Black holes are true enigmas in science world, but the idea that something is a paradox in nature just doesn't make any sense -after all, if both things exist, cleary there has to be some way of reconciling the two, and information going in or out of a black hole is no different.
We still don't even know for sure if there are actual things such as black holes. So to say that an information paradox theory about a theoretical astronomical phenomenon fully explains anything is a bit of a fantastic stretch. Until we can actually get out there and inspect what we think is a black hole, there's no way to explain anything.
The black hole information paradox does not fully explain how these massive structures destroy space-time. There is still a lot of unanswered questions that we do not know about space. This paradox only says that these massive structures destroy space-time but it does not give any reason or clue on how.
We act as if we understand the space and time continuum, but in reality even the most sophisticated of scientists has just a very small grasp of what is actually going on. So we are arrogant if we think we have a full explanation, even though we have gotten a better one.
No, the black hole information paradox does not fully explain how these massive structures destroy space-time, because the paradox only states that the black holes destroy space-time. There is no explanation for why this occurs, or why the laws of physics do not apply in these places. The black hole paradox raises more questions than it answers.