<p>There is an important characteristic in Chinese language: <strong>it often omits grammatical functors and particles</strong>. This phenomenon is extremely frequently seen in Classical Chinese, and still sometimes seen in Modern Vernacular Chinese.</p>

<p>Some examples in Modern Vernacular Chinese</p>

<p><strong>Examples 1</strong></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>没笔就没法写字。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Full sentence:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>如果没有笔，那么就没法写字。</p>
</blockquote>

<p><strong>Example 2</strong></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>有火就有烟。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Full sentence:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>如果有火，那么就有烟。</p>
</blockquote>

<hr>

<p>OK, now let me answer the question.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><strong>微</strong>管仲，吾其被髮左衽矣。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Modern Vernacular Chinese:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><strong>没有</strong>管仲，我披髮左衽了。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Full sentence:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>如果<strong>没有</strong>管仲，那麼我就披髮左衽了。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>English translation:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>If there were <strong>not</strong> Guanzhong, I would dishevel the hair and wear the clothes to the left.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Consequently, 微 is the adverb “not”.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-07-22T09:29:29.467Z
Great answer! Most of the time even 就 was being omitted, as in 没笔没法写字, 不戴口罩不得入内, 有事找大哥, etc.
skygate
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T14:57:46.563Z
2019-03-19T14:57:46.563Z
Victor
<p>"微" means "no", or "without" (無, 沒), as indicated in 國語辭典:</p>

<p><a href="http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=dcbdic&amp;searchid=W00000011415" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=dcbdic&amp;searchid=W00000011415</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>微管仲</p>
</blockquote>

<p>if it's not / without (微) mr 管 (管仲), . . .</p>

<p>in 論語注疏　卷十四 by 何晏 (魏)</p>

<p>it was marked:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>注馬曰．微．無也</p>
</blockquote>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/8goPT.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/8goPT.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-18T13:10:33.790Z
But I'm asking about its part of speech.
Apollyon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-18T13:49:24.087Z
@apollyon, grammar is important in english, and other languages. however, the classical chinese is very fuzzy, i would say, it's another paradigm. about its part of speech,  i would treat it as a "conditional clause", aka protasis ;)
水巷孑蠻
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-18T12:21:24.010Z
2019-03-18T12:21:24.010Z
水巷孑蠻
<p>微 is here analogous to 無 or 沒, and thus can be considered a verb. Using 没有A，就B to mean "if we did not have A, then B would happen" is still a common phrase in modern Chinese.</p>

<p>微 can also be an adverb, but it has a different meaning ("a little" rather than "not", as in 微笑).The sentence structure in your question also appears with other verbs, so it does not depend on 微's function as an adverb:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><strong>說</strong>曹操，曹操就到 (if you speak of Cao Cao, he will appear)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The main reason the sentence in your question is translated differently from other examples is because there is no good way to translate 無 or 微 into English as a verb.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T08:45:26.703Z
If "微" is a verb, could it be used in non-conditional contexts?
Apollyon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T08:55:14.663Z
@Apollyon That's an interesting question, and I'll try to look it up later. Can't think of any examples at the moment.
KWeiss
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-18T13:58:55.830Z
2019-03-18T13:58:55.830Z
KWeiss
<p>What is the part of speech of 微 in the following? A dictionary says it's a verb while others say it's an adverb. Do these claims hold water?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><strong>微</strong>管仲，吾其被髮左衽矣。</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-18T17:18:48.520Z
各個語言語法均有不同，何必老是要用詞性去套呢？我覺得這對學古漢語沒有好處。“微斯人，吾誰與歸？”“微夫人之力不至於此”中，微同此處用法，即表示“若不是，要是沒有”。你可以按照現在的語法當作副詞記憶，但這並非重點所在。比如說，你寫“微天青氣朗，吾其還也”就不對了，為何？微作此用法，其後應該接名詞性的成分，是因為微其實表“要是xx不存在”，而天總歸存在的，只不過是“若非天青氣朗，我就回去了”。這樣看，微似乎又不是副詞（因為接名詞性成分），所以不可完全套用今日之語法成分剖析。應該尊重古漢語之規律，習得其本身用法。
Toosky Hierot
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T00:03:27.033Z
If 微 can only be followed by a nominal element, then it should be a preposition.
Apollyon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T02:03:48.847Z
@toosky hierot, good points :) further, "管仲" should be read as "mr 管's governance when he's the prime minister of the nation 齊"; in which excluding his youth, or as civilian.
水巷孑蠻
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T03:05:48.100Z
@Apollyon HH，who konws. Functionally it is like an adverb (because if you take the following chunk as a clause, it modifies the clause and indicates condition)
Toosky Hierot
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T03:24:07.383Z
The whole chunk, i.e. 微 and the following nominal, functions as an adverb, but 微 itself does not.
Apollyon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-03-19T17:07:37.750Z
IMHO, reduction works for basic language learning but fail when you try to learn sentence that may contains metaphor. for such sentence, you should read the whole context and infer the meaning.
mootmoot
<grammar><word>
part of speech - "微" 管仲，吾其被髮左衽矣。
# part of speech - "微" 管仲，吾其被髮左衽矣。

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-03-18)

What is the part of speech of 微 in the following? A dictionary says it's a verb while others say it's an adverb. Do these claims hold water?

