<p>Re-reading the whole quote and not just the first 3 sentences there does seem to be some ramblings which need citations to back his claims.</p>
<p>The crux of your question:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I am puzzled [with] what he means by [the] word <strong>reveal</strong> above?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>why would you not want to reveal (whatever he means) yourself?</p>
<p>The first 3 sentences loosely refer to the concept of the johari window which I <a href="https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/22018">spoke about in another answer</a>.</p>
<p>The basic concept of the johari window is that in order to reveal yourself fully to yourself (who you are) you need to reveal yourself to others.  There can be abilities you have, and maybe aspects to your personality, which are unknown to you but others may see <strong>if you allow them to see them</strong>.</p>
<p>As for why you would not want to reveal yourself, there can be numerous reasons.  One example was used by Peterson in the same part of the book (Rule 8: Tell the truth — or, at least, don't lie)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Consider the person who insists that everything is right in her life. She avoids conflict, and smiles, and does what she is asked to do. She finds a niche and hides in it. She does not question authority or put her own ideas forward, and does not complain when mistreated. She strives for invisibility, like a fish in the centre of a swarming school.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This person is hiding herself.  She is not revealing her thoughts and ideas, so therefore she is not <strong>revealing herself</strong>.</p>
<p>If she revealed her thoughts and ideas she would be seen and heard, therefore putting the knowledge out there that she can think for herself.</p>
<p>On the other hand, she may not see that she <strong>can</strong> think for herself.  Maybe she thinks her ideas are not going to be correct or even be considered.</p>
<p>To find out more about the concept of the johari window, the links in the other answer (linked above) could help.</p>
<p>After those first 3 sentences, the quote gives <em>so-called</em> explanations referring to genes in the central nervous system (CNS) which I cannot vouch for and feel maybe a bit far fetched, although I must point out that I am not fully conversant with the neuroscience.  The problem with this part of the quote is that nothing mentioned is referenced, just like the first 3 sentences.</p>
<p>What I have found through basic internet searches is as follows:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Genetics of the nervous system refers to the study of genetics affecting the development, physiology and functions of the nervous system and diseases thereof<br>(nature.com n.d.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Several diseases that directly affect the nervous system have a genetic component: some are due to a mutation in a single gene, others are proving to have a more complex mode of inheritance. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders deepens, common themes begin to emerge...<br>(National Center for Biotechnology Information 1998)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether this part of the quote can be relevant to the situation may be answered by others here, but seeing as you haven't asked about that directly I feel a separate question would be needed for that.</p>
<p>##References</p>
<p>National Center for Biotechnology Information (1998). <em>The Nervous System</em>. Retrieved from <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22197" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22197</a></p>
<p>nature.com (n.d.). <em>Genetics of the nervous system</em>. Retreived from <a href="https://www.nature.com/subjects/genetics-of-the-nervous-system" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.nature.com/subjects/genetics-of-the-nervous-system</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T18:30:47.033Z
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/94028/discussion-on-answer-by-chris-rogers-phrase-used-by-jordan-peterson-about-revea).
AliceD
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T11:21:46.707Z
2020-09-08T12:30:29.783Z
2020-09-08T12:30:29.783Z
Chris Rogers
