, 2005 and Slusser et al., 2007) or providing healthy food at eye level (Berkeley Media Studies Group, 2006). While similar types of food items were offered and served across
the four middle schools in our study sample, rates of production and student plate waste appeared to differ between schools. More research and evaluation is clearly needed to better understand these differences and the collective impacts of school food services on students’ consumption/non-consumption Palbociclib mouse of fruits and vegetables so that school meal programs can help students increase consumption of healthy foods. While this is one of the first studies to use food production records in conjunction with student plate waste data to get a more comprehensive picture of student receptivity to school-based PF-01367338 molecular weight healthy food procurement practices that meet the new 2012 USDA school meal standards, it is subject to limitations. First, because this study used a cross-sectional observational design, it did not assess waste patterns before school menu changes were implemented. Therefore, it is not possible to ascertain
whether the plate waste patterns reported here represent an increase or decrease in overall waste from SY 2010–11 to SY 2011–12. Second, while it would have been ideal to observe the entire population of students who obtained school lunch meals, due to resource constraints, only students who ate lunch in the cafeteria after obtaining their food were observed in the study. No information on consumption patterns is available for students who left the cafeteria after obtaining their food. Comparison between observed and unobserved students was, therefore, not possible. Plate waste data were also not collected for roughly a fifth of the students in the sample due to students removing identification numbers from their lunch trays or disposing of their lunch waste outside of the cafeteria. Third, even though a standardized form was used for data collection, some mistakes in collecting plate waste data may have been present.
For example, if whole fruit was served without a wrapper and was taken off the tray by the student, then no evidence would be left behind to indicate that fruit had ever been served, creating medroxyprogesterone undercounting of the number of students selecting whole fruit. Field observations during data collection, however, suggest that only a relatively small number of students selected whole fruit and, among those who did, only a few were seen removing the whole fruit from the tray and leaving no remainder. Most students who selected a whole apple, for instance, left the core on the tray after consuming some of it. Because the field observations were not recorded in detail on the visual monitoring form and primarily serve to provide qualitative context, the extent of this potential limitation is not quantifiable.