Puck: Character Analysis
Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. If you need a professional help, send us your essay question and our qualified writer will help you to create an answer.
Qualified Authors and
Starting at Just
$13.90 a Page
Starting at Just $13.90 a page
He is poised but to as sugary as the Other fairies; as Boron’s jester, he is given to a certain roughness. Which leads him to transform Bottom’s head into that of an ass merely for the sake of enjoyment. Being a fairy of a mischievous nature is what leads Puck into triggering many of the memorable moments in the play. It is because of Puck’s many different character tendencies, along with his ever present mischievous nature that it is possible to analyze his character in three different ways. The first way to analyze Puck is through his own eyes. A fairy many be the implies way to describe Puck but he knows he is seen well as a goblin, or a creature Of chaos.
Agreeing that the previous would more accurately fit his description, Puck knows that he is prone to misadventure and cruel but good- hearted tricks. Knowing that puck is a mischief maker and creator of chaos, Oberon still relies on him to carry out his orders that way he intends for them to happen. To puck chaos is correct, and it is that chaos that Oberon secretly relies on. When Oberon sends Puck to Titans and her lover, Bottom, it easily foreseen fore Puck even arrives that something unfortunate would soon spoil Titanic’s evening.
Here Pucks lighthearted, yet cruel trickery gets the best of him verse he could not but help himself in turning Bottom’s head into that of an ass. Also, without his wit, creativity, and trickery, Puck would not have been able to trick the mortal men into chasing him. Puck is able only then to lead the mortal men far into the forest where eventually they both tire and fall asleep. Puck knows that his mischievous nature is more than just his entertainment, but that it is also his greatest strength that proves to be useful to his master, Oberon, himself, and also the audience.
A second way to view Puck is as a bringer of love, a Cupid of some sort. Although the concept of the love spell was Boron’s, he delegates the task to Puck. The mortals are not important enough for him to take care of himself and so he delegates this responsibility to puck, acting almost as Hermes to Zeus. As previously stated, Puck is fun-loving and prone to unfortunate mistakes and with this in Boron’s full knowledge Puck is still given the flower with the power of eve, After receiving the flower puck sets off with the best of intention but his personality wins out. Upon seeing the mortals lying sleeping, Puck contuses which mortal man he is to put the spell on and chooses the wrong one. Creating havoc rather than love, when the mortals wake up Puck realizes what he has done and amused and to some degree pleased, he does not get in any hurry to fix the mistake. He is not sorry, nor does he panic at the thought of Oberon finding out his mistake. Puck instead, blames the misfortune on the lover’s own foolishness. Not having done the work himself the first time, Oberon once again just entrust Puck to undo his mistake.
Even after turning the young lovers world upside down, it is Puck who is sent to restore order and set things right between the lovers, ensuring the plays happy ending. In many of Shakespearean play there is a character whose main purpose is informing the audience Of the important aspects Of the past, the present, and the future action of the play. These characters are known as the chorus and are prevalent in many of Shakespearean dramas. This is third way to view Puck’s character.
Sometimes the events taking place are only discussed by the chorus, ND other times the chorus seems to make predictions that lead the audience to expect the event. More often than not though, a twist ending is what the audience usually comes to accept. As the chorus, Puck not only directs the drama of A Midsummer Night’s Dream but brings the audience along with him. He keeps them updated on what has happened and what is happening throughout the play. Given that there are two plots, puck pulls off the task of narrator and fairy guide effortlessly as he ensures that no one gets lost as the two plots continuously weave in and out of each other,
To decide between these three different personalities as to which Puck would more closely fit would be interesting and yet near impossible. It is only when the three personalities are combined that the real exploration and analysis of Pucks true character can begin. Chaos is usually looked at as a derogatory term, but there can be good and bad chaos. Puck is exactly that, good and bad chaos. In fact, One could say Puck almost perfectly straddles the line between tranquility and chaos in that when it comes to his many unfortunate events, one gets fixed usually before more situations arise. Need Help
With Your Essay? Get Help From Professional Writer
Depending on the recipient Of his work, Puck is not evil, just playful enough to cause problems and also smart enough to go back and help undo or fix the multitude Of problems he causes throughout the play. Shakespeare inclusion of Puck as the form of knowledge shows that there is more to Puck’s character than just a mischievous hobgoblin you see at first glance. His character plays an important, if not major, role in the process of telling the story of A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Puck is not to be undermined as just a jouster fairy, but understood in his own right.