<p>Its chemically stable oxide, thus non-combustible, does not rot, and fairly hard. </p>

<p>Clay ceramics (just ceramic covers a huge swath of materials) are very non-reactive, and fairly hard, both are exactly what you want for preservation. The clay used in these ceramics is what is left when you chemically remove everything else from rock, it is usually the most stable components, mostly oxides. Earthenware clay in particular is often iron rich which makes it even stronger. once refired the clay transforms into a solid mass, essentially a man made rock.</p>

<p>When you look at what destroys artifacts most don't apply or apply the least to clay ceramics. </p>

<ol>
<li><p>Rot/decomposition: not an option for clays nothing organics to rot</p></li>
<li><p>Combustion. again not an option for clays, they are already oxides, under the right condition heat can actually make them tougher.</p></li>
<li><p>Erosion, this still destroys clay ceramics just like anything else but clay is fairly resistant. It is fairly hard and strong, some stones and metals are more resistant, and these are likewise more likely to be preserved. </p></li>
<li><p>Corrosion, clay ceramics ar mostly chemically inert oxides, already in their lowest energy state, so they won't corrode or dissolve when exposed to water, so they survive better than most metallic metals, or ionic compounds. </p></li>
<li><p>Theft vs rarity, ceramics generally were not valuable enough to be stolen unlike gold or gemstones or even plain stone, which would survive as well if not better. They were also common enough that that were basically all over a human habitation. If you had a human civilization you usually had hundreds of millions of ceramics. In the case of bricks the homes themselves might be made of it. So they were abundant enough that there was a good chance some would end up in the right conditions to be preserved. </p></li>
</ol>

<p>there is one other feature that applies to clay tablets. When a library full of books burns down the books are destroyed, when a library full of clay tablets burns down they clay actually gets tougher much of the time. </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-20T04:47:32.267Z
2018-12-20T04:47:32.267Z
John
<p>I have a general question which may sound naive: archeologists eg in Ancient Greece take a lot of information from preserved pottery they found. What physical attributes of ceramic items made of clay make them so likely to be preserved?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-18T16:10:42.077Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceramic
trond hansen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-18T16:51:28.150Z
Ceramics are hard, strong, & generally chemically nonreactive. The fact that clay was used to make them was due to clay being abundant, easy to obtain & use.
Fred
CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-18T17:30:53.740Z
This question has been cross posted on SE History - [Why are ancient pottery items so well preserved?](https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/50214/why-are-ancient-pottery-items-so-well-preserved)
Fred
<minerals>
Preservation of clay items
user132290
# Preservation of clay items

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-12-18)

I have a general question which may sound naive: archeologists eg in Ancient Greece take a lot of information from preserved pottery they found. What physical attributes of ceramic items made of clay make them so likely to be preserved?

**Tags:** minerals

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceramic  
> **username_2**: Ceramics are hard, strong, & generally chemically nonreactive. The fact that clay was used to make them was due to clay being abundant, easy to obtain & use.  
> **username_2**: This question has been cross posted on SE History - [Why are ancient pottery items so well preserved?](https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/50214/why-are-ancient-pottery-items-so-well-preserved)  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-12-20. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

Its chemically stable oxide, thus non-combustible, does not rot, and fairly hard.

Clay ceramics (just ceramic covers a huge swath of materials) are very non-reactive, and fairly hard, both are exactly what you want for preservation. The clay used in these ceramics is what is left when you chemically remove everything else from rock, it is usually the most stable components, mostly oxides. Earthenware clay in particular is often iron rich which makes it even stronger. once refired the clay transforms into a solid mass, essentially a man made rock.

When you look at what destroys artifacts most don't apply or apply the least to clay ceramics.

1. Rot/decomposition: not an option for clays nothing organics to rot
2. Combustion. again not an option for clays, they are already oxides, under the right condition heat can actually make them tougher.
3. Erosion, this still destroys clay ceramics just like anything else but clay is fairly resistant. It is fairly hard and strong, some stones and metals are more resistant, and these are likewise more likely to be preserved.
4. Corrosion, clay ceramics ar mostly chemically inert oxides, already in their lowest energy state, so they won't corrode or dissolve when exposed to water, so they survive better than most metallic metals, or ionic compounds.
5. Theft vs rarity, ceramics generally were not valuable enough to be stolen unlike gold or gemstones or even plain stone, which would survive as well if not better. They were also common enough that that were basically all over a human habitation. If you had a human civilization you usually had hundreds of millions of ceramics. In the case of bricks the homes themselves might be made of it. So they were abundant enough that there was a good chance some would end up in the right conditions to be preserved.

there is one other feature that applies to clay tablets. When a library full of books burns down the books are destroyed, when a library full of clay tablets burns down they clay actually gets tougher much of the time.


---

