Postmortems in the Sky
Space Science News home
Postmortems in the Sky Gamma Ray Bursts are part of the
evidence, but what is the cause?
October 25, 1999: While it's not quite Halloween, a radio astronomer struck that chord when he described astrophysicists' fascination with gamma-ray bursts.
"We're interested in dead and dying things," said Dr. Dale Frail of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Socorro, N.M. "Our highest ambition is to know who that dying thing is."
Frail spoke during the third day of the week-long Fifth biennial Huntsville Gamma Ray Burst Symposium. Gamma-ray bursts are mysterious flashes of high-energy radiation that come from the edge of the observable universe. Since their discovery by gamma-ray detectors designed to watch for nuclear weapons tests in space, scientists have tried to find counterparts in other parts of the spectrum so they might figure out what causes the bursts.
December 3: Mars Polar Lander nears touchdown
December 2: What next, Leonids?
November 30: Polar Lander Mission Overview
November 30: Learning how to make a clean sweep in space
The death rattles as detected in various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are all anyone can examine so far in the bid to uncover what causes such horrible deaths out at the edges of the known universe.
The death rattle and last gasp are mostly what scientists have to go on since it's impossible to bring major observatories to bear on a burst as it occurs, and far too much to hope that a telescope will be observing something when a burst happens to go off nearby. While BATSE and a few other instruments can record the gamma-ray flash of a burst, the rest of the astronomy community have to work with the afterglow - if a counterpart is found in other parts of the spectrum - which can last hours or a year.
Left: These are the discovery images of the optical afterglow emission from GRB 990123. The left panel shows the star field as it appeared prior to the explosive gamma-ray burst. A faint galaxy, indicated with an arrow, was originally proposed to contain the gamma-ray burst source. Now, however, the galaxy is thought to be in the foreground. The right panel shows the optical emission, observed about 4 hours after the gamma-ray burst on January 23, dominating the light from the faint galaxy. Credit: Dr. Stephen Odewahn/Caltech-NRAO-CARA GRB Collaboration.
Sign up for our EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery
"I believe that we are seeing a class of events that are optically dark (because) they are obscured by dust in the areas where the gamma-ray bursts exploded," he said. The observations have provided a powerful test of models of fireballs that expand outward from bursts.
Afterglows are also seen in visible and near-visible wavelengths and continue to be among the most valued because they help scientists in trying to locate the hosts of bursts. A total of 14 have been observed with the Hubble Space Telescope and point very strongly to a home for bursts.
"In every case, the gamma-ray burst is right on top of the stellar field," said Dr. Andrew Fruchter of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore. "It is not in the open where you find gaps" between galaxies near the edge of the observable universe.
Further, many of the bursts are associated with blue galaxies, which are observed to have high rates of star birth.
"All of these things are consistent with star formation," Fruchter said.
In many cases, the optical afterglow components are barely visible to Hubble, despite its incredible light gathering power. GRB 970228 (the numbers are the date of the burst) is the landmark sighting because it was the first optical component to be captured in visible light. When Hubble was able to look at it some weeks later, scientists saw "a small smudge in the sky," a dwarf galaxy with the fading embers of the burst.
bursts to take center stage at international meeting Oct.
11. More than 200 astronomers will gather to talk about gamma-ray
bursts, one of the most mysterious and increasingly watched-for
phenomena in the universe. The 5th Huntsville Gamma Ray Burst
Symposium, to be held Oct 18-22 in Huntsville, Alabama, will
have a wealth of new observations for discussions of bursts and
how to study them.|
Burst and Transient Source Experiment web site includes links to work with BATSE and to the 5th Huntsville Gamma Ray Burst Symposium.
Scientists catch another gamma-ray burster in visible light - May 18, 1999. Several telescopes observe optical counterpart
Cosmic gamma-ray bursts NEWS & RESEARCH
GOTCHA! The Big One That Didn't Get Away - Jan. 27, 1999. For the first time, images of visible light from a gamma ray explosion is captured by a robotic telescope.
Gamma-ray Bursters cross the 'Line of Death' - Oct. 13, 1998. A study of gamma-ray burst spectra shows one more thing that these mysterious, cosmological gamma-ray bursts are not.
Blast from the past: the latest clue in solving the gamma-ray burst mystery (May 6, 1998).
