对此，校方辩称，学校已经在操场设置了防护网，并张贴了管理规定、训练通知，告知进入操场须与训练场地保持安全距离并提醒注意自身安全，原告也不能证明学校“未尽到安全保障义务”，所以不同意赔偿。
Against these accusations, the university argued that it has set up protective barrier around the sports field and posted management regulations and training notices informing people to keep a safe distance from the training field when entering the sports ground and to be aware of their personal safety, and because the plaintiff couldn’t prove the university “didn’t fulfill safety assurance obligations”, the university refused to pay compensation.