<p>The two concepts are analogous and mutually illustrative, but empirically refer to different levels of analysis: behavioral and neural.</p>
<h2>Habituation</h2>
<p><strong>Habituation</strong> is a form of non-associative learning, specifically, learning that a stimulus is behaviorally unimportant. If I loudly and repeatedly bang on a metal pot immediately behind your head, you will probably be shocked, then uncomfortable, then annoyed, until you eventually learn to mostly ignore the unimportant sound. It is an effect detected in behavioral measures, rather than neural measures, and which, as any Google search will confirm, is well-established across many species. An example of the term's general usage from <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habituation" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia</a> (which I hope is sufficient for illustration), noting the emphasis on the behavioral rather than neural scale:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>The habituation process is a form of adaptive behavior (or neuroplasticity) that is classified as nonassociative learning. Nonassociative learning is a change in a response to a stimulus that does not involve associating the presented stimulus with another stimulus or event such as reward or punishment.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Repetition Suppression</h2>
<p><strong>Repetition suppression</strong> is a neural mechanism which attenuates (i.e., gradually decreases the intensity of) signals in the brain when a stimulus is detected repeatedly. Presenting the same visual stimulus repeatedly will therefore cause decreased response in some of the involved groups of visual neurons, which is also a useful effect in a number of behavioral research fields like memory and attention research. Two illustrative examples of the term's usage follow:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Memory</strong></p>
<p><em>Furthermore, single-cell recordings show experience-based changes in perirhinal neuronal firing patterns broadly consistent with item recognition, wherein firing rates decrease in response to previously encountered relative to novel stimuli (Xiang and Brown, 1998). Such firing rate decreases, termed “repetition suppression” ...</em></p>
<p>Gonsalves, B. D., Kahn, I., Curran, T., Norman, K. A., &amp; Wagner, A. D. (2005). Memory strength and repetition suppression: multimodal imaging of medial temporal cortical contributions to recognition. Neuron, 47(5), 751-761.</p>
<p><strong>Face recognition</strong></p>
<p><em>Repetition suppression, as manifested by the difference in response amplitude between the first and third repetitions of a target, was stronger for fearful than neutral faces.</em></p>
<p>Ishai, A., Pessoa, L., Bikle, P. C., &amp; Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(26), 9827-9832.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Clearly, habituation and repetition suppression share a lot of conceptual similarities, but it's important to remember that they are ultimately models of entirely different, if closely related physical phenomena which occur at completely different scales. Behavioral habituation relies to some extent on neural repetition suppression, but it does so through memory, attention and other cognitive systems. Repetition suppression alone is therefore not sufficient to explain behavioral habituation, or vice versa.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T12:10:39.003Z
Interesting answer. Just out of interest to grasp your answer - is repetition suppression the same as neural adaptation? Neural adaptation is e.g. apparent when a sensory neuron is repeatedly stimulated - it will often decrease its spike rate or responsiveness to the stimulus.
AliceD
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T12:17:45.080Z
@AliceD It is not. Neural adaptation is much, much more general, and can refer to almost any change over time. Repetition suppression is a more specific attenuating mechanism (attenuation refers to a loss in intensity over time, rather than any change over time).
Christian Hummeluhr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T12:19:42.690Z
Thanks for explaining, definitely something I have to look further into. +1
AliceD
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T12:20:50.803Z
Definitely, it's very productive. I've clarified what I mean by attenuation in the answer.
Christian Hummeluhr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T16:28:20.353Z
I voted up, but would in any case recommend adding references, especially to studies demonstrating the correlation between suppression and habituation.
Arnon Weinberg
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T16:32:52.853Z
@ArnonWeinberg "correlation between suppression and habituation" - the point of my answer is that they are related but largely incommensurate concepts. How would such a correlation be interpreted? Thank you, in any case. I will see if I can find a reference for at least repetition suppression.
Christian Hummeluhr
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T17:26:36.803Z
Perhaps I should have said "correlation, or lack thereof" - I would expect correlation where they overlap, and lack thereof where they don't.  Anyways, great answer. :-)
Arnon Weinberg
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-22T01:17:09.340Z
2015-03-22T17:00:43.270Z
2020-06-17T09:55:31.633Z
Christian Hummeluhr
<p>Neural repetition suppression seems to be describing behavioral habituation on a neuronal level. What's the difference between these two terms?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-27T12:44:47.293Z
Stating where you found these definitions would be helpful.
Seanny123
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-03-01T05:36:18.983Z
Habituation: all through my undergrad. Repetition suppression: some guy who works in a neurosci. lab.
RECURSIVE FARTS
<cognitive-neuroscience><terminology><conditioning><perceptual-learning>
What's the difference between repetition suppression and habituation?
RECURSIVE FARTS
# What's the difference between repetition suppression and habituation?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-02-27)

Neural repetition suppression seems to be describing behavioral habituation on a neuronal level. What's the difference between these two terms?

