<p>Use <strong>同时 (at the same time)</strong> if you just want to state that the two are equally true.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，<strong>同时</strong>在「Website 2」上被称为「Name 2」。</p>
</blockquote>

<p><br>
Use <strong>反而 (instead) or 而 (and/but)</strong> if you want to stress the opposition between the two. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，<strong>而</strong>在「Website 2」上被称为「Name 2」。</p>
</blockquote>

<p><br>
You can avoid further repetitions by simplifying the second verb or using a synonym. I think you can also omit the location verb after the second 在: </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>而在 [ Website 1 ] （上）（它）叫 / 是 / 被称 [ Name 2 ]</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T11:23:15.840Z
I find it a bit strange that an adverb (同時) can be separated from a verb, but I think this or fefe's suggestion make the most sense in keeping the pair of clauses equal.
Patrick Dark
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T11:32:29.490Z
同时 can also be a conjunction. Some accepted English translations are "moreover" or "furthermore".
blackgreen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T11:38:49.267Z
Those words are adverbs. But apparently there's a concept called "conjunctive adverbs" in which an adverb functions as a conjunction.
Patrick Dark
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T12:05:50.077Z
Yeah, that might be it. IIRC 就 should be one of these too.
blackgreen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-29T11:50:43.520Z
2017-11-29T11:57:57.700Z
2017-11-29T11:57:57.700Z
blackgreen
<p>Or simply, 这首歌在 <em>新浪</em> 上名为"你好"， 在<em>搜狐</em>上为"你好吗". </p>

<p>新浪 and 搜狐 are the names of websites. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T11:39:16.437Z
Upvoted for the vocabulary. I'd rather keep the symmetry of identical verbs though since I apparently can't eliminate the second one.
Patrick Dark
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T13:46:00.627Z
@PatrickDark, from the symmetry standpoint, you can put 这首歌在 新浪 上名为"你好"， 在 搜狐 上名为"你好吗“ 。
dan
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-30T02:36:23.933Z
2017-11-30T02:36:23.933Z
dan
<p>You can use '而 ~ 则 ' (and then) structure</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，<strong>而</strong>在「Website 2」上<strong>则</strong>被称为「Name 2」</p>
</blockquote>

<p>or simply use '则' (then)</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，在「Website 2」上<strong>则</strong>被称为「Name 2」</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You can also use '但 ~ 却' (but) structure</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，<strong>但</strong>在「Website 2」上<strong>却</strong>被称为「Name 2」</p>
</blockquote>

<p>or simply use '却' (but)</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>"这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，在「Website 2」上<strong>却</strong>被称为「Name 2」</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-12-01T11:28:21.753Z
Upvoted for the grammar points. I think these options put too much stress on the items being different when I want to simply indicate that there are multiple names, however.
Patrick Dark
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-29T13:23:41.820Z
2017-11-29T13:23:41.820Z
Tang Ho
<p>Consider the following two English sentences:</p>

<ol>
<li>The song is called "Name 1" on "Website 1".</li>
<li>The song is called "Name 2" on "Website 2".</li>
</ol>

<p>I can combine these two sentences to read:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The song is called "Name 1" on "Website 1" and "Name 2" on "Website 2".</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The subject and verb are dropped.</p>

<p>Now consider the same two sentences in Chinese:</p>

<ol>
<li>這首歌在「Website 1」上線被稱為「Name 1」。 </li>
<li>這首歌在「Website 2」上線被稱為「Name 2」。</li>
</ol>

<p>How do I similarly join clauses in Chinese if a different location is specified in the two clauses? Does it work the same as if no location was specified (i.e., just use 和)?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>這首歌在「Website 1」上線被稱為「Name 1」和在「Website 2」上線「Name 2」。</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The preceding text seems like it may be incorrect to me because the omitted verb occurs between the location and object.</p>

<p>It seems that I can also use 也, but that apparently requires repeating the verb, which I’d like to avoid to reduce verbosity:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>這首歌在「Website 1」上線被稱為「Name 1」, 也在「Website 2」上線被稱為「Name 2」。</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-30T02:39:19.520Z
I do not think you can use "和" or "也" here. You just use a comma, or use "而".
fefe
<grammar>
How do I avoid repetitions when combining two sentences with the same subject and verb?
# How do I avoid repetitions when combining two sentences with the same subject and verb?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-11-29)

Consider the following two English sentences:

1. The song is called "Name 1" on "Website 1".
2. The song is called "Name 2" on "Website 2".

I can combine these two sentences to read:

> The song is called "Name 1" on "Website 1" and "Name 2" on "Website 2".

The subject and verb are dropped.

Now consider the same two sentences in Chinese:

1. 這首歌在「Website 1」上線被稱為「Name 1」。
2. 這首歌在「Website 2」上線被稱為「Name 2」。

How do I similarly join clauses in Chinese if a different location is specified in the two clauses? Does it work the same as if no location was specified (i.e., just use 和)?

> 這首歌在「Website 1」上線被稱為「Name 1」和在「Website 2」上線「Name 2」。

The preceding text seems like it may be incorrect to me because the omitted verb occurs between the location and object.

It seems that I can also use 也, but that apparently requires repeating the verb, which I’d like to avoid to reduce verbosity:

> 這首歌在「Website 1」上線被稱為「Name 1」, 也在「Website 2」上線被稱為「Name 2」。

**Tags:** grammar

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I do not think you can use "和" or "也" here. You just use a comma, or use "而".  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-11-29. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Use **同时 (at the same time)** if you just want to state that the two are equally true.

> 这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，**同时**在「Website 2」上被称为「Name 2」。

Use **反而 (instead) or 而 (and/but)** if you want to stress the opposition between the two.

> 这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，**而**在「Website 2」上被称为「Name 2」。

You can avoid further repetitions by simplifying the second verb or using a synonym. I think you can also omit the location verb after the second 在:

> 而在 [ Website 1 ] （上）（它）叫 / 是 / 被称 [ Name 2 ]

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I find it a bit strange that an adverb (同時) can be separated from a verb, but I think this or username_1's suggestion make the most sense in keeping the pair of clauses equal.  
> **username_2**: 同时 can also be a conjunction. Some accepted English translations are "moreover" or "furthermore".  
> **username_0**: Those words are adverbs. But apparently there's a concept called "conjunctive adverbs" in which an adverb functions as a conjunction.  
> **username_2**: Yeah, that might be it. IIRC 就 should be one of these too.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-11-30. Score: 2

Or simply, 这首歌在 *新浪* 上名为"你好"， 在*搜狐*上为"你好吗".

新浪 and 搜狐 are the names of websites.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Upvoted for the vocabulary. I'd rather keep the symmetry of identical verbs though since I apparently can't eliminate the second one.  
> **username_3**: @username_0, from the symmetry standpoint, you can put 这首歌在 新浪 上名为"你好"， 在 搜狐 上名为"你好吗“ 。  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2017-11-29. Score: 1

You can use '而 ~ 则 ' (and then) structure

> "这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，**而**在「Website 2」上**则**被称为「Name 2」

or simply use '则' (then)

> "这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，在「Website 2」上**则**被称为「Name 2」

You can also use '但 ~ 却' (but) structure

> "这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，**但**在「Website 2」上**却**被称为「Name 2」

or simply use '却' (but)

> "这首歌在「Website 1」上被称为「Name 1」，在「Website 2」上**却**被称为「Name 2」

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Upvoted for the grammar points. I think these options put too much stress on the items being different when I want to simply indicate that there are multiple names, however.  

---