<p>In his book <em><a href="https://archive.org/stream/JordanB.Peterson12RulesForLifeAnAntidoteToChaos/Jordan%20B.%20Peterson%20-%2012%20Rules%20for%20Life_%20An%20Antidote%20to%20Chaos%20%282018%2C%20Random%20House%20Canada%29_djvu.txt" rel="nofollow noreferrer">12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos</a></em> (Peterson, 2018) has following quote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If you will not <strong>reveal</strong> yourself to others, you cannot reveal yourself
to yourself. That  does not only mean that you suppress who you are,
although it also means that. It means  that so much of what you could
be will never be forced by necessity to come forward. This  is a
biological truth, as well as a conceptual truth. When you explore
boldly, when you  voluntarily confront the unknown, you gather
information and build your renewed self  out of that information. That
is the conceptual element. However, researchers have  recently
discovered that new genes in the central nervous system turn
themselves on when an organism is placed (or places itself) in a new situation. These genes code for new
proteins. These proteins are the building blocks for new structures in the brain. This
means that a lot of you is still nascent, in the most physical of senses, and will not be
called forth by stasis. You have to say something, go somewhere and do things to get
turned on.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I am puzzled what he means by word <strong>reveal</strong> above?</p>
<p>why would you not want to reveal (whatever he means) yourself? Can you give some explanations what you think?</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<p>Peterson, J. (2018). <em>12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos</em>. Toronto: Penguin Random House. ISBN: <a href="https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/0345816021" rel="nofollow noreferrer">0345816021</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-22T21:21:56.073Z
Welcome. To let us understand the context of the material, please also provide the preceding lines.
AliceD
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-22T22:07:44.477Z
I don't think this is on topic because it is not related to the science of psychology or neuroscience, it's just some unsourced unsupported rambling.
Bryan Krause
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T05:18:21.567Z
@BryanKrause: Peterson seems [a lot more famous](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Peterson) for his politics than his science.
got trolled too much this week
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T05:34:00.833Z
gdan, for some reason that probably has most to do with Petersen's political opinions rather than anything else, his self-help book has received a lot of press coverage; you can read the [Wikipedia summary of those reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_Rules_for_Life#Reception) and decide for yourself if the book makes any sense
got trolled too much this week
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T08:51:19.690Z
As @BryanKrause pointed out, the text referred to is not related to the science of psychology *per se* because it is unreferenced, but this passage is actually referring to [the johari window](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/22018) I spoke about in an earlier answer
Chris Rogers
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T08:55:22.760Z
It is interesting to read the reviews @Fizz pointed out and maybe I will have a read myself to build up a review myself.
Chris Rogers
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T09:15:50.607Z
Also Wikipedia is being kind to Petersen https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/23/jordan-peterson-rage-self-help-guru-cathy-newman-twitter and by looking at the wiki talk page, I mean his fans barely allowed one critical review on that wiki page, after tons of arguments.
got trolled too much this week
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T12:45:38.177Z
If you don't reveal the truth you are more likely to have confused sense of self and more likely to be influenced by the way other's perceive or really the way you imagine other's perceive you.
Borut Flis
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-23T13:58:10.793Z
@user23284 Peterson has published peer reviewed science. That does not mean everything he writes or says has any basis in science. Similar to people on TV who have MD degrees and then use their degree to tout diet plans that are unsupported by evidence.
Bryan Krause
<learning><self><self-control><self-discipline>
Phrase used by jordan peterson about "revealing"
gdan
# Phrase used by jordan peterson about "revealing"

