IMPORTANCEBacterial cell cycles are known for few model organisms and can vary significantly between species. Here, we studied the cell cycle of Corynebacterium glutamicum, an emerging cell biological model organism for mycolic acid-containing bacteria, including mycobacteria. Our data suggest that C. glutamicum carries two pole-attached chromosomes that replicate with overlapping C periods, thus initiating a new round of DNA replication before the previous one is terminated. The newly replicated origins segregate to midcell positions, where cell division occurs between the two new origins. Even after long starvation or under extremely slow-growth conditions, C. glutamicum cells are at least diploid, likely as an adaptation to environmental stress that may cause DNA damage. The cell cycle of C. glutamicum combines features of slow-growing organisms, such as polar origin localization, and fast-growing organisms, such as overlapping C periods.
Bacteria regulate chromosome replication and segregation tightly with cell division to ensure faithful segregation of DNA to daughter generations. The underlying mechanisms have been addressed in several model species. It became apparent that bacteria have evolved quite different strategies to regulate DNA segregation and chromosomal organization. We have investigated here how the actinobacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum organizes chromosome segregation and DNA replication. Unexpectedly, we found that C. glutamicum cells are at least diploid under all of the conditions tested and that these organisms have overlapping C periods during replication, with both origins initiating replication simultaneously. On the basis of experimental data, we propose growth rate-dependent cell cycle models for C. glutamicum.
INTRODUCTIONBacterial chromosome organization is highly regulated, where replication coincides with the segregation of sister nucleoids and is tightly coordinated with cell division (1). Cell cycle control mechanisms exist that ensure constant DNA content throughout cell generations. In particular, the action of the key replication initiator protein DnaA is timed by various regulatory systems, for instance, via the CtrA protein cascade in Caulobacter crescentus or SeqA in Escherichia coli (2–6). Upon replication initiation, DnaA binds to the origin of replication (oriC) and mediates duplex unwinding prior to loading of the replication machinery (7, 8). The two evolving replication forks migrate along the left and right arms of the circular chromosome toward the terminus of replication (terC), where (FtsK-dependent) XerCD recombinases resolve chromosome dimers as a final step, as shown in E. coli (9, 10). Replication usually takes place within defined cellular regions via stably assembled protein complexes, namely, replisomes, of a rather static or dynamic nature (11, 12).The bacterial cell cycle can be divided into different stages, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The time of DNA replication is termed the C period. It is followed by a time interval necessary for cell division executed by the divisome (the D period). Several bacteria, like Mycobacterium smegmatis and C. crescentus, replicate their genomes once within a generation, where the C periods are temporally separated from each other (13, 14). Under slow-growth conditions, a nonreplicative state termed the B period precedes the C period (not shown); thus, the bacterial cell cycle resembles the eukaryotic cell cycle in some aspects (G1, S, and G2 phases). Contrary to this, fast-growing organisms such as Bacillus subtilis, E. coli, and Vibrio cholerae can overlap C periods during fast growth, a phenomenon termed multifork replication (15–17). Under these conditions, a new round of replication is reinitiated before the termination of the previous one. Therefore, generation times are considerably shorter than the duration of the C period. However, only one round of replication is initiated per cell cycle and usually one C period is completed at the time point of cell division (18). Many bacteria contain only one copy of the chromosome. However, several bacteria and archaea can have increased DNA contents because of oligo- or polyploidy (19). Polyploid cells harbor multiple, fully replicated chromosome copies throughout their life cycle, which has been frequently found in prokaryotes, including certain Gram-positive bacteria, proteobacteria, members of the order Deinococcales, cyanobacteria, and also archaea (20–27).FIG 1 Schematic representation of bacterial replication cycles under slow (left)- and fast (right)-growth conditions. Under slow-growth conditions, DNA replication (termed the C period) takes place within a single generation, followed by the interval between replication termination and completion of cell division (the D period). Fast-growing bacteria with generation times shorter than the C period, like B. subtilis and E. coli, undergo multifork replication; i.e., new rounds of replication are initiated before previous ones terminate. Chromosomes are indicated by black lines with oriCs and terCs as white and black circles.Besides the distinct cell cycle modes, chromosome localization patterns differ between model organisms. In a nonreplicating, slow-growing E. coli cell, the single chromosome is placed symmetrically, with the oriC and terC regions located at midcell positions and the replichores spatially separated in the two cell halves (28). Upon replication initiation, the two sister chromosomes segregate bidirectionally to opposite cell halves, with replisomes positioned at the midcell position (29, 30). Finally, oriC and terC are confined to cell quarter regions. Contrary to this, the model organisms C. crescentus, V. cholerae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa localize their nucleoids about the longitudinal axis with chromosome arms adjacent to each other (31–34). Sister replichores move to the opposite cell half, with the segregated oriC facing toward the pole, mirroring the second chromosome at the transverse axis. The oriC region of C. crescentus and V. cholerae is positioned by polar landmark proteins (35, 36), where replisomes assemble and simultaneously move toward the midcell position in the course of replication (12, 17). For the most part, P. aeruginosa places its replication machinery centrally (34). Finally, B. subtilis switches from longitudinal chromosome organization to the E. coli left-oriC-right configuration during replication initiation (37).The mitotic-like ParABS segregation system has been identified as a driving force behind coordinated nucleoid partitioning for more than two-thirds of the bacterial species analyzed, with exceptions specifically within the class Gammaproteobacteria, such as E. coli (38). This segregation mechanism involves components similar to the plasmid-located par genes responsible for active segregation of low-copy-number plasmids (39). Thereby, the ParB protein binds a variable number of centromere-like DNA sequences called parS sites in the proximity of oriC (40) and spreads along the DNA, forming large protein-DNA complexes (41–43). Interaction of ParB with the Walker-type ATPase ParA mediates ATP hydrolysis and thereby ParA detachment from DNA (44), driving apart the sister chromosomes as the ParA-ParB interaction translocates oriC toward the opposite cell half (33, 45, 46). The precise mechanism of ParABS-mediated DNA segregation has been under debate; however, to date, dynamic diffusion ratchet and DNA relay models are favored, where nucleoid and plasmid movement is mediated along a ParA gradient caused by local ParB-stimulated depletion of DNA-bound ParA (47–49). Deletion of this partitioning system has mild effects in B. subtilis and V. cholerae cells but causes severe chromosome segregation defects in other organisms and is essential for viability in C. crescentus and Myxococcus xanthus (46, 50–56).Here we present the cell cycle and spatiotemporal organization of oriCs and replisomes in C. glutamicum, a rod-shaped, polar-growing actinobacterium. It is closely related to pathogens like Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the latter being among the top 10 causes of fatal infections worldwide (57). Besides this, C. glutamicum is of great economic importance as an amino acid and vitamin producer and extensive efforts in metabolic engineering are being carried out concerning metabolite production and yield increase (58). Although its metabolism is one of the best studied among model