Bacterial lineages have repeatedly evolved intimate symbioses with eukaryotic hosts, the most famous cases being those of the cell organelles, mitochondria, and plastids. Symbiont genomes typically lose many ancestral genes, raising the question of how they function with so few genes. In organelles, part of the answer involves gene transfer to the host genome, allowing maintenance of essential functions. So far, the extent of gene transfer to hosts has not been assessed for other cases of intimate, obligate symbiosis. Aphids harbor an ancient coevolved intracellular symbiont, called Buchnera. We used the newly available sequence of the pea aphid genome to conduct an exhaustive computational search for genes of bacterial ancestry. We found that no functional genes have been transferred from Buchnera, ruling out such transfer as a driving force in genome reduction in this symbiont. However, the aphid genome does contain eight transcribed genes of apparent bacterial origin, some of which have been duplicated after transfer. Based on their expression patterns, most of these appear to function specifically in the aphid-Buchnera symbiosis, presenting the possibility that the maintenance of obligate intracellular symbioses can be affected by the acquisition and duplication of genes transferred from unrelated bacterial lineages.
Genome reduction is typical of obligate symbionts. In cellular organelles, this reduction partly reflects transfer of ancestral bacterial genes to the host genome, but little is known about gene transfer in other obligate symbioses. Aphids harbor anciently acquired obligate mutualists, Buchnera aphidicola (Gammaproteobacteria), which have highly reduced genomes (420–650 kb), raising the possibility of gene transfer from ancestral Buchnera to the aphid genome. In addition, aphids often harbor other bacteria that also are potential sources of transferred genes. Previous limited sampling of genes expressed in bacteriocytes, the specialized cells that harbor Buchnera, revealed that aphids acquired at least two genes from bacteria. The newly sequenced genome of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, presents the first opportunity for a complete inventory of genes transferred from bacteria to the host genome in the context of an ancient obligate symbiosis. Computational screening of the entire A. pisum genome, followed by phylogenetic and experimental analyses, provided strong support for the transfer of 12 genes or gene fragments from bacteria to the aphid genome: three LD–carboxypeptidases (LdcA1, LdcA2,ψLdcA), five rare lipoprotein As (RlpA1-5), N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (AmiD), 1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase (bLys), DNA polymerase III alpha chain (ψDnaE), and ATP synthase delta chain (ψAtpH). Buchnera was the apparent source of two highly truncated pseudogenes (ψDnaE and ψAtpH). Most other transferred genes were closely related to genes from relatives of Wolbachia (Alphaproteobacteria). At least eight of the transferred genes (LdcA1, AmiD, RlpA1-5, bLys) appear to be functional, and expression of seven (LdcA1, AmiD, RlpA1-5) are highly upregulated in bacteriocytes. The LdcAs and RlpAs appear to have been duplicated after transfer. Our results excluded the hypothesis that genome reduction in Buchnera has been accompanied by gene transfer to the host nuclear genome, but suggest that aphids utilize a set of duplicated genes acquired from other bacteria in the context of the Buchnera–aphid mutualism.
IntroductionThe smallest known cellular genomes are those of symbiotic bacteria living in insects [1]–[4]. These genomes have lost many genes considered essential in other bacteria, and one proposed explanation is that certain ancestral symbiont genes have been transferred to the host genome, with their products reimported to the symbiont cytosol [1],[5],[6]. This process is known to have occurred in mitochondria and plastids during their evolution as symbiotic associates of eukaryotic cells [7],[8]. Because these associations are mutualistic, selection on host genomes could favor maintenance of genes that benefit the prokaryotic associate. To date, strong evidence for gene transfer from mutualistic symbionts to insect hosts has not been found.Among the best-known (though not the most extreme) small symbiont genomes are those of Buchnera aphidicola (Gammaproteobacteria) (genome size: 420–650 kb), the obligate mutualistic symbiont of aphids [9]–[12]. Aphids are plant-sap sucking insects that have close associations with various microorganisms. Most aphid species, including the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, harbor Buchnera within the cytoplasm of specialized cells called bacteriocytes [13]–[13]. Since the initial infection in a common ancestor of aphids more than 100 million years ago [17], Buchnera have been subjected to strict vertical transmission through host generations, and the mutualism between Buchnera and their host has evolved to the point that neither can reproduce in the absence of the other. Buchnera cannot proliferate outside bacteriocytes, and when deprived of Buchnera, the host insects suffer retarded growth and sterility, as they are dependent on Buchnera for the supply of essential nutrients [15], [18]–[21]. During the course of coevolution with the host, Buchnera has lost a number of genes that are considered essential for bacterial existence [9]–[12]. The genome of Buchnera from A. pisum encodes about 620 genes (genome size: 650 kb), which is only one seventh of that of most related bacteria, such as Escherichia coli
[9]. This raises the question of whether certain genes have been transferred from the genome of ancestral Buchnera to the genome of aphids. In addition, aphids often contain other bacterial symbionts and pathogens [16], raising the possibility of LGT from a variety of bacterial lineages. Indeed, evidence is accumulating for extensive transfer of DNA (mostly pseudogenes) from the intracellular bacterium Wolbachia (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales) to its arthropod and nematode hosts [22]–[28]. Moreover, previous studies revealed that A. pisum acquired at least two highly transcribed genes from bacteria [29],[30], providing strong evidence that laterally transferred bacterial genes can be of functional importance in metazoan recipients.Recently, the full genome assembly of A. pisum was obtained by the International Aphid Genomics Consortium (IAGC) (IAGC, paper under review). These data provide the first opportunity for an exhaustive search of a genome of an animal that has coevolved with mutualistic intracellular bacteria, including an obligate mutualist with a highly reduced genome. We screened the A. pisum genome for bacterial sequences using several computational search strategies, and performed phylogenetic and experimental studies on LGT candidates. We identified a total of 12 genes or gene fragments that seem to have been transferred from bacterial genomes to the genome of an A. pisum ancestor. Their structures, phylogenetic positions, evolutionary histories, and expression profiles are further discussed in this paper.ResultsOur goal was an exhaustive inventory of genes of bacterial origin in the A. pisum genome. As is routine for Sanger shotgun sequencing projects, sequences with high identity to the cloning host and vectors were removed as suspected contaminants prior to assembly in the A. pisum project. Additionally, sequence reads with high identity to the previously sequenced genome of Buchnera str. APS (the Buchnera strain derived from A. pisum) [9] were removed, since Buchnera cells were mixed with host cells in the DNA sample used in the project. For our purpose, these filtered sequences were potential sources of information on LGT. So, as the first step, we retrieved and analyzed them.Lack of evidence for LGT from the reads eliminated prior to assemblyAmong approximately 4 million sequence reads that were generated for the A. pisum genome project, 90,678 reads were removed prior to the assembly of the genome (Acyr_1.0) due to low sequence quality or strong similarities to sequences of Buchnera, E. coli (cloning host), or the pUC 18 (cloning vector) sequences (IAGC, paper under review). However, if the A. pisum genome recently acquired DNA fragments from Buchnera, such sequences would show strong similarity to the genomic sequences of Buchnera, and may be inappropriately removed at this stage. To assess this possibility, we screened the discarded sequences for LGT candidates using three independent methods.A single sequence read with regions of similarity to bacterial sequences and invertebrate sequences represents a potential candidate for an A. pisum genomic fragment containing laterally transferred bacterial DNAs. To search for such candidates, we first used all of the 90,678 reads as queries, in BLASTX and BLASTN searches conducted against bacterial databases (see Materials and Methods, Table S1). This revealed 33,686 reads with region(s) significantly similar (BLASTX bit score ≥40, BLASTN bit score ≥55) to bacterial sequences (Figure S1, box 1). Subsequently, these 33,686 reads were subjected to BLASTX and BLASTN searches against the RefSeq invertebrate databases (Figure S1, box 2), demonstrating that 19,624 out of 33,686 reads also have region(s) significantly similar (BLASTX bit score ≥40, BLASTN bit score ≥55) to invertebrate sequences. Of