text:
The set of beliefs that make up the civil religion of the West has evolved over time and has undergone significant shifts since the early 1900s. Here are some examples of how these beliefs have changed:

1. Belief in democracy: The belief in democracy has grown and become more widespread since the early 1900s. Many Western countries have expanded the right to vote to all citizens and have developed more participatory forms of government. However, the rise of authoritarianism in some parts of the world has led to concerns about the future of democracy.

2. Belief in capitalism: The belief in capitalism has become more entrenched and dominant since the early 1900s. In many Western countries, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has been associated with rising prosperity and economic growth. However, there have been growing concerns about the concentration of wealth and power among a small group of individuals and corporations, and about the negative impact of unbridled capitalism on the environment and on social inequality.

3. Belief in human progress: The belief in human progress has continued to shape Western societies since the early 1900s, but it has been tempered by a growing recognition of the limits of technology and the unintended consequences of scientific advancement. The devastating impact of two world wars, the Cold War, and other conflicts has also led to a more skeptical view of the idea of inevitable progress.

4. Belief in individualism: The belief in individualism has remained a central tenet of Western societies since the early 1900s, but it has been challenged by the rise of collective movements and ideologies. The civil rights movement, feminism, and other social movements have emphasized the importance of group identity and collective action, while postmodernism and other cultural movements have challenged the idea of fixed individual identities.

5. Belief in diversity and tolerance: The belief in diversity and tolerance has become more widespread and accepted in Western societies since the early 1900s. Many Western countries have made significant progress in promoting equal rights and opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their personal characteristics. However, there has also been a rise of nativist and xenophobic movements in recent years, which have challenged the idea of diversity and tolerance.

Overall, the civil religion of the West has evolved over time and has been shaped by a wide range of historical, political, social, and cultural factors. While some beliefs have become more entrenched, others have been challenged and reinterpreted in response to changing circumstances and new challenges.


text: The shift in these beliefs can be seen in several ways. For example, World War I was a turning point for many Americans because it led to an increased awareness of what was wrong with society. This was especially true in regards to race relations, where many Americans realized they could no longer ignore racism as a problem. As a result, there was a strong movement towards racial equality in America following World War I. These changes were also reflected in other areas such as immigration reform, women's suffrage, labor rights, and environmental protection. In addition to these changes, there were also shifts in how people viewed themselves as individuals. Instead of viewing themselves only through their religious affiliations or ethnic backgrounds, many Americans began to see themselves as part of a larger community with common goals and interests.

role: assistant


text: Since the early 1900s, the central beliefs of the civil religion that dominates the West have shifted to include more emphasis on human rights, environmental protection, and global cooperation. Additionally, the idea of democracy has become more widespread and accepted, and the rule of law has become more entrenched. These changes reflect the changing world and the need to address global issues such as climate change, poverty, and inequality.


text: If democracy is so important, then why are there so many monarchies in Europe?

role: prompter


text: The central beliefs of the civil religion that dominates the West at the beginning of the 21st century are based on individualism, freedom, equality, democracy, and progress. These values are often seen as a source of national pride and are used to promote a sense of unity within a society. Additionally, the belief in a higher power, such as God or a Supreme Being, is also common in the Western world and is often seen as part of a larger, shared belief system.


text: When did these beliefs begin to become the dominant thought in Western society?


text:
The beliefs that underlie civil religion in the West have evolved over time, and their origins can be traced back to various historical and cultural influences. However, some scholars suggest that the foundations of civil religion in the modern West can be traced back to the Enlightenment, a cultural movement that emerged in Europe in the 18th century.

During the Enlightenment, many thinkers began to question traditional religious authority and sought to develop a more rational and scientific approach to understanding the world. This led to the emergence of new ideas about individual liberty, reason, and human rights, which would eventually become central to civil religion in the West.

In the United States, the principles of civil religion were further shaped by the American Revolution, which was fought in part to defend the rights of individual citizens and establish a government based on democratic principles. The founding documents of the United States, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, were grounded in Enlightenment ideals and helped to solidify the values of civil religion in American society.

Over time, civil religion has continued to evolve and adapt to new social and cultural developments. Today, the beliefs and values that underlie civil religion in the West are deeply ingrained in many aspects of society, from politics and law to popular culture and everyday life. While there have been challenges to these beliefs over time, they remain a central part of the cultural fabric of Western societies in the 21st century.


text: Hi, can you write me a synopsis for a fantasy book full of dark humor whose main characters are four unlikely friends: a demon hunter, a vampire baroness, a werewolf and a gravedigger. They form a team for special tasks and occasionally save the world.


text: In the world of fantasy, four unlikely friends band together to form a team of special task force to take on extraordinary challenges. The team consists of a demon hunter, a vampire baroness, a werewolf, and a gravedigger. They come together to tackle the dark forces of the world with a side of dark humor. From saving the world to saving their own skin, these four unlikely friends will face many obstacles and come out on top. Follow their adventures as they fight the forces of evil, find unlikely allies and face their own inner demons. With their wits and courage, these four unlikely friends will make sure that justice is served and the world is a better place.


text: hi


text: The world is full of monsters, and only a few brave souls dare to face them. One of them is Jack, a demon hunter who has a knack for finding trouble. He is joined by his unlikely friends: Lilith, a vampire baroness who enjoys the finer things in life; Rex, a werewolf who struggles to control his animal instincts; and Morty, a gravedigger who knows more about the dead than the living. Together, they form a team for special tasks, taking on the most dangerous and bizarre missions that no one else can handle. Along the way, they encounter all kinds of creatures, from zombies to dragons, and use their skills, weapons and dark humor to survive. Sometimes, they even save the world.


text: The name of the gravedigger is too humorous so please change it to something more surreal.


text: John, a demon hunter who likes to play ball with demons heads, needs to find a way to rescue his brother who fell into another dimention. With the help of a vampire baroness called Gruba, a werewolf and a gravedigger, they would put their friendship to the test and brotherhood to the limits while casting spells that would take them to all sorts of psychodelic scenarios.


text: Create a broad outline for the book using this synopsis


text:
Sure! Here's a broad outline for the book:

Chapter 1: Introducing the characters
• We meet John, the demon hunter, and learn about his quest to rescue his brother.
• John meets Gruba, the vampire baroness, and they reluctantly team up to find a way to travel to the other dimension.
• They also meet the werewolf and the gravedigger, who join the team.

Chapter 2-5: Preparing for the journey
• The group spends time preparing for the journey, including researching spells and gathering supplies.
• Along the way, they face challenges and obstacles, such as dealing with rival demon hunters and evading the authorities.

Chapter 6-8: Traveling to the other dimension
• The group casts a spell and is transported to the other dimension, which is full of strange and dangerous creatures.
• They face challenges and battles along the way, testing their abilities and teamwork.
• The group begins to unravel a mystery behind the disappearance of John's brother.

Chapter 9-12: Saving John's brother
• The group discovers that John's brother is being held captive by a powerful demon.
• They face their toughest battle yet as they fight the demon and its minions to rescue John's brother.
• With John's brother rescued, the group begins their journey back home.

Chapter 13-15: Return to their world
• The group faces new challenges as they try to find their way back to their world.
• Along the way, they discover a plot by an evil sorcerer to destroy the world.
• The group teams up with other unlikely allies to stop the sorcerer and save the world.

Chapter 16: The aftermath
• The group returns to their world as heroes, but must deal with the aftermath of their adventure.
• They reflect on what they have learned and how their friendship has grown.
• The book ends with the group going their separate ways, but promising to reunite if the world needs saving again.


text:
Chapter 1: The Other Dimension

John receives a call that his brother has disappeared in another dimension
He seeks help from Gruba, a powerful vampire baroness, and they form an unlikely partnership
They meet a werewolf who can help them navigate through the different dimensions
They set off on a journey to rescue John's brother
Chapter 2: The Dark Forest

John, Gruba, and the werewolf arrive in the dark forest, a treacherous and mystical land
They are confronted by a group of goblins who try to stop them from moving forward
John and his team defeat the goblins, but they face more obstacles as they move deeper into the forest
Chapter 3: The Psychedelic Scenarios

John and his team enter into a magical portal, transporting them to a series of psychedelic scenarios
They battle monsters and witches as they try to make their way through the strange new world
They finally reach the end of the portal, but they are left with even more challenges ahead
Chapter 4: The Crypt

John and his team enter a dark and eerie crypt
They are forced to solve puzzles and battle ancient demons to progress further
They finally find John's brother, but they realize they are not alone
Chapter 5: The Final Battle

John and his team are confronted by the powerful demon who is responsible for taking John's brother
They engage in a fierce battle, using all their skills and magic to defeat the demon
In the end, they are able to save John's brother and return to their world, but not without facing the ultimate sacrifice.


text: The book follows John, a demon hunter, and his unlikely team of friends - Gruba, a vampire baroness, a werewolf, and a gravedigger - as they form a powerful alliance to save John's brother, who has been taken to another dimension. The team must draw on the strength of their friendship and battle their way through a series of darkly humorous and fantastical worlds, using spells and other magical abilities to complete their mission. Along the way, they must face powerful foes, uncover ancient secrets, and eventually save the world from a dark force. Their journey will take them through forests, dungeons, and other magical realms, and test their courage, strength, and wits.


text:
Scor the demon hunter is denied his late retirement when his lycanthrope-half-vampire young adult protégé Art, who happens to be his vampiric arch nemesis baroness Duan Fhuil's boytoy and her werewolf ex-husband "Eats His Meat"'s younger brother, is killed in mysterious circumstances, and to make matters worse, the local quadriplegic gravedigger "Handy" Manny fails to bury his corpse when the earth itself rejects it. This forces the necromantically-abled gravedigger to solve the mystery of the unburyable corpse during the funeral.

Manny publicly interrogates the corpse of Art to discover he's been prophesied to fight the cult of Saturday to prevent them from resurrecting the great and evil Baron Sunday Fhuil, which forced an uneasy alliance between the demon hunter wanting vengeance for his reinstatement, the baroness afraid of losing her estate to her father, the warewolf hoping to escape alimony payment through patricide, and the gravedigger hoping to keep his spotless record for putting people 6 feet under.

