<p>Learning Chinese might help in learning Korean and Japanese, but if I were you, I would not count on it.</p>

<p>It's all about history, before the Hunminjeongeum(finished 1443 or 1444), Korea using Chinese characters for writing, and use Korean for oral communication. And it's hard since Chinese and Korean are different language family.</p>

<p>The original of Japanese is still under debate. It's easy can tell Chinese did affects Japanese(same as Korean, ancient Japan use Chinese character for writing for a long time, however, they speak differently)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-17T17:28:26.423Z
2017-04-17T17:28:26.423Z
Kevman
<p><strong>I don't recommend to learn both Chinese and Korean in parallel</strong>. They are quite different languages (far more different than Germany-English or French-English), and although some vocabularies have the same roots, the characters are different, so it is not intuitive enough to map which Chinese words into which Korean ones, and vice versa.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>So I would naïvely think that starting Chinese in parallel could help me building up and memorizing a larger dictionary,</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Having an knowledge of Chinese would definitely help, but that doesn't mean you should learn them in parallel. Some Chinese words are similar to Korean, but then why not learn these words directly in Korean? So if your goal is to get proficient in Korean, focus on Korean first. The same is true of any languages.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-25T17:36:33.283Z
2017-10-25T17:36:33.283Z
Blaszard
<p>I speak Chinese, Korean and Japanese and it's not the grammar but the vocabulary which is similar. I learnt Chinese first so expected Korean to be very alike due to reading that 60% of all Korean vocab comes from Chinese. I was shocked when I found Korean so alien but in truth it is similar - to Classical Chinese and not Mandarin. I started learning Cantonese recently and indeed the vocab is far more similar to that than Mandarin. E.g. 학 / 学 which is pronounced xué in Mando but hak in both Korean and Canto.  大 is dà in Mando but dae in both Korean and Canto so University is daehak in Korean and Canto but daxue 大学 in Mando. Learning Canto made Korean make more sense to me.</p>

<p>The other issue that I faced was the characters. Korean uses the traditional script so upon visiting Korea I was faced with not only Korean script but a multitude of shop names which they think look cool in the traditional Chinese script. So I was struggling with two scripts! </p>

<p>In general though, I've enjoyed learning them side by side as they do inevitably compliment each other, yet are different enough to not confuse you. I got to the stage of learning a new word in Mando and then looking up the word in Korean to see how similar it was. I learnt that all Chinese words in Korean work with 하다 to make them a verb so essentially all 하다 verbs are Chinese, e.g. To regret = 후회하다 / 后悔 hòu huî. It becomes quite fun!</p>

<p>Hope this helps! 
Gareth</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-19T09:52:26.713Z
thank you very much for your answer - especially the remark about Cantonese. I think I'll delay a study of Chinese for later times, when all the Korean is already (more or less) in place
nelv
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-05T13:47:52.680Z
Cantonese 學（学）is not hak, it's hok.
Weijun Zhou
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-18T11:04:08.540Z
2017-04-18T11:04:08.540Z
Gâr
<p>I started learning Korean last year, and by now I'm pretty confident with the basic rules of the game; I'm also pretty interested in Chinese, and I've heard that many Korean words can be split up in terms of Chinese characters: for example, 도서관 ("doseogwan") means library, and "doseo" should be associated to a Chinese word for book. The suffix "-관" is present at the end of words which denote a place, I don't know if this has a Chinese origin as well.</p>

<p>So I would naïvely think that starting Chinese in parallel could help me building up and memorizing a larger dictionary, and that already knowing the Korean phonetics could make my Chinese life easier. I should also mention that a similar question has already been asked here for Japanese-Chinese: I think in that case the learner would be more likely to get confused, because of Chinese characters being present (maybe altered in writing or pronunciation?) in the Japanese alphabet(s).</p>

<p>But: I admittedly know very little about both Chinese and Japanese, so I have no idea how sound these opinions could be. I welcome any feedback!</p>

<p>Based on your experience: could it be a good idea to start learning Chinese in parallel, right now? Would that be just confusing, ending up in a mix of both? Maybe somebody here tried and succeeded, or tried and failed - or know somebody who did.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T09:36:49.497Z
图书馆  túshūguǎn library 图书  túshū(1) [books] 馆 guǎn building
shop
term for certain service establishments
embassy or consulate
schoolroom (old)
user6065
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T10:30:08.867Z
Ummm... What is your question?
Sweeper
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T10:58:07.270Z
Ehm, good point. I just wanted to know if anybody has experience with trying to learn both together, and whether this could be a good or bad idea. I'll edit the question
nelv
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T12:13:04.830Z
important Sino-korean pronouncement：金日成同志万岁！金日成同志万歲！김일성동지만세！
user6065
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T12:17:19.733Z
Maybe someday this will also be valuable knowledge...
nelv
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T14:45:28.287Z
Korean and Chinese are vastly different. It might be better to learn Chinese and Japanese together since they share similar characters.
Michael
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-06T17:47:13.223Z
@MichaelC. It's funny that you say that. Korean and Japanese are both similar to each other and both very different from Chinese (e.g., in terms of grammar). They both also have a similar relationship to Chinese--they are unrelated to it, but they borrowed a huge number of words and morphemes. It's only an accident of the writing system that Japanese seems to have "similar characters" while Korean doesn't: they both have about the same amount of borrowing from Chinese.
Stumpy Joe Pete
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-26T11:38:39.703Z
For future readers, please be aware there is a [LanguageLearning.SE](https://languagelearning.stackexchange.com/) site.
Becky 李蓓
<learning><comparison>
While learning Korean, is it a good idea to start learning Chinese in parallel?
# While learning Korean, is it a good idea to start learning Chinese in parallel?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-06)

I started learning Korean last year, and by now I'm pretty confident with the basic rules of the game; I'm also pretty interested in Chinese, and I've heard that many Korean words can be split up in terms of Chinese characters: for example, 도서관 ("doseogwan") means library, and "doseo" should be associated to a Chinese word for book. The suffix "-관" is present at the end of words which denote a place, I don't know if this has a Chinese origin as well.

