Out of My Gord
my thoughts (in no particular order)
What's in a Word?
First published September 8, 2011 in Mediapost's Search Insider
I served for six years as a director of the Search Engine Marketers Professional Organization. Every six months or so, we'd get together to talk about the future of the organization. As you can imagine, the future of an organization catering to industry professionals is inextricably linked to the future of the industry itself. So, our conversations weren't so much about the future of SEMPO as they were about the future of search — and by extension, the future of search marketing.
Every time we embarked on this task of joint navel and crystal-ball gazing, we ran smack dab into the same dilemma: How do you define search? What is search? Should it even be called search any more? Esther Dyson, among others, thinks the term "search" may have outlived its usefulness. Perhaps "connection," "fulfillment" or "action" has a better connotation. At least these words imply there's something of substance on the other end of the search. They hint at successful outcomes. When Microsoft debuted Bing, the company sought to differentiate the product by calling it the "Decision" engine – "Bing is a search engine that finds and organizes the answers you need so you can make faster, more informed decisions."
For me, words are important, so in trying to define the future of our industry, the words we choose to represent the concept tell us something about our feelings towards it.
Let's start with "search," the generic label we currently use: to "search" is to attempt to discover something. We search for a needle in a haystack. We search for a missing child or a runaway fugitive. We search for the truth. All seem to indicate an expenditure of significant effort but no guarantee of success. Given the state of the Internet when search engines debuted, it was an apt moniker. But today, that's no longer the case. Today, I suspect, we launch almost every search with a clear expectation that somewhere out there, the information we seek exists. All we need is the right connection to it.
Given that, perhaps a "connection" engine is a better choice. To "connect" is to link known entities. Unlike with "search," when we use the term "connect" we know our objective exists and we're just trying to find the shortest path between points A and B. The word better captures the navigational usage of search, which accounts for a huge percentage of total queries. I've used the term myself in the past when I've said that search is the "connection" between intent and content.
But even "connection" implies a certain statelessness. While it better captures our intent than does the verb search, I don't know if it adequately represents the dynamic and participatory nature of our online activities. Whereas the verbs we used to use to define what we did online implied passive observance — "look," "browse" and "surf" (I never did get that one, but at one time using it made you sound uber-cool) — we now "book," "post," "comment," ""tweet," "buy" and participate in dozens of much more active ways, using more active verbs. Where once we went online to seek and consume information, we now want to "do" things. We expect to do things. And so we use Google or Bing to find the right tool to allow us to do those things. That's the rationale behind suggestions like "fulfillment" (to carry out, to satisfy or to develop to full potential) and "action" (something done or performed). Certainly, for some search tasks, calling Google or Bing an "action" engine would be a more appropriate description.
For some tasks — but not all. And that's the problem we kept running into when we tried to define what search is. It's tough to keep in any one box. It tends to be squishy and amorphous. And it has the habit of expanding into the ever-developing niches and crevasses of the online landscape.
So, was Bing right to call itself a "decision" engine? Is that the missing label that encapsulates all we look for in an engine? Do we need something to help us make better decisions (to compare and choose between alternatives)? It's at least as good as "search", and probably better, because it takes it one step further. It makes the assumption that the information about the best alternatives will be served to us by the engine.
While you might think this is just a frivolous exercise in semantics, I disagree. I think this question speaks to something fundamental in the evolution of search. We use words to label concepts — and when the labels no longer fit, it's because the concept itself has changed. If we have trouble applying a word to something, it's probably because we think of it in a different way than we used to. I believe this is true of search. And if we think of "search" differently, it means we must also think of "search marketing" differently.
