Western Canadian Select •1 hour 72.70 -0.25 -0.34%
Canadian Condensate •1 hour 84.55 -0.25 -0.29%
Premium Synthetic •1 hour 85.95 -0.25 -0.29%
Sweet Crude •1 hour 83.15 -0.25 -0.30%
Peace Sour •1 hour 80.15 -0.25 -0.31%
Peace Sour • 1 hour 80.15 -0.25 -0.31%
Light Sour Blend • 1 hour 83.45 -0.25 -0.30%
Syncrude Sweet Premium • 1 hour 85.55 -0.25 -0.29%
Central Alberta • 1 hour 80.15 -0.25 -0.31%
1 hour GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
Eastern Europe Has A Bitcoin Problem
Bitcoin miners fleeing China's regulatory…
High U.S. Gasoline Prices Set To Dent Demand
American consumers will drive less…
Daniel J. Graeber
Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…
U.S. Shale: Dazzling Numbers, But Also Divisions
By Daniel J. Graeber - May 27, 2014, 5:19 PM CDT
Two bills working their way through state legislatures more than 2,000 miles apart show that, although it's the envy of much of the world, the U.S. shale industry is a house divided.
Production from shale natural gas deposits in the United States is expected to outpace conventional types of natural gas through at least 2040. In an annual energy review published by the Energy Information Administration (EIA), shale gas production is actually expected to accelerate for the next 25 years, where most other resources show a decline.
But the picture looks less clear when you look at the situation state-by-state.
Illinois state lawmaker John Bradley doesn't want to wait for his state to finish drafting new rules governing its hydraulic fracturing operations. He's introduced a bill to eliminate the rulemaking portion of a law passed a year to regulate fracking. The state's department of natural resources has until November to finish drawing up the rules but lawmakers like Bradley and oil and gas industry officials believe the delay is bad for business.
Illinois ranks 27th in the nation in natural gas production, just five states from the bottom in terms of measured output. While it has the largest crude oil refining capacity in the region, it has few wells and what the EIA describes as "minimal production" of natural gas.
Lawmakers like Bradley think more legislative delays will push the state even further down the natural gas production rankings.
Two thousand miles away in California, it's a completely different story. Shale oil may be coming out of the ground fast enough to make OPEC nervous, but State Senator Holly Mitchell thinks it's time to apply the brakes.
Related Article: The California Shale Bubble Just Burst
She introduced a bill to do so after an EIA report dramatically lowered the estimate of how much recoverable oil there is in the Monterey shale play -- from 13 billion barrels to just 600 million barrels.
But that's still more than some states. Despite Mitchell's contention there's "no ocean of black gold" in California, the EIA ranks the state third in the nation in terms of overall crude oil production.
So in Illinois, which has few resources, there are lawmakers who want to fast-track the shale industry development.
Meanwhile, in California, even with the lowered EIA estimate, the industry is pumping along at a rate just behind behemoths Texas and North Dakota, but policymakers there say it's time to slow things down.
And overseas, the United States is the envy of an international community scratching its head on all matters related to energy security. Though some Eastern European countries are swimming in shale oil and gas, it's been difficult so far for them to replicate the U.S. success story. And that's the prevailing opinion from North Dakota, a state at the heart of the U.S. narrative.
It's easy to be dazzled by the pure numbers of the U.S. shale story. But on the margins, divisions reveal themselves. And the protests and acts of civil disobedience against the industry are another story all together.
By Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com
Let Them Eat Carbon - Big Energy Targeting Developing World
Baghdad's Hold On Kurdistan Slips Further As Oil Exports Begin
Synapsid on May 28 2014 said:
Monterey shale:
13 billion not 1.3 billion.