How to Read Nonfictional English Texts Faster and More Effectively
A 'Standard Reading Exercise' for ESL-StudentsHelmut Stiefenhöfer
Oberstufenkolleg and er Universitaet Bielefeld
hstiefen [at] hrz.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Introductory remarks:With the 'flood' of written information available,either in the traditional way, i.e. on paper, or via the 'World Wide Web' fast and effective reading (in English) has become a (foreign) language competence equal in importance to speaking competence.
The following set of tasks/exercises was designed to improve the reading competence of ESL-students. It is based on the assumption that reflecting his/her cognitive efforts in problem-solving helps the learner with the aquisition and successful application of problem-solving strategies and skills, not only in reading.
Objectives: By repeatedly working their way through the various tasks of this 'standard exercise' (either in class or in guided self-study) students are expected to improve their reading speed with nonfictional English texts and to learn how to process the information in those texts more effectively.
Student Levels: The exercises are appropriate for intermediate as well as for advanced
students. Once the student is familiar with the 'idea' behind each task it is more or less the
linguistic and content complexity of the exercise-texts that determine the level of difficulty.
For this reason the first runs through the different tasks ought to be done in class to make sure that all the students not only understand clearly what they are supposed to do but also gain an insight into how and why the performing of these tasks helps them to deal with (English) texts more effectively.
Some of the aspects and questions likely to come up during those first runs will be dealt with after the following presentation of the
Standard reading exercise
1. Read only the title of the chosen text. What do you already know about the topic? In note form write down pieces of information you expect to find in the text. (Mother tongue or English).
2. Write down at least 5 (key) words you expect to find in the text.
3. Is the text
a) an extract from a book? ......
b) a newspaper article? ......
c) a magazine article? ......
d) a scientific article? ......
(tick the right answer)
4. When was it published?..................
5. Read through the whole text as quickly as possible. Don't worry about the words you don't understand. Now write down, in not more than 15 words, the main theme of the text.
6. Ask yourself if the text may suit the needs that made you choose it as a source of information.
7. Read through the text again trying to understand as much as you can. When you come across a word which you don't know and which you think is important for the text write it down and beside it write your idea of what it probably means. (Mother tongue or English). Use the dictionary only if absolutely necessary!
8. Divide the text into sections. Name the sections according to their function (e.g. introduction, main part(s), conclusion etc.) and give one content-related keyword for each.
9. Write down the main idea of each paragraph using one sentence only.
10. Draw a diagram or a flowchart to show how the information in the text is organized.
11. Which of the expectations/anticipations you listed in task 1. does the text meet?
a) ..... b) ..... c) ..... d) ..... e) .....
12: On a separate sheet write a summary of the text. Not more than 100 words! Make use of the results of tasks 8, 9, and 10.
13: What do you think of the text? Evaluate it in the light of your reading purpose. Give reasons for your evaluation.
Task 1: Here the student is expected to activate the knowledge he/she already has about the text's topic area. To do so helps him/her a) to to review the choice of this specific text for his/her specific reading purpose (cf. also task 6), and b) to focus his/her attention and expectations on a certain direction which narrows the content-range of the decoding decisions in the text-processing to follow.
Task 2: Where task 1 aims at the content level of the text to be dealt with task 2 makes the reader activate his/her linguistic knowledge and focus on topic-related lexical and to some extent syntactic registers.
Task 3: Identifying the type of text helps the reader to get an idea about the addressees the author had in mind and about the likely 'depth', accuracy, and 'seriousness' of the text.
Task 4: To know the publication date of a text influences the expectations towards its topicality. A text on software-engineering written in the 1980's obviously cannot contain today's knowledge in this field.
The key-concept underlying tasks 1 - 4 is the assumption that the processing of the content- and linguistic items of a text is facilitated considerably if the reader has activated the knowledge he/she already has about those and/or related items to a state of alert. The less you are surprised by what you learn the faster you can 'place it in the right drawer in your knowledge-store'. Such anticipatory activities are probably the most important ones in effective learning through reading. When a student has dealt with tasks 1 - 4 a few times , has grasped the underlying concepts , and has overcome the common urge to start reading a text closely right away it doesn't take him/her longer than a couple of minutes to work through these tasks.
