Alexis Jones
Ashley Oliver
Bonnie Harris
Carmen Reynolds
Emma D'Anjolell
Grayson Burnett
Holly Pearce
Jessica Burgess
Madeleine Hale
Rachel Nuhfer
Ryan Moody
Sam Childers
Samantha Gillen
Savannah Gibson
Zoie Nelson
Archives Select Month December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 May 2018 April 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 1969
IMC Hawk Facebook
IMCclass Twitter
Dr. Jennifer Brubaker, UNCW IMC faculty member, applies the IMC framework to examine the brand of the celebrity and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
RT @brelynnhess: Anyone who thinks that working in social media doesn't require high-level writing and rhetoric skills clearly hasn't had t… 1 month ago
Our Fall 2020 IMC Achievement Award honoree, Olivia Nelson, offers advice on preparing for the professional world w… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
Congratulations to Olivia Nelson! All the best to you! https://t.co/Hyzw83HfEu 1 month ago
@KarynSpencer Good! You have a reason for visiting. It's a great place. 1 month ago
@KarynSpencer Hi. From but no longer in Wilmington, or currently living in Wilmington? 1 month ago
Congratulations #IMCHawks Wishing you all the best! twitter.com/UNCWCOM/status… 1 month ago
Don't overly stress about picking a major. College is a journey of discovery and you might find the first choice is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 month ago
Follow @UNCWIMC
IMC Hawks Blog
UNCW IMC Students writing about IMC and life at UNCW
Tag: authenticity hoax
Donald Trump: An IMC Approach
imcclass	November 4, 2015
By Daniel Dawson
The race for our next presidential candidates has been nothing short of entertaining this year, to say the least. The Republican Party's posterchild, Donald J. Trump, is currently the frontrunner in polls. When Trump announced his presidential campaign, our nation couldn't help but look incredulously at the millionaire mogul who's already built his successful brand through business, franchises and TV networks. Despite bluntness, controversial statements and even discrepancies in political speeches, Trump has garnered the support of thousands of Republicans and the praise of being one of the most candid, or "authentic" candidates—but how and why?
Perceptions of Authenticity
Can a political candidate, or anyone for the matter, be authentic? In short, no. Or at least this is what Andrew Potter argues, author of The Authenticity Hoax, a 2010 book that criticizes the modern individual's search for an ultimately unattainable "authentic" self.
In his chapter titled "Vote for me, I'm Authentic" Potter delves into the issue of voter apathy in democratic societies and how political campaigning and the media affect this. Most of us are used to manufactured speeches and the all-talk-no-results perception of politicians—and there's been a trend of voter apathy, or the choice to not vote, in developed countries.
Trumps political extremism manufactures a perception of authenticity which could motivate U.S. citizens to vote who may consider themselves apathetic. He delivers seemingly uncensored and extemporaneous speeches—however questionable they may be—that echo his results-oriented business background. Why does he have a larger following than, say, Carly Fiorina, former CEO of HP and businesswoman alike?
The Media Controls It
Agenda-setting theory, anyone? This communication theory says that the media manipulates what the public thinks is important. Basically, whatever stories have the most coverage in the news become the "important" issues—the flavor of the week. Trump, for a variety of reasons, has been covered practically every day by some type of media outlet since he announced his participation in the race. You probably have read a story or two about Trump, even if you didn't want to.
In a recent example of agenda setting not involving Trump—who won the first Democratic debate? Major media reports that Hillary Clinton was the clear winner when, according to online polls, Bernie Sanders was voted the winner by viewers. Is this a disparity of choice or opinion? Potter writes, "The media's pundit class feeds this gladiatorial conception of political debates by treating them as a boxing match, with the post-debate analysis invariably focused on who scored what points, and whether any of the candidates was able to strike the mythical "knockout blow" (p. 172). While the media like to sensationalize, there are other factors involving what the media cover. In short, the media, across multiple outlets, can report that Hillary Clinton won when voters disagree. How do we evaluate the ways we receive our news?
Trump's Brand
Like all political candidates, Trump is a brand. Donald Trump is a symbol, a message and a vehicle for his message. Trump is a business icon and has built an empire over many years, but why is Trump running for president, too? Political IMC is integral to the success or failure of a candidate's campaign—establishing ethos, effective marketing, political advertising, event planning and speech writing are just some components that go into the branding of a politician.
"''Some people think this will be good for my brand,' Trump concluded, as deep as he probes. 'I think it's irrelevant for my brand.'" This blasé quote came from Trump himself in a feature written by Mark Leibovich in the New York Times Magazine.
I disagree with Mr. Trump. For public figures, every extension of oneself, every action, participation, speech, statement, declaration affects one's brand. One's brand is the essence and the story of who they are. While Trump will probably only gain revenue and face time with his campaign, to say that it doesn't affect his brand is nonsense. Whether it's good or bad is a value judgment, but it's fair to say that is not now, Trump's brand will see the effects of this year's political campaign.