<p>According to Wiktionary, <a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E4%BF%9D%E7%A5%90" rel="nofollow noreferrer">保祐</a> is a variant of <a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E4%BF%9D%E4%BD%91" rel="nofollow noreferrer">保佑</a>. Google Ngram Viewer also consider 天祐 to be the same as 天佑: <a href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%91%2C%E5%A4%A9%E7%A5%90&amp;year_start=1800&amp;year_end=2008&amp;corpus=23&amp;smoothing=3" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ngram</a></p>

<p>Actually, here in mainland China, I think 佑 is much more prevalent than 祐 (I have not been to other Chinese-speaking areas so I cannot give you a definitive answer). You can witness it from the Wikipedia translation of similar subjects, all of them use 佑 instead of 祐:</p>

<ul>
<li>God Bless America - <a href="https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%91%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B" rel="nofollow noreferrer">天佑美國</a></li>
<li>God Save the Queen/King - <a href="https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%91%E5%A5%B3%E7%8E%8B" rel="nofollow noreferrer">天佑女皇</a>/女王、天佑吾皇/国王</li>
<li>Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser - <a href="https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%9D%E7%9A%87%E9%A2%82" rel="nofollow noreferrer">上帝保佑吾皇弗朗茨</a>/天佑吾皇弗朗茨</li>
</ul>

<p>So if you have to choose between them, I'd say 佑 is actually a safer choice.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-17T00:55:37.353Z
2020-03-17T01:12:40.590Z
2020-03-17T01:12:40.590Z
zypA13510
<p>Please remember that the purpose of Chinese characters is to represent Chinese <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme" rel="nofollow noreferrer">morphemes</a> and words; 天佑美國 consists of the same words as 天祐美國, so it cannot be a wrong translation - 「佑」, in this context, represents the same word as 「祐」.</p>

<p>To put it another way: would you question the correctness of <strong>Tiān yòu Měiguó</strong> as translation of <em>God Bless America</em>? <strong>Tiān yòu Měiguó</strong> consists of the same words as both 天佑美國 and 天祐美國, no?</p>

<hr>

<p>I'm slightly confused at the number of answers pointing towards Mainland Chinese dictionaries and usage, when the character choice in the banner is clearly not Mainland Chinese. It's trivial to do some extra research and open up a Taiwanese or Hong Kong dictionary to find that 「佑」 is also standard in those places.</p>

<p>Anyway, the crux of the question is <em>character choice</em>. Character choice is heavily tied with disambiguation purposes. Why do we even have both 「佑」 and 「祐」 being defined with the meaning <em>bless, protect</em>? In ancient times,</p>

<ul>
<li>「佑」 was also used as a phonetic loan for 「有」 (<em>to own land and resources</em>) or 「右」 (<em>a kind of senior official in Ancient China</em>). In these situations, one might not use 「佑」 for the meaning <em>bless, protect</em>.</li>
<li>「祐」 was also used as a phonetic loan for 「侑」, <em>to make offerings</em>. In these situations, one might not use 「祐」 for the meaning <em>bless, protect</em>.</li>
</ul>

<p>The take home message is that both 「佑」 and 「祐」 were widely (but not exclusively) used, for the meaning <em>bless, protect</em>. Modern Chinese usage across all regions has standardised the use of 「佑」 in modern vocabulary, but Chinese orthography is not set by any particular agency, and 「祐」 has plenty of historical precedence.</p>

<p>As long as there is plenty of precedence for the character to represent the morphemes and words used in the text, it doesn't make sense for the character choice to be "wrong".</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-18T09:02:14.513Z
2020-03-18T09:02:14.513Z
dROOOze
<p>In 《现代汉语词典》（商务印书馆，1996年7月第三版），"祐" is listed as a variant form of "佑", and "佑" is a standard form.</p>

<hr>

<p>Note: 《现代汉语词典》 is an authoritative dictionary published in mainland China.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-17T01:45:02.663Z
2020-03-17T02:16:49.897Z
2020-03-17T02:16:49.897Z
fefe
<p>According to 【现代汉语词典】，"祐" is the same as "佑". You can use any one of both of them.</p>

<p>But according to 【说文解字】, "佑" is not included in it, but "祐" is. It means that "佑" didn't exist in ancient Chinese. "佑" is listed as a variant form of "祐".
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/pEptj.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/pEptj.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>"祐"'s radical is “示”.  The Chinese characters with “示” usually related to religion or God in Chinese culture.
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/NBYkF.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/NBYkF.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>So strictly speaking,
God bless America is 「天祐美國」. </p>

<p>But According to 【现代汉语词典】，"祐" is the same as "佑". You can use any one of both of them. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-18T07:54:52.747Z
2020-03-18T07:54:52.747Z
KevinlearnChinese
<p>Given the present President, I would say, 美国 could use all the help it can get!</p>

<p>Have a look <a href="https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%A5%90/9473973?fr=aladdin" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>.</p>

<p>祐,本作佑。<br>
yòu, originally written yòu</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-16T10:44:58.253Z
2020-03-16T10:44:58.253Z
Pedroski
<p>It's 「天佑美國」. As for 佑 vs 祐, take a look <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChineseLanguage/comments/68k7la/when_to_use_%E4%BD%91_vs_%E7%A5%90/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-17T01:29:19.800Z
Would it be possible to [edit] this answer to give an explanation at this site?  As it stands it's a [link-only answer](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/225370/your-answer-is-in-another-castle-when-is-an-answer-not-an-answer).  I'm also unsure if Reddit is reliable.
Becky 李蓓
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-03-16T11:58:29.173Z
2020-03-16T11:58:29.173Z
Tentacle Monster
<p>Look at this mural from Chinatown, San Francisco:</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/hv4vQ.jpg" alt="American flag in Chinatown San Francisco"></p>

