A diastereoselective approach to axially chiral biaryls via electrochemically enabled cyclization cascade
Hong Yan1,
Zhong-Yi Mao1,
Zhong-Wei Hou1,
Jinshuai Song2 and
Hai-Chao Xu1
Hong Yan
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, iChEM and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, People's Republic of China
All articles from this author
Zhong-Yi Mao
Zhong-Wei Hou
Jinshuai Song
College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, People's Republic of China
Hai-Chao Xu
1State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, iChEM and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, People's Republic of China
2College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, People's Republic of China
This article is part of the thematic issue "Reactive intermediates part I: radicals".
Guest Editor: T. P. Yoon
Received 03 Jan 2019, Accepted 16 Mar 2019, Published 28 Mar 2019
A diastereoselective approach to axially chiral imidazopyridine-containing biaryls has been developed. The reactions proceed through a radical cyclization cascade to construct the biaryls with good to excellent central-to-axial chirality transfer.
Keywords: axial chirality; biaryl; electrochemistry; oxidation; radical
Axially chiral biaryls are prevalent in natural products, bioactive molecules and organocatalysts [1,2]. Among the many methods that have been developed for the synthesis of chiral biaryls [3-10], reactions that take avantage of the central-to-axial chirality transfer have been less explored [11-14]. In addition, an antroposelective synthesis of imidazopyridine-based biaryls has not been reported.
Nitrogen-centered radicals (NCRs) are attractive reactive intermediates for organic synthesis as they provide opportunities for the efficient construction of C–N bonds [15-19]. Recently, the generation of NCRs through electron transfer-based methods has been attracting attention. Organic electrochemistry is a powerful tool for adding or taking electrons from organic molecules to promote redox reactions because of its reagent-free feature and the tunability of electric current and potential [20-30]. We [31-34] and others [35-41] have studied the reactions of electrochemically generated NCRs. Particularly, we have recently reported an electrochemical synthesis of imidazo-fused N-heteroaromatic compounds via a radical cyclization cascade [31]. Building on this work, we report herein an atroposelective synthesis of imidazopyridine-containing biaryls via central-to-axial chirality transfer (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1: Reaction design.
Jump to Scheme 1
The substituents on the phenyl ring (R1) and at the propargylic position (R2) of carbamate 2 were varied to study their effects on the diastereoselectivity (Table 1). The electrolysis was conducted under previously established conditions employing a three-necked round-bottomed flask as the cell, a reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) anode and a platinum plate cathode [31]. The reaction was carried in refluxing MeCN/H2O (9:1) with tetraarylhydrazine 1 as the redox catalyst, NaHCO3 (2 equiv) as an additive, and Et4NBF4 (1 equiv) as the supporting electrolyte. These investigations indicated that bulky tertiary groups at both R1 and R2 positions were needed to ensure efficient chirality transfer. Hence, carbamate 2a (Table 1, entry 1) bearing a t-Bu group at R1 and R2 positions, respectively, reacted to give imidazopyridine-based biaryl 3a in 68% yield with good diastereoselectivity (14:1 dr). Replacing the t-Bu group at the propargylic position with iPr (Table 1, entry 2) or on the phenyl ring with Ph (Table 1, entry 3) or OiPr (Table 1, entry 4) all resulted in low diastereoselectivity (2:1 to 3:1).
