<p>To clarify:</p>

<ul>
<li>只 has two meanings and pronunciations, zhī (single) and zhǐ (only)</li>
<li>隻 is pronounced zhī and has the same meaning as 只 (zhī)</li>
<li>衹, 祇, 秖 all can mean zhǐ (only), but also had other meanings:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.zdic.net/z/23/js/8879.htm" rel="noreferrer">衹</a> has the same meaning, but could also mean 緹 (a reddish colour used in textiles) - hence the 衣 (clothing) radical</li>
<li><a href="http://www.zdic.net/z/20/js/7947.htm" rel="noreferrer">祇</a> also has the pronunciation of qí meanin <a href="http://baike.baidu.com/view/8607177.htm" rel="noreferrer">地祇</a>, or earth spirits in Chinese folk religion, hence the 示 (divine) radical</li>
<li><a href="http://www.zdic.net/z/20/js/79D6.htm" rel="noreferrer">秖</a> is supposed to mean "谷始熟", hence the 禾 (grain) radical</li>
</ul></li>
</ul>

<p>So what you're really asking can be split into multiple questions:</p>

<p><strong>Why are there multiple zhǐ (only) characters?</strong></p>

<p>衹 is the correct one, but due to close similarity with the other characters, they have often been confused for each other. Over time the other forms have become accepted as also having the same meaning.</p>

<p>Just to demonstrate how confusing this can be, the character <a href="http://www.zdic.net/z/20/js/7957.htm" rel="noreferrer">祗</a> is also mistakenly used; it even has a similar pronunciation (zhī). If you haven't noticed, the only difference is a dot below the right part: 氐</p>

<p>One of the goals of simplification had been to eliminate multiple characters meaning the same thing, so it's easy to see why these three were merged into 只 (zhǐ). According to 說文解字, 只 emerged as an alternate form of 衹 as far back as the Song dynasty ("宋人詩用只爲衹字"), explaining why 只 was chosen. But this leads to the next question:</p>

<p><strong>Why did 隻, unrelated and pronounced differently, also get merged into 只?</strong></p>

<p>That's harder to answer as it's one of the controversial aspects of simplified Chinese: 一简对多繁. For whatever reason, in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_General_Standard_Chinese_Characters" rel="noreferrer">《通用规范汉字表》</a> 只 was listed as "low risk" (低风险多音字). Probably because the two meanings have different pronunciations and have different grammatical functions, and therefore were unlikely to be mixed up. This is unlike the "high risk" characters like the infamous 干, which has confused computer translators into translating it as "fuck" on many Chinglish menus.</p>

<p>My guess is that they wanted to simplify 隻, a very commonly used character, but there were no good options - e.g. they could have used 支 but it is already a different measure word, which could cause confusion.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-21T12:52:27.987Z
So it's kind of a 错别字-problem?
Mou某
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-21T12:57:52.593Z
Maybe, but some of these "mistakes" have been used for 2000 years. To me that's more than enough time to accept them as part of the language.
congusbongus
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-21T12:01:53.310Z
2016-07-21T12:01:53.310Z
congusbongus
<p>只 zhǐ is just simply 只 zhǐ in simplified writing.</p>

<p>As far as I can tell the most common traditional form is 衹.</p>

<p>Why so many variations for traditional 只 zhǐ (衹/祇/秖/隻)?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-21T11:29:43.957Z
Probably all the characters were conflated with the reason that 隻 means 'single', 'lone', 衹 means 'only, merely',  祇  is a variant of 衹 (though rendering looks slightly different for the radical part in some fonts). 秖 is also considered a variant of 衹. However, some of the characters have other different meanings, that are hard to subsume under "only".
imrek
<traditional-vs-simplified>
Why so many variations for traditional 只 zhǐ (衹/祇/秖/隻)?
# Why so many variations for traditional 只 zhǐ (衹/祇/秖/隻)?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-07-21)

只 zhǐ is just simply 只 zhǐ in simplified writing.

As far as I can tell the most common traditional form is 衹.

Why so many variations for traditional 只 zhǐ (衹/祇/秖/隻)?

**Tags:** traditional-vs-simplified

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Probably all the characters were conflated with the reason that 隻 means 'single', 'lone', 衹 means 'only, merely',  祇  is a variant of 衹 (though rendering looks slightly different for the radical part in some fonts). 秖 is also considered a variant of 衹. However, some of the characters have other different meanings, that are hard to subsume under "only".  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-07-21. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

To clarify:

* 只 has two meanings and pronunciations, zhī (single) and zhǐ (only)
* 隻 is pronounced zhī and has the same meaning as 只 (zhī)
* 衹, 祇, 秖 all can mean zhǐ (only), but also had other meanings:
  + [衹](http://www.zdic.net/z/23/js/8879.htm) has the same meaning, but could also mean 緹 (a reddish colour used in textiles) - hence the 衣 (clothing) radical
  + [祇](http://www.zdic.net/z/20/js/7947.htm) also has the pronunciation of qí meanin [地祇](http://baike.baidu.com/view/8607177.htm), or earth spirits in Chinese folk religion, hence the 示 (divine) radical
  + [秖](http://www.zdic.net/z/20/js/79D6.htm) is supposed to mean "谷始熟", hence the 禾 (grain) radical

So what you're really asking can be split into multiple questions:

**Why are there multiple zhǐ (only) characters?**

衹 is the correct one, but due to close similarity with the other characters, they have often been confused for each other. Over time the other forms have become accepted as also having the same meaning.

Just to demonstrate how confusing this can be, the character [祗](http://www.zdic.net/z/20/js/7957.htm) is also mistakenly used; it even has a similar pronunciation (zhī). If you haven't noticed, the only difference is a dot below the right part: 氐

One of the goals of simplification had been to eliminate multiple characters meaning the same thing, so it's easy to see why these three were merged into 只 (zhǐ). According to 說文解字, 只 emerged as an alternate form of 衹 as far back as the Song dynasty ("宋人詩用只爲衹字"), explaining why 只 was chosen. But this leads to the next question:

**Why did 隻, unrelated and pronounced differently, also get merged into 只?**

That's harder to answer as it's one of the controversial aspects of simplified Chinese: 一简对多繁. For whatever reason, in [《通用规范汉字表》](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_General_Standard_Chinese_Characters) 只 was listed as "low risk" (低风险多音字). Probably because the two meanings have different pronunciations and have different grammatical functions, and therefore were unlikely to be mixed up. This is unlike the "high risk" characters like the infamous 干, which has confused computer translators into translating it as "fuck" on many Chinglish menus.

My guess is that they wanted to simplify 隻, a very commonly used character, but there were no good options - e.g. they could have used 支 but it is already a different measure word, which could cause confusion.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: So it's kind of a 错别字-problem?  
> **username_2**: Maybe, but some of these "mistakes" have been used for 2000 years. To me that's more than enough time to accept them as part of the language.  

---