Task 5: Dealing with this task requires competence in the reading strategy called
which can and ought to be developed in other units of EFL-courses and can be applied and
At this stage of the 'Standard Reading Exercise' the student has his/her first chance to to check if his/her educated guesses and expectations about the text at hand have been in the right direction.
Task 6: The results of task 5 can be used as the basis for answers to questions like: Is this the subject matter I expected the text to be about? Is it likely that in close reading this text will meet my reading purpose and suit my information needs? etc. Questions like these are relevant for an economical approach to the above mentioned 'flood' of information not only in study situations.
Task 7: Once a student has internalized the cognitive operations needed to perform
tasks 1 - 6
successfully in 'real life reading situations' it will very much depend on the answers he/she gives
in task 6 wether he/she attacks task 7. In reading-practise situations within ESL-lessons
the importance of such decisions ought to be made aware to the students,however, in the interest of
effects of this and later tasks they should remain hypothetical.
Here, with task 7, the reader must apply processing skills he/she has aquired and practised before. Amongst those are "making use of inter-language similarities", "morphologically based word-analysis", "guessing from context", "effective dictionary usage", "looking for text-type typical syntactic schemes", etc..
Task 8: Identifying the basic structure of a text and its major parts with their functions and their main 'message' helps the reader with a first step of organizing the bits and pieces of information he/she has gained through the previous tasks.
Task 9: Here the reader is asked to reconstruct the more or less obvious links between
of information found in a paragraph (so called propositions) by making use of their linguistic
representation (e.g. reference words) and to combine their major elements to information units
at a higher, i.e. more general and abstract level (so called macropropositions).
It helps the student if his/her special attention in the first encounters with this task is directed towards the beginning and the concluding sentence of paragraphs, especially longer ones.
Task 10: Dealing successfully with this task requires a basic concept of how
elements in a text are combined by an author to build the text's structure. It also requires the
awareness that being able to reconstruct this structure and to visualize it is very
helpful if the reader wants to a) check his/her understanding of the text, b) put down the so gained knowledge in a visually clear way that
makes it fairly easy at a later time to refresh or to reactivate this knowledge, e.g. for
With the teaching of the basics of diagram- and flowchart-visualizing (e.g. tree-diagram vs. chronological chart) the English teacher can either (hopefully) draw on what has been taught in other classes (natural or social science) or has to lay this foundation him-/herself.
Task 11: The main function of this task is pedagogical. In my experience it is
motivating for the
student to see again and this time more clearly, that he/she not only has anticipated correctly but
also that he/she had already known a lot about the topic at hand.
In 'real life reading' this step can be skipped when processing a text, especially since task 6 serves a very similar purpose.
Task 12: With this task the reader is asked to deal with the 'products' of his/her
in a way that a) allows him/her to check his/her comprehension while summarizing the text's
content in writing, preferably in his/her own words, b) owing to the 100 words limit, forces
to concentrate on the essentials of the text, c) leads to a product which can be used for
exam-preparation (cf. task 10), and d) last but not least, is a realistic/authentic writing
As far as a) - c) are concerned task 9 requires very similar cognitive activities and may suffice for mere 'reading in study situations'. The additional writing practise, however, has its own merits that don't need to be outlined here.
Task 13: Here the student is asked to reflect on the information gained with reference to
reading purpose and to view it critically to see whether and if so how far it fits into his/her previous
structure about this topic. The latter might lead to a) adding this information to his/her
topic-knowledge, b) questioning it and looking for further confirmation or refutation, or c) to
directly rejecting what the author said.
The self-confidence necessary for decisions as in b) and especially c) has to be developed in the classroom through repeated encouragement towards taking nothing for granted only because it exists in print and trusting one's judgement if there is sound proof of its validity. Such self-confidence together with competence in critical evaluation will become more and more important. Especially since the WWW, as a result of its principles, is fed with a huge quantity of texts the usefulness of which is highly debatable.
Concluding remarks: What has been said about the individual tasks and the concepts
certainly doesn't cover all the explanations and all the elements of assistance a student needs
when confronted with this 'Standard Reading Exercise' especially the first few times.
Hopefully, however, it has made clear that there are ways of 'breaking down' something as complex as 'effective reading competence' into manageable teaching- and practise units. Our experience in the classroom with this set of tasks/exercises has been positive. Nevertheless, we are of course open to criticism and look forward to learning about the experience made by colleagues facing the difficult task of teaching reading in ESL classrooms.
The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. II, No. 6, June 1996