1. Reduce exposure
While this study alone does not prove that all children in the womb have this many toxic chemicals in their bloodstream, it does show that a wide range of toxins crosses the placenta. These pollutants are capable of damaging organs like the brain and kidneys, and of causing behavioral disorders as well as reproductive problems.
How much damage these chemicals might be doing in combination with one another is yet to be fully tested. We may never fully escape all of the toxins in our environments, but thankfully we humans are capable of becoming aware of these pervasive chemicals and heavy metals and taking action.
Our homes are where we have the most control and also where we spend the most amount of our time. And it is where we cultivate health-conscious habits. They also pick up chemicals from cars on the road as well as pesticides and weed killer residue from lawns, sidewalks, and treated buildings. Lead dust, which can accumulate in the body and harm all of its systems, has also been found on our soles. Taking your shoes off when you get home and leaving them at the door is a super simple way to avoid tracking these invisible pollutants into your home.
Obviously, air is a pretty important factor in staying alive and well. Did you know that indoor air quality is recognized by the EPA as one of its major concerns when it comes to human health?
Our Lives Are Toxic: The Importance of Detoxing Your Body
Check out this pamphlet they put together about how to clean up the air you breathe in your home. Your mattress, carpet, vinyl flooring and shower curtains, laminate on your countertops, particleboard furniture and cabinets, the paint on your walls, the fabric on your couch, even your printer and fabric softener are all contributing to a concentration of chemicals in the air in your home. These and other materials let off gas and release chemicals like volatile organic compounds VOCs , flame retardants, and formaldehyde that can slowly sap your health. This is one reason why you should open your windows as much as you can.
Opening windows allows toxic gasses to circulate out of your home and welcomes in some fresh air. Even if it's freezing outside, crack that baby open for just five minutes a day. Granted, there will be some pollutants and allergens that waft in on the breeze, but overall you'll be disbursing and diluting the concentration of toxins in the air of your home. If you use artificially scented air fresheners, laundry detergents, or candles, replace them with more natural alternatives or unscented options.
- Beale Street Blues - Piano Accompaniment.
- Mobile Menu.
- Book of Job, The: A Short Reading.
- Molly's Suds Lyme Disease and Laundry Detergent -?
- Special Deals on System Set with Fluoride Filters.
Artificial scents contain many unlisted and untested chemicals, including phthalates, which act as hormone disruptors, and are linked to allergies and asthma as well as neurological symptoms such as dizziness and brain fog. Phthalates are also linked to birth defects, low sperm counts , nervous-system disorders , hormone dysregulation , diabetes , and obesity.
For alternatives, there are tons of essential-oil based products out there that smell amazing and even have aromatherapy benefits like boosting concentration, energy, and helping you sleep. You can use an essential-oils diffuser and pre-made blends to make it simple. Thieves by the brand Young Living is one great option for purifying the air, as it combines clove, lemon, cinnamon bark, eucalyptus radiata, and rosemary oils and smells like Christmas.
Another way to fragrance your home naturally is by boiling dried flower petals, citrus peels, cinnamon sticks, cloves, or other natural aromatics on the stove.
You can also replace artificially scented dryer sheets with reusable wool dryer balls and add essential oils. There are a lot of caustic ingredients in chemical household cleaners that can be harmful to skin, eyes, and lungs.
3 juices to detoxify and cleanse the body naturally | Green Living by Gmaids
They also often contain artificial fragrances and toxic chemicals. Fortunately, there are many non-toxic and natural cleaning products available these days even at the average grocery store. Begin replacing your chemical cleaning products with cleaner, safer ones. Detection and investigation of waterborne disease outbreaks is the primary responsibility of local, state and territorial public health departments, with voluntary reporting to the CDC.
The CDC and the U. Environmental Protection Agency EPA collaborate to track waterborne disease outbreaks of both microbial and chemical origins. Data on drinking water and recreational water outbreaks and contamination events have been collected and summarized since While useful, statistics derived from surveillance systems do not reflect the true incidence of waterborne disease outbreaks because many people who fall ill from such diseases do not consult medical professionals.
For those who do seek medical attention, attending physicians and laboratory and hospital personnel are required to report diagnosed cases of waterborne illness to state health departments.
- Chlorine The Body Detoxifier (With water, chlorine will clean your body of toxins and pathogens)?
