<p>Yes, we do invent new characters, but it's more common that the character was invented long ago and dead, and we just resurrect it to be the character of a chemical element.
In the past, only the emperors had the right to invent characters. In Ming Dynasty, the first emperor made the rules that one of the comprising characters of an imperial kinsman's name must contain one of the  "five elements"（“五行” 金 木 水 火 土）radicals In it. However, there weren't adequate elegant characters meeting the requirements. So they contrived many characters for this only purpose. These characters contribute to naming many chemical elements.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-05-07T11:32:17.090Z
2018-05-07T15:31:01.173Z
2018-05-07T15:31:01.173Z
Toosky Hierot
<p>You're right. We did invent a bunch of characters for chemical elements in 20th century. </p>

<p>We made it just one character by combining different radical(偏旁) together,  but people can associate them with the English words simply by their pronunciation.</p>

<p>You can read more about it from this Wiki article: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_elements_in_East_Asian_languages" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Chemical elements in East Asian languages</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-09T07:17:10.867Z
2018-04-09T07:17:10.867Z
Amyas Marshall
<p>I found that most chemical elements (ones I checked) are denoted by single character in Chinese. This is understandable for historical elements, but how it can be for new elements like Uranium and Plutonium? Does this means, that chinese people can invent new characters nowadays?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T20:39:35.887Z
Not just  any Chinese people. It is Chinese scientists and linguistics expert come to a consent on naming a new element. And yes, they do create new words
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T21:21:38.347Z
@TangHo so, character for plutonium is new? it was never used in ancient books?
Dims
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T21:37:29.100Z
For heavy elements, they use [金 Radical: (#167)] pairing with the transliteration of the beginning of the English word.  That creates an unique character that has no other meaning except for the element itself.
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-06T21:47:13.540Z
All chemical elements are denoted by a single character. They’ve been either inventing new characters or re-using old ones from antiquity that matched either meaning or sound to do this.
dROOOze
<characters>
How can it be single characters for new chemical elements like 鈽 and 鈾?
# How can it be single characters for new chemical elements like 鈽 and 鈾?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-04-06)

I found that most chemical elements (ones I checked) are denoted by single character in Chinese. This is understandable for historical elements, but how it can be for new elements like Uranium and Plutonium? Does this means, that chinese people can invent new characters nowadays?

**Tags:** characters

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Not just  any Chinese people. It is Chinese scientists and linguistics expert come to a consent on naming a new element. And yes, they do create new words  
> **username_0**: @TangHo so, character for plutonium is new? it was never used in ancient books?  
> **username_1**: For heavy elements, they use [金 Radical: (#167)] pairing with the transliteration of the beginning of the English word.  That creates an unique character that has no other meaning except for the element itself.  
> **username_2**: All chemical elements are denoted by a single character. They’ve been either inventing new characters or re-using old ones from antiquity that matched either meaning or sound to do this.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-04-09. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

You're right. We did invent a bunch of characters for chemical elements in 20th century.

We made it just one character by combining different radical(偏旁) together, but people can associate them with the English words simply by their pronunciation.

You can read more about it from this Wiki article: [Chemical elements in East Asian languages](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_elements_in_East_Asian_languages)


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-05-07. Score: 2

Yes, we do invent new characters, but it's more common that the character was invented long ago and dead, and we just resurrect it to be the character of a chemical element.
In the past, only the emperors had the right to invent characters. In Ming Dynasty, the first emperor made the rules that one of the comprising characters of an imperial kinsman's name must contain one of the "five elements"（“五行” 金 木 水 火 土）radicals In it. However, there weren't adequate elegant characters meeting the requirements. So they contrived many characters for this only purpose. These characters contribute to naming many chemical elements.


---

