If an Aryan man of noble feelings comes to visit this site, I can assure him that reading four books will transfigure his way of seeing the world.
These books are: Hellstorm by Thomas Goodrich, the abridged version of The Gulag Archipelago, and two books that appear within The Fair Race, whose image appears on the sidebar: Rome vs. Judea and Who We Are (PDF here, hard copy here).
Roger Scruton (1944-2020)
Author of The Aesthetics of Music (1997), Scruton also wrote many books on philosophy, art, politics, literature, culture, sexuality and religion; he also wrote novels and two operas.
However, Scruton errs in this video by speculating how to correct the problem of degenerate music that ubiquitously is scorching the Aryan soul. There is only one way to correct it: banning degenerate music as the Nazis banned it. Scruton simply recommended educating people in classical music. Well, my father, who disliked degenerate music, was a music pedagogue for children and yet my siblings and nephews, who studied in his music school, listen to degenerate music.
I expose such a flawed approach in music education in my second autobiographical volume, ¿Me Ayudarás? I must add that the libertarians in white nationalism, that is, those who fear Nazi collectivism, are wrong. They start from the assumption of the Enlightenment that Man is good by nature. The reality is that Man is not so good (again, see the book linked in this paragraph) and we need a Fourth Reich to control him. Consider, for example, how many white nationalists enjoy hearing degenerate music!
It seems a lie, but on this issue a woman like Carolyn Yeager, who admires National Socialism, is far closer to the truth than the men of white nationalism.
on January 19, 2020 at 11:57 am Comments (1)
Possessed whites
Jordan Peterson may be a sophist but he does well to remind us, quoting Jung, that the human being in general has no ideas: he is possessed by ideas.
Since the Imperial Church destroyed the Greco-Roman world, whites literally became possessed by Jewish ideas. Think about how many centuries the possessed ones bent their knees to deities like Yahweh and his son Yeshu.
Whites are so possessed that even the souls of the supposed rebels of the anti-white zeitgeist continue to be possessed by this idea. And I mean not only white nationalists who remain Christians. Every time I see more clearly that the fact that books like Who We Are remain unpublished, even by secular racialists, is because Pierce breaks away from Christian ethics by advising 'extermination or expulsion' of non-whites throughout his book.
Understand me well: like the normies, all racialists in today's world are possessed by an unhealthy idea. And like the normies they will remain possessed until the day of their deaths, as Thomas Kuhn saw. There are exceptions of course, including some commenters who have visited this site. But in general what Jung said remains: human beings have no ideas; they are possessed by ideas. And the idea that in this age governs westerners, including secular white nationalists, remains Christian ethics.
It is true that white nationalists are not normies. But since they are unable to break openly with Christian ethics they are in no man's land. The metaphor I have been using is that, although they left Normieland, while crossing the psychological Rubicon they stayed in the middle of the river. They are unable to continue crossing into the lands of National Socialism, and will remain unable to cross it until the day of their deaths. The magnet exercised by the precepts of Yahweh and his son Yeshu from the side of the river they left behind is irresistible.
Our only hope is to appeal to the very young generations, perhaps teenagers or children, who in the future will read The Fair Race: a compilation that, as I promised yesterday, in the 2020 edition I added a paragraph in the introduction (and deleted the PDF of 2019).
Above, Catherine gets a woman released from her pact with the devil before dying, a painting by Girolamo di Benvenutto (1470-1524). What Girolamo ignored is that Christianity itself is the devil, and that we must get whites released from their devilish pact before their race goes extinct.
on January 18, 2020 at 12:32 pm Comments (7)
To save time with new visitors who are unfamiliar with the point of view of this site and who want me to engage in discussions, in the comments section I will be placing this note as a mantra:
Before initiating any discussion
I wonder if you have read: this?
It would be great if, in addition to The Fair Race, visitors have also read Hellstorm and the abridged version of The Gulag Archipelago. Only in this way would it be possible for them to understand why I am talking about the darkest hour and begetting the proper gravitas. (In fact, the current subtitle of this blog, 'The site of a man fused to a weirwood tree', is a metaphor of seeing the past thanks to these books.)
That said, yesterday I detected a rhetorical failure in The Fair Race, the book of several authors that I compiled. From a strictly literary approach, it is not good to mix my informal comments with formal essays. In a previous edition of The Fair Race I had solved that problem simply by removing all my comments, as well as 'The Red Giant' by a Swede also written in informal English.
