Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-zxw8g Total loading time: 21.575 Render date: 2023-02-01T10:49:56.034Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
>Journals
>Law & Social Inquiry
>Volume 37 Issue 1
>What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after...
Law & Social Inquiry
What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after Critique? Revisiting Gordon's "Critical Legal Histories"
Christopher Tomlins
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]
For more than twenty-five years, Robert Gordon's "Critical Legal Histories" has been savored by legal historians as one of the most incisive explanations available of what legal history can and should be. Gordon's essay, however, is of significance to the course of sociolegal studies in general. This commentary offers an appreciation, and a critique, of "Critical Legal Histories." It explores Gordon's articulation of the central themes of critical legal studies, in particular his corrosion of functionalism and embrace of the indeterminacy thesis, and assesses the consequences for sociolegal and legal-historical analysis of the resultant stress on the contingency and complexity of social life.
Review Essay
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Winter 2012 , pp. 155 - 166
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01280.x[Opens in a new window]
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2012
Althusser, Louis. 1969. For Marx. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Balbus, Isaac D. 1977. Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the "Relative Autonomy" of the Law. Law and Society Review 11 (3): 571–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1999a. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1999b. Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century: Exposé[of 1939]. In The Arcades Project, 14–26. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blanqui, Auguste. 1872. L'Eternité par les Astres: Hypothèse Astronomique. Paris: Librairie Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul. 1984. Of Law and the River. Journal of Legal Education 34 (2): 222–29.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 2002. Legitimating the New Legal Orthodoxy. In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, ed. Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G., 306–34. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Laura F. 2009. The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post‐Revolutionary South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fischl, Richard Michael. 1992. The Question that Killed Critical Legal Studies. Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4): 779–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Sterling, Joyce. 1998. From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State. Law and Society Review 32 (2): 409–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1975. Introduction: J. Willard Hurst and the Common Law Tradition in American Legal Historiography. Law and Society Review 10 (1): 9–55.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1976. Recent Trends in Legal Historiography. Law Library Journal 69 (4): 462–68.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1981. Historicism in Legal Scholarship. Yale Law Journal 90 (5): 1017–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1982. New Developments in Legal Theory. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, ed. Kairys, David, 281–93. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1985. "Of Law and the River," and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom. Journal of Legal Education 35 (1): 1–9, 13–16.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1996a. The Past as Authority and as Social Critic: Stabilizing and Destabilizing Functions of History in Legal Argument. In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, ed. McDonald, Terrence J., 339–78. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1996b. The Struggle for the Past. Cleveland State Law Review 44 (1): 123–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1997. Foreword: The Arrival of Critical Historicism. Stanford Law Review 49 (5): 1023–29.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W., and Nelson, William. 1988. An Exchange on Critical Legal Studies between Robert W. Gordon and William Nelson. Law and History Review 6 (1): 139–86.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1985. Pigs and Positivism. Wisconsin Law Review 1985 (4): 899–935.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1973. The Conservative Tradition in the Writing of American Legal History. American Journal of Legal History 17 (3): 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1977. The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1973 1996. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1980. On Recent Marxist Theories of Law, the State, and Juridico‐Political Ideology. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 8:339–68.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1979. The Structure of Blackstone's Commentaries. Buffalo Law Review 28 (2): 205–382.Google Scholar
Kingson, Jennifer A. 1987. Harvard Tenure Battle Puts "Critical Legal Studies" on Trial. New York Times August 30. http://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/30/weekinreview/harvard‐tenure‐battle‐puts‐critical‐legal‐studies‐on‐trial.html (accessed October 23, 2010.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice. 1990. His and Her Story: The Life and Future of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18 (1): 69–90.Google Scholar
Martin, Peter W. 1985. "Of Law and the River," and of Nihilism and Academic Freedom. Journal of Legal Education 35 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry. 1984. Notes Toward an Intimate, Opinionated, and Affectionate History of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry. 2007. CLS Wasn't Killed by a Question. Alabama Law Review 58 (5): 967–77.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Louis B. 1984. With Gun and Camera through Darkest CLS‐Land. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 413–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern Marilyn. 1991 2004. Partial Connections. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1965. The Peculiarities of the English. Socialist Register 2:311–63.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1978. The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Timmons, Brian. 1990. That's No Okie, That's My Torts Professor. Wall Street Journal April 3, A20.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 2000. Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical Narrative. Law and Society Review 34 (4): 911–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 2007. How Autonomous Is Law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1984. Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism. Stanford Law Review 36 (1 & 2): 575–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1990. Back to the Future: The Short Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18 (1): 1–56.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., and Esser, John. 1989. "Critical Empiricism" in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box? Law & Social Inquiry 14 (1): 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1987. Social Theory: Its Situation and Task. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodiwiss, Anthony. 1990. Rights versus Conspiracy: A Sociological Essay on the History of Labor Law in the United States. New York/Oxford/Munich: Berg.Google Scholar
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Tomlins, Christopher 2012. After Critical Legal History: Scope, Scale, Structure. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 31.
