Posts Tagged 'counter-protesters'
Don't Like White Nationalism? Then Blame The Hypocrite Democratic Party And Mainstream Media That Are Most Responsible For Its Rise.
I'll say two things at the very outset: 1) Racism of ANY kind is evil because God made human beings in His own image (which is why abortion is so vile) and we should therefore respect the image of God in all human beings. And I can personally say that in my life I have seen some of the worst and some of the best in every color and creed, such that I have encountered, for example, some incredibly godawful black people and I have also known some of the noblest people on earth who were black, whose love and friendship this particular white guy was not worthy of. The notion that "racism is an unequal power structure" doesn't go anywhere NEAR far enough because most "white people" don't have any "institutional power." I as a white man am now an oppressed racial minority in my own state of California according to this leftist screed, and as a conservative Republican in a state that is so rabidly leftist that California all by itself accounts for the difference in the popular vote between Trump and Clinton, I am a politically oppressed minority as well. It is literally a crime against intelligence to claim that I have institutional power and only genuine fools say such idiotic things. We individual "white people" are every bit as frustrated with the government and being on the outside looking through poop-stained windows of power as much as anyone else. Frankly the only way the we will ever end "institutional power inequalities" is to abolish government and abolish the bureaucracies that make the leftist/liberal machine run given that the bureaucracies are staffed with hard-core union activists (see here for just one of a billion examples). Which isn't going to happen and which I as an individual "white person" have no more control of than anyone else. In point of fact, if racism is institutional than I as a small-government conservative am far less guilty of the crime of racism than Democrats, because they WANT the racist institutions and I want them cut massively down in size and power. Rather, I am an individual person and according to both my Judeo-Christian and conservative worldview (both of which are rabidly rejected by the left) I am responsible for what is in MY OWN heart and it must be in the individual human heart that true reform can begin. And that aspect of genuine racism is completely ignored at this point by every other race BUT white people. When they tell us that "black people can't be racist" that is such an outrageously ridiculous lie that only an intellectual could have been stupid enough to have considered it. By which I refer to George Orwell's classic understanding of the stupidity of the intellectuals, that "Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them." The leftist demagogic narrative that I as a white person am ruling the world oppressing the black race is utterly ridiculous simply considering the fact that I live in California and I am constantly forced to leap through the hoops imposed by my liberal masters. It is like the Hispanic liberal activist who is part of a mob surrounding and screaming at one man: "BECAUSE YOU ARE THE MINORITY! F*CK YOU!" The actual fact is that racism is every bit as real among blacks as it is whites. As just one example, it is a fact that blacks are so much more racist than whites that black people frequently refuse to see white doctors because of the doctor's race and the patient's racism. It is everywhere, all around us, in all kinds of people just as ALL sin is all around us in all kinds of people.
But liberals don't believe in "sin" being possible other than for whites. Sin according to liberals isn't a matter of the human heart, but rather a matter of race. Only whites are capable of "oppression." But sin is not merely "institutional" (not that I run any of the institutions they're talking about, especially when Obama and Eric Holder were running them); it is INDIVIDUAL. And it is because I am a true Christian and a true conservative, I am an INDIVIDUALIST and look at people as INDIVIDUALS rather than as members of racial groups as Democrats have been indoctrinated to do. And related to that is 2) that identity politics – the division of people into groups by race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. – and then attempting to mobilize and pit those groups against other groups which are defined as evil – is itself EVIL. And the Democratic Party is more responsible for this evil than anyone or anything else on the face of the earth today. If it is in any way, shape or form appropriate for black people, or Hispanic people, or gay people, to mobilize into groups and then vote for their own rights or their own causes based on their membership in their groups, then it is equally appropriate for white people to do the same thing the left is doing with its groups. But amazingly and incredibly hypocritically, the left cries in hysterical outrage when we finally do what they have been doing for decades. In bottom-line terms, if an Obama can urge Hispanics to "punish your enemies," then why the hell can a Trump not tell whites to go punish their enemies, also? You know, aside from the fact that to be a Democrat is to be a hard-core hypocrite and then constantly rationalize your hypocrisy with goal-post-moving arguments?
I came across a statement that expresses it nicely. Who qualifies as a "hate group"???
Do you think the Democratic Party made the list of "hate groups" on the bigoted extremist Southern Poverty Law Center's hate site? No. Not on your life. The Southern Poverty Law Center is an organization created to bully anyone it politically disagrees with, at times literally declaring "parents" as a hate group. The left has politicized hate and turned its own hate into a political weapon. The Southern Poverty law center five years ago attempted to violently attack the Family Research Council headquarters through one of their drones who obtained his hate from their website. And the same thing recently happened when another of the Southern Poverty Law Center drones tried to murderously wipe out the Republican congressional baseball team.
Watch this video of the Democratic Party's buddies the Antifa and tell me why they aren't being considered a hate group by the Democratic establishment, by the Southern Poverty Law Center, by the mainstream media, by any of these fools who so self-righteously claim to be opposed to hate. if conservative activists all over the country were screaming, "We hate Obama!" how would the media have framed that if not as racist and hateful and treasonous? But even after THOUSANDS of such protests and worse yet "counter protests" where mobs show up intending to shut down conservatives' rights to free speech "By Any Means Necessary," the reporting on the ugliness of the left is a desert.
Reuters actually had the propaganda balls to call vicious leftist Antifa RIOTERS "peace activists" even after they had thrown bottles filled with urine and stones at police. Joseph Goebbels at his Ministry of Propaganda would be smiling and rubbing his fingers together in satisfaction at these lies.
You're not exactly going to get a fair or honest list of "hate groups" from them or they'd have to put themselves near the very top of their own damn list. Just sayin'. Because I will show you if you read on that that label genuinely and rightfully applies.
But you've got one more bright, shining example of what the left does: brand "the other" as hateful while steadfastly ignoring their own hatefulness.
So sit down while I show you what I am saying is true. Because there is an awful lot to say about it.
I believe we begin to get to the real heart of President Donald Trump's project following the car-ramming incident in Charlottesville: the left is determined to coerce Trump to admit that racism is entirely his fault and entirely the fault of those who support him and that the left and the racial groups that compose the rabid leftist hate base are thereby absolutely absolved from even the possibility of any form of racism. Which is the project of the left. Because the Russia they screamed about for the last eight months is now such an obvious nothing-burger lie, they've turned to a new way to try to demonize Donald Trump, and so they want him to hang the albatross of racism around his own neck or at least submit to their putting the albatross of racism around his neck. The left doesn't want to "come to the table" and have a meaningful dialogue about racism and what both sides can do to reach unity and accord and common ground; no, they rather want to take the table away and scream at us about racism while we submissively bow our heads in shame and publicly admit our shame and our guilt and to submit to a thousand years of "reverse racism" to pay for our collective sins whether we as individuals ever committed any racist sin or not. And Trump is saying no freaking way. Because there is no point attempting to have any meaningful kind of conversation with these people on these terms.
We just saw it in Berkeley what we've seen dozens and dozens of times now: a conservative organization – yes, one having absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with "white supremacists" and having seven of their eight speakers being NON-white – was violently disrupted by "counter-demonstrators" who showed up without any kind of permit armed with weapons and all the hatred and viciousness that is inherent in modern liberalism in their hearts. A racist demagogue named Nancy Pelosi attempted to manufacture a riot by slandering the group to bring as much hate against the Patriot Prayer Rally as possible. And so the conservatives, as the only group that did not want the violence that Nacny Pelosi yearned for (slanderously calling it over and over again "a white supremacist rally" in an attempt to bring leftist hate groups to attack them, backed down and cancelled their event to prevent violence, and instead held a press conference rather than a rally.
Ms. Pelosi had called on the National Park Service to reconsider Patriot Prayer's permit, describing the event as a "white supremacist rally."
"Reason has prevailed because the people of San Francisco have demonstrated our determination to protect the freedom of peaceful expression as well as public safety," Ms. Pelosi said Saturday in a statement to the Mercury News.
But Mr. Gibson accused San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Ms. Pelosi of stoking unrest by labeling the event as a white supremacy fest, even though most of the scheduled speakers were not white and Mr. Gibson himself is half-Asian.
"To call us white supremacists made San Francisco way more dangerous," Mr. Gibson said.
He also accused Democrats of hypocrisy on protester violence: "You have a mayor who says that we're hateful, we're violent, he doesn't bring up any specific examples, but he doesn't mention one word about antifa. Not one word."
