<p>As for your second question, the problem with the etymology of Chinese characters is that most sources just give folk etymologies, which are very often completely bogus, according to serious paleographers. I'm not a paleographer myself, but I'll try to give a few pretty reliable sources so that you can investigate on your own.</p>

<p>The most likely explanation for the structure of the characters with the component 戠 is that they are semantic-phonetic compounds (形聲). All theories of character structure, from the traditional 六書 up to the modern 三書 proposed by Qiu Xigui (2000), recognise 形聲 as the largest category of characters, so you need to have strong arguments if you want to claim that some character groups were created in a different way, especially if they have clearly similar pronunciations.</p>

<p>Chen Zhiqun wrote a very interesting dissertation (2009, <a href="http://arrow.monash.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/monash:34651/THESIS01" rel="nofollow noreferrer">available online</a>) about the origin of semantic compounds. Her most important point is that the vast majority of semantic compounds were <strong>not</strong> created by combining meanings of two components, but were rather depictions of prototypical situations related to the meaning of the character. Another way of formation of such compounds was reclarification, the process of adding new compounds that did not change the meaning of the character.</p>

<p>I looked up some of the characters you mentioned in Pulleyblank's (1991) dictionary, and they had similar pronunciations in Early Middle Chinese (which we know from the Qieyun 切韻 rhyme dictionary, 601 CE):</p>

<pre><code>織職 tɕik
織識幟 tɕɨʰ/tɕiʰ
識 ɕik
熾 tɕʰɨʰ/tɕʰiʰ
</code></pre>

<p>It looks like most likely explanation is that 戠 was used to write a similarly pronounced word, which might or might not have been semantically related, and later it was reclarified with an additional component, such as 糸, 耳 or 言.</p>

<p>Other good sources to learn character etymology are 說文新證 by Chi Hsiu-Sheng (I think it's possible to find it online) and the <a href="https://www.outlier-linguistics.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Outlier Dictionary of Chinese Characters</a> (an initial release is expected in a few days, though we may need to wait for more detailed etymological explanations).</p>

