<p><strong>Answer 1</strong></p>

<p>The horizontal axis is indeed time (don't forget units and note how long those <a href="http://geoscience.wisc.edu/~chuck/Classes/Mtn_and_Plates/eq_cycle.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">periods</a> are!). As for the vertical axis, I'm certain that this is displaying vertical (or 'Z' or 'V') displacement. Keep in mind - like you mention - that we are only looking at a 1-D picure of the data, but there are other perspectives we are missing! For example, how is the earth being displaced with respect to North-South and/or East/West directions? </p>

<p><strong>Answer 2</strong></p>

<p>The vertical blue line you reference indicates different seismic <a href="https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/pi/Monitoring/Doc/Srr_2006/GUIDE.PDF" rel="nofollow noreferrer">phases</a> (or <em>arrivals</em>). For example, you list 'P' and 'PcP' - but there are many others! For example 'SKS', 'SKKS', etc. - see the hyperlink to understand this notation and the seismic waveforms they correspond to.</p>

<hr>

<p><strong>NOTE</strong>(1): For the term <em>phase</em> - be VERY careful with this word and the context I've applied it in. As is customary in geophysics, one word can refer to the same or different concepts. Read <a href="https://library.seg.org/doi/abs/10.1190/1.1885500?journalCode=leedff" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> for a good follow-up example of what I'm describing in terms of <em>phase</em>. </p>

<p><strong>NOTE</strong>(2): Many seismograms like this will initially be displayed in the conventional NEV (or NEZ) or <em>North-East-Vertical</em> coordinate system . But, to optimize many kinds of analyses and displays, one needs to rotate (or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_matrix" rel="nofollow noreferrer">transform</a>) this system into another - <a href="https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/5007/how-are-the-zne-zrt-and-lqt-coordinate-systems-defined">LQT</a>. Read <a href="https://service.iris.edu/irisws/rotation/docs/1/help/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> to understand what that means. </p>

<p><strong>NOTE</strong>(3): How does one know or estimate seismic phases like these? You need an <a href="http://ds.iris.edu/ds/products/emc-referencemodels/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">earth model</a>! From the source location and at the instantaneous moment of when the seismic event occurs, a corresponding seismic wavefield is generated and travels throughout the earth - interacting with its fluid and/or elastic mediums - all the while responding to (or <em><a href="http://subsurfwiki.org/wiki/Convolutional_model" rel="nofollow noreferrer">convolving</a></em>) its complex, 3-D velocity (and density) structure. As the seismic wavefield passes through different mediums via refraction, reflection, dispersion, 
attenuation, etc., it changes and subsequent various phases are produced and then recorded at a station. The phases - i.g. 'SKS', 'P', and many others - basically tell a story of how/where the wavefield changed, which is great for analyzing the crust, all sections of the mantle, and even the core!</p>

<p>*I've included a lot here but you've asked an outstanding question that you (and I) can really learn from!</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-12T00:39:16.420Z
Thank you for your answer! I did a [quick analysis](https://i.sstatic.net/fqYzW.png) of one of the peaks and I estimate that we are easily seeing noise-free accelerations of 1E-03 ng (ng="nano gees", 1E-11 m/s^2) which even filtered at  0.01 Hz is **0.01 ng/sqrt(Hz)**, which is way below the noise floor of normal seismometers according to [this answer](https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/16205/6031). This is still puzzling, perhaps it's just low-pass filtered noise and not a measurement of anything?
uhoh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-11T16:45:17.623Z
2019-07-11T16:45:17.623Z
nate
<p>This IRIS <a href="https://twitter.com/IRIS_EPO/status/1146950304262475776" rel="nofollow noreferrer">tweet</a> shows a video of siesmic waves from the recent M6.4 Earthquake in California rolling across the US.</p>

<p>I've made a small GIF to give the idea but the "GIF" in the tweet shows the whole thing.</p>

<p>At the bottom there is a plot of something versus time, the x-axis extends for about <em>35 minutes!</em>, and the vertical scale bar on the right is 44 nanometers(?) tall.</p>

<p><strong>Question:</strong> What does this 1D plot of displacement(?) versus time actually show? Is it a calculated quantity or a direct measurement of something? What are the vertical blue lines labeled P, PcP and Sc5?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Watch the waves from the M6.4 southern California #earthquake roll across the USArray seismic network (<a href="http://www.usarray.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.usarray.org</a> )! #socalearthquake THREAD</p>
</blockquote>

<hr>

<p>Low quality GIF, please see the <a href="https://twitter.com/IRIS_EPO/status/1146950304262475776" rel="nofollow noreferrer">tweeted original</a>!</p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/4ozid.gif" alt="IRIS M6.4 California Earthquake &quot;GIF&quot; tweet"></p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-09T16:44:13.253Z
The line says "z" at the left hand end, which suggests it might be an elevation. But I've no idea what elevation, especially if it's measured in nanometres!