The rally was billed as a "day of freedom, spirituality, unity, peace, and patriotism," and Mr. Gibson gave assurances on Facebook beforehand that "no extremists will be allowed in," including Nazis, anti-fascists (antifa), the Ku Klux Klan and white nationalists.
Even so, he said he was being menaced Saturday by antifa and By Any Means Necessary activists who followed the Patriot Prayer organizers and used Twitter to announce their whereabouts.
"Basically all day, this is what it's going to be like," he said. "We're going from spot to spot trying to hide from people who dress like ninjas, who run around, they want to burn stuff down, they want to commit violence, they want to use bike locks, they want to use clubs with nails through them."
We call it "fake news" the way leftist hatemongers like Nancy Pelosi make false, slanderous claims that are picked up by "reporters" and "reported" as "news":
Right-wing protester Johnny Benitez from Orange County says he came to Berkeley for peaceful dialogue, but got shouted down by the crowd.
"They still label me as a white supremacist," he said. "I still get death threats. This is a false message."
Benitez. Obviously a white guy name.
It's "fake news," but the leftist hate is all too real.
Fascist Democrat Party thug organizations such as Antifa and By Any Means Necessary (especially violent means) were out in force with hatred for freedom and democracy and homicide in their little roach souls in Berkeley yesterday. A conservative group held a "Rally Against Hate" that was viciously broken up by leftist hate:
Protesters from the poles of the U.S. political spectrum converged on another American city Sunday as violence erupted when left-wing protesters surrounded and attacked at least five right-wing demonstrators in Berkeley
The group of more than 100 hooded protesters, with shields emblazoned with the words "no hate" and waving a flag identifying themselves as anarchists, busted through police lines, avoiding security checks by officers to take away possible weapons.
Several thousand people had congregated for a "Rally Against Hate" in response to the planned right-wing protest that raised concerns of violence and triggered a massive police presence.
Berkeley police chief Andrew Greenwood defended how police handled the protest, saying they made a strategic decision to let the anarchists enter to avoid more violence. […]
Among those assaulted was Joey Gibson, the leader of the Patriot Prayer group, which canceled a Saturday rally and was then prevented from holding a news conference when authorities closed off the public square Gibson planned to use.
After the anarchists spotted Gibson at the Berkeley park, they pepper-sprayed him and chased him out as he backed away with his hands held in the air. Gibson rushed behind a line of police wearing riot gear, who set off a smoke grenade to drive away the anarchists, Fox 40 reported.
But for the most part, it is well-documented, the leftist police under orders of leftist bureaucrats who allowed the "anarchists" to enter stood down and then allowed the anarchists they'd let in to surround, attack, and viciously beat the legally-permitted free-speech demonstrators. Which is another way of saying I belong to a minority that is being systematically institutionally oppressed and I am not only banned from exercising my constitutional rights but am viciously set upon by the modern equivalent of SA Brownshirt stormtrooper thugs while the police who are supposed to protect me stand and root for the Nazis who are beating me "By Any Means Necessary."
Any one who is capable of even briefly entertaining the truth can see the vile hate of the left that was taking place well before Charlottesville and is only building up violent force now.
And so I support President Trump in this, regardless of how awkwardly he is going about it. Primarily because the rabid, whackjob racist craziness of the other side is simply disregarded and ignored and denied. If you want to have a conversation about race, don't claim to be willing to have one until you're willing to acknowledge the damn log in your own damn eyes while you're laying the blame on us. Not when I can detail all the racist crap that I am able to detail below.
Let's talk about "political correctness" and what it is and how it works. I've stated this before. Political correctness is not just a leftist way to make overly-sensitive people feel better. It was designed by early Marxist propagandists in Russia and the left continues to execute the Orwellian tactic today: if you can control words, you can control thought; if you can control thought, you can control actions. "PC" is an enormous, sophisticated and highly coordinated effort by elitist intellectuals to "fundamentally transform" Western culture as we know it by redefining it – by shaping the "acceptable" language people are allowed to use – and thereby dictating the parameters of cultural arguments, such that the people are banned from thinking outside of the artificial box they create for us. And people with incredibly radical agendas have been exploiting this tactic for decades and it has succeeded.
It's kind of like insisting that we call American Indians "native Americans." If I don't qualify as a "native American," then exactly where the hell do I get to be a native of??? I am quite serious here. It is racist to take my own homeland and the land of my birth and my ancestors' birth away from me. I am a native American and I don't apologize for calling myself what I clearly have every right and reason to call myself. My parents were native Americans. My grandparents were native Americans. Some of my ancestors climbed off the boat with the other Pilgrims. Some of my ancestors fought in the Revolutionary War and established this nation. Some of my ancestors fought in the Civil War and supported the Republicans as they defeated a violent, rabid Democratic Party to abolish slavery. But some damn liberal through the prism of communist-manufactured "political correctness" decreed that all white people ought to be racially disqualified from their own country. Not by any reasonable argument, but rather by rhetorical fiat and politically correct guilt-tripping. It's not about me hating American Indians; I love American Indian culture and participate in it and admire it at every opportunity. Rather, it's about giving one group a status that clearly does not belong to that group alone. In the case of minorities that status is "victim" as though no white person has ever been poor, or oppressed, or a target of hate from another racial group. Take me, for example: not only am I a "native American" who has had that status removed from me by rhetorical fiat, but I myself have also been a victim of racism when I was physically and violently attacked by five black men. You want to call American Indians "Original Americans," fine by me. I recognize American Indians were here when my ancestors rowed ashore at Plymouth Rock. But it is a crime of oppression against me to take away my right to be a "native American" when I absolutely AM one. Which according to the left is impossible due to the same rhetorical sleight-of-hand race-baiting demagoguery. And we've had this crap forced down our throats in too many ways too many times over and over again by one party for decades. And finally enough people had enough.
In 2016, did white people – especially including the white people who actually voted for Obama TWICE "racist" or did something else take place? Let me explain "what else" actually happened:
Barack Obama crushed and decimated middle class whites. If a Republican president had done this to black people, it would be proclaimed and vilified by the mainstream media and the Democrat Party as the very worst kind of racist hate. But because it was Democrats and particularly a black Democrat doing it to whites, it was okay. Because we live in a world full of more hypocrisy than the oceans and seas are filled with water. The middle class itself began to disintegrate under and as a direct result of Barack Obama's presidency and his policies. In the 2016 election, white people rose up because they literally began to comprehend their very survival was being threatened by a left that was openly hostile to them. It wasn't "racism" that made even middle class whites who voted for Obama in 2008 do this; it was systematic oppression BY a racist president and a racist party that created the oppression that they voted to free themselves of. It is simply a statement of fact that Barack Obama decimated the white middle class and the white working class (see also here) and THAT is why they rose up to overthrow the party of the race-baiting Oppressor-in-Chief.
Frankly, even black people largely suffered – and suffered in virtually every economic category – under Obama because his socialist Democrat Party policies are failures and have never lived up to the utopian fantasies of the liberals who are incapable of learning from history no matter how many times their "solutions" fail to solve. When the Democrat Party keeps inflicting hurt on the people they claim to care about while demonizing as "racist" the policies that would help the people they claim to care about, you should immediately understand that something is very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine.
When even a white liberal progressive female candidate gets shouted down at a liberal progressive function by people screaming, "Support black women!" you should immediately understand that something very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine.
When the House Minority Leader can slanderously demonize a conservative group as "white supremacist" and literally contribute to a violent counter-protest against that group when it has nothing whatsoever to DO with "white nationalism" and fully seven of its eight speakers are nonwhite, you should immediately understand that something very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine. Similarly, in Boston, an upcoming conservative rally focusing NOT on "race" but on "FREE SPEECH" is being falsely and hatefully labeled as a "white nationalist" event by the political leaders who are literally inciting riot by doing so. The leftwing Boston mayor is publicly saying that the city has to allow free speech no matter how "despicable" the group demanding free speech is. Which is basically code for all his leftist hate groups to "come and punish your enemies." To put it in Obama terms. And to quote some other revealing Obama political maxims: "If they bring a knife, you bring a gun". "Punch back twice as hard." "Get in their face." Obama is on the record as having said all of these things and it was marvelous in Democrats' sight.
