<p>The suggestion above to check historical data to get an idea of the time to peak/ time of concentration, and a get sense of the general storm response time is a good one. There are also empirical methods to relate the catchment slope, runoff coefficient, etc. to the time to peak/ time of concentration, which sounds like what you are looking for. You can find examples of them in the <a href="http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/publications/drainage/hydrology/section10.shtml" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MTO Computational Methods</a> webpage, more localized ones might exist wherever you are located. Look for the section on time to peak, although you may need other definitions in there to determine your inputs to that calculation (such as catchment slope).</p>
<p>Keep in mind that 'runoff time' is not a specific term, and that the 'runoff time' for a full response may be extremely long, as nature tends to follow exponential responses trends with long tails in recession. However, the time to peak and time of concentration are more specific terms with definitions you can find and apply.</p>
<p>In terms of how long to run the simulation, depends again based on what you are doing. For a real storm, there may be subsequest rainfall events before the full response is seen. If you just need the peak, then 2-3x the estimated time to peak from the methods above would likely be fine, depending on how flashy the catchment is. If you are running a hydrologic model of sorts, then run it for a long time to see the full response to check the response hydrograph, and compare that to real data to help validate your model.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-07-24T19:31:37.777Z
2020-07-24T19:31:37.777Z
Rob
<p>I want to use an rainfall-runoff model for pluvial flash floods and need to choose for my synthetic rain event the appropriate duration. In the literature it often says that the chosen duration should be as long or twice as long as the runoff time from the beginning of the runoff until out of the catchment. </p>

<p>How do I estimate the runoff time? Perhaps somehow by considering the catchment area or the topography?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-04-25T06:16:46.770Z
Is this a totally artificial system? Because it would make more sense to me to look at historic data to get the actual duration of rainfall events. Then preferably run a stochastic suite of simulations.
haresfur
<hydrology><models>
How to estimate the runoff time for my area?
DGIS
# How to estimate the runoff time for my area?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-04-23)

I want to use an rainfall-runoff model for pluvial flash floods and need to choose for my synthetic rain event the appropriate duration. In the literature it often says that the chosen duration should be as long or twice as long as the runoff time from the beginning of the runoff until out of the catchment.

How do I estimate the runoff time? Perhaps somehow by considering the catchment area or the topography?

**Tags:** hydrology, models

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Is this a totally artificial system? Because it would make more sense to me to look at historic data to get the actual duration of rainfall events. Then preferably run a stochastic suite of simulations.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-07-24. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

The suggestion above to check historical data to get an idea of the time to peak/ time of concentration, and a get sense of the general storm response time is a good one. There are also empirical methods to relate the catchment slope, runoff coefficient, etc. to the time to peak/ time of concentration, which sounds like what you are looking for. You can find examples of them in the [MTO Computational Methods](http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/publications/drainage/hydrology/section10.shtml) webpage, more localized ones might exist wherever you are located. Look for the section on time to peak, although you may need other definitions in there to determine your inputs to that calculation (such as catchment slope).

Keep in mind that 'runoff time' is not a specific term, and that the 'runoff time' for a full response may be extremely long, as nature tends to follow exponential responses trends with long tails in recession. However, the time to peak and time of concentration are more specific terms with definitions you can find and apply.

In terms of how long to run the simulation, depends again based on what you are doing. For a real storm, there may be subsequest rainfall events before the full response is seen. If you just need the peak, then 2-3x the estimated time to peak from the methods above would likely be fine, depending on how flashy the catchment is. If you are running a hydrologic model of sorts, then run it for a long time to see the full response to check the response hydrograph, and compare that to real data to help validate your model.


---

