<p>Research in neuroscience allowed to distinguish two concepts: "liking" and "wanting". Berridge and colleagues distinguished two different brain mechanisms for that.</p>

<ul>
<li>By injecting a tiny droplet of amphetamine drug in the <strong>nucleus accumbens (dopamine system)</strong>, they noted an increase of the incentive salience that cues trigger for their reward <em>without altering other components of desire or reward.</em></li>
<li>Experimentally, they also found that the generation of pleasure “liking” is more restricted neurochemically: opioid stimulation but not dopamine stimulation in some limbic strutures can enhance “liking”, whereas “wanting” is enhanced by both.</li>
</ul>

<p>Research suggest that liking and wanting belongs to two different pathways mediated by opioid and dopamine circuits.
This distinction between liking and wanting could lead to ambivalent processes individuals could like what they do not want and want what they do not like.</p>

<p>To conlude, according to Berridge there are different <strong>"hedonic hotspots"</strong> in the brain that, according to the types of valences of the external stimuli, may modulate different processes such as: wanting, liking and 'needing'</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/yEiII.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/yEiII.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>References :</p>

<p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813042/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wanting and Liking: Observations from the Neuroscience and Psychology Laboratory</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-09T09:03:23.290Z
2018-01-09T09:03:23.290Z
Fil
<p><a href="https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/19674">@jsakaluk's excellent, well supported answer</a> to <a href="https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/19662/is-maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-really-accurate-at-labeling-sex-as-a-physiologica">Is Maslow&#39;s hierarchy of needs really accurate at labeling sex as a physiological &quot;need&quot;?</a> gave a good rundown of the definition.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Definitions of "Needs", "Motives", etc., are dime-a-dozen. Though I don't necessarily agree with all the ingredients, I like how well explicated the criteria by <a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Baumeister and Leary (1995)</a> are, according to whom a fundamental need should: </p>
  
  <ol>
  <li>produce effects readily under all but adverse conditions</li>
  <li>have affective consequences</li>
  <li>direct cognitive processing</li>
  <li>lead to ill effects (such as on health or adjustment) when thwarted</li>
  <li>elicit goal-oriented behavior designed to satisfy it (subject to motivational patterns such as object substitutability and satiation)</li>
  <li>be universal in the sense of applying to all people</li>
  <li>not be derivative of other motives</li>
  <li>affect a broad variety of behaviors</li>
  <li>have implications that go beyond immediate psychological functioning</li>
  </ol>
</blockquote>

<h2>References</h2>

<p>Baumeister, R. F., &amp; Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. <em>Psychological Bulletin</em>, 117(3), 497-529.<br>DOI: <a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497" rel="nofollow noreferrer">10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497</a> PMID: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7777651" rel="nofollow noreferrer">7777651</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-05-22T15:24:46.787Z
2018-05-22T15:24:46.787Z
Chris Rogers
<p>Difference between 'need' and 'want' is pretty dynamic. However, the difference can be appreciated by answering a simple question, 'What if you don't get what you say you need/want?' If the absence of a particular thing creates a void in your life, then it's 'needed', else if its absence creates a manageable unease then it's only 'wanted. </p>

<p>The dynamic nature can be appreciated by a simple example. Telephone was a want, or some say a luxury in India back in 1980s, but today it's a need, or a necessity. Internet connectivity is somewhere between a need and want in India, but Canada has declared it as a 'right', that is, it has become a need in Canada.</p>

<p>Historically speaking, individual and species survival was the only need in paleolithic age, however with neolithic revolution, a permanent shelter became a need, and with the rise of civilizations, surplus food became a need because people needed to be free to carry out secondary and tertiary activities. Hence, the difference between 'need' and 'want' is based on historical, social, psychological, cultural and technological context.</p>

<p>Marketing people exploit these parameters to convert their product just from being a 'want' to being a 'need'. In corporate world they call it 'customer education'. Colgate advertisements told Indians in 1990s that salt can injure gums and therefore we shall use the tooth-paste instead of salt,converting a want into a need; fast-forward to 2015, the advertisements are asking if our tooth-paste contains salt, creating more want of a product which has already become a need! </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-09T06:46:01.410Z
2018-01-09T06:46:01.410Z
Himanshu Bansal
<p>In marketing the terms needs and wants are usually used to refer to different concepts. It is not clear to me what exactly they mean.</p>

<p>In psychology what are the definitions for needs and wants? What is the difference between them?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-29T13:36:58.007Z
I'm not a marketing specialist, but I think the 'need' refers to the (objective) qualities (essentials) of the product that are required (e.g. the requirement to call with a mobile phone), while the 'want' refers to the (subjective) perception of the best product including the nicest looks, the latest gadgets and the most prestige (a smart phone with camera, internet, etc etc etc)
AliceD
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-29T15:39:02.390Z
I don't think need/want are words that are used in psychology much--maybe in clinical/therapeutic psych?  But not in research, in my experience; research tends to talk about "motivation" instead. The need/want language is used much more in the design world to get clients to prioritize their requests.
Krysta
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-09T06:10:56.257Z
"needs" surely show up in [Maslow's hierarchy of needs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs). I'm not sure there's a conceptualization of "wants" in some psychological theory.
got trolled too much this week
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-09T07:24:54.283Z
And also [SDT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination_theory) posits the existence of some specific psychological needs.
got trolled too much this week
<terminology><motivation>
"Need" vs "Want" in psychology
DesignerAnalyst
# "Need" vs "Want" in psychology

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-12-29)

In marketing the terms needs and wants are usually used to refer to different concepts. It is not clear to me what exactly they mean.