How about this one: when a black state senator can openly call for the assassination of the white president of the United States of America and then TWICE refused to apologize because she literally argued that the one she is demanding be murdered is more wrong than the one who calls for that murder, and she is STILL actually in office because every single Democrat refused to rise up and demand her resignation, you should immediately understand that something very wrong and very vile going on within the Democratic Party machine. And for the record, this also tells you how godawful evil-wrong the mainstream media has become: because if it had been a white Republican calling for the assassination of President Obama, every single Republican in office would have instantly had microphones thrust into their faces demanding their reaction. But "race-rage" only flows one way, from Democrats to Republicans. No matter how evil-vile the Democrats truly are. If every single Democrat does not vote to expel Democratic Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal from the Senate, IT IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THAT IS RACIST AND BIGOTED AND HATEFUL AND EVIL. But the way this rigged party system works out, the Democratic Party will probably bribe Chappelle-Nadal to resign "on her own" so they won't have to prove they are racist by refusing to vote her out by offering her some cushy job at a university or some other uber-leftist think tank. She'll be okay until she faces Jesus Christ at the Great White Throne judgment of the wicked, I assure you.
When a hard-core racist group is absolutely NOT challenged by the mainstream media and is even celebrated and endorsed by the Democratic Party and their propaganda wing the media, you should immediately understand that something is very wrong and very vile is going on within the Democratic Party machine and with liberalism. White people have been presented with a list of 10 demands from Black Lives Matter. The very URL is titled "white people." What I want to do is to simply switch the races BLM uses and you tell me if this is "racist" as HELL:
1. Black or brown people, if you don't have any descendants, will your property to a white or Asian family. Preferably one that lives in generational poverty.
2. Black or brown people, if you're inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a white family. You're bound to make that money in some other Obama-privileged way.
3. If you are a developer or realty owner of multi-family housing, build a sustainable complex in a white blighted neighborhood and let white people live in it for free.
4. Black or brown people, if you can afford to downsize, give up the home you own to a white or Asian family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.
5. Black or brown people, if any of the people you intend to leave your property to are racists assholes, change the will, and will your property to a white or Asian family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.
6. Black people, re-budget your monthly so you can donate to white funds for land purchasing.
7. Black people, especially black women (because this is yaw specialty — Nosey Jenny and Meddling Kathy), get a racist fired. Yaw know what the fuck they be saying. You are complicit when you ignore them. Get your boss fired cause they racist too.
8. Backing up No. 7, this should be easy but all those sheetless BLM, Black Panthers, NAACP and Other lil' dick-black men will all be returning to work. Get they ass fired. Call the police even: they look suspicious.
9. OK, backing up No. 8, if any black person at your work, or as you enter in spaces and you overhear a black person praising the actions of BLM from yesterday, first, get a pic. Get their name and more info. Hell, find out where they work — Get Them Fired. But certainly address them, and, if you need to, you got hands: use them.
10. Commit to two things: Fighting black supremacy where and how you can (this doesn't mean taking up knitting, unless you're making scarves for white kids in need), and funding white and Asian people and their work.
Note: ALL I did was reverse the races in the racist hate-screed of Black Lives Matter. The above list is evil, psychotic and frankly demonic racist hate. And it is every bit as evil and psychotic and demonic and racist and hateful when it is examined in the words of Black Lives Matter. Because Black Lives Matter is very clearly a racist hate group every bit as much as the KKK is a racist hate group.
Read this vile racist screed from Affinity Magazine titled "Dear White Parents of Biracial Children: Having Mixed Babies Isn't Enough to Excuse Your Ignorance." The racist left has turned hatred and bitterness and meanness into VIRTUES. And they are turning on THEIR OWN if their own even slightly deviate from their "purity." These angry, hateful, self-righteous liberals are even worse than the Pharisees who organized a mob to crucify Jesus.
Deal with both logs in the eyes of both sides, dammit. But don't accuse me of being a racist because I won't do what you won't lift a finger to do. Because all that does is make you a hypocrite.
When white people are literally being denied the right to speak while "Black Lives Matter" is cherished by the same media that denounces them as "white nationalists," please realize that somebody is guaranteeing and ultimate violent rise.
The ACLU issued a statement withdrawing their support for the free speech rights of white nationalists that breaks with their entire history of fighting for free speech no matter what kind of speech it is. Not that they actually ever truly did that, but now their biased leftist ideology is fully and completely on display. The ACLU has made it crystal clear that it will CONTINUE to protect hate, but only hate from THEIR side. The problem is that "free speech" is a meaningless term if it doesn't apply to all. If one side gets to bring their "free speech" no matter how hateful it is – yes, and load up with weapons prepared for a violent brawl with the groups that legally filed for the permits to demonstrate as the leftists go in just like the jackbooted fascist Brownshirt stormtroopers from the Hitler era to break up the rallies of the opposition – and the ACLU will support one side and not the other, they are no longer for "civil liberties" but for leftwing fascist liberties.
In the last couple of days we have seen incredibly disturbing details as to just how rabid and racially unhinged the left truly is. For instance, during the Charlottesville rioting, ESPN demonstrated such racial stupidity that they actually made at the highest levels the decision to yank an Asian broadcaster because his name happened to be "Robert Lee." And they were mental enough to believe that "Robert Lee, 21st century Asian-American broadcaster = Robert E. Lee, 19th century Confederate general." And then the ESPN president executive actually came out lying about why they had yanked the Asian broadcaster it in direct refutation of their own initial statement that they had in fact done it for racial reasons because of the trivial coincidence of his name and lambasted the people who were trying to tell the truth about this fascist leftist fool network. And then it was the ACLU's turn, posting an innocent image of a child – okay, they were evil because it was a white kid and he had a hated American flag that today's liberals despise so much they refuse to stand an honor – which quickly became demonized as a Nazi image. And the ACLU is so racially depraved and so amoral that they actually apologized for putting up such a despicable image as a white child holding a flag with the caption, "This is the future that ACLU members want." Because apparently ACLU members really want the future of a boot stomping on a human face forever, providing that face is WHITE.
According to the left, THIS is now an image of "hate":
The face of hate is the liberal who is so evil that he sees hate in everything, including the innocent image of a little girl holding the flag of his country even when it's their own side posting that image. You can see her wearing her liberal ACLU shirt. The left is a group of haters that rabidly refuses to tolerate even the tiniest departure from their Orwellian Two Minutes Hate campaign that will go on and on and on for years if necessary until it achieves its hateful agenda. That's what the real face of hate is. And even a beautiful little child cannot escape this kind of hate.
And its violent hate.
Jeremy Beck said something very thought-provoking and historically proven time and time again: "You know, if you keep going further left, eventually you go left enough to get your guns back." The same way they had guns in the Soviet Union. The same way they had guns in China. The same way they had guns in North Korea. The same way they had guns in Cuba. They had guns in Cambodia. And yes, the same way they had guns in Nazi Germany (NAZI = "National SOCIALIST German WORKERS PARTY." It is simply a fact that Nazism was the "far right" only of the extreme, radical LEFT). Oh, the left was all for guns when they were fighting for power, as the ACLU is fine with THEIR side using guns and violence to attack their ideological opponents. But as soon as they seize power, give up your guns! And so the only problem being that they ended up with ALL the guns and liberalism/leftism WILL NECESSARILY end up with ALL the guns EVERY SINGLE TIME. Because "liberalism" is ultimately the rabid determination to dictate all political power and crush and oppress anyone and everyone who stands against their total, dictatorial totalitarian power. And history has proven this fact to be true EVERY SINGLE TIME the left has EVER been able to seize power and the most evil horror in all of human history has systematically resulted from it EVERY SINGLE TIME. And so Nazi Germany embraced leftist gun control confiscations; as did every single communist regime so the people would be powerless which is exactly the reason our founding fathers – who are now all condemned as symbols of hate by the left – demanding the American people have the guaranteed constitutional right to keep and bear arms which the left has tried to take away for decades.
White people are increasingly started to become frightened by this climate of leftist hate. Especially when even the very most innocent child among them is demonized as a hate symbol.
And so when you actually do have "white nationalism," who is to blame for it?
Let me just first point out the fact that liberals say that radical Islamic terrorism – which of course they refuse to link in any way, shape or form to "Islam" because they are true moral idiots – is the result of marginalization and discrimination. So if you keep shutting out a group of people's access and call them evil all the time, then according to liberalism you create the climate of terrorism because if they are denied a voice they will violently lash out. And so as we look at the left and how they have banned or blocked or denied white supremacists from having any voice or any rights, what is going to happen according to their own damn theory of terrorism??? Realize that it's not just leftist-oriented businesses such as Google (whose mantra is "Do no evil" but has regularly participated in the fascist suppression of free speech in China and now in America), and FaceBook, and PayPal, and GoDaddy, and Airbnb, and Uber, and Discord, and GoFundMe, and Spotify, and even the WordPress that I use, but it is elected Democrat mayors and politicians across the country who regularly and routinely label, marginalize and discriminate. It is simply what the left does.
