<p>"制冷" is not a verb. Note that your dictionary link that is showing calls it a <em>noun</em> (small "n."). It means "refrigeration", as in the power to refrigerate, not "to refrigerate" (v.). Hence it is invalid to insert it into the verb slot of the structure you are trying to use. </p>

<p>But, in fact, this actually leads the way to writing this sentence with proper grammar. Note that "不太好" is a degree word+adjective combination, giving 好ness in the degree 不太 (not so much), so you should instead just use the structure</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>N + degree + adj.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>just as in, say, "He is tall" - 他很高。 Hence, what you'll want to do is delete the 得 and make 空调 into the possessive to create a noun phrase:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>空调的制冷不太好。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>lit. "The air conditioner's refrigerating power is not all that good". And sure enough, this rings up hits - though not many, so there's probably also a more idiomatic way of saying it, but at least it's <em>correct</em>.</p>

<p>ADD: Yes, even better, just remove "的"- in this case you don't need it, because the refrigerating power is <em>intimately</em> (and not incidentally) possessed by the air conditioner (c.f. speaking of parts of one's own body, or one's parents - same cognitive logic as 我妈妈 vs. 我的妈妈, etc.), hence</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>空调制冷不太好.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>and this now gets a LOT of hits on Baidu.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-24T03:07:26.287Z
2019-10-24T03:07:26.287Z
The_Sympathizer
<p>The air conditioner isn't cooling very well.</p>

<p>空调冷却功能不太好。  </p>

<p>airco. cooling function not very good</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-19T10:03:08.553Z
2019-10-19T10:03:08.553Z
Pedroski
<p>You’ve got the concepts down but the problem here is that 冷 is not a verb. So now you’ve got 得 modifying 冷 and not 制.</p>

<p>Often times with words like this you might see repetition of the actual verb like:</p>

<p>• 说话说得</p>

<p>• 跳舞跳得</p>

<p>• 写字写得</p>

<p>This way it’s the verb that’s being qualified.</p>

<hr>

<p>This isn't a very common phrasing but here are some examples I found online:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p><a href="http://www.manmanbuy.com/p_556759.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">制冷制得很快</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p></p>

<blockquote>
  <p><a href="https://item.m.jd.com/ware/commentDetail/1436526_5da1f865-bf10-4a78-ace4-7936057a78c6.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">制冷制得比较柔</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p></p>

<blockquote>
  <p><a href="http://m.dobiez.com/book/5472/5472_111.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">调制冷制得好不好一样</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p></p>

<blockquote>
  <p><a href="https://www.sto.cx/book-104733-19.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">这两天制冷制得有些不顺利</a></p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-10-19T04:58:08.943Z
2019-10-19T06:25:36.483Z
2019-10-19T06:25:36.483Z
Mou某
<p>I thought</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>空调<a href="http://youdao.com/w/%E5%88%B6%E5%86%B7" rel="nofollow noreferrer">制冷</a>得不太好</p>
</blockquote>

<p>would be perfectly fine, using the grammar structure</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Subj. + Verb + 得 + Complement<br>
  <sub><a href="https://resources.allsetlearning.com/chinese/grammar/Potential_complement" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Chinese Grammar Wiki</a></sub></p>
</blockquote>

<p>But there's no hits on Baidu for <a href="https://www.baidu.com/s?wd=%E2%80%9C%E5%88%B6%E5%86%B7%E5%BE%97%E4%B8%8D%E5%A4%AA%E5%A5%BD%E2%80%9D" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><code>"制冷得不太好"</code></a> which is a strong indicator that something is wrong.  I don't know what though.</p>

<p><strong>Question</strong>: What's wrong with 空调制冷得不太好 meaning "The air conditioner cools poorly"?</p>

<p>It seems it's correct to say</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>空调制冷<a href="http://youdao.com/w/eng/%E6%95%88%E6%9E%9C" rel="nofollow noreferrer">效果</a>不太好</p>
</blockquote>

