The Page Curation tool flags Potential issues in the Page info tab of the page curation toolbar.
These include: Blocked user, Orphan, No categories, No citations etc. There is also a red number on the tab icon indicating the number of potential issues.
@Force_Radical My team doesn't intend to start working on this project for another few weeks. @MMiller_WMF Can someone from Growth do a code review on this?
@Force_Radical -- thanks for working on this code! Yes, I can put this in the queue for Growth team engineers to look at.
@Catrope -- this is going in our code review column.
MMiller_WMF added subscribers: kostajh, SBisson.
Moving volunteer patch into code review column.
kostajh changed the subtype of this task from "Task" to "Bug Report".
@Insertcleverphrasehere @Force_Radical This change has rolled out last week. Can you confirm if it is works as expected now?
The feature appears to be working as expected yes! I have seen flags for 'Orphan', 'No categories' and 'Blocked Users' are working (the stuff that was originally intended to be implemented). And it is pulling up a red number next to the 'I' symbol related to the number of issues, which is perfect.
It still needs to add the ORES issues that are flagged in the New Pages Feed (Vandalism, Spam, Attack, Copyvio) as well as the others requested in related Phab tasks of the 'additional Tie ins' listed above, so this task should remain open, but great work so far! Thanks, @Force_Radical!
Checked in betalabs - the flag is present and the issues are listed.
To note (besides the issues with missing ORES scores by @Insertcleverphrasehere).
(1) Articles that have ORES "Potential issues: None" may still have Potential issues flagged in flyout (cause Potential issues scoring is independent). Reviewed pages will display Potential issues too.
(2) On Special:NewPagesFeed is not possible to filter e.g. just for pages that 'Are orphaned'. The returned result set will have the pages that are orphaned and orphaned pages that have other problems.
Returning for additional work to Communty-Tech.
On a side note, we did notice that the 'no references' flag doesn't look for alternate citation styles, only </ref> tags. So it will flag an article that uses an alternate citation style (such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get_to_the_Boat) as having 'no references'. Thought it worth reporting the bug, even if it is a relatively uncommon occurrence.
Thanks for the thorough QA, Elena! I'll pull it on the Community-Tech board when we get started on the project.
Niharika removed projects: Growth-Team, MW-1.33-notes (1.33.0-wmf.22; 2019-03-19), Patch-Needs-Improvement, Patch-For-Review.
Niharika changed the subtype of this task from "Bug Report" to "Feature Request".