Input: [Steps] Death pronounced [Limiting Factors] if death occurs in the home then one of these people will need to be contacted availability of people able to do this task provide public education on the proper steps to take, designated number to call set up an on-call system 24/7 specifically for this task or develop strategies to utilize the existing emergency response system (i.e. 911) [Requirements]

Output: person legally authorized to perform this task

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada

Table 1: Usual Process for Corpse Management


Input: [Steps] Death certified [Limiting Factors] legally, may not necessarily be the same person that pronounced the death consider “collecting” deceased persons and having one authorized person perform this task en masse to improve efficiency [Requirements]

Output: person legally authorized to perform this task

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] Body wrapped [Limiting Factors] supply of human and physical (body bags) resources if death occurs in the home: the availability of these requirements consider developing a rotating inventory of body bags, if a short shelf life for body bags is a concern. consider training or expanding the role of current staff to include this task. provide this service in the home in conjunction with pronouncement and transportation to morgue. [Requirements]

Output: person(s) trained to perform this task body bags

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] Transportation to the morgue [Limiting Factors] availability of human and physical resources in hospital: consider training additional staff working within the facility consider keeping old stretchers in storage instead of discarding look for alternative suppliers of equipment that could be used as stretchers in an emergency, e.g. trolley manufacturers outside hospital: provide public education or specific instructions through a toll-free phone service re: where to take corpses if the family must transport [Requirements]

Output: in hospital: trained staff (orderly?) and stretcher outside hospital: informed person(s), stretcher and vehicle suitable for this purpose

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] Morgue storage [Limiting Factors] capacity of such facilities identify and plan for possible temporary morgue sites [Requirements]

Output: a suitable facility that can be maintained at 4°-8° C

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] Autopsy if required/ requested [Limiting Factors] availability of human and physical resources may be required in some circumstances ensure that physicians and families are aware that an autopsy is not required for confirmation of influenza as cause of death [Requirements]

Output: person qualified to perform autopsy and suitable facility with equipment

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] 1) CremationTable 1 - Footnote 1 * [Limiting Factors] capacity of crematorium/speed of process availability of coroner or equivalent official to issue certificate identify alternative vehicles that could be used for mass transport examine the capacity and surge capacity of crematoriums within the jurisdiction discuss and plan appropriate storage options if the crematoriums become backlogged discuss and plan expedited cremation certificate completion processes [Requirements]

Output: suitable vehicle of transportation from morgue to crematorium availability of cremation service a cremation certificate

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] 2)EmbalmingTable 1 - Footnote 2 ** [Limiting Factors] availability of human and physical resources capacity of facility and speed of process consult with service provided regarding the availability of supplies and potential need to stockpile or develop a rotating 6-month inventory of essential equipment/supplies discuss capacity and potential alternative sources of human resources to perform this task, e.g. retired workers or students in training programs consider “recruiting” workers who would be willing to provide this service in an emergency [Requirements]

Output: suitable vehicle for transportation from morgue trained person embalming equipment suitable location

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] Funeral service [Limiting Factors] availability of caskets availability of location for service and visitation contact suppliers to determine lead time for casket manufacturing and discuss possibilities for rotating 6-month inventory consult with the FSACTable 1 - Footnote 3 † to determine surge capacity and possibly the need for additional sites (e.g., use of churches etc. for visitation) [Requirements]

Output: appropriate location(s), casket (if not cremated), funeral director

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] 2a) Transportation to temporary vault or burial site [Limiting Factors] availability of human and physical resources identify alternative vehicles that could be used for this purpose consider use of volunteer drivers. FSAC strongly recommends that the care, handling and transport of remains be accomplished by trained workers rather than temporary untrained labour sources. [Requirements]

Output: suitable vehicle and driver

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] 2b) Temporary vault storage [Limiting Factors] temporary vault capacity and accessibility expand capacity by increasing temporary vault sites [Requirements]

Output: access to and space in a temporary vault

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Steps] 2c) Burial [Limiting Factors] availability of grave diggers and cemetery space extreme cold and heavy snowfall identify sources of supplementary workers [Requirements]

Output: grave digger, space at cemetery

Page 17 - The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector - Influenza - Public Health Agency of Canada


Input: [Events] animation_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's animation property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] click [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker icon was clicked.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] clickable_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's clickable property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] cursor_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's cursor property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] dblclick [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker icon was double clicked.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] drag [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is repeatedly fired while the user drags the marker.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] dragend [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the user stops dragging the marker.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] draggable_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's draggable property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] dragstart [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the user starts dragging the marker.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] flat_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's flat property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] icon_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker icon property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] mousedown [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired for a mousedown on the marker.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] mouseout [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the mouse leaves the area of the marker icon.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] mouseover [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the mouse enters the area of the marker icon.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] mouseup [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired for a mouseup on the marker.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] position_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker position property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] rightclick [Arguments] MouseEvent [Description]

Output: This event is fired for a rightclick on the marker.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] shape_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's shape property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] title_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker title property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] visible_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's visible property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Events] zindex_changed [Arguments] None [Description]

Output: This event is fired when the marker's zIndex property changes.

Google Maps JavaScript API V3 Reference   |   Google Maps JavaScript API   |   Google Developers


Input: [Task] Brace Yourself [Description] 1 - Recharge a combat bracelet or a skills necklace at the Legends' Guild [Quest(s) needed] Legends' Quest [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: Use a combat bracelet or skills necklace on the totem pole in the Legend's Guild. Attempting to recharge a fully charged combat bracelet or skills necklace does NOT work. Teleport to Ranging Guild will complete a Seers' Village Task while opening the bracelet for recharging


Input: [Task] Shadow Boxing [Description] 2 - Kill a shadow warrior in the Legends' Guild basement [Quest(s) needed] Legends' Quest [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: The shadow warriors do not appear as yellow dots on the minimap.


Input: [Task] Just Like That [Description] 3 - Enter the Magic Guild in Yanille [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 66 [Notes]

Output: Boosts can be used to enter the guild.


Input: [Task] Nice View [Description] 4 - Use the portal in the Magic Guild to teleport to Thormac's tower (west portal) [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 66 [Notes]

Output: The portal is on the top floor and on the westernmost wall.


Input: [Task] You're the Dirty Rascal [Description] 5 - Be on the winning side in a game of Castle Wars [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: A draw will not count.


Input: [Task] Ourania Mania [Description] 6 - Cast the Ourania Teleport spell [Quest(s) needed] Lunar Diplomacy [Skill(s) needed] 71 [Notes]

Output: Requires 1 Law, 6 Earth and 2 Astral runes. Must be on Lunar Spellbook and have talked to Baba Yaga after completing Lunar Diplomacy to learn the spell. Boosts may be used to reach the magic skill requirement


Input: [Task] Not on My Watch [Description] 7 - Pickpocket a watchman in Yanille while wearing gloves of silence [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 65 54 [Notes]

Output: The attempt must be successful to count. Boosts may be used for the thieving requirement. Watchmen can be found on the second floor of the tower north of Yanille.