these, 19,279 reads contained a single region with similarity to both bacterial and invertebrate sequences; such regions are not related to LGT and instead represent evolutionarily conserved genes, which are widely distributed both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Figure S1, box 3). The 345 remaining reads were apparently chimeric and were subjected to BLASTX and BLASTN searches against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant (nr) database (Figure S1, box 4), and visually inspected one by one. This revealed that 96 reads were parts of pUC 18 or other vectors; these were discarded. An additional 20 reads contained low-complexity sequences (homopolymers or short repeats) and were judged to be insignificant and removed. Because we expect any given genomic region to be covered by at least two high quality reads, we removed 36 singletons showing chimeric bacterial-aphid sequences as potential artifacts introduced by cloning/sequencing errors. The remaining 193 reads showed only weak and unreliable similarity to bacterial or animal sequences, leaving no promising candidates for LGT from this collection of reads.To further assess this population of precluded reads, we assembled the 90,678 discarded reads using phred/phrap. The assembly produced 5,094 contigs from 38,813 reads, leaving 51,865 reads as singletons. Using these contigs as queries, BLASTX and BLASTN searches were conducted against the bacterial protein database and the A. pisum genome assembly (Acyr_1.0), respectively. If a single contig has distinct regions each showing strong similarity to bacterial and A. pisum sequences, such a chimeric sequence would be a promising LGT candidate as mentioned above. However, no such contigs were found, again indicating that the precluded 90,678 reads lack promising candidates for LGT.To further focus on the possibility of recent LGT from Buchnera, all 90,678 reads were subjected to BLASTN searches against the Buchnera genome from A. pisum [Buchnera str. APS (NC_002252, NC_002253, NC_002528)] [9]. This revealed 26,529 reads with significant similarity (BLASTN bit score ≥55) to Buchnera sequences. After masking the regions similar to Buchnera, the sequences were subjected to BLASTN searches against the A. pisum genome assembly (Acyr_1.0), revealing 21 reads with regions similar (BLASTN bit score ≥55) to the pea aphid genome. However, none of these reads exhibited features of LGT; that is, they did not exhibit distinct regions with similarity to the Buchnera and aphid genomes respectively. Thus, we concluded that the precluded reads contain no evidence for laterally transferred genes.Screening of the A. pisum genome assembly for LGT candidatesWe next focused on screening of the A. pisum genome assembly (Acyr_1.0), using three independent strategies designed to detect LGT from any bacterial lineage. Two strategies were based on BLASTP/deduced amino acid sequences (Figure 1) and on BLASTX/six-frame translations (Text S1, Table S2, Figure S2), respectively. These were designed to detect potential transferred genes that might be at different stages of degradation or divergence following transfer to the host genome. We also conducted BLASTN searches designed to detect non-protein-coding sequences transferred from aphid symbionts.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g001Figure 1Flow chart of the BLASTP–based screening of the A. pisum genome for LGT candidates.First, all potential polypeptides (PPPs) not less than 60 amino acids were deduced from the genome assembly of A. pisum [Acyr_1.0; 22,798 scaffolds (N50 = 86.9 kb; Total size: 464.3 Mb), 6.2× coverage of the 525 Mb A. pisum genome] (IAGC, paper under review) as described in the Materials and Methods. A total of 1,105,168 PPPs corresponding to 92,293,525 amino acid residues were obtained (Figure 1, box 1).Using all 1,105,168 PPPs as queries, BLASTP searches were performed against the bacterial protein database (see Materials and Methods, Table S1). These searches revealed 7,093 PPPs that were significantly similar to bacterial proteins (BLASTP score ≥40) (Figure 1, box 2). Subsequently, these 7,093 PPPs were subjected to BLASTP searches against the RefSeq invertebrate protein database. Comparisons of BLAST hit scores revealed that 818 out of 7,093 PPPs were significantly more similar to bacterial orthologs than to invertebrate orthologs (Figure 1, box 3). To further verify their similarity to bacterial proteins, BLASTP searches were performed against the nr protein database at the NCBI website using the 818 PPPs as queries. For 742 PPPs, top BLAST hits were bacterial proteins (Figure 1, box 4).Exclusion of bacterial contaminantsThese 742 PPPs were located in 406 scaffolds, most of which were relatively short (<10 kb, whereas N50 of all the A. pisum scaffolds is 86.9 kb) and/or contained many unidentified nucleotides (N's). Among them, 331 scaffolds contained only DNA sequences that were nearly identical to bacterial genomic sequences in the non-redundant nucleotide database at NCBI. These 331 scaffolds (Table S3) were assumed to represent bacterial contaminants, and 662 of 742 LGT-candidate PPPs located in these 331 scaffolds were thus eliminated as potential LGT candidates (Figure 1, box 5). Most of the contaminants showed closest matches to related species of Enterobacteriaceae (Gammaproteobacteria) such as members of the genera Pantoea, Serratia, or Enterobacter (Table S3), which are known to infect aphids and other insects as pathogens [31]–[33]. Furthermore, some of these contigs showed near perfect identity to sequences within several BACs sequenced in the A. pisum genome project but of clear bacterial origin (AC202220, AC203059, AC203074). As part of the A. pisum genome project, 39 of the scaffolds that appeared to derive from bacterial contaminants were screened with PCR in new DNA samples from antibiotic-treated A. pisum LSR1 (the sequencing strain), and all were verified to be absent and thus contaminants in the original sample (IAGC, in review).In addition, two PPPs were located in two distinct scaffolds [SCAFFOLD5147 (EQ115919) and SCAFFOLD7004 (EQ117776)] that appeared to be artifactual chimeric fusions of DNA derived from the genomes of A. pisum and bacterial contaminants. In these cases, regions similar to bacterial genes were short (367 nt in the 12,278-nt SCAFFOLD5147 and 373 nt in the 229,440-nt SCAFFOLD7004), almost identical to known bacterial genes (the region in the SCAFFOLD5147 was 87% and 93% identical at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, respectively, to the fadE gene (YP_001269130) of Pseudomonas putida F1 (Gammaproteobacteria) (CP000712); the region in the SCAFFOLD7004 was 91% and 97% identical at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, respectively, to the glnD gene (YP_046710) of Acinetobacter baumannii str. SDF (Gammaproteobacteria) (CU468230), and covered only by a single sequence read each (based on visual inspections of the NCBI trace archive). As these scaffolds seemed highly likely to be artifacts due to cloning and/or assembly errors, we also discarded these two PPPs (Figure 1, box 5).Exclusion of PPPs weakly similar to bacterial proteinsTwenty of the 80 remaining LGT-candidate PPPs showed only weak similarity to bacterial proteins in the NCBI nr protein database (bit score ≤45 and E-value ≥0.001). Manual inspection of the BLAST hit sequences revealed that each of the aligned regions was short and that hits were derived from various genes that are not related to one another, indicating that the results were not reliable. Thus, these PPPs were also discarded (Figure 1, box 6). In addition, three PPPs showed moderate similarity to bacterial sequences (bit score >50, E-value <0.0001), but the aligned regions of both the queries and hit sequences consisted of tandem repeat sequences. As lengths of the repeat units of the queries and hit sequences were different and the similarity appeared to be detected only by chance, these PPPs were also removed from the LGT candidates (Figure 1, box 6).Exclusion of PPPs that were parts of proteins with higher similarity to metazoan proteinsFifty-four of the 57 remaining LGT-candidate PPPs were parts of the A. pisum proteins predicted by the NCBI and IAGC. Using full-length amino acid sequences of 54 corresponding proteins as query sequences, BLASTP searches were performed against nr protein database at NCBI. Forty-nine of the 54 proteins were more similar to animal proteins than to bacterial proteins, and were orthologs of proteins widely distributed both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Figure 1, box 7). Only a fraction of each PPP showed slightly higher similarity (BLAST bit score difference <13) to bacterial proteins than to animal proteins. Thus, none of these 49 proteins appeared more similar to bacterial proteins than to animal proteins, and so were removed from the LGT-candidates (Figure 1, box 7).Promising candidates of LGTFinally, eight genes corresponding to the eight remaining PPPs were judged as promising LGT candidates. These eight contained two copies of LD-carboxypeptidase (LdcA), three copies of rare lipoprotein A (RlpA), and one copy each of N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (AmiD), 1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase (bLys), and DNA polymerase III alpha chain (ψDnaE). To check the presence/absence of more paralogs for these genes, TBLASTN searches