Making speed dating cards
Giving consent does not necessarily mean that the proposal being considered is one’s first choice.
Furthermore, if the outcome of the latter passes a pre-determined consensus coefficient, that outcome may be regarded as the consensus.It is used to describe both the decision and the process of reaching a decision.Consensus decision-making is thus concerned with the process of deliberating and finalizing a decision, and the social, economic, legal, environmental and political effects of applying this process.Sometimes the outcomes of consensus can be contrary to majority.To ensure the agreement or consent of all participants is valued, many groups choose unanimity or near-unanimity as their decision rule.Proponents claim that outcomes of the consensus process include: In groups that require unanimous agreement or consent (unanimity) to approve group decisions, if any participant objects, they can block consensus according to the guidelines described below.
These groups use the term consensus to denote both the discussion process and the decision rule.
Furthermore, consent, as within Sociocracy, is defined simply by the absence of reasonable objections.
An objection is a reason why doing what is proposed stands in the way of satisfying needs or goals, which the proposal aims to satisfy.
Since unanimity may be difficult to achieve, especially in large groups, or consent may be the result of coercion, fear, undue persuasive power or eloquence, inability to comprehend alternatives, or plain impatience with the process of debate, consensus decision-making bodies may use an alternative decision rule, such as Unanimity Minus One (or U−1), or Unanimity Minus Two (or U−2).
Condorcet consensus is defined as the decision which is the Condorcet winner as in Condorcet method.
Groups that require unanimity allow individual participants the option of blocking a group decision.