<p>一些队员一样太好 doesn't sound right. </p>

<p>"Some players are equally very good" could be: 有些队员也非常不错 or 有些队员也非常棒.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-13T06:14:46.380Z
2018-12-13T06:14:46.380Z
dan
<blockquote>
<p>一些队员一样太好...</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's sounds odd; we don't say that.  You can say:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>一些队员同样特别好</p>
</blockquote>
<p>wherein</p>
<blockquote>
<p>一样 = 同样<br />
太 = 特别</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-13T14:41:44.257Z
2020-06-25T00:00:52.150Z
2020-06-25T00:00:52.150Z
Yuanning Zhao
<blockquote>
  <p><em>Is ”一些队员一样太好“ correct?</em></p>
</blockquote>

<ul>
<li><p>'队员' implies the players are 'team members'. If you meant players of a team sport involving a ball, you should use '球员' ; If you meant players of an individual sport involving a ball, you should use '球手'. If a sport doesn't involve a ball, then the people who participate in that sport are not called 'player' </p></li>
<li><p>'一样' could mean 'also'; '同样' is a better translation for 'equally' </p></li>
<li><p>太 doesn't mean 'very'. It means 'too ~' or 'overly'.   </p></li>
<li><p>'very' in Chinese is: '非常', '很' or '十分'</p></li>
<li><p>to describe a player as 'good', using '好' is too general (it could mean he is a good person). You should use a more specific term like '优秀/卓越 (brilliant)'  or '有才华'(talented)</p></li>
</ul>

<blockquote>
  <p>"some players are equally brilliant/ talented" </p>
  
  <p>"<strong>一些球员同样非常优秀</strong>"</p>
  
  <p><em>一些 (some) | players (球员) | 同样 (are equally) | 非常 (very) | 优秀 (brilliant)</em></p>
  
  <p>"<strong>一些球员同样非常有才华</strong>"</p>
  
  <p><em>一些 (some) | players (球员) | 同样 (are equally) | 非常 (very) | 有才华 (talented)</em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Other choices</p>

<p>"一些球员同样(十分)优秀"</p>

<p>"一些球员同样(很)优秀"</p>

<p>"一些球员同样(十分)有才华"</p>

<p>"一些球员同样(很)有才华"</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-12T17:53:16.877Z
2018-12-12T20:52:33.393Z
2018-12-12T20:52:33.393Z
Tang Ho
<blockquote>
  <p>一些队员同样很好.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Some players are equally very good.</p>

<p>If you want to use  一样, then 一些队员也是一样很好的.</p>

<p>太 can not be used in comparing context, it is like the superlative, no others are good like them.</p>

<p>So you can say 一些队员太好了,  without a comparing adverb, like 一样, 同样, etc...</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-14T13:53:17.777Z
I liked you comment on 太 being like the superlative. How do you feel about 一些队员一样很好 then? I think the problem is having ANY intensifier there, no matter it's 太, 很, 非常...
Enrico Brasil
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-14T15:39:30.193Z
Absolutely ok, 一样非常好， 一样极好，一样特别好 are all ok.  The difference is 一样  sounds more emphatic than 同样.
sfy
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-13T11:42:13.473Z
2018-12-13T11:42:13.473Z
sfy
<blockquote>
<p>一些队员一样太好。</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is this above sentence correct? My question is related to the existence of 太, which seems odd.</p>
<p>If it's wrong, how would I say &quot;Some players are equally very good&quot;?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-12T17:19:12.453Z
I think a little more context might be needed. For example there's this video on QQ entitled: *小脸蛋跟果冻一样太好摸啦*, where the snippet 一样太好 is okay.
Mou某
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-13T12:03:47.140Z
As an aside, I would consider *some players are equally very good* as waffle-language. You should rather say: *several players (of some group) are equally skilled*, which overall is easier to translate.
dROOOze
<grammar>
Is "一些队员一样太好" correct?
# Is "一些队员一样太好" correct?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-12-12)

> 一些队员一样太好。

Is this above sentence correct? My question is related to the existence of 太, which seems odd.

If it's wrong, how would I say "Some players are equally very good"?

**Tags:** grammar

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I think a little more context might be needed. For example there's this video on QQ entitled: *小脸蛋跟果冻一样太好摸啦*, where the snippet 一样太好 is okay.  
> **username_2**: As an aside, I would consider *some players are equally very good* as waffle-language. You should rather say: *several players (of some group) are equally skilled*, which overall is easier to translate.  

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_6 on 2018-12-13. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

> 一些队员同样很好.

Some players are equally very good.

If you want to use 一样, then 一些队员也是一样很好的.

太 can not be used in comparing context, it is like the superlative, no others are good like them.

So you can say 一些队员太好了, without a comparing adverb, like 一样, 同样, etc...

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I liked you comment on 太 being like the superlative. How do you feel about 一些队员一样很好 then? I think the problem is having ANY intensifier there, no matter it's 太, 很, 非常...  
> **username_6**: Absolutely ok, 一样非常好， 一样极好，一样特别好 are all ok.  The difference is 一样  sounds more emphatic than 同样.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-12-13. Score: 2

一些队员一样太好 doesn't sound right.

"Some players are equally very good" could be: 有些队员也非常不错 or 有些队员也非常棒.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-12-13. Score: 2

> 一些队员一样太好...

That's sounds odd; we don't say that. You can say:

> 一些队员同样特别好

wherein

> 一样 = 同样  
> 太 = 特别


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-12-12. Score: 2

> *Is ”一些队员一样太好“ correct?*

* '队员' implies the players are 'team members'. If you meant players of a team sport involving a ball, you should use '球员' ; If you meant players of an individual sport involving a ball, you should use '球手'. If a sport doesn't involve a ball, then the people who participate in that sport are not called 'player'
* '一样' could mean 'also'; '同样' is a better translation for 'equally'
* 太 doesn't mean 'very'. It means 'too ~' or 'overly'.
* 'very' in Chinese is: '非常', '很' or '十分'
* to describe a player as 'good', using '好' is too general (it could mean he is a good person). You should use a more specific term like '优秀/卓越 (brilliant)' or '有才华'(talented)

> "some players are equally brilliant/ talented"
>
> "**一些球员同样非常优秀**"
>
> *一些 (some) | players (球员) | 同样 (are equally) | 非常 (very) | 优秀 (brilliant)*
>
> "**一些球员同样非常有才华**"
>
> *一些 (some) | players (球员) | 同样 (are equally) | 非常 (very) | 有才华 (talented)*

Other choices

"一些球员同样(十分)优秀"

"一些球员同样(很)优秀"

"一些球员同样(十分)有才华"

"一些球员同样(很)有才华"


---

