<p>One of the claims that is somewhat easy to validate empirically is that "432 Hz sounds better than 440 Hz." <a href="https://acousticengineering.wordpress.com/2013/12/13/pitch-shifting-to-432-hz-doesnt-improve-music/">This informal experiment</a> tests this in a straightforward way. People listen to pitch-shifted versions of songs at a variety of different frequencies and rate their preference for the song. Importantly, they don't know which frequency the song has been shifted to.</p>

<p>The results pretty clearly debunk the claim that 432 "sounds better" than 440:</p>

<p><img src="https://acousticengineering.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/preference_graph1.png?w=500&amp;h=366" alt="results"></p>

<p>The preference ratings were highest at 440, and there was no statistical difference between 432 and 440.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-13T22:53:14.753Z
I am an experienced musician, and am "encoded" to 440. If something was shifted down this much, the whole would sound out of tune to me and would be torture.
theMayer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-14T00:50:37.290Z
Really? The baroque A was even lower than that, and musicians routinely tune to A's 'off' by 8 cents. I'm not defending the OP, though.
dwn
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-14T03:52:32.747Z
@dwn - I'm not a baroque musician, I play in a concert band which tunes to A 440, but I play the trombone and we have to know what "in tune" is or we would never achieve it! If you play any pitch for me, I can tell you if it's sharp, flat, or on-pitch instantly.
theMayer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-14T13:56:43.407Z
I said '8 cents', actually meant '8 Hz' (in this case, more like 30 cents)
dwn
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-12T23:28:46.860Z
2015-01-12T23:28:46.860Z
Josh
<p>I am a pro musician .... yes i agree that similarity and 'content' in any alleged 'blind' study sample will manifest a relevant INACCURATE difference in results. This has to be done with PET or other diagnostics to arrive at the correct conclusion. </p>

<p>However, as far as 'sacred' or metaphysical......the shape of the cochlea in the ear (natural biologic resonation chamber) and the mathematical science behind the theory of A-432 seems highly plausible <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdJinKf-lnw" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdJinKf-lnw</a> </p>

<p>The human experience detects and reacts to the subtle events...such as 8 cycles per second....IMO.....especially in prolonged exposure..such as normal modern audiophilic activities. </p>

<p>The experiment with the metal and the sand showing the perfectly formed patterns  with A-432 I feel is conclusive to prove a dissonance exists in the tactile and biological architectural realm. Plus the body is 70% 'water' which has been shown to give the same pattern generated results. </p>

<p>As a Professional musician there is NO DOUBT that music effects activity and the  'pace' of human activity.....MUZAK proved that with elevators.....internal thought and healing are natural not psychic human activities so my conclusion is 'YES' A-432 is probably a better vibrational experience which most likely has deeper results in the physical body. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-26T20:59:45.003Z
2015-10-26T20:59:45.003Z
John Hancock
<p>Search for “432 Hz” in YouTube and you’ll find plenty of examples where people have applied a pitch shifter to alter music ranging from a Mozart Requiem to Oasis’ Wonderwall.</p>

<p>But some claim that there is more to this than just preference. There are several blogs that claim that using a normal concert tuning of 440 Hz is bad for our health, but then what do you expect from something first promoted by the Nazis?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The recent rediscoveries of the vibratory / oscillatory nature of the universe indicate that this contemporary international concert pitch standard may generate an unhealthy effect or anti-social behavior in the consciousness of human beings … There is a theory that the change from 432 Hz to 440 Hz was dictated by Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels. [Source: <a href="http://www.zengardner.com/440hz-music-conspiracy-to-detune-us-from-natural-432hz-harmonics/#sthash.hcAIX7N2.dpuf">Zen Gardner</a>.]</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Also,</p>

<p>432 Hz is said to be mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe. Studies reveal that 432hz tuning vibrates with the universe’s golden mean PHI and unifies the properties of light, time, space, matter, gravity and magnetism with biology, the DNA code and consciousness. When our atoms and DNA start to resonate in harmony with the spiraling pattern of nature, our sense of connection to nature is said to be magnified. The number 432 is also reflected in ratios of the Sun, Earth, and the moon as well as the precession of the equinoxes, the Great Pyramid of Egypt, Stonehenge, the Sri Yantra among many other sacred sites. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>“From my own observations, some of the harmonic overtone partials of
  A=432hz 12T5 appear to line up to natural patterns and also the
  resonance of solitons. Solitons need a specific range to form into the
  realm of density and span from the micro to the macro cosmos. Solitons
  are not only found in water mechanics, but also in the ion-acoustic
  breath between electrons and protons.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>– Brian T. Collins </p>