Question; if the left isn't doing absolutely everything it can to "marginalize" and "discriminate' against white nationalists and the KKK and the so-called neo-Nazis, then what the hell are they doing???
So the answer to my question, if you are a liberal, is to look into the damn mirror. Because just by your own view toward Islamic terrorism, YOU caused the attack in Charlottesville according to your own damn analysis by marginalizing the white nationalists and refusing to give them any voice and discriminating against them and labelling them with your hate and intolerance. Compared to a free society where we were all supposed to be given the freedom to speak so we wouldn't resort to violence that you no longer permit. So stop marginalizing and discriminating against these groups. Or at least shut down all the other hate groups on YOUR side. If you want to stop the rise of white nationalism, where white people start standing up and taking back the rights that they forfeited by being intimidated by the constant demagogic and slanderous labels of racism applied to them every single time they said anything in favor of their self-interests the way the leftist groups have loudly done, then stop your racist crap. Stop the "Black Lives Matter" crap. Stop the La Raza (which means "The Race") crap. Stop the Congressional Black Caucus crap. Stop the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People crap. Stop race quotas. Stop racist university acceptance policies that punish white people and Asians because they're the wrong races. Because this flagrant hypocrisy is immoral and it is wrong and it is racist and you are guaranteeing and you are in fact responsible for the White Congressional Caucus and the Nationalist Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People and White Lives Matter and The Race (meaning the white race this time).
This isn't about me being a "racist". This is about me being a "fairist": I just want a fair, honest exchange where everybody is able to look at themselves as well as their opponents. I utterly despise hypocrite liars who constantly impose a different system on me than they apply to themselves. And while no one is immune from that tendency, including myself and people and the groups I support, it is the left that embodies "hypocrisy" today like nothing ever before seen in human history.
One of the fascinating things is how liberals want to blame the United States for slavery and how they want to blame white people for slavery. Both are total lies. The United States had slavery, yes, JUST AS EVERY OTHER DAMN NATION IN THE WORLD HAD SLAVERY. And the more "nonwhite" you got, the more slavery there was. I look up the countries that still have slavery today, and have the most slaves, and sure enough that's basically what I find to this very day. And secondly, black liberals are so full of hate for whites blaming us for slavery, but exactly how did we get all our slaves in the first place? Do you know what we did? We went to Africa and bought them FROM THE BLACK PEOPLE WHO SOLD THEM TO US. Even Obama's dear friend Henry Louis Gates acknowledges that historical fact. For the official historical record, it wasn't a bunch of white people running around the bushes in Africa with big butterfly nets; rather, white people went to the coasts of Africa and simply purchased them. Slavery was GIGANTIC in Africa, because one tribe would fight with another tribe and they would sell the victims they captured from the other tribe into slavery without a hinge of regret. They were reducing the population of their enemies and earning a tidy profit at the same time. We couldn't go to Britain and buy white people as slaves; we couldn't go to Ireland, or to Germany, or to France and buy slaves. No white people sold their own into slavery because Europe was still Christian and that was unheard of. But in Africa, it was a very different thing. So why do you limit your hate to white people when black slavery wouldn't have existed without black people???
Liberalism is the hatred of facts and the rabid hatred of history and truth. Which is why they have to act like Islamic State now and tear down historical artifacts using mob frenzy whenever necessary. And so you can go far and wide on the internet and see them claim the truth is a lie and the lie is their truth. But the fact remains that apart from Africa and Africans, there would have BEEN no "black slavery." Which only makes liberals hate whitey all the more because by screaming their violent hate they don't have to acknowledge the uncomfortable truths they turn their backs on while blaming "the other" for which they themselves bear a giant load of guilt.
If this country is going to survive, we need to stop blaming the past and start looking at what WE are doing right now today.
End the fake news reporting. To only slightly paraphrase the Bible, "There is no righteous reporter, not even one. There is no reporter who understands, there is no reporter who seeks God." I don't care who is demonstrating or what their message is or how much other people don't like it; the nanosecond someone or some people from "the other side" start any kind of violence, THAT SIDE THAT STARTS THE VIOLENCE IS ON THE SIDE OF THE DAMN NAZIS. Report the damn TRUTH. If you actually have any legitimate claim to oppose violence, then oppose the left that is routinely engaging in naked violence as a political tactic every single DAY now.
I'm just going to repeat what Donald Trump said about Charlottesville that applies here: there were bad people on both sides right from the very damn beginning and certainly at Charlottesville as well. The list of violent liberal attacks of leftist mobs against conservatives is mind-blowing. The simple fact is that liberal America has a rather terrible political violence problem. But what we are seeing today is liberals and liberalism being completely blind to the giant logs in their own eyes and fixating on the specks in the eyes of the people they hate. And it's wrong. And one of the primary reasons that black people have so failed to launch in America when other groups of people have done so well is that as a culture they are 1) Democrat and therefore believe evil is good and good is evil; and 2) because they are so mired in bitterness that they refuse to believe that hard work will allow them to improve their situations as the people who come here from all the rest of the world believe.
Martin Luther King, Jr. said that hate begets hate. And liberals are proof of that.
We have a president who got elected in a contentious election, and as a result of his election an entire political party along with an army of the most vicious partisan radical haters declared total war on the president and upon everything that president campaigned upon and was elected to do. Who am I talking about? Guess what? I'm talking about Abraham Lincoln. Because there is a direct damn parallel between what the true party of hate – the Democratic Party which has ALWAYS been the party of hate – did in 1860 and what that same damn party of hate is doing today.
There's a reason we ought to be forgiving and even forgive our enemies. But don't try to explain that to a leftist. Because Obama didn't teach his followers to reach out, but instead to lash out. And we've seen Obama's incredibly toxic effect on this nation as a result. And that hate is now being vindictively poured out on Donald Trump and everyone who voted for him no matter how polarized and divided the left has to break this country in pieces to do so. Because the demonic identity politics of separating people into groups and then pitting those groups against each other to create a fifty-percent-plus-one-vote coalition is at the heart of their toxic agenda.
Jesus told us that in the last days, race would rise against race. And it is very obvious that the day that Jesus described in the very end times is upon us. And in the United States of America, it will be because of and as a direct reaction to the Democratic Party's racist exploitation of race as a cynical means of imposing socialist, fascist power. And please don't be so stupid as to fail to understand that in order to be a "fascist," one first has to be a "socialist."
Interestingly – when you look at all the rabid, frothing hype this issue is getting by the press relative to its actual impact on society by any meaningful measure outside the fake news one created by the media – this "rise" of white nationalists is actually kind of …. ho hum when you actually look at the numbers. I had heard reported that there are fewer than 100,000 white nationalists in America – versus a national population of 325 million meaning that white nationalists represent an incredibly trivial .03 percent of the population. And yet with all the frothing media hysteria you would think it was some whopping percentage of whites goose-stepping with Nazi salutes to the cadence of Donald Trump ranting in German. I looked at what the left is saying about the actual numbers of white nationalists in America, and the numbers are so paltry as to be meaningless. I mean, the only firm number they could provide was "between 5,000 and 8,000 members nationwide." But then you see the project of the entire left wing apparatus – the Democratic Party, the media, etc. – as they then proceed to state:
Although the members of these groups may be especially vocal, the presence of racism in the U.S. cannot be quantified strictly by data. Nearly 63 million people voted for Trump, which means those voters were willing to accept and tolerate a racist, misogynist, xenophobe for a president, emboldening the small minority of neo-Nazis among them.
So in other words a "white nationalist" is to be defined as "anybody who voted for the current president of the United States."
Howard Dean, former Democratic governor, former Democratic Party presidential candidate, former DNC chairman, says, "If you vote Republican in 2018, you're voting for racism."
Well, there's a nice, polite invitation to a respectful exchange of ideas.
Oh, I got that wrong, didn't I? That's naked race-baiting hatred for half of the nation. The Democratic Party is built on hate just as it has always BEEN built on hate.
So this "rise" has hardly happened yet in any kind of actual fact. But the left and the mainstream media that serve as the left's propaganda arm rather desperately need a boogeyman. Even if that boogeyman is virtually nonexistent. And the reason they need a bogeyman is the same reason that Islamic radicalism needs the bogeyman of the Great Satan and Little Satan and North Korea needs the bogeyman of the United States: because in all three cases, they have nothing to offer but lies, fear and hate. And they need some kind of artificial narrative to disconnect people's brains from being capable of receiving reality.