**Tags:** cognitive-neuroscience, terminology, conditioning, perceptual-learning

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Stating where you found these definitions would be helpful.  
> **username_0**: Habituation: all through my undergrad. Repetition suppression: some guy who works in a neurosci. lab.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-03-22. Score: 7 | Accepted answer

The two concepts are analogous and mutually illustrative, but empirically refer to different levels of analysis: behavioral and neural.

## Habituation

**Habituation** is a form of non-associative learning, specifically, learning that a stimulus is behaviorally unimportant. If I loudly and repeatedly bang on a metal pot immediately behind your head, you will probably be shocked, then uncomfortable, then annoyed, until you eventually learn to mostly ignore the unimportant sound. It is an effect detected in behavioral measures, rather than neural measures, and which, as any Google search will confirm, is well-established across many species. An example of the term's general usage from [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habituation) (which I hope is sufficient for illustration), noting the emphasis on the behavioral rather than neural scale:

> *The habituation process is a form of adaptive behavior (or neuroplasticity) that is classified as nonassociative learning. Nonassociative learning is a change in a response to a stimulus that does not involve associating the presented stimulus with another stimulus or event such as reward or punishment.*

## Repetition Suppression

**Repetition suppression** is a neural mechanism which attenuates (i.e., gradually decreases the intensity of) signals in the brain when a stimulus is detected repeatedly. Presenting the same visual stimulus repeatedly will therefore cause decreased response in some of the involved groups of visual neurons, which is also a useful effect in a number of behavioral research fields like memory and attention research. Two illustrative examples of the term's usage follow:

> **Memory**
>
> *Furthermore, single-cell recordings show experience-based changes in perirhinal neuronal firing patterns broadly consistent with item recognition, wherein firing rates decrease in response to previously encountered relative to novel stimuli (Xiang and Brown, 1998). Such firing rate decreases, termed “repetition suppression” ...*
>
> Gonsalves, B. D., Kahn, I., Curran, T., Norman, K. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Memory strength and repetition suppression: multimodal imaging of medial temporal cortical contributions to recognition. Neuron, 47(5), 751-761.
>
> **Face recognition**
>
> *Repetition suppression, as manifested by the difference in response amplitude between the first and third repetitions of a target, was stronger for fearful than neutral faces.*
>
> Ishai, A., Pessoa, L., Bikle, P. C., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). Repetition suppression of faces is modulated by emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(26), 9827-9832.

Clearly, habituation and repetition suppression share a lot of conceptual similarities, but it's important to remember that they are ultimately models of entirely different, if closely related physical phenomena which occur at completely different scales. Behavioral habituation relies to some extent on neural repetition suppression, but it does so through memory, attention and other cognitive systems. Repetition suppression alone is therefore not sufficient to explain behavioral habituation, or vice versa.

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Interesting answer. Just out of interest to grasp your answer - is repetition suppression the same as neural adaptation? Neural adaptation is e.g. apparent when a sensory neuron is repeatedly stimulated - it will often decrease its spike rate or responsiveness to the stimulus.  
> **username_2**: @username_3 It is not. Neural adaptation is much, much more general, and can refer to almost any change over time. Repetition suppression is a more specific attenuating mechanism (attenuation refers to a loss in intensity over time, rather than any change over time).  
> **username_3**: Thanks for explaining, definitely something I have to look further into. +1  
> **username_2**: Definitely, it's very productive. I've clarified what I mean by attenuation in the answer.  
> **username_4**: I voted up, but would in any case recommend adding references, especially to studies demonstrating the correlation between suppression and habituation.  
> **username_2**: @ArnonWeinberg "correlation between suppression and habituation" - the point of my answer is that they are related but largely incommensurate concepts. How would such a correlation be interpreted? Thank you, in any case. I will see if I can find a reference for at least repetition suppression.  
> **username_4**: Perhaps I should have said "correlation, or lack thereof" - I would expect correlation where they overlap, and lack thereof where they don't.  Anyways, great answer. :-)  

---

