<p>The basic idea of <em>Quinian Boostrapping</em> is that you start off not understanding a concept, but use a symbolic placeholder for it, and then fill in the details over time. For example, right now you don't understand <em>Quinian Bootstrapping</em> but you do have the placeholder term "Quinian Bootstrapping" that you can hold in your mind and relate to other things you know and learn. Over time, your placeholder is replaced with the actual concept. </p>

<p>Note that this is how nearly all of our concepts work. What is "water" or "planet" or "electricity"? You start off with "I learned some arbitrary word that picks out some category of thing in the universe" and then approach the real concept over time. But note that an "expert" on the concept may surprise you: "ice is a form of water even though you think it is not" and "Pluto is not a planet even though you think it is" and "the bright flashes during a storm and the stuff that makes the TV work are the same." </p>

<p>You asked specifically about weight. Imagine a child newly learning "weight" as opposed to "mass" (and as opposed to "density" and "volume" and other nearby terms). The child will start off just knowing that there are various terms that are picking out nearby concepts, but not understanding what makes them different. But as the child is led through examples (e.g., "the same object will weigh more on Earth than on Mars") the placeholders become elaborated into concepts.</p>

<p>This bootstrapping ability relies on being able to relate information from a variety of sources to an arbitrary placeholder symbol, which means it is likely unique to humans.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-10-07T07:10:17.813Z
Do you have any references that could back up your statements and allow others to further investigate the matter?
Robin Kramer-ten Have
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-10-06T10:25:20.143Z
2016-10-06T10:25:20.143Z
user35632
<p>I've been trying my best to understand what <em>Quinian bootstrapping</em> is, by reading scientific articles on this topic, but I come across more and more philosophical concepts like "sortals" or similar. </p>

<p>I would like to just grasp the idea behind Quinian bootstrapping - what does a child <em>do</em> when understanding some abstract concepts, like "weight". Does anyone know how to explain how it works in a less complicated, but maybe more simplistic way?</p>

<p>I can add that I know what is bootstrapping.</p>

<p>References</p>

<ul>
<li>Carey, S. The Origin of Concepts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).</li>
<li>Carey, S. “Precis of The Origin of Concepts”, in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
34 (2011), 113-167</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-06T17:49:18.637Z
What do you already understand of *Quinian bootstrapping*? This will help us answer your question.
Seanny123
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-06T18:34:55.283Z
I can only be sure that I know bootstrapping as statistical method, but I guess it's like 'a chair' and 'an electric chair'.
Lil'Lobster
<philosophy-of-mind><thought>
Does anyone know how to explain Quinian bootstrapping process by Carey to a layperson (like me)?
Lil'Lobster
# Does anyone know how to explain Quinian bootstrapping process by Carey to a layperson (like me)?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-09-20)

I've been trying my best to understand what *Quinian bootstrapping* is, by reading scientific articles on this topic, but I come across more and more philosophical concepts like "sortals" or similar.

I would like to just grasp the idea behind Quinian bootstrapping - what does a child *do* when understanding some abstract concepts, like "weight". Does anyone know how to explain how it works in a less complicated, but maybe more simplistic way?

I can add that I know what is bootstrapping.

References

* Carey, S. The Origin of Concepts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
* Carey, S. “Precis of The Origin of Concepts”, in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  34 (2011), 113-167

**Tags:** philosophy-of-mind, thought

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: What do you already understand of *Quinian bootstrapping*? This will help us answer your question.  
> **username_0**: I can only be sure that I know bootstrapping as statistical method, but I guess it's like 'a chair' and 'an electric chair'.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-10-06. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

The basic idea of *Quinian Boostrapping* is that you start off not understanding a concept, but use a symbolic placeholder for it, and then fill in the details over time. For example, right now you don't understand *Quinian Bootstrapping* but you do have the placeholder term "Quinian Bootstrapping" that you can hold in your mind and relate to other things you know and learn. Over time, your placeholder is replaced with the actual concept.

Note that this is how nearly all of our concepts work. What is "water" or "planet" or "electricity"? You start off with "I learned some arbitrary word that picks out some category of thing in the universe" and then approach the real concept over time. But note that an "expert" on the concept may surprise you: "ice is a form of water even though you think it is not" and "Pluto is not a planet even though you think it is" and "the bright flashes during a storm and the stuff that makes the TV work are the same."

You asked specifically about weight. Imagine a child newly learning "weight" as opposed to "mass" (and as opposed to "density" and "volume" and other nearby terms). The child will start off just knowing that there are various terms that are picking out nearby concepts, but not understanding what makes them different. But as the child is led through examples (e.g., "the same object will weigh more on Earth than on Mars") the placeholders become elaborated into concepts.

This bootstrapping ability relies on being able to relate information from a variety of sources to an arbitrary placeholder symbol, which means it is likely unique to humans.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Do you have any references that could back up your statements and allow others to further investigate the matter?  

---