<p>Another blog wrote that,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The noticeable difference music lovers and musicians have noticed with
  music tuned in A=432 Hz is that it is not only more beautiful and
  harmonious to the ears, but it also induces a more inward experience
  that is felt inside the body at the spine and heart. Music tuned in
  A=440 Hz was felt as a more outward and mental experience, and was
  felt at the side of the head which projected outwards. Audiophiles
  have also stated that A=432hz music seems to be non-local and can fill
  an entire room, whereas A=440hz can be perceived as directional or
  linear in sound propagation.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Also, there is <a href="https://soundcloud.com/groups/432-hz-music">a group on SoundCloud where people everyday shares different sound tracks based on 432 Hz frequencies</a>. </p>

<p>It is still kind of ambiguous and unclear to me. Does it really work to tune your music to 432 Hz, or it is just a hoax? Does it really effect your sub-conscious state and your health?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-17T13:18:23.107Z
@Memming I think it's important to consider if there is a root-article that is able to be considered scientifically, regardless of what kind of colloquial verbiage that has grown up around it.   Sometimes untrained people can be inspired by worthwhile observations - we shouldn't be turned away because of their ability to consistently convey the observation by learned standards.
New Alexandria
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-17T19:45:22.820Z
@NewAlexandria You are right. Perhaps my reaction was too harsh...
Memming
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-03-18T02:32:46.987Z
that just sounds awfully esotheric to me...but I agree that it would be interesting to see some actual research on this. When I was studying musicology I read a short piece from Sigismund v. Gleich regarding the character and effects of the 12 minor and major scales...probably goes in a similar direction
Daniel W.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-14T08:49:42.033Z
Christian Lange is performing experiments on the health effect of harmonic music based on the 432 Hz. See here: http://acquaphi.com/golden-music.html
Brain
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-10T13:39:08.187Z
I like your background search, however, none of the cited posts point out any blind experimental setups, which should be really straightforward to do. I'm looking forward to seeing some studies on this, which at least from a subjective perspective prove that one hz is preferred over the other. You most likely won't find any resources on the effects on health. That would take a longitudinal study of people constantly listening to 432 hz only vs 440 hz, without them being aware what they are listening to.
Steven Jeuris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-10T19:01:56.083Z
We've got a couple related, upvoted questions here already (see **1.** [Is there psychoactive music?](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/1882/4086), and **2.** [Is there evidence to suggest that music can trigger release of a particular kind of neurotransmitter?](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/5627/4086)), and not much in the way of answers. Good opportunity for anyone with a background in this sort of study to contribute usefully here!
Nick Stauner
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-10T19:17:07.183Z
Adding to @what's point about a likely misconception implied by your phrasing, you may want to see [Subconscious vs Unconscious](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/992/4086).
Nick Stauner
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-10T19:41:51.070Z
Also possibly relevant: [Brainwave audio recordings and beta waves: how do they affect positivity?](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/5607/21)
Steven Jeuris
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-11T00:00:29.847Z
This would make for an interesting, if frivolous study. Even if one point of view were scientifically proven though, too many musicians (myself included) are hard-wired to 440. We would revolt, and quit playing :)
theMayer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-11T22:13:14.513Z
"432 Hz is said to be mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe..." Where is that from?
draks ...
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-12T09:50:03.563Z
@draks...http://omega432.com/432-music/the-importance-of-432hz-music/
Sufiyan Ghori
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T04:27:15.380Z
I'm not an expert. But some frequencies are simply annoying. But that could be simply due to the dynamics of how the sound is affecting the ear at a certain angle, air density, etc. There could be many reasons. I'm curious to know why some frequencies are more annoying than others at the same volume. Of course, as fun as it is to speculate here, scientific research is the only way to find out. There could be many reasons. Harmonics, resonance, bad associative memories, etc. could be a few reasons.
Erokhane
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-15T05:30:59.757Z
Some parts of your post is very fishy and highly likely pseudoscience. That omega432.com is full of nonsense.
Memming
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-16T14:15:54.320Z
Anybody can experiment with A432Hz instrument tuning self. Please use a free iOS audio player www.alphasxplayer.com that lets toggle between standard/432Hz modes. On my test, the difference in music sounding is distinguishable.
Maxim  Chernousov
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-02-23T04:46:54.587Z
YEP! I have proven it. I was getting cranky while playing violin, in 440 hz of course. I almost tried to break my violin! I was cranky because I was having trouble playing my scales. Then I tuned my violin to 432 hz. Sure enough, I played through the scales smoothly and without strain or strife, but with joy and life. MOZART CONCERTOS SOUND AMAZEBALLS IN 432 HZ!!!!
Violaceous
<well-being><music>
432 Hz vs. 440 Hz frequencies: health and psychological effects?
Sufiyan Ghori
# 432 Hz vs. 440 Hz frequencies: health and psychological effects?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-02-10)

