Obamacare "was the Republican plan in the early '90s."
Is the ACA the GOP health care plan from 1993?
By Jon Greenberg on Friday, November 15th, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.
Hannity: This was not the Republican plan.
Qualls: … in the early '90s.
Hannity: No Republican supported it. Not one Republican voted for this.
Qualls: … and make it work', instead of making it a government system.
Is the Affordable Care Act really the same as "the Republican plan in the early '90s?"
Short answer -- sort of. There was a Republican bill in the Senate that looked a whole lot like Obamacare, but it wasn't the only GOP bill on Capitol Hill, it never came to a vote and from what we can tell, plenty of conservative Republicans didn't like it.
Qualls told PunditFact that she was thinking of the Senate bill.
President Bill Clinton took on an ill-fated effort to reform health care in 1993. As the president's task force (led by First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton) worked behind closed doors to craft solutions to ever-rising health care costs and a growing number of uninsured families, Republicans scrambled to forge an alternative.
Republican Sen. John Chafee of Rhode Island was the point man. The bill he introduced, Health Equity and Access Reform Today, (yes, that spells HEART) had a list of 20 co-sponsors that was a who's who of Republican leadership. There was Minority Leader Bob Dole, R- Kan., Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and many others. There also were two Democratic co-sponsors.
A ban on denying coverage based on a pre-existing condition.
"You would find a great deal of similarity to provisions in the Affordable Care Act," Sheila Burke, Dole's chief of staff in 1993, told PunditFact via email. "The guys were way ahead of the times!! Different crowd, different time, suffice it to say."
That said, the Senate plan from 1993 was not identical to the health care law that passed in 2010. The Republican bill did not expand Medicaid as Obamacare does, and it did have medical malpractice tort reform, which the current law does not. In contrast to the current employer mandate, the Chafee bill required employers to offer insurance, but they were under no obligation to help pay for it.
Policy differences aside, health care scholar and former Clinton adviser Paul Starr at Princeton University said the Affordable Care Act is distinct in one other important way.
"The Chafee plan did not spell out how increased coverage would be financed," Starr said. "It was more of a symbolic bill than an actual piece of legislation."
In fact, after the bill was introduced, the Senate never took it up again.
Even before Chafee brought his bill forward, some conservatives were trying to scuttle it.
More hard-line senators such as Phil Gramm, R-Texas, House Republicans and the Heritage Foundation saw the Chafee bill as an unacceptable compromise. What they wanted was outright defeat of the president's approach.
No single alternative emerged, but there were a variety of Republican proposals. One in the House drew more co-sponsors than any other, 72 of them. It was called the Action Now Health Reform Act, but its scope was limited. Much of it focused on insurance for small businesses and the self-employed. It offered some protections for people with pre-existing conditions and included changes in medical malpractice law.
There was a smorgasbord of other House Republican bills. Like Chafee's bill, none of them went anywhere.
Qualls said the Affordable Care Act "was the Republican plan in the '90s." The bill she had in mind did have a strong roster of Republicans behind it, and it did share many major features with the Affordable Care Act. There were some significant differences but in a side-by-side comparison, the similarities dominate.
However, to call it the Republican plan, as though a majority of Republicans endorsed it, goes too far. The House Republicans took a different path, and there was opposition from more hard-line members of the Republican coalition. It is telling that the Chafee bill never became a full blown bill and never came up for a vote.
Published: Friday, November 15th, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.