<ul>
<li>Chen, Zhiqun. 2009. <a href="http://arrow.monash.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/monash:34651/THESIS01" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>Compound ideograph: a contested category in studies of
the Chinese writing system</em></a>. Monash University. Faculty of Arts. School
of Languages, Cultures &amp; Linguistics PhD thesis.</li>
<li>Chi Hsiu-Sheng 季旭昇. 2010. 《說文新證》，海峽出版發行集團</li>
<li>Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1991. <em>Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation: in
Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin</em>. UBC
Press.</li>
<li>Qiu, Xigui. 2000. <em>Chinese writing</em>. The Society for the Study of Early
China &amp; The Institute of East Asian Studies. Original version: 裘锡圭，1988，《文字學概要》，商務印書館出版</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T09:55:55.537Z
what do you think about this article: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_60069d920102wlbz.html
it can explain 蟙 (as spiders weave their webs). Would appreciate your comments.
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T10:32:06.977Z
Sorry, I'm not qualified to assess that. But I added two more good sources of etymology to my answer.
米好 '-'
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T09:07:12.077Z
2016-12-22T13:07:07.670Z
2016-12-22T13:07:07.670Z
米好 '-'
<p>Q1: 我认识他=I know him(in person, maybe have some relationship with him), I have seen him before, I can recognise his face. These explanation could be all correct, depends on the context. 我知道他= I have heard about him, I know which guy you talk about. 知道is a bit vague, 认识 is for sure that you have some kind of relationship with someone or something. However, people wouldn't mind if you use either one in oral Chinese.
Q2: Don't worry about them, as a native speaker, I know none of these words.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T06:46:45.753Z
2016-12-21T06:46:45.753Z
Yan Zhou
<p>认识是可以通过外观辨别客体，客体多为人，也可以为其他实物。
知道是全部或局部了解客体的特性，客体可以是实物，也可以是虚物，例如道理。对于客体的外形却未必了解。如：可以说知道一个没见过的人。</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-27T18:48:15.797Z
Thanks for the attempt. But the question is WHY there is difference and what are the sources of that difference. The etymological information will be much appreciated.
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-27T14:08:17.170Z
2016-12-27T14:08:17.170Z
月亮岛腐竹
<p>I stated in my comment that I don't think study the etymology help you understand a character as much as cross reference the roles of a character in different compound words.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For <strong>認</strong></p>
<p>[1] <strong>recognise</strong>; <strong>identify</strong>; <strong>make out</strong></p>
<p>[2] admit; acknowledge; agree; accept</p>
<p>[3] enter into a certain relationship with</p>
<p>[4] offer/undertake to do sth</p>
</blockquote>
<p>~</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For <strong>識</strong></p>
<p>[1] [v] <strong>know</strong>; recognize; discern</p>
<p>[2] [n] knowledge; opinion; view</p>
</blockquote>
<p>~</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For 認識 = to know, to recognize.</p>
<p>The logic behind it came from the meaning 'to recognize' in 認 and &quot;to know&quot; in 識. You <strong>recognize</strong> something, to <strong>know</strong> it</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Similarly:</p>
<p>見識: experience(v) = (see + know)
*'to see to know'</p>
<p>見識: experience(n)= (see + knowledge)
<em>knowledge from what you had seen</em></p>
<p>學識: knowledge; acquirements (n) = (learn/study + know)
<em>knowledge from what you had studied</em></p>
<p>常識: common sense; general knowledge(n) = (common + knowledge)
<em>knowledge that is common</em></p>
<p>Back to 認識, you know 識 is a knowledge you gain by '認' and from all the meanings 認 contained, only &quot;recognise / identify&quot; make sense, thus we know 認識 means &quot;knowledge gained by identify something&quot; or &quot; to identify something to know it.&quot;</p>
<p>As for 知道 (to know about something)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>知</p>
<p>[1] [v] <strong>know</strong>; understand; be aware of</p>
<p>[2] [n] knowledge; learning</p>
<p>[3] [v] to inform; notify; tell</p>
</blockquote>
<p>~</p>
<blockquote>
<p>道</p>
<p>[7] [v] <strong>think</strong>; suppose; wonder</p>
</blockquote>
<p>~</p>
<blockquote>
<p>知道: to know about something</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>you 知 (know; understand; be aware of) and 道 (think) - &quot;you know and think of/suppose something as~&quot;</em></p>
<p>From the information above, we can discern the difference between 認識 and 知道 :</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>認識</strong> = 1.(v) to recognize to know  2.(v)know (someone/ something you recognize/ identified before)</p>
<p><em>you have to meet someone, or come across something to recognize and know him or it.</em></p>
<p><strong>知道</strong>= to know (be aware of someone/something)</p>
<p><em>You don't have to meet a person to know him, you can know or be aware of someone by reading about him or heard of him.</em></p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T15:01:56.820Z
Upvoted, for X識 serie. 知道 is a bit of a strech (to know the way/method) it still does not easily explain the application of 知道. Ancient protocharacters do not help either, i agree here with you.
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-23T16:32:01.443Z
regarding the meaning of 道 in 知道，if 道 is taken to mean a noun (road,way,method,etc)  so that the compound is of type V+N/动宾 （Yip Po-Ching: governmental type), how can it be transitive (the object usually is clausal)? Examples of 动宾 type: 说话、唱歌、跳舞、鞠躬、磕头，note these are all intransitive, i.e. cannot be followed by an object. On the other hand if 道 is taken to be a verb, in the Middle Chinese meaning ⑿<动>以为。《灌园叟晚逢仙女》：“他还～略看一会就去，谁知这厮故意卖弄。”bkrs:4) среднекит. знать, ощущать, чувствовать, рассчитывать, думать(know, feel, consider, think) then 知道 would be of juxtaposisional (并列）V+V type,
user6065
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-23T16:32:32.970Z
agreeing with the possible structure of transitive verbs. The corresponding question has been submitted to the bkrs forum which seems to agree with the conclusion that 道 should be considered as verb in the Middle Chinese meaning: http://bkrs.info/taolun/thread-33973.html
user6065
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-23T16:38:25.640Z
道 as a verb can also mean " speak, describe. explain" Therefore 知道 could be [知(know)+道(explain)] , but "think" is the obvious best choice.  [知(know)+道(think)] - "you know to think of something as~" I would edit my answer.
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T14:51:41.110Z
2017-07-10T19:53:25.567Z
2020-06-17T09:50:11.587Z
Tang Ho
<p>I'm trying to understand what 识 means and why 认识 is different from 知道.</p>