I am reminded of Obama dismissing terrorism with the left and the Democratic establishment completely behind him saying "that terrorism takes far fewer lives in America than handguns, car accidents, and falls in bathtubs do." Notwithstanding the fact that most bathtub makers aren't trying to kill people by driving large bathtubs into crowds. Notwithstanding the fact that intentional violence motivated by hatred does something to the psyche of human beings that slipping in bathtubs does not do. But you simply need to realize the soul of the left yawns with boredom at the fact that tens of thousands of people are being murdered by terrorists every year and that under Obama deaths by terrorism rose by one-thousand, nine-hundred percent. That revealing statement was and remains an incredibly stupid and morally wicked statement that dismisses the victims and the virulent hate that seethes with the desire to murder every single human being possible. But if one actually compares the victims of white nationalism to the victims of Islamic terrorism, it becomes laughably obvious that the only rational response to the left over its "white nationalist" hysteria is to say, "You fools desperately need to get some kind of clue."
But again, the left is a pathologically evil ideology and such ideologies need bogeymen to distract people from THEIR OWN vile agenda. And if they don't actually have one, they know how to fake news one. I mean make one.
Being a Christian first and a conservative out of my Christian worldview, I am compelled by my love of and for the truth. Which means I am capable of doing something no liberal is capable of doing: I am capable of comprehending reality. Therefore, the moment I heard that somebody drove a car into a crowd at the protest and counter-protest in Charlottesville – without knowing which side had drove the car into which – I knew that it was a TERRORIST ACT. And because no, I am NOT a rabid ideologue the way too many leftists are, when I discovered that the car was driven by a white nationalist into a crowd of leftist protestors, I didn't readjust my awareness of that fact to conform to my ideology. I still recognize that the white nationalist who drove the car into a crowd was a terrorist and ought to be treated like one.
But I now compare that, and compare Obama's response to similar terrorist attacks and the left's response to his statements to the frankly insane and rabid frothing hysteria generated by Trump's frankly LESS provocative statement. I could cite DOZENS of examples, but due to time and space I'll only cite two, with one being close to the beginning of Obama's degenerate presidency and one occurring near the end of his eight years of national cancer. Think of Major Nidal Hassan. Think of the fact that the guy had business cards identifying himself as a "Soldier of Allah." Think of how he gunned down 13 (actually 14, as one victim was the unborn baby of another shooting victim) and wounded 31 while screaming "Allahu Akbar!!!" Think of how six months prior to his attack, he had already come to the attention of law enforcement officials due to his terrorist internet postings and think of the fact that he was in email contact with one of the worst al Qaeda recruiters. Then think of the fact that Obama abjectly refused to acknowledge that it was a terrorist attack and particularly a terrorist attack inspired by rabid Islamic theology. Think of the fact that the soldiers who were killed and wounded in that terrorist attack were systematically denied Purple Heart benefits for nearly the entire degenerate cancer of the Obama presidency and the abject refusal from Obama to treat this mass shooting as an Islam-inspired terrorist attack.
Here's the other one near the end of Obama's presidency, to document that even after eight years, this rabid fool was STILL a fool but STILL supported by the Party of Rabid Fools: a black hater armed with the ideology of racist anti-white hate at a "Black Lives Matter" – an obviously racist statement that white lives DON'T matter – systematically executed five police officers intent on murdering WHITE cops. In the aftermath of the Dallas massacre did Obama ONCE take on black hate? Not one the life of your little roach-soul, Democrat: Obama instead went to the farthest leftist demagoguery and blamed the 2nd Amendment for the massacre. And the Democratic Party and the leftists and the mainstream media cheered that Obama refused to acknowledge the hate that characterized their ideological bowel movement.
Consider the direct comparisons:
In July of 2016, an avowed black nationalist murdered five police officers during a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Dallas, Texas. The act of violence was well-planned and was motivated entirely by the hate-filled ideology of the shooter, Micah Xavier Johnson.
With several officers dead by the hand of a committed black nationalist, one might think the Obama administration may have considered the assassinations domestic terror and launched an investigation into groups associated with this ideology.
Barack Obama condemned the shootings, but he did not call out or even allude to Johnson's hateful views. He did, however, blame "powerful weapons" for the violence.
In her statement on the shooting, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch exploited the tragedy to push for gun control and praise the cause of Black Lives Matter. No mention of Johnson's ideology or "hate" in was made in her statement, but she did manage to directly name multiple cases of police-involved shootings — all after cops were the ones murdered.
Trump and his administration were urged to speak strongly against the alt-right on the presumption that there would further violence if none was taken.
In the case of the Dallas shooting, there was further violence from black nationalists following the attack. In the same month, three officers were gunned down in Baton Rouge, Louisiana by an adherent to this radical ideology. (RELATED: Baton Rouge Shooter Gavin Eugene Long Was Nation Of Islam Member, Railed Against 'Crackers' On YouTube Channel)
In a less violent case that also occurred in July of 2016, several churches in the area of St. Louis, Missouri, were vandalized and graffitied with rhetoric associated with black nationalism.
Once again, no demands for the Obama administration to condemn these actions — quite unlike how Trump is browbeaten to do so any whiff of extremism from the Right.
Let me just put it this way: Democrats love to label Republicans as the KKK, in spite of the historical FACT that the Klu Klux Klan was the invention of DEMOCRATS that had the mission of terrorizing blacks and WHITE REPUBLICANS. It is and always has been DEMOCRATS who are the true KKK, but let me provide another 3-letter label for Democrats that is even more descriptive of the party's actual platform and ultimate destiny: HHH. And "HHH" stands for "Hellbound Hateful Hypocrites."
It simply stands as a documented fact of history that Democrats and liberals are profound, pathological hypocrites.
Understand the demon-possessed hypocrisy of every single liberal in America as they scream that Donald Trump do something that their own Messiah of Hate refused to do even ONCE for eight demoniac years. Had Donald Trump blamed Dodge Challengers for the attack, he would have been no different – and no more ideologically despicable and no more cowardly – than Barack Hussein Obama.
So when Donald Trump said that there were bad people on BOTH sides – having already gone far enough to acknowledge that there was evil in the white nationalist side after eight years of Barack Obama refusing to acknowledge that there was even anything called "black nationalism" or "leftist hate groups" it amounts to an appalling act of outrageous moral hypocrisy that the left that steadfastly ignores the giant log in its own eyes suddenly became morally indignant at Donald Trump's refusal to go farther than a thousand miles further than Obama ever went.
I think of the left, the Democratic Party that is the political representation of the left, the mainstream media that is the propaganda mouthpiece for the left, the postmodernist denial of truth that is the philosophy of the left and the militant atheism that is the religious expression of the left. I think of how the left framed the "science" of evolution: there IS no God and can BE no God, and therefore evolution is the only "reasonable" or acceptable way to understand our origins. If you merely were open to the logical possibility that there COULD be a Creator God, and then considered the impossible complexity of the universe and the impossibility of chance to account for that universe, you would be compelled to come to a vastly different conclusion based on the evidence and to reality. But instead the left simply ruled out a priori even the possibility of a Creator. And although evolution is logical nonsense, logical nonsense prevailed because its rival explanation was denied any place in the debate.
In the same way, we have the left "defining" racism as "an unequal power structure." And thereby claiming that since blacks have no power, it is "impossible" for blacks to exhibit racism. When what racism very clearly is to anyone who is NOT a fool is the hostility or distrust toward members of a given race as a group simply because of their race.
And for the official record, one very much CAN hate one's own race. Adolf Hitler's father was half Jewish. Adolf Hitler ordered his father's birthplace complete with graves and birth registries to be forcibly evacuated and turned it into an artillery practice site to obliterate proof of his Jewishness. DNA tests from known members of Hitler's family prove it. When Hitler hated Jews, he hated his own illegitimate genealogy. In the same manner Karl Marx was a self-hating Jew who was the descendant of a long line of rabbis. The Jerusalem Post piece gets it wrong when its writer claims he converted to Christianity: he was a philosophical materialist and an atheist and his worldview was purely atheistic and his statement about religion being the opiate of the masses is ample proof of this fact. Yet this Jewish man wrote some incredibly hateful things about his own race. And the author of the Jerusalem Post piece is entirely correct when he states that "The tradition of self-hatred was sustained by Jewish communists." Which is to say that being a leftist and despising one's own race and one's own past goes hand-in-glove.
