However after some years only it had its studies entensificados in Germany for germanistas. We remember that Grammatical of Valence it is not the same thing that Grammatical of Constituent. This studies the grouping of the constituent in the lexical structures, in turn, that one mentions the dependence relations contextual. People such as Jorge Perez would likely agree. Let us understand of explicativa form in the distinction that Borba (1966, P. 16) makes between the two grammatical theories.
According to exactly: While a Constituent Grammar if occupies with the analysis of structures trying to discover as a constituent if it incases in another one or it belongs to another one, a Grammar of Valence looks for to detect relations of dependence between categories (basic) that (co) they occur in a context (former.: It depends it on B, if the presence of estimates B). We only made this fast approach for terms a general vision of these two boardings that costuma to confuse as being the same thing, however are not, in agreement could observe in the assertive one transposed above for Borba (1966). From now in them we withhold the boarding of valence for being the main focus of this discuso, more specifically the verbal valence. For Tesnire (1959), a valence grammar presents a sentence paradigm contends a basic element (generally a verb) and certain number of dependent elements, (known as arguments, expressions, complements or braves), whose number and type are determined by the valence that if it attributes to the verb. Borba (1996, p.18) increases despite: ' ' A Grammar of Valences if constructs from the comment of that the lexical item of the language have absolute value or relativo' '.
The type of valence is pointed according to nature of the verb. Four main types of verbal valences exist. 1) Valence Monovalente: it occurs when the verb selects only one argument.