<p>I'd like to further this response.
You also use 的 in the capacity of "one".
Like the brown one. 咖啡色的。</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-16T06:22:10.633Z
咖啡色的:  This 的 is called the Nominalising 的 -- it makes what's not a Noun into a Noun (e.g., 红 is not a N, add 的 to make it a N: 红的 / a red one).
Lillian Chia
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-05T12:32:22.673Z
@LillianChia Any Chinese linguistics paper sources?
Daniel Cheung
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-21T11:48:14.390Z
Apologies, Daniel Cheung, for late response; have been out of circulation. If, by "reference", you mean published academic writing, then no.
Lillian Chia
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-27T09:09:09.653Z
Hello TrustedDeveloper. :) Welcome to the Chinese SE. Do you mind expanding your answer a bit? It's not bad, but maybe it's too short and other users would appreciate it if you wrote more to add info. :)
Alenanno
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-09-01T15:05:32.680Z
@Alenanno I have expanded it [here](http://chinese.stackexchange.com/a/2047/752)
Be Brave Be Like Ukraine
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-27T04:57:54.847Z
2012-02-27T04:57:54.847Z
TrustedDeveloper
<p>This 的 is called Situational 的 or part of 是……的 with the 是 left out.</p>

<p>Situational 的 = "that's the way things are", for adding to a fact that's not to be gainsaid.  I find using "you know"/"let me tell you this" useful sometimes (e.g., 他不吃肉 vs 他不吃肉的 He doesn't eat meat, you know；他不會來 vs 他不會來的 He won't be coming, let me tell you this), but there'll be other English renditions depending on the context.  </p>

<p>We could say it's for emphasis.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-16T14:33:25.467Z
Do you have a reference for this?
O0123
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-21T11:47:14.217Z
Apologies for late response; have been out of circulation.  If, by "reference", you mean published academic writing, then no.
Lillian Chia
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-16T06:33:58.660Z
2019-06-16T07:58:55.850Z
2019-06-16T07:58:55.850Z
Lillian Chia
<p>I am new here but I have a sentence in a Chinese grammar book that also ends a sentence with 时. The sentence in English is :</p>
<p>“Finals beginning with -i or -u when not preceded by any initials, should be changed respectively into “y” and “w.”</p>
<p>The Chinese for this grammar point was written as:</p>
<p>以 -i 或 -u 开头的韵母，前面没有声母时， 必须吧 -i 改写为 “y”; 吧 -u 改写 为 ”w.”</p>
<p>时 means “when“ in the part 前面没有声母时 ？ It seems to literally mean ”in front of there isn’t a final when,” but I find the placement of “when” at the end of a sentence to be atypical because I thought in Chinese time words go earlier in the sentence. Hope I didn’t confuse things more.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-05T03:21:21.240Z
Hi, answers to this question must help the questioner to *confirm the way they're parsing a sentence with* 的 *at the end*. Unfortunately, this answer does not attempt to help the questioner answer their question.
dROOOze
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-05T03:22:48.263Z
Welcome to the site, Gary. I think you've confused 时 with 的. They look very similar.
Don Kirkby
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-05T01:25:08.483Z
2020-07-05T01:25:08.483Z
Gary
<p>"的" in this case means "certainly", "really", "I am sure that..." as the conclusion says in your question.</p>

<p>For me, such sentences are the same.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>我会去看他<strong>的</strong>。<br>
  我<strong>一定</strong>会去看他。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You can say "我一定会去看他的". The mood sounds stronger (I think it's not much stronger), but I can't tell you how strong it is (this is a natural language, not math). I would use this when I want to express that <em>"please don't remind me of it any more. I am sure to do that. I won't forget it"</em>. For example:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Mom: 别忘了早点回家过年。— <em>Don't forget to come back home early for the Spring Festival holidays.</em><br>
  You: 知道了，妈妈。— <em>I will, mom.</em><br>
  Mom: 一定要早点啊。— <em>make sure [you will come back] early!</em><br>
  You: 我会的。— <em>I am sure I will (mom, you don't need to repeat that. I will. I am sure.)</em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Also, you don't need to treat "的" seriously. It's used very common.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-15T07:03:19.130Z
Wow, a dialogue! Thanks for the great answer.
Don Kirkby
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-15T10:27:58.290Z
I don't have much to add to Huang's great answer. One thing is that 会 is quite normally associated with final 的. Second is that in writing (especially serious prose, not conversation), I think 的 is more likely to be omitted.
Bathrobe
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-15T11:05:05.370Z
+1 for the dialogue!
Alenanno
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-15T06:37:34.000Z
2012-01-15T11:07:29.453Z
2012-01-15T11:07:29.453Z
Huang
<p>I'm looking for confirmation of the way I'm parsing a sentence with 的 at the end, and I'd appreciate some background or other examples of this usage.</p>
<p>I found <a href="http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/403766" rel="noreferrer">this sentence on tatoeba.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>我一定會去看他的。<br />
I'll certainly go and see him.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The sentence is pretty clear to me, until I get to that 的 at the end. Is it one of the many &quot;emphasis&quot; patterns? I'm familiar with 是...的, but I haven't seen 的 on its own before.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.mdbg.net/chindict/chindict.php?wdqb=%E7%9A%84" rel="noreferrer">CEDICT definition of 的</a> includes, &quot;used at the end of a declarative sentence for emphasis,&quot; so it seems like that's what's going on here. What exactly is it emphasizing? When would you use this pattern?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-06-13T08:43:47.523Z
I've also been told with that the interrogative 是...的 e.g. 你们是什么时候认识的？the 是 can also be omitted, so 你们什么时候认识的？is the same interrogative pattern. Just as a semi-related bit of info.
Ming
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-15T21:01:41.563Z
+favorite. this kind of question is *so* useful. thanks for asking it.
magnetar
<grammar><sentence-structure><emphasis>
Why use 的 at the end of a sentence such as 我一定會去看他的?
# Why use 的 at the end of a sentence such as 我一定會去看他的?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-01-15)

I'm looking for confirmation of the way I'm parsing a sentence with 的 at the end, and I'd appreciate some background or other examples of this usage.

