<p>What are some ways to avoid the Jingle-Jangle fallacies when it comes to choosing a form of measurement in psychology research?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-22T03:48:40.580Z
This question might be a bit broad ... can you narrow it down to say, survey questionnaires, or machine learning research, or verbal exercises, or whatever you have in mind...?
Arnon Weinberg
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-22T04:10:11.150Z
I was thinking in terms of selecting a method of measurement for a research study. Can be questionnaires if that narrows it down even more, but not exclusively restricted to that way of measure.
betaegg
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-22T15:28:39.243Z
Factor analysis and structural equation modeling.
hexadecimal
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-24T23:51:32.580Z
What are Jingle-Jangle fallacies? can you give an example? it's good practice to frame your question with examples, provide web links to essential terminology etc.
AliceD
<measurement><terminology><experimental-psychology>
How to prevent falling for Jingle-Jangle fallacies?
betaegg
# How to prevent falling for Jingle-Jangle fallacies?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-01-22)

What are some ways to avoid the Jingle-Jangle fallacies when it comes to choosing a form of measurement in psychology research?

**Tags:** measurement, terminology, experimental-psychology

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: This question might be a bit broad ... can you narrow it down to say, survey questionnaires, or machine learning research, or verbal exercises, or whatever you have in mind...?  
> **username_0**: I was thinking in terms of selecting a method of measurement for a research study. Can be questionnaires if that narrows it down even more, but not exclusively restricted to that way of measure.  
> **username_2**: Factor analysis and structural equation modeling.  
> **username_3**: What are Jingle-Jangle fallacies? can you give an example? it's good practice to frame your question with examples, provide web links to essential terminology etc.  

---

## 0 answers

