Syracuse Journal of Law & Civic Engagement
About SLACE
Welcome from the Editor-in-Chief
2018-2019 Executive Board
Previous Boards
2013-2014 Executive (Founding) Board
SLACE Journal
Issue 5 (2017-18): On Youth Involvement
Voting in America: Is it Time to Lower the Voting Age?
Homeless, Gay, & Ignored: The Need for Federal Aid to Combat the Epidemic of LGBTQ Youth Homelessness in America
Issue 4 (2016-17): On Judicial Independence
PERSPECTIVES FROM THE BAR: Attorney Attitudes on the Implementation of a Federal Judicial Evaluation Program
The Good Judge
Issue 3 (2015-16): On Elections and Democracy
Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and a Disrupted Electoral College
Issue 2 (2014-15): On Life & Death
Think Like a Lawyer, Kill Like a Judge
Walking the Line: Tracing the Science of Miller v. Alabama in State Appellate Opinions
No Room for Redemption: Clemency in Missouri
Karma Police: Prosecutorial Strategies in Obscenity Cases and the Broader Culture War
An Inquiry into the Ethics of Capital Punishment
Issue 1 (2013-14): On Equality
Introduction to Vol. 1
Marriage is an Option
Recognizing Care: The Case for Friendship and Polyamory
U.S. v. Windsor and the Judicial Politics of the Roberts Court
Modern Marriage and Same-Sex Couples: Expanding the Good of Marriage
Future Issues
Notions of Discourse (Blog)
Email SLACE
Twitter- @SLACEForum
"Not arrogant enough to say who lives and dies– are you?"
February 5, 2015 / Christopher Jennison
Re-posting Texas defense attorney Paul Kennedy's blog post on the death penalty:
"I was recently asked by a commenter what I thought was a "fair" sentence for someone convicted of killing another.
The gentleman seemed to believe that the death penalty was appropriate – at least in that particular case. I won't put words in his mouth and assume that he supports the death penalty across the board.
I don't know the answer to his question.
I do know, as I have pointed out before, that killing a murderer doesn't bring any of the victims back to life. Killing him doesn't heal the wounds his actions caused. I also don't think it does anything to bring closure to the family and friends of his victim. The wounds will always be there – they just fade in and out in various degrees as time moves on.
There are three understood purposes of punishment in our criminal (in)justice system. The first is rehabilitation. Our penitentiary system owes much of its existence to religious sects who felt the best way to treat someone convicted of criminal activity was to remove him from the bad influences in his life and teach him another way to live. That's why most of our prisons are far removed from the "evil" influence of our major cities (in much the same way that most of our large land grant colleges are far removed from urban areas).
A second purpose is to deter others from breaking the law. If you see your buddy sent off to prison for breaking the law, maybe the message will hit home that it's best to obey the law. This, of course, only works for those folks who are able to weigh the costs and benefits of particular actions before deciding what to do.
The third purpose was to banish from civil society those who were blatant in their rule-breaking and expressed no remorse for their actions. One way to look at it is the folks we choose to banish from society are those folks that we're scared of.
I think it's a fairly safe bet to assume that our prisons long ago stopped serving any rehabilitative function. They have become warehouses for the mentally ill, drug addicts and folks who refuse to conform with the rules of civil society. We could add that prisons today are used as tools of social control to keep the poor and minorities from exercising any power.
Now our politicians and supporters of the death penalty will hang their hats on deterrence as being the reason we strap inmates to a gurney and murder them in cold blood. The idea is that the public sees what happens when you kill someone (well, kill someone whose life we've determined is more valuable than someone else's) and folks make a conscious decision not to do the same.
The only problem with that logic is that most murders aren't the act of rational actors. How many times is the victim of a murder an acquaintance of the murderer? How many times is the murder the result of an argument that two friends (or two relatives) had over a pool game or a bet or a small loan? How many times do we see someone killing their spouse or lover? Then you've got drug-related killings and "robberies gone bad."
We've been killing inmates for generations and we still have people killing people. The death penalty never has been, and never will be, a deterrent.
The death penalty is about nothing more than revenge. Always has been and always will be. As such it serves no useful purpose within a criminal justice system.
Furthermore, the death penalty is forever. Once you've killed an inmate, they aren't coming back. It doesn't matter whether they were guilty or innocent. Just think about that for a bit. Over the past decade we have witnessed an incredible number of stories of inmates who spent decades in prison being exonerated when DNA evidence revealed the jury got it wrong.
Our system is run by people. We're fallible. We all get it wrong every now and then. Michael Morton was convicted of killing his wife. The district attorney hid evidence and his successor fought like hell to keep the evidence from being tested because he knew what it would reveal.
Innocent people have been murdered by the state. As long as we continue to strap inmates down and inject poison into their veins we will run the risk of another innocent man being killed. Is that a chance you feel comfortable taking?
I have no use for religion. I think it's nothing but a tool of oppression. But I'm not arrogant enough to say that I know who should live and who should die.
← The Capital Punishment Cover-Up: Virginia wants to hide "all information relating to the execution process."
Former federal judge regrets 55-year marijuana sentence: Mandatory minimums can send a message, but at some point the message gets lost →
Latest from @SLACEforum
Issue 5 On Youth Involvement is here! Check it out at: https://t.co/uivv0yoUUy #YouthInvolvement #LGBTQ #LGBTQYouth… https://t.co/aXBgeCnPez 03:05:25 AM November 13, 2018 from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
Latest from #SLACE: High School Students Resilient in the Face of the Parkland Florida High School 301 09:03:34 AM April 12, 2018 from SLACE ReplyRetweetFavorite
Latest from #SLACE: DACA: Undocumented Youth in America 301 10:09:09 AM February 15, 2018 from SLACE ReplyRetweetFavorite
Latest from #SLACE: Online Terrorist Radicalization of Western Youth 301 10:15:56 AM January 18, 2018 from SLACE ReplyRetweetFavorite
@slaceforum
Issue 5 On Youth Involvement is here! Check it out at: https://t.co/uivv0yoUUy #YouthInvolvement #LGBTQ #LGBTQYouth… https://t.co/aXBgeCnPezTuesday, 11.13.18 08:05
Follow @SLACEForum (43 followers)
Categories Select Category Agricultural Policy Blog Campaign Finance Constitutional Corporate Coverage Crime Reduction & Prevention Criminal Current Members Democracy Disability Drugs Economics Education Energy Environmental Family Finance Foreign Affairs Gun Control Health Care Higher Education Immigration Income Inequality International Relations LGBTQ Miscellaneous Monetary Policy National Security NPR Patent Politics President Obama Religion SCOTUS Sentencing SLACE Archive Standardized Testing Suicide Sunday Funday Surveillance Taxes Taxs This American LIfe Tort Uncategorized Veterans Issues Vouchers Welfare Women's Rights
High School Students Resilient in the Face of the Parkland Florida High School Shooting
DACA: Undocumented Youth in America
Online Terrorist Radicalization of Western Youth
Minors and Medical Consent Laws
Transgender Youth Under the Trump Administration in Higher Education