<p>You are not far off from one of the classic tests of creativity!  The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking scores for <strong>fluency</strong> (number of responses) as well as <strong>originality</strong> (statistical rarity of responses) and <strong>elaboration</strong> (level of detail) on a variety of different tasks--some of which are similar to your mind-mapping task.  The validity of the TTCT has been examined with several long-term studies, so there is a fair amount of data on its measurements as well as the form of the test itself.</p>

<p>Torrance, E. P. (1981b). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced indicators of creative ability through a longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 136-140.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T15:01:50.480Z
Thanks a lot Krysta! Do you suggest evaluating the mind maps in the same way and claiming this is valid because the TTCT is valid? Because I'm not sure this would be accepted, since has not been validated yet.
Forinstance
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T15:44:52.077Z
No, I wouldn't claim that it's valid because the TTCT is valid--it's been validated, and your procedures haven't.  What arena is this research in, and what is your hypothesis?
Krysta
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-05-01T13:13:43.977Z
I'm dealing with evolution of social interactions and creativity is just one among the many variables. But is an important one. So I'm looking for an acceptable way to include it in the study starting from the tests we have..
Forinstance
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-04-30T13:04:00.437Z
2015-04-30T13:04:00.437Z
Krysta
<p>I have an experiment with 500 students who where asked to solve a general problem.</p>

<p>Each student had the assignment to find as many solutions as possible to the problem in 15 minutes. Solutions where submitted in the form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_map">mind maps</a> (where each node represents a possible solution and connections between nodes are also possible). 500 maps are available for evaluation. All the students were previously trained about the use of mind maps.</p>

<p>The objective would be to get a reliable proxy of each student creativity from their outputs. I'm not sure if this is possible or if the approach is just wrong and one should use a more accepted test to measure creativity. No other test scores are available for this sample. </p>

<p>We are thinking about different approaches such as:</p>

<ul>
<li>counting the number of generated ideas;</li>
<li>using experts to evaluate the characteristics of the creative outputs.</li>
</ul>

<p>Is there any paper related to the issue? Or any accepted method that could be used to evaluate creativty of the students?</p>

<measurement><psychology>
A measure of creativity from mind maps
Forinstance
# A measure of creativity from mind maps

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-04-29)

I have an experiment with 500 students who where asked to solve a general problem.

Each student had the assignment to find as many solutions as possible to the problem in 15 minutes. Solutions where submitted in the form of [mind maps](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_map) (where each node represents a possible solution and connections between nodes are also possible). 500 maps are available for evaluation. All the students were previously trained about the use of mind maps.

The objective would be to get a reliable proxy of each student creativity from their outputs. I'm not sure if this is possible or if the approach is just wrong and one should use a more accepted test to measure creativity. No other test scores are available for this sample.

We are thinking about different approaches such as:

* counting the number of generated ideas;
* using experts to evaluate the characteristics of the creative outputs.

Is there any paper related to the issue? Or any accepted method that could be used to evaluate creativty of the students?

**Tags:** measurement, psychology


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-04-30. Score: 8

You are not far off from one of the classic tests of creativity! The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking scores for **fluency** (number of responses) as well as **originality** (statistical rarity of responses) and **elaboration** (level of detail) on a variety of different tasks--some of which are similar to your mind-mapping task. The validity of the TTCT has been examined with several long-term studies, so there is a fair amount of data on its measurements as well as the form of the test itself.

Torrance, E. P. (1981b). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced indicators of creative ability through a longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 136-140.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks a lot username_1! Do you suggest evaluating the mind maps in the same way and claiming this is valid because the TTCT is valid? Because I'm not sure this would be accepted, since has not been validated yet.  
> **username_1**: No, I wouldn't claim that it's valid because the TTCT is valid--it's been validated, and your procedures haven't.  What arena is this research in, and what is your hypothesis?  
> **username_0**: I'm dealing with evolution of social interactions and creativity is just one among the many variables. But is an important one. So I'm looking for an acceptable way to include it in the study starting from the tests we have..  

---

