<p>听说只有三个(考生)得了满分 -- I heard that only three (examinees) got full marks</p>

<p>听说只有三个得了满分的(考生)--  I heard that there are only three (examinees) who got full marks</p>

<p>The object 考生 was omitted</p>

<p>考生 = examinee</p>

<p>得了满分的考生 = examinee who got full mark </p>

<p>'得了满分的' is an adjectival phrase that describes '考生'</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-10T13:33:05.920Z
Can I say "听说只有得了满分的三个."?
Jenny
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-10T17:34:14.950Z
"听说只有得了满分的三个." (I heard only the three  who got full mark) sounds like  an incomplete sentence. A complete sentence  would be something  like  "听说只有得了满分的三个(考生) 可以升上特進班" 0r " 听说只有得了满分的三个(考生) 有全額獎學金"
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-10T10:43:11.010Z
2020-04-10T11:58:32.353Z
2020-04-10T11:58:32.353Z
Tang Ho
<p>听说只有三个得了满分的。 </p>

<p>As Tang Ho has said, (考生) was implied in the original sentence.</p>

<p>The full sentence should be 听说只有三个得了满分的(考生)。 </p>

<p>To understand this sentence fully, a diagram is required. I'll analyze the fragment: 只有三个得了满分的(考生)。</p>

<pre><code>/-----Predicate-----\
只有三个得了满分的(考生)。

Predicate contains the verb and the object.
——————————————————————————————————————————

/-Predicator-\/-----Object-----\
     只有      三个得了满分的(考生)。

Predicator is the verb.
——————————————————————————————————————————

/-Adverbial-\/-Head-\
     只         有

The adverbial 只 (only) describes 有 (exist)

/-Modifier-\/----Head----\
    三个     得了满分的(考生)

三个 modifies 得了满分的(考生). There are three of (examinees who have attained full marks)
——————————————————————————————————————————

/-Modifier-\        /-Head-\
   得了满分     的     (考生)
\-Predicate-/

得了满分 modifies 考生. Examinees who have attained full marks.

I'll stop analyzing this sub-predicate (得了满分) for now.

——————————————————————————————————————————
</code></pre>

<hr>

<blockquote>
  <p>Can I say "听说只有得了满分的三个。"?</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>No.</strong> You would have said "I heard that only the three (examinees) who have attained full marks."</p>

<p>The explanation is quite long.</p>

<p>As explained above, 考生 was the implied object and that we can further reduce the sentence if there was a question in front which states the context. For example:</p>

<pre><code>Q: 有多少个得了滿分的(考生)？ How many (examinees) were there who have attained full marks?
A: 听说只有三个(得了滿分的考生)。 (I) heard that there were only three (who have attained full marks).
</code></pre>

<p>The aim of the question was to ask how many there were. And so, the answer conveyed the number.</p>

<p>Let us further analyze your sentence: 只有得了满分的三个(考生).</p>

<p>With the same logic before, using the (Modifier)的(Head) pattern, we can deduce:</p>

<ul>
<li>Modifier: 得了满分</li>
<li>Head: 三个考生</li>
</ul>

<p>This has the meaning of: "(The three examinees) who (have attained full marks)". This would make the modifier 得了满分 more important than 三个, which is not the point of the statement. These word orders change the meaning of the sentence analytically. It would only make sense in the following conversation.</p>

<pre><code>Q: 哪些考生可以收到獎品？ Who in the examinees can receive prizes?
A: 只有得了满分的(三个考生)。 Only those (three examinees) who have attained full marks.
</code></pre>

<hr>

<p>However, you can reverse the order of the sentence, into:</p>

<pre><code>听说得了满分的(考生)只有三个。 ≈ 听说只有三个得了满分的(考生)。
</code></pre>

<p>The only difference here is the focus/stress. The original sentence focuses more on the quantity of three and this reversed sentence focuses more on the state of attaining full marks. But this difference is quite subtle.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-11T06:28:18.780Z
Wow it is very kind of you to get me understand. Thank you so much!
Jenny
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-10T17:06:24.137Z
2020-04-10T17:23:19.750Z
2020-04-10T17:23:19.750Z
Daniel Cheung
<p>The full sentence is</p>

