In the course of doing mathematics, I make extensive use of computer-based calculations. There's one CAS that I use mostly, even though I occasionally come across out-and-out wrong answers.

After googling around a bit, I am unable to find a list of such bugs. Having such a list would help us remain skeptical and help our students become skeptical. So here's the question: 

What are some mathematical bugs in computer algebra systems? 

Please include a specific version of the software that has the bug. Please note that I'm not asking for bad design decisions, and I'm not asking for a discussion of the relative merits of different CAS's.

I don't know any interesting bugs in symbolic algebra packages but I know a true, enlightening and entertaining story about something that looked like a bug but wasn't.$\def\sinc{\operatorname{sinc}}$
Define $\sinc x = (\sin x)/x$.
Someone found the following result in an algebra package:
$\int_0^\infty dx \sinc x = \pi/2$
They then found the following results:
$\int_0^\infty dx \sinc x \; \sinc (x/3)= \pi/2$
$\int_0^\infty dx \sinc x \; \sinc (x/3) \; \sinc (x/5)= \pi/2$
and so on up to
$\int_0^\infty dx \sinc x \; \sinc (x/3) \; \sinc (x/5) \; \cdots \; \sinc (x/13)= \pi/2$
So of course when they got:
$\int_0^\infty dx \sinc x \; \sinc (x/3) \sinc (x/5) \; \cdots \; \sinc (x/15)$$=
\frac{467807924713440738696537864469}{935615849440640907310521750000}\pi$
they knew they had to report the bug. The poor vendor struggled for a long time trying to fix it but eventually came to the stunning realisation that this result is correct.
These are now known as Borwein Integrals.
A video on this topic, titled "Researchers thought this was a bug," is on the 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel here.