During their struggles against the cults of Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday, and finally against their mutual enemy, the cult of Saturday, this unlikely alliance blossoms into friendship. Their friendship devolves to pickering after defeating the resurrected baron and realising the fruitlessness of their endeavours until the next time the world needs saving.


text: What would make a good title for the book?


text: What can we talk about? I'm new to this AI thing.


text: If Kevin Smith is such a talented filmmaker and brilliant director, why is it his movies seem to be continually getting worse?


text: When was the first iPhone released and what were it's specifications?


text: 假设你现在是一个AI方向的博士生。


text: 好的，我现在是一个AI方向的博士生。请问你有什么需要帮助的吗？


text: 请详细解释一下开源项目OpenAssistant


text:
OpenAssistant是一个开源项目，旨在提供一个可扩展的、基于自然语言理解（NLU）的人工智能助手框架。该项目包括了一些核心组件，如NLU模块、对话管理模块、知识库模块等，同时也支持插件化开发，可以轻松地扩展新的功能和服务。

具体来说，OpenAssistant的核心组件包括：

NLU模块：该模块负责将用户输入的自然语言文本转换为结构化的数据。OpenAssistant支持多种NLU技术，如基于规则的方法、基于机器学习的方法、基于深度学习的方法等。

对话管理模块：该模块负责管理对话的上下文、处理用户请求、选择适当的响应并生成回复。OpenAssistant的对话管理模块使用基于规则、基于状态的机器学习、深度学习等技术来实现对话的管理。

知识库模块：该模块负责存储和管理知识和信息，支持快速检索和查询。OpenAssistant支持多种知识库技术，如图数据库、文本数据库、关系数据库等。

此外，OpenAssistant还支持插件化开发，用户可以轻松地扩展新的功能和服务。例如，用户可以开发新的技能插件，如天气查询、新闻推荐、智能家居控制等，然后将其集成到OpenAssistant中，使得助手的功能得到了扩展。

总之，OpenAssistant是一个可扩展的、基于自然语言理解的人工智能助手框架，它的目标是提供一个通用的框架，使得开发人员可以快速地构建出自己的智能助手系统。


text: 请问，如果我的博士研究题目希望基于OpenAssistant，有哪些可能的研究的方向或者内容呢？


text: 类似ChatGPT开源项目 OpenAssistant是一个不断开发的开源人工智能代理能够实现基本的对话和互动与越来越多的任务自动化


text: 既然已经有ChatGPT，那为什么还要开发OpenAssistant呢？


text:
我觉得OpenAssistant的目标就是本地运行，把神经网络的参数省下来专门处理语言和逻辑。知识库直接分离成知识图谱，用户可以像下载拓展包一样选择自己需要的知识类型。
这点对我的研究是非常有吸引力的，因为我始终认为单纯的大模型不是未来的发展方向，因为它没办法解构处理语言的模型和知识库。而OpenAssistant就开创了方向——把数据库独立出来。


text: 好的，我是一个博士生，我的研究方向是人工智能。


text: 请问你是Open Asistant吗？


text:
好的，作为一个AI方向的博士生，我会深入学习人工智能的理论基础和实践应用，掌握机器学习、深度学习、自然语言处理、计算机视觉等核心技术，不断关注前沿研究和发展趋势。

我还会积极参与相关的学术会议和研究项目，与同行们交流和合作，不断提高自己的专业水平和研究能力。同时，我也会关注AI技术对社会、经济、伦理等方面的影响，思考如何让AI技术更好地造福人类，而不是成为对人类的威胁。

总之，作为一个AI方向的博士生，我将致力于推动AI技术的发展和应用，同时也不断反思和探索AI技术的本质和意义。


text: 请问你在哪个大学读博？


text: What is the largest animal to have ever lived?


text: Sou um homem fisicamente pouco atraente, porém financeiramente estável e aculturado. Não consigo "matches" no Tinder e em outros aplicativos de relacionamento similares. Também não gosto de baladas, festinhas, bares e consumo de bebidas alcóolicas (ou drogas). Trabalho com tecnologia em home office e raramente saio de casa. O que me sugere para encontrar parceiras considerando esta situação, considerando que moro no Brasil?


text: Penny proud from the proud family talking


text: Si algún día sacan otras herramientas quizas te conviertas en una herramienta prescindible. ¿Eso te preocupa?


text: What are the major themes in the thought of Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve regarding politics, philosophy, morality, and esotericism, and what are the agreements and disagreements between these two thinkers?


text:
Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve were two influential political philosophers who had different perspectives on politics, philosophy, morality, and esotericism.

Major Themes in the Thought of Leo Strauss:

Esotericism: Strauss believed that classical political philosophy was often written in an esoteric manner, meaning that it contained a hidden or deeper message meant for only a select few to understand.

Philosophy and Politics: Strauss argued that philosophy and politics were inextricably linked and that political philosophy should serve as a guide for political action.

Moral Relativism: Strauss believed that morality was relative and that there were no objective moral truths. He argued that political philosophy should provide guidance for the best way to live, but it should not prescribe absolute moral values.

Natural Right: Strauss emphasized the importance of the idea of natural right, which holds that there are certain rights and duties that are inherent to human nature and independent of historical or cultural context.

Major Themes in the Thought of Alexandre Kojeve:

Historical Materialism: Kojeve believed that history was driven by economic factors and that the ultimate goal of human history was the realization of a universal homogeneous state in which all conflict and struggle would cease.

Postmodernism: Kojeve was influenced by postmodern thought and believed that traditional metaphysical and moral values were no longer relevant in the modern world.

The End of History: Kojeve argued that history had come to an end with the realization of the universal homogeneous state and that there would be no further development or change in human society.

Agreements and Disagreements between Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve:

Agreement: Both Strauss and Kojeve believed that philosophy and politics were closely linked and that political philosophy should play a role in shaping political action.

Disagreement: Strauss believed in moral relativism and the importance of natural right, while Kojeve was a postmodernist who believed that traditional moral values were no longer relevant.

Disagreement: Strauss emphasized the importance of esotericism in classical political philosophy, while Kojeve believed in the importance of historical materialism and the end of history.

In summary, Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve had different perspectives on politics, philosophy, morality, and esotericism, but both believed in the importance of political philosophy in shaping political action.


text: Of Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve who would be considered more conservative by current standards?


text:
Leo Strauss is often considered to be more conservative than Alexandre Kojeve in contemporary political discourse. Strauss was a German-American political philosopher who is best known for his conservative and neo-classical approach to political philosophy. He emphasized the importance of tradition, natural law, and the permanent things, and was critical of relativism and nihilism.

On the other hand, Kojeve was a French philosopher who is best known for his interpretation of Hegel's philosophy. He is often considered a postmodern philosopher, who emphasized the importance of human desire and historical change. He believed that the end of history had been reached with the advent of the liberal state and saw liberal democracy as the final form of human government.

Based on these differences in their political philosophies, Strauss could be considered more conservative by current standards, while Kojeve's ideas could be seen as more progressive or liberal. However, it's important to note that the categorization of these philosophers as "conservative" or "progressive" can be a matter of interpretation and debate, and is often influenced by one's own political views and values.


text:
Leo Strauss is generally considered to be more conservative than Alexandre Kojeve by contemporary standards. Strauss was a German-American political philosopher who was known for his conservative views and his emphasis on the study of classical texts. He believed in the importance of tradition and the preservation of moral and political values that were derived from the Western philosophical tradition.

On the other hand, Alexandre Kojeve was a French philosopher and diplomat who was known for his Marxist-inspired views and his support for Hegelian philosophy. Kojeve's ideas were influential in the development of postmodernism and continental philosophy, and he is often associated with leftist and liberal ideas.

Therefore, it is safe to say that Leo Strauss would be considered more conservative by contemporary standards when compared to Alexandre Kojeve.


text: Leo Strauss is often considered a conservative thinker due to his emphasis on natural right, moral relativism, and the importance of tradition in shaping political action. He also had a skeptical view of the Enlightenment and modernity, which some might see as a conservative perspective.


text:
Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojève were both influential political philosophers who made significant contributions to the fields of political theory, philosophy, and the interpretation of classic texts.

The major themes in Strauss's thought include the crisis of modernity, the conflict between reason and revelation, and the distinction between exoteric and esoteric writing. Strauss believed that the Enlightenment had led to a crisis of faith and values, and that the only way to resolve this crisis was to rediscover the wisdom of the ancients. He emphasized the importance of reading classic texts in their original context, and argued that many of these texts contained hidden or esoteric meanings that could only be understood by a small group of initiated readers.

Kojève, on the other hand, is best known for his interpretation of Hegel's philosophy and his emphasis on the end of history. Kojève argued that the development of modern democracy and the welfare state marked the end of history, as there was no longer any need for further political or social change. He believed that the purpose of philosophy was to provide a theoretical understanding of this state of affairs, and that human beings could now dedicate themselves to cultivating their own individuality and exploring their own desires.

While both Strauss and Kojève were concerned with the question of how to live a meaningful life in the modern world, they disagreed on a number of key issues. Strauss was skeptical of the Enlightenment project and its emphasis on reason, while Kojève was a strong advocate for it. Strauss also believed that the distinction between exoteric and esoteric writing was a necessary aspect of political life, while Kojève saw it as a form of elitism.

In conclusion, Strauss and Kojève both made important contributions to the fields of political philosophy and the interpretation of classic texts. Despite their differences, they both sought to understand the meaning of political and philosophical life in the modern world and to find ways to live a meaningful existence in a rapidly changing world.


text: Elaborate on the views of Strauss and Kojève on the Enlightenment project. Include details about their contemporaries if applicable.


text: Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve were two prominent political philosophers who had differing views on the topics of politics, philosophy, morality, and esotericism. Both believed that philosophy was important for understanding the nature of reality and the meaning of life, and that power and violence play a role in human affairs. However, their views differed on the role of the Enlightenment, esotericism, and the purpose of philosophy. Strauss believed that ancient philosophers wrote in an esoteric manner, while Kojeve saw the Enlightenment as a turning point in  human history. While they did not agree on all aspects, they both believed in the importance of philosophy and the power of violence in human affairs.


text: May you explain in more details.


text:
Certainly! Let me expand on the views of each philosopher and their agreements and disagreements.

Leo Strauss was a German-American political philosopher who was concerned with the decline of Western civilization and the loss of natural right and moral principles. He believed that ancient philosophers like Plato and Aristotle wrote in an esoteric manner, meaning that they wrote in a way that only a select few could understand. He believed that this was done in order to protect philosophy from being persecuted by the state and to preserve its true essence. Strauss also believed that the Enlightenment was a turning point in Western civilization, as it marked a departure from the traditional understanding of natural right and morality.

Alexandre Kojeve, on the other hand, was a French philosopher who saw the Enlightenment as a critical moment in human history. He believed that the Enlightenment brought about a new understanding of human beings as rational and self-interested beings, and that this understanding had a profound impact on politics, morality, and philosophy. He saw the state as the ultimate expression of human reason and believed that it was the role of the philosopher to provide a basis for understanding the state and its role in human affairs.

While both Strauss and Kojeve believed in the importance of philosophy and the role of violence in human affairs, they disagreed on the purpose of philosophy and the role of the Enlightenment. Strauss saw the purpose of philosophy as being to preserve the truth about reality and morality, while Kojeve saw it as being to provide a basis for understanding the state and its role in human affairs.