were performed against the A. pisum genome assembly using deduced amino acid sequences of the eight candidates as queries (Figure 1, box 8). This detected one more LdcA and two more RlpAs.We also performed a screen based on six-frame translations of the A. pisum genome (BLASTX), which is potentially more sensitive in detecting shorter and degenerate sequences, as the method is not limited by the threshold of the PPP length (≥60 aa) and will produce protein alignments across stop codons (Text S1, Table S2, Figure S2). This method identified 10 of the 11 LTG candidates found in the search based on PPPs, verifying the effectiveness of the two strategies. The BLASTX-based approach identified a single additional candidate, ATP synthase delta chain (ψAtpH).We also performed BLASTN searches using the genomes of Buchnera str. APS (NC_002252, NC_002253, NC_002528) [9] and Hamiltonella defensa (NC_012751, NC_012752) (Gammaproteobacteria; a facultative symbiont of aphids) [34] as queries, as such searches could reveal transfers of non-protein-coding fragments that would not have been evident in the PPP-based or the BLASTX-based searches described above. However, no additional LGT candidates were obtained in these searches.Thus, in total, computational screens identified 12 promising LGT candidates (LdcA1, LdcA2,ψ LdcA, AmiD, bLys, RlpA1, RlpA2, RlpA3, RlpA4, RlpA 5, ψDnaE, and ψAtpH) in the A. pisum genome (Table 1). One each of LdcAs (now renamed LdcA1, ACYPI009109) and RlpAs (renamed RlpA4, ACYPI004737) were originally detected in our previous transcriptome analysis of the A. pisum bacteriocyte [29], and were further verified to have been transferred from bacteria to the aphid genome via LGT [30]. Extant Buchnera lacks these genes other than dnaE and atpH
[9], whereas many other bacteria, including E. coli, a close relative of Buchnera, possess all of them [35]. To further verify the presence of these genes in the A. pisum genome, we conducted experimental analyses using quantitative PCR.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.t001Table 1LGT candidates in the A. pisum genome.GeneGene nameGene IDScaffoldPositionTop BLAST hit*
symbolIDStartEndSpeciesScoreE-value
LdcA1
LD-carboxypeptidase_1ACYPI009109EQ117656 (SCAFFOLD6884)36582295
Wolbachia endosymbiont of Culex quinquefasciatus Pel3102E-82ψLdcA
LD-carboxypeptidase (pseudo)N/AEQ122282 (SCAFFOLD11510)8120280565
Wolbachia endosymbiont of Drosophila melanogaster
992E-19
LdcA2
LD-carboxypeptidase_2N/AEQ111801 (SCAFFOLD1029)722410729N/AN/AN/A
AmiD N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidaseACYPI006531EQ126042 (SCAFFOLD15270)1847311268
Orientia tsutsugamushi
2201E-55
bLys
1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidaseACYPI004424EQ113280 (SCAFFOLD2508)4094658233
Wolbachia sp. wRi2143E-54
RlpA1
Rare lipoprotein A_1AUG4_SCAFFOLD5510.g2.t1**
EQ116281 (SCAFFOLD5509)912611255
Leptospirillum sp. Group II UBA543E-06
RlpA2
Rare lipoprotein A_2ACYPI008496EQ116281 (SCAFFOLD5509)2280117534
Pelobacter carbinolicus
477E-04
RlpA3
Rare lipoprotein A_3ACYPI38879EQ116281 (SCAFFOLD5509)3321330611
Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1553E-06
RlpA4
Rare lipoprotein A_4ACYPI004737EQ116281 (SCAFFOLD5509)3428737803
Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1841E-14
RlpA5
Rare lipoprotein A_5ACYPI005979EQ116281 (SCAFFOLD5509)4289540402
Desulfonatronospira thiodismutans ASO3-1493E-04ψDnaE
DNA polymerase III alpha chain (pseudo)N/AEQ126219 (SCAFFOLD15447)1017610500
Buchnera aphidicola str. APS824E-19ψAtpH
ATP synthase delta chain (pseudo)N/AEQ115356 (SCAFFOLD4584)93319630
Buchnera aphidicola str. APS791E-13*: BLASTX for ψDnaE and ψAtpH. BLASTP for the rest.**: The name of this gene model is based on the older version of the scaffold ID.Quantitative PCR verified the presence of LGT candidates in the A. pisum genomeBacterial symbionts, contaminants and pathogens present within the host are not expected to be at constant copy number relative to host genome copies, when multiple tissues or hosts are examined. For example, Buchnera and facultative symbionts show large fluctuations in genome and cell copy number relative to single copy A. pisum genes, depending on the tissue sampled and on the age and condition of the individual aphid (e.g., [36]–[38]). Pathogens are expected to vary even more in abundance, and typically are entirely absent from aphids, based on PCR assays [31]. In contrast, sequences that are part of the host genome will display nearly the same copy number as single copy genes from the genome, both reflecting the number of host genomic copies within a sample.To distinguish between the hypotheses that LGT candidates derive from the aphid genome rather than from contaminants, we examined copy number of these genes relative to a known single copy gene in the aphid genome, using real time quantitative PCR (Figure 2). Two A. pisum strains were used for the analysis; one was the strain LSR1 (n = 3), the North American strain that was used for the genome sequencing, and the other was the strain ISO (n = 4), the Japanese strain that was used for our previous transcriptome analysis of the bacteriocyte [29],[30]. A ribosomal protein gene, RpL7, which is believed to be present as a single copy per haploid A. pisum genome, was used as a standard. (This gene is present in only one copy in the A. pisum genome project and is only known as a single copy gene in other genomes.) Of the three LdcAs, only LdcA1 was analyzed. The target/standard ratios (mean ± SE) for LdcA1, AmiD, bLys, RlpA1, RlpA2, RlpA3, RlpA4, RlpA5, ψDnaE, and ψAtpH were 1.27±0.12, 0.98±0.13, 1.18±0.13, 0.91±0.07, 0.82±0.06, 0.89±0.06, 1.16±0.13, 0.98±0.07, 1.05±0.09, and 1.04±0.12, respectively (Figure 2). That these ratios were nearly constant across samples and centered around 1 (p>0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer test) strongly suggests that they are encoded in the A. pisum genome as single-copy genes. Moreover, the ratios for the nine genes showed no significant difference between the two A. pisum strains (p>0.05, Student's t-test), indicating that both strains encode these genes in their genomes. These results are a strong indicator that the candidate genes do not derive from contaminant bacteria, as the titer of such contaminants would dramatically differ among aphid individuals, which should result in ratio variation among samples.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g002Figure 2Copy numbers of LGT candidates in the A. pisum genome.Orange rhombi, copy numbers in the strain LSR1 (n = 3); Green circles, copy numbers in the strain ISO (n = 4). The copy numbers are shown in terms of copies of target genes per copy of the standard gene, RpL7. All quantitative PCRs were performed in triplicate. Each data point thus shows the mean of three separate quantitative PCRs.Aphids appear to have acquired only ψDnaE and ψAtpH from Buchnera
To further characterize these genes, we performed detailed structural and molecular phylogenetic analyses. The candidate in SCAFFOLD15447 (EQ126219) was similar to bacterial genes encoding DNA polymerase III alpha subunit (DnaE) (Table 1). The top BLASTX hit was DNA polymerase III alpha subunit [Buchnera aphidicola str. APS] (NP_240067.1) (E = 4×10−19), and essentially all the subordinate hits were DNA polymerase III alpha subunit proteins of various lineages of bacteria. The amino acid sequence of the aphid DnaE was 66% and 38% identical to DnaE orthologs of Buchnera str. APS and E. coli K12, respectively (Figure S3).Phylogenetic analyses clearly showed that the A. pisum ψDnaE forms a monophyletic clade with DnaE of Buchnera str. APS (99% in Bayesian inference (BI), 97% in maximum likelihood (ML), 100% in neighbor-joining (NJ)), which is sister to that of Buchnera str. Schizaphis graminum (the strain derived from another aphid species, S. graminum) (100/99/100) (Figure 3). This indicates that A. pisum relatively recently acquired ψDnaE from Buchnera, after its divergence from the lineage leading to S. graminum (50–70 million years ago) [10],[17]. However, the predicted aphid DnaE was 120 aa in length, whereas the DnaE of Buchnera str. APS is 1,161 aa, the approximate length of this gene in bacteria generally. No other DNA sequence corresponding to the missing part of DnaE was found in the A. pisum genome assembly. These observations imply that the A. pisum ψDnaE is a pseudogene. We further confirmed this possibility using a relative rate test showing that the A. pisum copy evolves at an accelerated rate, as expected for a pseudogene (Text S2).10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g003Figure 3Phylogenetic position of the aphid ψDnaE.A total of 90 aligned amino acid sites were subjected to the analysis. Orthologs from Gammaproteobacteria were used, as BLAST searches indicated that all top hits were in this group. A Bayesian tree is shown; the ML tree and NJ tree exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each node, support values over 50 are shown (BI/ML/NJ). Asterisks (*) indicate support values lower than 50. The A. pisum-Buchnera cluster is shown in red. Accessions of the sequences are shown in parentheses. