<p>Representing the relation between objects + their attributes in neurons is called <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_problem" rel="nofollow noreferrer">The Binding Problem</a>. The Wikipedia article I've linked to is a bit questionable at the moment, so you may want to read the paper "<a href="http://compneuro.uwaterloo.ca/publications/crawford2015.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Biologically Plausible, Human-Scale Knowledge Representation</a>" instead. In the paper, the authors describe different ways of encoding symbols and their relation in neurons, using the <a href="https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nef">NEF</a> and <a href="https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/spa">SPA</a>.</p>

<p>The paper shows how populations of neurons can represent vectors and symbols can be defined as vectors. Relations between symbols can be defined as operations on these symbols carried out by connection weights between populations.</p>

<p>For example, the scenario in the original post could be represented as:</p>

<p>$V = BLUE*CIRCLE + RED*TRIANGLE$</p>

<p>Where each word is it's own N-dimensional vector, $+$ is vector addition and $*$ is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_convolution" rel="nofollow noreferrer">circular convolution</a>.</p>

<p>Further discussion of this model can be found in <a href="https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/5738/4397">this StackExchange answer</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-07-16T11:40:04.427Z
2018-07-16T11:40:04.427Z
Seanny123
<p>What is the name of the problem to explain how the neural activation for "red circle and a blue triangle" is different from "blue circle and red triangle"? Just activating the neurons for "red", "blue", "circle", "triangle" is not enough.</p>

<terminology><theoretical-neuroscience>
Name of association phenomenon
root
# Name of association phenomenon

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-07-16)

What is the name of the problem to explain how the neural activation for "red circle and a blue triangle" is different from "blue circle and red triangle"? Just activating the neurons for "red", "blue", "circle", "triangle" is not enough.

**Tags:** terminology, theoretical-neuroscience


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2018-07-16. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

Representing the relation between objects + their attributes in neurons is called [The Binding Problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_problem). The Wikipedia article I've linked to is a bit questionable at the moment, so you may want to read the paper "[Biologically Plausible, Human-Scale Knowledge Representation](http://compneuro.uwaterloo.ca/publications/crawford2015.html)" instead. In the paper, the authors describe different ways of encoding symbols and their relation in neurons, using the [NEF](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nef) and [SPA](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/spa).

The paper shows how populations of neurons can represent vectors and symbols can be defined as vectors. Relations between symbols can be defined as operations on these symbols carried out by connection weights between populations.

For example, the scenario in the original post could be represented as:

$V = BLUE\*CIRCLE + RED\*TRIANGLE$

Where each word is it's own N-dimensional vector, $+$ is vector addition and $\*$ is [circular convolution](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_convolution).

Further discussion of this model can be found in [this StackExchange answer](https://psychology.stackexchange.com/a/5738/4397).


---