organisms, the underlying cell cycle parameters and chromosome organization patterns have not previously been analyzed in detail. C. glutamicum relies on a ParABS system to segregate its nucleoids prior to cell division (51, 59, 60). Chromosome segregation influences division site selection, and hence, growth and chromosome organization are tightly coupled in C. glutamicum (59). This may, in part, explain why protein machineries that have been described in various bacterial species like the Min system or a nucleoid occlusion system, both of which are involved in division septum placement, are absent from C. glutamicum (61).In this study, we tracked in vivo fluorescently labeled centromere-binding protein ParB, the terminus region of the chromosome, and the replisome sliding-clamp DnaN to investigate spatiotemporal oriC, terC, and replisome localization throughout the cell cycle. Fluorescence microscopy and single-cell tracking by time-lapse analysis revealed remarkably high oriC and replisome numbers during fast growth, suggesting multiple chromosomes and several simultaneous replication events per cell. Initially, cells possess two polar oriC-ParB clusters whereby, upon replication, sister oriCs segregate toward midcell positions. Additionally, the length of replication periods, as well as the overall DNA content, was determined for different growth conditions by marker frequency analysis and flow cytometry, thereby allowing the formulation of complete cell cycle models. Our data suggest diploidy and overlapping C periods in C. glutamicum and therefore give new insights into replication coordination within the class Actinobacteria.RESULTSOrigin numbers correlate with cell length in a ParA-independent way.We have shown before that the C. glutamicum partitioning protein ParB localizes at the origin regions of the chromosome close to the cell poles (51). However, in-depth studies of spatiotemporal chromosome organization were still missing. Therefore, we aimed to reanalyze oriC-ParB complexes microscopically by time-resolved live-cell imaging. To label origin regions, the native chromosomal parB gene of wild-type (WT) or ΔparA mutant C. glutamicum RES167 was replaced with parB-eYFP, resulting in strains with typical cell morphology and growth phenotypes (Fig. 2A; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). No cleavage products of ParB-eYFP were detectable (see Fig. S1), suggesting that fluorescent signals faithfully reflect ParB localization. Microscopic analysis revealed a correlation of ParB-eYFP focus numbers with cell length in both strains (Fig. 2B). In the WT background, between one and five foci were detected. The parA deletion mutant has variable cell lengths, and anucleate minicells (not taken into account) were observed. Up to 12 ParB foci were present in cells of the parA deletion mutant. Notably, most of the ParB foci in the parA knockout strain were less fluorescent than in WT cells, suggesting that lack of ParA causes problems in oriC-ParB assembly at the cell poles. Chromosome segregation defects upon parA deletion do not markedly affect the high correlation of the oriC-ParB focus number with cell length. However, linear regression models yield significant differences between the WT and parA deletion strains (Fig. 2B). Notably, the ParB concentration is not increased in the absence of parA (see Fig. S1D). The higher oriC numbers could be caused by a loss of oriC-ParB complex cohesion or reduced tethering to cell poles, which might be positively influenced by ParA.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.2FIG S1 Growth and cell length distributions of the strains used in this work. (A, B) Comparison of growth curves (A) and cell length distributions (B) (n = 200) of C. glutamicum mutant strains with those of the WT. All growth experiments were performed with BHI medium. Values were derived from triplicate measurements; standard deviations are indicated in all graphs. C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP, parB::parB-eYFP divIVA::divIVA-mCherry, dnaN::dnaN-mCherry, parB::parB-mCherry2, parB::parB-eYFP dnaN::dnaN-mCherry, ΔparA, and ΔparA parB::parB-eYFP mutant strains were analyzed. (C) Validation of full-length fusion proteins ParB-mCherry2 and DnaN-mCherry. Full-length fluorescent fusion proteins were validated via Western blotting. Whole-cell lysates of WT (lanes 1) and dnaN::dnaN-mCherry (lanes 2) and parB::parB-mCherry2 (lanes 3) mutant C. glutamicum strains were probed, and DnaN-mCherry and ParB-mCherry2 were detected via anti-mCherry polyclonal antibody. Shown are a Western blot analysis (left) and the corresponding Coomassie-stained gel (right). (D) Similar ParB-mCherry2 protein levels in the WT and ΔparA mutant backgrounds. Amounts of full-length ParB-mCherry2 fusion proteins in WT (lanes 1) and parB::parB-mCherry2 (lanes 2) and ΔparA parB::parB-mCherry2 (lanes 3) mutant C. glutamicum cells were visualized via Western blotting (left). The total protein load is shown by Coomassie staining (right). Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.9 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.FIG 2 Determination of the C. glutamicum oriC number and correlation with cell length. (A) Subcellular localization of ParB-eYFP in representative parB::parB-eYFP WT and ΔparA mutant cells. Shown are overlays of phase-contrast images and eYFP fluorescence (merge) and separate channels (phase, ParB). Scale bar, 2 µm. (B) ParB focus number depends on cell length in a ParA-independent way. In the WT strain, 1 to 5 foci were observed, and in a ΔparA mutant strain, 1 to 12 foci were observed (n = 400). Linear regression lines are shown. WT, r = 0.80; ΔparA mutant, r = 0.88; slopes are not equal (ANCOVA, F1,396 = 16.10, P < 0.0001). (C) Still image of C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP divIVA::divIVA-mCherry cells. Depicted are a phase-contrast image (lower right), DivIVA (lower left) and ParB-eYFP (upper right) fluorescence, and an overlay of all of the channels (upper left). Scale bar, 2 µm. (D) Time-lapse microscopy of a DivIVA-mCherry- and ParB-eYFP-coexpressing strain reveals distribution of cell length and ParB-eYFP cluster number at the beginning of septum formation and after cell division (n = 200). The microscopy images of a single cell exemplify the time-lapse analysis of septum formation (white arrowheads) tracked with a DivIVA-mCherry reporter. Scale bar, 2 µm.To determine the maximal number of oriCs per cell precisely, an additional allelic replacement of divIVA with divIVA-mCherry was carried out (Fig. 2C). With this construct, cell division can be monitored by DivIVA localization before the walls of the daughter cells are separated, because DivIVA efficiently accumulates at the septal membrane. This strain revealed WT-like growth rates and cell length distributions (see Fig. S1), suggesting that DivIVA-mCherry and ParB-eYFP are functional. DivIVA localizes to the cell poles, as well as newly formed septa, and therefore is a suitable marker for completed cell division (60). Analysis revealed an average of four ParB foci prior to completed septation at an average cell length of 3.94 µm; however, up to six foci per cell could be determined (Fig. 2D). Newborn cells with an average length of 2.01 µm mostly contained two foci. Origin numbers and cell size were relatively variable, as division septa are often not precisely placed at the midcell position in corynebacteria. Use of the DivIVA reporter to judge the ParB focus number per daughter cell resulted in oriC numbers per cell similar to those obtained when using the physical separation of daughter cells as a marker of cell division. Notably, these analyses revealed unexpected high oriC-ParB cluster numbers that hint at the ability of C. glutamicum to undergo multifork replication and/or to harbor multiple fully replicated chromosomes per cell.Spatiotemporal localization pattern of ParB-origin complexes.For analysis of chromosome arrangement during one cell cycle, live-cell imaging was performed with C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP (Fig. 3A; see Movie S1). Single cells with two ParB clusters were tracked over one generation time, and focus positions were determined relative to the new pole, revealing distinct origin localization patterns throughout the cell cycle (Fig. 3B). Newborn cells contain two ParB foci stably located close to the cell poles. Newly replicated oriCs segregate from the cell poles toward the midcell position. Often we observed the appearance of a