MediaWise
Complaining about the media
Dealing with the media
South Africa – Independent News & Media
Posted on November 1, 2011 by MediaWise Admin
Code of Conduct of Independent Newspapers. Independent News & Media is the largest newspaper group in South Africa, publishing 15 daily and weekly newspapers in the country's major metropolitan centres.
This Code of Conduct is a set of guiding principles for our newspapers. It is the frame of reference for good judgment and common sense required in day-to-day situations presented by media realities.
1. We maintain the highest professional and ethical standards. Fairness, accuracy, honesty, responsibility, independence and decency are our guiding principles.
2. We have a special duty to uphold the principle of freedom of expression, and strive to eliminate distortion, news suppression and censorship.
3. Ever aware of the media's watchdog role in society, we expose wrongdoing and any abuse of power or positions of power, public or private, serving as a constructive critic of all segments of society.
4. We should as far as possible reflect, in staffing and coverage, the diverse communities we serve, combat discrimination and prejudice on grounds of race and gender or sexual orientation, encourage racial co-operation and generally strive to enhance the welfare of the country.
5. We do not pander to personal or sectional interests but are solely concerned with the public interest.
6. We ensure reporting is impartial and balanced by making every effort to reflect all sides and by maintaining clear distinctions between comment, conjecture and fact.
7. We will rectify promptly any harmful inaccuracies with due prominence. Where apologies are warranted, these should be tendered without undue delay. In cases of sufficient importance, the right of reply should be afforded to persons criticised.
8. Advertising or promotional features should be clearly labelled to avoid confusion over the source and nature of material.
9. Material should be attributed fairly. Strict care should be taken against plagiarism of words or images.
10. We should ensure that all aspects of confidentiality are treated with circumspection and in consultation with senior editorial management.
11. Sources of information will be disclosed unless there is clear reason not to do so. They should not be disclosed where such information was provided under a pledge of confidentiality.
12. Anonymous and unnamed sources are avoided unless absolutely imperative. Information from anonymous sources, or documents received anonymously, should never be used without corroboration. When the confidentiality of a source requires protection, the reason should be explained.
13. Care should be taken against the unjustified disclosure of the identity of victims of crime, especially in cases of sexual assault.
14. Care should be taken against defamation.
15. Respect should be shown for every person's right to a fair trial.
16. We respect an individual's right to privacy, except where this clearly conflicts with the public interest, and we discourage any actions which entail unjustifiable intrusion into private grief and distress.
17. Exceptional care is taken that nothing is done which might harm or in any unjustified way compromise the interests of children.
18. Information, photographs and illustrations must be obtained by straight-forward means. The use of other means is justified only by over-riding considerations of the public interest.
19. We do not pay for information, except in extraordinary circumstances where it is in the public interest to obtain such information and there are no other available means. In all cases the editor must give approval.
20. Staff should not accept gifts, freebies or services of value without reference to editors, and in no case should any of
these be accepted if it entails an obligation to the donor. The performance of staff duties should not be allowed to be influenced by inducements, neither should journalistic positions be used for personal gain.
21. Staff must not use for their own profit financial information they receive in advance of its general publication, nor pass such information to others. Financial journalists in particular must not write about shares or securities in whose performance they know they or their close families have a significant financial interest without disclosing the interest to the
editor or financial editor. They must not buy or sell, either directly or through nominees or agents, shares or securities about which they have written recently or about which they intend to write in the near future.
22. Staff members should avoid active involvement in public affairs where a conflict of interest, potential or real, is likely to arise. Any financial, social, political or personal interest or activity which could give rise to such conflict should be declared to the editor.
23. Staff may only accept outside commissions, part-time employment or freelance work for other publications with the consent of the editor.
24. We report matters regarding ourselves and colleagues with the same vigour and candour as we would other institutions or individuals.
25. We are courteous in our dealings with the public. We are scrupulous about responding to invitations, and attend functions to which we accept invitations.
[Source: www.rjionline.org]
This entry was posted in Code by MediaWise Admin. Bookmark the permalink.
USA – Society of Professional Journalists (2014)
Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), approved 4:49p.m. Saturday 6 September 2014. Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. Ethical journalism strives … Continue reading →
IPSO: It's déjà vu all over again
1 June 2014 – 'Give newspapers more time to put their houses in order.' Sounds familiar? That was the plea of Labour's Lord MacGregor, the then Chairman of the Press Complaints Commission, in January 1992. He was responding to the … Continue reading →
The Media and…
Public Trust
The RAM Project
Trauma and conflict
Codes of Conduct Archive
What happens when people are denied a voice?
Contribution to the Cairncross Review
Transparency is in the public interest
Round and round in circles
Public service broadcasting at the cross roads
Archives Select Month June 2019 October 2018 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 June 2014 February 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 January 2011 October 2010 July 2010 August 2009 July 2009 October 2008 July 2008 June 2008 March 2008 February 2008 November 2007 October 2007 August 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 November 2005 October 2005 July 2005 April 2005 February 2005 October 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 September 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 January 2003 November 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999
Chequebook journalism