← A Changing of the Guard…
Pre-Elizabethan Drama: The Interlude →
Fitzwilliam Darcy: Hero or Bad Boy? Guest Post from Martine Roberts
Posted on January 23, 2017 by reginajeffers
This post was originally posted on Austen Authors, but I thought it worthy of a second look. From Martine Roberts we have a post on our favorite Austen hero (or it that our favorite bad boy)?
IT is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.
This is the first, and undoubtedly the most famous sentence from Jane Austen's popular, and much-loved novel, Pride & Prejudice.
It is now 203 years since this magnificent piece of fiction was published, but it is still, if not more, popular than ever. I cannot help but ask why? Is it because we all love a love story, or maybe it's because we enjoy the lively exchanges between Elizabeth and Darcy. Alternatively, perhaps it is because we all secretly love to see a bad boy turn good? Did Jane purposely write Darcy in this style? Or maybe she underestimated the attraction Darcy's character would have on the female population?
There have been many visual incarnations of the Fitzwilliam Darcy character over the years, and everyone who has watched one, or all of these productions has their favourite.
My personal introduction to Mr. Darcy was at the tender age of 9, when I first watched the 1940 film version starring, Sir Laurence Olivier.
Unaware of the multitude of inaccuracies in the film, I was nevertheless hooked. I was seduced by the language, the clothes, their manners, and courtesies. I can't think of anything more romantic than to have a man bow to me and then press a light kiss on my outstretched hand, (sigh). Though for a star-struck child from a working-class family, it was the prospect of a happy ending.
However, today's generation have a plethora of Darcy's to choose from. The two most recent, and apparently most popular, are the BBC mini-series starring the delectable Colin Firth, and his now iconic wet shirt scene. And the deliciously handsome, Matthew MacFadyen from the 2005 film version. And although Matthew did not walk out of a lake half undressed, his proposal during a thunderstorm was just as seductive. (Hands up all those who longed for him to kiss Keira Knightley in that scene?)
Before either of these, there was the rich-voiced David Rintoul in the 1980 mini-series, which is for some reason is rarely shown on TV.
We must also include a slightly different incarnation of P & P, and one of my personal favorites, Lost in Austen, which is another TV mini-series set in both modern and the Regency times. It is a must for all Austen fans. Though Elliot Cowen's Mr. Darcy is the only character that remotely resembles the one Jane invented, it is still very watchable.
These are just a few of the versions available to us. We also have the Bridget Jones films, Death Comes to Pemberley, Austenland, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, etc., etc., etc.
So, what is it that attracts us to this man? Jane's initial description of him is rather vague.
'Mr. Darcy soon drew the attention of the room by his fine, tall person, handsome features, noble mien, and the report which was in general circulation within five minutes after his entrance, of his having ten thousand a year. The gentlemen pronounced him to be a fine figure of a man, the ladies declared he was much handsomer than Mr. Bingley, and he was looked at with great admiration for about half the evening, till his manners gave a disgust which turned the tide of his popularity; for he was discovered to be proud; to be above his company, and above being pleased; and not all his large estate in Derbyshire could then save him from having a most forbidding, disagreeable countenance, and being unworthy to be compared with his friend'
Miss Austen does not describe Darcy as having a thick head of curly hair, or that he possessed piercing blue eyes, yet these are properties we automatically attribute to him.
Undoubtedly she describes him as a gentleman of noble birth, yet he lacks all the social niceties considered essential in the day. He is rude, arrogant, proud, intolerant and over-confident of his self-worth. Having said that, let's not forget that Jane also tells us that Darcy is tall, handsome, AND incredibly wealthy. OK, the last two items might have some influence on us, but what about Darcy as a person.
Is it because we secretly like the excitement that inevitably comes with a bad boy? Alternatively, it may be that we like to imagine that we could be the one person who could touch his heart, and by doing so, reform him? Or, is it that we cannot resist a challenge?. For me, it is all these reasons.
Jane Austen certainly knew one thing; a good novel had to have four things;
A hero, a villain, and a love story and a happy ending
In fact, all of Jane's books follow a very similar recipe.
Each novel has a hero.
Mr. Darcy in Pride & Prejudice, Mr. Knightley in Emma, Captain Wentworth in Persuasion, Edward Ferrars in Sense & Sensibility, Edmund Bertram in Mansfield Park, and finally Henry Tilney in Northanger Abbey.
And the proverbial 'bad guys.'
George Wickham, Mr. Elton, Mr. William Elliot, Willoughby, Captain Fredrick Tilney, and Henry Crawford.
Thankfully, (spoiler alert) Jane provides us with a happy ending in all her books.
And who could fail to be impressive by how Jane misleads us throughout the book, intertwining the character traits of Darcy and Wickham, making them both appear slightly bad while remaining generally decent. Only later in the story, as their real natures are revealed, do we discover their true worth. Darcy is the good guy with a bad reputation, while Wickham is a scoundrel, with all the appearances of being a good man.
Yet no other of Jane's novel have been so reproduced, or are so loved, as her baby, Pride & Prejudice. There are also thousands of spin-off books written every year on the subject. These are generally described as 'What if's' or Pride & Prejudice Variations, usually involving some, or all of her characters, and some, or all of the plot lines from Jane's original story. Indeed, I write them myself. Amazon.com: Martine J Roberts: Kindle Store
So, what is it about this book in particular? It is Darcy!