In psychology what are the definitions for needs and wants? What is the difference between them?

**Tags:** terminology, motivation

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I'm not a marketing specialist, but I think the 'need' refers to the (objective) qualities (essentials) of the product that are required (e.g. the requirement to call with a mobile phone), while the 'want' refers to the (subjective) perception of the best product including the nicest looks, the latest gadgets and the most prestige (a smart phone with camera, internet, etc etc etc)  
> **username_2**: I don't think need/want are words that are used in psychology much--maybe in clinical/therapeutic psych?  But not in research, in my experience; research tends to talk about "motivation" instead. The need/want language is used much more in the design world to get clients to prioritize their requests.  
> **username_3**: "needs" surely show up in [Maslow's hierarchy of needs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs). I'm not sure there's a conceptualization of "wants" in some psychological theory.  
> **username_3**: And also [SDT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination_theory) posits the existence of some specific psychological needs.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-01-09. Score: 3

Research in neuroscience allowed to distinguish two concepts: "liking" and "wanting". Berridge and colleagues distinguished two different brain mechanisms for that.

* By injecting a tiny droplet of amphetamine drug in the **nucleus accumbens (dopamine system)**, they noted an increase of the incentive salience that cues trigger for their reward *without altering other components of desire or reward.*
* Experimentally, they also found that the generation of pleasure “liking” is more restricted neurochemically: opioid stimulation but not dopamine stimulation in some limbic strutures can enhance “liking”, whereas “wanting” is enhanced by both.

Research suggest that liking and wanting belongs to two different pathways mediated by opioid and dopamine circuits.
This distinction between liking and wanting could lead to ambivalent processes individuals could like what they do not want and want what they do not like.

To conlude, according to Berridge there are different **"hedonic hotspots"** in the brain that, according to the types of valences of the external stimuli, may modulate different processes such as: wanting, liking and 'needing'

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/yEiII.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/yEiII.jpg)

References :

[Wanting and Liking: Observations from the Neuroscience and Psychology Laboratory](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2813042/)


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-05-22. Score: 1

[@jsakaluk's excellent, well supported answer](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/19674) to [Is Maslow's hierarchy of needs really accurate at labeling sex as a physiological "need"?](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/19662/is-maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-really-accurate-at-labeling-sex-as-a-physiologica) gave a good rundown of the definition.

> Definitions of "Needs", "Motives", etc., are dime-a-dozen. Though I don't necessarily agree with all the ingredients, I like how well explicated the criteria by [Baumeister and Leary (1995)](http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497) are, according to whom a fundamental need should:
>
> 1. produce effects readily under all but adverse conditions
> 2. have affective consequences
> 3. direct cognitive processing
> 4. lead to ill effects (such as on health or adjustment) when thwarted
> 5. elicit goal-oriented behavior designed to satisfy it (subject to motivational patterns such as object substitutability and satiation)
> 6. be universal in the sense of applying to all people
> 7. not be derivative of other motives
> 8. affect a broad variety of behaviors
> 9. have implications that go beyond immediate psychological functioning

## References

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. *Psychological Bulletin*, 117(3), 497-529.  
DOI: [10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497](http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497) PMID: [7777651](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7777651)


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2018-01-09. Score: 1

Difference between 'need' and 'want' is pretty dynamic. However, the difference can be appreciated by answering a simple question, 'What if you don't get what you say you need/want?' If the absence of a particular thing creates a void in your life, then it's 'needed', else if its absence creates a manageable unease then it's only 'wanted.

The dynamic nature can be appreciated by a simple example. Telephone was a want, or some say a luxury in India back in 1980s, but today it's a need, or a necessity. Internet connectivity is somewhere between a need and want in India, but Canada has declared it as a 'right', that is, it has become a need in Canada.

Historically speaking, individual and species survival was the only need in paleolithic age, however with neolithic revolution, a permanent shelter became a need, and with the rise of civilizations, surplus food became a need because people needed to be free to carry out secondary and tertiary activities. Hence, the difference between 'need' and 'want' is based on historical, social, psychological, cultural and technological context.

Marketing people exploit these parameters to convert their product just from being a 'want' to being a 'need'. In corporate world they call it 'customer education'. Colgate advertisements told Indians in 1990s that salt can injure gums and therefore we shall use the tooth-paste instead of salt,converting a want into a need; fast-forward to 2015, the advertisements are asking if our tooth-paste contains salt, creating more want of a product which has already become a need!


---

