This study examined the relative impact different channels of communication had on social perception based on exposure to thin slices of the behavioral stream. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that dyadic rapport can be perceived quickly through visual channels. Perceivers judged the rapport in 50 target interactions in one of five stimulus display conditions: transcript, audio, video, video+ transcript, or video+audio. The data demonstrated that perceivers with access to nonverbal, visual information were the most accurate perceivers of dyadic rapport. Their judgments were found to covary with the visually encoded features that past research has linked with rapport expression. This suggests the presence of a nonverbally based implicit theory of rapport that more or less matches the natural ecology, at least as it occurs within brief samples of the behavioral stream.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.
Archer, D., & Akert, R. M. (1977). Words and everything else: Verbal and nonverbal cues in social interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 443–449.
Argyle, M., Salter, V., Nicholson, H., Williams, M., & Burgess, P. (1970). The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and nonverbal signals. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 222–231.
Babad, E., Bernieri, F., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Nonverbal communication and leakage in the behavior of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 89–94.
Babad, E., Bernieri, F., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Students as judges of teachers' verbal and nonverbal behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 211–234.
Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 303–311.
Bernieri, F. J., & Gillis, J. S. (1995). The judgment of rapport: A cross-cultural comparison between Americans and Greeks. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 115–130.
Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M. & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110–129.
Bernieri, F. J., & Grahe, J. E. (1999). Thin-slice samples of the behavioral stream: Validating their use in social psychological research. Manuscript in Preparation. University of Toledo.
Berry, D. S., Pennebaker, J. W., Mueller, J. S., & Hiller, W. S. (1997). Linguistic bases of social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 526–537.
Depaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and Strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158.
Gifford, R. (1994). A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 398–412.
Gifford, R., & Hine, D. W. (1994) The role of verbal behavior in the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 115–132.
Gillis, J. S., Bernieri, F. J., & Wooten, E. (1995). The effects of stimulus medium and feedback on the judgment of rapport. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 33–45.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.
Kruglanski, A.W. (1989). The psychology of being "right": On the problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395–409.
Levesque, M. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178–1187.
Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248–252.
Mehrabian, A., & Weiner, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 109–114.
Noller, P. (1985). Video primacy—A further look. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 28–47.
Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. M. (1979). Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschager, Gunn, & Hain.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 113–136.
Tickle-Degnen, L, & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.
Zebrowitz, L. A. (1990). Social Perception. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
About this article
Cite this article
Grahe, J.E., Bernieri, F.J. The Importance of Nonverbal Cues in Judging Rapport. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 23, 253–269 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021698725361
- Social Psychology
- Visual Information
- Past Research
- Relative Impact
- Thin Slice