Innovation is the ability to use a new behaviour, or use an existing behaviour in a new context. Innovation, as an aspect of behavioural flexibility, could be important for allowing animals to cope with rapid environmental changes. Surprisingly, few studies have focused on how innovation ability is affected by task complexity. We investigated innovation ability across multiple tasks of varying complexity in a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat (Melomys cervinipes). We predicted that mosaic-tailed rats would be capable of innovating because they live in complex habitats and can exploit disturbed and changing environments. However, we also predicted that the success rate of innovating would decrease as task complexity increased. Mosaic-tailed rats were exposed to six novel problems: cylinder, matchbox, obstruction test, pillar, tile and lever (the last three presented in a Trixie dog activity board), which represented increasing complexity. We counted the number of individuals that could solve at least one task, compared individuals for solving efficiency and latency to solve, and compared the solving success of each task. All mosaic-tailed rats could innovate. However, solving success differed between individuals, with some solving every task and others only solving one. Solving success rate was significantly higher in the simplest task (pillar) compared to the most complicated task (lever). There was no effect of sex or sampling condition on innovation. This study is the first to demonstrate innovation ability across task complexity in an Australian rodent and provides promising avenues for future studies of innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Amici F, Widdi A, Lehmann J, Majolo B (2019) A meta-analysis of interindividual differences in innovation. Anim Behav 155:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.07.008
Ben Abdallah NMB, Fuss J, Trusel M, Galsworthy MJ, Bobsin K, Colacicco G, Deacon RMJ, Riva MA, Kellendonk C, Sprengel R, Lipp JP, Gass P (2011) The puzzle box as a simple and efficient behavioral test for exploring impairments of general cognition and executive functions in mouse models of schizophrenia. Exp Neurol 227:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.09.008
Benson-Amram S, Holekamp KE (2012) Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas. P Roy Soc Lond B Biol 279:4087–4095. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1450
Benson-Amram S, Weldele ML, Holekamp KE (2013) A comparison of innovative problem-solving abilities between wild and captive spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav 85:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.003
Biondi LM, Bó MS, Vassallo AI (2010) Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Anim Cognit 13:701–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8
Borrego N, Dowling B (2016) Lions (Panthera leo) solve, learn, and remember a novel resource acquisition problem. Anim Cognit 19:1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1009-y
Borrego N, Gaines M (2016) Social carnivores outperform asocial carnivores on an innovative problem. Anim Behav 114:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.013
Callaway WA, Turner AA, Croshaw OB, Ferguson JA, Julson ZJN, Volp TM, Kerr SE, Rymer TL (2018) Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridae). Mammal Species 50:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/mspecies/sey015
Chow PKY, Lurz PW, Lea SE (2018) A battle of wits? Problem-solving abilities in invasive eastern grey squirrels and native Eurasian red squirrels. Anim Behav 137:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.12.022
Daly M, Behrends PR, Wilson MI, Jacobs LF (1992) Behavioural modulation of predation risk: moonlight avoidance and crepuscular compensation in a nocturnal desert rodent, Dipodomys merriami. Anim Behav 44:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80748-1
Daniels SE, Fanelli RE, Gilbert A, Benson-Amram S (2019) Behavioral flexibility of a generalist carnivore. Anim Cognit 22:387–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01252-7
Delarue EMP, Kerr SE, Rymer TL (2015) Habitat complexity, environmental change and personality: a tropical perspective. Behav Proc 120:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.006
Euston DR, Gruber AJ, McNaughton BL (2012) The role of medial prefrontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron 76:1057–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.002
Gibbs RB (2005) Testosterone and estradiol produce different effects on cognitive performance in male rats. Horm Behav 48:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.005
Griffin AS, Guez D (2014) Innovation and problem solving: a review of common mechanisms. Behav Proc 109:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027
Guenther A, Brust V (2017) Individual consistency in multiple cognitive performance: behavioural versus cognitive syndromes. Anim Behav 130:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.011
Heinrich B, Bugnyar T (2005) Testing problem solving in ravens: string-pulling to reach food. Ethology 111:962–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01133.x