new ParB clusters at either the new or the old pole before a fourth focus separated from the opposite ParB spot. No bias in the timing of origin replication and segregation between old and new cell poles could be detected, as indicated by mean localizations of the third to the fifth focus appearing around the midcell position. A timeline over one generation cycle shows the continuous increase in newly formed segregating oriCs (Fig. 3C). Already after completion of half a cell cycle (~30 min), around half of the cells contained four or five ParB foci; this ratio further increased during growth progression. Uneven ParB focus counts per cell are abundant. Detachment of oriC-ParB complexes from cell poles via chloramphenicol treatment, combined with z-stacking of microscopic images, was used to more accurately determine oriC numbers (see Fig. S2). Up to eight ParB complexes and notably fewer uneven focus numbers were counted per cell than determined with previous experiment settings using untreated cells. These results hint at the absence of asymmetric replication initiation in C. glutamicum; hence, uneven ParB-oriC complex numbers are the result of a slightly variable colocalization time of sister oriCs. To corroborate these findings, we used automated analysis of still microscopy images to confirm the spatiotemporal oriC-ParB cluster localization (Fig. 3D). Therefore, we programed a Fiji software plug-in termed Morpholyzer that allows automated cell detection and analysis of fluorescence profiles (see Materials and Methods). High ParB fluorescence intensities were detected close to the poles of all of the cells measured, suggesting stable oriC anchoring at the cell poles. Segregation of sister oriC-ParB clusters toward midcell positions could be detected after around one-fourth of the cell cycle (Fig. 3D). Notably, oriCs stay in the cell half in which they originated. Similar dynamics of oriC localization and segregation patterns have been characterized before for M. xanthus, C. crescentus, M. smegmatis, and V. cholerae (33, 62–65). Upon ParA deletion, the time-dependent increase in oriC numbers became less distinct because of large cell length variations directly after cytokinesis (Fig. 3E). As a consequence, multiple oriC-ParB complexes were already present in large newborn cells. Analysis of still images further revealed a disrupted ParB-oriC pattern in parA deletion strains compared to the coordinated cellular oriC movement in WT cells (Fig. 3F). Fluorescent foci were detected all along the longitudinal cell axis without clear sites of preference, underlining the crucial role of the partitioning protein ParA in the polar and septal positioning of oriC-ParB clusters in C. glutamicum.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.9MOVIE S1 Growth of C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP cells in a microfluidic chamber with image acquisition every 5 min for a total of 225 min (AVI format). Download MOVIE S1, AVI file, 0.2 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.5FIG S2 Medium dependency of oriC-ParB cluster numbers per cell. (A) Comparison of oriC-ParB complex analysis with (gray bars) and without chloramphenicol treatment of cells combined with z-stacking of microscopic images (black bars). n = 200. (B, C) Comparison of growth (B) and distribution of cell lengths and ParB-eYFP cluster numbers (C) (n = 200) of the parB::parBeYFP mutant strain with the use of different carbon sources. Cells were grown in BHI medium (growth rate [µ] = 0.62), BHI+Gluc (µ = 0.49), MMI medium supplemented with glucose (µ = 0.32), and CGXII supplemented with acetate (µ = 0.41) or propionate (µ = 0.13). Experiments were performed in triplicate; error bars display standard deviations. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 0.3 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.FIG 3 oriC localization pattern during cell cycle progression. (A) Occurrence of newly formed ParB-eYFP clusters in the course of cell elongation. Still images show a time series of a typical C. glutamicum WT cell with initially two ParB spots. Three further foci appear over time (arrowheads); time points are indicated in minutes (top right corners). Scale bar, 2 µm. (B) Time-lapse single-cell analyses reveal oriC-ParB complex positions along the long cell axis at each moment in time when a new ParB-eYFP spot occurs. A third, a fourth, and eventually a fifth focus separate from the two initial ParB clusters located close to the cell poles and move toward midcell positions. Cells are aligned with the old pole facing upward; cell lengths are normalized to 1 (n = 46). Schemes shown to the left of the graphs illustrate average ParB-eYFP focus positions ± the standard deviations. (C) Time-dependent increase in the number of ParB clusters per cell. Percentages of cells with one to five spots are depicted for each time point (n = 30). (D) ParB-eYFP pattern along the cell axis depending on cell length in WT C. glutamicum. Automated image analysis of still microscopy images sorted by cell length with high fluorescence intensities displayed in green (n >200). (E) Counts of ParB-eYFP spots over time in C. glutamicum ΔparA. Percentages of cells with 1 to 12 ParB foci were determined for each time point (n = 30). (F) Random ParB-eYFP distribution along the longitudinal cell axis in relation to its length in a ΔparA mutant strain. Automated analysis of still images with high fluorescence intensities displayed in green (n >300). (G) The timing of replication initiation is similar at oriCs of old and young cell poles. Automated image analysis of the C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP divIVA::divIVA-mCherry fluorescence pattern sorted by cell length with the old cell pole (high polar DivIVA-mCherry signal level) facing downward. ParB-eYFP (green) and DivIVA-mCherry (red) fluorescence is illustrated in one demograph.Uniform timing of replication initiation at old and young cell poles.C. glutamicum cells grow asymmetrically with unequal rates of peptidoglycan (PG) synthesis at the cell poles. The old cell pole synthesizes more PG than the young pole (66) because of cell cycle-dependent dynamics of DivIVA accumulation (our unpublished data). As C. glutamicum DivIVA interacts with the oriC-attached ParB protein (60), the impact of the DivIVA level on chromosome replication or segregation timing was investigated. By using automated analysis of cells coexpressing ParB-eYFP and DivIVA-mCherry, old cell poles were identified by higher DivIVA fluorescence intensities and aligned accordingly. The fluorescence profile shown in Fig. 3G reveals synchronous origin movements toward the newly formed septum from both old and new cell poles, as suggested before by time-lapse analysis (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the timing of chromosome replication seems to be uncoupled from the assembly of the cell wall synthesis machinery despite ParB-DivIVA interaction.Longitudinal chromosome arrangement in C. glutamicumParB-origin clusters are stably associated with the cell poles, suggesting chromosome termini facing toward the midcell position. To prove an ori-ter-ter-ori chromosome organization in C. glutamicum, microscopic analysis of cells harboring fluorescently labeled terminal regions was used. To this end, a fluorescent repressor operator system (FROS) was used in parB::parB-eYFP cells, with an inducible extrachromosomal copy of lacI-cfp and lacO arrays inserted in proximity to terC. Between one and five terC complexes, with a mean count of 1.94, were observed in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium-grown cells (Fig. 4). Terminus numbers were further quantified at various growth rates, as shown in Fig. S3. Even at the lowest growth rate in propionate-supplemented CGXII medium, up to four foci could be observed. Notably, the frequency distribution of terCs per cell was relatively similar under all of the conditions tested. Likely, numbers were underestimated because of the terC colocalization of several chromosomes. Similar to oriC-ParB complexes, terC amounts per cell correlated with cell length. As expected, the number of terminus foci also increased depending on the number of ParB clusters per cell. Figure 4D displays the ParB-eYFP and terC pattern along the longitudinal axis in cells sorted by length. Termini localize to midcell positions throughout the cell cycle, while the opposing origin domains are situated at the cell poles. Interestingly, termini stay in place during the migration of replicated sister oriCs toward them (Fig. 3D shows a spatiotemporal origin pattern). Thus, C. glutamicum organizes the chromosomes in a longitudinal fashion with high terC numbers, suggesting more than two chromosomes at a time. This result is in line with unexpected ParB-oriC complex numbers, as shown before.