<p><sub>Attribution: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/peterlozano/4546033519" rel="nofollow noreferrer">American flag in Chinatown San Francisco by Pedro Lozano</a>. License: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CC BY 2.0</a></sub></p>

<p>It says「天佑美國」, but is that correct? Shouldn't it be「天祐美國」instead? Isn't god supposed to be a divine being?</p>

<word-choice><usage><traditional-characters><phrase>
Is「天佑美國」the correct translation for "God Bless America"?
# Is「天佑美國」the correct translation for "God Bless America"?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-03-16)

Look at this mural from Chinatown, San Francisco:

![American flag in Chinatown San Francisco](https://i.sstatic.net/hv4vQ.jpg)

Attribution: [American flag in Chinatown San Francisco by Pedro Lozano](https://www.flickr.com/photos/peterlozano/4546033519). License: [CC BY 2.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)

It says「天佑美國」, but is that correct? Shouldn't it be「天祐美國」instead? Isn't god supposed to be a divine being?

**Tags:** word-choice, usage, traditional-characters, phrase


---

## 6 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-03-17. Score: 3

According to Wiktionary, [保祐](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E4%BF%9D%E7%A5%90) is a variant of [保佑](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E4%BF%9D%E4%BD%91). Google Ngram Viewer also consider 天祐 to be the same as 天佑: [Ngram](https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%91%2C%E5%A4%A9%E7%A5%90&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=23&smoothing=3)

Actually, here in mainland China, I think 佑 is much more prevalent than 祐 (I have not been to other Chinese-speaking areas so I cannot give you a definitive answer). You can witness it from the Wikipedia translation of similar subjects, all of them use 佑 instead of 祐:

* God Bless America - [天佑美國](https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%91%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B)
* God Save the Queen/King - [天佑女皇](https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A9%E4%BD%91%E5%A5%B3%E7%8E%8B)/女王、天佑吾皇/国王
* Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser - [上帝保佑吾皇弗朗茨](https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%9D%E7%9A%87%E9%A2%82)/天佑吾皇弗朗茨

So if you have to choose between them, I'd say 佑 is actually a safer choice.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-03-18. Score: 2

Please remember that the purpose of Chinese characters is to represent Chinese [morphemes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme) and words; 天佑美國 consists of the same words as 天祐美國, so it cannot be a wrong translation - 「佑」, in this context, represents the same word as 「祐」.

To put it another way: would you question the correctness of **Tiān yòu Měiguó** as translation of *God Bless America*? **Tiān yòu Měiguó** consists of the same words as both 天佑美國 and 天祐美國, no?

---

I'm slightly confused at the number of answers pointing towards Mainland Chinese dictionaries and usage, when the character choice in the banner is clearly not Mainland Chinese. It's trivial to do some extra research and open up a Taiwanese or Hong Kong dictionary to find that 「佑」 is also standard in those places.

Anyway, the crux of the question is *character choice*. Character choice is heavily tied with disambiguation purposes. Why do we even have both 「佑」 and 「祐」 being defined with the meaning *bless, protect*? In ancient times,

* 「佑」 was also used as a phonetic loan for 「有」 (*to own land and resources*) or 「右」 (*a kind of senior official in Ancient China*). In these situations, one might not use 「佑」 for the meaning *bless, protect*.
* 「祐」 was also used as a phonetic loan for 「侑」, *to make offerings*. In these situations, one might not use 「祐」 for the meaning *bless, protect*.

The take home message is that both 「佑」 and 「祐」 were widely (but not exclusively) used, for the meaning *bless, protect*. Modern Chinese usage across all regions has standardised the use of 「佑」 in modern vocabulary, but Chinese orthography is not set by any particular agency, and 「祐」 has plenty of historical precedence.

As long as there is plenty of precedence for the character to represent the morphemes and words used in the text, it doesn't make sense for the character choice to be "wrong".


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-03-17. Score: 1

In 《现代汉语词典》（商务印书馆，1996年7月第三版），"祐" is listed as a variant form of "佑", and "佑" is a standard form.

---

Note: 《现代汉语词典》 is an authoritative dictionary published in mainland China.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-03-18. Score: 0

According to 【现代汉语词典】，"祐" is the same as "佑". You can use any one of both of them.

But according to 【说文解字】, "佑" is not included in it, but "祐" is. It means that "佑" didn't exist in ancient Chinese. "佑" is listed as a variant form of "祐".
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/pEptj.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/pEptj.jpg)

"祐"'s radical is “示”. The Chinese characters with “示” usually related to religion or God in Chinese culture.
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/NBYkF.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/NBYkF.jpg)

So strictly speaking,
God bless America is 「天祐美國」.

But According to 【现代汉语词典】，"祐" is the same as "佑". You can use any one of both of them.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2020-03-16. Score: -1

Given the present President, I would say, 美国 could use all the help it can get!

Have a look [here](https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%A5%90/9473973?fr=aladdin).

祐,本作佑。  
yòu, originally written yòu


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2020-03-16. Score: -2

It's 「天佑美國」. As for 佑 vs 祐, take a look [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChineseLanguage/comments/68k7la/when_to_use_%E4%BD%91_vs_%E7%A5%90/)

> **Comments:**
> **username_7**: Would it be possible to [edit] this answer to give an explanation at this site?  As it stands it's a [link-only answer](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/225370/your-answer-is-in-another-castle-when-is-an-answer-not-an-answer).  I'm also unsure if Reddit is reliable.  

---

