<p>會 is a <strong>modal verb</strong>.</p>

<p>From the classic <a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=njea2LBW4jcC&amp;pg=PA12" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Li &amp; Thompson (1981)</a> <em>Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar</em>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Most languages have morphemes for signaling the of a reported event relative to the time of speaking (tense) or the duration or completion of a reported event relative to other events (aspect)...</p>
</blockquote>

<p>會 and 要 are on the other hand examples of the last portion of the T-A-M trinity for <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_mood" rel="nofollow noreferrer">verb morphology</a>: M for <em>mood</em> or <em>modality</em>. The standard moods in Western European verb morphology are: indicative, subjunctive, conditional and imperative. Other examples are optative, jussive, hortative, interrogative and volitional.</p>

<p>In Mandarin Chinese, 會 can act as an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_modality" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><em>epistemic</em> modal</a>, i.e. with the idea of ways of knowing and confidence in the knowledge. These are of the same category as 可能 and 應該. As well as being like a "potential" mode, it is can act as a "conditional":</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>她如果去看牙科就會遲到。</p>
  
  <p><em>Tā rúguǒ qù kàn yákē jiù huì chí dào.</em></p>
  
  <p>If she has gone to see the dentist, then she'll be late.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>These words are definitely in a different category to the aspect particles 了、過、著, because 會 can be combined with them, under <a href="https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/17729/renf.pdf?sequence=2" rel="nofollow noreferrer">certain circumstances</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>他不會去了中國！</p>
  
  <p><em>Tā bù huì qù-le Zhōngguó!</em></p>
  
  <p>He can't have gone to China!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>On the other hand, 要 is a <em>deontic</em> modal, expressing shades of obligation / permission, and is in the same category as 可以 and 得 (<em>děi</em>).</p>

<p>These are actually very similar to English <em>will</em>, which derived from the modal verb meaning "want" (compare its noun form e.g. <code>God's will</code>, <code>the will of the people</code>, which retains that older meaning), and English <em>shall</em> deriving from a modal verb meaning "should" or "ought to" (compare its German cognate <code>sollen</code>). The future tense meaning is naturally implied.</p>

<p>Also, there are <a href="https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/17729/renf.pdf?sequence=2" rel="nofollow noreferrer">restrictions</a> for both languages on which modal can combine with which aspect marker. Only a select set of verbs can take both "future"-orientated modal markers and perfective 了 at the same time, e.g. 饒 <em>ráo</em>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>你要饒了他嗎？</p>
  
  <p><em>Nǐ yào ráo-le tā ma?</em></p>
  
  <p>Are you going to spare/forgive him?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Nonetheless, perfective 了 and experiential 過 aspect markers can appear with the future-orientated modal 會 or others when occurring in a non-final event clause in a sequence:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>我會辭了行再動身。</p>
  
  <p><em>Wǒ huì cí-le xíng zài dòngshēn.</em></p>
  
  <p>I will say goodbye / take leave then get up and go.</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-04T14:27:09.047Z
2020-02-05T17:13:35.663Z
2020-02-05T17:13:35.663Z
Michaelyus
<blockquote>
  <p>"but does rely on grammatical aspect in order to convey meaning. "</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Chinese uses words to convey meaning, much like any other language.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"I'm still trying to fully grasp what exactly an aspect is,"</p>
</blockquote>

<p>aspect:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>late 14c., an astrological term, "relative position of the planets as
  they appear from earth" (i.e., how they "look at" one another); also
  "one of the ways of viewing something," from Latin aspectus "a seeing,
  looking at, sight, view; countenance; appearance," from past
  participle of aspicere "to look at, look upon, behold; observe,
  examine," figuratively "consider, ponder," from ad "to" (see ad-) +
  specere "to look" (from PIE root *spek- "to observe"). Meanings "the
  look one wears; the appearance of things" are attested by early 15c.
  Sense of "a facing in a given direction" is from 1660s</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So, aspect is "one of the ways of viewing something,". The sentence below is actually just a flat statement:</p>

<p>我每天回到家的第一件事就是学习中文。(No need for 会. What, no cup of tea first?)</p>

<p>If you wish to say what 'aspect' this sentence has, well, that comes from 每天 which indicates that this is repetitive.</p>

<p>The concept of aspect in grammar is not helpful in understanding how language works. My advice: don't try to understand aspect, forget it.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-03T23:37:02.360Z
2020-02-03T23:37:02.360Z
Pedroski
<p>It is my understanding that Chinese does not employ tenses, but does rely on grammatical aspect in order to convey meaning. </p>

<p>I'm still trying to fully grasp what exactly an aspect is, but viewing the <a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_grammar" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia page for Chinese Grammar</a> provides some clarity. This page provides examples such as 了, 過, 在, 正在, and 著. I'm unclear if this is strictly a complete list or not given the formal definition of grammatical aspect and how grammatical aspect operates in Chinese. </p>

<p>Similar to how 了 describes a completed action, my understanding is that 會 can be used to describe an action that hasn't begun but will happen afterwards. Would this also count as a grammatical aspect? Or something else? If so, are there any other aspect markers to add to Wikipedia's list?</p>

<p>Example:
每天我回家，然後我會學習中文。
Every day, I would go home, and then I would study Chinese. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-01-31T23:01:11.987Z
It's more usually considered a verb in its own right, but I can see how someone could potentially make an argument that it's marking a prospective aspect.
user20347
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-01T09:52:47.837Z
I think it's more like a modal verb... BTW, it should be placed in the first clause: 每天我会回家，然后学习中文。
Toosky Hierot
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-02-04T14:31:04.113Z
我每天回家(後)會學習中文 is one of the more natural ways of expressing this.
Michaelyus
<grammar><particles>
Is 會 an aspect marker?
# Is 會 an aspect marker?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-01-31)

It is my understanding that Chinese does not employ tenses, but does rely on grammatical aspect in order to convey meaning.