Input: [Task] It Just Croaked [Description] 8 - Kill a frogeel in the Tower of Life [Quest(s) needed] Tower of Life [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: Use a Raw cave eel and Giant frog legs on the Western altar. NOTE: Be careful with the Giant frog legs, do not eat it, make sure you right-click on it. A high combat level is recommended


Input: [Task] Get Your Stinking Hands Off Me [Description] 9 - Have a zookeeper put you in Ardougne Zoo's monkey cage [Quest(s) needed] Monkey Madness [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: Wield the Karamjan Monkey greegree while in the Zoo and speak to one of the Monkey Minders, they will put you in the cage.


Input: [Task] Vine-Detta [Description] 10 - Kill your own Wild jade vine after the Back to my Roots quest [Quest(s) needed] Back to my Roots [Skill(s) needed] 59 72 53 [Notes]

Output: Plant a jade vine, check its health and leave it for a while. Optionally, pay Horatio 10 Wildblood hops to protect it. Come back after a while, it should be wild. Remember to take a good hitting hatchet.


Input: [Task] Living on a Prayer [Description] 11 - Use the Air Guitar emote near the musician southeast of the monastery south of Ardougne [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: Most music needed for this achievement can be unlocked by doing quests or Dungeoneering. The Air Guitar emote requires 500 music tracks unlocked


Input: [Task] Who Wants to Watch the Watchtower? [Description] 12 - Cast the Watchtower Teleport spell [Quest(s) needed] Watchtower [Skill(s) needed] 58 [Notes]

Output: Requires 2 law runes and 2 earth runes. Simply teleport. Teleport tabs don't work.


Input: [Task] Monkey Business [Description] 13 - Cross the monkey bars in the Yanille Agility Dungeon [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 57 [Notes]

Output: The entrance north of Yanille requires a knife or weapon with slash. The entrance in southern Yanille requires 82 Thieving and a Lockpick to access. You do not need to be successful, a failed attempt will also complete the task.


Input: [Task] It's My Newt [Description] 14 - Catch a red salamander from the Hunter area outside of Ourania Altar [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 59 [Notes]

Output: Requires a small fishing net (toolbelt does not work!) and a rope to set up traps. If you have done As A First Resort... , the hunter pool means you can catch the salamander with as low as 52 Hunter. However, this method is not recommended due to travel time between the hunter pool and the hunting area, even with the Ourania Teleport spell, it is extremely difficult to do under 54 Hunter.


Input: [Task] A Taste of the Exotic [Description] 15 - Pick a papaya or coconut from the fruit tree patch near Tree Gnome Village [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 57 [Notes]

Output: It takes about 16 hours for these trees to grow. It does not have to be a new tree.


Input: [Task] Blood Bank Withdrawal [Description] 16 - Attempt to steal blood runes from the chest in the Chaos Druid Tower's dungeon [Quest(s) needed] None [Skill(s) needed] 59 [Notes]

Output: Does not need to be successful, merely attempting to open the chest will complete the task.


Input: [Task] Artillery Strike [Description] 17 - Use a catapult in Castle Wars after gaining the knowledge from the Catapult Construction quest [Quest(s) needed] Catapult Construction [Skill(s) needed] None [Notes]

Output: Just use a rock with a catapult and shoot. You don't need to hit anyone or anything.


Input: [Comments] Security guards walk through school and parking lot periodically throughout the day. [Categories]

Output: Campus Safety

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Comments] A lot of family activities. [Categories]

Output: What to do for fun

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Comments] The food is delicious. [Categories]

Output: Food and Dining

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Comments] There are no dorms on campus. [Categories]

Output: Dorm Life

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Comments] The academic is fair. [Categories]

Output: Academic Rigor

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Comments] Be the best you can be. Do the best you can do. Good Luck. [Categories]

Output: Tips for prospective students

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Comments] Alamance Community College is a really good college. Its convenient for most students. Staff is very friendly and helpful. Wonderful appearance. Low cost. [Categories]

Output: In three sentences

Alamance Community College Reviews: Student Reviews and Ratings | Cappex


Input: [Type of note] Sketchnotes [Organization] Shared notebook, tagged by type [Improvements] Fine the way it is [Description]

Output: Collection of my sketchnotes for easy searching

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Inspiration [Organization] Notebook, tagged by technique [Improvements] Tag and file when clipping, identify key areas of focus [Description]

Output: Interesting sketchnotes, images, and web designs

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Visual library [Organization] Notebook, titles updated, duplicates merged [Improvements] Improve workflow – delegate titling? [Description]

Output: Visual thesaurus / sketches of abstract and concrete stuff

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] E-mail archives [Organization] None at the moment; notebook and tags [Improvements] Tag and file when forwarding [Description]

Output: Keep important information no matter which e-mail inbox it’s from

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] People, conversations [Organization] Notebook [Improvements] Add full names; consider Evernote Hello for mobile input? [Description]

Output: Quick notes from my mobile

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Ideas and thoughts [Organization] Notebook [Improvements] Should have weekly task to review and act on; separate from main Inbox? [Description]

Output: Quick notes from my mobile

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Actions [Organization] Notebook [Improvements] Should have weekly task to review and act on / copy into my Org file [Description]

Output: Quick notes from my mobile, when I’m away from Org

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Cooking [Organization] Notebook, tagged by technique or dietary considerations [Improvements] Review periodically; update when cooked [Description]

Output: Recipes, usually with pictures

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Wishlist [Organization] None at the moment; tags, probably [Improvements] Tag and file when clipping [Description]

Output: Resources to buy after more consideration

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Reference books [Organization] Notebook, search [Improvements] Go to the library more often [Description]

Output: Books held by the Toronto Reference Library, to request next time I’m there

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Letters [Organization] Notebook, tagged by person [Improvements] Fine the way it is [Description]

Output: Scanned letters so that I can review correspondence

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] PDFs [Organization] Inbox, occasionally tagged [Improvements] Use Web Clipper to specify tags and file in Notes right away [Description]

Output: Makes PDFs more searchable

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Blog posts / casual browsing [Organization] Notebook [Improvements] Use Web Clipper to file in Notes right away [Description]

Output: Interesting things that might be useful someday, especially for related items

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Other sketches [Organization] Notebook [Improvements] Fine the way it is [Description]

Output: Scanned sketchbook pages so that I can review

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Private notes [Organization] Notebook [Improvements] Have an outline? [Description]

Output: Things that I might want to remember or write about someday, but not yet

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Blog post ideas [Organization] Notebook, some tags [Improvements] Add links to outline? [Description]

Output: Inspiration, drafts, links, images, checklists

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Business and personal receipts [Organization] Notebook; tags, or just use folders on my drive? [Improvements] Decide where to do the organization; have an assistant retitle before import? [Description]

Output: Back up business and personal receipts; possibly be able to search through them

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Type of note] Blog research? [Organization] No organization; search by keywords or sourceurl: [Improvements] Clip, but remove from inbox quickly [Description]

Output: Clipped pages so they’ll show up in Google Search and related notes, and so that I can review them even if the source disappears (payoff > 2 years)

Thinking about how I can use Evernote more effectively - sacha chua :: living an awesome life


Input: [Task] Identify auras while using detect magic [DC] 15 + spell level [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Arcana

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify a spell effect that is in place [DC] 20 + spell level [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Arcana

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify materials manufactured by magic [DC] 20 + spell level [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Arcana

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify a spell that just targeted you [DC] 25 + spell level [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Arcana

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify the spells cast using a specific material component [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Arcana