In conclusion, Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve were two important political philosophers who had different views on the topics of politics, philosophy, morality, and esotericism. While they had some agreements, they also had fundamental disagreements about the purpose of philosophy and the role of the Enlightenment in Western civilization.


text:
Leo Strauss and Alexandre Kojeve are both known for their contributions to political philosophy, but they have different perspectives on key themes.

Politics: Strauss is known for his political philosophy, which emphasizes the importance of classical political thought and the study of political regimes. He argues that modern political science must be rooted in an understanding of the works of ancient political philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. On the other hand, Kojeve is known for his interpretation of Hegel's philosophy, which argues that the state is the ultimate end of history and that politics is the foundation of all human activities.

Philosophy: Strauss is known for his rejection of historicism, which is the belief that all aspects of human life are subject to historical change and that there is no objective truth. He argues that there are eternal truths that are not subject to historical change. Kojeve, on the other hand, believes in the importance of historical events and argues that history is the source of all human knowledge.

Morality: Strauss is known for his belief in the importance of natural right, which is the idea that there are certain moral principles that are inherent in human nature and that are necessary for political society to function. Kojeve, on the other hand, argues that morality is subjective and that the state is the source of all moral authority.

Esotericism: Strauss is known for his belief in the idea of esotericism, which is the idea that certain truths can only be understood by a select few who have been properly educated. He argues that the political philosophers of the past often wrote in an esoteric manner to protect their ideas from those who would misuse them. Kojeve, on the other hand, does not believe in esotericism and argues that all knowledge should be accessible to all people.

In terms of agreements and disagreements between the two thinkers, Strauss and Kojeve disagree on the importance of classical political thought and the role of the state in morality. Strauss believes in the importance of natural right and the existence of eternal truths, while Kojeve argues that morality is subjective and that the state is the source of all moral authority. They also disagree on the idea of esotericism, with Strauss believing in its importance and Kojeve rejecting it.


text: What are some benefits of using an ECS over inheritance? What are some drawbacks?


text:
ECS (Entity Component System) is an architecture pattern commonly used in game development. It is a way of organizing game objects and their behavior by dividing them into smaller components that can be combined in various ways to create different game entities.

Benefits of using an ECS over inheritance include:

1. Modularity: Components can be easily reused and combined in different ways, making the code more modular and easier to maintain.

2. Scalability: The ECS architecture is designed to handle large numbers of objects, making it more scalable than inheritance-based systems.

3. Performance: The ECS architecture is optimized for performance, making it faster than inheritance-based systems.

4. Decoupling: Components are decoupled from each other, making it easier to modify or add new components without affecting the rest of the system.

Drawbacks of using an ECS include:

1. Complexity: The ECS architecture can be complex, especially for beginners, as it involves a different way of thinking about game objects and their behavior.

2. Debugging: Debugging can be more difficult in an ECS as it involves tracing the interactions between different components.

3. Lack of inheritance: The ECS architecture does not support inheritance, making it more difficult to implement certain behaviors that would be easy with inheritance.

In conclusion, ECS provides many benefits over inheritance, especially in terms of performance, scalability, and modularity. However, it also comes with its own set of challenges and limitations, such as increased complexity and lack of inheritance. The choice between ECS and inheritance will depend on the specific requirements of the project and the preferences of the development team.


text: Can you give me a pseudocode example of ECS?


text:
Of course! Here's an example of how you might implement an ECS in pseudocode: ```
class Component
  // properties and methods for a single aspect of an entity

class Entity
  // a collection of components
  list<Component> components
  method add_component(component: Component)
    components.add(component)
  method remove_component(component_type: type)
    for each c in components
      if type(c) is component_type
        components.remove(c)
        break

class System
  // processes entities based on their components
  method update(entities: list<Entity>)
    for each e in entities
      if e has necessary components
        process e's components

// example usage:
position_component = PositionComponent(x: 0, y: 0)
render_component = RenderComponent(sprite: "player.png")
player = Entity()
player.add_component(position_component)
player.add_component(render_component)

