<p>You could put them in a supertable which supports nested matrix etc.
All the info on supertable here: <a href="https://github.com/engram-design/SuperTable" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/engram-design/SuperTable</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-23T12:17:06.913Z
I'm not sure that offers any improvement over putting them in a matrix field, and there would then be an extra third-party dependency.
Alex H
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-23T13:34:53.210Z
Since he said "but all of the fields visually gel together in the UI in a somewhat indistinguishable list." my answer is quiet relevant. The supertable has the "row" option which gives a clear difference from a matrix. in layout.
Jan_dh
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-20T15:44:37.797Z
2017-01-20T15:44:37.797Z
Jan_dh
<p>Is there a mechanism for grouping related fields in an entry besides:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>a) putting them in a tab - which I generally reserve to group fields at a higher order (e.g content/data/meta)</p></li>
<li><p>b) putting related fields inside a matrix block with a limit of 1, which feels like I'm adding a level of complexity to my content model.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>I have various modules in a page, so i've taken to labelling them with a common prefix for each module (as in 'Homepage Hero - Background Image', 'Homepage Hero - Subheading'), but all of the fields visually gel together in the UI in a somewhat indistinguishable list.</p>

<p>I suppose changing my use of tabs would serve my purpose, but could look quite unruly on an entry with many elements.</p>

<entry><admin>
Grouping related fields together
# Grouping related fields together

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-01-20)

Is there a mechanism for grouping related fields in an entry besides:

* a) putting them in a tab - which I generally reserve to group fields at a higher order (e.g content/data/meta)
* b) putting related fields inside a matrix block with a limit of 1, which feels like I'm adding a level of complexity to my content model.

I have various modules in a page, so i've taken to labelling them with a common prefix for each module (as in 'Homepage Hero - Background Image', 'Homepage Hero - Subheading'), but all of the fields visually gel together in the UI in a somewhat indistinguishable list.

I suppose changing my use of tabs would serve my purpose, but could look quite unruly on an entry with many elements.

**Tags:** entry, admin


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-01-20. Score: 1

You could put them in a supertable which supports nested matrix etc.
All the info on supertable here: <https://github.com/engram-design/SuperTable>

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I'm not sure that offers any improvement over putting them in a matrix field, and there would then be an extra third-party dependency.  
> **username_1**: Since he said "but all of the fields visually gel together in the UI in a somewhat indistinguishable list." my answer is quiet relevant. The supertable has the "row" option which gives a clear difference from a matrix. in layout.  

---