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.3FIG S3 Growth rate dependency of terC counts per cell. (A) Growth curves of C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP including a FROS for terC labeling (int::lacO pCLTON1PamtR-lacI-CFP). Cells were grown in different media, namely, BHI (growth rate [µ] = 0.62), BHI+Gluc (µ = 0.43), MMI medium supplemented with glucose (Gluc) (µ = 0.37), and CGXII supplemented with acetate (Ac) (µ = 0.39) or propionate (Prop) (µ = 0.15). Values were derived from duplicate measurements; error bars display standard deviations. (B) Distribution of terminus numbers per cell depending on the growth rate. One to five terC foci were counted in most of the media used, with the following average terC numbers: BHI, 1.94; BHI Gluc, 1.68; MMI Gluc, 1.66; CGXII Ac, 1.66; CGXII Prop, 1.74 (n = 250). (C) Representative cells grown at defined rates. Shown are bright-field (BF), terC FROS and ParB fluorescence (terC, ParB), and complement images (merge). Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.FIG 4 Subcellular terC positioning and cell length-dependent abundance. Microscopic analyses of terC were performed with C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP including a FROS in proximity to terC (int::lacO pCLTON1PamtR-lacI-CFP) grown in BHI medium. (A) Localization of oriCs and terCs in fast-growing cells. Shown are bright-field (BF), CFP and eYFP fluorescence (terC, ParB), and overlay (merge) images. terCs localize to midcell positions. Scale bar, 2 µm. (B) Numbers of ParB-eYFP and terC foci per cell depending on cell length (n = 250). Up to six ParB-oriC and up to five terC complexes were determined per cell. Linear regression lines are shown, terC, r = 0.40; ParB-eYFP, r = 0.64. (C) Increase in the number of terC foci with the rising number of ParB-eYFP spots per cell. Percentages of cells with one to five terC foci were determined, sorted by oriC complex numbers (n = 250). (D) The C. glutamicum chromosome is organized longitudinally throughout the cell cycle. Automated image analysis of still microscopy images sorted by cell length reveals the central terC (green) and polar ParB-eYFP (red) fluorescence patterns along the cell axis (n >200).Replisome tracking reveals multiple replication forks and variable origin cohesion times.In vivo characterization of replisome dynamics was carried out with a reporter strain in which the native locus of helicase sliding-clamp dnaN was replaced with a dnaN-mCherry fusion construct (Fig. 5A). Cell length distribution and growth of the DnaN-mCherry-expressing strain resemble the WT situation (see Fig. S1), and the presence of full-length DnaN-mCherry protein could be confirmed via Western blot analysis (see Fig. S1), suggesting that the localization patterns are not due to free fluorophores or degraded protein. To track the pattern of replication timing, automated analysis of fluorescence microscopy images of cells grown in BHI medium was used (Fig. 5B). In growing cells, high DnaN-mCherry signal levels were observed in a wide range around the midcell position. At the end of the first third of the generation time, a fluent transition of replication termination around the midcell position toward the formation of newly formed replication hubs in cell quarter positions took place. This large-scale microscopy analysis clearly indicates that new rounds of replication initiation cannot be temporally separated from the previous ones. C periods follow each other at short intervals or might even overlap under fast-growth conditions. Notably, single-cell analysis can show that replisomes are formed at polar or septal oriC-ParB complexes and gradually move away from the origins toward the midcell position (see Fig. S4). Such a DnaN fluorescence pattern is not immediately obvious in demographs, presumably because of variable timing of replication initiation between cells of similar sizes. Further, we questioned whether replication forks translocate actively to the midcell position or whether the observed movement is an effect of polar cell elongation in C. glutamicum. To this end, cellular DnaN movement was analyzed via time-lapse microscopy (see Fig. S5D). Subtraction of half the cell length increase from the distance covered by a replisome in a time frame from DnaN focus appearance until cell division yielded an average distance of zero. The possibility cannot be excluded that translocation of polar replisomes toward the midcell position is a passive process solely caused by polar cell elongation in C. glutamicum. The movement of replication forks observed by live-cell imaging appeared to be highly dynamic (see Movie S2). During live-cell imaging, a progressive increase in DnaN focus numbers over one generation time was observed (Fig. 5C). Initially, two replication forks were counted for most of the cells; the number further increased to up to six foci per cell throughout the cell cycle, indicating three or more simultaneous replication events per cell. Notably, replisome splitting and merging occur, and because of high DnaN numbers, focus overlays cannot be excluded. To further analyze replication initiation and progression depending on origin localization, a dual-reporter strain expressing ParB-eYFP and DnaN-mCherry was constructed. The WT-like growth and cell lengths of this strain were confirmed (see Fig. S1). The dependence of ParB-eYFP and DnaN-mCherry focus numbers on cell length is shown in Fig. 5D. On average, fewer DnaN than ParB spots were counted per cell, as indicated by regression lines. However, the replication fork number could have been underestimated because of frequent merging of forks initiated from the same origin. These results reveal simultaneous replication events of several chromosome equivalents per cell. Furthermore, a moderate correlation between the numbers of oriC-ParB clusters and replication forks per cell could be determined. By using live-cell imaging, cohesion periods of sister origins were analyzed, which are defined as the time between the formation of a new DnaN-mCherry spot in colocalization with an oriC-ParB cluster and the subsequent splitting of the latter into two distinct fluorescent signals (Fig. 5E). Time frames between replication initiation and sister origin segregation are illustrated in Fig. 5F. Since this approach is limited by the resolution of microscopic analysis, ParB cohesion could have been, on average, overestimated. However, cohesion periods appear to be highly variable. Time spans of 5 to 80 min were measured, with an average period of 36 min. The mean interval length is comparable to the 40-min origin colocalization time in fast-growing E. coli cells determined before (67). Further, a tight regulation of their origin cohesion periods might be absent from this organism. Replication initiations in the mother generation could frequently be observed with origin splitting only in subsequent generations, as exemplified in Fig. 5F. Notably, new rounds of chromosome replication were initiated at polar, as well as at midcell-positioned, origins (see Fig. S4).10.1128/mBio.00511-17.4FIG S4 Single-cell analysis of replisome dynamics. Replication cycle accounting for gradual replisome movement toward the midcell position. Shown are time series exemplifying the movement of replisomes relative to oriC-ParB complexes (green and red, overlay in yellow) in a strain encoding ParB-eYFP and DnaN-mCherry as allelic replacements of the native gene products. Images were taken at 5-min intervals (bottom right corner). At 5 min, polar replisomes assemble in a predivisional cell (white arrowheads), where newly replicated sister oriCs colocalize for up to 40 min; replisomes gradually move away from polar oriCs. Prior to replication termination, a new round of replication is initiated at 60 min (black arrowhead). Sister replisomes merge in one fluorescent spot but frequently split (50 and 55 min, see cartoon below images). Scale bar, 2 μm. