<p>Personally, I've never heard about this as a strict grammar rule. You can say both versions of the same sentence as:</p>

<p>他比我高 vs
他比我矮 
<br>or<br>
他比我富有 vs
他比我穷</p>

<p>and they would be equally correct, even though I can confirm the first ones FEEL better to me. I guess it has to do with the tendency of Chinese culture to point out positive qualities, or qualities perceived as such. As in the example, it's better to be tall than short. It's better to be rich than poor.</p>

<p>The negation is also performed on the positive quality. <br>
The same behavior can be found in western languages. It's always nicer to speak in euphemisms even if you're not making comparisons. "He's not so handsome", as opposed to "he's ugly". It's a sign of politeness. <br></p>

<p>If you want a more philosophical-sounding analysis, you can think that it's easier to speak about the presence of a quality, instead of its absence. What you first notice about a tall person is that she's tall, and not that she's not short. <br></p>

<p>As for your question, what are these "positive" qualities? 
Well, it all comes down to what defines a socially successful person: tall, rich, nice, handsome, smart are all good examples. 
<br>You can apply the same intuitive principle to things and concepts, even though the boundary is more blurred here: is expensive better than cheap? <br>
It depends. By looking at what kind of comparisons people make, you can also get a few hints about their personality and social status.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-04T11:36:55.617Z
2016-04-04T16:56:56.600Z
2016-04-04T16:56:56.600Z
blackgreen
<p>In some textbook materials, I read that comparisons in Chinese should be used with "positive adjectives". For example:</p>

<ol>
<li>This is correct: 我比他高。</li>
<li>This is said to be incorrect: 他比我矮。</li>
<li>It should be: 他没有我高。</li>
</ol>

<p>But I sometimes see sentences with supposedly "negative" adjectives (with 小 instead of 大, 矮 instead of 高, 瘦 instead of 胖...) such as the second sentence.</p>

<p>So, I am a bit puzzled about it. What exactly is meant by positive adjectives and what is the intuition for using them in comparative sentences? What are examples of "negative" adjectives that cannot be used in comparative sentences?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-04T12:41:53.670Z
I guess the book didn't explain it well -- as in the answer below, it doesn't seem to be a strict grammar rule, but just a matter of preference. You may as well be correct that it should be positive = non-negated, e.g. 不错 vs 好.
tomtau
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-04-04T12:56:10.380Z
whether any adjective is positive or negative seems to depend on context, clearly there are also situations where context suggests neutral judgment, presumably textbook materials include the latter situation in the positive case, users are reminded of the use 很 or 太 according as the adjective is positive or negative, 某形容词是＂积极的＂还是＂消极的＂似乎还要视上下文，而且显然上下文很可能暗示中立判断，所提出的教材大概也把后一种情况包括在积极的内,让用户想起来的是，必须说＂很＂或＂太＂取决于修饰的形容词是积极还是消极
user6065
<grammar><comparison><adjectives>
比 comparison structures: positive adjectives?
# 比 comparison structures: positive adjectives?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-04-04)

In some textbook materials, I read that comparisons in Chinese should be used with "positive adjectives". For example:

1. This is correct: 我比他高。
2. This is said to be incorrect: 他比我矮。
3. It should be: 他没有我高。

But I sometimes see sentences with supposedly "negative" adjectives (with 小 instead of 大, 矮 instead of 高, 瘦 instead of 胖...) such as the second sentence.

So, I am a bit puzzled about it. What exactly is meant by positive adjectives and what is the intuition for using them in comparative sentences? What are examples of "negative" adjectives that cannot be used in comparative sentences?

**Tags:** grammar, comparison, adjectives

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I guess the book didn't explain it well -- as in the answer below, it doesn't seem to be a strict grammar rule, but just a matter of preference. You may as well be correct that it should be positive = non-negated, e.g. 不错 vs 好.  
> **username_1**: whether any adjective is positive or negative seems to depend on context, clearly there are also situations where context suggests neutral judgment, presumably textbook materials include the latter situation in the positive case, users are reminded of the use 很 or 太 according as the adjective is positive or negative, 某形容词是＂积极的＂还是＂消极的＂似乎还要视上下文，而且显然上下文很可能暗示中立判断，所提出的教材大概也把后一种情况包括在积极的内,让用户想起来的是，必须说＂很＂或＂太＂取决于修饰的形容词是积极还是消极  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-04-04. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

Personally, I've never heard about this as a strict grammar rule. You can say both versions of the same sentence as:

他比我高 vs
他比我矮
  
or  
他比我富有 vs
他比我穷

and they would be equally correct, even though I can confirm the first ones FEEL better to me. I guess it has to do with the tendency of Chinese culture to point out positive qualities, or qualities perceived as such. As in the example, it's better to be tall than short. It's better to be rich than poor.

The negation is also performed on the positive quality.   
The same behavior can be found in western languages. It's always nicer to speak in euphemisms even if you're not making comparisons. "He's not so handsome", as opposed to "he's ugly". It's a sign of politeness.

If you want a more philosophical-sounding analysis, you can think that it's easier to speak about the presence of a quality, instead of its absence. What you first notice about a tall person is that she's tall, and not that she's not short.

As for your question, what are these "positive" qualities?
Well, it all comes down to what defines a socially successful person: tall, rich, nice, handsome, smart are all good examples.
  
You can apply the same intuitive principle to things and concepts, even though the boundary is more blurred here: is expensive better than cheap?   
It depends. By looking at what kind of comparisons people make, you can also get a few hints about their personality and social status.


---