Now, it seems to me that the solution to such a dilemma is not to eliminate these informal essays, as I did in a previous edition. I will simply have to add a paragraph in the introduction in which I confess that I failed to solve this rhetorical problem. One could imagine that I could have divided the content into two books: one with essays written in formal English and another in informal English. But I wanted to have the POV of this site under a single cover, a single PDF.
El Grial
I have deleted the category 'De Jesús a Hitler (book)' for the simple reason that I changed the title of the book. Now it is called El Grial (The Grail), and it contains a couple of texts more compared to the edition with the previous title. El Grial is a corollary to my two thick volumes, written in my mother tongue, that appear almost to the bottom of the sidebar.
Changing the subject, Mike's expression, 'bending the knee to Jewish deities, Yahweh and Yeshua' is terrific. It should be used by trolls in the comments section of the sites of purported anti-Semitic racists tolerant of Christianity.
Downton Abbey (film)
All the films of the last decades contain bad messages, sometimes in a subtle way, even films that could be used as Aryan pride. From the second film of the LOTR trilogy filmed by Jackson, for example, the beautiful Éowyn is empowered as if she was simply another warrior. At least by the end it is implied that Éowyn is going to marry (and have children) with Faramir, fulfilling the traditional role of woman in any normal society. But in the novels of George R.R. Martin who respond to LOTR, Arya, the equivalent to Éowyn, is already a runaway feminist who won't marry.
Both the television series and the Downton Abbey film contain subversive messages for Aryan preservation presented in a subtle, and sometimes not so subtle way. In Jane Austen's England women could not inherit in order to force them to marry, depend on a man and have children. That began to change since the late 19th century. Even in the television series, Downton Abbey records the beginnings of the social changes resulting from the first feminist wave that hit England. And in last year's movie, it is understood at the end that Lady Mary, not an Englishman, will inherit Downton Abbey.
A parenthesis: it's precisely skinny English ladies like Lady Mary, who below appears at the centre, whom I fancy the most.
That's not all. In the recent movie, which I saw a couple of days ago, the seeds of a future normalisation of homosexuality are sown. No wonder that Trevor Lynch (Greg Johnson) wrote a review of the film. He may have liked it, but what I saw in Downton Abbey is a description of the first mustard seeds that would grow big, like the evangelical parable about the kingdom of the Jewish god on gentile lands.
I have a hard rule when dealing with movies and television. Keep in mind that as a child I didn't see non-whites playing leading roles, neither on the small screen nor on the big screen. My rule is: if I see a non-white (usually a black) I immediately change the channel. I do that even in the news (although it is harder to know if one of the anchors is Jewish).
If white nationalists were as purist as a priest of the 14 words, they would do the same. And they would write destructive reviews about products of mass consumption, even about comparatively benign movies such as LOTR and Downton Abbey.
Thursday postscript
From Heisman's suicide note, a Jew that loved the anti-Roman subversiveness in Jesus' message:
The parable of mustard seed is the only parable attributed to Jesus that has three independent attestations. The following version is from Mark 4:30-32:
With what can we compare the kingdom of God, or what parable shall we use for it? It is like a grain of mustard seed, which, when sown upon the ground, is the smallest of all the seeds on earth; yet when it is sown it grows up and becomes the greatest of all shrubs, and puts forth large branches, so that the birds of the air can make nests in its shade.
Roman author Pliny the Elder (23-79 C.E.) noted in his encyclopedic Natural History that mustard "grows entirely wild, though it is improved by being transplanted: but on the other hand when it has once been sown it is scarcely possible to get the place free of it, as the seed when it falls germinates at once."
So while mustard "with its pungent taste and fiery effect is extremely beneficial for the health", even the domesticated variety breeds rapidly and can overrun the garden. If this strain is dangerous, then the wild one can wreak an agricultural epidemic. It not only gets out of control like a weed, but also can attract the further danger of nesting birds to the point of destroying the garden. The way of this aggressively multiplying weed, in Jesus's parable, was the way of the Kingdom of God: a dangerous, pungent shrub with fiery effect that takes over where it is not wanted.
The moral of the story is to weed the tiny plant as soon as it appears: the exact opposite of what Johnson said in his movie review.
I remember that when I lived in California in the 1980s, from time to time I watched a few seconds of the preaching of the televangelist Oral Roberts. But I was unaware of the biographical profile about such a folkloric American until very recently.
The preacher Roberts, leader of a $120 million-a-year Christian organisation, was such a grotesque, and typically American, figure that the mere fact of his existence should invalidate the US as a serious nation.
This is one of the problems of white nationalism. They see Jewry but are unable to see the beam in their own eye: a beam that certainly has to do with the power that Jewry has gained in the country of white nationalists.