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.The candidate in the SCAFFOLD4584 (EQ115356) was similar to bacterial genes encoding ATP synthase delta subunit (AtpH) (Table 1). The top BLASTX hit was ATP synthase delta subunit [Buchnera str. APS] (NP_239847.1) (E = 1×10−13), and essentially all the subordinate hits were ATP synthase delta subunit proteins of various lineages of bacteria. The amino acid sequence of aphid AtpH was 58% and 35% identical to AtpH orthologs of Buchnera str. APS and E. coli K12, respectively (Figure S4). However, the predicted aphid AtpH was 100 aa in length, and has three intermittent stop codons, whereas the AtpH of Buchnera str. APS is 177 aa, the approximate length of this gene in bacteria generally. No other DNA sequence corresponding to the missing part of AtpH was found in the A. pisum genome assembly. These observations imply that the A. pisum ψAtpH is also a pseudogene.Phylogenetic analyses gave results for the A. pisum ψAtpH that were similar to those for ψDnaE. The copy in the A. pisum genome forms a clade with AtpH of Buchnera str. APS (96% in BI, 65% in ML, 83% in NJ), which is sister to that of Buchnera str. S. graminum (100% in BI, ML, and NJ) (Figure 4). Thus, A. pisum relatively recently acquired both ψAtpH and ψDnaE from Buchnera, after divergence from a common ancestor of A. pisum and S. graminum.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g004Figure 4Phylogenetic position of the aphid ψAtpH.A total of 95 aligned amino acid sites were subjected to the analysis. Orthologs from Gammaproteobacteria were used, as BLAST searches indicated that all top hits were in this group. A Bayesian tree is shown; the ML tree and NJ tree exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each node, support values over 50 are shown (BI/ML/NJ). Asterisks (*) indicate support values lower than 50. The A. pisum-Buchnera cluster is shown in red. Accessions of the sequences are shown in parentheses. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.Aphid LdcA was duplicated after LGT from a bacteriumThree [ACYPI009109, SCAFFOLD11510 (EQ122282) nucleotide number: 81202.80565, and SCAFFOLD1029 (EQ111801) nucleotide number: 7224.10729] (Table 1) of the 12 candidates were similar to bacterial ldcA genes, which encodes LD-carboxypeptidases that are required for recycling murein (peptidoglycan), a component of the bacterial cell wall [39]. As demonstrated previously [30], one of the A. pisum LdcA genes [LdcA1; ACYPI009109 in the SCAFFOLD6884 (EQ117656)] has a functional protein-coding sequence. On the other hand, another gene (ψLdcA in the SCAFFOLD11510) newly found in this study (Table 1) had 11 frame-shift mutations in its potential coding sequence (Figure 5), suggesting that this copy of LdcA is a pseudogene.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g005Figure 5Structure of the aphid LdcAs.(A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of LdcAs. Residues conserved in two lineages are shaded gray. Triangles and reverse-triangles indicate frameshift deletions and insertions, respectively, in ψLdcA. Dashes (-) indicate alignment gaps. Asterisks (*) indicate gaps caused by frameshifts. (B) Domain structures of the aphid LdcA proteins and structures of the corresponding mRNAs and genomic DNAs.Molecular phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that the A. pisum LdcA1 and ψLdcA form a monophyletic clade (100% support in BI, ML, and NJ) that is sister to the clade of ldcAs of rickettsial bacteria, including Wolbachia (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales) (NP_966741) and Orientia tsutsugamushi (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales) (YP_001248242) (100% in BI; 99% in ML; 97% in NJ) (Figure 6). This branching pattern can be most simply explained by the hypothesis that an ldcA copy was transferred from Wolbachia or some other rickettsial bacterium to the aphid genome, followed by duplication, and subsequent inactivation of one copy. Symbionts from Rickettsiales are observed in some aphids [38],[40],[41], suggesting this bacterial clade as the source of this gene. However, the phylogeny is consistent with horizontal transfer among bacterial groups (Figure 6), and the A. pisum fragment potentially derives from another source such as a group of bacteria not yet sequenced. Mitochondria are also derived from the Alphaproteobacteria, but they can be ruled out as likely sources of this gene, since all animal mitochondria are extremely reduced in gene content and lack homologs of ldcA.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g006Figure 6Phylogenetic position of the aphid LdcA proteins.A total of 136 aligned amino acid sites were subjected to the analysis. A Bayesian tree is shown; the ML tree and NJ tree exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each node, support values over 50 are shown (BI/ML/NJ). Asterisks (*) indicate support values lower than 50. Taxonomic positions (bacterial taxonomy unless otherwise stated) are shown in brackets.α, γ, and δ indicate proteobacterial classes. The A. pisum-Rickettsiales cluster is shown in red. Accessions of the sequences are shown in parentheses. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.The remaining LdcA gene (LdcA2 in the SCAFFOLD1029) found in this study (Table 1) contained a large sequence gap, and only 108 nucleotides of its potential protein-coding sequence had been determined. This 108 bp region of LdcA2 was 100% identical to the corresponding region of LdcA1 (Figure 5). Moreover, the BLASTN analysis using bl2seq revealed that an approximately 10-kb region containing LdcA2 (total length unknown) in the SCAFFOLD1029 (45066 bp) is 97% identical to a region containing LdcA1 (1364 bp) in the SCAFFOLD6884 (19038 bp). Regarding the SCAFFOLD11510 containing ψLdcA, significant similarities to SCAFFOLD6884 and SCAFFOLD1029 were detected only in the ψLdcA region. This may suggest that LdcA2 also arose from a duplication event, and that its evolutionary history is relatively short in comparison to that of ψLdcA. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that LdcA1 and LdcA2 are alleles of a single gene, as the sequenced aphid genomic sample was heterozygous for some genomic regions (IAGC, paper under review).Aphids appear to have acquired AmiD from a rickettsial bacteriumAnother LGT candidate, ACYPI006531 in the SCAFFOLD15270 (EQ126042), was similar to bacterial genes encoding N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (AmiD) (Table 1, Figure 7). This enzyme is also required for recycling murein (peptidoglycan), a component of the bacterial cell wall [42]. The top BLASTP hit for the predicted gene (XP_001945574.1) of ACYPI006531 was a putative N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase [O. tsutsugamushi (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales)] (YP_001248113) (E = 1×10−55). Subordinate hits were either orthologs of AmiD or AmpD, two types N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases that are characterized in E. coli
[42]. The A. pisum gene ACYPI006531 was named AmiD, as it showed higher similarity to orthologs of AmiD than to AmpD. Moreover, as is the case for other AmiD orthologs, the A. pisum AmiD has an extra C-terminal tail (∼100 amino acids) that is absent from AmpD orthologs. This structural feature typifies AmiD, although the function of the tail is not known [42]. The amino acid sequence of A. pisum AmiD was 47% and 41% identical to AmiD proteins of O. tsutsugamushi and E. coli, respectively (Figure 7A). All three amino acids in the zinc-binding triad of AmiD (His-34, His-154, and Asp-164), which are essential for its catalytic activity [42]–[44], were conserved in the A. pisum ortholog. Figure 7B shows the structure of the aphid AmiD gene. The gene appeared to consist of 2 exons and a long single intron, although the intron contained two gaps.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g007Figure 7Structure of the aphid AmiD.(A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of AmiDs. Residues conserved in all lineages, three lineages, and two lineages are shaded black, dark gray, and light gray, respectively. Residues contributing to the domain structures are boxed. Arrowheads indicate three conserved amino acid residues involved in chelation of the zinc ion (His-34, His-154, and Asp-164) [43],[44]. Dashes (-) indicate alignment gaps. (B) Domain structure of the aphid AmiD protein and structures of the corresponding mRNA and genomic DNA.Phylogenetic analyses showed that the A. pisum AmiD is closely related to orthologs from Proteobacteria (Figure 8). Moreover, there was robust support (100% in BI; 90% in ML; 90% in NJ) for A. pisum AmiD forming a monophyletic clade with orthologs from intracellular symbiotic bacteria such as O. tsutsugamushi (Alphaproteobacteria) (YP_001248113) and Amoebophilus asiaticus (Bacteroidetes) (YP_001957902). O. tsutsugamushi is an intracellular bacterium that infects arthropods and mammals [45], whereas A. asiaticus is an intracellular symbiont of a unicellular eukaryote, Acanthamoeba