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 2.4 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.6FIG S5 Growth rate dependency of replisome numbers per cell. Cells were grown exponentially in BHI medium (BHI), BHI+Gluc, or MMI medium supplemented with glucose (MMI Gluc). (A) Images exemplify the localization of replisomes in dnaN::dnaN-mCherry mutant cells. Shown are phase-contrast images (phase), mCherry fluorescence (DnaN), and overlays of both channels (merge). Scale bar, 2 µm. (B) DnaN-mCherry counts per cell depending on the growth medium. Between zero and eight foci were determined per cell (n = 300). (C) Relationship between the replisome number and cell length. Linear regression lines are shown for cells grown in distinct media as follows: BHI, r = 0.54; BHI+Gluc, r = 0.55; MMI Gluc, r = 0.42 (n = 300). (D) Replisome translocation from the poles toward the midcell position likely arises because of polar cell growth. Shown is the difference between the cell length increase divided by two and the distance covered by the replisome from DnaN focus appearance until cell division. Length = 0.014 μm, standard deviation = 0.242 μm (n = 52). Download FIG S5, TIF file, 1.4 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.10MOVIE S2 Growth of C. glutamicum dnaN::dnaN-mCherry cells in a microfluidic chamber with image acquisition every 5 min for a total of 230 min (AVI format). Download MOVIE S2, AVI file, 0.3 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.FIG 5 Dynamic localization of multiple replisomes in C. glutamicum. (A) Localization of replisomes in dnaN::dnaN-mCherry mutant cells. Shown are an overlay (merge) of DnaN fluorescence (red) and DNA stained with Hoechst (blue) with a phase-contrast image and separate channels (DnaN, Hoechst, and phase). Scale bar, 2 µm. (B) Timing of replication along the cell axis. Automated analysis of still images with DnaN-mCherry fluorescence. Cells are sorted by length, and DnaN-mCherry fluorescence is shown as a heat map (blue to orange) (n >250). (C) Replisome numbers per cell vary within one cell cycle. Percentages of cells with one to six DnaN spots were determined for each time point (n = 59). (D) ParB and DnaN focus numbers in relation to cell length in C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP dnaN::dnaN-mCherry (n = 200). Linear regression lines are shown. ParB-eYFP/DnaN-mCherry, r = 0.65. (E) Time frames of replication initiation until segregation of sister oriCs. Shown is a time series showing the movement of ParB-eYFP and DnaN-mCherry foci (green and red, overlay in yellow) in parB::parB-eYFP dnaN::dnaN-mCherry mutant cells. Images were taken at 5-min intervals, as indicated in the top right corners. At 5 min, a replisome forms at the polar oriC (black arrowheads); sister oriCs separate at 50 min (white arrowheads). (F) Variable cohesion periods of sister oriCs. Shown is the distribution of oriC colocalization times analyzed by time-lapse microscopy together with the cumulative skew of sample data (n = 88).Overlapping replication periods allow fast growth.The observation of multiple DnaN and ParB foci suggests the possibility that C. glutamicum is able to initiate new replication rounds before the ongoing replication is finished. To test this hypothesis, we used marker frequency analysis to investigate the growth rate-dependent replication patterns of C. glutamicum. We determined the oriC/terC ratios of cells grown in three different media (BHI medium, BHI medium with 4% glucose [BHI+Gluc], and minimal medium with 4% glucose [MMI]), allowing fast, intermediate, and slow growth (see Fig. S6A). Data from quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments using markers of origin- and terminus-proximal regions prove the growth rate dependency of oriC/terC ratios (Fig. 6A). As a control, we analyzed B. subtilis, an organism with clear multifork replication. Exponentially grown B. subtilis cells have oriC/terC ratios considerably above 2 (see Fig. S6C). Analysis of exponentially growing C. glutamicum cells cultured in BHI medium and BHI+Gluc yielded mean oriC/terC ratios of 2.4 and 2.2, indicating an overlap of replication periods. Under slow-growth conditions in MMI medium, the mean oriC/terC ratio of 1.7 did not significantly differ from values obtained with cells in the stationary growth phase. Upon antibiotic treatment leading to replication runouts (by inhibiting replication initiation yielding fully replicated chromosomes), the ratios dropped to values close to 1 (data not shown). These results were further supported by whole-genome sequencing of cells grown in BHI and MMI media (Fig. 6B). Sequencing coverages revealed a symmetric progression of replication forks on both arms of the chromosome under all of the conditions tested. During exponential growth in BHI medium, the mean gene coverage in origin regions was around 2.1 times that measured in terminus-proximal regions. The oriC/terC ratio dropped to 1.5 for log-phase cells grown in MMI medium, as well as for cells in the stationary growth phase. These results hint at a fraction of cells that did not complete replication during stationary growth. Likewise, active replication forks were observed in around 24% of the stationary-phase M. smegmatis cells (65). We also analyzed oriC/terC ratios in the ΔparA mutant strain via qPCR (see Fig. S6D). These data do not hint at replication overinitiation in the strain lacking parA in comparison to that in the WT, supporting our notion, mentioned above, that higher oriC numbers in the ΔparA mutant strain are likely caused by a loss of oriC-ParB complex cohesion or reduced tethering to cell poles but not by overinitiation.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.7FIG S6 Examination of replication initiation. (A) Growth curves of WT C. glutamicum grown in BHI medium, BHI+Gluc, or MMI medium supplemented with glucose. Genomic DNA was isolated in the exponential and stationary growth phases and used in marker frequency experiments and for whole-genome sequencing. Values were derived from triplicate measurements; standard deviations are indicated in all graphs. For growth rates, see Table 1. (B) oriC-to-terminus ratios determined via marker frequency analysis of chromosomal loci cg0018 and cg2361; cf. Fig. 5A. ANOVA revealed an effect of the growth phase (F1,30 = 13.41, P < 0.001), of the medium used (F2,30 = 9.77, P < 0.001), and a significant interaction of the growth phase and the medium used (F2,30 = 7.17, P < 0.01). (C) Marker frequency analysis of B. subtilis 168 genomic DNA (marker in intergenic oriC and terC regions) isolated from cells grown in LB at time points of exponential-phase growth (oriC/terC ratio of >10) to stationary-phase growth (oriC/terC ratio of <2). (D) No overinitiation in the ΔparA mutant in comparison with that in WT cells was determined by qPCR of oriC/terC ratios. Cells were grown in BHI medium, and samples were taken in the exponential (white bars) and stationary (gray bars) growth phases. Shown are the mean and standard deviation of triplicate measurements, with WT values set to 1 and ΔparA mutant data normalized accordingly. Download FIG S6, TIF file, 0.2 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.FIG 6 Timing of DNA replication initiation and determination of oriC numbers per cell. (A) Marker frequency analysis of oriC and terminus regions. (Left) Schematic representation of the chromosomal positions of the oriC- and terC-proximal marker genes used. (Right) oriC-to-terminus ratios of the WT strain grown under different conditions were determined by frequency analysis of markers cg0002 and cg1702 (see Fig. S6B for cg0018/cg2361 ratios). Cells were grown in BHI medium, BHI+Gluc, or MMI supplemented with glucose. Samples were taken in the exponential (exp, white boxes) and stationary (stat, gray boxes) growth phases. Results are shown as box plots with medians indicated as solid lines and whiskers of 1.5 times the interquartile range (n = 6); outliers are depicted as open circles. ANOVA yielded significant variation among growth phase (F1,30 = 28.00, P < 0.0001) and medium (F2,30 = 3.43, P < 0.05) conditions. Letters indicate significant differences between data sets determined by post-hoc Bonferroni analysis at P < 0.05. (B) Whole-genome sequencing. Genomic DNA of WT C. glutamicum grown in BHI or MMI medium supplemented with glucose was isolated in the exponential and stationary growth phases. Data were analyzed by Illumina MiSeq shotgun sequencing and mapped to the C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence (GenBank accession no. BX927147.1). Data are displayed as the mean gene coverage of each 50-kb sliding window as a percentage of the total mean coverage per sample. Note that the RES167 strain used in this study lacks the