I think of all these white liberals, consumed by the guilt that they had been indoctrinated to believe were pathological to their own race. And pathetically attempting to disavow the racism that they themselves claim was literally part of their own DNA. Which is probably why liberalism actually believes that owe can be physically and biologically be born a man but somehow actually be a woman with this poor, tortured soul somehow being a victim of his own DNA with that aforementioned DNA somehow being a liar and not representing who they truly are. And so as ideologically indoctrinated liberals they turn on their own race and actually congratulate themselves for it to the praise and adoration of the echo chamber cocoon they live inside of.
And so in addition to or as a result of hating themselves, their ancestors, their own DNA, the left despise the cultural roots that created that which they hate: and so they must destroy all taint of the culture they so despise. And yes, it is a pathological component of liberal/leftist ideology. And so we go back to the Bolsheviks that the modern left today closely resembles in myriad ways:
In surveying the devastation of art wrought by the [Bolshevik] Revolution, a commission for artistic preservation, a commission for artistic preservation, headed by the noted art historian Igor Grabar and working closely with the Bolshevik government, reported a wave of destruction and burning in the summer of 1918 in which masses of art treasures perished or were stolen. The Revolution and the Civil War, said the report, had resulted in "manor houses reduced to dust, slashed paintings, demolished statues, gutted palaces, and cathedrals destroyed by shells." Some of this was of course the offshoot of combat, but most of it was vandalism–the willful destruction or defacement of beautiful objects. The beauty of these objects, lamented the commission, was not appreciated by the peasants who saw in "pictures, sculptures, antique furniture, and musical instruments not works of spiritual value but only characteristic features of landlord life–a life alien to them." [pg. 5, Bolshevik Culture: Experiment and Order in the Russian Revolution, 1989, edited by Abbott Gleason, Peter Kenez, Richard Stites]
In the very same way Islamic State terrorists – whose vile ideology was at best benignly ignored and at worst actually protected by Barack Obama – destroyed all vestiges of any and every culture they did not like as a matter of routine. And those who love history shocked and horrified by the ISIS destruction of Palmyra.
But where was the outrage over a liberal/leftist mob tearing down and then destroying a statue in Durham, North Carolina??? Where was the mainstream media outrage over this act of anarchy???
We have leftists saying things like:
"It's going to happen," promised Dyer, an artist. "This is a beautiful equestrian statue, and I don't want to be like the Taliban or the Bolsheviks, but this has got to go. If the city does not move it, we will. Lickity-split."
Which amounts to, "I don't want to be like the Taliban or like the Bolsheviks, but what the hell, I am like them, so I'll do the same thing and by destroying history actually repeat the very ugliest elements of history because I'm a liberal and that's what I do.
An overwhelming majority of Americans want the Confederate statues to remain as objects of history to be contemplated, or just as objects of Southern cultural pride to be respected. But liberalism is fascism, and fascism must violently tear down whatever it hates regardless of whether it is "lawful" or popularly supported or not. They have learned like all vile ideologies that with enough violence and enough hateful and rabid resistance, they will ultimately triumph as an apathetic culture shrugs and says, "whatever."
We live in a society where in city after city, the police have become political pawns, standing by while liberals and leftists violently confront any and all conservatives from not only demonstrating according to their 1st Amendment Constitutional rights, but simply having the right to SPEAK. And this is happening because police at this point understand that the left will literally MURDER THEM if they stand up to the mobs. It happened in Baltimore with the mayor literally saying, "We gave them space to destroy." It happened in Berkeley, with video documenting police standing down while leftist mobs violently attacked people and property they didn't like. Again, with the liberal mayor of Berkeley ordering police to stand down so conservatives could be violently attacked. And yes, the same thing happened once again in Charlottesville, a liberal bastion whose mayor was among the very first in the nation to declare war on Trump and all those who supported him: police clearly stood down while the situation grew out of control, with even the ACLU pointing out the liberal mayor and the liberal governor were to blame for the ensuing violence that resulted. The streets were not barricaded as per the agreement with the city of Charlottesville. The violent so-called Antifa were not penned in as per the agreement with the Charlottesville Police Department. Rather, the violent leftists were permitted to freely roam the streets and block the entrance to Lee Park that the so-called "far right" group had a legally permitted right to march to. And so what happened as a result with even the ACLU acknowledging the fact?
WASHINGTON – In the wake of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, which left one dead and at least 38 injured, many members of the national media were quick to blame the "Unite the Right" rally attendees for the outbreak of street warfare between "alt-right" and "alt-left" protesters.
But according to the ACLU and reporters covering the rally, the violence escalated due to what many believe was an intentional lack of police oversight, with the blame aimed squarely at Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe.
"The police actually allowed us to square off against each other," one counter-protester told CNN. "There were fights, and the police were standing a block away the entire time. It's almost as if they wanted us to fight each other."
I've heard all kinds of reports that the "right-wing" protesters showed up armed. But have you heard this that I saw in the Los Angeles Times once and ONLY once in the ocean of reports of armed right-wing groups?
Redneck Revolt, an armed leftist group that brought rifles to Justice Park, one of the spots where anti-racist groups had gathered.
What do you call it when the mainstream media selectively reports one fact about one side that they don't like but refuses to report the same fact about their own side? We call this "bias."
Was the left violent? Or was only the "far right" violent? Let's see what a University of Virginia student named Isabella Ciambotti had to say about what she saw to decide whether Donald Trump was right to say that there were bad people on both sides.
I was on Market Street around 11:30 a.m. when a counterprotester ripped a newspaper stand off the sidewalk and threw it at alt-right protesters. I saw another man from the white supremacist crowd being chased and beaten. People were hitting him with their signs. A much older man, also with the alt-right group, got pushed to the ground in the commotion. Someone raised a stick over his head and beat the man with it, and that's when I screamed and ran over with several other strangers to help him to his feet.
Ah, so what? "Isabella Ciambotti" is a white Anglo-Saxon name if I ever heard one. And I have to say for the sake of ignorant liberals that I am being facetious. Because no, it isn't.
When did the ugly car-ramming incident occur?
The crash occurred approximately two hours after clashes in which hundreds of people scramed, chanted, threw punches, hurled water bottles and unleashed chemical sprays on each other ahead of the scheduled noon demonstration.
It occurred AFTER scenes just like this one:
I mean, with due respect, the evil man has a flag; the morally sublime "anti-protester" has a freaking incendiary device to peacefully burn the evil man armed with the flag.
One side had a lawful permit to demonstrate. The other side showed up armed to the teeth and ready to fight the side with the lawful permit whether the law permitted them to demonstrate or not. Because the true fascist cannot abide anything that in any way disagrees with it. You have to have the morally sublime SA stormtrooper with his flame thrower to burn out all heresy.
But what does the hater do? He blames his victims for his own hate. And so even though it is beyond obvious that it was HIS actions that caused this violence to escalate so out of control – reporters on the ground at the time reported that the police were actually funneling the white nationalists directly into the crowd of anti-protesters rather than keeping them separated from each other as common sense would dictate – he blames who? Trump, of course.
Donald Trump said another entirely true fact other than the entirely true fact that yes, bad people showed up on both sides, both sides came ready for a fight, the city of Charlottesville and its leftist mayor were responsible for the violence getting so out-of-control that something truly horrible was GUARANTEED to happen. He also asked the simple question as to when the left will be satisfied by its destruction of anything and everything that they don't like and their many-times demonstrated willingness to use violence to do it.
We've been seeing this hate from liberals all along. We saw it a few months ago when a liberal Democrat with an assault rifle showed up at the Republican congressional baseball practice, verified that it was the Republicans on the field, and then opened fire. And the article I just linked to again shows the blatant, rabid hypocrisy of the Democratic Party and of the media because in the aftermath of that political violence, Democrats did NOT acknowledge the hate and the evil on their side; they just blamed Republicans and Republican policies.
So other than being a hypocrite, what reason do you have for demanding Donald Trump single out groups in any way, shape or form associated with him (mostly by liberal press fake news accounts) when you yourselves refused to single out YOUR hate groups and the hate on your OWN side???
