Sociology of Power and Authority
The Sociology of Power and Authority was offered in Fall 2017 at the University of Virginia. It was an upper-division undergraduate seminar with 20 students, meeting for an hour and fifteen minutes twice a week. On the first day of the course, several students revealed, unprompted, that they had been participants in the counter-protests downtown on August 12, 2017, and had witnessed the murder that took place there; many students expressed an interest not only in studying power and authority, but violence as well. Interestingly and importantly, these early student-to-student classroom interactions enhanced the intellectual quality of discussion in the class, and of the responses to my introductory lectures to the readings. I found that this semester more students, more often, were willing to engage in depth of thought and to argue with each other as well as with their professor. They were a living, breathing repudiation of the idea that discussing difficult matters in class restricts discourse. I want to be clear that I view my students as the cause of this atmosphere; they were remarkable in their conduct and respect for each other, despite rather deep and extensive disagreements about theory, culture, and politics.
The syllabus followed relatively closely a Monday-Wednesday rhythm. On Mondays, a classic reading — usually a difficult text — would be due; On Wednesdays, a shorter piece or pieces addressing the current “intellectual situation” were assigned. In the syllabus below, these “Wednesday readings” are preceded with a dash. After week 6, the students provided these themselves and gave brief presentations on them; these are not listed here.
It’s extremely unlikely that this class will ever fade from my memory. I felt extraordinarily fortunate to be asked to lead a situation in which both academic and everyday cynicism seemed to fall by the wayside, and in which intellectual ambition was manifest and yet untethered by the usual dictates of instrumental reason. I here provide a stripped-down version of the syllabus — a syllabus anchored, really, by two texts (Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and Fassin’s Enforcing Order). We will follow this with posts to PublicSeminar.org written by the students from the Sociology of Power and Authority, consisting primarily of edited versions of the final papers they wrote for the class.
Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem, pp. 206-298.
Week 8: What is authority?
Alexandre Kojeve, The Notion of Authority (A Brief Presentation). Verso Press. 2014, pp. 1-47, 95-100.
Week 9: Power, authority and violence, or race and policing, part 1
Didier Fassin, Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Polity Press, 2013, ix-112.
Week 10: Power, authority and violence, or race and policing, part 2
Didier Fassin, Enforcing Order, 113-173.
Week 11: Power, authority and violence, or race and policing, part 3
Nov. 6: Didier Fassin, Enforcing Order, 174-229
Week 12: Violence and the law
Hannah Arendt, On Violence. Harcourt Brace Javanovich. 1970. pp. 35-87.
Hannah Arendt, “Civil Disobedience” pp. 49-103 in Crises in the Republic, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1972.
Week 13: Style and politics
Richard Hofstader, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” Harper’s Magazine, 1964.
Week 14 : The eternal return to Hegel
G.W.F. Hegel, “Lordship and Bondage” Phenomenology of Spirit.
–Final Lecture and Discussion.