phage island (cg1981-cg2034) and harbors an ISCg14-mediated 5-fold tandem amplification of the tus locus (peaks at approximately 750- and 2,000-kb positions); both loci were excluded from data analysis. Stable replication progression is evidenced by the frequency of genes between the oriC (located at 0 kb) and terminus regions (at approximately 1.6 Mb). (C) Numbers of chromosomes per cell determined by flow cytometry after replication runout in BHI medium, BHI+Gluc, or MMI medium supplemented with glucose. Depending on the growth conditions, between 2 and 12 chromosomes were detected.Marker frequency analysis and genome sequencing results point to growth rate-dependent replication cycles in C. glutamicum cells, where the timing of a new initiation precedes termination of the previous replication event to enable fast growth.C. glutamicum cells contain multiple chromosome equivalents at various growth rates.As shown by marker frequency analysis, oriC/terC ratios are considerably higher in fast-growing than in slow-growing cells. To more precisely verify the DNA content per cell, flow cytometry was used. To this end, replication runouts of WT cells cultured at various growth rates were performed and nucleoids were fluorescently stained with SYBR Green I dye. DNA histograms show the numbers of fully replicated chromosomes, which equal the cellular origin numbers at the time point of antibiotic treatment (Fig. 6C). Absolute DNA content was assigned according to an internal standard (see Fig. S7A and B). The DNA content distributions of cells at the exponential or stationary growth phase not subjected to antibiotic treatment are shown in Fig. S7C for all of the conditions tested. Fast- and intermediate-growth conditions gave rise to mainly four and eight chromosomes per cell, and a smaller fraction of cells contained 10 and 12 chromosomes. Slow-growth conditions yielded mainly cells containing either two or four chromosomes and a small subpopulation containing eight chromosomes. Our data result in average chromosome numbers per cell of 5.90, 5.17, and 3.85, from the highest growth rate to the lowest, respectively. Strikingly, the number of chromosome equivalents determined by flow cytometry is considerably higher than expected from marker frequency results, and monoploid cell fractions were absent under all of the growth conditions tested in the exponential phase. Flow cytometry results are further supported by fluorescence microscopy analysis of WT parB::parB-eYFP cells cultivated at several different growth rates. Cells with fewer than two ParB foci per cell were almost absent under all of the condition tested. In addition, ParB-origin cluster numbers could possibly be underestimated because of potential origin cohesion (see Fig. S2). Replisome numbers per cell also depend on growth rates (Fig. S5), further supporting our results. Similar to oriC-ParB complexes, replisome numbers correlate with cell length for all of the conditions tested and fast growth in BHI medium or BHI+Gluc allows for one to six DnaN foci per cell, whereas zero to four DnaN spots were counted in MMI-grown cells. Thus, we conclude that C. glutamicum is at least diploid, with two chromosomes attached to the cell poles via the centromeric oriC-ParB nucleoprotein complex. Overinitiation of DNA replication leads to multiforked chromosomes under fast-growth conditions.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.8FIG S7 Calibration of DNA measurements. B. subtilis cells with known DNA content served as the internal standard in flow cytometry measurements after the application SPAAC cell wall staining with carboxyrhodamine (CR). The standard was included in samples of C. glutamicum cells grown at different rates; DNA was stained with Hoechst dye. (A) Flow cytometry sample of B. subtilis and C. glutamicum cells. Shown is the overlay (merge) of carboxyrhodamine (green) and Hoechst (blue) fluorescence with the phase-contrast image and individual channels (CR, phase, Hoechst). Scale bar, 2 µm. (B) Gating strategy exemplified on a sample containing BHI medium-grown C. glutamicum cells. (Left) C. glutamicum and B. subtilis subpopulations were identified in density plots of the carboxyrhodamine fluorescence intensity (CR FI, arbitrary units) channel versus the Hoechst fluorescence intensity (Hoechst FI, arbitrary units) channel according to their green fluorescence intensity. (Right) Determination of C. glutamicum chromosome numbers (black) according to the B. subtilis standard (red) in histograms versus DNA content. (C) Distributions of DNA content in WT C. glutamicum. Cells were grown in BHI medium (left), BHI+Gluc (middle), or MMI medium supplemented with glucose (MMI Gluc, right). Samples of exponential-phase cultures were taken prior to chloramphenicol treatment (exp.), after 4 h of incubation with (+Cm) or without chloramphenicol (in an already stationary state [stat.]). Cell fixation, staining, and flow cytometry were carried out subsequently. Download FIG S7, TIF file, 0.3 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.Growth rate-dependent cell cycle models.Cell cycle parameters derived from marker frequency and flow cytometry analyses (Table 1) allowed us to formulate complete cell cycle models for C. glutamicum under different growth conditions. A C period of 78 min was determined for cells grown in BHI medium, whereas intermediate and low growth rates are associated with slightly longer replication periods of 96 and 97 min. These values result in a DNA replication speed of around 340 bases/s, which is in the range of replication speeds reported for C. crescentus, M. xanthus, and M. smegmatis (Table 2 and references therein). D-period equations reported before (68) yielded time intervals longer than the doubling time for each of the three growth conditions analyzed, indicating the presence of two fully replicated chromosomes per newborn cell. Since we define the D period as the time interval from replication termination that took place in the current generation until subsequent cell division, D-period calculation was adapted to a diploid organism (see Materials and Methods). Those time frames remained relatively unaltered, with 20, 18, and 26 min from high to low growth rates, respectively.TABLE 1 Overview of C. glutamicum cell cycle parameters at distinct growth ratesGrowth mediumμa (1/h)Tdb (min)oriC/terC ratioNo. of oriCs/cellC period (min)D period (min)BHI0.66632.36 ± 0.545.90 ± 0.037820BHI+Gluc0.50832.23 ± 0.215.17 ± 0.029618MMI+Gluc0.321301.68 ± 0.283.85 ± 0.169726aμ, growth rate.bTd, doubling time.TABLE 2 Speed of DNA replication forks summarized for different model organismsOrganismGenome size (Mb)C period (min)Replication speed (bases/s)Reference(s)Corynebacterium glutamicum3.2178340This workMycobacterium tuberculosis4.426605087Mycobacterium smegmatis6.9914040064, 65Myxococcus xanthus9.1420038062, 88Caulobacter crescentus4.029535089Vibrio choleraea2.9630–50490–82017, 90Bacillus subtilis4.2250–60600–70068, 91Escherichia coli4.6440–200200–1,00015, 68, 92–94aShown are parameters for chromosome I only.Growth rate-dependent cell cycle modes are illustrated for fast- and slow-growth conditions (Fig. 7). Newborn cells localize their origins in two clusters at polar positions, with chromosomes being arranged longitudinally. During cell cycle progression, sister oriC-ParB complexes segregate and move toward septal positions, whereby up to four ParB foci per cell in MMI and up to six ParB foci per cell in BHI medium could be detected microscopically. Overlapping C periods allow for short doubling times of as little as 63 min, with a new round of replication initiating 28 min after cell division and the ongoing replication event terminating 15 min later. Cells with long doubling times of 130 min possess a short time interval of 7 min between cell division and replication initiation (B period) and fully replicate both chromosome copies once per generation. In both the fast- and the slow-growth models, cells are diploid, since newly replicated sister chromosomes will only be separated by cell division in the daughter generation. Thus, the cell cycle models suggested here describe overlapping replication cycles in combination with two sets of chromosomes in C. glutamicum.FIG 7 Spatiotemporal chromosome organization of C. glutamicum. Chromosomes are depicted as black lines with oriCs as green circles. In newborn cells, two initial oriCs are located close to the poles. Upon initiation of a new round of replication, sister oriCs segregate