<p>It was almost certainly multiple.    I can't say for 100% but I think it was very very likely - cause of the way they split apart for one.</p>

<p>For example, today: Europe, Asia and in a practical sense, Africa are all connected but contain several different plates.    The Indian Plate and the Eurasian plate are 2 different plates but the land is connected, so you'd never know it was two plates - well, except for the frequent earthquakes.   </p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/DaOfk.png" alt="Wiki picture of Indian Plate"></p>

<p>Source:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Plate" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Plate</a></p>

<p>Plate Tectonics is thought to be about 3.2 billion years old:   <a href="http://sciencenordic.com/modern-plate-tectonics-arose-32-billion-years-ago" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sciencenordic.com/modern-plate-tectonics-arose-32-billion-years-ago</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-06-06T08:16:53.810Z
2015-06-06T08:16:53.810Z
userLTK
<p>Pangaea consisted of all the tectonic plates that are around today including Antarctica, Africa, NA, SA, Australia, Europe, and Asia (am I forgetting any?).  No one knows why the continents broke apart but there is plenty of speculation.  The best bet is that the convection in the mantle changed.  It drives plate tectonics.  Where to convective cells well up, rifting occurs.  The continents were torn apart in areas that were above these convective cells.  </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-07-04T03:00:28.103Z
2015-07-04T03:00:28.103Z
see you
<p>I know Pangaea was a supercontinent that existed 270 million years ago and it started to break apart around 200 million years ago. I'm not clear on whether Pangaea was 1,2, or multiple tectonic plates. Can someone help me?</p>

<tectonics>
Explain the Idea of Pangaea and how the continents have reached their current positions
user2988
# Explain the Idea of Pangaea and how the continents have reached their current positions

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-06-06)

I know Pangaea was a supercontinent that existed 270 million years ago and it started to break apart around 200 million years ago. I'm not clear on whether Pangaea was 1,2, or multiple tectonic plates. Can someone help me?

**Tags:** tectonics


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-06-06. Score: 2

It was almost certainly multiple. I can't say for 100% but I think it was very very likely - cause of the way they split apart for one.

For example, today: Europe, Asia and in a practical sense, Africa are all connected but contain several different plates. The Indian Plate and the Eurasian plate are 2 different plates but the land is connected, so you'd never know it was two plates - well, except for the frequent earthquakes.

![Wiki picture of Indian Plate](https://i.sstatic.net/DaOfk.png)

Source: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Plate>

Plate Tectonics is thought to be about 3.2 billion years old: <http://sciencenordic.com/modern-plate-tectonics-arose-32-billion-years-ago>


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-07-04. Score: 0

Pangaea consisted of all the tectonic plates that are around today including Antarctica, Africa, NA, SA, Australia, Europe, and Asia (am I forgetting any?). No one knows why the continents broke apart but there is plenty of speculation. The best bet is that the convection in the mantle changed. It drives plate tectonics. Where to convective cells well up, rifting occurs. The continents were torn apart in areas that were above these convective cells.


---

