<p>我在网上找了一下，你提到的这篇文章标题是《死都没人爱的9种女人》，事实上它有“正常中文”版本的原文：
<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/18AjL.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>其实还可以搜索到一篇内容十分类似的文章《十种汉子该暴挨，你属于那一种？》，前者应该只是把后者内容当中的“男人”替换成了“女人”。而后者2006年左右就出现在网络上了，这种类型的文章作为段子实在是很过时。现在的大多数网民应该都不会觉得这篇文章有趣。</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Qd10q.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>至于你提到的这种“奇怪的中文”的版本，确实网上可以搜索到：</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/IYbWk.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

<p>这应当是通过某种类似于在线翻译的方式由电脑自动转换的，在网上还可以搜索到一些类似风格的文章。我不清楚这些网站在转载时进行这种转换的原因。不过显然这并不是为了有趣，也不是标准汉语的特殊形式，也不是所谓网络语言。应该说，就是网络上的一种信息垃圾。不用去深究，也不要把它作为学习中文的参考。</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-18T07:55:51.303Z
转换的原因会不会是为了防止抄袭侦测？
Gao
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-18T08:05:05.107Z
@GaoWeiwei Seems you're right. Found these 同义词替换/伪原创工具 http://baike.baidu.com/view/2537897.htm
NS.X.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-18T08:16:07.270Z
@NS.X. The software ain't half bad, reads somewhat like human (though you need a human to write something first). It's my first time reading this kind of writing, so I apologize for asking something 过时 and not really about the Chinese language.
Gao
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-18T07:30:59.400Z
2015-01-18T07:30:59.400Z
xdcsy
<blockquote>
  <p>本身明明长患上丑还说[...]那鸣一个惨呀!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>长患 should be 长相 and 鸣 should be 叫, but they appear too many times that the possibility of them being typos is close to nil.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>[...]以是在贬低他人的时辰就出格不留人情，以是咱们见到这类人时可以绝不夷由地上往打。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Again, normally we would say 于是 instead of 以是, 时候 instead of 时辰, 毫不犹豫 instead of 绝不夷由, and I think 格外 instead of 出格. I don't even understand what's 上往打: is 上往 上前?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>但是不管曩昔几多年</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I know Cantonese makes extensive use of 几多, but other sentences don't look like they're Cantonese. And isn't 曩昔 archaic? The reason I find this article so funny and interesting is that it is so colloquial, yet at the same time so archaic or formal.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>最厌恶掉臂及男子体面的女人</p>
</blockquote>

<p>What? 掉臂? As in <a href="http://baike.baidu.com/view/7333658.htm" rel="nofollow">自在</a>?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>眼望着本身岁数一点点年夜了</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Can you really use 年夜 as a verb like that?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>碰着如许的人</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This sounds rather formal and archaic.</p>

<p>Of course I am not endorsing these statements or anything, just saw them somewhere on the internet and find them amusing. Are these sentences written in some dialects/topolects or an unusual form of standard Chinese? Or are they internet slang?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-16T01:27:20.877Z
I've seen similar phenomenon (half dialectal, half made-up language) in more than one literature works, none of which is from famous writers. I am curious to know if it's a widely known style and/or the theory behind it.
NS.X.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-01-18T02:40:08.293Z
Could you share the source or more complete paragraphs?
NS.X.
<topolect><slang>
Is this funny way of saying things some dialect?
# Is this funny way of saying things some dialect?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-01-15)

> 本身明明长患上丑还说[...]那鸣一个惨呀!

长患 should be 长相 and 鸣 should be 叫, but they appear too many times that the possibility of them being typos is close to nil.

> [...]以是在贬低他人的时辰就出格不留人情，以是咱们见到这类人时可以绝不夷由地上往打。

Again, normally we would say 于是 instead of 以是, 时候 instead of 时辰, 毫不犹豫 instead of 绝不夷由, and I think 格外 instead of 出格. I don't even understand what's 上往打: is 上往 上前?

> 但是不管曩昔几多年

I know Cantonese makes extensive use of 几多, but other sentences don't look like they're Cantonese. And isn't 曩昔 archaic? The reason I find this article so funny and interesting is that it is so colloquial, yet at the same time so archaic or formal.

> 最厌恶掉臂及男子体面的女人

What? 掉臂? As in [自在](http://baike.baidu.com/view/7333658.htm)?

> 眼望着本身岁数一点点年夜了

Can you really use 年夜 as a verb like that?

> 碰着如许的人

This sounds rather formal and archaic.

Of course I am not endorsing these statements or anything, just saw them somewhere on the internet and find them amusing. Are these sentences written in some dialects/topolects or an unusual form of standard Chinese? Or are they internet slang?

**Tags:** topolect, slang

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I've seen similar phenomenon (half dialectal, half made-up language) in more than one literature works, none of which is from famous writers. I am curious to know if it's a widely known style and/or the theory behind it.  
> **username_1**: Could you share the source or more complete paragraphs?  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-01-18. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

我在网上找了一下，你提到的这篇文章标题是《死都没人爱的9种女人》，事实上它有“正常中文”版本的原文：
![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/18AjL.jpg)

其实还可以搜索到一篇内容十分类似的文章《十种汉子该暴挨，你属于那一种？》，前者应该只是把后者内容当中的“男人”替换成了“女人”。而后者2006年左右就出现在网络上了，这种类型的文章作为段子实在是很过时。现在的大多数网民应该都不会觉得这篇文章有趣。

![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Qd10q.jpg)

至于你提到的这种“奇怪的中文”的版本，确实网上可以搜索到：

![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/IYbWk.jpg)

这应当是通过某种类似于在线翻译的方式由电脑自动转换的，在网上还可以搜索到一些类似风格的文章。我不清楚这些网站在转载时进行这种转换的原因。不过显然这并不是为了有趣，也不是标准汉语的特殊形式，也不是所谓网络语言。应该说，就是网络上的一种信息垃圾。不用去深究，也不要把它作为学习中文的参考。

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: 转换的原因会不会是为了防止抄袭侦测？  
> **username_1**: @username_0Weiwei Seems you're right. Found these 同义词替换/伪原创工具 http://baike.baidu.com/view/2537897.htm  
> **username_0**: @username_1 The software ain't half bad, reads somewhat like human (though you need a human to write something first). It's my first time reading this kind of writing, so I apologize for asking something 过时 and not really about the Chinese language.  

---

