<p>Short answer.   When the Earth is closest to the sun in January that softens the seasonal variation in the Northern Hemisphere and it increases the seasonal variation in the Southern Hemisphere, so for now, in the Northern Hemisphere, the Summers are colder than they would be with a circular orbit and the winters are hotter.   The opposite is true in the Southern Hemisphere.</p>

<p>Overall the eccentricity variation doesn't change how much solar energy hits the Earth by much, so it's not the total solar energy.   It's when combined with precession, and the effect on the seasons, that the global effect can be significant. </p>

<p>If we had a perfectly circular obit then the only Milankovich cycle that would matter would be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Axial_tilt_.28obliquity.29" rel="noreferrer">axial tilt</a>.  Ice ages would either be on a 41,000 year cycle - very neat and tidy, or they wouldn't happen at all cause the orbital variation wouldn't be enough to get ice ages started.  Other factors, like solar minimums could play a role and over longer periods of time, continental drift and variations in plant life, so, maybe not that exactly that, but I think it's likely.</p>

<p>Too long answer:   Hotter summers and colder winters (or the opposite) is a form of climate change that accompanies the orbital cycles.  All the orbital cycles change climate at least by seasonally.  But if I'm reading your question right, you're asking about global temperature, not just seasonal variation.</p>

<p>Eccentricity has an effect because the two hemispheres are quite different and because it amplifies the effect of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Apsidal_precession" rel="noreferrer">precession</a>.</p>

<p>Oceans tend to be a temperature buffer.  They circulate and they warm up slowly and they cool down slowly so they don't get too hot in summer or too cold in winter.  Land can vary in temperature significantly more.   This buffering can be seen in this average temperature chart of the two hemispheres.   </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/4S5bC.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/4S5bC.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>The Northern Hemisphere varies about 13 degrees C and the Southern about 5.5 C.   Those numbers might seem low, but remember that near the equator, seasonal variation is small and there's more land near 0 latitude than up near 90 or -90.   How accurate this chart is, isn't really relevant.   It doesn't need to be perfect.  What's relevant is that seasonal variation is much smaller in the Southern Hemisphere because so much of it is ocean, even with the Sun being closest in January which should make the Southern Hemisphere season variation more extreme.  The ocean is the key factor.</p>

<p>With that in mind we can ignore the smaller variation in the Southern Hemisphere and just look at the Northern Hemisphere variation for any orbataly driven climate effects.   Before we get into eccentricity, it's important to understand <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Axial_precession" rel="noreferrer">Axial Precession</a>.   The Earth, as you noted, is closest to the Sun in early January, <a href="https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/perihelion-aphelion-solstice.html" rel="noreferrer">January 4th this year</a>.  that 3.4% closer That means Earth gets nearly 7% more sunlight in the first week of January than it gets in the first week of June.   That 7% is too small to move the seasons, but it's enough to affect them a bit.   Earth overall gets more solar energy January (Northern Hemisphere Winter) and less solar energy in June.   The Northern Hemisphere's more exteme seasonal variaiton comes into play when the Earth is closest to the Sun in May-June-July-August - that should happen in about 8,000 years, give or take.  The cycle averages about every 23,000 years, so roughly 11,500 years between highs and lows for each hemisphere.   </p>

<p>The most relevant factor is the Northern Hemisphere Summer.   This is what is thought to drive ice ages back and forth.   Snow can last on land a long time in higher Northern latitudes and when the summers are less hot, the snow can last well into May, June, even all year around.   The warmer winters are less of a factor cause you still get snow in warm winters, sometimes, it snows more heavily when the winter is warmer.    It's the cooler Northern Hemisphere Summers that allow snow build-up and make ice ages possible.  Eccentricity (combined with precession) plays a key role on the periodic, colder Northern Hemisphere summer.   </p>

<p>Don't worry, we're not entering an ice age in a few thousand years.   We're actually in a cool Northern Hemisphere summer period now, but, It's not quite that automatic.</p>

