<p>Yes and no. The Earth's hot inner core is one of many factors that contribute to the theory of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth_hypothesis#With_plate_tectonics" rel="nofollow">Rare Earth</a> indirectly. Since the potential temperature difference is what drives mantle convection (well density, but density depends on both pressure and temperature), the cold lithosphere and the hot core are absolutely necessary for the development of complex life if you take Darwin's theory of evolution to be the primary driver of speciation. Though, I'm sure there are other environments where life can emerge (I'm hoping one day we will find methanogenic life on Titan, that would be cool).</p>

<p>As winwaed also mentioned, the hot inner core is surrounded by a chaotically convecting liquid core which produces the Earth's magnetic field, undoubtedly important to life. </p>

<p><em>Edit for further explanation on the link between evolution and the potential temperature difference between the core and lithosphere:</em></p>

<p>While this goes a bit out of my expertise, the Theory of Evolution requires a diversity of environments in which random mutations naturally give a species an advantage over another. Plate tectonics enhances this diversity, by not only transporting land to different climates but also making new ones (arc volcanism).  Without the temperature difference between the core and the lithosphere, we would not have mantle convection, which is the fundamental driver of plate tectonics. So while the temperature of the core is not directly necessary for life, it has allowed for a much more diverse speciation on this planet. This, of course, has other implications (such as surviving catastrophic extinction) but those I feel are outside the scope of this question. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T01:25:37.963Z
Can you explain how darwinian evolution requires a temperature difference between the crust and core?
naught101
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T01:58:58.563Z
Yes, although its a bit tangential as i tried to imply in my previous explanation.
Neo
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T02:07:50.337Z
I think it makes the answer much clearer, thanks! My impression is that it's not actually a requirement, but that speciation would be a lot slower without it.
naught101
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T06:39:53.803Z
Natural selection does not necessarily implies a diversity of environments as competition between organisms is also a form of selection. And diversity of environments is independant of plate tectonics. I'm not saying that plate tectonics does not have an importance vis-à-vis life (it might, through volcanism for instance) but not for that reason. The explanation given by @winwaed in his comments is probably more of importance for the apparition of life as you noted.
plannapus
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T07:31:32.837Z
Of course as a micropaleontologist (studying fossil plankton) I am biased since plankton managed to become very diverse in a very homogenic environment (the so-called Paradox of the Plankton).
plannapus
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T00:45:27.993Z
2014-04-17T07:29:54.470Z
2014-04-17T07:29:54.470Z
Neo
<p>The liquid outer core and the magnetic field it generates are essential to life. Without the magnetic field we would have no atmosphere. The temperatures would be roughly equal to the moon (Which goes from 123 C on the hemisphere that happens to face the sun and -153 C on the shadowed hemisphere).</p>

<p>Source for moon temperatures:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.space.com/18175-moon-temperature.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.space.com/18175-moon-temperature.html</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T11:20:51.480Z
2014-04-17T11:20:51.480Z
tobias47n9e
<p>The earth would be dead without a molten core. There would be no volcanoes, earthquakes etc no plate tectonics. Any material eroded from mountains would eventually end up at the bottom of the sea, and then stay there. Eventually there would be no land above sea level. Erosion would continue until we are left with nothing but deep seas with little or no mineral nutrients. Not great for a rich diversity of life.</p>

<p>So when we hear of the natural disasters of volcanoes and earthquakes, appreciate that the very earth is alive and sustaining us. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-19T22:26:26.680Z
2018-02-19T22:26:26.680Z
Jason Farmer
<p>The theory of a Gravity Induced Lapse Rate proposed by Loschmidt (1876) suggests that all planetary bodies will have a temperature gradient in their atmosphere AND in the solid structure of the planet all the way to the core. If this theory is correct then the hot inner core of planets with an atmosphere is a common feature of all such bodies. It is (we think) obviously the case that life does not form on all such bodies but only on a select few. The features of the hot core, cooler surface &amp; gaseous atmosphere would not then be the deciding factor as to whether we have a lifeless planet or not.
If we assume, like the question, that life requires a certain temperature range then the main deciding factor will be the surface temperature as we expect life to be moving, swimming or flying about pretty close to the surface (generally). The 2 main deciding factors would be distance from the star and composition of the atmosphere, next factor is probably rotational speed on axis. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-24T22:45:54.037Z
2017-04-24T22:45:54.037Z
user7733
<p>A molten core is essential for the survival of life on Earth as we know it. The molten core of our planet is responsible for generating a magnetic field that shields the surface from harmful solar radiation and cosmic rays. Without this protective magnetic field, the Earth's atmosphere would be stripped away, and life would likely not be able to survive.</p>
<p>In addition, the molten core plays a critical role in regulating the Earth's climate and maintaining a stable environment for life to thrive. Without the heat generated by the core, the Earth's surface would be much colder and less hospitable to life. The movement of the molten material in the core also helps to drive the motion of the tectonic plates, which plays a critical role in the cycling of nutrients and the regulation of the carbon cycle, which are both important for life on Earth.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-06-22T10:16:53.013Z
2023-06-22T10:16:53.013Z
Chan
<p>Whether the high temperatures of the core is strictly necessary to maintain a habitable temperature at the surface I'm not sure, as the global temperatures are largely controlled by insolation and the greenhouse effect. The black-body radiation temperature of the Earth is about -18&#8239;&#176;C, and even a more realistic estimate of the surface temperature without an atmosphere is around 1&#8239;&#176;C [1]. That being said, it depends on what you define as life, if the Earth had no atmosphere the temperature would have been lower, but organisms would have adapted to that if they existed in the first place.</p>