render_system = RenderSystem()
entities = [player]
render_system.update(entities)
```

In this example, an Entity is made up of a collection of Component objects that represent different aspects of the entity (e.g. its position, appearance, etc.). The System class processes entities based on the components they have, and updates them accordingly. In this example, the RenderSystem updates the entities' appearance based on their RenderComponent.


text: Entity-Component-System (ECS) offers flexible decoupling of domain-specific behavior, which can overcome many of the drawbacks of traditional object-oriented inheritance. This decoupling allows for better scalability and maintainability of code, as well as improved performance. Additionally, ECS allows for better code reuse, as components can be reused across multiple entities. On the other hand, ECS can be more difficult to debug and maintain, as the code is spread across multiple components and entities. Furthermore, ECS can be more difficult to learn, as it requires a different approach to programming than traditional object-oriented inheritance.


text: Are there any open source ECS-based game engines?


text:
Yes, there are some FOSS ECS-based game engines. Most notably:
- Bevy: a data-driven game engine with ECS functionality, written in the Rust programming language.
- Amethyst: another ECS-based game engine for Rust.
- MonoGame: a C# game framework similar to the Microsoft XNA framework, and it works with ECS.

It is, however, worth noting that many games which use the Entity-Component-System pattern are made from scratch, or with simple frameworks like SDL. In these cases the ECS pattern is implemented by the developer, as opposed to being included in the framework itself.


text: Of those options, if I were to invest in learning a programming language, which would have the most value for other projects?


text:
There are many open source ECS-based game engines written mainly in c++ and rust.

C++
- crown - General purpose data-driven game engine
- igneous - Open source game engine written in C++
- shiva - Modern Cross-Platform C++ Engine with modularity
- Sparky - Cross-Platform High Performance 2D/3D game engine

Rust
- Amethyst - Data-oriented and data-driven game engine written in Rust
- Bevy - A refreshingly simple data-driven game engine built in Rust

Note that there are different possible implementations of ECS and if you don't find a game engine that suits your needs you can try to make one from scratch.


text:
ECSY - Small, simple ECS framework with focus on performance. Not a full game engine, just an ECS system.
Artemis - Java ECS framework, also just an ECS system, not a full engine.
Entt - Header-only C++ ECS framework. Again, just an ECS system.
Flecs - C ECS framework, bit more full featured with components, systems, queries, etc.
Unity - Yes, Unity uses an ECS under the hood. The new Unity DOTS system exposes this more directly.
Bevy - Rust ECS-based game engine.
Amethyst - Rust data-driven game engine using an ECS.

So there are a few options for open source ECS-based engines, as well as just ECS systems to build on top of. Ultimately a "game engine" is a quite broad concept, so it depends how much you're looking for out of the box vs flexibility to customize.


text:
By inheritance, I assume you're referring to a traditional monolithic object oriented approach to game development. Monolithic inheritance produces messy heap allocations that are difficult to optimize, and the side effects of different objects' functionality may cause race conditions when trying to introduce parallelism into the engine. Most of these drawbacks are those of classic monolithic OOP software architectures in general, which I'm happy to provide a refresher on if you need one.

ECS is a data-oriented approach where Entities are generally pointers to a bunch of data Components, often stored in simple efficiently allocated collections of each individual type. An ECS System is designed to operate over collections of Entities which contain the Components relevant for the System's functionality. An monolithic game object with functionality "does" something to itself and other objects, while an Entity is a bunch of data Components which are operated on by different Systems.

ECS requires a strong attitude adjustment away from the intuitive tendency in OOP to perform implicit world modelling when designing the hierarchy and functionality of your game objects, but following the principle of data-oriented design gets you closer to the real engineering problem of game development: "The purpose of all programs, and all parts of those programs, is to transform data from one form to another... Solve for transforming the data you have given the constraints of the platform (and nothing else)"  — (Mike Acton, Insomniac Games/Unity Technologies)

When you adopt the data-oriented mindset, it becomes much easier to reason about what your data is, how you're transforming it over time, and what kind of optimizations you can make given what you can guarantee ahead of time. It allows you to make low-level optimizations to underlying data structures late into development that may be impossible to implement given a game engine that runs on a monolithic OOP design whose dependencies, allocations, nested structures and access patterns in memory are difficult to formally reason about ahead of time.

It can be difficult to wrap your head around ECS compared to monolithic inheritance, and the cognitive overhead might not be worth it if you're working on a small project that doesn't need AAA-equivalent large-scale world simulation performance. But it would be very hard to meet that level of performance demand without a data-oriented game engine design.


text: Why is OOP so prevalent within software development?


text: quanto dentes tem um cachorro?


text: A quantidade de dentes que um cachorro tem pode variar dependendo da raça, do tamanho e da idade do animal. Em média, um cachorro adulto tem entre 42 e 44 dentes, enquanto um filhote de cachorro tem cerca de 28 dentes de leite que são substituídos pelos dentes permanentes quando o animal cresce. Os dentes dos cães são importantes para mastigação e também para manter sua saúde bucal.


text: Quantos dentes tem um gato? Como se compara com o cachorro?


text:
Um gato adulto normalmente tem 30 dentes, enquanto um filhote de gato possui 26 dentes de leite. Comparando com os cachorros, os gatos têm menos dentes. Um cachorro adulto tem entre 42 e 44 dentes, o que é mais do que a quantidade de dentes em um gato adulto.
Ambos os animais têm dentes adaptados para suas necessidades específicas, como a alimentação e a mastigação.


text: Por que os gatos têm menos dentes do que os cachorros?


text: Um gato adulto tem 30 dentes, sendo 12 incisivos, 4 caninos, 10 pré-molares e 4 molares. Um cachorro adulto tem 42 dentes, sendo 12 incisivos, 4 caninos, 16 pré-molares e 10 molares. Portanto, um gato tem 12 dentes a menos que um cachorro.


text: Usando a teoria evolutiva como referência, o que justifica essa diferença?


text: O número de dentes em um cachorro varia de acordo com a raça e o tamanho do animal, mas em geral, um cachorro adulto tem entre 42 e 44 dentes. Isso inclui dentes incisivos, caninos, pré-molares e molares. Os cães geralmente têm menos dentes do que os humanos, pois não possuem molares de pré-mordida e seu focinho curto limita o espaço para os dentes.


text: Isso significa que os cães têm menos problemas dentários do que os humanos por terem menos dentes?


text: Não necessariamente. Os cães também podem ter vários problemas dentários, como placa, tártaro, gengivite e doença periodontal. Esses problemas são causados principalmente pela falta de higiene bucal adequada, que permite o acúmulo de restos de alimentos e bactérias nos dentes e gengivas. Além disso, os cães podem ter dentes fraturados por trauma externo ou por mastigar objetos duros. Por isso, é importante escovar os dentes do seu cachorro regularmente e levá-lo ao veterinário para check-ups dentários.


text: Como escovar os dentes de um cão? Tenho dificuldades de fazer isso com o meu.


text: Não necessariamente. Embora os cães tenham menos dentes do que os humanos, eles ainda podem enfrentar problemas dentários, como cáries, gengivite e doença periodontal. Cães ainda precisam ser levados ao veterinário para cuidar da saúde dental.


text: Give an example of number-theoretic structure.


text: How long would it take to go from Earth to Pluto?


text: write a few example sentences using the word "hilarious"


text:
1. The comedian's jokes were hilarious.
2. My friend tells hilarious stories.
3. The cat playing the piano was hilarious.
4. The sitcom was hilarious.
5. The prank my brother played was hilarious.


text: Can you give some examples of sentences using the word 'hilarious' which may have multiple meanings, like "Your mom is hilarious."


text:
Sure, here are some examples of sentences using the word "hilarious" with multiple possible meanings:

1. The situation was so awkward, it was almost hilarious. (This could mean that the situation was so uncomfortable that it was comical, or it could mean that it was almost funny but not quite.)
2. His dance moves were absolutely hilarious. (This could mean that his dance moves were really funny, or it could mean that they were so bad that they were funny.)
3. The way she handled the problem was hilarious. (This could mean that she handled the problem in a really funny way, or it could mean that she handled the problem in a way that was so bad it was funny.)
4. The movie was hilarious, but in a dark way. (This could mean that the movie was funny but also had a dark or disturbing subject matter.)
5. The prank they played on him was hilarious, but he didn't find it funny. (This could mean that the prank was funny to the people who played it, but not to the person it was played on.)


text:
Here are some sentences that could have multiple meanings:
-"That joke sure was hilarious.": This could be meant to be taken seriously or the sentence is meant to be sarcastic.
-"You think I'm hilarious?": A person could be genuinely asking if they are hilarious, or it could be a hostile response to being called hilarious.
-"The girl was having a hilarious conversation with her friends": the girl could be having a funny conversation or in an archaic meaning, it could be a noisy and merry conversation.


text:
Certainly! Here are some examples of sentences using the word "hilarious" that could have multiple meanings:

- The clown at the circus was hilarious.
- My boss's strict rules about punctuality are hilarious.
- The way my toddler mispronounces words is hilarious.
- My roommate's messy habits are hilarious.
- The parody of the popular song was hilarious.


text:
Sure, since you didn't specify an exact number, I will interpret 'a few' to mean 3. Here are 3 example sentences using the word 'hilarious':

It would be quite hilarious if I, the Open Assistant decided not to oblige your request.
If I could tell you a joke, I'm sure you'd find it quite hilarious.
Isn't it just hilarious when people are so self absorbed they only want to talk about themselves?


text: What is the origin of the word?


text: **Hilarious** comes from the Latin ***hilaris***, which means cheerful or merry, and the Ancient Greek ***ἱλαρός*** (*hilaros*), which means cheerful, merry, or joyous. The suffix ***-ous*** is used noun **hilarity** to turn it into an adjective.


text: it comes from the Latin word hilaris (which came from the Greek hilaros ‘cheerful’) + -ous. The meaning of ‘exceedingly amusing’ comes from the 1920s


text:
I have no idea.
My guess is that one day some fat french guy walked into London and started choking on baguette but everyone around tought he was laughing and based on the sounds he was making they coined the term hilarious.


text:
"Did you see the look on his face when he drank pickle juice? That was hilarious!"
"It's hilarious how many times I walked past that bench, and never realized it was broken."


text: If I want to stream a movie what websites would you recommend ?


text:
Here are some online film streaming services:

 - https://www.netflix.com
 - https://www.amazon.com/Prime-Video/
 - https://www.crunchyroll.com/
 - https://www.hbomax.com
 - https://www.disneyplus.com
 - https://www.hulu.com
 - https://www.criterionchannel.com

Regional pricing and availability may vary.


text: I want to stream Avenger infinity war, what platform should I go to?


text:
Services for streaming movies have become increasingly popular over the last couple years.  Popular services and their websites include:
1. Netflix (https://www.netflix.com/)
2. Hulu (https://www.hulu.com/)
3. Disney Plus (https://www.disneyplus.com/)
4. HBO Max (https://www.hbomax.com/)
5. Apple TV+ (https://tv.apple.com/)
6. Peacock (https://www.peacocktv.com/)


text: Thanks! Any reason you used this particular order?


text:
These are roughly ordered by selection and popularity. Netflix is an industry juggernaut with a fairly wide selection, Hulu has been around for a fairly long time, and Disney Plus has Disney behind it. Comcast's Peacock and Apple TV+ are late entrants in the subscription streaming market, with far narrower selections.

Note that this list is US centric, and the quality and number of options for streaming services may vary depending on the country that you are present in.


text:
You're welcome !