<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Orbital_shape_.28eccentricity.29" rel="noreferrer">The eccentricity</a> in effect, determines how significant the axial precession is.   When the orbit is nearly circular, the difference in energy perihelion to aphelion is virtually zero.   Orbital eccentricity is currently dropping, moving towards circular, so we're not in a period of expected significant changes.  (The increased CO2 would prevent an ice age now anyway, but that's another story).  Earth's orbital cycles are in more of a holding pattern than moving towards an ice age. </p>

<p>When eccentricity peaks, the variation in solar energy hitting the Earth, perihelion to aphelion is significant.   It's loosely speaking, about 4 times the eccentricity.  The current eccentricity is 0.017, the current variation, Early January to Early June is about 4 times that or 0.068 or 6.8%.   At peak eccentricity of about .0679 would work out to roughly 27% variation in solar energy hitting the Earth, Perihelion to Aphelion.  (Perhaps nearly 30% with the working out the square).   This 30% variation in solar energy, depending on the perihelion and aphelion fall on the calendar, is sufficient to make ice ages come and go.   ((For very high eccentricity this 4 times rule doesn't work, but it applies pretty close to eccentricity pretty close to 0.))</p>

<p>In laymans terms, think of the eccentricity as turning up or down the effect of axial precession and those two combined, when properly lined up with the hemispheres, have a significant effect.   </p>

<p>The 3 cycles together, make a kind of ugly chart of ups and downs.  The orbital effect is rather uneven but Ice ages are often periodic because of feedback mechanisms on Earth.  Once formed, Glaciers are hard to melt and once melted, it takes peak conditions to get them forming again, so many of the smaller ups and downs in the chart don't drive ice ages, only the extremes.  </p>

<p>Wikipedia has a nice graph on the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Present_and_future_conditions" rel="noreferrer">Northern Hemisphere solar energy at summer solstice</a>.   When the chart is high, that tends to be a period of glacial melt.  When it's low, that's a period of ice age formation.   </p>

<p>Because the eccentricity is currently kind of low and shrinking, we're probably not due for an ice-age for about 50,000 years, at least according to current orbital models, per Wikipedia (same link as just above).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-25T08:47:41.417Z
2017-07-25T08:47:41.417Z
userLTK
<p><strong>Yes</strong>, but this is not mainly due to the small intensity variation of sunlight with distance.  Rather, the elliptical orbit affects the length of the seasons, which — along with other orbital effects — triggers the ice ages.</p>

<p>Currently, in the northern hemisphere, summers are longer than winters, because of Kepler's orbit laws and the fact that perihelion is in the northern hemisphere winter.  However, there is precession in the date of perihelion, and periodically over tens of thousands of years, it shifts into the northern hemisphere winter.  This causes enough of a difference to trigger the ice ages: see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles" rel="noreferrer">Milkankovitch cycles</a> on Wikipedia.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-25T08:52:12.190Z
The Northern Hemisphere Summers are longer because (as you say) Kepler orbits means the Earth is further away in the summer, being further away, less solar energy hits the Earth.    These effects cancel each other out somewhat.   In my answer I've assumed (as per my understanding) that the greater distance and less sunlight is the dominant effect and the longer summer the lesser effect.
userLTK
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-25T08:37:16.297Z
2017-07-25T08:37:16.297Z
gerrit
<p>The distance of earth to sun is proportional to the intensity of sunlight we receive. The distances between perihelion and aphelion are quite small, so the differences in sunlight intensities are too - <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perihelion_and_aphelion" rel="nofollow noreferrer">wiki</a>.</p>

<p>If the alternative circular orbit would be the average radius of the current ellipse then northern hemisphere summers would have slightly more intense sunlight, hotter, and and vice versa for the southern hemisphere, cooler (less UV).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-25T08:33:08.440Z
This answer fails to address that in the northern hemisphere, our winters are shorter than our summers, and the situation in the southern hemisphere is reversed.  This has a [significant impact](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles).
gerrit
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-25T06:28:30.977Z
2017-07-25T06:28:30.977Z
Communisty
<p>I know the Earth is nearest to Sun during the summers of the southern hemisphere. Does the orbit affect the climate actually? For example, would there be any difference if the Earth had a perfectly circular orbit?</p>

