<p>As Jan points out, there are many other factors in the oxygen balance, not just trees. But for a bit of fun, let us suppose that we burn all the trees on the planet. The global biomass of carbon is estimated as 47.4 PgC (it varies a bit according to season and inter-annual growth conditions). Of this we can estimate that the contribution from trees is about 36.3 PgC. 1 tonne of carbon consumes 2.67 tonnes of oxygen to create CO2, so the oxygen consumed is about 9.68 x 10^^10 tonnes. The total mass of the atmosphere is known to be 5.15 Petatonnes, of which oxygen is 20.95%, or 1.08 Petatonnes of oxygen. So taking the ratio, the loss of atmospheric oxygen from burning all the trees is 0.0034%. This is far less than the day-to-day fluctuations in available oxygen due to changes in atmospheric pressure - i.e. the weather. </p>

<p>So, there is a lot of woody biomass, but think of the partial pressure of the oxygen layer that wraps the Earth: 21.2 kPa O2 on every square centimetre of the Earth's surface. We are never going to run out of oxygen! On the other hand, pyrolysis of every tree on the planet would create so much smoke that we would probably all die of lung cancer!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-14T09:14:22.743Z
Thanks for that answer, I'm not sure who voted it down or why however!
Steji
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-09T23:40:10.767Z
2016-12-09T23:40:10.767Z
Gordon Stanger
<p>I was wondering about how much unchecked deforestation would have to occur before we tipped the balance and started using more oxygen than was being replenished by plants and trees.</p>

<p>Last I heard it was estimated that every day an area the size of Wales was being removed globally which sounds like a very large amount. This could be inaccurate now as it was a long time ago. Many companies now plant trees to offset carbon footprint or whatever but assuming they didn't how long would we have?</p>

<p>My question could be reduced to this - what area of land would need to be covered by forest to sustain life on earth without us all suffocating?</p>

<p>I imagine that this is a very simplistic view, it would probably cause global warming to accelerate first or the ecosystem to collapse and we'd all starve. I should say at this point that I am no scientist!</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-07T10:27:06.950Z
You are forgetting that large percentages of our oxygen are generated by plankton in the sea, and by land plants other than trees (including agricultural species). Still interesting to see a breakdown of the numbers though.
Jan Doggen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-07T10:29:38.453Z
Related: http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/4574/how-is-equilibrium-of-21-of-oxygen-in-atmosphere-established and http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/4425/why-does-earth-have-abundant-oxygen-in-the-atmosphere and http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/4346/how-much-of-earths-molecular-oxygen-in-the-atmosphere-is-due-to-plants and especially http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/8930/percentage-of-oxgen-left-after-burning-all-the-available-biomass. Hint: Search before asking
Jan Doggen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-07T11:59:40.597Z
Thanks for the links Jan, I did search beforehand but my understanding of the bigger picture is limited as I stated and none of this showed up in my search.
Steji
<oxygen><deforestation>
What rate of deforestation would be needed until we run out of oxygen?
Steji
# What rate of deforestation would be needed until we run out of oxygen?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-12-07)

I was wondering about how much unchecked deforestation would have to occur before we tipped the balance and started using more oxygen than was being replenished by plants and trees.

Last I heard it was estimated that every day an area the size of Wales was being removed globally which sounds like a very large amount. This could be inaccurate now as it was a long time ago. Many companies now plant trees to offset carbon footprint or whatever but assuming they didn't how long would we have?

My question could be reduced to this - what area of land would need to be covered by forest to sustain life on earth without us all suffocating?

I imagine that this is a very simplistic view, it would probably cause global warming to accelerate first or the ecosystem to collapse and we'd all starve. I should say at this point that I am no scientist!

**Tags:** oxygen, deforestation

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: You are forgetting that large percentages of our oxygen are generated by plankton in the sea, and by land plants other than trees (including agricultural species). Still interesting to see a breakdown of the numbers though.  
> **username_1**: Related: http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/4574/how-is-equilibrium-of-21-of-oxygen-in-atmosphere-established and http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/4425/why-does-earth-have-abundant-oxygen-in-the-atmosphere and http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/4346/how-much-of-earths-molecular-oxygen-in-the-atmosphere-is-due-to-plants and especially http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/8930/percentage-of-oxgen-left-after-burning-all-the-available-biomass. Hint: Search before asking  
> **username_0**: Thanks for the links Jan, I did search beforehand but my understanding of the bigger picture is limited as I stated and none of this showed up in my search.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2016-12-09. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

As Jan points out, there are many other factors in the oxygen balance, not just trees. But for a bit of fun, let us suppose that we burn all the trees on the planet. The global biomass of carbon is estimated as 47.4 PgC (it varies a bit according to season and inter-annual growth conditions). Of this we can estimate that the contribution from trees is about 36.3 PgC. 1 tonne of carbon consumes 2.67 tonnes of oxygen to create CO2, so the oxygen consumed is about 9.68 x 10^^10 tonnes. The total mass of the atmosphere is known to be 5.15 Petatonnes, of which oxygen is 20.95%, or 1.08 Petatonnes of oxygen. So taking the ratio, the loss of atmospheric oxygen from burning all the trees is 0.0034%. This is far less than the day-to-day fluctuations in available oxygen due to changes in atmospheric pressure - i.e. the weather.

So, there is a lot of woody biomass, but think of the partial pressure of the oxygen layer that wraps the Earth: 21.2 kPa O2 on every square centimetre of the Earth's surface. We are never going to run out of oxygen! On the other hand, pyrolysis of every tree on the planet would create so much smoke that we would probably all die of lung cancer!

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for that answer, I'm not sure who voted it down or why however!  

---