<p>(See Baidu search for <a href="https://www.baidu.com/s?wd=%E2%80%9C%E7%A9%BA%E8%B0%83%E5%88%B6%E5%86%B7%E6%95%88%E6%9E%9C%E4%B8%8D%E5%A4%AA%E5%A5%BD%E2%80%9D" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><code>"空调制冷效果不太好"</code></a>.)  That's fine and makes sense to me, but I don't understand why 空调制冷得不太好 is not also okay.</p>

<grammar><word-choice><usage>
What's wrong with 空调制冷得不太好 meaning "The air conditioner cools poorly"?
# What's wrong with 空调制冷得不太好 meaning "The air conditioner cools poorly"?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-10-19)

I thought

> 空调[制冷](http://youdao.com/w/%E5%88%B6%E5%86%B7)得不太好

would be perfectly fine, using the grammar structure

> Subj. + Verb + 得 + Complement  
> [Chinese Grammar Wiki](https://resources.allsetlearning.com/chinese/grammar/Potential_complement)

But there's no hits on Baidu for [`"制冷得不太好"`](https://www.baidu.com/s?wd=%E2%80%9C%E5%88%B6%E5%86%B7%E5%BE%97%E4%B8%8D%E5%A4%AA%E5%A5%BD%E2%80%9D) which is a strong indicator that something is wrong. I don't know what though.

**Question**: What's wrong with 空调制冷得不太好 meaning "The air conditioner cools poorly"?

It seems it's correct to say

> 空调制冷[效果](http://youdao.com/w/eng/%E6%95%88%E6%9E%9C)不太好

(See Baidu search for [`"空调制冷效果不太好"`](https://www.baidu.com/s?wd=%E2%80%9C%E7%A9%BA%E8%B0%83%E5%88%B6%E5%86%B7%E6%95%88%E6%9E%9C%E4%B8%8D%E5%A4%AA%E5%A5%BD%E2%80%9D).) That's fine and makes sense to me, but I don't understand why 空调制冷得不太好 is not also okay.

**Tags:** grammar, word-choice, usage


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2019-10-19. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

You’ve got the concepts down but the problem here is that 冷 is not a verb. So now you’ve got 得 modifying 冷 and not 制.

Often times with words like this you might see repetition of the actual verb like:

• 说话说得

• 跳舞跳得

• 写字写得

This way it’s the verb that’s being qualified.

---

This isn't a very common phrasing but here are some examples I found online:

> [制冷制得很快](http://www.manmanbuy.com/p_556759.aspx)

> [制冷制得比较柔](https://item.m.jd.com/ware/commentDetail/1436526_5da1f865-bf10-4a78-ace4-7936057a78c6.html)

> [调制冷制得好不好一样](http://m.dobiez.com/book/5472/5472_111.html)

> [这两天制冷制得有些不顺利](https://www.sto.cx/book-104733-19.html)


---

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-10-24. Score: 2

"制冷" is not a verb. Note that your dictionary link that is showing calls it a *noun* (small "n."). It means "refrigeration", as in the power to refrigerate, not "to refrigerate" (v.). Hence it is invalid to insert it into the verb slot of the structure you are trying to use.

But, in fact, this actually leads the way to writing this sentence with proper grammar. Note that "不太好" is a degree word+adjective combination, giving 好ness in the degree 不太 (not so much), so you should instead just use the structure

> N + degree + adj.

just as in, say, "He is tall" - 他很高。 Hence, what you'll want to do is delete the 得 and make 空调 into the possessive to create a noun phrase:

> 空调的制冷不太好。

lit. "The air conditioner's refrigerating power is not all that good". And sure enough, this rings up hits - though not many, so there's probably also a more idiomatic way of saying it, but at least it's *correct*.

ADD: Yes, even better, just remove "的"- in this case you don't need it, because the refrigerating power is *intimately* (and not incidentally) possessed by the air conditioner (c.f. speaking of parts of one's own body, or one's parents - same cognitive logic as 我妈妈 vs. 我的妈妈, etc.), hence

> 空调制冷不太好.

and this now gets a LOT of hits on Baidu.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-10-19. Score: 0

The air conditioner isn't cooling very well.

空调冷却功能不太好。

airco. cooling function not very good


---