<p>As far as I was able to gather the information on 戠 is a depiction of an armed group of people which, while in battle, should be recognized and diffirentiated from other groups by the general. </p>

<p>Now, 识 is 言+戠 and the explanation goes two ways:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>The relevant oracle bone form of 戠 combines 弋 stake + an abbreviated form of 辛 needle/cutting tool → use a sharp implement to notch a stake, creating a marker. 戠# replaces 辛 with 音 sound → mark/pay attention to a sound. And to obtain <em>knowledge</em> by <strong>marking</strong> another person's words.
You can read more about this view <a href="http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_60069d920102wlbz.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><strong>here</strong></a>. </p></li>
<li><p>But the best explanation I've come across is this: 识 is <em>to recognize</em> and it has a connotation "<em>to recognize (battle groups) by own eyes (what is needed of you on the battle field while operating your troops) or <strong>to see</em></strong>".  </p></li>
</ol>

<p>If <strong>2-nd</strong> theory/model is right, then it should explain a series of characters below (<strong>I need some help</strong> filling this list, I don't know all the meanings and maybe you know more characters with 戠): </p>

<ul>
<li>幟 - a cloth + conspicuous group = military standard which serves as a battle field marker.</li>
<li>嬂 - it's a woman's name and, I guess, being conspicuous or differentiable in the crowd is a plus for a female. In other words 戠 should posess some positive connotation in order to be incorporated in a name for a woman.</li>
<li>樴 - adding a stick to 戠 - group of people with stakes (battle group), or a single stake (chinese does not differentiate between plural or singular).</li>
<li>膱 - dried meat? Well, I'm at a loss here, can't explain, maybe it has something to do with strong/conspicuous flavor.</li>
<li>旘 - banner of a group of people (same as 幟) but here the banner is flapping on a wind.</li>
<li>熾 - bright/conspicuous fire so you can see it from afar.</li>
<li>職 - can't explain it.</li>
<li>蟙 - google shows a spider for this character. Maybe it has smth to do with with marks on some spider. Can't explain according to the model.</li>
<li>織 - to weave. I don't know how this fits in to the model.</li>
<li>軄 - I don't know what this character means.</li>
</ul>

<p>Again, if 2nd theory is true, then 认识 can be easily explained as <strong>"admit seeing"</strong>. This also explains why 认识 is used mostly for "I have met(seen) him" or "I know him (he is my friend i.e. I've seen him)"</p>

<p>Questions:</p>

<ol>
<li>As a native, does 识(to know) and 认识 convey "sensual, seeing" connotation to You, while 知道 does not convey this, as being more abstract "to know"?</li>
<li>Can you help fill the gaps in the list?</li>
</ol>