Table 1: Investigation on the effects of substituents on the diastereoselectivity.a
Entry Substrate Product, yield,b drc
1 2a (R1 = t-Bu, R2 = t-Bu) (±)-3a, 68%, 14:1 dr
2 2b (R1 = t-Bu, R2 = iPr) (±)-3b, 64%, 3:1 dr
3 2c (R1 = Ph, R2 = t-Bu) (±)-3c, 73%, 2:1 dr
4 2d (R1 = OiPr, R2 = t-Bu) (±)-3d, 78%, 3:1 dr
aReaction conditions: undivided cell, 1 (0.03 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol), H2O (1 mL), MeCN (9 mL), 3.5 F mol−1. bIsolated yield. cDetermined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
The scope of the electrosynthesis was investigated by varying the peripheral substituents of the carbamate substrate 2 (Scheme 2). The pyridyl ring could be substituted at positions 4, 5 and 6 with a range of substituents with diverse electronic properties such as OMe (3e), Br (3f), CF3 (3g), CN (3h), Cl (3i), and Me (3j). Pyridyl rings bearing multiple substituents were also tolerated (3k and 3l). The stereochemistry of the biaryl product was determined by obtaining an X-ray crystal structure of 3k. The t-Bu-substituted phenyl ring on the alkyne moiety containing an extra OMe (3m) or Me (3n and 3o) group was tolerated albeit with reduced diastereoselectivity. The t-Bu group on the phenyl ring and at the propargylic position could be replaced with other bulky tertiary substituents to afford a range of functionalized biaryl products (3p–w). The electrochemical conditions were compatible with several functional groups including aryltrimethylsilane (3p), silyl ether (3q–s), ester (3t) and cylic ketal (3u). Note that all the diastereomers were separable by flash column chromatography.
Scheme 2: Scope of electrochemical synthesis of axially chiral biaryls. Reaction conditions: undivided cell, 2 (0.3 mmol), H2O (1 mL), MeCN (9 mL), 3.5 F mol−1. aIsolated yield of the major diastereomer. bDetermined by 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture. cCombined yield of the two diastereomers.
Scheme 2: Scope of electrochemical synthesis of axially chiral biaryls. Reaction conditions: undivided cell, 2...
Heating a solution of the major isomer of 3n in MeCN at 80 °C for 4 h did not lead to isomerization, suggesting that the stereoselectivity of the reaction was not controlled by relative thermodynamic stability of the diastereomers. The major isomer of 3c, which contained a sterically less demanding Ph group at the R1 position (cf. Table 1), did not isomerize at room temperature for 1 year. However, heating a solution of this compound in MeCN at 80 °C for 4 h resulted in a mixture of diastereomers in a ratio of 3:1. These results suggest that the sterically demanding substituents at R1 and R2 positions (cf. Table 1) are critical to ensure good stereoselectivity during the product formation and to prevent isomerization after the reaction.
A mechanism for the electrochemical synthesis was proposed based on the results from our previous work [31] and of this work (Scheme 3). The redox catalyst 1 is oxidized at the anode to give radical cation I. In the meanwhile, H2O is reduced at the cathode to afford HO− and H2. The base generated at the cathode deprotonates 2a to give its conjugate base II. The anionic II is oxidized by radical cation I through single electron transfer (SET) to give radical intermediate III, which undergoes a biscyclization to give V. Further oxidation of V followed by hydrolysis of the cyclic carbamate moiety leads to the formation of 3a.
Scheme 3: Proposed reaction mechanism for the electrochemical synthesis of 3a.
Based on the proposed reaction mechanism and the results mentioned above, the cyclization of vinyl radical IV to give V is the atroposelective step. Density functional theory (DFT)-based calculations suggested that the cyclization of IV could be explained by a Curtin–Hammett scenario (Scheme 4) [42]. Specifically, the equilibrium of the conformations IV and IV′ is much faster than their respectively cyclizations to give V and V′. Since TS2 is relatively lower in energy than TS3, V is formed as the major product.
Scheme 4: Computation investigation on the vinyl radical cyclization. DFT (M06-2X/6-31G*) calculated energetics (kcal mol−1) are Gibbs free energies in MeCN.
Scheme 4: Computation investigation on the vinyl radical cyclization. DFT (M06-2X/6-31G*) calculated energeti...
In summary, we have developed a diastereoselective approach for the synthesis of axially chiral biaryls through an electricity-powered cyclization cascade. The reactions employ easily assembled starting materials and afford functionalized imidazopyridine-based biaryls in good to high yields and diastereoselectivity.