<p>If so, what is the effect of it? For example, does it cause hotter summers in southern hemisphere, or would it cause the southern hemisphere to receive more solar UV radiation?</p>

<climate><orbit>
Does the elliptical orbit of the Earth have effect on Earth's climate?
Gstestso
# Does the elliptical orbit of the Earth have effect on Earth's climate?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-07-25)

I know the Earth is nearest to Sun during the summers of the southern hemisphere. Does the orbit affect the climate actually? For example, would there be any difference if the Earth had a perfectly circular orbit?

If so, what is the effect of it? For example, does it cause hotter summers in southern hemisphere, or would it cause the southern hemisphere to receive more solar UV radiation?

**Tags:** climate, orbit


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-07-25. Score: 14

Short answer. When the Earth is closest to the sun in January that softens the seasonal variation in the Northern Hemisphere and it increases the seasonal variation in the Southern Hemisphere, so for now, in the Northern Hemisphere, the Summers are colder than they would be with a circular orbit and the winters are hotter. The opposite is true in the Southern Hemisphere.

Overall the eccentricity variation doesn't change how much solar energy hits the Earth by much, so it's not the total solar energy. It's when combined with precession, and the effect on the seasons, that the global effect can be significant.

If we had a perfectly circular obit then the only Milankovich cycle that would matter would be [axial tilt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Axial_tilt_.28obliquity.29). Ice ages would either be on a 41,000 year cycle - very neat and tidy, or they wouldn't happen at all cause the orbital variation wouldn't be enough to get ice ages started. Other factors, like solar minimums could play a role and over longer periods of time, continental drift and variations in plant life, so, maybe not that exactly that, but I think it's likely.

Too long answer: Hotter summers and colder winters (or the opposite) is a form of climate change that accompanies the orbital cycles. All the orbital cycles change climate at least by seasonally. But if I'm reading your question right, you're asking about global temperature, not just seasonal variation.

Eccentricity has an effect because the two hemispheres are quite different and because it amplifies the effect of [precession](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Apsidal_precession).

Oceans tend to be a temperature buffer. They circulate and they warm up slowly and they cool down slowly so they don't get too hot in summer or too cold in winter. Land can vary in temperature significantly more. This buffering can be seen in this average temperature chart of the two hemispheres.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/4S5bC.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/4S5bC.png)

The Northern Hemisphere varies about 13 degrees C and the Southern about 5.5 C. Those numbers might seem low, but remember that near the equator, seasonal variation is small and there's more land near 0 latitude than up near 90 or -90. How accurate this chart is, isn't really relevant. It doesn't need to be perfect. What's relevant is that seasonal variation is much smaller in the Southern Hemisphere because so much of it is ocean, even with the Sun being closest in January which should make the Southern Hemisphere season variation more extreme. The ocean is the key factor.

With that in mind we can ignore the smaller variation in the Southern Hemisphere and just look at the Northern Hemisphere variation for any orbataly driven climate effects. Before we get into eccentricity, it's important to understand [Axial Precession](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Axial_precession). The Earth, as you noted, is closest to the Sun in early January, [January 4th this year](https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/perihelion-aphelion-solstice.html). that 3.4% closer That means Earth gets nearly 7% more sunlight in the first week of January than it gets in the first week of June. That 7% is too small to move the seasons, but it's enough to affect them a bit. Earth overall gets more solar energy January (Northern Hemisphere Winter) and less solar energy in June. The Northern Hemisphere's more exteme seasonal variaiton comes into play when the Earth is closest to the Sun in May-June-July-August - that should happen in about 8,000 years, give or take. The cycle averages about every 23,000 years, so roughly 11,500 years between highs and lows for each hemisphere.