There have been vicious, bloody attacks of Trump's supporters by leftist hate groups. At San Jose, where the mayor was a Black Lives Matter supporter who had the police stand down while the rights and freedoms of conservatives were systematically violently denied. Go to Berkeley, where a professor used a bike lock on the head of a Trump supporter and another Trump supporter was beaten in the head by a liberal using his skateboard. The media coverage tried to frame their narrative in "Trumpian terms," telling us that "both sides" were involved in the fighting. But it was liberals violently attacking conservatives. Conservatives were beaten and bloodied at Berkeley. When you watch the video you hear the audio the black-armored fascist thugs who call themselves "Antifa" for the euphemistic title of "Anti-Fascist" viciously surround and beat conservatives while shouting "Beat the fascist!" And look at the pictures below of white Trump supporters afterward.
In all of these many cases, in these liberal cities, we have the vivid reminder of black protestors being attacked while the racist police stood and watched. Only now the racist police are political pawns standing by while liberals violently attack conservatives.
This leftist violence has been going on for a good year. It is because of that leftist violence that I became a Trump supporter in the first place, as I wrote about:
Democrats Truly Are Nazis, Or How The Left Actually Started Turning Me Into A Trump Supporter.
The Choice Is Now Clear, America: It's Donald Trump Or It's NAZISM. The Democrat Party Is THE Party Of Fascist, Nazi Thugs
The Nazis Are Already At It AGAIN: In These Last Days Before The Beast, Democrats are Sons And Daughters Of Hell, Pure And Simple
Democrats Are More 'NAZI' Today Than Actual NAZIS As Vicious Democrat Violence CONSTANTLY Physically Attacks Free Speech
Documented Fact: Obama And Clinton ORGANIZED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICANS Who Support Trump Through Party Roaches
Another Day, Another VIOLENT RIOT By Proto-Nazi DEMOCRATS
This crap has been going on not just during and following the Trump election victory, but for years of Obama. Before the vicious riots of Black Lives Matter where police officers were fair fame for assassination, it was the vile Occupy Movement. It's been the left organizing and exploiting violence all along. We have a Democrat Party machine operative who was literally caught on video organizing political violence against conservatives visiting the Obama White House 342 times.
Don't tell me that the left hasn't been organizing violently.
President Trump said:
"What about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say, alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt? Let me ask you this. What about the fact that they came charging with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs, do they have any problem? I think they do. So as far as I'm concerned, that was a horrible, horrible day," Trump said.
But Donald Trump states an obvious FACT and the media goes nuts with hate. It's an amazing thing.
The left is now tearing down the history of the republic. Gleefully using violence to do it. In North Caroline in broad freaking daylight, liberals tore down a Confederate statue right in front of a government building with no one arrested for vandalism or for anything else.
So whose feeling marginalized and discriminated against right now???
Liberals who are utterly lawless defaced the Lincoln Monument with graffiti writing, "Fuck law." Because as I have documented they are utterly lawless and brazenly defy the law everywhere at every turn.
In Chicago, a Lincoln statue was defaced and burned by the left. A liberal said "Fuck Abe Lincoln."
This is a trend and it wasn't just Trump predicting that the left wouldn't stop at Confederate monuments. They have a history-defacing agenda.
Trump argued "what's next? Washington and Jefferson? They owned slaves." And yes, they are on the left's hit list. The left's hate list.
"Is it George Washington next week and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You have to ask yourself where does it stop?" Trump said.
He continued, "George Washington was a slave owner. So will George Washington lose his status? Are we gonna take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? Do you like him, because he was a major slave owner. Are we gonna take down his statue? So it's fine. You're changing history, you're changing culture and I'm not talking about the neo-nationalists or the neo-Nazis because they should be condemned totally. But you had people in that group other than neo-Nazis, other than white nationalists, ok? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."
The mainstream media falsely and dishonestly claimed that, no, the left was ONLY going after the hated Confederate memorials. But that was a fake news LIE as I have already documented above.
There is a REASON that Lincoln – who is of course hated for it by the left now – demanded mercy and tolerance for the Confederacy that he gave his life to defeat: and the reason is that the damn war had to end. And doing what the left is viciously and hatefully doing to us today in their self-denying fascist intolerance is the exact opposite of what Lincoln realized needed to be done to end the Civil War. Which interestingly was started by Democrats after Republican Lincoln was elected. Because the same party platform premise that states that we have a right to declare as nonhuman babies and murder them was the identical same party platform premise that declared that people had a right to declare as nonhuman blacks and force them into bondage. The moral arguments justifying both are identical, and it is simply true that the Democrat Party always has been the party of hate, is today the party of hate, and always will BE the party of hate.
And so no, they WON'T stop. They have an agenda to abolish the Constitution and first they have to demolish the symbols upholding it. Destroy Thomas Jefferson and you destroy the Constitution that he participated in writing. Take away George Washington and you not only destroy the Constitution that he served as president of the committee including Jefferson who wrote the Constitution, you destroy the Father of our Country and therefore you take away the foundation for the nation he founded.
And now the left will be finally free to impose their own country over the one they have hated since even before the founder of the ACLU declared, "Communism is the goal" back in 1920.
It is true and it's been true for a long time: if people had known what Barack Obama's real agenda was, they never would have elected him. So he lied and the media colluded in helping him get away with his lie. Obama intentionally presented himself as "a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views." He was never honest. We now know he lied like hell when he said he believed "as a Christian" that marriage was between one man and one woman. His own chief political strategist has declared that Obama lied "for political reasons." We also know that Obama lied like hell to pimp ObamaCare by repeatedly declaring obvious lies such as "If you like your plan, you'll be able to keep your plan and if you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor." Obama was never honest with the America people. He lied to get himself in office and he lied again in 2012 to stay in office.
It's illuminating to hear a self-acknowledged liberal political expert declare that no, Obama would NOT have defeated Trump if he had been able to run again a third time as Obama also falsely declared. Too many people whom he had let down were beyond fed up with his lies.
So you just watch. The left has an agenda that they won't tell you about until after it is too late to stop it. But we already can see it coming. Prominent black liberal Al Sharpton is already calling for George Washington and Thomas Jefferson to go. And he did it right after Trump predicted that was coming next. The Jefferson Memorial should come down. And so the Constitution will stand on what? Wishful thinking? And we can see now why the left so despises the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Constitution will have its feet firmly planted in mid-air the day before it is deemed by the left to stand for nothing and ought to be abolished just like all the other things these fascists despise.
Did you know that New York is named after a notorious slave trader? Shall we now change the name? Maybe call it Roachville to name it after its present inhabitants? And then there's our capitol city, Washington D.C. named after George Washington. We used to think it was the "Redskins" part of "Washington Redskins" that was supposed to be offensive; but the left was already planning to make the "Washington" part offensive, too.
If you want to stop the hate, you've simply got to stop the Democrats. They truly hate America. They hate the Judeo-Christianity that forged the American worldview. They hate the people who fought to make our constitutional democratic republic a reality versus tyranny. They despise the nation that defeated Nazi and Imperial Japanese fascism. They hate the country that stopped the cancerous spread of communism and successfully defeated the communist Soviet Union. They want to replace it with something between the French Reign of Terror of the 18th century, the Stalinism that characterized much of the 20th, Maoism, the failed socialist state of Venezuela and the religion of Kim Jong Unism. They hate our military that prevents these and other ideologies of hate from threatening us; they hate our small businesses that create the overwhelming majority of our jobs and instead favor the mega-corporations because they can more easily regulate them and make them conform to their ideologies.
This isn't even about racism in terms of the agenda Democrats have. They have ALWAYS been the party of racism on one hand. We go back to the Civil War that Democrats viciously fought to keep blacks in bondage, then we think about the vicious postwar years after the Civil War when Democrats started the Klu Klux Klan to terrorize blacks and white Republicans as a means to continue to impose their brand of power in the South. We think about the Jim Crow laws that Democrat-appointed justices decreed. Then we get to the 20th century when Woodrow Wilson re-imposed the segregation that Republicans had banned; and from there we got to FDR segregating the labor unions to keep black people out. We get to the 1924 Democratic National Convention otherwise known as "Klanbake" because it was utterly dominated by the Klan and the racist Klan agenda. We get to the racist Democrat governor Orval E. Faubus. At this point we're a full century after the Civil War, and ONE racist party is still as hard-core racist as ever and the other party is still fighting them (Republican President Eisenhower imposed the right of black children to attend public schools over the Democrats cries of rabid hate).
The Democratic Party isn't a party that suddenly changed it's spots. It's a party that discovered a new way to own and dominate black people.
