How Big is our Footprint Really?
It’s quite evident that the human population is increasing every year. With this increase comes greater area use. Spreading out and using up more resources seems like a simple solution to human population growth, more people means more things needed for people’s consumption. It seems that humanity’s need for land is having a negative effect on the mobility of animals. I know this isn’t exactly shocking news, however, the global pattern of animal disturbance is quite incredible.
A study done in Tsavo, Kenya from 2002-2009 showed animals being greatly impacted by habitat fragmentation and loss (Field Museum, 2018). Animals affected by these phenomenons range from garden mice, to snow foxes, all the way to the African Elephant. The small mouse may not feel a huge burden due to terrestrial loss, because a mouse really doesn’t need too much space to survive. An elephant, however, needs much more room to graze, browse, and travel between migratory corridors. Animals all over the world are dealing with the same problem as those in Kenya. The lack of animal mobility can have detrimental effects to ecosystems, resulting in less pollination, population changes, spread of disease, and many other problems. Species need room to hunt, mate, and reproduce offspring. When their environment changes so drastically, animals have to change their normal behavior. Changes like these put species at risk for predation, starvation, health risks, and much more. Not all species are able to survive with such limited resources.
This study highlights the importance of threshold, and how resilient a species can be before they can no longer adapt to their environment. If we as humans aren’t cautious, we may cause too much burden for the animals to survive. There wasn’t a lot of bias in the story, it discussed the results of a study fairly and thoroughly. The article focuses on the possibility of fixing our footprint effects and being cautious about our impacts on nature. The article focuses on our ability to track how we are affecting species terrestrial use as well as our own, in order to limit or fix more damage to the health of the animals. As the population grows, humans have to keep in mind the limited resources shared with animals. Instead of another example of Tragedy of the Commons, discussions of how to live harmoniously with nature should be started.
There is a huge underlying ethical issue here: are the interests of humans more important than the interests of animals? That has been argued by philosophers such as Taylor, Singer, and Regan for years. Technically, animals have just as much need of natural resources than people do. Humans have to decide whether or not they will take into account the interests of animals, or they will stick with the human superiority complex. The article brings forth the timeless issue of how the actions of humans shape the world we live in.
Museum, F. (2018, January 25). Humans take up too much space — and it’s affecting how mammals move. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180125140916.htm