<p>As Neo and winwaed also mentioned, the molten iron in the core does protect organisms against harmful radiation from the sun, by providing the Earth with a shielding magnetic field.</p>

<p>Also, the hot core and mantle most likely did influence the origin of life to begin with, as near hydrothermal vents in the ocean floor conditions might have been or are suitable for spontaneous reactions that lead to the formation of self-reproducing molecules [2]. Note this is not in the Darwinian sense Neo talks about (Darwin's book is called <em>On the Origin of <strong>Species</strong></em>, not <em>On the Origin of Life</em>), but in the microbiological and geological sense.</p>

<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation#Temperature_of_Earth">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation#Temperature_of_Earth</a><br>
[2] Martin, W., J. Baross, D. Kelley, M.J. Russell (2008) <em><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1991">Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life</a></em>. Nature</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-02-20T16:20:16.710Z
I think that perhaps the most important point is missing here: The fact that the hot interior drives tectonics and volcanism, that are an essential part of the carbon cycle negative feedback (weathering-volcanism) that is thought to be responsible of keeping Earth's temperature in the range of liquid water for millions of years (Faint young Sun paradox), therefore allowing life to evolve in a relatively stable environment for billions of years.
Camilo Rada
CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-06-25T12:23:12.730Z
worth mentioning the radiation is really only a problem for land life, most of the life on earth lives in the ocean, and water isa very good radiation shield. Since life began in the ocean radiation might not stop life.
John
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T07:17:07.893Z
2014-04-17T07:17:07.893Z
hugovdberg
<p>The inner core of the Earth has an enormous temperature of around 4300 degrees Celsius.  Is this large inner core temperature an important factor contributing to the ideal temperature that is necessary to maintain life as we know it on the Earth's outer-crust and atmosphere, or is the temperature of the core quite irrelevant to the temperature on the Earth's crust?
<img src="https://i.sstatic.net/UbOw1.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-09-10T22:38:08.677Z
since it drives plate tectonics yes it is necessary for current oxygen loving life.  https://phys.org/news/2014-06-earth-breathable-atmosphere-tied-plate.html
John
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T00:41:32.193Z
A partial molten core is necessary for a strong magnetic field - this will help shield the Earth's surface from cosmic radiation
winwaed
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-04-17T06:47:19.700Z
According to [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_core#Temperature_and_pressure) the temperature is around 5600K so ~5300°C.
hugovdberg
<climate><temperature><core>
Is the Earth's hot inner core necessary for life?
Kenshin
# Is the Earth's hot inner core necessary for life?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2014-04-17)

The inner core of the Earth has an enormous temperature of around 4300 degrees Celsius. Is this large inner core temperature an important factor contributing to the ideal temperature that is necessary to maintain life as we know it on the Earth's outer-crust and atmosphere, or is the temperature of the core quite irrelevant to the temperature on the Earth's crust?
![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/UbOw1.jpg)

**Tags:** climate, temperature, core

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: A partial molten core is necessary for a strong magnetic field - this will help shield the Earth's surface from cosmic radiation  
> **username_3**: According to [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_core#Temperature_and_pressure) the temperature is around 5600K so ~5300°C.  
> **username_1**: since it drives plate tectonics yes it is necessary for current oxygen loving life.  https://phys.org/news/2014-06-earth-breathable-atmosphere-tied-plate.html  

---

## 6 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2014-04-17. Score: 13 | Accepted answer

Whether the high temperatures of the core is strictly necessary to maintain a habitable temperature at the surface I'm not sure, as the global temperatures are largely controlled by insolation and the greenhouse effect. The black-body radiation temperature of the Earth is about -18 °C, and even a more realistic estimate of the surface temperature without an atmosphere is around 1 °C [1]. That being said, it depends on what you define as life, if the Earth had no atmosphere the temperature would have been lower, but organisms would have adapted to that if they existed in the first place.

As Neo and username_2 also mentioned, the molten iron in the core does protect organisms against harmful radiation from the sun, by providing the Earth with a shielding magnetic field.

Also, the hot core and mantle most likely did influence the origin of life to begin with, as near hydrothermal vents in the ocean floor conditions might have been or are suitable for spontaneous reactions that lead to the formation of self-reproducing molecules [2]. Note this is not in the Darwinian sense Neo talks about (Darwin's book is called *On the Origin of **Species***, not *On the Origin of Life*), but in the microbiological and geological sense.

