<p>Could you share the context where you encountered this character? I'm almost certain that this character is only used in geographic names nowadays, for example, <code>阜阳</code> or <code>阜成门</code>. This is why you could not find it in modern translations of the words <code>dam</code> or <code>mound</code>, because even most Chinese people would not understand the meaning of this single character <code>阜</code>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T08:22:19.463Z
learning radicals
anonnymous
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T08:26:34.357Z
So are some radicals practically only used to convey a sound/pronounciation ie just as phonetic?
anonnymous
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T08:48:32.347Z
Actually there is an imperfect rule, and it works most of the time.
When a radical is the left part of a character, it conveys a certain sense. For example `阝` as in `阴`(northern side of a hill) and `阳`(southern side of a hill), it carries the meaning of `mound`.
But when the radical is the right part of a character, it usually only controls the sound of the character. For example `阜 fù` as in `埠 bù`(harbor), it conveys only the sound, not its original meaning.
vicch
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T08:21:46.403Z
2014-12-03T08:21:46.403Z
vicch
<p>Unfortunatelly, a character with some meaning doesn't necessarily take that meaning's radical.</p>

<p>For example: the word 母亲 (mother) doesn't have the 女 (woman) radical, even though it has a woman's idea.</p>

<p>That's what's happening with the word 土丘. Even though it has a "mountain" meaning, it doesn't necessarily take the mountain radical (阝).</p>

<p>The other way around is also true. Even if a character has some radical, it doesn't mean that we can clearly see that radical's meaning nowadays.</p>

<p>For example: 阿 (a) or 附 (attach) don't have a clear "mountain" meaning on them, although they have (阝). But they certainly had it when both characters were created back in the days.</p>

<p>I hope this helps you! =)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-06T00:34:54.413Z
2014-12-06T00:34:54.413Z
Enrico Brasil
<p>Yes you do, you just have to look further down the results of Google image search (and I wasn't expecting the top most images =.=). However, I don't think 阜 means dam, but it does mean mound, though in 99% cases it would be 土丘 or some other words because 阜 does not appear in conversational Chinese as far as I know. You get images related to ears because 阝 looks like an ear.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T08:19:08.667Z
"though in 99% cases it would be 土丘 or some other words because 阜 does not appear in conversational Chinese", this is what I am wondering, why
anonnymous
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T08:47:03.713Z
why are some radicals not in use for their meaning
anonnymous
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T06:50:35.813Z
2014-12-30T01:47:44.537Z
2014-12-30T01:47:44.537Z
Gao
<p>The radical 阜 and its other form 阝, used on the left, supposedly means mound or dam. Looking at image web search hits for 阜 or 阝, I get nothing related to dam or mound.</p>

<p>When I look up the Chinese translation of the words dam and mound, I get 水坝, 大坝, 土丘. None of which even contains 阜 or 阝.</p>

<p>What is going on? Are the Chinese trying to fool me? :)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-03T23:46:50.693Z
The "Chinese" are no more lying to you than the English are when searching for "ham" will give you results for pork instead of "farm, homestead". Language evolves, and in this case, the `阜` character is archaic and mostly survives in place names and by lending its meaning as a radical.
congusbongus
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-12-04T03:35:24.790Z
Related: http://chinese.stackexchange.com/q/6264/3561 :)
Ming
<meaning><characters><radicals>
Radical meaning vs characters in use
# Radical meaning vs characters in use

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-12-03)

The radical 阜 and its other form 阝, used on the left, supposedly means mound or dam. Looking at image web search hits for 阜 or 阝, I get nothing related to dam or mound.

When I look up the Chinese translation of the words dam and mound, I get 水坝, 大坝, 土丘. None of which even contains 阜 or 阝.

What is going on? Are the Chinese trying to fool me? :)

**Tags:** meaning, characters, radicals

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The "Chinese" are no more lying to you than the English are when searching for "ham" will give you results for pork instead of "farm, homestead". Language evolves, and in this case, the `阜` character is archaic and mostly survives in place names and by lending its meaning as a radical.  
> **username_2**: Related: http://chinese.stackexchange.com/q/6264/3561 :)  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2014-12-03. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Could you share the context where you encountered this character? I'm almost certain that this character is only used in geographic names nowadays, for example, `阜阳` or `阜成门`. This is why you could not find it in modern translations of the words `dam` or `mound`, because even most Chinese people would not understand the meaning of this single character `阜`.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: learning radicals  
> **username_0**: So are some radicals practically only used to convey a sound/pronounciation ie just as phonetic?  
> **username_3**: Actually there is an imperfect rule, and it works most of the time. When a radical is the left part of a character, it conveys a certain sense. For example `阝` as in `阴`(northern side of a hill) and `阳`(southern side of a hill), it carries the meaning of `mound`. But when the radical is the right part of a character, it usually only controls the sound of the character. For example `阜 fù` as in `埠 bù`(harbor), it conveys only the sound, not its original meaning.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2014-12-06. Score: 1

Unfortunatelly, a character with some meaning doesn't necessarily take that meaning's radical.

For example: the word 母亲 (mother) doesn't have the 女 (woman) radical, even though it has a woman's idea.

That's what's happening with the word 土丘. Even though it has a "mountain" meaning, it doesn't necessarily take the mountain radical (阝).

The other way around is also true. Even if a character has some radical, it doesn't mean that we can clearly see that radical's meaning nowadays.

For example: 阿 (a) or 附 (attach) don't have a clear "mountain" meaning on them, although they have (阝). But they certainly had it when both characters were created back in the days.

I hope this helps you! =)


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2014-12-03. Score: 1

Yes you do, you just have to look further down the results of Google image search (and I wasn't expecting the top most images =.=). However, I don't think 阜 means dam, but it does mean mound, though in 99% cases it would be 土丘 or some other words because 阜 does not appear in conversational Chinese as far as I know. You get images related to ears because 阝 looks like an ear.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: "though in 99% cases it would be 土丘 or some other words because 阜 does not appear in conversational Chinese", this is what I am wondering, why  
> **username_0**: why are some radicals not in use for their meaning  

---

