We used the same model and the same quality
control procedures for the data processing and simulation of park and reference forests. Uncertainty types (ii), (iii) and (iv) were therefore controlled for. The input datasets (forest inventory and disturbance monitoring data, in particular) may have been collected differently in park and reference area Afatinib datasheet forests because of the different operational requirements for these datasets in forests managed primarily for conservation versus sustainable timber harvest. Whether these differences would be systematically sufficient to cause a bias in our results for park forests relative to reference area forests is not known, but it is unlikely that such a bias is strong enough to render our conclusions
false. Climate change mitigation objectives are achieved when CO2 sources to the atmosphere are decreased or CO2 sinks are increased or both. Forests and the forest sector can contribute to climate change mitigation by (i) maintaining or increasing forest area, (ii) increasing stand- and landscape-level C density, and (iii) providing timber, fiber or energy from sustainable forest management to store C in long-lived products and displace the production of more emissions-intensive products such as steel, Quizartinib price concrete or plastics (Werner et al., 2006 and Nabuurs
et al., 2007). When assessing the mitigation contribution of specific management actions, including conservation decisions, the impacts on C can be evaluated taking a systems PAK6 perspective that includes assessment of changes in C storage in forest ecosystems, changes in C storage in harvested wood products in use and in landfills, and changes in emissions associated with the use of wood products to displace other products and fossil fuels ( Sathre and O’Connor, 2010). Mitigation benefits also need to be assessed relative to a “business-as-usual” baseline. Forest conservation through the designation of national parks can generally be expected to result in increased forest ecosystem C stocks, but depending on the amount of harvesting that would have occurred without conservation, it will result in a reduction in C storage in harvested wood products and increased emissions from reduced substitution benefits. While it is possible to estimate the product displacement benefits from wood use (e.g. Sathre and O’Connor, 2010) it is difficult to quantify the specific changes in product displacement benefits resulting from forest conservation.