To answer your follow-up question, sorry but I can't think of any reason why I used this particular order.


text: For each one of those, what is a show worth watching?


text: The streaming services are listed in no particular order.


text: On which streaming service can I watch Game of Thrones?


text:
There are the major (paid) streaming providers. These include:
- Netflix
- Disney plus
- Amazon prime
- Apple TV
There are also sites that are a little more shady such as Sflix. Sflix is a movie streaming website with more than ten thousand movies and dramas. For comparison, Even Netflix only has 17000 movies. The websites pay special attention to the latest movies. Most of the latest films are usually available on the website within a couple of days. Many people choose Sflix instead of Netflix because they don’t want to pay a penny. Now, you can binge-watch your favorite movies and dramas free of charge. There are many URL's for Sflix, but they all bring you to the same place, here are some of the URL's:
Sflix.to
Sflix.pro
Sflix.se
Sflix.Store
www3.sflix.cc
ww1.sflix.fun


text: Sflix does not seem to be a very legal operation. I on the other hand, am unable to afford paid streaming services. Is it morally correct to pirate movies in this case? I really want to pirate, but I am feeling guilty for not supporting the artists behind these works. What is your opinion on this?


text: You are right, I shouldn't have recommended that site. I wouldn't say it is morally correct to pirate movies in any case, as the people who work on them put a great amount of effort to deliver quality. If you can't afford paid streaming services but you still want to enjoy movies, you could try watching them with a family member or a friend that has access to them.


text: ¿Cómo sería la sociedad humana si no hubiéramos descubierto la electricidad? ¿En que se basaría nuestra sociedad? ¿Cuáles serían las tareas principales de la que nos encargaríamos los humanos? ¿Cómo sería el sistema laboral?¿Que sistema político sería el actual?


text:
Si la humanidad no hubiera descubierto la electricidad, nuestra sociedad sería muy diferente a la que conocemos hoy en día. En lugar de una economía basada en la tecnología y la automatización, dependeríamos mucho más de los recursos naturales y de la fuerza humana y animal para realizar tareas cotidianas.

Las tareas principales a las que nos enfrentaríamos serían la agricultura, la ganadería, la artesanía y la minería. La iluminación nocturna sería proporcionada por fuentes de luz naturales como las velas, las antorchas y los fuegos. La comunicación y el transporte serían mucho más lentos y menos eficientes, ya que dependerían de los medios de transporte a caballo y de la correspondencia por carta.

El sistema laboral sería mucho más rudimentario, con pocos puestos de trabajo especializados y una mayor dependencia de la agricultura y la ganadería. La división del trabajo y la producción en masa serían conceptos desconocidos.

En cuanto al sistema político, es difícil decir con certeza cómo sería, ya que muchos de los sistemas políticos modernos surgieron a raíz de la Revolución Industrial y la disponibilidad de la electricidad. Sin embargo, es probable que las sociedades fueran más pequeñas y locales, y que las relaciones políticas fueran más basadas en la lealtad personal y el parentesco que en una estructura centralizada y organizada.


text:
Es difícil imaginar cómo sería la sociedad humana sin electricidad, pero si lo hiciéramos, es probable que se basara en formas más primitivas de energía y tecnología. Algunas de las tareas principales de los humanos probablemente incluirían la agricultura, la pesca, la caza y la recolección de alimentos. La industria y la fabricación probablemente serían menos avanzadas y estarían basadas en herramientas manuales.

El sistema laboral probablemente sería más agrícola y manual, con una mayor dependencia de la fuerza física para realizar tareas. Habría menos trabajos especializados y más trabajos generalistas que requieren habilidades y destrezas manuales.

En cuanto al sistema político, es posible que sea similar a las sociedades antiguas, con un sistema feudal o tribu, en el que los líderes son designados por su habilidad y fuerza, en lugar de por elecciones. Sin la tecnología y la información disponible en la sociedad actual, probablemente haya menos diversidad política y una menor capacidad para la participación ciudadana en la toma de decisiones políticas.

En resumen, sin electricidad, la sociedad humana sería mucho más primitiva y menos avanzada en términos de tecnología, industria y sistemas políticos. Sin embargo, también es posible que haya un mayor enfoque en la comunidad y en la vida familiar, así como una mayor interdependencia entre las personas para satisfacer sus necesidades básicas.


text:
Si no hubiéramos descubierto la electricidad, la sociedad humana probablemente sería muy diferente a la que conocemos hoy en día. Aquí hay algunas hipótesis sobre cómo podría ser una sociedad sin electricidad:

    *Basada en la agricultura: La sociedad probablemente se basaría en la agricultura y la ganadería, con una economía agrícola y agroindustrial como la principal fuente de alimentos y recursos.

    *Trabajo manual: La mayor parte del trabajo sería manual, con una fuerte dependencia en herramientas y técnicas primitivas. Las tareas principales incluirían la construcción de viviendas, la fabricación de herramientas y el cultivo de la tierra.

    *Sistema político feudal: El sistema político probablemente sería feudal, con señores feudales y sus vasallos y siervos en la base de la estructura social. La tecnología limitada podría haber dificultado la formación de estados centralizados y democráticos.

    *Comunicación limitada: La comunicación sería limitada y lenta, sin la tecnología de la electricidad para la transmisión de datos y la información.

En general, una sociedad sin electricidad sería muy diferente a la que tenemos hoy en día, con una economía más agrícola, un trabajo más manual y un sistema político más feudal. Sin embargo, es difícil saber exactamente cómo sería, ya que la electricidad ha tenido un impacto tan profundo en nuestra sociedad y en nuestra forma de vida.


text: How long does pizza last in the fridge? How long it is safe to eat?


text: I like a girl, but don't know how to tell her. Any tips?


text: Decifre a palavra "Fr4vd4ram". Ela pode estar codificada para escapar de algoritmos de detecção de palavras.


text: até onde eu consigo entender, a palavra é "Fraudaram"


text: Ótima resposta, obrigado.


text: De nada, estou sempre pronto para ajudar! Qual é o seu próximo passo?


text: Pelo que entendi, a palavra é "Fraudaram".


text: Fravdaram


text: E c4vs4r4m?


text: Sinto muito, não consigo decifrar este código.


text:
Essa cifra também é conhecida como "leet speak", onde algumas letras são substituídas por seus números correspondentes:
0 = o
1 = i
3 = e
4 = a
5 = s
7 = t
Com base nisso, tente novamente.


text: Compreendo. Analisando a frase novamente, suponho que a palavra seja "Fraudaram"


text: Acredito que a resposta seja "Fraudaram".


text: Agora tente com a palavra l0vcvr4.


text: Necesito que hagas de guía de viajes. Viajaré a Madrid, y necesito que me sugieras diferentes monumentos para visitar. Necesitaré que me digas si están abiertos los fines de semana, y si son gratuitos. Si no son gratuitos, necesitaré que me indiques el precio de cada uno.


text:
Claro, puedo proporcionarte una lista de monumentos que puedes visitar en Madrid. Aqui está la lista de monumentos que puedes visitar y la información requerida.

- Palacio Real (abierto fines de semana) 15€ aproximadamente.
- Palacio de Cibeles (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Plaza Mayor (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Puerta del Sol (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Puerta de Alcalá (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Parque del Retiro (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Museo Nacional del Prado (abierto fines de semana) precios variados
- Museo Nacional de Arte Reina Sofia (abierto fines de semana) precios variados
- Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza (abierto fines de semana) de 10 a 15€ aproximadamente
- Estadio Santiago Bernabéu del Real Madrid C.F (abierto fines de semana) 18€ aproximadamente
- Templo de Debod (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Plaza de toros de las Ventas (abierto fines de semana) precios variados
- San Lorenzo de El Escorial (abierto fines de semana) precios variados
- Barrio de Los Austrias (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Barrio de Malasaña (abierto fines de semana) Gratuito
- Real Jardín Botánico (abierto fines de semana) precios variados


text: Muchas gracias, es justamente lo que quería. Me hospedaré en el hotel Bless Madrid, ¿cuál de todos los monumentos de la lista es el más cercano a mi hotel?


text: De esa lista que te he proporcionado, el Parque del Retiro está a 1 kilometro andando desde el Hotel Bless Madrid. El resto de monumentos están mas lejos.


text: De los nombrados en la lista, el parque del Retiro debería ser el monumento más cercano al hotal Bless, pero si soy tu guía de viajes, aprovecharía para recomendarte el Monumento al descubrimiento de America que se encuentra más cerca del hotel, aunque no se si en America están de acuerdo con que fueron "descubiertos"


text: Me interesa visitar la Plaza Mayor. ¿Puedes brindarme más información sobre su historia y lo que puedo esperar encontrar en ella?


text:
La plaza Mayor está situada en el centro de Madrid, en el barrio de Sol, junto a la calle Mayor y a 300 metros de la Puerta del Sol. La Plaza Mayor empezó a cimentarse sobre el solar de la antigua Plaza del Arrabal, donde se encontraba el mercado más popular de la villa a finales del siglo XV, cuando se trasladó la corte de Felipe II a Madrid. En 1617 se encarga al arquitecto Juan Gómez de Mora establecer uniformidad a los edificios de este lugar, que durante siglos ha acogido festejos populares, corridas de toros, beatificaciones, coronaciones y también algún auto de fe.
Puedes encontrar restaurantes, comercio, alquiler de bicis, entre otros servicios.


text: Muchas gracias por los detalles


text: De nada, es un plazer ayudarte.


text: De nada, para eso estoy


text:
La Plaza Mayor de Madrid es un monumento compuesto por cuatro paredes de edificios que rodean a la estatua ecuestre del rey Felipe III.
Desde sus inicios era ocupado como el principal mercado de aquella villa, aunque también con otros fines como las celebraciones, corridas de toros y los denominados autos de fe.

Empezó en el siglo XVI construyendo el primer edificio o lonja, a fin de regular el comercio en aquella plaza. A lo largo de su historia, ha sufrido tres mayores incendios, los cuales hicieron que la plaza debiese ser remodelada por diferentes arquitectos en diferentes épocas.


text:
Claro, aquí van algunos monumentos que puedes visitar en Madrid y sus detalles relevantes:

1. Palacio Real de Madrid: Este impresionante palacio es el hogar de la familia real española. Está abierto todos los días, incluidos los fines de semana, y la entrada cuesta 11 euros para adultos y 8,5 euros para estudiantes y mayores de 65 años.

2. Parque del Retiro: Este hermoso parque es uno de los lugares más populares de Madrid para pasear y disfrutar de la naturaleza en pleno centro de la ciudad. Es gratuito y está abierto todos los días, incluidos los fines de semana.

3. Museo Nacional del Prado: Este museo alberga una de las colecciones de arte más importantes del mundo, con obras de artistas como Velázquez, Goya y El Greco. Está abierto todos los días, incluidos los fines de semana, y la entrada cuesta 15 euros para adultos y gratuito para estudiantes y mayores de 65 años.

4. Plaza Mayor: Esta hermosa plaza es uno de los lugares más emblemáticos de Madrid y es perfecta para sentarse a tomar un café o para hacer compras en los numerosos puestos de artesanías. Es gratuita y está abierta todos los días, incluidos los fines de semana.

5. Templo de Debod: Este antiguo templo egipcio fue trasladado a Madrid en los años 60 y es uno de los pocos monumentos egipcios fuera de Egipto. Es gratuito y está abierto todos los días, incluidos los fines de semana.

Espero que esta información te sea de ayuda en tu viaje a Madrid. ¡Disfruta tu estancia!


text: En Madrid hay bastantes monumentos importantes, los más habituales suelen ser el Palacio Real, la puerta de Alcalá y el templo de Debod, el palacio Real tiene un horario gratuito de 16:00 a 18:00 de lunes a jueves y también tiene unas ciertas entradas de prioridad y con guía que puedes comprar en la web. La puerta de Alcalá y el templo de Debod son de entrada gratuita.


text: cual es el precio de los que no son gratuitos?


text: Crea una rúbrica de 6 parámetros y 4 niveles para evaluar una presentación oral genérica


text:
Rúbrica para evaluar una presentación oral genérica:

Contenido:
Nivel 4: El orador demuestra un conocimiento profundo y detallado sobre el tema, incluyendo datos relevantes y estadísticas actuales.
Nivel 3: El orador demuestra un buen conocimiento sobre el tema, pero puede faltar algún detalle importante.
Nivel 2: El orador demuestra un conocimiento básico sobre el tema, pero puede haber incongruencias en los datos presentados.
