a>. </p>

<p>In Fig. 1, I have posted a psychometric curve on a so-called stimulus detection task, where the subject (in this case myself) had to identify vibratory stimuli. The x-axis is stimulus level (arbitrary units) and the y-axis shows <em>P</em>, or the fraction correct (0 being 0% and 1 being 100% correct). At high stimulus levels (right side of the graph) I faithfully detected all stimuli.</p>

<p>At zero stimulus-intensity, however, no stimulus was presented, and such trials are sometimes called <strong><a href="http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199534067.001.0001/acref-9780199534067-e-1293" rel="nofollow noreferrer">catch trials</a></strong>. In this case, only a visual cue appeared on the screen, as in all trials, to notify the subject a trial was starting. You can see I pressed the '<em>Yes, I can feel it button</em>' in nearly 5% of the catch trials, while there was no stimulus presented at all. Subjects (too) willing to reach low thresholds (thus favorable outcomes) may tend to be trigger happy, and hit the '<em>Yes</em> button too often.</p>

<p>On another note, false positives tend to creep up in case of pathologies. In my field of research, blind people with retinal implants subjected to a visual detection task with electrical stimulation of the retina may report perceiving implant-evoked stimuli, while in fact they are perceiving random phosphenes caused by neurophysiological changes in their retinae, or visual cortex. Likewise, hearing-impaired folks may perceive spontaneous auditory sensations referred to as tinnitus. When subjected to auditory detection tasks in audiometric testing, they may perceive tinnitus sensations and hit the 'Yes' button while in fact no auditory stimulus through the headphones was presented.   </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/3oDdg.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/3oDdg.jpg" alt="psychometric"></a><br>
<sup>Fig. 1. Psychometric curve</sup></p>

<p><sub><strong>Reference</strong><br>
<strong>-</strong> <a href="https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3612918491/high-false-positive-rates-in-common-sensory-threshold" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Running, Atten Percept Psychophys (2015); <strong>77</strong>(2): 692-700</a></sub></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-17T08:53:33.687Z
Related, but [from my reading of the question](https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/17142/what-is-the-bias-called-when-listening-to-the-same-sound-repeatedly#comment33490_17142) I do not feel this answers it. The OP seems to refer to the same stimulus being presented over and over again (not a zero stimulus-intensity), which then is perceived as 'different' by the test subject.
Steven Jeuris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-17T09:04:32.753Z
@StevenJeuris thanks for looking into this. Let's see if OP comes back with anything. However, it's been devoid of activity for 4 months, so doubt OP will return us with an answer to your inquiry :)
AliceD
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-18T19:23:56.973Z
2017-08-16T22:30:26.520Z
2017-08-16T22:30:26.520Z
AliceD
<p>When people are made to listen to the same sounds repeatedly, it can trigger placebo effects, <em>i.e.</em>, they think they've heard something new or different the $ Nth $ time around, when in fact they haven't.</p>

<p>What is the name of this "bias"? And are there any research papers on it?</p>

<p>I've stumbled across the 'Focusing Effect' but I don't think that's what I'm looking for</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-17T08:51:10.540Z
I understood _"new or different"_ here as the same stimulus being presented to subjects and yet they perceive it as different. If this is the case, I presume @AliceD's answer (which refers to a 'zero-intensity' stimulus rather than the same stimulus) does not answer your question? Could you edit to make _"new or different"_ a bit less ambiguous?
Steven Jeuris
<perception><terminology><bias><hearing><placebo>
What is the bias called when listening to the same sound repeatedly?
belvitabiscuit
# What is the bias called when listening to the same sound repeatedly?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-18)

When people are made to listen to the same sounds repeatedly, it can trigger placebo effects, *i.e.*, they think they've heard something new or different the $ Nth $ time around, when in fact they haven't.

What is the name of this "bias"? And are there any research papers on it?

I've stumbled across the 'Focusing Effect' but I don't think that's what I'm looking for

**Tags:** perception, terminology, bias, hearing, placebo

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I understood _"new or different"_ here as the same stimulus being presented to subjects and yet they perceive it as different. If this is the case, I presume @username_2's answer (which refers to a 'zero-intensity' stimulus rather than the same stimulus) does not answer your question? Could you edit to make _"new or different"_ a bit less ambiguous?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-04-18. Score: 1

**Short answer**  
In psychophysics, positive hit-rates on zero-intensity stimuli are called *false positives*.

**Background**  
In **[psychophysics](http://psychology.jrank.org/pages/514/Psychophysics.html)**, it is a common phenomenon where subjects say they perceived something, while no stimulus was in fact being presented. Such responses are called **false positives** [(Running, 2015)](https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3612918491/high-false-positive-rates-in-common-sensory-threshold).

In Fig. 1, I have posted a psychometric curve on a so-called stimulus detection task, where the subject (in this case myself) had to identify vibratory stimuli. The x-axis is stimulus level (arbitrary units) and the y-axis shows *P*, or the fraction correct (0 being 0% and 1 being 100% correct). At high stimulus levels (right side of the graph) I faithfully detected all stimuli.

At zero stimulus-intensity, however, no stimulus was presented, and such trials are sometimes called **[catch trials](http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199534067.001.0001/acref-9780199534067-e-1293)**. In this case, only a visual cue appeared on the screen, as in all trials, to notify the subject a trial was starting. You can see I pressed the '*Yes, I can feel it button*' in nearly 5% of the catch trials, while there was no stimulus presented at all. Subjects (too) willing to reach low thresholds (thus favorable outcomes) may tend to be trigger happy, and hit the '*Yes* button too often.

On another note, false positives tend to creep up in case of pathologies. In my field of research, blind people with retinal implants subjected to a visual detection task with electrical stimulation of the retina may report perceiving implant-evoked stimuli, while in fact they are perceiving random phosphenes caused by neurophysiological changes in their retinae, or visual cortex. Likewise, hearing-impaired folks may perceive spontaneous auditory sensations referred to as tinnitus. When subjected to auditory detection tasks in audiometric testing, they may perceive tinnitus sensations and hit the 'Yes' button while in fact no auditory stimulus through the headphones was presented.

[![psychometric](https://i.sstatic.net/3oDdg.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/3oDdg.jpg)  
Fig. 1. Psychometric curve

**Reference**  
**-** [Running, Atten Percept Psychophys (2015); **77**(2): 692-700](https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3612918491/high-false-positive-rates-in-common-sensory-threshold)

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Related, but [from my reading of the question](https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/17142/what-is-the-bias-called-when-listening-to-the-same-sound-repeatedly#comment33490_17142) I do not feel this answers it. The OP seems to refer to the same stimulus being presented over and over again (not a zero stimulus-intensity), which then is perceived as 'different' by the test subject.  
> **username_2**: @StevenJeuris thanks for looking into this. Let's see if OP comes back with anything. However, it's been devoid of activity for 4 months, so doubt OP will return us with an answer to your inquiry :)  

---

