I was browsing the C# topic on generics and noticed that there wasn't a good canonical example for how to marry behavior that knows the type arguments with scenarios in which you do not know the type arguments but can still in principle interact with that type in a non-generic way. (perhaps I missed it?)
Regardless, the point of this question is to address the scenario in which a potential documentation-contributor can't offer even an attempt at an example without being confronted with the message, "This topic has the maximum number of examples". I completely understand why this check exists (drowning in examples), but it seems a bit coarse, and, moreover, really kind of puts the kibosh on a contributor's desire to participate.
Confronted with the sentence, "Consider removing superfluous examples or splitting out a portion of the examples here into a new topic." I feel like one is left bereft of any seriously actionable way to provide the content that was volunteered.
I don't know what the solution is, but it seems to me that there needs to be a more effective apparatus such that contributors can still feed their input into the system (too many examples -- perhaps at least allow the example to go into a queue) without forcing the potential contributor with no recourse save saving the contribution for later and engaging in an exercise of community persuasion.
I suspect it's common that effective contributors are not also effective persuaders. I think the status quo prevents too much signal from being processed.