Supporting Information File 1: Experimental part.
Financial support of this research from MOST (2016YFA0204100), NSFC (21672178), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, is acknowledged.
Bringmann, G.; Gulder, T.; Gulder, T. A. M.; Breuning, M. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 563–639. doi:10.1021/cr100155e
Return to citation in text: [1]
Pu, L. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2405–2494. doi:10.1021/cr970463w
Tanaka, K. Chem. – Asian J. 2009, 4, 508–518. doi:10.1002/asia.200800378
Wallace, T. W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3197–3210. doi:10.1039/b608470m
Bringmann, G.; Price Mortimer, A. J.; Keller, P. A.; Gresser, M. J.; Garner, J.; Breuning, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5384–5427. doi:10.1002/anie.200462661
Ma, G.; Sibi, M. P. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11644–11657. doi:10.1002/chem.201500869
Link, A.; Sparr, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3804–3815. doi:10.1039/c7cs00875a
Wang, Y.-B.; Tan, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 534–547. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00602
Yang, H.; Yang, X.; Tang, W. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 6143–6174. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2016.08.042
Wencel-Delord, J.; Panossian, A.; Leroux, F. R.; Colobert, F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3418–3430. doi:10.1039/c5cs00012b
Raut, V. S.; Jean, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Roussel, C.; Constantieux, T.; Bressy, C.; Bugaut, X.; Bonne, D.; Rodriguez, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2140–2143. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b11079
Vorogushin, A. V.; Wulff, W. D.; Hansen, H.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6512–6513. doi:10.1021/ja0201505
Guo, F.; Konkol, L. C.; Thomson, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18–20. doi:10.1021/ja108717r
Qiu, L.; Kwong, F. Y.; Wu, J.; Lam, W. H.; Chan, S.; Yu, W.-Y.; Li, Y.-M.; Guo, R.; Zhou, Z.; Chan, A. S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5955–5965. doi:10.1021/ja0602694
Kärkäs, M. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 5786–5865. doi:10.1039/c7cs00619e
Zhao, Y.; Xia, W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2591–2608. doi:10.1039/c7cs00572e
Chen, J.-R.; Hu, X.-Q.; Lu, L.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2044–2056. doi:10.1039/c5cs00655d
Zard, S. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1603–1618. doi:10.1039/b613443m
Xiong, T.; Zhang, Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 3069–3087. doi:10.1039/c5cs00852b
Yan, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Baran, P. S. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13230–13319. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00397
Wiebe, A.; Gieshoff, T.; Möhle, S.; Rodrigo, E.; Zirbes, M.; Waldvogel, S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5594–5619. doi:10.1002/anie.201711060
Möhle, S.; Zirbes, M.; Rodrigo, E.; Gieshoff, T.; Wiebe, A.; Waldvogel, S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6018–6041. doi:10.1002/anie.201712732
Feng, R.; Smith, J. A.; Moeller, K. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2346–2352. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00287
Moeller, K. D. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4817–4833. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00656
Yan, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Baran, P. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4149–4155. doi:10.1002/anie.201707584
Yang, Q.-L.; Fang, P.; Mei, T.-S. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 338–352. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201700740
Tang, S.; Liu, Y.; Lei, A. Chem 2018, 4, 27–45. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.001
Yoshida, J.-i.; Kataoka, K.; Horcajada, R.; Nagaki, A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2265–2299. doi:10.1021/cr0680843
Jiang, Y.; Xu, K.; Zeng, C. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4485–4540. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00271
Francke, R.; Little, R. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2492–2521. doi:10.1039/c3cs60464k
Hou, Z.-W.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Melcamu, Y. Y.; Lu, X.; Xu, H.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1636–1639. doi:10.1002/anie.201711876
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
Hou, Z.-W.; Yan, H.; Song, J.-S.; Xu, H.-C. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 909–915. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201800301
