Road signs should direct us where to go, where to stop and when to turn.
But when you’re driving, how many signs do you notice or miss completely? If you change the radio station or turn down the air conditioning, how long do you take your eyes off the road to find the button or dial?
Emeritus Professor Michael Regan from the UNSW School of Civil and Environmental Engineering is a psychologist specializing in transportation human factors. He says traffic control devices, including destination signs, warning signs and traffic lights, need to be designed from a human-centered perspective to be effective.
“Our road and transport environment is designed to help us to get from point A to point B. However, there is a fine line between what should be capturing our attention to assist us along that journey and what is a risk of being a distraction.
“For example, things such as advertising billboards along highways draw the driver’s attention to whatever is being promoted in the ad. But at the same time, they are a source of distraction and may instead draw the driver’s attention away from things that are critical for safe driving—such as being focused on the road ahead.
“There are many factors that come into play when designing a transport environment that is safe for all users but it needs to be designed from a human-centered perspective because, ultimately, we’ll be the ones using it.”
Distraction by design
The cockpit design of cars has changed drastically over the years with a shift to more interactive features and functions such as touch screen displays and Apple CarPlay. While these are meant to enhance the driving experience, they can often be a distraction for the driver.
“Research has shown that approximately 70 percent of distractions are within the vehicle,” says Prof. Regan.
“Actions such as selecting radio stations with touchscreen displays, entering destinations into navigation systems or even reaching for something in the glove box while the vehicle is in motion, are all distractions and pose a huge risk to the driver.
“If you take your eyes off the road for two seconds, it’s been shown that you double your risk of a collision. Any longer than two seconds, and the risk of a crash increases exponentially.
“As vehicle cockpits inherit more functionality and become more interactive, we need to ensure the driver’s safety is not compromised.”
Signs of a good sign
For any traffic control device to be effective, it should have three key features: it should be conspicuous, legible and the message itself must be comprehensible.
Working in the UNSW Research Centre for Integrated Transport Innovation (rCITI), Prof. Regan says when a traffic light or sign lacks one or more of these characteristics, it can instead become a distraction.
“Some traffic lights or signs aren’t obvious to drivers because they’re hidden behind a tree or there’s something blocking it,” he says.
“This encourages drivers to adopt compensatory visual scanning strategies to try to see them, which takes their eyes off the road for longer than is necessary. To capture the attention of the driver, signs must not have anything obstructing the messaging, so that it is visible to the driver—and the messaging must be crystal clear.
“For example, people generally understand what the different colors on traffic lights mean or that a stop sign, including its shape, indicates the driver needs to come to a complete stop.
“A sign can be confusing when the messaging is unclear or when you’re introducing a new symbol that many drivers aren’t familiar with. This takes away from the original purpose of the sign and becomes more of a distraction as drivers try to understand what the sign is telling them to do.”
He also says signs need to be credible and widely accepted by road users otherwise they will be ignored.
“Let’s say you’re driving along the highway on a Sunday, and you pass through a work zone that would normally be operative on a weekday. And the speed limit as you drive through the work zone is 40 kilometers per hour, but the highway normally has a speed limit of 110 kilometers per hour.
“You look around but there is no roadwork activity or workers around. While it’s technically illegal, people are less likely to obey the 40 kilometers per hours sign because it’s not credible in this context.”
New safety star rating needed
The Australian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) gives star ratings for the vehicle’s ability to protect the occupants in the event of a crash. A higher rating is awarded for vehicles with active safety systems, such as autonomous emergency braking, which assist the driver in preventing or minimizing the effects of a crash with pedestrians, cyclists or vehicles.
Prof. Regan says a similar system needs to be developed to rate how safe the design of roads are from a human-centered perspective.
“Some drivers may choose to drive on certain roads which are rated safer than others because, among other things, they know they will contain signs and signals that are conspicuous, legible and comprehensible, meaning they are less likely to become confused and distracted.
“It’s very clear that people value safety when it comes to purchasing a new car, but safety shouldn’t stop there, it should include our road system too. These are just a few of the many human-centered issues that would need to be considered in rating our roads.”
It’s not you, it’s me
In a perfect world, all road and transport environments will be designed from a human-centered perspective to minimize human error and optimize overall safety. But at the end of the day, humans will still be prone to conditions that may degrade driving performance and safety.
“Road users who are cognitively distracted—for example, when talking on their mobile phone about something complex or emotional—may see a traffic light change color but not respond to it,” says Prof. Regan.
“That’s what we call intentional blindness, it’s the look-but-fail-to-see phenomenon, and it’s an issue for drivers and pedestrians too.
Source: Read Full Article