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify underground hazard [DC] 15 + hazard's CR [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Dungeoneering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify mineral, stone, or metal [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Dungeoneering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Determine slope [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Dungeoneering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Determine depth underground [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Dungeoneering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify dangerous construction [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Engineering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Determine a structure's style or age [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Engineering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Determine a structure's weakness [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Engineering

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify a creature's ethnicity or accent [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Geography

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Recognize regional terrain features [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Geography

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know location of nearest community or noteworthy site [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Geography

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know recent or historically significant event [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: History

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Determine approximate date of a specific event [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: History

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know obscure or ancient historical event [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: History

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know local laws, rulers, and popular locations [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Local

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know a common rumor or local tradition [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Local

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know hidden organizations, rulers, and locations [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Local

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify natural hazard [DC] 15 + hazard's CR [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nature

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify a common plant or animal [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nature

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify unnatural weather phenomenon [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nature

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Determine artificial nature of feature [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nature

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know current rulers and their symbols [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nobility

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know proper etiquette [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nobility

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know line of succession [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Nobility

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know the names of the planes [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Planes

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Recognize current plane [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Planes

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify a creature's planar origin [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Planes

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Recognize a common deity's symbol or clergy [DC] 10 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Religion

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Know common mythology and tenets [DC] 15 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Religion

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Recognize an obscure deity's symbol or clergy [DC] 20 [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Religion

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Task] Identify a monster's abilities and weaknesses [DC] 10 + monster's CR [Knowledge Skill]

Output: Varies

Knowledge (Int; Trained Only) - Pathfinder_OGC

Table: Knowledge Skill DC's


Input: [Pathway Name] On-site Surface Soils [Source] Contaminated Soils [Medium] Surface Soils [Receptor Population] Employees [Time of Exposure] Past Present Future [Exposure Activities] Working outside on-site [Estimated Number Exposed] 6 [Chemicals] Table 3 [Exposure Route]

Output: Ingestion Inhalation Dermal

Table 4. Completed Exposure Pathways


Input: [Pathway Name] Off-site Surface Soils [Source] Contaminated Soils [Medium] Surface Soils [Receptor Population] IDOT Employees [Time of Exposure] Past Present Future [Exposure Activities] Maintaining road ditches [Estimated Number Exposed] 5 [Chemicals] Table 3 [Exposure Route]

Output: Ingestion Inhalation Dermal

Table 4. Completed Exposure Pathways


Input: [Pathway Name] On-site Surface Water [Source] Contaminated Water [Medium] Ponded Water [Receptor Population] Employees [Time of Exposure] Past [Exposure Activities] Working outside on-site [Estimated Number Exposed] 6 [Chemicals] Table 1 [Exposure Route]

Output: Dermal

Table 4. Completed Exposure Pathways


Input: [Pathway Name] Off-site Surface Water [Source] Contaminated Water [Medium] Ponded Water [Receptor Population] IDOT Employees [Time of Exposure] Past [Exposure Activities] Maintaining road ditches [Estimated Number Exposed] 5 [Chemicals] Table 1 [Exposure Route]

Output: Dermal

Table 4. Completed Exposure Pathways


Input: [Pathway Name] Private Wells [Source] Groundwater [Medium] Water [Receptor Population] Employees [Time of Exposure] Past Present Future [Exposure Activities] Consumption and use of well water for personal hygiene [Estimated Number Exposed] 6 [Chemicals] Table 2 [Exposure Route]

Output: Ingestion Dermal

Table 4. Completed Exposure Pathways


Input: [Pathway Name] Private Wells [Source] Groundwater [Medium] Water [Receptor Population] Residents [Time of Exposure] Present Future [Exposure Activities] Consumption and use of well water for personal hygiene [Estimated Number Exposed] 6 [Chemicals] Table 2 [Exposure Route]

Output: Ingestion Dermal

Table 4. Completed Exposure Pathways


Input: [Element Name] textureSliderBar [Data Type] String [Description]

Output: The background texture of the control


Input: [Element Name] textureSliderNib [Data Type] String [Description]

Output: The unfocused texture.


Input: [Element Name] textureSliderNibFocus [Data Type] String [Description]

Output: The focused texture


Input: [Element Name] font [Data Type] String [Description]

Output: The font used for the text label


Input: [Element Name] showrange [Data Type] Boolean [Description]

Output: Show a textual representation of the current value


Input: [Element Name] textcolor [Data Type] Long [Description]

Output: A color of the label text


Input: [Element Name] spintype [Data Type] Spintype [Description]

Output: The spin type of control: Int | Float | Text | Disc


Input: [Code] B [Definition] Available balances for all accounts [Command]

Output: Balance

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Code] H [Definition] Recent transactions per account [Command]

Output: History

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Code] C [Definition] List of text banking commands [Command]

Output: Command

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Code] HE [Definition] Help for text banking [Command]

Output: Help

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Code] L [Definition] Get a link to log in to Mobile Banking [Command]

Output: Login

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Code] R [Definition] Get a new activation code for Mobile Banking [Command]

Output: Recover

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Code] S [Definition] Stop Mobile Banking texts and alerts [Command]

Output: Stop

Bank Mobile with Nationwide and Download our App


Input: [Reviewer] Bethcat [Title] Fun and versatile [Date] 4/12/2015 6:55 pm [Comments]

Output: Always a fan of oil slick iridescence I was thrilled to find BL had bottled it. Like it's real life counterpart it's lovely no matter what light it's seen in. Long lasting it gets compliments no matter where I am. On my second bottle and hope it remains forever a part of the BL classics.

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] Robin, VA [Title] Amazing Color and Shimmer [Date] 4/5/2015 5:22 am [Comments]

Output: I absolutely love this color!!! It can be applied over another color, dark shades for a deep shimmer effect, or light shades for a lighter/brighter look, but I tend to wear 2 or 3 coats by itself and top it of with BL's top coat and I'm good to go with a fantastic purpley-blue shimmer mani that which compliments whichever color outfit I am wearing. This is my single favorite BL polish!!!!

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Title] Fab top coat [Date] 3/23/2015 6:42 am [Comments]

Output: This top coat adds a nice sparkle to any color you put it over. It's awesome on its own, but even more fab over any other color. I've tried it with dark colors and light colors and it works amazingly on either!

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] C Williams [Title] Gorgeous and Fun [Date] 8/21/2014 6:33 am [Comments]

Output: I have wanted this color for so long. I finally have a bottle. I tried it over Saucy Jack (which is a great color on its own) adding the Petrol overcoat takes it to the next level. I can't wait to try this with other colors.

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] Adrienne [Title] Sugar, Spice & Everything Nice! [Date] 7/3/2014 7:07 pm [Comments]

Output: I paired this with Marrow and love it--it spiced up the color perfectly! It gives any polish just the right amount of sheen. I also tried it alone and think it makes a nice simple statement for when you don't want too much color on your nails, but don't want to use a neutral color. It's like the frosting on a cake!

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] Brittany B [Title] Completely Gorgeous [Date] 7/3/2014 6:21 am [Comments]

Output: This overcoat is amazing. It looks great with every color I've paired it with, but goes above and beyond when paired with black or another especially dark color.

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] jstorck3899 [Title] subtle but powerful [Date] 7/2/2014 11:17 pm [Comments]

Output: This color is awesome! Worn alone it is subtle but makes a statement. Overtop of something else, it adds that special something I've been looking for!