<p><strong>P.S. Please, don't provide answers like "认识 is for people and 知道 is for facts because it's the way it is". I seek explanation, logic ect., not a "rule of thumb".</strong> </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-20T21:34:20.383Z
Etymology and/or mnemonics presented as etymologies will not necessarily leave you with a clear picture of the distinction between the two words.
Elliott B.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-20T23:47:31.673Z
@coobit: are you trying to say that the phonetic part of a character may also contribute to the meaning of the character? I have often wondered if that is so. Maybe you know Tang Ho?
Gangosa
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T04:01:41.010Z
Why would you think coobit knows me? I never suggested the phonetic part of a character contributes to the meaning of the character. It mostly doesn't.
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T05:29:58.613Z
我知道Tang Ho, 但是我不認識他。 :) I haven't "seen him" so he hasn't seen me either. And, yes, sometimes those "phonetic" parts do contribute to meaning.
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T06:27:47.953Z
When we say phonetic part, we are referring to the phonetic part of 形聲字(radical plus phonetic / Phonogram).  Most of the time, the phonetic part is there for phonetic reason only. For example 晴(sunny). Since the term 'sunny' means the sun is shining, the 日 radical is used as the meaning part, and 青 is there for phonetic reason.  Similarly, 青 in the character 情 is also the phonetic part, while the 心 radical being the meaning component.
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T09:51:29.507Z
Haha, sorry, here we have exactly the problem coobit was trying to penetrate! I expressed myself badly, I meant to say: Maybe you know the answer Tang Ho, not 'Do you, coobit, know Tang Ho personally." I will ask about phonetic versus meaning parts as a question. That will be clearer.
Gangosa
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T10:29:00.497Z
A useful article here: https://www.writtenchinese.com/renshi-vs-zhidao-knowing-when-to-use-renshi-and-zhidao/
Alex_ander
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T12:01:58.220Z
I hesitated on answering this question because I do not think study the etymology of a character is as useful as cross reference  the role of a character in different compound words.
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T12:56:16.980Z
@Alex_ander, I seek explanation, logic ect., not a "rule of thumb". The info in that link is all over internet. It give nothing to me.
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-21T21:38:30.373Z
I tend to think of 认识=to recognize 知道=to know (of)
rhughes
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T05:26:47.893Z
WHY 认识 is to recognize?
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T06:28:14.450Z
@coobit Etymology is NOT the way to study differences in meaning of modern words. For example, the English word *recognise* comes from a word that originally meant "[resume possession of land](http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=recognize&allowed_in_frame=0)". Do you think that can be used to understand the details of its modern meaning? If you want to know the logic behind the difference between 認識 and 知道 you shouldn't study etymology, but morphology, and in particular, look at how 識 works as a word-building morpheme.
米好 '-'
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T07:16:24.170Z
@米好, Etymology is not the ONLY way I study chinese. Some times etymology is quite unhelpful indeed. But sometimes (rarely) it gives some good ways to understand minor details about the usage of the character.
coobit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-22T21:19:34.240Z
regarding which type of compound these verbs belong to,
认识 evidently is of the juxtapositional (并列）type (s.e.g. Yip Po-Ching, The Chinese Lexicon)，regarding 知道，note bkrs：道 4) среднекит. знать, ощущать, чувствовать, рассчитывать, думать （medieval Chinese: know,feel,consider,think), therefore 知道 may also be of juxtapositional type
user6065
<difference><etymology><glyph-origin>
认识 vs 知道 based on glyph origins
# 认识 vs 知道 based on glyph origins

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-12-20)

I'm trying to understand what 识 means and why 认识 is different from 知道.

As far as I was able to gather the information on 戠 is a depiction of an armed group of people which, while in battle, should be recognized and diffirentiated from other groups by the general.

Now, 识 is 言+戠 and the explanation goes two ways:

1. The relevant oracle bone form of 戠 combines 弋 stake + an abbreviated form of 辛 needle/cutting tool → use a sharp implement to notch a stake, creating a marker. 戠# replaces 辛 with 音 sound → mark/pay attention to a sound. And to obtain *knowledge* by **marking** another person's words.
   You can read more about this view [**here**](http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_60069d920102wlbz.html).
2. But the best explanation I've come across is this: 识 is *to recognize* and it has a connotation "*to recognize (battle groups) by own eyes (what is needed of you on the battle field while operating your troops) or **to see***".