The most relevant factor is the Northern Hemisphere Summer. This is what is thought to drive ice ages back and forth. Snow can last on land a long time in higher Northern latitudes and when the summers are less hot, the snow can last well into May, June, even all year around. The warmer winters are less of a factor cause you still get snow in warm winters, sometimes, it snows more heavily when the winter is warmer. It's the cooler Northern Hemisphere Summers that allow snow build-up and make ice ages possible. Eccentricity (combined with precession) plays a key role on the periodic, colder Northern Hemisphere summer.

Don't worry, we're not entering an ice age in a few thousand years. We're actually in a cool Northern Hemisphere summer period now, but, It's not quite that automatic.

[The eccentricity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Orbital_shape_.28eccentricity.29) in effect, determines how significant the axial precession is. When the orbit is nearly circular, the difference in energy perihelion to aphelion is virtually zero. Orbital eccentricity is currently dropping, moving towards circular, so we're not in a period of expected significant changes. (The increased CO2 would prevent an ice age now anyway, but that's another story). Earth's orbital cycles are in more of a holding pattern than moving towards an ice age.

When eccentricity peaks, the variation in solar energy hitting the Earth, perihelion to aphelion is significant. It's loosely speaking, about 4 times the eccentricity. The current eccentricity is 0.017, the current variation, Early January to Early June is about 4 times that or 0.068 or 6.8%. At peak eccentricity of about .0679 would work out to roughly 27% variation in solar energy hitting the Earth, Perihelion to Aphelion. (Perhaps nearly 30% with the working out the square). This 30% variation in solar energy, depending on the perihelion and aphelion fall on the calendar, is sufficient to make ice ages come and go. ((For very high eccentricity this 4 times rule doesn't work, but it applies pretty close to eccentricity pretty close to 0.))

In laymans terms, think of the eccentricity as turning up or down the effect of axial precession and those two combined, when properly lined up with the hemispheres, have a significant effect.

The 3 cycles together, make a kind of ugly chart of ups and downs. The orbital effect is rather uneven but Ice ages are often periodic because of feedback mechanisms on Earth. Once formed, Glaciers are hard to melt and once melted, it takes peak conditions to get them forming again, so many of the smaller ups and downs in the chart don't drive ice ages, only the extremes.

Wikipedia has a nice graph on the [Northern Hemisphere solar energy at summer solstice](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles#Present_and_future_conditions). When the chart is high, that tends to be a period of glacial melt. When it's low, that's a period of ice age formation.

Because the eccentricity is currently kind of low and shrinking, we're probably not due for an ice-age for about 50,000 years, at least according to current orbital models, per Wikipedia (same link as just above).


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-07-25. Score: 6

**Yes**, but this is not mainly due to the small intensity variation of sunlight with distance. Rather, the elliptical orbit affects the length of the seasons, which — along with other orbital effects — triggers the ice ages.

Currently, in the northern hemisphere, summers are longer than winters, because of Kepler's orbit laws and the fact that perihelion is in the northern hemisphere winter. However, there is precession in the date of perihelion, and periodically over tens of thousands of years, it shifts into the northern hemisphere winter. This causes enough of a difference to trigger the ice ages: see [Milkankovitch cycles](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles) on Wikipedia.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: The Northern Hemisphere Summers are longer because (as you say) Kepler orbits means the Earth is further away in the summer, being further away, less solar energy hits the Earth.    These effects cancel each other out somewhat.   In my answer I've assumed (as per my understanding) that the greater distance and less sunlight is the dominant effect and the longer summer the lesser effect.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-07-25. Score: 0

The distance of earth to sun is proportional to the intensity of sunlight we receive. The distances between perihelion and aphelion are quite small, so the differences in sunlight intensities are too - [wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perihelion_and_aphelion).

If the alternative circular orbit would be the average radius of the current ellipse then northern hemisphere summers would have slightly more intense sunlight, hotter, and and vice versa for the southern hemisphere, cooler (less UV).

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: This answer fails to address that in the northern hemisphere, our winters are shorter than our summers, and the situation in the southern hemisphere is reversed.  This has a [significant impact](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles).  

---

