<p>What exactly are you trying to measure? some of the great North American and Andean batholiths have cooling histories of at least 20 million years, and maybe more than 50 million years. It is perhaps inappropriate to think of the crystallization process as having a single date. Phenocrysts near the top of the pluton are cooler, but may sink to deeper levels where they are partially resorbed or mantled in multiple cycles, giving rise to zoned phenocrysts. It can be a very long process. Generally, late stage pegmatites, which have been enriched in volatiles that depress the melting temperature, will indicate the youngest age of crystallization. Deeper levels of the magma chamber will be older, but really one needs to study the specific field relations, including extent of metamorphic aureole to decide upon the most appropriate younger or older samples. The middle will most probably give a reasonable average date. Remember, what you are measuring is the time of that the mineral cools through its 'closure temperature', which will be slightly to significantly younger than its time of crystallization.</p>

<p>As to the method of isotopic dating, K-Ar is generally OK but the relative error bounds get worryingly large for dates &lt; a million years. Ar-Ar is more precise but more expensive. It's also an excellent method, as is Rb-Sr, especially for really old precambrian plutons - provided the sample is fresh. Any weathering or diagenesis messes up the method. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T10:44:52.983Z
2015-12-06T10:44:52.983Z
Gordon Stanger
<p>The better site for sample collection would be the accessible site where it's possible to pick up a sample. Unless you have a drill rig or an excavator, you are limited to what's exposed. If you still have access to several zones of the pluton, take all of them. The more samples you have, the better it is. By choosing not to sample a certain zone you might be missing out on information.</p>

<p>The dating method should be zircon U-Pb dating, unless you have a very good reason why not to. Zircons are stable and robust, and with modern analytical methods it may be possible to resolve more than one age in a single zircon, representing for instance recycled detrital zircons.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-12-06T21:38:42.520Z
2015-12-06T21:38:42.520Z
Gimelist
<p>In selecting a sample for age-dating of a granite pluton, which site is a better site to collect a sample from, the centre, top or side? Why was this site a better choice? Which dating method would you recommend and why?</p>

<p>I know that it is better to get a sample from the middle but I'm stuck answering the last two questions.</p>

<p>Any help would be appreciated!</p>

<geochemistry><petrology><geochronology><orogeny><dating>
Relative dating of granite pluton
Hannah
# Relative dating of granite pluton

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-12-06)

In selecting a sample for age-dating of a granite pluton, which site is a better site to collect a sample from, the centre, top or side? Why was this site a better choice? Which dating method would you recommend and why?

I know that it is better to get a sample from the middle but I'm stuck answering the last two questions.

Any help would be appreciated!

**Tags:** geochemistry, petrology, geochronology, orogeny, dating


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-12-06. Score: 2

What exactly are you trying to measure? some of the great North American and Andean batholiths have cooling histories of at least 20 million years, and maybe more than 50 million years. It is perhaps inappropriate to think of the crystallization process as having a single date. Phenocrysts near the top of the pluton are cooler, but may sink to deeper levels where they are partially resorbed or mantled in multiple cycles, giving rise to zoned phenocrysts. It can be a very long process. Generally, late stage pegmatites, which have been enriched in volatiles that depress the melting temperature, will indicate the youngest age of crystallization. Deeper levels of the magma chamber will be older, but really one needs to study the specific field relations, including extent of metamorphic aureole to decide upon the most appropriate younger or older samples. The middle will most probably give a reasonable average date. Remember, what you are measuring is the time of that the mineral cools through its 'closure temperature', which will be slightly to significantly younger than its time of crystallization.

As to the method of isotopic dating, K-Ar is generally OK but the relative error bounds get worryingly large for dates < a million years. Ar-Ar is more precise but more expensive. It's also an excellent method, as is Rb-Sr, especially for really old precambrian plutons - provided the sample is fresh. Any weathering or diagenesis messes up the method.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-12-06. Score: 1

The better site for sample collection would be the accessible site where it's possible to pick up a sample. Unless you have a drill rig or an excavator, you are limited to what's exposed. If you still have access to several zones of the pluton, take all of them. The more samples you have, the better it is. By choosing not to sample a certain zone you might be missing out on information.

The dating method should be zircon U-Pb dating, unless you have a very good reason why not to. Zircons are stable and robust, and with modern analytical methods it may be possible to resolve more than one age in a single zircon, representing for instance recycled detrital zircons.


---