Posted by ghotchkiss in Behavior & Psychology, Online Trends, Search Behaviors, Search Marketing, SEM, SEO, Web Search
← A Peek "In the Plex," by Steven Levy
Is it Time to Relabel " Marketing? →
Categories Select Category Behavior & Psychology (597) Consumer Psychology (254) Evolutionary Psychology (154) Habits (51) Information Seeking & Foraging (228) Memory (27) Networking (66) Online User Experience (369) Search Behaviors (204) Corporate Strategy (334) Big Data vs Strategy (59) Brand Building (95) Corporate Darwinism (141) Customer Relationships (119) Market Research (29) The New Marketplace (219) Digital Marketing (308) Analytics and Metrics (25) B2B Marketing (16) Branding (26) Content and Thought Leadership (13) Display (13) Email Marketing (3) Lead Management (5) Search Marketing (189) SEM (135) SEO (143) Social Marketing (28) Video and Rich Media (5) Guest Posts (1) Interviews (20) Online Trends (543) eCommerce (34) Mobile (33) News & Content (83) Privacy (38) Social Media (176) Video and Virtual (43) Wearable technology (15) Web Search (251) Personal (297) Rants (121) Research (314) Cognition (174) Eye Tracking (33) Neuroscanning (15) User Behavior (263) Uncategorized (30)
Blog Archives Select Month January 2021 (2) December 2020 (4) November 2020 (4) October 2020 (4) September 2020 (5) August 2020 (4) July 2020 (3) June 2020 (5) May 2020 (4) April 2020 (4) March 2020 (6) February 2020 (4) January 2020 (3) December 2019 (4) November 2019 (4) October 2019 (4) September 2019 (3) August 2019 (4) July 2019 (5) June 2019 (1) May 2019 (3) April 2019 (5) March 2019 (4) February 2019 (4) January 2019 (4) December 2018 (4) November 2018 (5) October 2018 (6) September 2018 (2) August 2018 (1) July 2018 (4) June 2018 (2) May 2018 (3) April 2018 (6) March 2018 (3) February 2018 (3) January 2018 (5) December 2017 (4) November 2017 (4) October 2017 (5) September 2017 (4) August 2017 (5) July 2017 (4) June 2017 (5) May 2017 (4) April 2017 (4) March 2017 (4) February 2017 (4) January 2017 (5) December 2016 (4) November 2016 (4) October 2016 (4) September 2016 (4) August 2016 (5) July 2016 (4) June 2016 (4) May 2016 (5) April 2016 (4) March 2016 (4) February 2016 (4) January 2016 (4) December 2015 (4) November 2015 (4) October 2015 (4) September 2015 (5) August 2015 (4) July 2015 (4) June 2015 (5) May 2015 (3) April 2015 (4) March 2015 (6) February 2015 (4) January 2015 (4) December 2014 (2) November 2014 (3) October 2014 (6) September 2014 (4) August 2014 (4) July 2014 (5) June 2014 (4) May 2014 (1) April 2014 (5) March 2014 (6) February 2014 (7) January 2014 (12) December 2013 (3) November 2013 (3) October 2013 (5) September 2013 (2) August 2013 (5) July 2013 (4) June 2013 (3) May 2013 (5) April 2013 (4) March 2013 (2) February 2013 (4) January 2013 (5) December 2012 (3) November 2012 (4) October 2012 (4) September 2012 (4) August 2012 (5) July 2012 (4) June 2012 (4) May 2012 (5) April 2012 (4) March 2012 (5) February 2012 (4) January 2012 (5) December 2011 (5) November 2011 (3) October 2011 (4) September 2011 (5) August 2011 (4) July 2011 (4) June 2011 (5) May 2011 (4) April 2011 (4) March 2011 (5) February 2011 (4) January 2011 (4) December 2010 (5) November 2010 (3) October 2010 (5) September 2010 (5) August 2010 (3) July 2010 (4) June 2010 (4) May 2010 (13) April 2010 (11) March 2010 (8) February 2010 (16) January 2010 (16) December 2009 (8) November 2009 (25) October 2009 (14) September 2009 (4) August 2009 (4) July 2009 (5) June 2009 (4) May 2009 (4) April 2009 (5) March 2009 (7) February 2009 (9) January 2009 (11) December 2008 (7) November 2008 (7) October 2008 (8) September 2008 (6) August 2008 (4) July 2008 (6) June 2008 (5) May 2008 (5) April 2008 (6) March 2008 (3) February 2008 (5) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007 (16) October 2007 (12) September 2007 (4) August 2007 (7) July 2007 (9) June 2007 (8) May 2007 (15) April 2007 (14) March 2007 (16) February 2007 (12) January 2007 (32) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (4) October 2006 (6) September 2006 (12) August 2006 (29) July 2006 (4) June 2006 (17) May 2006 (24) April 2006 (8) March 2006 (5) February 2006 (4) January 2006 (4) December 2005 (4) November 2005 (2) October 2005 (2) September 2005 (3) August 2005 (3) July 2005 (2) June 2005 (2) May 2005 (2) April 2005 (2) March 2005 (2) February 2005 (2) January 2005 (2) December 2004 (1) November 2004 (1) October 2004 (2) September 2004 (2) August 2004 (1)
How Our Brain Finds Waldo
The Psychology of Entertainment: Our Need for Entertainment
The Inevitability of the Pendulum Effect
Test home page
The Psychology of Entertainment: Why We Love Watching in Crowds
The Psychology of Entertainment: Our Connection with TV
Influencer Marketing's Downward Ethical Spiral
What Does Being "Online" Mean?
The Psychology of Entertainment: What We Find Funny
The Psychology of Social: Are We Hardwired to Use Social Media?