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-05-22)

In his book *[12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos](https://archive.org/stream/JordanB.Peterson12RulesForLifeAnAntidoteToChaos/Jordan%20B.%20Peterson%20-%2012%20Rules%20for%20Life_%20An%20Antidote%20to%20Chaos%20%282018%2C%20Random%20House%20Canada%29_djvu.txt)* (Peterson, 2018) has following quote:

> If you will not **reveal** yourself to others, you cannot reveal yourself
> to yourself. That does not only mean that you suppress who you are,
> although it also means that. It means that so much of what you could
> be will never be forced by necessity to come forward. This is a
> biological truth, as well as a conceptual truth. When you explore
> boldly, when you voluntarily confront the unknown, you gather
> information and build your renewed self out of that information. That
> is the conceptual element. However, researchers have recently
> discovered that new genes in the central nervous system turn
> themselves on when an organism is placed (or places itself) in a new situation. These genes code for new
> proteins. These proteins are the building blocks for new structures in the brain. This
> means that a lot of you is still nascent, in the most physical of senses, and will not be
> called forth by stasis. You have to say something, go somewhere and do things to get
> turned on.

I am puzzled what he means by word **reveal** above?

why would you not want to reveal (whatever he means) yourself? Can you give some explanations what you think?

## References

Peterson, J. (2018). *12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos*. Toronto: Penguin Random House. ISBN: [0345816021](https://isbnsearch.org/isbn/0345816021)

**Tags:** learning, self, self-control, self-discipline

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Welcome. To let us understand the context of the material, please also provide the preceding lines.  
> **username_2**: I don't think this is on topic because it is not related to the science of psychology or neuroscience, it's just some unsourced unsupported rambling.  
> **username_3**: @BryanKrause: Peterson seems [a lot more famous](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Peterson) for his politics than his science.  
> **username_3**: username_0, for some reason that probably has most to do with Petersen's political opinions rather than anything else, his self-help book has received a lot of press coverage; you can read the [Wikipedia summary of those reviews](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_Rules_for_Life#Reception) and decide for yourself if the book makes any sense  
> **username_4**: As @BryanKrause pointed out, the text referred to is not related to the science of psychology *per se* because it is unreferenced, but this passage is actually referring to [the johari window](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/22018) I spoke about in an earlier answer  
> **username_4**: It is interesting to read the reviews @Fizz pointed out and maybe I will have a read myself to build up a review myself.  
> **username_3**: Also Wikipedia is being kind to Petersen https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/23/jordan-peterson-rage-self-help-guru-cathy-newman-twitter and by looking at the wiki talk page, I mean his fans barely allowed one critical review on that wiki page, after tons of arguments.  
> **username_5**: If you don't reveal the truth you are more likely to have confused sense of self and more likely to be influenced by the way other's perceive or really the way you imagine other's perceive you.  
> **username_2**: @user23284 Peterson has published peer reviewed science. That does not mean everything he writes or says has any basis in science. Similar to people on TV who have MD degrees and then use their degree to tout diet plans that are unsupported by evidence.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2019-05-23. Score: 3

Re-reading the whole quote and not just the first 3 sentences there does seem to be some ramblings which need citations to back his claims.

The crux of your question:

> I am puzzled [with] what he means by [the] word **reveal** above?

why would you not want to reveal (whatever he means) yourself?

The first 3 sentences loosely refer to the concept of the johari window which I [spoke about in another answer](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/22018).

The basic concept of the johari window is that in order to reveal yourself fully to yourself (who you are) you need to reveal yourself to others. There can be abilities you have, and maybe aspects to your personality, which are unknown to you but others may see **if you allow them to see them**.

As for why you would not want to reveal yourself, there can be numerous reasons. One example was used by Peterson in the same part of the book (Rule 8: Tell the truth — or, at least, don't lie)

> Consider the person who insists that everything is right in her life. She avoids conflict, and smiles, and does what she is asked to do. She finds a niche and hides in it. She does not question authority or put her own ideas forward, and does not complain when mistreated. She strives for invisibility, like a fish in the centre of a swarming school.

This person is hiding herself. She is not revealing her thoughts and ideas, so therefore she is not **revealing herself**.

If she revealed her thoughts and ideas she would be seen and heard, therefore putting the knowledge out there that she can think for herself.

On the other hand, she may not see that she **can** think for herself. Maybe she thinks her ideas are not going to be correct or even be considered.

To find out more about the concept of the johari window, the links in the other answer (linked above) could help.

After those first 3 sentences, the quote gives *so-called* explanations referring to genes in the central nervous system (CNS) which I cannot vouch for and feel maybe a bit far fetched, although I must point out that I am not fully conversant with the neuroscience. The problem with this part of the quote is that nothing mentioned is referenced, just like the first 3 sentences.

What I have found through basic internet searches is as follows:

> Genetics of the nervous system refers to the study of genetics affecting the development, physiology and functions of the nervous system and diseases thereof  
> (nature.com n.d.)

> Several diseases that directly affect the nervous system have a genetic component: some are due to a mutation in a single gene, others are proving to have a more complex mode of inheritance. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders deepens, common themes begin to emerge...  
> (National Center for Biotechnology Information 1998)

Whether this part of the quote can be relevant to the situation may be answered by others here, but seeing as you haven't asked about that directly I feel a separate question would be needed for that.

##References

National Center for Biotechnology Information (1998). *The Nervous System*. Retrieved from <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22197>

nature.com (n.d.). *Genetics of the nervous system*. Retreived from <https://www.nature.com/subjects/genetics-of-the-nervous-system>

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been [moved to chat](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/94028/discussion-on-answer-by-chris-rogers-phrase-used-by-jordan-peterson-about-revea).  

---