Gamma-ray burst identification earns top prize (Jan. 12, 1998)
Twinkle, twinkle, massive fireball - reports from the 4th Huntsville Gamma-ray Burst Symposium (Sept. 17, 1997)
Discovery may be "smoking gun" in gamma-ray mystery (March 31, 1997).
In several cases, Hubble's resolution and its ability to distinguish colors have allowed scientists to pick out burst afterglows and barely observable host galaxies. Fruchter described one irregular galaxy as "having the morphology of a train wreck."
Back in the radio end of the spectrum, Dr. Shri Kulkarni of the California Institute of Technology outlined evidence from radio astronomy and other fields that support two leading theories of what causes bursts. One is that two neutron stars coalesce to form a black hole, the other is that a massive supernova or "collapsar" explodes and also forms a black hole.
"It's like when people discovered supernovae," Kulkarni said. "People didn't know what they were, but eventually they figured it out." Supernovae now are known to be massive stars that blow themselves out with a great fury after a short but brilliant life.
Kulkarni said that there is "strong indirect evidence connecting [bursts] to massive stars in dusty hosts or with dust along the line of sight."
Whatever the cause, it is followed by an intense blast wave as the materials move outward from the source through interstellar space. But even then scientists are still puzzling over exactly what they are seeing. Dr. Titus Galama, who recently joined CalTech after a long stay at the University of Amsterdam, described the different spectra recorded for the famous burst of Jan. 23, 1999 (GRB 990123). The Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment (ROTSE) caught this burst in optical wavelengths within seconds of its detection by BATSE.
The burst was brilliant enough that had it been in the nearby M31 galaxy in Andromeda, it would have appeared as bright as the full moon. But despite having ROTSE and BATSE data that overlap in time, "there is no simple relationship between ROTSE's observations and BATSE." Galama said. He showed a graph with data from both instruments. The ends of data lines from BATSE and ROTSE did not point towards each other to indicate that one was a continuation of the other.
Left: This figure shows the how the brightness in gamma rays, as observed with BATSE, varied during GRB 990123. The three intervals marked by vertical lines indicate the times during which ROTSE obtained its first three visible images. Credit: Dr. Michael Briggs, NASA/Marshall.
"The prompt optical emission is not a simple extrapolation of the BATSE data to lower wavelengths," Galama said, "so we conclude that ROTSE and BATSE are seeing different components."
He suggested that BATSE sees gamma rays produced by internal shock waves as the exploding gas interacts with itself. The optical or visible part is caused by the external shock wave blazing forward through space and ramming into whatever dust and gas are there. Since that material can vary: some regions like the Coal Sack Nebula are so dense that the absorb light from stars and galaxies behind them, others are empty "superbubbles" swept clean by previous star explosions.
Finally, a late afterglow appears in gamma rays as the external shock wave causes reverse shocks within the expanding explosion. This appears in gamma rays as a smooth tail whose high spot early in the blast is masked by the blast itself.
But again in the spirit of Halloween, gamma-ray bursts can wear different masks, and not every one follows this basic model.
"To a first order," Galama concluded, "we have excellent agreement with the fireball model. But we have some oddities to investigate."1999 GRB Symposium series
Oct 25: Postmortems in the Sky To say they are ghoulish may be going too far, but like ghouls those studying Gamma Ray Bursts gleefully seek the moldering remains, and never see the living victim. But they are very much interested in both the victim and the cause.
Oct 21: Dodging pitfalls in the hunt for the cause of gamma-ray bursts Scientists discuss how to avoid making mistakes while searching for the solution to a big astrophysical mystery - What causes gamma-ray bursts?
Oct 20: Outbursts Result in Controversy Scientists have different ideas to explain the behavior of Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs).
Oct 18: After three decades of study, gamma-ray bursts still mystify Science@NASA caught up with Dr. Gerald Fishman for an interview about bursts and the symposium.
Oct 11: Gamma-ray bursts to take center stage at international meeting More than 200 astronomers will gather to talk about gamma-ray bursts, one of the most mysterious and increasingly watched-for phenomena in the universe.
More Space Science Headlines - NASA research on the web
NASA's Office of Space Sciencepress releases and other news related to NASA and astrophysics
Join our growing list of subscribers - sign up for our express news delivery and you will receive a mail message every time we post a new story!!!
|For more information,
Dr. John M. Horack , Director of Science Communications
|Author: Dave Dooling|
Curator: Linda Porter
NASA Official: M. Frank Rose