I was struck by this thought-provoking comment on home birth safety by Professor of Philosophy and Medical Ethics Elselijn Kingma. This very short video is an excerpt from a panel discussion, “Perinatal Mortality in the Netherlands: Facts, Myths and Policy,” which took place at the 2012 Human Rights in Childbirth conference in the Hague, Netherlands.
The video is less than two minutes long, but for those of you who prefer to read (like me), the transcript is below that.
Elselijn Kingma: “Science can tell us something about mortality rates, or it can tell us something about morbidity rates. But [only] once we figure out how we value those mortality rates and morbidity rates can we implement the policy.
“One thing that I always notice and that I find worrying in that respect is when the focus is only and ever on perinatal mortality—and much of the focus in the debates these last two days have been about that. And we can fight over and over about whether there is an 0.1 increase or a 0.4 increase or no increase or even a reduction in perinatal mortality rates in home birth. But what is very rarely mentioned is the overwhelming evidence that home births are safer for mothers. Not a little bit safer but massively so.
“Now, that tells us something about the values in our society. Those facts are there, but how we interpret those facts tells us something about how we value saving, very occasionally, one life of a child versus inflicting lots of harms on other people: namely, the mothers of those children.
“It is one thing for mothers to routinely make that choice, to put themselves at risk fro their children, and that is always and ever an act of extreme altruism. But from a policy level a society has a duty to value all its citizens and all its humans equally. And from that point of view it is not at all obvious that we should always be so focused on perinatal mortality.
“So that’s the interpretation point.”