An alternative interpretation of "nm" is "nautical miles", but I don't know what this would refer to either...
Semidiurnal Simon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-07-09T16:57:12.040Z
@SemidiurnalSimon thanks, and that's a really good point, I'd ran into nanometers vs nautical miles confusion once before, it's a real thing ;-)
uhoh
<earthquakes><seismic>
What is the vertical axis of this waveform shown in this tweeted IRIS GIF?
uhoh
# What is the vertical axis of this waveform shown in this tweeted IRIS GIF?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-07-09)

This IRIS [tweet](https://twitter.com/IRIS_EPO/status/1146950304262475776) shows a video of siesmic waves from the recent M6.4 Earthquake in California rolling across the US.

I've made a small GIF to give the idea but the "GIF" in the tweet shows the whole thing.

At the bottom there is a plot of something versus time, the x-axis extends for about *35 minutes!*, and the vertical scale bar on the right is 44 nanometers(?) tall.

**Question:** What does this 1D plot of displacement(?) versus time actually show? Is it a calculated quantity or a direct measurement of something? What are the vertical blue lines labeled P, PcP and Sc5?

> Watch the waves from the M6.4 southern California #earthquake roll across the USArray seismic network (<http://www.usarray.org> )! #socalearthquake THREAD

---

Low quality GIF, please see the [tweeted original](https://twitter.com/IRIS_EPO/status/1146950304262475776)!

![IRIS M6.4 California Earthquake "GIF" tweet](https://i.sstatic.net/4ozid.gif)

**Tags:** earthquakes, seismic

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The line says "z" at the left hand end, which suggests it might be an elevation. But I've no idea what elevation, especially if it's measured in nanometres!  An alternative interpretation of "nm" is "nautical miles", but I don't know what this would refer to either...  
> **username_0**: @username_1 thanks, and that's a really good point, I'd ran into nanometers vs nautical miles confusion once before, it's a real thing ;-)  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-07-11. Score: 3

**Answer 1**

The horizontal axis is indeed time (don't forget units and note how long those [periods](http://geoscience.wisc.edu/~chuck/Classes/Mtn_and_Plates/eq_cycle.html) are!). As for the vertical axis, I'm certain that this is displaying vertical (or 'Z' or 'V') displacement. Keep in mind - like you mention - that we are only looking at a 1-D picure of the data, but there are other perspectives we are missing! For example, how is the earth being displaced with respect to North-South and/or East/West directions?

**Answer 2**

The vertical blue line you reference indicates different seismic [phases](https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/pi/Monitoring/Doc/Srr_2006/GUIDE.PDF) (or *arrivals*). For example, you list 'P' and 'PcP' - but there are many others! For example 'SKS', 'SKKS', etc. - see the hyperlink to understand this notation and the seismic waveforms they correspond to.

---

**NOTE**(1): For the term *phase* - be VERY careful with this word and the context I've applied it in. As is customary in geophysics, one word can refer to the same or different concepts. Read [here](https://library.seg.org/doi/abs/10.1190/1.1885500?journalCode=leedff) for a good follow-up example of what I'm describing in terms of *phase*.

**NOTE**(2): Many seismograms like this will initially be displayed in the conventional NEV (or NEZ) or *North-East-Vertical* coordinate system . But, to optimize many kinds of analyses and displays, one needs to rotate (or [transform](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_matrix)) this system into another - [LQT](https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/5007/how-are-the-zne-zrt-and-lqt-coordinate-systems-defined). Read [here](https://service.iris.edu/irisws/rotation/docs/1/help/) to understand what that means.

**NOTE**(3): How does one know or estimate seismic phases like these? You need an [earth model](http://ds.iris.edu/ds/products/emc-referencemodels/)! From the source location and at the instantaneous moment of when the seismic event occurs, a corresponding seismic wavefield is generated and travels throughout the earth - interacting with its fluid and/or elastic mediums - all the while responding to (or *[convolving](http://subsurfwiki.org/wiki/Convolutional_model)*) its complex, 3-D velocity (and density) structure. As the seismic wavefield passes through different mediums via refraction, reflection, dispersion,
attenuation, etc., it changes and subsequent various phases are produced and then recorded at a station. The phases - i.g. 'SKS', 'P', and many others - basically tell a story of how/where the wavefield changed, which is great for analyzing the crust, all sections of the mantle, and even the core!

\*I've included a lot here but you've asked an outstanding question that you (and I) can really learn from!

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thank you for your answer! I did a [quick analysis](https://i.sstatic.net/fqYzW.png) of one of the peaks and I estimate that we are easily seeing noise-free accelerations of 1E-03 ng (ng="nano gees", 1E-11 m/s^2) which even filtered at  0.01 Hz is **0.01 ng/sqrt(Hz)**, which is way below the noise floor of normal seismometers according to [this answer](https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/16205/6031). This is still puzzling, perhaps it's just low-pass filtered noise and not a measurement of anything?  

---