[46]. This branching pattern can be most simply explained by the hypothesis that the aphid acquired amiD via LGT from a rickettsial bacterium. It is possible that A. asiaticus acquired amiD via LGT from a bacterium belonging to Proteobacteria, as the A. asiaticus amiD is distantly related to orthologs from other sequenced species of Bacteroidetes, and LGT is common among prokaryotes generally [47]. A putative ortholog of AmiD/AmpD was also detected in another metazoan species, the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens. However, the phylogenetic tree showed that the T. adhaerens ortholog is distantly related to the aphid AmiD (Figure 8), implying that the ancestors of A. pisum and T. adhaerens independently acquired the genes from different lineages of bacteria.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g008Figure 8Phylogenetic position of the aphid AmiD protein.A total of 124 aligned amino acid sites were subjected to the analysis. A Bayesian tree is shown; the ML tree and NJ tree exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each node, support values over 50 are shown (BI/ML/NJ). Asterisks (*) indicate support values lower than 50. Taxonomic positions (bacterial taxonomy unless otherwise stated) are shown in brackets.α, β, and γ indicate proteobacterial classes. The A. pisum-Orientia-Amoebophilus cluster is shown in red. The sequence from the placozoan T. adhaerens is shown in blue. Accessions of the sequences are shown in parentheses. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.Aphid bLys is a fusion of a eukaryotic peptidase and a bacterial lysozymeACYPI004424 in the SCAFFOLD2508 (EQ113280) appeared to encode a chimeric protein that consists of eukaryotic carboxypeptidase and a bacterial lysozyme (1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase) (Table 1, Figure 9). A conserved domain search at the NCBI website revealed that the carboxypeptidase (pfam00246, E = 3×10−45) and 1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase (pfam01183, E = 2×10−22) are encoded in its N-terminal region and C-terminal region, respectively. RT-PCR cloning of the transcript verified that the gene is transcribed and is truly chimeric (AB509281). The top hit of BLASTP for the C-terminal domain of the predicted gene model was 1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase [Wolbachia endosymbiont of Drosophila simulans (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales)] (YP_002727734) (E = 3×10−54). The subordinate hits were lysozymes of various lineages of bacteria. As these bacterial lysozyme genes lack common gene symbols, ACYPI004424 was tentatively named bLys (bacterial Lysozyme).10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g009Figure 9Structure of the aphid bLys.(A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of bLys orthologs. Residues conserved in all lineages and two lineages are shaded black and gray, respectively. Residues contributing to the domain structures are boxed. Dashes (-) indicate alignment gaps. (B) Domain structure of the aphid bLys protein and structures of the corresponding mRNA and genomic DNA.Lysozymes represent a family of enzymes that degrade bacterial cell walls by hydrolyzing the 1,4-beta-linkages between N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid in murein heteropolymers [48]. They are ubiquitously distributed among living organisms and are believed to be essential for defense against bacterial infection. Lysozymes are classified into several types (i.e., chicken, goose, invertebrate, plant, bacteria and phage types), and the A. pisum bLys was clearly categorized as a bacterial type (see below). Interestingly, unlike all other fully sequenced Metazoa, A. pisum appears to lack genes encoding canonical lysozymes [49]. If the bLys retains the bacteriolytic activity, this bacterium-derived lysozyme might compensate for the lack of canonical lysozymes in A. pisum. Figure 9B shows the chimeric structure of the aphid bLys gene. Bacterial lysozyme was encoded in the last (6th) exon, whereas eukaryotic carboxypeptidase was encoded in the 1st-3rd exons. The 1st exon also encoded a eukaryotic signal peptide, suggesting that the product is a secretory protein, as are other lysozymes.The amino acid sequence of the lysozyme domain of the A. pisum bLys was subjected to molecular phylogenetic analysis (Figure 10). The tree demonstrated that the aphid gene forms a clade with orthologs from Alphaproteobacteria (99% in BI; 82% in ML; 82% in NJ), and is especially closely related to a gene of Wolbachia pipientis wRi (YP_002727734) (93% in BI, 63% in ML, 74% in NJ). This is consistent with the hypothesis that the A. pisum bLys was transferred from a Wolbachia-like rickettsial bacterium to an ancestral aphid genome.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g010Figure 10Phylogenetic position of the aphid bLys protein.A total of 133 aligned amino acid sites were subjected to the analysis. A Bayesian tree is shown; the ML tree and NJ tree exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each node, support values over 50 are shown (BI/ML/NJ). Asterisks (*) indicate support values lower than 50. Taxonomic positions (bacterial taxonomy unless otherwise stated) are shown in brackets.α, γ, and δ indicate proteobacterial classes. The A. pisum-Wolbachia cluster is shown in red. Sequences from the fungi are shown in blue. Accessions of the sequences are shown in parentheses. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.Aphid RlpA was duplicated after LGTFive candidates (AUG4_SCAFFOLD5510.g2.t1, ACYPI008496, ACYPI38879, ACYPI004737, and ACYPI005979) appeared to encode bacterial rare lipoprotein A (RlpA) (Table 1). In contrast to the case of LdcAs, all of the five RlpA genes were clustered in a single scaffold, SCAFFOLD5509 (EQ116281) (Figure 11A). They were numbered consecutively following their order in the scaffold, and the RlpA gene that we reported previously (corresponding to ACYPI004737) [29],[30] was renamed RlpA4. The N-terminus of the computationally predicted gene model of ACYPI38879 was slightly different from what we reported previously (AB435384, AB435385) [30]. As our original predictions were based on full-length cDNA sequences and are highly reliable, we used these gene boundaries in the subsequent analyses. A double-ψ β-barrel (DPBB) domain that is conserved in bacterial RlpAs was conserved in all of the A. pisum RlpAs (encoded in the 3rd exon). In addition, an aphid-specific inhibitor cysteine-knot (ICK) domain, which is conserved in RlpA4 orthologs of three different aphid species [30], was observed at the N-terminal side of the DPBB domain of all the five A. pisum RlpAs (encoded in the 2nd exon) (Figure 11B and 11C). Signal peptides were detected in RlpA1, RlpA2, RlpA4, and RlpA5 (encoded in the 1st exon).10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g011Figure 11Structure of the aphid RlpAs.(A) Order and directions of RlpA genes in the SCAFFOLD5509. (B) Alignment of amino acid sequences of RlpAs. Residues conserved in all lineages, four lineages, and three lineages are shaded black, dark gray, and light gray, respectively. Dashes (-) indicate alignment gaps. Residues contributing to the domain structures are boxed. (C) Domain structures of the aphid RlpA proteins and structures of the corresponding mRNAs and genomic DNA sequences. *The length of the putative first intron of RlpA4 is unknown, as the putative first exon identified by cDNA cloning (AB435384) was not found in the SCAFFOLD5509. This would be due to sequence gaps in this scaffold.The molecular phylogenetic analysis indicated that the four newly found RlpAs (RlpA1, RlpA2, RlpA3, and RlpA5) are clustered with RlpA4 (100% in BI, 75% in ML, 77% in NJ) (Figure 12), which was previously demonstrated to be transferred from a bacterium to the aphid genome [30]. However, the phylogenetic positions of the aphid RlpAs were not clearly resolved within bacterial lineages. We tested the reliability in tree selection (approximately unbiased (AU) test [50]) and found that the possibility that the aphid clade clusters with the Enterobacteriaceae is quite low (p = 0.10); whereas the possibility that it exhibits the topology of the tree shown in Figure 12 was high (p = 0.91). Thus, it is unlikely that aphids acquired RlpA genes from ancestral Buchnera, as Buchnera branches with the family Enterobacteriaceae within the Gammaproteobacteria [16]. However, the tree of Figure 12 is suggestive of low resolution of the tree and/or of a history of horizontal transfer of rlpA among major bacterial groups, making the origin of the A. pisum copy unclear.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g012Figure 12Phylogenetic position of the aphid RlpA proteins.A total of 88 aligned amino acid sites were subjected to the analysis. A Bayesian tree is shown; the ML tree and NJ tree exhibited substantially the same topologies. On each node, support values over 50 are shown (BI/ML/NJ). Asterisks (*) indicate support values lower than 50. Taxonomic positions (bacterial taxonomy unless otherwise stated) are shown in brackets.α, β, γ, and ε classes indicate proteobacterial classes. Accessions of the sequences are shown in parentheses. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site. The aphid clade and Enterobacteriaceae clade are shown in red and blue, respectively.Their close localization in the genome, conserved exon/intron structures, and close phylogenetic positions suggest that the A. pisum RlpAs were duplicated after a single LGT from a bacterium. To further assess this possibility, we reanalyzed phylogenetic positions of aphid RlpAs, incorporating amino acid sequences of putative RlpA homologs of two other aphid species, Myzus persicae and Aphis gossypii (Figure S5). The tree showed that this gene was transferred before the divergence of Aphidini (containing A. gossypii) and Macrosiphini (containing A pisum and M. persicae), approximately 50–70 million years ago. This indicates that our strategies are effective in detecting rather ancient LGT.
