<p>It depends on what you mean by "Cantonese". The practical definition <em>is</em> Yuehai Yue, from Guangzhou down to Hong Kong and Macau.</p>

<p>Any dictionary will be limited. From a purely practical point of view, the scope of the lexicographer's project must be in some way worth the resource put in. Hence dictionaries limit their scope quite significantly.</p>

<p>In practice for Cantonese then, most dictionaries [as pointed out above] specify not 廣東話 but specifically 廣州話 - the bias towards the Yuehai 粵海 region is made explicitly. </p>

<h3>The Dominance of the Yuehai Prestige Dialect</h3>

<p>This is (in essence) one of the definitions of a prestige dialect, and the Cantonese as spoken in Guangzhou 廣州 has always been the leading example of the Yue 粵語 branch of Chinese. The fact that people originating from Guangdong 廣東 and Guangxi 廣西 provinces were already using the speech of Guangzhou 廣州 as their lingua franca gave it a prestige (the province was divided into two in the late Song dynasty). This meant in the early Repulican period, a Teochew 潮州話 speaker, a Hakka 客家話 speaker and possibly a Hmong speaker would have used 廣州話 as their lingua franca, even if they were doing business in Nanning 南寧 in Guangxi. Across the Sinosphere of SE Asia, the older term 廣府話 became standard across both Yue and Min speakers.</p>

<p>The rising prestige of Hong Kong 香港 through the 20th century only reinforced the trend of Yuehai dominance. The Yue-speaking diaspora throughout the world had already adopted the speech of Guangzhou 廣州話 by the mid 20th century (the largest Yue-speaking group that didn't do so was the Taishan [Toisan/Hoisan] 台山 group in California), and with a greater influx from HK into the diaspora, the strength of the Yuehai group of Cantonese increased within the Cantonese community overseas, even as Mandarin made strong inroads in Cantonese speaking territories.</p>

<h3>On the other Yue varieties</h3>

<p>Hence, any interest in the other Yue varieties would be documented, not by mainstream dictionaries, but fairly specialised linguist's dictionaries and papers. The dialect of Bobai 博白, Guangxi Province, is well known for having one of the largest tone inventories in the world.</p>

<p>The divergence and diversity with Yue should not be underestimated. The perception as just a "rougher version" (lit.: 鄉音 village sound) of (Guangzhou / Yuehai) Cantonese is broadly untrue. Everything from tones, sound system, [synchronic] sound changes, even some grammatical constructions as well as vocbulary can be different. Hence you are right to say that a lot of words would not be found in a mainstream Cantonese dictionary. But we would need a few more dictionaries to made before this can be quantified.</p>

<p>One of the most salient and well documented examples is <a href="http://taishanese.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Toisanese</a>, which maintains the Middle Chinese distinction between alveolar and palatal/retroflex sibilants, but recasts it as a /ɬ/ vs /s/ distinction, and has a toneme for making the plural pronouns (我 /ŋɔɪ˧/ for "I" to 哦 /ŋɔɪ˨˩/ for "we"). </p>

<p>In the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Dictionary_of_Modern_Chinese_Dialects" rel="nofollow noreferrer">現代漢語方言大詞典</a>, only two Yue varieties are represented: Guangzhou (of course) and <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/7218091636" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Dongguan</a>. Wiktionary has <a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Taishanese_Chinese" rel="nofollow noreferrer">some support for Toisanese</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-28T17:57:45.553Z
Are there representative dialects of the other branches of 粤?
Stumpy Joe Pete
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-29T06:25:09.913Z
Does `prestige dialect` have a Chinese term? I've found 优势方言 but I'm not sure how well that translates.
Mou某
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-29T09:02:06.430Z
@user3306356 优势方言 seems to be the main term used in the academic literature. E.g. ["A Summary of Studies of Chinese Dialect Grammar since 1990"](http://mdw.bnu.edu.cn/UserFiles/File/QIANYAN/%E4%B9%9D%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%E4%BB%A3%E4%BB%A5%E6%9D%A5%E6%B1%89%E8%AF%AD%E6%96%B9%E8%A8%80%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E8%BF%B0%E8%AF%84.pdf).
Michaelyus
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-29T09:30:37.763Z
@StumpyJoePete I think you are best referred to the references on the Wikipedia page for [Yue Chinese](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yue_Chinese). The one quoted above is the 1987 Linguistic Atlas of China version; there is also the Yue-Hashimoto 1991 classification.
Michaelyus
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-28T11:15:32.507Z
2019-05-29T14:34:21.783Z
2019-05-29T14:34:21.783Z
Michaelyus
<p>I've gone through these dictionaries:</p>