nonsynchronously from polar ParB-eYFP clusters and move toward the midcell position, where a new septum is formed. Notably, stages with single chromosomes per cell are absent. (A) Cell cycle of slow-growing cells in MMI medium. A short B period is followed by C and D periods; replication takes place within one generation. (B) Chromosome organization during fast growth in BHI medium. Multifork replication allows for short doubling times (Tds), with a second round of replication starting after the first half of the cell cycle, around 15 min before the previous one terminates.DISCUSSIONThe bacterial cell cycle has been analyzed in few model organisms in the past. A hallmark of fast-growing species such as E. coli and B. subtilis is the initiation of new rounds of DNA replication prior to replication termination and cytokinesis (15, 16). This process has been termed multifork replication. In slow-growing species or species with asymmetric division such as C. crescentus and M. smegmatis, C periods do not overlap (13, 14). The increasing knowledge of bacterial cell biology has made it clear that even fundamental cell processes such as cytokinesis and DNA replication might be organized and regulated in a far higher diversity than initially thought (69, 70). We have therefore analyzed the cell cycle of C. glutamicum under various growth conditions and at different growth rates. C. glutamicum emerges as a model organism for apical cell growth that is characteristic of members of the order Actinomycetales (61).Analysis of ParB foci in growing C. glutamicum cells revealed that under all of the culture conditions tested, a ParB focus is stably attached to each pole and terCs face toward the midcell position, suggesting an ori-ter-ter-ori orientation of the chromosomes (Fig. 2 to 4). Interestingly, newly replicated origins segregate to the midcell position, where they remain until cytokinesis is completed and they stay tethered to the newly forming cell poles (Fig. 3). Until now, it has been unclear by which molecular mechanism the placement of ParB and the chromosomal origin is directed. Earlier work has shown that ParB and the cell division protein FtsZ interact (51). Interaction of ParB with the divisome might be a plausible explanation for the observed localization pattern. Deletion of ParA completely abolishes the directed ParB segregation, confirming earlier results obtained by our group (51). Thus, unlike in other species with polar origin localization, such as C. crescentus and V. cholerae, the newly replicated origin does not migrate to the opposite pole (32, 71). This mode of segregation in C. glutamicum is compatible with the observation that both cell poles are constantly occupied with a ParB-oriC complex, suggesting that even newborn cells contain at least two chromosomes and hence are diploid. Because of the variable cohesion times of sister chromatids (Fig. 5C), the number of ParB foci does not necessarily reflect the number of origins and may lead to an underestimation of origins. Since cell elongation and cytokinesis are spatially less well regulated in C. glutamicum than in E. coli or B. subtilis, cellular chromosome content can be variable, explaining small cell fractions with origin or terminus numbers that deviate from the model (Fig. 4; see Fig. S3). The existence of several chromosomes is in line with the observation of multiple replication forks. During replication, two or more replication forks can be visualized, as judged by fluorescently labeled sliding-clamp DnaN (Fig. 5). The localization of origins in C. glutamicum is therefore different from that in the closely related species M. smegmatis. For M. smegmatis, a replication factory model has been proposed in which a centrally localized origin is replicated and the newly replicated origins are segregated toward the cell pole while the replisome remains in the cell center (64). In contrast, we show by time-lapse analysis that replication forks originate close to the cell pole and migrate toward the midcell position, possibly because of apical cell elongation in C. glutamicum (Fig. 5E; see Fig. S4). However, further proof is needed to distinguish replisome migration along its template DNA being pulled along with the growing pole from a static replication factory, as proposed for B. subtilis (72). We also observed that both origins initiate replication around the same time. Further support for diploidy stems from flow cytometry data (Fig. 6). In replication runout experiments, cells contain a minimum of 2 and up to 12 chromosomes, which is a clear indication of multiple initiations under fast-growth conditions (growth rates of >0.6 h−1). Although the presence of multiple chromosomes per cell has been suggested before (73), only single-cell analysis unambiguously supports the diploidy of C. glutamicum cells. The simultaneous presence of two polar chromosomes is in stark contrast to findings recently reported for Mycobacterium species (64, 65). Corynebacteria and mycobacteria are closely related, and hence, it comes as a surprise that they might differ in the cellular organization of their chromosomes. The constant diploidy of C. glutamicum could be a consequence of its environmental lifestyle. Many soil bacteria have elaborated sophisticated methods to counteract various environmental stresses such as desiccation, nutrient shortage, or exposure to DNA-damaging agents. In fact, nucleic acids are prominent targets for desiccation-induced damage (74). Cells carrying two or more chromosome equivalents will increase the chance for correct DNA repair based on homologous recombination. In line with this hypothesis, survival rates of coryneform bacteria are known to be high under various stresses, including desiccation (75–77). Analyses of long-term preservations of microbial ecosystems in permafrost demonstrate that corynebacteria dominate older sediments (77).In summary, we have provided detailed analyses of the cell cycle of C. glutamicum at different growth rates (Fig. 7). Data presented here point to a unique and previously undescribed mode of cell cycle regulation with two pole-attached chromosomes that simultaneously initiate replication. Under fast-growth conditions, new rounds of replication can be initiated before the previous round is complete, similar to multifork replication. In contrast to other bacteria with pole-oriented chromosomes, such as chromosome I from V. cholerae or C. crescentus, C. glutamicum cells contain two copies of the chromosomes and segregate the newly replicated origins only to the midcell position. Elucidation of the corynebacterial cell cycle is important for a full understanding of the growth behavior and homologous recombination of this medically and industrially relevant genus.MATERIALS AND METHODSOligonucleotides, plasmids, and bacterial strains.All of the primers, plasmids, and bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Tables S1 and S2 in Text S1.10.1128/mBio.00511-17.1TEXT S1 Table S1 describes the oligonucleotides used in this study, and Table S2 describes the bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study. Download TEXT S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB.Copyright © 2017 Böhm et al.2017Böhm et al.This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.Strain construction.Integration plasmids were constructed with 500-bp homologous regions upstream and downstream of the 3′ end of the gene to be labeled with a fluorophore sequence in between. For plasmids pK19mobsacB-parB-eYFP and pK19mobsacB-parB-mCherry2, the upstream and downstream fragments were PCR amplified from the C. glutamicum genome with primer pairs ParB-Hind-up-F/ParB-Sal-up-R and ParB-XbaI-D-F/ParB-Bam-D-R. Enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (eYFP) or mCherry2 sequences were amplified with primer pairs eYFP-SalI-F/eYFP-XbaI-R and mCherry2-SalI-F/mCherry2-XbaI-R. To construct pK19mobsacB-DnaN-mCherry, upstream and downstream homologous regions were amplified via primer pairs DnaN-Hind-up-F/DnaN-SphI-up-R and DnaN-XbaI-D-F/DnaN-BamHI-D-R. The mCherry sequence was amplified with primer pair mCherry-SalI-F/mCherry-XbaI-R. The resulting PCR fragments were digested with the respective restriction enzymes and consecutively ligated into pK19mobsacB vectors. Plasmid cloning was performed with E. coli DH5α. C. glutamicum was transformed via electroporation and selected for integration of the fluorophore as described before (78). To confirm the allelic replacements, parB::parB-eYFP and parB::parB-mCherry2 colony PCR