We suppose a State that has done the had thing, for example, according to the World Bank, has established a basic legal ordering, maintained surroundings of nondistorting policies, including the macroeconomic stability; invested in basic social services and infrastructure, prote’ge’ to the vulnerable groups and defendant the environment. We suppose a State that obtains, by means of aggressive policies and reforms, to control the inflation, to lower the interest rates to acceptable levels, to lower unemployment to understandable levels, abrir its economy, to privatize the unnecessarily estatizadas companies or to desmonopolizar the construction of infrastructure, the social benefit of good part of the sevicios public, services and other goods and services that have been inefficient, to create an essential, strong and nonarbitrary base institutional, to protect, in due form, the public order after to have agreed to La Paz with the insurgent groups, to protect the property, to end the economic insecurity in the home (avoiding the misery in oldness through systems of pensions, helping to do against catastrophic diseases by means of health insurances and offering attendance, in case of loss of the work, with insurances of unemployment), to control the corruption, to extend the citizen participation to good part of the democratic instances and, in short, that manages to close that ample existing breach between hoped of him and its own opportune possibility of answer, accommodating, since the same World Bank has said to it, its functions to its capacity. That is to say, we imagine a state that distills optimism and is attractive for the investment. Good, no? Now we imagine that it would happen later. Before as much efficiency and so good conditions are not exaggerated to anticipate the massive coming of foreign investments. It would not either seem to us stranger who the national investors, instead of to be producing use and development in foreign countries return to bring their talk.
This study intends to argue the importance of the development of people in the public sector, in the full direction as condition of transformation of model of a traditional and bureaucratic organizacional management. Moreover, it will be detached the importance of if searching a model of management of people that predominates in its essence the valuation social human being and as one of the great challenges of the public sector Word-key: Humanizao; Public administration; Public service. Ahead of the diverse changes in the social, economic scenes, technological politicians and, the organizations if come across with the requirement of one high standard of competitiveness that if extends in global level. In the case of the public sector, the challenge to face the context of changes is in the process of reform of device of the State, in the direction of that this process of transformation and consequent modernization, imposes to the state sphere the necessity to review its papers, functions and, especially, mechanisms of management. More consensual in Brazil as well as in other countries is each time, the concern with the beginning of the participation in the public administration, where new methods of performance are adopted directed toward the culture of the dialogue, to favor the work of the society on same it. For Perez (2004.p.221) ‘ ‘ the administration assumes the function today to harmonize the behavior of the social actors looking for to be most transparent, distanciando of purely managemental the bureaucratic models and neoliberais.’ ‘ The estimated ones of the new organizacional model for the public sector reflect the emphasis in the management of its human resources and in the adoption of more democratic and participativos styles that develop the abilities, as well as they satisfy the necessities of the external public and the server public.