I just tried this with an in memory SQLite DB using 6.6.2 and 7.0.1.
So the times don't compare with the LC scripts that have been suggested.
inventive scripts that have been suggested.
that, although that problem appears to be a bug that is already being fixed.
> I like the idea Mike K.
> that is repeat at over 2 sec and the broken by position at 22+ seconds.
> stored shouldn't matter right?
> Anyone up to test sqlite?  In memory db should be pretty zippy I'd guess.
> > quoted in 7, I wonder if using an SQLite or mySQL db would be faster.
> > > position by byte is just as slow !!
> > > > - -Alex.
> > > >> any means.
> > > >> going soon.
> > > >>> engine will normally be faster.
> > > >>> case (e.g. if the engine uses any variant of quicksort())..
> > > >>> the original version.
> > > >>> -- Alex.
> > > >>>> the first way is actually faster.
> > > >>>> So much for improving on LC's text chunking speed. Pah.