What is in a Name?
- Judge David Langham
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reports that Canada has overcome obesity by concluding This is inventive and novel, certainly.
“Weight that is higher than what is considered as a healthy weight for a given height is described as overweight or obese. Body Mass Index, or BMI, is used as a screening tool for overweight or obesity.”
One of the criteria under that statute, constituting a “preexisting permanent physical impairment” is:
“Obesity if the employee is 30 percent or more over the average weight designated for her or his height and age in the Table of Average Weight”
That led me to those charts, which led me to calculate my own statistics, which led me to label myself “obese.” The Government published an ideal weight range for my gender and height, and I was well above it. There were self-attempts at justification, at disbelief (in the standard, not the scales), at denial. But, the definition and the standard remained. I was obese.
We are an obese society. According to the American Cancer Society, many of us are obese, and the percentage is growing:
“between 2007-2008 and 2015-2016, the report says the rates of obesity rose significantly among adults, from 33.7% to 39.6%. Rates of severe obesity increased during this time from 5.7% to 7.7%.”
There are implications and problems. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery says there are potential health impacts:
“Obesity can cause a lot of damage to your body. People with severe obesity are more likely to have other diseases. These include type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, sleep apnea, and many more.”
Note that they say “cause.” There are others who note various potentials for obesity to aggravate various maladies and conditions. But, also to “cause.” Over the years I have seen a great many of those government standard height/weight charts in doctor’s offices. My impression has been that there is general consensus that overweight can increase health risks.
“Americans spend more than $60 billion annually to try to lose weight, on everything from paying for gym memberships and joining weight-loss programs to drinking diet soda.”
Canada’s solution is interesting. According to the BBC, it is not suggested that “diet and exercise” be forgone, but it is now advising “doctors to go beyond simply recommending diet and exercise.” The plan is to “focus on the root causes of weight gain and take a holistic approach to health.” That may or may not be consistent with merely changing the definition. Without an objective standard like the charts, how does one decide if they are or are not a healthy weight?
Well, the Canadian Medical Association has determined that there is a potential for “weight-related stigma against patients,” and it cautions practitioners against that. There are cultural assumptions, it notes, regarding “personal irresponsibility and lack of willpower.” The result is “blame and shame upon people living with obesity,” The Canadian approach seeks to remove the stigma attached to obesity, by redefining it, and thus purportedly empower clinicians to treat it.
The Canadian effort concluded that “many doctors discriminate against obese patients.” There is a “”weight bias” that leads to practitioner behavior. The sense is that many have operated on a simple advice of less calories and more activity. The new guideline continue to focus on healthy and balanced diet as well as “regular physical activity” But, there is a significant focus on the mental aspects of both hunger and weight gain.
The new Canadian guidelines will continue to utilize the body mass index (BMI) ensconced in that government height/weight chart. The waist size will also remain as a measure. But, the focus will shift from attaining “ideal weight” essentially to attaining some improvement. Size will not matter as much as making some progress. The authors of the standard point out that small weight reductions can effect improved health.
The issue seems to be both complex and vexing. Vast sums are invested annually in addressing it, and despite that rates of obesity are increasing. We like sugar, convenient processed foods, eating out, large portions, and more. We tend to like exercise, activity, and self-discipline less. We are engaged in a societal battle of the bulge, and many signs indicate we are losing. Changing definitions may help. The path of the Canadian effort will be interesting to watch.
I for one hope they are proven correct and that weight loss can be more easily attained through their new redefinition and removal of stigmas. Clearly, something needs to change and obesity trends need to improve. Too much is riding on it for us personally and collectively. But, let’s hope we are not just naively lowering the river. You think on it, I am going to get some breakfast.
Be the first person to comment!
Disclaimer: WorkersCompensation.com publishes independently generated writings from a variety of workers’ compensation industry stakeholders. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of WorkersCompensation.com.