<p>Most atmospheric science researchers use back-trajectory analysis in qualitative sense to explain source of a pollutant. And as pointed out by the questioner, it is not possible to associate trajectories calculated at a particular time to the measurement that is average of say several hours. </p>

<p>However, quantitative analysis of observed concentration with back-trajectories is possible and is used to identify emission sources and their strength. </p>

<p>For the quantitative analysis, a large number of back-trajectories are simulated (of the order of 100000) from the place of measurement, however each trajectory is initiated with slightly different initial condition.</p>

<p>Let me explain with an example. Suppose PM2.5 concentration was measured on a certain date as 24 hour average at location given by co-ordinates x, y and z. Assuming that air was well mix in region surrounding x, y and z given by x-dx to x + dx, y-dy to y+dy and z-dy to z + dy, backtrajectories will be simulated, each with slight different x,y and z but within volume given by 2dx*2dy*2dz. Also, the number of trajectories simulated will be equally distributed in the volume and time period (24 hours in this example) to which observation represents. The simulation will result in distribution of trajectory with some grid-boxes visited by several trajectories whereas others may have no trajectory or very few trajectories. Emissions in the grid-boxes which are more frequently visited, have more potential to contribute to observed concentration. In other words, the concentration being measured at x, y, z will be proportional to sum of amount of time spent by each trajectories multiplied by emission flux in that grid box. </p>

<p>More detailed description of backtrajectory analysis and its application to related to observed quantity are available in following articles. </p>

<ol>
<li><p>Gadhavi et al., 2015, Evaluation of black carbon inventories using a Lagrangian dispersion model - a case study over Southern India, Atmos Chem Phys, vol. 15, 1447-1461, doi: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1447-2015" rel="nofollow noreferrer">10.5194/acp-15-1447-2015</a>.</p></li>
<li><p>Seibert and Frank, 2004, Source-receptor matrix calculation with a Lagragian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 4, 51-63, doi:<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004" rel="nofollow noreferrer">10.5194/acp-4-51-2004</a></p></li>
</ol>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-06-08T10:22:21.023Z
2018-09-12T09:08:13.520Z
2018-09-12T09:08:13.520Z
Harish
<p>To correlate chemicals in aerosols emanating from certain sample points, backward trajectory analysis is usually applied for identifying the potential geographical source region.  </p>

<p><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/5mUFl.png" alt="">
In this figure from <a href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/7357/2016/acp-16-7357-2016.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Characteristics of aerosol pollution during heavy haze events in
Suzhou, China</a>, the trajectories are clustered into several groups. The different fractions of chemicals (e.g. organic matter, sulfate) in each group shows the impact of different regions.</p>

<p>It represents an easy approach  to research the impact of regional transportation for the particulate matter in certain receptors. </p>

<ol>
<li>The trajectories are calculated for certain times (e.g 0:00, 6:00, 12:00, 18:00 for each day).  </li>
<li>Offline PM samples with its chemical species are usually collected for 24 h </li>
</ol>

<p><strong>How can I relate the samples with trajectories with different temporal scale?</strong></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-11T15:32:52.077Z
While not directly related to aerosols, this paper (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL066888/full) provides a method to estimate the time-dependent connectivity between regions. If you set the time of integration to 24h, then the temporal scales should match.
arkaia
<atmospheric-chemistry><air-pollution><air-quality>
How to relate the backward trajectories with offline particular samples?
Han Zhengzu
# How to relate the backward trajectories with offline particular samples?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-11)

To correlate chemicals in aerosols emanating from certain sample points, backward trajectory analysis is usually applied for identifying the potential geographical source region.

![](https://i.sstatic.net/5mUFl.png)
In this figure from [Characteristics of aerosol pollution during heavy haze events in
Suzhou, China](http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/7357/2016/acp-16-7357-2016.pdf), the trajectories are clustered into several groups. The different fractions of chemicals (e.g. organic matter, sulfate) in each group shows the impact of different regions.

It represents an easy approach to research the impact of regional transportation for the particulate matter in certain receptors.

1. The trajectories are calculated for certain times (e.g 0:00, 6:00, 12:00, 18:00 for each day).
2. Offline PM samples with its chemical species are usually collected for 24 h

**How can I relate the samples with trajectories with different temporal scale?**

**Tags:** atmospheric-chemistry, air-pollution, air-quality

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: While not directly related to aerosols, this paper (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL066888/full) provides a method to estimate the time-dependent connectivity between regions. If you set the time of integration to 24h, then the temporal scales should match.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2018-06-08. Score: 1

Most atmospheric science researchers use back-trajectory analysis in qualitative sense to explain source of a pollutant. And as pointed out by the questioner, it is not possible to associate trajectories calculated at a particular time to the measurement that is average of say several hours.

However, quantitative analysis of observed concentration with back-trajectories is possible and is used to identify emission sources and their strength.

For the quantitative analysis, a large number of back-trajectories are simulated (of the order of 100000) from the place of measurement, however each trajectory is initiated with slightly different initial condition.

Let me explain with an example. Suppose PM2.5 concentration was measured on a certain date as 24 hour average at location given by co-ordinates x, y and z. Assuming that air was well mix in region surrounding x, y and z given by x-dx to x + dx, y-dy to y+dy and z-dy to z + dy, backtrajectories will be simulated, each with slight different x,y and z but within volume given by 2dx\*2dy\*2dz. Also, the number of trajectories simulated will be equally distributed in the volume and time period (24 hours in this example) to which observation represents. The simulation will result in distribution of trajectory with some grid-boxes visited by several trajectories whereas others may have no trajectory or very few trajectories. Emissions in the grid-boxes which are more frequently visited, have more potential to contribute to observed concentration. In other words, the concentration being measured at x, y, z will be proportional to sum of amount of time spent by each trajectories multiplied by emission flux in that grid box.

More detailed description of backtrajectory analysis and its application to related to observed quantity are available in following articles.

1. Gadhavi et al., 2015, Evaluation of black carbon inventories using a Lagrangian dispersion model - a case study over Southern India, Atmos Chem Phys, vol. 15, 1447-1461, doi: [10.5194/acp-15-1447-2015](http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1447-2015).
2. Seibert and Frank, 2004, Source-receptor matrix calculation with a Lagragian particle dispersion model in backward mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., vol. 4, 51-63, doi:[10.5194/acp-4-51-2004](http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-51-2004)


---