LdcA1, AmiD, and RlpAs are highly expressed in the bacteriocyteTo examine the expression profiles of the aphid genes acquired from bacteria, we quantified their transcripts in the whole body, the bacteriocyte, the embryo, and the midgut, using real-time quantitative RT-PCR (Figure 13). Only one of the three copies of LdcA (LdcA1) was used for the analysis. Pilot RT-PCR experiments failed to amplify transcripts of ψDnaE and ψAtpH, whereas PCR successfully amplified genomic sequences of both (Figure 2), verifying the effectiveness of the primer sets. Failure of the RT-PCR amplification suggests that these loci are not transcribed at a significant level, further supporting the hypothesis that ψDnaE and ψAtpH are pseudogenes. RT-PCR successfully amplified transcripts of LdcA1, AmiD, bLys, RlpA1, RlpA2, RlpA3, RlpA4, and RlpA5, suggesting they are transcribed and possibly functional.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.g013Figure 13Expression profiles of LGT candidates.Ivory, blue, green, and orange columns represent expression levels in the whole body, the bacteriocyte, the embryo, and the midgut, respectively; bars, standard errors (n = 6). The expression levels are shown in terms of mRNA copies of the target genes per copy of mRNA for RpL7. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (Tukey-Kramer test; *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001).The genes that were positive by RT-PCR analysis were further characterized using quantitative RT-PCR to measure the level of their transcription. These experiments showed that expression of LdcA1, AmiD, RlpA1-5 is highly upregulated in bacteriocytes. Transcripts for LdcA1, AmiD, RlpA1, RlpA2, RlpA3, RlpA4, and RlpA5 were 11.6, 8.53, 10.2, 64.6, 22.3, 154, and 14.1-fold more abundant in the bacteriocyte than in the whole body, respectively (p<0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer test) (Figure 13). For these genes, the transcript levels were invariably higher in the bacteriocytes than in the embryo and the midgut as well (p<0.001, Tukey-Kramer test). In contrast, the transcript for bLys appeared to be less abundant in the bacteriocyte than in other organs. The level of the bLys transcript in the bacteriocyte was only 33.7% of that in the whole body (p<0.01, Tukey-Kramer test), whereas the levels of the bLys transcript in the embryo and the midgut were comparable to that in the whole body (p>0.05, Tukey-Kramer test).DiscussionIn this study, using a number of different approaches, we identified 12 genes or gene fragments that are highly likely to have been transferred from bacteria to the genome of an ancestor of A. pisum. Unexpectedly, however, we found no functional genes that seem to have been transferred from Buchnera to the aphid genome. Only two pseudogenes, ψDnaE and ψAtpH, were shown to be of Buchnera origin, and both are highly truncated and appear not to be transcribed. Although a number of gaps still remain in the genome assembly of A. pisum (Acyr_1.0), exhaustive analyses of gene inventory and transcriptome data suggest that few genes are hidden in such gaps [51], indicating that the assembly is nearly complete (IAGC, under review). We do not exclude the possibility that we have missed a very limited number of LGT candidates, but that would not much affect the overall result. Moreover, results for RlpA suggest that rather ancient transfers could be detected using our search strategies (Figure S5). Thus, the present results rule out the hypothesis that the reductive evolution of the Buchnera genome has been enabled by LGT to the host aphid genome.The lack of LGT from Buchnera demonstrates a clear difference between Buchnera and organelles such as mitochondria and plastids, which have transferred a number of essential genes into the host chromosome [7],[8]. In Buchnera, loss of genes known to be essential for model organisms, such as E. coli, might reflect the coadaptation of other Buchnera genes, which may evolve additional functions, or coadaptation of the host, which may evolve to support its mutualistic symbiont [29],[52].Besides the two pseudogenes apparently derived from Buchnera, the 10 LGT candidates were three genes of LD-carboxypeptidase (LdcA), five genes of rare lipoprotein A (RlpA), and a single gene each of N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (AmiD), and 1,4-beta-N-acetylmuramidase (bLys). One each of LdcAs (LdcA1) and RlpAs (RlpA4) were originally found in our previous studies [29],[30]. Phylogenetic analyses suggested that LdcAs, AmiD, and bLys were derived from rickettsial bacteria closely related to the extant Wolbachia spp. (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales) and Orientia tsutsugamushi (Alphaproteobacteria, Rickettsiales), both of which are intracellular symbionts of Metazoa. Wolbachia are found in various lineages of arthropods and nematodes [16], [22]-[27],[41],[53], whereas Orientia infect arthropods and mammals [45]. Although the LSR1 strain used for the genome sequencing lacks rickettsial symbionts, infections of Wolbachia and Rickettsia are sporadically observed in aphids [38],[40],[41]. Thus, a previous infection may have been the source of these transferred genes [30]. Recent studies have revealed that genomes of various animal lineages have DNA sequences that appear to have been transferred from Wolbachia
[22]–[27],[30]. Dunning Hotopp et al. screened the genomes of a wide variety of nematodes and arthropods, including A. pisum, for Wolbachia-like sequences [24]. However, they did not detect any of the five Wolbachia-like genes identified in the present study. This appears to reflect their use of a higher threshold (>80% nucleotide identity), using only extant Wolbachia genomes as queries, aiming to detect recent LGTs from Wolbachia. In contrast, we conducted exhaustive analyses to identify all possible (ancient and recent) LGTs from all possible bacterial lineages, resulting in identification of 12 promising candidates. This implies that more extensive searches of other animal genomes could reveal many more LGT candidates. Thus, the A. pisum genome may not be unusual in containing genes acquired from bacteria.Rickettsial bacteria invade various types of host cells [13],[16],[38],[41], and in some cases are concentrated in germ cells [53]. In contrast, during most of their life stages, Buchnera are confined within bacteriocytes, which are somatic cells that are segregated from germ cells [13]–[16]. Buchnera cells are freed from the maternal bacteriocytes and are localized in the host germ line only when being transmitted to the next generation [13],[54],[55]. LGT must take place in the germ line for a transferred gene to be inherited across generations, and the difference between rickettsial bacteria and Buchnera in proximity to nuclei of germ cells may affect their rates of DNA transfer to host genomes. In this context, nuclear mitochondrial-like sequences (numts) may give some insight. As mitochondria reside in essentially all types of host cells including germ line cells, the nuclear genome has frequent opportunity to contact and acquire genomic fragments from mitochondria. Indeed, a total of 56 pseudogene sequences derived from transferred mitochondrial DNA was detected in the nuclear genome of A. pisum; these were estimated to represent approximately 35 transfer events, taking into account that some DNA transfers involved fragments bearing more than one gene and some DNA transfers were followed by subsequent duplication (IAGC, paper under review). Thus, detectable DNA transfers from mitochondria were more frequent than LGTs from bacteria, consistent with the hypothesis that proximity to germ line nuclei facilitates DNA transfer.Interestingly, all of the A. pisum genes of apparent rickettsial origin (LdcAs, AmiD, and bLys) encoded enzymes for metabolism of murein (peptidoglycan), a component of the bacterial cell wall. In bacteria, LdcA and AmiD are required for recycling murein [42], whereas lysozymes are utilized to hydrolyze it [48]. Quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated that expression of the A. pisum LdcA1 and AmiD were highly upregulated in the bacteriocyte, which is the cell that harbours Buchnera. As Buchnera possesses a cell wall composed of murein [56], but lacks both ldcA and amiD
