U. WASHINGTON / UC BERKELEY (US) — Working with fossils found in Tanzania, scientists have discovered what may be the oldest known dinosaur.
The findings mean that the dinosaur lineage appeared 10 million to 15 million years earlier than fossils previously showed, originating in the Middle Triassic rather than in the Late Triassic period.
“If the newly named Nyasasaurus parringtoni is not the earliest dinosaur, then it is the closest relative found so far,” according to Sterling Nesbitt, a University of Washington postdoctoral researcher in biology and lead author of a paper published online today in Biology Letters.
The humerus, or upper arm bone, of Nyasasaurus parringtoni next to a cross section of the bone. The many colors indicate that the bone fibers are disorganized, much like those of early dinosaurs. (Credit: ©Natural History Museum)
“For 150 years, people have been suggesting that there should be Middle Triassic dinosaurs, but all the evidence is ambiguous,” he says. “Some scientists used fossilized footprints, but we now know that other animals from that time have a very similar foot.
“Other scientists pointed to a single dinosaur-like characteristic in a single bone, but that can be misleading because some characteristics evolved in a number of reptile groups and are not a result of a shared ancestry.”
The researchers had one humerus (upper arm bone)and six vertebrae to work with. They determined that the animal likely stood upright, measured 7 to 10 feet in length, was as tall as 3 feet at the hip, and may have weighed between 45 and 135 pounds. Scientists estimate its tail was about five feet long.
The fossilized bones were collected in the 1930s from Tanzania, but it may not be correct to say dinosaurs originated in that country. When Nyasasaurus parringtoni lived, the world’s continents were joined in the landmass called Pangaea. Tanzania would have been part of Southern Pangaea that included Africa, South America, Antarctica, and Australia.
“The new findings place the early evolution of dinosaurs and dinosaur-like reptiles firmly in the southern continents,” says co-author Paul Barrett at the Natural History Museum in London.
The bones of the new animal reveal a number of characteristics common to early dinosaurs and their close relatives. For example, the bone tissues in the upper arm bone appear as if they are woven haphazardly and not laid down in an organized way. This indicates rapid growth, a common feature of dinosaurs and their close relatives.
“We can tell from the bone tissues that Nyasasaurus had a lot of bone cells and blood vessels,” says co-author Sarah Werning at the University of California, Berkeley, who did the bone analysis. “In living animals, we only see this many bone cells and blood vessels in animals that grow quickly, like some mammals or birds.”
“The bone tissue of Nyasasaurus is exactly what we would expect for an animal at this position on the dinosaur family tree,” she adds. “It’s a very good example of a transitional fossil; the bone tissue shows that Nyasasaurus grew about as fast as other primitive dinosaurs, but not as fast as later ones.”
Another example is the upper arm bone’s distinctively enlarged crest, needed to anchor the upper arm muscles. The feature, known as an elongated deltopectoral crest, is also common to all early dinosaurs.
Who were its relatives?
“Nyasasaurus and its age have important implications regardless of whether this taxon is a dinosaur or the closest relatives of dinosaurs,” Nesbitt says. “It establishes that dinosaurs likely evolved earlier than previously expected and refutes the idea that dinosaur diversity burst onto the scene in the Late Triassic, a burst of diversification unseen in any other groups at that time.”
It now appears that dinosaurs were just part of a large diversification of archosaurs. Archosaurs were among the dominant land animals during the Triassic period 250 million to 200 million years ago and include dinosaurs, crocodiles, and their kin.
“Dinosaurs are just part of this archosaur diversification, an explosion of new forms soon after the Permian extinction,” Nesbitt says.
Named at last
The name Nyasasaurus parringtoni is new, but “Nyasasaurus”—combining the lake name Nyasa with the term “saurus” for lizard—is not. The late paleontologist Alan Charig, included as a co-author on the paper, named the specimen but never documented or published in a way that was formally recognized.
“Parringtoni” is in honor of University of Cambridge’s Rex Parrington, who collected the specimens in the 1930s.
“What’s really neat about this specimen is that it has a lot of history. Found in the ’30s, first described in the 1950s but never published, then its name pops up but is never validated. Now 80 years later, we’re putting it all together,” Nesbitt says.
“This work highlights the important role of museums in housing specimens whose scientific importance might be overlooked unless studied and restudied in detail,” Barrett says. “Many of the more important discoveries in paleontology are made in the lab, or museum storerooms, as well as in the field.”
The specimen used to identify the new species is part of the collection at the Natural History Museum, London. Four vertebrae from a second specimen of Nyasasaurus, which were also used in this research, are housed in the South African Museum in Cape Town. The work was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Natural History Museum, London. The fourth co-author on the paper is Christian Sidor, University of Washington professor of biology.
Source: University of Washington