> **微**管仲，吾其被髮左衽矣。

**Tags:** grammar, word

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: 各個語言語法均有不同，何必老是要用詞性去套呢？我覺得這對學古漢語沒有好處。“微斯人，吾誰與歸？”“微夫人之力不至於此”中，微同此處用法，即表示“若不是，要是沒有”。你可以按照現在的語法當作副詞記憶，但這並非重點所在。比如說，你寫“微天青氣朗，吾其還也”就不對了，為何？微作此用法，其後應該接名詞性的成分，是因為微其實表“要是xx不存在”，而天總歸存在的，只不過是“若非天青氣朗，我就回去了”。這樣看，微似乎又不是副詞（因為接名詞性成分），所以不可完全套用今日之語法成分剖析。應該尊重古漢語之規律，習得其本身用法。  
> **username_0**: If 微 can only be followed by a nominal element, then it should be a preposition.  
> **username_2**: @username_1 username_1, good points :) further, "管仲" should be read as "mr 管's governance when he's the prime minister of the nation 齊"; in which excluding his youth, or as civilian.  
> **username_1**: @username_0 HH，who konws. Functionally it is like an adverb (because if you take the following chunk as a clause, it modifies the clause and indicates condition)  
> **username_0**: The whole chunk, i.e. 微 and the following nominal, functions as an adverb, but 微 itself does not.  
> **username_3**: IMHO, reduction works for basic language learning but fail when you try to learn sentence that may contains metaphor. for such sentence, you should read the whole context and infer the meaning.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2019-03-19. Score: 3

There is an important characteristic in Chinese language: **it often omits grammatical functors and particles**. This phenomenon is extremely frequently seen in Classical Chinese, and still sometimes seen in Modern Vernacular Chinese.

Some examples in Modern Vernacular Chinese

**Examples 1**

> 没笔就没法写字。

Full sentence:

> 如果没有笔，那么就没法写字。

**Example 2**

> 有火就有烟。

Full sentence:

> 如果有火，那么就有烟。

---

OK, now let me answer the question.

> **微**管仲，吾其被髮左衽矣。

Modern Vernacular Chinese:

> **没有**管仲，我披髮左衽了。

Full sentence:

> 如果**没有**管仲，那麼我就披髮左衽了。

English translation:

> If there were **not** Guanzhong, I would dishevel the hair and wear the clothes to the left.

Consequently, 微 is the adverb “not”.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: Great answer! Most of the time even 就 was being omitted, as in 没笔没法写字, 不戴口罩不得入内, 有事找大哥, etc.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-03-18. Score: 2

"微" means "no", or "without" (無, 沒), as indicated in 國語辭典:

<http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?o=dcbdic&searchid=W00000011415>

> 微管仲

if it's not / without (微) mr 管 (管仲), . . .

in 論語注疏　卷十四 by 何晏 (魏)

it was marked:

> 注馬曰．微．無也

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/8goPT.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/8goPT.png)

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: But I'm asking about its part of speech.  
> **username_2**: @username_0, grammar is important in english, and other languages. however, the classical chinese is very fuzzy, i would say, it's another paradigm. about its part of speech,  i would treat it as a "conditional clause", aka protasis ;)  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2019-03-18. Score: 1

微 is here analogous to 無 or 沒, and thus can be considered a verb. Using 没有A，就B to mean "if we did not have A, then B would happen" is still a common phrase in modern Chinese.

微 can also be an adverb, but it has a different meaning ("a little" rather than "not", as in 微笑).The sentence structure in your question also appears with other verbs, so it does not depend on 微's function as an adverb:

> **說**曹操，曹操就到 (if you speak of Cao Cao, he will appear)

The main reason the sentence in your question is translated differently from other examples is because there is no good way to translate 無 or 微 into English as a verb.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: If "微" is a verb, could it be used in non-conditional contexts?  
> **username_6**: @username_0 That's an interesting question, and I'll try to look it up later. Can't think of any examples at the moment.  

---

