When the World Health Organization had advised that walking and cycling were the safest means of travel during the coronavirus outbreak, Bogotá opened nearly 47 miles of new temporary bike routes.
It was an example of the coronavirus crisis leading to rapid changes that are transforming the way we think about using urban space. Suddenly cities are being forced to optimize how they use their finite square footage.
In thousands of cities and towns, from Portland to Berlin, streets are being closed to vehicular traffic and reclaimed, in the name of public health, by two-wheeled and two-footed humans.
The question is, once the health crisis subsides, will these changes remain in place?
As London’s walking and cycling commissioner Will Norman said: “We need to come out of this crisis in a radically different way.”
In recent years, Paris has been on the cutting edge of the car-free streets movement, with a mayor who has made pedestrianization of the city one of her calling cards.
The city is creating about 400 miles of pop-up “corona cycleways” for travel once the lockdown ends and converting one of its major central roads, the Rue di Rivoli, into a bicycle route.
What’s more, France’s Minister of Ecological Transition announced that, going forward, every French citizen will be entitled to free bicycle repairs of up to 50 euros ($55 USD) from a network of 3,000 mechanics who will be reimbursed by the government.
The plan will also fund permanent bike racks, cycling classes and support for cities to build more cycle lanes.
Milan, too, has announced that over 20 miles of cycling infrastructure installed for the pandemic will remain in place post-lockdown. The city is working with New York City’s former transportation commissioner to facilitate the transition.
Other governments are enacting similar policies.
The government of New Zealand has offered to reimburse cities for 90 percent of the cost of turning streets into permanent social spaces.
Budapest has installed bicycle lanes on major thoroughfares and has signaled that it may leave them there indefinitely.
Discussions about extending these street conversions indefinitely speak to how much potential there is for more permanent changes to be made.
France has rolled out temporary bike lanes in more than a hundred cities. Oakland, Calif., has closed 10 percent of its local streets to vehicles. New York has announced that it will make 100 miles of streets car-free. And Lithuania’s capital, Vilnius, is handing over much of its public space to bars and restaurants so they can serve customers while social distancing.
Across the world, in the space of just weeks, street closures — or openings, as advocates call them — have accomplished something urbanists have spent decades trying to do: convince cities of the benefits of car-free streets.
For years, research has shown that reclaiming streets from cars carries an array of economic benefits.
Back in Bogota, a study found that for every dollar spent on closing streets to vehicles on Sundays, three public health dollars are saved. Opening streets to people can be good for business, too: Bike lanes are shown to boost retail sales and jobs wherever they pop up.
The health advantages are also well-documented: Reducing car use leads to less pollution, safer streets, faster commutes, even declines in loneliness.
But perks laid out on paper are only so persuasive. What’s happening now amounts to a live-action dramatization of the positive health, economic and environmental effects of reducing car use.
In California, traffic accidents — as well as crash-related injuries and deaths — fell by half amid shelter-in-place orders, saving the state about $40 million per day.
Los Angeles, where driving is a way of life, is experiencing its longest stretch of clean air on record. Traffic congestion, of course, has virtually vanished from sight.
This real-life display of carless streets appears to be inspiring politicians and planners, a growing number of whom are signaling their intention to make at least some of the changes permanent.
But what happens when life returns to some kind of normal – and thousands of commuters want to drive to work?
Mike Lydon, an urban planner who has been tracking the spread of open streets interventions around the world, says that while cars will return to many of these streets, history shows that some will likely stay open. “Cities are starting to see the value in these changes first-hand. And more importantly, citizens are seeing it.”
There’s evidence for this: When cities have handed over streets to pedestrians, bicycles and transit, the public response has tended to be positive — even if it was initially skeptical.
This has been true in Delhi, where the popularity of a bus rapid transit system defied its critics; in New York, where once-controversial bike lanes and busways now enjoy overwhelming support; and in Bogota, where la Ciclovía is now heralded as one of the city’s best features.
As Anne Hidalgo, the mayor of Paris, put it: “I say in all firmness that it is out of the question that we allow ourselves to be invaded by cars.”
Tristan Cleveland is a writer for Reasons to be Cheerful, is a non-profit editorial project that strives to be a tonic for tumultuous times.
This story is part of the SoJo Exchange of COVID-19 stories from the Solutions Journalism Network, a nonprofit organization dedicated to rigorous reporting about responses to social problems. By examining some innovative ideas unfolding around the globe, we hope we can provide some answers – and some inspiration – in Georgia’s fight against the coronavirus.