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] bioniccherry [Title] great overcoat [Date] 7/2/2014 7:37 pm [Comments]

Output: love this color over Union Jack Black!

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Reviewer] Lilacs [Title] Rocker Chic [Date] 6/21/2014 9:20 am [Comments]

Output: Love this overcoat. It's so rocker chic when worn over dark colors. I absolutely love it!

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [Title] Glossy, duochrome-y, lovely [Date] 6/21/2014 8:30 am [Comments]

Output: I ordered Petrol to compare to Knackered. It's so lovely on. Very very glossy, but not metallic. As previous reviewers have said, it's very sheer on its own,requiring several coats for full color. However, I initially painted a test coat over an opaque coat of light gray I was already wearing and it was fully opaque immediately. You could do a light base coat of something neutral underneath first and you'd be good to go.

Petrol Overcoat Nail Lacquer : Sheer tornate overcoat : butter LONDON


Input: [ID] 4297 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:32:11 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I strongly disagree with you overturning President Bush's policy on embryonic stem cell research. To a policy that makes incentive to create and destroy human embryos. Instead of promoting adoption it promotes death. So disappointed that you seem to have no regard for the unborn child.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4298 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:08 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Human embryos are human beings in their young embryonic stage of life. All of us were at one time human embryos. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THESE YOUNG HUMAN LIVES TO BE KILLED FOR ANY REASON, inlcuding harvesting stem cells for research of any of reason! If you want to add federal funds for research - use it for adult stem cell research. You certainly must be aware of all of the advances with adult stem cells - NOT EMBRYONIC ONES!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4299 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:08 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Please do not consider degrading human life by the utilization of embryonic stem cells. This degradation has its roots in Nazi Germany.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4300 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:14 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Research on human embryonic stem cell has already been shown to be useless. Embryonic stem cells have cured not even one disease. Only adult stem cells have been successful. I do not want my tax dollars used to kill embryos through further failed experiments. Rather, I call upon you to promote the adoption of these human embryos.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4301 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:34 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: research that involves embryonic stem cells taken from human embryos is WRONG, EVIL AND BAD NO BAD, DO NOT DO THIS

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4302 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:36 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose the research on embryonic step cells. This research has already proven not to be effective and adult stem cells are healing people already without the destruction of a human life.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4303 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:53 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I appose the use of tax money to kill human embryo's for stem cell research. There has been great success with adult stem cells. In fact all the studies indicate that there has not been any promisng results from embryonic stem cell research. Why should we waste our resources with embryonic stem cells when there has been so much success with adult stem cells. Why should we pay to kill human enbryo's because scientist don't want restrictions of any kind on what they research. I for one do not want my money going to kill human embryo's. It would be in the best interest of everyone if we continue with the progress made on adult stem cells...there has already been great strides made with juvenile diabetes, spinal cord injuries and more. I would like to see my tax money continue to support the research of adult stem cells.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4304 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:54 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am not in favor of conducting research with embryonic stem cells. There is no need to feed the appetite of those who wish for the sacrifice of innocent human lives. Adult stem cells work much better.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4305 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:33:59 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: This is a crime against humanity. Cells are precious from the moment they are created. We are made in God's likeness from those same cells thus you are destroying something God has created and for which He had a purpose for its life.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4306 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:34:06 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We strongly oppose the proposed embryonic stem cell research plan, and submit that we seriously object to OUR tax dollars being used to support the death of these preborn children. We don't believe in killing human embryos to harvest their cells. With concern for our children and prayer for those who would foster this barbaric action,

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4307 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:34:15 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose these guidelines. I believe, as do many Americans, that human life begins at conception. Using these embryonic stem cells from human embryos derived from IVF will cause the needless death of the embryos.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4308 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:34:15 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Since the 22 lines of embryonic stem cells have not produced any favorable use, and adult stem cells have 70 or more medical uses, I am opposed to the further testing of embryonic stem cells. I feel that this isn't necessarilly about finding cures, but more about receiving funding for research. At the very least, if no use for has been found for embryonic stem cell research within a specified period of time, it should be abandoned & prohibited. Sincerely,

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4309 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:34:49 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Taxpayers money shuld be spent on a sure thing. there are over 70 diseases treatable with adult stem cells. With over 25 years of research with embryonic stems cells there are no diseases treatable with embroyonic stem cells. The venture capitalists invest in adult stem cell research not embryonic because they want results and a return on their investment. Don't waste taxpayers money on a lost cause and don't destroy human life to do it. I truly see this administration as pro death.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4310 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:34:56 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is appalling to me that my tax dollars are being used to fund the creation of life in order to destroy it. A life has begun at conception. If that life is cut short so callously (in the name of 'science'), we should be very concerned about how the Creator feels about it. Judgment will be poured out on those who harm His children. God have mercy on our country.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4311 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:04 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I recognize that celebrities or famous people in the public eye, such as Michael J. Fox, for example, have often spoken publicly about the need for embryonic stem cell research. These well-known ladies and Gentlemen have been articulate and occassionally even emotionally moving in their very passionate appeals. This does not mean that I have ever bought their arguments. I am a thirty-four year old man. For the last thirty-four years - my entire life, in other words - I have been living with a connective tissue disorder, known clinically as Osteogenesis Imperfecta (O.I.) I have a wonderful mother, who happens to agree with me on this contriversial medical issue, a father, who loves me unconditionally, a great personal care assistant, and an awesome sister and brother-in-law + an adorable nephew. I am blessed beyond what could have imagined at birth, and thanks to the aforementioned heroes, my life is currently not that bad. I cannot say that, despite the very best efforts of those who love me, that it has always been that way. In fact, it has not. The other truth that you would find out anyway, if you really got to know me well, is that I am pro-life!!! For this reason, and no other, I would have to believe that the use of embryonic stem cells were the one and only way to discover cures for currently incureable diseases. I would have to believe that Mr. Fox's very well-meaning suggestion was the sole way that these brakethroughs could occur. I do not believe either of these claims. I believe that the responsible procurement of adult stem cells, of which there are definitely enough, will serve everyone's needs just fine. To think, we can meet all the needs and we don't even have to sacrifice unborn children to do so. Perfect!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4312 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:08 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I HAVE PARKINSONS DISEASE WITH DYSTONIA OF THE FEET. PLEASE , HELP OUR SCIENTIST FIND A CURE.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4313 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:20 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Embryonic stem cells derive from the living bodies of human embryos. The embryos are killed by the process; thus this type of research involves the wrongful destruction of innocent, developing life. Human dignity can never benefit from this kind of lethal exploitation. To destroy human embryos for research purposes implies that some lives have more value than others, and that we may sacrifice some lives today so that future generations will benefit. This kind of reasoning is inherently dangerous. Respect for all human life – including human embryos – should guide all scientific research involving human subjects, as well as the legislative and executive branches of government that decide the funding of medical research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4314 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:25 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We are strongly opposed to our taxes being used to harvest embryonic stem cells. There has not been a single case proven to have helped solve any disease with embryonic stem cells, whereas adult stem cells have had overwhelming successes. You will be taking a human life...this is an abomination!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4315 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:26 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Dear National Institutes of Health, I am writing this letter to voice my complete opposition to the practice and use of my tax dollars in the research of human embryonic stem cells. Through simple study of human embryonic stem cell research and its benefits to mankind, there are currently no benefits or cures that have come from embryonic stem cells. However, what has been beneficial is the research into Adult stem cells which is not only ethically sound but the cells can also be found in multiple locations in the human body and (with further research) may have properties to be able to regenerate themselves (adult stem cells). On record there are 73 cures from Adult stem cells that are benefiting mankind. Embryonic stem cells have none. Please, I implore you, to stop funding an unethically sound and dead, embryonic stem cell, project. Instead look to where the benefits are coming from and invest in research for Adult stem cells. Thank you for your time.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4316 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:31 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is my understanding that what these guidelines do is send our tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death. Why would our government allow the destruction of embryos that could be donated for adoption to couples that are unable to conceive naturally and cannot afford expensive alternatives? Our government should be helping it's citizens, not destroying life!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4317 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:37 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose the use of federal funds for research on human embroyonic stem cells.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4318 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:35:46 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We oppose use of federal funds for research human embryonic stem cells. We do encourage adoption for the fertilized embryos left over from in vitro fertilization.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4319 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:00 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: On March 9, 2009 President Barack Obama issued an executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) which creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. I do not want to send my tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. I would rather promote the adoption of these human embryos; the draft guidelines would require their death. Adult stem cells have proven to be effective. Use them in research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4320 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:07 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not want my tax dollars going to fund something that specifically requires "death" of an embryo. This is morally wrong!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4321 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:26 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am against the use of my tax dollars to fund embryonic stem cell research (ESCR)that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. I am against this research because it destroys life. There have been very promising stem cell research from adult stem cells and new born navel cord stem cells. I request the consideration be made for funding in this area. Please DO NOT allow the research on embryonic stem cell research be funded by Federal money. Sincerely,

