“In a matter of a few days, I was meditating on the bank of a snowy river in Poland in ridiculous, freezing winter, and melting the snow around me with my body temperature,” Carney says.
Carney details that experience in his book, What Doesn’t Kill Us,which was released in 2017 and recently came out in paperback.
Carney points out that humans dealt with cold temperatures for much of their evolutionary history. Introducing a bit of chill into our daily life now, he says, stimulates muscles and tissue in a good way.
“Our bodies need to be in constant variation,” Carney says. “That’s what keeps us healthy and fit.”
But how does that translate to the way most of us exercise?
Is jogging in the cold this winter any better than hitting a treadmill in a warm gym? How about jumping into a frigid ocean for a swim?
We asked some leading physiologists to weigh in.
Burning extra calories
Many of the purported benefits of cold hinge on brown fat, sometimes referred to as “good” fat. Long known to exist in human infants, brown fat burns calories and generates heat.
Dr. C. Ronald Kahn, a researcher at the Joslin Diabetes Center at Harvard Medical School, was among the first scientists to document the existence of brown fat in very small amounts in adults in the mid-2000s.
People can increase their levels of brown fat by being in mildly cold environments, Kahn says, though the effect on the number of calories they burn will be relatively small.
“The average person will burn an extra 100 to 200 calories a day when brown fat is activated,” Kahn says. “But if you go eat half a muffin, forget it.”
And that “100 to 200 calories” figure is for someone who’s chilly all day long, he says. Most people experience cold for only short periods of time.
“When you activate brown fat, it may stay active for a few hours,” Kahn says. “Not permanently.”
Kahn also warns that Hof’s call for exposure to the extreme cold could be overkill.
“What it takes to activate brown fat is very mild degrees of cold,” Kahn says. “If I put you in a room at 60 or 62 degrees Fahrenheit and you’re dressed in very light clothing, that’s enough to do it.”
A second way that people can burn extra calories when they’re cold is through shivering. But Kahn doesn’t suggest that strategy, either, because shivering makes most of us miserable.
“It’s a way to burn extra energy,” Kahn says. “But I don’t think there’s any data to say that this is a good way to lose weight … because it’s not comfortable.”
Furthermore, people often warm up when they exercise, notes John Castellani, a research physiologist with the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine. Since you have to feel cold to burn those extra calories, Castellani says, people who exercise outside might not actually be burning any more calories than those who are in a warm room.
Exercising the blood vessels
A side effect of exposure to the extreme cold that Hof calls for is vasoconstriction. When you’re subjected to extreme cold, the muscles surrounding many of your blood vessels cause them to contract — sending more blood to your core, where it can stay warm.
Carney says that because modern humans live in temperature-controlled environments, “all of that musculature is weak.” Exercising those muscles through cold exposure, he claims, has “a huge impact on circulation and arterial health.”
Castellani says the theory is interesting but still untested.
“In terms of using [cold] as a way of … ‘training the blood vessels?’ To my knowledge there’s no data to support that claim,” says Castellani.
Additionally, Dr. Aaron Cypess, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health worries that cold-induced vasoconstriction could have negative consequences for some people, including spikes in blood pressure.
“We were looking at someone in one of our mild cold studies, and his blood pressure went really high,” Cypess says. “That’s not a good thing.”
Training the immune system
One of Wim Hof’s more startling claims — that he could consciously control his immune system — drew the attention of Matthijs Kox, a researcher at Radboud University Medical Center in the Netherlands.
“At first we were a little bit reluctant, but then we started to look up all the remarkable feats he had pulled off,” explains Kox. “So we decided to give him a chance to prove his claim.”
To put Hof to the test, Kox and his team injected Hof with a solution containing pieces of E. coli bacteria. Since the injection didn’t contain live bacteria, it couldn’t actually make Hof sick. But in most people, these bacterial compounds would fool the body into believing it is being attacked, triggering a temporary immune response that includes fever and inflammation. If Hof could indeed suppress his immune system, then the injection would have no such effect.
Sure enough, Hof’s body showed little reaction to the injection.
“He had virtually no symptoms — which was remarkable,” Kox says.
Kox followed up, repeating the test on a group of individuals whom Hof had trained. Just as with Hof, people in the study who had received the training showed little reaction to the injection. But untrained control subjects experienced fevers, headaches and chills. Kox and his research team published their results in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in 2014.
Suppressing your own immune system may be possible, those results suggest — but for many of us, this may seem counterproductive. Why would we risk getting sick?
Carney thinks that sort of suppression might benefit patients who are suffering from autoimmune disorders — such as forms of arthritis that are linked to the body’s immune system essentially attacking itself. If people could suppress their immune system as Hof does, Carney contends, some could potentially cure themselves of those diseases.
Kox is cautiously optimistic that this could, indeed, someday be a treatment strategy.
“We still have to test it, but it might be beneficial in conditions associated with an overactive immune response,” Kox says. “But we need more work — more proof — to see whether this is really beneficial.”
But which component of Hof’s training contributed to the outcome? Was it the cold exposure, or the breathing exercises and meditation?
Kox says he can’t tell from his findings, but he is currently supervising an experiment to find out. He expects those results to be published within the next couple of years. Until then, the value of cold exposure as a treatment for autoimmune disease remains largely unproven, if promising.
Revelers run into English Bay during the annual New Year’s Day Polar Bear Swim in Vancouver, British Columbia January 1, 2012. REUTERS/Ben Nelms (CANADA – Tags: SOCIETY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)
The case for cold?
The bottom line is, there is little evidence so far to suggest that training in cold weather makes you healthier, or that you can burn significantly more calories. The physiologists Shots talked to all agreed on one thing: There simply hasn’t been enough research to say one way or another.
Cypess says he isn’t ready to dismiss the potential benefits. But until he sees more compelling data, he’s not likely to suggest it as a therapy. He has a bigger priority.
“The most important thing is to get the person to exercise,” Cypess says. “There is no obvious added benefit to exercising in the cold.”
Paul Chisholm is a freelance science writer in Rapid City, S.D. You can reach him on Twitter: @PaulJChisholm.