Educating Patients Before They Leave the Hospital Reduces Readmissions, Emergency Department Visits and Saves Money
Treating a patient enrolled in the federal Medicare Advantage health insurance program costs hospitals an average of $10,800 compared with an average of $11,100 for patients enrolled in Medicare's traditional fee-for-service program. [Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HCUP Statistical Brief #66: Medicare Hospital Stays: Comparisons between the Fee-for-Service Plan and Alternative Plans, 2006.]
- Educating patients before they leave the hospital reduces readmissions, emergency department visits and saves money
- Call for papers for AHRQ's Symposium on Clinical and Comparative Effectiveness Research Methods
- AHRQ issues three updated career development Funding Opportunity Announcements
- AHRQ director helps consumers navigate the health care system in a Web advice column
- Health Policy Fellowship Announcement
- AHRQ releases new evidence report on back pain
- AHRQ's free notification service brings news and information to your E-mail inbox
- AHRQ in the professional literature
1. Educating Patients Before They Leave the Hospital Reduces Readmissions, Emergency Department Visits and Saves Money
Patients who have a clear understanding of their after-hospital care instructions, including how to take their medicines and when to make follow-up appointments, are 30 percent less likely to be readmitted or visit the emergency department than patients who lack this information. Fewer hospital readmissions and emergency department visits also translate to lower total costs. The AHRQ-funded study found that total costs (a combination of actual hospitalization costs and estimated outpatient costs) were an average of $412 lower for the patients who received complete information than for patients who did not. The study is published in the February 3 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine. Select to read our press release and select to access the abstract in PubMed®.
2. Call for Papers for AHRQ's Symposium on Clinical and Comparative Effectiveness Research Methods
AHRQ's Effective Health Care program invites abstract submissions for research papers on empirical studies and methodological advances for conducting comparative and clinical effectiveness research for its a second invitational symposium. Papers that are accepted through a peer review process will be presented by the primary author at the symposium in June and published as a journal supplement. The call for abstracts is available online. The deadline for submission is February 13.
3. AHRQ Issues Three Updated Career Development Funding Opportunity Announcements
On January 23, AHRQ issued three updated career development Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs). These FOAs announce AHRQ's intent to continue its career development programs. They also highlight the need for applications to focus on identified priority areas in one of the six AHRQ portfolios: value, prevention/care management, health information technology, comparative effectiveness, patient safety, and innovations and emerging issues. The deadline is March 9. The updated program announcements are:
- Independent Scientist Award (K02)
- Mentored Clinical Scientist Career Development Award (K08)
- Mentored Research Scientist Career Development Award (K01)
AHRQ has released a new evidence report on which complementary and alternative medicine therapies are being used to treat back pain. Complementary and alternative medicine includes therapies such as acupuncture, massage, naturopathic medicine, chiropractic spinal manipulation, and patient self-treatment. The report's authors found only limited research to understand the patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use for back pain, although it does appear that chiropractic spinal manipulation, massage, and acupuncture may be the most commonly used therapies. The authors found that most studies provided minimal information on the severity and sources of back pain; few concurrently evaluated the use of multiple complementary and alternative medicine therapies; and few evaluated complementary and alternative medicine therapy use in regions of the back other than low back. Furthermore, most studies provided only minimal details about the specific subtypes or variations of complementary and alternative medicine therapies used and most did not state the type of provider who applied the therapy. The evidence synthesis, Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Back Pain Utilization, was conducted by AHRQ's McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center and funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Select to access the report.