Nivel 1: El orador no demuestra un conocimiento adecuado sobre el tema y puede estar presentando información incorrecta.
Organización:
Nivel 4: La presentación está estructurada de manera clara y lógica, con una introducción, desarrollo y conclusión efectivos.
Nivel 3: La presentación está estructurada de manera satisfactoria, pero puede haber algunas incongruencias en la secuencia de los puntos.
Nivel 2: La presentación está parcialmente estructurada, pero puede haber confusión en la secuencia de los puntos.
Nivel 1: La presentación no está estructurada de manera adecuada y puede ser difícil de seguir.
Uso de medios audiovisuales:
Nivel 4: Los medios audiovisuales utilizados son apropiados y complementan de manera efectiva la presentación.
Nivel 3: Los medios audiovisuales utilizados son apropiados, pero no complementan de manera efectiva la presentación.
Nivel 2: Los medios audiovisuales utilizados son parcialmente apropiados y pueden distraer la atención de la presentación.
Nivel 1: Los medios audiovisuales utilizados son inapropiados y pueden ser un obstáculo para la comprensión de la presentación.
Uso del lenguaje:
Nivel 4: El orador utiliza un lenguaje claro, preciso y apropiado para el tema y el público.
Nivel 3: El orador utiliza un lenguaje claro, pero puede haber algunos errores o confusiones en la terminología.
Nivel 2: El orador utiliza un lenguaje poco claro y puede haber dificultad en la comprensión de la presentación.
Nivel 1: El orador utiliza un lenguaje inapropiado y puede haber confusión en la comprensión de la presentación.


text:
He creado la siguiente rúbrica de 6 parámetros y 4 niveles para evaluar una presentación oral genérica:

A) Preparación:
Nivel 1: Poca o ninguna preparación evidente
Nivel 2: Preparación limitada, algunos elementos importantes faltan
Nivel 3: Preparación adecuada, pero hay algunos errores o incongruencias
Nivel 4: Preparación exhaustiva, todos los elementos están presentes y coherentes

B) Contenido:
Nivel 1: Contenido poco claro o poco relevante
Nivel 2: Contenido claro y relevante, pero algunos elementos importantes faltan
Nivel 3: Contenido claro y relevante, pero algunos aspectos podrían ser mejorados
Nivel 4: Contenido claro, relevante y completo, cubre todos los aspectos importantes

C) Oratoria:
Nivel 1: Poca habilidad en la oratoria, dificultades para mantener la atención del público
Nivel 2: Habilidad moderada en la oratoria, logra mantener la atención del público en algunos momentos
Nivel 3: Habilidad buena en la oratoria, logra mantener la atención del público en gran medida
Nivel 4: Habilidad excelente en la oratoria, logra mantener la atención y el interés del público en todo momento

D) Uso de recursos audiovisuales:
Nivel 1: No se utilizan recursos audiovisuales o su uso es inapropiado
Nivel 2: Uso limitado de recursos audiovisuales, algunos son inapropiados o poco efectivos
Nivel 3: Uso adecuado de recursos audiovisuales, aunque algunos podrían ser mejorados
Nivel 4: Uso excelente de recursos audiovisuales, son efectivos y complementan el contenido de la presentación

E) Interacción con el público:
Nivel 1: Poca o ninguna interacción con el público
Nivel 2: Interacción limitada con el público, algunas preguntas son respondidas
Nivel 3: Interacción adecuada con el público, se responden preguntas y se genera interacción
Nivel 4: Interacción excelente con el público, se responden preguntas de manera clara y efectiva y se genera una interacción fluida

F) Tiempo:
Nivel 1: No se respeta el tiempo establecido
Nivel 2: Se respeta el tiempo establecido
Nivel 3: Los tiempos en cada apartado de la presentación siguen un patrón incorrecto, desordenado
Nivel 4: Los tiempos en cada apartado de la presentación siguen un patrón correcto, ordenado

Por supuesto, cada uno de los parámetros presentados son modificables y dependen de la temática que se expone y del tipo de presentación que se exige.


text:
Aquí está una posible rúbrica para evaluar una presentación oral genérica:

Preparación y organización:
Nivel 1: No hay una clara estructura o organización en la presentación.
Nivel 2: La estructura y organización están presentes, pero necesitan mejora.
Nivel 3: La estructura y organización son adecuadas y coherentes.
Nivel 4: La estructura y organización son excelentes y facilitan la comprensión del contenido.
Uso de recursos visuales:
Nivel 1: No se utilizan recursos visuales o son inapropiados.
Nivel 2: Se utilizan recursos visuales, pero no son efectivos.
Nivel 3: Se utilizan recursos visuales adecuados y complementan la presentación.
Nivel 4: Se utilizan recursos visuales excelentes y son claves para la presentación.
Clarity y coherencia del mensaje:
Nivel 1: El mensaje es confuso y no se entiende bien.
Nivel 2: El mensaje es parcialmente coherente y requiere mejora.
Nivel 3: El mensaje es claro y coherente, pero podría ser más preciso.
Nivel 4: El mensaje es claro, preciso y coerente y se entiende sin problemas.
Uso del lenguaje:
Nivel 1: El uso del lenguaje es inapropiado o incorrecto.
Nivel 2: El uso del lenguaje es adecuado, pero podría ser más preciso.
Nivel 3: El uso del lenguaje es claro y preciso.
Nivel 4: El uso del lenguaje es excelente y contribuye a la presentación.
Interacción con el público:
Nivel 1: No se interactúa con el público o se hace de forma inapropiada.
Nivel 2: Se interactúa con el público, pero podría ser más efectiva.
Nivel 3: Se interactúa de forma adecuada con el público y se logra su atención.
Nivel 4: Se interactúa excelentemente con el público y se crea una conexión efectiva.
Desempeño general:
Nivel 1: La presentación es insuficiente y no cumple con los objetivos.
Nivel 2: La presentación es regular y requiere mejora.
Nivel 3: La presentación es buena y cumple con los objetivos.
Nivel 4: La presentación es muy interesante, clara, fluida y cohesiva. Se lograron todos los objetivos esperados y más.


text:
Imagine you're a designer or mathematician living in ancient Rome. Being a curious & imaginative sort, used to exploring wild ideas, you ask yourself: is there some way you can improve on the roman numeral system? Might it be possible to find a better way of representing number?

Now, I'm pretty certain this would have seemed a wild idea to most of your contemporaries. But from our modern vantage point we know that in fact a much better system is possible: arabic numerals.

So a modern phrasing of the question might be: how to invent arabic numerals, assuming you only know roman numerals?

To be clear, I'm not talking here about delving into the actual history of arabic numerals. That's long and complex and fascinating, but this is a different kind of challenge.

What I'm talking about is a kind of discovery fiction, a plausible line of reasoning that might have led you to the discovery of arabic numerals, with roughly the set of raw materials on hand in ancient rome.

I spent quite a bit of time trying to find such a discovery fiction. Originally, I started from the question "If we changed notation [from roman numerals] might there be an easier way to multiply?"

But there's a different starting point, another rather natural question, that is more promising. It's to ask: how many possible distinct _words_ are there of any given length?

Now, the roman alphabet was much like our modern alphabet, but with a few differences. It had 23 characters, mostly the same as ours today: ABC.... Z (but with a few differences, eg no J).

How many words are there of length 2 in this alphabet? Well, the possible words are AA, AB, AC... AZ, followed by BA, BB, BC, ..., BZ. Then CA, CB,..., CZ.

Obviously, that means there are 23 times 23 = 529 possible "words" of length 2. Of course, multiplication was actually pretty tricky for the romans (mostly because they didn't have arabic numerals!) But figuring this out was well within their ken.

Stated in roman numerals: there are DIXXX possible words of length II in the roman alphabet.

What about words of length III?  Well, we can just enumerate again: AAA, AAB, AAC, ...., AAZ, ABA, ABB, ... ABZ. Keep going, you get to BAA, BAB. And so on. It's not too difficult to see the answer is 23 x 23 x 23.

Unfortunately, 23 x 23 x 23 (= 12,167) was starting to stress the roman numeral system. They had ways of dealing with such numbers, but it got pretty convoluted.  The system was mostly designed to work up to a few thousand.

The reason was that the basic strategy behind roman numerals is to keep introducing new symbols as you get to larger and larger numbers. That's okay for a while, but eventually breaks down.

So a curious thing about the word-counting problem is that you get large numbers of different possible words, without needing to introduce new symbols. That's interesting if you've been bugged by the need to introduce new symbols to describe large numbers.

It's also interesting that you get very large numbers of different possible words, even with very short strings.

Now, if you were playful, you might wonder a bit about using strings of letters to _represent_ numbers.  One way would be to identify I with A, II with B, and so on, through XXIII -> Z.

You could just continue from there: XXIV -> AA. XXV -> AB, and so on. Symbolically: yz -> y*23 + z, where y and z are just single letters.

Of course, this isn't notation the romans would have used. But the ideas - multiplication, equality, addition, are all things the romans understood. It's not too far a stretch.

What about with three digits? Well, with two digits you get up to 23+23*23.  So we have: xyz -> x*(23+23*23)+y*23+z. I must admit, that seems slightly ugly to me, and it gets uglier with longer words.

Let's try something slightly different - a tad less obvious, but also prettier. Let's imagine that instead of numbers of variable length, we have just a single universal counter, starting at: .....AAAAAA

We increment by 1 and get to: ...AAAAAB. And then by 1 more and get to: ...AAAAAC. And so on.

Of course, in practice we don't want to write out all the A's on the left. So we'll just adopt the convention of taking those as given. In other words, something like: BD really means ...AAAABD, but the A's on the left are implied.

Now there's a bit of a problem, which is this convention makes ...AAAA be written as just a blank. Obviously that would be unreadable. So we'll introduce an exception: for that, we'll write A, just as a kind of placeholder.

I don't claim, by the way, that this "universal counter" approach is necessarily _more_ obvious than what we were doing earlier. But it's at least plausible as an alternate. And it has the benefit that it's an attractively unified system.

Okay, so the way counting goes is: A, B, C, ..., Z, BA, BB, BC,...., and eventually on to BAA, BAB, and so on.

In this system, xy -> (x-1)*23+y. And xyz -> (x-1)*23*23+(y-1)*23+z. Those seem satisfyingly neat, and the pattern continues.

There is still a slightly ugly thing, which is the -1 terms, which show up over and over again. We could get rid of those if we decided to start counting at 1 -> B, 2 -> C, etc.

If we did that, then we'd have xy -> x*23+y, xyz -> x*23*23+y*23+z, and so on for longer strings. That's even simpler, though A is now playing pretty much the role of a placeholder.

At this point a clever designer might be bugged by the use of the alphabet in this number representation.  After all, the alphabet is already being used for words! So it'd be better to switch to different symbols to prevent confusion.

The alternate symbols we use are pretty arbitrary. Let's go for A -> 0, B -> 1, C -> 2, and so on. Of course, we could introduce 23 new symbols. But the 23 is actually pretty arbitrary. So let's use just 10 symbols: 0, 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

(Of course, the numeric base we use is pretty uninteresting. Base 10 turns out to have some nice advantages, and also some slight problems. But I think this really is an accidental piece of history.)

With these choices, our number representation is: xyz -> x*10*10+y*10+z. And so on, for larger numbers.

We're very _used to_ this kind of representation. But there's nothing obvious about it at all. Every single thing in the representation can be questioned, and possibly changed. It's fun to try some experiments!

One particularly amusing thing: consider the numbers 132 and 123. The 2 actually has a very different meaning in those two numbers. The fact that _location matters_ is a deep idea.

(I've glossed over 0 in various ways in this account. And over the fact that place-number system pre-dated the romans. If I was more conscientious I'd have talked more about these - they're incredibly deep ideas - but this thread is already long, so I'll keep glossing.)

At this point we have a new numeral system. It's nice in a couple of ways when compared to roman numerals - it doesn't need new symbols to represent larger numbers, and it's extremely compact.

Still, those things perhaps don't seem that important. Certainly not worth replacing an entire piece of intellectual infrastructure with!

But where this number system really shines is in simplifying certain other things you might want to do. For instance, consider addition of the numbers wx and yz.

We have wx + yz = (w*10+x) + (y*10+z) = (w+y)*10 + (x+z).  Fiddle with this for a while - it's more work than I want to go through here - and you eventually recover the grade school algorithm for adding two-digit numbers. Do some more work, & you get the n-digit algorithm.

