<p>Evidence provided by the <a href="https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2017/app/index.php?find=UK-10909" rel="nofollow noreferrer">UK</a> shows:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>《江西省信丰县地名志》(1987) page 378
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Jzrba.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Jzrba.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
</blockquote>
<ul>
<li>⿺见↷见 = hidden</li>
</ul>
<p>Now you see it...now you don't, I guess?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-05T13:46:32.100Z
What is the character in the last row? The image is not very clear.
Sweeper
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-05T16:33:43.707Z
@Sweeper ⿵门见 a simplified form of  (U+28D3C). On BabelStone PUA it is:  (U+E72D). In CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H it has been allotted the temporary code point: 32244.
Mou某
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-04T22:36:10.997Z
2021-03-04T22:36:10.997Z
Mou某
<p>Yesterday, March 3rd '21, in advance of IRG Meeting No. 56, IRG posted document: <a href="https://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/%7Eirg/irg/irg56/IRG56.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">IRGN2469</a>, entitled <a href="https://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/%7Eirg/irg/irg56/IRGN2469_CJK-ExtH.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H</a>. One of the characters in the document grabbed my attention:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/SWahp.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/SWahp.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Or</p>
<blockquote>
<p>⿺见↷见</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="https://babelstone.co.uk/Fonts/PUA.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">BabelStone PUA</a> also lists this character</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/4scvn.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/4scvn.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>But BabelStone's link to the original Tweet:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/JUMANJIKYO/status/1077599757021790208" rel="nofollow noreferrer">See @JUMANJIKYO (拾萬字鏡) on Twitter</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Seems to link to ⿴囗回 instead of ⿺见↷见 or ⿺見↷見</p>
<p>Any ideas what this character is about?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-04T23:34:20.470Z
Is `↷` a valid ideographic description character?
dROOOze
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-04T23:50:13.813Z
Haha, I'm not sure - I just copied it from Andrew's work really
Mou某
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-05T19:56:29.850Z
@dROOOze I can tell you it does *not* occur in the CJK IDS which is the first thing I checked when I saw this post!!
Ben Jackson
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-06T16:47:52.813Z
The correct IDS seems to be 〾⿺见见, but the leading 〾 doesn’t seem to really help that specifically.
Mou某
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-07T04:46:32.357Z
I hope they introduce things like ↷ formally, as we currently don't have the ability to specify rotated or mirrored components. I'm surprised people would make up a character like ⿺见↷见 though, as it doesn't seem to be even writable using common strokes.
dROOOze
<characters>
What is this character: ⿺见↷见 / ⿺見↷見?
# What is this character: ⿺见↷见 / ⿺見↷見?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-03-04)

Yesterday, March 3rd '21, in advance of IRG Meeting No. 56, IRG posted document: [IRGN2469](https://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/%7Eirg/irg/irg56/IRG56.htm), entitled [CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H](https://appsrv.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/%7Eirg/irg/irg56/IRGN2469_CJK-ExtH.pdf). One of the characters in the document grabbed my attention:

> [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/SWahp.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/SWahp.png)

Or

> ⿺见↷见

[BabelStone PUA](https://babelstone.co.uk/Fonts/PUA.html) also lists this character

> [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/4scvn.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/4scvn.png)

But BabelStone's link to the original Tweet:

> [See @JUMANJIKYO (拾萬字鏡) on Twitter](https://twitter.com/JUMANJIKYO/status/1077599757021790208)

Seems to link to ⿴囗回 instead of ⿺见↷见 or ⿺見↷見

Any ideas what this character is about?

**Tags:** characters

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Is `↷` a valid ideographic description character?  
> **username_0**: Haha, I'm not sure - I just copied it from Andrew's work really  
> **username_2**: @username_1 I can tell you it does *not* occur in the CJK IDS which is the first thing I checked when I saw this post!!  
> **username_0**: The correct IDS seems to be 〾⿺见见, but the leading 〾 doesn’t seem to really help that specifically.  
> **username_1**: I hope they introduce things like ↷ formally, as we currently don't have the ability to specify rotated or mirrored components. I'm surprised people would make up a character like ⿺见↷见 though, as it doesn't seem to be even writable using common strokes.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_0 on 2021-03-04. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

Evidence provided by the [UK](https://hc.jsecs.org/irg/ws2017/app/index.php?find=UK-10909) shows:

> 《江西省信丰县地名志》(1987) page 378
> [![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Jzrba.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/Jzrba.png)

* ⿺见↷见 = hidden

Now you see it...now you don't, I guess?

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: What is the character in the last row? The image is not very clear.  
> **username_0**: @username_3 ⿵门见 a simplified form of  (U+28D3C). On BabelStone PUA it is:  (U+E72D). In CJK Unified Ideographs Extension H it has been allotted the temporary code point: 32244.  

---

