<p>Perhaps "visual one-shot learning" is what you're looking for. </p>

<p>Your question reminded me of images like this </p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Cmrcd.jpg" alt="this">, </p>

<p>which typically take first-time viewers some time to figure out, but on second viewing the subject "pops out" immediately, even if considerable time has elapsed. </p>

<p>Here's an even more striking example: </p>

<p><img src="https://www.uncg.edu/~whanthon/optical_illusions_may06/dallenbach_cow.jpg" alt="This"> </p>

<p>I believe the phenomenon was described in L. Gregory's "The Intelligent Eye" (1970). [1] looks like an interesting paper (it's where I got the term "one-shot-visual learning" from) - though I can't seem to figure out how to access the full text.</p>

<p>[1] Mogi, K., Sekine, T., &amp; Tamori, Y. (2005). Slow and fast processes in visual "one-shot" learning. Perception, 34, 15-16. <a href="http://www.perceptionweb.com/abstract.cgi?id=v050495" rel="nofollow noreferrer">URL</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-07T18:19:13.287Z
can you expand a little bit on your answer to give a quick sketch of what visual one-shot learning is and why its relevant?
Artem Kaznatcheev
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-11-25T16:44:49.583Z
Spoiler alert: there's a Dalmation in the first picture (middle right side of the image, facing away, nose to the ground) and a cow in the second (head is on the left side, looking at viewer).
Josh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2012-04-07T17:52:28.583Z
2018-12-29T06:54:23.467Z
2018-12-29T06:54:23.467Z
Peter Helfer
<p>An immediate effect comes to my mind, even though the description doesn't exactly describe the problem:</p>
<h1><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Hindsight bias</a></h1>
<blockquote>
<p>Hindsight bias, also known as the knew-it-all-along effect or creeping determinism, is the inclination, after an event has occurred, to see the event as having been predictable, despite there having been little or no objective basis for predicting it.[1][2] It is a multifaceted phenomenon that can affect different stages of designs, processes, contexts, and situations.[3] Hindsight bias may cause memory distortion, where the recollection and reconstruction of content can lead to false theoretical outcomes. It has been suggested that the effect can cause extreme methodological problems while trying to analyze, understand, and interpret results in experimental studies. A basic example of the hindsight bias is when, after viewing the outcome of a potentially unforeseeable event, a person believes he or she &quot;knew it all along&quot;.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-29T08:54:47.947Z
2018-12-29T08:54:47.947Z
2020-06-17T09:55:31.633Z
Ooker
<p>The most relevant term would be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironic_Process_Theory">Ironic Processing</a>.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Ironic processing is the psychological process whereby an individual's deliberate attempts to suppress or avoid certain thoughts (thought suppression) render those thoughts more persistent.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This is a result of a failure of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_suppression">Thought Suppression</a> or more generally <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivated_forgetting">Motivated Forgetting</a>. It appears <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_suppression#Empirical_work">Thought Suppression doesn't work well</a> and generally the attempt to not think about X results in a sudden increase of thoughts about X. </p>

<p>Since you have a sudden increase of thoughts about the "suppressed" thought, you're strengthening retrieval of it, and you might even be conditioning that thought with the reason you don't want to remember it.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-06T20:56:34.863Z
How interesting! I've noticed this myself but never knew it was an actual concept.
Josh
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-06T21:01:46.640Z
@JoshGitlin there's controversial research on Motivated Forgetting, I'm honestly not sure which cases it's been found to be beneficial or detrimental, but I recall learning that it was detrimental in a course on Human Memory. Now I'm curious though
Zelda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-07T12:57:20.100Z
i'm not sure this answer really fits the question. OP didn't say anything about deliberately trying to forget. i think this is just a simple case of priming.
Jeff
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-07T17:31:25.543Z
@Jeff the "cannot unsee" meme implies one is trying NOT to see it. Otherwise it would simply be "you remember things". Which isn't a good question OR meme.
Zelda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-04-06T20:40:43.560Z
2012-04-06T20:40:43.560Z
Zelda
<p>During a discussion with my officemate I told him that I read somewhere that the <a href="http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/images/hs-2009-25-i-1920x1200_wallpaper.jpg" rel="nofollow">gas pillar in Carina nebula</a> looks like a cat punching the dog; ever since then, every time my wallpaper slideshow switches to this wallpaper, "cat vs dog" is the first thing that comes to my mind. We were curious whether there is some dedicated terminology for this. </p>