- Robes irlandaises (French Edition)!
- Michael, Row The Boat Ashore!
- How to eliminate toxins and pathogens.
Further reporting of these illness cases by state health departments to the CDC is voluntary, and statistically more likely to occur for large outbreaks than small ones. Despite these limitations, surveillance data may be used to evaluate the relative degrees of risk associated with different types of source water and systems, problems in current technologies and operating conditions, and the adequacy of current regulations. Craun, Nwachuku, Calderon, and Craun, From to , there were outbreaks and , cases of illness in public and individual water systems in the U. Table lists reported outbreaks, their causes, the numbers of cases of associated illness reported, and the types of water systems affected.
By far, the largest outbreak of this period occurred in with the emerging pathogen Cryptosporidium in Milwaukee. Figure The pie chart in figure illustrates the relative percentages of agents responsible for drinking water disease outbreaks in the period. From to statistics showed a gradual increase in the percentage of reported drinking water outbreaks for which causation is known. This trend was reversed in the time period see Figure Untimely investigation, a lack of specimen collection, a lack of testing, or incomplete testing are all obstacles to a more complete understanding of the causes of waterborne outbreaks Craun et al.
The number of reported drinking water outbreaks rose in , reversing a previously declining trend see Figure The number of reported illness cases due to these outbreaks, however, remained relatively static see Figure Figure Figure Insufficient drinking water chlorination sowed the seeds of tragedy in the small southern Ontario town of Walkerton in the Spring of Bacteria in the manure contaminated the well water as the chlorinator for that well was not operating due to inadequate maintenance. As the contaminated water from that well blended into the general water supply, the existing chlorine levels were overwhelmed by the sudden influx of organic matter and bacteria.
Before long, schools emptied and emergency rooms filled with children and elderly patients suffering from diarrhea and gastrointestinal upset. DNA typing studies carried out later would reveal E. The episode left seven people dead and 2, ill. A thorough government investigation of the Walkerton outbreak culminated in an exhaustive report published by the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General in Without the margin of safety provided by a carefully maintained chlorine residual, harmful bacteria remained in the water that coursed through Walkerton taps.
Samples taken from the Walkerton water system showed contamination with E. Campylobacter jejuni. Scanning Electron Microscope image courtesy of Dr. Dennis J. Kopecko, U. Food and Drug Administration. The Challenge of Disinfection Byproducts Drinking water chlorination has contributed to a dramatic decline in waterborne disease rates and increased life expectancy in the United States.
Largely because of this success, many Americans take it for granted that their tap water will be free of disease-causing organisms. In recent years, regulators and the general public have focused greater attention on potential health risks from chemical contaminants in drinking water. One such concern relates to disinfection byproducts DBPs , chemical compounds formed unintentionally when chlorine and other disinfectants react with certain organic matter in water.
Since that time, a wealth of research has improved our understanding of how DBPs are formed, their potential health risks, and how they can be controlled.
It is now recognized that all chemical disinfectants form some potentially harmful byproducts. The byproducts of chlorine disinfection are by far the most thoroughly studied. Most water systems are meeting these new standards by controlling the amount of natural organic matter prior to disinfection, while ensuring that microbial protection remains the top priority. Based largely on these animal data, EPA considers individual THMs and HAAs to be either possible or probable human carcinogens, although any risk from the low levels found in drinking water would be slight.
Some epidemiology studies have reported an association between human exposure to DBPs and elevated cancer risks, while other studies have found no association. EPA evaluated the existing cancer epidemiology studies and found that only for bladder cancer were associations with chlorinated water somewhat consistent. Even in these studies, cancer risks were not strongly correlated to measured THM levels, indicating that other factors cannot be ruled out Craun et al.
One study Larson et al.
TOP Seller Systems at The Most Affordable Prices
This time, no cancer was produced. Follow-up research showed that the daily gavage doses overwhelmed the capability of the liver to detoxify the chloroform, causing liver damage, cell death and regenerative cell growth, thereby increasing risks for cell mutation and cancer in exposed organs. When chloroform was given through drinking water, however, the liver could continually detoxify the chloroform as the mice sipped the water throughout the day.
Without the initial liver toxicity, there was no cancer in the liver, kidney or other exposed organs Butterworth et al.