[9], it is plausible that the laterally transferred LdcAs and AmiD in the A. pisum bacteriocyte may have compensatory functions to support the survival of Buchnera, as proposed previously for LdcA1
[30]. While neither function nor phylogenetic position of the aphid RlpAs is yet known, their proximity in the genome, conserved exon/intron structures, and close phylogenetic positions suggested that the five RlpA genes of A. pisum were generated from a single gene, by duplications following LGT. Moreover, the expression of all five genes was shown to be upregulated in the bacteriocyte, implying that all of the duplicated RlpAs function in the maintenance of Buchnera. Gene duplications after LGT were also shown for LdcA genes.In contrast to the case of LdcA1 and AmiD, the transcript for bLys was more abundant in other organs than in the bacteriocyte. In this context, it is notable that, unlike all other fully sequenced Metazoa, A. pisum lacks genes encoding canonical lysozymes [49]. Lysozymes are ubiquitously distributed among living organisms and are believed to be essential for defense against bacterial infection [48]. Retention of bacteriolytic activity by bLys might compensate for the lack of canonical lysozymes in A. pisum. The relatively high level of expression of bLys in the whole body of the pea aphid, observed in our study, might reflect a role of the bLys protein protecting the aphid's body from infectious bacteria. Conversely, high expression of bLys in the bacteriocyte might have a detrimental effect on the Buchnera cell wall, and the fact that it is not highly expressed in that tissue is consistent with Buchnera's importance in aphid nutrition [15], [18]–[21].A previous study on two LGT candidates (LdcA1 and RlpA4) suggested that apparent functional genes laterally transferred from bacteria have acquired some eukaryotic features [30]. This observation was further supported by the present, more comprehensive analyses. Spliceosomal-type introns were found in all the genes that were transcribed (LdcA1, LdcA2, AmiD, bLys, and RlpA1-5). This type of intron has not been observed in bacterial genes, indicating that these genes acquired introns after they were transferred to the aphid nuclear genome. Moreover, RlpAs and bLys display chimeric structures that consist of eukaryotic domains and prokaryotic domains. As the boundaries of the eukaryotic and prokaryotic domains of these proteins were consistent with the locations of introns, the chimeric structures of these genes might have come into being as the result of exon-shuffling [30],[57].In addition to providing strong evidence that A. pisum did not acquire functional genes from Buchnera, this study also provided evidence that 1) DNA fragments can be transferred from mutualistic intracellular bacteria to the nuclear genome of metazoan hosts; 2) Genes transferred from bacteria can function in the recipient Metazoa; 3) Transferred genes may be utilized for facilitating mutualistic associations between Metazoa and symbiotic bacteria.Although we can rule out the hypothesis that Buchnera genome reduction was dependent on transfer of genes to its host, it remains possible that other mutualistic intracellular bacteria have transferred genes to genomes of their metazoan hosts, as in mitochondria and plastids [7],[8]. Recently, several bacterial symbionts have been found to have genomes much smaller than that of Buchnera, and these symbionts are promising candidates for further investigation [1]–[4]. The most extreme cases are Carsonella ruddii str. Pv (Gammaproteobateria), the bacteriocyte symbiont of a psyllid, and Hodgkinia cicadicola (Alphaproteobacteria), a bacteriocyte symbiont of singing cicadas. The genomes of these two unrelated bacteria (NC_008512 and CP001226) are 160 kb and 144 kb in size, respectively, only a quarter of that of Buchnera str. APS (NC_002528), and they are lacking numerous genes considered essential for life [1],[2],[4].Materials and MethodsComplete genome sequence and predicted gene models of A. pisum
The first release of the genome assembly of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, (Acyr_1.0) was obtained from the Human Genome Sequencing Center at Baylor College of Medicine (http://www.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/projects/aphid/). Predicted gene models (Gnomon, RefSeq, etc.) of A. pisum were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Ftp/).Screening of unassembled reads90,678 reads that were precluded from the A. pisum genome assembly (Acyr_1.0) were retrieved from the Human Genome Sequencing Center at the Baylor College of Medicine (http://ftp.peaaphidgenome.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/peaaphidftp.html). BLASTX and BLASTN similarity searches [58] were performed using the genome of Buchnera aphidicola str. APS (NC_002252, NC_002253, NC_002528) [9], custom bacterial databases, RefSeq invertebrate databases, NCBI non-redundant (nr) databases, and the A. pisum genome assembly (Acyr_1.0). The bacterial nucleotide/protein databases were constructed using complete genome sequences of 35 representative bacterial species belonging to Proteobacteria or Firmicutes (8, 21, 3, and 3 species from Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Firmicutes, respectively) (Table S1). The assembly of the discarded reads were performed with the phred/phrap package [59] using default parameters.BLASTP–based screening of the A. pisum genome for laterally transferred genesIn this study, we define “open reading frames (ORFs)” as potential protein-coding sequences regardless of the presence/absence of initiation codons; namely, DNA stretches that begin with the first nucleotide after the previous stop codon and ends with a stop codon, with no stop codons in between. All ORFs having an inferred polypeptide length of at least 60 amino acids were extracted from the genome assembly of A. pisum (Acyr_1.0). Overlaps of ORFs encoded in different reading frames were permitted. The algorithm for the ORF extraction did not include prediction of exon/intron boundaries. Potential polypeptides (PPPs) were deduced from these ORFs and were used for analyses. BLASTP similarity searches [58] were conducted against the bacterial protein database and the invertebrate protein database. The invertebrate protein database was retrieved from NCBI (Reference Sequence Release 30). BLASTP searches against the non-redundant (nr) protein database were conducted at the NCBI website.BLASTX–based screening of the A. pisum genome for laterally transferred genesThe genome assembly of A. pisum (Acyr_1.0) was divided into lengths of 1,000 nucleotides (nts), overlapping by 200 nts. BLASTX [58] similarity searches were performed using the NCBI nr protein database (-e 1e-2 -F “m S”) and a custom database (-e 1 -F “m S”) containing proteomes of 714 prokaryotic species (Table S2), along with the proteomes from the insects Drosophila melanogaster, Anopheles gambiae, Apis mellifera, and Tribolium castaneum (Figure S2.2). See also Text S1.BLASTN screens with aphid endosymbiont genomesBLASTN searches were performed using the Buchnera str. APS genome (NC_002252, NC_002253, NC_002528) and the Hamiltonella defensa 5AT genome (ND_12751, ND_12752) as queries on the A. pisum genomic database. These searches have the potential to reveal recently transferred sequences that do not fall within protein-coding genes. The requirement for significance was E value < e-05. For significant hits, the A. pisum sequences from alignments were used as queries in BLASTN searches on nr nucleotide database at NCBI. Sequences were eliminated as LGT candidates if top hits in these searches were from other insect genomes. Scaffolds with hits in the initial searches were also checked against the list of scaffolds previously designated as bacterial contaminants. Scaffolds were eliminated as LGT candidates if included on this list or if the whole scaffold was both <2 kb in length and lacked any significant hits to another animal genome.Real-time quantitative PCRTwo A. pisum strains free from secondary symbionts were used for the analysis. One was strain LSR1, the North American strain that was used for the genome sequencing, and the other was strain ISO, the Japanese strain that was used for our previous transcriptome analysis of bacteriocytes [29]. DNA was extracted from three and four different batches of LSR1 and ISO, respectively. Quantification was performed with the LightCycler instrument and FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I kit (Roche), as described previously [29]. The primers used are listed in Table 2. The running parameters were: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 55°C for 5 s, and 72°C for the time shown in Table 2. Results were analyzed using LightCycler software version 3.5 (Roche), and the copy numbers were normalized to that of a ribosomal protein gene, RpL7. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer test.10.1371/journal.pgen.1000827.t002Table 2Primer sets used for quantitative PCR/RT–PCR.TargetForward primer 5′-3′Reverse primer 5′-3′Amplicon size (bp)Extension time (s)