was carried out with primers ParB-N-ter-SalI-F and ParB-PstI-800D-R, and for the allelic replacement dnaN::dnaN-mCherry, primers DnaN-N-ter-F and DnaN-Bam-700D-R were used. For terminus tracking, a FROS was constructed in C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP. To this end, the terminus-proximal int gene (cg1752) was replaced with a lacO array (~120 operator copies) cut out of pLAU43 with XbaI and XmaI. Upstream and downstream homologous flanking sequences of int were PCR amplified with primer pairs Int-HindIII-up-F/Int-PstI-up-R and Int-EcoRI-D-F/Int-NheI-D-R, and the resulting PCR fragments were digested with restriction enzymes as indicated in Table S1 in Text S1. All restricted fragments were subsequently ligated into plasmid pK19mobsacB, yielding pK19msB-int::lacO, which was cloned into C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP. Gene replacement was confirmed by colony PCR with primer pairs Int-700up-F and Int-700D-R. For pCLTON1PamtR-lacI-CFP construction, the lacI-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) sequence of pLAU53 was PCR amplified with LacI-SalI-F/CFP-KpnI-R and digested with the respective restriction enzymes. Subcloning was performed with pEKEx2, and after restriction digestion with PstI and KpnI, the fragment was ligated into pCLTON1PamtR. This plasmid was cloned into C. glutamicum parB::parB-eYFP int::lacO.Growth conditions and media.B. subtilis and E. coli cells were grown at 37°C in lysogeny broth (LB) supplemented with 25 µg/ml kanamycin when appropriate. C. glutamicum cells were grown at 30°C in BHI medium (Oxoid), BHI+Gluc, MMI medium (79) supplemented with 4% glucose, or CGXII medium (80) supplemented with 120 mM acetate or 100 mM propionate, as indicated. For growth experiments in BHI+Gluc, MMI, or CGXII medium, cells were inoculated into BHI medium and diluted in growth medium overnight for precultivation. The next morning, cultures were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1. Growth in BHI medium preceded an overnight inoculation step; cultures were rediluted to an OD600 of 0.5 the next morning. Extrachromosomal lacI-cfp expression was induced with 0.15 µg/ml tetracycline. For replication runouts, exponentially growing C. glutamicum or B. subtilis cells were treated with 25 or 200 µg/ml chloramphenicol for 4+ h.Fluorescence microscopy and live-cell imaging.Fluorescence microscopy was carried out with an Axio-Imager M1 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.) with an EC Plan Neofluar 100×/1.3 oil Ph3 objective and a 2.5× Optovar for automated image analysis. Filter sets 46 HE YFP (excitation [EX] band pass [BP] 500/25 nm; beam splitter [BS] 515 nm; emission [EM] BP 535/30 nm) and 43 HE Cy3 shift free (EX BP 550/25 nm; BS 570 nm; EM BP 605/70 nm) were used for fluorescence detection of eYFP and mCherry or mCherry 2 protein fusions. DNA was stained with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Scientific). For live-cell imaging, cells in the exponential growth phase were rediluted to an OD600 of 0.01 in BHI medium and loaded into a microfluidic chamber (B04A CellASIC; ONIX) at 8 lb/in2 for 10 s; for nutrient supply, 0.75 lb/in2 was used. Time-lapse microscopy was performed with a Delta Vision Elite microscope (GE Healthcare, Applied Precision) with a standard four-color InSightSSI module and an environmental chamber heated to 30°C. Images were taken with a 100×/1.4 oil PSF U-Plan S-Apo objective and mCherry (EX BP wavelengths, 575 to 25 nm; EM BP wavelengths, 625 to 45 nm)- or YFP (EX BP wavelengths, 513 to 17 nm; EM BP wavelengths, 548 to 22 nm)-specific filter sets were used for fluorescence detection (50% transmission, 0.3-s exposure). Images were taken at 5-min intervals. Stacks of six z-planes were taken with 0.2-µm section widths for terC and ParB-eYFP focus counting as indicated. For data analysis, FIJI software (81) was used; cell length measurements were acquired manually.Marker frequency analysis.Genomic DNA was isolated from C. glutamicum or B. subtilis cells in the exponential or stationary growth phase. DNA proximal to the origin or terminus (see Results) was amplified by qPCR with 2× qPCR Mastermix (KAPA SYBRfast; Peqlab) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were set to 10 µl containing 200 nM primer and 1.5 ng of DNA. Primer efficiency was tested for all of the oligonucleotides used (see Table S1 in Text S1) and estimated by calibration dilution curves and slope calculation (82). Each experiment was performed in technical triplicate on an iQ5 multicolor real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad), and threshold cycle (CT) values were determined with the Bio-Rad iQ5 software version 2.1. Results were analyzed via the 2−ΔCT method (83). DNA replication runouts (see the description of growth conditions and media above) yielding an oriC/terC ratio of 1 served as a reference.Flow cytometry analysis.Culture samples were fixed 1:9 (vol/vol) in 70% ethanol and stored at 4°C until use. Cells were pelleted at 5,000 rpm for 5 min and washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The DNA staining procedure used was adapted from a protocol described before (84). Samples were preheated to 37°C and stained with SYBR Green I (Invitrogen) at a final dilution of 1:10,000 for 15 min and consequently diluted in PBS. Flow cytometry analysis was performed with a BD Accuri C6 (BD Biosciences) with a 488-nm blue laser. Measurements were conducted at a flow rate of 10 µl/min with an acquisition threshold set to 700 on FL1-H and a rate of <5,000 events/s. At least 200,000 events per sample were collected. Data were analyzed by plotting samples as histograms versus the green channel (FL1-A, EM BP, 533/30 nm) on a log scale. All experiments were performed in biological triplicate.To calibrate the DNA measurements of different growth conditions, B. subtilis cells were used as an internal standard. A replication runout of B. subtilis cells grown in LB gave rise to cells with mainly four or eight fully replicated chromosomes (68). Prior to ethanol fixation, the cell wall was stained via strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC). In short, 5 mM 3-azido-d-alanine (Baseclick GmbH), which is incorporated into the cell wall, was added to the culture during the time of replication runout. Cells were washed in PBS, incubated with 10 µM dibenzocyclooctyl-(polyethylene glycol) 4−5/6-carboxyrhodamine 110 (Jena Bioscience) at 30°C for 20 min in the dark, and subsequently washed three times in PBS--0.1% Tween 80. This standard was included with C. glutamicum cells during incubation with 1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 DNA stain. Flow cytometry was performed with a FACSAria II (Becton, Dickinson) with a 488-nm blue laser and a 355-nm UV laser and appropriate filter sets. We collected 50,000 events per sample. Blots of DNA content versus the green channel were used to identify B. subtilis subpopulations, and C. glutamicum chromosome numbers were assessed in accordance with the standard in histograms versus the DNA amount. For data analysis, BD Accuri C6 software (BD Biosciences) or FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.) was used.Analysis of the cell cycle.C and D periods were determined via equations relating to the amount of DNA per cell in exponential-phase cultures (68, 85), which were adapted to the C. glutamicum cell cycle model with double the number of chromosome equivalents at any time. Since only every second initiation is followed by a cell division, the average number of oriCs per cell (Ī) was defined by the equation Ī = 2 × 2(C + D)/τ, where τ is the doubling time. The term for the average number of terCs per cell (T̅) was adjusted accordingly with the equation T̅ = 2 × 2D/τ. Hence, the D period was calculated as follows (the average number of oriCs [I] per cell [N] was resolved by flow cytometry) as follows D = {[ln(I/2)/N) × Td]/ln(2)} − C, where Td is the doubling time. The equation for determination of C periods does not change upon the assumptions made above, where the oriC-to-terC (I/T) ratio was determined by marker frequency analysis as follows: C = [ln(I/T) × Td]/ln(2).Statistical analysis.Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests were performed with R (86). Correlation coefficients, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and linear regressions were calculated with Excel and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
Corynebacterium ParA ParB cell cycle diploidy origin replication