<p> U+2208E<br>
 U+26A73<br>
 U+25E37<br>
 U+24B79<br>
 U+20C09<br>
 U+22BBF<br>
 U+269F4<br>
 U+2272B<br>
 U+24350<br>
 U+220DB<br>
 U+247D4<br>
 U+23A52<br>
 U+29D56<br>
 U+2A1C7<br>
 U+29B31<br>
 U+24705<br>
﨣 U+FA23<br>
 U+25E9D<br>
髟＋忿？(not found) ( U+29B64 U+29B6E  U+29B09)<br>
 U+25E78</p>

<p>Most of them are in the block of "CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B".<br>
﨣 is in the block of "CJK Compatibility Ideographs".</p>

<p>If you cannot see some Chinese characters above, I suggest installing the <a href="http://fonts.jp/hanazono/" rel="noreferrer">Hanazono font, 花園明朝體</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-09T08:01:30.060Z
I'm not sure if this is a reference to ⿱髟忿 or not:  http://vietcenter.temple.edu/nlv/tttgaideos.php 2771::≪[髟忿]:⨂≫ (phẫn: x x) but that's the only thing I can find also
Mou某
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-10T03:18:36.007Z
Depending on the image, I think it's  U+29B64. Also, can you share your method?
Vincent J. Ruan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-10T03:26:50.443Z
Depending on the image, the description might be wrong. However, phonetically, the description is right (忿 is the phonetic part). So, perhaps there hasn't been this character in Unicode.
Vincent J. Ruan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-10T05:02:40.147Z
Also, 﨣 U+FA23 has a duplicate from Extension B:  U+27EAF.
Vincent J. Ruan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-10T12:53:39.423Z
1. Type out the characters using 倉頡輸入法 (Cang-Jie IM).
2. Search them on the [異體字知識庫](http://chardb.iis.sinica.edu.tw/).
hinen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-09T07:06:57.673Z
2017-03-09T07:06:57.673Z
hinen
<p>@hinen already answered the question. </p>

<p>I wanted to tackle this (you know, teach a man to fish and all that jazz):</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I personally can't find their Unicode encodings.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Your best bet is:</p>

<p><a href="http://zisea.com/zslf.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">字海·两分</a></p>

<p>you get a little search box like this:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/mD2O8.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/mD2O8.png" alt="hi"></a></p>

<p>let's take your first character for instance:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Left: 巾, Right: 由</p>
</blockquote>

<p>and then we search:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/tk9cL.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/tk9cL.png" alt="to"></a></p>

<p>as easy as that and we get:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/jfRgl.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/jfRgl.png" alt="okay"></a></p>

<p>then we can click on our character and see more details:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/SjKoG.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/SjKoG.png" alt="yup"></a></p>

<p>and we get our nice little:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>unicode码：2208E</p>
</blockquote>

<p>and</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>复制字符：</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Repeat process.</p>

<hr>

<p>p.s.: (Not all characters are broken down so easily - sometimes you'll need to use your noggin' to figure out the right components.)</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-09T08:10:18.227Z
2017-03-09T08:37:34.723Z
2017-03-09T08:37:34.723Z
Mou某
<p>I've found these characters in an old dictionary about Classical Chinese / Sino-Vietnamese / Vietnamese. Although they can be analyzed pictorially (I don't know better words), I personally can't find their Unicode encodings. So, I wonder whether they or their variants have been coded. Moreover, are they really Classical Chinese characters, or were they just mistaken to be Classical Chinese by some Vietnamese?</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/ehdbD.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Imgur album</a></p>

<p>Here are the description:</p>

<ol>
<li>Left: 巾, Right: 由</li>
<li>Left: 舟, Right: 者</li>
<li>Left: 米, Right: 欠</li>
<li>Left: 盎, Right: 瓦</li>
<li>Left: 口, Right: 召</li>
<li>Left: 扌, Right: 乖</li>
<li>Left: 舌, Right: 單</li>
<li>Left: 忄, Right: 省</li>
<li>Up: 推, Down: 火</li>
<li>Up: 其, Down: 巾</li>
<li>Left: 犭, Right: 長</li>
<li>Left: 歹, Right: 曹</li>
<li>Left: 魚, Right: 小</li>
<li>Left: 僉, Right: 鳥</li>
<li>Up: 髟, Down: 兆</li>
<li>Left: 牜, Right: 霍</li>
<li>Left: 走, Right: 斗</li>
<li>Left: 米, Right: 周</li>
<li>Up: 髟, Down: 忿</li>
<li>Left: 米, Right: 孛</li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-09T08:01:51.973Z
I believe these are Chu Nom 字喃, which are Vietnam-coined phono-semantic characters (形聲字). All standard Chu Nom are included in Unicode CJK Ideographs Extension B, if not included earlier.
xuq01
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-10T04:46:53.313Z
@XuanruiQi First of all, Chu Nom does include a lot of intact Classical Chinese characters. Secondly, out of 19/20 found characters, according to Unicode sources, two are Chu Nom (the first two), three are from Kang Xi Dictionary (KXD), Taiwan and Chu Nom (3, 5, 20), one is Chu Nom and Taiwanese (number 6), one is from Hanyu Da Zidian (HDZ) and Taiwan (number 11), one is from HDZ (number 14), one is from Japan and UTC sources (number 17), the others (10) are from KXD and Taiwan. To conclude, I think almost all of these 20 characters are rare Classical Chinese.
Vincent J. Ruan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-10T05:01:07.930Z
@XuanruiQi Number 17 is also from Taiwan.
Vincent J. Ruan
<characters><traditional-characters><classical-chinese><character-identification>
Has Unicode included these Classical Chinese characters?
# Has Unicode included these Classical Chinese characters?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-03-09)