So I would naïvely think that starting Chinese in parallel could help me building up and memorizing a larger dictionary, and that already knowing the Korean phonetics could make my Chinese life easier. I should also mention that a similar question has already been asked here for Japanese-Chinese: I think in that case the learner would be more likely to get confused, because of Chinese characters being present (maybe altered in writing or pronunciation?) in the Japanese alphabet(s).

But: I admittedly know very little about both Chinese and Japanese, so I have no idea how sound these opinions could be. I welcome any feedback!

Based on your experience: could it be a good idea to start learning Chinese in parallel, right now? Would that be just confusing, ending up in a mix of both? Maybe somebody here tried and succeeded, or tried and failed - or know somebody who did.

**Tags:** learning, comparison

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: 图书馆  túshūguǎn library 图书  túshū(1) [books] 馆 guǎn building shop term for certain service establishments embassy or consulate schoolroom (old)  
> **username_2**: Ummm... What is your question?  
> **username_0**: Ehm, good point. I just wanted to know if anybody has experience with trying to learn both together, and whether this could be a good or bad idea. I'll edit the question  
> **username_1**: important Sino-korean pronouncement：金日成同志万岁！金日成同志万歲！김일성동지만세！  
> **username_0**: Maybe someday this will also be valuable knowledge...  
> **username_3**: Korean and Chinese are vastly different. It might be better to learn Chinese and Japanese together since they share similar characters.  
> **username_4**: @username_3C. It's funny that you say that. Korean and Japanese are both similar to each other and both very different from Chinese (e.g., in terms of grammar). They both also have a similar relationship to Chinese--they are unrelated to it, but they borrowed a huge number of words and morphemes. It's only an accident of the writing system that Japanese seems to have "similar characters" while Korean doesn't: they both have about the same amount of borrowing from Chinese.  
> **username_5**: For future readers, please be aware there is a [LanguageLearning.SE](https://languagelearning.stackexchange.com/) site.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_8 on 2017-04-18. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

I speak Chinese, Korean and Japanese and it's not the grammar but the vocabulary which is similar. I learnt Chinese first so expected Korean to be very alike due to reading that 60% of all Korean vocab comes from Chinese. I was shocked when I found Korean so alien but in truth it is similar - to Classical Chinese and not Mandarin. I started learning Cantonese recently and indeed the vocab is far more similar to that than Mandarin. E.g. 학 / 学 which is pronounced xué in Mando but hak in both Korean and Canto. 大 is dà in Mando but dae in both Korean and Canto so University is daehak in Korean and Canto but daxue 大学 in Mando. Learning Canto made Korean make more sense to me.

The other issue that I faced was the characters. Korean uses the traditional script so upon visiting Korea I was faced with not only Korean script but a multitude of shop names which they think look cool in the traditional Chinese script. So I was struggling with two scripts!

In general though, I've enjoyed learning them side by side as they do inevitably compliment each other, yet are different enough to not confuse you. I got to the stage of learning a new word in Mando and then looking up the word in Korean to see how similar it was. I learnt that all Chinese words in Korean work with 하다 to make them a verb so essentially all 하다 verbs are Chinese, e.g. To regret = 후회하다 / 后悔 hòu huî. It becomes quite fun!

Hope this helps!
Gareth

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: thank you very much for your answer - especially the remark about Cantonese. I think I'll delay a study of Chinese for later times, when all the Korean is already (more or less) in place  
> **username_9**: Cantonese 學（学）is not hak, it's hok.  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2017-04-17. Score: 2

Learning Chinese might help in learning Korean and Japanese, but if I were you, I would not count on it.

It's all about history, before the Hunminjeongeum(finished 1443 or 1444), Korea using Chinese characters for writing, and use Korean for oral communication. And it's hard since Chinese and Korean are different language family.

The original of Japanese is still under debate. It's easy can tell Chinese did affects Japanese(same as Korean, ancient Japan use Chinese character for writing for a long time, however, they speak differently)


---

### Answer by username_7 on 2017-10-25. Score: 0

**I don't recommend to learn both Chinese and Korean in parallel**. They are quite different languages (far more different than Germany-English or French-English), and although some vocabularies have the same roots, the characters are different, so it is not intuitive enough to map which Chinese words into which Korean ones, and vice versa.

> So I would naïvely think that starting Chinese in parallel could help me building up and memorizing a larger dictionary,

Having an knowledge of Chinese would definitely help, but that doesn't mean you should learn them in parallel. Some Chinese words are similar to Korean, but then why not learn these words directly in Korean? So if your goal is to get proficient in Korean, focus on Korean first. The same is true of any languages.


---