If **2-nd** theory/model is right, then it should explain a series of characters below (**I need some help** filling this list, I don't know all the meanings and maybe you know more characters with 戠):

* 幟 - a cloth + conspicuous group = military standard which serves as a battle field marker.
* 嬂 - it's a woman's name and, I guess, being conspicuous or differentiable in the crowd is a plus for a female. In other words 戠 should posess some positive connotation in order to be incorporated in a name for a woman.
* 樴 - adding a stick to 戠 - group of people with stakes (battle group), or a single stake (chinese does not differentiate between plural or singular).
* 膱 - dried meat? Well, I'm at a loss here, can't explain, maybe it has something to do with strong/conspicuous flavor.
* 旘 - banner of a group of people (same as 幟) but here the banner is flapping on a wind.
* 熾 - bright/conspicuous fire so you can see it from afar.
* 職 - can't explain it.
* 蟙 - google shows a spider for this character. Maybe it has smth to do with with marks on some spider. Can't explain according to the model.
* 織 - to weave. I don't know how this fits in to the model.
* 軄 - I don't know what this character means.

Again, if 2nd theory is true, then 认识 can be easily explained as **"admit seeing"**. This also explains why 认识 is used mostly for "I have met(seen) him" or "I know him (he is my friend i.e. I've seen him)"

Questions:

1. As a native, does 识(to know) and 认识 convey "sensual, seeing" connotation to You, while 知道 does not convey this, as being more abstract "to know"?
2. Can you help fill the gaps in the list?

**P.S. Please, don't provide answers like "认识 is for people and 知道 is for facts because it's the way it is". I seek explanation, logic ect., not a "rule of thumb".**

**Tags:** difference, etymology, glyph-origin

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Etymology and/or mnemonics presented as etymologies will not necessarily leave you with a clear picture of the distinction between the two words.  
> **username_2**: @username_0: are you trying to say that the phonetic part of a character may also contribute to the meaning of the character? I have often wondered if that is so. Maybe you know username_3?  
> **username_3**: Why would you think username_0 knows me? I never suggested the phonetic part of a character contributes to the meaning of the character. It mostly doesn't.  
> **username_0**: 我知道username_3, 但是我不認識他。 :) I haven't "seen him" so he hasn't seen me either. And, yes, sometimes those "phonetic" parts do contribute to meaning.  
> **username_3**: When we say phonetic part, we are referring to the phonetic part of 形聲字(radical plus phonetic / Phonogram).  Most of the time, the phonetic part is there for phonetic reason only. For example 晴(sunny). Since the term 'sunny' means the sun is shining, the 日 radical is used as the meaning part, and 青 is there for phonetic reason.  Similarly, 青 in the character 情 is also the phonetic part, while the 心 radical being the meaning component.  
> **username_2**: Haha, sorry, here we have exactly the problem username_0 was trying to penetrate! I expressed myself badly, I meant to say: Maybe you know the answer username_3, not 'Do you, username_0, know username_3 personally." I will ask about phonetic versus meaning parts as a question. That will be clearer.  
> **username_4**: A useful article here: https://www.writtenchinese.com/renshi-vs-zhidao-knowing-when-to-use-renshi-and-zhidao/  
> **username_3**: I hesitated on answering this question because I do not think study the etymology of a character is as useful as cross reference  the role of a character in different compound words.  
> **username_0**: @username_4, I seek explanation, logic ect., not a "rule of thumb". The info in that link is all over internet. It give nothing to me.  
> **username_5**: I tend to think of 认识=to recognize 知道=to know (of)  
> **username_0**: WHY 认识 is to recognize?  
> **username_6**: @username_0 Etymology is NOT the way to study differences in meaning of modern words. For example, the English word *recognise* comes from a word that originally meant "[resume possession of land](http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=recognize&allowed_in_frame=0)". Do you think that can be used to understand the details of its modern meaning? If you want to know the logic behind the difference between 認識 and 知道 you shouldn't study etymology, but morphology, and in particular, look at how 識 works as a word-building morpheme.  
> **username_0**: @米好, Etymology is not the ONLY way I study chinese. Some times etymology is quite unhelpful indeed. But sometimes (rarely) it gives some good ways to understand minor details about the usage of the character.  
> **username_7**: regarding which type of compound these verbs belong to, 认识 evidently is of the juxtapositional (并列）type (s.e.g. Yip Po-Ching, The Chinese Lexicon)，regarding 知道，note bkrs：道 4) среднекит. знать, ощущать, чувствовать, рассчитывать, думать （medieval Chinese: know,feel,consider,think), therefore 知道 may also be of juxtapositional type  

