<p>The positive impact of natural scenery on individuals well being has been well studied. I found a few studies looking at the physiological effects of viewing natural scenes.</p>

<p>Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used to access the electrical activity of the localized brain cortex associated with natural and urban environments (Ulrich, 1981; Nakamura, 1992). Ulrich reported that subjects shown urban and scenes produced more alpha (relaxation) activity when viewing nature scenes. High alpha amplitudes are associated with lower levels of physiological
arousal as well as feelings of wakeful relaxation. </p>

<p>More recently Kim at al (2010) conducted a functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) study exposing participants to either rural (natural) or urban scenery, they found that different areas of the brain were active when viewing the different scenes:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Activation of the anterior cingulate gyrus, globus pallidus, putamen
  and head of the caudate nucleus was dominant during rural scenery
  viewing, whereas activation of the hippocampus, parahippocamus and
  amygdala was dominant during urban scenery viewing (p &lt; 0.01). These
  findings allow better characterization of neural activation,
  suggesting an inherent preference towards nature-friendly living.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In terms of hormones, cortisol, amylase and adrenaline would be the ones changed by exposure to natural scenes as these are the hormones most associated with stress (Rashkova et al, 2012; Takahashi, 2005; Takai, 2004). </p>

<p>Park et al (2007) got two groups of participants to spend time in either a forest or a city for a day and then swap and spend a day in the opposite environment they found that: </p>

<p>The concentration of salivary cortisol in the forest area first group was significantly lower than that of the group that went to the city area first even after being in both landscapes.</p>

<p>It's worth noting however that a meta-analysis by Bowler et al (2010) found that research looking at hormones and natural environments was not consistent:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Meta-analysis of data on blood pressure and cortisol concentrations
  found less evidence of a consistent difference between environments
  across studies.</p>
  
  <p>Other hormones, or measures of hormone activation, apart from
  cortisol, have also been investigated such as adrenaline and
  noradrenalin and salivary amylase.  Across these different studies and
  outcomes, their results provide mixed findings, with no clear,
  consistent difference emerging in the effect of different
  environments.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>References:</p>

<p>Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., &amp; Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC public health, 10(1), 456.</p>

<p>Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Hirano, H., Kagawa, T., Sato, M., &amp; Miyazaki, Y. (2007). Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest)-using salivary cortisol and cerebral activity as indicators. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26(2), 123-128.</p>

<p>Takai, N., Yamaguchi, M., Aragaki, T., Eto, K., Uchihashi, K., &amp; Nishikawa, Y. (2004). Effect of psychological stress on the salivary cortisol and amylase levels in healthy young adults. Archives of oral biology, 49(12), 963-968.</p>

<p>Takahashi, T., Ikeda, K., Ishikawa, M., Kitamura, N., Tsukasaki, T., Nakama, D., &amp; Kameda, T. (2005). Anxiety, reactivity, and social stress-induced cortisol elevation in humans. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 26(4), 351-354.</p>

<p>Rashkova, M. R., Ribagin, L. S., &amp; Toneva, N. G. (2012). Correlation between salivary α-amylase and stress-related anxiety. Folia medica, 54(2), 46-51.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roger_Ulrich4/publication/222484914_Stress_Recovery_During_Exposure_to_Natural_and_Urban_Environments._Journal_of_Environmental_Psychology._11_201-230/links/5484322d0cf25dbd59eb1339.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environment and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.</a></p>

<p>Nakamura, R., &amp; Fujii, E. (1992). A comparative study of the characteristics of the electroencephalogram when observing a hedge and a concrete block fence. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, 55(5), 139-144.</p>

<p>Kim, G. W., Jeong, G. W., Kim, T. H., Baek, H. S., Oh, S. K., Kang, H. K., ... &amp; Song, J. K. (2010). Functional neuroanatomy associated with natural and urban scenic views in the human brain: 3.0 T functional MR imaging. Korean Journal of Radiology, 11(5), 507-513.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969710001695" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Kim, T. H., Jeong, G. W., Baek, H. S., Kim, G. W., Sundaram, T., Kang, H. K., ... &amp; Song, J. K. (2010). Human brain activation in response to visual stimulation with rural and urban scenery pictures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Science of the total environment, 408(12), 2600-2607.</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-16T09:06:24.927Z
2016-12-16T09:39:27.627Z
2016-12-16T09:39:27.627Z
queenslug
<p>I was looking for some research study that links activity/response of brain stimulated due to natural scenery (or walk but i guess that is more implausible situation just to track what is going on in brain while being out of an scanner)</p>

<p>I googled but it results are useless. Is there any study done related to this? Please post link to resource related to the issue. </p>

<p>PS: I am not a person with great grasp at cognitive science but just curious to know things more scientifically. </p>

<cognitive-neuroscience><reference-request><nature-nurture>
Any study related to intimacy with nature and link with how it affects hormones or other chemical equations of brain?
Tab
# Any study related to intimacy with nature and link with how it affects hormones or other chemical equations of brain?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-12-15)

I was looking for some research study that links activity/response of brain stimulated due to natural scenery (or walk but i guess that is more implausible situation just to track what is going on in brain while being out of an scanner)

I googled but it results are useless. Is there any study done related to this? Please post link to resource related to the issue.