I'm still trying to fully grasp what exactly an aspect is, but viewing the [Wikipedia page for Chinese Grammar](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_grammar) provides some clarity. This page provides examples such as 了, 過, 在, 正在, and 著. I'm unclear if this is strictly a complete list or not given the formal definition of grammatical aspect and how grammatical aspect operates in Chinese.

Similar to how 了 describes a completed action, my understanding is that 會 can be used to describe an action that hasn't begun but will happen afterwards. Would this also count as a grammatical aspect? Or something else? If so, are there any other aspect markers to add to Wikipedia's list?

Example:
每天我回家，然後我會學習中文。
Every day, I would go home, and then I would study Chinese.

**Tags:** grammar, particles

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: It's more usually considered a verb in its own right, but I can see how someone could potentially make an argument that it's marking a prospective aspect.  
> **username_2**: I think it's more like a modal verb... BTW, it should be placed in the first clause: 每天我会回家，然后学习中文。  
> **username_3**: 我每天回家(後)會學習中文 is one of the more natural ways of expressing this.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-02-04. Score: 5

會 is a **modal verb**.

From the classic [Li & Thompson (1981)](https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=njea2LBW4jcC&pg=PA12) *Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar*:

> Most languages have morphemes for signaling the of a reported event relative to the time of speaking (tense) or the duration or completion of a reported event relative to other events (aspect)...

會 and 要 are on the other hand examples of the last portion of the T-A-M trinity for [verb morphology](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_mood): M for *mood* or *modality*. The standard moods in Western European verb morphology are: indicative, subjunctive, conditional and imperative. Other examples are optative, jussive, hortative, interrogative and volitional.

In Mandarin Chinese, 會 can act as an [*epistemic* modal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_modality), i.e. with the idea of ways of knowing and confidence in the knowledge. These are of the same category as 可能 and 應該. As well as being like a "potential" mode, it is can act as a "conditional":

> 她如果去看牙科就會遲到。
>
> *Tā rúguǒ qù kàn yákē jiù huì chí dào.*
>
> If she has gone to see the dentist, then she'll be late.

These words are definitely in a different category to the aspect particles 了、過、著, because 會 can be combined with them, under [certain circumstances](https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/17729/renf.pdf?sequence=2):

> 他不會去了中國！
>
> *Tā bù huì qù-le Zhōngguó!*
>
> He can't have gone to China!

On the other hand, 要 is a *deontic* modal, expressing shades of obligation / permission, and is in the same category as 可以 and 得 (*děi*).

These are actually very similar to English *will*, which derived from the modal verb meaning "want" (compare its noun form e.g. `God's will`, `the will of the people`, which retains that older meaning), and English *shall* deriving from a modal verb meaning "should" or "ought to" (compare its German cognate `sollen`). The future tense meaning is naturally implied.

Also, there are [restrictions](https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/17729/renf.pdf?sequence=2) for both languages on which modal can combine with which aspect marker. Only a select set of verbs can take both "future"-orientated modal markers and perfective 了 at the same time, e.g. 饒 *ráo*:

> 你要饒了他嗎？
>
> *Nǐ yào ráo-le tā ma?*
>
> Are you going to spare/forgive him?

Nonetheless, perfective 了 and experiential 過 aspect markers can appear with the future-orientated modal 會 or others when occurring in a non-final event clause in a sequence:

> 我會辭了行再動身。
>
> *Wǒ huì cí-le xíng zài dòngshēn.*
>
> I will say goodbye / take leave then get up and go.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-02-03. Score: 0

> "but does rely on grammatical aspect in order to convey meaning. "

Chinese uses words to convey meaning, much like any other language.

> "I'm still trying to fully grasp what exactly an aspect is,"

aspect:

> late 14c., an astrological term, "relative position of the planets as
> they appear from earth" (i.e., how they "look at" one another); also
> "one of the ways of viewing something," from Latin aspectus "a seeing,
> looking at, sight, view; countenance; appearance," from past
> participle of aspicere "to look at, look upon, behold; observe,
> examine," figuratively "consider, ponder," from ad "to" (see ad-) +
> specere "to look" (from PIE root \*spek- "to observe"). Meanings "the
> look one wears; the appearance of things" are attested by early 15c.
> Sense of "a facing in a given direction" is from 1660s

So, aspect is "one of the ways of viewing something,". The sentence below is actually just a flat statement:

我每天回到家的第一件事就是学习中文。(No need for 会. What, no cup of tea first?)

If you wish to say what 'aspect' this sentence has, well, that comes from 每天 which indicates that this is repetitive.

The concept of aspect in grammar is not helpful in understanding how language works. My advice: don't try to understand aspect, forget it.


---

