> provide a rationale for why its good.
and the issue times out.
> paste of the prior rationale, or even just a link to the rationale.
worthwhile to do a proper summarization.
reason to write a counter proposal in the first place.
> misunderstood the spec text, as has happened with the hidden element.
> proposals, based on what others say.
> (correct me if I'm wrong on these, Sam).
I continue to maintain that, yes, it is a legitimate reason.
out or having an obviously weak or frivolous change proposal.
Next message: Maciej Stachowiak: "Re: Inadequate rationales (Was: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals)"
Previous message: Shelley Powers: "Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97)"
In reply to: Shelley Powers: "Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97)"
Next in thread: Shelley Powers: "Re: Change Proposals and Counter-Proposals (was Re: Issues 89 through 97)"