Tomlins, Christopher 2013. The State, the Unions, and the critical synthesis in labor law history: a 25-year retrospect. Labor History, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 208.
Arup, Christopher Jon 2014. Commodifying Farming, Regulating Capitalism?. SSRN Electronic Journal,
García-Villegas, Mauricio 2016. A Comparison of Sociopolitical Legal Studies. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 25.
HASKELL, JOHN 2016. From Apology to Utopia's Conditions of Possibility. Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 667.
Tomlins, Christopher 2016. "Be Operational, or Disappear": Thoughts on a Present Discontent. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Cowan, David and Wincott, Daniel 2016. Exploring the 'Legal' in Socio-Legal Studies. p. 1.
Arup, Christopher Jon and Plahe, Jagjit 2016. Access to Medicines in the Mature TRIPS Regime: A Sceptical View. SSRN Electronic Journal,
2016. The Beginnings of Islamic Law. p. 1.
Arup, Christopher Jon 2016. Reforming or Rejecting a New Commodity: Carbon Farming and Forestry Research. SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hamill, Sarah E 2019. Review of Legal History. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 538.
2019. Murder in the Shenandoah. p. 1.
Holdren, Nate and Tucker, Eric 2020. Marxist Theories of Law Past and Present: A Meditation Occasioned by the 25th Anniversary ofLaw, Labor, and Ideology. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 1142.
Desai, Deval 2020. Reflexive institutional reform and the politics of the regulatory state of the south. Regulation & Governance,
Quiroga-Villamarín, Daniel R. 2020. Domains of Objects, Rituals of truth: Mapping Intersections between International Legal History and the New Materialisms. International Politics Reviews, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 129.
Ben‐Natan, Smadar 2022. Problematizing law, childhood and rights in Israel/Palestine. By HediViterbo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 370 pp. $110.00 hardback.. Law & Society Review, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 649.
Ferguson, Rachel 2022. Russell Sandberg: Subversive Legal History: A Manifesto for the Future of Legal Education. Feminist Legal Studies, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 371.
View all Google Scholar citations for this article.
Save article to Kindle
To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the 'name' part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01280.x
Save article to Dropbox
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
Save article to Google Drive
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
Reply to: Submit a response
Title * Please enter a title for your response.
Contents * Contents help
Close Contents help
- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted
Please enter your response.
First name * Please enter your first name.
Last name * Please enter your last name.
Email * Email help
Close Email help
Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.
Occupation Please enter your occupation.
Affiliation Please enter any affiliation.
Conflicting interests
Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help
Close Conflicting interests help
Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.
Please enter details of the conflict of interest or select 'No'.
Please tick the box to confirm you agree to our Terms of use. *
Please accept terms of use.
Please tick the box to confirm you agree that your name, comment and conflicts of interest (if accepted) will be visible on the website and your comment may be printed in the journal at the Editor's discretion. *
Please confirm you agree that your details will be displayed.