Not sure if this is the right forum?
This post is NOT about crop circles though it may appear so at first.
Please read all three posts.
Below is Chilbolton (UK) radio telescope. Above it you can see a crop formation.
One year after the formation in the picture above another formation appeared in
the same field.
Two days after the face appeared this formation appeared. Both are shown below
in the field.
The following year this formation was found near another radio mast.
The disc looks very much like a compact disc and contains a message. The message
is written in binary and when converted it produces the following.
Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts and their BROKEN PROMISES.
Much PAIN but still time.
There is GOOD out there.
We OPose DECEPTION.
The upper/lower case is how it decodes.
Decoded by Paul Vigay.
Pauls is no-longer with us, his body was found floating in the sea near his home town.
In 1974 Carl Sagan Transmitted a signal into space in simple binary form. It contained details of -
Our DNA and the dominant substances that create life on earth.
That our planet is the third one from our sun.
Our height and what we look like.
Our population size.
Our calculation system.
Details about how we transmitted the message.
The star system that the signal was aimed at (M13) is very distant, infact its 26000 light years distant so we would not expect a reply until about
52000 years later (I did say it was distant). However, 27 years later all the above started happening.
The formation that appeared two days after the face looks like a copy of the message that Carl sagan sent all those years ago. Could it be a reply? At
first it looked identical but there are a few differences and this is where the story leaves the realm of the ordinary because some of the differences
would not be known to MOST mere mortals like ourselves.
We'll deal with the easy ones first.
The figure of the human has been changed from a 6.5 foot human to a 3.5 foot large headed being.
The population has been changed from 4.29 Billion (as in 1974) to 21.3 Billion.
The image of the transmitter has been changed. Do you recognise the image of the transmitter? look at the first photo right at the top of this post,
and note what its next to!!
Remember, we are supposed to believe these formations were created by a couple of drunk locals out for a laugh with planks of wood and string.
Silicon has been inserted into the atomic table at the the correct place.
An additional strand of DNA has been inserted correctly.
A change in the number of nucleotides.
The area showing our solar system is slightly different.
Lets consider the silicon, an element with an atomic number of 14, added precisely in the correct sequence - between oxygen (atomic number 8) and
phosphorus (atomic number 15). Someone at S.E.T.I. claimed the addition of silicon was pure science fiction however silicon is a crucial but almost
unknown ingredient in most terrestrial life. Neal Sullivan - then a Scripps graduate student– demonstrated (simultaneous with Volcani’s work) that
silicon is essential in the production of DNA-polymerase – an enzyme required for DNA synthesis in diatoms. The center vertical column has been
changed in the crop version: there are significantly more nucleotides in the alien DNA.
The following was posted anonymously by a research biologist.
Many people have been speculating whether the new Arecibo crop pictogram in Chilbolton is a hoax or real. The purpose of this message is:
1. To explain why the DNA part of that pictogram was altered from Sagan's original.
2. To suggest a return message.
The central part of the Chilbolton pictogram shows that a DNA double helix as found on Earth, with 10 base pairs per turn, has been replaced on one
side by a novel single-stranded helix with just 6 bases per turn. I had to work hard for several days, to discover that the single-stranded helix with
6 bases per turn refers to 2', 5'-linked RNA or DNA, as opposed to the normal 3', 5' variety. This is known to hardly any molecular biologist, and I
found out only by making an accurate model. Since the chemical formula of the 6-base helix remains the same as before, I guessed that any difference
might be one of stereochemistry: change the sugar-phosphate connection.
A tiny single-digit change in the central "rod" of that pictogram, located between the two nucleic acid strands, may confirm such a change in
stereochemistry once it is mapped accurately.
“In any case, there is no other plausible way of constructing a 6-fold helix as indicated.
A. "Association of 2', 5' ligoribonucleotides," Nucleic Acids Research 1992, vol. 20, pp. 1685-1690. This paper shows that 2', 5'-linked RNA will form
double helices, but prefers to remain single stranded.
B. "Synthesis and biological activities of 2', 5'-oligoadenylate," Nucleic Acids Research 1995, vol. 23, pp. 3989-3994. This paper explores the use of
2', 5' RNA as an antiviral drug; it seems we have been exposed to such strange molecules in the past, and have evolved an interferon-RNAase L system
C. "2', 5' linked deoxyribonucleosides: thermal stability", Nucleic Acids Research 1997, vol. 25, pp. 3310-3317. This paper shows that 2', 5' DNA
will form a double helix with RNA but not DNA; hence any 2', 5' infectious agents would not be detectable by PCR.
“Recall that origin-of-life experiments in the 1980's [?] by Leslie Orgel, found that RNA would often polymerize into two different forms, namely
2', 5' versus 3', 5'; and it was a mystery to chemical evolutionists why 3', 5' was favored on Earth.
Note that many abductees [remember, the central figure in the “response” version of the Arecibo Message looks like a classic “gray”] remain
ill with chronic fatigue, which generally includes a high level of RNAase L; just as if their immune systems have been activated by contact with 2',
The clear implication is that 2', 5' RNA may represent an alternative system of genetic coding to 3',5' RNA or DNA as found on Earth; and that the
makers of the Chilbolton pictogram wished us to understand that fact. Whether a secret band of elite scientists could hoax such a result seems
doubtful; since 2', 5' nucleic acids are mentioned rarely in the literature, and nowhere does it say that they form a single-stranded helix with 6
bases perturn, that I found only recently, by painstakingly constructing an accurate model.
“If the message is authentic, one must wonder whether it was sent by radio some time ago, yet not made public? Finally … let me suggest a
‘return message’ that could open communication rapidly.
I suggest that you ask people all around the world to write the following in deserts, beaches, forests, crops, and on all frequencies of amateur
radio: ‘2', 5' ---6 ‘… ‘3', 5' --- 10 ‘ Or simply ‘6 /10’ if they are lazy. But the full
message is better ...”
As you can see, this really is out of the realms of a couple of drunks with their planks of wood and string.
As stated by others - It realy is remarkable that our first reply should be from beings who's solar system is so like our own.
edit on 24-1-2012 by VoidHawk because: (no reason given)
edit on 24-1-2012 by VoidHawk because: (no reason
edit on 24-1-2012 by VoidHawk because: (no reason given)