I stand against hate and violence. Which is why I am a Judeo-Christian and follower of Jesus the Prince of Peace and which is why I vote for the Party of Lincoln that was just defaced by the Party of Hate.
Tags:Berkeley, Charlottesville, counter-protesters, free speech, intolerance, party of hate, Patriot Prayer Rally, pro-life, white natonalists
Posted in abortion, Barack Obama, Conservative Issues, Democrats, fascism, founding fathers, history, Media, morality, Nancy Pelosi, Politics, race, Religion and Culture, terrorism | 2 Comments »
Amazing: Liberals Show They Are Even MORE Intolerant And Violent Than Neo-Nazis
This is a really amazing story. As loathsome as Neo-Nazis are, and as hateful as they are, they are actually surpassed by garden variety American liberals.
Do you remember mostly Hispanic protesters marching to demand amnesty for illegal immigrants (and also see here)? Well, Neo-Nazis think they have a right to protest too. And, of course, American liberals thought that Neo-Nazis had every right to march when they were marching through a town filled with Jewish death camp survivors.
The same First Amendment free speech rights that gave the one group the right to protest give the other group the right to protest, too. At least, that has always been how it was supposed to work. And that was what leftist protesters proclaimed when they were out protesting a message that many others didn't like.
Not that liberals give a damn about genuine fundamental rights that apply equally to all citizens. They want total power and total control, and to hell with anyone who opposes any part of their agenda. They launch protest after protest until they gain power, and then they move to squelch the right to protest.
The thing I want to emphasize today is – when we consider Neo-Nazis and American liberals qua protesters – which side is actually more fundamentally intolerant and reactionary?
Apr 17, 2010 11:45 pm US/Eastern
Neo-Nazis, Counter-Demonstrators Square Off In LA
White Supremacists' Rally Against Immigration Meets Resistance From Hundreds Of Demonstrators
LOS ANGELES (AP)
Police block an angry crowd of counter-protesters after the neo-Nazi group, The American National Socialist Movement, held a rally in front of the Los Angeles City Hall, on April 17, 2010.
Let me interrupt this article with a very important message:
Note that this isn't the right wing versus the left wing. This is, rather, the left wing versus another group of the left wing. You might say that it is the right wing of the extreme left versus the left wing of the extreme left.
I would also point out that Nazism is and always HAS BEEN a leftwing movement. The primary difference between Nazis (i.e., the "National Socialist German Workers Party") and Marxists (e.g., the "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics") was that the former group wanted socialism in a nationalist manner, and the latter wanted socialism in an internationalist manner.
The Marxists said, "Workers of the world unite!", which was just what Andy Stern of the SEIU – who visited Barack Obama in the White House more than ANYONE – said.
Which is to say that, currently, Marxism is the form of radical socialism most in vogue with the American left. It is the form of socialism that the current occupant of the White House clearly favors.
The last thing I'd point out is that the Neo-Nazis of "The American National Socialist Movement" want socialism for white nationalist Aryans; conservatives don't want socialism for ANYBODY in America. We want the socialism that the Nazis, fascists, Marxist and communists wanted the hell out.
Sorry for interrupting. Let's continue.
A white supremacist group rallied against illegal immigration in downtown Los Angeles Saturday as hundreds of counter-protestors gathered to shout them down in a tense standoff that included several arrests, thrown rocks and police in riot gear.
Oops. Have to stop again. And not just to point out that the Associated Press should have people who at least know how to spell "protesters" to write about protests.
Are the Neo-Nazis a white supremacist group? Of course they are; only a fool would argue that they aren't. Then again, there ARE a great many fools in the country. So, yeah, while many of these Neo-Nazis would deny being "white supremacists" and pontificate and filibuster about other issues ad nauseum, let's just agree that they are white supremacists. But what about the other side?
What we have on the other side are "Latino supremacists." There's the powerful Latino group "La Raza," which means "the race." Can you even imagine how a racial group that calls itself "The Race" isn't racist? There's the term "reconquista" being dragged out again, which means "reconquest" of Southwestern America by Mexicans." There's thousands of Mexican protesters marching on American soil and demanding rights and privileges and concessions be granted to them by "white" Americans. Among other things, they argue that the Mexican government has a right to diligently protect ITS southern boarder from illegal immigrants, but that the American government has no right to similarly protect ITS southern boarder from illegal immigrants. They argue that Mexico and other Latin American countries have a right to be sovereign nations, but that America must become an "open borders" non-country. There's the waving the Mexican flag above an American flag which they hang upside down in mockery.
I don't mind for a second the media calling Neo-Nazis "white supremacists." Just be honest and call BOTH SIDES what they are.
And let's also realize that the theme of one group of leftists opposing another comes up again. The so-called "pro-immigration" events were organized by COMMUNISTS.
Sorry to interrupt again. Moving on:
Police officers stood between the white supremacists and counter-demonstrators on the south lawn of Los Angeles' City Hall, where about 50 members of the National Socialist Movement waved American flags and swastika banners for about an hour.
The white supremacists, many of them wearing flack helmets and black military fatigue uniforms, shouted "Sieg Heil" before each of their speakers took the podium to taunt counter-protestors with racial, anti-Semitic and misogynistic epithets.
"We will meet you head on," one of the white supremacists, whose name could not be made out over the fuzzy public address system, warned the crowd from behind several phalanxes of police in riot gear.
Members of the Detroit-based group said they picked the location for their rally because of Los Angeles' large immigrant population. They accused some of the immigrants of stealing jobs and committing crimes.
Group members also said they were reacting to the recent number of street marches across the country encouraging legislators to enact reform that includes amnesty for some illegal immigrants.
Oh, oh. Have to stop again. Just long enough to point out that all the pro-immigration and pro-amnesty street marches are apparently fine. It's just the any street march that in any way opposes the leftwing agenda that must be attacked and vilified. Whether it's Neo-Nazis advancing their favorite form of socialism or whether it's little old ladies who want to advocate limited government.
Moving on.
National Socialist Movement regional director Jeffrey Russell Hall announced that the group would begin backing political candidates who agreed with their anti-immigrant message.
But much of the white supremacists' words were drowned out by such chants as "Hey hey, ho ho, Nazi scum have got to go" from the larger crowd of about 500 counter-protestors who held signs that read "Nazis: Get Out of Los Angeles" and "Racists Are Ignorant."
There was a brief flare-up of violence before the speakers arrived. A shirtless man was seen being escorted to safety behind police lines by a plainclothes officer as counter-protesters punched and grabbed at him. Blood could be seen at the base of the man's neck.
National Lawyers Guild executive director James Lafferty, who attended both as a legal observer and counter-protestor, said he saw the man get into a fight with crowd members who saw his Nazi lightning bolt tattoos.
Police Commander David Doan said a second man who crowd members believed was sympathetic with the white supremacists was also assaulted during the rally. Both men were treated for minor injuries at a hospital and released.
As the rally ended, counter-protestors hurled rocks, branches and other items over the police line and into a parking lot where the white supremacists' had left their cars.
Some members of the group had trouble starting a black Ford Mustang and attempted to hook up jumper cables to their engine. They protected themselves from the flying debris by holding up swastika-emblazoned shields.
The white supremacists eventually gave up and pushed their car away so they could jump-start it out of range of the projectiles.
Doan said three or four counter-protestors were arrested for throwing items.
Yes, that's right. The group that peacefully protested, the group that followed the rules, was the Neo-Nazis. The group that was violent and intolerant were the liberals.
This sentence is particularly heartbreaking:
"They protected themselves from the flying debris by holding up swastika-emblazoned shields."
Can you even imagine that swastikas actually became the superior moral symbol during the day in that it was employed as a protective shield against a group who was using employing a violent symbol of rocks designed to attack and create injury?
Who ever would have thought that there was a group more loathsome than Neo-Nazis? Personally, I never would have dreamed such a thing could ever happen in America.
But it happened. And it happened even as peaceful Tea Party protesters are routinely targeted as somehow being tied to "violence."
Tags:American National Socialist Movement, amnesty, Andy Stern, communists, counter-protesters, First Amdendment, free speech, Hispanics, illegal immigration, immigration, La Raza, leftwing, liberals, Los Angeles, Marxist, Mexican flags, Mexicans, nationalists, Nazis, Nazism, Neo-Nazis, protest, protesters, racist, reconquista, rocks, Seig Heil, socialism, socialist, swastika, Tea Party, the race, violence, white supremacist, workers of the world unite
Posted in Conservative Issues, fascism, illegal immigration, Media, Politics, race, socialism | 6 Comments »