<p>From the <a href="https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8E%86%E5%8F%B2%E5%94%AF%E7%89%A9%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89" rel="nofollow noreferrer">wikepedia page</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>历史唯物主义（英语：Historical Materialism）是马克思主义哲学的重要组成部分，也被称为唯物主义历史理论（materialist conception of history）或<strong>唯物史观</strong>。</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-23T05:39:12.330Z
马克思先生不信奉上帝了吗？ 'Materialism' means you only believe in the physical world. Marx died before Quantum Mechanics really started, or he may have reconsidered!
Pedroski
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-23T12:28:49.167Z
@Pedroski, And he would reconsider more if he was still living now! lol
dan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-29T06:33:43.610Z
@Pedroski Things don't need to be match their name. For example, the Queen rules the United Kingdom, but really?
Kevman
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-23T00:53:50.567Z
2017-09-23T00:53:50.567Z
fefe
<p>I can't quite see what the phrase 唯物史观 really means here. Could someone please reformulate it with other words or just longer?</p>

<p>任何一门学科，包括理科，都是知识体系和价值体系的结合统一。物理学科的科学精神、唯物史观，不都是思想教育的重要内容吗？ 所以，教育工作者要有整体的育人观念。</p>

<p>In the text 科学精神 and 唯物史观 are separated with a listing comma '、' for which I use 'and'.</p>

<p>唯物： materialistic ??<br>
史观： historically speaking ?? historical??</p>

<p>Maybe:<br>
物理学科的科学精神、唯物史观，<br>
the scientific mind of physics and (、) historical materialism,<br>
不都是思想教育的重要内容吗？<br>
are they not both important parts of ideological education?  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-23T01:05:20.477Z
不都是思想教育的重要内容吗？ is a rhetorical question. I am not sure if 'Aren't they ...?' and 'Are they not ...' take the same effect in English, for I saw people use "Aren't they..." for a rhetorical question most of time.
dan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-23T05:46:49.953Z
没有什么两样’aren't they' 和 ’are they not' 之间。 ’aren't they'也不一定修辞的
Pedroski
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-23T10:17:41.987Z
historical materialism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_materialism
Mou某
<meaning>
What does 唯物史观 mean here?
# What does 唯物史观 mean here?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-09-23)

I can't quite see what the phrase 唯物史观 really means here. Could someone please reformulate it with other words or just longer?

任何一门学科，包括理科，都是知识体系和价值体系的结合统一。物理学科的科学精神、唯物史观，不都是思想教育的重要内容吗？ 所以，教育工作者要有整体的育人观念。

In the text 科学精神 and 唯物史观 are separated with a listing comma '、' for which I use 'and'.

唯物： materialistic ??  
史观： historically speaking ?? historical??

Maybe:  
物理学科的科学精神、唯物史观，  
the scientific mind of physics and (、) historical materialism,  
不都是思想教育的重要内容吗？  
are they not both important parts of ideological education?

**Tags:** meaning

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: 不都是思想教育的重要内容吗？ is a rhetorical question. I am not sure if 'Aren't they ...?' and 'Are they not ...' take the same effect in English, for I saw people use "Aren't they..." for a rhetorical question most of time.  
> **username_0**: 没有什么两样’aren't they' 和 ’are they not' 之间。 ’aren't they'也不一定修辞的  
> **username_2**: historical materialism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_materialism  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-09-23. Score: 1

From the [wikepedia page](https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8E%86%E5%8F%B2%E5%94%AF%E7%89%A9%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89):

> 历史唯物主义（英语：Historical Materialism）是马克思主义哲学的重要组成部分，也被称为唯物主义历史理论（materialist conception of history）或**唯物史观**。

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: 马克思先生不信奉上帝了吗？ 'Materialism' means you only believe in the physical world. Marx died before Quantum Mechanics really started, or he may have reconsidered!  
> **username_1**: @username_0, And he would reconsider more if he was still living now! lol  
> **username_4**: @username_0 Things don't need to be match their name. For example, the Queen rules the United Kingdom, but really?  

---

