<p>The images you've linked are composites, and so probably don't contain the characteristics by which raters were able to judge IQ accurately. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081237">The original article <sup>(Kleisner, Chvátalová, &amp; Flegr, 2014)</sup></a> is freely available and appears to answer your question in its abstract:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Faces that are perceived as highly intelligent are rather prolonged with a broader distance between the eyes, a larger nose, a slight upturn to the corners of the mouth, and a sharper, pointing, less rounded chin. By contrast, the perception of lower intelligence is associated with broader, more rounded faces with eyes closer to each other, a shorter nose, declining corners of the mouth, and a rounded and massive chin.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>These differences only relate to perceived intelligence, not measured intelligence.
From the conclusion:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>No specific traits that correlated with real intelligence were detected with standard geometric morphometric methods. Men and women with specific facial traits were perceived as highly intelligent. However, these faces of supposed high and low intelligence probably represent nothing more than a cultural stereotype because these morphological traits do not correlate with the real intelligence of the subjects.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The authors speculate on (but did not analyze) other factors that might explain the perceptibility of actual intelligence apart from the factors visible in the composites, including:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Particular configurations of eyes or gaze, colour of eyes, hair and skin, or skin texture.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>All of these characteristics would be wiped out in facial composites, so you probably can't actually perceive intelligence accurately from the images you've embedded according to this study.</p>

<p><sub><strong>Reference</strong><br>
Kleisner, K., Chvátalová, V., &amp; Flegr, J. (2014). Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women. <em>PloS One, 9</em>(3), e81237. Retrieved from <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081237">http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081237</a>.</sub></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-02T03:30:31.010Z
2014-04-02T03:30:31.010Z
Nick Stauner
<p>There are <a href="http://www.policymic.com/articles/86593/you-can-predict-this-man-s-iq-just-by-looking-at-his-picture?utm_source=policymicFB&amp;utm_medium=main&amp;utm_campaign=social" rel="nofollow noreferrer">claims that humans can recognize others' IQ</a>. </p>

<p>What's the difference between the below images that shows men's IQ?</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/2N21L.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>Personally, I can "feel" that the guy with high perceived intelligence (on the right) does indeed look the most intelligent.</p>

<p>However, what is the reason behind this gut feeling? The nose being wider? Is it  the slanting eyes? I found the associated grid drawings, but I still can't seem to figure it out.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-02T01:53:11.067Z
Looks like a cool article, but it also looks like it explains itself. Please follow suit and explain what you want to know that the article itself doesn't tell you about these pictures and the underlying differences. Also, please explain what this question has to do with human factors (if anything really).
Nick Stauner
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-02T01:56:01.373Z
it seems that the distance between mouth and eye is farther.
user4951
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-02T01:56:21.860Z
the front face of smarter people tend to expand.
user4951
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-02T03:48:11.067Z
Ah I see. The grids are distorted in the right and left. That is why I cannot see any difference by seeing how points differ according to the grids.
user4951
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-23T15:55:18.530Z
@user4951 Hi, the link in "claims that humans can recognize others' IQ.", doesn't work
Starckman
<perception><iq>
How exactly do we construct perceived IQ by facial features?
user4951
# How exactly do we construct perceived IQ by facial features?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-04-02)

There are [claims that humans can recognize others' IQ](http://www.policymic.com/articles/86593/you-can-predict-this-man-s-iq-just-by-looking-at-his-picture?utm_source=policymicFB&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=social).

What's the difference between the below images that shows men's IQ?

![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/2N21L.jpg)

Personally, I can "feel" that the guy with high perceived intelligence (on the right) does indeed look the most intelligent.

However, what is the reason behind this gut feeling? The nose being wider? Is it the slanting eyes? I found the associated grid drawings, but I still can't seem to figure it out.

**Tags:** perception, iq

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Looks like a cool article, but it also looks like it explains itself. Please follow suit and explain what you want to know that the article itself doesn't tell you about these pictures and the underlying differences. Also, please explain what this question has to do with human factors (if anything really).  
> **username_0**: it seems that the distance between mouth and eye is farther.  
> **username_0**: the front face of smarter people tend to expand.  
> **username_0**: Ah I see. The grids are distorted in the right and left. That is why I cannot see any difference by seeing how points differ according to the grids.  
> **username_2**: @username_0 Hi, the link in "claims that humans can recognize others' IQ.", doesn't work  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2014-04-02. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

The images you've linked are composites, and so probably don't contain the characteristics by which raters were able to judge IQ accurately. [The original article (Kleisner, Chvátalová, & Flegr, 2014)](http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081237) is freely available and appears to answer your question in its abstract:

> Faces that are perceived as highly intelligent are rather prolonged with a broader distance between the eyes, a larger nose, a slight upturn to the corners of the mouth, and a sharper, pointing, less rounded chin. By contrast, the perception of lower intelligence is associated with broader, more rounded faces with eyes closer to each other, a shorter nose, declining corners of the mouth, and a rounded and massive chin.

These differences only relate to perceived intelligence, not measured intelligence.
From the conclusion:

> No specific traits that correlated with real intelligence were detected with standard geometric morphometric methods. Men and women with specific facial traits were perceived as highly intelligent. However, these faces of supposed high and low intelligence probably represent nothing more than a cultural stereotype because these morphological traits do not correlate with the real intelligence of the subjects.

The authors speculate on (but did not analyze) other factors that might explain the perceptibility of actual intelligence apart from the factors visible in the composites, including:

> Particular configurations of eyes or gaze, colour of eyes, hair and skin, or skin texture.

All of these characteristics would be wiped out in facial composites, so you probably can't actually perceive intelligence accurately from the images you've embedded according to this study.

**Reference**  
Kleisner, K., Chvátalová, V., & Flegr, J. (2014). Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women. *PloS One, 9*(3), e81237. Retrieved from <http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081237>.


---

