The definition of "C-Style language" can practically be simplified down to "uses curly braces ({})."  Why do we use that particular character (and why not something more reasonable, like [], which doesn't require the shift key at least on US keyboards)?

Is there any actual benefit to programmer productivity that comes from these braces, or should new language designers look for alternatives (i.e. the guys behind Python)?

Wikipedia tells us that C uses said braces, but not why. A statement in Wikipedia article on the List of C-based programming languages suggests that this syntax element is somewhat special:


  Broadly speaking, C-family languages are those that use C-like block syntax (including curly braces to begin and end the block)...


Two of the major influences to C were the Algol family of languages (Algol 60 and Algol 68) and BCPL (from which C takes its name).


  BCPL was the first curly bracket programming language, and the curly
  brackets survived the syntactical changes and have become a common
  means of denoting program source code statements. In practice, on
  limited keyboards of the day, source programs often used the sequences
  $( and $) in place of the symbols { and }. The single-line '//'
  comments of BCPL, which were not taken up in C, reappeared in C++, and
  later in C99.


From http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/BCPL.html


  BCPL introduced and implemented several innovations which became quite
  common elements in the design of later languages. Thus, it was the
  first curly bracket programming language (one using { } as block
  delimiters), and it was the first language to use // to mark inline
  comments.


From http://progopedia.com/language/bcpl/

Within BCPL, one often sees curly braces, but not always.  This was a limitation of the keyboards at the time.  The characters $( and $) were lexicographically equivalent to { and }.  Digraphs and trigraphs were maintained in C (though a different set for curly brace replacement - ??< and ??>).

The use of curly braces was further refined in B (which preceded C).

From Users' Reference to B by Ken Thompson:

/* The following function will print a non-negative number, n, to
  the base b, where 2<=b<=10,  This routine uses the fact that
  in the ASCII character set, the digits 0 to 9 have sequential
  code values.  */

printn(n,b) {
        extern putchar;
        auto a;

        if(a=n/b) /* assignment, not test for equality */
                printn(a, b); /* recursive */
        putchar(n%b + '0');
}


There are indications that curly braces were used as short hand for begin and end within Algol.


  I remember that you also included them in the 256-character card code
  that you published in CACM, because I found it interesting that you
  proposed that they could be used in place of the Algol 'begin' and
  'end' keywords, which is exactly how they were later used in the C
  language.


From http://www.bobbemer.com/BRACES.HTM



The use of square brackets (as a suggested replacement in the question) goes back even further.  As mentioned, the Algol family influenced C.  Within Algol 60 and 68 (C was written in 1972 and BCPL in 1966), the square bracket was used to designate an index into an array or matrix.

BEGIN
  FILE F(KIND=REMOTE);
  EBCDIC ARRAY E[0:11];
  REPLACE E BY "HELLO WORLD!";
  WRITE(F, *, E);
END.




As programmers were already familiar with square brackets for arrays in Algol and BCPL, and curly braces for blocks in BCPL, there was little need or desire to change this when making another language.



The updated question includes an addendum of productivity for curly brace usage and mentions python.  There are some other resources that do this study though the answer boils down to "Its anecdotal, and what you are used to is what you are most productive with."  Because of the widely varying skills in programming and familiarity with different languages, these become difficult to account for.

See also: Stack Overflow Are there statistical studies that indicates that Python is “more productive”?

Much of the gains would be dependent on the IDE (or lack of) that is used.  In vi based editors, putting the cursor over one matching open/close and pressing % will then move the cursor to the other matching character.  This is very efficient with C based languages back in the old days - less so now.

A better comparison would be between {} and begin/end which was the options of the day (horizontal space was precious).  Many Wirth languages were based on a begin and end style (Algol (mentioned above), pascal (many are familiar with), and the Modula family).

I have difficulty finding any that isolate this specific language feature - at best I can do is show that the curly brace languages are much more popular than begin end languages and it is a common construct.  As mentioned in Bob Bemer link above, the curly brace was used to make it easier to program as shorthand.

From Why Pascal is Not My Favorite Programming Language


  C and Ratfor programmers find 'begin' and 'end' bulky compared to { and }.


Which is about all that can be said - its familiarity and preference.
