<p>It appears to be:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>撞伤不如撞死</p>
</blockquote>
<p>although it's not very commonly used; Googling <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%E6%92%9E%E4%BC%A4%E4%B8%8D%E5%A6%82%E6%92%9E%E6%AD%BB%22" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><code>&quot;撞伤不如撞死&quot;</code></a> gives 83 results.</p>
<p>It breaks down as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=%E6%92%9E%E4%BC%A4" rel="nofollow noreferrer">撞伤</a> = &quot;bruise / bump&quot;</li>
<li><a href="https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=%E4%B8%8D%E5%A6%82" rel="nofollow noreferrer">不如</a> = &quot;not equal to / not as good as / inferior to / it would be better to&quot;</li>
<li><a href="https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=%E6%92%9E%E6%AD%BB" rel="nofollow noreferrer">撞死</a> = &quot;to knock down and kill sb with a car / to run over sb / to run sb down&quot;</li>
</ul>
<p>It's used precisely for motor accidents where the driver decides to continue to murder the victim.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaUzJU7yy44" rel="nofollow noreferrer">This VOA video</a> uses the term when reporting on the Slate article.  It's also the headline of <a href="http://news.sina.com.cn/z/zsbrzsddkj/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this Sina news article</a> describing the phenomenon.  The earliest article I found with this term is <a href="http://www.fcgvipls.com/a/141.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> (which Google says is from 1996) which discusses the possibility of using it as a legal loophole.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-01-06T07:50:09.760Z
Just want to make it clear that this is not an "adage" whatsoever. It is just a sentence describing a legal loophole.
Betty
CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-01-02T12:16:14.423Z
2022-01-02T12:16:14.423Z
Becky 李蓓
<p>Not exist. </p>

<p>"It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure” is only because according to the statical calculation, the drive will pay more 400k RMB if they hit someone injured. </p>

<p>This sentence just reflects the law need to be amended.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-16T04:12:47.893Z
2017-04-16T04:12:47.893Z
Kevman
<p>Not sure if this is directly translated from the English or not but:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>撞死比撞伤强</p>
</blockquote>

<p>And</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>宁撞死毋撞伤</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Or</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>宁撞死 勿撞伤</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I would go with the last one.</p>

<p>There's this Sina article from '06</p>

<p>交通肇事潜规则：宁撞死毋撞伤？
<a href="http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2006-12-24/123010849978s.shtml?from=wap" rel="nofollow">http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2006-12-24/123010849978s.shtml?from=wap</a></p>

<p>Talking all about it.</p>

<p>As for context, like the title of the article says above its really just a "unwritten" traffic "rule". I haven't seen it used in other contexts but I'm sure you could draw an illustration, especially just by tacking a -般 on the end.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T05:43:37.240Z
Please read the question again...
NS.X.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T05:58:41.720Z
@NS.X. What's the problem? I didn't answer the part about contexts (yet) but I'm pretty sure that's the adage for “It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure.”
Mou某
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T08:03:57.220Z
The OP was asking is there any adage (aphorism, proverb, famous saying) for it. The second question about context implied the adage may not even be originated from traffic scenarios. “宁撞死毋撞伤” is an authentic way to express the meaning but not an adage. As the other comment suggested, “一不做二不休” is along the adage line, but the meaning is not close enough.
NS.X.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T08:52:49.717Z
An adage can be a short statement or phrase, I wouldn't split too many hairs over what does or doesn't count as one.
Mou某
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T09:46:28.053Z
If an adage is only referring to a short statement or phrase, you can make up one (or find one made up by other person on the internet) for anything, which renders the question meaningless. It only makes sense if OP was looking for a proverb or at least well-known saying. But I'll leave it to the OP to determine if this answer is good enough.
NS.X.
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T11:14:20.123Z
The linked Sina article answers the OP's question very well.  There currently is such a saying and (some) people in China attribute it to driving instructors,  So the question that remains is: does linking to an answer in Chinese count as answering a question on this site?
Colin McLarty
CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-09-12T05:40:14.457Z
2015-09-12T06:27:16.303Z
2015-09-12T06:27:16.303Z
Mou某
<p>In "<a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2015/09/why_drivers_in_china_intentionally_kill_the_pedestrians_they_hit_china_s.html" rel="nofollow">Driven to Kill - Why drivers in China intentionally kill the pedestrians they hit</a>", it's claimed that there's an adage in Chinese of “It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure.”</p>