LdcA1 CAACCTGACGCTAGTCGAGAACT CACGTCCTCCAAGAACACGAT
824
AmiD GGGGCAACTACTCGTCAATC ACGGGTCCCATGAATCATTAG
904
bLys TGCAACAACCAGAAACCAGAGC ACAACAGCACCACCATGAAAATTTGC
884
RlpA1 GCTATGTTGCCAGTTGGCTCAG GGTTCCGTTCTTTGGTTGCATATAGG
1025
RlpA2 GTTGTCCAGAGAAACAGCCAAGGT GAATTCTCCAAACGGGGTACAAC
874
RlpA3 GAAGGACGACAGTCATCACG ACATCAGAGCAGCGTCATTGG
874
RlpA4 CGGCGGACGGTAAGGTAAT ACTGTACCGGGCCTGTGTTC
814
RlpA5 CAATCCGGAAAATAAGGCAGTTGA CACTTCAACTTTTGTGCCTGGTGG
974ψDnaE GCTTCTACTCAAGAAGGATATAAC GCTCTCGTGTAATTATGTACC
27211ψAtpH AATTGTTGGATTGAGATCAGCA ACAAAGACTGTTCTCATATTGTTCG
804Structural analysisDomain structures of predicted proteins were analyzed using the CD-search at the NCBI website [60]. Similarities between two sequences were analyzed by using the bl2seq tool at the NCBI website [58]. The presence and location of signal peptides were predicted by using the program SignalP 3.0 [61].Molecular phylogenetic analysisMultiple alignment was performed using the program MAFFT 5.8 [62], followed by manual refinement. Aligned sites that included alignment gap(s) were omitted from the analysis. Molecular phylogenetic analyses were conducted by three methods, Bayesian inference (BI), maximum likelihood (ML), and neighbor joining (NJ). In the BI analysis, we used the program MrBayes 3.1.2 [63]. In total, 4,000–50,000 trees were obtained (ngen 400,000–5,000,000, samplefreq 100), and the first 2,000–40,000 of these were considered as “burn in” and discarded. We confirmed that the potential scale reduction factor (PSRF) was around 1.00 for all parameters and that the average standard deviation of split frequencies converged towards zero. A posterior probability of each node was used for the support value of the node. ML trees were estimated using the program RAxML Version 7.0.0 [64]. Bootstrap values were obtained by generating 1,000 bootstrap replications. NJ trees were constructed using the program Neighbor in PHYLIP 3.6 [65]. Pairwise distances were calculated by the program Tree-Puzzle 5.2 [66]. Bootstrap values were obtained by generating 1,000 bootstrap replications. We used the program ProtTest v1.4 [67] for the selection of the substitution models of amino acid sequences. The WAG + gamma + Inv model was used for the phylogenetic analysis except for that for DnaE. For the estimation of the DnaE tree, the Blossom62 + gamma model was used.Approximately unbiased testTo test whether the A. pisum RlpA might be derived from an ancestral Buchnera genome (and therefore closely related to the Enterobacteriaceae), an approximately unbiased (AU) test was conducted using the program package Treefinder version Oct. 2008 (distributed by the author at www.treefinder.de). For the analysis, the ML tree inferred by molecular phylogenetic analysis was used. The tree topology of the ML tree was fixed except for the phylogenetic position of the aphid RlpA cluster. All possible alternative positions of aphid RlpA cluster in the tree were analyzed, to assess the hypothesis that the aphid copy fell on the branch to Enterobacteriaceae.RT–PCR cloning of bLys
Strain ISO was used for the analysis. The insects were reared on Vicia faba at 15°C in a long-day regime of 16 hr light and 8 hr dark. RNA was isolated from the whole bodies of 12–15 day-old parthenogenetic apterous adults using TRIzol reagent, followed by RNase-free DNase I treatment. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized using pd(N)6 primer and PrimeScript reverse transcriptase (Takara). PCR primers were bLys_1F (5′- CCATTAGCTACTAATTGTCTAGTAAG -3′) and bLys_2004R (5′- TCATGAAAGAGGTAAACTTCCATTTG -3′). Running parameters were 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min. The PCR product was cloned using pGEM-T easy vector system (Promega).Real-time quantitative RT–PCRRNA was isolated from the whole bodies, bacteriocytes, embryos, and midguts of 12–15 day-old parthenogenetic apterous adults of the ISO strain as described above. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized and quantification was performed using the LightCycler system as described above. Primer sets and running parameters were the same as those used for the quantitative PCR except that the number of PCR cycles was 45. The relative expression levels were normalized to mRNA for the ribosomal protein RpL7. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey-Kramer test.Supporting InformationFigure S1Flow chart of the evaluation of the individual reads precluded from the genome assembly.(0.03 MB PDF)Click here for additional data file.Figure S2Flow chart of the BLASTX-based screening of the A. pisum genome for LGT candidates.(0.04 MB PDF)Click here for additional data file.Figure S3Alignment of amino acid sequences of DnaEs. Residues conserved in three and two lineages are shaded black and gray, respectively. Triangles and reverse-triangles indicate frameshift deletion and insertion, respectively, in the aphid ψDnaE. Dashes (-) indicate alignment gaps. Asterisks (*) indicate gaps caused by frameshifts.(0.49 MB PDF)Click here for additional data file.Figure S4Alignment of amino acid sequences of AtpHs. Residues conserved in all and two lineages are shaded black and gray, respectively. Dashes (-) indicate alignment gaps. Dots (.) indicate stop codons.(0.43 MB PDF)Click here for additional data file.Figure S5Phylogenetic position of RlpA proteins from three aphid species. The legend is the same as for Figure 12. Circles indicate inferred splits of the ancestors of A. pisum and Myzus persicae. Rhombi indicate inferred duplications of RlpA. Amino acid sequences of RlpA proteins from M. persicae and Aphis gossypii were deduced from assembled EST sequences that were retrieved from NCBI. The accession numbers of the ESTs were DW014944, DW011752, ES221611, ES222724, and DW013043 for M. persicae RlpA1, EE571687 and EE264310 for M. persicae RlpA3, ES221157, EE263538, EE571585, EE262867, and ES220852 for M. persicae RlpA5, DR395894, DR393442, and DR391922 for A. gossypii RlpA1, and DR391796 for A. gossypii RlpA4.(0.06 MB PDF)Click here for additional data file.Table S1List of bacteria used to construct bacterial databases.(0.03 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.Table S2List of bacteria and archaea used to construct a protein database (for the BLASTX-based screening).(0.07 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.Table S3Scaffolds inferred to be of bacterial contaminants.(0.06 MB XLS)Click here for additional data file.Text S1Screening based on BLASTX.(0.02 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.Text S2Relative rate test for the A. pisum ψDnaE.(0.03 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Biology/Evolutionary and Comparative Genetics Evolutionary Biology/Genomics Evolutionary Biology/Microbial Evolution and Genomics Genetics and Genomics Genetics and Genomics/Bioinformatics Genetics and Genomics/Comparative Genomics Genetics and Genomics/Functional Genomics Genetics and Genomics/Gene Discovery Genetics and Genomics/Gene Expression Genetics and Genomics/Genome Projects Genetics and Genomics/Genomics