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4322 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:36 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I have a cancer called "Multiple Meyloma". If it weren't for my stem cell transplant,I may not be here to type this note... The informatoin going out to the public is so far off and twisted that no one knows the real truth of what is going on with this medical reserch.. So I will leave it at that and not get on a soap box rant. Thank you !!!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4323 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:43 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Government funding for embryonic stem cell research should not be used. Adult stem cell research has far outpaced any advances in embryonic cells and does not present any ethical controversy. If the purpose is truly to develop new cures, funds should be used to further fund promising technology: Adult Stem Cell research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4324 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:47 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Mr President and congress,this is to inform you we are totally opposed to using federal funding for research on human embryos.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4325 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:36:58 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is a scientific fact that there have been no benificial results from using stem cells from human embryos. In fact embyonic stem cell use has actually caused more medical problems and left the victims of this embyonic stem cell research with dashed hopes and in worse condition than before they were 'experimented on'. Yet, there have been many beneficial advances in medicine with adult stem cell research. There is no LOGICAL reason to allow continued use of embryonic stem cell researh when adult stem cell research is providing success with hope of healing for millions of humans. The only reason to continue to do embyonic stem cell reseach is either for the sole purpose of gaining federal funds or for purposes other than ethical healing of humans. Therefore, I ask that human embyonic stem cell research funding from my tax dollars not be allowed. I do not want to hurt more people and I do not want to contribute to the mutilation of tiny humans for any reason. Nor do I want my tax dollars to be used for murdering human beings, because in any culture that is unethical.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4326 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:37:35 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am opposed to the use of taxpayer money to be used for the destruction of human embryos. It is unethical to destroy a human embryo which could be adopted/implanted/carried by a women for a couple who wants a child. There have been no significant break-throughs with embryonic stem cell research however, there is great promise with the use of adult stem cells. Please fund research using adult stem cells which does not destroy a human embryo. History is full of examples where humans experimented on other humans because they did NOT consider them people, i.e, the Nazi's experimented on the Jews in the concentration camps and Black men were denied Penicillin to treat syphillis in the south....all for the "good of mankind!" Let us not make the same mistake--Killing a human embryo for the use of experimentation--is unethical. sincerely,

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4327 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:37:38 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I opposed the overturning of the stem cell research to be paid for by the taxpayers. I also oppose using a fetus cells for research. I believe former President Bush's guidelines for research fit into my Christian belief more than the guidelines that President Obamha is proposing. I am speaking for the children that will be murdered in this process. Listen to the American people that are crying out for the unborn children.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4328 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:37:46 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Since there has been no evidence that embryonic stem cell research is successful, why do we continue to waste tax payer money for this unethical practice? Adult stem cell research has had great success and does not require the killing of a human life. How can it be claimed that this group of people are ethically responsible when they endorse the killing of life? Each of you will be held accountable when you stand before God and try to explain your actions. Stop this barbaric practice and listen to your conscience, not a President who has no regard for the sanctity of life.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4329 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:38:12 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: For many Americans with a personal connection to type 1 diabetes, the Administration’s expansion of the federal policy on embryonic stem cell research has renewed our hope for a cure. I am writing today to support the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) draft guidelines and suggest a change to ensure promising, ethically conducted research currently underway will be eligible for federal funding in the future. The Administration’s Executive Order on stem cell research restored scientific decision-making to its rightful place at the NIH. In these guidelines, the NIH has demonstrated its capacity to formulate a research framework that will unleash the potential of embryonic stem cell research while maintaining the highest safety and ethical standards. I would encourage the NIH, however, to grandfather into this policy stem cell lines that have received federal funding, as well as existing lines that were derived in an ethically-responsible manner according to the best practices at the time. Research on these stem cell lines should be eligible for federal funding so that scientists can maximize the scientific advancements already achieved through research on these lines. Research should be vigorously pursued on all promising stem cell sources that could potentially lead to a cure for type 1 diabetes. While embryonic stem cell research is still in its early stages, this research has already yielded impressive results in our continuing effort to find a cure for type 1 diabetes. Recent research suggests that embryonic stem cells can be differentiated to produce the insulin-producing beta cells that could reverse the course of type 1 diabetes. We do not yet know which stem cell sources may ultimately lead to a cure or be the most clinically useful or practical for patients with type 1 diabetes. It is clear, however, that the more knowledge we gain about embryonic stem cells, the better we can assess the full therapeutic potential of all stem cell sources. These draft guidelines allowing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research using excess embryos from fertility clinics will ensure that this research matures and its potential is more fully realized. I commend the NIH for allowing this important research to expand in a scientifically and ethically appropriate manner.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4330 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:38:18 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I think Embryonic Stem Cell Research is wrong I think it is immoral and destroys life. why can't we use Adult Stem Cells we are going against what our forefathers would have wanted