I've found these characters in an old dictionary about Classical Chinese / Sino-Vietnamese / Vietnamese. Although they can be analyzed pictorially (I don't know better words), I personally can't find their Unicode encodings. So, I wonder whether they or their variants have been coded. Moreover, are they really Classical Chinese characters, or were they just mistaken to be Classical Chinese by some Vietnamese?

[Imgur album](https://i.sstatic.net/ehdbD.jpg)

Here are the description:

1. Left: 巾, Right: 由
2. Left: 舟, Right: 者
3. Left: 米, Right: 欠
4. Left: 盎, Right: 瓦
5. Left: 口, Right: 召
6. Left: 扌, Right: 乖
7. Left: 舌, Right: 單
8. Left: 忄, Right: 省
9. Up: 推, Down: 火
10. Up: 其, Down: 巾
11. Left: 犭, Right: 長
12. Left: 歹, Right: 曹
13. Left: 魚, Right: 小
14. Left: 僉, Right: 鳥
15. Up: 髟, Down: 兆
16. Left: 牜, Right: 霍
17. Left: 走, Right: 斗
18. Left: 米, Right: 周
19. Up: 髟, Down: 忿
20. Left: 米, Right: 孛

**Tags:** characters, traditional-characters, classical-chinese, character-identification

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I believe these are Chu Nom 字喃, which are Vietnam-coined phono-semantic characters (形聲字). All standard Chu Nom are included in Unicode CJK Ideographs Extension B, if not included earlier.  
> **username_0**: @XuanruiQi First of all, Chu Nom does include a lot of intact Classical Chinese characters. Secondly, out of 19/20 found characters, according to Unicode sources, two are Chu Nom (the first two), three are from Kang Xi Dictionary (KXD), Taiwan and Chu Nom (3, 5, 20), one is Chu Nom and Taiwanese (number 6), one is from Hanyu Da Zidian (HDZ) and Taiwan (number 11), one is from HDZ (number 14), one is from Japan and UTC sources (number 17), the others (10) are from KXD and Taiwan. To conclude, I think almost all of these 20 characters are rare Classical Chinese.  
> **username_0**: @XuanruiQi Number 17 is also from Taiwan.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-03-09. Score: 10

U+2208E  
U+26A73  
U+25E37  
U+24B79  
U+20C09  
U+22BBF  
U+269F4  
U+2272B  
U+24350  
U+220DB  
U+247D4  
U+23A52  
U+29D56  
U+2A1C7  
U+29B31  
U+24705  
﨣 U+FA23  
U+25E9D  
髟＋忿？(not found) ( U+29B64 U+29B6E U+29B09)  
U+25E78

Most of them are in the block of "CJK Unified Ideographs Extension B".  
﨣 is in the block of "CJK Compatibility Ideographs".

If you cannot see some Chinese characters above, I suggest installing the [Hanazono font, 花園明朝體](http://fonts.jp/hanazono/).

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: I'm not sure if this is a reference to ⿱髟忿 or not:  http://vietcenter.temple.edu/nlv/tttgaideos.php 2771::≪[髟忿]:⨂≫ (phẫn: x x) but that's the only thing I can find also  
> **username_0**: Depending on the image, I think it's  U+29B64. Also, can you share your method?  
> **username_0**: Depending on the image, the description might be wrong. However, phonetically, the description is right (忿 is the phonetic part). So, perhaps there hasn't been this character in Unicode.  
> **username_0**: Also, 﨣 U+FA23 has a duplicate from Extension B:  U+27EAF.  
> **username_2**: 1. Type out the characters using 倉頡輸入法 (Cang-Jie IM). 2. Search them on the [異體字知識庫](http://chardb.iis.sinica.edu.tw/).  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-03-09. Score: 2

@username_2 already answered the question.

I wanted to tackle this (you know, teach a man to fish and all that jazz):

> I personally can't find their Unicode encodings.

Your best bet is:

[字海·两分](http://zisea.com/zslf.htm)

you get a little search box like this:

[![hi](https://i.sstatic.net/mD2O8.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/mD2O8.png)

let's take your first character for instance:

> Left: 巾, Right: 由

and then we search:

[![to](https://i.sstatic.net/tk9cL.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/tk9cL.png)

as easy as that and we get:

[![okay](https://i.sstatic.net/jfRgl.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/jfRgl.png)

then we can click on our character and see more details:

[![yup](https://i.sstatic.net/SjKoG.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/SjKoG.png)

and we get our nice little:

> unicode码：2208E

and

> 复制字符：

Repeat process.

---

p.s.: (Not all characters are broken down so easily - sometimes you'll need to use your noggin' to figure out the right components.)


---

