Nobody knows Sutpen's entire story. The narratives we read in <em>Absalom, Absalom! </em>– whether second-hand or fourth-hand – are all very partial and flawed through the influence of sorrow, bitterness, regret and revenge. The notion of the past is tied up with the crises that the various characters experienced. The past bears down very strongly on the present, and no one can escape Sutpen's influence. In fact, the narrators' version of events is more about <em>mis</em>remembering and fantasy than recounting facts. All of the characters are at once overly intimate with their own pasts and completely incapable of representing reality. Sound complicated? That's because it is.
Questions About Memory and the Past
- Who is the story's most reliable narrator of past events?
- How does memory get in the way of reality in Absalom, Absalom!?
- Which characters are reconciled with the past? Does anyone seem able to "move on"?
Chew on This
The entire story is based on people's memories. As "living" as Sutpen is to the reader, we never actually seem him in real time.
Miss Rosa would have been a lot happier if she didn't spend so much time dwelling on the past.