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4331 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:38:20 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am in favor of federally funded human embryonic stem cell research. I think that any medical advancements that come as a result of this research should be clearly stated; this way anyone who opposes this work may then have the opportunity to reject any help derived from it.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4332 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:38:22 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: If you ask someone when life begins, you get different answers. This me to believe they really do not know and are just guessing. Life begins with the embryo. It's a slippery slope when you start messing with when life begins. Stem cell research can be done in other ways. Besides, if not you still do not take apart a life for some research. I strongly advocate that we do not use embryos for research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4333 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:38:52 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Please be very careful on this decision because interpretation between authorizatin to do stem cell research may mean to one, death to an individual is eminent and therefore, let us just let that person 'pass on' in order to get the needed produce for stem cell research or let's jump on the band wagon of abortion to get that fluid for stem cell research. Life for all is as important as life to do research for. It's one thing to use it from a body that has deceased for natural causes without encouragement or assistance but who is going to monitor that - the government again. Example: If your mother were near death and you found out that someone interpreted that if she went ahead and 'passed on' then we can get what we need for stem cell research. That is one way some people would interpret that concept.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4334 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:38:54 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We believe this legislation is terrible. After we had come so far toward protecting embryonic life under the Bush administration, we have now again seen "CHANGE." I agree that CHANGE can be a good thing and CHANGE was needed; however, movement toward a completely immoral, socialist society in which the most innocent and delicate lives are not protected is not the CHANGE we should want. I knew going into President Obama's four-year term that I would disagree with most of his ideas of CHANGE and I have to say that at this point in time, I have never been less proud to be an American. We hear of babies being killed in other countries as a form of population control and we are generally appalled by this idea; however, we have no problem with killing babies in order to do "research." The most heart-breaking part of this is that most of the same forms of research can be done with harvested cord blood and stem cells that do not need to be obtained from embryos themselves. America--it's time to turn our eyes upon Jesus. Life begins at conception. Psalm 106:34-43 "Israel failed to destroy the nations in the land, as the Lord had told them to. But they mingled with the nations and adopted their customs. They worshiped their idols, which became a snare to them. They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons. They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan, and the land was desecrated by their blood. They defiled themselves by what they did; by their deeds they prostituted themselves. Therefore the Lord was angry with his people and abhorred his inheritance. He handed them over to the nations, and their foes ruled over them. Their enemies oppressed them and subjected them to their power. Many times he delivered them, but they were bent on rebellion and they wasted away in their sin." Wake up America! We should be able to smell the stench of our own sin by now--it's disgusting. Pray for President Obama and the rest of the government--pray that they will wake up and smell their sin and realize that calling themselves "Christian" is as true as Bill Clinton's "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" statement.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4335 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:39:00 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose the use of federal funds for research of human embryonic stem cells.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4336 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:39:00 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Murder by any name is still murder...

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4337 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:39:26 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: To whom it may concern, I do not support the use of embryonic stem cell research as proposed in the "NIH Stem Cell Guidelines" I quote: II. Guidelines for Eligibility of Human Embryonic Stem Cells for Use in Research A. The Executive Order: Executive Order 13505, Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells, states that the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), through the Director of the NIH, may support and conduct responsible, scientifically worthy human stem cell research, including human embryonic stem cell research, to the extent permitted by law. Nor do I ever want my tax dollars to support this barbarian practice. I am directly opposed to the abortion of human life at any stage and certainly opposed to then use that precious little life for a scientific experiment. I never thought I would see the day when human life was so reduced to a mere approval of a bill or a sign off on paper. We should all be ashamed of ourselves for corrupting God's creation so. Sinserly, *****, PA.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4338 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:40:06 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is wrong to send our tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, you're trying to kill the embryos - i.e. you're commiting "MURDER"! SO, PLEASE STOP USING OUR TAX DOLLARS TO DO STEM CELLS RESEARCH!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4339 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:40:18 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We strongly oppose the use of embryonic stem cells for research purposes. Thank you,

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4340 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:40:27 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Absolutely no need to use embryonic stem cells - adult stem cells are doing wonders. Trials with embryonic stem cells have been disastrous. Leave the embryonic stem cells for possible adoption. Such tests will do more harm than good. If companies still want to do them, they can use their own funds.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4341 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:40:31 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Stem Cell Research can be accomplish without the use of unborn babies. This is proven to be true. How can you justify killing an unborn baby and using it to help save a life. Something is truly missing in the hearts of the supporters. God help us!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4342 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:41:51 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: There is no definitive proof that using embryonic stem cells can or will provide better results than adult stem cells. It is morally unethical to say the least. And as with the global warming hoax, many decide that the debate is over when they refuse to acknowledge the many who disagree and have proven them wrong. I don't care how many "celebrities", who falsely claim they "know" better, publicize and support it. That alone would make me think twice.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4343 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:41:57 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose use of federal funds for resarch on human embryonic stem cells. It kills a baby. That is murder.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4344 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:41:59 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I disagree with spending my tax payer dollars to fund embronic stem cell research. I do not support killing human life to experiment on. No health improvements/innovations can be tracked back to embryonic stem cell research only adult stem cell research. Please do not spend my money to support this deadly practice. God will surely hold us all accountable.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4345 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:42:13 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: To whom it may concern, I am deeply opposed to the use of federal fund for embryonic stem cell research as recently approved by Pres. Obama. There is no need for this when adult stem cells are sp readily avalable, have been proven to work, and do not cause the demize of fertilized eggs.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4346 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:42:29 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Please do not use federal funds to create and/or destroy embryos for research. It is immoral to take life in this way and there is NO need to do this since adult stem cells have shown to be very promising in research. As a tax payer and a Roman Catholic, I object strenuously to using MY tax dollar to fund any form of embryonic stem cell research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4347 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:42:55 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not want to have any part in killing a living human being. This is our hard-earned money, and I feel you are using it in a terribly immoral way. There are already proven ways to use adult stem cells. The use of embryonic stem cells is absolutely horrific! If allowing the killing of this life is so easy for you to do, what will be next?

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4348 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:43:02 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is very sad that they just want to destroy these babies. I don't think that our money should be going to this, especially in these tough economic times. I have heard some research saying that they can just do stem cell research and it is just as good as embryonic stem cell research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4349 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:43:14 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: This is to voice my opposition to the use of federal funds for research This is to voice my opposition to the use federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4350 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:43:50 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am strongly opposed to the funding of embryonic stem cell research by the NIH. It is not necessary to engage in such ethically controversial and morally irresponsible research out of a misplaced sense of scientific curiousity when more ethical and empirically successful forms of such research are available for funding.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4351 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:43:51 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Life begins at conception. Whether by men and women or embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for reproductive purposes. Life is life. If they are no longer needed for that purpose they should be treated with the same respect as any human would be afforded and be buried.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4352 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:43:57 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Regarding embryonic stem cell research (ESCR), that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos, I wish to state my OPPOSITION. I do NOT want my tax dollars to fund this killing!!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4353 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:44:00 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: To whom it may concern ADULT human stem cells do not destroy the life of a human being and should be the only stem cells used for research. Life is a very precious gift and should be protected and valued in all stages!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4354 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:44:02 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am opposed to the use of federal tax dollars for the use of Human Stem Cell research. This is a direct violation of my religious freedom as an American citizen. My tax dollars should not go to fund something that I stand against religiously. I believe that life begins at conception and that if these embryos are used for research, it is murder, just like abortion is murder. I have known couples who have done embryo adoption because they are not able to have children of their own and to think that those babies could have been sacrificed in the name of research is horrible. Thank you for allowing me to share my opinion on this matter.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4355 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:44:40 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: ***** Message List | Delete Previous | Next Forward | Reply | Reply All Subject: Oppose the Obama Embryonic Stem Cell Regulations View Full Header View Printable Version View as plain text ***** From: ***** Date: Fri, May 1, 2009 7:20 am To: ***** Priority: Normal Please submit your comment directly to the National Institutes of Health by May 26, 2009 to oppose use of federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells. As you may know, President Bush's policy was to allow funding for research that involved embryonic stem cells taken from human embryos so long as the cells were obtained on or prior to August 9, 2001. Since then, the government has funded research on over 22 stem cell lines. President Bush's policy erected a wall and did not encourage the further killing of human embryos for their cells. However, on March 9, 2009 President Barack Obama issued an executive order that overturned President Bush's policy and opened the floodgates for funding more embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) that creates an incentive to create and destroy human embryos. President Obama designated the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to draft guidelines for distributing funds for this research. Last week, April 23, NIH officially posted draft guidelines to open federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. What these guidelines do is send your tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death. We strongly oppose these regulations!! Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter of importance.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4356 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:44:41 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I respectfully request that no additional embryonic stem cell research lines be made available for research. For over 20 years, research has been performed with embryonic stem cell research and, in this time, no proven cures or therapies have been discovered. The argument that more research with embryonic stem cells will open up new avenues is debatable. Why has nothing been found in the past 20 years? Instead, research and money should be spent on adult stem cells. With over 70 different therapies/cures, the results of this research are proven.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4357 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:44:42 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not support my tax dollars being used to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. I support and promote the adoption of these human embryos instead of requiring their death.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4358 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:45:04 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Matt.25:45,46a "Then shall He answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to Me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment."

