how to evaluate the likelihood of a paper's conclusion being correct versus a contrasting paper? how to rank data quality of a paper when using a data scale to measure the probability, which one is more accurate? what is the scale of replication if replicated how to rank what metrics can be used to rank the relative likelihood of a paper's results being correct? what metrics are used to rank the likelihood of an experiment to be correct? when a paper replication status is highest on the statistics scale how to rank a paper's likelihood how to rank the likelihood of a study what kind of metrics can be used in an experiment to rank the relative likelihood of the data is correct versus another paper? what data quality could be used to evaluate the likelihood of a paper's results being correct? which metrics are used to rank the likelihood of a contrasting paper? what is a higher replicated statistic how can you measure the likelihood of a paper being correctly duplicated? what is the highest number of replicates on the scale what is the metrics in research that can rank the likelihood of a paper being correctly reproduced? what is the likelihood that a research paper is correct what is the scale for replication success why the correlation between replication and replicability is high