Hobbs RJ (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in southwestern Australia. Conserv Biol 15:1522–1528. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.01092.x
Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM (2011) Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09670
Holekamp KE, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Yoshida KCS, Benson-Amram S (2015) Brains, brawn and sociality: a hyaena’s tale. Anim Behav 103:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.023
Kimura D, Hampson E (1994) Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 3:57–61
Kozlovsky DY, Branch CL, Pravosudov VV (2015) Problem-solving ability and response to novelty in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli) from different elevations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1874-4
Kummer H, Goodall J (1985) Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 308:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1985.0020
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2015). Package ‘lmertest’, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
Laland KN, Reader SM (1999) Foraging innovation in the guppy. Anim Behav 57:331–340. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0967
Laurance WF (1994) Rainforest fragmentation and the structure of small mammal communities in tropical Queensland. Biol Conserv 69:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90325-5
Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0330
Lenth R, Love J (2018) Package ‘Ismeans’, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lsmeans/index.html
Manrod JD, Hartdegen R, Burghardt GM (2008) Rapid solving of a problem apparatus by juvenile black-throated monitor lizards (Varanus albigularis albigularis). Anim Cognit 11:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0109-0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (2013) Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, 8th edn. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra
O’Connor AM, Burton TJ, Leamey CA, Sawatari A (2014) The use of the puzzle box as a means of assessing the efficacy of environmental enrichment. J Vis Exp 94:e52225. https://doi.org/10.3791/52225
Papp S, Vincze E, Preiszner B, Liker A, Bókony V (2015) A comparison of problem-solving success between urban and rural house sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:471–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1859-8
Reader SM, Laland KN (2001) Primate innovation: sex, age and social rank differences. Int J Primatol 22:787–805. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012069500899
Reader SM, Laland KN (2003) Animal innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rymer T, Pillay N, Schradin C (2013) Extinction or survival? Behavioral flexibility in response to environmental change in the African striped mouse Rhabdomys. Sustainability 5:163–186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010163
Sherry DF, Jacobs LF, Gaulin SJ (1992) Spatial memory and adaptive specialization of the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 15:298–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(92)90080-R
Sih A, Trimmer PC, Ehlman SM (2016) A conceptual framework for understanding behavioral responses to HIREC. Curr Opin Behav Sci 12:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.014
Tecwyn EC, Thorpe SK, Chappell J (2012) What cognitive strategies do orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) use to solve a trial-unique puzzle-tube task incorporating multiple obstacles? Anim Cognit 15:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0438-x
Thornton A, Samson J (2012) Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Anim Behav 83:1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.018
Turner IM (1996) Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. J Appl Ecol 33:200–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404743
van Horik JO, Madden JR (2016) A problem with problem solving: motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks. Anim Behav 114:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.006
Vitale A, Calisi R, Carere C, Carter T, Ha JC, Hubrecht R, Jennings D, Metcalfe N, Ophir AG, Ratcliffe JM, Roth TC, Smith A, Sneddon L (2018) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 135:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.031
Wolf JL, Summerlin CT (1989) The influence of lunar light on nocturnal activity of the old-field mouse. Anim Behav 37:410–414
Wood DH (1971) The ecology of Rattus fuscipes and Melomys cervinipes (Rodentia: Muridae) in a south-east Queensland rain forest. Aust J Zool 19:371–392. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9710371
This work was supported by the College of Science and Engineering support funds from James Cook University (to MKR and TLR). We thank Nicholas Anderson, Natasha Schulz and Emmeline Norris for their assistance. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rowell, M.K., Rymer, T.L. Innovation in a native Australian rodent, the fawn-footed mosaic-tailed rat (Melomys cervinipes). Anim Cogn 23, 301–310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01334-6
- Behavioural flexibility
- Environmental change
- Individual variation
- Problem solving