<ul>
<li>ABC Cantonese</li>
<li>广州话方言词典</li>
<li>广州话-普通话词典</li>
<li>CCCanto</li>
<li>Words.HK</li>
</ul>

<p>and they all seem to be very <em>Yuehai</em> (粵海).</p>

<hr>

<p><strong>How limited is it to only base a Cantonese dictionary on the Yuehai topolect?</strong></p>

<hr>

<p>The first question that comes to mind is <em>pronunciation</em>.</p>

<p>All of the above dictionaries seem to do a weak job of Yuehai pronunciation to being with. For instance 屋 is only listed with <strong>one</strong> pronunciation in each of the dictionaries: <code>uk1</code> in ABC Cantonese and Words.HK &amp;&amp; <code>nguk1</code> in《广州话方言词典》and《广州话-普通话词典》.</p>

<p>A more comprehensive dictionary would, presumably, list both pronunciations perhaps differentiating between 老派 and 新派 pronunciations. But, this is all without getting into different pronunciations in different locales. </p>

<hr>

<p>The second question that comes to mind is vocabulary.</p>

<p>There are many different branches of Cantonese:</p>

<ul>
<li>Yong-Xun</li>
<li>Qin-Lian</li>
<li>Goulou</li>
<li>Siyi</li>
<li>Gao-Yang</li>
<li>Wu-Hua</li>
</ul>

<p>While the <em>majority</em> of vocabulary might be very similar throughout the different branches of Cantonese, there would still be tons of words and phrases that would be neglected in a simple Yuehai-based Cantonese dictionary, no?</p>

<p>——</p>

<p>I’m not an expert, I do have an inkling, but I’d like to know what people more versed in the subject than I am think.</p>

<cantonese>
How limited are Cantonese dictionaries?
# How limited are Cantonese dictionaries?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-05-25)

I've gone through these dictionaries:

* ABC Cantonese
* 广州话方言词典
* 广州话-普通话词典
* CCCanto
* Words.HK

and they all seem to be very *Yuehai* (粵海).

---

**How limited is it to only base a Cantonese dictionary on the Yuehai topolect?**

---

The first question that comes to mind is *pronunciation*.

All of the above dictionaries seem to do a weak job of Yuehai pronunciation to being with. For instance 屋 is only listed with **one** pronunciation in each of the dictionaries: `uk1` in ABC Cantonese and Words.HK && `nguk1` in《广州话方言词典》and《广州话-普通话词典》.

A more comprehensive dictionary would, presumably, list both pronunciations perhaps differentiating between 老派 and 新派 pronunciations. But, this is all without getting into different pronunciations in different locales.

---

The second question that comes to mind is vocabulary.

There are many different branches of Cantonese:

* Yong-Xun
* Qin-Lian
* Goulou
* Siyi
* Gao-Yang
* Wu-Hua

While the *majority* of vocabulary might be very similar throughout the different branches of Cantonese, there would still be tons of words and phrases that would be neglected in a simple Yuehai-based Cantonese dictionary, no?

——

I’m not an expert, I do have an inkling, but I’d like to know what people more versed in the subject than I am think.

**Tags:** cantonese


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-05-28. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

It depends on what you mean by "Cantonese". The practical definition *is* Yuehai Yue, from Guangzhou down to Hong Kong and Macau.