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-12-21. Score: 10 | Accepted answer

I stated in my comment that I don't think study the etymology help you understand a character as much as cross reference the roles of a character in different compound words.

> For **認**
>
> [1] **recognise**; **identify**; **make out**
>
> [2] admit; acknowledge; agree; accept
>
> [3] enter into a certain relationship with
>
> [4] offer/undertake to do sth

~

> For **識**
>
> [1] [v] **know**; recognize; discern
>
> [2] [n] knowledge; opinion; view

~

> For 認識 = to know, to recognize.
>
> The logic behind it came from the meaning 'to recognize' in 認 and "to know" in 識. You **recognize** something, to **know** it

Similarly:

見識: experience(v) = (see + know)
\*'to see to know'

見識: experience(n)= (see + knowledge)
*knowledge from what you had seen*

學識: knowledge; acquirements (n) = (learn/study + know)
*knowledge from what you had studied*

常識: common sense; general knowledge(n) = (common + knowledge)
*knowledge that is common*

Back to 認識, you know 識 is a knowledge you gain by '認' and from all the meanings 認 contained, only "recognise / identify" make sense, thus we know 認識 means "knowledge gained by identify something" or " to identify something to know it."

As for 知道 (to know about something)

> 知
>
> [1] [v] **know**; understand; be aware of
>
> [2] [n] knowledge; learning
>
> [3] [v] to inform; notify; tell

~

> 道
>
> [7] [v] **think**; suppose; wonder

~

> 知道: to know about something

*you 知 (know; understand; be aware of) and 道 (think) - "you know and think of/suppose something as~"*

From the information above, we can discern the difference between 認識 and 知道 :

> **認識** = 1.(v) to recognize to know 2.(v)know (someone/ something you recognize/ identified before)
>
> *you have to meet someone, or come across something to recognize and know him or it.*
>
> **知道**= to know (be aware of someone/something)
>
> *You don't have to meet a person to know him, you can know or be aware of someone by reading about him or heard of him.*

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Upvoted, for X識 serie. 知道 is a bit of a strech (to know the way/method) it still does not easily explain the application of 知道. Ancient protocharacters do not help either, i agree here with you.  
> **username_7**: regarding the meaning of 道 in 知道，if 道 is taken to mean a noun (road,way,method,etc)  so that the compound is of type V+N/动宾 （Yip Po-Ching: governmental type), how can it be transitive (the object usually is clausal)? Examples of 动宾 type: 说话、唱歌、跳舞、鞠躬、磕头，note these are all intransitive, i.e. cannot be followed by an object. On the other hand if 道 is taken to be a verb, in the Middle Chinese meaning ⑿<动>以为。《灌园叟晚逢仙女》：“他还～略看一会就去，谁知这厮故意卖弄。”bkrs:4) среднекит. знать, ощущать, чувствовать, рассчитывать, думать(know, feel, consider, think) then 知道 would be of juxtaposisional (并列）V+V type,  
> **username_7**: agreeing with the possible structure of transitive verbs. The corresponding question has been submitted to the bkrs forum which seems to agree with the conclusion that 道 should be considered as verb in the Middle Chinese meaning: http://bkrs.info/taolun/thread-33973.html  
> **username_3**: 道 as a verb can also mean " speak, describe. explain" Therefore 知道 could be [知(know)+道(explain)] , but "think" is the obvious best choice.  [知(know)+道(think)] - "you know to think of something as~" I would edit my answer.  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2016-12-22. Score: 2

