<p>There are different perspectives that you could take on your question.</p>

<p>An <strong>objective perspective</strong> could seek to quantify the true probability that a person is correct in their belief. This would be compared with the person's subjective belief that they are correct. Over confidence could then be defined as the situation when the subjective probability is greater than the objective probability. In this objective sense, having absolute confidence removes the possibility of being under-confident, and having absolutely no confidence  removes the possibility of being over-confident.</p>

<p>A <strong>social perspective</strong> could focus on the displays of confidence in an interpersonal setting. In such settings displays of confidence can be used to achieve social goals, such as admiration, access to job opportunities, convincing others to follow a course of action, etc. Furthermore, social norms regarding displays of confidence influence how such displays are perceived. In some situations, a display of confidence may be perceived as arrogance, whereas in others it may be seen as an admirable leadership trait.</p>

<p>The concept of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-efficacy" rel="nofollow">self-efficacy</a> is particularly relevant to your question. It refers to a person's belief that they can succeed on a particular task in a given situation. In general self-efficacy is seen as a good thing. It is associated with self-esteem, persistence on tasks, and many other positive psychological states. However, often there is lack of discrimination between objective efficacy and a person's particular bias in their perception of their efficacy. In some cases accurate self-efficacy leads to better decisions, however in other cases, a slight positive bias may lead to greater persistence and offer psychological protection.</p>

<p>In terms of psychological interventions for increasing accuracy of confidence judgements, the following are some ideas:</p>

<ul>
<li>Seek out objective sources of feedback</li>
<li>Create group environments where differences of opinion and views are encouraged</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-11-07T17:54:21.883Z
good answer, I have noticed that confidence increases capability, I wonder why that is...
Greg McNulty
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-11-07T23:15:37.553Z
To the extent that confidence is accurate, then to some extent confidence is capability. I think in some domains (e.g., leadership, sales, etc.) a little bit of bravado can be beneficial. In other cases, confidence or at least self-efficacy may lead to greater persistence which in turn increases competence. Confidence may also lead people to interpret their competence as greater than it actually is (i.e., a belief confirmation orientation).
Jeromy Anglim
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-11-06T01:09:04.273Z
2012-11-06T01:09:04.273Z
Jeromy Anglim
<p>Usually, confidence is based on experience; proven results with regards to a task or ability increase one's belief that the task can be completed a second time.  Notice that this has nothing to do with what others believe you can do - it's about what <em>you</em> believe you can do.</p>

<p>Overconfidence is bravado - false posturing to fool or mislead others; most often used to hide an actual lack of confidence.  This is all about getting <em>others</em> to believe that one is capable of a task.</p>

<p>There are a lot of non-scientific articles related to the difference between the two concepts:<br>
<a href="http://www.hindustantimes.com/HTEducation/Chunk-HT-UI-HTEducationSectionPage-OtherStories/10-signs-of-confidence-and-overconfidence/SP-Article1-706701.aspx" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is a "10 characteristics of" page from Hindustan Times<br>
while <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/09/110914-optimism-narcissism-overconfidence-hubris-evolution-science-nature/" rel="nofollow">here</a> is an article from National Geographic talking about narcissism and overconfidence.  </p>

<p>These were found with a <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=confidence+vs+overconfidence" rel="nofollow">Google Search</a> for 'overconfidence vs confidence'.  I'm sure you would get more scientific results if you dig some digging, or tried Google Scholar.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-11-05T20:18:58.310Z
2012-11-05T20:18:58.310Z
BenCole
<p>People say there is a very small difference between confidence and overconfidence. </p>

<ul>
<li>How can knowledge of psychology help someone know whether they are are confident or overconfident? </li>
<li>What is the state of mind when someone is overconfident?   </li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-11-05T20:20:17.390Z
Welcome to CogSci.SE!  Usually we ask that question posters do some initial research before posting questions - just like other SE websites.  Check our faq - http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/faq - for more details. (I did not -1, but I suspect that's why it happened).
BenCole
<social-psychology><personality>
What is the difference between confidence and overconfidence?
gpuguy
# What is the difference between confidence and overconfidence?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-11-05)

People say there is a very small difference between confidence and overconfidence.

* How can knowledge of psychology help someone know whether they are are confident or overconfident?
* What is the state of mind when someone is overconfident?

**Tags:** social-psychology, personality

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Welcome to CogSci.SE!  Usually we ask that question posters do some initial research before posting questions - just like other SE websites.  Check our faq - http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/faq - for more details. (I did not -1, but I suspect that's why it happened).  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2012-11-06. Score: 3

There are different perspectives that you could take on your question.

An **objective perspective** could seek to quantify the true probability that a person is correct in their belief. This would be compared with the person's subjective belief that they are correct. Over confidence could then be defined as the situation when the subjective probability is greater than the objective probability. In this objective sense, having absolute confidence removes the possibility of being under-confident, and having absolutely no confidence removes the possibility of being over-confident.

A **social perspective** could focus on the displays of confidence in an interpersonal setting. In such settings displays of confidence can be used to achieve social goals, such as admiration, access to job opportunities, convincing others to follow a course of action, etc. Furthermore, social norms regarding displays of confidence influence how such displays are perceived. In some situations, a display of confidence may be perceived as arrogance, whereas in others it may be seen as an admirable leadership trait.

The concept of [self-efficacy](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-efficacy) is particularly relevant to your question. It refers to a person's belief that they can succeed on a particular task in a given situation. In general self-efficacy is seen as a good thing. It is associated with self-esteem, persistence on tasks, and many other positive psychological states. However, often there is lack of discrimination between objective efficacy and a person's particular bias in their perception of their efficacy. In some cases accurate self-efficacy leads to better decisions, however in other cases, a slight positive bias may lead to greater persistence and offer psychological protection.

In terms of psychological interventions for increasing accuracy of confidence judgements, the following are some ideas:

* Seek out objective sources of feedback
* Create group environments where differences of opinion and views are encouraged

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: good answer, I have noticed that confidence increases capability, I wonder why that is...  
> **username_2**: To the extent that confidence is accurate, then to some extent confidence is capability. I think in some domains (e.g., leadership, sales, etc.) a little bit of bravado can be beneficial. In other cases, confidence or at least self-efficacy may lead to greater persistence which in turn increases competence. Confidence may also lead people to interpret their competence as greater than it actually is (i.e., a belief confirmation orientation).  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2012-11-05. Score: 3

Usually, confidence is based on experience; proven results with regards to a task or ability increase one's belief that the task can be completed a second time. Notice that this has nothing to do with what others believe you can do - it's about what *you* believe you can do.

Overconfidence is bravado - false posturing to fool or mislead others; most often used to hide an actual lack of confidence. This is all about getting *others* to believe that one is capable of a task.

There are a lot of non-scientific articles related to the difference between the two concepts:  
[Here](http://www.hindustantimes.com/HTEducation/Chunk-HT-UI-HTEducationSectionPage-OtherStories/10-signs-of-confidence-and-overconfidence/SP-Article1-706701.aspx) is a "10 characteristics of" page from Hindustan Times  
while [here](http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/09/110914-optimism-narcissism-overconfidence-hubris-evolution-science-nature/) is an article from National Geographic talking about narcissism and overconfidence.

These were found with a [Google Search](https://www.google.com/search?q=confidence+vs+overconfidence) for 'overconfidence vs confidence'. I'm sure you would get more scientific results if you dig some digging, or tried Google Scholar.


---