Search for “432 Hz” in YouTube and you’ll find plenty of examples where people have applied a pitch shifter to alter music ranging from a Mozart Requiem to Oasis’ Wonderwall.

But some claim that there is more to this than just preference. There are several blogs that claim that using a normal concert tuning of 440 Hz is bad for our health, but then what do you expect from something first promoted by the Nazis?

> The recent rediscoveries of the vibratory / oscillatory nature of the universe indicate that this contemporary international concert pitch standard may generate an unhealthy effect or anti-social behavior in the consciousness of human beings … There is a theory that the change from 432 Hz to 440 Hz was dictated by Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels. [Source: [Zen Gardner](http://www.zengardner.com/440hz-music-conspiracy-to-detune-us-from-natural-432hz-harmonics/#sthash.hcAIX7N2.dpuf).]

Also,

432 Hz is said to be mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe. Studies reveal that 432hz tuning vibrates with the universe’s golden mean PHI and unifies the properties of light, time, space, matter, gravity and magnetism with biology, the DNA code and consciousness. When our atoms and DNA start to resonate in harmony with the spiraling pattern of nature, our sense of connection to nature is said to be magnified. The number 432 is also reflected in ratios of the Sun, Earth, and the moon as well as the precession of the equinoxes, the Great Pyramid of Egypt, Stonehenge, the Sri Yantra among many other sacred sites.

> “From my own observations, some of the harmonic overtone partials of
> A=432hz 12T5 appear to line up to natural patterns and also the
> resonance of solitons. Solitons need a specific range to form into the
> realm of density and span from the micro to the macro cosmos. Solitons
> are not only found in water mechanics, but also in the ion-acoustic
> breath between electrons and protons.”

– Brian T. Collins

Another blog wrote that,

> The noticeable difference music lovers and musicians have noticed with
> music tuned in A=432 Hz is that it is not only more beautiful and
> harmonious to the ears, but it also induces a more inward experience
> that is felt inside the body at the spine and heart. Music tuned in
> A=440 Hz was felt as a more outward and mental experience, and was
> felt at the side of the head which projected outwards. Audiophiles
> have also stated that A=432hz music seems to be non-local and can fill
> an entire room, whereas A=440hz can be perceived as directional or
> linear in sound propagation.

Also, there is [a group on SoundCloud where people everyday shares different sound tracks based on 432 Hz frequencies](https://soundcloud.com/groups/432-hz-music).

It is still kind of ambiguous and unclear to me. Does it really work to tune your music to 432 Hz, or it is just a hoax? Does it really effect your sub-conscious state and your health?