Any dictionary will be limited. From a purely practical point of view, the scope of the lexicographer's project must be in some way worth the resource put in. Hence dictionaries limit their scope quite significantly.

In practice for Cantonese then, most dictionaries [as pointed out above] specify not 廣東話 but specifically 廣州話 - the bias towards the Yuehai 粵海 region is made explicitly.

### The Dominance of the Yuehai Prestige Dialect

This is (in essence) one of the definitions of a prestige dialect, and the Cantonese as spoken in Guangzhou 廣州 has always been the leading example of the Yue 粵語 branch of Chinese. The fact that people originating from Guangdong 廣東 and Guangxi 廣西 provinces were already using the speech of Guangzhou 廣州 as their lingua franca gave it a prestige (the province was divided into two in the late Song dynasty). This meant in the early Repulican period, a Teochew 潮州話 speaker, a Hakka 客家話 speaker and possibly a Hmong speaker would have used 廣州話 as their lingua franca, even if they were doing business in Nanning 南寧 in Guangxi. Across the Sinosphere of SE Asia, the older term 廣府話 became standard across both Yue and Min speakers.

The rising prestige of Hong Kong 香港 through the 20th century only reinforced the trend of Yuehai dominance. The Yue-speaking diaspora throughout the world had already adopted the speech of Guangzhou 廣州話 by the mid 20th century (the largest Yue-speaking group that didn't do so was the Taishan [Toisan/Hoisan] 台山 group in California), and with a greater influx from HK into the diaspora, the strength of the Yuehai group of Cantonese increased within the Cantonese community overseas, even as Mandarin made strong inroads in Cantonese speaking territories.

### On the other Yue varieties

Hence, any interest in the other Yue varieties would be documented, not by mainstream dictionaries, but fairly specialised linguist's dictionaries and papers. The dialect of Bobai 博白, Guangxi Province, is well known for having one of the largest tone inventories in the world.

The divergence and diversity with Yue should not be underestimated. The perception as just a "rougher version" (lit.: 鄉音 village sound) of (Guangzhou / Yuehai) Cantonese is broadly untrue. Everything from tones, sound system, [synchronic] sound changes, even some grammatical constructions as well as vocbulary can be different. Hence you are right to say that a lot of words would not be found in a mainstream Cantonese dictionary. But we would need a few more dictionaries to made before this can be quantified.

One of the most salient and well documented examples is [Toisanese](http://taishanese.blogspot.com/), which maintains the Middle Chinese distinction between alveolar and palatal/retroflex sibilants, but recasts it as a /ɬ/ vs /s/ distinction, and has a toneme for making the plural pronouns (我 /ŋɔɪ˧/ for "I" to 哦 /ŋɔɪ˨˩/ for "we").

In the [現代漢語方言大詞典](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Dictionary_of_Modern_Chinese_Dialects), only two Yue varieties are represented: Guangzhou (of course) and [Dongguan](https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/7218091636). Wiktionary has [some support for Toisanese](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Taishanese_Chinese).

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: Are there representative dialects of the other branches of 粤?  
> **username_0**: Does `prestige dialect` have a Chinese term? I've found 优势方言 but I'm not sure how well that translates.  
> **username_1**: @user3306356 优势方言 seems to be the main term used in the academic literature. E.g. ["A Summary of Studies of Chinese Dialect Grammar since 1990"](http://mdw.bnu.edu.cn/UserFiles/File/QIANYAN/%E4%B9%9D%E5%8D%81%E5%B9%B4%E4%BB%A3%E4%BB%A5%E6%9D%A5%E6%B1%89%E8%AF%AD%E6%96%B9%E8%A8%80%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E8%BF%B0%E8%AF%84.pdf).  
> **username_1**: @username_2 I think you are best referred to the references on the Wikipedia page for [Yue Chinese](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yue_Chinese). The one quoted above is the 1987 Linguistic Atlas of China version; there is also the Yue-Hashimoto 1991 classification.  

---