I found [this sentence on tatoeba.org](http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/403766):

> 我一定會去看他的。  
> I'll certainly go and see him.

The sentence is pretty clear to me, until I get to that 的 at the end. Is it one of the many "emphasis" patterns? I'm familiar with 是...的, but I haven't seen 的 on its own before.

The [CEDICT definition of 的](http://www.mdbg.net/chindict/chindict.php?wdqb=%E7%9A%84) includes, "used at the end of a declarative sentence for emphasis," so it seems like that's what's going on here. What exactly is it emphasizing? When would you use this pattern?

**Tags:** grammar, sentence-structure, emphasis

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: +favorite. this kind of question is *so* useful. thanks for asking it.  
> **username_1**: I've also been told with that the interrogative 是...的 e.g. 你们是什么时候认识的？the 是 can also be omitted, so 你们什么时候认识的？is the same interrogative pattern. Just as a semi-related bit of info.  

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_11 on 2012-01-15. Score: 18 | Accepted answer

"的" in this case means "certainly", "really", "I am sure that..." as the conclusion says in your question.

For me, such sentences are the same.

> 我会去看他**的**。  
> 我**一定**会去看他。

You can say "我一定会去看他的". The mood sounds stronger (I think it's not much stronger), but I can't tell you how strong it is (this is a natural language, not math). I would use this when I want to express that *"please don't remind me of it any more. I am sure to do that. I won't forget it"*. For example:

> Mom: 别忘了早点回家过年。— *Don't forget to come back home early for the Spring Festival holidays.*  
> You: 知道了，妈妈。— *I will, mom.*  
> Mom: 一定要早点啊。— *make sure [you will come back] early!*  
> You: 我会的。— *I am sure I will (mom, you don't need to repeat that. I will. I am sure.)*

Also, you don't need to treat "的" seriously. It's used very common.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Wow, a dialogue! Thanks for the great answer.  
> **username_12**: I don't have much to add to username_11's great answer. One thing is that 会 is quite normally associated with final 的. Second is that in writing (especially serious prose, not conversation), I think 的 is more likely to be omitted.  
> **username_6**: +1 for the dialogue!  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2012-02-27. Score: 6

I'd like to further this response.
You also use 的 in the capacity of "one".
Like the brown one. 咖啡色的。

> **Comments:**
> **username_6**: Hello username_3. :) Welcome to the Chinese SE. Do you mind expanding your answer a bit? It's not bad, but maybe it's too short and other users would appreciate it if you wrote more to add info. :)  
> **username_7**: @username_6 I have expanded it [here](http://chinese.stackexchange.com/a/2047/752)  
> **username_4**: 咖啡色的:  This 的 is called the Nominalising 的 -- it makes what's not a Noun into a Noun (e.g., 红 is not a N, add 的 to make it a N: 红的 / a red one).  
> **username_5**: @username_4 Any Chinese linguistics paper sources?  
> **username_4**: Apologies, username_5 username_5, for late response; have been out of circulation. If, by "reference", you mean published academic writing, then no.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2019-06-16. Score: 1

This 的 is called Situational 的 or part of 是……的 with the 是 left out.

Situational 的 = "that's the way things are", for adding to a fact that's not to be gainsaid. I find using "you know"/"let me tell you this" useful sometimes (e.g., 他不吃肉 vs 他不吃肉的 He doesn't eat meat, you know；他不會來 vs 他不會來的 He won't be coming, let me tell you this), but there'll be other English renditions depending on the context.

We could say it's for emphasis.

> **Comments:**
> **username_8**: Do you have a reference for this?  
> **username_4**: Apologies for late response; have been out of circulation.  If, by "reference", you mean published academic writing, then no.  

---

### Answer by username_9 on 2020-07-05. Score: 0

I am new here but I have a sentence in a Chinese grammar book that also ends a sentence with 时. The sentence in English is :

“Finals beginning with -i or -u when not preceded by any initials, should be changed respectively into “y” and “w.”

The Chinese for this grammar point was written as:

以 -i 或 -u 开头的韵母，前面没有声母时， 必须吧 -i 改写为 “y”; 吧 -u 改写 为 ”w.”

时 means “when“ in the part 前面没有声母时 ？ It seems to literally mean ”in front of there isn’t a final when,” but I find the placement of “when” at the end of a sentence to be atypical because I thought in Chinese time words go earlier in the sentence. Hope I didn’t confuse things more.

> **Comments:**
> **username_10**: Hi, answers to this question must help the questioner to *confirm the way they're parsing a sentence with* 的 *at the end*. Unfortunately, this answer does not attempt to help the questioner answer their question.  
> **username_0**: Welcome to the site, username_9. I think you've confused 时 with 的. They look very similar.  

---

