<p>The concept of rivers being the outcrop of an aquifer at the surface is a useful generalization, but tends to simplify the real world.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>The water level in a river can be higher than the water table in an aquifer. We would describe the river as 'losing' water and it would recharge the aquifer. So in that case channelization would reduce aquifer recharge and potentially lower the water table. As an example irrigation canals in arid areas are often quite leaky. Projects to line the canals to reduce leakage have frequently had the unintended consequence of cutting off local recharge to aquifers used by farmers adjacent to the canal.</p>
</li>
<li><p>If the water level in the aquifer is higher than the river we describe it as a 'gaining' river. Channelization would reduce river flow and lead to higher water tables in the aquifer. The consequence of the higher water tables might be increased spring or river flow in another part of the aquifer - or in the worst case emergence of water adjacent to the channelized section waterlogging the ground. The extreme case of filling up a whole region is improbable, as once levels rise enough the water will just flow back into the channel, or further rise will be balanced by evaporation from open water.</p>
</li>
<li><p>Stretches of river may change from losing to gaining, and vice versa, seasonally, or in response to changes in geology or topography over quite short distances. Natural river beds are often not seamlessly connected to the aquifers they run over; muds and silts on the river bed can reduce permeability and effectively cause natural channelization. Equally artificial channelization is rarely 100% effective and leak proof.</p>
</li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-17T06:39:11.727Z
To add to your answer, channelizing the river banks would isolate the groundwater from interacting with the river as you detailed above. Additionally, the groundwater would, however, back up against the concrete to some permeability-defined height and flow faster down gradient.
Knob Scratcher
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-26T11:53:25.263Z
2021-02-26T14:00:14.003Z
2021-02-26T14:00:14.003Z
Andy M
<p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but most rivers lie where <strong>the water table protrudes into open air.</strong> In other words, the water table level is exactly the same as the river water level. (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_table" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Wikipedia</a> has a good diagram.)</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/jvY5r.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/jvY5r.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>So now the question is, what happens if you channelize the river with impermeable walls and bed? E.g., <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_River" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the Los Angeles River</a>, which has concrete walls.</p>
<p>What happens to the isolated water table now? It is no longer free to drain into the river, so where does it go? Does it drain away more into the ground? Does it stay more saturated than normal until evaporation? And doesn't this produce dangerous ground conditions and bad environmental effects?</p>
<p>Water needs to follow some cycle, or it will just fill up more and more till the whole region is a flooded lake or ocean. So I'm trying to understand the water cycle in this case.</p>

<hydrology><rivers><water-table>
What effect does river channelization have on the surrounding water table?
DrZ214
# What effect does river channelization have on the surrounding water table?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-02-25)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but most rivers lie where **the water table protrudes into open air.** In other words, the water table level is exactly the same as the river water level. ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_table) has a good diagram.)

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/jvY5r.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/jvY5r.png)

So now the question is, what happens if you channelize the river with impermeable walls and bed? E.g., [the Los Angeles River](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_River), which has concrete walls.

What happens to the isolated water table now? It is no longer free to drain into the river, so where does it go? Does it drain away more into the ground? Does it stay more saturated than normal until evaporation? And doesn't this produce dangerous ground conditions and bad environmental effects?

Water needs to follow some cycle, or it will just fill up more and more till the whole region is a flooded lake or ocean. So I'm trying to understand the water cycle in this case.

**Tags:** hydrology, rivers, water-table


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-02-26. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

The concept of rivers being the outcrop of an aquifer at the surface is a useful generalization, but tends to simplify the real world.

1. The water level in a river can be higher than the water table in an aquifer. We would describe the river as 'losing' water and it would recharge the aquifer. So in that case channelization would reduce aquifer recharge and potentially lower the water table. As an example irrigation canals in arid areas are often quite leaky. Projects to line the canals to reduce leakage have frequently had the unintended consequence of cutting off local recharge to aquifers used by farmers adjacent to the canal.
2. If the water level in the aquifer is higher than the river we describe it as a 'gaining' river. Channelization would reduce river flow and lead to higher water tables in the aquifer. The consequence of the higher water tables might be increased spring or river flow in another part of the aquifer - or in the worst case emergence of water adjacent to the channelized section waterlogging the ground. The extreme case of filling up a whole region is improbable, as once levels rise enough the water will just flow back into the channel, or further rise will be balanced by evaporation from open water.
3. Stretches of river may change from losing to gaining, and vice versa, seasonally, or in response to changes in geology or topography over quite short distances. Natural river beds are often not seamlessly connected to the aquifers they run over; muds and silts on the river bed can reduce permeability and effectively cause natural channelization. Equally artificial channelization is rarely 100% effective and leak proof.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: To add to your answer, channelizing the river banks would isolate the groundwater from interacting with the river as you detailed above. Additionally, the groundwater would, however, back up against the concrete to some permeability-defined height and flow faster down gradient.  

---