<p>Does this adage exist, and in what contexts is it typically used (that is, is it used in the context of driving, or mainly in other contexts)?</p>

<expressions><saying>
Does Chinese have an adage saying “It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure”?
# Does Chinese have an adage saying “It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure”?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-09-12)

In "[Driven to Kill - Why drivers in China intentionally kill the pedestrians they hit](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2015/09/why_drivers_in_china_intentionally_kill_the_pedestrians_they_hit_china_s.html)", it's claimed that there's an adage in Chinese of “It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure.”

Does this adage exist, and in what contexts is it typically used (that is, is it used in the context of driving, or mainly in other contexts)?

**Tags:** expressions, saying


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-01-02. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

It appears to be:

> 撞伤不如撞死

although it's not very commonly used; Googling [`"撞伤不如撞死"`](https://www.google.com/search?q=%22%E6%92%9E%E4%BC%A4%E4%B8%8D%E5%A6%82%E6%92%9E%E6%AD%BB%22) gives 83 results.

It breaks down as follows:

* [撞伤](https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=%E6%92%9E%E4%BC%A4) = "bruise / bump"
* [不如](https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=%E4%B8%8D%E5%A6%82) = "not equal to / not as good as / inferior to / it would be better to"
* [撞死](https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?wdqb=%E6%92%9E%E6%AD%BB) = "to knock down and kill sb with a car / to run over sb / to run sb down"

It's used precisely for motor accidents where the driver decides to continue to murder the victim.

[This VOA video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaUzJU7yy44) uses the term when reporting on the Slate article. It's also the headline of [this Sina news article](http://news.sina.com.cn/z/zsbrzsddkj/) describing the phenomenon. The earliest article I found with this term is [here](http://www.fcgvipls.com/a/141.html) (which Google says is from 1996) which discusses the possibility of using it as a legal loophole.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Just want to make it clear that this is not an "adage" whatsoever. It is just a sentence describing a legal loophole.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-04-16. Score: 1

Not exist.

"It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure” is only because according to the statical calculation, the drive will pay more 400k RMB if they hit someone injured.

This sentence just reflects the law need to be amended.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2015-09-12. Score: 1

Not sure if this is directly translated from the English or not but:

> 撞死比撞伤强

And

> 宁撞死毋撞伤

Or

> 宁撞死 勿撞伤

I would go with the last one.

There's this Sina article from '06

交通肇事潜规则：宁撞死毋撞伤？
<http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2006-12-24/123010849978s.shtml?from=wap>

Talking all about it.

As for context, like the title of the article says above its really just a "unwritten" traffic "rule". I haven't seen it used in other contexts but I'm sure you could draw an illustration, especially just by tacking a -般 on the end.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: Please read the question again...  
> **username_4**: @NS.X. What's the problem? I didn't answer the part about contexts (yet) but I'm pretty sure that's the adage for “It is better to hit to kill than to hit and injure.”  
> **username_5**: The OP was asking is there any adage (aphorism, proverb, famous saying) for it. The second question about context implied the adage may not even be originated from traffic scenarios. “宁撞死毋撞伤” is an authentic way to express the meaning but not an adage. As the other comment suggested, “一不做二不休” is along the adage line, but the meaning is not close enough.  
> **username_4**: An adage can be a short statement or phrase, I wouldn't split too many hairs over what does or doesn't count as one.  
> **username_5**: If an adage is only referring to a short statement or phrase, you can make up one (or find one made up by other person on the internet) for anything, which renders the question meaningless. It only makes sense if OP was looking for a proverb or at least well-known saying. But I'll leave it to the OP to determine if this answer is good enough.  
> **username_6**: The linked Sina article answers the OP's question very well.  There currently is such a saying and (some) people in China attribute it to driving instructors,  So the question that remains is: does linking to an answer in Chinese count as answering a question on this site?  

---

