<p>So, I did some research, and although I never found anything that specifically said "This is why you shouldn't tool chrome-tanned leather," the information that I did find suggests a reason.</p>

<p>Lots of resources describe the difference between chrome- and vegetable-tanning.  I think this quote (from the <a href="http://www.goldbarkleather.com/selecting-the-right-leather-for-your-project" rel="nofollow noreferrer">GoldBark Leather site</a>) summarizes things pretty well:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>There’s a lot that goes into each of these tanning processes. What’s important to know is that one uses vegetal oils (from tree bark) to tan and another uses chemicals (chromium) to tan it. Vegetal tanned leather, generally referred to as veg tan, takes a longer amount of time to create, is considered higher quality, and therefore costs more. Chrome tanned leather has a quicker turn around time and therefore costs less.</p>
  
  <p>The end product of these two processes are drastically different. Veg tan is generally thicker, more firm, and more durable. It’s the kind of leather you see in a nice pair of leather shoes. Chrome tanned is thin, very stretchy, and less durable. It’s the kind of leather that you see in a car that has a leather interior.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The <a href="http://www.carryology.com/insights/chrome-vs-vegetable-tanned-leather/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Carryology site</a> also has some interesting information about the actual chemical processes and how they differ. It explains that in vegetable tanning, tannin molecules displace the water molecules that are bound into the collagen within the leather. In chrome-tanning, chrome molecules replace the water molecules within the collagen. It goes on to explain:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>chrome ions displacing the water and binding with the collagen are much smaller than vegetable tanning molecules. This generally makes chrome tanned leather thinner and softer than vegetable tanned leather.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Because I don't know anything about tooling leather, I did some searching about that process, and ran across some good information on <a href="https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/tooling-and-stamping-leather.752239/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this forum posting</a>. From the fourth entry:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>You simply can't tool, carve, or stamp Latigo or oil softened leather
  like you tried to use.</p>
  
  <p>You need to start with Vegetable Tanned Tooling Leather. It's almost
  white, and almost hard when you buy it.</p>
  
  <p>Then wet it damp, but not soaking wet. Then wrap it in a towel and let
  it set for an hour or so to 'case' it. That allows the moisture to
  work through the leather fibers and prepare it for tooling.</p>
  
  <p>Once it reaches damp, but not dry enough to turn light color again.
  You can carve &amp; stamp it to your hearts content. It takes tooling,
  molding, and shaping around a gun almost like modeling clay!</p>
  
  <p>Then once dry and oiled, it will retaing the stamping &amp; shaping
  forever.</p>
  
  <p>Avoid belly and leg cuts as it is soft &amp; stretchy and will not retain
  its shape.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Once I read this information, it seems obvious why chrome-tanned leather won't work well.  Chrome-tanning reduces exactly those elements that make a piece of leather appropriate for tooling--thickness and stiffness.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-10-12T17:50:47.380Z
2017-10-12T17:50:47.380Z
magerber
<p>It seems to be common knowledge in the leather working community that chrome tanned leather doesn't work for tooling, I.E. carving and debossing, but I've never seen any explanation as to why this is so.</p>

<p><strong>What properties does chrome tanned leather have that make it unsuitable for tooling, and how does the process of chrome tanning give it these properties when vegetable tanning does not?</strong></p>

<leather>
Why can't you tool chrome-tanned leather?
walrus
# Why can't you tool chrome-tanned leather?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-10-12)

It seems to be common knowledge in the leather working community that chrome tanned leather doesn't work for tooling, I.E. carving and debossing, but I've never seen any explanation as to why this is so.

**What properties does chrome tanned leather have that make it unsuitable for tooling, and how does the process of chrome tanning give it these properties when vegetable tanning does not?**

**Tags:** leather


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-10-12. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

So, I did some research, and although I never found anything that specifically said "This is why you shouldn't tool chrome-tanned leather," the information that I did find suggests a reason.

Lots of resources describe the difference between chrome- and vegetable-tanning. I think this quote (from the [GoldBark Leather site](http://www.goldbarkleather.com/selecting-the-right-leather-for-your-project)) summarizes things pretty well:

> There’s a lot that goes into each of these tanning processes. What’s important to know is that one uses vegetal oils (from tree bark) to tan and another uses chemicals (chromium) to tan it. Vegetal tanned leather, generally referred to as veg tan, takes a longer amount of time to create, is considered higher quality, and therefore costs more. Chrome tanned leather has a quicker turn around time and therefore costs less.
>
> The end product of these two processes are drastically different. Veg tan is generally thicker, more firm, and more durable. It’s the kind of leather you see in a nice pair of leather shoes. Chrome tanned is thin, very stretchy, and less durable. It’s the kind of leather that you see in a car that has a leather interior.

The [Carryology site](http://www.carryology.com/insights/chrome-vs-vegetable-tanned-leather/) also has some interesting information about the actual chemical processes and how they differ. It explains that in vegetable tanning, tannin molecules displace the water molecules that are bound into the collagen within the leather. In chrome-tanning, chrome molecules replace the water molecules within the collagen. It goes on to explain:

> chrome ions displacing the water and binding with the collagen are much smaller than vegetable tanning molecules. This generally makes chrome tanned leather thinner and softer than vegetable tanned leather.

Because I don't know anything about tooling leather, I did some searching about that process, and ran across some good information on [this forum posting](https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/tooling-and-stamping-leather.752239/). From the fourth entry:

> You simply can't tool, carve, or stamp Latigo or oil softened leather
> like you tried to use.
>
> You need to start with Vegetable Tanned Tooling Leather. It's almost
> white, and almost hard when you buy it.
>
> Then wet it damp, but not soaking wet. Then wrap it in a towel and let
> it set for an hour or so to 'case' it. That allows the moisture to
> work through the leather fibers and prepare it for tooling.
>
> Once it reaches damp, but not dry enough to turn light color again.
> You can carve & stamp it to your hearts content. It takes tooling,
> molding, and shaping around a gun almost like modeling clay!
>
> Then once dry and oiled, it will retaing the stamping & shaping
> forever.
>
> Avoid belly and leg cuts as it is soft & stretchy and will not retain
> its shape.

Once I read this information, it seems obvious why chrome-tanned leather won't work well. Chrome-tanning reduces exactly those elements that make a piece of leather appropriate for tooling--thickness and stiffness.


---