**Tags:** well-being, music

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: I like your background search, however, none of the cited posts point out any blind experimental setups, which should be really straightforward to do. I'm looking forward to seeing some studies on this, which at least from a subjective perspective prove that one hz is preferred over the other. You most likely won't find any resources on the effects on health. That would take a longitudinal study of people constantly listening to 432 hz only vs 440 hz, without them being aware what they are listening to.  
> **username_6**: We've got a couple related, upvoted questions here already (see **1.** [Is there psychoactive music?](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/1882/4086), and **2.** [Is there evidence to suggest that music can trigger release of a particular kind of neurotransmitter?](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/5627/4086)), and not much in the way of answers. Good opportunity for anyone with a background in this sort of study to contribute usefully here!  
> **username_6**: Adding to @what's point about a likely misconception implied by your phrasing, you may want to see [Subconscious vs Unconscious](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/992/4086).  
> **username_5**: Also possibly relevant: [username_4wave audio recordings and beta waves: how do they affect positivity?](http://cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/5607/21)  
> **username_7**: This would make for an interesting, if frivolous study. Even if one point of view were scientifically proven though, too many musicians (myself included) are hard-wired to 440. We would revolt, and quit playing :)  
> **username_8**: "432 Hz is said to be mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe..." Where is that from?  
> **username_0**: @draks...http://omega432.com/432-music/the-importance-of-432hz-music/  
> **username_9**: I'm not an expert. But some frequencies are simply annoying. But that could be simply due to the dynamics of how the sound is affecting the ear at a certain angle, air density, etc. There could be many reasons. I'm curious to know why some frequencies are more annoying than others at the same volume. Of course, as fun as it is to speculate here, scientific research is the only way to find out. There could be many reasons. Harmonics, resonance, bad associative memories, etc. could be a few reasons.  
> **username_2**: Some parts of your post is very fishy and highly likely pseudoscience. That omega432.com is full of nonsense.  
> **username_1**: @username_2 I think it's important to consider if there is a root-article that is able to be considered scientifically, regardless of what kind of colloquial verbiage that has grown up around it.   Sometimes untrained people can be inspired by worthwhile observations - we shouldn't be turned away because of their ability to consistently convey the observation by learned standards.  
> **username_2**: @NewAlexandria You are right. Perhaps my reaction was too harsh...  
> **username_3**: that just sounds awfully esotheric to me...but I agree that it would be interesting to see some actual research on this. When I was studying musicology I read a short piece from Sigismund v. Gleich regarding the character and effects of the 12 minor and major scales...probably goes in a similar direction  
> **username_4**: Christian Lange is performing experiments on the health effect of harmonic music based on the 432 Hz. See here: http://acquaphi.com/golden-music.html  
> **username_10**: Anybody can experiment with A432Hz instrument tuning self. Please use a free iOS audio player www.alphasxplayer.com that lets toggle between standard/432Hz modes. On my test, the difference in music sounding is distinguishable.  
> **username_11**: YEP! I have proven it. I was getting cranky while playing violin, in 440 hz of course. I almost tried to break my violin! I was cranky because I was having trouble playing my scales. Then I tuned my violin to 432 hz. Sure enough, I played through the scales smoothly and without strain or strife, but with joy and life. MOZART CONCERTOS SOUND AMAZEBALLS IN 432 HZ!!!!  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_12 on 2015-01-12. Score: 9

One of the claims that is somewhat easy to validate empirically is that "432 Hz sounds better than 440 Hz." [This informal experiment](https://acousticengineering.wordpress.com/2013/12/13/pitch-shifting-to-432-hz-doesnt-improve-music/) tests this in a straightforward way. People listen to pitch-shifted versions of songs at a variety of different frequencies and rate their preference for the song. Importantly, they don't know which frequency the song has been shifted to.

The results pretty clearly debunk the claim that 432 "sounds better" than 440:

![results](https://acousticengineering.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/preference_graph1.png?w=500&h=366)

The preference ratings were highest at 440, and there was no statistical difference between 432 and 440.

> **Comments:**
> **username_7**: I am an experienced musician, and am "encoded" to 440. If something was shifted down this much, the whole would sound out of tune to me and would be torture.  
> **username_13**: Really? The baroque A was even lower than that, and musicians routinely tune to A's 'off' by 8 cents. I'm not defending the OP, though.  
> **username_7**: @username_13 - I'm not a baroque musician, I play in a concert band which tunes to A 440, but I play the trombone and we have to know what "in tune" is or we would never achieve it! If you play any pitch for me, I can tell you if it's sharp, flat, or on-pitch instantly.  
> **username_13**: I said '8 cents', actually meant '8 Hz' (in this case, more like 30 cents)  

---

### Answer by username_14 on 2015-10-26. Score: -4

I am a pro musician .... yes i agree that similarity and 'content' in any alleged 'blind' study sample will manifest a relevant INACCURATE difference in results. This has to be done with PET or other diagnostics to arrive at the correct conclusion.

However, as far as 'sacred' or metaphysical......the shape of the cochlea in the ear (natural biologic resonation chamber) and the mathematical science behind the theory of A-432 seems highly plausible <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdJinKf-lnw>

The human experience detects and reacts to the subtle events...such as 8 cycles per second....IMO.....especially in prolonged exposure..such as normal modern audiophilic activities.

The experiment with the metal and the sand showing the perfectly formed patterns with A-432 I feel is conclusive to prove a dissonance exists in the tactile and biological architectural realm. Plus the body is 70% 'water' which has been shown to give the same pattern generated results.

As a Professional musician there is NO DOUBT that music effects activity and the 'pace' of human activity.....MUZAK proved that with elevators.....internal thought and healing are natural not psychic human activities so my conclusion is 'YES' A-432 is probably a better vibrational experience which most likely has deeper results in the physical body.


---