If one reads the webzine of Kevin MacDonald, for example, one finds that the subject-matter is Jew, Jew, Jew, Jew… And the Christians, that numerically are more in the country of MacDonald? Or is it that the fact that there are millions of morons who worship the god of the Jews has nothing to do with Jewish power in that country? Last year I quoted some words from Robert Morgan that are worth reciting:
Man has everywhere and at all times been a wolf to man. The big difference between Christians and others is that they lie about it, just as they lie about everything else. Case-in-point: The Christian apologists on this thread, who claim to be fighting Jews by worshiping a Jewish rabbi and calling him God. Needless to say, such people are residents of Crazy Town, with Kevin MacDonald as their mayor, and Andrew Joyce as his chief publicist and amanuensis.
But the problem is not Andrew Joyce or The Occidental Observer. It is the entire movement, and you must not have been born in the US to see something so obvious. I still remember Tom Sunic saying, after witnessing an evangelical event replete of pure whites in Alabama, that that was 'worse than communism'—despite his sufferings in the communist Yugoslavia of Josip Broz Tito.
Peter & Andrew
For Catholics like my (late) father, the New Testament tales about St. Peter occupy a place of pre-eminence. They ignore that those are only tales, literary fiction from the pen of some Hellenized Semites of the 1st century.
In this fresco of 1436 we see Peter next to Andrew, his brother, at the time of being both called by the 'Master'. The scene is due to the hand of Andrea di Giusto, and is located in the church of St. Andrew, in Ripalta.
Beyond myopia
One of the things that I liked about Richard Spencer's recent eschatological speech about his country is that he recognises that what is at stake is the entire American paradigm.
If one reviews the sites of white nationalism, they are nearsighted. They try to locate the origin of white decline in the Jewish quarter without any substantial self-criticism about what caused the empowerment of Jewry in the first place. People like Tom Sunic have said, in public conferences full of white nationalists, that the Jews 'did not fall from the Moon', but that their empowerment was due to factors intrinsic to Western civilisation. The same I can say about Spencer. Unlike the endemic myopia in the movement, Spencer is an intellectual who has begun to see the big picture.
Spencer is a relatively isolated case. It is a pity that the other American intellectual who wasn't myopic, Michael O'Meara, has retired from the forums of white nationalism. But if there is something irritating in the movement, it is for Christians to go out with specious arguments such as pondering whether Christianity is compatible with racialism, given the racial history of the United States at times when they seemed not to be fighting each other.
This is a specious argument as I said. This winter, for example, I suffered a terrible respiratory illness that, in my case, is chronic. The polluted air of Mexico City is killing me: and this shows more and more every winter.
It is silly to say that the capital's air is compatible with health as apparently the contamination doesn't affect my sister, with whom I live. Rational would be to recognise that the air is toxic, although at first it doesn't affect everyone. Living in a toxic environment for health and saying that it isn't toxic because the symptoms are not yet noticed is magical thinking. As magical as saying that Christianity hasn't adversely affected us during every single historical stage of the West.
To have the god of the Jews as our god; obeying the precepts of a supposed new testament addressed to us gentiles (out of the pen of Jews, of course) and continuing to ignore Aryan history* is a formula for the continuing ethno-suicide. In fact, if we analyse it deeply, the ideology of white nationalists, in which I include secular webzines such as those by Johnson and MacDonald, is more in line with this continuous slip toward suicide than to what would be an authentic intellectual reaction against the American paradigm.
But at least someone like Spencer begins to glimpse that the problem has a much larger dimension than what myopics see in the movement.
(*) With the exception of Jake F., Arthur Kemp and an Englishman who sat on my right in one of the private meetings of the London Forum a few years ago, nobody I know properly values the only non-fiction book of Pierce.
on January 12, 2020 at 1:05 pm Comments (26)
I've just watched The Two Popes. It is a typical product of the Netflix provider, with its eternal anti-white and anti-western motivations. However, it is a good film to illustrate what we have been calling 'the Christian question' (the CQ).
Countless times I have said it but it is worth repeating:
The current pope is not an anti-pope as the Christian forums of white nationalism claim. On the contrary: he is the first pope who tries to take the message of Jesus in all its purity to the real world. That's why Jorge Bergoglio, whom I understand pretty well since we share the same mother tongue, chose Francis as his papal name: something that no one who sat in Peter's chair had dared to do before.
So anti-western and anti-white is the film that it ends with black 'refugees' in the Sistine Chapel, and with the words of Francis sympathising with them. It was not the only bad message of the film. But the one that best represents the CQ.