Hou, Z.-W.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Song, J.; Xu, H.-C. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 5810–5813. doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b02105
Hou, Z.-W.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Zhao, H.-B.; Melcamu, Y. Y.; Lu, X.; Song, J.; Xu, H.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9168–9172. doi:10.1002/anie.201602616
Gieshoff, T.; Kehl, A.; Schollmeyer, D.; Moeller, K. D.; Waldvogel, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 12317–12324. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b07488
Xu, H.-C.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13542–13543. doi:10.1021/ja806259z
Gieshoff, T.; Schollmeyer, D.; Waldvogel, S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9437–9440. doi:10.1002/anie.201603899
Kehl, A.; Breising, V. M.; Schollmeyer, D.; Waldvogel, S. R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17230–17233. doi:10.1002/chem.201804638
Lin, M.-Y.; Xu, K.; Jiang, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.-G.; Sun, B.-G.; Zeng, C.-C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1665–1672. doi:10.1002/adsc.201701536
Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Xue, M.; Zhang, R.; Xu, K.; Zeng, C. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3443–3446. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00981
Hu, X.; Zhang, G.; Bu, F.; Nie, L.; Lei, A. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 9370–9375. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b02847
Seeman, J. I. J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 42–48. doi:10.1021/ed063p42
References 1,2
1. Bringmann, G.; Gulder, T.; Gulder, T. A. M.; Breuning, M. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 563–639. doi:10.1021/cr100155e
2. Pu, L. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2405–2494. doi:10.1021/cr970463w
Go to references 1,2
References 20-30
20. Yan, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Baran, P. S. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 13230–13319. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00397
21. Wiebe, A.; Gieshoff, T.; Möhle, S.; Rodrigo, E.; Zirbes, M.; Waldvogel, S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5594–5619. doi:10.1002/anie.201711060
22. Möhle, S.; Zirbes, M.; Rodrigo, E.; Gieshoff, T.; Wiebe, A.; Waldvogel, S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6018–6041. doi:10.1002/anie.201712732
23. Feng, R.; Smith, J. A.; Moeller, K. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2346–2352. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00287
24. Moeller, K. D. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4817–4833. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00656
25. Yan, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Baran, P. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4149–4155. doi:10.1002/anie.201707584
26. Yang, Q.-L.; Fang, P.; Mei, T.-S. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 338–352. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201700740
27. Tang, S.; Liu, Y.; Lei, A. Chem 2018, 4, 27–45. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.001
28. Yoshida, J.-i.; Kataoka, K.; Horcajada, R.; Nagaki, A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2265–2299. doi:10.1021/cr0680843
29. Jiang, Y.; Xu, K.; Zeng, C. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4485–4540. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00271
30. Francke, R.; Little, R. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 2492–2521. doi:10.1039/c3cs60464k
Go to references 20-30
15. Kärkäs, M. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 5786–5865. doi:10.1039/c7cs00619e
16. Zhao, Y.; Xia, W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2591–2608. doi:10.1039/c7cs00572e
17. Chen, J.-R.; Hu, X.-Q.; Lu, L.-Q.; Xiao, W.-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2044–2056. doi:10.1039/c5cs00655d
18. Zard, S. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1603–1618. doi:10.1039/b613443m
19. Xiong, T.; Zhang, Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 3069–3087. doi:10.1039/c5cs00852b
11. Raut, V. S.; Jean, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Roussel, C.; Constantieux, T.; Bressy, C.; Bugaut, X.; Bonne, D.; Rodriguez, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2140–2143. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b11079
12. Vorogushin, A. V.; Wulff, W. D.; Hansen, H.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6512–6513. doi:10.1021/ja0201505
