A little-known fact about vaccines is that the data used for their initial approval is incomplete, lacking the more robust data gathered from post-marketing experience that shows how people actually react to their use in the real world. And it is this post-marketing data that tells the real story about the many deadly side effects involved, which can sometimes number in the hundreds for a single vaccine.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has compiled a post-marketing data summary of more than three dozen vaccines routinely administered to young children as part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) official schedule, revealing a number of shocking truths about the dangers associated with vaccination that the medical establishment largely withholds or makes difficult for people to access.
Unless parents look very closely at the vaccine package insert published after the government issues approval for a given vaccine, they will never know the full extent to which getting their children jabbed puts their health and well-being at risk. This is information that one would think should be made publicly available before vaccines are even approved, but that sadly only comes after they are widely distributed to children.
“In April, 2020, Children’s Health Defense summarized the postmarketing data for over three dozen vaccines given routinely to American infants, children and adolescents,” CHD reports.
“That tally showed that vaccines touted for the prevention of 13 illnesses (Table 1) have been linked to at least 217 adverse medical outcomes reported post-licensure, including serious infections, autoimmune conditions, life-threatening allergies and death.”
Table 1 and other tables from the CHD analysis of childhood vaccines is available at this link.
As shocking as this might be, it gets worse. Not only is post-marketing data for vaccines difficult to find, but it, too, is often incomplete because vaccine manufacturers have the freedom to choose which outcomes to list or not list, “using loose criteria determined by severity, frequency of reporting and ‘strength of evidence for a causal relationship,'” CHD further notes.
In other worse, if a vaccine side effect is too drastic or disturbing, vaccine corporations might come up with some kind of excuse not to report it. On top of that, many vaccine adverse events are underreported to begin with, which means the vaccine industry can claim that the available data is “inconclusive,” and thus too “erroneous” to have to report.
Even so, the post-marketing data that vaccine companies do provide on package inserts still paints a “dramatic picture,” according to CHD, revealing an “almost double the total number of undesirable post-vaccination outcomes” compared to the incomplete data used for the initial approval of vaccines.
According to CHD’s analysis of some of the most common childhood vaccines, including those for diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type B, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, influenza, meningococcal infection, pertussis, pneumococcal infection, polio, rotavirus, tetanus, and varicella, there are at least 397 different types of reactions reported pre- and post-licensure – meaning parents are not getting the complete picture of a vaccine’s safety with only the data supplied to the government prior to its approval.
“Although roughly 400 adverse events is a sobering number, again, it is probably an underestimate,” CHD further notes. “This is because most clinical trials follow participants for an absurdly short period of time – three days here, seven days there – and do not capture problems that arise beyond that brief window, even though clinicians recognize (and the scientific literature confirms) that vaccine reactions are not always immediate or acute.”