<p>It is a simple adiabatic scenario.</p>
<p>When an air parcel idiabatically raises, its heat exchange with surrounding is zero. Therefore, the decreased internal energy (with the related temperature decrease) of an air parcel is equal to the work done by the parcel during its expansion, and vice versa.</p>
<p>This change is reversible.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-01-05T20:59:42.700Z
2022-01-05T20:59:42.700Z
Poutnik
<p>In the mixed layer the <strong>virtual</strong> potential temperature <span class="math-container">$\theta_v$</span> is constant and therefore, you substitute the virtual temperature <span class="math-container">$T_v$</span> for <span class="math-container">$T$</span>.</p>
<p><span class="math-container">\begin{equation}
\theta_v = T_v \left( \frac{p_0}{p} \right)^{\frac{R}{c_p}} = T \left( \frac{p_0}{p} \right)^{\frac{R}{c_p}} (1+0.61r) = \theta (1+0.61r)
\end{equation}</span>
Here
<span class="math-container">$r$</span> is the mixing ratio (mass of water/mass of dry air). In the mixed layer <span class="math-container">$\partial r/\partial z = 0$</span> or <span class="math-container">$r=\text{const}$</span>. and thus, your virtual temperature increases in the presence of moisture. Your profile will thus, stay parallel to the dry adiabatic lines.</p>
<p>Your lapse rate will only change if air is saturated <strong>and</strong> water vapor condenses, due to the latent energy release.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-06-05T01:52:39.630Z
2022-06-05T02:16:40.403Z
2022-06-05T02:16:40.403Z
Joscha Fregin
<p>The whole idea of well-mixed is that it all has the same properties (as you note the moisture profile, the left line, also follows the mixing ratio, showing it has the same moisture.... winds don't have to be constant, as they are driven by surrounding pressure fields, but will tend to be more similar than in unmixed profiles)</p>
<p>Well in terms of temperature, the air is also all of the same quality when well mixed... except with the background that as it rises/falls it always gains/loses the energy of expanding/compressing.  But in near-adiabatic processes, that process is reversible.</p>
<p>So an oddball analogy: picture it as a skyscraper which has an elevator with a fee to ride up, based upon the number of floors, but which is returned when you ride back down in the same rate.  And everyone in the building decides to &quot;mix&quot; their monies, so that each has fundamentally the same amount in the end, when they leave I guess.  It'd make it so people on different floors would have different amounts due to the elevator rides they've done, but because that elevator process is just a background, and they all fundamentally have the same amount, as anyone could take the elevator to another floor, and have the same amount as the person there.</p>
<p>So a mixed region is like an elevator with a <span class="math-container">$9.8\,\mathrm{°C}$</span> fee per <span class="math-container">$\mathrm{km}$</span> of height.  And even if the mixed region doesn't happen to include 1000 mb, that'd be like if they only mixed monies on floors 15-23 on the skyscraper... we could still reference all back down to the money they'd have when they leave the building.  So it is with potential temperature, we have to reference it to the same level, and we just happen to have defined it as 1000 mb.  But a mixed layer can be over any pressure level range.</p>
<p>When temperatures follow those dry adiabat lines it shows that they have the same true base values, accounting for the reversible change from lifting/sinking.</p>
<p>So temperature <strong>is</strong> vertically homogeneously distributed in a well-mixed layer, except the background requirement that it be stratified by the temperature change to get to the different levels each air molecule is at.  Temperature isn't necessarily entirely horizontally homogeneous at the lowest levels in such a mixed atmosphere because of topography, ground cover, etc... but again it will tend to be more similar because vertical mixing suggests decent horizontal motion (mass continuity), and will tend to mix down any increased winds aloft (due to reduced friction) so there will tend to be more motion to mix horizontally near ground level than on more stable days.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2022-01-05T20:58:21.340Z
2022-01-05T20:58:21.340Z
JeopardyTempest
<p>Why is the potential temperature, defined as <span class="math-container">$\theta = T\Big(\frac{P_0}{P}\Big)^{R/c_p}$</span>, constant in a well-mixed layer? I understand that the dew point temperature has to be parallel to a line of equal mixing ratio in the T-log P diagram, but I have trouble connecting this to the fact that the temperature sounding is parallel to a dry adiabatic lapse rate (DALR).
The potential temperature is the temperature an air parcel would have if it were brought dry-adiabatically to 1000 mbar. But since temperature doesn't have to be homogeneously distributed in a well-mixed layer, why would the potential temperature be constant?</p>
<p>An example of a well-mixed layer is shown here (the layer that extends from the surface to about 650 hPa):
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/9GYlo.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/9GYlo.png" alt="T-logP diagram" /></a>
I got the image from <a href="https://www.cs.ubc.ca/%7Etmm/courses/cpsc533c-06-fall/projects/sancho/proposal/documents/Skew-T-Manual.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this manual</a>.</p>