13. Guo, F.; Konkol, L. C.; Thomson, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18–20. doi:10.1021/ja108717r
14. Qiu, L.; Kwong, F. Y.; Wu, J.; Lam, W. H.; Chan, S.; Yu, W.-Y.; Li, Y.-M.; Guo, R.; Zhou, Z.; Chan, A. S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5955–5965. doi:10.1021/ja0602694
References 3-10
3. Tanaka, K. Chem. – Asian J. 2009, 4, 508–518. doi:10.1002/asia.200800378
4. Wallace, T. W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3197–3210. doi:10.1039/b608470m
5. Bringmann, G.; Price Mortimer, A. J.; Keller, P. A.; Gresser, M. J.; Garner, J.; Breuning, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5384–5427. doi:10.1002/anie.200462661
6. Ma, G.; Sibi, M. P. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11644–11657. doi:10.1002/chem.201500869
7. Link, A.; Sparr, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3804–3815. doi:10.1039/c7cs00875a
8. Wang, Y.-B.; Tan, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 534–547. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00602
9. Yang, H.; Yang, X.; Tang, W. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 6143–6174. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2016.08.042
10. Wencel-Delord, J.; Panossian, A.; Leroux, F. R.; Colobert, F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3418–3430. doi:10.1039/c5cs00012b
Go to references 3-10
31. Hou, Z.-W.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Melcamu, Y. Y.; Lu, X.; Xu, H.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1636–1639. doi:10.1002/anie.201711876
Go to reference 31
42. Seeman, J. I. J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 42–48. doi:10.1021/ed063p42
35. Gieshoff, T.; Kehl, A.; Schollmeyer, D.; Moeller, K. D.; Waldvogel, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 12317–12324. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b07488
36. Xu, H.-C.; Moeller, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13542–13543. doi:10.1021/ja806259z
37. Gieshoff, T.; Schollmeyer, D.; Waldvogel, S. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9437–9440. doi:10.1002/anie.201603899
38. Kehl, A.; Breising, V. M.; Schollmeyer, D.; Waldvogel, S. R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17230–17233. doi:10.1002/chem.201804638
39. Lin, M.-Y.; Xu, K.; Jiang, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.-G.; Sun, B.-G.; Zeng, C.-C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1665–1672. doi:10.1002/adsc.201701536
40. Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Xue, M.; Zhang, R.; Xu, K.; Zeng, C. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3443–3446. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00981
41. Hu, X.; Zhang, G.; Bu, F.; Nie, L.; Lei, A. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 9370–9375. doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b02847
32. Hou, Z.-W.; Yan, H.; Song, J.-S.; Xu, H.-C. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 909–915. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201800301
33. Hou, Z.-W.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Song, J.; Xu, H.-C. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 5810–5813. doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b02105
34. Hou, Z.-W.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Zhao, H.-B.; Melcamu, Y. Y.; Lu, X.; Song, J.; Xu, H.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9168–9172. doi:10.1002/anie.201602616
All Thematic Issues
Article is part of the thematic issue
Reactive intermediates part I: radicals
Tehshik P. Yoon
The asymmetric Henry reaction as synthetic tool for the preparation of the drugs linezolid and rivaroxaban
Martin Vrbický, Karel Macek, Jaroslav Pochobradský, Jan Svoboda, Miloš Sedlák and Pavel Drabina
Recent advances in the asymmetric phosphoric acid-catalyzed synthesis of axially chiral compounds
Alemayehu Gashaw Woldegiorgis and Xufeng Lin
Synthesis of highly substituted fluorenones via metal-free TBHP-promoted oxidative cyclization of 2-(aminomethyl)biphenyls. Application to the total synthesis of nobilone
Ilya A. P. Jourjine, Lukas Zeisel, Jürgen Krauß and Franz Bracher
Online Beilstein Talk with Hermann A. Wegner March 16 – Register for free!
Beilstein Glyco-Bioinformatics Symposium 2023 - June 20 to 22, 2023, Limburg, Germany
Take a look at the research you were most interested in last year
© 2019 Yan et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)
Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS-Feed.
Yan, H.; Mao, Z.-Y.; Hou, Z.-W.; Song, J.; Xu, H.-C. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 795–800. doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.76