<p>It actually is the common <em>centi-</em> prefix, but applied to temperature <em>changes</em> in units of Kelvins rather than absolute temperatures. The research as quoted by the Daily Mail obscures this by simplifying the results for a general audience.</p>

<p>The analyses and results are much more clearly described in the <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6422/70" rel="noreferrer">original refereed journal article</a>, which clearly refers to changes in temperature - see in particular the discussion of their Fig. 1 (reproduced below), which explicitly refers to rates of temperature change of 0.1 and 0.02 °C at depths below 2000 m over the previous century, corresponding to cK contours of ~10 and near zero in the corresponding section of that figure.</p>

<p>So, the contours in the figure quoted by the Daily Mail represent changes in temperature between measurements made in the 1870s and the early 2000s, in units of 0.01 K (or equivalently, 0.01 °C).</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/8nWKh.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/8nWKh.jpg" alt="Fig 1"></a>
Figure 1 from Gebbie and Huybers (2019), <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8413" rel="noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8413</a> - reproduced here for non-commercial use.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-11T20:01:44.983Z
The article you linked says that the question plot ("Fig. 2") is not over the last century, it shows changes `"between the 1870s and 2000s"`.  Add that to the answer and I will accept it. ...  Also, should the axis be labeled something like "Change (cK)" or " cK" etc?
Brock Adams
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-11T20:10:48.037Z
That's correct, I edited my answer to clarify both the timescale shown in the Daily Mail's figure and point out the differing timescale I referred to for the figure I quoted.
I would label the figure "T (cK)" personally - not to mention adding a request for more descriptive labels overall if I had been a reviewer :)
dplmmr
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-01-11T19:34:44.903Z
2019-01-11T20:07:55.037Z
2019-01-11T20:07:55.037Z
dplmmr
<p>An <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6558285/Little-Ice-Age-hundreds-years-ago-cooling-bottom-Pacific-researchers-find.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">article about ocean temperature history/modeling</a> has this plot:</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/IGUtQ.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/IGUtQ.jpg" alt="Purty colors" /></a></p>
<p>Where the units are given as <code>cK</code>.</p>
<p><code>cK</code> does not seem to be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Convert/list_of_units/temperature" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a standard temperature unit</a> and <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=units%20of%20temperature%20list%20%22cK%22" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Google searches return millions of results that don't seem relevant</a>.</p>
<p>While it might be &quot;fun&quot; if the temperatures shown were Kelvin, centi-Kelvins, or even Celsius, that seems unlikely as we are all still alive.</p>
<h3>So, what is <code>cK</code> as shown on the graphic, and how do you convert the temperatures shown to degrees Celsius?</h3>
<p>If the axis is really some delta temperature, what is the zero point?</p>

<oceanography><temperature><climatology>
What kind of temperature unit is "cK"?
Brock Adams
# What kind of temperature unit is "cK"?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-01-11)

An [article about ocean temperature history/modeling](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-6558285/Little-Ice-Age-hundreds-years-ago-cooling-bottom-Pacific-researchers-find.html) has this plot:

[![Purty colors](https://i.sstatic.net/IGUtQ.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/IGUtQ.jpg)

Where the units are given as `cK`.

`cK` does not seem to be [a standard temperature unit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Convert/list_of_units/temperature) and [Google searches return millions of results that don't seem relevant](https://www.google.com/search?q=units%20of%20temperature%20list%20%22cK%22).

While it might be "fun" if the temperatures shown were Kelvin, centi-Kelvins, or even Celsius, that seems unlikely as we are all still alive.

### So, what is `cK` as shown on the graphic, and how do you convert the temperatures shown to degrees Celsius?

If the axis is really some delta temperature, what is the zero point?

**Tags:** oceanography, temperature, climatology


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-01-11. Score: 6 | Accepted answer

It actually is the common *centi-* prefix, but applied to temperature *changes* in units of Kelvins rather than absolute temperatures. The research as quoted by the Daily Mail obscures this by simplifying the results for a general audience.

The analyses and results are much more clearly described in the [original refereed journal article](http://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6422/70), which clearly refers to changes in temperature - see in particular the discussion of their Fig. 1 (reproduced below), which explicitly refers to rates of temperature change of 0.1 and 0.02 °C at depths below 2000 m over the previous century, corresponding to cK contours of ~10 and near zero in the corresponding section of that figure.

So, the contours in the figure quoted by the Daily Mail represent changes in temperature between measurements made in the 1870s and the early 2000s, in units of 0.01 K (or equivalently, 0.01 °C).

[![Fig 1](https://i.sstatic.net/8nWKh.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/8nWKh.jpg)
Figure 1 from Gebbie and Huybers (2019), <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8413> - reproduced here for non-commercial use.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: The article you linked says that the question plot ("Fig. 2") is not over the last century, it shows changes `"between the 1870s and 2000s"`.  Add that to the answer and I will accept it. ...  Also, should the axis be labeled something like "Change (cK)" or " cK" etc?  
> **username_1**: That's correct, I edited my answer to clarify both the timescale shown in the Daily Mail's figure and point out the differing timescale I referred to for the figure I quoted. I would label the figure "T (cK)" personally - not to mention adding a request for more descriptive labels overall if I had been a reviewer :)  

---

