Problem-solving teams are equipped to help leaders break through vexing operational challenges that impair customer satisfaction. Often, there are more challenges than resources, and staying focused on the most critical problems is imperative. This case study describes how a team redirected its efforts toward strategic needs.
LouieStat: An organizational performance review program that uses the total quality management approach of plan, do, check, act (PDCA) for problem-solving.
OPI and Performance Partners work together on department improvement projects within the LouieStat program. LouieStat highlights a department's performance using key process metrics. Problem-solving is a responsibility of the Performance Partners with OPI guidance.
New OPI leadership reviewed its project listing and training records and realized its team was focusing too much energy on training and support of low-priority projects.
OPI team members, however, were not reviewing all possible problem-solving opportunities across the departments to identify key themes of a strategic nature. For example, overtime hours might be a concern to a few departments, resulting in training or small improvement projects. The better response would be to examine the organization's total overtime performance using root cause analysis tools.
Through OPI team discussions, the team members agreed to investigate how it delivered support to internal partners, in order to raise the level of problem-solving in the city. OPI leadership suspected the team needed to become more of an internal management consulting unit emphasizing strategic work.
OPI created a complete but straightforward tool to collect data (Table 1). The device allowed team members to gather qualitative and quantitative data to make changes. Data-gathering methods included surveys, focus groups, interviews and project summaries.
What problem(s) do we help our clients to solve?
Why should clients engage us?
What five words best describe us?
What are the key deliverables for our brand?
How do we describe the ideal client?
What are the strengths of our brand?
What are the weaknesses of our brand?
What are our vision and mission?
What factors help us implement our strategy?
Is our strategy likely to help overcome future challenges?
What is the maturity of each service?
12 months out, which services will be up, down or flat?
Which team members own the services?
How do we measure the quality of our services?
Which service processes are critical?
How is the technology used in our daily work?
What are the strengths/weaknesses of our daily system?
What are our developmental needs for using the system?
What is our working philosophy?
How do we ensure our values align with our brand?
What is our day-to-day method?
How do we collaborate with others?
How are mistakes in our area handled?
In plain English, what is our core competency?
12 months out, which skills will be up, down or flat?
How do we share knowledge?
How do we help clients grow their skills?
Improvements to the training approach resulted in more than 500 employees giving OPI a rating of 9.5 out of 10. More strategically, over 15 projects were commissioned following training – including six new visual boards and six applications of 5S. The projects for visual boards and 5S were accomplished in less than one month per project, and the cost avoidance savings totaled $299,520.
As valuable as these benefits are, the more important result of OPI's tune-up is a renewed focus on strategic projects. All projects are now reviewed and prioritized against city and department plans before decisions are made about acceptance and execution. The visual boards and 5S projects, for example, are part of a broader city initiative to be a 5S city.
Keep your problem-solving priorities focused on strategic work. Examine your work. Use the assessment tool as a starting point to improve. Engage your internal partners. Good luck!