PS: I am not a person with great grasp at cognitive science but just curious to know things more scientifically.

**Tags:** cognitive-neuroscience, reference-request, nature-nurture


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2016-12-16. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

The positive impact of natural scenery on individuals well being has been well studied. I found a few studies looking at the physiological effects of viewing natural scenes.

Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used to access the electrical activity of the localized brain cortex associated with natural and urban environments (Ulrich, 1981; Nakamura, 1992). Ulrich reported that subjects shown urban and scenes produced more alpha (relaxation) activity when viewing nature scenes. High alpha amplitudes are associated with lower levels of physiological
arousal as well as feelings of wakeful relaxation.

More recently Kim at al (2010) conducted a functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) study exposing participants to either rural (natural) or urban scenery, they found that different areas of the brain were active when viewing the different scenes:

> Activation of the anterior cingulate gyrus, globus pallidus, putamen
> and head of the caudate nucleus was dominant during rural scenery
> viewing, whereas activation of the hippocampus, parahippocamus and
> amygdala was dominant during urban scenery viewing (p < 0.01). These
> findings allow better characterization of neural activation,
> suggesting an inherent preference towards nature-friendly living.

In terms of hormones, cortisol, amylase and adrenaline would be the ones changed by exposure to natural scenes as these are the hormones most associated with stress (Rashkova et al, 2012; Takahashi, 2005; Takai, 2004).

Park et al (2007) got two groups of participants to spend time in either a forest or a city for a day and then swap and spend a day in the opposite environment they found that:

The concentration of salivary cortisol in the forest area first group was significantly lower than that of the group that went to the city area first even after being in both landscapes.

It's worth noting however that a meta-analysis by Bowler et al (2010) found that research looking at hormones and natural environments was not consistent:

> Meta-analysis of data on blood pressure and cortisol concentrations
> found less evidence of a consistent difference between environments
> across studies.
>
> Other hormones, or measures of hormone activation, apart from
> cortisol, have also been investigated such as adrenaline and
> noradrenalin and salivary amylase. Across these different studies and
> outcomes, their results provide mixed findings, with no clear,
> consistent difference emerging in the effect of different
> environments.

References:

Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC public health, 10(1), 456.

Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Hirano, H., Kagawa, T., Sato, M., & Miyazaki, Y. (2007). Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest)-using salivary cortisol and cerebral activity as indicators. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 26(2), 123-128.

Takai, N., Yamaguchi, M., Aragaki, T., Eto, K., Uchihashi, K., & Nishikawa, Y. (2004). Effect of psychological stress on the salivary cortisol and amylase levels in healthy young adults. Archives of oral biology, 49(12), 963-968.

Takahashi, T., Ikeda, K., Ishikawa, M., Kitamura, N., Tsukasaki, T., Nakama, D., & Kameda, T. (2005). Anxiety, reactivity, and social stress-induced cortisol elevation in humans. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 26(4), 351-354.

Rashkova, M. R., Ribagin, L. S., & Toneva, N. G. (2012). Correlation between salivary α-amylase and stress-related anxiety. Folia medica, 54(2), 46-51.

[Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environment and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roger_Ulrich4/publication/222484914_Stress_Recovery_During_Exposure_to_Natural_and_Urban_Environments._Journal_of_Environmental_Psychology._11_201-230/links/5484322d0cf25dbd59eb1339.pdf)

Nakamura, R., & Fujii, E. (1992). A comparative study of the characteristics of the electroencephalogram when observing a hedge and a concrete block fence. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, 55(5), 139-144.

Kim, G. W., Jeong, G. W., Kim, T. H., Baek, H. S., Oh, S. K., Kang, H. K., ... & Song, J. K. (2010). Functional neuroanatomy associated with natural and urban scenic views in the human brain: 3.0 T functional MR imaging. Korean Journal of Radiology, 11(5), 507-513.

[Kim, T. H., Jeong, G. W., Baek, H. S., Kim, G. W., Sundaram, T., Kang, H. K., ... & Song, J. K. (2010). Human brain activation in response to visual stimulation with rural and urban scenery pictures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Science of the total environment, 408(12), 2600-2607.](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969710001695)


---