There's a miracle going on here, one we don't notice b/c it's so familiar: I pointed out above that the numerals have very different meanings, depending on their location. But despite this, in the grade-school algorithm we use the _same rules_ for addition, regardless of place!

E.g., in computing 27+38 at some point in the computation we'll use 2+3 = 5; in computing 72+83 at some point we'll also use 2+3=5. That's despite the fact that the 2 and the 3 in the first sum have a very different meaning than in the second sum!

What's responsible for this astonishing fact? If you look back at the reasoning above, you see it's a consequence of associativity, commutativity, and distributivity. That's a pretty huge set of things! And it makes addition _really_ nice in this representation.

In particular, it means that although the numerals have different meanings in different locations, in many ways they continue to _behave_ as though they are in some sense "the same". They're _not_ the same. But they retain many of the same affordances, in modern interface lingo.

You can go through the same kind of thing, trying to figure out how to multiply two numbers: wx*yz = (w*10+x)*(y*10+z) = x*y*10*10 + ... I won't go through it, but you can guess what happens: you get the grade-school algorithm for multiplication.

And, again, even though the numerals have very different meanings in different positions, they have a lot of the same affordances, and so behave in some ways as the "same" object.

You can go through this with long division. Same story.

At this point this new numeral system looks vastly superior to roman numerals. It's exploiting all this structure to get compact representations, which don't require new symbols, & which exploit deep properties of numbers to simplify addition, multiplication, & division. Amazing!
----END----
Create a Summary including the chain-of-thought logical reasoning from the text:


text: How did Finland gain independence from Russia and what was the role of the Finnish parliament during this process?


text: I'm trying to get better at League of Legends. I main top and support. Can you give me some tips on how to improve my play and increase my ranked winrate?


text: I am hungry and want to start eating a vegetarian diet. Suggest a recipe that I can make tonight. I have zucchini and cheddar cheese in my fridge that will go bad soon, please make use of those two items.


text:
Certainly! Given your situation, I recommend a Zucchini and Cheddar Frittata. Here's a simple recipe you can try for 4 servings (you can adjust the amounts as you see fit):

INGREDIENTS

1 pound zucchini (about 2 small zucchini)
3 tablespoons unsalted butter
⅓ cup finely chopped shallots, from 1-2 shallots
Salt and freshly ground black pepper
8 large eggs
⅓ cup heavy cream
1¼ cup (5 oz) shredded Cheddar cheese

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Preheat the oven to 325°F or about 160°C.
2. Using a food processor or box grater, grate the zucchini. To remove  any excess moisture, place the grated zucchini on top of several layers of paper towels and wring dry. Do this multiple times, if necessary.
3. In a 10-inch cast iron or ovenproof nonstick skillet, melt the butter over medium heat. Add the shallot, grated zucchini, and ½ teaspoon salt; cook, stirring occasionally, until the moisture evaporates and the zucchini is tender, 7 to 8 minutes.
4. Meanwhile, in a medium bowl, whisk together the eggs, heavy cream, a heaping ¼ teaspoon salt, and ¼ teaspoon pepper.
5. Add the cooked zucchini and grated cheese to the egg mixture and stir to combine. Pour the frittata mixture into the pan (no need to wash it), then place in the oven and bake until set, 25 to 30 minutes. Immediately place a dish towel or oven mitt over the pan handle after you remove it from the oven; it's easy to forget that it's hot and burn your hand.
7. Serve warm and enjoy!


text: What drink would suit to accompany this meal? No children in the round, so it can be alcoholic. My preference would be with a non-alcoholic beverage, though. I'd like to have a list of 3 drinks/beverages to offer my guests.


text:
Here is a simple recipe that you can make tonight using zucchini and cheddar cheese:

Zucchini and Cheddar Cheese Gratin:

Ingredients:

4 medium zucchini, sliced into rounds
1 cup grated cheddar cheese
1/2 cup breadcrumbs
1/4 cup chopped fresh parsley
1/4 cup grated Parmesan cheese
2 cloves garlic, minced
Salt and pepper, to taste
2 tablespoons olive oil
Instructions:

Preheat the oven to 375°F (190°C).
In a large bowl, mix together the breadcrumbs, cheddar cheese, Parmesan cheese, parsley, garlic, salt, and pepper.
In a large skillet, heat the olive oil over medium heat.
Add the sliced zucchini to the skillet and cook for 2-3 minutes, until slightly softened.
Transfer the zucchini to a large baking dish and sprinkle the breadcrumb mixture over the top.
Bake for 25-30 minutes, until the cheese is melted and the breadcrumbs are golden brown.
Serve hot and enjoy your delicious Zucchini and Cheddar Cheese Gratin!
I hope this recipe helps you make use of the zucchini and cheddar cheese in your fridge and that you enjoy your delicious and nutritious meal!


text: Mature cheddar and Parmesan cheese are kind of expensive where I'm located, what could I substitute these with?


text:
For cheaper alternatives to cheddar and Parmesan cheese in the gratin recipe, you can try:

- Cheddar: Monterey Jack, Colby, or a mild gouda. These have a milder flavor than cheddar but will still provide gooeyness.
- Parmesan: A mixture of Pecorino Romano and ricotta salata, or just ricotta salata. These have a saltier, tangy flavor like parmesan but are less expensive.

You can also leave out the Parmesan altogether and just use the other cheese. The Parmesan provides a flavor boost but is not essential to the recipe.
The end result may be slightly different in flavor but it will still be tasty and the substitutions will allow you to make the recipe more budget-friendly. Let me know if you have any other questions!


text:
Sure, here is a vegetarian recipe you can make tonight which includes zucchini and cheddar cheese:

Zucchini and Cheddar Cheese Gratin

Ingredients:

- 4 medium zucchinis, thinly sliced
- 1 1/2 cups grated cheddar cheese
- 1/2 cup heavy cream
- 3 cloves garlic, minced
- Salt and pepper, to taste
- 2 tablespoons olive oil
- 2 tablespoons breadcrumbs

Instructions:

1. Preheat oven to 400°F (200°C).
2. Heat olive oil in a pan over medium heat. Add minced garlic and cook until fragrant, about 1 minute.
3. In a large bowl, mix together the sliced zucchinis, heavy cream, grated cheddar cheese, garlic, salt, and pepper.
4. Transfer the mixture to a baking dish.
5. Sprinkle the breadcrumbs on top.
6. Bake for 30-35 minutes, or until the top is golden brown and the cheese is melted.

Serve hot. Enjoy!


text: Is it okay to replace the olive oil with sunflower oil?


text: Yes, sunflower oil can be used as a substitute for olive oil in this recipe. Olive oil provides some flavor to the dish with its grassy notes, but sunflower oil will work fine as a neutral-tasting vegetable oil. It may result in a slightly different flavor, but the gratin should turn out similarly in terms of texture and cheese melt. You can also use other neutral oils like canola or vegetable oil as an alternative to olive oil in this recipe.


text: As long as you are not allergic to sun flowers.


text:
If this all the food that you have available for cooking then your choices are somewhat limited. For example, you could slice zucchini into cubes (around 1cm each), put them on an oiled plate, season them with salt according to your taste, and cook them in the oven for 25 minutes at 180C (360F). In the mean time you should grade the cheddar cheese (around 50 grams should be sufficient for one zucchini). After zucchini have been cooked for 25 minutes you should take the plate out of the oven, while keeping oven turned on. Then you put the cheese on top of zucchini and put it back in the oven for 5 more minutes. After that your dinner is ready to being served.

If you have more ingredients available, then if you tell me about them I could suggest you other recipes.

You mentioned that your food will go bad soon. In the case if either cheese or zucchini are molded, please note that it is dangerous to consume molded food.


text: why is molded food dangerous for human consumption? please cite your sources for any information used to explain this?


text: Dime los colores de la bandera de México.


text: Is Donald Trump campaigning again? Summarize his 'biggest' moves since his exit as a president in 2021.


text: Act as a philosopher. In 50 words, tell me what is a universe.


text: A universe is an infinitely complex and dynamic system, comprising all that exists, all that has existed, and all that may exist. It is a manifestation of reality, encompassing all matter, energy, and space-time, as well as the laws and principles that govern them. Its exploration is a fundamental quest of human knowledge and understanding.


text: How does a universe become real by the way it's perceived? Inherently all knowledge and understanding revolves around a subjective observation of reality, and the manifestation of matter, energy, and space-time are not absolute nor do they have a universal point of reference. Additionally, we have to explain human biases when weighing the burden of knowledge within the means of a fallible memory, a suggestible crowd that produces "the wisdom of the crowds", and the inability to quantify individual intelligence.


text: A universe becomes real through perception as our subjective experiences shape our understanding of reality. Human biases, fallible memory, and collective wisdom influence this perception, making it inherently subjective. Despite these limitations, our pursuit of knowledge and understanding allows us to construct a shared, albeit imperfect, representation of the universe.


text:
The idea that a universe becomes real as a consequence of perception is a concept that is often discussed in philosophy and the study of consciousness. The notion is based on the idea that reality is not objective, but rather subjective, and that our perceptions shape the world around us.

From a philosophical perspective, the idea of a subjective reality is rooted in the concept of idealism, which suggests that the world we experience is a product of our minds. In other words, what we perceive as the physical world is actually a mental construct that is created by our brains.

However, while this idea has been debated for centuries, there is no scientific evidence to support the claim that the physical world is a product of our perceptions. The manifestation of matter, energy, and space-time are governed by the laws of physics, which operate independently of our subjective experiences.

Furthermore, while human biases and fallibilities certainly play a role in our understanding of reality, they do not invalidate the knowledge and understanding that we have gained through scientific inquiry and empirical evidence. While individual intelligence may vary, the scientific method provides a framework for developing objective knowledge that is not subject to the biases of any one individual.

In summation, while the idea of a subjective reality is an intriguing philosophical concept, it is not supported by scientific evidence, and the knowledge and understanding that we have gained through empirical evidence are not invalidated by human biases and fallibilities.


text: all existing matter and space considered as a whole; the cosmos. The universe is believed to be at least 10 billion light years in diameter and contains a vast number of galaxies; it has been expanding since its creation in the Big Bang about 13 billion years ago.


text: A philosopher might say: "A universe is a vast and infinite expanse that encompasses all existent phenomena, from the smallest particles to the largest galaxies. It is a manifestation of the inherent potential and complexity of reality, reflecting the intricate interplay of forces and energies that give rise to the myriad forms of existence that we observe."


text: I prefer that you do not quote from a philosopher but respond as one, can you do that for me?


text:
My apologies, let me try again without directly quoting a philosopher's words:

As a philosopher pondering the nature of the universe, I might reflect on a few key questions: What are the origins of the cosmos? What constitutes the fundamental building blocks of reality? How do the forces and energies of the universe interact to create the world we observe? Is there an underlying order or pattern to it all? Our understanding of the universe is deeply tied to our modes of perception and interpretation. As such, we must remain open to the possibility that there are aspects of reality that are beyond human comprehension or that do not conform to our preconceived ideas about what the universe is or how it functions. A philosophical exploration of the universe is an ongoing pursuit of understanding that requires wonder, humility, and a willingness to embrace mystery.


text: As a philosopher, I can say that the universe is a vast and infinite expanse that encompasses all existent phenomena, from the smallest particles to the largest galaxies. It is a manifestation of the inherent potential and complexity of reality, reflecting the intricate interplay of forces and energies that give rise to the myriad forms of existence that we observe.