As for your second question, the problem with the etymology of Chinese characters is that most sources just give folk etymologies, which are very often completely bogus, according to serious paleographers. I'm not a paleographer myself, but I'll try to give a few pretty reliable sources so that you can investigate on your own.
The most likely explanation for the structure of the characters with the component 戠 is that they are semantic-phonetic compounds (形聲). All theories of character structure, from the traditional 六書 up to the modern 三書 proposed by Qiu Xigui (2000), recognise 形聲 as the largest category of characters, so you need to have strong arguments if you want to claim that some character groups were created in a different way, especially if they have clearly similar pronunciations.
Chen Zhiqun wrote a very interesting dissertation (2009, available online) about the origin of semantic compounds. Her most important point is that the vast majority of semantic compounds were not created by combining meanings of two components, but were rather depictions of prototypical situations related to the meaning of the character. Another way of formation of such compounds was reclarification, the process of adding new compounds that did not change the meaning of the character.
I looked up some of the characters you mentioned in Pulleyblank's (1991) dictionary, and they had similar pronunciations in Early Middle Chinese (which we know from the Qieyun 切韻 rhyme dictionary, 601 CE):
織職 tɕik
織識幟 tɕɨʰ/tɕiʰ
識 ɕik
熾 tɕʰɨʰ/tɕʰiʰ

It looks like most likely explanation is that 戠 was used to write a similarly pronounced word, which might or might not have been semantically related, and later it was reclarified with an additional component, such as 糸, 耳 or 言.
Other good sources to learn character etymology are 說文新證 by Chi Hsiu-Sheng (I think it's possible to find it online) and the Outlier Dictionary of Chinese Characters (an initial release is expected in a few days, though we may need to wait for more detailed etymological explanations).

Chen, Zhiqun. 2009. Compound ideograph: a contested category in studies of
the Chinese writing system. Monash University. Faculty of Arts. School
of Languages, Cultures & Linguistics PhD thesis.
Chi Hsiu-Sheng 季旭昇. 2010. 《說文新證》，海峽出版發行集團
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1991. Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation: in
Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. UBC
Press.
Qiu, Xigui. 2000. Chinese writing. The Society for the Study of Early
China & The Institute of East Asian Studies. Original version: 裘锡圭，1988，《文字學概要》，商務印書館出版

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: what do you think about this article: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_60069d920102wlbz.html it can explain 蟙 (as spiders weave their webs). Would appreciate your comments.  
> **username_6**: Sorry, I'm not qualified to assess that. But I added two more good sources of etymology to my answer.  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2016-12-21. Score: 1

Q1: 我认识他=I know him(in person, maybe have some relationship with him), I have seen him before, I can recognise his face. These explanation could be all correct, depends on the context. 我知道他= I have heard about him, I know which guy you talk about. 知道is a bit vague, 认识 is for sure that you have some kind of relationship with someone or something. However, people wouldn't mind if you use either one in oral Chinese.
Q2: Don't worry about them, as a native speaker, I know none of these words.


---

### Answer by username_9 on 2016-12-27. Score: -1

认识是可以通过外观辨别客体，客体多为人，也可以为其他实物。
知道是全部或局部了解客体的特性，客体可以是实物，也可以是虚物，例如道理。对于客体的外形却未必了解。如：可以说知道一个没见过的人。

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for the attempt. But the question is WHY there is difference and what are the sources of that difference. The etymological information will be much appreciated.  

---

