Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities
Sonja Klinsky, A. Gupta
WIMEK
Equity has remained a deeply contested concept in multilateral climate politics ever since the Brundtland Commission report, with academic debate and geopolitical conflict alike focusing on how to conceptualize the principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities' (CBDR-RC) of industrialized and developing countries in combating climate change, enshrined within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The focus here is on scrutinizing equity-in-practice, i.e. how equity is being operationalized within multilateral climate governance. The authors trace how the two component elements of the CBDR-RC principle ('common but differentiated responsibilities' and 'respective capabilities') are being operationalized within the obligations and institutional arrangements relating to mitigation and adaptation within the UNFCCC. The focus of equity is shifting away from the 'responsibility' component to that of 'capabilities' (with capabilities reduced, furthermore, to a technical notion of capacity building). Equity-in-practice is thus increasingly coming to be equated, within the UNFCCC, with capacity building. The authors discuss whether such a taming of equity is also discernible in newer developments, such as negotiating the rule-book for the enhanced transparency framework of the 2015 Paris Agreement, and debating the role within climate policy of climate engineering technologies. The authors draw out the implications of this analysis for the prospects of UN-led multilateralism to deliver on climate equity in the pursuit of sustainable development.
What Next for Sustainable Development?
Our Common Future at Thirty
James Meadowcroft, David Banister, Erling Holden, Oluf Langhelle, Kristin Linnerud, Geoffrey Gilpin
Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA
Klinsky, S., & Gupta, A. (2019). Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities. In J. Meadowcroft, D. Banister, E. Holden, O. Langhelle, K. Linnerud, & G. Gilpin (Eds.), What Next for Sustainable Development?: Our Common Future at Thirty (pp. 159-179). Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975209.00019
Klinsky, Sonja ; Gupta, A. / Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities. What Next for Sustainable Development?: Our Common Future at Thirty. editor / James Meadowcroft ; David Banister ; Erling Holden ; Oluf Langhelle ; Kristin Linnerud ; Geoffrey Gilpin. Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA : Edward Elgar, 2019. pp. 159-179
@inbook{5ef132cfe94441fbbe2defbd9d909c5a,
title = "Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities",
abstract = "Equity has remained a deeply contested concept in multilateral climate politics ever since the Brundtland Commission report, with academic debate and geopolitical conflict alike focusing on how to conceptualize the principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities' (CBDR-RC) of industrialized and developing countries in combating climate change, enshrined within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The focus here is on scrutinizing equity-in-practice, i.e. how equity is being operationalized within multilateral climate governance. The authors trace how the two component elements of the CBDR-RC principle ('common but differentiated responsibilities' and 'respective capabilities') are being operationalized within the obligations and institutional arrangements relating to mitigation and adaptation within the UNFCCC. The focus of equity is shifting away from the 'responsibility' component to that of 'capabilities' (with capabilities reduced, furthermore, to a technical notion of capacity building). Equity-in-practice is thus increasingly coming to be equated, within the UNFCCC, with capacity building. The authors discuss whether such a taming of equity is also discernible in newer developments, such as negotiating the rule-book for the enhanced transparency framework of the 2015 Paris Agreement, and debating the role within climate policy of climate engineering technologies. The authors draw out the implications of this analysis for the prospects of UN-led multilateralism to deliver on climate equity in the pursuit of sustainable development.",
author = "Sonja Klinsky and A. Gupta",
doi = "10.4337/9781788975209.00019",
editor = "James Meadowcroft and David Banister and Holden, {Erling } and Oluf Langhelle and Kristin Linnerud and Geoffrey Gilpin",
booktitle = "What Next for Sustainable Development?",
publisher = "Edward Elgar",
Klinsky, S & Gupta, A 2019, Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities. in J Meadowcroft, D Banister, E Holden, O Langhelle, K Linnerud & G Gilpin (eds), What Next for Sustainable Development?: Our Common Future at Thirty. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA, pp. 159-179. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975209.00019
Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities. / Klinsky, Sonja; Gupta, A.
What Next for Sustainable Development?: Our Common Future at Thirty. ed. / James Meadowcroft; David Banister; Erling Holden; Oluf Langhelle; Kristin Linnerud; Geoffrey Gilpin. Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA : Edward Elgar, 2019. p. 159-179.
T1 - Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities
AU - Klinsky, Sonja
N2 - Equity has remained a deeply contested concept in multilateral climate politics ever since the Brundtland Commission report, with academic debate and geopolitical conflict alike focusing on how to conceptualize the principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities' (CBDR-RC) of industrialized and developing countries in combating climate change, enshrined within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The focus here is on scrutinizing equity-in-practice, i.e. how equity is being operationalized within multilateral climate governance. The authors trace how the two component elements of the CBDR-RC principle ('common but differentiated responsibilities' and 'respective capabilities') are being operationalized within the obligations and institutional arrangements relating to mitigation and adaptation within the UNFCCC. The focus of equity is shifting away from the 'responsibility' component to that of 'capabilities' (with capabilities reduced, furthermore, to a technical notion of capacity building). Equity-in-practice is thus increasingly coming to be equated, within the UNFCCC, with capacity building. The authors discuss whether such a taming of equity is also discernible in newer developments, such as negotiating the rule-book for the enhanced transparency framework of the 2015 Paris Agreement, and debating the role within climate policy of climate engineering technologies. The authors draw out the implications of this analysis for the prospects of UN-led multilateralism to deliver on climate equity in the pursuit of sustainable development.
AB - Equity has remained a deeply contested concept in multilateral climate politics ever since the Brundtland Commission report, with academic debate and geopolitical conflict alike focusing on how to conceptualize the principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities' (CBDR-RC) of industrialized and developing countries in combating climate change, enshrined within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The focus here is on scrutinizing equity-in-practice, i.e. how equity is being operationalized within multilateral climate governance. The authors trace how the two component elements of the CBDR-RC principle ('common but differentiated responsibilities' and 'respective capabilities') are being operationalized within the obligations and institutional arrangements relating to mitigation and adaptation within the UNFCCC. The focus of equity is shifting away from the 'responsibility' component to that of 'capabilities' (with capabilities reduced, furthermore, to a technical notion of capacity building). Equity-in-practice is thus increasingly coming to be equated, within the UNFCCC, with capacity building. The authors discuss whether such a taming of equity is also discernible in newer developments, such as negotiating the rule-book for the enhanced transparency framework of the 2015 Paris Agreement, and debating the role within climate policy of climate engineering technologies. The authors draw out the implications of this analysis for the prospects of UN-led multilateralism to deliver on climate equity in the pursuit of sustainable development.
U2 - 10.4337/9781788975209.00019
DO - 10.4337/9781788975209.00019
BT - What Next for Sustainable Development?
A2 - Meadowcroft, James
A2 - Banister, David
A2 - Holden, Erling
A2 - Langhelle, Oluf
A2 - Linnerud, Kristin
A2 - Gilpin, Geoffrey
PB - Edward Elgar
CY - Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA
Klinsky S, Gupta A. Taming equity in multilateral climate politics: A shift from responsibilities to capacities. In Meadowcroft J, Banister D, Holden E, Langhelle O, Linnerud K, Gilpin G, editors, What Next for Sustainable Development?: Our Common Future at Thirty. Cheltenham UK / Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar. 2019. p. 159-179 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975209.00019
10.4337/9781788975209.00019