[1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation#Temperature_of_Earth>  
[2] Martin, W., J. Baross, D. Kelley, M.J. Russell (2008) *[Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life](http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1991)*. Nature

> **Comments:**
> **username_11**: I think that perhaps the most important point is missing here: The fact that the hot interior drives tectonics and volcanism, that are an essential part of the carbon cycle negative feedback (weathering-volcanism) that is thought to be responsible of keeping Earth's temperature in the range of liquid water for millions of years (Faint young Sun paradox), therefore allowing life to evolve in a relatively stable environment for billions of years.  
> **username_1**: worth mentioning the radiation is really only a problem for land life, most of the life on earth lives in the ocean, and water isa very good radiation shield. Since life began in the ocean radiation might not stop life.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2014-04-17. Score: 6

Yes and no. The Earth's hot inner core is one of many factors that contribute to the theory of [Rare Earth](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth_hypothesis#With_plate_tectonics) indirectly. Since the potential temperature difference is what drives mantle convection (well density, but density depends on both pressure and temperature), the cold lithosphere and the hot core are absolutely necessary for the development of complex life if you take Darwin's theory of evolution to be the primary driver of speciation. Though, I'm sure there are other environments where life can emerge (I'm hoping one day we will find methanogenic life on Titan, that would be cool).

As username_2 also mentioned, the hot inner core is surrounded by a chaotically convecting liquid core which produces the Earth's magnetic field, undoubtedly important to life.

*Edit for further explanation on the link between evolution and the potential temperature difference between the core and lithosphere:*

While this goes a bit out of my expertise, the Theory of Evolution requires a diversity of environments in which random mutations naturally give a species an advantage over another. Plate tectonics enhances this diversity, by not only transporting land to different climates but also making new ones (arc volcanism). Without the temperature difference between the core and the lithosphere, we would not have mantle convection, which is the fundamental driver of plate tectonics. So while the temperature of the core is not directly necessary for life, it has allowed for a much more diverse speciation on this planet. This, of course, has other implications (such as surviving catastrophic extinction) but those I feel are outside the scope of this question.

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: Can you explain how darwinian evolution requires a temperature difference between the crust and core?  
> **username_4**: Yes, although its a bit tangential as i tried to imply in my previous explanation.  
> **username_5**: I think it makes the answer much clearer, thanks! My impression is that it's not actually a requirement, but that speciation would be a lot slower without it.  
> **username_6**: Natural selection does not necessarily implies a diversity of environments as competition between organisms is also a form of selection. And diversity of environments is independant of plate tectonics. I'm not saying that plate tectonics does not have an importance vis-à-vis life (it might, through volcanism for instance) but not for that reason. The explanation given by @username_2 in his comments is probably more of importance for the apparition of life as you noted.  
> **username_6**: Of course as a micropaleontologist (studying fossil plankton) I am biased since plankton managed to become very diverse in a very homogenic environment (the so-called Paradox of the Plankton).  

---

### Answer by username_7 on 2014-04-17. Score: 5

The liquid outer core and the magnetic field it generates are essential to life. Without the magnetic field we would have no atmosphere. The temperatures would be roughly equal to the moon (Which goes from 123 C on the hemisphere that happens to face the sun and -153 C on the shadowed hemisphere).

Source for moon temperatures:

<http://www.space.com/18175-moon-temperature.html>


---

### Answer by username_8 on 2018-02-19. Score: 3

The earth would be dead without a molten core. There would be no volcanoes, earthquakes etc no plate tectonics. Any material eroded from mountains would eventually end up at the bottom of the sea, and then stay there. Eventually there would be no land above sea level. Erosion would continue until we are left with nothing but deep seas with little or no mineral nutrients. Not great for a rich diversity of life.

So when we hear of the natural disasters of volcanoes and earthquakes, appreciate that the very earth is alive and sustaining us.


---

### Answer by username_9 on 2017-04-24. Score: -1

The theory of a Gravity Induced Lapse Rate proposed by Loschmidt (1876) suggests that all planetary bodies will have a temperature gradient in their atmosphere AND in the solid structure of the planet all the way to the core. If this theory is correct then the hot inner core of planets with an atmosphere is a common feature of all such bodies. It is (we think) obviously the case that life does not form on all such bodies but only on a select few. The features of the hot core, cooler surface & gaseous atmosphere would not then be the deciding factor as to whether we have a lifeless planet or not.
If we assume, like the question, that life requires a certain temperature range then the main deciding factor will be the surface temperature as we expect life to be moving, swimming or flying about pretty close to the surface (generally). The 2 main deciding factors would be distance from the star and composition of the atmosphere, next factor is probably rotational speed on axis.


---

### Answer by username_10 on 2023-06-22. Score: -2

A molten core is essential for the survival of life on Earth as we know it. The molten core of our planet is responsible for generating a magnetic field that shields the surface from harmful solar radiation and cosmic rays. Without this protective magnetic field, the Earth's atmosphere would be stripped away, and life would likely not be able to survive.

In addition, the molten core plays a critical role in regulating the Earth's climate and maintaining a stable environment for life to thrive. Without the heat generated by the core, the Earth's surface would be much colder and less hospitable to life. The movement of the molten material in the core also helps to drive the motion of the tectonic plates, which plays a critical role in the cycling of nutrients and the regulation of the carbon cycle, which are both important for life on Earth.


---