<meteorology><atmosphere><temperature>
Potential temperature constant in a well-mixed atmospheric layer?
theWrongAlice
# Potential temperature constant in a well-mixed atmospheric layer?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2022-01-05)

Why is the potential temperature, defined as $\theta = T\Big(\frac{P\_0}{P}\Big)^{R/c\_p}$, constant in a well-mixed layer? I understand that the dew point temperature has to be parallel to a line of equal mixing ratio in the T-log P diagram, but I have trouble connecting this to the fact that the temperature sounding is parallel to a dry adiabatic lapse rate (DALR).
The potential temperature is the temperature an air parcel would have if it were brought dry-adiabatically to 1000 mbar. But since temperature doesn't have to be homogeneously distributed in a well-mixed layer, why would the potential temperature be constant?

An example of a well-mixed layer is shown here (the layer that extends from the surface to about 650 hPa):
[![T-logP diagram](https://i.sstatic.net/9GYlo.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/9GYlo.png)
I got the image from [this manual](https://www.cs.ubc.ca/%7Etmm/courses/cpsc533c-06-fall/projects/sancho/proposal/documents/Skew-T-Manual.pdf).

**Tags:** meteorology, atmosphere, temperature


---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2022-01-05. Score: 1

It is a simple adiabatic scenario.

When an air parcel idiabatically raises, its heat exchange with surrounding is zero. Therefore, the decreased internal energy (with the related temperature decrease) of an air parcel is equal to the work done by the parcel during its expansion, and vice versa.

This change is reversible.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2022-06-05. Score: 1

In the mixed layer the **virtual** potential temperature $\theta\_v$ is constant and therefore, you substitute the virtual temperature $T\_v$ for $T$.

\begin{equation}
\theta\_v = T\_v \left( \frac{p\_0}{p} \right)^{\frac{R}{c\_p}} = T \left( \frac{p\_0}{p} \right)^{\frac{R}{c\_p}} (1+0.61r) = \theta (1+0.61r)
\end{equation}
Here
$r$ is the mixing ratio (mass of water/mass of dry air). In the mixed layer $\partial r/\partial z = 0$ or $r=\text{const}$. and thus, your virtual temperature increases in the presence of moisture. Your profile will thus, stay parallel to the dry adiabatic lines.

Your lapse rate will only change if air is saturated **and** water vapor condenses, due to the latent energy release.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2022-01-05. Score: 1

The whole idea of well-mixed is that it all has the same properties (as you note the moisture profile, the left line, also follows the mixing ratio, showing it has the same moisture.... winds don't have to be constant, as they are driven by surrounding pressure fields, but will tend to be more similar than in unmixed profiles)

Well in terms of temperature, the air is also all of the same quality when well mixed... except with the background that as it rises/falls it always gains/loses the energy of expanding/compressing. But in near-adiabatic processes, that process is reversible.

So an oddball analogy: picture it as a skyscraper which has an elevator with a fee to ride up, based upon the number of floors, but which is returned when you ride back down in the same rate. And everyone in the building decides to "mix" their monies, so that each has fundamentally the same amount in the end, when they leave I guess. It'd make it so people on different floors would have different amounts due to the elevator rides they've done, but because that elevator process is just a background, and they all fundamentally have the same amount, as anyone could take the elevator to another floor, and have the same amount as the person there.

So a mixed region is like an elevator with a $9.8\,\mathrm{°C}$ fee per $\mathrm{km}$ of height. And even if the mixed region doesn't happen to include 1000 mb, that'd be like if they only mixed monies on floors 15-23 on the skyscraper... we could still reference all back down to the money they'd have when they leave the building. So it is with potential temperature, we have to reference it to the same level, and we just happen to have defined it as 1000 mb. But a mixed layer can be over any pressure level range.

When temperatures follow those dry adiabat lines it shows that they have the same true base values, accounting for the reversible change from lifting/sinking.

So temperature **is** vertically homogeneously distributed in a well-mixed layer, except the background requirement that it be stratified by the temperature change to get to the different levels each air molecule is at. Temperature isn't necessarily entirely horizontally homogeneous at the lowest levels in such a mixed atmosphere because of topography, ground cover, etc... but again it will tend to be more similar because vertical mixing suggests decent horizontal motion (mass continuity), and will tend to mix down any increased winds aloft (due to reduced friction) so there will tend to be more motion to mix horizontally near ground level than on more stable days.


---

