<p>According the the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yerkes%E2%80%93Dodson_law" rel="nofollow">Yerkes–Dodson</a> law, a moderate level of arousal gives energy to the task, improving performance.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Yerkes–Dodson law is an empirical relationship between arousal and
  performance, originally developed by psychologists Robert M. Yerkes
  and John Dillingham Dodson in 1908. The law dictates that
  performance increases with physiological or mental arousal, but only
  up to a point. When levels of arousal become too high, performance
  decreases.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Anger is an emotion that creates arousal, but it is also a negative emotion that makes other people more hostile and negative. Other emotions that create positive arousal are excitement, interest, curiosity etc.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-17T19:38:51.320Z
I find it hard to grasp how psychologists define the various types of emotions in a meaningful manner. And how did they manage to measure arousal? What empirical measures did Yerkes and Dodson use? Thanks.
Jack Maddington
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-27T22:18:19.060Z
Hi, @DesignerAnalysr, can you please answer the question in my comment above? Thanks.
Jack Maddington
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-10-09T15:17:15.713Z
@JackMaddington find here the original article with all the experiment details at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Yerkes/Law/
DesignerAnalyst
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-17T07:56:12.333Z
2016-05-17T07:56:12.333Z
DesignerAnalyst
<p>Is there any evidence that a little bit of inner anger is healthy when engaging in problem solving? I personally feel this way, but feel that people around me misinterpret my anger as being directed at them and the world around me instead of at the problem I'm trying to solve. Thanks.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-05-11T02:42:29.190Z
Anger is constituted by a large amount of cognitive, behavioral, physiological, and experiential variability, so the (unsatisfying) answer is that it likely varies depending on the context (e.g., the problem being solved, the person, the setting)!
mrt
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-09-27T22:20:41.227Z
Are there no graphs of how these variables interact? Where did you get your answer from? Can you please core a reference (or is this your personal experience from work)?
Jack Maddington
<problem-solving><mood>
Anger and problem solving
Jack Maddington
# Anger and problem solving

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-05-10)

Is there any evidence that a little bit of inner anger is healthy when engaging in problem solving? I personally feel this way, but feel that people around me misinterpret my anger as being directed at them and the world around me instead of at the problem I'm trying to solve. Thanks.

**Tags:** problem-solving, mood

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Anger is constituted by a large amount of cognitive, behavioral, physiological, and experiential variability, so the (unsatisfying) answer is that it likely varies depending on the context (e.g., the problem being solved, the person, the setting)!  
> **username_0**: Are there no graphs of how these variables interact? Where did you get your answer from? Can you please core a reference (or is this your personal experience from work)?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-05-17. Score: 3

According the the [Yerkes–Dodson](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yerkes%E2%80%93Dodson_law) law, a moderate level of arousal gives energy to the task, improving performance.

> The Yerkes–Dodson law is an empirical relationship between arousal and
> performance, originally developed by psychologists Robert M. Yerkes
> and John Dillingham Dodson in 1908. The law dictates that
> performance increases with physiological or mental arousal, but only
> up to a point. When levels of arousal become too high, performance
> decreases.

Anger is an emotion that creates arousal, but it is also a negative emotion that makes other people more hostile and negative. Other emotions that create positive arousal are excitement, interest, curiosity etc.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I find it hard to grasp how psychologists define the various types of emotions in a meaningful manner. And how did they manage to measure arousal? What empirical measures did Yerkes and Dodson use? Thanks.  
> **username_0**: Hi, @DesignerAnalysr, can you please answer the question in my comment above? Thanks.  
> **username_2**: @JackMaddington find here the original article with all the experiment details at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Yerkes/Law/  

---