Imagine you are seeing or reading Pride & Prejudice for the first time. Initially, Jane gives us permission to dislike Darcy. Indeed, we could do nothing but dislike him. To promote this, Jane made his character rude, cold and aloof, in stark contrast to, Elizabeth and Wickham's, which are warm, witty, and charming. It is only as the story unfolds that we learn of Darcy's struggles, especially where Wickham and Georgiana are concerned. Only then, does our hearts begin to soften.
The heavy responsibility of a large estate, a young sister to raise, the friend who turns out to be an enemy, not to mention suffering delusional relatives or the dozens of servants and tenant's that rely on him. His responsibilities are heavy indeed.
Then, as our budding like of Darcy begins to unfold like a flower, he does the most selfless thing imaginable. In rescuing Lydia, and by default all her sister's, Darcy bind's himself to his nemesis forever. With this final act of chivalry, Darcy's transformation is complete, and our hearts are finally won.
Personally, I liked Darcy just the way he is, gorgeous, rich, and a little bit dangerous. (I loved how he dealt with Mrs. Younge and Wickham).
For whatever reason, you like this novel, I would like to think that Jane was sending a message through the media of her book.
Love can cross any divide; we should never give up hope, and real love is worth the wait.
You may find Martine Roberts at these links: Amazon Author Page and Facebook
This entry was posted in book release, books, eBooks, excerpt, fashion, film, film adaptations, Georgian England, Guest Blog, Guest Post, Jane Austen, Living in the Regency, Living in the UK, love quotes, marriage, Uncategorized and tagged "bad boy", Elizabeth Bennet, Fitzwilliam Darcy, guest post, hero, Jane Austen, Martine Roberts. Bookmark the permalink.
12 Responses to Fitzwilliam Darcy: Hero or Bad Boy? Guest Post from Martine Roberts
MaryAnn Nagy says:
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. I first started reading Pride & Prejudice when I was ten years old and fell in love with love. I remember always thinking that I would find and have a tall, dark and handsome man sweep me off my feet. I lived one block from the library and was there everyday reading and checking out books. There weren't televisions in those days and I had 3 brothers so I was a bookworm in the library as well as school. But as I grew, I started to appreciate good writing and continued to read and appreciate authors. Jane Austen became my favorite to this day! That is my story of the love of reading.
MaryAnn, we are sisters from different mothers. I still read every day. I have been in love with Darcy since I was twelve.
LordBeariOfBow says:
Olivia??? Really, I don't think the late Lord Olivier would be amused
I detest that wet shirt scene, spoils the story, just stupid sensationalism to get the women in.
Did they think that women would not watch without that rubbish titillate them? I'm sure Miss Austen would not have been amused.
Like most I envisage both Miss Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy as being blue eyed, and yet both actress and actor in the 1995 production have brown eyes. Also Miss Ehle is somewhat large, for 'my little Lizzy'. Clair Foy would have made a delightful Elizabeth!
That nasty autocorrect must have taken hold of Martine's fingers, Brian. I should have checked before I posted this one, but I have been down with bronchitis/pneumonia for several weeks now. I was just glad to have it up and ready.
For me, I always have Elizabeth with hazel eyes, so they might change from green to brown depending upon her mood.
I was privileged to see Jenner Ehle in all three parts of Coast of Utopia on Broadway. She won a Tony Award for her role.
2006	The Coast of Utopia: Voyage	~ Liubov Bakunin ~ Vivian Beaumont Theater
2006	The Coast of Utopia: Shipwrecked	~ Natalie Herzen
2007	The Coast of Utopia: Salvage	~ Malwida von Meysenbug
However, although I think her a superb actress and downright "eye-drawing" on stage, I admit she would not have been my first choice as Elizabeth Bennet. I picture Elizabeth smaller in stature ~ like a wood sprite who steals Darcy's heart when he did not expected it.
And that's why I liked Miss Foy for the part;
I agree that Miss Ehle is a fine and underrated actress; I've put it down to her likeness to Meryl Streep.
When it comes to portraying Englishwomen I think Miss Streep should be passed over every time for Miss Ehle who has that fine English natural accent courtesy of her mother.
Jennifer Ehle was born in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, my neck of the woods (so the saying goes).
I thought at first you were referring to Claire Foy, then I realized you were talking Of Miss Ehle.
Miss Foy is an outstanding actress in my book, heres a link to some pictures of her, if you take the time to scroll through I'm sure you'll understand why I think she would make the perfect Elizabeth. Unfortunately in 1995 she was but 11 years old and not then an actress.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=claire+foy&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=648&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiT-e6tgdzRAhXCJpQKHce3CAoQiR4IhwE&dpr=1
I knew who Claire Foy was. I adored her in "Little Dorrit." She would make an excellent Elizabeth Bennet.
She was marvelous in Little Dorrit, that was the first time I'd seen her, and became an admirer of her and her talent from the start.
I look at her and can just imagine Mr Bennet saying " ……my little Lizzy"
I don't think Darcy was either a bad guy nor hero. He was an aristocratic Englishman stuck in a class conscious society that forbid the mixing of classes especially in marriage. Fortune, power, and land inheritance was all that most of these aristocrats wanted to achieve. If love came later into the marriage, it made for the better marriage. Colin Firth was Darcy way before the lake-wet shirt scene. I have copies of each Pride and Prejudice movie, but the 1995 version is the only one that I have in multiple formats that I watch quite often. But, good article and thanks for sharing.
I always thought Mr. Wickham was the bad boy. Lucky Lydia! Ugh.
I am of the same opinion, Rachel.