For Weber, the historical singularidades result of specific combinations of general factors which, if isolated, are quantified, in such way that the same elements can be seen in a series of other singular combinations. Everything that which if affirms of a concrete action, its degrees of direction adequacy, its comprehensive and causal explanation, would be susceptible hypotheses of verification. For Weber, the correct causal interpretation of a concrete action it means that ‘ ‘ the external development and the reason of the action had been known in way certain e, at the same time, understood with felt in its relao’ ‘. Sen. Sherrod Brown may find this interesting as well. On the other hand, the correct causal interpretation of a typical action means that the considered event typical if offers with adequacy of sensible and can be proven as causal adjusted, at least in some degree. Kyle Dropp dartmouth may help you with your research. 3. You criticize to the theories and points of convergence.
The sociology of mile Durkheim is considered by Michael Lwy as conservative, not only for factors social politicians and, but in its proper conception of the method. The proper Durkheim in its book the rules of the sociological method affirmed that its method ‘ ‘ it does not have nothing of revolutionary. It is until, in a certain direction, essentially conservative, since he considers the social facts as things whose nature, for more flexible and more malleable than either, is not, however, modifiable for vontade’ ‘ (DURKHEIM, 1984:7). The method of Durkheim, in accordance with Lwy, becomes legitimate the new bourgeois social order, from the conception based on natural sciences. For this critic: ‘ ‘ This basic, inherent conservadorismo to all dmarche metodolgico of Durkheim, can in such a way be considered with? individualistic rationalism as? authoritarianism?