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4359 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:45:24 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It has been shown that ADULT stem cells have been successful! It has been shown that embryonic stem cells have produced absolutely NOTHING! Embryos are incipient human beings! Please do not destroy incipient human beings to produce NOTHING! GO with what has already PROVEN to be successful--adult stem cells.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4360 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:45:47 PM [Comments]

Output: I oppose the use of tax dollars for funding embryonic stem cell research as it destroys human life. Adult stem cells have been found to be more effective in treating disease. Why are we not making that research more of a priority?

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4361 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:45:58 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: This letter is in reference to draft guidelines for federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. I am opposed to using my tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of requiring the death of these human embryos, I request that you promote the adoption of these human embryos. While I cannot be responsible for the actions taken by individual couples when determining how to deal with "leftover" embryos, I feel it is unfair to use my tax dollars to destroy human life when I am so opposed to that. Thank you for your consideration.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4362 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:46:19 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We are vehemently opposed to use of Federal taxpayer money for use in embryonic stem cell research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4363 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:46:25 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I strongly oppose research on human embryonic stem cells which have been "left over" after in vitro fertilizations....these embryos should be offered for adoption...not sent to death. Even more so, I oppose cloning human embryos for research and experimentation. We should focus our energies on adult stem cell research which is actually showing promise. Nothing good will come from killing babies to look for cures. I'm livid that my tax dollars might be used to fund this.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4364 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:46:37 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is felt that the destroying of human embryos for the purpose of obtaining human cells for research is murder. Any time a viable fetus is killed for any purpose is murder, for example, if the murder of a pregnant human female transpires and the fetus does not survive, the perpretrator is charged with double homicide and not just with killing the mother. If this bill passes, then Obama, the Congressmen and Senators who sigh it will be guilty of murder by proxy. In addition, abortion in itself is, in my opinion, cold calculated murder and no other definition can be assigned to the act.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4365 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:46:37 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am opposed to using embrionic stem cell for research. We the public, do not hear enough on adult stem cell procedures which I understand are sufficient. I am very opposed to the gov't using my tax money for this.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4366 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:46:42 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: It is irresponsible that the federal government fund, let alone PERMIT, experimentation on human embryos. THEY ARE HUMAN. Those embryos will never grow into dogs, cats, frogs...only humans. Do not let these precious human beings be treated worse than animals and then discarded when they are no longer "useful." Perhaps the companies who have leftover human embryos can put them up for adoption - killing these people will only have a detrimental impact on society in the long run. Think of all the potential you are allowing to be killed. Who knows if one these people may become our President one day or may have a cure for AIDS. You'll never know if you just kill them.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4367 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:20 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: In my opinion, the regulations of NIH should forbid research on embryonic stem cells. Not ADULT stem cells, but embryonic stem cells for moral reasons - specifically human rights issues, as both biologically and genetically those embryos are human beings - embryonic human beings, but human beings nonetheless. There are several issues involved. 1. How were those embryos - fertilized ova - obtained? From miscarriages? From abortions? From traffickers in embryos? 2. Embryonic stem cell research has been going on for 25 years without, I understand, result, whereas ADULT stem cell research has resulted in progress in treating some 70 diseases. Therefore, why all the fuss about embryonic stem cell research? 3. The most fundamental questions concerning federally funded stem cell research is that such research can now take place and be funded pursuant to a Presidential Executive Order 13505. I thought that only the House of Representatives can appropriate the funding for any Federally funded program. Under our Constitution the President does not have the power to appropriate money for anything. (A) Isn't the President unconstitutionally usurping this Constitutional prerogative of the House? (B) Are Executive Orders per se Constitutional? (C) Shouldn't matters having to do with appropriations and expenditures of Federal funds for Federal programs be decisions of our elected representatives? (C) What about "government of the people, by the people and for the people"? Thank you,

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4368 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:32 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I plead with you to stop the use of so called "leftover" embryonic stem cells for research. You are killing the life of a child. These embryos could be used for adoptive purposes, thus saving the life of a child while also providing happiness to parents wishing for a child to love and nurture in their lives.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4369 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:37 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not think thatEmbryonic cell research shoild be funded by the Federal government. I understand that a lot of research has been successful with the use of adult stem cell rsearch. I feel this should continue.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4370 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:37 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am strongly opposed to embryonic stem cell research as such is morally and ethically unacceptable. Life begins at conception and to "harvest" embryonic stem cells in the name of finding cures for life itself is the ultimate irony and tragedy. Taking life to cure life is inhumane, especially when adult stem cell research has been proven just as, if not more viable an option. The ramifications of continued embryonic stem cell research sets precedence without boundaries and must be stopped before further women and children are exploited in the name of science.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4371 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:39 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not think thatEmbryonic cell research shoild be funded by the Federal government. I understand that a lot of research has been successful with the use of adult stem cell rsearch. I feel this should continue.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4372 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:43 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not want my tax dollars going to stem cell research. This is NOT something that I voted for.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4373 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:47:50 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: We appose our tax dollars being used to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Promoting the death of these Human embroyos instead of adoption is wrong.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4374 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:48:02 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose embryonic stem cell research. I do not want my tax dollars to fund any embryonic stem cell research.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4375 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:48:53 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I object to any stem-cell research wether ordered by Obama or any other person on unborn fetus.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4376 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:10 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I'm imploring you to do away with embryonic stem cell research. As I understand it, that which has been done so far has been unsuccessful in treating any diseases, while adult stem cells, on the other hand, have been quite effective in fighting several ailments, such as cicle cell anemia. It's immoral & unethical as well, since it takes the life of an unborn baby. I get upset at the thought that my tax dollars could contribute to this, mainly because those who could from the private sector won't due to the failure of experiments to this point (they must think enough have been done, or they'd help with costs). Thanks for your attention!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4377 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:12 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: From the Federal Register Notice, dated 04/23/09 "As described in these draft Guidelines, human embryonic stem cells are cells that are derived from human embryos, are capable of dividing without differentiating for a prolonged period in culture, and are known to develop into cells and tissues of the three primary germ layers. Although human embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos, such stem cells are not themselves human embryos." I find it difficult to believe that people who are so highly educated as to be able to endorse human embryonic stem cell experimentation cannot understand how the intentional destruction of one of these embryos is not destroying human life. If you left those cells to "divide...in culture..." and they continued to develop and you put them in an embryo-friendly environment (such as a uterus), these cells would form into a human being; not a zygote, not a fetus, a real person - like the experimenters themselves. PLEASE do not use federal funds to promote/perform human embryonic stem cell research. You are taking a life that does not belong to you, and using my money to do it - against my will (and, even according to the government's definition, I have my rights, even if a embryo or fetus does not).