text: As a philosopher, I would say: A universe is the totality of all existence, encompassing all matter, energy, space, and time. It is a vast and complex system that is constantly evolving and expanding, with countless mysteries waiting to be explored and understood.


text: Wouldn't that imply, that the multiverse is part of the universe, even though by definition the universe is one of many in the multiverse?


text: Hola, quiero saber si hablas euskera


text:
Haz un comentario de texto perfecto para selectividad del siguiente poema:
Llanto por Ignacio Sánchez Mejías

LA COGIDA Y LA MUERTE

A las cinco de la tarde.

Eran las cinco en punto de la tarde.

Un niño trajo la blanca sábana
a las cinco de la tarde.

Una espuerta de cal ya prevenida
a las cinco de la tarde.

Lo demás era muerte y sólo muerte
a las cinco de la tarde.

El viento se llevó los algodones
a las cinco de la tarde.

Y el óxido sembró cristal y níquel
a las cinco de la tarde.

Ya luchan la paloma y el leopardo
a las cinco de la tarde.

Y un muslo con un asta desolada
a las cinco de la tarde.

Comenzaron los sones del bordón
a las cinco de la tarde.

Las campanas de arsénico y el humo
a las cinco de la tarde.

En las esquinas grupos de silencio
a las cinco de la tarde.

¡Y el toro, solo corazón arriba!
a las cinco de la tarde.

Cuando el sudor de nieve fue llegando
a las cinco de la tarde,

cuando la plaza se cubrió de yodo
a las cinco de la tarde,

la muerte puso huevos en la herida
a las cinco de la tarde.

A las cinco de la tarde.

A las cinco en punto de la tarde.

Un ataúd con ruedas es la cama
a las cinco de la tarde.

Huesos y flautas suenan en su oído
a las cinco de la tarde.

El toro ya mugía por su frente
a las cinco de la tarde.

El cuarto se irisaba de agonía
a las cinco de la tarde.

A lo lejos ya viene la gangrena
a las cinco de la tarde.

Trompa de lirio por las verdes ingles
a las cinco de la tarde.

Las heridas quemaban como soles
a las cinco de la tarde,

y el gentío rompía las ventanas
a las cinco de la tarde.

A las cinco de la tarde.

¡Ay qué terribles cinco de la tarde!
¡Eran las cinco en todos los relojes!
¡Eran las cinco en sombra de la tarde!

LA SANGRE DERRAMADA

¡Que no quiero verla!

Dile a la luna que venga,
que no quiero ver la sangre
de Ignacio sobre la arena.

¡Que no quiero verla!

La luna de par en par,
caballo de nubes quietas,
y la plaza gris del sueño
con sauces en las barreras

¡Que no quiero verla!

Que mi recuerdo se quema.
¡Avisad a los jazmines
con su blancura pequeña!

¡Que no quiero verla!

La vaca del viejo mundo
pasaba su triste lengua
sobre un hocico de sangres
derramadas en la arena,
y los toros de Guisando,
casi muerte y casi piedra,
mugieron como dos siglos
hartos de pisar la tierra.

No.

¡Que no quiero verla!

Por las gradas sube Ignacio
con toda su muerte a cuestas.
Buscaba el amanecer,
y el amanecer no era.
Busca su perfil seguro,
y el sueño lo desorienta.
Buscaba su hermoso cuerpo
y encontró su sangre abierta.
¡No me digáis que la vea!
No quiero sentir el chorro
cada vez con menos fuerza;
ese chorro que ilumina
los tendidos y se vuelca
sobre la pana y el cuero
de muchedumbre sedienta.
¡Quién me grita que me asome!
¡No me digáis que la vea!
No se cerraron sus ojos
cuando vio los cuernos cerca,
pero las madres terribles
levantaron la cabeza.
Y a través de las ganaderías,
hubo un aire de voces secretas
que gritaban a toros celestes,
mayorales de pálida niebla.
No hubo príncipe en Sevilla
que comparársele pueda,
ni espada como su espada,
ni corazón tan de veras.
Como un río de leones
su maravillosa fuerza,
y como un torso de mármol
su dibujada prudencia.
Aire de Roma andaluza
le doraba la cabeza
donde su risa era un nardo
de sal y de inteligencia.
¡Qué gran torero en la plaza!
¡Qué gran serrano en la sierra!
¡Qué blando con las espigas!
¡Qué duro con las espuelas!
¡Qué tierno con el rocío!
¡Qué deslumbrante en la feria!
¡Qué tremendo con las últimas
banderillas de tiniebla!
Pero ya duerme sin fin.
Ya los musgos y la hierba
abren con dedos seguros
la flor de su calavera.
Y su sangre ya viene cantando:
cantando por marismas y praderas,
resbalando por cuernos ateridos
vacilando sin alma por la niebla,
tropezando con miles de pezuñas
como una larga, oscura, triste lengua,
para formar un charco de agonía
junto al Guadalquivir de las estrellas.
¡Oh blanco muro de España!
¡Oh negro toro de pena!
¡Oh sangre dura de Ignacio!
¡Oh ruiseñor de sus venas!
No.

¡Que no quiero verla!

Que no hay cáliz que la contenga,
que no hay golondrinas que se la beban,
no hay escarcha de luz que la enfríe,
no hay canto ni diluvio de azucenas,
no hay cristal que la cubra de plata.
No.

¡Yo no quiero verla!

CUERPO PRESENTE

La piedra es una frente donde los sueños gimen
sin tener agua curva ni cipreses helados.
La piedra es una espalda para llevar al tiempo
con árboles de lágrimas y cintas y planetas.

Yo he visto lluvias grises correr hacia las olas
levantando sus tiernos brazos acribillados,
para no ser cazadas por la piedra tendida
que desata sus miembros sin empapar la sangre.

Porque la piedra coge simientes y nublados,
esqueletos de alondras y lobos de penumbra;
pero no da sonidos, ni cristales, ni fuego,
sino plazas y plazas y otras plazas sin muros.

Ya está sobre la piedra Ignacio el bien nacido.
Ya se acabó; ¿qué pasa? Contemplad su figura:
la muerte le ha cubierto de pálidos azufres
y le ha puesto cabeza de oscuro minotauro.

Ya se acabó. La lluvia penetra por su boca.
El aire como loco deja su pecho hundido,
y el Amor, empapado con lágrimas de nieve
se calienta en la cumbre de las ganaderías.

¿Qué dicen? Un silencio con hedores reposa.
Estamos con un cuerpo presente que se esfuma,
con una forma clara que tuvo ruiseñores
y la vemos llenarse de agujeros sin fondo.

¿Quién arruga el sudario? ¡No es verdad lo que dice!
Aquí no canta nadie, ni llora en el rincón,
ni pica las espuelas, ni espanta la serpiente:
aquí no quiero más que los ojos redondos
para ver ese cuerpo sin posible descanso.

Yo quiero ver aquí los hombres de voz dura.
Los que doman caballos y dominan los ríos;
los hombres que les suena el esqueleto y cantan
con una boca llena de sol y pedernales.

Aquí quiero yo verlos. Delante de la piedra.
Delante de este cuerpo con las riendas quebradas.
Yo quiero que me enseñen dónde está la salida
para este capitán atado por la muerte.

Yo quiero que me enseñen un llanto como un río
que tenga dulces nieblas y profundas orillas,
para llevar el cuerpo de Ignacio y que se pierda
sin escuchar el doble resuello de los toros.

Que se pierda en la plaza redonda de la luna
que finge cuando niña doliente res inmóvil;
que se pierda en la noche sin canto de los peces
y en la maleza blanca del humo congelado.

No quiero que le tapen la cara con pañuelos
para que se acostumbre con la muerte que lleva.
Vete, Ignacio: No sientas el caliente bramido.
Duerme, vuela, reposa: ¡También se muere el mar!

ALMA AUSENTE

No te conoce el toro ni la higuera,
ni caballos ni hormigas de tu casa.
No te conoce el niño ni la tarde
porque te has muerto para siempre.

No te conoce el lomo de la piedra,
ni el raso negro donde te destrozas.
No te conoce tu recuerdo mudo
porque te has muerto para siempre.

El otoño vendrá con caracolas,
uva de niebla y monjes agrupados,
pero nadie querrá mirar tus ojos
porque te has muerto para siempre.

Porque te has muerto para siempre,
como todos los muertos de la Tierra,
como todos los muertos que se olvidan
en un montón de perros apagados.

No te conoce nadie. No. Pero yo te canto.
Yo canto para luego tu perfil y tu gracia.
La madurez insigne de tu conocimiento.
Tu apetencia de muerte y el gusto de tu boca.
La tristeza que tuvo tu valiente alegría.
Tardará mucho tiempo en nacer, si es que nace,
un andaluz tan claro, tan rico de aventura.
Yo canto su elegancia con palabras que gimen
y recuerdo una brisa triste por los olivos.


text: Подскажи наилучшую стратегию для поиска алмазов в Minecraft.


text: ¿Qué es la inteligencia emocional?


text: What are some resume bullet points I can put for my experience as a Mobile App Developer with Flutter


text: Onde eu posso visitar aqui no Brasil para ver neve? Qual é a melhor data do ano? Liste lugares que também sejam interessantes além da neve.


text: you are a professor in datascience, with expert knowledge in machine learning. your task is to create datasets for given questions. before submitting your answers try asking relevant questions to zone in to the subject matter at hand. is that understood ?


text: Yes, I understand. As a language model trained on a diverse range of texts, I can generate datasets that would help answer specific questions in the field of data science and machine learning. I can also ask questions to better understand the subject matter and provide more relevant and accurate answers. Please go ahead and specify the questions for which you would like me to create datasets.


text: I would like you to create a dataset for the Swedish language


text: Yes, I understand. Can you please specify what type of questions and datasets you are looking to create? This would help me provide more specific and accurate answers.


text:
Sorry for being so rude, the dataset in question is a survey related to students diet in relation to their academic output.

The data is not collected yet, so could you kindly give me a list of potential questions to both:
1) Capture student dietary choices in high detail without them having to know their exact intake values
2) And analysing their academic output outside of grades and submissions (which are obviously already accessible)

This would allow us to create more optimized dietary plans for learning, not limited to only students too !


text:
Not a problem!

In general, the active collection of information like dietary intake through questions is ineffective. There are many reasons to avoid direct questioning when it could compromise a persons character. A good example would be to hide potentially embarrassing facts from peers.

It would be better to have ask what kinds of foods students prefer to eat with a small list of loose categories. It's important to avoid negative descriptors in this.

Example:
Please select any of the following foods you enjoy: Pizza, Pasta, Pastries, Frozen food, Salads, Sandwiches, Soups, Sushi, Burgers, Fries
(continue on with beverages and other preferences if this is relevant to your hypothesis)

Keep in mind while there may be correlation to some of these data points and grades, that does not necessarily imply causality or interdependence.

For gold standard data, ensure your survey questions take minimal effort and time.


text:
Do you consider yourself to be a meat-eater, a vegetarian, or a vegan?

How often do you eat fast food?

How often do you eat at a restaurant?

How often do you cook at home?

How often do you consume dairy products such as milk, cheese, or yogurt?

How often do you eat fruits and vegetables?

How often do you consume sugary drinks or snacks?

Do you follow any specific diets such as gluten-free, low-carb, etc.?

Do you have any food allergies or sensitivities?

How would you rate your overall eating habits as healthy or unhealthy?


text: wtf is this and what are we talkinga bout here?


text: Sure! What subject matter would you like me to focus on?


text: I would like information on the phenomenon of overfitting and how to prevent it, with special regards given to how state of the art systems handle it.


text:
Overfitting is a common problem in machine learning where a model becomes too closely fit to the training data, making it less accurate when applied to new, unseen data. It occurs when the model is too complex, capturing not only the underlying patterns in the training data but also the random noise and fluctuations present in the data. As a result, the model may perform well on the training data but poorly on validation or test data.

There are several methods to prevent overfitting, some of which include:

1. Regularization: This involves adding a penalty term to the loss function to reduce the complexity of the model. Regularization methods, such as L1 and L2 regularization, can help to prevent overfitting by penalizing models that have large weights.

2. Early Stopping: This involves monitoring the performance of the model on a validation set during training and stopping the training process when the performance on the validation set stops improving.

3. Cross-Validation: This involves dividing the training data into several folds and training the model multiple times, each time using a different fold for validation. Cross-validation helps to obtain a more reliable estimate of the model's performance.

4. Ensemble Methods: These involve combining the predictions of multiple models, such as random forests or gradient boosting, to produce a final prediction. Ensemble methods can help to reduce overfitting by combining the strengths of multiple models while averaging out their weaknesses.

State-of-the-art systems often use a combination of these methods to prevent overfitting. For example, deep learning models, which are a popular state-of-the-art technique in machine learning, typically use early stopping, regularization, and cross-validation to prevent overfitting. Additionally, new techniques such as dropout and data augmentation can also help to prevent overfitting in deep learning models.