<p>There are three points why 简谱 prevails in China.</p>
<ol>
<li>Tonality.
Most music pieces are tonal music. And 简谱 is essentially a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solf%C3%A8ge#Variations" rel="nofollow noreferrer">&quot;movable&quot; do</a> notation system, which makes it easier for reader, esp. amateur, to grasp the melody.</li>
<li>History reason.
In Chinese traditional music, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gongche_notation" rel="nofollow noreferrer">工尺谱</a> is the main notation system, which is comparable to 简谱. 工尺谱 is also a &quot;movable&quot; do notation system.</li>
<li>Culture. (Why 1, 2, 3 not C, D, E)
Chinese is more familiar which the order of number than the English alphabets. Using Arabic number makes it easier for beginners in China to establish mapping from 1, 2, 3 to do, re, mi and easy to spread and learn. I don't think it has anything to do with the rejection of alphabetic characters.</li>
</ol>
<p>The use of 简谱 was common in <em>Chinese traditional instrument</em> performance. But now conservatories in China use staff more. Now 简谱 is more common in music score for amateurs (esp. guitar scores, or chorus scores).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-09T09:16:14.217Z
2018-01-09T09:39:09.653Z
2020-06-17T09:50:11.587Z
Moods
<p>Agree with Moods and YCode. But I think there is also a technical reason, printing staff(五线谱) is much harder before modern printing technology developed.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-10T02:36:45.097Z
2018-01-10T02:36:45.097Z
Xin
<p>The original idea behind 简谱 jiánpǔ was to make music scores accessible to "the masses". If one has never laid one's hands on a musical instrument and has had no other exposure to music aside from listening to it, 简谱 jiánpǔ (consisting of Arabic numbers 1 to 7) may be indeed more accessible. After all, who can't read the Arabic numbers 1 to 7? But even in the 60s in China, musicians who played an instrument used the Western style music score. Ironically, not knowing the Western style music score was a real impediment to learning Western music instruments.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-10T00:58:04.443Z
2017-12-10T00:58:04.443Z
YCode
<p>Looking at some guitar music in Chinese, I noticed that a notation system called 简谱 <em>jiǎnpǔ</em> "simple (numbered) tablature" is quite widespread. Is there any particular reason why this way of representing music is so common? It is virtually unseen in the West from my (not so deep) experience with music.</p>

<p>As Chinese only (fairly) recently began using the Latin alphabet for things (C, D, E...) I am curious if this preference for numbered representation reflects a tendency to reject alphabetic characters when possible (e.g. when <a href="https://chinese.stackexchange.com/questions/25706/how-may-donald-be-rendered-in-chinese/25759#25759">transcribing names</a>).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-13T00:10:14.963Z
简谱 is easier to read than staff(五线谱), where you have to count the lines to identify each note. 简谱 is a good notation system for simple music, which is suitable for most amateur musical learners. But when it comes to a music with multiple parts, the staff is better than 简谱 because of a good alignment for parts provided.
dan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-13T02:53:41.150Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbered_musical_notation  Off-topic, It's about music,  not language
sfy
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-08-14T11:00:16.730Z
Although Chinese avoid using latin alphbet when possible. But this is not related to Jianpu vs latin letter notes (C,D,E,F,G,A,B). They are totally different systems, based on different musical culture. Using Jianpu, musicians can ease the notation when only cares about a single track and relative pitch of notes, while sheet music is more flexible in composing multi-track music (e.g. symphony), and absolute pitch of notes.
Harry Summer
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-03-15T13:20:56.837Z
Note: it may be widespread in some area/instruments, but when it comes to piano it's definitely using modern staff notation, even in China.
zypA13510
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-01T05:32:51.480Z
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question is about music, not Chinese language. [FAQ: What is On topic and Off topic on this site?](https://chinese.meta.stackexchange.com/a/238/12687) Culture: This site is about the Chinese language, not its culture. Questions about culture will be closed as Off Topic.
zypA13510
<culture>
乐谱 Chinese music tablature
# 乐谱 Chinese music tablature

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-08-12)

Looking at some guitar music in Chinese, I noticed that a notation system called 简谱 *jiǎnpǔ* "simple (numbered) tablature" is quite widespread. Is there any particular reason why this way of representing music is so common? It is virtually unseen in the West from my (not so deep) experience with music.

As Chinese only (fairly) recently began using the Latin alphabet for things (C, D, E...) I am curious if this preference for numbered representation reflects a tendency to reject alphabetic characters when possible (e.g. when [transcribing names](https://chinese.stackexchange.com/questions/25706/how-may-donald-be-rendered-in-chinese/25759#25759)).

**Tags:** culture

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: 简谱 is easier to read than staff(五线谱), where you have to count the lines to identify each note. 简谱 is a good notation system for simple music, which is suitable for most amateur musical learners. But when it comes to a music with multiple parts, the staff is better than 简谱 because of a good alignment for parts provided.  
> **username_2**: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbered_musical_notation  Off-topic, It's about music,  not language  
> **username_3**: Although Chinese avoid using latin alphbet when possible. But this is not related to Jianpu vs latin letter notes (C,D,E,F,G,A,B). They are totally different systems, based on different musical culture. Using Jianpu, musicians can ease the notation when only cares about a single track and relative pitch of notes, while sheet music is more flexible in composing multi-track music (e.g. symphony), and absolute pitch of notes.  
> **username_4**: Note: it may be widespread in some area/instruments, but when it comes to piano it's definitely using modern staff notation, even in China.  
> **username_4**: I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question is about music, not Chinese language. [FAQ: What is On topic and Off topic on this site?](https://chinese.meta.stackexchange.com/a/238/12687) Culture: This site is about the Chinese language, not its culture. Questions about culture will be closed as Off Topic.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-01-09. Score: 1

There are three points why 简谱 prevails in China.

1. Tonality.
   Most music pieces are tonal music. And 简谱 is essentially a ["movable" do](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solf%C3%A8ge#Variations) notation system, which makes it easier for reader, esp. amateur, to grasp the melody.
2. History reason.
   In Chinese traditional music, [工尺谱](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gongche_notation) is the main notation system, which is comparable to 简谱. 工尺谱 is also a "movable" do notation system.
3. Culture. (Why 1, 2, 3 not C, D, E)
   Chinese is more familiar which the order of number than the English alphabets. Using Arabic number makes it easier for beginners in China to establish mapping from 1, 2, 3 to do, re, mi and easy to spread and learn. I don't think it has anything to do with the rejection of alphabetic characters.

The use of 简谱 was common in *Chinese traditional instrument* performance. But now conservatories in China use staff more. Now 简谱 is more common in music score for amateurs (esp. guitar scores, or chorus scores).


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2018-01-10. Score: 0

Agree with username_5 and username_7. But I think there is also a technical reason, printing staff(五线谱) is much harder before modern printing technology developed.


---

### Answer by username_7 on 2017-12-10. Score: 0

The original idea behind 简谱 jiánpǔ was to make music scores accessible to "the masses". If one has never laid one's hands on a musical instrument and has had no other exposure to music aside from listening to it, 简谱 jiánpǔ (consisting of Arabic numbers 1 to 7) may be indeed more accessible. After all, who can't read the Arabic numbers 1 to 7? But even in the 60s in China, musicians who played an instrument used the Western style music score. Ironically, not knowing the Western style music score was a real impediment to learning Western music instruments.


---