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4378 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:19 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Why is it that with the success of adult stem cell development that we must insist on using our time and money and energy in the killing of human embros. It is a puzzle to me that thoughtful scientist exchange the saving of lives and the success with the use of adult stem cells for the proven failure of stem cell research using embros. As a tax payer I would like to see our tax dollars used wisely and in areas of proven success.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4379 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:25 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Why, in the name of all that is good, would we want legislation to promote stem cell research when 0 diseases have been helped by this method and 70 diseases have been cured with adult stem cells. Why waste the money and the lives to reinvent something that is already working?

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4380 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:38 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: we are opposed to embryonic stem cell research- you can get the same results by using blood- why should a child have to die for this? who are we the nazi party?

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4381 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:45 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I openly oppose the use of federal funds for research on embryonic stem cells. I do not want my tax dollars paying for this research which will bring death to these human embryos.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4382 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:49:48 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I urge that you do not destroy human embryos in order to do stem cell research. These embryos are human life and they should never be taken purely for research. They have no voice to speak or uphold their rights and it is our duty to speak for them.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4383 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:13 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Adult stem cells have ALREADY shown much more promise than embryonic stem cells. Put the money where proven success resides! Using embryonic stem cells is not only immoral but a waste of my taxpayer dollars. Put my tax dollars to use where success is already proven.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4384 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:16 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I do not think thatEmbryonic cell research shoild be funded by the Federal government. I understand that a lot of research has been successful with the use of adult stem cell rsearch. I feel this should continue.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4385 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:17 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am opposed to the use of federal funds for research on human embryonic stem cells and believe it is in violation of my rights as a taxpayer and is an inappropriate use of tax payer monies.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4386 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:20 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Don't do this since it is not a certainty that the stem cells are the best route to follow. Also, don't follow this road simply because of strong political pressure. Not smart!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4387 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:24 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Health (NIH) to draft guidelines for distributing funds for this research. Last week, April 23, NIH officially posted draft guidelines to open federal funding for research on human embryonic stem cells. What these guidelines do is send my tax dollars to experiment on stem cells taken from human embryos that supposedly are "leftover" from in vitro fertilization. Instead of promoting the adoption of these human embryos, these draft guidelines would require their death. I am in favor of promoting the adoption of these human embryos rather then thier death.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4388 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:28 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: The purposeful killing of an embryo, as is necessary for obtaining embryonic stem cells, is the killing of a human being. This violates the 6th Commandment, "you shall not kill." Additionally, itis done without the consent of the individual being killed. Any society which kills the most defenseless of its members for the potential good of the larger group has degraded its values, and has doomed itself.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4389 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:48 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I think it is disgraceful that even one human being believes it is acceptable to create A LIFE for the purposes of destroying that life. We should protect our most innocent not seek to detroy them. I believe that ALL life should be respected and I believe that all (this includes the unborn) have a right to life and the pursuit of happiness as stated in our Constitution. It was not long ago that another group was thought of as less than human (slaves), thankfully we came to our senses about that issue. I find it heart breaking that an African American president would not respect all human life...of all people...he should. When will the American people come to their senses about the unborn? They are human beings and deserve to be protected. And God will surely judge those that seek to destroy the life that he has wonderfully created and I don't think he will accept ANY excuses (and that includes the excuse about the issue being "above my pay grade" or anything about seeking to make medical advances for the greater good). I can't even imagine how anyone does not shudder at the mere thought of having to stand before Almighty God and try to explain that they not only did not fight to protect the life that God created but they in fact eagerly sought to destroy it. I am so sad for anyone that will be in that position.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4390 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:56 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I oppose any use of embryonic stem cells and funding of such by my taxpayer dollars. Life is too precious and is only given by GOD. Embryonic stem cell research is already used under the guidelines given by President Bush. Adult stem cells have much more value and do not involve taking of human life. Please have the courage to stop this madness of not valuing human life just to undertake possible uses of these cells. Private industry is welcome to invest in this research, but they don't. Here is the clue! It doesn't work!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4391 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:50:59 PM [Affiliation] Self [Organization Name] Primary Care-Giver/ Home School Teacher/ retired Commercial RE Broker [Comments]

Output: Re: Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines as per April 23, 2009 Federal Register Notice. This is to encourage you to consider the facts that NO significant diseases have been prevented/ cured by embryonic stem cells and that the research and applications have been VERY significant with Adult Stem Cells which have cured many diseases, therefore we need NO Embryonic Stem Cell Research. I hope you will agree and vote against it.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4392 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:51:17 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: I am strongly opposed to this suggested change in the guidelines on moral grounds. This expansion involves - in my opinion - the taking of lives that could be cultivated for adoption. It is unconscionable to consider using our tax dollars to fund this activity that is considered by a majority of American citizens to be immoral.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4393 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:51:21 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: ONe does not destroy life in order to improve life. Adult stem-cell research is the way to go.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4394 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:51:45 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: As a healthcare professional (Physician Assistant) I spend my time trying to prolong life and increase the quality of life. While embryonic stem cell research may be promising, there have been NUMEROUS studies done on adult stem cells that have shown great results and promise cure rates for several chronic diseases. I am opposed to further research at the expense of life. The risk:benefit ratio is not worth it and above all, the sanctity of human life (no matter what stage of development) is at stake.

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4395 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:51:51 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: These draft Guidelines would allow funding for research using human embryonic stem cells that were derived from embryos created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for reproductive purposes and were no longer needed for that purpose. "They are still babies and still deserve to live. I have MS and would rather die than allow a baby to die to cure my disease."

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [ID] 4396 [Entry Date] 05/01/2009 at 03:52:08 PM [Affiliation] Self [Comments]

Output: Please do not change the rules and guidelines regarding embryo stem cell research !!

Listing of Comments on Draft NIH Human Stem Cell Guidelines


Input: [Patent application number] 20110182475 [Published] 07-28-2011 [Description]

Output: TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAPPING AND DETECTION - A system and method provides maps identifying the 3D location of traffic lights. The position, location, and orientation of a traffic light may be automatically extrapolated from two or more images. The maps may then be used to assist robotic vehicles or human drivers to identify the location and status of a traffic signal.


Input: [Patent application number] 20140018992 [Published] 01-16-2014 [Description]

Output: Transitioning a Mixed-Mode Vehicle to Autonomous Mode - Disclosed are methods and devices for transitioning a mixed-mode autonomous vehicle from a human driven mode to an autonomously driven mode. Transitioning may include stopping a vehicle on a predefined landing strip and detecting a reference indicator. Based on the reference indicator, the vehicle may be able to know its exact position. Additionally, the vehicle may use the reference indictor to obtain an autonomous vehicle instruction via a URL. After the vehicle knows its precise location and has an autonomous vehicle instruction, it can operate in autonomous mode.