<p>他考得很好，得了满分。听说只有三个得了满分的。 </p>

<p>I get a bit confused with 的. I understand that the sentence means “there are only 3 people that get full marks.” </p>

<p>Please help me out. Thank you guys :D</p>

<meaning><meaning-in-context><word>
Meaning of 的 in 只有三个得满分的
# Meaning of 的 in 只有三个得满分的

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-04-10)

The full sentence is

他考得很好，得了满分。听说只有三个得了满分的。

I get a bit confused with 的. I understand that the sentence means “there are only 3 people that get full marks.”

Please help me out. Thank you guys :D

**Tags:** meaning, meaning-in-context, word


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-04-10. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

听说只有三个(考生)得了满分 -- I heard that only three (examinees) got full marks

听说只有三个得了满分的(考生)-- I heard that there are only three (examinees) who got full marks

The object 考生 was omitted

考生 = examinee

得了满分的考生 = examinee who got full mark

'得了满分的' is an adjectival phrase that describes '考生'

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Can I say "听说只有得了满分的三个."?  
> **username_1**: "听说只有得了满分的三个." (I heard only the three  who got full mark) sounds like  an incomplete sentence. A complete sentence  would be something  like  "听说只有得了满分的三个(考生) 可以升上特進班" 0r " 听说只有得了满分的三个(考生) 有全額獎學金"  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-04-10. Score: 1

听说只有三个得了满分的。 
As username_1 has said, (考生) was implied in the original sentence.
The full sentence should be 听说只有三个得了满分的(考生)。 
To understand this sentence fully, a diagram is required. I'll analyze the fragment: 只有三个得了满分的(考生)。
/-----Predicate-----\
只有三个得了满分的(考生)。

Predicate contains the verb and the object.
——————————————————————————————————————————

/-Predicator-\/-----Object-----\
     只有      三个得了满分的(考生)。

Predicator is the verb.
——————————————————————————————————————————

/-Adverbial-\/-Head-\
     只         有

The adverbial 只 (only) describes 有 (exist)

/-Modifier-\/----Head----\
    三个     得了满分的(考生)

三个 modifies 得了满分的(考生). There are three of (examinees who have attained full marks)
——————————————————————————————————————————

/-Modifier-\        /-Head-\
   得了满分     的     (考生)
\-Predicate-/

得了满分 modifies 考生. Examinees who have attained full marks.

I'll stop analyzing this sub-predicate (得了满分) for now.

——————————————————————————————————————————



Can I say "听说只有得了满分的三个。"?

No. You would have said "I heard that only the three (examinees) who have attained full marks."
The explanation is quite long.
As explained above, 考生 was the implied object and that we can further reduce the sentence if there was a question in front which states the context. For example:
Q: 有多少个得了滿分的(考生)？ How many (examinees) were there who have attained full marks?
A: 听说只有三个(得了滿分的考生)。 (I) heard that there were only three (who have attained full marks).

The aim of the question was to ask how many there were. And so, the answer conveyed the number.
Let us further analyze your sentence: 只有得了满分的三个(考生).
With the same logic before, using the (Modifier)的(Head) pattern, we can deduce:

Modifier: 得了满分
Head: 三个考生

This has the meaning of: "(The three examinees) who (have attained full marks)". This would make the modifier 得了满分 more important than 三个, which is not the point of the statement. These word orders change the meaning of the sentence analytically. It would only make sense in the following conversation.
Q: 哪些考生可以收到獎品？ Who in the examinees can receive prizes?
A: 只有得了满分的(三个考生)。 Only those (three examinees) who have attained full marks.


However, you can reverse the order of the sentence, into:
听说得了满分的(考生)只有三个。 ≈ 听说只有三个得了满分的(考生)。

The only difference here is the focus/stress. The original sentence focuses more on the quantity of three and this reversed sentence focuses more on the state of attaining full marks. But this difference is quite subtle.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Wow it is very kind of you to get me understand. Thank you so much!  

---