<p>I learned via Google that this is a meme called "What has been seen cannot be unseen", I wonder what is the term for this phenomenon in cognitive science? Like a memory bias during the perception of something? Or it is that people tend to visualize some new concept/picture/term as something they are more familiar with subconsciously?</p>

<memory><terminology><perception>
What is the term for "What has been seen cannot be unseen" in cognitive sciences?
Shuhao Cao
# What is the term for "What has been seen cannot be unseen" in cognitive sciences?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-04-06)

During a discussion with my officemate I told him that I read somewhere that the [gas pillar in Carina nebula](http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/images/hs-2009-25-i-1920x1200_wallpaper.jpg) looks like a cat punching the dog; ever since then, every time my wallpaper slideshow switches to this wallpaper, "cat vs dog" is the first thing that comes to my mind. We were curious whether there is some dedicated terminology for this.

I learned via Google that this is a meme called "What has been seen cannot be unseen", I wonder what is the term for this phenomenon in cognitive science? Like a memory bias during the perception of something? Or it is that people tend to visualize some new concept/picture/term as something they are more familiar with subconsciously?

**Tags:** memory, terminology, perception


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2012-04-06. Score: 12 | Accepted answer

The most relevant term would be [Ironic Processing](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ironic_Process_Theory).

> Ironic processing is the psychological process whereby an individual's deliberate attempts to suppress or avoid certain thoughts (thought suppression) render those thoughts more persistent.

This is a result of a failure of [Thought Suppression](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_suppression) or more generally [Motivated Forgetting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivated_forgetting). It appears [Thought Suppression doesn't work well](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_suppression#Empirical_work) and generally the attempt to not think about X results in a sudden increase of thoughts about X.

Since you have a sudden increase of thoughts about the "suppressed" thought, you're strengthening retrieval of it, and you might even be conditioning that thought with the reason you don't want to remember it.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: How interesting! I've noticed this myself but never knew it was an actual concept.  
> **username_5**: @username_3Gitlin there's controversial research on Motivated Forgetting, I'm honestly not sure which cases it's been found to be beneficial or detrimental, but I recall learning that it was detrimental in a course on Human Memory. Now I'm curious though  
> **username_6**: i'm not sure this answer really fits the question. OP didn't say anything about deliberately trying to forget. i think this is just a simple case of priming.  
> **username_5**: @username_6 the "cannot unsee" meme implies one is trying NOT to see it. Otherwise it would simply be "you remember things". Which isn't a good question OR meme.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2012-04-07. Score: 8

Perhaps "visual one-shot learning" is what you're looking for.

Your question reminded me of images like this

![this](https://i.sstatic.net/Cmrcd.jpg),

which typically take first-time viewers some time to figure out, but on second viewing the subject "pops out" immediately, even if considerable time has elapsed.

Here's an even more striking example:

![This](https://www.uncg.edu/~whanthon/optical_illusions_may06/dallenbach_cow.jpg)

I believe the phenomenon was described in L. Gregory's "The Intelligent Eye" (1970). [1] looks like an interesting paper (it's where I got the term "one-shot-visual learning" from) - though I can't seem to figure out how to access the full text.

[1] Mogi, K., Sekine, T., & Tamori, Y. (2005). Slow and fast processes in visual "one-shot" learning. Perception, 34, 15-16. [URL](http://www.perceptionweb.com/abstract.cgi?id=v050495)

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: can you expand a little bit on your answer to give a quick sketch of what visual one-shot learning is and why its relevant?  
> **username_3**: Spoiler alert: there's a Dalmation in the first picture (middle right side of the image, facing away, nose to the ground) and a cow in the second (head is on the left side, looking at viewer).  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-12-29. Score: -1

An immediate effect comes to my mind, even though the description doesn't exactly describe the problem:

# [Hindsight bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindsight_bias)

> Hindsight bias, also known as the knew-it-all-along effect or creeping determinism, is the inclination, after an event has occurred, to see the event as having been predictable, despite there having been little or no objective basis for predicting it.[1][2] It is a multifaceted phenomenon that can affect different stages of designs, processes, contexts, and situations.[3] Hindsight bias may cause memory distortion, where the recollection and reconstruction of content can lead to false theoretical outcomes. It has been suggested that the effect can cause extreme methodological problems while trying to analyze, understand, and interpret results in experimental studies. A basic example of the hindsight bias is when, after viewing the outcome of a potentially unforeseeable event, a person believes he or she "knew it all along".


---

