عنوان مقاله [English]
In Islamic philosophy of nature there are different laws, including the question of the validity of nature. Following on from the question of the validity of the concept of nature, three key concepts in the field of nature emerged in the works of Islamic philosophers, which linked each of these concepts to the philosophical views of the philosophers and created many differences. These three concepts are: the concept of 'natural whole', the concept of 'my nature as hey', and the concept of 'conditional validity'. There are two popular views among philosophers regarding the relevance of these concepts. The first view considers the nature of nature and the nature of my life to be in accordance with the validity of the divisional condition. The second view, contrary to the first view, holds that both of these concepts are consistent with partial conditional validity. The present article attempts to explore the views of Ibn Sina and Agha Ali Zenuzi in this regard. The answer to this is that Ibn Sina invented the credentials of the second view, and Agha Ali represents a third view that explicitly considers the views of other philosophers to be unfinished, and that the new stage is the latest step in the philosophical evolution of this idea. .