<p>Apart from today, yes.</p>

<p>Back in the Cambrian (~500 million years ago), there was a continent in the southern hemisphere called Gondwana. It was a combination of several modern day continents: South America, Australia, Antarctica and Africa. A small piece of North America that corresponds mostly to modern day northern Canada existed in the northern hemisphere, called Laurentia. Curiously, some parts of northwestern Europe were part of that as well (Scotland, Norway).</p>

<p>Between the Devonian (~370 million years ago) and the Triassic (~200 million years ago) almost every continent on the Earth was amalgamated into one super continent called Pangaea, including Gondwana and Laurentia. During the Jurassic and Cretaceous (~150 million years ago) the entire thing separated due to the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, sending North America north west and South America south west. Since then the two continents were separated, until very recently (geologically speaking) that a land bridge formed between the two.</p>

<p>A very good website with reconstructions of paleogeographical maps is this one:</p>

<p><a href="http://scotese.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scotese.com/</a></p>

<p>Note that these are all interpretations and they are open for debate. But the general idea is correct.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-24T00:56:13.527Z
2015-10-24T00:56:13.527Z
Gimelist
<p>Further to Michael's answer, the evidence for both America's once belonging to a supercontinent, prior to opening of the Atlantic, is abundant. Some examples;</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Trilobites from the Cambrian of NW Scotland belong more to the North
American type than to the European-Asian (Tethyan) type. </p></li>
<li><p>Get a geological map of Brazil and Africa, and see how well they fit
together.</p></li>
<li><p>There are fluvially deposited diamonds found in South America but no
source area, i.e. no kimberlites. This didn't make sense until it
was realized that the diamonds were transported in westward flowing
rivers from kimberlites in Africa prior to the rift which separated
South America from Africa.</p></li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-10-24T04:10:45.700Z
2017-03-25T12:36:11.333Z
2017-03-25T12:36:11.333Z
Gordon Stanger
<p>I know this question have been asked very often, but I could not find a proper answer around StackExchange, so I thought this might be a good place to ask:</p>

<p>Have the landmasses of North and South America ever been part of the same continent?</p>

<geology><plate-tectonics><earth-history>
Have the landmasses of North and South America ever been part of the same continent?
makeMonday
# Have the landmasses of North and South America ever been part of the same continent?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2015-08-28)

I know this question have been asked very often, but I could not find a proper answer around StackExchange, so I thought this might be a good place to ask:

Have the landmasses of North and South America ever been part of the same continent?

**Tags:** geology, plate-tectonics, earth-history


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2015-10-24. Score: 3

Apart from today, yes.

Back in the Cambrian (~500 million years ago), there was a continent in the southern hemisphere called Gondwana. It was a combination of several modern day continents: South America, Australia, Antarctica and Africa. A small piece of North America that corresponds mostly to modern day northern Canada existed in the northern hemisphere, called Laurentia. Curiously, some parts of northwestern Europe were part of that as well (Scotland, Norway).

Between the Devonian (~370 million years ago) and the Triassic (~200 million years ago) almost every continent on the Earth was amalgamated into one super continent called Pangaea, including Gondwana and Laurentia. During the Jurassic and Cretaceous (~150 million years ago) the entire thing separated due to the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, sending North America north west and South America south west. Since then the two continents were separated, until very recently (geologically speaking) that a land bridge formed between the two.

A very good website with reconstructions of paleogeographical maps is this one:

<http://scotese.com/>

Note that these are all interpretations and they are open for debate. But the general idea is correct.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2015-10-24. Score: 2

Further to Michael's answer, the evidence for both America's once belonging to a supercontinent, prior to opening of the Atlantic, is abundant. Some examples;

1. Trilobites from the Cambrian of NW Scotland belong more to the North
   American type than to the European-Asian (Tethyan) type.
2. Get a geological map of Brazil and Africa, and see how well they fit
   together.
3. There are fluvially deposited diamonds found in South America but no
   source area, i.e. no kimberlites. This didn't make sense until it
   was realized that the diamonds were transported in westward flowing
   rivers from kimberlites in Africa prior to the rift which separated
   South America from Africa.


---

