This is then dissolved in THF and the Grignard added.
In a recent group seminar I spoke about the trouble I had in achieving consistency with that reaction. Part of the resulting discussion revolved around the method of fusing and what I had been doing wrong. The PI noted how important it is for the fusing to be performed correctly as it influences the reactivity.
What actually happens to the zinc chloride during this process? My little understanding of inorganic solid-state chemistry leads me to believe that the initial crystals break down but the resolidified glass should essentially have the same structure. I am also at a loss how to explain any differences in reactivity following this method.
P. Dotta, A. Magistrato, U. Rothlisberger, P. S. Pregosin, A. Albinati, Organometallics 2002, 21, 3033–3041. DOI: 10.1021/om020314q. Synthesis of the ligand 4 on page 3040.
P. G. Gassman, J. G. Schaffhausen, J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3214–3223. DOI: 10.1021/jo00410a024. Synthesis of compound 28 on page 3220.
One purpose is to eliminate water as @Waylander has already pointed out.
Another is to have a clean crystal surface. Aging is a common process of crystals. The surface is transformed slowly. The crystalline structure changes since it is not the same to be surrounded with other atoms (molecules, ions) of the same composition than with nothing or a gas.
Finally, another purpose is to have a crystal size as small as possible. The smaller the crystals the bigger the surface area, so more is available and the reaction proceeds faster. The small crystals are obtained in the rapid cooling. The faster, the smaller.
The zinc chloride solidifies in one lump, but there are still crystals. They only have grown together. If it were a real glass, the reactivity would be the highest since there would be no packing. This can only be achieved with extreme rapid cooling. When cooling is fast but still takes some time, crystals grow. When the cooling is slower, the crystals grow bigger. The smaller they are, the more surface the lump has.
Melting must be done for the other reasons, but when you cool it must be done fast because, if not, you will get a less reactive mass. It is not a comparison between molten and non molten product, but between fast or slow cooling of the molten salt.
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged experimental-chemistry ionic-compounds phase reactivity or ask your own question.
How can the iron in the reaction of iron (ii) chloride and zinc not go to zero oxidation state?
How to determine the reactivity of a set of compounds that may undergo nucleophilic substitution?
how does mass of carbon 12 is like this?